15 Jul 2020

USDA food box program fails to deliver significant share of much needed aid

Alex Findijs

The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) “Farmers to Families Food Box Program” has failed to deliver 15 percent of its promised deliveries to charities and food banks so far.
Announced by President Donald Trump in April, the program allocated $3 billion to purchase food from farmers who had lost sales to large buyers during the pandemic and contracted companies to box and deliver it to people in need. The boxes are composed of fresh produce, meat and dairy, with enough food to feed a family of four for one week.
The USDA anticipated the delivery of $1.2 billion worth food between May 15 and June 30. Instead, the program has delivered less than two-thirds of this amount, just $755.5 million, while being plagued by chronic issues. Many of the companies awarded contracts lacked proper experience and personnel to work in food distribution, and often failed to deliver boxes on time or at all.
The San Antonio, Texas based CRE8AD8 (pronounced ‘create a date’), a high-end wedding and corporate event planner, was awarded a $39 million contract to deliver 750,000 boxes across seven states. The San Antonio Express-News reports that the company has only delivered a fraction of its promised boxes, a performance so dismal that it is one of 16 companies whose contracts were not renewed for the second round of the program (July 1 to August 31).
The Houston Food Bank reported that only 15 of 87 truckloads were delivered. Even worse, the North Texas Food Bank in Plano, the Southeast Texas Food Bank in Beaumont, the West Texas Food Bank in Odessa, the Community Food Bank of Southern Arizona in Tucson and the Utah Food Bank in Salt Lake City all have reported that they received none of their expected deliveries from CRE8AD8.
The USDA has not commented on whether the undelivered boxes will be provided later or if the money and food allocated has been lost.
Even if all the food boxes had been delivered it would still have not been enough. The number of food insecure Americans was 37 million in 2019, prior to the economic collapse triggered by the coronavirus pandemic. The number of Americans lacking access to the necessary amount of nutrition has doubled since the onset of the pandemic according to the COVID Impact Survey.
The total amount allocated for the Food Box Program between May 15 and August 31 is $2.67 billion. For this 78-day period the allocated funds amount to less than a dollar a day for each of the 37 million people already living with food insecurity.
Such a paltry sum, organized in a pathetically disorganized and careless manner, is a demonstration of the failure of the capitalist system and its inability to meet the needs of the working class and the most vulnerable layers of society. Trillions of dollars were made available to bail out the banks and corporations through the CARES Act, but only a few billion dollars could be spared to prevent mass hunger and malnutrition among workers and children.
In total, government payouts and actions from the Federal Reserve have reached upwards of $8 trillion dollars in bailouts to the ruling class. The $3 billion for food aid is equal to less than one four-thousandth of a percent of this unprecedented bailout.
The myth that there is no money to provide for the social needs of the masses of workers and youth has been undone by the pandemic. The money is there, it is simply not profitable to allocate it to those who need it the most.
The average annual cost to feed a person in the United States is $3,144 per year. The planned military budget for 2021 of $740.5 billion would be enough to fully cover the food costs of 235 million people every year. Even just one-sixth of the American budget for war could end food insecurity entirely.
The USDA already has 1.9 million food boxes invoiced for the second round and is preparing to use the remaining $330 million in a third round starting September 1. If the first round is an indication, the rest of this program will fall severely short of its intended goal, and even further short of meeting the social needs of the American working class.

Haphazard plans to reopen US schools spur growing opposition among educators

Renae Cassimeda

Opposition among educators, parents and students is mounting across the US against the push by the Trump administration and the ruling elite to rapidly reopen schools—a move which coincides directly with the homicidal drive by the ruling class to force workers back on the job amid the deepening COVID-19 pandemic.
In recent weeks, Americans have witnessed the pandemic worsen throughout the country as a result of the measures pushed through by state governors to lift restrictions and reopen state economies. The number of new COVID-19 cases surpassed 65,000 on Monday and Tuesday, while last Friday saw a single-day record for new cases at 71,787.
Throughout the US, public school districts are rushing to implement plans for reopening in the fall. Plans range from fully in-person learning, fully online, or blended models with both in-person and online instruction.
Amid the rapid spread of COVID-19, science teachers check-in students before a summer STEM camp at Wylie High School Tuesday, July 14, 2020, in Wylie, Texas. (AP Photo/LM Otero)
The two largest school districts in California, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) and San Diego Unified School District (SDUSD), released a joint statement Monday announcing they will begin their school years fully online. LAUSD will begin classes August 18 while SDUSD will begin August 31. LAUSD and SDUSD serve a combined 20 percent of the 6 million public school students throughout California.
The move to a fully online format was announced as a temporary measure, with the joint statement noting, “both districts will continue planning for a return to in-person learning during the 2020-21 academic year, as soon as public health conditions allow.”
