5 Sept 2023

UK schools, hospitals, houses and other public buildings at risk of collapse in expanding RAAC concrete scandal

Thomas Scripps


Since the government revealed last Friday that over 150 schools had been identified as at risk of collapse due to the use of RAAC concrete, three days before they were due to reopen for the start of term, evidence of a far more widespread problem and of countless warnings ignored has been pouring in.

Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete is a lightweight material mostly used for flat roofing between the 1950s and the 1990s—cheaper and quicker to produce and install. Moisture and polluted air significantly reduce its strength over time. It was given a usable lifespan of roughly 30 years, though a Building Research Establishment report in 2002 warned that there was a risk of collapse without warning in panels over 20 years old.

Reinforced Aerated Autoclaved Concrete (RAAC), close-up view [Photo by Marco Bernardini, own work / CC BY-SA 3.0]

Over 100 schools have been ordered to fully or partially close, with “mitigations”—largely consisting of propping up faulty roofs—already in place at another 50.

It is only through sheer luck that no one has yet been seriously hurt or killed. Collapses involving RAAC are known to have taken place in schools in 2017, 2018 and this summer, fortunately while the buildings were empty.

Thousands of children and school workers are potentially still at risk. According to Education Secretary Gillian Keegan, around 1,500 schools are yet to complete checks to find out whether they have RAAC, and another 450 suspect they do but are waiting for an official assessment. The fact that the problem was investigated by survey rather than an urgent system of inspections is a crime meaning dangerous cases of RAAC have been missed elsewhere.

Government statements that 95 percent of schools are likely to be unaffected suggests around 700 with problems. The NAHT union has written to the government noting that it told the National Audit Office in May, “that there were 8,600 schools which might have RAAC that had not been investigated.”

Urgent warnings have been sounded for years. The Local Government Association has raised the issue repeatedly since 2018. In 2019, the Standing Committee on Structural Safety labelled RAAC a “significant risk”. The Office for Government Property reported in 2021 and 2022 that RAAC was “now life-expired and liable to collapse”.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was told while serving as Boris Johnson’s Chancellor that there was “a critical risk to life” in schools if rebuilding work was not carried out. The former head civil servant at the Department for Education told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme Monday that they had requested the money to rebuild 300-400 schools a year and were given the funds for just 100 by Sunak, which was later cut to 50.

Sunak and current Chancellor Jeremy Hunt have taken the same attitude even in the face of popular uproar. With pictures of collapsed classrooms on the front of every newspaper, Treasury officials briefed that there would be no new money made available either to fix building or provide alternative accommodation and transport. It would have to come from the existing, savaged, education budget. Statements to the contrary have been made since, but with no details provided.

According to the National Audit Office, RAAC is present in at least 41 hospitals. Twenty-four of these have buildings identified as at risk of collapse, with seven hospitals requiring a full rebuild. Documents seen by the Sunday Times warn of “catastrophic” and “likely” collapse. Many trusts already have steel and wooden props in place, with staff being asked to carry out regular inspections.

The problem is compounded by asbestos, present in 90 percent of schools and hospitals. To date, the official response to Britain’s worst work-related killer—inhaled particles are highly carcinogenic—has been to “manage” the substance in place, on the basis that it is only unsafe when damaged or disturbed. Collapses, or even minor structural damage, could therefore release clouds of toxic fibres.

Court and other government buildings have also been flagged for RAAC, with Harrow Crown Court already closed for at least nine months.

Building survey Rapleys has warned the material is also very likely to have been used in flat roof, low rise public housing developments, putting a huge number of households in danger. Work it has conducted on the public estate previously suggests 5-10 percent of public buildings from the 50s, 60s and 70s use RAAC panels.

The one certainty is that the government has no idea of the full scale of the emergency and is trying to keep a lid on what it does know. Sunak insisted that he was in no way responsible for his own actions when chancellor, while an embattled Gillian Keegan was recorded proclaiming that she had done a “f…ing good job”, while unnamed “others” had “sat on their arses”.

RAAC is a prime example of a crumbling public infrastructure, sabotaged by relentless funding cuts. Schools in the UK have a maintenance and repair backlog of £11.4 billion—more than a third of buildings in the school estate are past their initial design life. The figure for the National Health Service is £10 billion, and for the courts, £1 billion. Outstanding repairs on roads total £14 billion, and another £6 billion on bridges. The estimated cost of post-Grenfell fire remedial work on tower blocks is £15 billion. Figures are not available, but the state of disrepair across the UK’s council housing estate is infamous.

All of mainstream politics is designed to conceal the basic cause of the UK’s worsening health, education and general living standards—the funnelling of an ever-greater share of social wealth into the bank accounts of the super-rich and the major corporations.

