4 Dec 2018

British Institute in Eastern Africa (BIEA) Thematic Research Grants 2018/2019

Application Deadline: 20th December 2018.

Eligible Countries: UK or Eastern African countries.

About the Award: The British Institute in Eastern Africa invites applications for funding for research projects that engage with one or more of the following thematic areas:
  1. Citizens and Science in Eastern Africa
  2. Migrations and Mobilities
  3. Everyday States
  4. Land, Heritage ad Memory
  5. Spending Time
Type: Grants

Eligibility:
  • BIEA research funding is available to support original research within these thematic areas in any discipline in the humanities and social sciences across the region.
  • The BIEA’s thematic grant scheme particularly seeks to help researchers who have limited access to other sources of funds. In doing so, the BIEA seeks to nurture early career researchers and scholars in eastern Africa, and is keen to fund small projects that lay the ground for larger projects.  Such researchers may include postgraduate students in eastern African or the UK, or people who have not followed conventional research careers but whose local knowledge or contacts make them well-fitted to conduct quality research.
  • This funding supports original research in the humanities and social sciences, and we particularly encourage applications from the wider eastern African region, which we define as stretching from Sudan, to Mozambique, and including Madagascar. ‘
  • Priority is given to researchers based in the UK or eastern Africa.
Number of Awards: Limited

Value of Award: Grants are normally between £500 and £1,000; in exceptional circumstances, up to £1,500 may be awarded. The grant should contribute towards actual research costs and not include institutional overheads, equipment, and applicant’s stipend or publication costs.

How to Apply: 
Visit Programme Webpage for Details

African Institute for Mathematical Sciences (AIMS) Master’s & Co-operative Master’s Program 2019/2020 (Fully-funded) for African Students

Application Deadline: 31st March 2019

Eligible Countries: African countries

About the Award: Apply to the AIMS Master’s in the Mathematical Sciences, a unique, innovative program providing problem-solving and computational skills as well as exposure to cutting-edge fields or the AIMS Co-operative Master’s in Mathematical Sciences, a work integrated master’s program, offered only at AIMS Senegal, AIMS Cameroon and AIMS Rwanda.
Why should you apply to AIMS?
  • Courses are taught by outstanding African and international lecturers and supported by a team of resident tutors.
  • AIMS graduates progress to top advanced degree programs and careers in Africa and all over the world.
  • AIMS have a climate of highly interactive teaching where students are encouraged to learn together through questioning and discovery.
  • AIMS place emphasis on computational methods and scientific computing with 24/7 access to computer labs and the internet.
  • Both students and lecturers share a 24-hour learning environment.
  • AIMS have a Pan-African student body including a minimum of 30% women
Type: Masters

Eligibility: Eligibility requirements include;
  • Applicants must have a conferred 4-year university degree in mathematics and science or engineering subject with a significant mathematics component or anticipate completing by the start date of the AIMS course.
  • Applicants should demonstrate a strong aptitude in mathematics, leadership and community service. Women applicants are strongly encouraged to apply.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: There are no course fees for successful applicants. Full bursaries covering tuition, accommodation, meals, and travel costs are also awarded to successful applicants.

Duration of Programme: 18 Months

How to Apply: 
  • You can visit the Applicants FAQ page to see Frequently Answered Questions,
  • Click here to apply for AIMS Master’s in Mathematical Sciences
  • Click here to apply for AIMS Co-operative Master’s in Mathematical Sciences
  • GOODLUCK!
Visit Programme Webpages for Details

