18 Jul 2020

COVID-19 spread accelerates across Europe as EU summit opens

Alex Lantier & Johannes Stern

As European Union (EU) heads of state began meeting Friday in Brussels to discuss a bailout package, as part of a two-day summit, the COVID-19 pandemic was accelerating across the continent. Back-to-work policies launched by governments and trade unions across Europe since lock-downs ended in May are leading to a collapse of social distancing, and a new contagion threatening once again to swamp health systems.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Macron at the EU Summit in Brussels on 17 July [Credit: Stephanie Lecocq/Pool via AP]
In Spain—where 1,361 new cases were discovered on July 16, the first time since May that the total was over 1,000—municipal authorities in Barcelona asked residents of the metropolitan area of 5 million people to stay inside yesterday. Of these new Spanish cases, 647 were in Catalonia. Regional counselor Meritxell Budó said this was “the last chance to avoid having to go to measures confining the entire population.”
Germany had 583 new infections and Austria 157 on Thursday, the highest number in the latter country since April 10. In Belgium, COVID-19 infections have risen 32 percent to an average of 115 daily. The reproduction rate of the virus has passed above 1 in Germany as well as in Belgium, indicating that the number of new cases is beginning to grow exponentially again. “Given these data,” said Belgian virologist Marc Van Ranst, “we must say that we are seeing the beginning of a second wave.”
In France, where there are 184 active clusters and confirmed community spread, the reproduction rate has surged to 2.62 in Brittany, 1.5 in the Loire Valley, and 1.55 in the Riviera. It is over 1 in a number of regions, including the Paris area.
Nonetheless, the focus of the officials gathering in Brussels for their first physical meeting since the COVID-19 pandemic’s onset in Europe was not stopping the contagion. Rather, they were clashing over how to organize trillion-euro corporate and bank bailouts while imposing austerity and mass layoffs destroying millions of jobs across Europe. The European bourgeoisie is not waging war on COVID-19, but on the working class.
While the European Central Bank (ECB) has printed €1.25 trillion [$US1.43 trillion] given to European banks, the EU is preparing a €750 billion bailout planned by Berlin and Paris. Already, EU states have lavished tens of billions on corporate bailouts for Siemens, Airbus, Renault and various national airlines. At the same time, governments, corporations and trade unions are shamelessly approving mass sackings carried out by powerful corporations enriched by bailouts using public funds.
Bitter divisions persist in the EU over how to guarantee that bailouts will serve to impose draconian austerity, as in Greece after the 2008 Wall Street crash, and boost EU firms’ global competitiveness. Arriving in Brussels, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, whose government holds the rotating EU presidency, said: “The differences are still very large and so I can’t predict that we will achieve a result this time. It would be desirable, but we also have to be realistic.”
On the first day of talks, several smaller countries opposed the Franco-German bailout. Hungarian premier Viktor Orban threatened to veto a provision requiring states to respect the EU’s “fundamental values” to receive bailout funds, and Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte demanded the right to veto all spending of EU bailout funds.
Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte hailed the bailout proposed by Berlin and Paris, where austerity would not be mandated by EU talks as in Greece, but worked out in behind-the-scenes negotiations among major EU powers. “We are elaborating a response, an economic and social response, to all our European citizens in the common interest of the values that we share,” Conte claimed.
In reality, the EU is responding to world capitalism’s greatest economic downturn since the 1930s by aggressively asserting its imperialist interests. This strategy, carried out at the expense of the working class at home, relies critically on the support of the union bureaucracies to try to suppress explosive social opposition.
Yesterday, the French unions met with newly installed Prime Minister Jean Castex to plan economic policy. They agreed to wait until the end of the year to implement major cuts to pensions they negotiated earlier this year with President Emmanuel Macron, while Castex works on formulating corporate restructuring and mass layoffs at workplaces across France. Nonetheless, union officials of all colorations hailed Castex and his reactionary plans as they left his offices.
Philippe Martinez of the CGT (General Confederation of Labor) said: “We are in midstream, but what is done cannot be undone. Discontent, protests, he has to take them into account. That is a good thing.” This is a fraud. In reality, the EU is planning massive attacks and timing them carefully in discussions with the unions to avoid provoking a social explosion.
What holds the EU together is not so much common interests, as desperate attempts to confront the European working class at home and great power rivals abroad—not only traditional opponents of NATO like Russia, but increasingly the EU’s NATO “ally,” the United States.
At the summit, the EU powers are seeking to take a further step in transforming the EU into a military alliance. At a meeting in Warsaw, German Defence Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer and her Polish counterpart Mariusz Blaszczak pleaded for more EU military spending. In the current compromise proposal from EU Council President Charles Michel, €7 billion are earmarked for the EU defence fund, which promotes joint armament projects, and a further €1.5 billion for adapting the European transport network to military requirements.
Underlying this policy is the deepest economic crisis since the end of the Second World War and growing inter-imperialist tensions, especially between Germany and the United States.
On Wednesday, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued new threats to intensify sanctions against companies building the Nord Stream 2 pipeline linking Russia and Germany. The sanctions prepared under the American CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) law—which was previously used against Iran, North Korea and Russia—are aimed at companies from at least five European countries.
Germany’s Wintershall and Uniper, Royal Dutch Shell, France’s ENGIE and Austria’s OMV have all been involved in financing the construction of Nordstream 2.
On Thursday German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas denounced US plans in unusually strong terms. “With its announcements on measures that also threaten European companies with sanctions, the US Administration is disrespecting Europe’s right and sovereignty to decide itself where and how we source our energy,” he said in a German foreign ministry statement. “European energy policy is decided in Europe and not in Washington. We firmly reject extraterritorial sanctions.”
Another event pointing to the very tense transatlantic relationship is Thursday’s ruling by the EU Court of Justice throwing out a central EU-US data flows agreement, the so-called Privacy Shield. The official presentation of the ruling as a defence of European citizens’ democratic rights against US spy services is a fraud. European intelligence services, like their American counterparts, routinely engage in mass spying on the population.
Rather, after the EU closed its borders to American citizens, citing the disastrous US handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, the EU is responding to the pandemic by moving against its nominal “ally.”
There are ever more aggressive calls to re-militarize not only German but EU foreign policy. In an interview with German weekly Die Zeit published on Thursday, Kramp-Karrenbauer called for massively rearming the EU to defend its imperialist interests internationally, including against nuclear powers:
“We need a 360-degree view,” she stressed. “If you look at who is within range of Russian missiles in Europe, it is just the Central and Eastern European states and us [Germany]. That is one of the reasons why many of these states see us as an important partner to lean on, with their interests in mind. We will work on a joint threat analysis during our EU Presidency. For we must develop defence systems. Take air defence: This is increasingly about drones, AI-controlled drone swarms or hypersonic weapons.”
Whichever factions win out in the bitter debate over bailout policy, it is clear that the plans for a dramatic rearmament and corporate restructuring of the EU entail serious attacks on workers.

