24 Jan 2017

Australia: Parmalat lockout in bid to slash conditions

Will Morrow

Around 65 workers have remained locked out at the Parmalat dairy processing facility at Echuca, in northern Victoria, for five days. When workers arrived on January 18, they were informed that the plant would be shut indefinitely.
The lockout is part of Parmalat’s efforts to impose major cuts to wages and working conditions. The company has been in backroom negotiations with the unions covering workers at the site, the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) and the Electrical Trades Union (ETU), over the terms of a new workplace agreement since last August.
In November, Parmalat applied to the Fair Work Commission, the federal government’s industrial relations tribunal, to tear up the existing agreement. That would mean workers would then be covered by an industry-wide award. This reportedly would cut workers’ wages by up to 50 percent while lengthening the working week from 35 to 38 hours, and gutting redundancy provisions by reducing the maximum payout to 16 weeks’ worth of pay.
The company had been notified by the AMWU on January 12 of a token four-hour strike from 3:00 a.m. on January 18.
The unions are now doing everything they can to reach a sellout deal with the company. The union kept workers at the plant isolated, many of whom remain camped outside the facility, by refusing to organise any broader industrial action against the lockout.
The unions’ only concern is to maintain their privileged position at the negotiating table to bargain away the conditions and wages of the workers they falsely claim to represent. They have denounced the company’s unilateral action, calling on the management to instead utilise the unions’ services to impose its attacks.
AMWU national food secretary Tom Hale attacked Parmalat’s “heavy-handed” response, “when they could just be getting back to the table.” The AMWU’s web site encourages readers to send a pre-written letter of protest to the company, pleading with it to “please come back to the table and offer a fair deal with the employees.”
There are signs that the company and union are close to a deal that delivers Parmalat’s major demands. The company announced last Friday it had held a “productive” meeting that day with the unions. A spokesman said: “By close of business on Monday, January 23, it is anticipated that Parmalat and the unions will propose new wording for clauses within the new enterprise agreement.” Neither the company nor the unions has reported on the nature of the clauses being negotiated. Further backroom meetings have been organised.
Parmalat had imposed another lockout on 50 workers at its Longwarry plant in the Gippsland region of Victoria last July, in response to limited industrial action by workers, including refusal to work overtime, complete paperwork and load or unload trucks. There, as at Echuca, the union covering workers at the site, the National Union of Workers, refused to appeal for any action at Parmalat’s other plants or by other sections of the working class.
Parmalat produces major dairy brands such as Paul’s Milk, Vaalia yoghurt, Oak and Breaka flavoured milks; it employs about 2,500 workers at multiple sites in Victoria and around Australia. It is one of the largest global dairy producers. The French giant Lactalis, which employs some 36,000 people in more than 18 countries around the world, purchased a majority share of Parmalat in 2011. At the start of this year, Lactalis launched a voluntary tender to gain total control of the company.
Parmalat’s latest lockout is part of a sweeping corporate and government onslaught against manufacturing workers nationally, under conditions of a deepening crisis in the Australian and world economy. Entire regions of Australia are in recession, and the economy officially shrank by 0.5 percent during the September quarter of 2016, the last quarter for which statistics are available.
This assault is being coordinated with federal and state governments, both Liberal-National and Labor, and assisted by the trade unions. Parmalat’s bid to scrap the existing workplace agreement follows a pattern set by the energy provider AGL, which operates the Loy Yang A power station in Victoria’s Latrobe Valley. This month, FWC approved AGL’s request to revoke its existing agreement, clearing the way for the company to slash wages by between 30 and 65 percent.
The FWC has since intervened again on the side of AGL against the Loy Yang workers, by ruling it illegal for workers to engage in industrial action such as coordinated sick days and refusing to work overtime. The Victorian state Labor government of Daniel Andrews had also threatened to intervene against the workers if they took industrial action.
AGL’s wage-cutting followed the announcement by Engie, the French multinational, that it plans to close the Hazelwood mine in the Latrobe Valley in March this year. The nearby Australia Paper manufacturing plant, which employs 1,250 people, is working with the trade unions to impose a wage cut of 5 percent, and 11.5 percent for new hires.
These attacks came as Ford ended car production in Australia, with General Motors and Toyota due to close their plants this year. The shutdown of auto production threatens to destroy up to 150,000 jobs, directly and indirectly.
There is also a crisis in the Australian and global dairy industry. World dairy prices dropped by about half between 2013 and 2016 due to oversupply, according to the United Nations Dairy Price Index.
The major dairy conglomerates are placing the burden of the price fall on farmers. The New Zealand-based company Fonterra, which accounts for 40 percent of all dairy trade globally, cut the price it pays to Australian farmers from $5.60 per kilogram of milk solids to $4.75 last June. Two months earlier, Murray Goulburn reduced the price it paid to its 2,500 farm suppliers from $6 to less than $5 per kilogram. For many farmers, the prices are now below the cost of production, sending them into ruin.
This cost-cutting has boosted profits for companies like Parmalat. In the year to December 31, 2015, Parmalat’s sales revenue rose by 8 percent to $1.65 billion, with a 3.7 percent increase in profits to $35.3 million, from its Australian operations alone.
However, investors are driving mergers and acquisitions, accelerating corporate demands for restructuring that targets workers’ wages and conditions. An Australian Associated Press report last June noted: “While there have been 876 deals in the global dairy industry since 2010, worth a total of $US57.3 billion … the sector is still highly fragmented—leaving room for further consolidation.”

