1 Nov 2023

Pakistan mounting campaign of state harassment and intimidation to expel 1.7 million Afghan refugees

Zayar


Tens of thousands of impoverished Afghan refugees—many of whom have lived in Pakistan for years, even decades—have fled to the country of their birth in recent weeks in order to escape detention and deportation.

With the full backing of Pakistan’s military, the country’s interim government has vowed to expel all 1.7 million “illegal” Afghan migrants starting November 1.

Even before the passing of the official deadline to “voluntarily” leave Pakistan, Afghans who sought refuge in Pakistan from the social catastrophe caused by decades of imperialist-fomented war and neocolonial occupation have been the target of a vicious campaign of state harassment and intimidation.

Afghan refugees aboard a truck heading to the Torkham, Pakistan, border to return home hours before the expiration of an Oct. 31, Pakistani government deadline for those who are in the country "illegally" to leave or face deportation. [AP Photo/Muhammad Sajjad]

In a statement issued Tuesday, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said the government was using “threats, abuse, and detention to coerce Afghan asylum seekers without legal status to return to Afghanistan or face deportation.” HRW researcher Fereshta Abbasi told Al-Jazeera, “Pakistan’s announced deadline for Afghans to return has led to detentions, beatings, and extortion, leaving thousands of Afghans in fear over their future.”

Fearing hefty government fines, landlords have evicted Afghans from their homes, and employers have dismissed them en masse. In Karachi, Pakistan’s largest city, police have carried out mass arrests of Afghan refugees.

Pakistani authorities have rejected appeals from the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, international refugee aid organizations and Pakistan-based human rights groups for the mass deportation campaign to be dropped or at least delayed.

“After November 1, no compromise will be made over illegally staying immigrants,” Interior Minister Sarfraz Bugti told a news conference last week. To underscore this, he menacingly added, “Those leaving the country voluntarily would have lesser difficulties than those nabbed by the state.”

The government has set up deportation centres—in reality, mass internment camps—in all four provinces to “process” and detain “illegal” refugees prior to their expulsion.

With Pakistan facing a devastating economic crisis and its political establishment and state institutions, including the military, largely discredited in the eyes of the masses, Pakistan’s authorities see a vendetta against Afghan refugees as a means of diverting popular anger, while building up the apparatus of state repression.

Pakistan’s anti-immigrant witch-hunt is being mounted by a so-called caretaker government that assumed office in August and, according to the constitution, was supposed to hold power for only 90 days during which national and provincial assembly elections were to be held. However, at the behest of the military and with the support of much of the political establishment, the elections have been delayed until at least the end of January. In the interim, the caretaker government has been tasked with pushing through a raft of highly unpopular austerity measures dictated by the International Monetary Fund.

In victimizing refugees, Pakistan’s ruling elite is lifting a page from the playbook of the imperialist powers, who have responded to the global surge in refugees caused by their predatory wars and capitalist-driven economic collapse and environmental devastation with Fortress North America and Fortress Europe anti-immigrant policies.

This has not stopped Washington and the European Union powers from issuing hypocritical calls for Pakistan to provide sanctuary to those fleeing the repression of Afghanistan’s Taliban regime. “We strongly encourage Afghanistan’s neighbors, including Pakistan, to allow entry for Afghans seeking international protection,” the US State Department declared in an October 19 statement.

US imperialism and the ravaging of Afghanistan

US imperialism bears primary responsibility for the horrendous social and economic conditions that have driven millions of Afghans from their homes over the past four decades. In the late 1970s, Washington began its patronage of Islamist militants to first provoke a Soviet invasion and then weaken the Soviet-backed regime in Kabul. These forces included Osama Bin Laden’s al-Qaida. With Pakistan, then a longtime close US ally serving as the conduit for CIA weaponry into Afghanistan during the 1980s, Washington gave its full support to the brutal anti-working dictatorship of General Zia ul-Haq and his reactionary project to “Islamize” Pakistan.

Following the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, a bloody civil war ensued and the Islamist Taliban ultimately seized power. After September 11, the Bush administration exploited Bin Laden’s presence in Afghanistan to legitimize the brutal invasion and neocolonial occupation of the geostrategically significant country—an occupation which lasted over two decades and claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. Since the US-led war was launched, 5.9 million Afghans have fled the country or been internally displaced, according to the Cost of War project by Brown University’s Watson Institute.

After the ignominious departure of US and coalition troops in 2021 in the face of Taliban resistance and popular opposition to the corrupt neo-colonial regime in Kabul, Washington took revenge on the Afghan people by plunging the country into an economic catastrophe. In addition to sanctions against the Taliban-led regime, the US government illegally seized $7 billion in Afghan Central Bank assets held by the New York Federal Reserve.

More than 60 percent of the Afghan population presently live on less than $1 per day, while a staggering 97 percent have fallen below the poverty line. Wide swaths of the population have been mentally traumatized and thousands physically maimed by the reign of terror experienced by impoverished Afghans at the hands of their US-NATO occupiers. A February 2023 World Food Program report found 4 million people are acutely malnourished, including 3.2 million children under the age of five. Nearly 20 million people, or half of the population, were projected to be acutely food-insecure by March 2023, with 6 million of them in the emergency stage.

Pakistan’s impoverished Afghan refugee population

The wars and upheavals of the last four decades have resulted in repeated waves of Afghans seeking refuge in Pakistan. According to the UN, more than half a million Afghans crossed over into Pakistan after the Taliban came to power in Kabul in August 2021.

