13 Nov 2017

IJP Journalism Exchange Program for Young Journalists in Africa and Germany 2018

Application Deadline: 15th February, 2018
Fellowship Dates:
  • Fellowship for African Journalists: June/July 2018
  • Fellowship for German Journalists: August/September 2018
  • Selection and announcement of the delegates: March, 2018
  • Introductory Conference in Berlin: June, 2018
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: SADC-Member States: Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe + Kenya
To be taken at (country): Germany and countries in Africa
About the Award: The Southern African-German Journalists’ Programme is a multiyear effort to shape an integrated understanding of the other country and region and to foster relations between Africa and Germany. It has been offered as a response to concerns about an increasing political and cultural detachment between Africa and Europe. The bursary is intended to enable young journalists to gain valuable insights into the political, economical, cultural as well as the social fabric of the host country.
For all selected IJP-Fellows the Programme starts with an Introductory Conference for all delegates. This will allow the participants from Southern Africa to familiarise themselves with the host country. After that they will work for several weeks with media houses before going out to undertake individual research within Germany. Applicants are asked to submit their preferences for the newspaper, radio or TV station or news agency they would like to work with. The possible location will be chosen by the IJP organisers in dialogue with each delegate. It is expected that former and new participants assist one another with regard to accommodation and contacts.
Participants of the Southern African Bursary 2015
Offered Since: 1998
Type: Fellowship
Eligibility: 
  • All journalists from Southern Africa (SADC Member States and Kenia) between the age of 25 and 40 who regularly work for a media organisation can apply.
  • It is assumed that all candidates have a strong command of the English language. German language abilities are an advantage but are not mandatory.
Number of Awardees: six young Africans and up to five young German journalists.
Value of Fellowship: The Southern African delegates receive a fixed payment of 3,000 Euro. This is expected to cover most of their travel, accommodation and living expenses. No further payments will be made: delegates are expected to use their own funds for any further costs. Payment for their work with the host media is not envisaged. To receive the full grant participants are obliged to write a report of at least three pages and provide copies of their published journalistic work after returning home.
Duration of Fellowship: 2 months
How to Apply: 
Enclose a CV with a passport photograph.
2. Write a 800 word essay addressing the following topics:
  • Why you would like to work in Germany
  • What you expect from IJP and what you think you can contribute to it?
  • What are the 3 research topics you want to pursue during the fellowship?
  • What role you expect to play at your home media in the future?
  • How you will spend the bursary?
3. Include a one-page resume detailing your education and work experience, your standard of German and English (copies of certificates/ e.g. Goethe Institut/Toefel), plus 2 copies of articles written by you (TV and radio journalists must type up their reports since no audio or video tapes can be considered)
4. A journalistic reference from your editor or head of department is required (freelancers should submit a reference from a senior journalist). It should also guarantee your leave of absence for the duration of the program.
Award Provider: The International Journalists‘ Programmes (IJP)

Columbia University ISHR Human Rights Advocates Program (HRAP) Fellowship for Developing Countries 2018

Application Deadline: 11:59 GMT, 31st January, 2018.
Eligible Countries: Low and Middle Income countries
To be taken at (country): Columbia University, USA
About the Award: The program leverages the resources of Columbia University and international organizations such as Human Rights Watch and WITNESS to provide proven grassroots leaders with skill-building and networking opportunities.
Through workshops, seminars, Columbia University classes and meetings with policy makers and potential funders, participants will share their experiences, reflect critically on their strategies, and plan future campaigns.
The Program is designed for lawyers, journalists, doctors, teachers, social workers, community organizers, and other human rights activists working with NGOs on issues including sexual and gender-based violence, minority rights, LGBT rights, labor rights, migration, health, social exclusion, environmental justice, disability rights, and corporate social accountability.
Type: Fellowship
Selection Criteria: 
  • The Program is designed for lawyers, journalists, doctors, teachers, social workers, community organizers, and other human rights activists working with NGOs on issues including sexual and gender-based violence, minority rights, LGBT rights, labor rights, migration, health, social exclusion, environmental justice, disability rights, and corporate social accountability.
  • Participants are selected on the basis of their previous work experience in human rights, commitment to the human rights field, and demonstrated ability to pursue graduate-level studies. Full-time students or government officials will not be considered. Applicants holding full or part-time jobs pursuing their advocacy efforts are preferred.
  • Advocates must work at the grassroots level. Applicants from high-income countries will not be considered except for those representing marginalized communities.
  • Advocates must provide proof of institutional endorsement in English from their organizations for their participation in the Program and must commit to returning to that organization upon completion of the Program.
  • Only one application per organization should be submitted. More than one application means all applications from that organization will be disqualified. It is up to the applicant to make sure no one else from the organization has applied.
Value of Program: ISHR makes every effort to provide full funding to cover participants’ program costs as well as travel and housing. A stipend is also provided for basic costs.
Duration of Program: The program typically starts in late August/early September and ends before the middle of December. Exact dates vary year to year and will be listed on the application.
How to Apply: Applicants are asked to complete the application in its entirety. Please complete all sections in English. Please follow all instructions, including those sent to your email address.
It is important to go through the application requirements and FAQ in the Program Webpage (See Link below) of the Program before applying
Award Provider: The Institute for the Study of Human Rights (ISHR), Columbia University.