The announcement comes in response to a surge in new cases within the state due to a series of lifted restrictions spearheaded by Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom in recent weeks. Yesterday saw the highest number of new cases in California, 9,561, while yesterday’s death toll was the second highest for the state at 139.
The statement by LAUSD and SDUSD cites contradictory and vague guidelines set forth by the state government, argues the pandemic is not under control and calls on the federal government to provide more funding so that schools can “reopen in a responsible manner.”
Also on Monday, a meeting of the Orange County Board of Education, which presides over multiple school districts in Southern California, approved its guidelines for the full reopening of schools on August 31 through in-person learning, the most reckless model which is being heavily promoted by the Trump administration.
In gross disregard for the lives of educators, students and their families, the guidelines advised against the use of masks and social distancing measures. It states, “K-12 children represent the lowest-risk cohort for Covid-19. Because of that fact, social distancing of children and reduced census classrooms is not necessary and therefore not recommended. … Requiring children to wear masks during school is not only difficult—if not impossible to implement—but not based on science. It may even be harmful and is therefore not recommended.”
As the board meeting took place, parents and educators rallied outside the venue opposing the plans to reopen in person. Though the guidelines stipulate recommendations for school districts, each district may choose exactly how it plans to reopen with in-person learning. Multiple school districts under the Orange County Board of Education are planning on beginning the school year with a fully online model, similar to LAUSD and SDUSD, in response to the surge in cases and growing opposition by parents and educators.
The antiscientific rhetoric being put forward by the Orange County Board of Education, claiming that schools are safe and kids simply do not get the virus, is a criminal lie that is being rejected by educators and parents. School districts, including LAUSD and SDUSD, have noted in prior weeks that they want to reopen, but only in response to wide opposition to in-person learning have some districts begun opting for a fully online model at the start of the school year.
Various rallies and actions by educators, parents and students are erupting across the US against the palpably unsafe return to school.
Teachers in Austin, Texas have organized a rally for “Safe School Opening,” with a list of demands including online instruction until county infection rates are below 0.05 percent.
Teachers and parents in Loudoun County, Virginia protested Monday outside a Board of Educators meeting for Loudoun County Public Schools in opposition to the reopening plan for a hybrid model, which would include in-person learning when classes resume. Outside the board meeting, one teacher carried a sign with the words, “I can’t teach from a hospital or grave!"
In Lawrence, Kansas teachers protested outside the Lawrence Public School District board room opposing the district’s plan to reopen schools with in-person instruction. They demanded proper PPE and social distancing guidelines in schools, and that 14 days must elapse with zero new COVID-19 cases in Douglas County before they would be willing to resume in-person classes.
In St. Louis, Missouri teachers, parents, and students held a sit-in on Monday protesting the St. Louis Public Schools plans to reopen with in-person learning.
Teachers in Manteca and Ripon, located in central California, are planning a “Social Distancing Safety Rally” on Thursday to protest the Manteca Unified School Board’s decision to reopen schools with a fully in-person format.
Parents from Arlington Public Schools in Virginia created an online petition calling for the district to implement a fully online learning format for students. Their online petition request reached 2,382 signatures as of Tuesday evening.
While these protests have been organized in part by the local teacher unions, they are only doing so to maintain credibility in the eyes of teachers. For their part, the National Education Association (NEA) and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) have been promoting the Biden election campaign and the fraudulent HEROES Act.
The Socialist Equality Party calls on educators, parents and students to build on the mass opposition to schools reopening and to form independent rank-and-file safety committees in every school and neighborhood, to prepare a nationwide strike to stop the unsafe reopening of schools. Educators must demand a major expansion of funding for education, which would include a program to rebuild the schools and hire the necessary staff to provide high quality, safe and equal education for all.
A paraeducator from Massachusetts explained why a nationwide strike is needed, saying, “I think it would help to have a nationwide strike. Just talking about it with administration won’t sway them. We have to show them we won’t sacrifice ourselves because they say it’s safe. They say children don’t get sick, but we do, and we’re not going to risk our own lives or infecting our families.”
Dylan Lomangino, an elementary Orchestra teacher at Riverside Magnet School in East Hartford, Connecticut, expressed support for a nationwide strike. “What I’m hearing from the NEA is that their big solution is to vote for Biden. But what else? I realize we have to fight against capitalist interests. How do we use our collective strength to get what we need is the ultimate question. We have more leverage because parents and students are invested in schools, so we can actively work against a government that represents capitalist interests.”