US moving to ban China-based TikTok social media app

Kevin Reed

As part of its aggressive confrontation with China, the Trump administration is preparing to ban the hugely popular social media app TikTok, developed by the Beijing-based internet corporation ByteDance.
According to a report in the Financial Times (FT) on Thursday, the White House is considering putting TikTok on a blacklist that would prevent Americans from using the app on the grounds that the Chinese government is obtaining the personal information of US citizens through the social media platform.
FT wrote, “Three people familiar with the debate in the Trump administration said one proposal being looked into was to place ByteDance, the parent Chinese company, on the commerce department’s ‘entity list’.” If this action were taken, the report said, it would become “exceptionally hard for US companies to provide technology to TikTok. The restrictions would include software, meaning that Apple and other app stores could no longer provide updates over their platforms.”
One of the senior US officials told FT, “We are going to send a very strong message to China.”
The entity list, which identifies non-US individuals and organizations as presenting a risk to national security and/or foreign policy interests, was used last year to block the Chinese telecom tech corporation Huawei from doing business in the US on the grounds that it was assisting Beijing in conducting espionage in America.
On July 7, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Fox News that the White House was “taking this very seriously” and “certainly looking at” banning the TikTok. In relation to the overall expanding anti-China policy, Pompeo explained, “With respect to Chinese apps on peoples’ cellphones, the United States will get this one right too.”
When asked if he would suggest that US citizens use the TikTok app, Pompeo claimed without providing any evidence or proof, “Only if you want your private information in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.”
TikTok, which is based in Los Angeles, released a statement defending its security practices, saying: “We are fully committed to protecting our users’ privacy and security. TikTok has an American CEO, a Chief Information Security Officer with decades of US military and law enforcement experience… TikTok US user data is stored in Virginia and Singapore, with strict controls on employee access. These are the facts.”
TikTok is a video sharing social media platform where users make short videos between 3 and 60 seconds of themselves or others dancing, lip-syncing to a popular song, telling jokes or performing other talent acts, and share them with other users. Use of copyrighted music is restricted to a maximum of 15-second videos. The app is currently available in 75 different languages.
A precursor to TikTok called Douyin was initially released in 2016 in China and rapidly gained 100 million users within one year. Rebranded as TikTok for international release in September 2017, the app has since been downloaded 2 billion times and has at least 800 million monthly active users.
To get a sense of how massively popular TikTok is and how rapidly it has come to dominate the video sharing segment of the social media market, Twitter was launched in 2006, added video sharing in 2013 and has 330 million monthly active users.
Another Trump administration official who has been a vocal proponent of banning TikTok while providing zero facts to back up claims that the app is spying on US citizens is White House trade adviser Peter Navarro. Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Navarro said the Trump administration is “just getting started” and he would not rule out a US ban of TikTok.
Navarro claimed that “all the data that goes into those mobile apps that kids have so much fun with and seems so convenient, it goes right to servers in China, right to the Chinese military, the Chinese Communist Party, and the agencies that want to steal our intellectual property.”
While the Chinese company has attempted to reassure the US government that it poses no threat by hiring the former Disney executive Kevin Meyer as CEO, Navarro said TikTok is running the same playbook as Huawei and putting “an American puppet” in charge, which is not going to work.
Expressing US imperialist gangsterism, Navarro said even if TikTok is sold to an American buyer, it would not solve the problem. “If TikTok separates as an American company, that doesn’t help us,” he said. Again, without providing any details or proof of his assertion, Navarro asserted, “Because it’s going to be worse—we’re going to have to give China billions of dollars for the privilege of having TikTok operate on US soil.”
On Wednesday, White House chief of staff Mark Meadows told reporters on Air Force One that the administration is “looking at the national security risk as it relates to TikTok, WeChat and other apps that have the potential for national security exposure, specifically as it relates to the gathering of information on American citizens by a foreign adversary.” WeChat is a messaging, social media and mobile payment app released in 2011 with more than one billion worldwide monthly active users.
A major aspect of the concern over the popularity of Chinese social media apps is their use in other countries around the world, undermining the domination of internet and social media markets by the US tech corporations. TikTok is more popular in India than is it in the US and the third country of where it is most popular is Brazil. Some American corporations such as Wells Fargo and Amazon have banned the use of TikTok by employees on company-owned devices.
Another consideration is that the US military-intelligence establishment wants to be in charge of and have the unfettered and exclusive ability to utilize mass consumer mobile devices and apps to spy on the public. Meanwhile, according to experts, the data being collected by TikTok is not unique for an advertising revenue-based platform.
According to Will Strafach, iOS security researcher and creator of the privacy-focused Guardian Firewall app, “For the iOS app available to Western audiences, it [TikTok] appears to collect very standard analytics information,” including user’s device model, screen resolution, operating system in use, and time zone information. “Most data collection by apps concerns me, I don’t like any of it. However, in context, TikTok appears to be pretty tame compared to other apps,” he says.
There is bipartisan support in Congress for the Trump administration’s aggressive efforts against the Chinese apps. Senator Marco Rubio (Republican of Florida), who is the acting chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, wrote in a statement, “TikTok has yet to provide a real explanation to Americans about how they protect their data and how much of it could be made available to the Chinese Communist Party.”
Rubio is calling on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), led by the Treasury Department, to investigate TikTok. It has been reported that CFIUS is already conducting a secret national security review of TikTok and ByteDance. In the past, CFIUS investigations have forced Chinese companies to sell their US assets and block potential acquisitions of US companies by Chinese firms.
Last March, the House passed an amendment submitted by Senator Abigail Spanberger (Democrat of Virginia) to ban TikTok use by employees of the Transportation Security Administration, following the agency’s guidance against its use in February.
There are significant encumbrances and contradictions involved in moving to shut down the use of TikTok and other China-based popular apps in the US. Among these are concerns that doing so would be a drastic measure that can cause a series of retaliatory actions in an escalating trade war and the impact of shutting down widely used communication tools that are used by Americans free of charge in the months leading up to the presidential elections.

