29 Aug 2018

Wealth of Nations Reporting Workshops on Illicit Finance in Africa 2018

Application Deadline: 9th September 2018.

Eligible Countries: African countries

To Be Taken At (Country): Workshops will take place in Johannesburg, South Africa

About the Award: Wealth of Nations is a long-term engagement, and journalists who take part must commit to all elements of the scheme, signing an agreement to this effect. These elements include:
  • The production of stories or investigations on illicit financial flows
  • A mentoring support scheme that will help produce these stories
  • Intensive training on reporting illicit finance
    • The first workshop will take place from Monday, 15 October – Friday, 19 October 2018 at the Institute for the Advancement of Journalism in Johannesburg
    • Selected participants will be invited to a follow-up workshop in early December 2018
Journalists will not be considered to have completed the scheme until they have completed all the elements, which include producing at least one story or investigation on illicit financial flows and will not receive their certificates until this point.

Type: Workshops

Eligibility: 
  • Journalists with at least two years of professional experience.
  • It is an advantage if you are familiar with investigative journalism, reporting on finances and/or dealing with numbers more generally. But if you have a strong motivation to learn about and understand these issues then we will consider your application.
  • You must be able to spend significant time working on illicit finance stories or investigations.
  • Both freelancers and staff journalists may apply. Journalists working for a news organisation will need consent from their editor to take part. Freelancers should provide evidence that one or more media organisations will be willing to take their work.
  • Journalists working in any medium or multiple media are welcome to apply (print, online, radio or television).
  • Journalists should be based in Africa and working for one or more African media organisations.
  • Journalists applying must have fluent English.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: 
  • If selected, you will take part in one intensive workshops (5 days) covering illicit finance, reporting on companies, accounts and budgets, and investigative techniques. Workshops will take place in Kampala or Dakar (TBC).
  • You will propose one or more story ideas that you wish to work on within the scheme – we will provide experienced journalists to help you pursue your stories right up to publication/broadcast
  • Selected participants will receive modest funding to help them realise their stories or investigations; those who are funded may have further opportunities for training
  • You will have exclusive access to expertise through our network of illicit finance experts
  • You will also have access to story ideas and editorial advice, and will be invited to share your own expertise with participants from other regions
Successful applicants will receive a full bursary that will cover air travel expenses (economy class), accommodation, local transfers and meals. Please note that you need to check visa requirements and ensure you have the necessary documentation required. The cost of your visa and any other related costs will be the responsibility of the participant.

Duration of Program: The first workshops will take place between 15 October – 19 October 2018

How to Apply: 
  • Two work samples
  • A letter from your editor consenting to your participation and confirming that any story written as part of the programme will be published in the publication you work for
Please have these ready before you begin the form.

Click here to begin the application form.

Visit Program Webpage for Details

Award Providers: Wealth of Nations

Important Notes: you will be asked to upload samples of your work, as well as a letter from your editor consenting to your participation. Please have these ready before you begin the form.

Adobe Research Women-in-Technology Scholarship for Female Undergraduate Students in STEM Fields 2019

Application Deadline: 28th September 2018

About the Award: Adobe Research creates innovative technologies for software products to better serve consumers, creative professionals, developers, and enterprises. Adobe brings together the smartest, most driven people to give them the freedom to nurture their intellectual curiosity, while providing them the necessary resources and support to shape their ideas into tangible results.

Fields of Study: This scholarship is intended for students studying computer science, computer engineering, or related technical fields.

Type: Fellowship, Undergraduate

Eligibility: In order to be eligible for the 2019 Adobe Research Women-in-Technology Scholarship, applicants must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Be a female student currently enrolled as an undergraduate or masters student at a university for the 2018-2019 academic year.
  • Intend to be enrolled as a full-time undergraduate or masters student at a university for the 2019-2020 academic year.
  • Be majoring in computer science, computer engineering, or a closely related technical field.
  • Maintain a strong academic record
  • Not have a close relative working for Adobe Research.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The Adobe Research Women-in-Technology Scholarship includes:
  • A $10,000 award paid once.
  • A Creative Cloud subscription membership for one year.
  • An Adobe Research mentor.
  • An opportunity to interview for an internship at Adobe.
How to Apply: Applications must include:
  • A resume
  • Academic transcripts from your current and/or past institution
  • Three references (our online application system will request letters from your references via email)
  • Answers to up to four essay questions, which will be available when we start accepting applications
  • An optional 60-second video or multimedia submission describing your dream career.
Click here to begin.

Visit the Program Webpage for Details

Award Providers: Adobe

Important Notes: Scholarship recipients will be announced by December 21, 2017.

What is FireEye?

