6 Sept 2023

Pakistan’s IMF-dictated electricity price hikes spark mass protests

Zayar


Mass protests against punishing electricity tariff hikes and the skyrocketing cost of food, petrol, and other essentials have roiled Pakistan’s major urban centres for well over a week.

The broad-based protests, which erupted outside the country’s largely discredited political establishment, have caused increasing dismay and apprehension in ruling class circles. However, the recently installed “election caretaker” government—backed by the military, long the country’s most powerful political force—is vowing that there will be no retreat on the price increases or on the larger package of IMF-dictated austerity measures of which they are part.

Pakistani shopkeepers close their businesses during strike against inflation in Peshawar, Pakistan, Saturday, September 2, 2023. [AP Photo/Muhammad Sajjad]

Two months ago, Pakistan, the world’s fifth most populous country, negotiated a $3 billion emergency loan with the US-dominated IMF to stave off an imminent threat of default.

The bailout loan, which is equivalent to just one month of Pakistan’s imports, has failed to forestall the continuing unravelling of Pakistan’s economy. A key reason for this is that the IMF is insisting on “shock therapy” measures—beginning with the elimination of energy price subsidies and limited export controls, as well as the implementation of full market-based exchange rates. These “pro-investor” measures are further fueling inflation, now running at well over 25 percent, and the depreciation of the Pakistani rupee. Since the beginning of the 2023-24 fiscal year on July 1, the rupee has lost more than 10 percent of its value vis-a-vis the US dollar, driving up the cost of oil and other imports, including inputs needed for Pakistan’s textile industry, the country’s principal export earner.

Electricity prices have doubled in the past three months, and petrol prices have been raised multiple times. The IMF, meanwhile, is pressing for the removal of the general sales tax exemption on fuel, which would result in a further price spike.

The sustained popular protests over the electricity rate increases are causing mounting alarm in ruling circles, where fear of a mass uprising akin to that which erupted in Sri Lanka last year and drove the Rajapakse government from power is palpable.

Pakistani shopkeepers strike against inflation in Peshawar, Pakistan, Saturday, September 2, 2023. [AP Photo/Muhammad Sajjad]

By the end of last week, the protests had spread across the country. On Saturday, a country-wide “shutter-down” strike was observed by retail and wholesale traders, shutting down most markets, including in the country’s largest cities, Karachi and Lahore.

In some parts of the country, workers in the transport sector joined the shutdown, staging a wheel-jam strike to voice their anger over the repeated fuel price increases. Protesters blocked major roads in every large city and in what has become a popular form of protest over the past ten days, burned their electricity bills on camera to underscore their refusal to pay the punishing price increases, as well as their contempt for the government.

Power workers have played a prominent role in the protests. In Lahore last Wednesday, they staged protests to demand the lowering of energy prices, immediate action to deal with a severe staff shortage that has led to a drastic increase in fatal accidents, and free electricity for power sector workers. However, the protest was isolated and contained by the All Pakistan Wapda Hydro Electric Workers Union.

Hundreds of thousands of workers at the government-controlled Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) and its power distribution companies have repeatedly frustrated attempts to privatize the public utility by mounting powerful protests. However, workers have not yet been able to break free from the suffocating grip of the unions, which have limited them to appeals to the government and limited strikes with little economic impact.

Despite widespread worker involvement, the weakness of the present protests lies in the lack of an organized intervention by the working class, based on a socialist program, to rally all of the oppressed toilers against the government, the Pakistan-US military-strategic partnership and all the political representatives of the Pakistani bourgeoisie.

Various small traders’ associations representing shop owners and other middle-class sections, who were somewhat insulated from the economic crisis until recently, currently dominate the protests politically.

Taken aback by the size of the protests, the “pre-election” interim prime minister, Anwaar ul Haq Kakar, initially attempted to mollify the masses with a vague August 27 promise of “relief,” even if only in the form of allowing for the delayed payment of electricity bills. But after discussions with the IMF, Finance Minister Shamshad Akhtar bluntly contradicted Kakar last Wednesday. She declared the economic situation to be “worse than anticipated” and that there is no “fiscal space” for any mitigation of the price hikes.

On Thursday, Kakar held a press conference to denounce the protests. “People should pay their bills, as we are also going to launch a grand policy to recover bills from those who did not pay in the past,” he vowed. The interim prime minster also sought to pass blame for the crisis onto the power workers, accusing them of being involved in “power theft.”

He warned the protesters that his government will adhere “at any cost” to the agreement the outgoing coalition government—led by the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) and the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP)—negotiated with the IMF and not allow any “deviating” from the IMF-dictated austerity and restructuring measures. In addition to the elimination of subsidies, especially in the energy sector, these include tax hikes, a fire-sale of government assets, and allowing the market-based devaluation of the rupee to continue.

