7 Apr 2022

General strike in Greece against destruction of living standards worsened by Ukraine war

Robert Stevens


Greek workers from every sector of the economy mounted a 24-hour general strike yesterday.

The strike was called in opposition to a cost-of-living crisis hitting millions and rising social inequality. It paralysed much of the country.

Public transport largely ground to a halt in the Athens where no services ran on the subway, tram, trolley or suburban railway. Buses ran only 12 hours from 9a.m. with two three-hour stoppages by bus workers at the start and end of their shifts. Ferries which play a critical role serving Greece’s many islands remained in ports. Schools were closed as state-run services closed. Health care workers treated only emergency cases in state-run hospitals.

Demonstrators shout slogans as they march during a 24-hour nationwide strike in central Athens, Greece, Wednesday, April 6, 2022.

The strike would have had an even greater impact but for the anti-democratic, intervention of the Civil Aviation Service who secured a court order making illegal the participation of air traffic controllers, electrical engineers, and telecommunications personnel.

The movement of Greek workers is part of global eruption of the class struggle fueled by the decimation of workers living standards, fueled by the pandemic and the war in Ukraine. Strikes and mass protests have broken out against savage austerity in many countries in recent weeks, including Sri Lanka, Spain, Sudan, Tunisia and Canada.

The income of millions has been slashed particularly by soaring energy prices that have been made much worse by Greece’s participation in economic sanctions against Russia. Forty percent of Greece’s annual energy needs comes from gas supplies imported from Russia.

This assault is made on a working class that has suffered a nearly 15 year social and economic war on its living standards by successive governments led by the social democratic PASOK; the pseudo-left SYRIZA (in government from 2015-2019) and the conservative New Democracy (ND).

The strike was called by Greece’s two main unions representing 2.5 million workers, the private sector General Confederation of Greek Workers (GSSE) and the public sector Civil Servants’ Confederation federation (ADEDY). The Stalinist Communist Party (KKE)-run All Workers Militant Front (PAME) federation participated.

Rallies were held in all main cities and towns with over 70 taking place throughout the day. Tens of thousands participated in the Athens rallies, with the Associated Press reporting that “9,000 protesters held marches in Greece's second-largest city of Thessaloniki in the north.”

In Athens, three rallies were held in different squares, led by the different federations and leftist political parties.

The thousands attending rallies spoke for millions, using the occasion to denounce the ND government’s heavy involvement in the war deliberately provoked by the US and NATO powers. Thousands attended the PAME rally in the main Syntagma square, in front of the Greek Parliament. The poster promoting the rally included the slogans “Against the cost-of-living increase”, “For Collective Bargaining and increases to wages” and “No to Greece’s involvement in the war”. PAME’s constituency includes members and their descendants who recall the fascist occupation of the country by Hitler’s troops in the Second World War and the taking of power by the US-backed fascist junta in 1967, which remained in power until 1974. There is growing anti-imperialist sentiment and opposition to a ruling elite more broadly in the working class, with Greece deepening its ties with NATO and functioning as a key base for provocations against Russia.

Demonstrators march during a 24-hour nationwide strike in Athens, Greece, Wednesday, April 6, 2022. (AP Photo/Thanassis Stavrakis)

Such is the strength of feeling that the trade union bureaucracy is forced to make a tactical shift. The Press Project website reported, “For its part ADEDY has given an anti-war tone to the strike action” with its call for an immediate cessation of the war. It is “accusing the government of utilizing the war to shift its own responsibility for the rise in the cost of living, cuts to workers’ wages and to continue its anti-worker and neo-liberal policies.”

Inflation is rising exponentially, surging from 6.2 percent in January to 7.2 percent in February and according to preliminary data released last week, reaching 8 percent in March. A Greek Statistical Agency study in February found that inflation has pushed electricity prices up by a staggering 71.4 percent. The cost of natural gas is up by 78.5 percent. Many families rely on heating oil to warm their homes, now priced 41.5 percent higher. Prices for fuels and lubricants rose by 23.2 percent.

Such prices are simply unaffordable in a country where the minimum wage is just €663 a month (US$723) following a tiny increase in the rate by Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis’ ND government in January. Given the soaring rate of inflation on top of terrible reduction of living standards already imposed, a 13 percent rise in the minimum wage called for by the GSSE would take it to just €751.

Energy price rises and the rising price of basic goods, as well as shortages of bread and other flour-based products has triggered a social crisis. Greece imports about 250,000 tonnes of soft wheat from Russia and Ukraine, 30 percent of its total wheat imports. Even before the Ukraine war, the wholesale cost of wheat had already surged 80 percent higher than in 2020, mainly due to energy costs. Two weeks ago, supermarket imposed restrictions on how much flour, oil and other items could be bought.

“Our life now is just being in debt,” Georgios Alexandropoulos, a 60-year-old courier worker told Reuters during the strike. “I owe the electricity company and my landlord, I'm two months behind in rent, and I owe the last two electricity bills. Soon we will be in debt to everyone... we can't go on like this.” Psychologist Michalis Tokaras said he was forced to “cut back on everything”, adding, “We have to choose between paying our mortgage or paying bills. We've reached the bottom.”

The GSEE said on calling the strike, “For the last 14 years, workers have been carrying the burden of a deep crisis that has affected everyone’s incomes and lives.”

The demands of the trade union bureaucracy, with ADEDY also calling for wage increases at least equal to GDP growth and inflation and abolition of the hated solidarity tax of between 1 percent and 4 percent of income—first introduced in 2011 and supposed to expire in 2015—are deeply cynical. The unions have collaborated with governments to suppress every struggle of the working class year after year.