Kevin Reed

In back-to-back announcements last week, the social media platforms Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Blogger and Google+ reported that they had removed hundreds of user accounts, pages, channels and posts on the grounds of “coordinated inauthentic behavior” and “spreading divisive content and misinformation.” The social media companies further justified their censorship measures with assertions that the closed accounts were linked to a political influence campaign of the Iranian government.
On August 21, Twitter posted the following on its Twitter Safety account: “Working with our industry peers today, we have suspended 284 accounts from Twitter for engaging in coordinated manipulation. Based on our existing analysis, it appears many of these accounts originated from Iran.”
On the same day, the head of Facebook cybersecurity policy, Nathaniel Gliecher, published a blog post titled, “What We Have Found So Far.” He wrote, “We've removed 652 pages, groups and accounts for coordinated inauthentic behavior that originated in Iran and targeted people across multiple internet services in the Middle East, Latin America, UK and US.”
Two days later, Google SVP of Global Affairs Kent Walker published a blog entry titled, “An update on state-sponsored activity,” writing, “We identified and terminated a number of accounts linked to the IRIB (Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting) organization that disguised their connection to this effort, including while sharing English-language political content in the U.S.: 39 YouTube channels that had 13,466 total US views on relevant videos; 6 blogs on Blogger; 13 Google+ accounts.”
Many of the shuttered accounts were connected to web sites with left-wing views and political positions opposing the crimes of the American, Saudi, and Israeli governments in the Middle East. Other accounts purported to be in support of US Senator Bernie Sanders and expressed support for Palestinians and opposition to the state of Israel.
As the World Socialist Web Site has explained, the unified actions of the social media companies represent a new stage in an expanding US government-directed censorship of the Internet that began more than a year ago. In August 2017, the WSWS proved that changes to Google’s search algorithms that promote “authoritative” news sources were also suppressing left-wing, socialist and anti-war websites.
That the content of the social posts of supposed “bad actors” and “coordinated manipulation” is in direct conflict with US foreign policy agenda demonstrates that Twitter, Facebook and Google are acting in concert with government entities. In fact, the common thread between the unified censorship of the social media companies was their reliance upon information provided by FireEye, an IT firm with close ties to the US State Department and Wall Street and managed by former military intelligence and law enforcement officers.

What is Fire Eye?

FireEye is a publicly listed $3 billion cyber-security company founded in 2004 and based north of San Jose, in Milpitas, California. The company began by developing expertise in tracking and shutting down botnets that spread email spamming operations around the globe. According to one industry expert FireEye has “become the Navy SEALs of cybersecurity, especially for next-generation cybersecurity threats.”
Through a series of acquisitions over the past five years, FireEye has emerged as a prominent provider of investigative services for high-profile cyber-attacks on American corporations such as the breach of customer data at Target (2013), the hack of Sony Pictures email servers (2014) and the Experian data breach (2017).
A major aspect of the present-day operations of FireEye is government contracts for network security at the state and federal level. FireEye has contracts with US government departments and there have been reports of close ties between the company and the National Security Agency.
FireEye has played a prominent role in the campaign regarding “Russian meddling” in the 2016 elections and it is a proponent of the claims that Russia has “weaponized” social media. The firm published a report on the alleged disinformation and influence campaign of the Russian government following the testimony of FireEye CEO Kevin Mandia before Congress on March 30, 2017.
Mandia served in the United States Air Force and was a computer security officer in the 7th Communications Group at the Pentagon and a special agent in the Air Force Office of Special Investigations. He began his commercial cyber-security career working as a contractor for Lockheed and later founded Mandiant, a company that investigated espionage by the Chinese government and also held contracts with the Defense Department.
The President of FireEye is Travis Reese, who was co-founder of the Computer Forensic and Intrusion Analysis Group at Aegis Research Corporation, which has held multiple Defense Department contracts over the past 15 years. Previously he was a Special Agent with the United States Air Force Office of Special Investigations.
The main financial muscle behind FireEye is Bain Capital Management, the hedge fund once run by Mitt Romney. FireEye’s chairman of the board is Enrique Salem, managing director of Bain Capital Ventures, formerly CEO of Symantec, a director of ADP and other software giants, as well as a member of President Obama’s Management Advisory Board.

The FireEye report on “Iranian Influence”

The censoring of social media accounts by Twitter, Facebook and Google was based primarily upon information provided to them by FireEye. On August 23, FireEye published a 38-page report titled, “Suspected Iranian Influence Operation.”
The report includes flowcharts, account names and screen shots of specific websites and social media accounts that it claims exist to “promote political narratives in line with Iranian interests,” adding, “These narratives include anti-Saudi, anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes, as well as support for specific U.S. policies favorable to Iran, such as the U.S.-Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA).”
However, as the title of the document suggests, FireEye provides only speculation of any connection between the targeted online publishers and the Iranian government. As with the previous “Russian interference” campaign, where no proof of social media meddling in the 2016 elections was ever provided, the FireEye report says, “While highly unlikely given the evidence we have identified, some possibility nonetheless remains that the activity could originate from elsewhere, was designed for alternative purposes, or includes some small percentage of authentic online behavior. We do not currently possess additional visibility into the specific actors, organizations, or entities behind this activity.”
The concept of “coordinated inauthentic behavior,” a phrase that wreaks of state repression, is being developed and promoted as part of advanced forms of Internet and social media censorship. The technology monopolies are preparing measures, with the assistance of government contractors like FireEye, to shut down the websites, email accounts, social media pages and blog posts of forms of expression that they deem are outside the spectrum of “authentic” sources.
The targeting of supposed Russian and Iranian influence in US politics is part of the strategic rollout of these censorship techniques as they are being tested and perfected. These methods will be used to stifle and shut down social and political opposition by masses of people against growing inequality, war and attacks on democratic rights. We encourage readers to contact the World Socialist Web Site and report instances of social media censorship and to join our campaign to defend freedom of speech on the Internet.

