12 Jan 2024

US and UK launch war against Yemen

Oscar Grenfell




A US Navy guided-missile destroyer launches an attack towards Yemen, January 11, 2024. [Photo: US Central Command]

The US and UK began bombing Yemen tonight, including strikes in the country’s densely-populated cities. While the scale of the assault is still emerging, the bombardment is an illegal act of war targeting an oppressed and impoverished nation that had already been ravaged by a years-long onslaught by Saudi Arabia, backed by the US and its allies.

The attack highlights the growing danger of a broad Middle Eastern conflict, as the US seeks to transform Israel’s genocide in Gaza into a regionwide offensive, particularly targeting Iran.

In a statement to Reuters, a Houthi official confirmed that strikes had hit the capital city, Sanaa, which has an estimated population of more than three million, as well as Dhamar in the southwest, Sadda in the northwest, and Al Hudaydah, the largest Yemeni port city adjacent to the Red Sea. 

Associated Press journalists reported hearing five airstrikes in Sanaa. Footage posted to X/Twitter shows large explosions in Al Hudaydah.

A US military statement proclaimed that the attack hit 60 “targets” and involved “Over 100 precision-guided munitions.” As of this writing, the toll of dead and injured is unknown.

In comments cited by the Al Mayadeen news agency, Hussein al-Ezzi, the Houthi deputy foreign minister, said: “Our country was subjected to a massive aggressive attack by American and British ships, submarines and warplanes, and they will have to prepare to pay a heavy price and bear all the dire consequences of this blatant aggression.”

The US and the UK have effectively launched a new war without even a figleaf of Congressional or parliamentary approval. Amid widespread and ongoing popular anger over the Gaza genocide, US President Joe Biden and UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak did not front the press to announce the operation or to answer questions about the bombing.

Instead, the White House issued a statement in Biden’s name confirming that strikes had begun.

It declared: “Today, at my direction, U.S. military forces—together with the United Kingdom and with support from Australia, Bahrain, Canada, and the Netherlands—successfully conducted strikes against a number of targets in Yemen used by Houthi rebels to endanger freedom of navigation in one of the world’s most vital waterways.”

Biden concluded by threatening a further escalation. “These targeted strikes are a clear message that the United States and our partners will not tolerate attacks on our personnel or allow hostile actors to imperil freedom of navigation in one of the world’s most critical commercial routes. I will not hesitate to direct further measures to protect our people and the free flow of international commerce as necessary.”

The attempt to present the bombardment as a defensive action, upholding international law, is a fraud on the scale of the lies about weapons of mass destruction used to justify the illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The clear aim of the bombardment is to ensure that nothing obstructs the now three-month long US-Israeli genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. Since mid-November, Houthi forces have carried out a number of operations in the Red Sea, with the stated aim of blocking war materiel and military-related supplies from being delivered to Israel and used against Gaza.

The US-led bombing campaign is thus of a piece with the Biden administration’s funding of the Gaza genocide, to the tune of tens of billions of dollars, and its repeated “urgent” deliveries of munitions to the Zionist regime to ensure that the mass slaughter continues.

The war has been in preparation for weeks. In December, the Biden administration unveiled “Operation Prosperity Guardian,” an international coalition to enforce de facto US and Israeli control over the Red Sea. That included public lobbying of European and allied states to commit warships to the region. 

On January 3, a US-orchestrated statement signed by 13 of its “partners” included bellicose threats of conflict with the Houthis. On Wednesday, the US successfully moved a resolution in the United Nations Security Council condemning the Houthis and setting the stage for an attack on Yemen.

The US and the UK are bombing a country that has already been decimated by imperialist-backed war.

In 2014 and 2015, the Houthi movement took over large swathes of Yemen, in a mass struggle against the government of then President Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi. Hadi had come to power in the wake of a popular uprising in 2011 against the dictatorial regime of Ali Abdullah Saleh, but had resolved none of the social issues that gave rise to that upheaval.

Saudi Arabia responded to the advance of the Houthis by launching a brutal war in March, 2015 aimed at restoring Hadi. At the start of 2022, the United Nations estimated that the Saudi onslaught had claimed 377,000 lives.

In the course of the war, Saudi Arabia carried out actions of a genocidal character, in some instances paralleling what Israel is now inflicting on Gaza. That included a blockade of all supplies, initiated in 2015 and then intensified in 2017. Saudi Arabia later claimed to have lifted the siege, but continued to hinder and delay supplies to the country.

Saudi Arabia systematically bombed Yemen’s agricultural crops and foodstuffs, in a policy aimed at deliberately orchestrating a famine. Estimates indicate that up to 60 percent of the death toll is the result of starvation. The onslaught contributed to mass disease outbreaks, including a cholera epidemic that infected a million people in a country of 34 million. 

