20 Jul 2019

UK: Bed shortages cause increasing reliance on emergency beds in NHS hospitals

Ben Trent

Due to the rising demand for hospital beds in the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) has become more reliant on the use of temporary or emergency beds for patients.
“Escalation beds,” which are supposed to alleviate peaks in demand during the winter months, are being routinely deployed due to the lack of beds across all hospitals.
A study for the British Medical Association (BMA), based on Freedom of Information requests, discovered that on March 3, a total of 3,428 escalation beds were in use despite the easing of the winter spike. By May 1, at least 1,637 escalation beds were still being used—according to results provided by only 80 (a third) of the 240 NHS trusts in England.
The Independent article reporting the study noted that “Four out of five NHS hospitals are relying on emergency surgical beds to provide enough space for routine patients as they try to keep up with soaring demand. …”
It added, “If a surgical bed is unavailable operations may have to be cancelled, this adds to already significant waiting lists which have seen waits for cancer treatment and routine operations grow ‘unacceptably.’”
NHS England chief Simon Stevens warned a few days previously that “We are now at a point where our hospital bed stock is overly pressurised, and in many parts of the country we are going to need—backed up by extra nurses—increased capacity, not decreased.” Stevens warned that this was “quite a significant gear shift” for the NHS.
Stevens put the year-round use of emergency beds in the context of the loss of almost 15,000 beds since 2010. But his figures are an underestimation.
In England, total bed capacity has been slashed from 160,254 in 2009 to 129,992 in 2019, according to official NHS England figures. Over the same period, available beds for mental illness and learning disability have been cut by a third, from 29,330 to 19,368.
Over the past 30 years, NHS bed capacity has been halved by Labour and Conservative governments. Bed occupancy rates have reached dangerous levels, jeopardising patient safety and efficiency as a result.
The average occupancy rate for general and acute beds (open overnight) runs above 90 percent, according to the latest figures. However, the “safe” and most efficient level is considered to be 85 percent.
Last month, Dr. Nick Scriven, the president of the Society for Acute Medicine, warned that “[t]he system is now so reliant on this ‘extra capacity’ that most hospitals cannot survive even minor changes in pressure that occur. Even just a weekend can throw some into chaos, with beds opening on a Sunday and taking until the Thursday to close on a never-ending cycle.”
This month Scriven stepped up his warnings to declare that a significant health disaster could rapidly overwhelm the NHS. He declared: “This is meant to be the time when services are least stretched and staff have an opportunity to draw breath but the numbers are staggering—more than 17,500 people needing emergency admission every day in June with a 5 percent increase in 12 months and the number of patients ‘stuck’ in acute beds is identical to this time last year (4,500).
“These two mean the pressure remains relentless and people are suffering delays in getting care, notably the 12-hour breach number was 375 percent more this June compared to 2018.
“As we lurch from one period of pressure to another without any noticeable respite there is now an incredibly serious worry on the horizon in Australian flu which could cause chaos in the UK.
“If the experience in Australia—75,000 cases up on the same period in 2018—is replicated then we would see a similar situation to the ‘bad’ winter of 2017 well before we move into winter proper.
“It would be unknown how the NHS would cope given that even in the middle of summer many of our hospitals still have a large proportion of so-called extra capacity in use.”
One example, reported in the local BirminghamLive website, was the Accident and Emergency department in Walsall’s Manor Hospital receiving 311 admissions on June 24, breaking the previous record within a 24-hour period by 18 patients. This is part of a trend of year-on-year increases, typically in April and May.
Manor Hospital Chief Executive Richard Beeken said there was a “greater number of referrals for admission than we have been able to cope with within our core bed base,” adding, “During April, May and June we have seen huge strain placed upon our urgent care services.”
The BMA is campaigning for a further 10,000 patient beds for the NHS.
This comes amid the release of results of the annual inpatient survey conducted by the Care Quality Commission (CQC). The results from 76,000 hospital patients surveyed in July 2018 are the worst in 10 years.
One in 10 said that they should have been admitted to hospital “a lot” sooner. Almost one in six “definitely” felt they had waited too long to get a bed on a ward after admission. Less than 60 percent of respondents said that they could get help from a member of staff in reasonable time, whilst only 37 percent of respondents answered affirmatively that they could find a member of staff to discuss their fears and worries.
Of the findings Dr. Scriven stated, “They show that despite the often heroic efforts of staff on the ground, the relentless pressures building in the system for years on end are starting to take a toll.”
Professor Ted Baker, the chief inspector of hospitals at the CQC, declared, “The mounting pressure on the system is having a direct impact on how people are experiencing inpatient care.”
The NHS is in the grip of a complete collapse, where all the resources are under incalculable levels of strain, after the deliberate assaults by successive governments over the last decade. The 71-year-old public institution is being dismantled and sold off to private bidders, piece by piece.
The terrible impact of relentless attacks on the NHS is underscored in a recent report, “Ending the Blame Game,” by the Institute for Public Policy Research think tank. It found that reversals in public health initiatives led to fully 131,000 preventable deaths since 2012.
The reason the cuts have been able to proceed is due to the lack of any opposition from the Labour Party and its partners in the trade union bureaucracy.
Dame Donna Kinnair, chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), praised the conniving RCN leadership after they rammed through a rotten sell-out pay deal in 2018 as “a credit to nursing and our organisation.”
Labour’s shadow health secretary, Jonathan Ashworth, offered token criticism, declaring, “The Tories and, in coalition, the Lib Dems, have run down the NHS and imposed the biggest funding squeeze in its history.” Yet, when the Tories unveiled their Long Term Plan, which sanctions further attacks on the NHS, he did not object to the principles that underlay it—that of further opening up the NHS to private investment through Integrated Provider Contracts (ICPs).