The struggle by workers against the systematic lowering of its social position and super-exploitation by corporations is now intersecting with growing opposition to war, imperialism and dictatorship.

For weeks, workers in Thessaloniki at the Greek railway company TrainOSE refused to transport NATO military armoured vehicles to the Ukrainian border that had arrived in Greece on US cargo vessels at Alexandroupolis port in the north. They were to be sent to Romania and Poland on the Ukrainian border for use by the Zelensky regime. Despite TrainOSE threatening workers with dismissal, they were unable to secure agreement to move the train. In the end the company had to recruit scabs to take the train to Alexandroupolis.

According to reports, eight strikers were arrested yesterday in Thessaloniki, including, according to the Ta Nea daily, members of the KKE central committee. A rally was held yesterday evening at the police headquarters in the city to demand their release.

The political significance of the action in Greece was underscored by the response of Ukrainian neo-Nazis who yesterday denounced “Members of the red rabble in Greece… A platoon of Ukrainian nationalist formations would solve the problem once and for all.” Referring to the fascist junta that ruled Greece, they added, “Let's bring back the power of the ‘black colonels’—quickly and efficiently.”

In the face of a tidal wave of government and media propaganda demonising Russia and demanding everyone sacrifice their living conditions to back the NATO operation, TaNea reported that a majority of two thirds in a poll conducted for the Journal of the Editors said that shipping war material to Ukraine puts Greece at risk.

A majority supported only humanitarian aid being sent. Only 32 percent answered that both humanitarian aid and war material should be sent. Only a slim majority (53 percent) believed that the war will be limited locally, and 40 percent feared it is likely to lead to a global conflict.

Billionaire Elon Musk buys his way onto Twitter’s board of directors

Kevin Reed


Elon Musk, the wealthiest man on Earth, has purchased 9.1 percent of the social media and microblogging platform Twitter and secured a seat on the company’s board of directors.

According to a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Tuesday, Musk disclosed the purchase of more than 73 million shares of Twitter stock between January 31 and April 1. He spent a total of $2.64 billion or an average of $36.16 per share.

On Monday, following initial reports of the investment, the value of Twitter shares jumped by 27 percent. The Wall Street response to news that the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX had become an active Twitter investor increased Musk’s net worth by $1 billion, a 40 percent return.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk (Wikipedia photo)

The appointment to the board of directors was acknowledged by Twitter executives on Tuesday. Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal tweeted in the morning that he was “excited to share that we’re appointing @elonmusk to our board!” Agrawal added, “He’s both a passionate believer and intense critic of the service which is exactly what we need on @Twitter, and in the boardroom, to make us stronger in the long-term. Welcome Elon!”

Musk replied, “Looking forward to working with Parag & Twitter board to make significant improvements to Twitter in coming months!”

Later, Twitter founder and former CEO Jack Dorsey tweeted, “I’m really happy Elon is joining the Twitter board! He cares deeply about our world and Twitter’s role in it. Parag and Elon both lead with their hearts, and they will be an incredible team,” to which Musk replied, “Thanks Jack!”

According to Forbes “The Real Time Billionaires List,” Elon Musk is the wealthiest man in the world with a net worth of $279.5 billion at the time of this writing. His wealth is approximately $100 billion greater than the second person on the list, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who has a net worth of $184.5 billion.

Musk first overtook Bezos as the richest man in the world in January 2021 following a dramatic rise in the value of Tesla stock. Shares of the electric car maker increased ten-fold, going from $88.60 to $880.02 in twelve months. During this time frame, Musk’s net worth went from $30 billion to nearly $200 billion.

The speculative basis of Musk’s wealth is shown by the fact that current Wall Street value of Tesla is $1.08 trillion, six times the value of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler (Stellantis) combined. These three companies produce far more cars at dozens of factories, exploiting the labor of many tens of thousands of workers. Tesla only recently began turning a profit.

Musk is a major user of Twitter, having joined the platform in 2009 and posted more than 17,300 tweets. He has more than 80 million followers and has used the platform to spread misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic, campaigned against economic lockdowns and refused to comply with shelter-in-place orders, ordering a restart of auto production at Tesla facilities in California in defiance of government policy.

Many corporate media reports have focused on Musk’s comment about making “significant improvements to Twitter in the coming months,” and interpreted this to mean he will be involved in making product changes. As evidence of this, the reports have pointed to a tweet survey by Musk that posed the question, “Do you want an edit button?” Of the 4.4 million people who responded, 74 percent answered, “yes.”

Another conversation with Musk on Twitter included a conversation about the need to remove Crypto spam bots from the platform, to which he said that this was “the single most annoying problem on twitter imo.”

While Musk himself has not articulated an agenda for the company, other reports have concentrated on his role in relationship to the company’s censorship policies. On March 26, about a week before his investments in the company had become public, Musk tweeted another survey that asked, “Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy. Do you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this principle?,” to which more than 2 million people responded, with 70 percent of them answering, “No.”

He followed up the survey with questions: “Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy. What should be done?” and “Is a new platform needed?”

On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal published an editorial that called on Musk to intensify his “disdain for Twitter’s heavy-handed censorship, which the company uses to silence prominent voices (e.g., Donald Trump) and stifle views that disagree with the prevailing progressive consensus.”

Predictably, the Journal ignored the growing and blatant online political censorship of left-wing and anti-capitalist views and instead accused “Big Tech” of “serving as handmaiden to the woke speech police.” The Journal editors said it would be “refreshing” if Musk were to “stake some of his own wealth in the cause of promoting political free speech.”