How Middle East Dictators Bring Their Western Allies Down

Robert Fisk

Middle East dictators, we like to believe, live in heaven. They have palaces, servants, vast and wealthy families, millions of obedient people and loyal armies who constantly express their love for their leader, not to mention huge secret police forces to ensure they don’t forget this, and masses of weapons to defend themselves, supplied, usually, by us.
These tyrants – autocrats or “strongmen” if they happen to be our allies – exist, we suppose, in a kind of nirvana. Their lawns, like their people, are well-manicured, their roses clipped, their rivers unsullied, their patriotism unchallenged. They wish to be eternal.
But this is our Hollywood version of the Middle East. Having not suffered our own dictators for a generation, we suffer from mirages the moment we step into the sand. Real dictators in the Middle East don’t behave or think like this. It is power and the risks of power and the love of ownership that obsesses them. The possession of untold wealth or an entire nation, and their own form of patriotism – and the challenges they have to face to sustain this way of life: that is the attraction.
Their countries — and their countries’ histories – are their personal property, to dispose of as they wish. They may lock up their opponents by the tens of thousands or drop barrel bombs upon them or chop up an unruly journalist. But they know – and it is true – that there must be residual support for the beloved dictator from all those millions who swear that they will sacrifice themselves – “our blood, our soul” – rather than allow harm to come to them.
How else would the majority of Egyptians go on supporting their field marshal-president when he has abandoned all forms of freedom? How else could the Syrian government survive if its army had not fought on for its country – and saved the regime – after tens of thousands of deaths? Attribute this to patriarchy, tribalism, minority fears or – in the case of Egypt – infantilism. Or straightforward love of country. But dictators cannot survive without some measure of genuine fealty from their populations.
This provides the thrill of power, the excitement of domination – or “responsibility”, as they would call it. It is about personal gratification. The people are not just loyal. The dictator is their father. Did not Mubarak, in his very last speech as president in 2011, address Egyptians as “My children! My children!”?
Within his personal mental asylum, the American president managed to blurt out this essential truth earlier this month when he mixed up the real and incinerated Californian town of Paradise with a mythical place of his own imagination called Pleasure. Twice he said it – an easy and obvious mistake for a man who is himself captivated by power and assumed popularity.
Trump, like his dangerous Middle Eastern allies, doesn’t want to live in heaven. He craves the pleasures of leadership. He enjoys risk. He believes not in history or morality. He believes in himself. That is why a lot of Arab despots rather like Trump. They have much in common.
Except for understanding. And here’s the problem. Arab dictators, delusional though they may be, have got us taped. They see through our lies and our arms sales and our lust for oil and our fraudulent desire that Jeffersonian democracy embrace the Muslim world. But we simply do not comprehend the Middle East. We do not spot even the most obvious clues to the behaviour of these Arab gauleiters. We roar with laughter at their sword dances and fake elections and talk of equality and liberalism, when we should be terrified.
Let me give you a particularly grizzly example of this. Take what appeared to us to be the weird behaviour of the Saudi consul in Istanbul in the days following the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi. We all watched the extraordinary footage of Mohammad al-Otaibi as he took Reuters on a tour of his six-storey building. During this apparently bizarre performance, the consul opened up cupboards, filing cabinets and panels covering air-conditioning units to show Jamal was not there. But how on earth, we asked ourselves, could they have conceivably hidden the journalist in a cupboard, as the consul seemed to suggest? What a nincompoop the poor chap must be! What a charade.
But I don’t think it was a charade at all. Otaibi did not take part in Jamal’s murder. But he may well have known the Saudi goons had dismembered the journalist. And in his truly unconscious way – confronting a real crime – Otaibi performed a very natural act to prove his own innocence: he showed us that not a single chopped-up limb, not a leg, foot, arm, stomach or bone fragment or piece of skull, was left inside the embassy.
We – still unaware of Jamal’s terrible dissected fate – thought: well, you couldn’t store an entire body in a filing cabinet. What’s this guy Otaibi playing at? But, of course, you could hide a severed hand or a skull in a cabinet. And the consul showed us – truthfully — that no bits of Jamal were still lying around the diplomatic premises. We thought Otaibi’s antics with the cupboards and the air-conditioning panel were funny rather than suspicious. Apparently, we still do. In fact these antics were very serious indeed.
I point out this salient fact because we allowed our natural racism towards the Arabs to overcome any serious line of enquiry. By wrongly assuming that the consular official was a fool, we missed the significance of his actions – which is exactly what we do when we frame our foreign policy in the Middle East.
The Arabs comprehend our world rather well. They are not stupid. They watch CNN and Fox with the same irreverence, ironically, as a western liberal or leftist, and they know that the simplest Hollywood themes will appeal to the Americans: fear of Islamist “terror”, political stability and low oil prices, and fortunes in cash that may be bestowed upon western nations in return for political support and military power.
It is we who do not understand them but we who choose to paint the backcloth to their politics. They may lock up and torture the innocent but they are also “moderates” fighting “Islamist extremism” – this of the Saudis, who gave us 15 of the 19 killers involved in 9/11, for heaven’s sake.
Thank goodness we’ve got these vicious men on our side. Needless to say, if we back the wrong side in the Arab world and call for the overthrow of the local “strongman”, then the Russians can step in to support the erring dictator — whom they will also dub a “moderate” fighting “Islamist extremism”, who will also be preserving the world from terror. Vladimir Putin is a ruthless and cynical enough man to know just how far to take this performance.
But we are not. Our political leaders climb into the old Bush rhetoric bath about the expansionist evils of Iran – without once, ever, mentioning Shiism, which is what the Sunni Arab world is trying to destroy. US defence secretary Michael Pompeo – and can we please, just once, drop the “Mike” bit? – has accused Iran of being “the world’s largest state sponsor of terror” and a “mafia”. Trump tweets of Iran’s “demented words of violence and death”. Yet who was it who first demanded that America should “cut off the head of the [Iranian] snake” as long ago as 2008? According to leaked US diplomatic memos, it was King Abdullah – the brother of the present King Salman, father of America’s dodgiest best friend, Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman. And along with Benjamin Netanyahu’s repeated and demented comparison of Iran with Nazi Germany – a follow-up to the crown prince’s description of Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei as “the new Hitler of the Middle East” – our regional war map has been pretty well sketched out.
Who is responsible for the Syrian civil war? Iran. Who is responsible for the Yemen war? Iran. Who is responsible for sectarianism in the Middle East? Iran. Who threatens Israel? Iran. Only three and a half years ago, the Saudis launched their bombing campaign and military adventure against the Houthis – “Iranian-backed”, as we like to say – in Yemen. This was the creation of Mohammad bin Salman, who was then Saudi defence minister. It had two codenames: Operation Decisive Storm and Operation Restoring Hope. It proved neither decisive not did it give hope to anyone. It merely killed tens of thousands – let’s not get involved in the wretched statistics scorecard yet once more – yet the western powers which gave its military and logistics support to the Saudis in this awful conflict shrugged their shoulders. Iran was to blame.
Even when Mohammad bin Salman jailed many of his fellow princes and business colleagues in a luxury Riyadh hotel and kidnapped the Lebanese prime minister, we smiled. Good chap, our MbS. Opening up the Saudi oil market, letting women drive. Our kind of guy. We’ll leave out for now Tom Friedman’s grovelling articles in The New York Times. Then came the demise of Jamal Khashoggi – of whom more has been written than of all the dead of Yemen – but even then, we’re still behind the Saudis in their Sunni war. We couldn’t blame Iran for this murder, so the world itself must be to blame. Isn’t that what Trump said? The world might be “accountable” for the chopping up of Jamal, he said, because “it is a very vicious place”.
Vain are our leaders in their failure to remember the entanglement of their fates with Middle Eastern history. Suez destroyed Anthony Eden. The Iranian hostage crisis destroyed President Jimmy Carter. Irangate almost did for Ronald Reagan. George Bush Sr’s “new order” in the Middle East may have doomed his subsequent election. George W Bush’s invasion of Iraq has besmirched his political reputation forever.
The same goes for Tony Blair – although it is instructive to remember that it was Lebanon and Israel which caused Blair’s downfall. His refusal to accept an early ceasefire during Israel’s war with Hezbollah in Lebanon after more than 1,000 civilians had been killed – in support of George W’s plan to give the Israelis more time to destroy Hezbollah (Iran again, of course!) – finally destroyed the Blair premiership. The Syrian war provoked the ocean of Muslim immigrants who fled to Europe and probably – and very sadly – ultimately finished off the political career of Angela Merkel. And how much did her version of the murder of the US ambassador in Libya lead to Hilary Clinton’s downfall?
So I have a prediction. If the Trump regime collapses – for regime it is – I suspect it will not be his frolics with the Russians which destroy it. Nor his corruption, nor his domestic lies. Nor his misogyny. Nor his anti-immigrant racism. Nor his obvious mental instability, though this clearly connects him to his friends in the Arab world. The Middle East has already got its coils into the White House. Trump is a friend of a highly dangerous state called Saudi Arabia. He has adopted Israeli foreign policy as his own, including the ownership of Jerusalem and wholehearted support for Israel’s illegal colonisation of Palestinian Arab land. He has torn up a solemn treaty with Iran. He has joined the Sunni side in its sectarian war with the Shias of the Middle East, in Iran, in Lebanon, in Syria, in Bahrain and, of course, in Saudi Arabia itself.
Many countries have gone to war on behalf of other nations. Britain drew the sword for Poland in 1939, albeit a little late in the day. But to actively seek participation in someone else’s sectarian war for no other reason than to continue to sell weapons to a wealthy and unstable autocracy, to amalgamate your own country’s foreign policy with that of the most militarily powerful state in the Middle East — to the point of depriving an entire people of a share in its capital city – and to willfully ignore the long and lucrative support that our Gulf “allies” have given to the most frightful of our cult enemies – those who have indeed struck in the streets of London and New York – is beyond the usual lexicon. It is beyond shameful. Beyond wicked. Were it not for the insanity of the man responsible, the word “depravity” comes to mind.
Crystal balls are dangerous objects in the Middle East. Mine have been broken several times. But there’s no reason why Donald Trump should be immune from the fate of so many of his predecessors. It’s no longer good enough to say merely: “Watch out.” We all do that by nature these days. But the Arabs and Muslims who live in territory which many of the American supporters call the holy land may well decide his future; after all, he thinks he can decide theirs.
The world is indeed a vicious place – but the Middle East is its most treacherous.