The refugee flows have served to further cement ties between the Pashtun-speaking regions of the two countries. Historically, the Afghan-Pakistan border has meant little to the Pashtun tribes who live on both sides. It was established in 1893 as the result of the machinations of British India’s colonial rulers, and Afghan governments have long argued the so-called Durand line was meant only to indicate spheres of influence, not state boundaries. This has long been a serious bone of contention between Islamabad and Kabul, resulting in armed clashes both under the US-backed regime and the current Taliban-led one.

According to UN High Commissioner of Refugees, about half of the Afghan refugees live in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, formerly known as the North-West Frontier Province. In 2018, the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), a semi-autonomous region predominantly populated by Pushtun tribes, were merged with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. These tribes have fiercely resisted the dividing of their communities across the Afghan-Pakistan border.

Another 24 percent of refugees are living in by far Pakistan’s poorest province, Balochistan. Sharing the poverty of the vast majority of the Pakistani population, many of them are forced to live in mud huts or other makeshift shelters not suitable for living, with little or no educational or health facilities.

The Pakistan government’s announcement of forced deportations created panic and shock waves across the entire Afghan refugee community, including undocumented migrants and those living in Pakistan with documentation. The government has assured the 2.7 million Afghans who do have papers that they will be unaffected by its crackdown on “illegals.” However, even those whom the government concedes have legal status are highly apprehensive. This is principally because of the breadth and indiscriminate character of the chauvinist politics animating the state’s anti-Afghan campaign. A further concern is that roughly 1.4 million refugees have Proof of Registration (PoR) cards that expired on June 30 and which they have been unable to renew due to the incompetence and stalling of the authorities.

The Pakistan government has sought to justify its anti-immigrant crackdown as necessary to suppress and contain an intensifying wave of attacks by the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). Government officials have accused the Pakistan-based Islamic fundamentalist militia of receiving support among the refugees without providing a shred of evidence.

Since the Taliban’s return to power in Kabul, terrorist attacks by the TTP, an entirely separate organization from the Taliban despite their ideological connections, have intensified in Pakistan. Islamabad has accused the Taliban of allowing the TTP to operate from Afghanistan and has demanded its suppression.

Government ministers have incited anti-Afghan sentiments by blaming Afghans for recent terrorist attacks. On October 17, Interior Minister Sarfraz Bugti claimed “14 out of 24” suicide bombings this year were carried out by Afghan nationals. The Home Minister in Balochistan’s provincial government, Zubair Jamali, said, “They are involved in destabilising the country, and it won’t be tolerated.”

The TTP is the byproduct of the Pakistan military’s offensive against the anti-US occupation forces in the FATA during the US occupation of Afghanistan. In the 1980s, the region has been a base of operations for the CIA-funded Islamist militia, including Al Qaeda, fighting the Soviet-backed regime in Kabul.

In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attack, the Bush administration forced the US-backed Pakistan dictator General Pervez Musharraf to end his support for the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and send security forces into the FATA to establish control of the border. Musharraf used the bloody methods typical of the Pakistani ruling class. On his orders, the military launched indiscriminate air strikes and helicopter gunship attacks, devastating villages and farmlands, imposed collective punishments, and made widespread use of torture and disappearance.

This provoked increasing hostility and armed opposition. More than 2 million people have fled the FATA in a massive internal displacement of the Pashtuns across the country, producing a massive, ongoing humanitarian crisis.

White House in discussions with Israel on deploying US troops to Gaza

Andre Damon



Secretary of State Antony Blinken testifies at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday, as demonstrators hold up red-colored hands in protest of U.S. complicity in Israel's genocide against the Palestinians. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that the United States and Israeli governments are in active discussions regarding the deployment of US troops to Gaza to act as an occupying force after Israel’s planned crushing of the Palestinian resistance.

“The US and Israel are exploring options for the future of the Gaza Strip, including the possibility of a multinational force that may involve American troops,” Bloomberg reported.

The moves were “impelled by a sense of urgency to come up with a plan for the future of Gaza now that a ground invasion has begun,” Bloomberg stated.

Bloomberg’s report underscores the degree to which the United States is not merely a passive supporter, but an active participant in Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians.

The report gives details of a cryptic comment made by Secretary of State Antony Blinken before the Senate Appropriations Committee. He said, “We can’t have a reversion to the status quo with Hamas running Gaza.”

Blinken added, “We also can’t have—and the Israelis start with this proposition themselves—Israel running or controlling Gaza. Between those shoals are a variety of possible permutations that we’re looking at very closely now, as are other countries.”

As Blinken testified, multiple people sitting behind him held up their hands painted in red, symbolizing the bloody role of the United States government in facilitating Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians.

As Blinken was making these comments, news was filtering in about Israel’s airstrike on Jabalia, Gaza’s largest refugee camp, which killed and injured hundreds of people and prompted a wave of anger around the world.

There are growing indications, as yet unverified, that US troops are actively involved in the fighting in Gaza.

Salman al-Harfi, Palestine’s former ambassador to France, told Sputnik News on Monday that US military personnel said US troops were directly involved in the ground operation against Gaza.

“They not only support [Israel], but are also participating in the war against the Palestinian people,” al-Harfi told Sputnik. “The United States is sending military personnel to the area. They are involved in military operations on the ground in Gaza.”

Bloomberg’s report contradicts the public assertion by Vice President Kamala Harris Sunday that “we have absolutely no intention nor do we have any plans to send combat troops into Israel or Gaza, period.”

On Tuesday, the US announced that it would send 300 more troops to join the more than 40,000 that are already deployed throughout the Middle East.

The troops “are intended to support regional deterrence efforts and further bolster US force protection capabilities,” Air Force Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder said.

Since Hamas’s October 7 incursion into Israel, the United States has surged warships, troops and aircraft into the Middle East without precedent outside of wartime.