In 2019, the United Nations warned that Yemen had the highest number of people requiring urgent humanitarian aid in the world. That cohort included an estimated 75 percent of the entire population. The following year, Yemen was the second-worst placed country in the world on the Global Hunger Index, as well as the highest on the Fragile States Index.

The war crimes were funded by successive US administrations, beginning with that of Obama. Between 2015 and 2021, the Defence Department allocated $54.6 billion of military support to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which also played a central role in the bombardment. The US, together with its allies including Britain, trained Saudi pilots, provided intelligence and politically defended the onslaught.

In bombing Yemen, the US and the UK are not so much returning to the scene of a previous crime, as continuing one that never ended. Notably, Al Hudaydah, one of the cities bombed tonight, was a particular target of Saudi Arabia, because it is a port. Denying Houthi access to the Red Sea was also a key component of the Saudi Arabian blockade.

US backing for the Saudi onslaught was bound up with the fact that the Houthis are a Shia movement with ties to Iran. By taking power, they had threatened the imperialist-dominated status quo as well as the protracted US moves against Iran.

The current attack, occurring as it does amid full-scale US-Israeli genocide in Gaza, Zionist bombing operations targeting Lebanon and Syria, and threats from Washington against Iran, underscores the danger of a massive conflagration throughout the region and more broadly.

11 Jan 2024

Government Of Turkey Undergraduate, Masters & PhD Scholarships (Türkiye Burslari) 2024/2025

Application Deadline: 20th February 2024

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: See List below.

To be taken at (Universities): Turkish Universities

Fields of Study: Courses offered at the universities

About Türkiye Burslari Government of Turkey Undergraduate & Postgraduate Scholarships: Türkiye Scholarships include both scholarship and university placement simultaneously. Applicants will be placed in a university and programme among their preferences specified in the online application form. Candidates can apply to only one scholarship programme following their educational background and academic goals.

Type: Undergraduate, Masters, PhD

Eligibility: To be eligible for Turkiye scholarship, applicants must;

  • be a citizen of a country other than Turkey (Anyone holding or ever held Turkish citizenship before cannot apply)
  • not be a registered student in Turkish universities at the level of study they are applying.
  • There is also age condition candidates are required to meet:• For applicants applying to Undergraduate Degree: Those who were born no earlier than 01.01.2001,
    • For applicants applying to Master’s Degree: Those who were born no earlier than 01.01.1992,
    • For applicants applying to Ph.D Degree: Those who were born no earlier than 01.01.1987,
  • Applicants shouldn’t have any health problems barrier to education.
  • have at least 75 % cumulative grade point average or diploma grade over their maximum graduation grade or have at least 75 % success in any accepted national or international graduate admissions test.

Required Documents

  • Online application
  • A copy of a bachelor or master’s diploma or document indicating that the candidate is bachelor or master’s senior student
  • A certified bachelor and/or master’s transcript (indicating courses taken and relevant grades of the candidate)
  • A copy of a valid ID card (passport, national ID, birth certificate etc.)
  • Passport photo

Number of Scholarships: several

Value of Türkiye Burslari Government of Turkey Undergraduate & Postgraduate Scholarships: The Scholarship Covers:

  • Monthly stipend (600 TL for undergraduate, 850 TL for master and 1.200 TL for PhD )
  • Full tuition fee
  • 1-year Turkish language course
  • Free accommodation
  • Round-trip air ticket
  • Health insurance

Duration of Türkiye Burslari Government of Turkey Undergraduate & Postgraduate Scholarships: for the period of study

How to Apply

Apply Now!

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Government Of Austria ITH Fully-Funded Masters Scholarships 2024/2025

Application Deadline: 31st March, 2024

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Scholarships are offered to i) ADC Priority countries (See list below) and ii) Other Developing countries

To be taken at (country): The Institute of Tourism and Hotel Management in Salzburg Klessheim, Austria.

About the Government of Austria ITH Fully-funded Masters Scholarships: The Austrian Development Cooperation through the Institute of Tourism and Hotel Management offers about 30 scholarships to applicants from priority countries as well as other developing countries. The Tourism School in Salzburg has an outstanding international reputation and a long tradition. They train future entrepreneurs and employees according to the needs of the international tourism and leisure industry.