Large coronavirus outbreak at Rook Row Farm in Britain

Thomas Scripps

Seventy-five workers at Rook Row Farm in Mathon, Herefordshire, have tested positive for coronavirus. More than 200 workers employed as vegetable pickers and packers at the AS Green and Co farm are quarantined on-site.
This is the latest and one of the largest workplace outbreaks in the UK since the ending of the national lockdown by the Johnson government. It is proof that capitalist exploitation, particularly of the most oppressed sections of the working class, is the primary driver of the pandemic.
Most of the farmworkers are migrant labourers from Eastern Europe, mainly Bulgaria and Romania. This year, however, they have been supplemented by British workers who signed up under national “Pick for Britain” and “Feed the Nation” campaigns. These sought to make up a shortfall of agricultural workers caused by international travel restrictions by drawing on the UK’s own pool of vulnerable labour, those made redundant or furloughed with wage cuts during the pandemic.
Entrance to Rook Row Farm View northwards from the lane to Moorend Cross. Rook Row farmhouse is on the extreme right. (credit: Wikimedia Commons)
In May, Andrew Green, owner of AS Green and Co, appealed for 160 such workers: “The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in soaring demand for fresh produce, but with tighter border controls and travel restrictions in place, many UK farmers have been left with a labour shortage, putting their produce at risk. In line with the Feed the Nation campaign, we are looking for local workers to join our family team in Mathon.”
The World Socialist Web Site warned that month that workers could expect close to minimum wage for long, hard shifts—some beginning as early as 5:30am and some ending as late as midnight. They would be forced to pay for their onsite accommodation, in shared facilities that were clearly unsafe during a pandemic.
On Sunday, the Guardian published an interview with a former worker at the Rook Row farm. Karen (not her real name) shared one of 33 mobile homes, rented at a cost of £50 per week, and often worked 12-hour-plus shifts, earning £8.85 per hour for the first 48 hours a week and £11.06 thereafter. She told the Guardian these minimal wages could be reduced by financial penalties: “People were punished for getting stuff wrong or being too slow. If you were slow you had to have a day off. It didn’t happen to me, but our whole line was sent home early one day.”
Employers consider these low-wage labour forces wholly dispensable, with no regard for their safety. Karen explained, “I was isolated at the beginning but after that we were treated as one big household and you are all working together. Everyone is living and working so close together that it’s not surprising that if anyone gets Covid, it will spread very fast, and now nearly half of them have got it.”
On Monday, two more former Rook Row Farm workers, Leah Johnson and Brandon Burridge, told the BBC that they had been required to share a toilet with 60 other people. Leah said, “People were saying ‘there is only one toilet’—that is ridiculous—and it got quite gross quite quickly, and we were told [by other team members] to avoid it all costs. There was one bit of hand sanitiser in the toilet.” Additional portable toilets had to be delivered to the farm this Monday.
During the pair’s induction process, 15 people were sitting together on shared benches in clear violation of the 2-metre social distancing rule. “There was nothing about hand sanitiser, we weren’t given any. We were not allowed to wear gloves,” Leah explained.
These accounts rubbish company owner Andrew Green’s claims—made when advertising for new workers in May—that work on the farm would “provide the opportunity to work in a safe, healthy environment throughout the summer months…” But, as ever, government agencies are on hand to carry out a cover-up.
Katie Spence, Public Health England (PHE) Midlands Health Protection Director, said on Sunday, “We are working closely with the management at AS Green and Co to support the health and wellbeing of their workforce and wider public health.
“To support this workforce of around 200 key workers, the company has put in place a range of infection control measures to try to reduce the risk of staff being exposed to COVID-19.
“Measures include supporting testing on site, promoting social distancing in communal social areas and in the indoor packaging area; providing PPE [personal protective equipment] for staff where applicable, encouraging regular handwashing for at least 20 seconds, and promoting the use of face coverings in closed areas.”
This statement is made after over a third of the workforce has been infected! PHE can make such a nakedly cynical response because no opposition whatsoever to the endangering of workers up and down the country is being organised by the trade unions. On March 24, the Unite union issued a statement calling on the government to “Respect agricultural migrant workers supplying the food industry” and asking for salaries and health and safety measures to be “strictly enforced.” The union’s national officer for agriculture, Bev Clarkson, said at the time, “Today Unite is putting down a strong marker that we won’t tolerate any rogue bosses tempted to make a fast buck during this national emergency.”
Rook Row farm and multiple virus outbreaks at food processing factories show the real value of Unite’s “strong marker.” In response to events at the farm, Clarkson had to the gall to say, “We said at the start of this pandemic that this is something that is likely to happen,” before adding an apologia, “Employers say they are doing all they can but they say they can’t adhere to the guidelines on social distancing,” and calling for supermarkets to be “held accountable.”
Allowing people to fall victim to coronavirus in the workplace has obvious implications for the whole of society. Leah Johnson and Brandon Burridge’s experience working for AS Green and Co raises the danger of the virus spreading from the farm to the wider community. Having left the site on July 2, the first they heard of the outbreak was in the media. Brandon said, “I tried to ring them to ask why we hadn’t been informed [of the outbreak] as I thought it was their duty to say so.
“But we were told that our usual contacts weren’t available. The woman on the phone offered to pass on the message, but we didn’t get a response. So I emailed them but I still haven’t had a response. And we’ve been blocked from the team Whatsapp group.”
The authorities say workers who left the farm recently have been contacted and asked to self-isolate, but how many like Leah and Brandon have been left off the list?
Another danger is posed by workers leaving the site due to austere and draconian quarantine conditions, enforced with police blockades and roadblocks around the farm and by keeping migrant workers’ passports “secure”, according the Sun. The newspaper reported Monday that four workers, three of them testing positive for coronavirus, have fled the site. Herefordshire County Council claims three have left, one of them infected.
Most concerningly, North Herefordshire MP Bill Wiggin, a Conservative, confirmed on Monday that a group of workers had been driven in a minibus to a Morrisons supermarket in the local town of Malvern and a Primark clothes store, the Iceland supermarket and a Romanian store in the city of Worcester. The trip took place last week when the virus was already circulating among the workforce. It is not clear whether it was organised after AS Green and Co were made aware of the outbreak—the first case was reported to them last Wednesday, and an additional five cases on Thursday.