Canada’s Liberal government steps up internet censorship with creation of new media fund

Penny Smith & Roger Jordan

In a further step aimed at strengthening state control over the internet and digital content, Canada’s Liberal government has announced a multi-million dollar media fund to be distributed to outlets deemed to be producing “authoritative content.” The $600 million fund, to be launched this fall, will be dispensed by an eight-member government-appointed committee.
The fund, made up of tax credits and incentives to be handed out over the next five years, was first announced last November, under the guise of protecting “the vital role that independent news media play in our democracy and in our communities.”
Behind all of the bogus talk about defending “independent media” outlets and “Canadian journalism,” the new funding structures are explicitly aimed at censoring the internet in the lead up to and following this fall’s federal election. They are part of a global assault on democratic rights and freedom of speech by ruling elites in every country, which has found its most graphic illustration in the persecution of publisher and journalist Julian Assange and courageous whistleblower Chelsea Manning.
Underlining the international character of the censorship efforts, Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland co-hosted the Global Media Freedom Conference earlier this month with British Foreign Minister Jeremy Hunt, who has repeatedly vowed to hand Assange over to the Trump administration.
Promoting a meeting that took place just seven miles from Assange’s prison cell, where he is being held alongside terrorists and convicted criminals for the “crime” of exposing the global conspiracies of US imperialism and its allies, Freeland’s foreign ministry sought to strike a pose of concern for journalistic integrity. “Canada and the UK are working together to defend media freedom and improve the safety of journalists who report across the world,” declares Global Affairs Canada on its website in a passage that would not be out of place in Orwell’s 1984 .
The very language used by the Trudeau government to justify the creation of the media fund, replete with references to “authoritative content” and “independent news outlets,” recalls nothing so much as Google’s wide-ranging internet censorship program. Launched in April 2017, the global push to demote news sites deemed undesirable to the powers that be led to a sharp drop in traffic for left-wing, anti-war and socialist publications, the World Socialist Web Site chief among them.
The government’s hand-picked committee will include representatives from News Media Canada, the Association de la presse francophone, the Quebec Community Newspaper Association, the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada, the Canadian Association of Journalists, the Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec, Unifor, and the Fédération nationale des communications.
This advisory panel is anything but independent. The fact that the Liberals have included Unifor, Canada’s largest trade union that represents 12,000 journalists, underscores that Trudeau views the unions as a key pillar of support for the capitalist state and its policies of austerity and war. Over the past three decades, Unifor and the union bureaucracy as a whole have sabotaged and suppressed working class struggles. The Liberals therefore have full confidence that the Unifor bureaucrats will prove invaluable in supporting the state-led offensive against voices of opposition and dissent.
Unifor backed the Liberals in the 2015 election campaign, while Unifor president Jerry Dias acted as a trusted advisor to the Liberal government during the renegotiation of NAFTA. This fact has prompted the only criticism of the fund within ruling circles, with the official opposition Conservative Party declaring that the Trudeau government is stuffing the panel with pro-Liberal representatives.
Predictably, the Tories have expressed no concern with the initiative’s fundamentally anti-democratic and authoritarian premises. This is because all of the major parties, including the Liberals, Tories, and NDP, have been complicit in the erection of the scaffolding of a police state over the past 15 years in the name of fighting “terrorism.”
The media fund is the latest step Ottawa is taking towards expanding the power of the state to control and censor digital content. It follows a series of international meetings and coordinated measures that Prime Minister Trudeau claims are aimed at keeping Canadians safe from “foreign interference,” principally from Russia and China.
The threat of “foreign interference” in the coming federal election was laid out by the Communications Security Establishment, which is part of the US National Security Agency-led “Five Eyes” global spying network, in its update to a report titled “Cyber Threats to Canada’s Democratic Process” released in April. The report assessed that it is very likely Canadian voters will encounter foreign cyber interference ahead of, and during, the 2019 general election.
Shortly after, Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland announced during a G7 foreign ministers meeting in France that “Our judgment is that interference [in the federal election] is very likely and we think there have probably already been efforts by malign foreign actors to disrupt our democracy.”
In mid May, at the “Christchurch call” summit in Paris where heads of state and big tech officials discussed a closer working relationship, Trudeau announced plans for a Digital Charter to increase the regulation of the tech sector. The Canada Declaration on Electoral Integrity, released later the same month and signed by the government and social media companies, commits social media platforms to “intensify efforts” to combat “disinformation” and “promote safeguards that effectively help address cybersecurity incidents.”
Regarding social media regulation, Trudeau announced at a meeting before the International Grand Committee on Big Data, Privacy and Democracy, “I’d much rather do it in partnership with platforms but, if it comes down to it, we will take measures that we will regret having to take because our imperative is to keep citizens safe.”
After details on the Digital Charter were published in late May, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains warned in vague terms that “violations of the laws and regulations that support these principles” will result in “clear, meaningful penalties.”
It is unclear whether “meaningful penalties” mean millions of dollars in fines for press outlets and tech firms, or worse, the persecution, imprisonment, and torture of individual journalists and political dissidents like Assange, who faces extradition to the United States on espionage charges for revealing the global war crimes and conspiracies of US imperialism.
Ottawa’s turn to digital censorship is further reflected in federal budget 2019. Measures to “safeguard Canadian democracy” include $19.4 million in funding over four years for the Department of Canadian Heritage to launch the Digital Democracy Project, an international initiative led by Canada aimed at creating “guiding principles” for combating online “disinformation”, and the Digital Citizen Initiative aimed at educating the public on “deceptive practices” used online.
Confronted with growing worker militancy and mass opposition to government policy, the Canadian ruling class in collaboration with its imperialist allies is setting out to establish and formalize mechanisms for state censorship.
The turn towards internet censorship and other authoritarian practices must be seen in the context of rising working class militancy against right-wing provincial regimes in Ontario and Quebec.
As the right-wing populist premiers Doug Ford and Francois Legault gut public services and workers’ rights, the ruling elite as a whole fears that the mounting protests could erupt into an all-out challenge to the agenda of capitalist austerity and war supported by all of the established parties. This includes the Trudeau government, which has hiked military spending by over 70 percent and collaborated with the Trump administration’s far-right crackdown on refugees and immigrants.

