31 Aug 2020

African Union Innovating Education in Africa Expo 2020

Application Deadline: 25th September 2020 by 23:00 (GMT+3).

About the Award: The advent of COVID-19 has exacerbated challenges in Africa’s education system and reinforces the need for fit for context, innovative and scalable solutions in education. DOTSS provides an approach for reorienting Africa’s education and training systems to meet the knowledge, competencies, skills, innovation and creativity required to nurture African core values and promote sustainable development at the national, sub-regional and continental levels as espoused in CESA.
There is the need to promote innovation in the entire education and skills development ecosystems, taking advantage of the digital revolution, in order to increase its impact and also ensure that disadvantaged groups are not left out. As the Continental Education Strategy for Africa (CESA 16-25) states, ICT is an essential tool for ensuring universal access, quality of provision, and empowerment of school graduates for meaningful personal lives, and contribution to social economic development.  
Since its inception in 2018, the Innovating Education in Africa Expo has continued to gather momentum and established itself as the leading Pan-African event promoting the adoption of Education Innovations in Africa. In light of the above, the African Union Commission (AUC) and Partners across Africa will hold the third edition of Innovating Education in Africa Expo as a virtual series of events and activities from October 2020 – June 2021.

Innovations being sought:
The innovation should either be in the phase of piloting or implementation in Africa with some demonstrated success. The solutions should focus on one or more aspects of the education delivery system including data and analytics, teaching and learning management software, teaching and learning materials, connectivity of schools, assessment, education hardware and infrastructure, and school administration. Additionally, the innovation should satisfy at least one of the following:
  • Enable access to education and improved quality of delivery for those who are unable to access existing services.
  • Demonstrate a scalable, sustainable business and financing model.
  • Provide services to consumers at lower prices than existing alternatives.
Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility: Applications are accepted from entrepreneurs aged between 18-35 years. Organisations should meet the following criteria:
  • Implementing an education innovation in Africa in line with the “background” and “innovations being sought” defined in the Call for Submissions.
  • Should have been a legally registered and operational for not less than 1 year.
  • Should not have previously awarded in the top 10 category of the Innovating Education in Africa Expo 2018 and 2019.
Eligible Countries: African countries

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Successful applicants will benefit from one or more of the following:
  • Receive cash grants up to 100,000 USD.
  • Innovation promoted to policy makers, investors, and practitioners during the Virtual Exhibition Day.
  • Participate in entrepreneurship training, business incubation and acceleration program towards strengthening business model and scaling up of innovations.
  • Innovation published in the Africa Education Innovations Handbook 2020.
  • Certificate of Recognition from the African Union Commission.
How to Apply: Submissions should be made online in English or French at www.edu-au.org/submit-innovation. The following information should be submitted:
  • Describe the need which the innovation targets (100 words max).
  • Describe the business model for implementing the innovation (250 words max).
  • Provide information on the impact or demonstrated success of your innovation (100 words max).
  • Explain how the innovation can be upscaled sustainably (100 words max).
  • Video which shows your innovation in action.
  • Profile of the organisation’s leader or leadership team, as applicable.
  • Business registration certificate.
Deadline for submissions is 25th September 2020 by 23:00 (GMT+3). Please send any enquiries to owusum@africa-union.org.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

IELTS Scholarship Award 2020

Application Deadline: Awards granted all year round

Eligible Countries: Any

To be taken at (country): Anywhere

About the Award: IELTSPodcast is dedicated to helping students prepare for their IELTS exam and would like to offer an opportunity to students who are facing financial difficulties and need to attain their IELTS certificate. We would like to provide an online course and essay correction service for free to deserving students.

Eligibility:
  • -Non-native English Speakers
  • -Students who have never taken the IELTS exam before
  • -Students who need the IELTS exam for Study or Career advancement
  • -Students who are continuing their studies abroad
  • -Professionals who need their IELTS certificate for career advancement
Value of Scholarship: $195
-Please note, the award does not cover your IELTS exam fee.

How to Apply: Please follow the instructions here  

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Name of Award Provider: IELTSPodcast

International PhD Program for Agricultural Economics, Bioeconomy and Rural Development (IPPAE) Scholarships 2021/2022

Application Deadline: 31st October 2020

Eligible Countries: Developing Countries

To be Taken at (Country): Germany

About the Award: The International PhD Program for Agricultural Economics, Bioeconomy and Rural Development (IPPAE) was first accredited in 1992 by the funder, the German Academic Exchange Office (DAAD). The program is the result of a cooperation between the agricultural economics groups of the University of Hohenheim and the University of Giessen. The program is highly competitive and interdisciplinary. Its strength is that all PhD candidates have prior research or work experience in an area close to their PhD topics, which strengthens their analytical skills as well as the amount of knowledge that can be passed from peer to peer. In Giessen, the IPPAE lays its thematic focus on empirical, problem-solving research, at the crossroads between agricultural economics, agricultural sociology, farm economics and sustainable resource use. To date, more than 100 candidates received their PhD through the IPPAE Giessen.


About the Award:

Type: PhD

Eligibility:
  • outstanding scholars from developing countries and emerging economies (DAC)
  • 2 years of work experience
  • excellent written and spoken English
  • MSc degree obtained not more than 6 years prior to application
  • MSc degree in agricultural economics or related subjects
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Funding for this program as well as the German language course is provided by DAAD.

Monthly Funding
  • A monthly scholarship which presently amounts to € 1.200 is paid for the time of the doctoral studies (38 months).
  • Family allowances are provided if the candidate’s family joins him/her during the time of the doctoral scholarship allocation.
Yearly Funding
  • One return flight per year for 3 years
  • Yearly research grant of € 460 to purchase items such as laptops, winter clothes, or cover the costs to participate to courses or conferences
Additional Research Funding
  • A fieldwork allowance is provided for 2 years. This allowance is of maximum € 2.500 and is not extendable at all.
  • The publication of the PhD Thesis is supported with up to € 1.200.
German Languange Course Funding
  • Allowance of € 410 per month
  • Accommodation is provided
Duration of Award: The IPPAE Giessen program lasts 42 months. It has a formalised structure which is compulsory to follow. The programme starts 1st of October each year.

