30 Jul 2018

Egypt’s military junta condemns 75 coup protesters to death

Chris Marsden

A Cairo court referred 75 defendants to Egypt’s grand mufti to approve death by hanging sentences on Saturday. The 75 are all part of a mass trial of 739 defendants, who all face the same maximum penalty.
Only two defendants, both US citizens, were excluded from the first group to be condemned for participating in an August 2013 protest against the coup staged by Egypt’s ruling military junta in July under Gen. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi that deposed the government of President Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Several of those referred for a death sentence are leading figures in the now banned Muslim Brotherhood, but charges also include illegal assembly, possession of a weapon and murder.
This turns reality on its head. The brutal military assault on the sit-in at Cairo’s Rabaa al Adawiya square in support of Morsi led to the deaths of over 1,000 people.
The mass trial in Cairo is only the latest outrage in a campaign of repression that has been ongoing ever since and seen over 60,000 imprisoned for political crimes, thousands executed and thousands more “disappeared” by the security services.
Torture and mass murder are accompanied by systematic censorship, targeting journalists, newspapers, TV stations and over 500 web sites, in the name of combating “fake news” that “spreads instability,” damages “public order” or harms the “national interest.”
The blood on Sisi’s hands also drenches the palms of political leaders of all the major parties in the United States, Europe and the other imperialist powers.
The Trump administration paved the way for Saturday’s death sentences by announcing on July 25 that it was unfreezing $195 million in military aid to Egypt, while a senior military delegation was visiting Washington and a congressional hearing was underway to supposedly consider extending an aid freeze. At least 17 Americans are still incarcerated in Egyptian jails.
Trump is only continuing the policy of his predecessor, Barack Obama.
The same day as the death sentences were delivered, David D. Kirkpatrick of that most fervently pro-Obama newspaper, the New York Times, published an extended preview of his upcoming book on Egypt, acknowledging that Obama’s administration had “paved the way for Trump’s embrace of dictators.”
Kirkpatrick notes the open endorsement of Sisi’s coup and repression of the Brotherhood by leading figures in the then Democratic administration, including Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel.
“Kerry told me he had argued at the White House that Mr. Morsi’s removal was not, in fact, a coup. General Sisi had merely bowed to the public will in order to save Egypt,” he writes. Obama “yielded to those views” when he “decided not to make any determination about whether Mr. Morsi’s ouster was or was not a coup, effectively accepting it.”
This is a flimsy apologia for Obama, who first lifted the 2013 military aid ban on Egypt in 2015.
Aside from a subsequent and brief period of denial provoked by Sisis’s clampdown on NGOs that was ended by Trump this month, Washington has continued to provide an average of $1.3 billion a year to Egypt—more than to any other country besides Israel.
The same holds true of all the major powers, with the butcher Sisi making diplomatic visits to Berlin, London, Paris and Rome to rake in arms deals and aid packages. Earlier this month, France was accused by human rights organizations of aiding Sisi’s repression through arms sales involving at least eight companies worth €1.3 billion and including “powerful digital tools” that “have helped establish an Orwellian surveillance and control architecture that is being used to eradicate all forms of dissent and citizen action.”
Two overarching considerations inform the attitude of the imperialist powers to Egypt’s dictatorship.
First is the escalating contest for domination of the oil-rich Middle East, including plans for military conflict with Iran.
Trump’s announcement of a Middle East Strategic Alliance, modelled on NATO, seeks to bring together Israel, Saudi Arabia and the UAE in alliance with Egypt—regimes that have carried out repression just as brutal as Sisi against the Palestinians and in Yemen. Savage repression to crush social and political dissent must accompany such a turn to war, and not only in the Middle East.
More fundamental still is the threat posed by the working class.
The Egyptian Revolution was the key event in the “Arab Spring” of 2011, which witnessed the eruption of mass strikes and protests that led to the downfall of first Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia and then the February ouster of Hosni Mubarak.
But without establishing its political independence and without a revolutionary party to lead it, the Egyptian working class was politically disarmed by the bourgeois forces liberal and Islamist, it looked to for leadership. A vital role in this betrayal was played by pseudo-left groups such as the Revolutionary Socialists, who insisted throughout that the working class confine itself to a struggle for “democracy” in alliance with one or another faction of the bourgeoisie.
This has allowed the Egyptian military to restore its rule and its imperialist sponsors to resume their policies of war and repression and exploitation of the region, including Libya, Syria and Iraq. But the fear remains that Egypt was only a prelude to a far broader revolutionary offensive by the working class that this time will also sweep through Europe, America and across the world.
Sisi is not only given carte blanche by the major powers to carry out his clampdown, but is provided with unlimited financial and technical support because they are preparing or actively employing similar measures against the working class at home.
In a recent interview, Sisi declared of his government’s overarching mission, “Everything is linked to stability and security. I want us to develop an acute fear of instability.”
This statement could just as easily have come from the mouth of Trump, Hillary Clinton, Emmanuel Macron, Theresa May or Angela Merkel.
Everywhere, the gap between the super-rich financial oligarchy and the mass of workers and young people struggling to get by has achieved morbid dimensions. Social anger is palpable. For the first time since 2011, industrial struggles and other forms of mass protest are re-emerging.
Everywhere, the response of the ruling elites is the same—a turn to police-military measures against the population, mass surveillance, censorship, attacks on democratic freedoms, the deliberate cultivation of far-right forces, cuts to social programs and stepped-up military spending.
The central lesson that must be drawn from the earth-shaking events of 2011 and the tragedy that has followed is the necessity to consciously prepare an international revolutionary struggle for the overthrow of the capitalist state and imperialism.
The goal must be the taking of state power by the working class and the building of a socialist economic system to end the scourge of austerity, dictatorship and war and provide for the essential needs of all the world’s people.
The sole basis for doing so is through the construction of sections of the International Committee of the Fourth International, in Egypt and throughout the world.

