25 Jul 2018

First Aid for Victims of Heat

Anandi Sharan

  As Earth is in a condition of runaway climate change, – as feedback effects from warming oceans unleash dramatic temperature extremes on Earth, – there are more and more people who need first aid to save them from the negative effects of heat during the hot season. In some regions the hot season may be becoming longer and longer.
In the Northern hemisphere where there is more inhabited landmass than in the Southern hemisphere, the impacts from warming oceans and an ever earlier ice free Arctic are felt by millions of humans.
Of course southern part of Indonesia, Australia, southern Africa and southern part of Latin America are also affected.
In Pakistan and India and in Oman, Qatar, Iraq, Yemen and China to name just some most populous or hottest countries in the Northern hemisphere, temperatures of upto 50 degrees C are now common in summer in many places.
Exposure to such a temperature for more than an hour or two for a human let alone many species of animals leads to sure death.  More and more elderly and young people and adults weakened by poverty are dying from heat across the Earth. War compounds the devastating effect of heat of course and some of the hottest places such as Yemen are additionally being attacked by  coalitions of armies that live from destroying others: and the people in such war zones  are in specially urgent need of first aid of course.
Other regions where people will suffer more than others is where the patients are already weakened by other diseases, such as in regions where people are suffering from cancer from arsenic poisoning from groundwater  in the regions from the Indus valley in Pakistan to the Indo Gangetic plains of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal and Bangladesh.
The heat being put into the atmosphere by people operating and using cars, factories, power stations, oil rigs, aeroplanes, nuclear power stations, armaments including bombs, and more recently the internet and the web-based storage system for information known as the cloud is rising every year. The atmosphere, the oceans and the land are the main sinks that absorb heat but as the concentrations of greenhouse gases in these sinks rise the heat is being retained and returning more feedback effects into the system.
Governments have reneged from taking responsibility to outlaw capitalism and corporations are going into overdrive adding new greenhouse gases into the sinks.
Smart city technology and other energy intense life style products for rich urban consumers are on the rise. Consumers, producers and distributors think nothing about sweating and complaining on the one hand but using more and more fossil fuel energy for communication, transportation, food production and all aspects of daily life on the other. Workers such as factory workers in the informal sector and agriculturists outside of these air-conditioned gated compounds for living and working are all the more affected by the heat generated inside these upper caste zones.
As oceans absorb more and more heat, ocean temperatures are rising, and this in turn completely overthrows the normal weather patterns Earth had experienced for the last five thousand years or so.
Unlike the waves of warming in the ten thousand years after the last ice age, the warming wave now is not followed by a cooling one as in that Holocene epoch. It is all on the upward trajectory for the foreseeable future because it is being driven by capitalism to the extent that the present geological age is now called the Anthropocene epoch, after the fact that the Earth’s major geological and biological changes are being driven by capitalist man. The effects of the heat that is already in the system will cause temperature rise lasting many thousands of years with compensatory mechanisms some time down the line that humans will never know anything about.
Being in a situation of runaway climate change means that many living things on an Earth will find Earth uninhabitable in the lifetime of my two grandchildren and yours and there will no generations of humans much beyond those.
It is  simply impossible to know how many phyla if any or all of the six kingdoms of living things will continue. Trees may be one of the phyla from the plant kingdom to survive. But humans, of the animal kingdom, phylum chordata, class of mammals, the order of primates, the family of hominidae, the genus homo and the species homo sapiens sapiens, will not survive, because they die when their body temperature is above 40 degrees C unless treated, and most regions on Earth are going to be experiencing more and more days of temperatures above 40 degrees C.  When immediate first aid treatment is not be found  because the patient does not have access to sufficient ice or to an air conditioned room she dies.
In this scenario it is highly likely that in the coming years more and more of us will ourselves die or/and meet more and more people who are suffering from a life threatening condition of being too hot because they are burning up from the inside due to exposure to Earth’s inhuman temperatures. In the coming years we should expect more and more humans to die from heat.
So what do we do. From ourselves we should and must expect  in relation to ourselves frugality, austerity, simple living, minimal use of commercial energy, cheerful scepticism and sceptical self-mockery, as well as equanimity, perseverance, and courage. Towards others we must act with pity, charity and compassion by selflessly dedicating ourselves to mitigating their suffering.
The human body copes with heat by perspiring and breathing to cool down. In many countries including Nigeria and India temperatures are now causing what one author called “wild unthinkable conditions”. To protect the body from overheating during hot weather it is important to stay in the shade, drink plenty of water, wear loose white clothes and avoid exertion. If this advice is followed the body can keep itself cool by perspiring and from the intake of cool air. Any greater exertion for some hours in direct sun, – such as what agriculturists and labourers expose themselves to due to poverty,  and all workers expose themselves to because working is not an option, – causes heat exhaustion with dizziness, headache and fainting.
In a lesser heat emergency, such as heat cramps or heat exhaustion, the following steps may lower your body temperature: get to a shady or air-conditioned place such as the mall, movie theatre or public library. Cool off with damp sheets and a fan. If you’re with someone who is experiencing heat-related symptoms, cool the person by covering him or her with damp sheets or by spraying with cool water. Direct air onto the person with a fan. Take a cool shower or bath. If you’re outdoors and not near shelter, soaking in a cool pond or stream can help bring your temperature down. Rehydrate. Drink plenty of fluids. Also, because you lose salt through sweating, you can replenish salt and water with some lemon and salt water.  Don’t drink sugary or alcoholic beverages to rehydrate. These drinks may interfere with your body’s ability to control your temperature. Also, very cold drinks can cause stomach cramps.
Humidity increases the apparent temperature. If the temperature remains high at night and humidity does not come down at night the body does not have the chance to loose excess body heat. In moist conditions we do not get the cooling effect of rapid evaporation. Thus it is important to be extra vigilant when it is hot and humid.
Heat exhaustion if caught early can usually be treated with rest, a cool environment and hydration which should include refuelling of electrolytes, which are necessary for muscle and other body functions.  Lemon water and salt is an important drink to replenish lost salts from sweating. In the period before overheating the body adapts to heat by reducing the salt concentration of sweat progressively and increasing the volume of sweat; by reducing the volume of urine and by bringing blood close to the surface where it can be dissipated easily into the environment by radiation. So when we are getting hotter and hotter we get red.
Heat exhaustion is caused by loss of body water and salt through excessive sweating. Symptoms of heat exhaustion may start suddenly, and include high body temperature, heavy sweating, weakness, dizziness, visual disturbances, feeling faint, fatigue, intense thirst, nausea or irritability, headache, vomiting, diarrhoea, muscle cramps or weakness, breathlessness, palpitations, tingling and numbness of the hands and feet.
Recovery occurs after resting in a cool area and consuming cool drinks like water, clear juice, or lemon water with salt. First aid for heat exhaustion includes getting medical help and staying with the person until help arrives; moving her to a cooler, shaded location; removing as many clothes as possible (including socks and shoes); applying cool, wet cloths or ice to head, face or neck; spraying with cool water.
Heat oedema is swelling which generally occurs among people who are not acclimatised to working in hot conditions. Swelling is often most noticeable in the ankles. Recovery occurs after a day or two in a cool environment. Heat rashes are tiny red spots on the skin which cause a prickling sensation during heat exposure. The spots are the result of inflammation caused when the ducts of sweat glands become plugged. Heat cramps are sharp pains in the muscles that may occur alone or be combined with one of the other heat stress disorders. The cause is salt imbalance resulting from the failure to replace salt lost with sweat. Cramps most often occur when people drink large amounts of water without sufficient salt (electrolyte) replacement.
Heat syncope is heat-induced dizziness and fainting induced by temporarily insufficient flow of blood to the brain while a person is standing. It occurs mostly among unacclimatised people. It is caused by the loss of body fluids through sweating, and by lowered blood pressure due to pooling of blood in the legs. Recovery is rapid after rest in a cool area.
Heat exhaustion may quickly develop into heat stroke. Symptoms of heat stroke include: hot, dry skin or profuse sweating, confusion, loss of consciousness, seizures, very high body temperature. When the patient is suffering from heat exhaustion or heat stroke her heart rate increases. If she heats up to 39-40 C, fatigue sets in. At 40-41C, heat exhaustion is likely and above 41C, the body starts to shut down. Chemical processes start to be affected, the cells inside the body deteriorate and there is a risk of multiple organ failure. The body cannot even sweat at this point because blood flow to the skin stops, making it feel cold and clammy.
If the skin is dry, the body temperature above 39°C, if the patient is suffering from confusion and is unconsciousness  she is suffering from heat stroke. Heatstroke can occur at any temperature over 40 C and, if not treated immediately, chances of survival can be slim. The best method of cooling people down is to immerse them in ice water or apply ice packs to the groin and armpits where crucial arteries are located – but it all depends on how long the body has been at an elevated temperature and whether they can be brought to a place of lower humidity in time.
Heat stroke is the most serious type of heat illness. Signs of heat stroke include body temperature often greater than 39°C, and complete or partial loss of consciousness. Sweating is not a good sign of heat stress as there are two types of heat stroke – “classical” where there is little or no sweating (usually occurs in children, persons who are chronically ill, and the elderly), and “exertional” where body temperature rises because of strenuous exercise or work and sweating is usually present. Heat stroke requires immediate first aid and medical attention. Delayed treatment may result in death. First aid for heat stroke as for heat exhaustion includes: stay with the person until help arrives, move to a cooler, shaded location, remove as many clothes as possible (including socks and shoes), immerse in cold water, in a bath of cold or ice water to quickly lower the patients core body temperature. The quicker she can receive cold water immersion, the less risk of death and organ damage.  If cold water immersion is unavailable,  her body temperature can be lowered using an evaporation method. Cool water is misted on the body while warm air is fanned over her, causing the water to evaporate and cool the skin. Another technique is to pack the patient with ice and cooling blankets if available. Another method is to wrap her in a special cooling blanket and apply ice packs to her groin, neck, back and armpits to lower her temperature. If available she should be given  medications to stop her shivering. Shivering increases body temperature, making treatment less effective. A muscle relaxant, such as a benzodiazepine stops the shivering. The patient should not be forced to drink any fluids.