In keeping with Kakar’s vow, the interim government stuck to the IMF plan and increased the price for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) by 19.5 percent on September 1.

Voicing the fears gripping large section of Pakistan’s ruling elite, the widely read English-language daily Dawn has issued increasingly shrill warnings to the government about the dire implications of the mounting social unrest. A recent Dawn editorial accused Kakar of being “detached from ground realities” and cautioned that the protests represent “a grave threat to the country’s stability.” A Sunday editorial statement concluded, “This is no longer a political problem but an existential one.”

But like the rest of Pakistan’s ruling elite, the editors of Dawn have nothing to offer apart from an intensification of the austerity measures that have already driven tens of millions into destitution. In a September 1 editorial, Dawn called for an end to the uncertainty over the coming elections. Although the interim government is supposed to organize elections for the National Assembly and the four provincial legislatures by November, rumours persist that Kakar and his ministry will connive with the military and state bureaucracy to postpone the elections, on the calculation that a ‘non-political” government will be a better instrument for imposing the IMF’s savage diktats. The Dawn’s editors, for their part, are insisting that the need of the hour is “a stable new elected government,” because the present “state of the economy demands tough decisions that a temporary set-up is not capable of making.”

The current nationwide demonstrations are the first large-scale popular protests since the massive military crackdown on Imran Khan’s right-wing Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and its largely urban middle-class supporters. The repression followed a series of protests against Khan’s arrest in early May on politically-motivated corruption charges. Khan had sought to exploit the seething anger against the PML (N)-PPP government for implementing reviled IMF austerity, despite his own part in enforcing similar policies when he was in power (August 2018-April 2022).

In contrast to the protests in defence of Khan, the current wave of demonstrations developed outside of the reactionary political establishment in Islamabad. As the protests gathered pace, the Islamic fundamentalist Jamat-i-Islami and then the PPP sought to intervene to boost their support and politically rein them in.

There are several factors contributing to Pakistan’s devastating economic crisis. The most significant are the global COVID-19 pandemic, which caused huge job losses; the US-NATO instigated war with Russia in Ukraine, which has led to skyrocketing global food and energy prices; and the unprecedented climate change-driven summer 2022 floods that caused over $30 billion in damages.

Most of Pakistan’s 240 million people live in or on the verge of poverty. One measure of this is energy consumption. Although Pakistan boasts nuclear weapons, its per capita energy consumption is among the lowest in the world outside of Africa. A quarter of the population still has no access to electricity at home.

Sumaira Malik, living on the outskirts of Islamabad and a mother of three, explained the unbearable living conditions most working-class families face. Speaking to Al Jazeera, she said she’s considering taking one of her children out of school in order to pay the electricity bill. “Last month, our bill was more than 19,000 rupees ($62), and my husband and I had no option but to seek a loan from our relatives to pay it off,” she said. “This month, we were handed a bill of 37,000 rupees ($122).” Malik is a house maid and her husband is an office cleaner and their joint monthly income is just 50,000 rupees ($164).

Protests mount against Macron’s refusal to withdraw French troops from Niger

Alex Lantier


After tens of thousands of workers and youth protested this weekend in Niger’s capital, Niamey, thousands have encircled the NATO military base in Niamey. The base hosts some 1,500 French troops alongside US and Italian troops, fighter jets, killer drones and attack helicopters. Protesters are demanding that French troops, who have intervened across France’s former colonial empire in the Sahel during the 2013-2022 French war in neighboring Mali, leave immediately.

French soldiers disembark from a U.S. Air Force C130 cargo plane at Niamey, Niger base, on June 9, 2021. [AP Photo]

A protester outside the Niamey base, Ibrahim Mohamed, told France Info he could not find any innocent explanation for the spate of mass murders in villages that took place across the Sahel during France’s war in Mali. “With all the tools France has today with surveillance drones and heavy weapons … I don’t understand how individuals on motorcycles can come kill our people day and night,” he said.

Maïkoul Zodi, the Niger coordinator of the Turn The Page activist network who addressed protesters surrounding the Niamey base yesterday, declared: “[W]e have encircled this base and we will camp out here until the last French soldiers leave our territory before we go home.”

Paris is pursuing a blatantly neocolonial policy, however. President Emmanuel Macron and the military brass still refuse to withdraw their troops or replace France’s unpopular ambassador to Niger, Sylvain Itté. Anonymous French officers are issuing threats in the press to crack down on protests in Niamey and pledging that any withdrawal they carry out will aim to strengthen French combat effectiveness across the entire Sahel.

France Info cited “the army general staff” as warning that “French forces are ready to retaliate against any threat to [France’s] military and diplomatic positions in Niger.”