28 Jul 2018

Merck More Than a Mother Media Awards for Journalists and Students in East Africa (USD3000 Award) 2018

Application Deadline: 31st March 2018

Eligible Countries: East African countries

About the Award: Merck Healthcare have established this award in partnership with Africa Fertility Society to showcase and appreciate outstanding health journalism and to recognize individual professional journalists and students who have produced accurate, informative, and compelling stories about infertile women or couples.
The stories targeted are those of infertile women sharing their suffering and abuse by their husbands, families or communities due to their condition. It is very critical to share these stories with the public to build advocacy of the need to change such behavior and break the stigma around infertility in general. It also will provide a platform for those who have sought treatment to advise others on the journey and support those undergoing infertility treatments.

Type: Contests/Awards

Eligibility: The Award is open to print, video broadcast, photo journalists and media students whose stories appear in newspapers, websites, blogs and television and that target the public.
  • The stories submitted should be in a form of articles with photos, or three to five minute videos recorded using smart devices
  • The story must have been published any time before 30th  AUGUST 2017
  • Links to the stories must be submitted before the dead line.
  • Plagiarism of any kind will lead to automatic disqualification
  • Photo entries will only be limited to 2 photographs per journalist/student.
  • Applicants should be East African journalists and registered media students in East Africa.
Categories: Submission will be judged and recipients selected based on the following categories:

Print and Online
  • Newspapers or magazines
  • Online (blogs and/or social media)
The stories submitted should be in a form of articles with photos, or three to five minute videos recorded using smart devices
Broadcast
  • Television
  • Online (blogs and /or social media)
Photos
  • Newspaper or magazines
  • Online(blogs and /or social media)
Value of Award:
  • Multimedia: USD3000;
  • Print: USD1000;
  • Radio: USD1000;
  • Online: USD1000;
How to Apply: 
  • Applicants Name, Sex, Age, Category, Media House (for students), Country and Contacts must be provided with the submission.
  • Applications can be submitted via MyStory@MerckMoreThanAMother.com.
  • Watch videos below on the stories of women’s suffering as a result of the infertility stigma on the Program Webpage (See Link below)
Visit the Program Webpage for Details

Award Providers: Merck

SCIENCE BY WOMEN Visiting Research Senior Fellowships for African Women (Fully-funded to Spain) 2018

Application Deadline: 30th September 2018

Eligible Countries: African Countries

To Be Taken At (Country/university): Spain
  • Spanish National Biotechnology Centre
  • Institute of Photonic Sciences
  • Institute of Mathematical Sciences
  • Barcelona Graduate School of Economics
  • Centre for Genomic Regulation
  • Vall d´Hebron Institut de Recerca
  • Institute for Neuroscience
  • Kronikgune Research Center
  • Biocruces (bc)
  • DeustoTech
Eligible Fields of Study: The preferred areas of research include:
  1. Health and Bio-medicine
  2. Energy, Water and Climate Change
  3. Agriculture and Food Safety
  4. Mathematics, Information and Communication Technologies
  5. Economic Science
About the Award: Following the success of 1st and 2nd Edition, the Women for Africa Foundation (FMxA), in line with its mission of contributing to the development of Africa through its women, is launching the 3rd Edition of SCIENCE BY WOMEN programme, with the aim to promote African women’s leadership in scientific research and technology transfer and to foster the capacity of the research centres in their home countries.
The main goal is to enable African women researchers and scientists to tackle the great challenges faced by Africa through research in Health and biomedicine, agriculture and food security, water, energy and climate change,  mathematics, Information and Communication Technologies as well as Economic Sciences.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: 
  • Being a woman
  • Nationality of an African country.
  • PhD with at least 3 years of post-doctoral professional experience
  • Contractual relationship with a university or a public or private non-profit organization based in Africa dedicated to significant scientific research in the areas indicated
  • Excellent academic record and proven track of relevant research experience
  • Solid working knowledge of English
  • Proven experience leading a research group
Beneficiaries of first and second edition are not eligible. Candidates must have already contacted and identified research groups in the host centres to confirm that their proposed research can be carried out in collaboration with those research groups and, when needed, in their laboratories.

Selection Criteria: Applications will be subjected to a highly competitive selection process by the Women for Africa Foundation’s Scientific Committee. The jury will evaluate the following criteria:
  • The candidate’s research career, curriculum vitae and experience as independent research group leader.
  • The project’s scientific -technical quality and innovative potential.
  • The expected and measurable economic or social impact of the research project.
  • The candidate’s plan to communicate and disseminate the project’s results.
  • The proper consideration of ethical issues where appropriate.
Successful applicants will present innovative research projects that respond to the needs of African populations and that are likely to be transferred into products or patents for commercial exploitation, or services and public policies which have a social impact in terms of people’s welfare and quality of life, as well as an economic impact in terms of companies’ productivity and competitiveness.

Number of Awards: 10

Value of Award: Successful candidates will have access to the following benefits:
  • Flight from their centre of origin to the host institution and back
  • Living allowance of 2.400 Euros gross per month to cover accommodation, personal expense and health and occupational accident insurance coverage.
Duration of Program: 6 months

How to Apply: Only applications submitted in English via the Science by Women microsite at www.mujeresporafrica.es will be accepted. They must include the following documents:
  • Letter of Interest (max. 1 page)
  • Full curriculum vitae • Fully filled form
  • Brief but concise description of the project to be developed in the Spanish
  • host centre (max. 2 pages)
  • A letter of the prospective host group’s stating its interest to support the project proposed by the candidate.
APPLICATION FORM

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: Women for Africa Foundation (FMxA)

DAAD/CERAAS Masters and PhD Scholarships for sub-Saharan African Students 2018 – Senegal

Application Deadline: 30th July 2018

Eligible Countries: sub-Saharan African countries

To Be Taken At (Country): Senegal

About the Award: The target group for scholarships are graduates and postgraduates from Sub-Saharan Africa with a first academic degree if applying for a master’s programme, or with a Master’s degree if applying for a doctoral programme who want to pursue Master’s or PhD courses in their home country (so called In-Country scholarships) or in another Sub-Saharan African country (In-Region scholarships).

