17 Apr 2017

Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA) Grants 2017

Application Deadline: 30th May 2017
Offered annually? Yes
To be taken at (country):
Fields of Proposal: OSIWA seeks proposals aimed at achieving the following specific themes:
  • Economic Governance and Advancement
  • Justice Reform and Rule of Law
  • Journalism
  • Equality and Anti-Discrimination
  • Democratic Practice
About the Award: The Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA) is a grant making and advocacy foundation that is part of the global Open Society Foundations Network. OSIWA works to support the creation of open societies in West Africa marked by functioning democracy, good governance, the rule of law, basic freedoms, and widespread civic participation. Its headquarters is in Dakar and it has offices in Abuja, Monrovia, Freetown and Conakry.
Type: Grants
Eligibility: OSIWA primarily awards grants to local organizations based in West Africa. In rare and limited circumstances, it provides support to West Africa-based international organizations with a strong commitment to transfer knowledge to local groups they partner with. It provides grants to government institutions as well as regional and sub-regional organizations working in its core priority areas. OSIWA requires all organizations seeking funding to submit a complete proposal, budget, and other relevant documents including leadership information (list of Board members, trustees and management staff who will be involved in the project), proof of registration and banking details.
Applications that are not submitted with all the relevant documentation may be delayed.
Selection Criteria: Selection criteria and process applications are evaluated on the extent to which the organization possesses the vision, drive, experience and skills required to create and sustain a project that will advance OSIWA’s objectives.
Value of Program: There is no set maximum amount for OSIWA funding. OSIWA operates a limited budget for the ten countries it covers and its regional program. In the event that OSIWA cannot fund the entire project budget, it may choose to fund part of it and request the grant seeker to source for the outstanding balance.
How to Apply: Proposals should be sent directly to: proposals@osiwa.org. Only proposals sent to this email address will be considered. Proposals will be accepted until May 30th 2017. OSIWA encourages the early submission of proposals. Submitted proposals will be reviewed on a first-come, first-served basis.
Award Provider: Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA)

InfoCongo Stories, Maps and Data Visualization Grant for Journalists 2017

Application Deadline: 20th May 2017
Eligible Countries: Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Zambia
About the Award: InfoCongo.org is a news and data platform of Internews´ Earth Journalism Network in Central Africa. Launched in August 2015, the initiative aims to identify and amplify local and international reporters dedicated to covering environmental issues in the region. Our main focus is to show the impacts of environmental change on human lives and ecosystems. For this reason, we prioritize stories about forests, water, climate change, wildlife, extractive industries, conflicts and crimes.
InfoCongo uses geo-referenced information, mapping and data visualization to tell stories and we welcome collaboration with fellow journalists, designers, developers, mapmakers and others to help us communicate the region’s most pressing issues. The grant opportunity is open to media and design professionals from Congo Basin countries, as well as to other nationalities interested in these issues or already working in the region.
Type: Grants
Eligibility: Our fund offers small grants ranging from $500 to $1,500 to support stories and visuals that reveal and illuminate pressing issues in the Congo Basin. Proposals should focus on the production of one or more story, map or data visualization element.
We welcome proposals from independent journalists and also from established (small and big) media outlets. Graphic designers, mapmakers, videographer and photographers are also welcome to apply, provided they can show examples of past work. Ideally, applicants should be based in a Congo Basin country and/or demonstrate that the impact of the story on their audience will positively influence development in the Congo region.
Proposals must indicate an outlet in which the applicant plans to publish. These outlets are free to air or publish the material first, so long as they agree to joint publication on InfoCongo.org and the Earth Journalism Network website. If selected, a signed agreement will require commitment from the media outlet to publish or broadcast the story, assuming it meets editorial standards.
Selection Criteria: We are interested in proposals that focus on:
  • Illegal exploitation and trade in wildlife and forest resources in the Congo Basin;
  • The cost of human conflicts on forest and conservation;
  • Climate change and forest-related stories;
  • The social and environmental costs and benefits of specific national and regional development projects such as dams, mines, industrial zones, ports, oil and gas projects, roadways and economic land and forestry concessions;
  • Environmental Impact Assessments and responsible investment policy and practice, and other social and environmental safeguards;
  • Positive stories highlighting best practices for regional development projects, policies or practice.
Value of Award: InfoCongo will consider stipend requests for journalists, web developers, photographers, videographers, data analysts and cartographers. Expenses for travel, research and/or database access, and translation may also be covered. Fixed costs for office supplies or equipment, however, will not be covered.
We expect budgets to not exceed $1,500 per proposal.
How to Apply: As part of the application process, applicants will need to provide an itemized budget that estimates expenses for the project and details how the funds will be used. Budget will be reviewed based on the criteria outlined above (see “What Expenses May Be Covered?”).
Award Provider: Earth Journalism Network