Whistleblowers expose Australian government crimes at Nauru refugee camp

Oscar Grenfell

Over the past week medical professionals and social workers have blown the whistle on the dire conditions facing refugees being held in Australian detention on the tiny Pacific Island nation of Nauru. They have reported widespread trauma and self-harm among children, untreated health problems and medical crises threatening deaths.
The exposures are a damning indictment of successive federal governments, Labor and Liberal-National alike, which have denied asylum to refugees seeking to arrive in Australia by boat, consigning them indefinitely to virtual concentration camps.
The reports have shown that a number of children have suffered life-threatening medical crises. One staff-member on Nauru told the Guardian: “Everyone on the island knows how serious this is. We have been saying for months a child is going to die in these circumstances.”
Anonymous statements from government employees, published by the Guardian, revealed that at least three children were flown from the island to Australia last week to receive urgent medical care.
On Friday a federal court judge ordered that a female child be transported immediately to Australia for hospitalisation. For much of the past three weeks she had refused to eat or drink.
Three separate doctors had issued reports to government authorities calling for her to be flown to Australia. They stated that she was suffering from “resignation syndrome,” a condition common among imprisoned child refugees who withdraw from all interaction and activity.
According to the Guardian, the girl recently told an Australian advocate: “I can’t live in this island anymore. I hate everything and everyone around me. I hate to go outside. We left our country to have a good and better life, but we faced the worst life ever, the life which forced us to end it.”
In another case, authorities had repeatedly blocked the medical transfer of a 12-year-old Iranian refugee boy to Australia despite warnings from staff that he could die. As of last week the boy, who has been imprisoned on the island for five years, had refused all food and water for up to a fortnight and was being fed intravenously. A staff member stated: “They know about this in Canberra but nothing is happening.”
One of the children reportedly removed from the island last week was a 14-year-old boy who has not left his bed for at least four months. Medical staff reported that his depression was so severe he no longer ate, washed or went to the toilet. They warned that he may suffer permanent disabilities as a result of severe muscle wastage.
Other child victims are even younger. The Guardian reported on the case of Ahoora, a seven-year-old whose Iranian family has been incarcerated on Nauru since he was just three-years-old.
The boy cannot read or write, has been prescribed strong anti-depressants, and has been described by doctors as experiencing “deep psychic suffering” and post-traumatic stress disorder. They have warned that these conditions will only worsen with continued imprisonment.
Ahoora’s mother self-harms by burning herself with cigarettes. She sent a letter of complaint about the treatment of her son to the company that manages the refugee camp, Canstruct, daubed in her own blood.
Confidential government documents obtained by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s “7:30” program, aired on Monday night, revealed shocking suicidal crises among the more than 100 children detained on Nauru.
In one instance last June, a 14-year-old girl doused herself in petrol as she was holding a lighter. In another, a ten-year-old “attempted to self-harm by ingesting some sharp metal objects,” which appeared to be taken from fencing wire.
Dr Vernon Reynolds, a child psychiatrist who worked at International Health and Medical Services (IHMS), an Australian government contractor on Nauru, told “7:30” he was “surprised” that no refugee children had yet taken their life on the island. He insisted that Australian authorities were “neglecting these kids,” and that if nothing were done, further injuries, and possibly deaths would occur.
Reynolds had been due to return to Nauru in April, but was allegedly blocked by Australian authorities who were hostile to his clinical recommendations and critical reports.
Fiona Owens, a social worker who headed IHMS’ child mental health team on the island from May to July, told “7:30”: “The only thing a lot of the children are thinking about is how to die. They Google it on the internet. The extreme possibilities are death of children, death of adults, continual death of adults and children.”
Jacinta O’Leary, another whistleblower who worked as a nurse on Nauru last year, reviewed the trauma caused by the government’s refusal to transfer refugee women to Australia for abortions. Until threatened court action late last year, the Australian government had claimed, for several months, that all medical treatment, including pregnancy terminations, was the responsibility of Nauru authorities. Abortions are illegal in Nauru.
The whistleblowers have taken a courageous stand in defence of democratic rights and against the bipartisan persecution of refugees. Current and former staff who expose crimes at detention centres have previously been threatened with prosecution and imprisonment.
The 2015 Border Force Act passed by the Liberal-National Coalition government and the Labor Party made it a crime for any person working in a detention centre to publicly reveal the conditions of asylum-seekers, with “violations” punishable by up to two years’ incarceration.
The government last year made amendments to the legislation in response to legal action taken in the high court. The changed laws, however, included punishments for the release of information that could harm “national security,” a sweeping and vaguely defined provision.
The dire plight of refugees on Nauru is a damning indictment of the entire political establishment. It was the Greens-backed minority Labor government that, in 2013, reopened the brutal detention camps on Nauru and Papua New Guinea’s Manus Island, and decreed that the asylum-seekers incarcerated in them would never be allowed to set foot in Australia.
This vicious program has made Australia a world “model” for the abrogation of the right to asylum and the brutal persecution of the most vulnerable sections of the working class, fleeing US-led wars, invariably supported by Australia, and government persecution. The country’s “border protection” program has also been hailed by US President Donald Trump, along with neo-fascists across Europe.