Field of Study: The In-Country/In-Region Scholarship Programme Scholarships supports studies in subject areas with strong relevance to national development.
The scholarships at CERAAS are available in the following fields:
  1. Physiology
  2. Genetics
  3. Genomics
  4. Agronomy
  5. Plant Breeding
  6. Plant Health
  7. Agroforestry
Type: Masters, PhD

Eligibility: Applicants
  • have successfully completed generally a three-year university degree (Master candidates) or a two-year university degree (doctoral candidates) with above average results (second class upper division)
  • clearly show motivation and strong commitment
  • have thorough knowledge of the language of instruction
  • have completed their last university degree not more than 6 years ago at the time of application
  • must be nationals or permanent residents of a Sub-Saharan African country
  • should generally be a) staff member of a public or private university, b) candidate considered for teaching or research staff recruitment, c) from the public sector or d) DAFI-Alumni (Albert Einstein German Academic Refugee Initiative)
Female applicants and candidates from less privileged regions or groups are especially encouraged to participate in the programme.

Number of Awards: It has been agreed upon that DAAD cooperates with Centre d’Etude Régional pour l’Amélioration de l’Adaptation à la Sécheresse (CERAAS) by offering up to 2 InRegion and 1 In-Country scholarships for PhD and up to 3 In-Region and 1 InCountry scholarships for Master studies at CERAAS for the intake 2018.

Value of Award: 
  • The scholarship covers Tuition, Travel, Study and Research allowance, Monthly living and accommodation allowance as well as a Final allowance.
  • DAAD In-Country/In-Region scholarship holders are also encouraged to apply for a research grant in Germany for 2 up to 6 months. Please note: The short-term research stay in Germany should preferably be announced in the application for the regular scholarship.
The short-term research scholarship includes:
• a monthly scholarship payment for living costs which amounts to 1.000 € per month
• health/accident/personal liability insurance
• a flat-rate travel allowance

All further details regarding additional benefits and the additional application processes will be provided after admission to the scholarship programme.

Duration of Programme:  The duration
  • of the PhD programme is up to three years
  • of the Master programme is up to two years
How to Apply: If you are interested, then go through the Application requirements HERE

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: DAAD, CERAAS.

US National Gallery of Art Visiting Senior Fellowship Programme for International Researchers 2019/2020

Application Deadlines:
  • March 1–August 15, 2019
    Deadline: 21st September, 2018
  • September 1, 2019–February 29, 2020
    Deadline: 21st March, 2019
To Be Taken At (Country): USA

About the Award: Fellowships are for full-time research, and scholars are expected to reside in Washington and to participate in the activities of the Center throughout the fellowship period. Lectures, colloquia, and informal discussions complement the fellowship program. Each visiting senior fellow is provided with a study. In addition, visiting senior fellows who relocate to Washington are provided with housing in apartments near the Gallery, subject to availability. Visiting senior fellows have access to the notable resources represented by the art collections, the library, and the image collections of the National Gallery of Art, as well as to the Library of Congress and other specialized research libraries and collections in the Washington area.

Fields of Study: Paul Mellon and Ailsa Mellon Bruce Visiting Senior Fellowships are intended to support research in the history, theory, and criticism of the visual arts (painting, sculpture, architecture, landscape architecture, urbanism, prints and drawings, film, photography, decorative arts, industrial design, and other arts) of any geographical area and of any period. Visiting senior fellowship applications are also solicited from scholars in other disciplines whose work examines artifacts or has implications for the analysis and criticism of visual form. For appointment to visiting senior fellowships in 2019–2020, the Center encourages applications in the fields of the visual arts and culture of African Americans, Africa, and the African diaspora.

Type: Research, Fellowship

Eligibility: 
  • Visiting senior fellowships are intended for those who have held the PhD for five years or more at the time of application, or who possess an equivalent record of professional accomplishment.
  • Individuals currently affiliated with the National Gallery of Art are not eligible for the visiting senior fellowship program.
  • Visiting senior fellowships are awarded without regard to the age or nationality of applicants.
  • Applications are reviewed by an external selection committee composed of scholars in the history of art and related disciplines. Outside readers may assist in the evaluation of proposals.
Number of Awards: Up to 12

Value of Award: The Center awards up to twelve short-term (up to 60 days) Paul Mellon and Ailsa Mellon Bruce Visiting Senior Fellowships annually. Stipends for two-month fellowships range from $7,000 to $8,000, depending on relocation requirements; in addition, fellows receive housing, as available.

Duration of Programme: 2 months

How to Apply: Candidates for visiting senior fellowships must submit an online application that includes a proposal and a copy of one article or chapter of a book, to be submitted on or before the appropriate deadline. Two letters of recommendation in support of the application are required. Procedures for associate appointments are the same as those for the visiting senior fellowship program.

Apply online for a visiting senior fellowship

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: NGA

United Nations OHCHR Indigenous Fellowship for Indigenous Peoples (Fully-funded to Geneva, Switzerland) 2019

Application Deadline: 30th August 2018.​

To Be Taken At (Country): Geneva, Switzerland

About the Award: The English language component of the Indigenous Fellowship Programme (IFP) was established in 1997. It takes place at the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in Geneva, Switzerland and lasts for 4 weeks, usually coinciding with the annual meeting of the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP).
The objective of this training programme is to enhance the knowledge of indigenous peoples on existing international human rights instruments and mechanisms, so they can use them to more effectively advocate for the rights of their communities and raise their concerns at the international level. At the end of the Programme, trained fellows are also in a better position to share and give training sessions on the knowledge gained to their indigenous communities and organizations.
The training combines theoretical sessions with briefings on the UN system, OHCHR mandate and activities, international Human Rights instruments (Treaties, Conventions, Declarations) and mechanisms (Human Rights Council, Treaty Bodies, Special Procedures) – including those more specifically dealing with indigenous issues (UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ILO Convention 169, the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, EMRIP). Practical assignments and exercises also help better integrate the theory. Fellows are also given the opportunity to actively participate in the annual meeting of EMRIP. Additionally, they get introduced to the work of other UN and specialized agencies (ILO, WIPO, UNESCO, UNICEF) and of Geneva based Human Rights NGOs, including DoCip.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: Only indigenous men and women may apply for the Programme. Non-indigenous persons will not be
considered even if they work for an indigenous organization.