IDB Scholarships for Muslim Communities in Non-Member Countries 2017/2018

Application Deadlines: 
  • May-July: Deadline for submission to the IDB (for abroad studies)
  • June to December: Deadline for submission of applications to the IDB  (for in-country studies)
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Field of Study
  • Medicine
  • Engineering
  • Agriculture
  • Other fields related to above disciplines
About Scholarship: The objective of the Programme is to improve the socio-economic conditions and to preserve the cultural and religious identities of Muslim Communities in Non-member Countries through developing their human capital resources. The Programme provides scholarship to the academically meritorious but financially needy young Muslim students to pursue undergraduate or first-degree study in professional courses.
The concept of the Programme is to build a team of professional and committed Muslims as a tool for the improvement of the socio-economic conditions of their communities. Under this Programme, the scholarships are given as interest-free loan to the students but grants to the communities to which they belong. After graduation and gainful employment, all graduates are obliged to repay their loan amount to the community (IDB Local Trusts) for recycling and awarding additional scholarships to the local needy students.
Scholarship Offered Since: 1983
Scholarship Type: Undergraduate studies
Selection Criteria: Each year, the Programme follows the following selection procedures:
  • The Counterpart Organization announces the Programme in the country and invites applications from potential candidates who fulfill the criteria of the Programme.
  • The Scholarship Selection Committee (SSC) conducts the interviews of eligible candidates and recommends them through the Counterpart Organization to the IDB.
  • The IDB makes the final selection and informs the Counterpart Organizations.
Eligibility: To be eligible for this scholarship, the student/applicant must be able to meet the following basic criteria:
  • Age not over 24 years.
  • Completed senior secondary / pre-university education with good grades in major science subjects and language of instruction.
  • Secured admission in one of the disciplines covered under the Programme at a recognized college or university in their own countries (for in-country study).
  • Not in receipt of any other scholarship.
  • Committed and needy Muslim.
  • Recommended by the Counterpart Organization.
Number of Scholarships: Several
Value of Scholarship: The Programme covers all relevant expenses during students’ study period, including tuition fees, health and living costs as determined by the IDB.
Duration of Scholarship: for the period of study
Eligible Countries: developing countries
To be taken at (country): Consistent with the concept of the Programme, students must get admission or be in the first year in their own countries.
On exceptional basis and where admissions in professional courses are not possible or not available in any particular country, the IDB assists to place students from these countries in IDB member countries, which have been generous enough to provide places for the IDB students in their universities.
How to Apply
In countries, where the Programme is being implemented, inquiries can be made and application form obtained from Counterpart Organization in the country.
In a country, where the Programme has not yet been implemented, inquiries may be directed to the Scholarship Division, Department of Communities in Non-Member Countries, IDB.
Visit scholarship webpage for more details
Sponsors: Islamic Development Bank
Important Notes: To help students prepare themselves for their future leading role in the development of their communities and countries, the IDB also provides them with extra-curricular activities under a special programme called Community Development Programme comprising the following three components: Guidance and Counselling Activities, Post Study Activities and Capacity Building Activities.

Kashmir On Boil Again As Student Protests Spread

Mir Suhail

Protests against the Pulwama raids by police have escalated to other towns outside Srinagar. While Srinagar police is battling students in SP College, reports about similar protests came from Shopian, Sopore, Pattan, Gaderbal and now from Kashmir University. Police reportedly used force at almost all places.
The students of various colleges boycotted their classes and staged protests inside their college premises, Chanting slogans against alleged high-handedness of forces against the students of Degree College Pulwama, the students assembled in the college and staged protests. The joint call was given By KUSU and AJKSU in solidarity with GDC Pulwama .
At least 17 boys, all students, were injured when police and CRPF on Saturday came to arrest some students at Government Degree College, Pulwama. The police had come to arrest the students who had objected to the entry of an armoured vehicle into the college last week. That incident had led to the closure of the college.
kashmir-student-protest
While protesting against the Pulwama raids by police, more than 1000 students of Degree College Sopore and State run Higher Secondary School assembled in the college premises. They later moved out of the college as well.
As the police sealed the college exits, the students started demonstrating within the premises. Since the college is just a wall away from the police headquarters, they started pelting stones on it. It triggered clashes between the two sides. Police used tear smoke shells and various students are reportedly injured. The situation is tense but is under control.
Students across Kashmir are restive over the daring police raids on the Pulwama College. More than 65 students were injured in that college on Saturday. Interestingly, no investigations have been launched in the Pulwama raids.
Reports said dozen odd students are injured in the SP College Srinagar where intense clashes are going on. Students from Women’s College have also entered the SP College and the situation is reported to be grim. The police are using tear smoke, stunt grenades and PAVA shells. Police is getting into the classes.
A magistrate on duty is reported to have told police to offer some passage to the students to move out which will pave way for some normalcy.
Reports from Shopian said the police fired projectiles into the college premises at a time when the students were assembling to protest. “We had not moved out that they started shelling us,” one students rang up and told me in a choked, coughing voice. “They are pushing us to the wall, he further added ,Pity the intellect of those who instead of challenging the state’s muscularity, violence perpetrated by the armed forces gone berserk across Kashmir and political failure are shifting the blame on the young students. Students are not mannequins,They do not act like robots. They think, feel and act on their own.

Just now, reports said students of Kashmir University have came out in a procession. It was within the premises so far. Colleges in Pattan and Khanabal are also on boil.