Far-right and fascist supporters of Donald Trump are urging Musk to restore Trump’s Twitter account, which was permanently suspended in the aftermath of the January 6, 2021, mob attack on the US Capitol aimed at overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election. QAnon conspiracy supporter Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Republican of Georgia) tweeted, “Will the new majority shareholder return freedom of speech to Twitter?”

On Tuesday, the Washington Post published analysis by Timothy L. O’Brien with the headline, “Elon Musk’s Twitter Investment Could Be Bad News for Free Speech,” which said, “Maybe he wants to bring Twitter to heel.” Calling him a “free speech absolutist,” O’Brien wrote that Musk’s Twitter “rants and raves have been wide-ranging and unfettered. He once tweeted, then deleted, a meme comparing Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to Hitler. He’s tweeted transphobic memes. He’s slagged a British cave explorer as a ‘pedo guy.’”

The entry of Musk into Twitter underscores the control of social media and the internet as a whole by a tiny layer of capitalist billionaires, including Mark Zuckerberg at Meta (which owns Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, and a dozen smaller companies), Sergei Brin and Larry Page at Google (which owns YouTube), Jeff Bezos at Amazon and a handful of others.

While the internet offers unprecedented scope to the development of human cooperation and interaction, within the framework of capitalism it becomes a further source of profit and wealth accumulation for the ruling class, resources which, as Musk demonstrates, are deployed at the whim of reactionary and even buffoonish figures.

US boosts arms shipments to Ukraine, admits to training Ukrainian fighters

Andre Damon


In the wake of unsubstantiated allegations by the United States that Russia has executed civilians in the outskirts of Kiev, the United States has increased its weapons shipments to Ukraine. On Wednesday, it also admitted to training Ukrainian forces on American soil. Both actions increase the likelihood of a direct military clash between the US and Russia, the world’s two largest nuclear powers.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced yesterday that Washington is sending an additional $100 million in arms, consisting primarily of anti-tank weapons, to Kiev.

Blinken said this was the sixth major tranche of war materiel dispatched to Ukraine since August 2021. He said that the new disbursement brings the total “assistance commitment to Ukraine to more than $2.4 billion since the beginning of this administration, and more than $1.7 billion since” the start of the war. Blinken noted that more than 30 countries, including the majority of NATO’s members and the European Union, have been funneling arms to Ukraine.

Ukrainian military forces train to use a US-supplied NLAW anti-tank weapon on the outskirts of Kyiv, Ukraine, Wednesday, March 9, 2022. (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)

He justified the escalation of US involvement in the proxy war by pointing to alleged Russian war crimes, saying, “The world has been shocked and appalled by the atrocities committed by Russia’s forces in Bucha and across Ukraine.”

On Monday, calling Russian President Vladimir Putin a “war criminal,” Biden demanded a “wartime trial” of the Russian president, according to the official White House transcript of his remarks.

In a statement Wednesday, the United States admitted to training Ukrainian troops in the United States, teaching them how to use the “switchblade” “kamikaze drone,” hundreds of which are being put into use now in Ukraine.

“We took the opportunity, having them still in the country, to give them a couple of days’ worth of training on the Switchblade,” John Kirby, the chief Pentagon spokesman, said on Wednesday.

Other NATO powers are similarly escalating their involvement. The UK is planning to send armored vehicles to Ukraine, the Times of London reported Wednesday.

“The UK is adding to its offer of lethal weapons in the belief that the next three weeks will be critical in determining the outcome of the war. … These [armored vehicles] could enable Ukrainian forces to push further forward towards Russian lines,” observed the newspaper.

A senior government source told the Times of London, “The next three weeks will be critical. [The Ukrainians] have already partly won. They have exhausted the Russian army, won the battle of occupation and condemned Putin to eternal isolation. Can they push back the Russian army? Can they break the Russian army? Possibly. Depends on what help we can all give.”

The United States, meanwhile, is continuing its threats against China and India, two former colonial countries, unless they join the economic warfare against Russia.

“Our message to the Indian government is that the costs and consequences for them of moving into a more explicit strategic alignment with Russia will be significant and long term,” National Economic Council Director Brian Deese said.

On Thursday, the United States will lead an effort in the United Nations to remove Russia from the United Nations Human Rights Council.

The last time a country was removed from the body was when Libya was taken off in 2011. Shortly afterwards, Islamist terrorists funded by the United States sodomized Libya’s president to death with a bayonet. The United States remains a member of the U.N. Human Rights Council.

Explaining the European Union’s motives in stoking up the war by arming Ukraine, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell declared, “We want [the war] to end as soon as possible, but not in any way. … That is why we have to continue arming Ukraine. ... More weapons, that is what the Ukrainians expect of us, and that is what we are doing.”

Speaking Wednesday, Biden pledged to intensify the United States’ economic war against Russia, declaring, “We’re going to further increase Russia’s economic isolation,” Biden said. “The United States will continue to stand with the Ukrainian people in their fight for freedom.” The White House announced a new round of sanctions, targeting Russia’s largest banks, and prohibiting investment in Russia by Americans.

The US proxy war is being used to rapidly intensify the global arms race being led by the United States and targeting not only Russia but China.

On Tuesday, the White House announced an agreement by the Australia-UK-US (AUKUS) partnership to produce a new generation of nuclear weapons targeting China.

Citing “Russia’s unprovoked, unjustified, and unlawful invasion of Ukraine,” Prime Minister Scott Morrison of Australia and Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the United Kingdom declared they were “pleased with the progress in our trilateral program for Australia to establish a conventionally armed, nuclear‑powered submarine capability.”