Indigenous peoples share some or all of the following identifying characteristics:
  • Descendants of the peoples who inhabited a land or territory prior to colonization or the establishment of State borders;
  • Distinct social, economic and political systems, languages, cultures and beliefs;
  • Determined to maintain and develop this distinct identity;
  • Strong attachment to their ancestral lands and the natural resources therein;
  • Belong to the non-dominant groups of a society and identify themselves as indigenous peoples.
The candidate
  • Should be proposed and the candidacy supported by his/her indigenous organization or community;
  • Should have a good working knowledge of English, French, Russian or Spanish, languages in which the Programme is conducted;
  • Should be willing and able to train other indigenous persons upon return to their respective communities/organizations.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Participants of the Fellowship Programme are entitled to the following: a return ticket (economy class) from their country of residence to Geneva; a daily or monthly stipend to cover their basic needs in Geneva, including modest accommodation, food and transport; a basic health insurance for the duration of the Programme. OHCHR will not cover any additional expenses such as visa fees and travel insurance.

Duration of Programme: 4 weeks

How to Apply: We strongly encourage you to send your application form​ well before the deadline.
Fellowship applications will only be taken into consideration if they are fully completed.
Both parts I and II of the application form must be signed and sent by regular post at the following address:

Mr. Morse Caoagas Flores
Coordinator, Indigenous Fellowship Programme
Indigenous Peoples and Minorities Section
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
48, Avenue Giuseppe-Motta, Office 2-05
CH-1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland


Scanned applications are also accepted, although we prefer receiving applications by post.
Your scanned application can be sent at the following email: fellowship@ohchr.org and copy:mflores@ohchr.org

Application forms need to be accompanied by an official recommendation letter from the nominating indigenous organization or community.

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: UN OHCHR

Important Note: There is no age limit or formal educational requirement to apply to the programme.

Chinese Government Must Act on Vaccine Issues

Cesar Chelala

A recent scandal on the manufacturing of the rabies vaccines is just one more example of how some pharmaceutical firms put their profits before people’s health in China. This shows the need for the Chinese government to fully investigate the problem and punish those responsible for this abuse.
On July 15, the State Drug Administration discovered that Changchun Changsheng Bio-tech Co. altered its manufacturing records for the human rabies vaccines, because they have been rendered less effective. This was not the first time that this company had done something illegal. Last October, it was found that the company had produced “junk” diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccines, for which it was punished on July 20, 2018.
Last year, the company received a subsidy of 48.33 million yuan ($7.15 million). This is more than 10 times the fine it received after it was found to have produced defective batches of the DPT vaccines. This huge subsidy raises the question of possible collusion between the company and government officials, particularly since the company wasn’t apparently affected by this action.
In unvaccinated children who get serious cases of diphtheria, the toxin spreads through the blood stream and cause life threatening damage to heart and kidneys, nerve damage and paralysis. One in 10 children who get diphtheria dies from it. Children infected with the bacteria which causes tetanus may develop headaches, and have spasms and a tightening of the jaw muscle, which is why this disease is called “lockjaw”. Children who develop whooping cough have uncontrollable coughing spells which may last for more than a minute. Before the vaccine became available, whooping cough killed between 5,000 and 10,000 people every year.
In China, the DPT vaccine, which protects children from diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough, is part of the country’s national immunization program. Children are required to have this vaccine –which will protect them throughout childhood- for school admittance. If vaccinations cease, or ineffective vaccines are used, many more children would get those diseases.
Of the questionable DPT vaccines made by the Changchun Changsheng company, 252,600 doses were sold to Shadong province. Health authorities there started revaccinating children who had been injected with the defective vaccines and reported no major health consequences on those children.
According to the Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention, the leading public health agency in the country, China is the world’s biggest vaccine producer. More than 40 Chinese manufacturers produce 63 kinds of vaccines which can prevent 34 diseases. In the Chinese market, more than 90 percent of vaccines sold are made domestically.
If this recent vaccine crisis leads many parents to stop vaccinating their children, this could create a serious public health problem, since children would no longer be protected against frequent childhood diseases.
The government has created a special team to investigate this issue, which goes from vaccine production and marketing to their use in children. Government officials have promised to keep the public informed about the results of these investigations. Because this is not the first time that this problem has occurred, however, this indicates that there are structural loopholes that need to be analyzed and the culprits punished if the problem is going to be solved.
This recent episode shows that vaccine production should be closely controlled by the State. A restructuring of the whole production, supervision and marketing systems is imperative. Children’s health shouldn’t be subject to the greed of vaccine manufacturers and corrupt government officials.