Riot police attack Athens protest against Airbnb as housing costs soar

John Vassilopoulos

Riot police armed with clubs and tear gas attacked protesters in Athens last Thursday night. The demonstration was called to oppose Airbnb and other short-letting platforms that have hiked up house prices in the Greek capital.
The attack by riot police came one day after Draconian law-and-order plans were unveiled after the first cabinet meeting of the newly elected conservative New Democracy (ND) government. These include the re-establishment of the notorious DELTA rapid response police unit, with the hiring of 1,500 officers both for DELTA and the motorcycle DIAS.
All security-related departments, including those covering migration policy, are to be placed under a single “super-ministry,” which will come under the jurisdiction of newly appointed Citizen Protection Minister Michalis Chryssochoidis.
Around 80 mostly young people marched through the Athens district of Koukaki. The proliferation of short-term lets in the area around the Acropolis and other tourist attractions has resulted in a lack of affordable housing for locals.
Police and mainstream media outlets claimed riot police acted in response to protesters attacking them with sticks and stones, resulting in two policemen sustaining light injuries.
However, this was contradicted by several eyewitnesses who described the police attack as unprovoked.
Riot police assault demonstrators in Athens
video posted on Facebook shows four riot policemen attacking a protester while two others try to protect him. In the background, passers-by scream at the police to stop, including an older tourist who approaches the police, shouting in English, “Stop doing this! Stop, please!”
A separate video shows a man with head injuries sitting on the pavement being tended to by members of the public while a group of riot police look on. The man was later reportedly arrested.
Man with head injuries after assault by riot police
Commenting on the attack, the video’s poster wrote, “If this happens on a march of hardly 100 people…on Koukaki’s central-most pedestrian area and blatantly in front of passers-by…you can imagine how far [this government’s] violence and repression can go.”
Speaking to lifo.gr, a local resident who witnessed the attacks from her balcony also said the protest had been entirely peaceful: “Young people were shouting slogans against Airbnb and giving out flyers. I did not see any of the kids holding wooden sticks. … I don’t know if there was a verbal altercation between protesters and police. Even if there was, this does not justify tear gas and violence. … We’re not even talking about anti-establishment activists or veteran anarchists from the Exarchia district. Just young people who are protesting because they can’t live in their own neighbourhood.”
The same resident described police actions towards one of the protesters: “They beat the living daylights out of that kid. We were shouting from our balconies, but they did not stop.”
According to a survey published by Airbnb in 2016, Koukaki came fifth out of 16 “top trending neighbourhoods.” It had experienced a massive 800 percent growth in short-term guests the previous year. A quick search on Greek lettings site xe.gr brings up just over 100 properties currently available for rent in the area. This compares to more than 800 properties in Koukaki that are listed on short-term platforms like Airbnb and HomeAway. The same explosion in short-term letting is reportedly taking place in neighbourhoods across the Athens metropolitan area.
The bulk of these properties, in many cases entire blocks of flats, form part of property portfolios of mostly foreign investors taking advantage of Athens’ relatively low property values compared with the rest of Europe. A Golden Visa programme launched in July 2013 offers five years’ residency to real estate investors who spend at least €250,000 on property. According to data compiled by Inside Airbnb, nearly half of Airbnb hosts in Athens have multiple properties listed under their account.
A report published by Kathimerini noted: “According to data analytics company AirDNA, the commercial triangle surrounding Plaka and Monastiraki has 1,181 properties, mostly high-quality, generating an average monthly income for their owners (based on 80 percent occupancy) of around 1,625 euros. The second most lucrative Airbnb neighborhood is Acropolis, with an average monthly income of 1,430 euros and 321 listings, followed by Thiseio (1,300 euros and 268 listings), Koukaki-Makriyianni (1,275 euros and 684 listings) and Kerameikos (1,264 euros and 213 listings).”
Just hours after the incident in Koukaki, outgoing Syriza Deputy Citizen Protection Minister Katerina Papakosta could not even bring herself to raise a serious protest, stating on her Facebook page that “the current prime minister has said that there will be no acts of lawlessness under his government…let every logical and intelligent citizen be the judge of that.”
Having lost the election, the pseudo-left Syriza has no intention of abandoning its march to the right. Having junked its mandate to end austerity only months after being elected at the start of 2015, the outgoing Syriza government routinely deployed riot police units to attack demonstrations against its austerity policies. Syriza also deployed riot police against desperate migrants and refugees interned in squalid camps such as Moria on the island of Lesbos as part of the European Union’s reactionary immigration agenda. The ND government will continue these policies.
It was under Syriza’s watch that Airbnb became prevalent in Athens. According to statistics from Inside Airbnb, since 2015 listings have increased exponentially. Meanwhile, rents in Athens as a whole grew by an average of 50 percent—but more than doubling in Koukaki.
Meanwhile, wages have continued to fall. The median income in the private sector is not even €900 a month. Based on current prices for a 70-square-metre apartment in Athens, more than half this median income would go towards rent.