Yesterday, French officials confirmed that they have opened talks with Niger’s military regime on a partial withdrawal of French troops from Niamey. However, the purpose of these talks is to give French troops the option to redeploy out of the most contested areas in Niger, so they could continue combat duties elsewhere in the region.

Le Figaro wrote: “It is useless to leave more than one thousand soldiers inactive in this area. ‘Functional’ discussions have begun to organize the withdrawal of certain military elements, according to the defense ministry. These are ‘preparatory’ discussions, that are technical and not political, it is said. The soldiers could be deployed elsewhere, their number is not yet decided. The general staff wants to maintain its operational credibility on the ground [in Niger]. The move could of course be reversed.”

In the meantime, French officials are ignoring an offer from China, Niger’s second-largest trading partner after France, to mediate between Paris and the Nigerien junta. Chinese Ambassador to Niger Jiang Feng extended this offer after meeting with Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine, the prime minister nominated by the Nigerien military junta.

“The Chinese government intends to play a positive role, as a mediator, completely respecting regional countries in order to find a political solution to this Nigerien crisis,” Jiang said. “China always follows the principle of non-interference in other countries’ internal affairs,” Jiang added, saying that he hoped African countries could “solve their problems, African-style.”

The Chinese regime’s attempt to broker a settlement with Paris reflects concerns within ruling circles in Beijing over Macron’s aggressive policy in Niger. Since the July 26 coup in Niger ousted French-backed President Mohamed Bazoum, Macron has pressed aggressively to slap sanctions on Niger and prepare an invasion of the country by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) countries to return Bazoum to power. The sanctions and the threat to topple the junta in Niamey cuts across significant Chinese economic interests.

Beijing is building major infrastructure projects in Niger, which decades of French domination since formal independence from France in 1960 have left as one of the world’s poorest countries. It is building a 2,000-kilometer oil pipeline to transport Nigerien oil to ports in Benin, and a €1 billion hydropower plant at Kandadji on the Niger river to reduce the number of blackouts in Niger. It is unclear whether French-ECOWAS sanctions can block Beijing’s projects, or whether Nigerien oil sales on world markets can allow Niamey to evade the ECOWAS sanctions.

Already, however, it is apparent that Paris faces the deepest challenge to its hegemony over its former colonial empire since the bloody 1954-1962 war for Algerian independence from France. The coup in Niger came after a series of coups in neighboring Mali and Burkina Faso which brought to power military regimes that demanded the departure of French troops from their countries. This reflected growing outrage among workers and youth at the bloodshed in Mali and across the Sahel during France’s 2013-2022 war in Mali.

West Africa [Photo by PirateShip6 / CC BY-SA 4.0]

The crisis of French imperialism is all the more serious due to the explosive opposition in the working class in France to Macron’s austerity diktat at home. He rammed through pension cuts this spring in the face of overwhelming popular opposition and mass strikes by millions of workers, trampling the will of the people underfoot and sending riot police squads to brutally assault strikers and protesters. Having slashed pensions, Macron then rammed through a €100 billion increase in France’s military budget amid the NATO war on Russia in Ukraine.

The objective conditions for a united, international revolutionary struggle of workers in France and in France’s former African colonies against imperialism are emerging.

The decisive question facing the construction of such a movement is a political break with the national trade union bureaucracies and allied pseudo-left or nationalist parties, based on an international struggle against imperialist war and for socialism. In France, these forces blocked broader strike action this spring to bring down Macron during the pensions struggle. In Niger and across the Sahel, they are working to prop up the military juntas’ negotiations with imperialism, while trying to falsely present the juntas as “left,” anti-imperialist governments.

In reality, the junta in Niger is desperately seeking to maintain relations with Macron, while trying to defuse explosive opposition to imperialism among workers and youth. Indeed, as talks between the Nigerien and French militaries over a partial French evacuation proceeded, Niger’s junta made its position unmistakably clear in a press conference by Prime Minister Zeine.

Zeine called for cooperation with French imperialism, while noting that France’s military presence in Niger is “in a position of illegality” as it is opposed by the population and not authorized by the government. Pointing to the junta’s “exchanges” with the French army, he said: “What we would like is, if possible, to maintain a cooperation with the country with whom we share so many things.”

Similarly, despite their invocations of opposition to France, the human rights organizations and activist groups in the Turn The Page network that is intervening in the protests in Niger are also closely tied to imperialist interests. The network’s web site lists among its sponsors the French state’s French Development Agency (AFD), the German state-funded Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, and the US National Democratic Institute (NDI). The NDI is part of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a longtime conduit for CIA funds.

5 Sept 2023

UK Commonwealth Scholarships 2024/2025

Application Deadline: 17th October 2023 at 16:00 GMT.

The scholarships are for study in the UK beginning in September/October 2024.