The BRICS, Climate Catastrophe, Resource Plunder and Resistance

Farai Maguwu

The heads of state from Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa are meeting in Johannesburg’s corruption-ridden financial district of Sandton for a two-day annual summit. Pretending to challenge Western imperial hegemony over poor nations of the South, this bloc has itself proved to be no different.
If anything, two of the BRICS powers – China and India – are investing billions of dollars in coal-fired thermal-power generation in Africa while winning global applause for increasing their solar and wind power at home. This contradiction and policy inconsistency is one of many which makes the BRICS a farce.
China is funding coal projects in Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe, yet is a global powerhouse in renewable energy. It put on hold more than 100 coal plants in 2017 with a combined installed capacity of 100 gigawatts. In 2016 China’s energy regulator also halted coal fired projects amounting to over 300 gigawatts, mainly due to overcapacity but also health and local pollution concerns.
Yet last month Zimbabwe concluded a $1.4 billion agreement with the Export-Import Bank of China (Exim Bank) for the construction of a 600 megawatt coal-fired power plant.
Now here is the problem. Several Chinese state energy companies are losing business due to government slowing of carbon emissions and China is turning them to Africa. Due to its unrivalled current level of pollution, China has first-hand knowledge on the effects of coal on the environment and human health. Researchers from Berkeley Earth, a California-based climate research organization, calculated that about 1.6 million people in China die every year from health issues caused by the country’s notoriously polluted air.
So why is China financing an industry that creates death and destruction when clean energy technology is rising fast in China itself? Dumping old technology makes business sense to China, just as it always did to the West.
Refusing to be outdone, the Indian Government is being praised globally for taking steps to halt carbon emissions, but it too extended a $310 million loan to Zimbabwe to finance a rehabilitation programme for Hwange Thermal Power station that would entail upgrading the plant and extending its lifespan by a further 15-20 years.
According to New Delhi’s ambassador to Harare, Rungsung Masakui, “The Indian Government is keen to assist and co-operate with the people of Zimbabwe in projects that uplift your people.”
Coal is killing people in India, yet will uplift Zimbabweans? We should instead consider such loans as odious, as there was no consultation with citizens of either country.
Apart from investing in dirty fossil energy projects, BRICS nations are also united in looting Africa’s resources via dodgy relations with corrupt African regimes. In neighboring Mozambique, the Brazilian company Vale has been displacing hundreds of farmer-pastoralist villagers from ancestral homes to pave way for coal mining. Although villagers are unanimous in condemning this modern-day colonialism, their protests have been met with fire and fury by the Rio-based firm, which apparently has corporate impunity. The Mozambican government seem powerless to restrain Vale.
In Zimbabwe, Vladimir Putin has muscled his way into the lucrative platinum and diamond sectors. After the military coup in November, Putin sent his powerful Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to meet Zimbabwe’s President Emmerson Mnangagwa where they agreed to move ahead with a dodgy $3 billion platinum project in Darwendale. Lavrov later revealed to the media that Russia was also interested in Zimbabwe’s diamond sector, adding the two countries will increase military cooperation.
But health, access to clean water, food security, jobs and infrastructure development are the main priorities of the Zimbabwean people – not more power to our country’s de facto junta. Beijing’s diversion of diamonds via its military, both back to China through the Anjin company and to the Zimbabwean army, was so notorious already that even former President Robert Mugabe – deposed in a coup last November – admitted that of $15 billion worth of the alluvial stones taken from the Marange fields, less than $2 billion had been accounted for.
As the BRICS leaders arrived in Johannesburg this week, a brics-from-below group also met for a Teach In and two protests, to throw proverbial bricks at the conference of polluters and looters. More than 100 activists held both a picket against the BRICS New Development Bank on Wednesday, and a ‘Break the BRICS’ march to the Sandton Convention Centre on Thursday, to demand that BRICS leaders leave.
The main hosting body was the United Front-Johannesburg, whose co-chair Trevor Ngwane ensured a variety of progressive forces made the visit uncomfortable, by raising issues that middle-of-the-road journalists and ‘civil society’ groups dared not address. Other activists were from the Soweto Electricity Crisis Committee, Soweto Action Committee, South Durban Community Environmental Alliance, Earthlife Africa, groundWork, the South African Kashmir Action Group, and solidarity groups with Congo and Rwanda, as well as India’s National Alliance of People’s Movements, the Russian network Openleft.ru and .
Linking issues and constituents, they raised the people’s demands, which include ending exploitation, unemployment, climate change, pollution, violence against women, repression, surveillance, non-delivery of services, austerity, budget cuts, human rights abuses, rampant corruption, racism, xenophobia, extreme inequality, looting resources, subimperialism, neoliberalism, dictatorships and homophobia.
With South Africa hosting scores of BRICS-related events this year, as the official host, there is an enormous stress on generating a new hegemony. We feel this in Zimbabwe, where the heavy hand of South Africa has made achieving democracy much more difficult since the 1990s. Thankfully, there are Johannesburg allies who have begun a bottom-up process, with people from all BRICS nations and from the hinterlands of the BRICS countries, together fighting the climate change, plundering and so many other social evils.