How to Apply:
  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.
Visit Award Webpage for Details

Iran Sitting On A Ticking Powder Keg

Haider Abbas

Shahran oil depot in north west Tehran has been likened to a “hydrogen bomb” 
The subterfuge and sabotage, particularly after the August 4, 2020 Beirut, Lebanon blasts, in which around 181 people died, more than 3,00,000 rendered homeless and property worth billions of USD gutted, has become the new normal.   There are many theories about who perpetrated the blasts but Lebanese former interior minister has openly blamed Israel to have done it, but now an absolute different angle has come forward, which has been till date remained outside the human purview, i.e. that seismological imbalances suggest that there were six-blasts with an 11-second intervals, which preceded the main explosion 43 seconds later. This startling revelation has come from Boaz Hayoun, a former military engineering officer of Israeli’s Tamar Group.  There is an elaborate report published in Reuters on August 13, 2020 which gives a glimpse as to where the world is heading. No wonder, so intimated the Gulf-states have become, that UAE, within a fortnight of the blasts has succumbed to normalise relations with Israel.  Israel has denied its involvement and US president has said that blast was not an accident but may be through a bomb.
This small report is enough to bring the actual nightmares to the world, ‘“I cannot say categorically what caused this, but I can say these blasts were at the same location,” has said Hayoun.  Lebanon President Michel Aoun has said investigators would also look into the possibility of “external interference” such as a bomb, as well as negligence or an accident as causes.  Hayoun (has) assessed that the Beirut incident involved underground explosions. The 43-metre (140-foot) deep crater at the port could not have been left by the explosion of the amount of ammonium nitrate reported by Lebanese authorities, he said: “It would have been shallower, maximum 25 or 30 metres.” The main explosion, of the ammonium nitrate warehouse, was preceded by a nearby fire.  Israel Defense, a leading private online journal with close ties to the Israeli military establishment and which first reported Hayoun’s findings, described his analysis of a possible blast sequence as consistent with munitions detonations.  Such a sequence could be consistent with “weapons systems that are activated in a chain” and which might have been stored in the port and set off accidentally or deliberately, said Israel Defense. However, it did not provide evidence to suggest sabotage’. Why would anyone claim a sabotage?
It may be known that , in the past few months, there has been a spurt, in mystery fires in Iran ( July 6, 2020), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ( August 6, 2020), Dubai ( August 5, 2020), Iraq ( August 15, 2019) etc and it is yet to be detected as to who is behind such fires, and the world is just baffled over it, thus, owing to such diabolic designs, and also the dangerously placed situation in Iran, ( the prime target of Gulf-states, US and Israel) Tehran City Councilor Majid Farhani has warned that immediate steps are warranted from Iran or else Iran might witness a far greater blast than what has happened in Beirut.
A report published in The Daily Star on August 29, 2020 has spelled the dangers ahead.  Farhani has said, what may be termed as the biggest warning to Iran as Iran is at risk of a huge explosion 300 times a day that could be deadlier than Beirut.  In the said report Farhani has referred that ‘Tehran, the capital city of Iran, is also located near an active earthquake fault line placing it at risk of a devastating earthquake. This, along with oil tankers surrounding it, could cause severe devastation, ( as ) millions could die in Iran as the country is at high risk of suffering a “tragedy even worse than Beirut” due to oil tankers being situated in an earthquake zone, Tehran, could one day experience a devastating quake as it stands on a fault line – which coupled with an explosion – could be disastrous, it has been warned. But in Tehran, with a capacity of 30,000 litres of oil spread across 300 tankers, an accidental explosion at the Shahran facility could cause widespread damage – especially as it’s right in the middle of an earthquake zone. He further stated that “Shahran faces danger 300 times a day and nobody is paying any attention” and likened the danger to a hydrogen bomb.   The city of Tehran is located on an active fault called Mosha-Fasham’ . God forbid, if an earthquake (engineered or real) strikes Iran it would be a human disaster of unimaginable magnitude.
The US attitude for Iran is well known for the last half a century and has recently added more heart-burns to it, Gulf-states and Israel, when Iran entered into a 25 years 400 billion USD deal with China on July 13. 2020 as Iran is only stumbling block to Israel rising power-status in the Gulf-region, and no wonder US secretary of state Mike Pompeo on his latest visit to Israel, on August 24, 2020, has warned that one day Iranians will also normalise with Israel, in the same visit, he sat in the backdrop of old Jerusalem city where Jews want to construct the ‘third-temple’ by demolishing Al-Aqsa mosque, one of the holiest sites to Muslims.
Thus, in the wake of ultimate technological advancements by Israel and  US, it  may be considered that artificial rains can be forged, weathers can be delayed, droughts manufactured,  or even earthquakes may be brought, and no doubt, the world has become extremely susceptible after the outbreak of COVID-19  pandemic to all such maneuvers. How this latest COVID-19 has brought (man-made) havoc or has benefited a few billionaires in the world, will be a part of research for tomorrow, but owing to the way how dangerously the world is treading, in terms of a war like situation between India-China, India-Pakistan, China-US, Turkey-Greece or for that matter US-Iran, it tends to become very extremely vulnerable not only for Iran but in fact for the whole world.