They further pledged to commence new trilateral cooperation on hypersonics and counter-hypersonics, and electronic warfare capabilities.

That same day, the Pentagon approved a $95 million weapons sale, centering around the Patriot missile system, to Taiwan.

It is increasingly clear that the Ukraine war, incited by the United States and NATO, is now being used as the occasion for putting into effect long-running plans for “great-power conflict” in the United States.

The record $813 billion Pentagon budget proposed by the Biden administration for a massive expansion of the US military-industrial complex makes this clear.

All 28 Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee have published a letter calling for expanding military funding even further. Committee Chairman Mike Rogers told Fox News Monday, “Our nation faces unprecedented threats from China and Russia, and it’s unconscionable that President Biden has chosen to once again shortchange our warfighters.”

He added, “Xi Jinping is watching as President Biden continues to falter. … In fact, while China has the largest navy in the world and is rapidly expanding their nuclear arsenal… Luckily, Congress calls the shots when it comes to funding our military.”

AUKUS pact expanded to base hypersonic missiles in Australia

Mike Head


On the eve of calling a federal election, Prime Minister Scott Morrison this week took another critical step to placing Australia on the frontline of US preparations for war against China.

Morrison heralded a major expansion of last September’s AUKUS military pact, an agreement that has bipartisan support from the opposition Labor Party, which is equally committed to the intensifying US military alliance.

In a joint statement, Morrison, US President Joe Biden and UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson declared that the AUKUS treaty between the three governments would be extended to include the development of ­“advanced hypersonic and counter-hypersonic capabilities” and electronic warfare technologies.

The UK Carrier Strike Group 2021, led by HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier, departing the UK (credit: Royal Navy/Flickr)

Land-based hypersonic missiles, which would have a range of more than 2,000 kilometres, would be stationed in Australia, while air and sea versions could be deployed on the country’s jet fighters and warships.

This would make Australia an even more crucial base for the US, from which to launch a potential nuclear war against China, which is regarded by Washington as the chief threat to US global dominance.

Hypersonic missiles are capable of travelling at least five times the speed of sound, dramatically reducing the warning time. Coupled with their manoeuvrability, this makes them virtually impossible to intercept. They can carry nuclear warheads.

No price tag was mentioned. But these programs would require the spending of billions more dollars, on top of the near $600 billion already allocated for Australian military weaponry over the current decade.

Bloomberg reported last November, based on internal Pentagon estimates, that the missiles would cost more than $100 million each, adding about $30 billion to spending to develop some 300 missiles, starting this year.

CNN revealed on Wednesday morning that the American military had secretly tested hypersonic missiles last month.

The full extent of the AUKUS partnership, directed against China, is becoming increasingly apparent. The treaty was initially headlined by the provision of long-range nuclear-powered attack submarines to Australia. That was itself a major step toward confrontation with China, against which the submarines would be deployed.

The latest announcement said the allies would also work together to overhaul their military innovation systems, and deepen information-sharing on the development of advanced military capabilities. AUKUS covers a wide range of weaponry and intelligence collaboration, including cyber warfare, artificial intelligence, quantum technology and undersea drone systems.

The announcement referred vaguely to work progressing on “other critical defense and security capabilities” as well. These would include agreements struck over the past two years to expand the US use of air, naval and land bases in Australia.

In addition, the announcement revealed a series of top-level government and military meetings between the three allies to advance their war plans. Senior national security advisers from each country met on March 10 to review the partnership’s “pleasing” progress, and multiple steering group meetings have occurred.

According to the Australian Financial Review, 17 trilateral working groups are working under the AUKUS banner, with nine focused on the submarines, and eight relating to other advanced military capabilities.

In February, officials from the three countries inspected locations across Australia, reportedly to review sites to build and operate the submarines. Shortly after that, Morrison said $10 billion would be spent building a submarine base and another $5 billion expanding a repair and maintenance shipyard.

While not naming China as the target, the announcement showed how the US and its allies are exploiting the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which the US and NATO deliberately provoked, to prepare for a similar conflict with China. The three leaders said action was needed to combat “coercion” in the light of Russia’s invasion. That allegation that has been levelled increasingly against Beijing, with unsubstantiated claims that it could invade Taiwan.

US Democratic Party congressman Joe Courtney, who co-chairs the Friends of Australia Congressional Caucus, which has its own “AUKUS Caucus” taskforce, underscored the importance attached by the Biden administration to Australia as a base for war.

Courtney told the Australian Financial Review: “It’s blindingly obvious that when you look at the aggression and the size of the Chinese navy, the US clearly has to pivot into the region, and the region is so vast that we need allies like Australia ready.”

Morrison is planning a “khaki election,” based on beating the drums of war in order to divert from the intense political and social crisis produced by the deadly “live with the virus” policies that have intensified the COVID-19 pandemic, soaring levels of social inequality and the devastating impact of climate-related floods and bushfires.

The Liberal-National Coalition prime minister trumpeted AUKUS as “the most significant defence agreement this country has entered into since the ANZUS Treaty 70 years ago” and said he had achieved what “no other prime minister has been able to secure”—a US commitment to share its nuclear technology.

A day earlier, Morrison and Defence Minister Peter Dutton declared that Australian fighter jets and warships would be armed with long-range strike missiles by 2024, three years earlier than promised, as part of another $3.5 billion military upgrade.

US military industry giants Raytheon and Lockheed Martin would work to “rapidly increase” Australia’s ability to maintain and manufacture guided weapons. This would further integrate Australia into US military operations.

Dutton, who is vying to replace the increasingly discredited Morrison, stepped up his aggressive accusations against China. He told the Nine Network that China was “on course” to take over Taiwan, Chinese President Xi Jinping was an “autocrat” and “China is arming herself with more nuclear weapons.”