On Monday, the Pentagon confirmed that USS Bataan (LHD-5) and USS Carter Hall, two massive US amphibious assault ships, will stay in the Red Sea as part of the troop buildup in the Middle East.

The ships house the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, a 2,600-strong force of Marines. In addition to the Carter Hall, three guided missile destroyers are also in the Red Sea. One of these destroyers, USS Carney, is claimed by the US to have shot down multiple missiles and drones launched by Houthi rebels in Yemen on October 19.

The USS Gerald R. Ford and its associated carrier strike group is currently operating in the eastern Mediterranean, and is being joined by the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower, which entered the Mediterranean Sea on Monday.

On Thursday, the US attacked what it claimed were Iran-backed militia sites inside of Syria.

In his testimony on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, Blinken made clear the vital significance of the Middle East in the US’s efforts to subjugate Russia and China.

“For our adversaries, be they states or non-states, this is all one fight,” Blinken said. “If we start to peel off pieces of this package, they will see that, they will understand that we are playing whack-a-mole, while they cooperate increasingly.”

Blinken will travel to Israel Friday “for meetings with members of the Israeli government, and then will make other stops in the region,” the State Department said.

Blinken’s trip takes place as it is clear that the war is expanding in both scope and intensity. On Tuesday, Yemen’s Houthi militia claimed to have carried out a missile attack on Southern Israel, using a “large batch” of missiles and drones.

The massive US troop buildup in the Middle East is accompanied by an intensifying bombing campaign against the population of Gaza. On Tuesday, the New York Times reported that “at least a quarter of all buildings in northern Gaza” appear to be either damaged or destroyed, based on an analysis of satellite images by two university researchers.

They estimate that as many as 44,500 buildings throughout the Gaza Strip have been destroyed. The airstrikes have so far killed more than 8,000 people, according to Gaza health authorities.

Unlike the October 17 bombing of Al-Ahli Arab Hospital, which killed 500 people, the Israeli military publicly took responsibility for the Jabalia refugee camp bombing.

In an interview with CNN, Lt. Col. Richard Hecht admitted that the IDF knew there were civilians in the area it was bombing and proceeded regardless.

“But you know that there are a lot of refugees, a lot of innocent civilians, men, women and children in that refugee camp as well, right?” CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer asked.

“This is the tragedy of war, Wolf,” Hecht replied.

On Tuesday, the director of the UN’s Human Rights Office in New York, Craig Mokhiber, resigned in protest of Israel’s genocide in Gaza. “Once again, we are seeing a genocide unfolding before our eyes, and the Organization that we serve appears powerless to stop it,” he wrote in a letter to UN High Commissioner on Human Rights Volker Turk.

UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), meanwhile reported that 3,450 children in Gaza had been killed since October 8.

“Our gravest fears about the reported numbers of children killed becoming dozens, then hundreds, and ultimately thousands were realised in just a fortnight,” James Elder, a spokesperson for UNICEF said Tuesday.

“The numbers are appalling; reportedly more than 3,450 children killed; staggeringly this rises significantly every day. ... Gaza has become a graveyard for thousands of children.”

31 Oct 2023

UK government plans harder clampdown on protests against Israeli war crimes in Gaza

Thomas Scripps


The British state is planning to step up its repression of protests against Israel’s war crimes and ethnic cleansing in Gaza. As the popular movement in solidarity with the Palestinians grows—half a million attended a national demonstration in London on Saturday—the government and police are seeking new tools to intimidate and arrest protestors.

In the lead-up to Saturday’s demonstration, the media whipped up a torrent of slander denouncing those participating. There have been countless references to a fascistic article by the UK’s Commissioner for Countering Extremism Robin Simcox, published in The Times, “Hate marches in Britain are a wake-up call to all decent people.”

A section of the 500,000 strong March for Palestine demonstration in London assembling at Victoria Embankment

The hundreds of thousands who have protested Israel’s war on Gaza with chants of “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” declares Simcox, are guilty of chanting “death to Jews”. They have “been careful to construe their public displays of support just below the legal threshold for hate crime, glorification of terror, or public order offences… exploiting one of our proudest British values, freedom of expression, to pursue a shameful extremist agenda, the normalisation and promotion of antisemitism.”

His screed continues that this is also “the price that Britain and other Western European countries are paying for a three decade-long failed policy mix of mass migration and multiculturalism.”

On Friday, The Times added to this barrage the totally baseless allegations, supposedly citing private conversations with counterterrorism officers, that the Iranian government “is trying to heighten tensions at rallies over Israel’s bombing of Gaza. They have warned of increased hostile-state activity in Britain. It is directly linked to the Iranian regime and includes a campaign of online disinformation and Iranian operatives being physically present at protests.”

On Sunday, head of London’s Metropolitan Police Mark Rowley used these lies as a platform to call for a review of the legal definition of “extremism”, giving his officers a free hand to round up as many protestors as they can get their hands on.

Roughly 100 people have been arrested in connection with the protests since Israel’s war began, but Rowley threatened there would be “many more” in the future: “we’re going to be absolutely ruthless”. Crown Prosecution Service lawyers are now stationed in police operations rooms monitoring the protests to “identify” as many alleged offences as possible.

The London police chief, previously the UK’s lead counter terror officer, did his bit to smear the hundreds of thousands who have taken a stand against Israel’s genocide as Iranian stooges, terrorist accomplices and antisemites: “You’ve got state threats from Iran, you’ve got terrorism being accelerated by the events and hate crime in communities… In the middle of it, we’ve got these big protests.”

He lamented that police could only “enforce up to the line of the law,” since “there’s no point arresting hundreds of people if it’s not prosecutable.”