Academy of Medical Sciences warns 251,000 more people could die of COVID-19 in Britain

Robert Stevens

The UK faces a catastrophic winter wave of coronavirus infections that could see the deaths of up to 251,000 people and 119,900 even in a “reasonable worst-case scenario.”
The modelling, by the Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS), is based on deaths in hospital alone and not in care homes and other settings. The AMS warns that mass deaths are likely unless the government carries out immediate "intense preparation" throughout the rest of July and August. This should include having access to the necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) in hospitals, reorganising social care services and increasing testing capacity.
One of the four National Academies, the AMS was established in 1998 as an “independent body… representing the diversity of medical science.” It was commissioned by the Conservative government’s Chief Scientific Advisor Sir Patrick Vallance to assess the risks the National Health Service (NHS) faces this winter. The report involved the work of an advisory group of 37 experts.
Preparing for a challenging winter 2020-21: a report by the UK's Academy of Medical Sciences
“Preparing for a challenging winter 2020/21” warns that any surge in COVID-19 cases, combined with the winter pressures faced by the NHS, would overwhelm public health care.
Professor Stephen Holgate, a respiratory specialist from University Hospital Southampton, who chaired the report, said, "This is not a prediction, but it is a possibility." He warned, "The modelling suggests that deaths could be higher with a new wave of COVID-19 this winter, but the risk of this happening could be reduced if we take action immediately."
Professor Azra Ghani, chairwoman in infectious disease epidemiology at Imperial College London, told the PA news agency, “We are looking at what would be the worst that would happen, such as if there was a further relaxing of interventions, more contacts taking place, schools may be a factor, people going back to work and that sort of thing. Those things create more contacts, plus people will be indoors more and more people will want to meet up indoors.”
The Academy’s news article accompanying the report states, “Research suggests that COVID-19 is more likely to spread in winter with people spending more time indoors and the virus able to survive longer in colder, darker winter conditions.” Last week it was reported that “senior scientific advisors” to the government have “strong” evidence that the virus flourishes at an optimal cold temperature of around 4C (39F).
The report warns, “The NHS and social care systems typically operate at maximal capacity in the winter months, with bed occupancy regularly exceeding 95 percent in recent years. As recently as in 2017/18, England and Wales experienced approximately 50,000 excess winter deaths.”
The Academy models its worst-case scenario based on the reproductive number of the virus, the R value, rising to 1.7 from September 2020. In the March peak of the virus this year, the R value was 3--meaning that one infected person would pass it on to three others. The modelling suggests that a new surge in coronavirus infections would lead to a peak in hospital admissions and deaths in January and February 2021.
The Academy of Medical Sciences website announces its study
The report centres on “four additional challenges” that “have great potential to exacerbate winter 2020/21 pressures on the health and social care system, by increasing demand on usual care as well as limiting surge capacity.”
  • A large resurgence of COVID-19 nationally, with local or regional epidemics. This is underway as “We are already seeing local outbreaks.”
  • Disruption of the health and social care systems due to reconfigurations to respond to and reduce transmission of COVID-19 with a knock-on effect on the ability of the NHS to deal with non-COVID-19 care.
  • A backlog of non-COVID-19 care following the suspension of routine clinical care that is likely to result in an increased number of poorly-managed chronic conditions or undiagnosed diseases and be combined with a surge in post-COVID-19 morbidity. It notes that the overall waiting list in England alone could “increase from 4.2 million (pre-COVID-19) to approximately 10 million by the end of the year. Reducing the backlog of care will be hampered by reduced operational capacity across NHS organisations designed to prevent nosocomial transmission (resulting from a stay in hospital) of COVID-19.”
  • A possible influenza epidemic that will be additive to the challenges above. This section notes “the most recent significant influenza season in winter 2017/18 coincided with a colder winter; led to over 17,000 excess respiratory deaths and caused NHS Trusts to cancel all elective surgery in January 2018, resulting in 22,800 fewer elective hospital admissions when compared to the previous year. A generalised increase in respiratory infections over the winter could also rapidly overwhelm test and trace capacity.” (emphasis in original)
The report cites the importance of the national lockdown in containing the number of deaths in Britain to the tens of thousands. Had it not been imposed hundreds of thousands would have died. The “introduction of wide-scale physical distancing in the UK from 23 March 2020 onwards is estimated to have reduced the reproduction number from R0~3 to Rt ~0.7-0.9 (R0, basic reproduction number; Rt, effective reproduction rate). It has been estimated that these measures resulted in an 80 percent reduction in transmission and that 470,000 (95 percent CrI [credible interval] 370,000-580,000) deaths had been averted in the UK up to 4 May 2020 due to such interventions.”
It warns, under conditions in which the government has dismantled the national lockdown, “As these restrictions are eased, it is likely that Rt will rise such that Rt remains close to 1.43.”
The report proceeds on the expectation that there will be no more national lockdowns, stating, “We consider a scenario in which it is not possible to respond to a rising incidence of COVID-19 with a lockdown of similar effectiveness to that imposed in March. Under our reasonable worst-case scenario--in which Rt rises to 1.7 from September onwards (just over half of the initial level of transmission experienced in early March 2020)—infections could be expected to rise gradually with a peak in hospital admissions and deaths of a similar magnitude to the first wave” (emphasis in the original). This is projected to occur in January/February 2021, “coinciding with a period of peak demand on the NHS.” Modelling suggests “an estimated total number of hospital deaths (excluding care homes) between September 2020 and June 2021 of 119,900 (95 percent CrI 24,500-251,000), over double the number occurring during the first wave in spring 2020.”
The AMS also modeled based on lower R rates. Even a rate of 1.1—which is already the case in sizable areas of the UK due to the lifting of the lockdown—would lead to an estimated 1,300 hospital deaths between September this year and June 2021. An R rate of 1.5 would lead to 74,800 hospital deaths.
The virtually limitless ability of the virus to spread in the coming weeks is noted under a section of the report, “The unknown magnitude of the potential winter resurgence of COVID-19.”
It states “outbreaks of COVID-19 in hospitals and care homes are likely to become common again and may be exacerbated by simultaneous transmission of influenza in these settings, as well as transmission between settings. Outbreaks are also likely in environments with groups at high risk, such as hostels for the homeless (especially dormitory-style night shelters); asylum seekers in Home Office accommodation; prisons; Roma, Gypsy and Traveler encampments; and migrant workers in shared accommodation. Mortality rates are likely to continue to be highest in older adults, those with chronic diseases, those from BAME groups, those in high exposure occupations, and urban areas with high levels of poverty. The workplace represents a further risk environment with major outbreaks reported in food manufacturing settings, as were religious gatherings and social events prior to closure of mass gatherings.”
The report’s acceptance of the mantra of the government and capitalist media that further national lockdowns are not economically “viable,” means that it takes a cavalier attitude to the government’s plan for the reopening of schools in September. It states, “Although schools re-opening is known to increase the transmission of influenza, this has not yet been demonstrated for SARS-CoV-2, and there is substantial uncertainty around the likely impact of schools re-opening on Rt and the implications for this winter.” On this basis it advises that the “increasing transmission via schools reopening needs to be balanced against the longer-term impacts of school closure on child and adolescent development, as well as the economic and social impact of school closure on parents…”
The report anticipates that the government would intervene to prevent the R number rising to 3 and above—and an exponential spread of the disease--on the basis that it imposed a national lockdown in March. There is no basis for this conclusion. As the outbreak reached the UK, the Johnson government was set on a policy of “herd immunity” and, in the words of government advisor Vallance, the suppression of the disease “was not desirable because you want some immunity in the population.” The government allowed the spread of the virus in Britain—leading to the preventable deaths of tens of thousands--and was only forced to act by growing public opposition. Its premature abandonment of the lockdown to force millions back to work and children back to school is a continuation of its murderous policy.