US student loan corporation faces lawsuit for cheating millions

Seb Gomez

Navient, the largest servicer of student loans in the United States, has recently been targeted by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the state attorneys general of Washington and Illinois for misleading borrowers and other illegal practices that increased the loan repayment costs for millions.
Navient oversees some $300 billion in student loans for more than 12 million borrowers, 6 million of which are under contract with the Department of Education. In total the Delaware-based corporation, which was formed out of Sallie Mae in 2014, accounts for nearly one fourth of all student loan borrowers. The lawsuit alleges that every account may have been affected by the malpractice.
Navient is charged with misleading borrowers away from cheaper income-based payment plans in order to inflate loans with higher interest rates. Borrowers are legally allowed to change payment plans as they please. However, Navient is accused of advising its customer service employees to press customers away from the income-based plans and into forbearance, a short-term postponement of payment normally appropriate for those with temporary financial difficulty.
Those placed into forbearance without proper knowledge of the terms face significantly higher costs, which generally increase the longer the payments are postponed. Such costs include the accumulation of unpaid monthly interest and the addition of unpaid interest to the principal balance of the loan, resulting in a recalculation of the loan based on the compounded interest.
The court filing concluded that from 2010 to 2015, Navient enrolled 1.5 million borrowers in two or more consecutive forbearances, more than 470,000 in three consecutive forbearances, and 520,000 in four or more. In total this amounted to nearly $4 billion in extra interest revenue for the company over those 5 years.
The lawsuit points out that Navient customer service employees had been incentivized to mislead customers. The longer the call, the less these workers are paid. The process to transition a customer into an income-based payment plan requires multiple and lengthy conversations as well as an online or paper application with income tax documentation.
By contrast, forbearance enrollment can be completed with one phone call and without any paperwork. These findings reveal that the company’s practices had effectively ensured that the employees tasked with helping customers would be financially burdened to actually do so.
Navient also neglected to inform those able to enroll in income-based plans that their enrollment required recertification after a 12-month period. The lawsuit notes that failure to recertify in a timely manner typically increases monthly payments by hundreds to even thousands of dollars and delays the progress toward loan forgiveness.
In addition to Navient’s cost-cutting and selective presentation of information to student loan holders, the company is charged with careless overview of the accounts of injured military veterans. Permanently injured veterans are eligible to have their federal student loans discharged. However, on numerous accounts, Navient improperly marked the forgiven loans as defaults, ruining veterans’ credit scores.
Navient and its predecessor, Sallie Mae, have a history of government lawsuits and investigations spanning nearly two decades.
In 2014, Navient was fined $60 million by the Justice Department and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for illegally overcharging military customers. That lawsuit found that the company had intentionally ignored the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which caps loan interest rates at 6 percent for active military personnel. In 2008, Sallie Mae struck a settlement with the state of New York for $2 million for conflict of interest practices. The company was found to have been paying for the entertainment and travel expenses of school officials it was doing business with.
The recent filing by the CFPB came just two days before the inauguration of now President Donald Trump. The New York Times reported that immediately following the November election, Navient’s stock value rose to nearly $18 from around $13, reflecting speculation among shareholders that the incoming administration would move to further deregulate finance— including the potential dismemberment of the CFPB.
The CFPB was established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Since its inception, Republican politicians have unanimously opposed the largely harmless organization, but now with Republican control of the House, Senate and White House, even such nominal reforms can be expected to be pulled back in the near future.
Currently, total student debt towers at more than $1.4 trillion, surpassing both credit card and auto loan debt. A report released earlier this month by the CFPB also found that the number of Americans aged 60 and over still paying for student debt has quadrupled since 2005, increasing from 700,000 to 2.8 million seniors.