Type: Postgraduate

Eligibility: To apply for the Government of Austria ITH Fully-funded Masters Scholarships at ITH, candidate must meet the following criteria:

  • Be between 18 – 35 years of age
  • Have a secondary school leaving certificate (high school diploma)
  • Have a minimum of one year‘s experience within the tourism and hospitality industry
  • Non-native English speakers must have an English qualification e.g. TOEFL, Cambridge 1st Certificate, IELTS or equivalent

Successful candidates should be ambitious and open-minded with good organisational and time management skills

Number of Awardees: up to 30

Value of Scholarships: Scholarship for Priority countries include:

  • tuition fee
  • accommodation
  • flight tickets (from home country to Salzburg and back)
  • health insurance
  • food from Monday – Sunday
  • excursions (except field trip to ITB Berlin)
  • € 205.- pocket money per month

Not included in this scholarship are:

  • transfer from the Airport to the hostel and back to the Airport when leaving
  • visa fee: the visa fees have to be paid by the applicants. The entry visa is approximately $ 110, – and the 8 months residence permit, which will be issued in Salzburg, costs approximately € 120.

Scholarship for Developing countries include:

  • tuition fee
  • health insurance
  • food from Monday – Friday
  • excursions (except field trip to ITB Berlin)
  • € 205.- pocket money per month

Not included in the Scholarship are:

  • accommodation: accommodation costs have to be covered by students who are awarded this scholarship. It is € 247, – per month. (€ 1976, – in total). The total accommodation fee of € 1.976, – has to be remitted in advance before admission letter can be issued.
  • flight ticket: Students who are on this scholarship have to cover their own travel expenses from their countries to Salzburg and back.
  • visa fee: the visa fees have to be paid by the applicants. The entry visa is approximately $ 110, – and the 8 months residence permit, which will be issued in Salzburg, costs approximately € 120.

Eligible Countries: 

ADC Priority countries include: Ethiopia, Uganda, Burkina Faso, Mozambique, Bhutan, Palestinian Territories, Georgia, Armenia

Other Developing countries include: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Dem. Rep., Eritrea, Gambia, The, Guinea, Guinea-Bisau, Haiti, Kenya, Korea, Dem Rep., Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Togo, Zimbabwe, Bolivia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Congo, Rep., Côte d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, Arab Rep., El Salvador, Ghana, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Kiribati, Kosovo, Lao PDR, Lesotho, Mauritania, Micronesia, Fed. Sts., Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Philippines, Samoa, São Tomé and Principe, Senegal, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vietnam, West Bank and Gaza, Yemen, Rep., Zambia, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Angola, Argentina, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belize, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Fiji, Gabon, Grenada, Hungry, Iran, Islamic Rep., Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, FYR, Malaysia, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Mexico, Montenegro, Namibia, Palau, Panama, Peru, Romania, Serbia,  Seychelles, South Africa, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Thailand, Tonga, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu and Venezuela

How to Apply: Students may attend ITH by private means or through scholarships given by the Austrian Development Cooperation.

PROCEDURE: 

  1. Get information about ITH from an Austrian consulate or embassy
  2. Download ITH application form by clicking hereAustrian embassies and consulates have this form as well.
  3. Application Process – all applications should be sent directly to the Institute via post.
    Submission deadline is the 31st of March 2024 (all applications have to be received by the ITH office the latest by 31st March 2024)
  4. You will receive a confirmation by email that you application has been received
  5. Confirmation – You will be informed about the result of your application in May 2024. If you were awarded a scholarship you will receive a letter of acceptance.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

The earthquake in Japan highlights crimes of the Turkish ruling class

Hakan Özal


The 7.6 magnitude earthquake that struck Japan on January 1 was the largest to hit the Noto Peninsula since records began in 1885.

The death toll has now risen to over 200. There is no doubt that many of these deaths could have been prevented. The Japanese government, preparing for a US-led war against China, has allocated a military budget of $56 billion for fiscal year 2024, but only $3.8 billion for disaster prevention in 2022. For capitalist governments in every corner of the world, making more profit takes precedence over human life.

A destroyed road near Noto town in the Noto peninsula facing the Sea of Japan, northwest of Tokyo, on Tuesday, January 2, 2024, following Monday's earthquake. [AP Photo/Hiro Komae]

This does not exclude a comparison between the 7.6 magnitude Noto earthquake with the two 7.7 and 7.6 magnitude earthquakes centered in Kahramanmaraş on February 6, 2023, which devastated Turkey and Syria, to determine the extent of the criminality of the Turkish ruling class.

The earthquakes of February 6, 2023, directly affected 11 provinces in Turkey, flattening some areas to the ground. According to official figures, more than 50,000 people lost their lives and hundreds of thousands of people had their lives turned upside down. According to the Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change, 36,932 buildings collapsed during the earthquake and 311,000 buildings were rendered unusable due to damage. For those who survived the devastation, the struggle to survive continues nearly a year later.

In Hatay, one of the provinces hardest hit by the Kahramanmaras earthquake, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said “it is not possible to be prepared for such a big disaster.” But a simple comparison of the devastation and death toll from the Japanese earthquake with the aftermath of the February 6 earthquake in Turkey contradicts Erdogan and confirms experts' warnings about preparedness for earthquakes of this magnitude.