France: Delevoye report prepares the slashing of pensions by Macron

Anthony Torres 

After 18 months of consultations, the high commissioner for pension reform, Jean Paul Delevoye, will today provide French President Emmanuel Macron with his recommendations for an attack on pensions to be implemented in the autumn. The announcement will be of great social and political significance. Despite widespread social anger and the isolation of the ruling class revealed in the mass “yellow vest” protests, the Macron government is making no concessions. It is accelerating the campaign to destroy the social rights established after the Second World War and the fall of fascism.
This morning, Delevoye, together with the minister of health and solidarity, Agnès Buzyn, will receive the trade unions and employers who have been involved in the consultations for more than a year, before submitting his report to Prime Minister Edouard Philippe. The pension reform bill will be introduced in the fall. However, it will not be debated in Parliament until 2020, after the municipal elections, given its obvious unpopularity, and will come into force in 2025.
The new “universal” points-based pension system will replace the 42 current pension schemes. Pensions will be calculated based on the number of quarters that an employee has worked. They will no longer be calculated using the best 25 years for private employees and the last six months of work in the case of civil servants. This will equate to major reductions in pension payments, particularly since the “points” accrued by workers have no fixed value, and can be lowered at any time by the government.
While the retirement age will formally remain 62, in practice it will be determined by a so-called equilibrium age of 64. Those who retire before 64 will have their payment cut, as for workers who currently leave before the retirement age. In other words, the effective retirement age for a full pension is being raised by two years.
While the financial aristocracy is building up the repressive apparatus of the state to mobilise against the working class, these professions will not be affected by the pension cuts. The police, which physically repress workers and young people, as well as customs officers and prison guards, will retain their early retirement age of 57 or even 52 years.
In contrast, urgent care workers in the public hospital system, who have struck against the lack of resources and the onerous conditions of work, will retire under the same terms as their private colleagues. Even with a clause accounting for the physically taxing nature of their work, they will be able to retire on a full pension at 60 at the earliest.
A further reduction has been planned in the subsidy provided to workers who make so-called insufficient contributions to their pension, in the name of balancing the pension system by 2025. However, the government has opted not to implement this in the current budget, as had been foreshadowed. This is in order to ensure the implementation of the overall pension reform, and reduce the threat of mass opposition in the working class escaping outside the control of the trade unions—which have already been weakened by the “yellow vest” protests. The measure will be postponed until either after the municipal elections of 2020 or the social security financing bill of 2021.
When asked about the presentation of the Delevoye report, the unions hypocritically sought to cover their long collaboration with the government in negotiating the attack. Frédéric Sève of the CFDT said on Thursday, “[W]e hope there will be a credible, constructive approach that takes into account the reality of work and the difficulty of certain processions, to avoid a brutal standardisation.”
The award for hypocrisy went to Philippe Martinez, the head of the General Confederation of Labour (CGT). “The main victims of this reform will be the precarious, the temporary workers, who will not have a full career,” he said. He added the claim that the retirement age being maintained at 62 was “really taking us for fools.” Having said all this, however, Martinez added casually that “something must be done” to finance pensions.
As with the other reforms of Macron and his predecessors, the unions have participated in the so-called social dialogue to work out the destruction of the Labour Code, the privatisation of the national railway network, and the slashing of unemployment benefits. The criticisms that the unions are now theatrically proclaiming have already been worked out behind the scenes with the employers and the government for 18 months. The unions know what is being carried out by the government and support it.
It is a lie that these cuts are necessary because there is no money. Billionaires in France have tripled their assets since the 2008 crash. Bernard Arnault, the head of the luxury fashion group LVMH, recently surpassed the $100 billion threshold, and surpassed Bill Gates as the world’s second richest man. The European Central Bank has showered billions in public funds upon the financial institutions and banks over the past decade. But corporations and governments are seeking to boost profitability and competitiveness while slashing social spending to free up resources for massive military budget increases and preparations for war.
The ruling class directly finances the majority of the trade unions’ revenues, which is why these corporatist apparatuses and their political allies refused to mobilise any struggle in support of the “yellow vest” protests or in opposition to Macron’s anti-social policies. Instead, the unions, with Martinez at the forefront, slandered the “yellow vests” and declared they were in the pay of the bosses and the far right.
Social opposition is growing across Europe to militarism and austerity, expressed in this year’s national teachers’ strike in Poland and strikes in Portugal, Belgium and Germany against the freezing of inflation-adjusted wage increases. The ruling class, however, is offering no social concessions. The banks are imposing an authoritarian policy, riding roughshod over the views of the vast majority of the population.
Confronted with the growing opposition of workers and youth, Macron is basing himself on and expanding the police-state measures enacted in the wake of the former Socialist Party government’s state of emergency. The attacks now being carried out against the working class can only be carried out only through the building of an authoritarian regime. Thus, Macron hails Pétain, the leader of the Vichy collaborationist regime, and arrests hundreds of “yellow vests” who protested his government on Bastille Day, leading them to empty warehouses surrounded by barbed wire.
The unions, which are hostile to any movement against Macron, have presented the legitimate demands for social equality of the “yellow vests” as the actions of the far right. This is a lie. Macron’s pension cuts show that the unions are the accomplices of the employers and the government in imposing austerity and covering the preparations for an authoritarian regime.
The way forward is the preparation of an international struggle of the working class, independent of the trade union apparatuses, in a movement to overthrow capitalism and transfer power to the workers.