China’s policies spur Central Asians to cautiously chart independent course

James M. Dorsey

China’s brutal crackdown in its north-western province of Xinjiang and growing questions about the dark side of some of its Belt and Road investments is fuelling anti-Chinese sentiment, prompting some countries to explore ways to chart an independent course, and feeding into the narratives of rising populist leaders.
The incarceration of up to 25,000 Kazakhs in re-education camps in Xinjiang designed to install Chinese values and loyalty to President Xi Jinping, erase nationalist and militant sentiment, and introduce ‘Chinese characteristics’ into perceptions of Islam among the region’s Uyghur population, a Muslim Turkic ethnic group, has spurred a Kazakh search to cautiously chart an independent course.
An estimated 1.5 million ethnic Kazakhs live in Xinjiang, 200,000 of which obtained Kazakh citizenship after the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991. In contrast to Uyghurs, they were able to move freely across the Kazakh-Chinese border until 2016 when China stepped up its crackdown in Xinjiang.
Chinese policy also figures in crucial Pakistani elections with populist contender and former international cricket player Imran Khan demanding greater transparency in China’s US$ 50 billion plus investment in the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a Belt and Road crown jewel and the initiative’s single largest investment. Mr. Khan is also demanding a more equitable distribution of Chinese investment among Pakistan’s provinces.
Irrespective of whether Mr. Khan emerges victorious from the Pakistani polling, he is likely to be a major voice. His call for greater transparency resonates with significant segments of the business community represented by the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry who have been critical of commercial terms that advantage Chinese companies with reduced benefit to their Pakistani counterparts.
Mr. Khan’s call for greater transparency is likely to get a significant boost if Pakistan is forced to turn to the International Monetary Fund to bail out its troubled economy.
Major political parties and business organizations in the Pakistani province of Gilgit-Baltistan have meanwhile threatened to shut down the Pakistan-China border if Beijing does not release some 50 Uighur women married to Pakistani men from the region, who have been detained in Xinjiang.
The province’s legislative assembly unanimously called on the government in Islamabad to take up the issue. The women, many of whom are practicing Muslims and don religious attire, are believed to have been detained in re-education camps.
Concern in Tajikistan is mounting that the country may not be able to service its increasing Belt and Road-related debt. With the World Bank and the IMF warning that Tajikistan runs a high risk of debt distress, Tajikistan has seen its debt-to-GDP ratio balloon from  33.4% of GDP in 2015 to an estimated 56.8% in 2018.
The emerging stories of Kazakhs released from re-education camps in Xinjiang and a court case a Chinese national of Kazakh descent accused of entering Kazakhstan illegally after working in one of the detention centres holding hundreds of thousands of mostly Turkic Muslims is forcing the Kazakh government to stand up more forcefully for the rights of its nationals and reinforcing its desire to steer a middle course between Chinese and Russian ambitions in Central Asia.
41-year-old Sayragul Sauytbay is on trial for allegedly illegally crossing the Chinese-Kazakh border border to join her husband and two children in Kazakhstan. Ms. Sauytbay told the court she had escaped to Kazakhstan after being told by Chinese authorities that she would never be allowed to join her family because of her knowledge of the camps.
Chinese authorities have denied the existence of the camps despite mounting evidence from both official documents and witness accounts. China’s foreign ministry said it “had not heard” of the camps.
Ms. Sauytbay’s defense is attracting attention and spurring anti-Chinese sentiment not only because of her first-hand account of the detention camps but also because of her assertion that she had access to classified Chinese documents that shed light on the sprawling network of re-education centres.
Ms. Sauytbay’s trial puts the Kazakh government, an important Belt and Road partner, in a bind. She has admitted having illegally entered the country but said she would disappear in one of Xinjiang’s detention camps if she were returned to China. Ms. Sauytbay has requested political asylum in Kazakhstan.
Kazakhstan has until now to sought to raise the issue of the fate of ethnic Kazakhs in Xinjiang quietly and cautiously with China. Returning Ms. Sauytbay would open the government to accusations that it is kowtowing to Beijing and failing to protect its people. Allowing her to stay, would give further credibility to reports on the extent and nature of the crackdown in Xinjiang.
The trial also boosts Kazakh efforts to steer a middle course between Chinese and Russian influence in Central Asia by forging closer ties to European nations and the United States as well as the Muslim world.
Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev discussed with President Donald J. Trump, on a visit to Washington in January, an “enhanced strategic partnership” that would strengthen cooperation “on political and security issues, trade and investment, and people-to-people relationships.”
Uzbek president Shavkat Mirziyoyev travelled to Washington on a similar mission, seeking US support for his liberalizing economic and political reforms.
Central Asian leaders suggested to European Union High Representative for Security and Foreign Affairs Federica Mogherini that they were looking to Europe rather than China and Russia for assistance in building sustainable economies that can create jobs for the region’s mushrooming youth population.
That is not to say that Central Asian nations, most of which are members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, do not welcome massive Chinese and Russian investment. They do, but also realize that the investment may improve their infrastructure and enhance security but does not necessarily ensure their ability to sustainably create jobs.
In a sign of the times, Russian commentator Yaroslav Razumov noted that Kazakh youth recently thwarted the marriage of a Kazakh national to a Chinese woman by denouncing it on social media as unpatriotic.
Quoting Kazakh commentators as blaming Russia for stirring anti-Chinese sentiment in their country, Mr. Razumov, in an article entitled ‘Ally, but not a friend,’ warned that Russia, and by extension China, “must learn to live with this.”

Extreme weather in Japan has deadly impact on the elderly

Gary Alvernia

Extreme weather in Japan continues to claim lives as more than 77 people have died during a heatwave in which temperatures reached record highs. This comes on the heels of massive flooding and landslides caused by torrential rains that left over 210 people dead, the most in such a disaster in 35 years.
Temperatures have been as high as 41.4 degrees Celsius in Tokyo and have impacted the continued clean-up operations in the southwestern part of the country following the floods. AccuWeather analyst Joel Myers warned that the real death toll is “likely already in the hundreds despite the official toll of somewhat more than two dozen,” a result of the more indirect effects of the heat wave on one’s health.
The death toll is the latest example of a pattern of inadequate preparation for extreme weather as seen in previous natural disasters in Japan. In these cases, the elderly often bear the brunt and this year has been no different, with older people and retirees being the majority of those killed in the heat wave and floods.
Many apartments and schools lack air conditioning or centrally controlled climate systems meaning that people do not have access to cooling centres, particularly workers and the poor who cannot afford private air conditioning units. Eleven people, mostly elderly, died on Saturday alone.
Similar patterns are seen amongst the flood victims. In reporting on the fatalities, the Japan Times noted that of the 169 identified victims, as of July 15, 118 were over the age of 60. Even more shockingly, the Financial Timesreported that in the town worst hit by the floods, Mabi, located in Okayama Prefecture, only 1 of the 40 confirmed deaths was under the age of 62.
In explaining the high proportion of deaths, both Japanese media outlets and the government have sought to shift blame on to the elderly, claiming in the case of the floods that they failed to heed warnings and evacuate in time. When asked to comment, one senior government official reportedly said “I think Japan is going to have to recognise that old people either cannot, or do not want to, follow the textbook procedures in a crisis.”
Others have attributed the deaths as an inevitable part of the ageing demographic of Japan, which now has the largest proportion of elderly people in the world, with more than one-quarter over the age of 65. Such explanations were contradicted by revelations of the inadequate measures taken by local and federal Japanese authorities in providing adequate warning and evacuation during the storm, an issue seen consistently in prior natural disasters.
As Professor Shiro Maeno, of Okayama University, an expert on river engineering noted, “There was no way the elderly and the disabled could have been evacuated with an order that was past midnight [only a few hours before the disaster struck]. The response should have come much earlier.”
In Mabi, residents were only given minutes to evacuate due to a delay in issuing the necessary warnings. Compounding this, in some cases, many elderly individuals simply had nowhere to go. Evacuees from around Japan reported that some shelters were either too small or were already full when they arrived.
Mabi residents also reported that the government delayed for decades implementing appropriate flood-control plans, and upgrading early warning systems, with construction of appropriate defences planned to start only later this year despite the project being approved in 2010.
Poor planning and criminal negligence is the norm, not the exception. With each disaster, the government issues empty platitudes while doing nothing to make genuine improvements. When eastern Japan was struck by the devastating 2011 Tokohu earthquake and tsunami, resulting in the nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, roughly two-thirds of the nearly 16,000 killed were over the age of 60.
Invariably, the bulk of the burden and suffering caused by such negligence and misappropriation of public wealth is borne by the working class and the poor. Due to the decades-long economic stagnation of Japan, coupled with intensifying attacks by the ruling elite against living and working conditions, poverty rates have increased across most age-groups since the 1980s.
Current rates of old-age poverty in Japan are estimated at roughly 20 percent, one of the highest in the developed world and nearly double the OECD average of 12.5 percent. However, certain layers of elderly workers, particularly single women have been hit even more severely, with poverty rates in that group reaching 40 percent for divorced women, a product of the regressive measures of Japan’s welfare system that penalizes unmarried women.
Like the current generation of youth and middle-aged workers, who have often had years of insecure employment, the poverty rates for the elderly will worsen. This social reality is met with indifference, if not outright hostility, by the Japanese governments who refuse to provide workers with any real support once they have outlived their “usefulness” as sources of exploitation.
Contrary to Tokyo’s claims that an ageing society means that no money will be available for social programs, the Japanese government, while providing tax cuts for the wealthy and large corporations, has embarked upon massive re-militarization. Earlier this year, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party proposed to double its military spending to two percent of GDP, which would make it the third largest military spender in the world.