With current technology, it is not possible to predict exactly when an earthquake will occur. However, based on past earthquakes and surveys scientific predictions can be made about which regions are prone to earthquakes and their possible magnitude.

For example, on March 10, 2022, Alican Kop, Director of the Earthquake Research and Risk Center at Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (KSÜ) and Assistant Professor at the Department of Geological Engineering, pointed out in an article published on the university's website that Kahramanmaraş is a very risky region. They recalled that a 28-kilometer fault zone runs through the city center and is very close to the Gölbaşı-Türkoğlu segment, which has accumulated energy for 509 years.

According to the news published in Kahramanmaraş Manşet on February 1, 2020, Kop stated at a meeting on seismicity at KSÜ that “we also have the risk of experiencing two earthquakes in a row. In other words, there is a really high risk of earthquakes in Kahramanmaraş”. He correctly predicted the double earthquake.

Despite the warnings of scientists, the ruling class and its political representatives have taken no significant measures against earthquakes; public safety and infrastructure have been completely subordinated to the capitalist profit system.

Aerial photo shows collapsed buildings and destruction in Hatay, Turkey, on Feb. 7. [AP Photo/IHA]

Seda Şendir Torisu, a Turkish civil engineer working in Japan, told the BBC on November 3, 2020, that Turkey has specifications and disaster regulations like Japan. However, unlike in Japan building production is left to the initiative of the contractor-subcontractor system and great concessions have been made in the inspection mechanisms.

There is no scientific earthquake-resistant urban transformation. As their indifference to disasters such as the pandemic and global warming shows, for the ruling class an investment that does not bring immediate profit is useless. They are not interested in the catastrophic consequences of their activities.

Engels expressed this indifference in the following way in Dialectic of Nature:

When an individual manufacturer or merchant sells a manufactured or purchased commodity with only the usual small profit, he is satisfied, and he is not concerned as to what becomes of the commodity afterwards or who are its purchasers. The same thing applies to the natural effects of the same actions. What did the Spanish planters in Cuba, who burned down forests the slopes of the mountains and obtained from the ashes sufficient fertiliser for one generation of very highly profitable coffee trees, care that the tropical rainfall afterwards washed away the now unprotected upper stratum of the soil, leaving behind only bare rock?

The Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects (TMMOB), which opposed a 2013 amendment to the Zoning Law, sent a letter to the then-president asking him to veto the law, warning, “With the abolition of professional supervision... unfair competition will deepen, signatory or fake engineers, architects and urban planners will proliferate, and the way will be paved for unqualified contractors who consider survey and project services as an increase in costs and refrain from any kind of supervision for the sake of profit.”

In addition to the problems in the supervision of the compliance of constructed buildings with regulations, one of the main reasons why earthquakes turn into disasters is the zoning amnesties used by the governments as a source of political and economic power. There have been more than 20 zoning amnesties in Turkey, the first of which began in 1948.

A badly damaged building in Antioch surrounded by rubble after the Turkish-Syrian earthquake.

Zoning amnesty refers to the issuance of a “building registration certificate” for buildings or structures that are in violation of the building permit. Approximately 7.4 million people benefited from the last zoning amnesty, which came into effect before the general elections in June 2018. Many buildings in Turkey that were built without permits have been legalized through various zoning amnesties.

The main beneficiaries of these amnesties, which were introduced by the governments for electoral purposes and to raise funds, were the multi-story buildings built illegally by building contractors. Huge illegal buildings in the city centers were given a clean bill of health and became the graves of the victims of the February 6 earthquake. None of the officials from the ruling party, nor from the opposition parties that have been in power in the municipalities for years have been held responsible.

Murat Kurum, who served as Minister of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change between 2018 and 2023 and bears the main political responsibility for the buildings that collapsed in the earthquake. He has been selected by the Justice and Development Party as its candidate for mayor of the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IBB) in the elections scheduled for next March.

Current mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, the candidate of the opposition Republican People's Party (CHP), has been implementing “urban transformation in İstanbul” for four years. Presented as an earthquake preparedness measure, this has been a way to drive working class residents from the city centre and build luxury residences for the affluent. The fundamental aim of the “urban transformation” imposed by the ruling class for years is not to protect residents from earthquakes but to boost profits for construction firms and enrich the wealthiest layers of society.

The University of Sheffield and growing links to the arms trade by academic institutions

Joe Mount


The University of Sheffield in the UK has links with defence contractors that supply components for war planes used by the Israeli military in their genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza.

The connections to the aerospace industry are operated through the Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre (AMRC), a technology park that houses dozens of external firms, including weapon manufacturers, alongside its research facilities. The AMRC’s industrial membership includes Rolls-Royce, Boeing, BAE Systems and Messier-Dowty, plus 60 other organisations. The AMRC boasts, “We can reduce the time taken to make a component from 40 hours to just three. We can take an assembly process down from 60 minutes to 60 seconds. And we can take 10 years of production and do it in 10 weeks.”