He added, “There is scope to be much sharper in how we deal with extremism within this country. The law was never designed to deal with extremism, there's a lot to do with terrorism and hate crime but we don’t have a body of law that deals with extremism, and that is creating a gap.”

The next step in this state orchestrated witch-hunt was for Home Secretary Suella Braverman to order a Home Office review of terrorism and extremism laws to consider “tweaks to the wording of existing laws to strengthen policing of the language and slogans at pro-Palestinian demos,” according to Politico.

Given the timescale of a review and new legislation, Communities Secretary Michael Gove has meanwhile been tasked with implementing a new non-statutory definition of extremism by the end of the year. The Times reports that the new wording “will make it easier to crack down on charities, places of worship, universities and other organisations that spread radical ideology or host hate preachers.”

The current definition is already as broad as “vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values”.

On Monday, Braverman, other senior ministers, national security officials and police took part in a COBRA meeting (which deal with national crises) “to look at domestic security arrangements in the wake of three weekends of protests and rising incidents of anti-Semitism,” in the Times’ words.

Britain's Home Secretary Suella Braverman speaks on immigration at the American Enterprise Institute on Tuesday, September 26, 2023, in Washington. [AP Photo/Kevin Wolf]

Speaking to broadcasters after the meeting, Braverman let rip a barrage of lies and threats, “Let me explain what we have seen over the last few weekends. We have seen now tens of thousands of people take to the streets following the massacre of Jewish people, the single largest loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust, chanting for the erasure of Israel from the map.

“To my mind there is only one way to describe those marches. They are hate marches.”

Braverman, who is the most notorious hate monger in Britain today, continued, “What the police have made clear is that they are concerned that there is a large number of bad actors who are deliberately operating beneath the criminal threshold in a way which you or I or the vast majority of British people would consider to be utterly odious.” She added that she “would not hesitate” to change the law to facilitate a crackdown.

The ruling class is intent on the brutal repression of a mass movement they have long feared, amid a resurgence of the class struggle now exacerbated by the impacts of the pandemic, the cost-of-living crisis and the outbreak of war--first in Ukraine and now in the Middle East. It is using the McCarthyite atmosphere whipped up by the media and the government over any opposition to Israel’s genocidal assault on the Palestinians to roll out well-prepared plans for a police state.

Rowley was appointed to head the Metropolitan Police for precisely this purpose, having spent the previous few years advising the UK government’s Commission on Countering Extremism. In 2019, the World Socialist Web Site reported how a report on “left-wing extremism” submitted to the Commission, “set out to brand as suspect views held by millions of people” as extremist, among them that “The greatest threat to democracy has always come from the far right” and that “Zionism is a form of racism”.

The eruption of a mass, global movement against the imperialist powers and their Israeli client state is exposing the real state of political relations the world over: deeply isolated and despised governments stand opposed to the vast bulk of the working class and youth.

US condemns calls for Gaza ceasefire, as Israel accelerates ground offensive

Andre Damon



Palestinians leave their homes following Israeli bombardment on Gaza City, Monday, Oct. 30, 2023. (AP Photo/Abed Khaled)

The United States, a leading instigator and supporter of Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza, has once again publicly rebuked global calls for an end to the war.

At a news briefing Friday, US National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby was asked to comment on Friday’s overwhelming 140-15 vote in the United Nations General Assembly in favor of a ceasefire in Gaza.

“We do not believe that a ceasefire is the right answer right now,” Kirby said. “We believe that a ceasefire right now benefits Hamas, and Hamas is the only one that would gain from that right now.”

Kirby reiterated the talking points of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who vocally condemned all those both within Israel and worldwide who are calling for an end to Israel’s attacks on Gaza.

“Calls for a ceasefire are calls for Israel to surrender to Hamas, to surrender to terrorism, to surrender to barbarism,” Netanyahu told reporters, vowing, “That will not happen.” He continued, “Just as the United States would not agree to a ceasefire after the bombing of Pearl Harbor or after the terrorist attack of 9/11, Israel will not agree to a cessation of hostilities with Hamas after the horrific attacks of October 7.”

Netanyahu referred to the Palestinians as “the forces of barbarism,” adding, “If Hamas and Iran’s axis of evil wins, you will be their next target,” referring to Israel’s imperialist allies. Netanyahu asked if “the civilized world [is] ready to fight the barbarians,” saying that Israel’s opponents want to “usher in a world of fear and darkness,” calling them the enemies of civilization.

Kirby and Netanyahu made these statements as Israeli tanks and soldiers pushed further toward Gaza City, with video showing Israeli troops shooting indiscriminately at civilian vehicles. Israeli ground troops entered Gaza last week and have steadily moved to encircle Gaza City from multiple directions. Israel has blocked food, water, and fuel from entering into the enclave of two million people and is only allowing in a trickle of assistance to flow in from Egypt.

The advancing troops were accompanied by a relentless bombing campaign that continues to kill hundreds of Palestinians every single day. Between October 28 and 29, 302 Palestinians were killed in Gaza, according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. The death toll has soared to over 8,000, of whom 67 percent are women and children. Nearly three-quarters of the population of Gaza, or 1.4 million people, have been internally displaced. Throughout the country, UN refugee facilities reported that they are at three times their intended capacity.

The massacre of Palestinians in Gaza is accompanied by a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing by Israeli settlers in the West Bank, whose activities are given quasi-official sanction by the Israeli government. According to the United Nations, nearly 1,000 Palestinians have been displaced from their homes in the West Bank over the past three weeks. Another 121 Palestinians in the West Bank were displaced after Israeli forces demolished their homes. At least seven Palestinians in the West Bank have been killed by Israeli settlers since October 7, and more than 100 Palestinians in the West Bank have been killed by Israeli police and military forces over the same time period.