US escalates economic warfare against Russia and China

Nick Beams

Having won a battle in its economic war against China with the reversal this week by the UK Johnson government of a decision to allow the telecom giant Huawei limited participation in the rollout the British 5G mobile phone network, the US is pushing forward.
It has now been reported the White House is considering taking action that would mean use of the Chinese popular video app TikTok was essentially banned.
The mechanism would be a decision by the Commerce Department to put the parent company ByteDance on its “entity list,” meaning it would be virtually impossible for Apple and other app sources to provide updates.
No decision has been made but the Financial Times cited an unnamed official who said it could come within a month and “we are going to send a very strong message to China.”
The administration is also reported to be considering using the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act under which TikTok could be deemed an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US national and economic security—the same justification used against Huawei.
In the pushing for a ban on Huawei by its allies, the US insisted, without providing any evidence, that the company represented a security threat and that even if it was not directly tied to the Chinese Communist Party it could be compelled to supply information.
Despite these claims, the UK government decided in January that it would allow Huawei to play a limited role in the 5G rollout, excluding it from so-called core areas. This provoked furious response from the White House, as well as sections of Johnson’s own Conservative Party.
Accordingly, Washington upped the ante and in May imposed export control regulations in relation to Huawei, effectively preventing the company from buying US-made technology and software, thereby opening the way to secure a reversal of the January decision.
Announcing the decision to remove all Huawei gear by 2027 and blocking the purchase of any new equipment after December this year, Oliver Dowden, the minister in charge of UK telecommunications, told Parliament: “As facts have changed, so has our approach.”
Next on the US hit list is Germany. So far, the Merkel government has yet to make a decision on whether to bow to US demands that it exclude Huawei, saying it will make a determination in the autumn.
There are major economic interests at stake. Deutsche Telekom, which is one-third state-owned and is the country’s major provider of mobile phone services, uses a large amount of Huawei equipment. It has warned against any decision that would make it harder to roll out 5G.
Any ban on Huawei would impose considerable costs and there are longer-term considerations as well. Having already fallen behind in the development of new telecommunications technology, Germany is concerned that it could lag still further if it accedes to US demands because Huawei equipment is often cheaper and better than the alternatives.
But as in Britain, there are powerful forces within the German political establishment lining up behind the demands of Washington. Reporting on the issue this week, the Economist cited remarks by Norbert Röttgen, an anti-Huawei parliamentarian: “We cannot trust the Chinese state and the Chinese Communist Party with our 5G network.”
The article noted that the Social Democrats, who form part of the ruling grand coalition, are also opposed to Huawei, along with the Greens and cited a comment from a think tank representative that “if there were a vote in parliament today, Huawei would lose.”
The White House’s anti-China barrage is not only directed outwards but is also being aimed at US corporations that have a close connection with China.
In a speech in Michigan on Wednesday, Trump’s attorney general William Barr said some major companies, citing Disney and Apple, had become pawns of China and had enabled Beijing to acquire mass influence and wealth at the expense of the US.
Making it clear that the Trump administration’s drive against China has gone far beyond the issue of trade and US firms had to embrace broader geo-strategic issues, he said: “American companies must understand the stakes. The Chinese Communist Party thinks in terms of decades and centuries, while we tend to focus on the next quarter’s earnings report.”
Barr made it clear that his appeal could be backed by legal action under legislation covering foreign lobbying.
“America’s corporate leaders might not think of themselves as lobbyists,” he said. “But you should be alert as to how you might be used, and how your efforts on behalf of a foreign company or government could implicate the Foreign Agents Registration Act.”
In other words, if US corporations do not toe the line in the anti-China economic and military drive, they could find themselves on the wrong side of the law.
The increased bellicosity emanating from Washington is not confined to China or high-tech industries.
On Wednesday, the White House stepped up its drive to derail the construction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline that would transport gas from Russia to Germany, now nearing completion, as secretary of state Mile Pompeo warned companies providing assistance to the project would be hit by US sanctions.
The pipeline is being built by a company owned by the Russian energy giant Gazprom. But five major European energy groups have provided half the funding.
Pompeo said the sanctions threat was a “clear warning to companies that aiding and abetting Russia’s malign influence projects will not be tolerated. Get out now, or risk the consequences.”
Two years ago, Congress passed legislation to try to halt the project but the State Department said loans and investments made before its passage would be exempt from sanctions. Now those protections are to be withdrawn.
“Let me be clear,” Pompeo said, “these aren’t commercial projects. They are the Kremlin’s key tools to exploit this bad European dependence in Russian energy supplies… a tool that ultimately undermines transatlantic security.”
The US attack on the pipeline is not just directed at Russia but is also aimed at Berlin and enjoys bipartisan support.
Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz, one of the most vocal opponents of the project, said the move by the State Department to remove protection from sanctions “again confirms that there is a unified, bipartisan, bicameral, inter-branch consensus across the whole of the US government to ensure Putin’s pipeline never comes on line.”