Rescue attempts abandoned for seven buried Peruvian miners

Cesar Uco

Attempts to rescue seven Peruvian miners buried under an avalanche of mud and stones have been largely abandoned one week after the disaster that trapped the men in a tunnel hundreds of feet underground.
Rescue workers and firefighters from Peru’s southern city Arequipa were withdrawn five days after the disaster. Local residents accompanied by four specialists and firefighters from the nearby town of Nazca continued a desperate attempt to reach the trapped miners, but were forced to suspend their efforts on Sunday following another small avalanche that placed their own lives in danger.
Summer—January to March—is the rainy season in Peru’s Andean mountain chain, when thousands of avalanches and landslides take place. Nonetheless, every summer, tens of thousands of peasant-miners, most of them Quechua speakers, risk their lives, in an attempt to secure a little more money to feed their families by entering dangerous abandoned and informal mines.
This year has been particularly rainy, with avalanches and landslides forcing the temporary closure of main roads in the country’s south.
The tragedy at the Las Gemelas mine occurred on the afternoon of Monday, January 16. Heavy rains unleashed a flood that covered the entrance and exit of Las Gemelas, which is located in a remote area far from the valleys that cut through the Andes in the district of Acarí, in the Arequipa region. Initially, there were 15 miners in the mine, but eight managed to get out before the barrage covered its entrance and exit.
Immediate aid came from 11 miners from Orcopampa, who arrived to help in the rescue.
The regional manager of Energy and Mines stationed in Arequipa, Vladimir Bustinza, reported that it was not until the early hours of Wednesday that rescue brigades were notified. “It is a well that goes down four galleries, which are 250 meters deep and we have seven trapped miners with very little life expectancy,” he said. It is estimated that the miners are located between 80 and 100 meters down.
Bustinza added, “The company had failed to pass the necessary regulations to become a formal mine. Chinchilico Perú SAC is a company that is dedicated to the extraction of gold.”
The informal mine is located two hours by road from the city of Nazca in the department of Ica, and seven hours from Arequipa, Peru’s second largest city and the commercial center of the south.
RPP Noticias reported, “A rescue team formed by firefighters from the Arequipa Company left this afternoon [Wednesday] with 20 rescuers to Acari in an Army Aviation helicopter, which was carrying the submersible pump provided by Sedapar required to save the miners.”
Due to heavy rains and rough terrain, the helicopter could not land. The head of the Seventh Command of the Arequipa Fire Company, Commander Jorge Martínez, told RPP Noticias that “the team will travel a trail about two hours to reach the mine.” He added that the mine was a 200-meter-deep tunnel, with mud covering about 50 meters.”
The rescue work was delayed by a defect in a generator, which forced rescuers to wait for the arrival of other equipment.
Mothers and wives of the trapped miners also gathered at the site, expressing their determination to stay until the miners were brought out.
On Thursday, the body of one of the miners, Eduardo Urquia Tonama (32), was recovered.
According to RPP Noticias, “The miners’ relatives told the National Police that those who have been trapped are Antony Lovón Mercado (19), Eduardo Laura Chiclla (27), Luis Alberto Huaraca Nuñez (30), Gilber Llantoy Ayala (23), Hussein Yelssen Flores Paico (22), Alberto Huamán Jiménez (52) and Eduardo Urquia Tuanama (30).”
There are thousands of such informal mines in Peru, with miners risking their lives working for third parties in abandoned mines under highly dangerous conditions
In November of last year, six miners died after inhaling toxic gases in an abandoned mine located in the Mazocruz sector of Santiago de Chocorvo in the central province of Huaytará, where several informal mines operate.
Neighbors could not help out of fear of toxic gases. One survivor stated that there were strong toxic odors when they decided to enter the mine.
In April 2012, nine miners were rescued in time. They were employed as informal workers—meaning off the books—in the Cabeza de Negro mine in the department of Ica. They were trapped underground for six days, surviving by means of a tube that brought in oxygen and food.
The owner of the Las Gemelas mine is Buenaventura, whose general manager is Roque Benavides, a multimillionaire who is a partner of foreign capital in large mining projects.
In many cases, miners, desperate for work, refuse to divulge to authorities the names of the individuals who hired them.
There are also a large number of informal miners who work on their own account, seeking out abandoned mines to see if there is anything left to dig out. As these small illegal operations are located in remote areas, they are rarely inspected.
The major mining companies bear responsibility for the dozens of deaths that take place in these abandoned mines each year. They are responsible for closing mines that they have stopped exploiting and ensuring that others cannot get into them. As such precautions are viewed as a drain on profits, they fail to take them, with fatal consequences.

Cold weather kills hundreds in Eastern Europe and the Balkans

Markus Salzmann

In the past few weeks icy temperatures and massive snowfall have caused hundreds of deaths in Eastern Europe, the Balkans, and Greece. Official figures record 33 deaths from cold in Europe just last weekend.
In Poland, more than 50 people have died as temperatures have fallen at times to minus 25 degrees. Twenty of the victims died of carbon monoxide poisoning due to inhaling fumes from burning wood in enclosed rooms.
In Slovakia, Pravda.sk reported that two people, presumed homeless, were discovered dead in the cities of Nitra and Bratislava. In one village a pensioner was found frozen last Friday in front of his doorstep. In the northern Slovakian district of Namestovo, a 54-year-old died on the way home from work.
In Latvia, 19 people have died due to the cold temperatures since the start of the year. According to the state forensic medical institute, 60 deaths have been registered since September 2016.
According to official data, likely an underestimate, over a dozen deaths have been recorded in Bulgaria since the beginning of the year. Snow storms have cut off about 650 villages from electricity.
In Romania, more than 130 roads had to be closed due to snow storms in past weeks. Hospitals were evacuated and public transport collapsed. Moldova closed its border with Ukraine because of massive snow, while more than a meter of snow fell in northern Albania. Many villages were cut off from the outside world in these regions. There are as yet no reliable figures on casualties.
In Hungary, at least 80 people have frozen to death this winter—twice as many as last year—not counting deaths taking place in the last several days, when temperatures fell to negative 20 degrees. Of the dead, about 30 people froze to death in unheated homes, according to data from the Hungarian Social Forum.
Hungary’s large Roma population is especially impacted. The Washington Post reported that large number of Roma boys skip school in order to chop firewood or forage for sticks for wood stoves.
Deaths due to the cold have also been recorded in Ukraine and Belarus.
In a month-long period in the winter of 2011-2012, extreme cold killed about 600 Europeans. If the current cold wave persists for a similar length of time, the number of deaths could be much higher.
The situation in the refugee camps along the so-called Balkan route and in Greece is particularly dire.
On Friday the UN children’s fund Unicef warned that more than 23,000 child refugees and migrants could risk respiratory infections, “even death from hypothermia,” due to sub-freezing temperatures across Europe.
An estimated 23,700 migrant and refugee children, including infants and newborns, remain stranded in Greece and the Balkans, where temperatures have plunged below minus 20 degrees.
A television report last week showed dozens of lightly clad refugees on the island of Lesbos lining up for the only meal they were to receive that day. Even more deplorable were the scenes inside the flimsy tents where the refugees and their families live. The inhabitants burn wood and refuse inside the tents in order to keep warm.
“Infants and the very young generally have less body fat to insulate them against the cold, making them more susceptible to respiratory problems and potentially fatal viral and bacterial infections such as pneumonia and influenza,” declared Basil Rodriques, Unicef Regional Health Advisor for Central and Eastern Europe. In response to reports of migrant tents buried in snow, the EU’s migration chief, Dimitris Avramopoulos, told reporters “last week’s images must not be seen again.”
The deplorable conditions in the refugee camps is an indictment of the policy of the pseudo-left Syriza government in Athens, which, along with all other European, prioritizes deterring and deporting refugees over providing humanitarian relief.
In Serbia, about 2,000 refugees live on the street or in storage halls. One of these “accommodations” is located in a row of warehouses behind the central bus station in the Serbian capital, Belgrade. Men, women and children live there without heating and sanitation. In order not to freeze, they light open fires, leading to smoke poisoning and severe respiratory diseases.
The only help comes from private, non-profit organizations that provide blankets and warm food.
“The government has failed here,” declared Petar Bogovic of the private aid organization Refugee Aid Serbia. “European policy, the icy temperatures and the lack of preparation for the winter have exacerbated an unbearable situation for thousands of men, women and children.”