The failure of US strategy in Venezuela

Yanis Iqbal

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States’ “maximum pressure” campaign against Venezuela continues to intensify.
Washington is planning to impose sanctions on “bad actors” that do business with Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro’s government, singling out countries such as Russia, China, Cuba and Iran.
James Story, the top US diplomat accredited for Venezuela, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: “Certainly by the actions we have taken, we’ve increased cost for bad actors, malign actors in Venezuela. We have to continue to consider other ways to do that”.
In addition to the possible sanctioning of countries supporting Maduro, the Trump administration has tapped into more than US$300 million in frozen Venezuelan government funds in an effort to strengthen its regime change operations against Maduro’s government; contemplated an October deadline for ending exemptions to Venezuelan sanctions that allow some companies and refiners to still receive the South American producer’s oil.
The US also seized four tankers in August, carrying 1.1 million barrels of fuel (valued at US$50 million) from the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC). These foreign-flagged ships were identified as BellaBeringPandi and Luna and were brought to Houston, Texas.
Majid Takht Ravanchi – the spokesman for the Iranian mission to the United Nations – has deemed the seizure of ships as an act of “piracy” that is “a direct threat to international peace and security and contravenes international law, including the United Nations Charter”.
Increasing imperialist aggressions on the part of the US is an indication of a deeper failure of US foreign policy toward Venezuela, which has struggled to achieve domestic support among Venezuelans.
On August 2, Venezuela’s opposition decided to boycott the legislative elections scheduled for December 6, citing Maduro’s “oppressive dictatorship” as the reason. This decision has been lent support by Lima Group members and the US.
The opposition’s growing alienation from the masses has forced it to steer clear of the parliamentary elections. Coromoto Godoy Calderon, ambassador of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to the Republic of India, told me that 83% of Venezuelans reject opposition leader Juan Guaidó and said: “it is typical US disinformation to present Guaidó as an ‘interim president’.
“This only hides the fact that the US regime-change policy and their Venezuelan puppets are increasingly losing support”.
The opposition’s fragmentation of legitimacy in the eyes of Venezuelans is closely correlated to US imperialist ambitions. To analyse the current situation of the anti-Chavista camp, it is necessary to look at the dynamics of American aims in Venezuela.

Oil and ideology

In a 2017 Oval Office meeting, US President Donald Trump said that Venezuela is “the country we should be going to war with”.
“They have all that oil and they’re right on our back door.”
In a similarly blunt and belligerent manner, John Bolton, at that time the National Security Advisor, told Fox News in January last year: “It will make a big difference to the United States economically if we could have American oil companies really invest in and produce the oil capabilities in Venezuela.”
From these statements, it is evident that US foreign policy toward Venezuela is motivated by two objectives.
Firstly, the US wants to establish complete control over a country which the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) defined in 1961 as “extraordinarily wealthy” in terms of its natural resources. Venezuela has rich resources of gold, nickel, iron ore, steel, diamond, alumina, coal, bauxite, asphalt, natural gas and petroleum. Of these resources, petroleum is the most important for Venezuela, accounting for 99% of the country’s export earnings.
The US has constantly targeted Venezuela’s large, lucrative oil reserves and the current war of economic sabotage, media propaganda and military coup against the country is a manifestation of US “petro-imperialism”.
Through US sanctions against Venezuela, the country’s oil production capacities have been undermined, with production reaching approximately 388,000 barrels a day in July, or 60% below the average oil production rate of July last year; the US has blacklisted vessel owners, shipping operators and threatened to sanction any tanker facilitating Venezuela’s oil exports.
Due to these measures, shipping firms are avoiding Venezuela, making it difficult to hire tankers to load and export crude. Venezuela’s state-owned company Petroleum of Venezuela (PDVSA) is unable to use its own tankers, because sanctions have left them lacking the certification needed to navigate international waters.
By crippling Venezuela’s oil production, the US hopes to succeed in raising global oil prices, opening up demand for its own producers and maintaining the boom in US oil production.
Secondly, by toppling the socialist administration of Maduro, the US would gain the ability to abruptly halt the construction of an independent foreign policy, restore US dominance; prevent the diversification of trading partners and privatise firms that have been partly or wholly nationalised. In a nutshell, USA will be able to eliminate the powerful force of socialist ideology and re-align Venezuela to the principles of capitalism if it succeeds in overthrowing Maduro’s government.
The potent threat of socialist ideology and the Bolivarian Revolution is known to various US security experts. In 2005, Max G Manwaring, retired Professor of Military Strategy at the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College, acknowledged that the Bolivarian Revolution is “developing the conceptual and physical capability to challenge the status quo in Latin America, and to generate a ‘Super Insurgency’ intended to bring about fundamental political and economic change in the region”.
Echoing the same view, free market economists Rafael Acevedo and Luis Cirocco wrote: “Since Chávez’s death in 2013, the attacks against private property continued, and Chávez’s successor, Nicolás Maduro, keeps promising more of the same.”
In terms of foreign policy, Venezuela has adopted an anti-imperialist policy since the Bolivarian Revolution initiated in 1999 and has sought to pursue an independent foreign policy. Even in the contemporary period, the country is collaborating with China, Russia, Iran, Cuba and now, Turkey to find alternatives to US imperialism.
Between March 19 and July 26, China shipped 46 tons of medical supplies to Venezuela, including more than one million rapid Coronavirus tests, 150,000 molecular diagnostic kits, eight million face masks, two million disposable gloves, up to 135,000 protective suits, more than 23,000 infrared thermometers and 14,000 lens protectors.
Chinese aid to Venezuela is part of a long-term diplomatic relationship between the countries. Between 1999 and 2011, for example, 430 bilateral agreements were signed, of which 171 were projects involving cooperation in the areas of energy and mining, agriculture, science, infrastructure, industry and aerospace.
Russia, similarly, provides aid to Venezuela and Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said: “For its part, Russia will continue to aid Venezuela, namely on stabilising the sanitary-epidemiological situation”.
Venezuela’s relationship with Russia is also long-standing. Last year, Russia’s United Grain Company shipped 600,000 tons of grain to Venezuela to be used to distribute subsidised wheat flour to bakeries serving the poor. In the same year, the Saint-Petersburg-based Gerofarm Company sent 200,000 doses of insulin to Venezuela.
Iran is also helping Venezuela, having successfully shipped US$46 million worth of petrol, petroleum products and diluents to the South American country in May. According to Godoy, “the arrival of Iranian fuel and supplies to reactivate the oil and fuel industry for the population has made it possible to break the naval and energy blockade against the country, despite threats from the United States.”
On top of fuel shipments, Iran has established a supermarket in Venezuela called Megasis and shipped cargo carrying food to ensure proper supply in the newly established supermarket.
Recently, Turkey has started helping Venezuela by processing gold and facilitating the construction of new hospitals in different regions. Turkey has donated medical supplies, including 25 ventilators, 100,000 surgical masks, 50,000 N-95 type masks, 35,000 protective coveralls, 200,000 gloves and 40,000 test kits. It has also lifted tariffs on Venezuelan seeds and cheese, allowing the crisis-torn country to export a total of 16,600 tons of agricultural products free of customs duties.
Furthermore, Turkey has tripled its exports to Venezuela — which rose from US$37.4 million in 2017 to US$120.8 million in 2018 — and established a gold-for-food mechanism, wherein it has become a key supplier for the Maduro government’s main food subsidy program, known as the Local Supply and Production Committees (CLAPs).
Finally, Cuba has assisted Venezuela in its COVID-19 campaign by sending its medical brigades to the country. On March 15, Cuba sent several members of the Henry Reeve International Contingent of Doctors specialised in Disasters and Serious Epidemics to facilitate Venezuela’s Coronavirus health infrastructure.
More recently, on August 17, Cuba sent an additional 212 health professionals to the Latin American country so that the pandemic could be effectively combated. These medical brigades have greatly supported the exhaustive campaign to carry out tests, isolate cases and prevent infections.