UK Natural History Museum (NHM) Wildlife Photographer of the Year for Young and Adult Photographers 2018

Application Deadline: 14th December 2017 11.30 GMT.
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: All
To be taken at (country): London, UK
About the Award: For more than 50 years, Wildlife Photographer of the Year has championed honest and ethical wildlife photography, while pushing the boundaries of artistic freedom, narrative excellence and technical skill. We discover, encourage and reward nature photographers and wildlife ambassadors. Show us life through your lens and make your mark on the world of nature photography.
The competition is organised by  the Natural History Museum, London.
The competition comprises an Adult Competition open to photographers aged 18 and over, and a Young Competition open to photographers aged 17 and under.
  • There are 16 adult categories: [1] Animals in Their Environment; [2] Animal Portraits; [3] Behaviour: Amphibians and Reptiles; [4] Behaviour: Birds; [5] Behaviour: Invertebrates; [6] Behaviour: Mammals; [7] Plants and Fungi; [8] Underwater; [9] Urban Wildlife; [10] Earth’s Environments; [11] Black and White; [12] Creative Visions; [13] Wildlife Photojournalist: Single Image; [14] Wildlife Photojournalist Award: Photo Story; [15] Rising Star Portfolio Award (ages 18 to 25), [16] Wildlife Photographer Portfolio Award (ages 26 and over).
  • There are three age group categories for photographers aged 17 and under: [1] 10 Years and Under; [2] 11-14 Years; [3] 15-17 Years
Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2017
Offered Since: 1963
Type: Contest
Eligibility:  
  1. The Competition comprises an Adult Competition open to photographers aged 18 and over, and a Young Competition open to photographers aged 17 and under. Any contact with the Owners regarding the Adult Competition or the Young Competition (unless specified otherwise below) should be via the email address: wildlifephotographeroftheyear@nhm.ac.uk.
  2.  Selected entries to the Competition may be displayed in an exhibition at the Natural History Museum (‘the Exhibition’) and/or toured nationally and internationally (‘the Touring Exhibition’), featured online, in publicity materials relating to the Competition, Exhibition and Touring Exhibition, or as merchandising according to the terms here under.
  3. Entrants are not permitted to submit images that:
    • feature farm animals, family pets, and/or cultivated plants;
    • portray captive or restrained animals, animal models, and/or any other animal being exploited for profit unless for the purposes of reporting on a specific issue regarding the treatment of animals by a third party;
    • have been captured with the use of live bait;
    • have been awarded any prize, recommendation or other award in any international competition before 24 October 2016.
  4. Entrants are required to report on the natural world in a way that is both creative and honest:
    • entries must not deceive the viewer or attempt to disguise and/or misrepresent the reality of nature;
    • caption information supplied must be complete, true and accurate.
  5. Entrants must not do anything to injure or distress any animals or destroy their habitat in an attempt to secure an image.
  6. Entrants (or the entrant’s parent or guardian) are responsible for ensuring full compliance with any applicable national or international legislation and for securing any relevant permits that may be required (which, in the case of human portraits and recordings, will include the subject’s permission) and which must be made available on request by the Owners.
  7. If the Owners suspect that an entry has been achieved through the use of cruel or unethical practices, including the use of live bait, the entry will be disqualified and the Owners reserve the right to report the entrant to the applicable authorities.
View other Eligibility Requirements in the Contest Webpage below
Value of Award: 
For photographers aged 18 or over
Wildlife Photographer of the Year
  • £10,000, trophy and personalised certificate
Wildlife Photographer Portfolio Award
  • £2,500 and personalised certificate
  • trip to London to attend the awards ceremony
Wildlife Photojournalist Award: Photo Story
  • £2,500 and personalised certificate
  • trip to London to attend the awards ceremony
Rising Star Portfolio Award
  • £1,500 and personalised certificate
  • trip to London to attend the awards ceremony
Adult category winners
  • £1,250 and personalised certificate
  • trip to London to attend the awards ceremony
Adult category finalists
  • personalised certificate
  • invitation to the awards ceremony in London
For photographers aged 17 and under
Young Wildlife Photographer of the Year
  • £1,000, trophy and personalised certificate
Young category winners
  • personalised certificate
  • trip to London for awards ceremony
Young category finalists
  • personalised certificate
  • invitation to the awards ceremony in London
Award Provider:  Natural History Museum, London.

What’s Really Going On in Saudi Arabia

John Chuckman

“Trump Says Saudi Elites Caught In Anti-Corruption Probe Were ‘Milking’ Kingdom For Years.”
This is just nonsense from Trump.
Corruption is and has been everywhere in Saudi Arabia. How else could it be with all the countless billions changing hands in a fairly closed society?
So, it is easy for a guy like the new Crown Prince to glance around and conveniently find some corruption among people he wants to discredit anyway.
It may go beyond merely discrediting them to having hundreds of billions seized by the Crown Prince. Not a bad day’s work.
What is going on is a kind of coup against the old order by the new usurper Crown Prince. His recent appointment was by a King well known for his senility, and it suddenly and surprisingly upset the established order of succession and all kinds of extended family compacts.
We likely will never know what truly happened in this secretive kingdom. But we do know the abrupt changes created lots of enemies who needed attending to, and that seems to be what is happening.
And the enemies have no friends in Washington to whom they can appeal. The old order in Saudi Arabia suffered terribly in the wake of 9/11, and despite great efforts to pacify the US with new levels of cooperation, it is now being swept out.
Now, whatever is considered good for a hyper-aggressive United States is coincidentally good for its de facto colony in the Middle East.
Trump himself has already proved to be one of Israel’s best-ever American friends. Israel has long had great influence, but it possibly never had it so good as it does now, as with a UN Ambassador who speaks as though she were a joint appointment of Trump and Netanyahu. Trump’s only competitor in this regard would be Lyndon Johnson.
The US and Israel closely embrace the usurper because he has proven his dependability with bloody projects like making illegal war on Yemen. That war is exactly like the proxy war waged by mercenaries – ISIS and Al-Nusra et al – in Syria except that in this case it is the open work of a nation-state. And now he joins Israel in making threats on Lebanon.
In all the Neocon Wars in the Mideast, great effort has been made, one way or another, not to have Israel at center stage, to avoid having Israel appear as aggressor. But, in fact, without the influence of Israel, none of these terrible wars would have happened.
Yes, the Crown Prince will be a dependable component in the years-long American-Israeli project of creating a new Middle East. The Crown Prince is essentially Israel’s man in Saudi Arabia, just as President el-Sisi is in Egypt. Israel is comfortable being surrounded by absolute governments, so long as they are absolute governments beholden to its patron, the United States.
Right now, the new Crown Prince is doing another bloody service for Israeli interests. The Prime Minister of Lebanon, Saad Hariri, was called to come to Riyadh in the King’s name for some business, as it turned out on false pretenses. Hariri had his plane surrounded and he was effectively arrested upon landing. Just pure modern piracy. Later, and who knows after what threats, he announced his sudden and unexpected resignation as prime minister, and he remains in Saudi Arabia.
It just so happens, in very recent time, Netanyahu and some of his officials have made some very ugly noises against Lebanon and even staged a large-scale set of war games, including calling up reservists, clearly threatening the country.
Israel just cannot stand the idea of Hezbollah being part of the Lebanese government whereas a reasonable observer would say Lebanon had achieved a peaceful balance in governing a land of many diverse political and religious groups.
After all, it hasn’t been that long ago since Israel helped catapult Lebanon into a terrible, bloody civil war, and it did so with its own bloody and unwarranted invasion of the country. Hezbollah, an organization which has never been a true terrorist group no matter what Israel goes on about, came into its own by opposing Israel’s long-term, illegal occupation of Southern Lebanon.
They were only defending what is theirs, but they made Israel look very bad, and that is an unforgivable offence. So, here we have the new Saudi Crown Prince doing more dirty work on Israel’s behalf, much as with his war in Yemen where he bombs civilians regularly, saving Israel from having to act on its own to get what it wants in someone else’s country.
You see, if Israel itself actually had to do all the ugly deeds it wants done in the region, the world would see it with blinding clarity for the pariah state that it truly is, starting wars incessantly. Proxies – whether mercenary gangs like ISIS and Al-Nusra in Syria or tyrants like the new Saudi Crown Prince in Yemen and Lebanon – are the latest fashion statement from Tel Aviv.