The Labour Party has tried to score a few propaganda points against the Tories for even refusing to provide a list of impacted schools and for its constant public spending cuts. They have even pointed to a commitment of funding for school construction made prior to the election of the Tories in 2010—13 years ago! But Labour under Sir Keir Starmer now boasts of its unbreakable commitment to “fiscal responsibility.” By pledging to big business and the banks to spend no more than the Tories, Labour is promising to do nothing to address crises like the RAAC scandal or any of the hundred other social issues confronting the working class. Only two weeks ago, Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves was writing off tax rises for the super-rich with the line “[I] don’t have any spending plans that require us to raise £12 billion.”

Labour and the Tories are the parties of a financial and corporate oligarchy and their upper middle-class hangers-on, whose privately educated and insured families have no stake whatsoever in preserving a decent education or any other social right to the broad mass of the working class.

In 1975, the value of public assets was equal to 137 percent of annual national income, while the value of private assets was 365 percent. By 2021, private wealth had grown to 650 percent—mostly held by a small fraction of the population—while public wealth had fallen to negative 75 percent, taking account of government debts. Catastrophic events like the Grenfell Tower fire and the experiences of millions in the pandemic testify to the terrible consequences of this looting.

Fascist mobs terrorise migrants in Cyprus while police turn blind eye

Robert Stevens


Migrants on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus have been subject to pogrom-type attacks by fascist groups. The political groundwork for these attacks has been laid by the governments of the European Union (EU), which have whipped up hostility to migrants month after month.

The pogroms have taken place over a two week period while police and riot cop squads, known to be hotbeds of far-right activity, turned a blind eye.

The attacks were instigated by members of the far right Elam organisation (National Popular Front, also known as the National People’s Front). But they began when the authorities cut off the water and electricity supply to an apartment complex where Syrian refugees live in the village of Chlorakas, near the western resort of Paphos. This provocative, inhumane act was carried out in scorching 40-degree heat.

The refugees were then evicted from the complex. Al Jazeera described “a police sweep” carried out “to evict dozens of refugees allegedly living there illegally.” This was authorised even though the migrants—as noted by KISA, the Cyprus-based anti-racist NGO—“have been permanently and legally settled in Cyprus for years.

The August 21 operation was ordered by President Nikos Christodoulides in a meeting “with the attorney general, ministers of interior and justice, deputy welfare minister, undersecretary to the president and police chief.”

The Cyprus Mail noted that under the order, “The migration department will begin noting down all asylum seekers who have been living in the contentious Ayios Nikolaos apartment bloc in Chlorakas.” Government spokesman Konstantinos Letymbiotis said that those deemed to be legally in Cyprus would have to find another place to live, and in the interim would be sent to the Kofinou immigration detention centre, the newspaper reported, and “Those living here illegally will be arrested and deported immediately.”

As refugees protested their persecution, they were confronted over two nights (August 27-28) by a mob of racists and fascists who on the second night declared they were leading an “anti-ghettoisation” demonstration. On the first night, at least 1,000 fascists “splintered into smaller groups that began attacking foreign nationals living in Chlorakas,” reported the Cyprus Mail.

It added, “Businesses owned by migrants saw their shop fronts smashed and vehicles overturned.

“One Cypriot resident charged that a group of thugs broke into a home with seven children and their mother and began breaking things inside the house.

“Another elderly Cypriot man said they were warned that Elam members may ‘punish’ locals who chose not to participate in the protest.”

Video footage from Monday night showed around 250 Greek Cypriots chanting “get out, get out,” marking the second night in a row of racist attacks against foreign nationals living in Chlorakas. Cyprus Mail reported, “Earlier on Monday, a group of some 500 Syrian residents held a peaceful demonstration, as a reaction to the previous night’s violent attacks against them. Shop windows were smashed and migrants beaten and threatened.”

Of an initial 21 arrested, there were more migrants and refugees detained (12) than there were fascists (9). This was despite the police chief, as reported by Al Jazeera, telling “state broadcaster CyBC on Tuesday [August 29] that the clashes began when Greek Cypriots attempted to assault the migrants and refugees.”

President Christodoulides authorised more police to be flooded into the area. Tensions were whipped up, with Christodoulides’ press officer Victoras Papadopoulos pandering to fascist sentiment with the comment, “Since the day the government took over [in February 2023], it has been tackling immigration and illegal migration in every way possible. Arrivals have been reduced by half, returns have increased and applications are being processed twice as fast.”