French nurses denounce sellout as thousands protest on Bastille Day

Will Morrow

There is mass opposition among nurses and other health care workers to the sellout agreement reached between the French trade unions and the Macron government on Friday. Thousands took part in demonstrations across the country yesterday on Bastille Day, including hundreds of nurses who marched to oppose the assault on the public hospital system during the coronavirus pandemic.
The agreement has been hailed by the Macron government and French and international media as an “historic” sign that health workers are finally receiving just recognition for their sacrifices.
This fraud was taken to new heights of cynicism with the homage given to health care workers at the official Bastille Day celebration at the Place de la Concorde in Paris. Macron, his wife Brigitte and other political figures who have slashed hospital resources applauded before a group of hospital employees, with television cameras panning slowly across their faces.
The protest in Paris
Reality was able to break into this spectacle only via a personal drone hovering above and carrying a sign reading, “Behind the homages, Macron strangles the hospitals.”
None of this has convinced health employees or the working population, which is overwhelmingly opposed to Macron’s accelerating austerity program. The agreements covering health care workers include a total of €7.5 billion of additional funding for wages and new positions. This is less than the €12 billion the Macron government handed over to just two companies, Renault and Air France, which have proceeded to lay off tens of thousands of workers. It is approximately 2 percent of the hundreds of billions pledged in March to prop up the debts of French banks and corporations.
It includes two successive wage increases of €91 per month, to be delivered in September 2020 and March 2021. Additionally, 7,500 new nursing positions are to be created—a drop in the ocean, equivalent to approximately two or three new positions per institution. There are already another 7,500 such positions across the country that are budgeted for but still unfilled—such are the horrendous conditions for nurses that have made it impossible to attract and retain staff.
The insulting wage rise follows 10 years in which nurses have not seen a pay increase. Nurses in France are among the worst paid in Europe, receiving on average respectively 13 percent and 29 percent less than their Spanish and German counterparts, who themselves are grossly underpaid. The €300 per month that the French unions claimed was their central demand in negotiations would have brought nurses to the median for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
Most significantly, the agreement includes nothing to address the hospitals’ chronic funding shortfalls, which have been glaringly exposed by the pandemic. In the past 30 years, more than 100,000 hospital beds have been closed due to repeated funding cuts by both Socialist Party and Gaullist governments. The agreement also allows hospitals greater flexibility in extending employees’ work week beyond the official 35-hour maximum.
“Even 300 euros would not be a lot compared to what we have lost in the last 10 years,” said Dominique, a hospital administration worker with more than 30 years who came to the Paris demonstration. “It’s shameful. We see the working conditions that have gotten worse. They are continuing to close beds. They want to privatise everything. We are fighting here for the public health system, so that everyone can have access to health care. That’s why we’re on the street today. I’m here for myself and the generation to come.”
Dominique
Dominique denounced the unions’ role in negotiating and signing the agreement. “I have been against the unions for years,” she said. “I don’t trust them. It’s more than a year and a half that we have been protesting and striking in the hospitals. Everyone knows what our demands are: for more money, more resources. They keep going to these negotiations with the government. It is just to draw us out. They don’t belong on our side. For me, they’re bought.”
“There are a lot of staff who are leaving the public system,” she added. “That’s the purpose. They want people to leave so they can privatize. The government gives billions to private companies that are laying off employees. It’s open and in front of our eyes. We’re exhausted and angry. We are not slaves, but today we are just surviving. What will become of the lives of our children? Are they to be slaves?”
On Facebook, nurses have posted statements denouncing the union sellout. The agreement was signed by the French Democratic Labour Confederation (CFDT), the National Union of Autonomous Unions (UNSA), and Workers Force (FO). This provided the necessary number of signatures to ensure its passage.
Knowing that the agreement would pass regardless, the SUD union and the General Federation of Labour (CGT) have postured as critics of the agreement. The CGT itself declared that it may eventually sign the agreement, with Mireille Stivala declaring that while it may be “disappointing, we have to acknowledge all the same that it’s thanks to the mobilisation of staff over recent years, and thanks to the trade unions, that we’ve been able to [obtain] … this wage increase.”
“The unions are worse than the employers, and that’s why we’re getting nowhere with social policies,” commented a nurse, Lydie, on the Inter-Urgences Facebook page. “I agree with the word ‘mascarade,’” said Gwenaëlle. “We are not asking for charity but a fair wage increase.” Augore commented, “I no longer have any confidence in the trade unions after this. I’m ashamed of all of it. I’m fed up.”
At the Paris protest, Émilie, a young nurse with five years’ experience, described the conditions during the height of the first wave of the pandemic in France. “I was in an area that treated coronavirus patients,” she said. “We were given only surgical masks, which don’t protect the wearer from catching the virus. Some of the patients tested positive with the serological test but negative with the rapid nasal test, which has many false negatives. They were kept without masks and treated as though they were negatives.
“I am not principally concerned with a wage rise. What we need is more resources, human and material. Throughout whole shifts in the night, often I have nothing. I don’t believe there will be a change though. Or it will not be sufficient. The unions signed this agreement, except Sud and the CGT. But I don’t trust them either.”
The Socialist Equality Party urges nurses and health care employees to take their struggle out of the hands of the pro-corporate trade unions by forming independent rank-and-file action committees, controlled directly by workers themselves, to organise a struggle for a well-resourced, high-quality public health care system, and to appeal directly to workers across Europe and internationally. This must be based on a socialist programme to reorganise society’s resources according to social need rather than private profit.