The “spice” drug crisis in Britain

Anna Mayer 

The drug “spice” is increasingly popular among the most vulnerable groups in Britain—including the young, homeless and imprisoned.
The drug has horrific effects, with users, often homeless, invariably found in a semi-comatose state, slumped in the centre of cities such as Manchester and Sheffield.
Although the drug was designed to be a harmless alternative to cannabis, it is anything but. Known by a multitude of other names such as K2 and fake pot, spice is a mixture of herbs and synthetic cannabinoids, intended to mimic the effects of cannabis.
Effects range from anxiety to paranoia to hallucinations; with users exhibiting violent behaviour and feeling brain-dead, hence the label “zombie drug.” Spice can also raise blood pressure, sometimes leading to heart attacks and even death.
One of the factors contributing to the dangers of spice is the fact that its production does not involve a controlled environment and it is not professionally tested, which means that any potentially harmful effects of the drug are unknown until it is taken. Due to its ever-changing composition, users are often unaware of the chemicals it contains.
Spice is among a multitude of cheap, synthetic drugs that are widely accessible and popular with vulnerable layers. These include the stimulant “monkey dust,” available for as little as £2, that causes severe hallucinations, paranoia and a loss of sense of pain. Emergency services spoke of a monkey dust “epidemic” in the city of Stoke-on-Trent, with users exhibiting dangerous behaviour such as jumping off buildings and running into traffic.
Staffordshire Police report they have taken 950 monkey dust related calls in the last three months alone. Its use has led to several deaths, with one 54-year-old man, Anthony Pepper, found dead by his girlfriend with packets of the drug in his hand. A 35-year-old man, John Rigby, died after he took the drug and climbed over a safety barrier onto the A50 road and was hit by a truck as he tried to weave through oncoming evening traffic.
Although the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016 made the production and supply of psychoactive drugs such as spice illegal, manufacturers have gotten around this by changing ingredients.
A paper, “Adding spice to the porridge,” by researchers at Manchester Metropolitan University noted that 60-90 percent of prisoners were regular spice smokers. Addiction to spice in prison often leads to addicts amassing huge debts to dealers and becomes a source of violence. In an indication of the social crisis, some prisoners are deliberately getting themselves arrested just to smuggle spice back into prison to repay debts or make money.
Interviewed by Vice magazine, Andy, who had been released from prison recently, said, “You make sure you are plugged when you go and commit a crime, in case you go straight back in. So you go with spice up your arse for a burglary. You deliberately get yourself arrested or break your license so you can go back in jail and sell spice.”
Users said the drug makes them feel happy and that they experience a “blackout” when taking it. Speaking to Daily Star about his spice use Dan Nicholson, a 31-year old homeless man, said, “I did them [legal highs] once when they were legal in shops [before 2016]. I had a really bad experience. I blacked out for six hours. I woke up not knowing who I was, where I was or anything.” He had lost his job, which led to his eviction from his flat.
Another spice user, Jed, who has been homeless for 20 years, said, “Yes I take spice, but who wouldn’t if they were living my life? It makes me feel good, it puts me to sleep, it blocks stuff out. It passes the time, and I have a lot of that.”
Dr. Robert Ralphs, a lecturer and researcher at Manchester Metropolitan University, says that prisoners use the drug to “kill time” and that it provides a “warm blanket” that apparently gives a sense of comfort and security to those experiencing the most insecure conditions.
The prevalence of the drug and the correlation of homelessness with its use highlights that the roots of the spice pandemic are social, not individual—homeless and prison-bound people use the drug to ameliorate the material conditions in which they find themselves.
A 2015 report carried out by the Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research estimates that around 35,000 young people are homeless at any one time across the UK. Moreover, 26 percent of young people surveyed by the study said that they had slept rough, constituting the “hidden homeless.”
Last month, a House of Commons briefing on youth unemployment said that 524,000 young people aged 16-24 were unemployed. Although official statistics show unemployment is decreasing, the number of “hidden” unemployed—those not in education, employment or training (NEETs)—is increasing. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) estimated: “There were 808,000 young people (aged 16 to 24 years) in the UK who were not in education, employment or training (NEET) in January to March 2018. The number increased by 14,000 from October to December 2017.”
Not only is unemployment widespread, so is insecure work on low pay. According to the ONS, the number of zero-hour contracts rose by 100,000 to 1.8 million in the UK in 2017, with prevalence among youth, students and women. Zero-hour contracts are those in which the employer is not obliged to provide a minimum number of hours for a worker.
With uncertainty over whether they will be able to provide for themselves, people on zero-hour contracts are 50 percent more likely to have mental health problems.
Last week the Guardian reported that, according to NHS figures, 400,000 under-18s were in contact with mental health services. Although these numbers are rising, constant cuts to the NHS mean that less help is available to match the demand. There has been a 30 percent fall in the number of hospital beds for the mentally ill since 2009. Young people must wait for exorbitant amounts of time to access services and, at times, the hardships and pressures upon youth are so great that some decide to end their own lives.
The global capitalist crisis finds youth everywhere struggling to get by, with the resort to drugs, including spice, a desperate attempt at escaping their situation.
The New York Times reported that in Brooklyn, 33 people were suspected of overdosing on spice in just one day in July. Witnessing three spice users collapse on his way to work, Brian described the scene to the NYT as something “out of a zombie movie, a horrible scene.”
In the richest country in the world, a health catastrophe is steadily unfolding. In 2016, drug overdoses accounted for 64,070 deaths and more Americans have died from drug use in this century than in all of America’s wars. This disaster likewise has its roots in unemployment and poverty, as the country’s working class has been bled dry by the profit hungry capitalist elites.
In Australia, the drug “ice”—otherwise known as crystal meth—gained popularity, as shown by a study by the Medical Journal of Australia, which found that the number of regular ice users aged 15-34 doubled over a five-year period from 2009 to 2014. “These are young people whose lives are very precarious. We can’t just give them drug treatment ... and then send them on their way,” said Dr. Nathan, a researcher from the University of New South Wales in Australia.
In South Africa, which has the second highest youth unemployment in the world, 80 percent of male youth deaths are alcohol or drug related, according to the SACENDU project. This correlates with the hardships and a lack of future that youth face.
In the bourgeois media, the growth of the use of spice and similar drugs is never linked to the fundamental social problems that underlie any addiction because doing so would mean criticising the system they defend. In typical disdainful fashion, David Nutt of the Guardian exclaimed, “Spice ruins lives and costs taxpayers a fortune.” It is undoubtedly the case that the National Health Service and emergency services, already overwhelmed by a chronic lack of funding, are struggling to cope with an influx of spice users.
But such commentary only serves to channel the outrage at the pillaging of the NHS and other services away from its source in the capitalist system, based on the accumulation of vast profits for the owners of the means of production, whilst condemning the producers of the wealth of society—the working class and its future generations—to a life of poverty, disease and ignorance.
For these young people, the International Youth and Students for Social Equality offers the only perspective of ending the exploitation, poverty and misery that is the ultimate source of drug addiction. We fight to build a new revolutionary movement with the aim of overthrowing capitalism and establishing socialism, a system based on the common ownership and enjoyment of society’s resources.