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Developing commonwealth countries

Subject Areas: All subject areas are eligible, although the CSC’s selection criteria gives priority to applications that demonstrate strong relevance to development.

commonwealth scholarship

About Scholarship: Each year, UK Commonwealth Scholarships for Master’s and PhD study in the UK are offered for citizens of developing Commonwealth countries. These scholarships are funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID), to contribute to the UK’s international development aims and wider overseas interests, supporting excellence in UK higher education, and sustaining the principles of the Commonwealth.

Offered Since: 1959

Type: Masters, PhD

Who is qualified to apply? To apply for these scholarships, you must:

PhD

To apply for UK Commonwealth Scholarships, you must:

  • Be a citizen of or have been granted refugee status by an eligible Commonwealth country, or be a British Protected Person
  • Be permanently resident in an eligible Commonwealth country
  • Be available to start your academic studies in the UK by the start of the UK academic year in September 2023
  • By September 2023, hold a first degree of at least upper second class (2:1) honours standard, or a second-class degree (2:2) and a relevant postgraduate qualification (a Master’s degree)
  • NOT be registered for a PhD, or an MPhil leading to a PhD, at a UK university before September 2022
  • NOT have commenced and be currently registered for a PhD, or an MPhil leading to a PhD, in your home country or elsewhere
  • Have the support of a potential supervisor from at least one UK university listed in your application form
  • Have provided all supporting documentation in the required format
  • Be unable to afford to study in the UK without this scholarship

Masters

To apply for UK Commonwealth Scholarships, you must:

  • Be a citizen of or have been granted refugee status by an eligible Commonwealth country, or be a British Protected Person
  • Be permanently resident in an eligible Commonwealth country
  • Be available to start your academic studies in the UK by the start of the UK academic year in September 2023
  • By September 2023, hold a first degree of at least upper second class (2:1) honours standard, or a second class degree (2:2) and a relevant postgraduate qualification (usually a Master’s degree). The CSC would not normally fund a second UK Master’s degree. If you are applying for a second UK Master’s degree, you will need to justify as to why you wish to undertake this study
  • NOT be registered for a PhD, or an MPhil leading to a PhD, at a UK university or in your home country before September 2023
  • Be unable to afford to study in the UK without this scholarship
  • Have provided all supporting documentation in the required format

The CSC promotes equal opportunity, gender equity, and cultural exchange. Applications are encouraged from a diverse range of candidates.

Selection Criteria: Applications are considered according to the following selection criteria:

  • Academic merit of the candidate
  • Quality of the proposal
  • Potential impact of the work on the development of the candidate’s home country

Selection process

Each year, the CSC invites selected nominating bodies to submit a specific number of nominations.

The CSC invites around three times more nominations than scholarships available – therefore, nominated candidates are not guaranteed to be awarded a scholarship. There are no quotas for scholarships for any individual country. Candidates nominated by national nominating agencies compete with those nominated by other nominating bodies, and the same standards will be applied to applications made through either channel.

Number of Scholarships: Approximately 300 scholarships are awarded each year. The CSC invites around three times more nominations than scholarships available – therefore, nominated candidates are not guaranteed to get a scholarship. There are no quotas for scholarships for any individual country. Candidates nominated by national nominating agencies compete with those nominated by universities/university bodies, and the same standards will be applied to applications made through either channel.

Duration of Scholarships: 12 months for Masters and up to 36 months for PhD

Value of Scholarships: Each scholarship provides:

  • Approved airfare from your home country to the UK and return at the end of your award (the CSC will not reimburse the cost of fares for dependants, nor usually the cost of journeys made before your award is finally confirmed)
  • Approved tuition and examination fees
  • Stipend (living allowance) at the rate of £1,347 per month, or £1,652 per month for those at universities in the London metropolitan area (rates quoted at current levels).
  • Thesis grant towards the cost of preparing a thesis or dissertation, where applicable
  • Warm clothing allowance, where applicable
  • Study travel grant towards the costs of study-related travel within the UK or overseas
  • For PhD Scholars, fieldwork grant towards the cost of fieldwork undertaken overseas (usually the cost of one economy class return airfare to your fieldwork location), where approved
  • For UK Commonwealth Scholarships PhD Scholars, paid mid-term visit (airfare) to your home country (unless you have claimed (or intend to claim) spouse and/or child allowances during your scholarship, or have received a return airfare to your home country for fieldwork)
  • If you have children and are widowed, divorced, or a single parent, child allowance of £576.61 per month for the first child, and £143 per month for the second and third child under the age of 16, if you are accompanied by your children and they are living with you at the same address in the UK (rates quoted at current levels)

To be taken at: UK Universities

How to Apply for UK Commonwealth Scholarships: You must apply to one of the following nominating bodies in the first instance – the CSC does not accept direct applications for these scholarships:

  • National nominating agencies – this is the main route of application
  • Selected universities/university bodies, which can nominate their own academic staff
  • Selected non-governmental organisations and charitable bodies

All applications must be made through one of these nominating bodies. Each nominating body is responsible for its own selection process and may have additional eligibility criteria. You must check with your nominating body for their specific advice and rules for applying, their eligibility criteria, and their closing date for applications.