The Burning Hot Planet

Robert Hunziker

A recent UK newspaper headline read “The World’s On Fire,” which is literally true as extraordinary continent-wide wildfires consume the planet, accompanied by unbearable, insufferable, oppressive heat. Europe, North America, Japan, and North Africa are all experiencing unprecedented scorching heat.
All of which begs the question of when anthropogenic, or human-caused, global warming will be recognized as a reality by America, the second biggest contributor of greenhouse gases (GHG).
Don’t look for confirmation from the Trump administration, the U.S. Senate or House, the leadership of America (ahem). They are all deniers, and thus have blocked any and all efforts of an American “Marshall Plan” for renewable energy.
The reality is that NASA warned the Senate about human-caused global warming way back in 1988. Thirty years later, the planet burns and America’s government has accomplished next to nothing, a big fat zero! In fact, the U.S. government is rolling back some regulations that slow down CO2 emissions. So, the USA is now onside with global warming, an advocate, all-in for more GHGs stoking more heat.
In sharp contrast to America, resourceful Germany is known as “the world’s first major renewable energy economy.” Over the first six months of 2018, “Germany produces enough renewable energy to power the country’s households for an entire year” (Source: Independent, July 2, 2018).
And, canny China has committed more funding (about $150B) to renewables over the past year than the EU and U.S. combined. As the U.S. looks to coal, China invests in renewable energy. China’s National Energy Administration ordered local governments to give priority access to renewable power generators. (Source: The Global Energiewende, Energy Transition, May 21, 2018)
Heat and fire: People hospitalized; People dying. In Japan alone 80 are dead from a pounding heat wave and 30,000+ hospitalized from heat stroke… oh, only 30,000, which number increases by the hour! Kumagaya 106F; Tokyo 104F.
Stifling heat engulfs the planet. Is this what global warming looks like? If not, then just imagine what the real thing looks like!
Nobody has made an official proclamation about the wherefores or causes of planetary heat, but one has to wonder whether anthropogenic global warming is the vicious monster standing behind the curtain. After all, there’s nobody assigned to officially announce the impact of human-influenced global warming, but it sure feels like it!
Temps like 120F in Chino, California are far, far above normal. And, how about 124F in Quargla, Africa? Or, even more bizarre yet, 74 heat wave deaths in Quebec, way up north.
It is indisputable that the planet is not handling the heat very well, but is it the planet’s fault? Did an angry, upset, abused, never loved Mother Earth wake up one day and decide to burn-up? Doubtful.
More likely, some outside force like Homo sapiens (which is Latin for “wise man”) pushed emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) too far for far too long.
In fact, the science is absolutely 100% clear: It’s indisputable that, over time, GHGs blanket the atmosphere and act like an oven… imagine that!
BBC science editor David Shukman says the striking feature of today’s multiple heat waves happening at the same time is the jet stream. It is meandering in gigantic wacky loops, thus altering climate throughout the Northern Hemisphere as it stalls for long periods of time, trapping zones of high pressure, cloudless, windless, extremely hot zones.
Interestingly enough, for some years now climate scientists have warned that global warming is impacting the Arctic 2-3xs faster than the planet as a whole, which, in turn, throws off normal well-defined spinning jet streams at 39,000 feet into wacky deep prolonged loops that alter weather patterns throughout the hemisphere. Take a guess as to what’s happening now….
Answer: In an article in New Scientist, “Warming Arctic Could Be Behind Heatwave Sweeping Northern Hemisphere,” d/d July 24th according to the UK Meteorological Office: ”The heatwave across much of the northern hemisphere could continue for weeks, and possibly even months. And, accelerated warming in the Arctic compared to the rest of the planet could be a key contributor.”

The Danger Zone
According to Arctic News, Can We Weather The Danger Zone? d/d July 1, 2018: “Earth may have long crossed the 1.5°C guardrail set at the Paris Agreement (2015).” Further to the point, the Danger Zone was likely surpassed as early as 2014 based upon NASA data adjusted to reflect the preindustrial baseline, air temps, and Arctic temps (not in agreement with mainstream science).
And, more distressing yet, according to the same Arctic News story: “The world may also be crossing the higher 2°C guardrail later this year, while temperatures threaten to keep rising dramatically beyond that point.”
What? According to the IPCC and the Paris Agreement 2015, countries “voluntarily” (oh, well) agreed to hold back GHGs to prevent exceeding the dreaded 2°C guardrail until 2100, and hopefully beyond. Wow! It’s not even 2020 yet. Is global warming 80 years ahead of schedule?
The Arctic News article suspiciously reads like the onset of runaway global warming. To confirm that suspicion, Arctic News claims (and here’s where it gets kinda scary crazy): “…much carbon is stored in large and vulnerable pools that have until now been kept stable by low temperatures. The threat is that rapid temperature rise will hit vulnerable carbon pools hard, making them release huge amounts of greenhouse gases, further contributing to the acceleration of the temperature rise.”
Does that describe Runaway Global Warming? Answer: Yes!
Examples of massive carbon pools: Permafrost – 900 Gt; High-Latitude Peatlands – 400 Gt; Tropical Peatlands 100 Gt; Methane Hydrates 10,000 Gt, and more (one gigaton is equivalent to one-billion metric tons or equivalent to 100,000,000 elephants).
Unfortunately, those massive carbon pools are exposed to unbelievable hot temps recorded at the farthest northern reaches, for example, 92.3°F on the Siberian coastline of the Arctic Ocean, which is permafrost country and methane hydrate territory. Oh really, Miami Beach temps in Siberia?
Maybe the U.S. should alter its climate change/global warming stance re: (1) the Paris ’15 Agreement by joining ASAP and (2) cancel the interminable Republican (mostly) denial about human-caused global warming, or more formally known as: “The Great American Global Warming School of Denial,” nowadays propagated by Trump and minions, especially as runaway global warming appears to be at an incipient stage, or maybe worse.
On the other hand, when is too late too late?
But, then again, thinking more about it: DO SOMETHING!