The Illusion of Armed Salvation

Robert Koehler

This time, the “the fire and the fury” of American mass murder erupted in church. Twenty-six people were killed, including children, one only 18 months old.
How do we stroke their memory? How do we move forward? This is bigger than gun control. We should begin, I think, by envisioning a world beyond mass murder: a world where rage and hatred are not armed and, indeed, where our most volatile emotions can find release long before they become lethal.
As I read about the shootings at Sutherland Springs, Texas, and studied Devin Patrick Kelley’s troubled bio, I suddenly found myself picturing a coal miner trapped in a collapsed mine. Here was a man trapped inside himself: buried in his own troubles, disconnected from his own humanity and, therefore, everyone else’s humanity. A man in such a state is utterly disempowered.
And in this country, the path back to empowerment — for God know how many people — begins with owning a gun.
“The United States is one of only three countries, along with Mexico and Guatemala . . . (in which) people have an inherent right to own guns,” Max Fisher and Josh Keller pointed out recently in the New York Times.
That is to say, in most other countries, gun ownership, like driving a car, is a privilege to be earned, not a basic human right to be removed by law only when extreme conditions warrant it. And a large, organized segment of the population intends to keep it that way. After every mass shooting, the force that rallies in this country is the force that cherishes the right to own guns and views every attempt by government to limit that right as a theft of the most fundamental of freedoms, not as a means of protecting people. It’s as though the right to bear arms equals the right to be fully human.
Envisioning a world without mass murder — which means a world without war, waged either collectively or privately (with both types of war generating handsome profits for the weapons industry) — means envisioning a world where guns are not a precondition for empowerment and us vs. them isn’t society’s default setting.
Guns are a symptom of society’s addiction to fear. And efforts to pass gun control legislation are continually on the political defensive, caught between the addicts and the profiteers.
And thus, as the Baltimore Sun noted: “If Kelley was eligible to buy a gun, it was only just barely. Yet even so he was able to buy not just any gun but a civilian version of a military assault rifle, designed not for hunting or self-defense but combat.”
The Air Force didn’t work out for him. He was court-martialed for abusing his then-wife and fracturing the skull of his toddler stepson, spent a year in confinement and wound up with a bad-conduct discharge, but he still was able to claim his right to go into combat.
And in claiming that right — and becoming one of the “bad guys with a gun” — Kelley fueled the combat instincts in others, such as Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has called for the armed protection of America’s churches. Speaking on Fox News, Paxton recommended armed security guards or “at least arming some of the parishioners so they can respond to something like this.”
As Fisher and Keller reported, citing a 2015 University of Alabama study: “Americans make up about 4.4 percent of the global population but own 42 percent of the world’s guns. From 1966 to 2012, 31 percent of the gunmen in mass shootings worldwide were American. . . .
“Adjusted for population, only Yemen has a higher rate of mass shootings among countries with more than 10 million people. . . . Yemen has the world’s second-highest rate of gun ownership after the United States.”
And of course the danger isn’t just from mass shootings. In 2013, for instance, there were 11,208 homicides in the U.S. involving guns, 21,175 suicides and 505 deaths from accidental discharge, they point out.
The prevailing belief and legal standard in this country is that people have a right to be armed in order to protect themselves, no matter that the opposite is probably the case. David Robert Grimes, writing several years ago in The Guardian, cited the findings of a University of Pennsylvania study that people carrying firearms were about 4.5 times more likely to be shot than those who did not carry and noted, with reference to a number of studies:
“While defensive gun use may occasionally occur successfully, it is rare and very much the exception — it doesn’t change the fact that actually owning and using a firearm hugely increases the risk of being shot.”
He also noted: “There’s good evidence that the very act of being in possession of a weapon has an unfortunate effect of making us suspect others have one too.”
Thus, arming ourselves both intensifies our fear and increases our literal danger. A lost soul with little emotional control to begin with is particularly susceptible to such effects and is, no doubt, the last person who should be armed. But in the United States of America, owning a gun — better yet, an assault rifle — may well be the most enticing option he has to save himself.

