2 Oct 2020

As pandemic resurges, Canada’s governments press forward with reckless back-to-work drive

Roger Jordan


The coronavirus pandemic is surging across most of Canada, with total new daily infections rapidly approaching 2,000—or more than four times the average just six weeks ago—and hospitalizations and deaths on track to experience a parallel spike in coming days.

Yet the federal Liberal and provincial governments are pressing forward with their homicidal back-to-work, back-to-school drive, which prioritizes big-business profit over human lives.

Quebec’s right-wing CAQ premier, Francois Legault, has ordered the Greater Montreal and Quebec City areas and the Chaudieres-Appalaches region, or more than 5.5 million people, into partial “lockdown.” Theatres, bars and restaurants in these “red zones” have been ordered closed from October 1 to 28, and residents instructed not to socialize with anyone outside of their households. In contrast to the strict controls on social gatherings, Legault and other government officials insist that schools and businesses will remain open.

Legault, who has previously publicly advocated for “herd immunity,” that is letting the virus rip through the population, declared Monday, “Our goal is to protect our health system, our schools and the work of as many workers as possible.”

Yesterday, Quebec reported 933 new COVID-19 cases, the highest number since early May, 16 deaths and 13 new hospitalizations.

In neighbouring Ontario, a further 538 infections were reported Wednesday, with the majority, as has been the case over the past two weeks, coming from Toronto, Ottawa and the Peel Region. Worryingly, the province has reported outbreaks at 46 long-term care facilities. Residents of long-term care facilities and seniors’ homes accounted for well over three-quarters of the more than 5,000 Canadians who died during the first wave of the pandemic between March and June.

Earlier this week, Ontario Health Minister Christine Elliott reported that 62 percent of the province’s new infections are among people aged 40 or under, a damning indictment of the push of the entire political establishment for the reopening of businesses and schools with virtually no restrictions.

On Monday, Ontario reported over 700 new COVID-19 cases, its highest one-day increase since the pandemic began. This development prompted the Ontario Hospital Association to request that Ontario’s Doug Ford-led Conservative government move certain regions of the province back to Stage 2 of its reopening plan, which would reimpose restrictions on certain businesses.

Such a step has been all but ruled out by governments at all levels. Last week, a leaked Ontario government planning document revealed that even in its worst-case scenario for the pandemic’s second wave, only “targeted action,” singling out specific workplaces, schools or localities, is envisaged. “The return to an earlier stage of provincial reopening, or even regional approaches to tightening would be avoided in favour of organization-specific or localized change,” stated the document.

Federal Health Minister Patty Hajdu has struck a similar tone, stressing that unlike the lockdowns forced on governments by popular pressure earlier this year, future public health measures should be “surgical.” In its September 23 Throne Speech, the Trudeau government similarly insisted shutdowns should be “short-term” and limited to the “local” level.

Who is responsible for the resurgent pandemic?

The reckless drive to keep schools and businesses open that all levels of government are now pursuing is motivated by the demands of corporate Canada and the financial oligarchy for their profit-making to be intensified, regardless of the cost in human life.

This is having a particularly disastrous impact on schools, whose reopening was uniformly pressed for by the federal Liberal government, the hard-right governments of Ontario, Quebec and Alberta, and British Columbia’s NDP government, because only if children were herded back to class could parents be freely available to generate profits once again for the corporate elite.

As of Tuesday, Ontario has reported 308 infections in schools among students and staff. A further 126 cases have been recorded at childcare facilities, leading to the closure of 36 centres and 176 homes. In Quebec, the Gerard-Filion High School on Montreal’s south shore was forced earlier this week to close for two weeks after positive tests were recorded among 26 students and seven staff members. Overall, provincial figures released a week ago revealed 1,163 cases at 489 schools.

These catastrophic numbers, which will inevitably produce a surge in fatalities in the weeks ahead, are the direct product of conscious policies pursued by the political establishment.

Faced with the looming health disaster produced by their embrace of “herd immunity,” political leaders are rejecting all responsibility and instead blaming the population. “I know it’s difficult, I was young myself, I remember what we wanted to do is go out with our friends and have fun,” stated Legault at a press conference Tuesday.