Hard Truths and the ‘Indispensable Nation’

Kenn Orphan

“Americans, like human beings everywhere, believe many things that are obviously untrue. Their most destructive untruth is that it is very easy for any American to make money. They will not acknowledge how in fact hard money is to come by, and, therefore, those who have no money blame and blame and blame themselves. This inward blame has been a treasure for the rich and powerful, who have had to do less for their poor, publicly and privately, than any other ruling class since, say, Napoleonic times.”
– Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., Slaughterhouse-Five
“I am opposing a social order in which it is possible for one man who does absolutely nothing that is useful to amass a fortune of hundreds of millions of dollars, while millions of men and women who work all the days of their lives secure barely enough for a wretched existence.”
– Eugene Debs
“The genius of our ruling class is that it has kept a majority of the people from ever questioning the inequity of a system where most people drudge along paying heavy taxes for which they get nothing in return.”
– Gore Vidal
It was about a year ago that United Nation’s special rapporteur, Philip Alston, issued a report on the dire state of the American republic. It revealed that upwards of 40 million Americans live in poverty. Among its findings:
+ By most indicators, the US is one of the world’s wealthiest countries.  It spends more on national defense than China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, United Kingdom, India, France, and Japan combined.
+ US health care expenditures per capita are double the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) average and much higher than in all other countries. But there are many fewer doctors and hospital beds per person than the OECD average.
+ US infant mortality rates in 2013 were the highest in the developed world.
+ Americans can expect to live shorter and sicker lives, compared to people living in any other rich democracy, and the “health gap” between the U.S. and its peer countries continues to grow.
+ U.S. inequality levels are far higher than those in most European countries
+ Neglected tropical diseases, including Zika, are increasingly common in the USA.  It has been estimated that 12 million Americans live with a neglected parasitic infection. A 2017 report documents the prevalence of hookworm in Lowndes County, Alabama.
+ The US has the highest prevalence of obesity in the developed world.
+ In terms of access to water and sanitation the US ranks 36th in the world.
+ America has the highest incarceration rate in the world, ahead of Turkmenistan, El Salvador, Cuba, Thailand and the Russian Federation. Its rate is nearly 5 times the OECD average.
+ The youth poverty rate in the United States is the highest across the OECD with one quarter of youth living in poverty compared to less than 14% across the OECD.
+ The Stanford Center on Inequality and Poverty ranks the most well-off countries in terms of labor markets, poverty, safety net, wealth inequality, and economic mobility. The US comes in last of the top 10 most well-off countries, and 18th among the top 21.
+ In the OECD the US ranks 35th out of 37 in terms of poverty and inequality.
+ According to the World Income Inequality Database, the US has the highest Gini rate (measuring inequality) of all Western Countries
+ The Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality characterizes the US as “a clear and constant outlier in the child poverty league.” US child poverty rates are the highest amongst the six richest countries – Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Sweden and Norway.
+ About 55.7% of the U.S. voting-age population cast ballots in the 2016 presidential election. In the OECD, the U.S. placed 28th in voter turnout, compared with an OECD average of 75%.  Registered voters represent a much smaller share of potential voters in the U.S. than just about any other OECD country. Only about 64% of the U.S. voting-age population (and 70% of voting-age citizens) was registered in 2016, compared with 91% in Canada (2015) and the UK (2016), 96% in Sweden (2014), and nearly 99% in Japan (2014).
These are staggering figures; but the report resonated with me on a visceral level. I’ve lived all over the United States for most of my life, but it was my crisscrossed traverse across the continent two years ago that opened my eyes to the scale of destitution of which so many have become desperately ensnared.
I drove across the north, south and middle of United States with my sister several times because we had to care for my mother who resided in Florida. We finally decided to move her back to Canada with us after my father died because we knew she would not receive the care she needed in the States. In those many long days on the interstate I saw what America had transformed into.
The blight of corporate neglect and economic depression was nothing less than breathtaking. The main streets of town after town were boarded up, with only a smattering of dollar stores, payday loan shops, liquor vendors and storefront churches open. Hideously oversized franchise signs scraped the sky in an all too familiar impertinence. Big box stores and fast food restaurants were clustered around predictable junctions along the highways in an uninspired, formulaic pattern. It became apparent to me that these islands of banality offered some of the only employment for the people who lived in these regions. And the police patrolled every street constantly, making life feel rather like a prison camp.
These are the hard truths about America, a nation drowning in delusions, feckless nationalism and layers of supercilious bravado, where corporations, which siphon hundreds of billions of dollars from public coffers via tax evasion and subsidies are rarely held to account. Industry poisons the water, eviscerates ancient mountains, and devastates urban and rural communities with impunity. This is the “indispensable nation” where more of its citizens are locked behind bars than elsewhere in the world and usually for non-violent offenses. Where police murder unarmed people in stairwells, or hotel hallways, or for routine traffic stops and almost always get away with it. Where domestic violence often spills over to mass shootings which have become an almost daily occurrence. Where life expectancy is rapidly declining in a trend not seen since World War I. Where investment in military weaponry that terrorize the poor in other nations is exponential, but investment in veterans assistance is nil.
And yet despite this landscape of misery where inequity is exploding and infrastructure is failing at breakneck speed, the supremacist concept of “American exceptionalism”has managed to bamboozle millions into believing they live in the greatest nation on the planet. Social media has become a strange place to see this mythology in living colour. One comment on a Facebook post about the refugee crisis underscored this disconnect:
“These people need to clean up their own sorry countries. People all over the world just want to get into America because of its free stuff. It is the greatest nation on the planet!”
The sentiment echoed many others I read that exhibited and extraordinary lack of curiosity and willful ignorance about their nation’s enormous role in creating the miserable conditions these people were fleeing from in the first place. That the CIA supported and aided right-wing coups in these nations (and scores of others) was simply not in their orbit. Another comment parroted Donald Trump’s dehumanization of asylum seekers as “invaders.” Never mind the fact that it has been the US which has invaded dozens of nations, including several in Central and South America over its rather short history. And the reference to “free stuff” is shocking too, considering social services have been drastically cut in most places.