New War Drums Out Of Saudi Arabia

Elias Akleh

During its zenith the Ottoman Empire extended over parts of three continents; Europe, Asia and Africa. Its rule had also spread over the Arab World in the Middle Eastern region for long four centuries. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire the Western colonial powers (the Illuminati, the Hidden Hand, the Khazars, the Rothschilds, the Zionists or whatever you want to call them) had planned to keep the Arab World in the vital geostrategic Middle Eastern region divided, weak, plagued with perpetual wars so that no other empire could be formed to prevent them from robbing the natural resources of the area.
This plan started with the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement, and continued on with 1917 Balfour declaration establishing the Israeli terrorist state and its wars against Arab states, the American orchestrated eight years (1980-1988) Iraq/Iran war, President Bush’s (father) 1990/1991 Gulf War,   President Bush’s (son) 2003 war against “Global Terror” destroying Iraq, the neocons’ “Project for Greater Middle East” changed later to the “New Middle East”, the so-called Arab Spring and the destruction of Libya, and finally the six years terrorist wars against Syria and the devastating three years Saudi war against Yemen.
These planned wars kept the Arab World politically divided, conflicted, economically and culturally under-developed, and war-torn with millions of its Arab inhabitants killed, maimed and displaced.
Every action creates a reaction. Every oppression is faced with resistance. As the logical result of all these destructive and devastating wars a new generation of stronger, more adaptable, more creative, and yes more militaristic resistance group was destined to emerge and grow as struggle for survival. A phoenix rising from the ashes; in Lebanon Hezbollah was born and grew stronger. Its fighters caused the American marines to withdrew from Lebanon after bombing the American embassy in 1983. This was followed in 1985 by the ousting of the Israeli occupational forces from southern Lebanon. In 2006 Hezbollah was able to inflect heavy casualties on the so-called undefeatable Israeli forces and to stop them from advancing into southern Lebanon one more time. Getting stronger and more battle experienced Hezbollah joined the Syrian forces to defeat the American/Israeli/Turkish/Saudi supported and armed terrorist groups; such as ISIS and al-Nusra, who waged a six-years terrorist war against Syria.
In occupied Palestine national resistance grew against the Israeli occupation. Two national Intifadha movements erupted against Israeli oppression. Different militarily, though weak, resistance factions were developed. Hamas was the strongest faction and won the Palestinian election in 2006. Yet this did not suit Israel and its western supporters, so they applied pressure on the Palestinian Authority to oppose a Hamas government, which eventually led to the separation of the Gaza Strip from the West Bank and the establishment of two separate Palestinian governments. Israel took advantage of the situation, imposed a military siege against Gaza Strip and led military attacks against the Strip. Unfortunately, some Arab governments; such as Jordan and Egypt, joined Israel in its siege against Gaza.
Hezbollah and Hamas were supported by Iran, who had its own share of colonialism and wars. Britain occupied Iran and exploited its oil since WWII. Mohammad Mosaddegh was appointed as the Prime Minister in 1951. He nationalized the petroleum industry and the oil reserves, an act that angered the West. In 1953 an American led coup deposed of Mosaddegh and appointed a stooge; Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, as the Shah of Iran. With the help of his ruthless secret police; the SAVAK, the Shah ruled Iran suppressively for the benefit of British and American oil companies.
The February 1979 Islamic Revolution deposed of the Shah and established an Islamic Republic. The US responded by inciting and financing popular uprisings such as the Kurdish rebellion, and uprisings in Sistan and Baluchestan. When these uprisings failed the CIA Iraqi operative; Saddam Hussein, was pushed into war against Iran in 1980 that lasted eight years.
The Iranians learnt that the best way to protect themselves and their country is through the build up of their own military industry and through supporting Arab resistance groups in the neighboring Middle Eastern region.
After the 2006 Israeli defeat and failure to destroy Hezbollah in the north, its 2008-09 and 2014 military failures to destroy Hamas in the south, the failure of the terrorist wars against Syria and Iraq, and the failure of the on-going war against Yemen, it became evident that a growing militarily strong Iran, with its influence in these Arab countries is the major stumbling block for Western colonialism and for the continuation of the Greater Israel Project.
Iran is now the main target for US/Israel/NATO/Gulf states, who are stepping up pressure to isolate Iran internationally and to cut its Middle Eastern wings.
For years the well-known nuclear Israel kept on claiming that Iran is one year away from developing nuclear bomb.
While allowing itself to develop tactical nuclear bombs the Trump administration is criticizing the 2013 P5+1 Iranian nuclear deal (JPOA – Joint Plan of Action) threatening not to re-certify the agreement.
The US, Britain and France had considered Hamas a terrorist group, and recently had added Hezbollah to the terrorist list. They are inciting hatred and enmity particularly in the oil and gas rich Gulf States; Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Kuwait, against Iran.
This hatred and enmity are clearly manifested in the frustrated Saudi Kingdom due to the failure of its costly military foreign policies meddling in the region. The Kingdom had paid Israel for its 2006 offensive in southern Lebanon to get rid of Hezbollah but this Israeli offensive had failed. In his November 11th speech, Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah, exposed the fact that the Kingdom, then, had paid billions of dollars to Israel to attack Hezbollah.
The Kingdom had also failed to get rid of Syrian al-Assad, who rejected the Saudi pipe line and Qatari gas line through his country to Europe. It had also eventually failed to bully Qatar and had gained its enmity instead. It had also failed to subdue the Bahraini popular revolution. Finally, the Kingdom is so frustrated due to the still on-going 3 years Operation Decisive Storm against Yemen, and had become very concerned after Yemeni forces had successfully launched missiles into the Saudi capital.
With the encouragement of President Trump himself, and conspiring with the Zionist  Jared Kushner, an in-experienced, power hungry, and un-realistically dreaming Saudi prince; Mohammad bin Salman, had conducted a coup against all the other royal princes violating all the Saudi family ruling traditions. Somehow, King Salman was convinced to remove Crown Prince Muhammad bin Nayef, the heir to the kingdom, from all his positions, and to appoint his own son Mohammad as the Crown Prince, violating all the Family’s ruling tradition that has been adopted since the establishment of the kingdom.
A petition signed by 21 princes and ministers was sent to the king objecting to the crowning of prince Mohammad and urging for the return of the status quo. Corrupt himself, Prince Mohammad’s reaction was to launch what he claimed to be an anti-corrupt campaign, imprisoning at least eleven princes and tens of ministers and businessmen, and confiscated what is estimated to be $800 billion in assets.
Thus, Mohammad now has purged the domestic front from any opposition and gained total control over the major sectors of the state; military, security, media, economy and religion. This was accomplished with the employment and help of the American Black Waters mercenaries.
Mohammad bin Salman had also called in the Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri, arrested him as soon as he landed in Riyadh, and forced him to broadcast his resignation accusing Iran of interfering in Lebanese and regional affairs, and of Hezbollah of occupying Lebanon and having plans to assassinate him. Mohammad bin Salman’s goal was to spread chaos among Lebanese factions especially after he accused Iran and Hezbollah of supplying Yemen with missiles that hit Riyadh, which he considered an act of war vowing to respond militarily to free Lebanon from the Hezbollah’s grip.
Beating the drums of what could be WWIII in the region, this naïve, inexperienced, dreaming-to-become a great emperor Mohammad bin Salman is not aware that he, like other leaders in the region, is played by the American administration. He seems to have the illusion that the presence of the American military bases and fleets in the Persian Gulf would protect him from any attack. Besides his war on Yemen he believes that he could pay some Arab leaders to form a military coalition to first subdue Qatar, then attack Iran, and at the same time pay Israel, again, to fight Hezbollah.
What this prince, Mohammad bin Salman, has overlooked is the tribal loyalty many Saudi citizens have for the princes he imprisoned. A counter-coup and an assassination could be in his near future as a retribution to the sins he committed against the tribal honor and the Saudi family tradition.