Keeping Russia as an Enemy

Brian Cloughley

“Russia is the most significant threat just because they pose the only existential threat to the country right now.”
— General John Hyten, Commander US Strategic Command, February 2, 2018
“A Russian space capsule carrying three astronauts has docked with the International Space Station two days after it was launched from Kazakhstan . . . It is carrying Serena Aunon-Chancellor of the United States, Sergey Prokopyev of Russia and German Alexander Gerst.”
— Media Reports, June 8, 2018
Following on from the modest movement towards détente achieved at the Putin-Trump meeting, what next?
Anything but détente, it seems.
US media outlets, followed by those of the UK and some other western countries, went nigh on berserk with fury, and the war-supporters in Washington have been shrill to the point of hysteria. Their paranoia about Russia, never far from the surface, has burst through with a vengeance.
Another predictable result has been escalation of the West’s anti-Russia propaganda campaign which has been gathering momentum for years.
Remember the Sochi Winter Olympics?  They took place in 2014 and as noted by the International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach, “were a great success” because “the Russians provided seamless organization. Sochi promised excellent sports venues, outstanding Olympic Villages and impeccable organization. It delivered all that it promised. The athletes themselves praised every aspect. . . it is clear that Sochi provided many lasting legacies.”
Unfortunately, the only legacy in the West is irritation that the Sochi Olympics were so well planned and mega-successful. And there is resentment and even rage that such success was repeated when Russia hosted the 2018 football World Cup Competition so efficiently.
The West finds it infuriating that the competition went so well.  I am no football fan, but I watched a bit of the BBC’s coverage following the final game when a reporter interviewed English football fans in Moscow and tried to guide them into saying something critical about Russia. But they were all extremely supportive of Russia and said they had enjoyed their stay and that everything had been perfect. How annoying.
Intriguingly, there is no BBC internet link to that piece of reporting, but I didn’t dream it.  Nor did I dream that BBC television ignored the closing ceremony, although Rupert Murdoch’s Sun newspaper told the world that “those who did see the closing ceremony were left unimpressed as it was described as ‘boring’ by fans.” But of course.  How could it possibly be anything else? It took place in Russia, after all.
The only piece of juicy nastiness that could be grabbed and blazoned to the world by the Western media before the World Cup Competition ended so successfully was a minor incident at the final match. This was quickly publicized, with, for example, the US CBS television network reporting that “a posse of pitch invaders interrupted the match before quickly being accosted and dragged — not so nicely — off the pitch. The real question is, how in the world do this many people even get on the pitch?”  (At a football match in London in March this year “hundreds of fans charged along the concourse” and the owners of one of the football teams that were playing “had to leave the directors’ box for their own safety as the London Stadium descended into chaos.”  That’s how people get on the pitch in England.)
Facts often confuse the Western mainstream media, and the “posse” invading the pitch consisted of only four people who were swiftly removed.  But not before the intellectual Mr Jason Burt, Chief Football Correspondent of the London Daily Telegraph informed the world that “security guards ran onto the grass immediately to tackle the pitch invaders and grab them all very quickly. And it’s off to the Gulag for them. Well done lads, you’ll enjoy your lifetime in a Russian prison.”
It is this sort of outrageous and totally imbecilic comment that illustrates the attitude of much of the West to Russia. And it is clever and attractive in a propaganda sense, being pithy and quick and nerve-striking, because so many westerners think they know all about gulags.
As recounted by the commentator Garret Epps in The Atlantic in March 2018, “In 1973, the great Russian writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn coined the term ‘Gulag Archipelago’ to denote the Soviet system of political prisons and labor camps. In the last 25 years, the United States has, without fanfare, brought into being a kind of Enforcement and Removal Operations’ Archipelago — secretive, loosely supervised, and, in human and constitutional rights terms, deeply problematic. And the ‘system’ will, if the current administration carries forward its enforcement plans, grow significantly larger year by year.” The US gulag archipelago is firmly in place.
But in the minds of so many of the Western world, that have been ever-so-gently brainwashed over the years of the New Cold War, ‘gulags’ are forever Russian, and they are ready for pitch invaders.
Cold War Two is thriving, having been initiated and fostered by West and especially by the Pentagon and much of Congress, whose members benefit enormously from cash donations by weapons’ manufacturers whose generosity so far this election cycle has totaled $19,332,442 in traceable hand-outs.  The Pentagon is reported as having calculated that “overseas weapons sales by US firms rose $8.3 billion from 2016 to 2017, with American arms makers moving a total of $41.9 billion in advanced weaponry to foreign militaries last year.”  There is profit in supporting confrontation.
Development of the new Cold War was described succinctly in February 2018 by Stephen F Cohen, professor emeritus of Russian Studies and Politics at NYU and Princeton, in that “[President] Clinton pursued winner-take-all policies consistent with viewing Russia as a defeated power, presiding over a massive intrusive crusade to shape that former rival into ‘the Russia we want’;  beginning the expansion of NATO, now on Russia’s borders; and bombing Moscow’s traditional Slav ally Serbia in 1999, despite Yeltsin’s protests. Indeed, the extreme vilification of Putin by former members of the Clinton administration, including Hillary Clinton, who equated him with Hitler, are not unrelated to their unwise Russia policies of the 1990s — loudly applauded, it should be added, by media journalists now also in the forefront of demonizing the current Kremlin leader.”
The Western media and what is now called the ‘deep state’ — the power clique, somewhat akin or even complementary to the military-industrial complex spotlighted by President Eisenhower almost sixty years ago — are intent on portraying Russia as a warmongering expansionist state, but they never mention the fact that, as recorded in the 2018 World Report of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute “In 2017 the USA spent more on its military [$610 billion] than the next seven highest-spending countries combined. . . . at $66.3 billion, Russia’s military spending in 2017 was 20 per cent lower than in 2016.”
The New York Times summed up the Washington Establishment’s attitude to the Putin-Trump July 16 talks with the headline “Trump Opens His Arms to Russia. His Administration Closes Its Fist.”  Entirely coincidentally, three days before the meeting, Washington’s best and brightest announced that twelve Russians had been indicted for allegedly interfering with the US elections in 2016.   The word “allegedly” was rarely used by the West’s mainstream media, and the fact that no evidence of any sort has been presented to backup up the allegations has been completely ignored. The automatic verdict is that Russia is guilty of whatever charges might be levelled, just as in Britain the blame for an incident of poisoning has been laid firmly at Russia’s door without a shred of proof that Russia was involved.
Make no mistake:  the man Trump is the worst president the US has ever had.  He is, in the well-chosen words of the commentator Robert Reich, a “selfish, thin-skinned, petulant, lying, narcissistic, boastful megalomaniac.”  But — it seems he wants to talk and negotiate with Russia, rather than indulging in ceaseless confrontation.
Trump has long expressed interest in improving ties with Russia, and the recent summit was his first real opportunity for doing so. Yet it will be difficult for this progress to have any permanence with so many in the Military-Industrial Complex uniting to undermine it.  The Deep State’s fury and bitterness will not die down, and its propaganda campaigns will continue to fuel the Second Cold War.  Exporting weapons is most lucrative, and many big-ticket items are scheduled to be sold to European countries, which is why it’s important to keep Russia as an enemy.