US hits record 74,987 new daily COVID-19 cases

Benjamin Mateus

The United States posted a record 74,987 new cases of COVID-19 Firday, amid a massive resurgence of the pandemic throughout the country. 42 states have seen a rise in cases over two weeks and only Maine and Delaware have demonstrated a decline.
The number of COVID-19 cases has swiftly and silently passed 14 million. Nearly 600,000 people have paid the price with their lives all due to the criminal negligence of political leaders who are more beholden to the financial oligarchs’ need to further enrich themselves than ensuring the safety and livelihood of billions of working people who toil every day to eke out a living.
Nurses and physicians on a COVID-19 unit in Texas [Credit: Miguel Gutierrez Jr.]
Yesterday saw a one-day high of 249,233 cases with 5,747 deaths. Brazil reported more than 2 million cases of COVID-19, while India had the dubious honor of being the third nation to exceed 1 million cases. The three countries combined account for nearly half of all global cases, with the United States representing 26.6 percent of all cases.
Florida, with 327,241 cases of COVID-19, third highest in the country, reported 13,965 new cases on Thursday and a one-day high of 156 fatalities. The state has had more than 100 deaths four days running. To place the catastrophe into context, the Orlando Sentinel wrote, “If coronavirus were a hurricane, it seemed to reach category five status over the weekend. More than ever, Florida needs decisive, resolute guidance to get through this storm.” The number of deaths on Thursday surpassed all the direct fatalities from all the hurricanes over the last two decades.
Texas also set a one-day high of 154 fatalities and the third day in a row of deaths above 100. Governor Greg Abbott has walked back his position to lock down the state, joining other Republican and Democratic governors to mandate unenforced and unenforceable mask policies. The defiance by many stems from the politicization of the pandemic and mistrust engendered in the advice provided by public health officials and the scientific community in general.
Texas has also exceeded 300,000 cases, bringing it in fourth place. Statewide, more than 3,637 people have died. Kinsa data, a company that uses Internet-based technology to track thermometer readings, shows that the rate of COVID-19 infections is moving fastest in Texas. According to the company, “This level of sustained, rampant disease transmission suggests that there is likely a lot more illness in the community than what has been reflected in the case numbers to date.” Though yesterday saw plateauing of cases with a drop in statewide COVID-19 hospitalization rates, it predicts that the situation is only growing direr.
States like Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and Oklahoma are facing the same predicaments as Arizona, Texas and Florida, who moved to open their communities to business and commerce earlier. Tulsa, Oklahoma, voiced concerns on Thursday about ICU capacity. The OSU Medical Center in downtown Tulsa has opened its COVID-19 ward to its first sets of patients since the Army Corp of Engineers built it last spring. St. Francis hospital informed the local Fox News channel that the current influx in patients would become unsustainable soon if the surge is not halted. Hillcrest Hospital issued a statement: “Today, our ICU bed capacity is at 90 percent full, and we consistently run at 90 to 95 percent across our metro hospitals.”
However, as the surge has become more entrenched, the White House has issued a directive to bypass the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in collecting the critical data on hospitalizations and report them to their local state departments or via a private portal that relays the data directly to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The use of the portal is also tied to the access of the federally supplied drug Remdesivir. The fiasco in the nation’s inability to create the necessary infrastructure for rapid broad testing is now further crippled in its response to manage the developing crisis by hiding the impact of the virus on community health care facilities.
In Kansas and Missouri, where cases are rising, according to NPR, the hospital data have suddenly gone missing or are incomplete. The Kansa Hospital Association notified its health department that its hospital data would be delayed while the Missouri Hospital Association explained that it no longer has access to data it uses to guide its mitigation efforts. The spokesperson for the Missouri Hospital Association said, “all evidence suggests that Missouri’s numbers are headed in the wrong direction. And, for now, we will have very limited situational awareness. That’s all very bad news.”
The Democrats have sent letters to the White House, the coronavirus taskforce, and HHS Secretary Alex Azar, demanding access to the data be restored. However, these toothless efforts are intended to win favors with their electorates, lacking any substantive initiatives. There is no serious policy to bring a real solution to the pandemic as it would require placing the fragile economy back into lockdown, with its implication on the markets. It should be underscored that on this issue, the Democrats and Republicans are united. Meanwhile, according to the Wall Street Journal, the US labor market recovery is losing its momentum as the surge in cases has led to uncertainties in employment and worries among consumers.
Questions among health care workers are once again turning to the shortage in personal protective equipment (PPE) used by nurses and physicians to treat patients at hospitals and clinics safely. Arizona has seen PPE demand climb 176 percent in June, 224 percent in California, 237 percent in Texas, and 240 percent in Florida, according to the Financial Times. Ali Raja, a co-founder of the volunteer organization #GetUsPPE and an Emergency Room physician, said, “I’ve heard from my friends in hospitals in Houston, where they’re wearing raincoats and ponchos instead of hospital gowns, any plastic barrier to separate them. We hear a lot from folks who are telling us that they’re just making do without because they have patients who are ill and need to be cared for.”
There is now much hope being placed on a vaccine that could provide immunity to the population. Moderna published the results of its phase one trial this week and is expected to launch its phase three trial soon. Yet, the struggle to find a treatment to treat the global population against the coronavirus is spinning into another point of national antagonism.
Concerningly, a recent preprint study by the Department of Infectious Diseases, King’s College London, followed patients after COVID-19 infection measuring their antibody titers over time. It writes that “in individuals that only develop modest antibody titers following infection, titers become undetectable or are approaching baseline after 50 days highlighting the transient nature of the antibody response towards SARS-CoV-2 in some individuals.” It is known that coronavirus infections tend to produce short-lived infections. This will be one facet of analysis for the Moderna vaccine trial, assessing titer levels of its subjects over time.
Given concerns about the possibility that herd immunity is potentially a flawed construct biologically with SARS-CoV-2, the push to open schools at a time when the seasonality of the virus also has become an issue of debate, this may be the development of a perfect storm scenario, all things considered.