Sanctions and militarism

Being a political group funded and propped up almost entirely by the US, the Venezuelan opposition has invariably reiterated the exploitative ambitions of US imperialism and has, therefore, lost the support of the masses.
During a speech in the US in 2013, the far-right politician and coup plotter Leopoldo Lopez said: “We have to hurry the exit of the government.
“Nicolas Maduro must go out sooner than later from the Venezuelan government. Nicolas Maduro and all his supporters…from my point of view, the method is secondary, what is important is the determination to reach our goals at any cost.”
Here, the right-wing politician epitomises the US-funded opposition camp in Venezuela whose only objective is to appeal for international sanctions to isolate, destabilise, and overthrow the government of Maduro and reach imperialist goals “at any cost”.
Support for sanctions has consigned the right-wing opposition to political oblivion since US sanctions have resulted in a severe health crisis, contributing to 40,000 deaths in 2017–18 alone.
More than 300 000 Venezuelans are at risk due to a lack of lifesaving medications; 80, 000 HIV-positive patients have had no antiretroviral therapy since 2017; insulin is unavailable because US banks have refused to handle Venezuelan payments for this; millions of people have been without access to dialysis, cancer treatment and therapy for hypertension; children have been affected due to delays in vaccination campaigns and children with leukaemia awaiting bone marrow transplants abroad are now dying.
Venezuela’s Vice President for Planning Ricardo Menendez has said the country has lost US$38 billion over three years because of US sanctions. In total, the country has lost US$169 billion as a result of the sanctions regime.
With that $169 billion, Venezuela could have paid its $110 billion debt, instituted redistributive measures or imported food and medicines for 45 years. Instead, Venezuela’s opposition has decided to clamour for US sanctions and further the objectives of imperialism.
The right-wing opposition in Venezuela has even tried military means to oust Maduro.
When asked whether he would like Trump and the US military to intervene, Guaidó said he would “evaluate all options” to oust Maduro.
In a similar fashion, Trump, too, declined to rule out military intervention in Venezuela as he met Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro in March lasy year. On May 3, a failed military incursion called Operation Gideon, was carried out by Silvercorp, a private US security company hired by Guaidó.
The Venezuelan opposition is, therefore, ideologically inclined towards militarism and this has further dissociated it from the people. Last year, a poll indicated that 86% of Venezuelans reject a military intervention.
Nevertheless, military intervention is still on the cards and according to a “Threat Model” developed by a researcher at the American Military University, “The inability of the US to achieve its goals by current policies will likely embolden hawks to push for stronger measures.”
Moreover, Aruba and Curaçao each house a US military Forward Operating Location (FOL) that could be used to militarily invade Venezuela.
In June, four US Air Force aircraft and crew were deployed to Hato Airport on Curaçao by the US Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM) to “help US and international law enforcement authorities disrupt and defeat transnational criminal organisations trafficking illegal narcotics in the region”.
This was a highly belligerent act against Venezuela insofar as the Western media, the US Department of Justice and the International Narcotics Control Board falsely framed Maudro’s administration as a “narco-state”.
In a likewise manner, the US carried out Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOps) and Psychological Operations (PSYOps) on July 15. The objective of these operations was “to progressively degrade an adversary’s decision-making process, undermining command and control. Carried out on a regular basis, they put the adversary under a false state of alert or, worse, monotony”.
As the right-wing opposition in Venezuela subverts socialism and democracy with the support of the US, the Chavista support-base is slowly consolidating.
A war-mongering article published in Military Review acknowledged that Maduro’s “supporters have an ideology — anti-imperialist socialism — that serves to unify their efforts in coordinated responses to security challenges, and explains Maduro’s political resilience to outside pressures.”
“If US forces launch an operation into the heavily built-up areas in Caracas, or some of its other outlying areas, aside from having to deal with Venezuela’s conventional forces, they will likely face stiff, armed resistance from irregular forces and opposition in multiple forms from crowds sympathetic to Maduro and his political ideology, including armed uprisings as well as passive popular resistance.”
Washington and their political puppets know full well that while they can sanction and militarise Venezuela, they cannot gain legitimacy among Venezuelans.