Turkey Denies Working With Michael Flynn To Kidnap Gulen

Abdus Sattar Ghazali

Prime Minister Binali Yildirim Saturday (Nov 11) denied Turkey’s involvement in an alleged plot involving former U.S security adviser Michael Flynn to kidnap U.S.-based controversial cleric Fetullah Gulen, allegedly behind last year’s coup attempt to overthrow President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Extraditing Gulen is a major priority for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
In an interview with CNN television host Fareed Zakaria, Yildirim said Turkey was expecting the White House to extradite Gulen. However, “we see that there is no signal [through] which extradition will occur,” said Yildirim.
When asked if Flynn had given any assurances to Turkey, Yildirim said: “No, we are not dealing with Michael Flynn, we are dealing with the government of United States.”
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal reported Friday, Special counsel Robert Mueller is investigating Michael Flynn and his son’s alleged plan to forcibly remove Gulen from the United States and deliver him to Turkey.
Flynn, who is President Trump’s former national security adviser, and his son Michael Flynn Jr. were allegedly were involved in a plan to deliver Fethullah Gulen to the Turkish government, which views Gulen as a political enemy and has pressed the U.S. for his extradition, The Journal reported. In exchange, Flynn and Flynn Jr. would be paid as much as $15 million.
Flynn — who was forced out of his White House job this year after revelations that he had misled officials about his conversations with the Russian ambassador — reportedly discussed the plan with Turkish government representatives last December. The meeting caught the attention of FBI, who have questioned at least four people about it.
The Journal quoted one person who spoke to the FBI as saying that the alleged discussions included transporting Pennsylvania based-Gulen, on a private jet to the Turkish prison island Imrali. Turkish officials, according to The Journal, first raised the possibility of removing Gulen from the country by force in an earlier meeting that took place in September.
Flynn had publicly supported Gulen’s extradition in an op-ed published on The Hill — a U.S. political website — on Nov. 8, the U.S. presidential election day, according to Zakaria.
Yildirim said the Turkish justice minister was in contact with his U.S. counterpart regarding Turkey’s extradition request. “They were in communication. They are still in communication to provide some progress on that matter.”
He compared the defeated coup attempt in Turkey to the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, adding that Turkey was the first country to offer help and send its army to Afghanistan to fight the U.S. war on terror.
“We didn’t ask who was behind this. The United States said this is Al-Qaeda behind of this attack and Al-Qaeda is responsible. Nobody asked the United States is there any evidence that Al-Qaeda did so,” he said.
Flynn’s top attorney in a statement, on Nov 10, called the allegations “outrageous” and “false”.
Flynn, who only lasted 24 days as Trump’s national security adviser, has been a key figure in Mueller’s Russia investigation.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has accused FETO and its leader Gulen plotting the July 15, 2016 attempted coup, which left 250 people killed and nearly 2,200 injured.
Turkish-US relations
Apparently, Turkish-US relations are tense at present.
In early last month, Turkish investigators arrested Metin Topuz, a 35-year employee of the U.S. Istanbul Consulate on suspicion of collaborating with Fetullah Gulen’s organization in regard to the various crimes they have committed in Turkey over the past several years.
Turkish society had been aware for several months that someone at the U.S. Consulate had been in frequent contact with Gulen’s operatives, wrote Adam McConnel, Professor at Sabanci University of Istanbul. His comment titled “New balance in Turkish-American relations” was published the Anadolu news agency.
But U.S. Ambassador to Turkey John Bass, whose tweets, public statements, and actions over the past two years had already made him unwelcome, chose to completely ignore the Istanbul Consulate’s cloudy and deeply disturbing communications with Gulen’s adherents.
If those conversations were simply a part of Topuz’s responsibilities at the Consulate, then the Ambassador could, at the very least, have explained that to Turkish society.
Bass, however, chose to condescend to Turkish society in relation to a matter that all Turkish citizens care greatly about, .
Gulen’s followers took 250 Turkish lives in July 2016, but the former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey did not deem the issue important enough to take the necessary and logical step of informing Turkish society why Topuz had been on the phone with Gulen’s operatives so frequently. No attempt was made to provide transparency or soothe Turkish public sentiment, Adam McConnel said.
Instead, Ambassador Bass decided to make a diplomatic gaffe of monumental proportions.