You must make your application using the CSC’s online application system, in addition to any other application that you are required to complete by your nominating body. The CSC will not accept applications that are not submitted via the online application system.

You are advised to complete and submit your application as soon as possible, as the online application system will be very busy in the days leading up to the application deadline.

The CSC will not accept supporting documentation submitted by nominating agencies or outside the online application system.

Visit PhD Scholarship webpage for details.

Visit Masters Scholarship webpage for details.

UK schools, hospitals, houses and other public buildings at risk of collapse in expanding RAAC concrete scandal

Thomas Scripps


Since the government revealed last Friday that over 150 schools had been identified as at risk of collapse due to the use of RAAC concrete, three days before they were due to reopen for the start of term, evidence of a far more widespread problem and of countless warnings ignored has been pouring in.

Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete is a lightweight material mostly used for flat roofing between the 1950s and the 1990s—cheaper and quicker to produce and install. Moisture and polluted air significantly reduce its strength over time. It was given a usable lifespan of roughly 30 years, though a Building Research Establishment report in 2002 warned that there was a risk of collapse without warning in panels over 20 years old.

Reinforced Aerated Autoclaved Concrete (RAAC), close-up view [Photo by Marco Bernardini, own work / CC BY-SA 3.0]

Over 100 schools have been ordered to fully or partially close, with “mitigations”—largely consisting of propping up faulty roofs—already in place at another 50.

It is only through sheer luck that no one has yet been seriously hurt or killed. Collapses involving RAAC are known to have taken place in schools in 2017, 2018 and this summer, fortunately while the buildings were empty.

Thousands of children and school workers are potentially still at risk. According to Education Secretary Gillian Keegan, around 1,500 schools are yet to complete checks to find out whether they have RAAC, and another 450 suspect they do but are waiting for an official assessment. The fact that the problem was investigated by survey rather than an urgent system of inspections is a crime meaning dangerous cases of RAAC have been missed elsewhere.

Government statements that 95 percent of schools are likely to be unaffected suggests around 700 with problems. The NAHT union has written to the government noting that it told the National Audit Office in May, “that there were 8,600 schools which might have RAAC that had not been investigated.”

Urgent warnings have been sounded for years. The Local Government Association has raised the issue repeatedly since 2018. In 2019, the Standing Committee on Structural Safety labelled RAAC a “significant risk”. The Office for Government Property reported in 2021 and 2022 that RAAC was “now life-expired and liable to collapse”.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was told while serving as Boris Johnson’s Chancellor that there was “a critical risk to life” in schools if rebuilding work was not carried out. The former head civil servant at the Department for Education told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme Monday that they had requested the money to rebuild 300-400 schools a year and were given the funds for just 100 by Sunak, which was later cut to 50.

Sunak and current Chancellor Jeremy Hunt have taken the same attitude even in the face of popular uproar. With pictures of collapsed classrooms on the front of every newspaper, Treasury officials briefed that there would be no new money made available either to fix building or provide alternative accommodation and transport. It would have to come from the existing, savaged, education budget. Statements to the contrary have been made since, but with no details provided.

According to the National Audit Office, RAAC is present in at least 41 hospitals. Twenty-four of these have buildings identified as at risk of collapse, with seven hospitals requiring a full rebuild. Documents seen by the Sunday Times warn of “catastrophic” and “likely” collapse. Many trusts already have steel and wooden props in place, with staff being asked to carry out regular inspections.

The problem is compounded by asbestos, present in 90 percent of schools and hospitals. To date, the official response to Britain’s worst work-related killer—inhaled particles are highly carcinogenic—has been to “manage” the substance in place, on the basis that it is only unsafe when damaged or disturbed. Collapses, or even minor structural damage, could therefore release clouds of toxic fibres.

Court and other government buildings have also been flagged for RAAC, with Harrow Crown Court already closed for at least nine months.

Building survey Rapleys has warned the material is also very likely to have been used in flat roof, low rise public housing developments, putting a huge number of households in danger. Work it has conducted on the public estate previously suggests 5-10 percent of public buildings from the 50s, 60s and 70s use RAAC panels.

The one certainty is that the government has no idea of the full scale of the emergency and is trying to keep a lid on what it does know. Sunak insisted that he was in no way responsible for his own actions when chancellor, while an embattled Gillian Keegan was recorded proclaiming that she had done a “f…ing good job”, while unnamed “others” had “sat on their arses”.