These policies saw asylum claims drop from 10,600 during the period March to July 2022, to just 4,976 in the same period this year. This represents a doubling down on the anti-immigration policies of the previous government under Nicos Anastasiades, whose interior ministry declared the Chlorakas area off-limits to new migrant arrivals in 2021. Anastasiades’s government had already slashed the number of immigrants allowed into the country. In 2022, it carried out around 7,000 returns, the most in relation to population of any EU country.

Migrants walk near the Pournara Emergency Reception center, in Kokkinotrimithia, on the outskirts of the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, April 18, 2022. [AP Photo/Petros Karadjias, File]

The government intervention emboldened the fascists who went on the rampage again last Friday in Limassol, the second largest urban area in Cyprus after Nicosia. This time the police stood down entirely and allowed the mob to terrorise refugees and anyone who they viewed to be foreign. The Cyprus Mail reported, “The anti-immigrant protest held in Limassol… revealed a rampant extremism that had no qualms about destroying everything in sight, and a shocking failure from police to keep the situation under control.”

It added, “Children were in sight as firecrackers were thrown randomly and that no one died during the violence was nothing short of a miracle.” The pogrom was led by around “200 black-clad rioters screaming ‘Cyprus is Greek’ and began with the chant ‘we’ll start with the blacks first and then police.’”

The report continued, “Thugs targeted anyone with the ‘wrong’ skin colour. An Asian woman who saw her business smashed to pieces sat on the pavement unable to speak through her sobs, managing only to choke out ‘I have four children’. The protestors who chanted they wanted migrants out of the country broke the till of her store and stole all her money that she wanted to send to family back home…

“Targeted attacks towards migrants went unchecked by police, and businesses owned by foreign nationals such as a Syrian barbershop and food place were smashed to pieces… Despite it being a well-known fact that the seafront has a host of multicultural businesses, there were no police officers to man the area and ward off violent protesters.”

The article noted, “A group of Syrian men that saw their shop smashed to pieces stared at the scene in shock and said ‘there were five police cars here and they didn’t do anything. They saw everything… the infamous police water cannon Aiantas stood there idly, and ultimately served as a decorative accessory.”

It concluded that “ultimately on Friday night, it was the thugs that controlled the area, not the police” even “Though police knew since at least the day before about the planned protest, and after a week of violent incidents in Chlorakas village.”

Reports attest to the fact that locals and tourists came to the defence of migrants, protecting them as best they could.

Labour Minister Yiannis Panayiotou said in an interview on CyBC’s morning programme Monday that, “No one should be taking the law into their own hands.” This was reported as a condemnation of the far-right, but the real implication is that the repression of migrants should be left in the hands of the government at this stage.

Panayiotou also urged that anti-migrant sentiment should not be allowed to jeopardise a vital source of cheap labour required by the capitalist class. “Economic migrants [must be processed differently] from those seeking refuge from danger whom we are under EU and international obligation to protect.” The Cyprus Mail reported “the minister explained… their status must be based on preconditions of economic necessity.”

Panayiotou noted that 110,000 third country nationals are currently employed on the island, compared to 340,000 Greek Cypriots, with another 10,000 Greek Cypriots registered unemployed.

Zelensky fires defense minister as US prepares for Ukraine war to last for years

Andre Damon


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced Sunday that he was replacing Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov amid the failure of Kiev’s NATO-backed summer offensive.

Despite the deaths of tens of thousands of Ukrainian troops in the 89 days since the start of the offensive, Kiev’s forces have advanced only a few kilometers.

Ukrainian Minister of Defense Oleksii Reznikov talks to the media after the meeting of the 'Ukraine Defense Contact Group' at Ramstein Air Base in Ramstein, Germany, Friday, April 21, 2023. Reznikov submitted a letter of resignation to the Parliamentary Speaker in Kiev, Ukraine, Monday, September 4, 2023. [AP Photo/Matthias Schrader]

Last month, the Washington Post reported that US intelligence agencies have concluded that the offensive will fail to reach its main objectives of driving to the Azov Sea in order to cut off the “land bridge” to the Crimean Peninsula.

Announcing Reznikov’s resignation, Zelensky called for “new approaches” in the conduct of the war.

The New York Times, citing Ukrainian officials who spoke off the record, said, “Ukraine will need new leadership as the war drags on.”

Reznikov’s replacement, Rustem Umerov, is the co-chair of the Crimea Platform, a diplomatic initiative founded in 2021 to secure international support for Ukraine’s efforts to reconquer the Crimean Peninsula, which was annexed by Russia in 2014.

The appointment of Umerov, a native of Crimea, sends a signal that, in the face of a military debacle, Kiev is doubling down on its goal of recapturing the peninsula. Umerov, not surprisingly, has close ties to the American state, having taken part in high school in the Future Leaders Exchange program funded by the US Department of State.