AMRC website flaunting BAE Systems as one of its "Tier 1" members [Photo: Screenshot: amrc.co.uk]

BAE Systems, the sixth-largest arms company in the world, funded research projects involving academics at the ARMC worth £8.5 million between 2012 and 2022. The British multinational company produces components for F-35 fighter-bomber planes, contributing approximately 14 percent of their total value.

Lockheed Martin, the giant American defence contractor, produces the F-35 warplanes in collaboration with companies such as Northrop Grumman and BAE. Lockheed sells hundreds of these high-tech killing machines each year to the US, Britain, Italy, Israel, and other regimes around the world.

The Israeli air corps has used these aircraft in successive onslaughts against the Palestinians.

The Israeli Air Force (IAF) gets most of its advanced military hardware from the US, including the F-35 Lightning II jet fighter-bombers which it first deployed in 2017. Although most of the Israeli fleet comprises the older F-15 and F-16 fighter jets, the F-35 planes are in active use in the offensive on Gaza, including for air strikes.

Israeli carpet-bombing of the small enclave has killed tens of thousands and levelled entire civilian areas. The Israel Defense Forces have also conducted precision air strikes against noted militants, anti-war activists, and writers.

Among British universities, the University of Sheffield has the most significant, long-term links to the aerospace industry, including major arms manufacturers.

Between 2012 and 2022, a total of £72 million worth of research funding was received from firms such as Rolls-Royce, Boeing, BAE Systems, and GKN according to a freedom of information (FOI) request seen by local newspaper The Star. These funds average £6 million per year and comprise approximately 5 percent of the total research income of the entire university.

Rolls Royce is the largest contributor and funds around £4 million per year in research and services. Rolls-Royce Holdings makes a third of its £12 billion annual revenues from arms sales.

Boeing funds an average of £1 million worth of work each year.

BAE Systems gives over £800,000 per year to fund research projects into automated manufacturing using advanced robotics. A team of academics employed by the AMRC performed research that used next-generation robotics to help automate the manufacturing processes used to create F-35 planes more cheaply and efficiently.

These researchers were actively involved in the deployment of this technology for the production of deadly weapons. The process was introduced at the BAE factory in Samlesbury, Lancashire to speed up the production of fuselage panels for hundreds of F-35 jets, saving the company over £15 million over five years.

BAE Systems, whose military contracts are worth over £20 billion annually, gave the AMRC team their “Chairman’s Award” to acknowledge the value of their support. One of the academics involved, Adrian Hirst, boasted, “My highlight was the F-35 countersinking work we did for BAE Systems. It was challenging, high precision work that we saw through from initial idea to execution on the shop floor at BAE Samlesbury. I really felt like the work we had done was making a difference in UK manufacturing.”

BAE Systems supplies aircraft, tanks, and missiles to the American, British, and Saudi governments. The company has benefited from the spread of war around the world, with the militarisation of capitalist governments creating new orders worth over £1 billion that have increased the company’s revenue by 7 percent.

BAE sold £15 billion worth of war materiel to the monarchic Saudi regime during its ongoing intervention in the Yemini civil war waged since 2015.

Alongside BAE, dozens of British companies are involved in the supply chain for the F-35 fighter-bomber. The production and export of these components is encouraged and facilitated by Rishi Sunak’s Conservative government and opposition political parties, including Labour.

Sheffield University is the biggest recipient of aerospace industry funding in the UK. The details of these research projects are mostly hidden from public view. In response to a FOI request, Sheffield University stated, “The University acknowledges the public interest in openness and its sources of funding and how this funding is used. We recognise a particular interest in accountability regarding the involvement of the University with private companies that could be perceived to be ‘arms companies’.

“This is, however, set against the public interest in allowing the University to operate fairly and equally within the commercial environment that it operates within. The University determines that there is a greater public interest in allowing this to continue and that were this not to be the case its core functions of teaching and research would be likely to be negatively impacted.”

Last year South Yorkshire was granted “investment zone” status by the Conservative government, along with 11 other English regions. Academic research is being primed to play an even greater role in attracting investment from corporations. The Financial Times noted, “Each zone will be focused around existing research institutions and industrial clusters, with up to £80mn of support — a mix of grants and tax breaks — available to help attract further jobs and private investment.” The newspaper noted that the AMRC had just “received a £29.5mn research grant from the Aerospace Technology Institute”.

The FT cited Steve Foxley, chief executive of the AMRC, who “welcomed the additional boost provided by investment zone status and said the central role of higher education in the policy was key.” Foxley said of companies including Boeing, Rolls-Royce, Spirit AeroSystems and McLaren ‘I really think with the investment zones I can attract investment from the industrial partners that we work with.’”