Argentine teachers launch protest strike

Rafael Azul 

On Tuesday April 11, Argentine teachers carried out a 24-hour national protest strike against the repression by Buenos Aires police of a teachers’ rally at the national legislature two days earlier.
The teachers had set out to install an “an itinerant school”, a tent in which to conduct classes as a form of protest. They were prevented from doing so by the police attack, which included the use of pepper spray and beatings with nightsticks, as the protesters chanted, “We educate your children, stop beating us!”
The symbolic school recalled the teachers’ protest tent against the neo-liberal policies of President Menem (Peronist, 1989-99) that also targeted teachers’ wages and working conditions, in which teachers carried out rotating hunger strikes during 1,003 days. While that tent became an iconic symbol of workers repudiation of Menem’s policies, it was also the union bureaucracy’s way of maintaining the teachers’ struggle at the level of protest, allowing Menem to proceed with the wave of privatizations that radically transformed Argentine society.
So it was with the “itinerant school”. A spokesperson for SUTEBA, one of the four teachers unions, described the protest tent as an alternative to striking and Sonia Alesso, president of the Federation of Argentine Education Workers (CETERA), as she denounced the repression, declared that the idea of the “itinerant school” had been “a creative response” to protesting.
In fact, government authorities reversed themselves and the “itinerant school” was off and running this Wednesday, signaling that the order to repress may have been an overzealous response by government officials. Seeing it in this light, the one-day strike by teachers on April 11, like its national counterpart on April 6, was merely a vehicle for workers to express their discontent while the real negotiations affecting their jobs and living standards take place behind their backs.
The Macri government, whose austerity big business policies echo those of Menem, is determined not only not to give in to the demands of education workers, but to set a pattern to discipline the entire working class.
On the day of the strike, Macri, speaking at a conference of business entrepreneurs, defended the repression of the teachers and denounced the strike. “They break the law and then go on strike,” declared Macri.
Education Minister Esteban Bullrich condescendingly scolded the participants in Sunday’s rally stating that the police violence “is also a form of education.” Alleging that the teachers had not obtained “formal” permission to set up the structure, Bullrich added ominously: “When a police officer gives an order, enforcing a law, it must be obeyed.” In the face of shocking video evidence, Buenos Aires officials have cynically declared that the “police acted defensively.”
The repression of the teachers followed by a few days of attacks by Naval troops and police against workers blocking the Pan American highway and other roads during the general strike of April 6.
Following several months of agreement and relative peace with the union bureaucracies, Macri administration is now escalating and deliberately creating an atmosphere for repression and police attacks.
Assisting Macri is the governor of Buenos Aires Province, María Eugenia Vidal. Vidal is demanding that teachers’ wages be tied to concessions, on absenteeism and teacher evaluations. In the past, she has threatened to withdraw government recognition of the teachers unions. Vidal has repeatedly made it plain that the government’s policy on education does not stop at wages: “We are engaged in a broader battle than wages,” she recently declared.
A recent comment in the Madrid daily El Pais compared Vidal’s relationship with the teachers to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s year-long battle with the British coal miners in 1984-85. The miners’ defeat had disastrous consequences for the British working class.
The parallel is fitting. In the early months of his presidency, Macri made agreements with the Argentine trade union bureaucracy, in which the 2016 wage increases for teachers was set at the national level and set the benchmark for the rest of the working class in the byzantine yearly wage-setting process known in Argentina as paritarias, which feebly compensate workers for the ravages of the previous year’s inflation. Now, Macri has upped the ante and provoked the current battles with wage offers that amount to a draconian cut in living standards that teachers find totally unacceptable, tied to a package of concessions.
Equally provocative was the repression of the teachers’ symbolic “itinerant school” on bogus charges that there was no formal approval, utilizing rules that the government turn on and off as it sees fit.
The attacks on living standards have been accompanied by a media campaign depicting the teachers as shirkers and representing their struggle as an attack on the rights of children. The aim is to exploit middle class resentment, and create a base of support for greater attacks on the rights of workers.
Due to inflation last year, Argentine educators’ real wages and living standards have fallen. Inflation this year is anticipated to be 25 percent.
In the on-going paritarias, the teachers unions are demanding a 35 percent wage increase in national negotiations. Given that the rate of inflation in 2016 was 40 percent, their modest demand at best compensates for past price increases. The government promotes the fiction that, as a result of Macri’s austerity measures and tight money policies, inflation this year will be restrained to less than the 19 percent ceiling (in three payments) it is placing on wage increases.
Furthermore, Macri insists that teacher salaries are a provincial matter and should be subject to provincial paritarias, knowing full well that the provinces’ ability to grant wage increases are constrained by cuts in federal education grants.
According to a recent report, the monthly salary for a teacher with ten years seniority in the majority of Argentina’s provinces is below the poverty line for a family of four, of 13,670 pesos (900 US dollars). Nationally the average is 11,455 pesos (85 percent of poverty). Only in some of the southern Patagonian provinces, where living costs are higher than the rest of the country, do teachers’ wages exceed the national poverty line.
Despite the draconian concessions demanded by Macri, the CETERA union bureaucracy has no intention of launching a real fight. On the contrary, it will continue to negotiate away educators’ rights and conditions. On March 1, a week before the launching of a series of strikes, CETERA leader Sonia Alesso declared the federation’s willingness to negotiate and indicated her surprise that Macri had changed the rules of the game relative to 2016. Negotiations will take place, as they did then, largely behind the backs of the membership.