UK government crisis erupts over Trident nuclear missile failure

Paul Mitchell 

The Conservative government’s attempt to cover up the potentially catastrophic failure of a Trident ballistic missile has blown up in its face.
The disarmed nuclear missile was launched off the United States coast last June, just one month before the British parliament voted 472-117 to renew the £40 billion Trident nuclear submarine missile system. Knowledge of it would have torpedoed the justifications given by an overwhelming number of Labour MPs for their support for its renewal.
The revelations are an acute embarrassment to Prime Minister Theresa May, in the week that she seeks to benefit from being the first foreign leader to meet US President Donald Trump in Washington, DC on Friday. May has threatened the European Union states with a “hard Brexit,” citing Britain’s military prowess as a nuclear power while warning of trade war measures unless they agree to favourable terms.
According to the Sunday Times, the Conservative government imposed a news blackout after the missile was fired from the newly refurbished nuclear submarine HMS Vengeance from its position off the Florida coast. Instead of heading as planned eastwards out into the Atlantic Ocean, the missile’s positioning systems malfunctioned and it went in the opposite direction over the US mainland.
A Royal Navy source told the Sunday Times that “something went wrong. ... There was severe panic that this test launch was not successful. Senior figures in military and government were keen that the information was not made public.”
“Ultimately, Downing Street decided to cover up the failed test,” the source continued. “If the information was made public, they knew how damaging it would be to the credibility of our nuclear deterrent. The upcoming Trident vote made it all the more sensitive.”
Following the publication of the Sunday Times report, the prime minister repeatedly refused to say how much she knew about the failure, insisting she had “absolute confidence” in the UK’s nuclear missile system.
By Monday morning Julian Lewis, the Conservative MP who chairs the House of Commons Defence Committee, the parliamentary body that is supposed to exert democratic oversight over the defence establishment, was wheeled out to blame former Prime Minister David Cameron for the cover-up.
Lewis declared, “In fairness to the present prime minister one has to accept that she has been dealt a rotten hand because this matter, the decision to cover it up, if there was such a decision, as appears to be the case, was taken in the dying days of the Cameron administrations when spin doctors were the rule in Number 10 Downing Street.” Cameron’s PR team denied any involvement in the cover-up.
By Monday lunchtime, a Number 10 spokesperson was forced to admit that May had been briefed on a number of nuclear issues, including the Trident malfunction, when she took office.
Soon after, a US Defense Department official confirmed to CNN Monday afternoon that the missile had to be diverted into the ocean and its self-destruct programme activated.
This confirmation visibly deflated UK Defence Secretary Michael Fallon, who was in the midst of a belligerent stone-walling operation in a hastily called and thinly attended session of the House of Commons in which he repeatedly declared that he would not answer any questions about the “details of submarine operations.”
Fallon stated that “earlier governments in different situations, in more benevolent times, might have taken a different decision about how much information they would be prepared to reveal about these particular ‘demonstrate and shakedown’ operations [before submarines are returned to service] but these are not benevolent times and we have taken the decision not to release any information about the testing involved in the successful return of HMS Vengeance to its operational cycle.”
To every question about who knew what and when, Fallon gave the same answer. The capability and effectiveness of Britain’s nuclear deterrent must not be questioned.
The Trident malfunction has thoroughly exposed the Labour Party and the culpability of its leader Jeremy Corbyn, who retreated from his anti-Trident stance prior to the vote on renewal.
In the name of “party unity” he refused to challenge Labour policy on Trident at the party’s National Conference, allowed a free vote on British military action in Syria that resulted in bombing raids and opposed war crimes charges against former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair and his accomplices.
Corbyn was only able to muster 47 Labour MPs in opposition to Trident’s renewal, while the majority—140—voted alongside the Conservatives in defence of Britain’s “nuclear deterrent.”
Deputy Leader Tom Watson was gung-ho in his support for Trident renewal as a means of strengthening the NATO build-up against Russia. The nominal Corbyn supporters Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry and then Defence Secretary Clive Lewis abstained, claiming the vote was merely a cynical political manoeuvre by the Tories to split the Labour Party.
Ultimately the vote confirmed that a single party of war exists in Britain that works together and cuts across all nominal party lines.
In response to the Trident malfunction revelations, Corbyn blandly said Labour wanted “a serious discussion,” adding, “It’s a pretty catastrophic error when a missile goes in the wrong direction.” Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell was equally anodyne, stating that it was “extremely worrying” that Parliament had not been informed.
To underscore their political cowardice, neither Corbyn nor McDonnell was present in the Commons when Fallon spoke. It was left to Labour MP Kevan Jones, who resigned as Shadow Armed Forces Minister as part of the coup the Blairites mounted against Corbyn, and Shadow Defence Minister Nia Griffiths, appointed by Corbyn despite her commitment to Trident, to question Fallon.
Griffiths complained, “I am sorry it’s taken allegations in a Sunday paper to bring these questions to Parliament. Let us be clear we are not asking the Secretary of State to disclose anything sensitive. All we want is clarity and transparency. Because the Prime Minister refused four times to say when she became aware. …We need to hear these facts from the Prime Minister and not have them sprawled across a Sunday newspaper.” Again Fallon refused to answer.
Even the faint whiff of outrage emanating from the Labour benches is a fraud. Labour cannot pretend to have been misled about the threat posed by Trident, whether or not it malfunctioned.
During the July debate on renewal, May made the unprecedented and ominous declaration that she was quite prepared to press the button authorising a nuclear strike killing 100,000 innocent men, women and children. Labour made no denunciation of this threat, when it was directed at Russia or China. Instead Corbyn was heckled by his own MPs when he spoke against renewal.
Nor were concerns vocalised in 2015 when William McNeilly, a former Royal Navy nuclear submariner-turned-whistleblower, warned that Trident was “a disaster waiting to happen.”
He posted a dossier on-line criticising “military deceivers” and naval “spin doctors” for ignoring the 30 defects he had identified on the weapons system. His warning that “It’s only a matter of time before worse information comes out, and everything is proven to be true” has come to fruition.
Despite Labour’s supine performance, the cover-up over Trident may yet do serious damage to May’s government under conditions of escalating divisions over Britain’s post-Brexit foreign and economic policy.
In addition, the issue also comes to prominence as the government announced on Monday plans following Brexit to overturn EU state-aid rules in order to support and deregulate the nuclear industry and four other key sectors.
Corbyn has abandoned his longstanding support for decommissioning Britain’s civil nuclear power industry as a crucial by-election at Sellafield looms, declaring that it could remain “for a long time.”