Hospital workers go on strike in Rhode Island

John Marion

More than 2,400 nurses, mental health workers, technicians and therapists at Rhode Island Hospital and its associated Hasbro Children’s Hospital have gone on strike this week, with hundreds picketing the hospital in Providence. Workers called the strike after rejecting a new contract by vote last week, along with demands made by management in a federal mediating session on Monday morning.
The workers are striking against attacks on their raises, pensions and working conditions. The three-year contract that recently expired guaranteed 3.5 percent yearly step increases for each worker. These steps cover the first 10 years of a worker’s tenure, and no additional cost of living increase has been given to them for the last eight years.
In the recent negotiations, management sought to “restructure”—that is, weaken—the steps, with raises as low as 2.25 percent per year over a four-year contract.
A striking nurse told WPRO, “I’m doing everybody else’s job with very little resources, poor equipment, and the people are getting sicker and sicker. I’m incapable of doing my job, at this point, safely.”
Lifespan is a hospital group composed of Rhode Island Hospital and four others, including the Brown University medical school. RIH by itself is the fourth largest employer in the state, and Lifespan, with 17,000 workers, is the largest.
On Monday Lifespan’s director of public relations boasted that the system is worth $2.2 billion, then complained to the press that last year it “showed an operating income of only $14.6 million.” The organization is paying $10 million to Huffmaster Strike Services to provide scabs during the strike. If this amount were paid out to the 2,400 striking workers, each would receive more than $4,000.
The previous three-year contract, which contained a no strike-no lockout clause, expired on June 30.
A Frequently Asked Questions document on the website of United Nurses and Allied Professionals Local 5098, which represents the workers, dodges the question of a strike fund, claiming that it would require extra dues. Instead, it advises members to borrow money from their Fidelity retirement accounts or “notify your creditors that you may have difficulty paying some bills in the event of a strike. Reassure them that you will continue to do your best to pay them.”
Picketing nurses were pictured holding signs that read “Patients Before Profits.” Like many “not-for-profits,” Lifespan avoids taxes but pays its executives handsomely. Rhode Island Hospital had revenues of nearly $1.3 billion in 2016, up 5 percent from the year before. Its president took home nearly $800,000 in salary and other compensation that year, and the executive vice president made more than $1.65 million.
The strike was scheduled to last from 3 p.m. Monday to 3 p.m. Thursday. Management is then planning a one-day lockout because it signed a four-day contract with the scab company.
While the union weakened the strike from the beginning by setting a three-day limit, management and the state’s government were far better prepared. On Monday the Providence Journal wrote, “in the basement of the Department of Health, officials gathered Monday morning in an impromptu command center as if preparing for a major storm.”
In fact, the Rhode Island Department of Health began issuing nursing licenses to scabs as early as June 1 in preparation for the strike. Dr. Nicole Alexander Scott, Director of RIDOH, told the press: “We have evaluated and seen that the nurses that are brought in are experienced nurses. This is a company that deals with strike management, so there is reassurance.”
That company, Huffmaster Strike Services, boasts on its wesite, “Huffmaster can assist with all aspects of pre-strike contingency planning and, if a work stoppage occurs, we can provide replacement workers, strike trained uniformed officers, and a full array of supporting services.”