RAAC is a prime example of a crumbling public infrastructure, sabotaged by relentless funding cuts. Schools in the UK have a maintenance and repair backlog of £11.4 billion—more than a third of buildings in the school estate are past their initial design life. The figure for the National Health Service is £10 billion, and for the courts, £1 billion. Outstanding repairs on roads total £14 billion, and another £6 billion on bridges. The estimated cost of post-Grenfell fire remedial work on tower blocks is £15 billion. Figures are not available, but the state of disrepair across the UK’s council housing estate is infamous.

All of mainstream politics is designed to conceal the basic cause of the UK’s worsening health, education and general living standards—the funnelling of an ever-greater share of social wealth into the bank accounts of the super-rich and the major corporations.

The Labour Party has tried to score a few propaganda points against the Tories for even refusing to provide a list of impacted schools and for its constant public spending cuts. They have even pointed to a commitment of funding for school construction made prior to the election of the Tories in 2010—13 years ago! But Labour under Sir Keir Starmer now boasts of its unbreakable commitment to “fiscal responsibility.” By pledging to big business and the banks to spend no more than the Tories, Labour is promising to do nothing to address crises like the RAAC scandal or any of the hundred other social issues confronting the working class. Only two weeks ago, Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves was writing off tax rises for the super-rich with the line “[I] don’t have any spending plans that require us to raise £12 billion.”

Labour and the Tories are the parties of a financial and corporate oligarchy and their upper middle-class hangers-on, whose privately educated and insured families have no stake whatsoever in preserving a decent education or any other social right to the broad mass of the working class.

In 1975, the value of public assets was equal to 137 percent of annual national income, while the value of private assets was 365 percent. By 2021, private wealth had grown to 650 percent—mostly held by a small fraction of the population—while public wealth had fallen to negative 75 percent, taking account of government debts. Catastrophic events like the Grenfell Tower fire and the experiences of millions in the pandemic testify to the terrible consequences of this looting.

Fascist mobs terrorise migrants in Cyprus while police turn blind eye

Robert Stevens


Migrants on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus have been subject to pogrom-type attacks by fascist groups. The political groundwork for these attacks has been laid by the governments of the European Union (EU), which have whipped up hostility to migrants month after month.

The pogroms have taken place over a two week period while police and riot cop squads, known to be hotbeds of far-right activity, turned a blind eye.

The attacks were instigated by members of the far right Elam organisation (National Popular Front, also known as the National People’s Front). But they began when the authorities cut off the water and electricity supply to an apartment complex where Syrian refugees live in the village of Chlorakas, near the western resort of Paphos. This provocative, inhumane act was carried out in scorching 40-degree heat.

The refugees were then evicted from the complex. Al Jazeera described “a police sweep” carried out “to evict dozens of refugees allegedly living there illegally.” This was authorised even though the migrants—as noted by KISA, the Cyprus-based anti-racist NGO—“have been permanently and legally settled in Cyprus for years.

The August 21 operation was ordered by President Nikos Christodoulides in a meeting “with the attorney general, ministers of interior and justice, deputy welfare minister, undersecretary to the president and police chief.”

The Cyprus Mail noted that under the order, “The migration department will begin noting down all asylum seekers who have been living in the contentious Ayios Nikolaos apartment bloc in Chlorakas.” Government spokesman Konstantinos Letymbiotis said that those deemed to be legally in Cyprus would have to find another place to live, and in the interim would be sent to the Kofinou immigration detention centre, the newspaper reported, and “Those living here illegally will be arrested and deported immediately.”

As refugees protested their persecution, they were confronted over two nights (August 27-28) by a mob of racists and fascists who on the second night declared they were leading an “anti-ghettoisation” demonstration. On the first night, at least 1,000 fascists “splintered into smaller groups that began attacking foreign nationals living in Chlorakas,” reported the Cyprus Mail.

It added, “Businesses owned by migrants saw their shop fronts smashed and vehicles overturned.

“One Cypriot resident charged that a group of thugs broke into a home with seven children and their mother and began breaking things inside the house.

“Another elderly Cypriot man said they were warned that Elam members may ‘punish’ locals who chose not to participate in the protest.”

Video footage from Monday night showed around 250 Greek Cypriots chanting “get out, get out,” marking the second night in a row of racist attacks against foreign nationals living in Chlorakas. Cyprus Mail reported, “Earlier on Monday, a group of some 500 Syrian residents held a peaceful demonstration, as a reaction to the previous night’s violent attacks against them. Shop windows were smashed and migrants beaten and threatened.”

Of an initial 21 arrested, there were more migrants and refugees detained (12) than there were fascists (9). This was despite the police chief, as reported by Al Jazeera, telling “state broadcaster CyBC on Tuesday [August 29] that the clashes began when Greek Cypriots attempted to assault the migrants and refugees.”