But it was this comment I read recently on a right-wing social media page that I found the most dumbfounding because it referred to one of its nearest neighbours:
“Canada compared to the United States is a third world nation. Roads full of potholes, slums, and terrible healthcare and short lifespan. They should let Trump work to save their sad nation.”
I’ll admit I had to stop and read that one twice. Of course Canada has many problems, its Tar Sands, arms dealing, and abysmal treatment of the First Nations communities among them, but the one thing that stood out was the ignorance about so-called “socialized medicine.”  This is a recurring theme and is the tragic result of decades of indoctrination by the capitalist class of the country. Both ruling parties have long been in bed with the insurance industry and Big Pharma which has derailed every effort for universal, single payer healthcare. The result has been ridiculously high infant mortality compared with other developed countries, skyrocketing levels of bankruptcy and foreclosures due to medical expenses, and the resurgence of disease associated with poverty.
That some still think of Trump as a savior may be risible, but there is a deeper wound that has been ignored by most establishment liberals too ensconced in their privilege to notice. Magical thinking is like a drug. It can easily become a balm to those who face a daily litany of miseries, humiliations and trials. As a medical social worker I attempted to assist scores of families and individuals navigate these miseries. My battles were with insurance companies refusing coverage, not doctors.
But I personally know what it is like to not have any kind of insurance and be fearful of getting sick or injured with no money to pay for exorbitant bills, and then to be handed an $11,000 bill for a few days stay in a hospital. I’ve felt the stigma myself of accepting county healthcare assistance which didn’t even cover a fraction of the costs and being treated like a social pariah because of it. I also know what it is like to watch loved ones who had no money and, although they were deathly ill, try to leave the hospital because they had incurred $80,000 in medical bills which they knew they would never be able to pay. It alters every aspect of a person’s life and leaves one in a state of perpetual anxiety where the only escape is often found in either addiction, magical thinking or some combination of the two.
In contrast I’ve taken a relative to the hospital in Canada for severe abdominal pain and saw her met with immediate care. She was rushed into emergency surgery without ever once having to worry about the cost. This not to say the Canadian healthcare system does not have its problems. It does. And we can discuss them at some other point. But there is no comparison to a nation where ordinary citizens put off vital treatment or medicine for fear of a staggering bill or where GoFundMe has fast become the go tosource for assistance with exorbitant medical expenses.
Poverty is an imposed oppression, the byproduct of rampant greed and the bastard child of an ever decadent capitalist class. And the way it is imposed is through food, housing and healthcare insecurity. But Americans who are poor are ladled with both the torment of financial worry and the noxious guilt of feeling like they are defective human beings because of their predicament. The “Oprah Effect” has convinced many that their failure to succeed in this inherently unjust system is a personal flaw. It is all about the self and its deceptively cruel mantra of positive thinking. One can see this quite clearly in media and entertainment. Anyone who is wealthy is cast in an almost deified light while the poor become punchlines, demonized, pitted against one another or ignored completely. But both ruling political parties espouse these values too. Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi is on record chiding a young constituent for daring to question this inherently unjust economic order by stating with pride “We’re capitalists.” As if making a religious declaration of faith.
This arrangement as the late Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. alluded to has been a boon for the ruling classes who, year after year, strip away the last vestiges of a beleaguered social safety net while making it easier for them to amass even more wealth. They have managed to deflect analysis and criticism of the current order by constantly referring to “personal responsibility”as the source of the problem, and this has created what Sheldon Wolin called “inverted totalitarianism.” A kind of partially self-imposed oppression of the corporate mind, where citizens are transformed into “consumers.” Civics and politics are reduced to spectacle. Every political leader is a millionaire or billionaire. Celebrity scandals dominate the media cycle. The wealthy are endlessly lauded for their “accomplishments”while societal infrastructure and works for the public good are neglected or demolished. Ecosystems are denuded and degraded for corporate profit. Each person becomes an island unto themselves without agency. And all of it is normalized by mass media.
History is replete with examples of how this framework often leads to fascism. Neglect of civic education and economic justice create the conditions that enable its rise. Trump, then, shouldn’t be regarded as an anomaly. He is the logical result of decades of neoliberal capitalist corruption in both ruling political parties. And he is pulling the levers that he knows will work in this machine: nativism, xenophobia, misogyny, conspiratorial thinking, racism, authoritarianism, demonization of the press, scapegoating, nationalism, confusion.
Distracting the populace (and the press for that matter) from the real threats to their existence and their day to day economic degradation has become Trump’s raison d’etre. Of course he is downplaying recent dire climate change reports despite the scorched earth in California or the flattened towns on the Florida panhandle because his focus must be on the other, the foreigner, the migrant. He can dehumanize, deport or easily exterminate them if politically necessary. In other words, deal with the “problem.” Climate change? Not so much.
Thankfully there has been push back, but the fundamental narrative must still be challenged. The US is textbook example of neoliberal, corporate capitalism run amok. Most taxes go for a bloated military that slaughters the poor in other countries and protects the interests of the wealthy. But there is entrenched illiteracy in the culture when it comes to this rather odious reality. The military is still adored in most precincts of society, from sports to education to religion. To criticize its’ size or the money ($716 bn) it receives is considered heresy in both ruling political parties. This might explain the impunity an increasingly militarized police force has when they crackdown on dissent or terrorize communities of colour. And there is little to no mainstream public discourse that addresses any of it.
It is the American mind that needs to be deprogrammed of this narrative for there to be any meaningful change. A mind rife with fallacies and delusions about its greatness. An attitude that ignores the reality of its dire condition and instead embraces national myths and fantasies. As long as the issue of class continues to be ignored or talked about in terms that obscure its role in political agency desperate people will look to authoritarian answers and despots that soothe their base fears and prejudices. The gap between the extremely wealthy and the rest will grow ever wider as the ecology and living standards degrade. Neglect in an age of biospheric crisis will become even more normalized. Civil rights and liberties will continue to be weakened and chipped away. As long as capitalism remains sacrosanct and considered irreproachable, the descent toward full blown fascism will eventually turn into a free fall.