Wealthiest 500 French people own 30 percent of the country’s GDP

Kumaran Ira

Since the 2008 Wall Street crash, the 500 richest Frenchmen have tripled the percentage of the economy that they hold in their personal fortunes. From 2009 to 2018, their collective fortune passed from 10 percent to 30 percent of France’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), reaching a record level of €650 billion, according to the 2018 ranking by Challenges magazine. National production has not tripled, however, but only increased 12 percent.
These vast sums have been accumulated through social austerity policies and structural reforms imposed by successive governments since 2008, to destroy social rights established by the working class after the Liberation from Nazi Occupation and the collaborationist Vichy regime.
The growth of such fortunes refutes all the arguments that workers must accept cuts to wages and social benefits because they are too expensive and there is no money. In fact, attacks on wages and working conditions have served to build up the fortunes of a parasitic financial aristocracy that is pushing official politics far to the right.
President Emmanuel Macron is boosting their fortunes by trampling underfoot the opposition of the vast majority of the French population to his attacks on pensions, wages, health care, and unemployment insurance. His denunciation of the “crazy amounts of money” that he said France spends on social services reflects the boundless arrogance of the bankers and super-rich that dominate French and European society.
According to a Bloomberg report published in May, France’s 13 wealthiest people have gotten €23.67 billion richer just since the beginning of 2018. Since January, French billionaires have increased their wealth by 12.2 percent, and the 100 wealthiest individuals have increased their wealth by 15 percent over the last year.
Among France’s billionaires, Bernard Arnault was in the top slot for the second year running. From 2008 to 2018, the fortune of the owner of luxury conglomerate LVMH has gone from €18 billion to €73.2 billion. His fortune is the largest in Europe and the fourth largest in the world. Over the last year alone, his fortune has increased by €19.1 billion, which is €52 million per day.
The fortune of the joint owners of Chanel, Alain and Gérard Wertheimer, has reached €40 billion, rising from the sixth to the second slot. Then come the fortunes of Axel Dumas, the manager of Hermès (€39.6 billion), and Françoise Bettencourt-Meyers, the owner of the L’Oréal corporation (€39.3 billion). Gérard Mulliez (Auchan corporation, €38 billion) and François Pinault (luxury holding firm Kering, €30.5 billion) take the fifth and sixth positions.
These billionaires have benefited from Macron’s massive cut to the Tax on Wealth (ISF) hitting the top tax brackets, and from state subsidies for anti-worker merger and acquisitions operations.
The Arnault family started out by running a regional construction firm in the north, built its fortune using its political connections and public subsidies to restructure and downsize the textile industry. It ultimately acquired LVMH in the 1980s, leaving in its wake a trail of shuttered factories and devastated communities across northern France. That region has now become one of the main electoral bases of the neo-fascist National Front.
Arnault, who became fabulously wealthy due to strategic acquisitions of various fashion and luxury firms, backed Macron in last year’s election.
This unprecedented concentration of wealth is an international phenomenon. In 2017, 82 percent of the wealth created in the world was taken by the wealthiest 1 percent of the world’s population. The poorest half of humanity saw no increase in its wealth.
The Wealth-X report found that the global population of billionaires has increased by 15 percent since 2016, to reach 2,754 people, and that the wealth of these billionaires “has increased 24 percent to a record level of $9.2 trillion.” This is 12 percent of the GDP of the entire planet.
At the same time, across the world, the workers and the impoverished masses have no say in the economic decisions of the world’s governments. While states adopt policies that enrich the billionaires, millions of people pass under the poverty level each year.
Already in 2010, the top 10 percent in France owned 62 percent of the national wealth, while the bottom 50 percent only had 5 percent of the wealth.
An Ifop poll for Atlantico found that more than half of the French population fears falling into poverty, and that 55 percent fear it more than they did before. Political analyst Christophe Boutin told Atlantico, “It was the retirees, who give relatively low percentages, who produced this 55 percent score for the entire French population, whereas French people who are still of working age would have led to an average closer to 60 percent.” For the unemployed, it is 82 percent who fear falling into poverty.
The Challenges report underscores that French capitalism—despite its pretensions to being a relatively soft, conciliatory and regulated social order—is torn apart by the same insoluble social contradictions as global capitalism as a whole.
The social inequality revealed in this report is a political indictment of capitalism, and in particular of the organizations that have long claimed to represent the “left” in France. At the Liberation, the National Council of the Resistance (CNR) justified the maintenance of capitalist rule in France, despite the crimes of fascism in France and across Europe, by promising that France would forever after be a social Republic. The Stalinist, social democratic and Gaullist components of the CNR all promised to abolish “economic and financial aristocracies” in France.
Not only did the financial aristocracy survive the Liberation, but over the decades they have established a degree of economic hegemony that they had not enjoyed since the blackest hours of the Great Depression of the 1930s and the Second World War. Faced with the rise of these politically illegitimate fortunes and of the attendant social inequality and repression, workers will ultimately find no other way forward than to expropriate these ill-gotten gains.

Greece: 76 dead in wildfires near Athens

Katerina Selin

Catastrophic forest fires are raging in the Greek region of Attica near the capital Athens since Monday. According to current data, 76 people have died in the blaze so far, but the number of victims will probably increase. This is the biggest fire disaster since 2007, when devastating fires broke out throughout Greece and over 80 people died.