Northern Ireland general election called as Stormont collapses amid Brexit crisis

Steve James

A general election has been called for the devolved Northern Ireland Assembly on March 2.
The poll, less than one year after the previous election, will be held under conditions of a deep political crisis. In jeopardy are all the power-sharing arrangements established in Northern Ireland under the 1998 Good Friday Agreement aimed at ending the conflict between the pro-British Protestant Unionist and Irish Catholic Republican forces.
The election date was announced by James Brokenshire, the British government’s Northern Ireland secretary, following the resignation earlier this month of Sinn Fein’s Martin McGuinness, Northern Ireland’s deputy first minister.
McGuinness is struggling with a serious heart and nerve condition and has subsequently announced he will not be standing again for office. But his resignation had the political aim of bringing down his rival and partner in power, First Minister Arlene Foster of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). Sinn Fein, after ten years of sharing office with the DUP, has seized upon the scandal surrounding the Renewable Heat Initiative (RHI), or “cash for ash,” in which Foster herself is deeply implicated, to strengthen its position north and south of the border. It is at the same time combining calls for Irish unity with opposition to last year’s UK vote to leave the European Union (EU).
RHI, a British government scheme to promote bio-mass fuel sources, evolved into a decades-long hand-out to farms and businesses. Current estimates are that the scheme will cost the British government £660 million and Stormont £490 million. Former Minister for Enterprise Trade and Investment Jonathan Bell told Stormont last week that special advisers to the first minister and the party’s director of communication “had such extensive interests in the poultry industry that it [RHI] was not allowed to be on my [Bell’s] ministerial agenda.” Bell is suspended from the DUP and supports a public inquiry into the scheme, whose costs he was trying to restrict.
However, much more is at stake than easy money for chicken farmers. The RHI scandal has become the focus of political shifts rooted in the unravelling of the European Union (EU), which is a grave threat to Irish capital, North and South.
Northern Ireland voted to remain in the EU by a majority of 56 to 44 percent. The region’s economy is tied closely to the UK, but also the Irish Republic and the EU. Of export sales in 2014, for example, £12.7 billion arrived in the UK, but £3.6 billion went to the Republic, £2.1 to the rest of the EU and £4 billion to the rest of the world.
While the UK is the largest market, access to the EU, including the Republic with which the North is increasingly integrated, is vital. EU subsidies to the value of £3.5 billion over the last seven years have been handed over, while another £3.5 billion is planned for the period between 2014 and 2020. Most of this goes to farmers, but numerous cross-border projects to facilitate investment, such as train refurbishments, have also benefited.
In the immediate aftermath of the June 23 Brexit vote, Irish Taoiseach Enda Kenny raised the possibility of unification “if there is clear evidence of a majority of people wishing to leave the United Kingdom and join the Republic, that that should be catered for in the discussions that take place.” Kenny went on to compare Northern Ireland’s situation to the unification of Germany, noting that the former East Germany was immediately absorbed into the EU.
Subsequently, demands were raised from all sides for some form of special status for the North to ensure free movement of trade and people over the currently unenforced border with the Republic. In December, the Dublin government hosted a conference attended by all the Northern parties except the DUP and the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) to support calls for special status.
The hard-line unionists of the DUP campaigned to leave the EU. Writing in the Irish Times, journalist Fintan O’Toole complained that the DUP paid for a glossy supplement to the Metro free newspaper, handed out to London commuters just before the June 23 referendum. O’Toole reckoned the supplement would be the most expensive piece of election propaganda ever purchased by an Irish party. The Metro does not publish in Northern Ireland. The DUP, moreover, currently has eight MPs at Westminster. With the Conservative government’s majority down to 14 seats and some Tories likely to vote against aspects of the Brexit process, the votes of DUP MPs might become crucial. The DUP, therefore, has significant leverage with the government of Theresa May. For her part, Arlene Foster has promised that the upcoming election will be “brutal.”
In forcing an election, Sinn Fein are hoping to take advantage of the DUP’s support for Brexit, its exposure over RHI and broad popular hostility to all Northern Ireland’s political institutions, to shift the balance of power. On this basis, and by warning of the dangers of a post Brexit “hard border,” Sinn Fein, the only major all-Ireland party, are hoping to further advance the case for Irish unification.
Tensions have been greatly intensified by May’s January 17 speech confirming that the British government will pursue a “hard” Brexit involving departure from the European Single Market and customs union. Although May’s speech referred to upholding the Common Travel Area, in operation between Britain and Ireland since Irish independence and partition, she made no reference to any special status for Northern Ireland by which single market membership could be retained.
The economically liberal Alliance Party described May’s speech as “catastrophic for Northern Ireland.” Deputy leader Stephen Farry said, “Any departure from the customs union and the single market will necessitate a formal border either across the island of Ireland or down the Irish Sea. ... Barriers will be erected in terms of either the east-west or north-south relationships which are recognised and empowered under the Good Friday Agreement.”
Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams went further. “Taking the North out of the EU will destroy the Good Friday Agreement,” he said, describing the British government position as a “hostile action.”
Adams cited the British government’s decision to remove Britain from the European Convention on Human Rights as undermining “fundamental elements of the Good Friday Agreement.” He pointed out that “citizens in the North, under the agreement, have a right to Irish citizenship, and therefore EU citizenship.” He demanded that the Irish minority government should “be relentless in a diplomatic offensive” to avoid a hard border. The Irish government is currently expanding its diplomatic missions across the capitals of Europe, seeking support for the Irish position.
The situation is further complicated by the coming to power of the Trump administration in the US. Relations between Europe and America have soured over tax breaks offered by the Irish government to US companies exporting to Europe and seeking to exploit Ireland’s uniquely lax tax laws. The EU has demanded the Irish government collect some €13 billion in back taxes from Apple Inc. In response, the Irish government has forged an alliance with Apple against the EU rulings.
President Donald Trump is said to be likely to favour vast new tax breaks to Apple to encourage the tech giant to repatriate some of its profits to the US, underscoring the position of Ireland, North and South, as a plaything of the major powers.