Manufacturing “Islamic Extremism”

Ghali Hassan

Hate is like drinking poison and waiting for the other person to die”. Saint. Augustine
The so-called “Islamic extremism” has become synonymous with the Western definition of “terrorism” to conceal the West’s ongoing war on Islam and Muslims. It is invented and sensationalised by anti-Muslim Anglo-Zionist mass media and the Anglo-Zionist political establishments. Its intention is to demonise Muslims and conflate Muslim identity with a propensity for violence in order to manipulate the public and justify brutal repression of Muslims.
A recent study by the University of Alabama in the U.S., found that “terrorist attacks” committed by people described and identified according to their faith as “Muslim extremists” receive 357% more U.S. press coverage than those committed by non-Muslims (Jews and Christians). The study adds that, terrorist attacks committed by non-Muslims received an average of 15 headlines, while those committed by people with Muslim names and Islamic backgrounds received 105 headlines. The study findings were based on all attacks on the U.S. soil between 2006 and 2015. White and right-wing committed nearly twice as many terrorist attacks as those depicted as Muslim extremists” between 2008 and 2016 [see 1 and 2]. In fact, Muslims have committed less acts of terrorism than non-Muslims who committed more than 90% of all acts of terrorism. In addition, Jews have committed more acts of terrorism in the U.S. than Muslims, according to FBI study. Furthermore, a study released by Duke University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, shows that, “the terrorist threat posed by ‘radicalized’ Muslim-Americans has been exaggerated.” Despite all of this, a new study from the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding, or ISPU, asserts that perpetrators of violent crimes are sentenced more harshly when they are perceived to be Muslim. The report also asserts that major American media outlets focus a disproportionate amount of attention on Muslims accused of plotting violence. The trends in the U.S. are not much different in Australia.
Australia is ruled by what is called “Liberal-National Coalition”, a wealthy pro-Israel and anti-Muslim Neofascists clique. From the bigoted John Howard and Tony “Dumb-Dumb” Abbott to the current (selected) Prime Minister Scott Morrison or “Scomo” and the Liberal’s anti-Muslim attack dog Peter Dutton, they destroyed Australia and turned it into a cesspool of poisoning Islamophobia, breeding ground for Neofascists, ignorance, injustice and rampant political corruption. Indeed, poisoning Islamophobia, corrupt political class, ignorance, growing Neofascism, surveillance cameras, and concentration camps for Muslim refugees have become an integral part of the Australian culture and political landscape. The Liberal-National clique have always used anti-Muslim racist rhetoric of “us versus them” to win elections and enrich themselves and their friends at the expense of ordinary Australians.
The Muslim community is a relatively small minority in Australia, making up roughly 2.6% of the total Australian population, where around 93% of the Muslim population is clustered in urban areas, where racism and the poison Islamophobia are both, deeply rooted and institutionalised, and where Islam and Muslims are systematically discriminated against and demonised in the Zionist mass media [3]. Like in many countries with Muslim minorities, the Australian government anti-Muslim “policies are designed to control the Muslim community, to ‘domesticate’ Islam, have put pressure on Muslims not simply to integrate into a ‘multicultural’ society but to assimilate by abandoning elements of their Muslim belief and culture in order to enjoy full participation in their newly [adopted] country”, according to a study by the University of Exeter in Britain [4]. In other words, to be accepted in Australia, Muslims must convert to a new form of “Islam” created for them by Australian authorities.
The Muslim community was on notice again, when on the 09th November 2018, a lone psychopath Somali-born man (Shire Ali) went on a random violent knife attacks in Melbourne’s busiest streets (Bourke Street), killing one innocent man (the Pellegrini’s Café owner, Mr. Sisto Malaspina) and injuring two others before being killed by Australian Police.  After the Police revealed the perpetrator’s name and background, his random act of violence was classified as an act of “terrorism”.  It is his name and background that made him a “Muslims terrorist”, in a deeply-racist, Islamophobic and ignorant Anglo-Saxon society.  His motives were unknown and had nothing to do with Islam. It is fair to say that, he was a drug user and had nothing to do with Islam or Muslims. He was neither religiously or politically motivated to commit crimes. Shire Ali was well-known to Police and intelligence authorities (Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation, ASIO) and was cleared of posing any “threat to national security”. Though his passport was cancelled in 2015 by ASIO, who feared the Somali-born suspect would go to Syria to fight with the “Islamic State” (IS, formerly Daesh, ISIS/ISIL) or al-Qaeda terrorists, but no evidence provided. The Police also alleged that he was a loner and has no link to terrorist groups. “I think it is fair to say he [Shire Ali] was inspired. He was radicalized. We’re not saying there was direct contact [with terrorists]. We’re saying it was more from an inspiration perspective” and there was no direct contact with terrorist groups, Australian Federal Police Acting Deputy Commissioner Ian McCartney told reporters in Melbourne.
It was the oafish (unelected) Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison who made the most outrageous and racially-motivated allegations against the Australian Muslim community. He took the lead in spreading fear, and anti-Muslim hatred by accusing the Muslim community of “terrorism”. In a desperate attempt to salvage his corrupt minority government, Mr. Morrison used the tragedy and its victim to extract political mileage and justify the Liberal-National failures in economy and social policies. Indeed, scapegoating of Muslims and using racist fearmongering that targets Muslims especially during election campaigns have become an attractive rhetoric in Australian racist politics. Indeed, threat of terrorism has dominated headlines and spurred debate in the lead-up to every state and federal election. Instead of scapegoating Muslims, Mr. Morrison should use his “leadership” to promote diversity and social cohesion, not division. Despite the draconian and repressive laws targeting Muslim Australians, the vast majority of Muslims are law abiding citizens not involved crimes. If a small minority of Muslim Australians were involved in violence, “it it is the hostility and dehumanisation white Australia has meted out to generations of [Muslim] immigrants that pushes some of them to ‘seek worth elsewhere. Whether it is expressed in street violence or in foreign fighters, these people are inherently just seeking what society was unwilling to provide them: their humanity, their worth being recognised’”, writes Australia columnist Ruby Hamad.
Furthermore, Mr. Morrison called on Australian Muslims to take “special responsibility” – i.e., collective culpability – to fight “Islamic extremism”, arguing that the perpetrator is a Muslim, and he is a “radicalised terrorist”. When a Muslim alleged to have committed a criminal act, the whole Muslim community is collectively blamed. Of course, Muslims reject act of violence and the killing of innocent people is forbidden in Islam. “They [the Muslims] can’t look the other way”, said an aggressive Mr. Morrison. Muslims of course, are feed up with these generalise condemnations, collective responsibility and guilt “Asking Muslims to assume pastoral responsibility over a mythical homogenous ‘community’ not only relies on a racist framing of every Muslim as a potential terrorist, but it locates the ‘problem’ in Islam and ‘culture’, not politics. The script we are given for talking about the war on terror is censored and redacted,” writes Australian author Randa Abdel-Fattah. Consequently, the violent act of one psychopath (alleged or otherwise) does not criminalise or blamed on the entire diverse community of Muslims. Are all Catholic people guilty of paedophilia, or just some priests?