Rustem Umerov, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, attends the peace talks with Russian delegation in Gomel region, Belarus, on February 28, 2022. On Monday September 4, 2023 Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov submitted a letter of resignation after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he would be replaced, and named his successor, Rustem Umerov, a Crimean Tatar lawmaker, as the new defense minister. [AP Photo/Sergei Kholodilin/BelTA Pool Photo ]

Umerov is, moreover, an investment banker, a fact that will allow for an even more lucrative alignment between the war and the international and national financial interests that are profiting from the conflict.

Reznikov’s departure took place against the backdrop of a protracted government crisis that has been bound up with a series of corruption scandals implicating the Department of Defense, in particular. In January, a deputy defense minister and the department’s head of procurement were dismissed after revelations that the department overpaid for food provided to troops. At the time, it was also widely reported that Reznikov would be dismissed, yet he remained in his position. At the time, the Zelensky government initiated the most far-reaching purge since the beginning of the war in February 2022. Now, another purge of the state apparatus is under way.

In a statement to the Washington Post commenting on Reznikov’s ouster, the Ministry of Defense said that “several high-ranking officials of the Ministry of Defense were removed from their posts and became subjects to investigation.”

A day before Reznikov’s dismissal, Ukraine’s domestic security service detained Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky on suspicion of fraud and money-laundering. Kolomoisky had been closely associated with Zelensky during the latter’s television career and was an early political backer. In May, the head of the country’s supreme court was arrested on charges of bribery. And on Friday, a former deputy minister of economy accused of misappropriating money for humanitarian needs had bail set at $25,000.

With more than $100 billion in US and international money flowing into Ukraine, corruption has been widespread. The New York Times reported that close to a billion dollars worth of weaponry had been paid for but not delivered. This is no doubt only a glimpse of the war profiteering and plunder that the Ukrainian oligarchy is engaged in as it sends hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian youth and workers to their almost certain death in the war. Corruption is second nature of a ruling class and state apparatus that emerged from the Stalinist destruction of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the orgy of plunder in the capitalist restoration that followed.  

The shakeup in the Ukrainian Defense Ministry comes amid widespread commentary in the US media preparing the American public for the war to stretch on for years.

In an op-ed in the Washington Post, Max Boot wrote, “Ukraine may have a better chance to win in 2024.” This is the same Max Boot who, less than three months before, had interviewed General David Petraeus as saying that he expects “the Ukrainians to achieve significant breakthroughs and accomplish much more than most analysts are predicting.”

This time, Boot cites another retired general, US Army Brig. Gen. Mark Arnold, who declared that he is “more optimistic about the prospects for decisive operations next year.” He quotes Arnold as saying, “I remain very skeptical that a decisive battle will occur this year that makes a material effect toward Ukrainian victory. That can happen next summer when the majority of maneuver equipment arrives from NATO into Ukraine.”

In another column along the same lines in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “How to Help Ukraine Win the War of Attrition,” Walter Russell Mead declares, “Second, current American strategy is not working well.” He writes that “victory” will require an American commitment to another endless war, declaring, “If this is a war of attrition, the US and its partners are well-placed to win. We just need to make up our minds and roll up our sleeves.”

In yet another variation of this theme, former British Army General Richard Barrons writes in the Financial Times, “Ukraine cannot win against Russia now, but victory by 2025 is possible.” He continues, “Ukraine’s current counteroffensive will not throw Russia out—not that anyone expected it to. Nor is it likely to cut the occupation in half before the winter, which might have been one of the more optimistic aims. It has, however, shown how the Russian army can be beaten. Not in 2023, but in 2024 or 2025.”

The general continues, “Ukraine will take until mid-2024 to reconstitute a sufficiently powerful air force and is very short of the key equipment needed to clear mines. Fixing all this will take the war into next year at the least.”

In January, US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley proclaimed that the US plan was to “go on the offensive to liberate Russian-occupied Ukraine” and to “liberate the occupied areas.” With officials having pledged the support for the sweeping goal of retaking Crimea and the Donbas, the US media has gone to work proclaiming that Ukraine’s spring offensive would lead to the collapse of Russian troops in the equivalent of the Normandy landings on D-Day.

Now, with the offensive having created a bloody disaster, US officials are preparing public opinion for a years-long conflict, in which the current death toll, now in the hundreds of thousands, could well stretch into the millions.

Effects of China slowdown spreading

Nick Beams



Auto assembly at World Robot Conference at the Etrong International Exhibition and Convention Center outside Beijing, Thursday, Aug. 17, 2023. [AP Photo/Andy Wong]

The effects of China’s economic slowdown, reflected most graphically in the ongoing turmoil in the real estate sector, a key driver of growth, are starting to ripple through the global economy. The major impact so far is in East Asian countries where indices of manufacturing are turning down.