Without advance notice to Turkish authorities or to Turkish society, he suspended visa application procedures late on Sunday, Oct. 8, for Turkish citizens, claiming that the arrest of Topuz constituted a security threat to U.S. missions in Turkey.
Turkey, no longer the U.S.’s patsy, immediately implemented the same restrictions for U.S. citizens, and a full-blown crisis erupted between the two countries.
To top off the disgraceful situation, U.S. officials demanded that Turkish authorities return Topuz’s telephone, claiming that it is a security threat for them and that the phone is protected under the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
Because of the other problems plaguing Turkish-American affairs, official U.S. behavior in regard to Topuz’s arrest has caused far greater harm to relations between the two NATO allies than might have been the case otherwise, McConnel argues.
Look at it this way: at the exact same time the U.S. has sent hundreds of truckloads of weapons to the PKK’s Syrian branch, the U.S. claims to be highly concerned about a telephone used to help Gulen’s cultists carry out extralegal activities, essentially sabotage, intended to harm Turkish state and society.
“What do Turkish citizens understand from that? That Turkish lives and security are not as important to U.S. officials as a single cell phone. And then U.S. officials express surprise that anti-Americanism rise in Turkey?,” concludes McConnel.
Gulen movement declared a terrorist group
On June 1, 2016, President Erdogan officially designated the Gulen movement a terrorist group and said he would pursue its members whom he accused of trying to topple the government.
Gulen, described by Pape Escobar as a CIA asset, has long been accused by leading Justice and Development Party (AKP) lawmakers, President Erdogan and his inner circle of forming and heading a terrorist organization to topple the Turkish government through insiders in the police and other state institutions.
Critics point to a video that emerged in 1999 in which Gulen seemed to suggest that his followers should infiltrate mainstream institutions. “You must move within the arteries of the system, without anyone noticing your existence, until you reach all the power centres ” You must wait until such time as you have got all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institution in Turkey.”
According to the Diplomat, in May 2015, Tajikistan had become the latest Central Asian country to close schools linked to the Gulen movement. In fact, Tajikistan’s decision to close the schools reflected a wider trend in the region. The Turkish Daily Sabah reported in mid-May 2015 that Kosovo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kazakhstan, Somalia, and Japan have all begun procedures to close Gulen-linked schools. In July 2014, Azerbaijan closed Gulen schools on fears of a parallel government. Uzbekistan shut down its Gulen schools in 1999. In Russian Chechnya and Dagestan regions Gulen-backed schools were once banned by President Putin. The Gulen website says that the schools are back in operation.
A Turkish court in December 2014 issued an arrest warrant for Gulen. Turkish government has asked for his repatriation.
Gaza Freedom Flotilla
Tellingly, in 2010, Gulen shocked Turkey when he supported brutal Israeli operation on May 31, 2010 against the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara, which was part of six ships of the “Gaza Freedom Flotilla” in the international waters of the Mediterranean Sea. The Turkish led flotilla, organized by the Free Gaza Movement and the Turkish Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (degreesHH), was carrying humanitarian aid and construction materials, with the intention of breaking the illegal and inhumane Israeli-Egyptian blockade of the Gaza Strip.
During the raid, nine activists were killed including eight Turkish nationals and one Turkish American, and many more were wounded. Volunteers had come from over forty countries, united by the simplicity of their mission: to publicly deliver aid to Gaza in order to challenge Israel’s illegal blockade on small, densely populated Gaza strip.
In his 2010 Wall Street Journal interview, Gulen commented on the incident, saying, “It is not easy to say if they [the IHH] are politicized or not”. He continued by insisting that the IHH should have sought permission from Israel before transporting aid to Gaza.
During his interview with Cuneyt zdemir in 2010, Gulen refused to refer to the victims of the Mavi Marmara as ‘martyrs’: “It is out of the question to call these people martyrs. They knew they were going there to get killed and went at their own discretion”.
Moreover, his followers tried to portray the involvement of Mavi Marmara in the Flotilla as a form of “jihadism”, or radical militant Islamist action. Consequently, the stance of Gulen and his movement vis–vis the flotilla has been and still is a subject of criticism in Turkey.
Not surprisingly, Gulen calls for shredding five percent of Islam to make it acceptable to the West. One of his popular mantras is: “Build schools instead of mosques.”