US media warns of “Russian meddling” in Latin America

Alex González

In the midst of growing tensions between the United States and Russia, sections of the US media are provocatively warning that Russia is bolstering its influence in Latin America at the expense of the US. These allegations are part of a broader crusade to beat the drums of war against Russia.
On April 8, the Washington Post published an article titled “The Soviet Union fought the Cold War in Nicaragua. Now Putin’s Russia is back,” alleging that a Russian compound in Managua, Nicaragua is a covert spying facility aimed against the United States.
The article reads, “The Nicaraguan government says it’s simply a tracking site of the Russian version of a GPS satellite system. But is it also an intelligence base intended to surveil the Americans?” Citing anonymous US officials, the article claims the goal of the new facility could be to intercept internet traffic running through the ARCOS 1 fiber-optic cable from Miami to Central America, supposedly in retaliation for the Obama administration’s scale-up of US and NATO troops near Russia’s borders in Eastern Europe.
In a similar article, the Washington, DC insider website The Hill claims Russian President Vladimir Putin is seeking to interfere in the Mexican elections in support of Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), the leader and 2018 presidential candidate of the Movement for National Regeneration (Morena). The article openly admits there is no “hard evidence” to justify this allegation, but puts forward conjecture as fact.
The Hill quotes Christopher Wilson, deputy director of the Wilson Center Mexico Institute, who stated, “Russia meddles in elections, we know that…Russia’s biggest interest would be on wreaking some havoc on the U.S.-Mexico relationship.” Adapting himself to the neo-McCarthyite campaign being waged in the US, Armando Ríos Peter, a Mexican senator for the Party of the Democratic Revolution, told the publication: “If [Russia] intervened in the United States, there’s every reason to think that Mexico is a target for attack.”
The United States ruling class wrote the book on “meddling” in Latin American affairs. Over the last century, the US has invaded several Latin American countries, orchestrated coups, backed right-wing deaths squads, and supported brutal dictators. Across Latin America, the words “Central Intelligence Agency” evoke memories of the most brutal and depraved crimes.
In Nicaragua, one of the two examples of alleged Russian meddling provided by the Washington Post and The Hill, the US backed the brutal dictatorship of the dynastic Somoza family for roughly three decades. After Anastasio Somoza’s removal from power in 1979, the US then supported the fascistic Contra rebels who murdered tens of thousands of peasants in the Nicaraguan Civil War. In the case of Mexico, US influence goes back to before the reign of Porfirio Diaz. The US has invaded Mexico three times and stole half of Mexico’s territory after the Mexican-American war of 1846-48.
More recently, it is US officials who have explicitly signaled that Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador is not acceptable to the American ruling class. On April 5, Senator John McCain said: “If the election were tomorrow in Mexico, you would probably get a left-wing, anti-American president of Mexico. That can’t be good for America.”
John Kelly, Secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, added: “It would not be good for America, or for Mexico.”
This amounts to an acknowledgement that the US is prepared to “meddle” in the Mexican elections. As CIA Director Michael Pompeo stated at a speech Thursday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies: “You know, we perform intelligence on [foreign] elections in the same way that we do with respect to everything else.”
US concerns against Russian meddling serve not only to promote the drive to war against Russia in Syria and Eastern Europe, but also to limit the influence of both Russia and China in Latin America, which US imperialism sees as its own “backyard.”
During the past decade, Russia has performed some naval drills with both Venezuela and Nicaragua and continues to give military and economic aid to the Venezuelan government of Nicolás Maduro. In 2015, Nicaragua’s parliament passed a resolution allowing Russian warships to dock in Nicaraguan ports, and the two countries are reportedly planning future joint military exercises. This comes nowhere near the regular military drills and billions of dollars spent by American imperialism in funding the region’s many right-wing governments.
In a February 3 article, the Wilson Center noted: “Russian military cooperation with the countries in the Western Hemisphere remains limited, and Moscow does not aspire to build a significant military presence in the region. Russia is unable to afford such a presence, and making a long-term financial commitment to Latin America is not the Kremlin’s goal.”
According to the Atlantic Council, Chinese trade in Latin America has increased by nearly 2,000 percent since 2000, and Latin America is collectively now China’s fourth largest trading partner. The Trump administration’s “America First” trade policies could further increase Chinese economic ties in the region as many Latin American countries seek to decrease their dependence on the US for fear of higher tariffs. Mexico currently sends over 80 percent of its manufacturing exports to the United States, with Nicaragua sending over 50 percent.
The US Army War College published a similar article in 2015 with regard to China titled, “Expanding the Rebalance: Confronting China in Latin America.” This article makes a similar case that Chinese influence is “creating economic interdependencies and undermining US influence and generating further political, social and economic tensions.”
The warnings by the corporate press and military think tanks that Russia and China are expanding their influence in the region presages a deepening involvement of US imperialism in the region. The new campaign sends a message: the US will not tolerate any challenges to its self-proclaimed and unlimited right to exploit Latin America.

Without evidence, UK parliamentary report accuses Russia of interference in Brexit referendum vote