Last week it was reported that purchasing managers’ indices in manufacturing for August had come in at below 50—the border between expansion and contraction—for Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

The contraction in South Korea was the 14th consecutive monthly decline, the longest downward run in the history of the survey, while the index for Japan showed its fifth monthly decline in a row.

Describing the situation in South Korea, the Financial Times (FT) said the manufacturing slump had “extended to its longest in nearly half a century” while other big exporters were also being hit by slow demand.

It said South Korea was viewed as a “bellwether” for the region’s technology supply chains “which has helped underpin global growth for decades.”

In another indicator of the extent of the slowdown, South Korean exports in July fell at the sharpest rate in more than three years with one of the main factors being the lower shipments of computer chips to China.

So far this year South Korea’s exports to China, which account for around 20 percent of its total, have fallen by 25 percent year-on-year in the first eight months of this year.

The situation is being regarded with increasing alarm in the South Korean political establishment and the country’s finance ministry has set up a special task force to monitor the economic situation in China.

“Korea is unlikely to see a recovery any time soon, unless the Chinese economy turns around rapidly,” Park Chon-goon, head of research at Standard Chartered in Seoul told the FT.

But there is virtually no possibility of a major lift in the Chinese economy because the Xi Jinping regime is opposed to providing the kind of stimulus measures employed in the past—increased government spending and an expansion of credit—because it fears such action will only exacerbate debt and financial problems.

There is some tinkering around the edges with financial authorities easing credit and lowering interest rates but nothing remotely approaching the measures of the past.

The longer-term significance of the China slowdown is revealed in the fact that from 2010 to 2019, when the world was still suffering the effects of the global financial crisis of 2008, its growth rate averaged around 9 percent. This year, the official target is just 5 percent, the lowest level in more than three decades, with some estimates that it will come in lower.

The effect of China on the global economy can be seen in an analysis by the International Monetary Fund. It has calculated that every percentage point increase in China’s growth adds 0.3 percentage points to the global growth rate.

Besides the three key East Asian industrial economies, South East Asian countries are also being hit by the China slowdown.

Vietnam, which exports garments, textiles, footwear and some electronic products, has reported that exports in the second quarter have fallen by 14 percent from a year ago. Growth rates in Malaysia and Thailand are also reported to be slowing.

The Asian economies are among the first to feel the effects of the China slowdown, but they will not be the last, according to an analysis by the Gavekal research organisation, which has a focus on China.

“As China’s economy weakens, foreign suppliers that grew fat supplying raw materials and machinery face lean times. The cratering of China’s property market will not quickly reverse, and conditions may worsen before they improve,” it said.

Two economies that fit that category are the US and Australia. The US firm Caterpillar, which supplies construction machinery, has said that the fall in Chinese demand for its products used on building sites is worse than expected.

Australia is a major supplier of industrial raw materials, in particular iron ore and coal. While exports have held up so far, providing needed tax revenue for the Albanese Labor government, the fall in the value of the Australian dollar, widely regarded as a marker for the Chinese economy, is an indication that this situation may not last.

Australia, along with Brazil and other raw material exporters, was one of the major beneficiaries of the previous stimulus measures. But they are not going to be repeated.

In a speech to the China International Finance Annual Forum held in Beijing on Sunday, Cai Fang, a leading labour market economist and policy adviser to the People’s Bank of China, outlined some of the reasons why.

Noting the decline in the Chinese population last year, the first ever recorded, he said China had entered a “new normal” which would create new conditions for the economy.

He said a shrinking and ageing population would ultimately affect long-term national growth.

“China’s potential in [economic growth] will fall further, even beyond original expectations,” Cai stated.

There have been predictions that China’s expected growth rate of 5 percent—already well below the 8 percent level that the government used to maintain was necessary to maintain “social stability”—could drop to around 3 percent by the end of the decade.

Dealing with more immediate questions, Cai said there was a mismatch between the labour market and changes in the industrial sector requiring production efficiencies which meant it would be hard to provide jobs, including for young people.

Over the past months the urban unemployment rate for young people aged 16 to 24 has been hitting new records, reaching 21.3 percent, prompting the government to stop publishing the data last month. But past methods to boost the economy are not going be carried out again, Cai told the forum attended by bankers and business chiefs from around the country.

“We need to recognise that traditional stimulus, which concentrated on infrastructure construction, is not going to work under the current economic situation,” he said.

“These would not be able to create many jobs, nor would those jobs created be suitable for the young population.”