The AUKUS expansion is part of a series of escalating military commitments. Last month Morrison’s government said it would spend $1 billion to build missiles and guided weapons in Australia.

However, led by Anthony Albanese, Labor is just as ready to conduct a “khaki election.” Labor has insisted it has no difference with the anti-China offensive. In fact, Albanese has sought to outdo the Coalition, boasting that Labor initiated the US alliance during World War II.

Moreover, Albanese has criticised the government for leaving “gaps” in military capabilities until the submarines are delivered over the next two decades.

This week, Albanese told an April 5 Canberra doorstop media conference he was concerned about “government cuts to our important Defence Budget.” That dovetails with the criticisms being made in key ruling circles, such as by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a pro-US thinktank that has pushed for an even more aggressive anti-China stance.

Likewise, Australian foreign editor Greg Sheridan yesterday accused the government of making “self-congratulatory artificial timing announcements.” He said there was a “fundamental mismatch” between its “rhetoric of national security and its astonishing lack of action.”

Labor’s response is a warning. Like the current Coalition government, a Labor-led government would only increase the vast military build-up, and seek to impose its burden on working people through deeper cuts to public health, education, housing and other essential social programs.

Bank of International Settlements chief says new era of inflation has begun

Nick Beams


The head of the Bank for International Settlements has warned of a “new inflationary era” that will require major changes in the policies of central banks.

In a speech delivered in Geneva on Tuesday, Agustin Carstens, the general manager of the BIS, the umbrella organisation of the world’s central banks, made clear these changes will be directed against the working class as he pointed to the increased risk of a “dangerous wage-price spiral.”

Carstens acknowledged that for himself and other central bankers the inflation surge had come as a complete surprise, puncturing the long-cultivated myth that the leading capitalist economists and financial officials have some superior knowledge about the workings of the economic system over which they preside.

A graph on the BIS website (bis.org)

“The shift in the inflationary environment has been remarkable,” he said. “If you had asked me a year ago to lay out the key challenges for the global economy, I could have given you a long list, but high inflation would not have made the cut.”

On the same day, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development reported that consumer prices in the world’s 30 richest countries had risen by 7.7 percent in February compared with just 1.7 percent a year ago.

Carstens noted that almost 60 percent of advanced countries had price rises of more than 5 percent—the highest proportion since the 1980s—with the inflation rate in more than half of emerging market economies running above 7 percent.

The inflation surge may have been completely unanticipated but when it comes to dealing with it, the representatives of the profit system have an unerring class instinct.

The change in circumstances meant that a change in the paradigm was called for, Carstens said. “That change requires a broader recognition in policymaking that boosting long-term resilient growth cannot rely on repeated macroeconomic stimulus, be it monetary or fiscal. It can only be achieved through structural policies that strengthen the productive capacity of the economy.”

Long experience has revealed the meaning of these words. In a capitalist economy, based on the drive for profit, increasing “productive capacity” means deepening the attacks on the working class, whose labour power is the source of all profit, through a combination of wage cuts, the reduction of social spending and the development of more intense work methods.

Carstens indicated that in his view loose monetary policy and expanded government spending programs had helped cause the “flare up” in consumer prices. “Policy settings, at least over the past year, may have served as a springboard for the rapid expansion.”

Noting that by some metrics, labour markets look even tighter than they did pre-COVID, he said inflation had started to affect the “cost of living” and there were early signs that wage growth had become more sensitive to inflation over the past year. That was an oblique reference to the rise of wages struggles around the world.

No one wanted a repeat of the 1970s, Carstens said, recalling a period when major struggles by the working class shook the profit system.

But the “good news” was that central banks were aware of the risks and it was clear that “policy [interest] rates need to rise to levels that are more appropriate for the high-inflation environment.” Most likely this would require that interest rates rise “in order to moderate demand.”

As always, these prescriptions are cast in language aimed at obscuring their essential class content, as if the economy did not involve the lives of billions of workers but was some kind of machine.

The content of his remarks was that if workers fight for wage increases to compensate them for past losses and seek to combat the rampant inflation of today, then central banks must hike rates to bring about a recession and create unemployment. Carstens described this euphemistically as “moderating demand.”

Officials of the world’s major central bank, the US Federal Reserve, are singing from the same song sheet. On Tuesday, Lael Brainard, a member of the Fed’s board of governors and awaiting Senate confirmation as Fed vice chair, issued a call for “stronger” action if necessary to lift interest rates. She indicated she was also in favour of a “rapid” reduction in the Fed’s $9 trillion holdings of financial assets.

Speaking to a conference organised by the Minneapolis branch of the Fed, she said it was of paramount importance to get inflation down. The Fed would continue to tighten monetary policy both by lifting interest rates and by “starting to reduce the balance sheet as a rapid pace as soon as our May meeting.”

Minutes of the Fed’s March meeting, released yesterday, showed it was developing a plan to cut its asset holdings by $95 billion a month from next month.

Brainard’s remarks were significant both because of her position and also because last year she insisted that the Fed should not be premature in pulling back stimulus measures.

Following Fed chair Jerome Powell, she also invoked Paul Volcker who, as Fed chair in the 1980s, drove interest rates to record highs, resulting in deep recession, to crush wage demands.

But the Fed’s attempts to restore economic order are far from plain sailing under conditions of worsening global turmoil. Those responsible for directing the policy of the state face a resurgent working class on the one hand and a fragile financial system caused by continuous injections of money on the other.