Most UK universities accept blood money from aerospace companies and the arms trade, including prestigious institutions such as King’s College London, Cambridge, Oxford, and Imperial College London. These firms gave over £23 million per year in research funding between 2013 and 2021, according to FOI requests by the charity Action on Armed Violence (AOAV). Some institutions refused to provide details for commercial or national security reasons, so these figures underestimate the reality.

The British government also funds research and business collaborations with institutions in Israel that are complicit in the Netanyahu regime’s genocide. Universities UK, the organisation of university management, announced its “Israel innovation researcher mobility scheme” last spring and awarded the funds to 12 universities, including major institutions such as the University of Leeds and University College London.

The links between academia and the arms trade go beyond research. These companies are invited to employment fairs to recruit young engineers and managers onto their career development programmes.

This corruption has provoked a series of student demonstrations on campus. Dozens of students protested and occupied university buildings in Sheffield at the start of the 2022 and 2023 autumn semesters to put pressure on university management to dissociate the institution from companies complicit in war crimes.

The draconian response of the university leadership was to spend £40,000 on private investigators to spy on student activists. This is part of a broader wave of victimisations of students opposing the Israeli onslaught and expressing solidarity with the Palestinians.

The marketisation of higher education means that universities are increasingly run like businesses, treating students like consumers and exploiting their workforce. Research interests are increasingly dominated by the interests of the ruling class. The relentless attacks on pay and conditions for workers in higher education provoked a long-running national industrial dispute from 2019, sold out last year by the University and College Union.

Ecuador’s government declares state of war with support of Washington

Andrea Lobo


Only six weeks after his inauguration, Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa has suspended democratic rights and ordered tanks and thousands of troops to carry out military operations across the country. 

Heavily armed soldiers roam the streets of Cotopaxi Province in central Ecuador, Tuesday January 9 [Photo: Ejército Ecuatoriano]

On Monday, following a handful of prison riots and the jailbreak of drug lord Adolfo Macías, alias “Fito,” Noboa ordered a state of exception nationally for 60 days. The measure suspends freedom of assembly, speech and movement, imposes a nighttime curfew enforced through arrests, and “provides political and legal support” for the military to act with impunity.

In response to a manhunt with thousands of soldiers and police, on Tuesday gangs launched at least 30 attacks in nine different cities, targeting markets, malls, hospitals, university campuses, police stations, and briefly taking a television news set hostage on live air. 

Videos on social media have shown scenes of chaos, with crowds of students and citizens running from attacks.

The government announced that the attacks and clashes on Tuesday left 13 dead, including three police officers, with prison guards and police taken hostage. 

Noboa then escalated the conflict, declaring war on 22 gangs. “I have ordered the Armed Forces to execute military operations to neutralize these groups,” he stated. 

The events on Monday were preceded by Noboa’s moves to implement a security plan involving the deployment of the military against gangs, building several new maximum-security jails and placing gang leaders on “prison boats.” 

Five days earlier, Noboa proposed a referendum asking Ecuadorians to allow the Armed Forces to intervene in internal security and enjoy immunity for any crimes committed, but the ruling class decided to simply dispense with such “democratic” fig leaves. 

The official narrative, as presented in a press conference Tuesday night by Adm. Jaime Vela, head of the General Command, is that the plan was working, which led to “unprecedented” gang reprisals. Standing next to ministers and masked soldiers, Vela said: “The future of our nation is at stake.”

Following this speech, speaking for the Biden administration, US Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Brian Nichols tweeted: “We are ready to provide assistance to the Ecuadorian government and will remain in close contact with President Daniel Noboa’s team regarding our support.” 

The reality is that the Ecuadorian military already acts in close coordination with the Pentagon. In October, Biden and ex-president Guillermo Lasso had already agreed to US military deployments on Ecuadorian soil. Then, last month, the White House announced an aid package of $200 million for arming the Ecuadorian military.

The “Pink Tide” governments of Lula da Silva in Brazil, Gustavo Petro in Colombia, Gabriel Boric in Chile and Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela joined Washington in expressing their support for Noboa’s declaration of war. 

Within Ecuador, the entire political establishment has fallen in line. On Tuesday, all parties in Congress announced an agreement granting the military and police a legal amnesty or pardons for any crimes they commit. 

Former President Rafael Correa, who leads from exile the largest party in Congress, Citizen’s Revolution, tweeted: “Full support, Mr. President. Organized crime has declared war on the state and the state must emerge triumphant. It is time for national unity.” His party had already formed a legislative coalition to give Noboa a parliamentary majority. 

All fronts led by the Stalinist Communist Party, including Popular Unity, the United Federation of Workers (FUT) and the Revolutionary Youth (JRE) have called for “unity” in supporting the military operations, with criticisms confined to its inefficiency. 