Germany to acquire hypersonic anti-ballistic missile system—another step towards nuclear war

Gregor Link


In mid-August, the Israeli Defence Ministry announced it had received permission from the US to sell the Arrow 3 missile defence system to Germany. The procurement of the system by the German Defence Ministry still has to be confirmed by the parliaments of both countries, but this is considered a formality, according to observers. The German parliament’s budget and defence committees already approved the purchase in June. The move has far-reaching military and geo-strategic implications. According to the German air force, Arrow 3 could be operational as early as 2025.

Launch of an Arrow defence missile

Surrounding the new acquisition is discussion of preparations for nuclear war. The system consists of mobile missile units with a range of up to 2,400 kilometres and three radar systems. Deployed in Germany, Arrow 3 would cover all of Europe, including Moscow and Crimea, as well as half of Turkey and parts of Algeria and Libya. The projectile reaches more than ten times the speed of sound, can engage missiles at altitudes of up to 100 kilometres and can also be used against satellites. It is particularly suitable for combating weapons of mass destruction such as medium- and long-range missiles.

Costing almost four billion euros—paid for out of the 100 billion euro “special assets” fund for the German army—this is the largest arms deal in Israeli history. Ron Prosor, Israeli ambassador to Germany, welcomed the US approval, saying, “This is a historic day that marks a turning point in relations between Israel and Germany.” For the first time, he said, “an Israeli system will protect the skies over Germany and all of Europe.” Steffen Seibert, Germany’s ambassador to Israel, said the move would “add a very significant element to our military relations”.

While the procurement of Arrow 3 shines a spotlight on the close diplomatic and military ties between Germany and Israel, the decision also marks a shift away from other “marketable” missile defence systems, such as the US Terminal High Altitude Area Defense or a version of the French-Italian SAMP/T (MAMBA), which was delivered to the Ukrainian military in May and June.

War against nuclear powers

The acquisition of anti-ballistic hypersonic missiles is directly aimed at further escalating NATO’s proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. It is the military corollary to the insane statements of leading NATO politicians and military strategists that the west should not be “deterred” by Russian nuclear weapons from realising its military aims in Ukraine. According to Israeli sources, the weapon system is also capable of fending off the nuclear-capable Kinschal hypersonic missile, which has been used by the Russian military against Ukrainian positions since March 2022.

The development of its own strategic and tactical missile defence by Germany is also intended to enable the air force to wage war against Russia and other nuclear powers independently of US military support. The Arrow programme stems from an Israeli-American project initiated in 1986 to integrate Israel into the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) of the United States. US President Ronald Reagan had declared three years earlier in an infamous televised speech that SDI would give the US military “the means to render nuclear weapons ineffective and obsolete” and “eliminate the threat of strategic nuclear missiles”.

At the same time, the Arrow 3 deal is part of Germany's biggest arms build-up since World War II and is integral to the comprehensive great power agenda of the ruling class. It is aimed at politically and militarily weakening the historical rivals of German imperialism—especially Poland and France, but also Italy and Britain—and thereby placing the smaller powers of Europe under German “protection”.

Chancellor Olaf Scholz had already elaborated these plans in a keynote speech at Prague’s Charles University in August 2022, where he held out the prospect of a massive upgrade of the German air force and called for a “jointly built air defence system in Europe” to strengthen the “European pillar of NATO” and take action “against threats from the air and from space”. Germany will “design this future air defence system from the outset in such a way that our European neighbours, such as the Poles, Baltic countries, the Dutch, Czechs, Slovaks or our Scandinavian partners can also participate”.

To this end, Arrow 3 is to be integrated into a comprehensive air defence system as part of the European Sky Shield Initiative (ESSI), which aims to establish Germany as the leading military power on the continent. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius (SPD), Defence Committee Chair Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann (FDP) and Green Party Defence Spokesperson Sara Nanni all told the press that the system would “protect our neighbouring states”. The states in question “would only have to acquire ‘Arrow’ missile units for their defence,” according to a Tagesschau news report. The radar data would come from a central airspace surveillance system in Germany.

European Sky Shield Initiative

The ESSI was launched in October last year on the initiative of the German government on the sidelines of a NATO meeting in Brussels to create “a European air defence and missile defence system” following Scholz’s speech in Prague. The associated memorandum was signed by the defence ministers of the Czech Republic, Germany, Belgium, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, the United Kingdom, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia, and is “open to other interested states”.