UNICEF report: COVID-19 exacerbating hunger and other maladies facing South Asia’s children

Naveen Dewage

South Asia, home to around one-quarter of the world's population, has emerged as an epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 1.4 million cases with over 32,000 fatalities have been recorded from the region’s eight states, which range from India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh—respectively, the world’s second, fifth and eight most populous countries—to tiny Bhutan and Maldives.
India, with 910,174 infections and 23,779 deaths as of yesterday, is the worst affected country in the region and has the third highest number of infections globally.
A report published last month by UNICEF, the United Nations International Children’s Fund, gives a sense of the terrible consequences of the pandemic for children. Entitled “Lives Upended: How COVID-19 threatens the futures of 600 million South Asian children,” the report documents mass poverty, a lack of healthcare and education, and increased dangers of child malnutrition, abuse and neglect.
The appalling living conditions for the vast majority of the population in South Asia, including a lack of clean water and proper sanitation, dilapidated healthcare systems, massive urban slums and congested public transport, have contributed to the unchecked spread of the virus.
Meanwhile, the pandemic is further exacerbating the horrific living conditions facing workers and the rural poor across the region.
Those worst affected include children from migrant families that have moved from the countryside to the cities, and marginalized or oppressed communities, like India’s Muslims or Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, who are stigmatized and accused of spreading the virus. As the report notes, “deep-rooted inequalities in societies are being exposed.”
Of the 600 million children in South Asia in 2016, 240 million lived in “multidimensional poverty.” The report details how the disruption of health services and education, deteriorating sanitary conditions, and weakened child protection due to the pandemic will cause poverty and social distress to rise sharply. It estimates that more than 120 million additional children will fall into poverty during the next six months.
“The side-effects of the pandemic across South Asia, including the lockdown and other measures, have been damaging for children in numerous ways,” said Jean Gough, UNICEF regional director for South Asia. “But the longer-term impact of the economic crisis on children,” she warned, “will be on a different scale entirely. Without urgent action now, COVID-19 could destroy the hopes and futures of an entire generation.”
According to the report, immunization, nutrition, and other vital health services have been severely disrupted, threatening the lives of almost half-a-million children and mothers over the next six months.
776 million people live in homes where there are no hand-washing facilities, making it impossible to follow the basic hygiene recommendations to avoid infection by COVID-19. An estimated 7.7 million children under five years of age already suffer from severe wasting caused by inadequate dietary intake or diseases, and over 56 million are stunted. Of these stunted children, 40 million live in India—a country that boasts more than 130 billionaires, and the world’s third largest military budget, alongside mass destitution.
The disruption to routine health services, which are totally inadequate at the best of times across South Asia, will result in children with other diseases going untreated. As examples, UNICEF cited severe outbreaks of measles with 250 cases in Nepal, and a 55 percent drop in routine vaccinations given to Bangladeshi children in April as compared to February.
In early May, a UNICEF survey found that 30 percent of Sri Lankan families had already reduced their food consumption. A similar percentage had lost all their income. In Bangladesh, some of the poorest families can no longer afford three meals a day.
Food insecurity in war-ravaged Afghanistan is emerging as a huge problem. Around 10.9 million people, 35 percent of the country's population, could face acute food insecurities in the second half of 2020. The number of young children suffering from wasting has increased by 15 percent compared to last year.
These economic hardships have encouraged a surge in underage marriages, as families seek to reduce the number of mouths they have to feed by marrying off their daughters. “Too many South Asian women give birth to undersized, low birth-weight infants because they are too young, thin and short during pregnancy,” said UNICEF Regional Nutrition Adviser Harriet Torlesse.
The report cites research by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, which notes, “In the worst-case scenario, South Asia could see the additional deaths of as many as 881,000 children aged 5 or under and that of 36,000 mothers over the next twelve months. [Or 2,400 additional deaths daily] The bulk of these deaths would occur in India and Pakistan, although Bangladesh and Afghanistan could also see significant levels of additional mortality.”
Among the factors contributing to this disastrous situation are the disruption to the global pharmaceutical and medical supply chains, and the reassigning of limited health resources to fight COVID-19. This will result in the undermining of vital and essential maternal, new-born, and child health services.
The education of 430 million students has been interrupted as schools closed to stop the spread of the pandemic. Due to the worsening social conditions children and their families confront, observers are concerned that many of them may never return to school. Nearly 32 million children were not being schooled even before the pandemic. Millions of South Asian children end their primary education without acquiring basic literacy and numeracy skills.
In India alone, school closures have impacted 247 million children in primary and secondary education and 28 million children attending preschool education at Anganwadi centers (child care centers) in rural areas. Even before the pandemic, more than 6 million children were not in school education. Most students from poor families have no access to the internet and related technology to participate in distance learning.
In India and Nepal, hundreds of schools were converted into makeshift quarantine centers. “Communities will need to be reassured that these schools have been safely disinfected before children are allowed back to class,” noted the report.
In India, millions of migrant workers, in many cases with their families, had to walk long distances to return to their native villages following the Narendra Modi-led, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government’s ill-prepared coronavirus lockdown. When the lockdown was imposed with less than four hours forewarning on March 25, Modi and his BJP provided no assistance to these workers, many of whom worked in the informal sector and lost their jobs and all income overnight. The government also failed to establish mass testing and systematic contact tracing, or to pour massive resources into strengthening health infrastructure.
The UNICEF report took note of the fate of the children of migrant workers, stating, “The journey for these children was arduous enough. And many of them have continued to suffer from abuse, uncertainty, stigma, and discrimination even after they reached home.”
The UNICEF report criticises the region’s governments for their failure to allocate adequate spending to social programmes to assist the hundreds of millions of impoverished working people who have lost their livelihood, or at a minimum weeks of income, during the pandemic. It says, “The current level of fiscal responses has been inadequate, and some countries have offered almost nothing.” The report recommended that governments “direct more money towards social protection schemes, including emergency universal child benefits and school feeding programs.”
Such appeals will fall on deaf ears. For decades, governments across South Asia have allocated meagre resources to public health care and other social programs, while pursuing “pro-investor” policies such as massive corporate tax cuts, tax-free enterprise zones, and the fire-sale of public assets. They thus bear full responsibility for the horrendous levels of poverty, ill health, and social misery that have facilitated the rapid spread of the pandemic. These policies have been implemented at the behest of domestic capital and the international banks and financial institutions, like the International Monetary Fund, in order to shift the burden of the crisis of world capitalism onto the backs of working people and impoverished toilers.
As the spread of the virus continues to accelerate, South Asia’s governments have responded by stepping up attacks on the working class. They are imposing further cuts to budgets for health and education so as to service debt payments to the IMF and big banks, while at the same time reopening the economy so that the corporate elite can extract profits from highly exploited workers, regardless of the cost in human life. This is summed up in the ruling elite’s embrace of a policy of “herd immunity,” i.e. allowing the virus to spread unchecked throughout the population, even though this will cause hundreds of thousands of additional deaths.