The European Union expands its war against refugees

Marianne Arens

There is growing worldwide outrage at the numbers of refugees dying in the Mediterranean and the inhumane conditions in Libyan refugee camps, where people are tortured and die horrifically. After the courageous captain of the Sea Watch, Carola Rackete, landed shipwrecked asylum seekers in Lampedusa, defying an Italian government ban, more than half a million people signed a petition supporting her and quickly raised €1.5 million for her legal defence. Sixty German cities and towns agreed to accept the refugees.
The EU has responded with new plans to expand its war on refugees. It is considering military operations in the civil war in Libya and in the Sahel to take over prisons and establish new concentration camps, which are referred to as “transit centres” and “disembarkation platforms.” Military patrols are to block the coast of the Maghreb. Alongside the EU Foreign and Home Affairs Ministers meetings taking place this week, more and more similar demands are being raised.
A week ago, the Bild ran with the headline, “Does the military have to take care of order in Libya?” It quoted retired General Lothar Domröse demanding that soldiers from EU countries be deployed to Libya to “train security protection and coastal protection.” In the same article, German Development Minister Gerd Müller (Christian Social Union, CSU) demanded that the United Nations gain access to Libya and administer the camps itself.
In the Neue Osnabrück Zeitung Müller demanded an immediate international “rescue mission” for the refugees in Libya. Weeping crocodile tears, he complained that people only had the choice of “dying in the camps through violence or hunger, dying of thirst in the desert or drowning in the Mediterranean (...) The EU has switched off its spotlights.” What was needed now was “a joint humanitarian initiative by Europe and the United Nations to rescue refugees on Libyan soil. The new EU Commission must act immediately.”
Leader of the Free Democratic Party (FDP) Christian Lindner told Die Welt newspaper, “The solution must be that we create decent housing and legal escape routes to Europe inside North Africa, with the United Nations refugee agency.” Shipwrecked people had to be rescued, but they would have to be “returned to the starting point of their journey,” i.e. to Libya. “We have to face the truth,” said Lindner, “among the refugees are also economic migrants who are not being persecuted who have no legal right to stay”.
The head of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (Bamf), Hans-Eckhard Sommer, spoke up on broadcaster WDR saying he was in favour of “a coalition of European states creating a protection zone in Libya” in order “to take care of the people” there and bring them back to their countries of origin. He reasoned that “we must prevent people from facing mortal danger.”
Mathias Middelberg, the internal affairs political spokesman of the Christian Democrat parliamentary group, was determined to “protect” African migrants with brute force, i.e. to keep them out of Europe with rifles and barbed wire. He told news agency DPA, “In the medium term, we need to implement the decisions of the EU Council of June 2018,” and that meant “even greater cooperation with countries of origin and transit to reduce migration” as well as “disembarkation platforms on the Mediterranean coast.”
Middelberg was referring to the EU summit of June 2018, when EU governments decided to completely seal off fortress Europe and force migrants into de facto concentration camps in Africa.
Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn demanded that the EU-backed and supported Libyan “unity government” should now “finally allow camps to be built under the umbrella of UNHCR and IOM [International Organization of Migration]”. According to Asselborn, there was “urgent need for about six reception centres for every 1,000 migrants.”
Finally, David McAllister (Christian Democratic Union, CDU), who chairs the European Affairs committee of the EU parliament, expressed the same idea. He was also the election manager of the German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen in her candidacy for the office of EU Commission President. In the Bild newspaper McAllister explicitly advocated “additional operations in cooperation with NATO” and “joint patrols of EU member states and neighbouring countries in the Mediterranean (e.g. Tunisia).”
The demands and plans being expressed indicate a clear pattern: the EU wants to use the refugee crisis as an opportunity to invade North Africa by military force and take control in Libya and other countries. It wants to construct huge concentration camps there, in which migrants can be returned who have already reached Europe.
The EU military advance into Africa, however, pursues even wider goals: access to oil, natural gas, rare earths and other raw materials, as well as the occupation of strategic positions against rivals China and the USA. More and more, the EU is turning into a monstrous military union. The fate of migrants is the last thing that worries the EU politicians.
In their attempts to get out of Libya, around 360 migrants have been on a hunger strike for eight days. In early July, they survived the attack on the Tadzhura detention centre near Tripoli. Over fifty detained refugees were killed and around 150 injured when a rocket hit the camp. The hunger strikers, who fear further attacks, are also refusing to be transferred to other prisons because they do not want to give up their hope of reaching Europe.
In sharp contrast to the EU’s plans, Doctors Without Borders (MSF) is calling for the immediate evacuation of all imprisoned migrants and refugees from Libya. According to findings of the UNHCR and the IOM, about 50,000 registered refugees and an estimated 800,000 other migrants are said to be caught up in a country being engulfed by civil war. So far, the UNHCR has only been able to get some 600 out of Libya, including taking 295 to Italy and 289 to Niger.
The migrants who are on hunger strike in Tadzhura have once again demonstrated to the world the murderous conditions that face people trying to escape on their dangerous journey across the Mediterranean. According to IOM data, 4,068 people have reached mainland Italy or Malta this year, while 3,750 have been picked up by the Libyan Coast Guard and taken back to the torture camps.
By July 15, 682 people had died attempting the crossing. On average, this is three to four people a day drowning, dying of thirst, or perishing from lack of help.