As Israel’s onslaught against both Gaza and the West Bank continues, it is becoming increasingly impossible to deny that the Netanyahu government has seized upon the events of October 7 to initiate a campaign of ethnic cleansing. In remarks on Monday, Philippe Lazzarini, Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, stated bluntly at the United Nations, “What happened and continues to happen is forced displacement.

“Civilians remaining in the north are receiving evacuation notices from the Israeli forces, urging them south to receive scarce humanitarian assistance,” he said. “But many, including pregnant women, people with disabilities, the sick and the wounded, are unable to move.” He added, “Hunger and despair are turning into anger against the international community.”

On Monday, the Financial Times reported that the Israeli government is seeking to relocate Palestinians into Egypt’s Sinai Desert. In an article entitled, “Netanyahu lobbied EU to pressure Egypt into accepting Gaza refugees,” the FT wrote, “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to convince European leaders to put pressure on Egypt into accepting refugees from Gaza.” The FT quoted a Western diplomat as saying, “Netanyahu pushed quite hard that the solution was for Egyptians to take Gazans at least during the conflict.”

The FT quoted Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi as saying Egypt “rejects ‘any attempt to liquidate the Palestinian issue by military means or through the forced displacement of Palestinians from their land, which would come at the expense of the countries of the region’.” The plans by Netanyahu are consistent with a leaked proposal from Israel’s intelligence ministry calling for the population of Gaza to be relocated to tent cities in the northern Sinai desert and not to allow the population to return.

Amid the escalating ground invasion, Israel is intensifying its bombardment of hospitals throughout Gaza. In its daily update on the situation in Gaza, the United Nations wrote, “Over the weekend, the vicinities of Shifa and Al Quds hospitals in Gaza City and of the Indonesian hospital in northern Gaza were reportedly bombarded, causing damage. This followed renewed calls by the Israeli military to evacuate these facilities immediately. All 13 hospitals still operational in Gaza City and northern Gaza have received repeated evacuation orders in recent days.”

On Sunday, the Palestine Red Crescent Society said that Israel threatened to bomb the Al Quds hospital, where 14,000 people are sheltering. The UN also reported, “The Turkish Friendship Hospital, which treats cancer patients in Gaza, was severely damaged by intense bombing in its vicinity. The bombing caused several injuries.”

In his remarks to the UN Security Council Monday, UNRWA Commissioner-General Lazzarini said, “More than 420 children are being killed or injured in Gaza every day.

“Save the Children reported yesterday that nearly 3,200 children were killed in Gaza in just three weeks. This surpasses the number of children killed annually across the world’s conflict zones since 2019,” Lazzarini said.

Protests in Ukraine demand return of soldiers from the front

Jason Melanovski



The friends and families of Ukrainian soldiers protest forced conscription and the treatment of soldiers by the Ukrainan military.

In an indication of growing fatigue with and opposition to the NATO proxy war against Russia in the Ukrainian population, protesters gathered in cities throughout Ukraine on Friday to demand the return of their friends and family members at the front. Some of them have been deployed without pause since the very beginning of the bloody NATO-provoked war on February 24, 2022.

Testifying to the widespread frustration in Ukraine with unending mobilization, protests were held in the capital city of Kiev, as well in smaller cities such as Ternopil, Odessa, Dnipro and others throughout the country.

In Kiev, family members and friends of deployed soldiers prepared a document demanding that both President Voldymyr Zelensky and General Valery Zaluzhny clarify exactly how long soldiers are expected to remain at the front. After gathering on Independence Square, protesters marched to the office of President Zelensky to present their demands, such as the passing of a bill to limit mobilization to 18 months of service.

According to the appeal, within Ukraine, despite the “general mobilization” declared at the start of the war, “some are serving without the terms of release known to them, while others are not serving at all.”

“The situation of uncertainty about the terms of service leads to the deterioration of the moral and psychological state of servicemen, to social tension between military and civilians, as well as to the demoralization of personnel,” the document stated.

“Our relatives have been at the front since February 24. Many servicemen have never been home. Their families wake up and go to sleep with only one thought they want to hear: I’m alive, I’m going home. We wrote a collective appeal, where we ask that we be given the terms of service and demobilization, which should be according to the law according to the Constitution of Ukraine,” stressed protester Anastasiya Chuvakina.

Protesters insisted they will continue to gather in Kiev and throughout the country until the government and military make public the terms of mobilization.

“We will seek to clarify the terms of demobilization. Let it be a year and a half, let it be a little longer, but they should know the terms. They should know that the country for which they give their lives stands behind them,” said one soldier’s wife.

In July, Ukraine’s parliament voted to extend martial law and mobilization for another 90 days until November, marking the eighth extension since the beginning of the war. Many reports from Ukraine have documented the criminal methods through which men are forcibly drafted into the army after being effectively kidnapped on the streets and in shopping malls. 

Despite calls for parliament to approve a bill limiting deployments at the front to 18 months, Zelensky’s own Servant of the People political party holds an outright majority in parliament and will be unlikely to move any legislation forward that could potentially impair the war effort without the President’s support. The office of President Zelensky has yet to publicly state how long his government believes soldiers are expected to serve at the front.

Zelensky’s much publicized four-month long “counteroffensive” has now effectively ended with tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers reportedly killed over the summer in a barrage of senseless charges at Russian defenses that according to the New York Times actually resulted in a net loss of Ukrainian-held territory.