Trump uses executive orders to impose hiring and regulatory freezes

Tom Eley

In the first days of his presidency, Donald Trump has issued a series of executive orders and memoranda that outline his administration’s far-right agenda: economic nationalism and war abroad; attacks on living standards and democratic rights at home.
On Friday, immediately following his inauguration, Trump issued an executive order weakening the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The order, titled “Executive Order Minimizing the Economic Burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pending Repeal,” directs the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies involved in the ACA’s administration, to the greatest extent possible under the law, to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay” any part of the act that imposes financial burdens on states, insurance corporations, pharmaceuticals, HMOs, or individual health care consumers.
The ACA was not a social reform, as the Obama administration and its allies presented it, but pro-corporate legislation designed to shift the burden of health care onto workers, while providing new revenue streams for the insurance giants. But Trump has cynically exploited widespread popular disillusionment with Obamacare to attack it from the right. It is not clear what portions of the ACA will be preserved, if any, but those measures that were designed to provide some pretense of concern for workers—such as that barring insurers from refusing policies to individuals with preexisting medical conditions—will be scrapped.
Also on Friday, Trump issued an executive memorandum designed to hold up all federal regulations that were in the process of implementation in the Obama administration. It instructs all heads of all federal agencies to clear any new regulation not yet published or implemented with “a department or agency head appointed or designated by the President after noon on January 20, 2017.”
On Monday morning, Trump signed three more orders, this time defined as executive memoranda, in front of media and administration officials in the Oval Office.
The first scuttles US entry into the 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Promoted by the Obama administration, the TPP would have created a massive free trade zone to isolate China and drive down the wages of US workers.
However, Trump’s scrapping of the TPP actually represents an intensification of Washington’s rivalry with China. Trump will “negotiate” with Beijing through the threat of war—both economic and military. Meanwhile, Trump’s claim that his “America First” policies will be “a great thing for American workers” is a bald lie. His intention is to lift all restraints on the exploitation of American workers, as his freeze on all federal regulation makes clear.
Trump’s real attitude toward helping American workers was revealed by the second order he signed on Monday, imposing a hiring ban on all federal agencies. The ban on new hires comes under conditions in which the US labor force participation rate stands at about 62 percent, a low not seen since the mid-1970s, prior to the mass entry of women into the workforce. It puts the lie to Trump’s claims, frequently made on the campaign trail, that he would rebuild America’s crumbling infrastructure.
Before signing, Trump looked up and stated, twice, “except for the military”—that is, the federal hiring ban will not affect the sprawling military-intelligence apparatus, which he has repeatedly promised massively increased funding—though the US already spends more on its military than the planet’s next nine largest military spenders combined. The text of the memorandum, issued later in the day, also exempts “any positions ... necessary to meet national security or public safety responsibilities.”
Finally, Trump reinstated the reactionary “Mexico City policy,” which blocks federal funding for international health care charities in poor countries if those charities provide information to women about abortion. The rule, a reward handed to his party’s narrow “base” among Christian fundamentalists and the Catholic clergy, was first imposed in the Reagan administration and has been alternately repealed and reinstated by Democratic and Republican administrations ever since.
None of the three items signed by Trump on Monday were actually “executive orders,” but “executive memoranda.” Between the two forms of executive document—both of which order or instruct federal employees on policy—there is no clear distinction. However, since a 1962 rule adopted by President John Kennedy, executive orders have always explicitly invoked a legal rationale for the dictated presidential action. In other words, they attempt to root presidential authority in law, and are published in the Federal Register. Presidential memoranda, which were used more by Obama than any other president in history, do not include any such legal explanation and frequently go unpublished.
The US Constitution provides for neither executive orders nor executive memoranda. Their use is bound up with the emergence of what historians have called “the imperial presidency.” Executive orders began to be numbered and entered into the federal registry only in 1907, in the wake of the American turn to empire during the administration of Theodore Roosevelt, who issued over 1,000. His cousin, Franklin Roosevelt, easily surpassed that, issuing 3,721, including the infamous Executive Order 9066, which was used to sweep up and imprison over 110,000 Japanese-Americans in concentration camps.
Since the late 1970s, executive orders, along with a third type of presidential edict, executive proclamations, have been used dozens of times to impose a “state of emergency” that grants the president broad, quasi-dictatorial powers, authorities granted by the 1976 National Emergencies Act. Presidents repeatedly renew “states of emergencies” imposed by their predecessors, so that there are presently over 30 such ongoing emergencies.
Every year during his administration, Obama renewed George W. Bush’s Proclamation 7463, which provides much of the legal basis for “the war on terror.” Bush cited the state of emergency declared by the Executive Order to justify the prison camp at Guantanamo Bay.
Obama last renewed this order, Proclamation 7463, “National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks,” on September 15, 2016, with the US presidential election less than two months away. The powers inherent in that order now fall to the Trump administration.