Agribusiness and food industry: A curse for slavery and traditional farming

Bijit Das

Ignorance can be the best escapism, but if we are cognizant about the history of agriculture and the morphology of earth, we will know that a spectre haunts the living today. The spectre of science in proliferating scientificity and genealogy of knowledge on food production haunt us today.
Food for self is transformed into food for others under the realm of business and surplus accumulation. Remembering the geographer David Harvey’s magnum opus on accumulation by dispossession regenerates the spirit of Marx’s primitive accumulation to understand the nexus of two independent identities of land, labour and ultimately the colonization of both.
Food is something that has a cultural hegemony on living beings. We all want it, there is a denial of it, there is business happening, there is politics happening because of it. Primitive accumulation has led to the metamorphosis of the food from being a need to being a need for industry. The food and agribusiness industry today lingers around the soul of neoliberalism, corporatization and industrialisation.
When there is an overproduction of any good involving surplus, capital and labour accumulation there is a factor of harm involved in it, a prognosticate that can be drawn from history. This harm occurs because of the invisible thin line drawn between illegal and legal anthropocentric activities related to food such as exploitation of labour in the food industry, food adulteration and deception of food calibre.
Justice to human plight is sought from the human-created institution of law. Law in terms of food-related harms often flunks to render protective working conditions for farmworkers or cornering the false consciousness prevalent among the mass of acquiring healthy food. And thus behind this subterfuge, it’s the agribusiness and food companies that rejoices a moment of pleasure.
This can be explained by how food-related harms are induced within the farming practices and the impact of capitalism on farming which juxtaposes the impact of primitive accumulation of farming lands and their fertility, accumulation by dispossession of farmers autonomy by the culture of mono cropping and GM seed companies.
Food industry and slavery in America
The animating force of labour is induced into human history since time immemorial, so is slavery a part of the history of agricultural production. The cocoa industry in America during the European colonialism flourished under the undecipherable veil of slavery. The idealism of European trade expansionism was implied by the exploitation of land and resource, therefore to manifest this idealism there was a demand for labour, and the cocoa industry was no exception on this.
During the initial kick-off, the eye on labour was sufficed by the indigenous American population but this led to certain catastrophes when these populations were introduced to various diseases of which they weren’t immune to, perhaps leading to substantial population diminution. Therefore the alternate solution to meet the demand gave an eye on to the former and source of slave workers, Africa.
Slavery was a new normal back then which was approved and backed by forces such as Pope and the Catholic Church for the non-Christian people. This continued till 1965 when the church became partisan towards the obligation of inhumanity. And it was up to 1840 that slavery was considered illegal in England.
The cocoa industry expanded to its optimum in the due course of time till eradication of slavery became a convention. This was a splendid hour for romanticising of companies like Cadbury, Mars, Hershey, Rowntree, Fry and Lindt. The epoch saw the growth of cocoa production as well as the movement to abolish slavery. And in the midst of this the Harkin- Engel Protocol came up that obstructed corporates for stimulation of child and forced labour. Though slavery got recognition as an unlawful act by law, still these forms of labour haunt humanity till date.
The ghost that frightens traditional farming
Late 20th century marked the occasion of rampant increment of the worldwide network, which flourished under the consolidation of capitalist’s fiscal exponent, under the management of enhancing technocracy and scientific yield, competitiveness beneath the minority positioning of farmers in the agrarian domain.
The genetically modified crops that were created to boost food production were embedded by the patent laws. These GM seeds were procured from corporate institutions like Monsanto, Syngenta, Du Pont and Bayer into different parts of the world. The laws had the synergy of using the seeds only once in a season with entering into strict contact with the corporations by the farmers and there were various sanctions for failure of obligations.
Fines became the future of some farmers who innocently grew genetically modified crops without entering into contracts. Thus, farmers dispossessed from their autonomy over their ability to choose seeds felt as contract farmers, and unable to make an independent decision concerning farming.
The financial crisis of 1980, the birth of contract farming did nothing rather than to add more to the plight, and also giving opportunity for proliferating financial powers of corporates. The elites with bucks, the owners of mega enterprises expanded their sucking tentacles into the financialization of the economy, controlling liquidity in the market considering the demand and price level, creating game plans and sometimes a vacuum of crisis. The immense amount of money which was accumulated by the elites was the product of accumulation by dispossession and not out of growth.
Farmers increasingly becoming rural landless and falling under the tentacles of mono farming sparks the enigma induced in the Indian state of Jharkhand’s Palamau where the rampant eucalyptus plantation to meet the growing demands for the agribusiness companies robbed the villagers of food, water, fuel and means of endurance. Adding more to the devastation the following plant sucked up water to an extent that it led to chronic water scarcity in regions where the plant was grown.
Now the question is which class of people benefits from the industries connected with eucalyptus farming, it is defiantly not the poor and the downtrodden.
Theft of resource and environmental transformation is the product of accumulation by dispossession and the credit system is adding fuel to this dispossession by dialectically accumulating the dispossessions of the poor. Farmer suicide and a divorce between farmers from their lands, a divorce that is constructed through exhausting and fading away of farmers autonomy to their land where they live and their lack of decisive ability in what is raised and for whom, a divorce that is a product of harm that no law acknowledges can be totaled to David Harvey’s pessimism.