In much of east Ukraine, Ukrainian soldiers are now on the defensive, attempting to hold onto cities such as Avdiivka. Located just 40 miles from the major city of Donetsk, the city “arguably has more strategic value than Bakhmut,” according to the Washington Post. Bakhmut, colloquially known as the “meat grinder,” was seized in May by Russia after a months-long battle that resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of both Russian and Ukrainian soldiers.

According to figures by the Russian government, Ukraine has lost 90,000 soldiers in just four months of its counteroffensive operations. 

In August, Ukraine’s main supporter, the United States, estimated total Ukrainian deaths at 70,000, with 100,000 to 120,000 wounded, while retired United States Army Colonel Douglas MacGregor has estimated that up to 400,000 Ukrainians soldiers have been killed in action. Whatever the true number, it is clear that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are in desperate need of soldiers to continue the war following Zelensky’s failed counteroffensive. The pre-war Ukrainian population was under 30 million, and it has significantly shrunk since, with at least 6 million having left the country since the beginning of the war. 

Amid the ongoing carnage at the front, Ukrainian men continue to flee the country illegally as unemployment skyrockets and the destruction of the Ukrainian economy, which was already the poorest country in Europe before the war, continues.

A recent story from Business Insider highlighted the dilemma facing many working class Ukrainians. The outlet referenced the story of war veteran Bohdan who was forced to hide his identity for fear of being identified by the country’s fascistic security forces. Bohdan spoke of the horrors at the front and was now supporting the attempts of his 21-year-old son Artem to escape the country before he was conscripted.

According to Bohdan, apart from facing death at the front, “There is not much work or quality education for young men during wartime, so some of them want to leave, but they can’t.”

Recently, Ukrainian news outlet Slovo y Delo reported that thanks to the war, Ukraine had entered the top 10 list of countries with the highest unemployment rates in the world.

According to data from National Bank of Ukraine, the country’s unemployment rate of 21.1 percent in 2022 was actually an improvement from the previously projected 26 percent. Other countries on the top 10 list include the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Angola, Botswana and Palestine.

Meanwhile, the Zelensky government plans for a further expansion of the conflict with the use of the newly delivered army tactical missile system (ATACMS) missiles from the United States, which can strike targets more than 100 miles away and employ cluster munitions.

Last week, in an online address to the parliamentary summit of the Crimean Platform, Zelensky warned that his country would be ramping up its attacks on Crimea and within Russia, signifying a further escalation of the nearly two-year long war. “We have not yet gained full fire control over Crimea and surrounding waters, but we will,” Zelensky said. “This is a question of time.”

30 Oct 2023

Thousands protest in Israel calling for an end to the bombing of Gaza

Jean Shaoul


Israelis joined millions of people throughout the world, opposing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s genocidal war against the Palestinian people, taking to the streets in several towns and cities to demand the government end the war and do everything necessary to bring home the 230 hostages being held in Gaza.

In Tel Aviv, hundreds of angry young protesters gathered outside the headquarters of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on Saturday evening holding banners saying, “Ceasefire now” and “Bring back the hostages, alive, now.”

Haim Rubinstein, for the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, demanded, “Is there a plan? We don’t know. That’s what we want to find out.” She added, “We also want to know the meaning of what happened last night,” referring to the IDF ground invasion of Gaza and the bombardment of 150 Hamas underground targets, including tunnels where the hostages are believed to be held.

Hundreds demonstrated outside Netanyahu’s home in Caesarea, accusing him of responsibility for the war, demanding he resign and chanting, “Take responsibility for the sake of the people.” At a demonstration in Jerusalem, banners called for a prisoner exchange. Hundreds took part in a rally in the northern port city of Haifa, home to both Jews and Palestinians, with other rallies held in Beersheba, Herzylia, Netanya and Kfar Saba and other towns.

Supporters held at least 20 vigils for the hostages’ families and memorials for those killed around the country on Saturday night.

These protests followed a rally Tuesday when hundreds protested in Tel Aviv, demanding the government secure the release of the hostages. At an earlier rally on October 14, angry demonstrators turned on Netanyahu, chanting “Go to jail, Bibi! [Netanyahu’s nickname]” and “Leave.” Placards read, “Bibi, you have blood on your hands,” “We’ve been abandoned,” “Return the hostages immediately,” and “There’s no trust, quit.” They accused Netanyahu and his government of being more interested in their own survival than the Israeli people.

While these protests are small and reflect a Zionist opposition to the Netanyahu government, they are indicative of growing concerns about the purpose and direction of the war that threatens to escalate across the region, putting the survival of the state itself at risk.

The scale of the destruction of Gaza is unprecedented. More than 8,000 people have been killed, including 3,000 children, more than 1,700 women, and dozens of families killed together when their houses collapsed on them. More than 17,000 people have been injured, with another 2,000 still missing under the rubble. At least 16,000 residential units have been destroyed and a further 11,000 made uninhabitable.

At the same time, the US is surging troops, warships and aircraft to the Middle East to be deployed against Iran and its allies, Hezbollah, Syria and the Houthis in Yemen. The Biden administration is not only supporting Israel’s war against Gaza and inflaming public opposition to US imperialism and its Arab allies who have not lifted a finger to defend the Palestinians, but providing the weapons Israel is using to carry out attacks on Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and the West Bank.

On Saturday, representatives of families with relatives held hostage in Gaza met Netanyahu and urged him to agree to an “everyone for everyone” prisoner exchange with Hamas, one of whose demands in launching the attack on Israel on October 9 was the release of all the Palestinian prisoners being held in Israeli jails.

Meirav Leshem-Gonen, father of a 21-year-old hostage told the press the families had pleaded with Netanyahu not to launch military operations that could endanger their loved ones, a reference to the planned ground invasion. Malki Shemtov, the father of another hostage, said the families had insisted they were all in agreement that they don’t care how many concessions the government had to make to get all captives back home safely.