New Australian government to intensify pro-US militarism and class war

James Cogan

In the wake of the August 24 ousting of Malcolm Turnbull as prime minister, his replacement, former Treasurer Scott Morrison, has flagged an intensification of the economic nationalism, anti-Chinese xenophobia, scapegoating of immigrants and pro-US militarism that has dominated official Australian politics for the past decade and more.
Morrison named his cabinet on Monday. His ministerial appointments represent an explicit overture to the most right-wing layers of the Liberal Party who were responsible for tearing Turnbull down.
Peter Dutton, the candidate of the right in the leadership ballot, was reinstated into the powerful Home Affairs ministry, where he will continue to oversee the witch hunting of Muslims and other immigrants and refugees, as a “threat” to internal security.
Mathias Cormann, whose desertion from Turnbull provided Dutton and his backers with the numbers to oust the prime minister, was reinstated as Finance minister and leader of the government in parliament’s upper house, the Senate.
Angus Taylor from the right grouping, a public opponent of wind-powered energy generation, was given the Energy ministry. Alan Tudge, who has denounced immigrants for forming “cultural bubbles” in Australia’s major cities and has advocated that new migrants should be required to pass an English-biased “Australian values test,” was given the new “Cities and Population” portfolio.
Morrison failed to give ministries to two of Dutton’s main backers and relative newcomers, former special forces officer Andrew Hastie and former army general Jim Molan. The profile of both, however, has been dramatically raised and they will function as powerbrokers within the government.
Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who was stripped of the leadership in September 2015 by a party coup launched by Turnbull, and who then led the protracted campaign to bring him down, was also not given a cabinet position. He intends to remain in the parliament and Morrison has named him “Special Envoy on Indigenous Affairs,” giving him a high-profile media role touring Aboriginal communities.
Despite losing the leadership contest to Morrison after ousting Turnbull, the right faction, which enjoys the backing of the Rupert Murdoch-owned media, will put its stamp on the government’s agenda. This is indicated by the policies that Morrison and his new cabinet are flagging for the Liberal-National Party Coalition government’s campaign for the next election, which must be held by May 2019 at the latest.
In terms of foreign policy, the Morrison government will remain firmly aligned with Washington’s economic and military confrontation with China, to ensure the US remains the dominant power in Asia and internationally. Morrison has already invited President Trump to visit Australia as soon as possible. The new foreign minister, former Defence Minister Marise Payne, has confirmed that Chinese communication companies Huawei and ZTE will be banned from any role in the development of a 5G mobile phone network on “national security” grounds.
Julia Gillard’s previous Labor government, which had fully committed Australia in 2011 to the US anti-China “pivot to Asia,” had already proscribed Chinese companies from participating in the country’s new broadband internet network.
In June 2018, the Coalition and Labor joined forces to push through draconian “foreign interference” legislation. The new laws are, above all, aimed at developing a xenophobic witch hunt against alleged “Chinese agents of influence” in Australian business, politics, academia and media.
On energy policy, Morrison has signalled that his government will repudiate any Australian commitment to reducing its carbon emissions by expanding renewable generation, and may subsidise the construction of new coal-fired and gas-fired power plants. Australia is among the largest exporters of coal and natural gas, and a powerful section of its corporate elite has a vested interest in pushing back against any move away from fossil fuels, regardless of the long-term consequences.
The new cabinet is also discussing stepped up attacks on recipients of social welfare benefits. These include increased drug testing and the extension of the so-called “cashless” payment system, in which the most disadvantaged layers of the population are issued debit cards that can only be used at selected stores and for specified items. The demeaning and stigmatising “cashless” policy has been trialled for more than a decade in impoverished indigenous communities and some working-class suburbs.
On immigration, Morrison has indicated that his government will look to forcing new migrants to spend up to five years living in Australia’s regional areas. This policy, which has been discussed over recent years, is a direct overture to right-wing attempts to blame the lack of infrastructure and services in the major cities, such as Sydney and Melbourne, on “too many people,” rather than on the real cause—decades of underfunding and unplanned development.
Taken together, the various policies being rolled out or considered underscore the fact that one of the main objectives behind Turnbull’s ousting was to refashion the Liberal Party into a far more right-wing movement. Under conditions of immense international geostrategic tensions, and intense social antagonisms within Australia, the dominant faction of the ruling class is demanding that the entire political establishment commit to suppressing opposition to its military alliance with the US, and to the ever worsening social and economic conditions facing the majority of the population.
The ruling elite is acutely aware that Australian capitalism is spiralling toward an economic crisis that will inevitably provoke explosive class conflict. The Trump administration’s “America First” trade war measures against China and other US competitors are leading toward a global slump. Canberra’s backing for Washington is likely to result in retaliatory measures from China, Australia’s largest export market. The steady rise in US interest rates, aimed at sucking international investment into Wall Street, is causing currency falls and generating enormous pressure to follow suit in numerous countries, including Australia.
The impact has already been predicted. At present, due to a speculative property market boom, causing staggering increases in housing prices and rents, 25 percent of mortgage holders are in “housing stress”—that is, they cannot pay down their mortgage repayments and meet other household costs. Just a one percent rise in interest rates will increase that figure to 40 percent. A two percent rise in rates—back to the level of 2012—will put 50 percent of mortgage holders under stress. If rates rose by four percent, which would return them to their average, then over two thirds of households would be left hovering on the brink of default.
The underlying cause of the social crisis is the decades-long suppression of working-class wages and the shattering of permanent, secure employment under successive Labor and Coalition governments. Incomes have fallen so low that, as far back as 2015, at least 54 percent of those surveyed reported that they suffered financial stress, defined as not being able to afford regular meals, pay their mortgage, rent or bills on time, or having to borrow or ask family or friends for assistance to make ends meet.
On the other hand, as is the case around the world, the capitalist and upper-middle classes have enriched themselves through the hardship inflicted on the working class. A Credit Suisse study in 2017 estimated that the top 1 percent controlled 23 percent of all wealth—more than the bottom 70 percent of the population combined.
While hundreds of billions of dollars are being allocated to expanding the military, intelligence and police agencies during the coming years, public health, education and other essential services are being starved of resources and teeter on the brink of dysfunction.
Combined with the prospect of war with China, social inequality is the over-riding factor behind the continuous right-wing lurch of the entire political establishment—into seeking to divide the working class with anti-immigrant demagogy and toward authoritarian forms of rule.