Brazil surpasses two million coronavirus cases as reopening drive continues

Tomas Castanheira

Brazil surpassed the mark of 2 million confirmed coronavirus cases after 43,829 new infections were recorded Thursday. The country is approaching 77,000 deaths from the disease, with 1,299 on Thursday alone, the highest rate of daily deaths in the world.
These staggering numbers, an underestimation amid widespread lack of testing, express the result of the “back to work” policy being promoted by all political parties of the Brazilian ruling class.
Between the beginning of May and the third week of June, more than 5 million of the 16.6 million people who were off work as a result of the pandemic returned to their activities, according to a survey by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE).
As the parties gave the push to suspend all measures to contain the virus at the beginning of May, Brazil had still 100,000 confirmed cases and just over 6,000 deaths. The following months witnessed a deadly escalation of the disease, with more than 500,000 cases, 25 percent of the total, having been recorded in the unfinished month of July alone. Coronavirus deaths have sped up this week in ten Brazilian states.
Cemetery workers carry the coffin of Bruno Correia, whose family said he died of COVID-19, to his gravesite at the Campo da Esperanca cemetery in the Taguatinga neighborhood of Brasilia, Brazil, July 17, 2020 [Credit: AP Photo/Eraldo Peres]
Instead of recognizing the catastrophic consequences of its policies, the Brazilian political establishment, headed by the fascistic President Jair Bolsonaro, is continuing with its plans to reopen, resuming more and more activities.
In São Paulo, the state hardest hit by the virus, right-wing governor João Doria of the Brazilian Social Democratic Party (PSDB) claimed the state had arrived at a supposed “plateau” of infections and enacted the highest relaxation of social distancing measures since the pandemic began. It is time for a “return to normalcy,” he declared.
The “plateau” of the virus in São Paulo boils down to the “explosion of a Boeing 747 every day,” in the words of Dimas Covas, director of the Butantan Institute research center, and member of the state’s Coronavirus Contingency Center. On Thursday, São Paulo registered 398 new deaths. “This may last until next year,” declared Covas.
On Thursday, the capital of Rio de Janeiro, the second most affected state, entered “phase 4” of its economic reopening, with expansion of the capacity of gyms and shopping malls, and the resuming of team sports practice on the beaches. On the same day, the state registered 133 deaths and more than 1,600 new cases. Mayor Marcelo Crivella, of the right-wing Republicans party, was planning to reopen kindergartens, but retreated in the face of massive opposition from parents and educators.
However, for Bolsonaro, the measures taken by governors and mayors are still timid. Since he tested positive for COVID-19 on last week, he has been promoting a campaign to accelerate the general resumption of activities in the country.
On the same day that Brazil reached 2 million cases, Bolsonaro declared in his usual live-stream: “We cannot continue suffocating the economy. Can you understand that the lack of wages, the lack of jobs kills, and kills more than the virus itself? Is it difficult to get it?”
Bolsonaro believes that his sociopathic positions have been completely substantiated from the point of view of the profit interests of Brazil’s ruling class. Since the first cases of COVID-19 in the country, he has opposed any measure that would affect capitalist production, threatening the workers that they would starve if they were removed from work to protect themselves from the virus.
“Now the press starts showing what I was talking about back then,” he said this Thursday. “But, when you said it back then, you weren’t in the mood, it wasn’t politically correct. Standing alone against the tide isn’t easy. The people also said, he’s alone, he’s the only world leader who talks about it.”
Bolsonaro praises the large volume of exports by the agribusiness sector, which, according to him, “is very good for Brazil.” “There was no unemployment, folks worked in the countryside, unlike the city, where many governors and mayors decided to go for the lockdown.”
The maintenance of agribusiness activities in the midst of the pandemic, especially the meat processing industry, ensured a substantial growth in exports, with an increase of 17.5 percent in the first four months of 2020. At the same time it has been the main source of spread of the virus around the country outside of the major cities.
Whole Brazilian cities have been contaminated from outbreaks in meat processing plants, which operate under highly unsafe conditions favourable to the transmission of the disease. A study conducted in June in Taquari, a meat industry city in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, showed that its rate of contamination was 14 times higher than the rest of the state.
Since then, infections among meat processing workers in Rio Grande do Sul have increased 40 percent, reaching over 6,000 confirmed cases. In the states of Santa Catarina and Paraná, also in the south of the country, there are 3,132 and 3,246, respectively, infected workers at the meat processing plants. Over the last two weeks, the average number of deaths increased 98.5 percent in Rio Grande do Sul, 95.8 percent in Paraná and 47.7 percent in Santa Catarina.
The actual numbers are certainly much higher and, according to Rio Grande do Sul’s labor prosecutor, Priscila Schvarcz, are being concealed by the meat processing companies. In an interview with Folha de São Paulo, Schvarcz said: “When they talk of 20 cases, in fact, there are from 200 to 300. It’s at least ten [times] more than what they initially say.”
Schvarcz denounced, particularly, the refusal of the Brazilian based transnational food corporation JBS to sign any agreement to regulate its operations, such as the use of masks, or protocols of transportation of the workers.
Such companies have virtually no impediments to the normal operation of their activities, regardless of the deathly risks they impose on workers and to public health of the cities where they are located.
In Paraná, amidst the devastation, the government of Ratinho Júnior of the Social Democratic Party (PSD) withdrew this week a “tougher” regulation on meat processing plants, which required 6.5 feet of distancing between workers and paid time off for “at risk” workers. This came just after a meeting between the government and JBS executives, which announced an investment of 800 million reais (about US$148 million) in the state, with massive tax rebates for the company.
Despite attempts by governments and companies, the catastrophic situation in the meat plants cannot be completely covered up. China, whose economic recovery has boosted the prospects of high profitability of meat processing companies, has begun to reject the products of a series of Brazilian meat processing units, claiming a high risk of contamination by coronavirus.
In defense of the corporations, Agriculture Minister Tereza Cristina called for the restrictions to be lifted, arguing “there is no scientific proof that COVID-19 can be transmitted through food.” She also claimed that meat processing plants are “complying with all the protocols,” and the problem is that “they are testing a lot of people… If they didn’t test them, maybe there wouldn’t be all this negative repercussion over the sector.”
Besides her willingness to say anything to benefit her interests, the minister’s statement highlights the completely irrational character of the development of the economy under the interests of capitalist profit, as Bolsonaro virulently argues.
Despite their differences, all the political forces linked to capitalism are incapable of offering an alternative path. The Brazilian trade unions, defending so-called national “strategic interests,” demonstrated last week in front of the Ministry of Economy for an “Economic Recovery Agenda,” poorly disguised with empty phrases for added safety.
A real recovery of the economy can only take place under the control of the workers, through the establishment of rank-and-file safety committees, to demand safe procedures in the workplaces and social distancing in the neighborhoods, and to democratically determine what production is essential and where products should go.
This struggle is, by its very nature, international and involves the independent political mobilization of the global working class for direct confrontation of the transnational corporations, the financial oligarchy and their governments.