In his annual letter to shareholders issued earlier this week, Jamie Dimon, the head of JPMorgan, the biggest US bank, said the US economy was facing unprecedented risks.

Dimon warned that the war in Ukraine could collide with inflation. These developments, he wrote, “present completely different circumstances than what we’ve experienced in the past and their consequences may dramatically increase the risks ahead.”

The letter was in marked contrast to that of a year ago in which Dimon held out the prospect for a “Goldilocks” economy in which there would be sustained growth coupled with a small upward drift in inflation and interest rates.

Today, the Fed could move interest rates higher than markets expect—a process that would cause “lots of consternation and very volatile markets.”

The war in Ukraine along with sanctions, would “at a minimum” slow the global economy amid turmoil in commodity markets. Additional sanctions, which he supports, could “dramatically and unpredictably” worsen the situation.

“Along with the unpredictability of war itself and the uncertainty surrounding global commodity supply chains, this makes for a potentially explosive situation.”

Global life expectancy drops two years since the start of the pandemic

Evan Blake & Benjamin Mateus


A major study published in March in the journal Population and Development Review estimates that global life expectancy declined by roughly 0.92 years in 2020 and another 0.72 years in 2021. These are the first declines in global life expectancy since the United Nations began tracking this figure in 1950 and the worst since World War II killed an estimated more than 70 million people.

The study, written by sociologist Dr. Patrick Heuveline of the University of California, Los Angeles, is highly significant in that it is the first to estimate global life expectancy declines from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report notes, “Annual declines in life expectancy … appear to have exceeded two years at some point before the end of 2021 in at least 50 countries. Since 1950, annual declines of that magnitude had only been observed on rare occasions, such as Cambodia in the 1970s, Rwanda in the 1990s, and possibly some sub-Saharan African nations at the peak of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) pandemic.”

Prior to 2020, there had been an uninterrupted 69-year rise in life expectancy since the United Nations began calculating this figure, from 1950 when life expectancy was 45.7 years until 2019 when it had reached 72.6 years, with an average of 0.39 years of life added annually.

Global life expectancy, 2010–2021 (both sexes, in years). SOURCE: 2010–2019, United Nations (2019); 2010–2021, author's calculations (see the Appendix for details)

The report notes, “The largest annual gains, more than 0.7 year from 1964 to 1968, reflect the success of global public health campaigns, in particular childhood vaccination programs.” Additional public health initiatives adopted in many countries at the time included the filtering and chlorinating of water supplies, the development of sanitation infrastructure, swamp drainage, milk pasteurization and mass vaccination campaigns, among many other scientific achievements.

Over the last two decades, this progressive expansion of life expectancy came under increasing attack, as the dissolution of the USSR in 1991 and the eruption of American imperialism initiated three decades of unrelenting social counterrevolution on a world scale. The report notes that in the years preceding the pandemic, “annual gains in global life expectancy … declined below their 1950–2019 average of 0.39 years, dipping below 0.3 years from 2015 to 2018 and below 0.2 years in 2019.”

The pandemic has rapidly accelerated this retrogression and has proven to be one of the deadliest pathogens to have ever ravaged human civilization. The comparison of the pandemic to world wars is no hyperbole. According to a study published in The Lancet, global excess deaths in the last two years stood at 18.2 million by the end of 2021, nearly equivalent to all the deaths during World War I.

Unlike previous pandemics, every aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic was both foreseeable and preventable, as documented by dozens of scholarly papers, books and even films released just since the start of the 21st century. At every step of the way, the financial oligarchy and its political representatives ensured that profits were prioritized over human lives and well-being.

To put it succinctly, the decline in life expectancy is a concrete health measure of the policies of social murder, whose monetary values can be appraised by the coinciding rise in stock market indices.

In the United States and many other countries, sections of the ruling elites have long advocated lowering life expectancy. They welcomed the pandemic as a positive good to cull the elderly and infirm, reduce pension obligations and cut social services.

Lexie, 6, left, Charlie, 8, right, and their mom wait in an exam room before Charlie has an MRI during a long day of testing at Children's National Hospital, in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 26, 2022. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

At a national level, eight countries experienced substantial declines in life expectancy of more than four years over the last two years. These include five countries in Latin America—Peru (5.6 years), Guatemala (4.8), Paraguay (4.7), Bolivia (4.1) and Mexico (4.0)—and three in Europe, including Russia (4.3), Bulgaria (4.1) and North Macedonia (4.1).

The study estimates that in 53 countries, including the United States, life expectancy declined by over two years during the worst 12-month period of the pandemic. Numerous other countries experienced even worse 12-month periods of declining life expectancy, including Tunisia (3.4 years), South Africa (3.1), Egypt (2.3), Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.0), North Macedonia (4.0), the Philippines (3.0), India (2.6), Kazakhstan (3.2), Lebanon (3.4) and more. However, multiple countries in the Asia-Pacific region where elimination strategies were employed, including China with a population of 1.4 billion people, life expectancy climbed.

To appreciate the full impact of the study’s findings, it is worth noting that in 2019 the United Nations anticipated that global life expectancy would rise by 0.18 years in 2020. The implication is that had the ruling elites taken the necessary measures to eliminate COVID-19 in January-March 2020, the world’s population would have expected a life span two years higher than now exists. Instead, global life expectancy has dropped to below 2013 levels, with one decade of gains in life expectancy vanishing for all of mankind.

Alongside the massive loss of life, there has also been a tremendous loss of livelihood. A recent study conducted by researchers from the University of Michigan estimated that roughly 43 percent of reported infections worldwide have led to Long COVID, with more than 100 million people likely experiencing various symptoms which can impact nearly every organ in the body.