Paul Mitchell 

A report published last week by British MPs[Members of Parliament] on the June 23, 2016 Brexit vote, “Lessons Learned from the EU Referendum,” is being used to whip up accusations of “foreign interference” and stoke up demands for a “major” new cyber security programme.
The Guardian declared in response to the report’s publication, “…foreign states may have interfered in the vote…” with the BBC proclaiming, “Brexit vote site may have been hacked.” London’s Standard newspaper cast aside any doubt, telling its readers, “Brexit voting website crash ‘caused by foreign cyber attack’,” inventing a quote along the way. The Sun similarly declared, “Russian ‘Cyber Hit’ On EU Vote Website.”
No one reading the press headlines would gather that the bulk of the report, produced by the cross party House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Select Committee (PACAC), is concerned with devastating criticisms of the then Prime Minister David Cameron and his Conservative Party government.
Cameron is accused of holding “a ‘bluff-call’ referendum in order to close down unwelcome debate,” using state funding and civil servants to unfairly promote a Remain vote and failing to prepare “proper planning for a Leave vote.” As a result, his credibility was “destroyed” and the reputation of the Civil Service for impartiality “damaged,” the Committee concluded.
These criticisms should have led to calls for the Conservative government to resign and action taken against Cameron and his associates for fraud. But no, all of this was brushed aside by the media. Instead, the focus was on the crash of the Voter Registration computer system on June 7, 2016 and unsubstantiated claims that Russia was involved.
At the time, the crash was put down to a sudden increase in applications as the deadline approached. More than 500,000 people tried to register on the final day, with the crash taking place 100 minutes before the registration deadline ended. There were no suggestions from government, other politicians, or the media that foreign powers may have been involved in the crash or that hacking was responsible.
The “Lessons Learned” report, based on expert testimony, explains that the cause of the crash was “an exceptional surge in demand… the sheer numbers of duplicate applications and confusion as to whether individuals needed to re-register.” In addition, the government “clearly failed to undertake the necessary level of testing and precautions” and that when problems arose they were “not further investigated and corrected.”
However, without any evidence, the report raises the false flag of foreign interference. It states, “We do not rule out the possibility that there was foreign interference in the EU referendum campaign caused by a DDOS (distributed denial of service attack) using botnets, though we do not believe that any such interference had any material effect on the outcome of the EU referendum.”
The report then makes the ludicrous claim that while US and UK government involvement in cyberspace is “predominantly technical and computer-network based,” Russia and China use “a cognitive approach based on understanding of mass psychology and of how to exploit individuals”—that is, they engage in propaganda and brain-washing.
It would appear that references in the report to Russian interference were inserted at a later stage, after the Putin government was accused of using hackers to undermine the Hillary Clinton campaign during the US Presidential race late last year. Nowhere in the report are there any references to the source of the information about DDOS, botnets, cognitive approaches or mass psychology.
None of the written evidence submitted to the committee by 104 individuals and organisations made any reference to Russia.
Of the hundreds of questions asked during the three days of oral evidence, only three questions—in the session on November 1, 2016—concerned Russian interference and were obviously introduced as an afterthought as the anti-Russian campaign in the US was reaching fever-pitch. They were asked by Labour committee member Paul Flynn and directed at Electoral Commission chair Jenny Watson.
Flynn asked Watson, “Are the rules sufficiently robust to detect interference from a government like Russia’s, knowing Putin’s declared policy of campaigning to weaken the European Union and the allegations made about Russia’s conduct in the American presidential election?”
Watson replied, “If you are talking about the outcome of the referendum, I am confident that the declaration I made on the morning of 24 June reflects the votes that were cast by voters.” She added, “I would imagine that those kinds of questions would be best asked of the security services, to be quite honest.”
It is clear that the intelligence agencies—whose heads have made numerous anti-Russian statements over the last period centred on unsubstantiated allegations of all manner of “interference” by Moscow—were duly approached to give their position.
Announcing the publication of the “Lessons Learned” report, Select Committee chair and Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin focussed on the web site crash, declaring, “We have taken advice on this and you cannot rule out the possibility it was a direct attack.”
“We’ve seen this happen in other countries. Our own government has made it clear to us that they don’t think there was anything, but you don’t necessarily find any direct evidence,” Jenkin explained.
While claims of “interference” in the Brexit referendum campaign by Russian president Vladimir Putin are uncritically accepted as good coin, the blatant—indeed unprecedented—interventions by Western leaders in the referendum were positively welcomed.
In April 2016, former US President Barack Obama flew to the UK to warn that the country would be at the “back of the queue” in any trade deal with the US if people voted to leave the EU. He declared that if he were a British voter, he would think twice about leaving a market that makes up 44 percent of British exports, and is “responsible for millions of jobs and an enormous amount of commerce upon which a lot of businesses depend.” The Guardian crowed, “Obama sends the right message.”
Days before the referendum German Chancellor Angela Merkel broke “her self-imposed vow of silence” on the Brexit vote to say, she hoped the British population would vote to remain “for the benefit of all of us.” She then threatened that the UK would get a worse deal outside the EU.
European Council President Donald Tusk warned that a Leave vote would have “dramatic” negative consequences and European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker declared, “deserters will not be welcomed back with open arms.”
Compared to these belligerent pro-Remain “interferences”, Russian reactions, according to Newsweek magazine, were “notably restrained.” It added, “the immediate foreign policy fallout from the British referendum has been more muted than one might have expected.”
Putin attacked the claim made by Cameron that Russia would savour the crisis produced by the UK leaving, accusing him of using the anti-Russian card to instil fear ahead of the referendum. Following the vote to leave Putin warned that its “traumatic effect” would last a long time.
Whether or not Putin’s pronouncements are to be believed is not the issue. As the President of the Russian Federation, Putin is the country’s elected head of state and has every right to put forward Russia’s view on such a fundamental issue as the Brexit referendum.
The report marks only the latest episode in British imperialism’s anti-Russian campaign, backed by their media echo chambers.
In February, Ciaran Martin, head of the UK’s new National Cyber Security Centre, told the Times there had been “a step change in Russian aggression in cyberspace. Part of that step change has been a series of attacks on political institutions, political parties, parliamentary organisations and that’s all very well evidenced by our international partners and widely accepted.”
This was stated alongside a number of entirely unsubstantiated scare stories by the British political and media establishment that Russia was seeking to interfere in this year’s French and German elections.
In contrast to much hyped and unsubstantiated claims of Russian meddling in British politics, around 120 UK troops arrived in Estonia last month as part of one of the biggest British deployments to Eastern Europe in decades. These were joined by 300 UK vehicles, including Warrior infantry fighting vehicles, Challenger 2 tanks and AS90 self-propelled artillery pieces. A further 680 UK troops will arrive in Estonia this spring, as part of NATO’s enhanced Forward Presence—a critical component of NATO’s ongoing military build-up and encirclement of Russia.