This year, Sweden and Denmark, as well as Austria and Switzerland, joined the initiative. In a separate declaration, Switzerland absurdly stated that participation in the European military pact was in line with the neutrality clause enshrined in both the Austrian and Swiss constitutions. In direct contradiction to this, a Germany army (Bundeswehr) document states that it is “intended to integrate the expanded or newly created capabilities of the joint procurement initiative into the air defence of the NATO area led by the NATO Commander for Europe”.

Details are being kept secret from the public. The Bundeswehr merely states that, in addition to Arrow 3, it also plans to procure further German missile defence systems of the type IRIS-T SLM, as well as US Patriot models for the “near and immediate vicinity” in the course of ESSI.

In fact, ESSI is an informal “coalition of those willing to rearm” whose relationship to NATO and “Europe” is completely opaque. For example, the ESSI signatories Sweden, Austria and Switzerland are not members of NATO; Switzerland, Norway and Great Britain are not EU states. Key EU states such as France, Poland, Italy and Spain, which maintain close arms industrial relations with Germany within the framework of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), are also not part of the initiative.

The current Arrow 3 procurement plans actually compete with two other European missile defence projects that have been pursued behind the scenes for years. These are the French-coordinated PESCO project Timely Warning and Interception with Space-based Theatre surveillance (TWISTER), whose hypersonic missile is currently being developed by MBDA, and the Hypersonic Defence Interceptor (HYDEF), which was awarded by the European Commission to a Spanish-led missile consortium in July 2022. Although Germany is a major participant in both systems, government officials have claimed that they will not be operational in time to merit consideration.

Domination of Europe

The German ESSI initiative has been roundly rejected and publicly criticised by France. At a conference on European air defence on the sidelines of the Paris Air Show, French President Emmanuel Macron warned against the purchase of non-European weapons systems. These are “less manageable, tied to timetables, queues and priorities, sometimes subject to third-country approval” and are “too dependent on the outside world”. Scholz’s initiative was not agreed with Paris and “prepares problems for tomorrow”. Macron then announced the joint procurement of several hundred French-made Mistral short-range missiles together with Estonia, Hungary, Belgium and Cyprus.

Representatives of the German military then accused Macron of defending French interests and “putting Europe’s air defence at risk”. A recent paper by the government-affiliated German Institute for International and Security Affairs entitled “Germany’s Weak Leadership Role in European Air Defence” complains that “quite a few partners have major reservations about Germany’s idea” with regard to ESSI. Although “the participation of France and Italy is indispensable for the success of the initiative”, Berlin “has not (yet) succeeded in allaying the concerns of important partners about its leadership role”.

The paper concludes that Germany must rearm even more comprehensively and assert its claim to military leadership in Europe all the more vehemently. The goal must be to close the “capability gap” of strategic missile defence “as quickly as possible without weakening or endangering European development programmes”.

The paper goes on to say that Germany, as coordinator of the ESSI, must set a good example in financing Europe’s air defence. Around 5 billion euros from the special fund are only a first step. In addition,” regular funds from the defence budget” are needed for technical improvements and new acquisitions. Also, “high costs for operation, exercises and maintenance” had “not yet been taken into account in the Bundeswehr's financial planning”.

4 Sept 2023

Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme 2024/2025

Application Deadline: 1st December 2023 at Hong Kong Time 12:00:00

Offered Annually? Yes

About Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme: The Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme (HKPFS), established in 2009 by the Research Grants Council (RGC), aims to attract the best and brightest students in the world to pursue their PhD programmes in Hong Kong’s institutions. About 300 PhD Fellowships will be awarded this academic year. For awardees who need more than three years to complete the PhD degree, additional support may be provided by the chosen institutions. Financial aid is available for any field of study.

Eligibility: Candidates seeking admission as new full-time PhD students in the following eight institutions, irrespective of their country of origin, prior work experience, and ethnic background, should be eligible to apply.

  • City University of Hong Kong
  • Hong Kong Baptist University
  • Lingnan University
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • The Education University of Hong Kong
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  • The University of Hong Kong

Applicants should demonstrate outstanding qualities of academic performance, research ability / potential, communication and interpersonal skills, and leadership abilities.

Selection Criteria: While candidates’ academic excellence is the primary consideration, the Selection Panels will take into account factors as follows:

  • Academic excellence;
  • Research ability and potential;
  • Communication and interpersonal skills; and
  • Leadership abilities.

Number of Awards: 300

Value of Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme: The Fellowship provides an annual stipend of HK$331,200 (approximately US$42,460) and a conference and research-related travel allowance of HK$13,800 (approximately US$1,760) per year for each awardee for a period up to three years. 300 PhD Fellowships will be awarded in the 2024/25 academic year*. For awardees who need more than three years to complete the PhD degree, additional support may be provided by the chosen universities. For details, please contact the universities concerned directly.