In a significant subset of Long COVID patients, the condition can be quite debilitating and lead to the inability to work or care for themselves. Recent studies have associated even mild COVID-19 infections with an increase in all-cause mortality.

The report by Dr. Heuveline serves as a devastating indictment of the response of world capitalism to this global catastrophe. Expressing the silent brutality of the bourgeoisie, not a single corporate media outlet has reported on the groundbreaking study. The silence of the media and all world governments on the report underscores their culpability in the greatest social crime since World War II.

Outside of China and a handful of countries in the Asia-Pacific region which eliminated COVID-19 in early 2020, world capitalist governments refused to implement the measures necessary to stop the transmission of the virus. Instead, they pursued either the most brutal “herd immunity” strategy of mass infection or maintained a pretense of implementing limited mitigation measures, all of which were scrapped during the surge of the Omicron BA.1 subvariant.

These policies caused the evolution of ever more infectious and vaccine-resistant variants, with the Omicron BA.2 subvariant the most dangerous so far. China is now the only major country still fighting for a Zero-COVID strategy and is presently battling its worst outbreak since the start of the pandemic due to the BA.2 variant, with a record of over 20,000 infections reported on Tuesday.

The Western media now brays for China to abandon Zero-COVID, knowing full well that this could cause millions of deaths throughout the densely populated country. At the same time, they are cheerleading the US-NATO escalation of the drive to war with Russia which threatens to unleash a nuclear World War III.

Both the response to the pandemic and the escalating drive to war express the criminality and bankruptcy of the capitalist system, which is hurtling mankind toward disaster. The same criminal financial oligarchy that has gorged itself and amassed trillions of dollars since the start of the pandemic now strives for an imperialist carve-up of Russia, China and the entire Eurasian landmass to directly exploit the region’s vast resources and working class population.

Just before the start of the Omicron surge, the World Socialist Web Site initiated the Global Workers’ Inquest into the COVID-19 Pandemic, which is gathering testimony from workers, scientists and anti-COVID activists throughout the world to uncover and document the disastrous response to the pandemic. These efforts must be expanded in every country and the findings popularized within the working class.

Above all, it is vitally necessary to build a mass movement rooted in the international working class fighting intransigently against war and for a strategy to eliminate COVID-19 throughout the world.

Only the universal deployment of every public health measure on a world scale, including paid lockdowns, mass testing, contact tracing, the isolation of infected patients and quarantining of exposed people, the globally coordinated provision of vaccines and treatments, the provision and mandating of high quality N95 or better masks, and more, can stop the pandemic and renew the growth of global life expectancy.

6 Apr 2022

Minority Africa Fellowship 2022

Application Deadline:

24th April 2022.

Tell Me About Minority Africa Fellowship:

The Minority Africa Fellowship, a project by Minority Africa — a digital publication using data-driven multimedia journalism to tell African minority stories — targets journalists and storytellers from minority groups across Africa providing them with the platform, skill, and mentorship to report stories from and about their communities.

Through an intensive six-month paid program, fellows will polish their existing reporting abilities both from a skill and thematic perspective but will also be trained on the intersecting areas and groups of focus for the fellowship. This means that fellows are taught and leave the fellowship knowing how to cover groups outside of the immediate communities they belong to.

These groups include women, sexual, gender, ethnic, and religious minorities, persons with disabilities, migrants, asylum seekers, as well as refugees. We nonetheless acknowledge that all minorities across the continent do not fall under these broad categories and also focus on groups that exist outside of these general definitions.  

Fellows will be trained by journalists from the Minority Africa newsroom as well as a network of journalists who work for or have worked across the continent with the Associated Press, Agence France Presse, Reuters, RFI, CNN, The Guardian, Time, and began legacy media companies tackling present media problems including one praised by former US President Barack Obama.

This training program includes modules on solutions journalism, data journalism, interrogating the scope of inclusive futures within the metaverse, as NFTs and AI adoption grow, and the geopolitics of climate change among others. 

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Fellowship

Who can apply for Minority Africa Fellowship?

Fellows have to be at least 18 years of age, they have to be from and living in an African country and belong to at least one of the minority groups highlighted in the focus areas above. They can be writers, photographers, filmmakers, journalists, or a combination of all and have relevant and provable work experience in their chosen areas. 

Which Countries are Eligible?

African countries

Where will Award be Taken?

Online

How Many Fellowships will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of Minority Africa Fellowship?

Fellows will be paid a monthly allowance, receive an internet stipend, and intra-country travel related to the coverage of stories will be covered by Minority Africa.

During the fellowship, fellows will be familiarized with editorial guidelines of Minority Africa and will work and report on stories for the publication. They are paired with external mentors, work with editors in the newsroom, and are required to produce at least two stories every month. 

By the end of the program, each fellow would have published 12 stories on Minority Africa. These stories will be a blend of reported multimedia features as well as opinions and analysis. The program is entirely virtual and the first cohort runs from May to October 2022. 

How Long will the Program Last?

6 months

How to Apply for Minority Africa Fellowship:

All applications have to be submitted online and through our secure application form on this website. Applications received over email will not be considered. Applications for the first cohort open on the 1st of April 2022 and close on the 24th of April 2022.

Apply Now

Visit Award Webpage for Details

UK government axes coronavirus infection control funding in social care

Stephan Alexander


From April 1, key funding for infection control in social care settings, including free lateral flow testing (LFT) for visitors and sick pay for the precariously employed workforce has been discontinued. Free testing will be wound up a few weeks later by the devolved governments in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

The move, which comes as the BA.2 variant is producing a record wave of infections and hundreds of deaths daily, will leave relatives and friends of the elderly and clinically vulnerable shouldering considerable costs. Those wishing to take a test before visiting a care home or for keeping loved ones safe in their own homes will now have to pay for an LFT. The legal requirement for people visiting care homes to take a test has been lifted, provoking widespread concerns that the sick, disabled, and elderly will be exposed to the virus.