Fake news, lynchings and mobocracy in India

 Abid Ahmad Shah 

India is the country of people belonging to varied regions, religions, sects, communities, castes; etc.From the past times till date, the multiculturalism and plural ethos of this country has set a strong precedent to the world about this land of diversity. This country is the country of its natives, be it hindus ,muslims,sikhs,christians,parsis,buddhists,etc.No one can escape its identity at the same time. This belongs to as much to one and sundry.
Gone are the days when there was narrow communication in the world due to a number of varied factors and barriers. However, it was the medium of communication which brought to fore the exchanges between the masses down the human history. Down the phases of passing times, communication surged to a remarkable extent and with the arrival of new scientific inventions and discoveries and paraphernalia, day in and day out, the channels of communication widened the world over and narrowed the communication gap with a renewed sway after the inroads of media in the world nation states. Media is considered to be the third eye and fourth pillar of a democracy. The recent century has seen a surge in the ascendency of media in general and social media in Particular, like, facebook, whatsapp, instagram, orkut, etc.Today, there are millions of users of the social networking sites in the world and in India too.
Today, the news in buzz becomes rapidly rampant and circulates at the skyrocket speed due to increased delivery over mass media platforms. News that originates in one part of the globe spreads like wild fire and it is the common man who is the sole player in the whole process. The post-truth era has even added a new framework of the news analysis. However, one cannot blindly believe in what one reads, hears or has a say about. Reality check is must for the same. Nowadays, the increase in the news platforms has seen such an upswing that it becomes a problematic affair for the common man to differentiate between reality and virtuality that is, real news and fake news. Single fake news generated and forwarded by a single foe of humanity destroys the whole fabric of the society and leads to ultimate social disorder and chaos.
Fake news is the new buzzword of the current times which has created an unhealthy atmosphere and given impetus to the anti-democratic forces and anti-human forces to run amuck and create fake and false narratives on the social networking sites or thereto so on and so forth about the people, which cause ultimately lynching of the people under the guise of wrong information and mere suspicion in India. This has wreaked havoc in India and snatched the precious lives of the innocent persons who have become victims of these unruly mobs.
This problem of lynch mobs is not only a law and order problem of the current times, but a major challenge to our democratic credentials of rule of law which has brought disrepute to India ,the world over in general and constitutional provisions in particular. Article 21 guarantees right to life to every tom, dick and harry of India. To snatch the life of a common Indian citizen through the vehicle of mobocracy is not only the violation of our democracy, but also tantamount to the murder of democracy.
India which is the largest democracy in the world is unfortunately metamorphosing into the mobocracy. The recent killing of the innocent victims at the behest of lynching mobs through brutal beating of rods, sticks and bricks is a tragic phase of our democratic slump.It was the tool of messenger which created the fake news and a wrong narrative of child-lifters in one part of the country, leading to the bloodbath of the innocent victims and added a bad and an unholy chapter to the historical chronicles of the times in India. Muslims are also the soft targets of these goons under the facade of beef mania. The overt and covert attempts of the cow vigilantes have already snatched the life of a number of Muslims, be it Ikhlaq of Dadri, or someone else.The recent lynching of Akbar Khan a muslim in Alwar,Rajasthan by cow vigilantes is a next gory chapter of brutalism in the name of vigilantism,which invited ire of congress leader Rahul Gandhi.The near lynching attempt of a muslim man under the wrong information of slaughter is a blot for our composite culture-laden Jammu and Kashmir,particularly those who have no regard of the old aged persons and cannot differntiate between cattle herders and slaughterers.Meanwhile,U.P. Chief  Minister has recently in an interview to a national channel said that there must be respect for the religious sentiments so far as faith is concerned.
The weird mob mentality of people and wrong and fake narratives about the people adds fuel to the fire. In India,a single encounter of the people with a Kashmiri person ,be  it a student, researcher, job aspirant, intellectual, tourist, patient,etc. adds a taunt of Pakistani narrative and militant name from the people of mainland India about the same fellow. Who has given the people the right to call the names of Kashmiri’s with such utterances? It is the media with a biased attitude that has constructed such very fake-cum-false narratives about the people of Kashmir and engulfed the psyche of the people who are seen with a needle of suspicion everywhere and elsewhere they go. Last year, when a video over social media appeared, wherein an old man of district Anantnag perhaps was seen saying that he along with another Kashmiri fellow were hurled invectives and abuses upon while travelling in some part of the country and people had called them as Atankwadi (terrorists) being Kashmiris.Not only this, People of North-East are also taunted everywhere, even in Delhi metros, with names.The attack on Kashmiri students last year in Haryana who were studying in Haryana’s central university by goons has time and again raised question about the safety and security of the valley students studying in differnet parts of the country.Even,People from Bihar are seen with a narrow and a different perspective. How sad and pathetic? While travelling in a DTC bus in New Delhi way back in 2011, a women hurled invectives on a person, calling him Bihari with ensuing taunts, who remained as a mute spectator at the scene. This can be called as the oral lynching of the people’s conscience of other parts of the country.
Cutting long story short, the problem of lynching has to cease, once for all in India. The role of government is mandatory and primary and people’s secondary. Without the intervention of strong law or making of a strong ordinance, the problem will continue to persist and loom largely in the land of sufis, sages, saints, seculars of India and what not and haunt the memories of people in the days to come.
Government needs to rope in a strong law to neutralise the menace of mobocracy and lynching’s in India.Also, social networking sites need to introspect and doubly-verify the news, before they forward it to the users. If the same situation persists in near future, India will be under the shade of complete mobocracy with ruling mobs without any fear of law and justice, where rule of law will be sidelined to the margins of the written confines of the document of Indian constitution, without any practicability of the same .