Tesla’s market valuation pushes past Ford and GM

Gabriel Black 

The electric car manufacturer Tesla surpassed GM briefly this past week as the most valued US car manufacturer, achieving a market capitalization Monday (the total value of all stocks issued) of a little over $50 billion. While Tesla’s stock has dipped slightly after this high, below that of GM, its market capitalization is still higher than the Ford Corporation.
The valuation of Tesla by the stock market at a higher level than GM and Ford is remarkable given that Tesla produces a small fraction of the number of cars that either company makes. For example, in the second quarter of 2016, Tesla shipped 24,500 vehicles, nearly double what it had done the year before. However, GM sold over 2.4 million automobiles in the same quarter, 100 times more vehicles.
Since late 2016, Tesla’s market price has shot up from $30 billion to $47.62 billion today. Meanwhile, GM and Ford have seen their market capitalization decline in the past few months, a general trend for the automakers since 2014.
The valuation of Tesla at this seemingly absurd level is the result of massive financial bets by speculators that the company will be at the forefront of a coming automated and electric revolution in the global car industry. These speculators have also been driven by cheap, hot money on Wall Street which has caused the whole stock market to reach new, unprecedented levels. This trend, which began under the administration of former president Barack Obama, was further bolstered by the Trump administration’s ongoing dismantling of barriers and regulations on large corporations.
Since its founding in 2003, Tesla has focused on producing electric luxury vehicles, releasing its Tesla Roadster in 2008, followed by its Model S, an electric luxury sedan, in 2012. Although its products have been aimed at upper-class consumers, its newest car, the Model 3, will be released this summer with a price tag around $35,000 before rebates, in an attempt to grab a larger share of the auto market.
Tesla’s business model rests partly on its bet that its superior technology in the way of batteries and automated driving will allow it to wrestle a substantial share of the future car market from the long-standing auto giants. Elon Musk, founder and CEO of Tesla, said in a tweet on April 3, “Tesla is absurdly overvalued if based on the past, but that’s irrelevant. A stock price represents risk-adjusted future cash flows.”
Tesla is pioneering lithium-ion cell development and production—a primary component of all electronic devices that run on batteries. It has invested about $2 billion dollars into a gigantic battery factory outside of Reno, in the state of Nevada. In combination with this, Tesla has launched a home battery product and is working to release roofs for homes that are solar panels but look like regular roofs.
Simultaneously, the company is a leader in automated-driving—which auto and tech companies are racing to perfect. Most car companies and tech companies plan on launching a fully-automated car by 2020, including Google, Toyota, Uber, Volvo, Nissan, Daimler, Honda, and PSA.
Tesla, however, is planning on having one ready by next year and has the advantage of already having autopilot features on most of its cars for some time, allowing the company to collect large amounts of data and better perfect its software. Meanwhile, Ford has partnered with Uber to produce fully autonomous ride-sharing vehicles in 2021 and GM with Lyft to do the same thing, with test versions coming out in 2018.
Tesla’s emergence as the most-valued US car company reflects general trends in the economy. In 2006, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Amazon were far down the list for the most valuable companies in the world. Today, Apple is the most valuable company in the world ($753 billion), followed by Alphabet (Google’s parent company), Microsoft, and then Amazon. Facebook is the eighth most valuable company, in-between Johnson & Johnson and JPMorgan Chase.
These companies are all making enormous revenues off of their capacity to arrive at groundbreaking technology first. The tremendous money at stake means that these companies are at each other’s throats when it comes to property rights and research. Whoever achieves a given technology first, and reliably, can easily push out its rivals.
This has resulted in several vicious lawsuits involving Google, Uber, Tesla and others—an irrational, expensive, and time-consuming way to achieve scientific and technological progress. Undoubtedly, if these companies worked together, and solved the technical problems collectively, technology would develop at an even faster rate.
While this shift toward high-tech reflects changes in the physical economy toward production and distribution systems highly dependent on the most advanced forms of technology and computer programming, it reflects equally, if not more so, the immense financial speculation that grips the high-tech industry.
Since the crash of 2008 the world’s financial markets have been flush with cheap credit due to low interest rates and quantitative easing. This has led to large quantities of hot money trying to find the most profitable outlet. Several top companies, like Amazon and Google, have only recently made profits but have grown enormously in market value due to their tremendous growth and market dominance in their given industries.
Tesla and other tech companies have seen their stocks soar as they become repositories for this flood of cheap credit. The stock market as a whole has shot far past the heights it reached prior to the 2007 financial crisis, with tech stocks pioneering this gigantic new bubble.
In addition to these considerations, Tesla also benefits from political connections with Trump. Elon Musk, along with many other tech leaders, is on Trump’s economic advisory council.
Though he criticized Trump before the election, post-election, the billionaire Musk has been the largest proponent of working with Trump on the advisory board. In contrast, several members, including the Uber CEO, have quit in protest at Trump’s immigration policies. Tesla’s cars, which are exclusively assembled in the US, are a bargaining chip for Musk when it comes to winning further subsidies or price rebates from the government.