Netanyahu cynically told the families that freeing the hostages was a chief goal of the war, a soporific that flatly contradicted his bloodthirsty “We will turn Gaza into an island of ruins” declaration. In all the government’s pronouncements, the hostages have not so much as got a mention. It has taken three weeks for Netanyahu even to meet the families.

Yahya Sinwar, Hamas’ leader in Gaza, issued a statement saying, “We are ready to conduct an immediate prisoner exchange deal that includes the release of all Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails in exchange for all prisoners held by the Palestinian resistance.”

Amid the official howls of outrage against Hamas, according to B’tselem, as of last June, Israel was holding 4,499 Palestinians—mostly from the West Bank and East Jerusalem with 183 from the Gaza Strip, in detention or in prison on what it defined as “security” grounds. At that time, the Prison Service was also holding 850 Palestinians, 3 of them from the Gaza Strip, for being in Israel illegally.

Most significantly, the number of prisoners has doubled to more than 10,000 since October 9 after Israel arrested around 4,000 labourers from Gaza who had permits to work in Israel, detaining them in military bases in the Negev desert, with reports from Palestinian lawyers and officials of severe mistreatment, assaults and inhuman conditions, including being subjected to starvation and thirst. It has also arrested 1,070 other Palestinians in overnight army raids in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, most of whom are being held in administrative detention without charge.

Speaking at a press conference on Thursday in Ramallah, Qadura Fares, head of the Palestinian Authority’s Commission for Detainees’ Affairs, said recent developments are “unprecedented” and “dangerous.” “Everyone who is arrested is assaulted. Many of the prisoners have had their limbs, hands and legs broken… degrading and insulting expressions, insults, cursing, tying them with handcuffs to the back and tightening them at the end to the point of causing severe pain… naked, humiliating and group search of the prisoners,” he explained.

On Wednesday, the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, approved a plan reducing the minimum living space for each prisoner, previously 3.5 square metres, to accommodate the rising numbers and has made it easier to arrest Palestinians both in the occupied territories and in Israel itself on mere suspicion.

Russia’s war-time budget

Andrea Peters



Russian President Vladimir Putin, center, Admiral Nikolai Yevmenov, Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, left, and Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, right, arrive at The Peter and Paul Fortress to attend the Navy Day parade in St. Petersburg, Russia, Sunday, July 30, 2023. [AP Photo/Alexander Kazakov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo]

Under conditions of the US and NATO’s ongoing escalation of the war in Ukraine, Moscow is placing the country’s economy on a war footing, with a massive increase in military spending slated for 2024-2026. On Thursday, the Russian Duma gave initial approval to the Kremlin’s proposed federal budget, which will raise defense expenditures to 10.7 trillion rubles (about $113 billion) next year. This is a record 6 percent of gross domestic product, the largest military-spending to GDP ratio since the dissolution of the USSR.

These outlays, while still minuscule in comparison to the trillion plus dollars that the US spends annually on defense, are a 70 percent increase over 2023. When the additional 3.4 trillion rubles ($36 billion) dedicated in 2024 to “national security” is added to the bill, nearly 40 percent of Russia’s federal budget will soon go to war-making and intensifying the state’s repressive powers.

Compared to 2021, Moscow will have now tripled its disbursements in these areas. For the first time ever, Russia’s expenditures on defense and security will dwarf those directed towards “social policy.” The government is planning to devote nearly double to the military-industrial complex and its related institutions than it does to financing pensions, public sector wages, and other social programs, which will now account for just over 21 percent of all federal expenditures, the lowest level since 2011. Even these numbers are an underestimate, as many defense and security expenses are either classified information, included under other categories, or handled at the level of regional budgets.

The budget comes after 19 months of war in Ukraine. Speaking for the parasitic oligarchy that emerged out of the restoration of capitalism in the Soviet Union, the Putin regime had invaded Ukraine after years and decades of imperialist provocations, based on the bankrupt conception that it could quickly force the imperialist powers to the negotiating table and discuss terms for a “peaceful existence”. This strategy has catastrophically backfired. Whatever their own military setbacks, the imperialist powers have continued to escalate and expand the war in Ukraine. Now, in the Middle East, where the US is backing Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza, a new front is opened up through an escalation of conflict with Syria and Iran, both allied with Russia.

Under these conditions, the Russian oligarchy is feverishly trying to beef up its defenses in order to deal with the intensifying war and the efforts by the imperialist powers to break up Russia, a central part of their larger scramble to re-divide the world.

US President Biden, who has already funneled $75 billion in assistance to Kiev since February 2022 according to the Kiel Institute, is now demanding tens of billions more to finance Ukraine’s killing machine, as well as wage war in the Middle East, where new fronts along which Russia must wage combat will emerge. Washington is pursuing a policy of, as characterized by the RAND Institute in 2019, “overextending and unbalancing Russia” through “cost-imposing options” that are intended to stress “Russia’s economy and armed forces.”

Clearly concerned that the economic strains of financing the war will aggravate social discontent in a country with extremely high levels of social inequality, the Kremlin is attempting to present the new budget as a policy of equally “guns and butter.” Speaking at a meeting of a Duma committee last week, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov insisted that the country’s 2024-2026 financial plan was not a “military budget,” but rather devoted to “social issues.”

Over the course of the last year the Putin government has been making small increases to pensions by indexing them to inflation, providing some subsidies to families with young children, granting minor bonuses to certain public sector workers, and so forth. This is allegedly to continue in the forthcoming years. Allocations for social spending are slated to rise in 2024 by one trillion rubles ($10.5 billion) to a total of 7.7 trillion ($82 billion).