President Christodoulides authorised more police to be flooded into the area. Tensions were whipped up, with Christodoulides’ press officer Victoras Papadopoulos pandering to fascist sentiment with the comment, “Since the day the government took over [in February 2023], it has been tackling immigration and illegal migration in every way possible. Arrivals have been reduced by half, returns have increased and applications are being processed twice as fast.”

These policies saw asylum claims drop from 10,600 during the period March to July 2022, to just 4,976 in the same period this year. This represents a doubling down on the anti-immigration policies of the previous government under Nicos Anastasiades, whose interior ministry declared the Chlorakas area off-limits to new migrant arrivals in 2021. Anastasiades’s government had already slashed the number of immigrants allowed into the country. In 2022, it carried out around 7,000 returns, the most in relation to population of any EU country.

Migrants walk near the Pournara Emergency Reception center, in Kokkinotrimithia, on the outskirts of the capital Nicosia, Cyprus, April 18, 2022. [AP Photo/Petros Karadjias, File]

The government intervention emboldened the fascists who went on the rampage again last Friday in Limassol, the second largest urban area in Cyprus after Nicosia. This time the police stood down entirely and allowed the mob to terrorise refugees and anyone who they viewed to be foreign. The Cyprus Mail reported, “The anti-immigrant protest held in Limassol… revealed a rampant extremism that had no qualms about destroying everything in sight, and a shocking failure from police to keep the situation under control.”

It added, “Children were in sight as firecrackers were thrown randomly and that no one died during the violence was nothing short of a miracle.” The pogrom was led by around “200 black-clad rioters screaming ‘Cyprus is Greek’ and began with the chant ‘we’ll start with the blacks first and then police.’”

The report continued, “Thugs targeted anyone with the ‘wrong’ skin colour. An Asian woman who saw her business smashed to pieces sat on the pavement unable to speak through her sobs, managing only to choke out ‘I have four children’. The protestors who chanted they wanted migrants out of the country broke the till of her store and stole all her money that she wanted to send to family back home…

“Targeted attacks towards migrants went unchecked by police, and businesses owned by foreign nationals such as a Syrian barbershop and food place were smashed to pieces… Despite it being a well-known fact that the seafront has a host of multicultural businesses, there were no police officers to man the area and ward off violent protesters.”

The article noted, “A group of Syrian men that saw their shop smashed to pieces stared at the scene in shock and said ‘there were five police cars here and they didn’t do anything. They saw everything… the infamous police water cannon Aiantas stood there idly, and ultimately served as a decorative accessory.”

It concluded that “ultimately on Friday night, it was the thugs that controlled the area, not the police” even “Though police knew since at least the day before about the planned protest, and after a week of violent incidents in Chlorakas village.”

Reports attest to the fact that locals and tourists came to the defence of migrants, protecting them as best they could.

Labour Minister Yiannis Panayiotou said in an interview on CyBC’s morning programme Monday that, “No one should be taking the law into their own hands.” This was reported as a condemnation of the far-right, but the real implication is that the repression of migrants should be left in the hands of the government at this stage.

Panayiotou also urged that anti-migrant sentiment should not be allowed to jeopardise a vital source of cheap labour required by the capitalist class. “Economic migrants [must be processed differently] from those seeking refuge from danger whom we are under EU and international obligation to protect.” The Cyprus Mail reported “the minister explained… their status must be based on preconditions of economic necessity.”

Panayiotou noted that 110,000 third country nationals are currently employed on the island, compared to 340,000 Greek Cypriots, with another 10,000 Greek Cypriots registered unemployed.

Zelensky fires defense minister as US prepares for Ukraine war to last for years

Andre Damon


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced Sunday that he was replacing Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov amid the failure of Kiev’s NATO-backed summer offensive.

Despite the deaths of tens of thousands of Ukrainian troops in the 89 days since the start of the offensive, Kiev’s forces have advanced only a few kilometers.

Ukrainian Minister of Defense Oleksii Reznikov talks to the media after the meeting of the 'Ukraine Defense Contact Group' at Ramstein Air Base in Ramstein, Germany, Friday, April 21, 2023. Reznikov submitted a letter of resignation to the Parliamentary Speaker in Kiev, Ukraine, Monday, September 4, 2023. [AP Photo/Matthias Schrader]

Last month, the Washington Post reported that US intelligence agencies have concluded that the offensive will fail to reach its main objectives of driving to the Azov Sea in order to cut off the “land bridge” to the Crimean Peninsula.

Announcing Reznikov’s resignation, Zelensky called for “new approaches” in the conduct of the war.

The New York Times, citing Ukrainian officials who spoke off the record, said, “Ukraine will need new leadership as the war drags on.”

Reznikov’s replacement, Rustem Umerov, is the co-chair of the Crimea Platform, a diplomatic initiative founded in 2021 to secure international support for Ukraine’s efforts to reconquer the Crimean Peninsula, which was annexed by Russia in 2014.