Amazon workers denounce working conditions

Evan Blake

In recent years, Amazon has become one of the fastest-growing and most valuable companies in the world. According to the Financial Times Global 500 rankings, Amazon has the fourth greatest market capitalization, jumping from 33rd in 2015 and now trailing only Apple, Google and Microsoft.
The Seattle, Washington-based online retail giant has an estimated 341,000 employees in at least 30 countries around the world. At the end of 2016, Amazon had roughly 180,000 full-time employees in the US, a six-fold increase since 2011. In January, the company announced plans to hire 100,000 more full-time workers in the US by mid-2018. This will be largely through the building of new fulfillment centers (warehouses as large as one-million square-feet or roughly the size of 28 football fields), which contain inventory from suppliers and enable Amazon to increasingly offer same-day delivery services for many of its products.
The rise of Amazon has funneled unfathomable wealth to the company’s founder, chairman and CEO, Jeff Bezos, who recently surpassed Warren Buffett to become the second-richest person in the world, with a total wealth of $76.9 billion. In 2016 alone, Bezos amassed $27.6 billion, largely through the rise in the value of company shares. This amount is enough to pay each of Amazon’s worldwide employees a salary of $80,938, or a wage of roughly $39 per hour.
The immense wealth accumulated by Bezos has been produced by the labor of Amazon workers, who are highly exploited and paid close to the minimum wage for highly physically-demanding work. The company uses state-of-the-art technology to maximize the output it extracts from every worker and has been routinely cited for workplace safety violations and abuse.
“Pickers,” warehouse workers who collect items scheduled for delivery, are required to wear tracking devices and routinely walk upwards of 15 miles during a shift. They are reprimanded and even fired by supervisors if their data shows any inefficiencies.
A 2014 article in Wired magazine noted “the rapid-fire way that warehouse workers” physically move and package items. “The packing stations are a whirl of activity where algorithms test human endurance. Orders stream down a computer screen that indicate the proper box size for each. Rollers spit out the bags of sealed air used to cushion items in the boxes and the tape to seal them. Workers whip through the folding, packing, and sealing of boxes at a speed that could only come through days, months, and years of practice. The pace cannot slow if Amazon wants to meet the demand the company itself has stoked through the speed and reliability of its fulfillment operation.”
Fulfillment center in Tracy, California
In June 2014, 52-year-old Jody Rhoads was killed when machinery she was operating to move pallets crashed into shelving and pinned her at a fulfillment center in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. In another notorious incident in 2011, management at an Amazon warehouse in Breinigsville, Pennsylvania refused to open their doors to provide ventilation as temperatures reached 110 degrees. When workers began collapsing on the job, the company simply paid to have ambulances on standby outside the facility to shuttle workers to the hospital.
World Socialist Web Site reporting team recently spoke with Amazon workers in Tracy, California, 63 miles east of San Francisco. It quickly became clear that management has tried to create an atmosphere of intimidation to prevent workers from speaking out against poor working conditions. A worker with three years’ experience, at first apprehensive about speaking to a WSWS reporter, nevertheless chose to talk briefly without giving his name. Referring to the risk he was taking, the worker said, “A lot have been fired for a lot less.”
During job training workers are told speaking to the media is against company policy and could result in immediate dismissal. “I knew someone who was fired simply for saying the word ‘union’ and being overheard by a manager,” the worker told the WSWS. “The company has threatened to shut down and relocate entire fulfillment centers if they hear enough talk about forming a union.”
Another worker said the starting wage at the plant is $13.50 per hour. Workers receive a meager $0.25 per hour raise every six months, with a ceiling wage of $15 per hour, a poverty wage scale in a state with one of the highest costs of living. Nationally, starting wages for Amazon workers are often only $11-12 per hour.
Another worker told the WSWS, “The most striking thing to me about working here is the incredibly low morale. I’ve worked at other jobs, including at large factories, and I’ve never seen workers’ morale so low. You try to get by and pretend ‘it’s another day in paradise,’ but it’s really difficult when everyone seems so depressed and angry all the time.”
The Tracy fulfillment center opened in October 2013 at the same time as another facility was opened in nearby Stockton, a city devastated by the 2008 financial collapse, which in 2012 became the largest American city to declare bankruptcy, before being surpassed by Detroit the following year.
Amazon has six fulfillment centers in San Bernardino, another major city to declare bankruptcy.
The company apparently targets areas that have been hard hit by deindustrialization, which have an ample supply of unemployed workers who can be exploited for low wages. Cash-strapped states and localities offer the company large tax cuts and other subsidies to “create jobs.”
Some of the sites chosen for new fulfillment centers are Livonia, Michigan, western suburb of Detroit, where the warehouse will be built on the location of a former General Motors plant.
Amazon is also slated to open two facilities in Aurora, Illinois, where Caterpillar plans to close a plant later this year, wiping out 800 jobs. The state of Illinois is granting Amazon $12.9 million in corporate tax breaks for these two facilities, and potentially over $100 million for the company’s eight total facilities in the state.
There is a deep undercurrent of hostility among Amazon workers toward these brutal working conditions that they face, and a growing sentiment in support of a struggle. In addition to these concerns, Amazon workers at the Tracy, California facility and another warehouse in northern Virginia, just outside of Washington, DC, also spoke to the WSWS about the danger of war, expressing the general antiwar sentiment felt in the majority of the American population.
After learning that Trump had ordered air strikes directly targeting the Syrian government, one worker at the Tracy facility emphatically declared, “Trump is an idiot.” Another at the Northern Virginia facility said, “In my opinion, killing is never the way and it is definitely not the way to achieve peace in this world.” This worker noted that at a younger age he had been forced to join the US Army, as a means of paying for his school tuition.
An Amazon contractor at the Northern Virginia center said, “There are so many other things the population should be worrying about. The threat of a major war with another nuclear power is something we all should be concerned about, and it should be the media’s job to bring something like this to peoples’ attention. It seems like it’s left up to the socialists to be the ones to bring it up.”
While management seeks to silence dissent among Amazon workers there are many Facebook pages and reddit.com posts where workers actively express their opposition. There is a sense that something must be done not only about conditions on the job but the grim prospects an entire generation of young workers is facing, including massive student loan debts, dead-end and low-paying jobs and the danger of war.
Efforts by several trade unions, including the International Association of Machinists, to make inroads among Amazon workers have been rebuffed due to the decades of betrayals by these organizations. Far from improving wages and conditions for warehouse and logistics workers, including at United Parcel Service, the Teamsters and other unions have maintained multi-tiered wage and benefit systems and part-time and precarious employment conditions.
Amazon workers need organization. They do not, however, need organizations that are tied to the big business and the corporate-controlled political parties. The Socialist Equality Party urges Amazon workers to form rank-and-file workplace committees to unite Amazon workers to fight for the right to secure, good-paying and safe jobs. Amazon workers in the US and internationally possess an immense, but, as yet, untapped power, and common industrial action by workers could quickly become a choke point in the global economy.
Fundamentally, the great questions confronting Amazon workers, like all workers in the US and around the world—the immense social inequality, the underlying structure of society, the threat of a nuclear world war—can only be addressed through the building of a mass political movement of the working class against the capitalist system, which enables the few like Bezos to accumulate vast riches by exploiting the collective labor of the working class.
We encourage all Amazon workers to contact the World Socialist Web Site today. We will do everything in our power to assist workers in establishing lines of communication among Amazon workers throughout the US and internationally, to build rank-and-file committees and elaborate a fighting strategy to defend their interests.