However, behind this nominal increase is a major attack on the working class.

First, as noted in an article published in the Russian Nezavisimaya Gazeta on October 17, the government’s plan actually rests upon a “tightening of both fiscal and monetary policy.” Inflation and the current low value of the ruble—the latter of which is essential to the government’s revenue calculations and foreign trade balance—will cancel out any positive impact that increases in social spending might have for ordinary people. “The indexation of public sector wages and pensions in real terms will be zero” and “public investment will be reduced in real terms,” observe researchers at the Institute of National Economic Forecasting (INEF) in a recently released study of the new budget.

In addition, expenditures on education, healthcare, and utilities are slated to substantially decline over 2024-2026 as a percentage of the overall budget, as well as in real terms. Starting next year, the Russian government will allocate just 4.4 percent of its account to healthcare, down from 5.2 percent currently. That number will fall further by the time 2026 is reached, with the state intending to shave off another 5 billion rubles by the end of its fiscal cycle.

With annual inflation currently at 5.4 percent, the value of the 1.62 trillion rubles ($16.9 billion) that Moscow will spend next year on healthcare will be a significant drop in real terms—by one estimate, 9 percent. Previous promises to expand treatment for vascular conditions, update oncology centers, invest in medical research, and modernize primary care are expected to be scrapped.

Already, Russia’s healthcare system is in crisis. In January, Health Minister Mikhail Murashko revealed that the country is short tens of thousands of doctors, nurses, and medical personnel. The overriding problem is extremely poor pay, an issue that has only worsened as officials have cut special compensation granted when the covid-19 pandemic was officially recognized.

In June in the small southern Siberian town of Abakan, healthcare workers at an ambulance station protested because while they had received a small pay increase, they ended up making less than before because they were stripped of various bonuses. Overall, they saw their incomes drop by between 5,000 and 15,000 rubles.

According to the website Medvestnik, based on the new budget, in 2024 a nurse working in primary care will be eligible for a federally-financed “social payment” of 6,500 rubles, about $68. Paltry as it is, this is still 40 percent more than the special allotment for junior medical staff in emergency departments, which will be 4,500 rubles.

The educational system in Russia will likewise receive less than nothing in the forthcoming three years, with federal budget expenditures dropping from 1.54 trillion rubles in 2024 to 1.41 trillion in 2026.

The country’s utilities systems will fare even worse. From today’s high of 857 billion rubles, spending in this area will drop to just 381 billion rubles in 2026—a fall of more than 50 percent. The impact on Russia’s already failing water, heating, and sewage infrastructure will be huge. In October of last year, 200,000 residents of Volgograd—the city, formerly Stalingrad, where the Red Army inflicted a major defeat on the Nazis in 1942—experienced the collapse of a sewer line.

The federal government is also planning to make significant cuts to transfers and subsidies for Russia’s 87 regions, which will undermine local expenditures on all manner of things and cause officials to turn to borrowing. Currently, one Soviet republic, Udmurt, has debts that are 100 percent of the value of its income. Another 9 regions are running at 70 percent.

Concerned about the implications of this austerity plan, parliamentary deputies from the Stalinist Communist Party (KPRF) and Just Russia voted against the budget on Thursday. They are not opposed to the vast expansion in military financing, but rather alarmed by the political consequences of the looming cuts in social expenditures.

In his remarks to the Duma, KPRF head Gennady Zyuganov combined denunciations of the 2024-2026 for failing to be a “victory budget” that adequately increases defense spending and centralizes state power with criticisms of the corrosive impact that gutting social funding on social and political stability.

There are also concerns that Russia’s forthcoming budget rests on shaky ground. A week ago, Russia’s Accounts Chamber criticized the government’s plan. According to the Russian business daily Kommersant, the state’s auditor pointed to the fact that the “macro forecasts of the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank,” which have to guide the budget, are in conflict with one another. It also “reproached the Ministry of Finance for the lack of explanation for the adjustment of the budget rule” that shapes the government’s financial calculations, “identified the risks of failure to achieve the new cut-off price of oil at $60 per barrel,” which is what the Kremlin is basing its revenue assumptions on, and raised concerns over the fact that there is “an increase in the share of defense spending and debt service with a decrease in the share of state investment and transfers to regions.”

Lawmakers’ budget calculations assume that the ruble will continue trade at a low value relative to the dollar, such that exports, primarily sales of oil valued in dollars, will generate large ruble revenues. Currently, for instance, the ruble is trading at about 90 to dollar, such that if a barrel of oil sells at $60 (the base price assumed by lawmakers for 2024-2026) it will yield 5,400 rubles. If, however, the ruble strengthens in value—e.g. it trades at 75 rubles to the dollar—the Russian treasury’s ruble income will fall precipitously. And should the price of a barrel of oil drop below $60, the country’s coffers will also be in trouble.

Finance Minister Siluanov acknowledged a week and a half ago the vulnerability of Russia’s budget to currency swings. 'A change in the exchange rate by one ruble will lead to an increase or a decrease in budget revenues (of) around 100 billion rubles,” he observed.

Despite the immense impact of the sanctions by the US and its NATO allies, the Russian economy could so far rely on revenues from oil exports to China and other countries. After a fall in GDP in 2022, the economy is once again showing signs of growth.

Another primary pillar of the economic and industrial growth has been military spending, with industrial output in key sectors being geared towards war-related production. This, in turn, rests on increasing defense outlays and the government’s ability to sustain them going forward. At the same time, Russian corporations are under pressure because the country is experiencing a labor shortfall caused, at least partly, by the fact that tens of thousands of workers have been drafted into the military.