ErdoÄŸan’s conversion of Hagia Sophia into a mosque and the danger of war

UlaÅŸ AteÅŸci & Alex Lantier

Turkish President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan’s decree Friday turning the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul into a working mosque is an Islamist populist gesture that will accelerate the drive to war across the Mediterranean and the Middle East.
The history of this unique, nearly 1,500-year old basilica is of cultural significance to billions of people in many countries and cultures. It is not so much a Turkish monument as a world monument that the course of history has entrusted to the Turkish people for safekeeping. Amid the growing ethnic and sectarian bloodshed caused by decades of imperialist war in the Middle East, the attempt to claim the Hagia Sophia for Islam alone cannot fail to have unforeseen consequences.
The Hagia Sophia was completed in 537 during the reign of Roman emperor Justinian I, as a Christian church in what was then Constantinople. UNESCO, which has placed it on the World Heritage List, calls it one of the “unique architectural masterpieces of Byzantine [art] … designed by Anthemios of Tralles and Isidoros of Miletus in 532-537.”
This breathtaking building was a center of the Eastern Orthodox Church until the 15th century, except for a brief period in the 13th century when Crusaders sacked Constantinople and turned the Hagia Sophia into a Roman Catholic cathedral. In 1453, Ottoman Sultan Mehmet II conquered the city, turning the Hagia Sophia into a mosque. The Ottoman Empire added minarets to the Hagia Sophia, as well as antique Hellenistic art drawn from across Turkey.
The fall of the Ottoman Empire and the establishment in 1923 of an independent Turkish Republic, in a war fought with Soviet aid against invading British, French, Italian, Greek and Armenian armies, changed the Hagia Sophia’s status. In 1935, President Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and his cabinet converted the Hagia Sophia into a museum. UNESCO designated it a World Heritage Site in 1985. In the period since 2007, over 30 million people have visited the Hagia Sophia.
Since the 1935 decree turned the Hagia Sophia into a museum, Islamists and certain Turkish nationalists have called for reversal of this decision and to turn it back into a mosque.
Significantly, the risk of international conflict posed by such communal and nationalist appeals was acknowledged by ErdoÄŸan himself barely a year ago. Just before the March 2019 local elections, he dismissed the call to convert the Hagia Sophia into a mosque as a “provocation.” Referring to the thousands of mosques scattered in non-Muslim-majority countries across the world, he asked: “Do they think what would happen to those mosques? … I will not be duped.”
Fifteen months later, ErdoÄŸan has resorted to this provocation, and it has not taken long for the first denunciations to begin pouring in. The Russian Orthodox Church called the Hagia Sophia’s conversion into a mosque “unacceptable,” while Catholic Pope Francis declared himself “very distressed.” Indian media, incensed by ErdoÄŸan’s criticisms of anti-Muslim communal riots in India, are demanding that New Delhi intervene to criticize ErdoÄŸan.
The Greek government, a nominal NATO “ally” of Turkey, which is locked in a bitter dispute with Turkey over Cyprus and oil drilling rights in the Mediterranean, also condemned the decision. Athens warned that “it does not only affect relations between Turkey and Greece, but its relations with the European Union.”
Underlying the shift in the ErdoÄŸan’s policy are intractable international crises and class conflicts for which the Turkish bourgeoisie has no solutions. Three decades since the Stalinist regime’s dissolution of the Soviet Union removed the main political and military obstacle to US-led wars in the Middle East, Turkey is surrounded by wars and bitter commercial and geopolitical conflicts that threaten to escalate into an all-out military conflagration.
ErdoÄŸan’s decision to join US-led wars in Libya and Syria in 2011 has ended in a bloody debacle; it now finds itself waging proxy wars in both these countries against its nominal allies. Turkey is backing the Libyan Government of National Accord (GNA) against the French- and Russian-backed militias of warlord Khalifa Haftar, and clashing with Greece in the Mediterranean. As part of its ongoing war against US-backed Kurdish nationalist groups, it has repeatedly invaded the north of Syria, whose government is supported by Russia.
At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic is vastly intensifying international class conflict and fueling the ErdoÄŸan government’s collapse in the polls to the lowest level since 2002, to about 30 percent. According to trade union estimates, the pandemic has led to at least 11 million job losses in Turkey, raising the number of unemployed to over 17 million, a historic record. The Turkish bourgeoisie are watching with concern and dismay the growing strikes and protests by workers for safe working conditions and against austerity across America, Europe and internationally.
Especially after mass multi-racial and multi-ethnic protests internationally against the US police murder of George Floyd, they are terrified of growing mass political opposition.
ErdoÄŸan’s turn to using the Hagia Sophia to incite religious and communal sentiment aims to suppress these class contradictions, divide the working class along religious and national lines, and promote nationalism amid an escalating spiral towards war between the major powers.
Precisely because this is a class policy, it cannot be opposed by supporting ErdoÄŸan’s opponents within the Turkish bourgeois establishment. The decision to turn the Hagia Sophia back into a mosque is supported not only by ErdoÄŸan’s Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) and its Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) ally but also by its bourgeois opponents, including the Kemalist Republican People’s Party (CHP) and its far-right ally, the Good Party—parties that imperialist governments and media present as the enlightened “alternative” to ErdoÄŸan.
While CHP leader Kemal KılıçdaroÄŸlu’s reaction to the Hagia Sophia decision was to state, “Open it, if you want it to open,” Muharrem Ä°nce, former presidential candidate of the CHP-led opposition against ErdoÄŸan in the 2018 presidential election, declared his support for the decision. Ä°nce said he would be among worshippers in the first prayer in the Hagia Sophia on July 24. It is no coincidence that these parties also fully support ErdoÄŸan’s war policies across the region in the interests of the Turkish ruling class.
The Hagia Sophia question provides its own confirmation of Leon Trotsky’s Theory of Permanent Revolution. In the final analysis, democratic rights and human culture cannot be defended, and ethnic and religious divisions in countries of belated capitalist development cannot be overcome, under the leadership of the bourgeoisie. The defense of democratic rights and the overcoming of ethnic and religious conflict require a turn to the working class, mobilized on an international and socialist program against capitalism and imperialist war.
None of these struggles can be advanced without a direct struggle against imperialism, nationalism and war. Expressions of concern over the Hagia Sophia from governments and religious bodies in imperialist countries of America and Europe are false to the core. Their manifestly hypocritical criticisms only play into the hands of the Turkish bourgeoisie’s promotion of nationalism—amid explosive tensions between Turkey and not only Russia, but also its ostensible NATO “allies” including Washington, Paris and Athens in Syria, Libya and the eastern Mediterranean.
While French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian declared France “deplores” Ankara’s decision, which European Union (EU) foreign policy chief Josep Borrell called “regrettable,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a statement on July 1 urging ErdoÄŸan “to continue to maintain the Hagia Sophia as a museum” and adding that he “views a change in the status of the Hagia Sophia as diminishing the legacy of this remarkable building ...”
The imperialist ruling classes have overseen for decades the plundering of priceless cultural sites across the Middle East, and their empty invocations of concern today deserve nothing but contempt. The Iraqi National Museum was looted after the illegal US-led invasion of country in 2003. The NATO proxy war in Syria, launched by Washington and the European powers, led to the destruction of cultural sites dating back millennia, such as the old city of Palmyra.
While the Trump administration criticizes ErdoÄŸan’s transformation of the Hagia Sophia into a mosque, it supported the granting of full control over Jerusalem and the Temple Mount/Al Aqsa mosque to the Israeli state.
Imperialist governments’ obscene looting of the globe with wars, bank bailouts, tax cuts and other hand-outs to the global financial aristocracy goes hand-in-hand with disregard for art and culture in their own countries. As Le Drian hypocritically expresses his concern over the Hagia Sophia, he said nothing of the fate of Notre Dame cathedral in Paris. His own government spent so little on fire security during the catherdral’s renovation that a fire destroyed the roof and spire and very nearly the entire building, which is closed for years to come.
The ErdoÄŸan government’s transformation of the Hagia Sophia into a mosque is an exposure not only of the Turkish bourgeoisie. It is a warning that amid an intensifying spiral of war and a deadly global pandemic, the capitalist class around the world is engaged in a relentless promotion of nationalism and religious politics that, if it is not stopped, can only end in even greater disasters.
The social force that can and must be mobilized against this growing drive to war is the international working class. Already before the COVID-19 pandemic, mass strikes in the United States and “yellow vest” protests in France—together with mass protests from Algeria and Lebanon to those in Iraq and Iran over the US murder of Iranian General Soleimani—signaled a new upsurge of the class struggle. The critical question is to unify these growing struggles of the international working class by arming them with a socialist and anti-imperialist perspective.
This is the only way to stop the drive to war, growing incitement of religious and national divisions by the bourgeoisie, and to defend the common cultural and historical heritage of humanity.