Selection Panel: Shortlisted applications, subject to their areas of studies, will be reviewed by one of the following two Selection Panels comprising experts in the relevant board areas:

  • sciences, medicine, engineering and technology
  • humanities, social sciences and business studies

Application Process for Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme:

  • Eligible candidates should first make an Initial Application online through the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme Electronic System (HKPFSES) to obtain an HKPFS Reference Number by 1 December 2023 at Hong Kong Time 12:00:00 before submitting applications for PhD admission to their desired universities.
  • Applicants may choose up to two programmes / departments at one or two universities for PhD study under HKPFS 2024/25. They should comply with the admission requirements of their selected universities and programmes.
  • As the deadlines for applications to some of the universities may immediately follow that of the Initial Application, candidates should submit initial applications as early as possible to ensure sufficient time to submit applications to universities.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for More Details

WAAW Foundation Undergraduate STEM Scholarships 2024

Application Deadline: 17th November, 2023

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Young women from all Africa countries

To be taken at: Applicants home country

About the Award: The Working to Advance African Women (WAAW) foundation aim to increase the pipeline of African women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) related disciplines, and work to ensure that this talent is engaged in African innovation. Scholarships are renewable annually, following proof of the student’s continued academic performance.

Eligible Fields of Study: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)-related courses at any African university;

  • a. All fields of Engineering
  • b. All computer science
  • c. Science & Mathematics related fields; Industrial chemistry, environmental sciences
  • d. Medical courses; Pharmacy / Biomedical, Biochemistry, Zoologye. Agriculture, Geography, Statistics, etc.

Not Accepted Courses:

a. Core medical courses like Medicine and Surgery, Nursing, etc

b. Social Science courses

c. Art courses.

Type: Undergraduate

Selection Criteria and Eligibility: WAAW foundation’s annual scholarship initiative is aimed at supporting need based African female STEM-focused college education. Please read the eligibility criteria before you apply. All non qualifying applications will be automatically deleted! Criteria for eligibility includes:

Please read the eligibility criteria before you apply. All non-qualifying applications will be automatically deleted! Criteria for eligibility include:

  • Female students of African origin, living and studying in Africa.
  • Currently enrolled in an undergraduate B.S.degree program.
  • Studying STEM-related courses in a University or college in Africa.
  • Demonstrable financial need
  • Excellent Academic Record.
  • Proven leadership, volunteering, and community service
  • Below the age of 32 years.
  • Only students in their first and second year are eligible to apply. And also students in their third year if studying a five-year course.

Please note that WAAW does not fund graduate (masters, MBA, or Ph.D.) programs, second or subsequent degrees, students older than 32 years, non-STEM focused courses, or Diploma degrees. There are NO EXCEPTIONS to these requirements.

WAAW Foundation awards annual scholarships to students who demonstrate need and prove their status as full-time students in a STEM-related course in an African University. Recipients will be required to start a STEM Outreach Chapter at their university.

Number of Scholarship: Not specified

Value of Scholarship: Scholarship recipients will receive an award of $500 for the academic year, or the equivalent in their country’s local currency. Scholarship recipients may reapply for renewal the following year, with proof of continued excellent academic performance.

Duration of Scholarship: Scholarship is a onetime fund but is renewable annually, following proof of the student’s continued academic performance.

How to Apply: Your application will include the following:

  • The application form should be filled out completely.
  • Personal and Contact Information.
  • Educational background and Family Information.
  • A statement of need should describe why scholarship funds are needed and what the funds will be used for if received.
  • Essays are vital criteria in determining candidates who are shortlisted. Responses to essay where to buy modafinil online reddit questions that address career goals and how you expect the WAAW scholarship will assist in your education. Please have your essay responses ready before you begin the application.
        3. In 500 words or less, what is your proudest achievement to date
      1. Two academic/professional references. Note recommendation letters and transcripts ARE NOT REQUIRED at the time of application. ONLY after a candidate has been shortlisted. However, you must provide the names of 2 references in your application.

      ONLY Shortlisted candidates will be required to send the following additional items in order to complete this process.

      • 2 references; one MUST be written by a professor from your institution of study and the other from an academic supervisor/advisor or mentor to be emailed by your referee to us.
      • A copy of a current signed and sealed transcript from your University is to be emailed to transcripts@waawfoundation.org
      • A copy of the student’s School identity card must be scanned and emailed to us.

      Please do not email inquiries until you have reviewed all the requirements above,  including the list of accepted and unaccepted courses in the FAQ link above.

      Please visit our FAQ page for answers to your questions

      For further information or inquiries please email: scholarship@waawfoundation.org

      Apply Here

      Visit Programme Webpage for Details