US pushes fabricated claims of Russian hacking of virus research

Barry Grey

The global COVID-19 catastrophe is worsening by the hour, fueled by the homicidal back-to-work drive of all the major capitalist countries. Infection rates are rising and heading rapidly to 14 million. The number of deaths will soon hit 600,000. In the US, the epicenter of the pandemic, infections are setting new records on a nearly daily basis, deaths are rising sharply, testing has broken down and hospitals in many regions are at or over capacity.
But the New York Times chose to lead its front page on Friday with an article accusing Russian intelligence of “plotting to steal” US, British and Canadian research on a coronavirus vaccine. The article uncritically reports allegations made jointly on Thursday by intelligence agencies of the three countries that a shadowy entity they call APT29 has sought to hack the computer systems of Western companies, research organizations and government agencies involved in the development of a COVID-19 vaccine.
As with previous anti-Russian smears, including Moscow’s supposed manipulation of the US 2016 election and the more recent New York Times fabrication about Russian bounties to the Taliban to kill US troops, neither the intelligence agencies, the Times nor the media more broadly present any evidence to back up the lurid claims. The intelligence handouts are nevertheless, once again, immediately presented by the corporate media as unchallengeable fact.
The Times' front-page coverage of alleged Russian hacking contrasts with its response to this week’s attack on Twitter. The newspaper has adopted a decidedly muted tone in reporting that some of the worlds most high-profile figures and companies, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Apple, had their Twitter accounts compromised.
For various reasons, including uncomfortable questions the Twitter attack raises about the ability of the technology companies to manipulate user accounts, the Times gives short shrift to this massive hack, only to concentrate on another alleged to have occurred against no specific target and at no specific time. The article on the alleged Russian hacking does not even mention the Twitter hack, because to do so would invite the obvious conclusion that it does not take a nation-state to carry out a successful cyber-attack.
As usual, the Times for the most part cites unnamed “officials” in describing the alleged activities of APT29, also dubbed “Cozy Bear.” It notes that government officials “would not identify victims of the hackings.” No dates or specific incidences of hacking are given. However, the newspaper cites Robert Hannigan, the former head of the British intelligence agency GCHQ, as naming as the “apparent” primary target Oxford University and the British-Swedish company AstraZeneca, which are jointly working on a vaccine.
US media reports acknowledge that there is no evidence that any data was actually stolen by the alleged hackers and that no information was compromised. The Times quotes Hannigan as saying that the hackers were not seeking to disrupt vaccine production.
The US National Security Agency on Thursday released an advisory (“APT29 targets COVID-19 vaccine development”) that is even flimsier. In a mere three and a half pages of text, it declares, without providing any evidence, that APT29 is “almost certainly” part of Russian intelligence. It then claims that the group has been targeting organizations involved in vaccine development in the US, UK and Canada “throughout 2020,” seeking through the use of malware to “gain a foothold” in the targeted computer systems. However, it is silent on whether it has succeeded in doing so.
The unsubstantiated accusations of vaccine research hacking are not limited to Russia. Last week, FBI Director Christopher Wray said China was “working to compromise American health care organizations” conducting COVID-19 research, a charge that was repeated by Attorney General William Barr in a speech in Michigan on Thursday.
What is behind these concocted smears against Russia and China?
There is a ferocious global struggle between competing corporations and nations to be the first to patent a vaccine for the coronavirus. At stake are billions of dollars for corporate CEOS, investors and bankers, and an immense geopolitical advantage for the country that wins the vaccine sweepstakes.
In a May 27 article on what it called “vaccine nationalism,” the Wall Street Journal wrote:
Pharmaceutical companies are bracing for export bans on future coronavirus vaccines and spreading production across different continents, on early signs of a high-stakes geopolitical scramble to secure supplies for a scientific breakthrough that could confer enormous economic and political power…
A coronavirus vaccine would be a monumental prize for the first country able to manufacture it at scale, a civilizational triumph comparable to the moon landing. It would allow the winner to revive its economy months ahead of others and then select which allies get shipments next, centering the global recovery on its medical output.
The United States is most nakedly pursuing a nationalistic course, aimed at enriching American oligarchs and deploying the vaccine not as a means to save lives, but as a weapon against countries in the crosshairs of US imperialism. These include, in the first instance, China and Russia, but also Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, Cuba and others. The American ruling elite intends, moreover, to use a vaccine to gain leverage against its European “allies,” particularly Germany.
Washington will withhold the vaccine from countries deemed impediments to its drive for global hegemony and reward those that fall into line behind its plans for war and conquest with access to the lifesaving drug.
As Science magazine wrote in May, the Trump administration’s “warp speed” vaccine development program is based on “eschewing international cooperation—and any vaccine candidates from China,” and aimed at developing vaccines “reserved for Americans.”
The American ruling class is increasingly concerned that it may be losing the race for the vaccine. The World Health Organization reports that more than 160 vaccines are being developed and 23 have begun clinical trials on humans. Russia is developing 26 vaccines, two of which are undergoing clinical trials. Eight of the potential vaccines in various stages of human testing are being developed in China, the most of any country. The Chinese state-owned firm Sinopharm and another Chinese company have already announced they are entering final testing.
The Washington Post published an article on Thursday, the same day as the joint anti-Russia statement from the US, the UK and Canada, reporting progress in China’s vaccine program. Earlier, the Times published an article on China that stated, “By some measures, it is winning the race, with four companies already testing their vaccine candidates on humans.”
Also on Thursday, Reuters published an article reporting that Russia plans to produce 30 million doses of an experimental COVID-19 vaccine domestically this year, with the potential to manufacture a further 170 million abroad. It quoted Kirill Dmitriev, the head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, as saying, “We believe that based on the current results it will be approved in Russia in August and in some other countries in September... making it possibly the first vaccine to be approved in the world.”
Under no conditions is US imperialism prepared to allow either Russia or China to dominate the global market for a COVID-19 vaccine. It is seeking in advance to criminalize their efforts, very possibly as a prelude to banning the import of such a vaccine into the US and lesser powers dependent on it, such as the UK and Canada.
In regard to the development of a coronavirus vaccine, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told reporters last month, “There should not be a divide between the haves and the have-nots.” But the actual situation, determined by the class interests of the capitalist oligarchs who dominate the world, is precisely the opposite. The United States, in particular, is seeking to use control of a COVID-19 vaccine as a weapon.
Human lives are no consideration to the American financial oligarchy. Its only concerns are the profits of US corporations and the dominance of American imperialism.
In a rational and humane society, the issue of secrecy in the development of a lifesaving vaccine, all the more in the midst of a deadly pandemic, would never even arise. All questions of personal gain or national advantage would be completely subordinated to the pursuit of a globally coordinated effort, utilizing the revolutionary gains in science and technology and the knowledge of experts in every country, to contain and ultimately eradicate the virus and provide the needed medical care and social support for all those impacted both physically and economically.
But that is impossible within the framework of capitalism. The obscene perversion of the effort to develop and make available a vaccine as a result of its subordination to corporate greed and the drive for geopolitical domination exposes the bankruptcy of capitalism. Human progress and life itself are incompatible with a system based on the accumulation of personal wealth by a corporate-financial elite and the division of the world into rival nation-states.
The struggle against the pandemic is the struggle, led by the international working class, to expropriate and overthrow the capitalist parasites and establish world socialism.