Why the India-China Border Issue Remains Intractable

Anand Benegal

Why is the Sino-Indian border dispute considered intractable in nature? Will it become more/less resoluble in the near future?
This commentary examines the conditions for its resolution, derived from past research on border disputes, bargaining, and negotiations in international relations. It considers three conditions for resolution: 1) If neither country sees an interest in continuing this conflict 2) If the contours of the resolution seem like a win-win scenario for nationalist-realists on both sides, and 3) if both sides have the ability to make reneging on an agreement a costly affair.
First, China has likely calculated that it is more logical to wait out the current border status quo to arrive to a more beneficial deal in the future. This is due to the interest in a swift resolution seeming to be more from India's side given its relatively weaker position based on military strength and economics. China's growth projection for 2020 is 6-6.5 per cent. India's economy grew quicker in 2018-19 (by 7 per cent), and is expected to steadily grow at around 7.5 per cent over the current and next two financial years. However, this belies the sizeable difference between their GDPs: China's GDP for 2018-19 was US$ 13.6 trillion, while India's GDP for the same year was US$ 2.72 trillion (approximately 5 times less than China's). Therefore, China's gains from a 6 per cent growth are substantially greater than India's gains from a 7 or 7.5 per cent growth. China is therefore increasing its economic differential relative to India.
Domestically, there have also been questions about the resilience of the Indian economy including concerns that India's GDP measurements are unsound, resulting in an inflated figure and lending a measure of uncertainty to projected growth estimates. In terms of military spending, data put out by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) shows China's military spending to be US$ 250 billion in 2018-19, while India's was US$ 66.5 billion. This paints a clear picture of the military-economic power differential between India and China. Since China is growing more powerful over time in military-economic terms, waiting out the status quo to arrive at a future resolution is a rational option.
Second, there is serious doubt about whether a "win-win" narrative can ever emerge for nationalists on both sides given the present scenario. Territorial integrity is a central driver to India's national identity ever since Indian Independence in 1947. Indian society is extremely diverse in terms of regional cultures, religions, ethnicities, and linguistics. In this context, the belief in the sanctity of India's territoriality aids the conception of an Indian nationality and what it represents. Historically, however, India has come to territorial resolutions which resulted in a net loss of territory. One instance is the 2015 India-Bangladesh land swap agreement, and another is the 1976 agreement which granted the previously disputed Katchatheevu Island sovereign recognition by India as a Sri Lankan island. (Officially, India does not recognise this as "ceding" territory).
Conversely, China's history of treaties (examples include TajikistanRussiaMyanmar and Pakistan) points to a trend in which Beijing only seems to accept territorial dispute resolutions that result in net territorial gain for China. The projection of historical wrongs using Ming and Qing era maps makes territorial concessions difficult for China without 'loss of face'. In fact, even a resolution involving acknowledgement of the current territorial status quo could be painted as a narrative of Chinese concession, triggering external observers (states like Brunei, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, the US) to demand withdrawals and concessions elsewhere in the South China Sea (SCS). This is a circumstance Beijing does not want to entertain as the SCS is a core maritime interest.
Beijing also likely believes that India is the more flexible party in bilateral border negotiations based on precedent. This perception therefore may lead them to expect a future agreement that results in net territorial gain. However, this belief would be a miscalculation on China's part. The existence of territories (Aksai Chin, Demchok) claimed by India and controlled by China results in a scenario in which India would be unwilling to come to a resolution that contributes to territorial concessions to China.
Third, even if a land border agreement was reached, how could India guarantee its enforceability? China will be secure that India will not renege on a land boundary agreement due to its superior military and economic standing which enables swift and effective reprisal. India does not share this same security, and is more wary of China reneging on an agreement. India has also noted China's territorial encroachments into NepalBhutan, and India (prominent cases include the case of almost a thousand troops entering Ladakh's Chumur sector in 2014, and a stand-off in Sikkim in 2017) and is therefore unlikely to trust that any agreement made will stand firm. This lack of trust and India's unequal ability to enforce any possible resolution solidifies the intractability of the dispute.
The discernible imbalance in the India-China power differential, past history and current nationalism, core interests, and lack of mutual trust operate in a matrix and reinforce the intractability of the border issue. Projecting from these current conditions, it does not seem likely that there will be a land border resolution between the two states in the near future. Unless there is a foundational change in bilateral relations involving a substantial increase in India's military-economic capacities and a reversal in Beijing's negotiating approach, the status quo is projected to continue.  

17 Jul 2019

Merck Make-IT Africa Start-up Programme 2019 for African Entrepreneurs

Application Deadline: 17th July 2019

About the Award: If you have answered yes to any of the questions above. Then we are looking for you! The Joint Start-up Programme, a collaboration between Merck Accelerator with Tech Entrepreneurship Initiative “Make-IT in Africa” is your gateway to quickly explore and validate the potential for co-creating and working in in the health sector especially in partnership with Merck.