For its part, the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities (CONAIE) representing the indigenous bourgeoisie said: “We call for national unity to join efforts among all sectors of society.” 

In its latest statement after the election of Noboa, the Revolutionary Movement of Workers (MRT) of the Pabloite United Secretariat had praised the CONAIE and FUT for their “radical opposition to the new government” and called for their “remaking the unity of the popular camp.” 

By calling for national unity behind the US-trained and bloodstained Ecuadorian military, all of these organizations have become entirely exposed as right-wing agencies of the bourgeoisie and imperialism. 

Washington is again attempting to harness drug cartel violence to justify a “wars on drugs.” Plan Colombia and Plan Merida in Mexico show that this can only result in hundreds of thousands of deaths without making a dent in drug trafficking, which is ultimately anchored in the armed forces, government officials and financial elites.

Before that, 20th-century Ecuador and Latin America were marked by US-backed military dictatorships used to suppress opposition from below, which in several cases were directly backed by the Stalinists. 

As recently as June 2022 and October 2019, Ecuador witnessed the same scenes of troops marching and tanks rolling into cities, enforcing curfews, and carrying out unrestricted raids and checkpoints. But on those occasions soldiers killed and mutilated dozens of workers, peasants and youth at mass protests against social inequality, inflation, unemployment and the collapse of public education and healthcare. In both cases, the media and authorities criminalized protesters as “narco-terrorists.”

Today, US imperialism is escalating its efforts to use its military power to counteract the decline of its economic position in Latin America and globally, as reflected in its proxy war against Russia in Ukraine and its support for the Israeli genocide in Gaza, which itself is part of an unraveling conflict across the Middle East.

The Pentagon is openly stating its goal of recolonizing Latin America. During a December 2 US Senate hearing titled “Overlooking Monroe? Protecting our hemisphere and homeland?” several military and political leaders invoked the need to enforce the 1823 Monroe Doctrine opposing influence of any other powers in the Americas. 

At the event, the Southern Command chief Gen. Laura J. Richardson, pointed to the “infinite and strategic natural resources” in the region and said “it is time to act now” against growing Chinese economic influence. 

However, as demonstrated by mass social protests in recent years that in Ecuador and other countries blocked oil fields and mines, it is the revolutionary threat of the historically combative working class across Latin America that constitutes the main obstacle to, and cause for fear by, US imperialism and its local client elites. This is taking place amid a crisis of bourgeois rule across the region, where all sections of the political establishment have been fatally discredited.

On December 6, Fitch Ratings, the Wall Street agency, issued a special report on Chile, Peru, Colombia and Ecuador, warning about a new “political and social upheaval,” pointing to the 2019 protests, “growing disillusionment with political leaders” and “growing calls for social expenditures amid a major economic slowdown after a short-lived post-pandemic rebound.” What has rebounded are COVID-19 cases amid the ongoing pandemic.

After Rafael Correa came to power in 2007, the boom in oil and mineral prices driven by Chinese growth allowed the increase of both social spending and corporate profits. He convened a Constituent Assembly and adopted the Chavista slogan of “21st Century Socialism” to exploit this brief economic surge in a bid to refashion the crisis-ridden capitalist state. 

Once oil prices fell in 2014, Correa and his hand-picked successor Lenín Moreno moved to impose brutal social austerity and sanction IMF loans. Moreno handed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to the British police and reached a “cooperation agreement” with the Pentagon in 2019.

Last October, Noboa pulled off an upset victory in snap elections triggered by the political downfall of the right-wing administration of Guillermo Lasso, who had dissolved Congress and his government by invoking a “mutual death” clause.

The local oligarchy and imperialism concluded that Lasso could not meet their pro-investor agenda because of his unpopularity. Instead, the ruling class opted for a clean break and the installation of a militarized police state aimed above all against working class opposition. 

Noboa, the 36-year-old scion of one of Ecuador’s wealthiest families, has rammed through corporate tax cuts and announced a plan to cut public spending by $1 billion and request a new loan from the IMF. “We wish to reset the economy,” he said in an interview last week. 

The sharp increase in cartel violence and homicides in Ecuador in recent years has historical and international roots. They cannot be solved through national social reforms—which the ruling class rejects outright—and much less by means of war and a capitalist dictatorship.

Commercial real estate plunges posing major problems for banks

Nick Beams


The indications by the US Federal Reserve that it is moving towards interest rate cuts may have boosted Wall Street, at least temporarily. However, they have done nothing to alleviate the mounting crisis for banks arising from debts in the commercial property market which have to be refinanced in the coming period.