17 Jul 2020

One World Media Coronavirus Reporting Award 2020 for Journalists & Filmmakers

Application Deadline: 30th July 2020.

About the Award: The One World Media Awards this year come at an unusual time, as we face the Covid-19 pandemic.
In response to the exceptional work of journalists and filmmakers covering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries, we are launching the Coronavirus Reporting Award 2020, supported by EBRD. 
We did not want to wait till next year. Entries are open now and the winner will be announced in October 2020.
This is a global story like few others. We’re connected by a shared crisis that presents us all with new ways of living and seeing the world. 
We want to champion stories that show us what is happening beyond our borders and spotlight international perspectives on the pandemic. 
We’re looking for stories that show us the potential solutions, the urgent needs and the surprising implications of COVID-19 around the world.
The Award will be for a piece of media in any format, including print, film, audio, or digital media. You can find the eligibility and selection criteria below. 

Type: Award

Eligibility: All entries should focus on stories, topics or issues in, about or related to the developing world, including Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America, the Middle East, Russia or the Post-Soviet States. Jurors will be looking for media that covers underreported stories or new angles and approaches to more familiar stories.
Entries must have had their first screening, broadcast, theatrical release, launch or publication between 1 December 2019 and 30 July 2020.
The Coronavirus Reporting Award is open to entrants anywhere in the world, as long as the work meets one of the following criteria:
  • the entry has been broadcast, screened or published (in print or in an established online publication/website) in the UK; OR
  • the entry has been broadcast or published (in an established print/online publication/website) internationally and is available for an English-speaking audience; OR
  • the entry has been screened at an international film festival
Selection Criteria: Entries will be evaluated based on the overall merit of the piece, with an emphasis on:
Relevance of the coverage
  • The focus must be on stories or topics in, about or related to a developing country
  • Include the voices and views of people in/from developing countries
Quality of the coverage
  • Well-crafted, structured and engaging
  • High production and editorial values
  • Distils and presents complex topics to the target audience in an understandable and accessible way
Originality and creativity of the coverage
  • All entries should highlight under-reported stories or issues, or explore new angles on familiar topics.
  • We are particularly looking at how the story is told: Is it amplifying voices that are normally unheard? Is it an inspiring story that will create change? Does the story challenge misperceptions or stereotypes of developing countries?
Substance and accuracy of the coverage
  • Depth of research and analysis
  • Well-researched, accurate and balanced reporting
Impact and reach of the coverage
  • Demonstrates the actual impact or potential for the coverage to catalyse change
  • May have prompted additional media coverage or policy change
  • Consideration may be given to the total audience reached
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Certificates will be given to winners

How to Apply: APPLY NOW
  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.
Visit Award Webpage for Details

Commonwealth Professional Fellowships 2021 for Mid-career Professionals in Developing Countries – UK

Application Deadline: 3rd August 2020 4pm (GMT).

Eligible Countries: Developing Commonwealth country

To be taken at: UK Universities

About Scholarship: The Commonwealth Professional Fellowships support mid-career professionals from developing Commonwealth countries to spend a period of time with a UK  host organisation working in their field  for a programme of professional development.
These Fellowships are offered under six development themes:
1.Science and technology for development
2.Strengthening health systems and capacity
3.Promoting global prosperity
4.Strengthening global peace, security and governance
5.Strengthening resilience and response to crises
6.Access, inclusion and opportunity


Type: Research, Fellowship

Eligibility: To be eligible for these fellowship, candidate must:
  • Be a citizen of or have been granted refugee status by an eligible Commonwealth country, or be a British Protected Person
  • Be permanently resident in an eligible Commonwealth country
  • Have at least five years’ full-time, or equivalent part-time, relevant work experience, in a profession related to the subject of the Fellowships programme, by the proposed start of the fellowship – voluntary work experience will not be counted towards this minimum
  • Be in employment at the time of application that they will return to upon completion of the fellowship
  • Not have undertaken a Commonwealth Professional Fellowship within the last five years (at the time of application)
  • Not be seeking to undertake an academic programme of research or study in the UK. Academics are eligible to apply for the scheme, but only to undertake programmes of academic management, not research or courses relevant to their research subject
  • Be available to undertake the Fellowship between 1 February 2021 and 15 March 2021. You should check exact dates with the prospective Host.
Selection Criteria: 2021 applications for Commonwealth Professional Fellowships will be judged on the following criteria:
  • The extent to which the proposed Fellowship will ensure the transfer of skills relevant to the needs of a Commonwealth developing country
  • The extent to which those skills will lead to practical benefits for the developing country following the Fellowship
  • The extent to which the Fellowship will have a catalytic effect, either within the developing country concerned, or in establishing new relationships with the UK
Number of Scholarships: Several

Value of Scholarship: A commonwealth Fellowship covers the living expenses for the Fellow as well as a return airfare to the UK. It also provides funding support to the host organisation, with a budget of up to £3,000 available for attendance at conferences, on short courses, and other eligible costs.