At least 26 dead in garbage dump collapse in Sri Lanka

Vijith Samarasinghe & Wimal Perera

The death toll from Friday’s collapse of a large portion of the massive garbage dump in Meethotamulla, in the suburbs of Colombo, rose to 26 by yesterday evening. The bodies of seven children, along with 19 adults, have been found so far. Another 12 injured have been admitted to the Colombo National Hospital. Residents told WSWS reporters that there could be as many as a 100 people still buried under the debris.
The Meethotamulla garbage dump
About 145 houses have been destroyed or buried by the collapsing garbage mountain. Around 645 people from 180 families have been displaced and are temporarily sheltering in a nearby primary school and other places without basic amenities. Because the Hindu traditional New Year festival day fell on April 14, visiting relatives may also have been inside the buried houses. The Sri Lanka Electricity Board warned people to leave the surrounding area because a high voltage power line has been damaged.
The tragedy has provoked shock and outrage across the country, compounding the political crisis of the goernment, which is already facing widespread opposition over its austerity policies. President Maithripala Sirisena has held meetings with ministers, military chiefs and government officials to announce assistance and compensation for the victims. Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe has cut short his tour of Asia “because of the disaster.”
With government approval, Colombo Municipal Council had established a huge garbage dump on a 16-acre block of land and heaped waste up to 30 metres high. Management of the dump lacked any scientific application or concern for the lives of nearby residents. Friday’s collapse destroyed all the houses in its southern boundary.
People wait near the Colombo national hospital mortuary to collect the bodies of those killed.
A woman, who had been waiting since Friday for the bodies of her brother, his wife and 12-year-old daughter to be unearthed, told the WSWS that no government officials or rescue teams reached the site for more than an hour after the disaster. “Residents themselves started searching for the buried people. Then the navy and police came with few shovels,” she said.
Facing rising anger, the government sent army “rescue teams” a few hours later. The army brigadier in charge of the disaster site told the media that a contingent of 600 has now been deployed.
Soldiers and rescue teams are searching the site with rented excavation machinery and without proper equipment or protective gear. This shows the lack of proper disaster preparedness by the government, despite the many landslides in recent years that have killed hundreds. In 2004, the Asian tsunami killed around 40,000 people in Sri Lanka.
A section of displaced people in the Terence school at Kolonnawa
Another woman told the WSWS: “For how long have we been saying that this [heap of refuse] would collapse!” She said that a university professor had warned last year that the garbage mountain could collapse due to the pressure of methane gas being produced inside. “All our cries fell on the deaf ears of governments! They did nothing until so many people were buried alive,” said a man who was waiting for information about relatives.
Law and Order Minister Sagala Ratnayaka, S.M. Marikkar, a government parliamentarian for the area, and Police Chief Pujith Jayasundara faced angry protests by local people when they visited the area.
“People told them that there’s no need to visit after so many have died. What we got when we protested against dumping of garbage here was baton charges,” a man told the WSWS. “Politicians, Buddhist monks, or Catholic priests, none of them are wanted here.”
Another man, now alone with his grandson, angrily explained that these were not deaths, but murders.
Conscious of the simmering anger, the government has deployed a large number of police and soldiers in the area. Under the pretext of “public safety,” the entire area has been cordoned off. The residents are still unable to salvage valuables from their houses.
Contingents of riot police armed with water cannon, tear gas and firearms are on stand-by in nearby towns such as Wellampitiya and Gothatuwa New Town.
More than 24 hours after the collapse, Deputy Finance Minister Harsha de Silva said that the problem had been building up more than 20 years and the government had now decided to immediately stop the dumping of garbage at the site.
Blaming the victims themselves, de Silva stated that the tragedy occurred because the families had refused to move from the area, despite being offered compensation. Locals, however, told the WSWS that there had not been a resettlement program, apart from verbal promises by officials for a pittance in compensation or for rent for a house at an alternative location.
Six bodies of two families
These attempts to evict people are a part of the project initiated by the previous government of President Mahinda Rajapakse, and continued by the current government, to transform Colombo into an international financial and commercial hub. The government is now seeking to use the tragedy to push ahead with evictions.
For a long time this area was used as a place for dumping garbage. However, the dangerous situation developed after 2009 when it became Colombo’s main garbage disposal facility. People protested, warning against the potential disasters on many occasions in the past few years. In early 2014 the Mahinda Rajapakse government launched a violent police attack on the residents who were engaged in a sit-in for days blocking dumping.
During the campaign for the January 2015 presidential election, Ranil Wickremesinghe, then opposition leader, visited the area and told the residents that the problem of the garbage dump would be solved as soon as Maithripala Sirisena was elected. Yesterday he sent hypocritical condolences and cynically stated that the government had been on the point of solving the problem of the garbage dump. In reality, his government responded to local protests in May and December 2015 with brutal police attacks and the arrest of many residents.
The Meethotamulla garbage dump disaster is another tragedy generated by successive governments and the drive for profit. It demonstrates that the capitalist system cannot resolve even the most basic problems facing the masses. While President Sirisena has reportedly ordered an immediate stop to garbage disposal in the area and relief for the victims, his real concern is to prevent the disaster from becoming a focus for mounting anger against the government.