Yemen: End Blockade, Avert Famine

Chandra Muzaffar

The threat of mass famine in Yemen is as real as ever — in spite of the reopening of the port of Aden and the Wadea land crossing on the Saudi-Yemen border. This is not enough, according to the UN Office of Humanitarian Aid (OCHA). The blockade of all ports especially Hodeida should be lifted immediately. Most humanitarian aid goes through ports other than Aden.
The government of Saudi Arabia had imposed a total blockade of all Yemen’s seaports, airports and land crossings on the 6th of November 2017. This was in response to the firing of a missile from Yemen on the 4th of November that was brought down near Riyadh’s international airport. The Saudi Heir Apparent, Muhammad bin Salman, the country’s de facto ruler, has alleged that the missile was supplied by Iran and represents “an act of war.” Tehran has denied the allegation.
However, Tehran does provide moral support to the Houthi rebels who control the capital, Sanaa, and most of Western Yemen.  These rebels have been fighting against the government of Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, who is backed by Saudi Arabia, for a few years now. The Houthis are also linked to the former president of Yemen, Ali Abdullah Salleh.
The Houthis who have lauded the firing of the missile insist that they had manufactured it. They justify the missile attack as retaliation for the Saudi bombing and killing of Yemeni civilians which has been going on since early 2015. The bombing has destroyed Yemen’s water and sanitation systems. Hospitals and schools have been targeted. Farms and factories have also been subjected to aerial bombardments. Even residential areas have not been spared.  Thousands have died as a result of the military action of the Saudi-led coalition. Earlier UN reports observed that children in particular have suffered a great deal, not just directly from the bombing but also indirectly from the rapid spread of communicable diseases such as cholera.  In fact, 2100 people (including a lot of adults) have died of the disease since April 2017 and the number is expected to increase to 1 million by the end of December this year.
It is against this backdrop that chief of OCHA Mark Lowcockpleaded with the UN Security Council on the 8th of November to act with a sense of urgency. He warned that there will be a famine in Yemen, exacerbated by the blockade.  He stated bluntly that, “It will be the largest famine that the world has seen for many decades, with millions of victims.” Lowcocknoted sombrely that the Yemen Humanitarian Response Plan tasked with addressing the crisis is only 57 % funded with just 1.3 billion US dollars out of the 2.3 billion needed to prevent millions from dying of starvation and disease.
Women and men of conscience everywhere should respond to this grim situation by persuading their governments to pressurise the Saudi leadership to end the sea, air and land blockade at once, without conditions. Humanitarian aid organisations should have free and unimpeded access to all segments of society in North and South Yemen.The UN should also at the same time revitalise its drive to collect more funds from not only member-states but also well-heeled corporations and philanthropic bodies right across the board.
Perhaps of all governments it is the US administration that has the greatest influence and impact upon Saudi Arabia. It is in a position to coax Prince Muhammad bin Salman to remove the blockade.  It can ensure that aid reaches everyone through legitimate channels. If the American people also come forward to help the Yemeni people through fund-raising activities, it may prompt people in other countries to also reach out.
Of course humanitarian assistance however generous is not the real solution. Given the nature of the conflict and the crisis in Yemen, the various parties concerned will have to forge an enduring solution through mediation and negotiation. It is not just the various actors who are directly involved in the conflict that should come to the negotiating table. Saudi Arabia and Iran should also play their role. So should the United States.
There must be a willingness on the part of everyone to compromise, to make meaningful concessions. There must be a realization that there is no military solution especially since the whole world has witnessed what the use of force can lead to — the death and devastation it causes and the sorrow and suffering it engenders. Right from the outset, there was only one solution, a non-violent political solution.
And the only institution which is in some position to bring everyone to the negotiating table is the United Nations, specifically the UN Secretary-General. Antonio Guterreshas been deeply concerned about the tragedy in Yemen from the time he assumed the office of Secretary-General on the 1st of January 2017. If he can end the bloody conflict and help formulate a solution, he will earn his spurs. The entire human family which yearns for peace in Yemen and elsewhere would be eternally grateful to him and to the UN.

National Australia Bank to eliminate 6,000 jobs

John Harris

The National Australia Bank (NAB), one of the country’s big four banks, last week announced a restructuring that will cut 6,000 jobs over the next three years, while unveiling a record $6.642 billion profit. As of September 30, NAB employed 33,422 full-time staff, so the losses amount to nearly one in every five workers.
The job destruction is part of a broader transition throughout the financial sector, moving further away from over-the-customer service to automated and digitally-based operations. This has widespread implications. About 168,000 people are employed in banking across Australia, and finance and insurance sector as a whole is the country’s 11th largest employer.
NAB’s overall profit was up 2.5 percent from $6.483 billion last year. According to the Australian Financial Review, the rise was fuelled by continued growth in housing and business lending plus stronger margins on sales. Revenue rose 2.7 percent to $9 billion.
The redundancies are calculated to cut costs by more than $1 billion by 2020. The beneficiaries will be the major financial corporations that dominate the bank’s share register, although NAB’s stock price initially fell because of the feared expenses involved in the $1.5 billion three-year restructuring program.
The restructure aims to channel 60 percent of NAB’s business onto a digital platform, up from the current 10 percent. It also seeks to halve the number of financial products the company sells and reduce the number of IT applications by 20 percent.
CEO Andrew Thorburn attempted to ameliorate the shock by saying 2,000 new digitally-focused jobs would be created. He told the media, however, that the entire banking industry was coming under enormous pressure to reshape its workforce. NAB’s move, he declared, would put pressure on its “main rivals” to make “similar cost cuts.”
Bell Potter Securities analyst TS Lim told the Sydney Morning Herald, “Australian banks still have too many branches and too many head office staff.” If they were to remain competitive, banks would have to make deeper cuts, especially the Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Westpac, which have the largest branch networks.
A few days later, Westpac CEO Brian Hartzer unveiled an $8 billion profit, while indicating that banking jobs are becoming more precarious. Commenting on Westpac’s results, Martin North, principal of Digital Financial Analytics, said “the volume of transactions [face-to-face] across the branch network fell 23 percent in the last two years.” The bank had closed 59 branches and sacked about 500 people.
On top of the technological shifts, the banks are vulnerable to any crash in the over-heated housing market. Already they are reportedly bracing for much slower growth in the market, which accounts for approximately 60 percent of their loans.
Ian Pollari, the head of banking at KPMG Australia, said slowing credit growth, long-term pressure on margins and competition from financial tech firms were all pushing banks to look hard at costs.
The redundancies at NAB are the latest in an endless series of job cuts. In November 2005, NAB carried out a three-year global restructure that destroyed 4,500 jobs, announcing an annual net profit of $4.13 billion that year.
Earlier this year, the once publicly-owned Commonwealth Bank cut 150 jobs from a processing centre in Brisbane as part of a broader restructure. Back in 2003, the Commonwealth Bank cut 3,700 jobs.
Similarly, ANZ bank is conducting an ongoing restructure which has seen 1,500 jobs lost over the past 12 months, following up 1,000 job losses in 2012.
The number of staff employed by banks is already well below the peak of 189,000 in 1991, despite a 40 percent increase in Australia’s population since then. That was the year in which the Keating Labor government began the privatisation of the Commonwealth Bank, laying the groundwork for the gutting of jobs and services.
The trade unions covering bank workers have been fully complicit in this process, both in backing Labor governments and smothering all resistance to redundancies. Typically, the Financial Sector Union (FSU) presented NAB’s latest cuts as a fait accompli. FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano said 80 of the 6,000 jobs had gone already and “there will be more line ups along the way.”
In a media statement, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) restated its support for the Labor Party’s call for a banking royal commission. ACTU president Ged Kearney said that the move to sack 6,000 workers came after “countless scandals” in the banking and finance sector.
Any such inquiry would cover-up the pivotal roles played by Labor governments and the unions in the carve-up of jobs and conditions of banking and finance workers, as well as the underlying driving forces in the corporate profit system.
The extraction of extraordinary profits by the banks at the expense of jobs highlights how capitalism subordinates all developments in technology and infrastructure to the interests of a wealthy elite, preventing them being used for the benefit all.