A state of emergency has been declared in the greater Athens area and the government has announced a three-day period of national mourning. More than 600 firefighters are on duty; the army supports them with airplanes, helicopters and ships. The government has also requested international assistance. Hospitals report almost 190 wounded, at least 11 of whom are in severe danger.
The fires had started in two different places at the same time: one in a pine forest near Kineta, about 50 kilometres west of Athens, and another in a forest in Penteli northeast of the city. Due to the constant drought and heat with temperatures around 40 degrees Centigrade (104 degrees Fahrenheit) and due to strong winds up to wind force 9, the flames spread at high speed, especially in eastern Attica, and advanced toward the sea coast. Many Athenians own holiday homes in this region and are currently staying there for vacation.
Infernal scenes took place around the port city of Rafina. The popular seaside resort of Mati, where most of the victims lived, burnt out completely in a very short time. Pictures of charred house ruins and burnt-out cars remind one of a war zone. The fire quickly caught the houses, so that many inhabitants—whole families—had no time to flee. A reporter from the news channel Skai reported that more and more charred bodies are being discovered, including two women clutching their dead children.
Many tried to escape in their cars, but were trapped on the way by flames and ran in all directions to save their lives. Especially tragic is the fate of a group of 26 people who tried to save themselves in a field but were surrounded by fire and all burned. The rescue workers found the bodies crowded together, including families.
Others fled to the coast, but not all reached one of the beaches. Many arrived at rocks by the sea where they had to wait for rescue. A teenager jumped in panic from the cliff and was found dead in the sea.
Greek survivor Kostas Laganos described his escape at the BBC: “Fortunately the sea lay before us and we jumped in, as the flames followed us to the water. We suffered burns on our backs before we could dive into the water.”
More than 700 people were rescued from the coasts by fishing boats and ships. The media showed children, elderly, men and women wading through the water surrounded by thick, stuffy smoke or waiting on wooden chairs, in the background, clouds of smoke that were visible as far as Athens, where they laid a dark veil over the sun.
At present, over 1,000 buildings, including homes and shops, and at least 300 cars have been destroyed. Hundreds of people had to leave their belongings behind and are now without shelter. While emergency care and accommodation by the authorities were initiated slowly, the solidarity of the population was great. Many offered shelter, donated blood and helped with food. Numerous people from the larger area and several children’s camps had to be evacuated.
The rescue and firefighting work was hindered by the strong and turning winds, and also by the overnight darkness from Monday to Tuesday. But the fact that the catastrophe is taking on such dramatic proportions cannot only be seen as a result of the weather conditions, but has social causes.
Although Greece faces huge forest fires every year and is well aware of the dangers of the summer heat, it is not prepared for them. According to the Financial Times, even hours after it was clear that the fire would reach Mati, no official evacuation order was issued. A journalist from the state broadcaster ERT, who was there with his family at the time of the fire, described the lack of infrastructure and preparations for such disasters.
The main road of Mati, Leoforos Marathonas, became a trap for many people because it is too narrow and does not offer enough space for the passage of rescue vehicles. The numerous alleys and dead ends also made it difficult to get through. An emergency plan either did not exist or was not known to the inhabitants, so that they looked in panic for ways out and were trapped. Information to those affected via radio or other channels was also inadequate. The rapid power failure was accelerated by the fact that the electricity pylons in the villages were made of wood and burnt down.
The exact causes of the fire disaster are still unclear at this time, but there are several facts that point to arson. Serafim Tsiougris, president of the Panhellenic Union of Voluntary Fire Brigades, told ERT: “I can say without any reservations: this is not an accidental event. When a great fire breaks out in Kineta and simultaneous reports of fires at several Attica sites, that is very disturbing.” Media and officials also stressed that the fact that the blazes started in completely different places at the same time suggests arson. The government has already ordered an investigation.
Forest fires in Greece are often started by criminal land speculators in order to create new building land. Their goal is to illegally build real estate on the burned forest areas, which they subsequently have approved by the authorities. They use “flexible” laws and exploit the fact that Greece is the only European country without a forest registry. Due to the high property prices, they are targeting coastal regions and the Athens area in particular. One Mati resident said to FT that already “many summer homes were built illegally among the pine woods,” increasing the risk of fire.
When in 2007 a fire inferno spread all over Greece, the World Socialist Web Site explained how the ruling elite, then under the government of right-wing conservative New Democracy, and criminal real estate speculators were responsible for the forest fires.
More than 10 years later, the situation has not improved—on the contrary. The government of the pseudo-left Syriza (Coalition of the Radical Left) has imposed cuts on the fire brigade and pushed through massive austerity in the public sector. The social attacks on the Greek working class on the one hand and the privatisation and deregulation of the state in the interests of companies and oligarchs on the other have brought class tensions in Greece to a boiling point.
Resistance is growing among the population. As the Süddeutsche Zeitung reports under the headline, “After the flames comes rage,” many local residents denounced the government’s lack of reaction. For example, there was no extinguishing water in the area of Mati. A Greek pensioner commented: “This is the job of the administration and Nea Makri has a mayor who prefers to appear on television rather than do his job as a local politician”. Another inhabitant said she was “angry” that the state did not react properly to the fire catastrophe.