US-led “back to work” drive spreads death across Latin America

Eric London

On Monday, Latin America’s official coronavirus death toll reached a grim milestone, surpassing the total dead in North America. More than 145,000 have died, and over 3.5 million have tested positive across Latin America. Mass poverty and inequality dominate the region after hundreds of years of colonial and imperialist exploitation, leaving each country especially vulnerable to the transmission of the virus.
Four of the seven countries with the highest global positive cases are now in Latin America, as underfunded public health systems collapse.
Brazil is second with 1.9 million cases, behind only the US. Peru, Chile and Mexico are fourth, fifth and sixth, respectively, with over 300,000 positive cases each. These figures drastically underestimate the spread of the virus because testing is in shambles. While Italy and the US presently perform more than 100 tests per 1,000 people, Mexico tests just 5 people per 1,000, Brazil tests 7 per 1,000 and Peru tests 9 per 1,000.
Soldiers patrol Ciudad Bolivar, a neighborhood with high cases of the novel coronavirus in Bogota, Colombia, Monday, July 13, 2020. (AP Photo/Fernando Vergara)
As hospitals overflow and as cities dig up bodies to clear cemetery space for the dead, all governments and all political parties across the region are scrambling to reopen their economies, sacrificing countless lives for corporate profit.
In Brazil, where President Jair Bolsonaro responded to the death toll by proclaiming, “So What?,” businesses have begun reopening across the country and millions of workers are being forced back on the job. “Governors and mayors are sending the population to the slaughterhouse with the prerogative of an economic recovery,” a Brazilian medical expert told CNN.
In Mexico, where auto plants and sweatshop maquiladoras that produce parts for export to the US have restarted, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador told the population to go to work, “be free,” and “enjoy the sky, the sun and fresh air.” The ostensibly left-wing López Obrador has mimicked Bolsonaro’s policies, announcing the further lifting of restrictions this week. Earlier, he told Mexicans they could stave off the virus by eating corn, which he calls “that blessed plant.”
In Nicaragua, the government led by Sandinista Daniel Ortega has effectively denied the existence of the virus, while in Honduras, US-backed President Juan Orlando Hernandez tested positive and, like Bolsonaro, used his own sickness to downplay the virus, forcing the country’s maquiladoras to stay open. Honduran workers are dying by the hundreds to produce clothes and shoes for export to the US.
Ligia Ramos, a director of the Honduran Medical College tweeted:
“If we don’t close the maquiladoras, we will have to close the hospitals. It does not make sense to be crying every week for a friend, a coworker. Close the damn maquiladoras for the love of God. If they continue with the maquiladoras, if they keep making money on the pain of the people, we will not stop the disease.”
In neighboring Guatemala and El Salvador, the virus has also spread through deportees from the US, many of whom US officials knew had tested positive.
From Tijuana to Cape Horn, the virus is ravaging impoverished regions from indigenous tribes in the Amazon rainforest to densely populated urban megacities like Mexico City, Lima and Rio de Janeiro.
But as the virus spreads, the ruling classes of Latin America are forcing millions back to work on behalf of US imperialism, which requires the reopening of Latin American supply chains to fuel its own “back-to-work” campaign.
In March, most of Latin America was only just beginning to experience widespread community transmission of the disease. Mexico and Honduras did not suffer their first reported coronavirus deaths until March 26, while Brazil’s came on March 19 and Chile’s on March 21. Peru’s first reported death came on April 1. Production, largely for export to the US, continued throughout the region at this time.
In April, however, as the death tolls began to climb, workers’ strikes and protests spread through the region, especially in Mexico and Brazil. In mid-April, as workers denounced unsafe conditions in northern Mexico’s maquiladoras, Trump announced: “I spoke with the president of Mexico yesterday. … If a supply chain based in Mexico or Canada interrupts with our making a big product and an important product, or even a military product, we’re not going to be happy, let me tell you that.”
As a result, across the Americas, the death toll rose and production continued. The markets recovered thanks to the resumption of production, the multitrillion-dollar CARES Act corporate bailout and the promise of endless cash infusions from the Federal Reserve.
Now, the back-to-work initiative is in full swing in the US and widespread outbreaks have transformed North American workplaces into death traps, including auto plants, meatpacking facilities, produce farms and warehouses. As US workers are forced back to work, Wall Street is demanding that Latin America further speed up production.
This was the purpose of Trump’s visit with Mexican President López Obrador in Washington last week, where business executives from both countries insisted on an end to whatever work restrictions remain. Speaking to the Atlantic Council after the dinner, US Ambassador to Mexico Christopher Landau said, “I was talking to one of the senior executives from the Ford Motor Company” about further speeding up production in Mexico. “They were saying they are going to have to start shutting down their factories in the United States as of next week if they don’t get that rolling.”
At companies like Ford, GM and Fiat-Chrysler, international supply chains link Bolivian and Chilean mines, Central American and Mexican parts production and the assembly plants in the US, Argentina, Brazil and Canada. These companies have profited immensely on the back-to-work campaigns in each country.
Over the course of the hemispheric back-to-work drive, Ford’s stock rose from $4.01 per share on March 23 to $6.30 today, a 57 percent increase. GM’s rose from $16.80 on March 18 to $25.32, a 51 percent increase. Fiat Chrysler’s stock sold at $6.35 on March 20, rising to $10.23 today, an increase of 61 percent.
Meanwhile, the UN reports that in just four months, the number of Latin Americans in need of emergency food assistance has tripled. The World Bank reports that 50 million people will fall into poverty in Latin America this year, bringing the total to 230 million.
Extreme poverty will triple from 4.5 percent to 15.5 percent as a result of the virus, rising to a total of 96 million people, including millions who lack clean water for hand washing.
In the densely populated working-class neighborhoods of Lima, Peru, where the virus is spreading rapidly, average working hours have fallen by 80 percent, forcing masses of workers into destitution. There will be 44 million unemployed across the region this year. There are widespread reports of rising prostitution.
But here, too, there is more good news for corporate America and the geostrategic interests of US imperialism.
Mass unemployment and sickness will create such a downward pressure on wages that, as S&P Global reported this month, “If anything, an economic crisis in Latin America twinned with depreciating currencies and reduced relative labor costs may lead manufacturers to expand in Latin America rather than head to Asia.” Not only will this improve corporate America’s bottom line, it will also help US imperialism sideline its geostrategic rival, China.
Common action is required on the part of workers across the Americas to unite in the fight for workplace safety and against the US-led back-to-work drive. It is a matter of life and death for millions of people.
Everywhere there is a yearning for a radical transformation of the world economy—this was shown by the mass protests that swept the region in 2019. But what is needed is a socialist political perspective.

14 Jul 2020

Government of Italy Bachelors, Masters, PhD Scholarships 2020/2021 for Students with International Protection

Application Deadline: 30th July 2020

To be taken at (country): Italy

Type: Bachelors, Masters, PhD

Eligibility: The scholarship annuities are reserved for students of the following types:
  • Winners of the previous calls in the A.Y. 2016/17, A.Y. 2017/2018, A.Y. 2018/2019 and A.Y. 2019/2020 who are entitled to obtain the  scholarship in A.Y. 2020/2021 if they obtain the minimum number of CFUs indicated in art.4.
  • Students with international protection by 25 July 2020 obtained in Italy, enrolled for the first time in the Italian University system, in a bachelor (corso di laurea triennale), master degree (corso di laurea magistrale o magistrale a ciclo unico), or a PhD program (corso di
    dottorato) – A.Y. 2020/2021.
Number of Awards: 100

Value of Program: The scholarships are awarded by the University, possibly in cooperation with the Regional Authorities for the Right to Study, and entitle students to exemption from taxes and university contributions, accommodation services (house and meal), access to university facilities (centers, libraries). Any additional services may be offered by third parties.

Duration of Scholarship: Duration of Program

How to Apply: 
Both categories of candidates must apply from the web site http://borsespi.laziodisco.it, by July 30, 2020, midnight, Rome local time

Applicants are also required to attach the following documents:
1. Copy of an Italian identity document (ID);
2. Copy of the document certifying the international protection;
3. – Students referred to in art. 2, lett. a: list of exams taken;
– Students referred to in art. 2, lett. b: short CV (in Italian or English).


* Candidates are kindly requested to contact the University they wish to enroll BEFORE submitting their application, in order to verify the feasibility of enrollment. For information on University contact details, please write to refugees@crui.it

Visit Program Webpage for details