Five million people in UK earn less than £8.10 an hour

Thomas Scripps

More evidence has emerged of the desperate conditions faced by millions of low-paid workers across the UK.
Even as the Conservative government increases the voluntary UK Living Wage to £8.75 an hour (£10.20 in London), the Resolution Foundation reports that a quarter of low-paid workers were permanently stuck in low-wage jobs over the last decade.
Nearly half fluctuated in and out of the low-pay bracket, while just one in six escaped into more gainful employment. Low pay is defined by the foundation as less than two-thirds the median hourly wage of £12.10. This means more than 5 million people are earning £8.10 an hour or less.
The emergence of such a low-wage workforce, just 70 pence less than the new supposedly living wage, reflects broader structural changes in the British and world economy following the 2008 financial crash. Full-time employment is now out of reach for many, with growing numbers forced into precarious part-time and self-employment, lacking even basic protections including sick pay. According to the report, 64 percent of those permanently stuck in low-pay were working part-time.
For the British working class, the period of austerity since 2008 has been one of continued and drastic decline in real wages: down 11 percent in 2017 compared with 2007, and with inflation continuing to outstrip wage growth throughout this year. The only section of the workforce to improve its pay was the poorest 15 percent, thanks to the abysmally low level at which these workers started. The Resolution Foundation report highlights sharp divisions in these “gains.” The 25 percent of those in low pay who are trapped there saw their wages increase by just 40p an hour—well behind the £4.83 increase for the one in six who escaped and pointing to the creation of a permanent poverty-wage sector of the labour force.
For low-paid workers aged under 25, even this picture is too rosy. They are not entitled to the National Living Wage (£7.50/hour)—instead earning the minimum wage of between £4.05/hour and £7.05/hour depending on age, or £3.50/hour for apprentices. Young workers are being underpaid by between £820 and £6,300 a year for carrying out the same work as older workers, according to a report by the Young Women’s Trust. A survey of more than 4,000 young people conducted by the charity found that raising the apprentice minimum wage and extending the National Living Wage to under 25s were the two most popular suggested policies (with 83 percent and 79 percent in favour.)
According to a study by the Trades Union Congress (TUC), 16- to 17-year-olds working 40 hours a week for the minimum wage were £300 a year worse off in real terms compared to 2008, with those aged 18-20 £250 worse off.
Both young and older low-paid workers have been particularly sharply affected by welfare cuts and the rising cost of living, far outstripping meagre wage gains.
Among the more punitive increases in living costs over the past decade has been childcare. Young women in their early to mid-20s are highlighted by the Resolution Foundation as one of the most vulnerable groups when it comes to low-pay.
According to recent research by the TUC, the average cost of childcare increased 48 percent between 2008 and 2016. A single parent in full-time work in 2016 spent, on average, one fifth of their wages to place a one-year-old in nursery for 21 hours a week—compared to one sixth in 2008. Two parents in full-time work saw a jump from 8 percent to 11 percent of their income spent on childcare from 2008 to 2016.
Speaking for the Family and Childcare Trust, Ellen Broome explained, “Low-income families claiming Universal Credit typically take home just £1.96 per hour after childcare costs have been paid, and some get even less than this.”
Crippling expenses, combined with poor wages, have led to serious levels of indebtedness. Total consumer debt from car finance, personal loans and credit cards stands at £200 billion. The annual growth rate of consumer credit stands at 10 percent, compared to a 2 percent annual household income growth. Working people are being forced to borrow money on an unprecedented scale to simply get by. There are 8.3 million people in the UK with problem debts, according to the Money Advice Service. Half of all UK adults are “financially vulnerable—highly reliant on credit or unable to cope with small rises in bills,” according to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The greatest problems are faced by young people and renters, both typically among the low-paid. Those aged 25-34 hold, on average, five times more unsecured debt as a ratio of income than over-55s (twice as much as 35- to 44-year-olds) and are three times more likely to use credit to pay for essential items like food. Compared to mortgage holders, renters are twice as likely to resort to credit to pay for essential items. Figures from the FCA released in October show that 55 percent of 18- to 24-year-olds are in debt, as are 63 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds, owing an average of over £8,000. Moreover, 20 percent of 25- to 34-year-olds have no savings at all, with an additional 33 percent having less than £1,000.
With the Bank of England beginning to raise interest rates, millions of people are standing on the precipice.
In the light of these figures, the miserly increases planned for the UK and National Living Wage are exposed as a fraud. The recent increase to the UK Living Wage means only 150,000 workers will be affected, with many major companies refusing to pay the higher rate. The plans to increase the enforced minimum for over 25s to £8.75 an hour will still leave an estimated 4.3 million workers in low pay, according to the Resolution Foundation. In addition, the numbers of workers clustered within 1 percent of the wage floor is expected to double to 3.7 million by 2020.
Labour’s proposal is to increase the minimum to £10 an hour, but neither Labour nor the TUC are prepared to seriously challenge employers on low-pay.
Responding to the recent increase in the voluntary minimum, Labour’s Mayor of London Sadiq Khan appealed to businesses, “Paying the London living wage is not only the action of a responsible organisation, but a successful one too. Many of the accredited employers I speak to tell me of the increased productivity and reduced staff turnover that they’ve experienced since signing up.”
TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady, on the other hand, continues to petition the Tory Government to take up Labour’s plan, “by raising the minimum wage to £10 an hour as soon as possible.”
The Labour and trade union bureaucracy are wholly incapable of addressing the fundamental cause of low-pay, rising living costs and debt: the more and more forcible exertion of the laws of capitalist economy. According to an Institute for Public Policy Research report into wealth inequality in Britain, “Every generation since the post-war ‘baby boomers’ has accumulated less wealth than the generation before them had at the same age.” This is not a question of intergenerational conflict, but of the collapse of the post-war order and a deepening capitalist crisis which recent entrants to the labour market are feeling most sharply.