UK signs off on US death penalty for “ISIS Beatles”: What are the implications?

Julie Hyland

Confirmation that UK Prime Minister Theresa May supports the decision not to seek guarantees from Washington against the death penalty in the case of the so-called “ISIS Beatles” sets a dangerous and sinister precedent.
On Monday, the Daily Telegraph leaked a letter from Home Secretary Sajid Javid to US Attorney General Jeff Sessions disclosing that the government would not seek “death penalty assurance” in the case of Alexanda Kotey and El Shafee Elsheikh. The pair are alleged to be members of a four-man ISIS cell responsible for the brutal murders of several Western captives in Syria and Iraq.
Dubbed the Islamic State’s “Beatles” due to their British accents, Kotey and Elsheikh, along with Mohammed Emwazi (AKA Jihadi John) and Aine Davis, are alleged to have appeared masked in videos glorifying the bloody executions of British aid workers David Haines and Alan Henning and US journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff.
Emwazi was killed in a targeted US air strike in 2015, while Davis was convicted in Turkey of membership in a terrorist organisation and jailed for seven-and-a-half years in 2017. Kotey and Elsheikh were captured by Western-backed Kurdish militias in Syria in January 2018, as they fled advancing Syrian government forces and have been held there since.
Britain abolished the death penalty for murder in 1965 (although it remained in force in Northern Ireland until 1973) and officially has declined to extradite suspects to any jurisdiction that might result in their execution. But in the leaked letter, Javid wrote the UK “does not currently intend to request, nor actively encourage” the transfer of Kotey and Elsheikh to Britain, suggesting there was more chance of their successful prosecution in the US.
He wrote: “I am of the view that there are strong reasons for not requiring a death penalty assurance in this specific case, so no such assurances will be sought.”
Lord Carlile, the cross-bench peer, described Javid’s letter as a “dramatic change of policy by a minister, secretly, without any discussion in parliament. ... That is a decades-old policy and it is not for the home secretary to change. ...”
Not only has the government covertly abandoned blanket opposition to the death penalty, but it has overturned its publicly stated opposition to the Guantanamo Bay US military camp in Cuba. In January, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order to keep Guantanamo open, building on Barack Obama’s failure to close the facility.
The internal briefing, marked “official sensitive,” says: “If the US deems a federal prosecution not possible, they might seek transfer of Kotey and El-Sheikh to Guantanamo Bay (GTMO).”
Cynically, it notes that, although Her Majesty’s Government “will not lobby the US to not send them to GTMO, we will maintain our long-standing position that GTMO should close,” in part due to the “wider reputational risks of HMG seemingly undermining our publicly stated desire to see” the facility closed.
The briefing states that Javid and Boris Johnson, then foreign secretary, made the decision, and notes that May is “aware of this. ...”
The briefing notes that Javid instructed officials to “action the request” for UK cooperation in intelligence sharing. According to the Telegraph, the Metropolitan Police and FBI have been investigating Kotey and El-Sheikh activities in Syria “for the past four years, collecting more than 600 witness statements in a criminal inquiry involving 14 other countries.”
It has now been revealed that the government had already secretly stripped the two of British citizenship, making them stateless. El-Sheikh grew up in London as the child of parents who fled Sudan in the 1990s, while Kotey, of Ghanaian and Greek-Cypriot parentage, was born in London.
The British media is loudly propagandising that the atrocities of which the pair are accused means they have forfeited any rights. Noting smugly that this is “not an extradition case” as it had “now been officially acknowledged that these men are no longer UK citizens,” the Telegraph questioned why government should ever have been “required to seek assurances about the use of the death penalty in order to hand over intelligence to the US courts?”
Rupert Murdoch’s Sun, under the heading, “We couldn’t care less about the fate of the two ISIS jihadis and good riddance if they are executed in the US,” editorialised, “We should give them [the US] every scrap of evidence we have. And if this pair face the death penalty under US law, what business is it of ours?”
The case underscores the extent to which democratic rights—going as far back as the Magna Carta—have been overturned under the pretext of the “war on terror.”
The 2014 Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill empowered the home secretary to strip UK-born citizens of British citizenship under the royal prerogative.
In September 2015, then-Prime Minister David Cameron announced that he had authorised the extra-judicial killings of British citizens—Reyaad Khan, Ruhul Amin and an unnamed other—in a US drone strike.
The British authorities are known to have participated with Washington in extraordinary rendition and torture at CIA “black sites.” The decision of the May government in this case goes even further in enabling the state to accrue authoritarian powers on the pretext of “national security.”
In May, the Washington Post reported a dispute between London and Washington over whether Kotey and El-Sheikh should stand trial in the UK, in keeping with the US government’s position “that terrorist fighters captured overseas should be returned to their countries of origin,” or be sent to Guantanamo or stand trial in the US.
The report cited an apparent reluctance on the part of the Department of Justice to the latter course because federal prosecutors did not believe there “is sufficient evidence to secure convictions and lengthy prison terms.”
Detention in Guantanamo, however, might also lead to lengthy wrangles, leading to Sessions’s complaint that he “was disappointed, frankly, that the British…are not willing to try the cases but pretend to tell us how to try them.”
In the leaked briefing, Javid refers to the government’s intent to address Washington’s concerns. “I do understand your frustration on this subject,” he wrote, so, “in order to improve the chances of prosecution in other cases in the future we in the UK are introducing new legislation to improve the range of offences on the statute book going forward. ...”
Additional issues of grave import are also raised by this case, which coincides with the extraordinary Israeli operation to transfer Syrian “White Helmets” out of danger of capture by Syrian government forces for resettlement in Canada and Europe. As the WSWS noted, this is aimed at the “salvaging of individuals who have served as assets in the Western-backed campaign to topple the government of President Bashar al-Assad and replace it with a pliant stooge regime.”
This is only the most overt instance of US and British military/intelligence backing for Islamic jihadis. It is a matter of public record that the Islamic extremists responsible for the Manchester and London bombings in 2017, like those involved in the 2005 London bus bombings, were known to British intelligence.
Jihadi John was known by MI5 for six years and yet was able to travel to Syria in 2013. Not only did Britain’s MI5 intelligence agency carefully track his movements, but it had sought to recruit him as an informant and covert agent. Chief among the questions the intelligence agency had to answer about its relations with Emwazi, the WSWS wrote at the time, was whether it “was successful in its recruitment efforts. In other words, did Emwazi go to Syria with MI5’s foreknowledge and blessings?”
Is it to avoid the possibility that Kotey and Elsheikh might say too much that the British authorities do not want them to stand trial in the UK?
Yet another alarming “coincidence” arises. Ben Emmerson, QC, a former UN special rapporteur on human rights and counter-terrorism, described Javid’s stance as “unprincipled, incompetent and almost certainly unlawful.”
Historically, the British government’s position to oppose the death penalty in all circumstances has “translated to an absolute rule, which is legally enforceable, not to extradite an individual to a country where they are at serious risk of the death penalty without an assurance that the penalty will not be carried out.”
It was “immaterial” that the men were no longer British citizens. “It is passing information to a foreign power where they know the consequences are going to be a fundamental human rights abuse of this kind,” he said.
In the last days, it has been revealed that the US and UK are in cahoots with Ecuador to evict WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange “imminently” from the Ecuadorian Embassy, where he has been forced to shelter for six years for exposing the war crimes of Washington and its allies.
If he leaves the embassy, he will be imprisoned by Britain for breaching bail and almost certainly face an application to extradite him to the United States to stand trial on manufactured charges of espionage, which carries the death penalty. It cannot be ruled out that these latest actions are part of the British government’s preparations to serve Assange up to Washington.