Apply to get a chance to work on a collaboration project with existing Merck’s innovation projects.
Fields:
  • Digital Solutions in the Healthcare Sector
  • Bio-Sensing and Interfaces
  • Liquid Biopsy Technologies
Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility: We are looking for start-ups that fulfil the following criteria:
  • Registered in an African country and operative for at least a year
  • A business model with a focus on the SDG’s and a solution in the fields of Healthcare, Life Sciences, Performance Materials and other search fields such as Biosensing and Interfaces, and Liquid Biopsy
    Technologies
  • Start-ups with at least 2 cofounders
  • The team supports gender equality and diversity
  • Applicants must be fluent in English
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: This is your gateway to quickly explore and validate the potential for co-creating and working in partnership with Merck and profit from the broad network of Make-IT in Africa. In addition, we have a few perks for the best start-ups:
  • Business Case Development:
    • Fully paid bootcamp in Nairobi for top 20 start-ups (5 per each region) to ideate and develop business cases for collaboration with Merck
    • Continuous business support, technical support and online mentoring and coaching
    • Scale-Up Diagnostics and Design for Scale Training
  • Ecosystem Learning Journey:
    • Spotlight and exhibition at the South Africa Innovation Summit in Cape Town for 4 finalists
    • Spotlight and Demo Day at Merck in South Africa for 4 finalists
    • Spotlight and exhibition at MEDICA conference in Dusseldorf for 4 finalists
  • Corporate Collaboration: A fully paid trip to Merck Innovation Center at the HQs to pitch for a collaboration project with Merck for 4 finalists
  • Connect and Community: Three meetups in each focus region will be conducted to connect with a rich community of founders and innovators in your region going through the same challenges, as you exchange ideas and build lifetime connections.
  • Access to Make-IT Fellowship:
    • Investor meetups
    • Business opportunities
    • Potential exposure measures
Duration of Award: August 5 – November 27, 2019

How to Apply: Our program will be targeting start-ups across Africa. We will have one application platform where participants will be required to specify which region they are applying from and where their business is registered: North Africa, Eastern Africa, West Africa, and Southern Africa.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Acumen East & West Africa Fellows Programme (Fully Funded Leadership Programme for Emerging Leaders) 2019

Application Deadline: 11th August, 2019

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Countries in East and West Africa

To be taken at (country): Fellow’s Home country

About the Award: The program equips extraordinary individuals from across East and West Africa with the knowledge, support system and practical wisdom to unlock their full potential and drive positive change in society. Fellows are bright minds and big thinkers who dare to do what’s right, not what’s easy, to create positive change in their country. Fellows can come from diverse cultural, geographic and socioeconomic backgrounds and work in any sector, and they must be committed to ending poverty in their community through their work.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: 
  • Innovators who either started an organization or enterprise, or who are driving change within an existing organization or company.
  • Men and women of all ages and education levels who are able to participate in a program conducted in English.
  • East Africans who demonstrate a commitment and concrete connection to the region.
  • Leaders with strong personal integrity, unrelenting perseverance and moral imagination.
  • Committed individuals ready to undergo an intensive yearlong personal transformation and leadership journey.
Number of Awardees: Not specified

Value of Fellowship: Over the course of a year, Fellows remain in their jobs while taking part in five week-long seminars, where they receive the tools, training and space to innovate new ideas, accelerate their impact, build a strong network of social leaders from across their region and around the world.

Duration of Fellowship: 1 year

How to Apply: The online application consists of:
  • Background information
  • Resume/CV
  • Short & long answer questions
It is important to go through the Application instructions on the Fellowship Webpage before applying.

Visit Fellowship Webpage for details

Award Provider: Acumen East Africa Fellows Programme

Vodacom Discover Graduate Programme 2019 for Young African Leaders

Application Deadline: 31st August 2019

Eligible Countries: South African Citizen by Birth/Naturalisation prior to 1994, however citizens of DRC, Kenya, Lesotho, Mozambique and Tanzania are encouraged to apply.

About the Award: Vodacom Group is a leading African communications company providing a wide range of communication services, including mobile voice, messaging, data, financial and converged services to over 103 million customers. From its roots in South Africa, Vodacom Group has grown its mobile network business to include operations in Tanzania, the DRC, Mozambique, Lesotho and Kenya. Vodacom’s mobile networks cover a population of over 260 million people. Through Vodacom Business Africa (VBA), Vodacom Group offers business managed services to enterprises in 32 countries. Vodacom Group is majority owned by Vodafone (64.5% holding), one of the world’s largest communications companies by revenue.

Type: Job

Eligibility:
  • Must have less than 2 years working experience post studies.
  • Must be under the age of 25 years old.
  • South African Citizen by Birth/Naturalisation prior to 1994, however citizens of DRC, Kenya, Lesotho, Mozambique and Tanzania are encouraged to apply for consideration in those markets.
  • Must have obtained a minimum of 65% aggregate for completed or most recent academic results.
  • Must have a minimum of a B-degree (B-Com, BSc & B-Tech) qualification (NQF 7).
  • A 3 year National Diploma (NQF 6) will be considered in the following areas only:
    • Electrical / Electronic Engineering
    • Computer Software Engineering and
    • Information Systems/Information Technology
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Gaining high business exposure from day one, you’ll experience rotations in different areas of our organisation. We’re committed to developing and inspiring fresh talent so you can expect plenty of support and guidance as you develop your skills in your chosen field. It’s a challenging and rewarding adventure, and as you work alongside some of the industry’s leading experts you’ll develop the solutions that will shape our customers’ futures and yours.