Now, let’s compare the attack of 09 November 2018 by the Somali-Australian with that of the Greek-Australian James George Gargasoulas (also known as “Dimitrious”), which took place in the same Bourke Street in Melbourne on 20 January 2017. Gargasoulas killed 6 innocent people, including 2 children and injured 27 others in a trail of death, terror and destruction. Yet the knife attacks by the Somali-born have been clearly labelled as “terrorism”, whereas the attack by the Greek-Australian is considered a massacre, “rampage”, and “tragedy”. Gargasoulas has been charged with six counts of murder, but not any terror-related offences. Indeed, once Gargasoulas was identified as Greek-Australian, he was described “mentally unstable” – a legitimate ground denied to Muslims –, and the Police cleared him of terrorism immediately. “This individual is not related to any terrorism activity,” Victoria’s Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton said.  Gargasoulas is the “Bourke Street driver”, not the terrorist. He is called a “monster”, a codeword for something large and good, but never a terrorist. In his recent trial, Gargasoulas has told a Melbourne Supreme Court jury that, he had a premonition “given by God” of running people over. He was never called a terrorist, but an Australian with “mental health issues” that are denied to the Somali-born Australian. In fact, the media sympathise with Gargasoulas and portrayed him as a good guy believing in “the second coming of Christ”, as he told the jury. Muslims are supposed to be discreet when it comes to their Islamic faith and discussing Islam in an Australian court has dire consequences.
It is instructive to define what is called terrorism. Like most other countries, Australia does have its definition of terrorism in domestic law. In Australia, a “terrorist act” is defined as an action or threat that:
  1. a) is intended to advance a political, religious or ideological cause; and
  2. b) is intended to coerce or influence a government by intimidation, or intimidate a section of the public; and
  3. c) causes one in a list of specified harms, including death, serious injury, or serious property damage.
The first requirement – the intention to advance a political, religious or ideological cause –, the “motive” requirement, is specifically designed for Muslims. This is key to distinguish religiously-motivated attacks (apply only to Muslims) from other attacks perpetrated by non-Muslims, like that committed by Gargasoulas in Bourke Street. According to Western political establishment and the Zionist mass media, any act of violence committed by someone with Islamic background is religiously-motivated (committed in “the name of Islam”). That is why Western mass media and politicians blamed IS/ISIS for almost every “act of terrorism” allegedly committed by people with Islamic background with the attention to associate violence with Islam. Even the fabricated description of terrorists as “Jihadis” – doesn’t exist in Arabic – by the Anglo-Zionist media, politicians and pundits is misleading and aimed at associating Islam and Muslims with violence. jihād, [جهاد] has no violent connotations and it literally means to strive for better goal in life. One must be completely illiterate to call Western-backed terrorists “Jihadis”. They are not. The so-called “IS/ISIS claimed responsibility” has become a household cliché. The Australian Police and ASIO rely on the above definition in their targeting of Muslims. Australian men from Muslim background are constantly spied-on, arrested in pre-dawn raids, imprisoned (on trumped-up charges), on bails, have had their passports cancelled, and on watchlist because Australian Police and ASIO allege they were “plotting an Islamic State-inspired terror attack”. In addition to systemic racism and discrimination, the Australian Muslim community is under siege and lives in fear. In a recent rant in Federal parliament, an uneducated Senator for Queensland (the fascist One Nation Party), Fraser Anning, has called in parliament for a “final solution” to Muslim migrants and the return of Australia to the old fascist White Australia Policy. Fortunately, there are no “gas chambers” in Australia, but “the plight of Muslims is beginning to mirror that of targeted ethnic minority groups on the eve of the war in the former Yugoslavia, or Jews in the dying days of the Weimar Republic”, writes American columnist Chris Hedges.
The recent arrest of Mr. Kamer Nizamdeen, a PhD student at UNSW in Sydney is a case in point. Mr. Nizamdeen was arrested by Australian Federal Police and NSW Police and accused (and charged) of “plotting Islamic State-inspired acts of terrorism”. It was only after friends and family members raised the alarm, the charges against him were dropped, and Mr. Nizamdeen returned to his home in Sri Lanka. He was framed by a paid Police informant. From the safety of his home in Sri Lanka, he said: “The AFP, NSW Police and the [Australian] authorities are responsible for abominable conduct and irreparable damage, which cannot be quantified in any manner whatsoever. It took six days for my lawyers to contact me. I had no access to lawyers or my family [in] this time, in solitary confinement in Supermax prison. I had no contact with the outside world for six days which is a violation of basic and fundamental human rights.” Mr. Nizamdeen treatment is what every Muslim in Australia is expecting.
As always, we are told, IS/ISIS terrorists had “claimed responsibility” for the latest attack in Melbourne, contradicting Deputy Commissioner McCartney earlier assertions. If that was the case, then the perpetrator had nothing to do with Islam and Muslims, because IS/ISIS terrorists and their affiliates (like al-Nusra Front) are Western-sponsored international terrorists.
The IS/ISIS terrorists are a double-edged sword that serves two purposes. Firstly, IS/ISIS is created as a useful tool― (1) to justify U.S.-led war of terror in the Middle East; and (2) as a proxy army and an instrument to create chaos and fuel sectarian wars between the region’s ethno-religious groups. The mantra of “fighting terrorism” (in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, etc.) is in reality fighting alongside the terrorists against independent nations who refused to submit to Anglo-Zionist diktats. For example, in Iraq, IS/ISIS grew under the watchful and complaisant eyes of the U.S. occupation of the country. From the outset, the U.S. armed and financed IS/ISIS/al-Qaeda to this day nonstop, as Brandon Tuberville shows.  Then when needed, the terrorists were allowed by the U.S. army to march – in Toyota Hilux trucks, paid for by the U.S. – into Iraq from Syria and occupied a large part of the country, including the City of Mosul in 2014. The U.S. regime played its car well in Iraq by― (1) using the terrorists to terrorise the Iraqi civilians, and intimidate the weak Iraqi government; and (2) having the terrorists as a pretext to justify the wanton destruction of Mosul and the permanent U.S. colonial occupation of Iraq for which the U.S. House of Representatives has just approved a bill titled the: “Preventing Destabilization of Iraq Act” (HR 4591). So, U.S. reign of terror against the Iraqi people continues over three decades since it begun. As President Trump clearly stated, the primary goal is to support and advance Israel’s fascist expansion and dispossession of the Palestinian people. It is estimated that more than 40,000 Iraqi civilians were killed by the indiscriminate bombing of the “U.S.-led Coalition”. The overwhelming majority of the victims were women and children. IS terrorists (approximately 9,000) were given safe passage (by the U.S.-led Coalition) to Eastern Syria to continue their barbaric terror war there and to be used as a pretext to destroy another Muslim-Majority Arab nation.