Compulsive Shopping Addiction

Zeenat Khan

A recent study done by a market research firm Rakuten Intelligence found that since the pandemic started there has been a sudden rise in online shopping. Ecommerce spending in the U.S. is up more than 30 percent since the beginning of March. Ecommerce is booming, and Silicon Valley’s’ richest such as Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are getting even richer while the pandemic gets worse. Compulsive buying among consumers has become a very real phenomenon in the United States since coronavirus came to town. It splits fairly equally along gender lines: 6% of women and 5% of men. The overall trend reveals that under life in quarantine people who are fortunate to have jobs are spending more than before. There has been a slight change in focus as people are more motivated on buying entertainment products and books as most people are homebound now. The initial phase of buying in bulk and stockpiling in groceries and other items has lessened a bit. The supply chain has been rocked by the pandemic, the crisis seems to be over, and it remains operational in full force.
Let us not be fooled that we are only buying essentials. The quintessential proverb that women and shopping go hand in hand might sound like a cliché. Is this statement a myth, or does it connote an actual reality in today’s global, urban culture? With the evolution of digital commerce, compulsive buying especially now has increased at an alarming rate. It has gotten easier and faster now to find things that one is looking for. Shopping nowadays has become as easy as baking an apple pie. While the literature on global trends in obsessive shopping is still growing, there is increasing evidence that overconsumption affects a significant number of shoppers, particularly women, across the world – in America, Europe, Asia and Africa.
The leading consumer data analytics firm Amperity tracks consumer spending. It recorded, “huge plunges in spending in the first full week of April on ‘home, jewelry, and leisure’ and ‘fashion and apparel’.” The numbers are not same as it used to be but it is still huge. During the pandemic women including myself are buying things nonstop. We are at times making hasty decisions in buying things that we do not actually need right now. My recent acquisition of a Prada purse during the pandemic might seem bizarre to some people. The superfluous spending on a luxury item can fall under impulsive buying. I, of course, will not agree with this as I have convinced myself that as long as it (such purchases) doesn’t become a pattern, I am not a compulsive buyer. My rationale is: I always wanted a black Prada and I bought it with the hope that there will be a better and normal future. So why not get ready for it in anticipation? Does this make me a “romantic shopper” like the Chinese consumers?  Perhaps. “How else does one explain the shopping craze witnessed in China on the first day of reopening a single Hermès store clocked in $2.7 million in sales?” Qubit reported, “A 2% rise in luxury spending in late March even as fast-fashion sales plunged 40%. The theory of buying less but better is what causing this increase in sales of luxury items.”
Though women have a tendency to spend more on shopping than men – some men can be worse than women. For example, British rock star Sir Elton John has recently admitted that in less than two years, he had spent almost 40M lbs. on shopping. Though, there are major differences in how men and women shop. In 2013, a survey was conducted in Britain of 2000 people, assessing whether men and women shop with the same things in mind. The survey found that women look for a great bargain; they take a long time in choosing a color, checking out the label, the fiber contents and going in the dressing room to try out the outfit. After spending about two hours – more often than not they decide to forgo the search, and start it all over again. Men, on the other hand become bored after twenty-six minutes, on average, into their shopping.
The numbers of compulsive shoppers are ubiquitously on the rise as this fever has become a global phenomenon. In countries with rapidly growing economies, like China, adult women are famously becoming hooked on shopping and acquiring the latest designer goods. In South Asia, this movement is also catching on. In Bangladesh and India, women are reportedly working hard to keep up in their search for the latest saris, lehengas, stylish salwar suits, and pieces of jewelry in trendy boutiques and stores. Many women are enticed by the newly arrived online boutiques and cannot resist the unique shopping experience. High-end women’s designer fashions and the ambience in a new store or an array of online display ads attract many urban women to make frequent purchases.
Compulsive shoppers or the shopaholics’ motto is: whatever it is, we want it. They want the latest trendy clothes, designer accessories, or the latest must-have fad – no matter where in the world it comes from, or whatever the cost might be. To the shopaholic, shopping is not a frivolous, fun activity. They become obsessed with buying things. Their spending sprees, which can get out of hand, create serious financial and emotional distress, for the entire family. It has the potential to create a lethal whirlwind in a household — like a ship getting caught in a sudden storm. As a result, often the entire family suffers for one member’s hidden addiction.
Women have a tendency to spend more on shopping than men. However, there are major differences in how men and women shop. A survey was conducted in Britain of 2000 people, assessing whether men and women shop with the same things in mind. The findings were that women look for a great bargain; they take a long time in choosing a color, checking out the label, the fiber contents and going in the dressing room to try out the outfit. After spending about two hours — more often than not they decide to forgo the search, and start it all over again. Men, on the other hand become bored after twenty-six minutes, on average, into their shopping. When ordering online they spend way less time than women. Most men do not like shopping with their partners, and many avoid doing so at any cost. Women take a lot of time in selecting an item, whereas a man selects an item within the first few minutes.
Is obsessive shopping a hobby taken too far, or an addiction? Whether it is a woman’s own money, family inheritance share, or the money comes from the spousal joint account – a lot of women love to spend money in buying things that they do not actually need or really want. There are constant TV commercials, and endless shopping deals that are being offered to the consumers. The online shopping is available 24/7, and most women today have access to a PC or an iPad. Some even enjoy shopping using their iPhone.
Experts on shopaholics’ behavior believe that there are many underlying problems that trigger shopping addiction. We need to dig a little deeper here, and try to peel away the layers to see what else we can uncover behind shopaholics’ unusual spending. Psychologists call this addiction “Compulsive Buying Disorder.” The medical term used to describe shopaholics is called “Omnimonia.” This disorder can fall under irrational behavior, and possesses the same characteristics of that of a gambler, drug addict or a binge eater – people who are unable to control a sudden impulse.
Throughout the year, my mailbox is jammed with glossy flyers from many department stores promoting upcoming sales. My inbox is filled with announcements of upcoming super sales and new promotions. Now the stores have gone one step further since many are not going to the enclosed shopping malls now. I have heard from a friend how one particular store calls her at home lately to update her on the sales so that she can get the best pick. This kind of marketing strategy is a form of aggression, which more and more stores will adapt in no time. The personal phone call is a somewhat a new trend to deceive a buyer into thinking that she is a very valued customer. Such manipulation on the part of the seller makes a good and trusting consumer duped into charging away.
When an impulsive purchase becomes an obsession – it is the very first sign that one might be grappling with a very serious condition. Shopaholics are not occasional impulsive buyers. When they are in a department store, or searching on the internet, they can immediately spot the latest fashion – a watch, purse, and jewelry gleaming in display cases. While checking it out — they are also on the lookout for a pair of perfect black suede shoes that will go with a newly purchased outfit, for Sunday dinner at a friend’s house. All the while, they might be cheerfully thinking about how their designer ensemble will add a dash to their sophistication, and how they will be the envy of that group. It is this ‘high’ or the thrill of having material stuff that makes life exciting. Perhaps a shopaholic lives to feel that experience.
Continuous purchasing of new items gives people an “adrenaline rush.” According to experts quoted in the Huffington Post, “dopamine, a brain chemical associated with pleasure, is often released in waves as shoppers see a desirable item & consider buying it.” Such burst of sudden excitement can become very addictive for many. The compulsion becomes so intense that they max out their credit cards and get new ones with high interest rates. They often are unable to pay the monthly minimum payments and go into huge debt. I once read an article where a woman took out a second mortgage on her home in order to support her shopping addiction. She did this without consulting her spouse since the house was in her name — a gift from her own parents.
Most women who indulge in abnormal shopping sprees try to rationalise their spending beyond their means as normal behavior. Working women might justify their spending habits as well-deserved special treatment; if no one else is pampering them – that is the least they can do for themselves to boost their ego. Or, they might simply say: I earned it, and I have the right to spend it. Single women are another case: they might reason that they need to look sharp, smart and available, and to keep up with ever-changing fashion trends means constant shopping. Otherwise, potential life partners might not pay attention to them. They convince themselves that keeping up with appearances will be a big pay off when they can hook the most eligible bachelors in town. With that possibility on the horizon, they shop to look their best.
Each woman’s reasons for spending are quite different from another. There are no set causes; often each story is sadder than the one before. Compulsive shopping is usually associated with other issues, such as depression, mood disorders, eating disorders, substance abuse problems, loneliness, social isolation (a huge factor during the coronavirus pandemic), low self-esteem, job pressure, divorce and hordes of relationship issues. They may look for validation from a spouse, boyfriend, friends, or even from co-workers. Wearing a particular designer number makes them feel good, temporarily. A shopaholic has a thousand different ways to justify her/his indulgence and why they continuously buy things.
Initially, shopaholics cover their tracks very well. It might start as buying one pair of designer jeans, the latest purse made by Gucci or Louis Vuitton, or a $575.00 pair of Jimmy Choo shoes. Most shopaholic women are particularly vulnerable to shoes and designer handbags. Triggered by the desire to fill some kind of void, traumatic event or just to feel good, the shopaholics immerse themselves in material things. They show zero regard for their finances. Sometimes having a simple argument, originating from the pressures of daily life, can trigger that impulse to go on the Internet to surf their favorite online sites.
More often than not, shopaholics are under huge psychological pressure to avoid getting caught. Even if they try very hard, they cannot curb their spending. Sometimes they bring new items into the house when no one is around, and hide things in their attics or deep in their daughters’ closets so that no one can make the discovery. The compulsive shoppers are often on edge if they cannot swipe their credit cards on a daily basis. If they are unable to shop during the day, at night when everyone is asleep, they go online and order things. They may spend countless hours on eBay, betting for a $600 dollar, Italian leather summer sandal that they may not even wear.
Shopaholics become very good at rationalizing their behavior and just about any purchase if they are cornered or challenged. Sooner or later such habits catch up with them though. The unsuspecting spouses go through severe shock when they find out. Sometimes families have to declare bankruptcy because they cannot pay the bills that their wives/husbands had hiked up without their knowledge. Marriages fall apart, divorce becomes a real possibility – couples lose their family homes to the banks. Debt collectors keep on calling them from morning until late at night. Children suffer because of a rude awakening that the family they knew as theirs is no longer there because of a shopaholic parent.