24 Jul 2018

AVAC HIV Prevention Research Advocacy Fellows Program for Young Leaders in Africa and Asia 2019

Application Deadline: 7th September 2018

Eligible Countries: African and Asian countries

About the Award: The HIV Prevention Research Advocacy Fellows Program pairs emerging leaders in advocacy and activism with existing organizations to develop and execute creative, context-specific projects focused on HIV prevention research.
The overall goal of Advocacy Fellows is to expand and strengthen the capacity of civil society advocates and Organisations to monitor, support and help shape HIV prevention research and rapid rollout of new effective interventions in low- and middle-income countries with high HIV burdens. The program is guided by the belief that effective, sustainable advocacy grows out of work that reflects country level Organisational and individual interests and priorities and is led by passionate advocates who are motivated to bring change.
Fellows projects focus primarily on advocacy around biomedical HIV prevention research (such as clinical trials of vaccines, microbicides, pre-exposure prophylaxis) or rollout of male circumcision for HIV prevention. Fellows projects may also focus on “test and treat” or ARV treatment as prevention strategies, which are under active discussion in many contexts. Fellows receive training, financial support, and technical assistance to plan and implement a targeted one-year project within host organizations focused on HIV/AIDS.
Founded in 1995, AVAC is a non-profit organization that uses education, policy analysis, advocacy and a network of global collaborations to accelerate the ethical development and global delivery of HIV prevention options as part of a comprehensive, integrated and sustained response to the pandemic.

Join an informational conference call to learn more about the program and ask questions directly to those who lead the program and/or have been a part of it on Tuesday, August 7 at 8am New York / 9am Rio / 2pm Johannesburg / 3pm Nairobi / 6pm Mumbai. (Visit www.timeanddate.com to confirm the time in your time zone.)

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: The Advocacy Fellows Program seeks the following:
  • Emerging or mid-career community leaders and advocates involved or interested in advocacy around HIV prevention research and implementation, particularly the areas described in question (3).
  • Individuals with some experience or education in the areas of HIV and AIDS, public health, medicine, international development, women’s rights, communications, or advocacy with key populations, such as sex workers, LGBTQ individuals and drug users.
  • Individuals based in low- and middle-income countries with high HIV burdens and where biomedical HIV prevention clinical research is planned or ongoing and/or where there is current work on implementation of new preventions strategies (such as voluntary medical male circumcision, pre-exposure prophylaxis or PrEP, early treatment and “combination prevention” packages.) Advocates can also develop proposals that seek to catalyze plans and policies in countries where little activity on these issues has happened to date. Please visit www.avac.org/pxrdwww.avac.org/trial-map and specific resources noted in the appendix to identify countries where research and implementation is ongoing or planned.
  • Those proficient in the English language. Applications are encouraged from all countries where prevention research is ongoing or rolling out, however the Advocacy Fellow and key staff at his/her Organisation must be able to communicate with AVAC staff in English.
  • Demonstrated awareness of and willingness to learn about ongoing prevention research and implementation in their respective countries, although extensive knowledge in biomedical HIV prevention is not required. They must also be able to demonstrate strategic analysis of how Fellows Program activities will relate to local prevention landscapes.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: 
  • Full-time compensation for the Fellow, small project budget and technical assistance from AVAC for 12 months.
  • Mentoring and capacity building in biomedical HIV prevention research and implementation advocacy from AVAC for both Advocacy Fellows and Host Organisations.
  • Connection to a global network of biomedical HIV prevention research advocates including current and former Advocacy Fellows, researchers, civil society leaders and other individuals and/or organisations working in similar fields.
Duration of Program: 2018 Fellow Projects run from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020.