Commercial Real Estate sale sign sits on a lot in Wheeling, Ill., Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2023 [AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh]

The Fed move led to a 1 percentage point drop in the interest rate or yield on the benchmark 10-year US Treasury bond. Despite some liquidity being provided to banks in the short-term, it will not halt what has been described as the “slow-burn of the US commercial property slump.”

While it may have eased tensions for now, the Fed move has been described as “too little and too late and temporary, to prevent rising bankruptcies.”

The worsening situation was laid out in a report published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) in December, which has been the subject of a number of articles in the financial media. Authored by four economists, it was entitled “Monetary Tightening, Commercial Real Estate Distress, and US Bank Fragility.”

Writing in the London-based Telegraph, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard cited remarks by Columbia University professor, Tomasz Piskorski, one of the authors of the NBER paper.

“It’s not a liquidity problem; it’s a solvency problem,” he said. “Temporary measures have calmed the market, but half of all US banks are running short of deposits with assets worth less than their liabilities, and we are talking about $9 trillion.

“They are bleeding capital and could not survive if something triggers a sudden loss of confidence. It is a very fragile situation and the Federal Reserve is watching it closely.”

Not all banks are immediately affected. The looming crisis is concentrated in smaller and regional banks which are often heavily invested in local commercial property. But the experience of the past year shows that problems that arise in less significant areas of the banking system can rapidly spread.

One need only recall the crisis of March last year when Silicon Valley Bank and two others went under because of a run by depositors. Financial authorities had to intervene to guarantee all uninsured depositors lest the crisis spread throughout the system.

The situation in the commercial property sector and its implications for banks is potentially even more serious. The March crisis was sparked by the fact that due to a rise in interest rates, the market value of the Treasury bonds, which they bought as a safe haven for their cash, had fallen giving rise to significant book losses.

In commercial real estate the problem is refinancing debt at a much higher interest rate. Some $5 trillion taken out in loans in the period when interest rates were at historic lows will come due in a series of tranches.

Evans-Pritchard cited comments by Scott Rechler, chairman of the Long Island developer RXR and a member of board of the New York Fed.

He said lenders were only now beginning to mark down loans. “As an industry, we in the first innings of what’s going to be a long game,” Rechler said, noting he had defaulted on a $240 million loan for a 31-storey Broadway office tower and handed the keys to a syndicate of banks.

“You can’t raise rates this quickly and not expect a financial shock. We’re already working on transactions at 50 percent on the dollar; the equity is wiped out and half of the loan is wiped out.”

Professor Stijn Van Niewerburgh, a property and finance expert at Colombia University, has described the property market as a “train wreck in slow motion.” He recently published a paper which estimated that the “value destruction” of New York office buildings could exceed $650 billion.

The extent of the mounting problems is laid out in the NBER paper. It found that after the adoption of “hybrid working patterns”—the increase in working from home as a result of the pandemic—and higher interest rates, about 14 percent of all loans and 44 percent of office loans appeared to be in “negative equity.”

That is, current property values are less than the outstanding loan balances.

“Additionally,” it continued, “around one-third of all loans and the majority of office loans may encounter substantial cash flow problems and refinancing challenges, reflecting in part a more than doubling of the cost of debt following monetary tightening and substantial increase in credit spreads.”

The effect of the interest rate rises since March 2022 was outlined in the paper. It found that if CRE loan distress had manifested itself in early 2022 when interest rates were low, not a single bank would have failed even under the most pessimistic assumptions.

But because of the interest rate hikes since then and a more than $2 trillion decline in banks’ assets values, as many as 482 banks with aggregate assets of around $1.4 trillion would have the market value of their assets below their liabilities.

According to the research, distress in the CRE sector “could lead to the inclusion of dozens to over three hundred predominantly smaller regional banks within the cohort of institutions vulnerable to insolvency arising from … uninsured depositor runs.”

In other words, the crisis which erupted last March, leading to three of the four largest bank failures in US history, arose from conditions endemic in large parts of the banking system.

It noted that quite apart from spillover effects arising from the direct connections between banks, “the news about commercial real estate defaults and banking losses could be a trigger for a widespread run on the banking system by uninsured depositors, unravelling a fragile banking system,”

Moreover, the analysis suggested that “so long as interest rates remain elevated, the US banking system will face a prolonged period of insolvency risk.”

That conclusion has major implications as regards the very stability of American capitalism. A Fed interest rate of 5 percent or even more is not high by historical standards. But its maintenance today poses the risk of widespread insolvency.

That fact points not to a conjunctural downturn, which can somehow be alleviated, but to a deep-going historical crisis. The rise of American capitalism was powered by its industrial might.

That era has gone forever and today it is the centre of financial parasitism and speculation, financed by the inflow of ultra cheap money such that even the raising of interest rates to levels considered to be entirely “normal” in the past now threatens to bring down the financial system like a house of cards.