Social Media And The Mental Health Of The Youth

Sehba Jamal

Social media becomes an essential tool for youth today. Undoubtedly it helps people in connecting with the people around the globe and also reduces the distance, but on the other hand, it created a detachment from the people who are around. Social media is mostly famous among youngsters; they spend most of their time on social platforms for different purposes. It is one of the tools which shares a single platform with many users and helps an individual in expressing their feelings, thoughts, and views and also helps in showing their other side of being bloggers.
According to Merriam Webster (2014), defines social media as “forms of electronic communication (as web sites for social networking and microblogging) through which users create online communities to share information, ideas, personal messages, and other content (as videos).”
In this 21 century, youth, are preferring virtual communication, spending most of their time on social media for different purposes.
Interaction with the real-world is minimal, which creates the feeling of being isolated, and many youngsters feel irritated and disturbed. No doubt, social media is a great tool. It helps people in socializing with the world and also helps you in sharing your creativity, your perspective.
SOCIAL MEDIA AND ITS LINK TO MENTAL HEALTH
There is a famous quote of Aristotle “human beings are a social animal.” It ultimately defines human beings who can’t live in isolation; they need interaction. Communication is vital for a healthy life, and through social media, people get a platform where they can easily share their opinion and feelings. On the other hand, the same social media creating stress, anxiety, overthinking, depression, and many more. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), mental health is “a state of well-being in which the individual realizes his or her abilities, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and can make a contribution to his or her community.” There are many effects of social media; it could be positive and negative, but mental problems or mental issues that arise when something is negatively impacting us. We know that today, it’s impossible to live without smartphones and social media, but the excess usage of these things has significant consequences on the life of people. Extra use of social media leads an individual in isolation and cuts them off from real society as people started living in the virtual world.
POSITIVE ASPECTS OF SOCIAL MEDIA
Interaction through social media possesses many benefits for you. It makes communication easy with family and friends anytime, anywhere, and helps you to keep up to date around the world and can create a virtual family.
Social media provides you a platform where you can raise your voice on any critical issues and raise awareness also.
You can promote your business and ideas with the world.
It helps you in educating yourself through distance mode or school from home.
It helps in reducing isolation and also helps provides you entertainments in the form of movies, songs, comedy shows, etc. which, in many cases, becomes emotional support.
NEGATIVE ASPECTS OF SOCIAL MEDIA
Everything possesses good or bad in itself. Social media to have negative quality despite so much positivity. The same social media which reducing your isolation will create social isolation for you and reduce your face to face interaction.
CYBERBULLYING
According to Wikipedia, “Cyberbullying or cyberharassment is a form of bullying or harassment using electronic means. Cyberbullying and cyberharassment are also known as online bullying.”
In the article times of India 27 October 2018, it has been reported that 37 percent of Indian parents say their children have been a victim of cyberbullying. (Dhawan, 2018)
Victims of cyberbullying end up with psychological problems, like depression, isolation, anxiety, stress, low esteem, and in some cases, it becomes a case of suicide.
STALKING
For many years the term “stalking” described the activity of hunters pursuing animal prey (Heckels & Roberts, 2010).
Stalking is something that can be done deliberately towards an individual intended to frighten by making texts, emails, phone calls, explicit or implicit threats, blackmail, or even sexual assault; usually.
SOCIAL ISOLATION
One of the famous quotes of Aristotle, “human beings are a social animal.” Human beings cannot live in isolation because the mental and physical condition of an individual determines by the interaction. A mental state of an individual depends on social interaction because human beings are social creatures. It doesn’t affect only health but also our morality example, high blood pressure, sleep factor, and emotional factors, etc. (our social networks like families, communities virtual or real, etc.), helps us in surviving.
INTERNET ADDICTION
Today, it is very much difficult for anyone to keep away from accessing social media. Social media is one of the most talkative topics among youth. Most youngsters are addicted to the internet. Almost teenagers having a mobile in hand and accessing social media for a long hour is eventually become an addiction, and slowly it starts impacting their mental health,  day to day routine, and personal development.
SUGGESTIONS
Youth should be careful while connecting with the people who are unknown to you; it helps you in keeping away from cyberbullying and won’t affect their mental health.
The relationship between parents and children must be friendly so they can share everything and will develop a happy and healthy life.
Youth should limit the usage of social media.