23 Jan 2017

Call for Applications: Women in Tech Africa (WiTA) 2017 -Global Champions

Application Deadline: 3oth January 2017 at 5:00 pm GMT.
Eligible Countries: Countries in Africa
To be taken at (country): Online. Read Eligibility below
Fields of Involvement: 
1)Social Media English-2 spots
2)Social Media French-2 spots
(create content calendar and promote events and women in tech across Africa, must have social media experience- 2 yrs)
Operations
3)Operations offline :Helping Country lead with events in country(set up, event promotion , picture taking)
4)Operations Online: Helping manage/set up online webinar
Blog Content Creators
5)Blog Contributor –English 2 spots
6)Blog Contributor –French 2 spots
7)Blog Editor – 2 spots( French 1 – English 1)
(writing a bi weekly column for the website, must be a able to share links to work they have written in the past)
About the Award: Women in Tech Africa (WITA) has the sole mission of supporting female leadership and creating a pipeline for girls to choose technology. It believes that, though the technological field is currently male dominated, there is a great opportunity for many women and girls to thrive in this same field.
This programme is an opportunity for you to apply your skills and gifts to make a difference in the general developmental growth of Africa with special focus on technological development and entrepreneurship. Women in Tech Africa (WiTA) believes that everyone has a role to play in realizing the developmental growth of Africa starting from our communities with our unique set of skills and gifts.
All you need is internet and your willingness to be part of the Global Champion Programme.
Type: Training
Eligibility: Individuals (women, girls, men and boys) from different professional backgrounds and skill sets qualify to partake. Applicants below eighteen (18) years are encouraged to apply but will need to provide a parental/ guardian approval and consent in a formal letter.
Number of Awardees: Up to 12
Value of Program: 
  1. Certification/ testimonial for being a WiTA Global Champion.
  2. Work closely with the team at Women in Tech Africa (WiTA) head office (Ghana) on projects.
  3. Recognition and visibility on all WiTA platforms.
  4. Publication of all write ups by Global Champions to over 500,000 audience from more than thirty (30) countries.
  1. Network with over 20,000 members and experts.
  2. Get potential hires with our numerous corporate sponsors.
  3. Business opportunities or partnerships with our numerous partners and business professionals.
  4. Acquire new knowledge and learn skills
As a Global Champion for WiTA, your involvement would be voluntary. No funds will be available to cover the costs of your participation.
Duration of Program: 
  1. Global Champions are expected to make available at most an hour a day to fulfill their commitments.
  2. In the case of special projects, Global Champions would be required for more than an hour based on the nature of the project(s).
How to Apply:  Apply now to become a WiTA Global Champion.
Award Provider: WiTA Global Champion.

DFS Lab/Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Fintech Bootcamp for African and Asian Entrepreneurs.

Application Deadline: 28th February, 2017
Eligible Countries: Countries in Africa and Asia
To be taken at (Region): South Asia (city to be determined)
About the Award: Using the Design Sprint Methodology, a process of structured ideation and prototyping for answering critical business questions, entrepreneurs will go through a workshop to design, prototype and test new ideas. Rapid prototyping and UI/UX mockup support will be available on site. By creating quick prototypes for representative customers, you can get actual feedback and see if there’s a real potential for the solution you’ve created.
This high-intensity program provides you with the very best hands-on support and guidance from top flight mentors to help bring your idea to life.
Type: Entrepreneurship
Eligibility: To be eligible for this program, candidate must:
  • Be passionate about solving problems faced by low-income consumers
  • Believe they have what it takes
  • Be small and nimble teams of world class entrepreneurs, engineers, product managers, or other brilliant people who want to build digital services for millions of users.
  • have deep expertise in fintech, payments, or retail finance and a strong desire to work in developing countries.
  • Dream of creating financial products that will serve the needs of billions of low income consumers in developing countries.
  • have a founder or co-founder fill out the application.
  • Teams must consist of two-persons who wish to launch a company or very early stage startups with less than USD $100K investment to date who wants to send two co-founders to our bootcamp.
  • The startup’s vision should be to create an innovative new technology to address one of DFS Lab’s priority areas.
Number of Awardees: Not specified
Value and Duration of Program: The best ideas will receive grant funding of up to USD $100K and six months of additional support from the DFS Lab. The program runs for 5 days and includes flights, healthy meals, accommodation and fun!
Award Provider: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