Duration of Award: Fulltime

How to Apply:

Step 1
  • Before you can apply for a position, please ensure that you meet all of the above criteria.
Step 2
  • Complete the questionnaire below by choosing any one category from the list and answering all questions correctly.
Step 3
  • Once you have completed the questionnaire successfully, you will only then be prompted to apply accordingly.
Step 4
  • Once you’ve registered and applied, we’ll email you confirmation of receipt. Our Resourcing Team will then carefully assess your application and provide you with feedback every step of the way!
Visit Award Webpage for Details

Borlaug-Adesina Fellowship 2019 for Young African Agropreneurs

Application Deadline: 31st July 2019

Eligible Countries: African countries

To be Taken at (Country): Iowa, USA

About the Award: The World Hunger Fighters Foundation, in partnership with the World Food Prize Foundation, USA, is establishing this year-long Fellowship Program, presenting an unparalleled opportunity to outstanding African youths between the ages of 21 and 30 years old to attend the WHFF Africa Youth Institute at the World Food Prize Foundation in Iowa, United States of America. It is an innovative educational program that challenges promising youths across the continent to join forces with other youths globally to solve the most critical problems we face on the planet, providing real-world experiences to prepare them, as Borlaug-Adesina Fellows, for success and high-impact careers to that will end hunger across the world.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: Outstanding African youths between the ages of 21 and 30 years old.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The Fellows will be provided with opportunities to gain exposure and experience at any of the International Agricultural Research Centers around the world, or with a select number of global food and agribusiness companies.

Duration of Award: 1 year

How to Apply: APPLY TODAY

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Children’s Trafficking and Exploitation is a Persistent, Dreary Phenomenon

Cesar Chelala

Child trafficking and exploitation are again in the news after the Wall Street trader Jeffrey Epstein was charged on July 8 with sex trafficking crimes involving dozens of minors. Among the latest accusation is one by Jennifer Araoz, 32, who said that Epstein raped her when she was 15, and she had been working at his home giving him massages. After the incident, Araoz became profoundly depressed, had anxiety and panic attacks, and had to drop out of school shortly afterward. Her case is just one of the many cases being investigated against the New York financial adviser.
Children’s trafficking and exploitation is a widespread phenomenon that is causing enormous suffering throughout the world. It can take several forms such as forced labor, sexual exploitation and child begging, among other practices. It is estimated that 4 million women and girls worldwide are bought and sold each year either into marriage, prostitution or slavery. Over one million children enter the sex trade every year. Although most are girls, boys are also victims.
The extent of the problem
A report presented to the European Parliament showed that in Egypt criminal gangs kidnap African migrants and subject them to the worst kind of abuses, and reclaim steep ransoms from their families. It is estimated that between 25,000 to 30,000 people were trafficked in the Sinai Peninsula between 2009 and 2013.
In the United States, as many as 50,000 women and children from Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe are brought to the country and forced to work as servants or prostitutes. The US government has prosecuted cases involving hundreds of victims. In other countries where this problem is frequent, the prosecution rate is lower.
Child sex tourism is an aspect of this worldwide phenomenon, and it is concentrated in Asia and Central and South America. According to UNICEF, 10,000 girls annually enter Thailand from neighboring countries and end up as sex workers. Thailand’s Health System Research Institute reports that children make up 40% of those working in prostitution in Thailand. And between 5,000 and 7,000 Nepali girls are transported across the border to India each year and end up in commercial sex work in Mumbai or New Delhi.
Commercial sexual exploitation
Although the greatest number of children forced to work as prostitutes is in Asia, Eastern European children from countries such as Russia, Poland, Romania, Hungary and the Czech Republic, are increasingly unwilling victims.
As a social and pathological phenomenon, prostitution involving children does not show signs of abating. In many cases, not only individual traffickers but also organized groups kidnap children and sell them into prostitution, with border officials and police frequently serving as accomplices.
Because of their often undocumented status, language deficiencies and lack of legal protection, kidnapped children are particularly vulnerable in the hands of smugglers or corrupt and heartless government officials. “Trafficking is a very real threat to millions of children around the world, especially to those who have been driven from their homes and communities without adequate protection,” said UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore.
Commercial sexual exploitation of children is a growing problem worldwide. The reasons include increased trade across borders, poverty, unemployment, low status of girls, lack of education (including sex education) of children and their parents, inadequate legislation, poor law enforcement and the eroticization of children by the media, a phenomenon increasingly seen in industrialized countries.
Consequences of sexual exploitation of children
Social and cultural reasons force children into entering the sex trade in different regions of the world. In many cases, children from industrialized countries enter the sex trade because they are fleeing abusive homes. In countries of Eastern and Southern Africa, children who became orphans as a result of AIDS frequently lack the protection of caregivers and become, therefore, more vulnerable to sexual abuse and exploitation.
In South Asia, traditional practices that perpetuate the low status of women and girls in society fuel this problem. Children exploited sexually are prone to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS. In addition, because of the conditions in which they live, children can become malnourished, and develop feelings of guilt, inadequacy, and depression.
Besides the moral and ethical implications, the impact that sexual exploitation has on children’s health and future development demand urgent attention. Throughout the world, many individuals and nongovernmental organizations are working intensely for the protection of children’s rights. Many times, their work puts them in conflict with governments and powerful interest groups.
Policies to protect children
There is general agreement that a victim-centered human rights approach is the best possible strategy to address this problem. Its focus should be punishing the exploiter and protecting and rehabilitating the child.
UNICEF has been particularly active in calling attention to children’s exploitation and in addressing its root causes. This organization provides economic support to families so that their children will not be at risk of sexual exploitation; it improves access to education, particularly for girls, and is a strong advocate for children’s rights.
The work of nongovernmental organizations and U.N. agencies should be complemented by governments’ actions. Those actions should include preventing sexual exploitation through social mobilization and awareness building, providing social services to exploited children and their families, and creating the legal framework and resources for psychosocial counseling and for the appropriate prosecution of perpetrators. The elimination of children’s exploitation is a daunting task, but one that is achievable if effective policies and programs are put in place.