UN panel cites massive war crimes in US-backed war on Yemen

Bill Van Auken

A draft report prepared by a United Nations human rights panel has spelled out in detail the massive and savage war crimes that have been carried out against the people of Yemen in the three-year-old war waged by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates with indispensable military and political backing from Washington.
The report was produced by the Group of Independent Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen, a body formed by the United Nations human rights council in September of last year with a year-long mandate to investigate human rights abuses in the impoverished and war-ravaged country.
The group’s formation represented a reversal for Riyadh and Washington, which had successfully fought off previous attempts to mount an investigation into the near-genocidal war against the Yemeni people. Nonetheless, the group of experts lacked even the limited power of a full-scale UN commission of inquiry to recommend prosecution for war crimes in the international criminal court.
The report attributes the vast majority of civilian casualties—which it places at 6,475 killed and 10,231 wounded, while admitting that the real toll is far higher—to Saudi air strikes that “have hit residential areas, markets, funerals, weddings, detention facilities, civilian boats and even medical facilities.”
The report comes in the immediate wake of two horrific atrocities in the space of just two weeks that claimed the lives of at least 60 children and over a dozen others. The first took place on August 9, when a Saudi warplane launched a 500-pound bomb against a bus carrying students from their summer camp to a traditional end-of-summer ceremony, killing 40 children and at least 11 others. While Saudi officials denied responsibility for the attack, and the Pentagon claimed it was still investigating the matter, CNN reported from the scene that remains of the bomb dropped revealed it was made by the giant US arms contractor, Lockheed Martin.
This was followed by another murderous attack on women and children fleeing a neighborhood in the besieged port city of Hodeidah on August 23. A Saudi missile struck the truck in which they were riding, killing at least 22 children and four women.
As the report makes clear, these massacres are by no means an aberration.
The Group of Experts reviewed 60 cases in which Saudi air strikes were carried out against residential areas, killing more than 500 civilians, including 84 women and 233 children. It investigated 29 cases in which strikes were carried out against public spaces, including hotels, killing another 300 civilians. It reviewed 11 air strikes targeting marketplaces, killing and maiming hundreds more. It also probed bombing raids staged against funerals and weddings, most infamously the October 2016 attack on Al-Kubra Hall in the city of Sana’a during the funeral of the father of a senior official, which killed at least 137 civilians and injured 695.
Also investigated were air raids against detention facilities, civilian boats carrying both fishermen and refugees, and numerous medical facilities and ambulances as well as “educational, cultural and religious sites.”
The panel also cited the use by the Saudi warplanes of “double strikes,” in which a second attack is carried out against a target quickly after the first in order to kill first responders and others rushing to the scene to help the wounded.
The incidents cited in the report are by no means a comprehensive list of all the air strikes – estimated at over 18,000 – conducted against Yemen over the past three years, but only representative of the carnage that is taking place.
The report uses mealy-mouthed language that conceals the murderous campaign to force the Yemeni people to submit to Saudi domination. It questions the “targeting process” and the “effectiveness of precautionary measures” adopted to protect civilians by the Saudi-led coalition, and expresses “serious concerns about the respect of the principle of distinction” between military and civilian targets.
At the same time, it acknowledges that Saudi warplanes are employing US-supplied precision-guided munitions that “would normally indicate that the object struck was the target.”
Precisely. Saudi Arabia, the UAE and their allies are carrying out a protracted and deliberate massacre of a largely defenseless Yemeni population.
Also cited as a “violation of international human rights law and international humanitarian law,” i.e., a war crime, are the Saudi-led and US-backed “de facto blockades” of Yemen’s borders, as well as its sea ports and airports.
“The impact of these developments on the civilian population has been immense,” the report states, referring to the blockades. “The accessibility of food and fuel has significantly declined, due to increased costs of bringing goods to markets. These costs have been passed on to consumers, rendering the limited goods available unaffordable for the majority of the population. The problem has been exacerbated by the Government’s non-payment of public sector salaries, affecting one quarter of the population, since August 2016. The effects of the price increases coupled with the erosion of their purchasing power have been disastrous for the population.”
As a result, the report adds, “As of April 2018, nearly 17.8 million people were food insecure and 8.4 million were on the brink of famine. Health-care facilities were not functioning, clean water was less accessible and Yemen was still suffering from the largest outbreak of cholera in recent history.”
The blockade has also prevented people from seeking medical treatment that they are unable to secure inside Yemen. Last August, the Ministry of Health in Sana’a reported that 13,000 Yemenis had died from health conditions that could have been treated if the Saudis had not shut down the country’s airports. Just this week, the health minister issued an appeal to suspend the blockade so that victims of the recent bombings, including badly wounded children, could travel to hospitals abroad.
The report also cites as war crimes the systematic forced disappearances, arbitrary detention and systematic torture and rape of Yemenis taken into custody by the Saudi-led coalition, in particular military forces deployed in the country by the UAE.
“At Bir Ahmed Prison, forces of the United Arab Emirates raided the facility and perpetrated sexual violence,” the report states. “In March 2018, nearly 200 detainees were stripped naked in a group while personnel of the United Arab Emirates forcibly examined their anuses. During this search, multiple detainees were raped digitally and with tools and sticks.”
In addition, detainees have been “beaten, electrocuted, suspended upside down, drowned, threatened with violence against their families and held in solitary confinement for prolonged periods.”
The report also cites the rampant torture and rape of refugees, particularly Somalis and Eritreans, at the hands of Security Belt Forces, comprised of Islamist militias deployed by the Saudi-led coalition on Yemen’s borders.
The report concludes that the panel of experts “has identified, where possible, individuals who may be responsible for international crimes, and the list of individuals has been submitted” to the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights.
There is no indication, however, that this list includes the names of individual political and military officials without whose participation the war in Yemen would have been impossible. These would include Barack Obama, Donald Trump, James Mattis, Gen. Joseph Votel and many others in the top ranks of the Pentagon and CIA, as well as the Democratic and Republican parties.
The only oblique reference to Washington’s role is a recommendation that the “international community … refrain from providing arms that could be used in the conflict in Yemen.”
US support for the Saudi-led war, initiated under Obama, has included not merely supplying the tens of billions of dollars’ worth of US weaponry that has been turned on the Yemeni people, but also indispensable collaboration by the Pentagon in providing mid-air refueling for Saudi warplanes, without which they could not carry out their murderous bombing raids. A joint logistical center has been set up in Riyadh to supply US intelligence for Saudi strikes and, since last December, US special operations troops have been secretively deployed on the ground to aid Saudi forces.
The White House and the Pentagon have no intention of halting their participation in the Yemen war, which they see as part of a region-wide campaign to roll back Iranian influence and establish US hegemony over the oil-rich Middle East.
This was made clear Tuesday by Defense Secretary Mattis at a Pentagon press conference at which he dismissed the recent atrocities that claimed the lives of over 60 children. He claimed that the US was working with the Saudis to reduce civilian casualties, but “we recognize we are not going to achieve perfection.” He referred to the bus full of children blown to bits by an American bomb as a “dynamic target.”
The UN’s “experts” make no pretense of holding Washington accountable for the war crimes in Yemen, just as the international body has done nothing to bring to justice the US officials responsible for the series of wars, from Afghanistan to Iraq to Libya and Syria, that have claimed the lives of millions and turned tens of millions into refugees.
In any genuine accounting for the slaughter in Yemen, as well as the wider sociocide carried out by US imperialism throughout the Middle East, figures like Mattis, Obama, Trump, et al., would be standing in the dock like the surviving leaders of Hitler’s Third Reich in Nuremberg.
Settling accounts with Washington’s war criminals is the task of the American working class, united in struggle with the working people of the Middle East and the entire planet.