The appointment of Umerov, a native of Crimea, sends a signal that, in the face of a military debacle, Kiev is doubling down on its goal of recapturing the peninsula. Umerov, not surprisingly, has close ties to the American state, having taken part in high school in the Future Leaders Exchange program funded by the US Department of State.

Rustem Umerov, a member of the Ukrainian Parliament, attends the peace talks with Russian delegation in Gomel region, Belarus, on February 28, 2022. On Monday September 4, 2023 Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov submitted a letter of resignation after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he would be replaced, and named his successor, Rustem Umerov, a Crimean Tatar lawmaker, as the new defense minister. [AP Photo/Sergei Kholodilin/BelTA Pool Photo ]

Umerov is, moreover, an investment banker, a fact that will allow for an even more lucrative alignment between the war and the international and national financial interests that are profiting from the conflict.

Reznikov’s departure took place against the backdrop of a protracted government crisis that has been bound up with a series of corruption scandals implicating the Department of Defense, in particular. In January, a deputy defense minister and the department’s head of procurement were dismissed after revelations that the department overpaid for food provided to troops. At the time, it was also widely reported that Reznikov would be dismissed, yet he remained in his position. At the time, the Zelensky government initiated the most far-reaching purge since the beginning of the war in February 2022. Now, another purge of the state apparatus is under way.

In a statement to the Washington Post commenting on Reznikov’s ouster, the Ministry of Defense said that “several high-ranking officials of the Ministry of Defense were removed from their posts and became subjects to investigation.”

A day before Reznikov’s dismissal, Ukraine’s domestic security service detained Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky on suspicion of fraud and money-laundering. Kolomoisky had been closely associated with Zelensky during the latter’s television career and was an early political backer. In May, the head of the country’s supreme court was arrested on charges of bribery. And on Friday, a former deputy minister of economy accused of misappropriating money for humanitarian needs had bail set at $25,000.

With more than $100 billion in US and international money flowing into Ukraine, corruption has been widespread. The New York Times reported that close to a billion dollars worth of weaponry had been paid for but not delivered. This is no doubt only a glimpse of the war profiteering and plunder that the Ukrainian oligarchy is engaged in as it sends hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian youth and workers to their almost certain death in the war. Corruption is second nature of a ruling class and state apparatus that emerged from the Stalinist destruction of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the orgy of plunder in the capitalist restoration that followed.  

The shakeup in the Ukrainian Defense Ministry comes amid widespread commentary in the US media preparing the American public for the war to stretch on for years.

In an op-ed in the Washington Post, Max Boot wrote, “Ukraine may have a better chance to win in 2024.” This is the same Max Boot who, less than three months before, had interviewed General David Petraeus as saying that he expects “the Ukrainians to achieve significant breakthroughs and accomplish much more than most analysts are predicting.”

This time, Boot cites another retired general, US Army Brig. Gen. Mark Arnold, who declared that he is “more optimistic about the prospects for decisive operations next year.” He quotes Arnold as saying, “I remain very skeptical that a decisive battle will occur this year that makes a material effect toward Ukrainian victory. That can happen next summer when the majority of maneuver equipment arrives from NATO into Ukraine.”

In another column along the same lines in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “How to Help Ukraine Win the War of Attrition,” Walter Russell Mead declares, “Second, current American strategy is not working well.” He writes that “victory” will require an American commitment to another endless war, declaring, “If this is a war of attrition, the US and its partners are well-placed to win. We just need to make up our minds and roll up our sleeves.”

In yet another variation of this theme, former British Army General Richard Barrons writes in the Financial Times, “Ukraine cannot win against Russia now, but victory by 2025 is possible.” He continues, “Ukraine’s current counteroffensive will not throw Russia out—not that anyone expected it to. Nor is it likely to cut the occupation in half before the winter, which might have been one of the more optimistic aims. It has, however, shown how the Russian army can be beaten. Not in 2023, but in 2024 or 2025.”

The general continues, “Ukraine will take until mid-2024 to reconstitute a sufficiently powerful air force and is very short of the key equipment needed to clear mines. Fixing all this will take the war into next year at the least.”

In January, US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mark Milley proclaimed that the US plan was to “go on the offensive to liberate Russian-occupied Ukraine” and to “liberate the occupied areas.” With officials having pledged the support for the sweeping goal of retaking Crimea and the Donbas, the US media has gone to work proclaiming that Ukraine’s spring offensive would lead to the collapse of Russian troops in the equivalent of the Normandy landings on D-Day.

Now, with the offensive having created a bloody disaster, US officials are preparing public opinion for a years-long conflict, in which the current death toll, now in the hundreds of thousands, could well stretch into the millions.