How to Apply: Applications go through a thorough review process, including by an external review panel made up of advocates, researchers, past Fellows and Host Supervisors recommendations. Short-listed applicants are interviewed. Selected Fellows will be notified by the end of November.
  • Applicants must submit the individual and Host Organisation information forms, the essay/short answer questions, the Host Organisation letter of support and the CV/resume by 7 September 2018.
  • Short-listed candidates and proposed Host Organisations are contacted for further documentation and interviews that aim to get to know each applicant a little better.
  • Successful applicants and Host Organisations are notified in November 2018.
Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: AVAC

TWAS-CASAREP Workshop on Climate Change for Young Scientists in sub-Saharan Africa (Fully-funded to Bangalore, India) 2018

Application Deadline: 20th August 2018

Eligible Countries: sub-Saharan African countries

To Be Taken At (Country): Bangalore, India

About the Award: The workshop will include thematic lectures by eminent scientists followed by hands-on training on remote sensing, modelling and measurement techniques for climate-relevant parameters. There will also be poster and oral presentations by participants. This workshop will provide a platform for participants to learn outstanding grand challenges in climate, atmospheric and ocean sciences and also to discuss some of the recent research findings.

Type: Workshop

Eligibility: 
  • Applications must be from young scientists under the age of 40 years from Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in sub-Saharan Africa
  • Applicants must have a science and engineering background with a Masters or PhD working in LDCs.
  • Applications from female young scientists is highly encouraged.
Number of Awards: 18

Value of Award: Applicants will be fully sponsored.

Duration of Programme: 5-7 December 2018.

How to Apply: Applications should be directly forwarded to marvin@assaf.org.za by 20 August 2018. To be considered, applicants must complete the attached form in full and submit it with the supporting documents on or before the closing date:
Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: TWAS-CASAREP

UK Government Darwin Fellowship Award for Developing Countries 2019

Application Deadline: 13th November 2018

Eligible Countries: Developing Countries

To Be Taken At (Country): UK

About the Award: The Fellowship programme is intended to support Fellows to draw on UK technical and scientific expertise in the fields of biodiversity and sustainable development to broaden their knowledge and experience.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: Applications for Fellowship funding should come from an organisation (the Lead Organisation) and not an individual. There should be a named individual within the Lead Organisation responsible for the application, called the Project Leader. The host organisation where the individual will carry out the training or research must be in the UK.
The Lead Organisation:
  • must have expertise in natural resource management
  • can be either a public or private sector organisation
  • should provide experts from within the organisation with a proven track record and at the forefront of their discipline(s) to work closely with or supervise the Fellow. This expertise is typically expected to be a minimum of 10 years of relevant experience
Darwin Fellowships will support promising individuals who:
  • have a link with a recent or current Darwin Initiative project or
  • are currently involved directly in the implementation of the key biodiversity conventions and agreements listed above
Further information is available in the guidance.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Eligible costs (depending on the nature of the Fellowship) include a monthly subsistence, Lead organisation expenses, travel costs and fees for academic qualifications. Further information on Darwin Fellowship awards can be found in the Darwin Round 25 Guidance.

How to Apply: 
Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: UK Government

Wits-TUB Urban Lab Interdisciplinary Bilateral Masters Scholarships for Students in sub-Saharan Africa 2019

Application Deadline: 30th September 2018.

Eligible Countries: sub-Saharan Africa

To Be Taken At (Country): South Africa and Germany.

About the Award: The bilateral Wits-TUB Urban Lab programme supported by the Federal Ministry for Economic
Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) seeks to improve graduate education in urban fields across sub-Saharan Africa. Both lead partners, the Habitat Unit at the School of Architecture of the Technische Universität Berlin, and the School of Architecture and Planning at University of the Witwatersrand offer a new urban-oriented graduate and postgraduate training and capacity building programme that would effectively address the challenges and needs outlined below .

The programme includes bilateral exchange activities, workshops and conferences implemented through the Wits-TUB Urban Lab and will focus on four innovation areas that address SDG implementation in
urban areas:

• Politics and policy of the urban
• Understanding complex urban systems
• Managing change processes
• Coproducing knowledge between theory and practice (Wits-TUB Urban Studio)


Fields of Study: The masters scholarships apply to the following 1 year full time degrees at Wits University in
Johannesburg, supported by a bilateral programme with TU Berlin:

• MSc Development Planning (MSc DP)
• Master of Urban Studies in the field of Sustainable Energy Efficient Cities – MUS (SEEC)
• Master of Urban Studies in the field of Housing and Human Settlements – MUS (HHS)
• Master of Urban Studies in the field of Urban Politics and Governance (MUS – UPG)
• Master of Urban Studies in the field of Urban Management – MUS (US)

Please note that once completed, the degree certificates are issued by Wits University. They are not joint degrees as such.

Type: Masters

Eligibility: Scholarships are open to :
 South African citizens
• Citizens from other countries in sub-Saharan Africa
• Applicants must possess the requisite qualifications to be granted the scholarship.

There is no age limit applying to the scholarships for study purposes. However, at the time of the application, no more than 6 years should have passed since an applicant graduated from his/her previous bachelor or master studies.
All scholarship applicants must have applied for admission to the relevant degree (as per above list) at Wits University and be in possession of a ‘person number’ which is issued by Wits University upon application for admission into a degree.

Number of Awards: 5

Value of Award: Successful candidates will be expected to sign a contract stipulating the conditions of the
scholarship. The scholarship includes:

• Full tuition fee
• Monthly stipend (living expenses including: subsistence expences, accommodation, other costs)
• Travel from home country/place of origin is covered.
• Costs of Summer/Spring School in Berlin

The scholarship recipients will benefit from guest lectures, joint supervision scheme and a summer school at Wits University.

Duration of Programme: The masters scholarship covers the duration of one academic  year

How to Apply: 
  • Every applicant has to fill in the first basic application form before they can access the full form.
  • The whole application process (including online access to the application form) is found IN LINK BELOW
Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and German Academic
Exchange Service (DAAD)