The wanton destruction of the city of Raqqa in Syria was modelled on Mosul. A report by Amnesty International (‘War of Annihilation) said, there is strong evidence that the U.S.-led Coalition indiscriminate air and artillery attacks on population centres violated international law and have committed heinous and unconscionable war crimes. Like Mosul, Raqqa was deliberately obliterated and thousands of innocent civilians were killed and injured. According to Syrian medical sources, many mass-graves have been found after the occupation of Raqqa by the U.S. forces, noting that 4,000 corpses of civilians, including nearly 2,500 children, women and the elderly, have been unearthed from the mass-graves. Australia is complacent because Australia is part of this U.S.-led criminal enterprise. When Australian SAS returned home recently, they were welcomed as “heroes” who were “protecting” Australia killing defenceless women and children Israeli-style.
Secondly, IS/ISIS provides a pretext for Western governments and mass media to incite fear among Western population and stir up anti-Muslim racial hatred to justify Western governments’ repression of and attacks against Muslims and refugees. It is ironic that the Australian government claims and pretends to be “fighting the terrorists”, while it is complicit in U.S.-imposed barbarous sanctions that aimed at starving the lives of the Syrian people, not the terrorists. In fact, every nation that is opposing U.S. policies and fighting against U.S.-sponsored terrorism is under barbarous sanctions.
Australia is part of the U.S.-led Coalition, which includes extremist regimes like Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirate (UAE), Israel, Turkey, Qatar, and Jordan. These U.S.-led vassal states are in league with the U.S. proxy international terrorists  (a.k.a. “moderate rebels”) not only in Syria to overthrow the Syrian Government of President Bashar al-Assad, but also in Iraq and in Yemen. The clichés of “humanitarian intervention” in “civilian war” are the pretexts to justify foreign military invasion and occupation. The U.S.-led regimes and their Arab stooges in the Gulf are backing several groups of international terrorists, including IS/ISIS, al-Qaeda and al-Nusra Front, recruited from over 80 countries to do what has become a normalised Anglo-Zionist crime of “regime change” in Syria. The terrorists are well armed, well financed and heavily promoted by Western media and “humanitarian” NGOs. Overwhelming evidence shows that on behalf of Israel the U.S. and its vassal-state allies, including Britain, FranceIsraelTurkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan have been recruiting, arming, financing and defending the terrorists against the legitimate Syrian Government. We all know, unless you have been living on the Moon for the seventy years, that the U.S. and Israel are the world’s leading sponsors of international terrorism, followed by their closest “allies”, namely Britain, France, and Saudi Arabia. Of course, Australia couldn’t be prouder than standing shoulder to shoulder with the world’s leading sponsors of terrorism.
To disguise and “humanise” ester-sponsored terrorism, the terrorists’ propaganda organ, the so-called “White Helmets” is created and financed by the Anglo-Zionist regimes. With full access to Western mass media and the entertainment industry, the White Helmets are nothing more and nothing less than IS, ISIS/ al-Qaeda terrorists in white helmets. Disguised as “humanitarian volunteers”, the White Helmets is a British-U.S. propaganda organ, which has received a glowing publicity in the West, even nominated for the Noble Prize. They are financed by the Zionist George Soros, Avaaz NGO and USAID. The White Helmets is a clearly an Anglo-Zionist Public Relations project established to help the terrorists in Syria regain credibility and “humanitarian” images in Western public opinion. In other words, it main task is to prepare Western public for war on Syria. Their disinformation tactics are designed to promote Western military invasion of Syria, modelled on the criminal invasion and wanton destruction of Libya. An article by Rick Sterling sheds light on the true purpose of the White Helmets. With the imminent defeat of the terrorists by the Syrian Army, and their allies (Russia and Iran), members of the White Helmets and their families have been evacuated by the Israeli army to be relocated to Western countries, including, Britain, Canada, Germany and the U.S.
The U.S.-led Coalition air force – better known as the al-Qaeda air force –, including the Australian and the Israeli air forces have been proving the terrorists with aircover and to help with their criminal assault on Syrian towns and villages. Indeed, Australia brags about its “role” in U.S.-led criminal air attacks on Syrian soldiers in Deir ez-Zor on 19 September 2016 (Australian ABC). At least 62 brave soldiers (SAA) were killed and more than 100 injured defending their country against Western-sponsored international terrorists. The U.S.-led Coalition continues to bomb and kill Syrian civilians indiscriminately in a campaign of ongoing terror. On Friday 23 November 2018, the Syrian Arab News Agency(SANA) reported that 11 civilians, including women and children, were killed in a U.S.-led airstrike in the village of al-Shaafa in eastern Deir ez-Zor. The Syrian Government has repeatedly and rightly accused the U.S.-led Coalition of using white phosphorus and cluster bombs in Syria and Iraq, causing heavy civilian casualties in built-up areas. Furthermore, the Israeli regime in particular has openly defended the terrorists – on behalf of the U.S.-led Coalition – provided them with medical supplies, arms and aircover, until Russia decided to act on its long-postponed decision to deliver the S-300 ABM missiles to Syria to act as a deterrent anti-aircraft system.
Finally, counting on Australians’ ignorance and lack of knowledge of Islam, Home Affairs Minister, the anti-Muslim Peter Dutton, has pressed for the speedy passage of laws to give Police more powers to bust encrypted communications, to identify, monitor (spy on), and arrest Australians (Muslims in particular). The aim is to create a “large-scale information secret service” all under the guise of “countering terrorism.” Mr. Dutton has called on Muslim Australians to act as Police informants against fellow Muslims. In addition, Australian Police and ASIO have requested more cash and more resources to monitor and police Muslim Australians.
It was possible that the perpetrator (Shire Ali) of the knife attacks in Melbourne had been recruited by enemies of Islam in Australia to commit act of violence and blackened the name of Islam and the Muslim community. There have been many violent attacks by Western criminals (in Europe, the U.S.) that were blamed on Muslims without any evidence. False flag terrorism has been a staple diet of many regimes around the world, and designed to stir-up anti-Muslim hatred, enact draconian laws and justify illegal aggression against Muslim-majority nations. It is obvious that Muslims are not the beneficiaries of the violence, but Western politicians, the anti-Muslim pro-Israel Zionist establishment and Israel are the major beneficiaries.
There is no hard evidence to support Western narrative that what have been labelled as acts of “terrorism” are associated with Muslims and Islam. On the contrary, there is overwhelming evidence that “Islamic extremism” is a manufactured anti-Muslim narrative. At a time when the anti-Muslim Anglo-Zionists are trying to manipulate the public that Islam, not them, is the greatest threat to world’s peace and humanity, it is good to show them that not everybody is drinking their poison.