The Hack Reactor Coding Scholarship for Tech Students 2017 – USA

Application Deadline: 18th February, 2017
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: All
To be taken at (country): United States of America
About the Award: Hack Reactor believes in a more diverse and equitable tech workforce. As part of our Diversity and Inclusion efforts, we will be awarding at least 50% of all scholarships to underrepresented groups in software engineering*. Women, People of Color and LGBTQ community members are strongly encouraged to apply.
Type: Training scholarship
Selection Criteria: 
  • Clear, Empathic Communicators
  • Passionate, intelligent learners
  • JavaScript Fundamentals
Number of Awardees: Not specified
How to Apply: Begin by filling out the first part of the application form. From there, you will be redirected to the full scholarship application form. You will need to complete all portions of the scholarship application, then be accepted into the program via the standard Hack Reactor admissions process to be considered for the scholarship.
Award Provider: Hack Reactor

Allan Gray Entrepreneurship Scholarship/Fellowship for South Africa, Namibia, Botswana and Swaziland Students 2017

Application Deadline: Varies by country (see below)
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: Citizens of South Africa, Namibia, Botswana and Swaziland (Only South African citizens are eligible to apply. Application for other countries aren’t set for now. Please check back in coming weeks).
Field of Study: All areas of studies is accepted
About Fellowship: The Allan Gray Orbis Foundation offers the exceptional Allan Gray Fellowship to Southern Africa’s pioneering bright young students. This initiative aims to develop students, known as Allan Gray Candidate Fellows, into Southern Africa’s future high impact responsible entrepreneurs.
Every year, the Foundation selects the best and most ambitious Grade 12 and first year university students from Southern Africa, Namibia, Botswana and Swaziland to join its vibrant community of Allan Gray Candidate Fellows.
The Fellowship includes comprehensive tertiary education financial support alongside exposure to thought leaders, mentorship and entrepreneurial mindset development. Access to postgraduate funding is available to those who have excelled in their tertiary studies and the Fellowship Programme.
Offered Since: not specified
To be taken at (country): The Allan Gray Fellowship is available to 1st year students at
  • University of the Witwatersrand (WITS),
  • University of Johannesburg (UJ),
  • University of Pretoria (UP),
  • University of Cape Town (UCT),
  • Stellenbosch University (SU),
  • University of the Western Cape (UWC),
  • Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU)
  • Rhodes University (RU).
Eligibility
  • Have you played any leadership roles at school or university as either a Prefect, member of the LRC, or sport team captain?
  • Have you attained any formal school or university awards within the Academics, Cultural or Service fields?
  • In the last 3 years, have you created an original product or service, developed it and possibly sold it (preferably NOT including any school market days you may have participated in)
  • OR have you initiated an activity or project that has made an impact in your school, university, community or environment?
  • Have you recently worked in any environment to generate your own money?
  • Do you participate in any sporting activities at school, university or outside this environment?
  • Do you participate in any cultural activities at school, university or outside this environment?
  • Do you display an ability to manage your emotions effectively?
  • Are you generally aware of the emotions of those around you and react appropriately?
  • Do you display an ability to be flexible and adaptable with change?
  • Are you able to describe an occasion or occasions where you have been able to achieve success despite difficulty?
  • Do you consistently demonstrate perseverance, tenacity and goal-oriented behaviour?
If you answered yes to most of these questions, then you are eligible to apply.
Selection Criteria
Fellowship Applicants need to be able to show a track record of leadership or being entrepreneurially minded. The Foundation’s framework to measure this as follows:
  • Achievement Excellence:The ongoing pursuit of excellence with tangible and specific focus on setting goals. A motivation to make a difference and leave a mark.
  • Intellectual Imagination:Demonstrated by an established record of intellectual achievement; an ability to see the unseen, challenge the status quo and suggest that things could be done differently.
  • Courageous Commitment:The courage and dedication to continue, realising that applying consistent commitment has a way of overcoming.
  • Spirit of Significance:A weight of personality that comes from living a life personified by passion and integrity.
  • Personal Initiative:A person who makes things happen and celebrates the satisfaction of bringing new things into being. Independent, proactive and self-starting
Number of Awards: The Allan Gray Orbis Foundation awards up to one hundred Fellowships every year.
Value of Award: The Allan Gray Fellowship covers the following:
  • Financial assistance in terms of academic studies at a Southern African University (UCT, WITS, UJ, UP, Rhodes or NMMU) for the full length of the degree.
  • Full cost of residence; cost of living stipend to meet the incidentals of normal life on campus.
  • An Entrepreneurial and Personal Development Programme, which is overlaid on top of the Allan Gray Fellow’s undergraduate studies, running throughout the year. This will include seminars, guest speakers, experiential learning activities and project based deliverables.
  • Mentorship, both from individually assigned Foundation employed staff, as well as business mentors, that will assist the Fellow in their development.
  • Future scholarships for postgraduate study that are in line with potential future impact, if the Fellow proves their ability during the undergraduate degree. This opportunity extends to the possibility of international study.
  • The possibility of future funding from E2 for those Fellows who successfully complete the programme, have work experience and are able to submit compelling business plans.
Deadlines:
Grade 12: 12th May 2017. (South Africa), Not set yet (Swaziland & Botswana), To Be Confirmed (Namibia)
1st Year University: 18th August 2017 (South Africa)
How to Apply: Interested applicants can apply for the Fellowship opportunity during their Grade 12 school year or during their first year of university. The Fellowship application is open to learners and students from South Africa, Namibia, Botswana and Swaziland (ONLY SOUTH AFRICAN APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN SET FOR NOW. This site will be updated with changes in the Application Process).
Scholarship Provider: The Allan Gray Orbis Foundation