28 Aug 2018

Jay Jordan IFLA/OCLC Early Career Development Fellowship Programme for Librarians from Developing Countries 2019 – USA

Application Deadline: 28th September 2018.

Eligible Countries: Developing countries

To Be Taken At (Country): USA

About the Award: OCLC and the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) are now accepting applications for library professionals to participate in the 2019 Jay Jordan IFLA/OCLC Early Career Development Fellowship Program.
The Fellowship Program, sponsored by IFLA and OCLC, is a four-week program based at OCLC headquarters in Dublin, Ohio, USA, that provides education and professional development opportunities for early career librarians from countries with developing economies.
The IFLA/OCLC Fellowship Program offers advanced continuing education and exposure to a broad range of issues in information technologies, library operations and global cooperative librarianship. To date, the program has welcomed 90 librarians and information science professionals from 39 countries.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: The Fellowship Program is for library and information science professionals who are in early stages of career development and from countries with developing economies. Eligibility is limited to those who are from a qualifying country, have a degree in library or information science obtained within the past five years, and have at least three years, but no more than eight years, of library or information science experience.

Number of Awards: 5

Value of Award: The Fellows visit many libraries, cultural heritage institutions and library organizations. They also observe OCLC’s governance structure in action, gaining insight into issues affecting the global library cooperative. In addition, Fellows give presentations about their home countries and libraries and discuss real-world solutions to the challenges facing libraries today.

Duration of Programme: Program to run from 16 March to 12 April 2019

How to Apply:  

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: IFLA, OCLC

Finland Government Scholarships for International Students (EUR 1500 monthly allowance) 2019/2020

Application Deadline: 15th February, 2019.
CIMO will inform both successful and unsuccessful candidates of the results by June annually.

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: The Finland Government scholarships are based mainly on cultural agreements or similar arrangements between Finland and the following countries:
  • Australia
  • China
  • Cuba
  • Egypt
  • Israel
  • Japan
  • Mexico
  • Mongolia
  • Namibia
  • Peru
  • Republic of Korea
  • Turkey
  • Ukraine
  • USA
To be taken at (country): Finland

About the Award: The Finland Government Scholarship Pool programme is open to young researchers from all academic fields. The scholarship cannot be applied for Master’s level studies or post-Doctoral studies/research. The Finnish Government Scholarship Pool programme application form is not an application for a study/research placement. It is merely an application for funding.