The Israel-UAE Deal Isn’t About Peace at All

Phyllis Bennis

In some ways, the U.S.-brokered plan for mutual recognition between Israel and the United Arab Emirates is big news. For more than a quarter of a century, only two Middle Eastern countries—Egypt and Jordan—had officially recognized Israel. None of the Gulf monarchies did.
So, it was a pretty big deal when the announcement was made. Except, actually, not so much.
Despite the UAE’s claimed adherence to a decades-long position that no Arab country should normalize relations with Israel until it ended its occupation of Palestinian land, ties between the UAE and Israel had been quietly underway for years. The same is true of many other Arab states.
Quiet but not-quite-covert trade, technology transfers, and security partnerships are an old story. Intelligence ties began in the 1970s, and commercial links took off after the 1994 Oslo accords.  After 9/11, the Bush administration encouraged technology as well as security connections. These expanded continuously, pausing only when Israel assassinated a Hamas leader in the UAE in 2010 and the UAE briefly severed relations.
But by 2011, when Arab popular uprisings across the region were terrifying the autocratic Gulf monarchies, the ties were quickly reestablished. All it took was an Israeli decision to allow a weapons technology sale to the UAE to go through, and a promise they wouldn’t carry out future assassinations in UAE territory.
Over the next decade, Iran emerged as the major enemy du jour for both Israel and the UAE, not to mention several other U.S.-backed Arab monarchies and dictatorships. By the time Trump came into office, his Middle East policy was shaped almost entirely around the creation of a regional anti-Iran coalition with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE at its core.
No Pretense of Peace for Palestinians
What wasn’t involved in any of this recent trajectory? Palestine.
Almost 30 years ago, Washington orchestrated a supposed Middle East peace conference in Madrid, based on what became known as the “outside/in” strategy. The idea was that under U.S. and—sort of—international auspices, Israel would normalize relations with Arab states while continuing its occupation, settlement expansion, land theft, and discrimination against Palestinians. And once the Arab governments were on board the U.S.-Israeli train, the Palestinians would have no choice but to get on board, too.
That plan failed, of course. And the next iteration, the so-called “inside/out” strategy of creating an Israeli-Palestinian agreement first, which shaped the Oslo accords of the mid-1990s, failed as well. Neither held any potential for actual peace, because neither aimed to provide justice for Palestinians living under Israeli control and facing Israel’s wildly disproportionate power.
So why would anyone think that a return to the earlier failed “outside/in” approach would work any better this time? Because this time around, there was no pretense that Israeli-Palestinian peace—let alone justice—was the goal.
Who Gets What?
Both Israel and the UAE have wanted normalization for a long time. And now they’ve got it. No serious Israeli opposition exists. Public opposition in the UAE, if it exists, is sufficiently suppressed as to appear non-existent. And Palestinian opposition is irrelevant.
Israel gets its first acknowledged normalization with a Gulf monarchy, and gives up nothing.
Formally, Israel says it will suspend its formal annexation of the West Bank as part of the deal. But its de facto annexation of huge swathes of Palestinian land in the West Bank has been in place for decades, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government had already put off a declaration of formal annexation because right-wing pressure had shifted from demands for annexation to concerns about the pandemic. And Israel’s United Nations Ambassador Gilad Erdan maintains even now that annexation “isn’t off the table and will be back on the agenda.”
Meanwhile, going public with UAE ties strengthens Israel’s role at the center of the regional anti-Iran coalition. All good for Tel Aviv.
For its part, the UAE gets brownie points with the United States, especially with the Trump administration (and most especially with Trump son-in-law and Middle East adviser Jared Kushner, who has become a BFF of UAE crown prince Mohammed bin Zayed as well as his Saudi counterpart Mohammed bin Salman).
Normalizing public ties with Israel strengthens the Emiratis’ regional position within Washington’s Middle East orbit. And the new connection gives much-needed credibility to the more aggressive regional role the UAE has been playing in recent years in the region, where it’s been punching far above its weight.
With a population of less than 10 million—of which only about 12 percent are UAE citizens— the breathtakingly wealthy statelet is playing major military roles in war-devastated Yemen and in chaos-riven Libya. The result has been a much more visible role within Washington’s anti-Iran coalition.
The UAE’s Israel embrace also gives the Saudis a bit of a poke in the eye, as it represents a direct repudiation of the 2002 Saudi-launched Arab Peace Initiative. That plan was never implemented, but it was predicated on a clear rejection of normalization with Israel absent an end to Israel’s occupation of the 1967 territories, a just solution for Palestinian refugees, and the creation of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.
The U.S. gains strength in the region by getting two key economically and militarily powerful allies to hook up ever more closely against Iran. Trump can claim re-election credit from his extremist pro-Israel base (primarily Christian fundamentalists) for helping Israel gain more Arab recognition.
And of course what better way to follow the Trump family performance disguised as the Republican convention than a high-visibility, high-pomp signing ceremony between two of the president’s favorite allies?
It Could Get Worse
And the Palestinians. The Palestinians get what the Palestinians always get. Bupkes, as my grandma used to say. Yiddish for “nothing.”
Not a big shift, since Arab governments in general and the UAE monarchy in particular have done little to nothing to actually support Palestinian rights in recent years. The deal does nothing to end the threat of annexation, since de facto annexation is already in place and de jure annexation is just being delayed for a while.
Could it get worse? Absolutely. The UAE move provides political cover for other Arab states to make their covert ties with Israel public—despite on-again/off-again denials, Sudan and Oman are rumored to be moving towards recognition, and possibly Bahrain as well.
Those moves could complicate Palestinian diplomatic efforts at the United Nations or elsewhere.
Even without substance, rhetorical validation from Arab governments has sometimes been useful for Palestinian efforts to show the global breadth of their support. At the non-governmental level, some boycott campaigns against businesses profiting from occupation might face challenges because of Arab governments protecting those companies. But the agreement will not seriously affect BDS, a global grassroots movement led by Palestinian civil society that does not rely on any government support.
Like so many U.S. “peace plans” before it, the Israel-UAE normalization deal will fail to bring peace. De facto annexation of illegally occupied Palestinian land continues, and refugees are still denied their right of return. While those things continue, no new Israel-Arab normalization effort has any chance of bringing peace.
We need to remember, once again, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s warning that “Peace is not just the absence of war, but the presence of justice.”