Two World Conferences…. What Can We Expect?

Arshad M Khan

President Trump’s abrupt cancellation of bilateral talks with Mr. Putin at the G-20 meeting in Argentina — following the seizure of Ukrainian ships by Russia — puts any rapprochement on the back burner, at least for the time being.  As leaders convene, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is flashing his wallet, his presence awkward, trying to buy friends — this time India with the promise of investments, where tens of thousands of farmers are marching on Delhi to protest soaring production costs while produce prices plunge, as Prime Minister Modi meets with the Crown Prince.
In Argentina also, Human Rights Watch has petitioned successfully for a court prosecutor in the Jamal Khashoggi case putting the Crown Prince in peril of arrest.  Fortunately for him the wheels of justice turn slowly in Argentina as elsewhere because its courts will first have to consider the issue of diplomatic immunity.  He is safe for the present but the question of an international arrest warrant looms and could curtail future foreign trips.
The G-20 leaders will have their hands full with the U.S. and China trade war, dreaded photo-ops with the Crown Prince, and any new bombshells from the mercurial Donald Trump.
Doubtless more important for humankind is a second meeting:  COP24, officially the 24th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, is scheduled for December 2-14 in Katowice, Poland.  Its purpose … to develop an international agreement compelling all countries to implement the Paris climate accord, which limits global mean temperature rise to 2 degrees C.  But then some time ago doubts arose about the 2C limit being enough.
So it was that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was charged with comparing the 2C rise with a 1.5C rise, and the risks to the world of both.  The panel’s 1.5C report unveiled to the world on October 8, 2018 was far from sanguine.  For limiting warming to 1.5C, it allowed only a 12-year window.  Beyond that such a rise will become a foregone conclusion “dicing with the planet’s livability.”  There the matter rests as we await the outcome of COP24.  By the way, a somewhat scary thought is the fact that when President Trump was asked about the 1.5C report, his answer seemed to imply he had never heard of IPCC.
Meanwhile, the annual greenhouse gas bulletin issued by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) reported a new high in CO2 levels of 405.5 parts per million reached in 2017, 41 percent higher than in 1990 and 46 percent higher than preindustrial levels.  Average global temperatures in 2018 are expected to be the fourth highest on record and the last four years the four warmest.  Calling it an emergency, WMO has commenced the development of methods to guide and observe emissions reduction procedures at emission sources.  Particularly worrisome also is the finding of a resurgence of CFC-11, an air-conditioning gas blamed for depleting the ozone layer, and supposed to have been phased out under the 1987 Montreal Protocol.  Adding to worries, the rising CO2 trend continues for on May 14, 2018 another high of 412.60 ppm was recorded.
Moreover, the new UN emissions gap report, an assessment of country performance in meeting voluntary targets, also confirms CO2 levels are rising for the first time in four years.  The prior decline believed to have been caused by improved technology turns out simply to have been a consequence of economic slow down.  In a press release, UN Environment notes only 57 countries, or less than a third of the total, representing 60 percent of global emissions, are on target to start decreasing emissions by 2030.  It begs the question whether current voluntary targets should be made mandatory, an issue clearly ripe for debate.
What can we expect from these meetings?
The G-20 is a hodgepodge of advanced, emerging and developing economies with varying vulnerabilities in financial systems and institutional stability.  Insofar as there is an asymmetry, it makes for different priorities.  Cross-border finance and transactions on capital account are dominated by the advanced economies, and global liquidity is heavily dependent on the U.S. dollar despite recent attempts to mitigate its influence, principally by China and Russia.  Unless there is a real crisis as in 2008, not much can be expected other than the usual pablum.   On the other hand, the Trump-Xi private meeting has led to a temporary truce and helped to alleviate the effects of the ongoing trade war that is disquieting markets.
COP24 is another matter for it has to address an existential issue, an issue that could threaten the well-being and lives of our children and grandchildren.  Is Donald Trump’s lacuna on global warming unique or shared conveniently by others?  Will UN Environment be given some muscle or will it simply continue to report the paltry efforts of the members?  We just have to wait and see how seriously the world’s leaders view an issue increasingly evident in the uncommon severity of weather events.