Duration of scholarship: Typically 3-months but could be extended to 6-months

How to Apply: 
  • Host organisations reserve the right to make changes to the Programme (in discussion with selected Fellows) after selections have been made.
  • The closing date for submission of your application is 4pm (BST) on Friday 3rd August 2020
  • The closing date for the submission of references is 4pm (BST) on Monday 17th August 2020. Your application must include at least two references by this date, one of which must be from your current employer, otherwise it will be considered ineligible.
  • Once the closing date for Fellows’ applications and references has passed your application will be shared with the Host organisation you have applied to in order for them to review all applications and select the candidates they wish to put forward to the Commission. The Commission will make the final selections of Host organisation programmes and individual Fellows.
  • You can access the online application system now.
Visit Award Webpage for details

Czech Government Scholarships 2021/2022 for Developing Countries

Application Deadline: 30th September 2020

About the Award: Granting scholarships to citizens from developing countries for studies at Czech public higher education institutions (referred to as “universities”) is an important part of the foreign development cooperation of the Czech Republic and has a long tradition. From the late 1950s to the present day over 20 000 foreign nationals have completed their studies at Czech universities with a scholarship of the Government of the Czech Republic.
Government scholarships for studies at universities in the Czech Republic are governed by a Resolution of the Government of the Czech Republic as part of a joint project pursued by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (https://www.msmt.cz/) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (https://www.mzv.cz/).

Type: Doctoral and Masters

Eligibility:
  • The scholarships are intended solely to promote the studies of adults who are foreign nationals from developing third countries in need. Neither a citizen of the Czech Republic, nor a citizen of a member state of the European Union, nor any other foreign national with a permit to permanent residence on the territory of the Czech Republic may, therefore, be granted this type of scholarship. Furthermore, the scholarships may not be granted to persons under 18 years of age. (The applicants have to turn 18 as of 1 September of the year when they commence studies in the Czech Republic at the latest.)
  • In  Master/ Doctoral Study Programmes plus one-year Preparatory Course of the English language (Which is combined with other field-specific training): Government scholarships of this category are awarded to graduates from upper secondary schools, or Bachelor’s / Master’s degree courses, as applicable, Who can Enroll only in Study Programmes in which instruction is given in the English language. Depending on the subject area, Applicants are normally required to sit entrance Examinations at the higher education institution Concerned. Successful passing of Entrance examination constitutes a precondition for the scholarship award; or
  • in Follow-up Master study programmes or Doctoral study programmes. Government scholarships of this category are awarded to graduates from Bachelor or Master study programmes, respectively, who enrol in study programmes with instruction in the English language.
In addition, the Scholarship Review Board will take into consideration applicants’ results from their earlier studies. Priority will be given to students who have not previously had the opportunity to study abroad.

Eligible Countries: Scholarships for the academic year 2021/2022 are offered to the citizens of the following countries:
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina,
  • Ethiopia, 
  • Georgia, 
  • Cambodia, 
  • Moldova, 
  • Ukraine, 
  • and Zambia.
To be Taken at (Country): Public Universities in Czech Republic

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award:
  • The scholarship covers the necessary costs related to staying and studying in the Czech Republic. The scholarship amount is regularly amended.
  • Currently the amount paid to students on a Bachelor’s, Master’s or follow-up Master’s study programme stands at CZK 14,000 per month
  • Whereas the amount paid to students of a Doctoral study programme stands at CZK 15,000 per month.
The above scholarship amounts include an amount designated for the payment of accommodation costs. Costs of accommodation, food and public transport are covered by scholarship holders from the scholarship under the same conditions that apply to students who are citizens of the Czech Republic. Should health services exceeding standard care be required by the student, s/he shall cover them at his/her own cost.

Duration of Award: These Government Scholarships are designed to cover the standard length of study plus one-year preparatory course of the Czech language(which is combined with other field-specific training).

How to Apply: Each applicant is obliged to fill in an electronic application form available at http://registr.dzs.cz/registr.nsf at the latest by 30 September of the year prior to the given academic year (i.e. the calendar year that precedes the academic year for which scholarships are offered).
Detailed information on the terms and conditions of scholarship awards is provided in the binding “Guidelines for Granting Scholarships of the Government of the Czech Republic”, issued in Czech and English

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.
Visit Award Webpage for Details

French Institute Visas for Creation 2020 for African and Caribbean Artists

Application Deadline: 31st July 2020

Eligible Countries: Countries in Africa and the Caribbean

To be taken at (country): France

Type: Contest

Eligibility: It is open to the following candidates:
  • African artists who propose a residency project taking place in France;
  • Caribbean artists (island residents only) who propose a residency project taking place in mainland France or the French Departments of America (DFA).
It is concerned with the following disciplines:
visual arts, photography, digital arts, architecture, design, arts, fashion, theatre, dance, circus, street and puppet arts, music, multidisciplinary projects.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: This tool is intended for artists and curators residing in Africa or the Caribbean, who have professional experience in the relevant artistic field and who need, in order to develop their project or career, a 2-month residence period in France within a professional structure (such as the CCN, CDCN, Scène Nationale, CDN, Centres d’art, SMAC, etc.), a partner institution of the Institut français (Cité Internationale des Arts) or which is linked to a residency programme in a territorial collectivity.

Duration of Award: 2 months

How to Apply: APPLY
  • It is important to go through all application requirements on the Programme Webpage (see link below) before applying
Visit Award Webpage for Details