Type: Doctoral (PhD)

Eligibility: In order to be an eligible applicant for the Finland Government scholarships, candidate must first successfully apply for a study/research placement at a Finnish university/public research institute – in other words, you must be at least provisionally accepted either as a visiting Doctoral-level student/researcher, or as a full-time Doctoral degree student. Please see section Doctoral Admissions for information on how to apply for a Doctoral-level study or research placement in Finland.
To be eligible, the applicant must:
  • have established contact with the Finnish receiving institution before applying (see section ‘Doctoral Admissions’)
  • have a letter of invitation from the academic supervisor in Finland; the invitation should also explain the commitment of the host institution to the project
  • have earned a Master’s-level degree before applying
  • intend to pursue post-Master’s level studies as a visiting student, participate in a research project or teach at a university or public research institute in Finland; priority will be given to doctoral studies
  • not have spent already more than one year at a Finnish higher education institution immediately before the intended scholarship period in Finland
  • be able to give proof of sufficient skills in speaking and writing the language needed in study/research*
  • be a national of one of the eligible countries listed above
Number of Awardees: Not specified

Value of Scholarship: The scholarship includes:
  • a monthly allowance of EUR 1500. The allowance is sufficient for one person only.
  • Expenses due to travel, international or in Finland, are not covered by the programme. Scholarship recipients are recommended to make arrangements for sufficient insurance coverage for their stay in Finland.
Duration of Scholarship: The Finnish Government Scholarship Pool programme can be applied for a study/research period of 3-9 months, 9 months being the maximum time for an individual applicant.

How to Apply: Applications for the Finnish Government Scholarship Pool funding should be made to the appropriate authority in the applicant’s country. The scholarship authorities in each country are invited to present applications for up to 10 candidates for the Finnish Government Scholarship Pool.
You can download the 2019/2020 application form using the below link.

Finnish Government Scholarship Pool application form 2018-2019
It is important to go through the Application instructions on the Scholarship Webpage (see link below) before applying.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Award Provider: Government of Finland

Total Nigeria Young Graduate Programme for Nigerian Students 2018

Application Deadline: 10th September 2018

Eligible Countries: Nigeria

To Be Taken At (Country): Nigeria

Offer ID: 13960BR

Field: Finance, Sales, Operations/Exploitation

Type: Internship

Eligibility: 
  • Must not be more than 26 years of age
  • Recent graduate with post graduate work experience not more than 2 years
  • A bachelors graduate with a minimum degree of 2nd Class Upper
  • Must be geographically mobile
  • He/she should be able to work in a multi-cultural environment.
  • He/she should be able to work in a team, be self-driven, innovative and willing to learn.
  • Good command of English.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Paid

Duration of Programme: The YGP is an 18 months program which commences  with a 6 month – 9 months program in Total Nigeria

How to Apply:

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: Total PLC

Pope Francis’s Bumpy Road to the Catholic Church’s Redemption

Cesar Chelala

These are not easy times for Pope Francis. Within two days he received strong criticism for Catholic priests’ sexual abuse of more than a thousand children in Pennsylvania. He was also confronted by Ireland’s Prime Minister and then by a high officer of the Catholic Church.
During his recent visit to Ireland, the first papal visit in almost 40 years, Leo Varadkar, Ireland’s Prime Minister, told Pope Francis, “Magdalene Laundries, Mother and Baby Homes, industrial schools, illegal adoptions, and clerical child abuse are stains on our state, our society and also the Catholic Church [Magdalene Laundries, and Mother and Baby Homes are places where nuns mistreated single mothers and illegally gave their children up for adoption]. Wounds are still open and there is much to be done to bring about justice and truth and healing for victims and survivors.”
While the Pope listened as Varadkar talked about the children abused in Pennsylvania detailing the “brutal crimes perpetrated by people within the Catholic Church and then obscured to protect the institution at the expense of innocent victims.” This is a story,” he said, “all too tragically familiar here in Ireland.”
Not all of Varadkar’s words were critical of the Church. In measured tone he told Pope Francis, “Holy Father, we thank you for your care for the Earth, for emphasizing the urgent challenge of climate change, and for reminding us of our responsibilities.  We thank you for the empathy you have shown for the poor, for migrants and for refugees.”
But Varadkar also added, “There can only be zero tolerance for those who abuse innocent children or who facilitate that abuse. We must now ensure that from words flow actions. Above all, Holy Father, I ask for you to listen to the victims.”
Prime Minister Varadkar made his position clear on other topics where there is divergence with the Church’s position saying, “We have voted in our parliament and by referendum to modernize our laws –understanding that marriages do not always work, that women should make their own decisions, and that families come in many forms including those headed by a grandparent, lone parent or same-sex parents or parents who are divorced.”
Varadkar’s words echoed a similar –but even stronger stand—taken by his predecessor, Enda Kenny. In 2011, Mr. Kenny openly confronted the Vatican for its handling of the children’s abuse question, and for failing to cooperate with the investigation carried out by the Irish government.
Pope Francis responded, “I cannot fail to acknowledge the grave scandal caused in Ireland by the abuse of young people by members of the church charged with responsibility for their protection and education.” And added, “It is my hope that the gravity of the abuse scandals, which have cast light on the failings of many, will serve to emphasize the importance of the protection of minors and vulnerable adults on the part of society as a whole.”
Just as Pope Francis was ending his visit to Ireland, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, who was apostolic nuncio in Washington D.C. from 2011 to 2016, accused Pope Francis and several senior prelates of complicity in covering up Archbishop Theodore McCarrick’s allegations of sexual abuse. Archbishop Viganò claimed that Pope Francis knew about sanctions imposed on then-Cardinal McCarrick by Pope Benedict XVI, but not only chose to repeal them and made him his trusted advisor.
Archbishop Viganò said that Pope Francis “is abdicating the mandate which Christ gave to Peter to confirm the brethren,” urged him “to acknowledge his mistakes” and “set a good example to cardinals and bishops who covered up McCarrick’s abuses and resign along with all of them.” The Vatican press office refused to respond to Archbishop Viganò’s letter.
These are trying times for Pope Francis and for the Catholic Church. The determination with which abusers are punished and effective policies are put in place to  prevent further abuses will be an indication of how seriously Pope Francis decides to reform the Church and honor the survivors of abuse at the hands of catholic clergy.