In this April 20, 2020, photo, nurses guide a resident at Wren Hall nursing home in the central England village of Selston. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein)

Nadra Ahmed, chair of the National Care Association, said, “Visitors should never have been left out of the free testing regime, as they’re coming into high-risk environments for themselves and loved ones.

“This is a community of frail, vulnerable people with complex medical conditions and we know the virus is still out there and is highly infectious within communities, and no testing is now the new normal.”

Charity and care sector leaders have condemned the end of free testing as a “tax on caring”. Observing safe testing protocols for vulnerable relatives is an additional financial burden for working-class families, under conditions of a steep rise in the cost of living estimated to plunge 1.3 million people into absolute poverty in the UK. It could cost visitors to care homes upwards of £70 per month to individually fund the previous LFT testing protocols, providing yet another pandemic profit stream for big business.

Many firms are now jumping on the gravy train, with some charging exorbitant prices for the LFT kits they sell. Office supplies company Ryman, for example, is selling packs of 20 kits for £300, or £15 for a single test which some experts say cost only “pennies” to manufacture. More reliable PCR tests, which can confirm a COVID infection, are also no longer free. Here, private companies are charging anything between £45 and £100 for a single test. Those on a minimum hourly wage of £9.50 would have to work between 5 and 10 hours to pay for one test.

The abandonment of all public health measures will further isolate the clinically vulnerable, who have already effectively been excluded from safe access to society as ever more virulent coronavirus strains have been allowed to spread uncontrolled through workplaces, schools and the wider community.

A spokesperson for the Alzheimer’s Society said, “Over the past two years, we’ve consistently heard many tragic stories from families struggling to visit their loved ones in care homes. With infection rates rising once again, the government must provide free lateral flow tests for all visitors to care homes so that families are not put in an agonising position where they are forced to ration visits, leaving people with dementia once again isolated and alone.”

Even before the impact of these measures, infection rates in those aged 70 and older are already at the highest since records began, according to the Office for National Statistics. In the week ending March 18, 2022, there were 325 Covid-related deaths in those aged 86 years or older—25 more than the previous week. The same period saw 187 Covid deaths in those aged 75 to 84, with the next highest death toll (78 deaths) recorded in individuals aged 65 to 74.

The recent Vivaldi study of 15,000 care home residents, backed by the UK government’s Health Security Agency, found that immunity against hospitalisation and death declines rapidly in older generations compared to the young in the three to seven months following a second dose of the vaccine.

Although a second booster shot (or fourth dose) for the elderly (aged 75+) and vulnerable is now available, the roll out is slow and less than half the severely clinically vulnerable have had one. It remains to be seen how well the booster will perform against the BA.2 variant and further mutations that mass infection will produce.

For the moment social care staff, National Health Service (NHS) workers and other “high risk” workforces such as prison officers, will retain access to free testing together with care home visitors who perform personal care for relatives. Testing for residents, however, will only be carried out during a suspected outbreak instead of routine weekly testing.

Testing for domiciliary carers is to be reduced to twice per week rather than daily, in line with the guidance for care homes. Those providing home care can visit upward of a dozen households in a single week. The reduction in testing will increase the risk of infection for the nearly one million people dependent on such visits in the UK.

If more evidence were needed of the Conservative government’s homicidal disregard for the lives and health of society’s most vulnerable, it is laid bare by the latest testing guidance for severely immunocompromised adults. Although they will have access to some free tests, they are instructed to test only if they become symptomatic, when it may well be too late to save them from serious health complications or death. Their family members and friends will have to pay if they want regular testing, even if they live in the same household as a vulnerable relative.

Even before these measures, the effectiveness of testing in social care settings had already been drastically undermined with the sector on its knees from the combined impact of the pandemic and decades of austerity cuts and privatisation. Staff shortages stand at well over 10 percent of the workforce (120,000 in England alone), with attrition rates as high as 30 percent due to poverty wages and intolerable working conditions across the sector.

In the face of a renewed surge of the virus, such is the staffing crisis in care that many providers are encouraging infected staff to continue working if they are asymptomatic or develop only mild symptoms. Somerset Council public health consultant Alison Bell said, “In some cases, we have no choice but to have people who are testing positive delivering care to people in Somerset. That risk is actually less than that person not receiving care.”

Besides comprehensive free testing, a raft of other essential public health protections and support programmes have been abandoned as of April 1. These include:

  • Funding for sick pay for those self-isolating under the Adult Social Care Infection Control Fund has ended. The fund was introduced in May 2020, after the first deadly wave in care homes was linked partly to the absence of sick pay across the heavily privatised sector, which meant that workers could not afford to stay at home when infected.
  • Limits on workforce movements between care homes have been lifted. These were set up due to high levels of transmission related to the widespread dependence of the sector on heavily exploited agency workers who work shifts piecemeal across many different care homes and hospitals over a large geographical area.
  • The UK-wide compensation scheme which had provided families of NHS and social care staff who died of Covid with a miserly £60,000 bereavement payment has been closed, even though workers in the sector continue to die from workplace exposure. Ten NHS staff have died of COVID since the start of December 2021, according to official figures. Some 922 care workers died from COVID between the start of the pandemic and May 2021 in England, according to the workforce development body Skills for Care.