This slanderous attempt to blame young people for the resurgent virus is aimed at shifting attention away from the total failure of government policies to contain the pandemic. To the extent that infection rates are raging among younger people, this is above all because they have been forced back to unsafe schools, or because a greater proportion of them work in poorly paid, customer-facing service jobs that bring them into regular contact with large numbers of people.

The back-to-work drive was orchestrated in a conspiracy involving the federal and provincial governments, the trade unions and big business. Its first stage involved the Trudeau government funneling $650 billion in March into the bailout of the banks, big business and the financial markets so as to assure the wealth and investments of the rich and super-rich. Then, in a series of closed-door consultations beginning in April, they began planning how the economy could be reopened and future lockdowns averted. In a joint statement published by the federal Labour Ministry, leading business lobby groups, the Canadian Labour Congress and Unifor on April 15, policies were called for that would “keep Canadian businesses ready to come roaring back and ensure the economy can recover by getting people back to work quickly and in a safe manner.”

Three weeks later, on May 8, the CLC took upon itself the task of justifying a reckless reopening of the economy, declaring in a statement that there was no alternative. Forcing millions back to unsafe workplaces would be “a monumental challenge in the era of COVID-19,” declared the union bureaucrats. “But it is a challenge that we must meet.”

As the back-to-work, back-to-school drive got under way, the unions ensured that no organized opposition from workers developed. All attempts by workers to protest or strike against unsafe conditions were sabotaged or declared “illegal.” The union bureaucracy’s indifference and contempt towards the lives of the workers they purport to represent was summed up bluntly by the comments of Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation President Harvey Bischof. He declared just days prior to the reopening of the schools, “If the question is whether we are planning some illegal job action, the answer is a flat-out no.”

Only a working class-led movement can stop the pandemic, save lives and protect workers’ incomes

If this homicidal policy is to be stopped, working people must take matters into their own hands and intervene into the growing health and socioeconomic crisis as an independent political force. The first step in this process should be the building of rank-and-file safety committees in every workplace, school and neighbourhood to fight for the shutdown of all nonessential sectors of the economy until the pandemic is contained; full income security for all jobless workers; and the provision of proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for all essential workers. The building of such committees will require a relentless political struggle against the NDP and pro-capitalist trade unions.

The urgency of such a struggle has been underscored by the political events of the past week. The NDP, led by Jagmeet Singh, has made clear that it once again intends to prop up the minority Liberal government, this time by backing its pro-corporate Throne Speech in parliament. The policies outlined in the speech will, if implemented, ensure the further acceleration of the reopening of the economy, which will have deadly consequences for working people. According to a recent projection by the US-based Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, Canada’s COVID-19 death toll could reach 16,000 by the end of the year if current public health policies remain in place.

Early Wednesday morning, the NDP joined with the Liberals and other opposition parties to ensure rapid passage of the government’s latest spending bill. The main component of this is the transfer of the approximately 2.8 million workers still receiving the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) onto Employment Insurance (EI) or a number of newly created, makeshift benefits designed for the self-employed and individuals responsible for providing care to relatives. The stricter requirements attached to EI and to the Canada Recovery Benefit, including to “actively seek work” and accept “any reasonable job offer,” mean that in practice the vast majority of workers will be pushed off these programs as soon as possible. They will be forced into taking low-wage, insecure jobs, putting their own health and lives, not to mention those of their families, at risk amid a dramatic resurgence of COVID-19.

Singh told HuffPost in a recent interview that his party was ready to back the Throne Speech and would be more than happy to back the Trudeau government for another three years until the next federal election is due. The NDP leader justified this position by touting a temporary sick leave benefit agreed to by the Liberals that will give workers a grand total of two weeks of sick pay, claiming this is something that will “help millions of Canadians.”

The truth is that the NDP has desperately been seeking to cooperate with the Liberals for over a year. Prior to the 2019 federal election, Singh repeatedly offered the NDP’s services as a coalition partner to Trudeau. Throughout the pandemic, the NDP has supported the government on all critical votes, including its anti-democratic decision to shut down regular sittings of parliament for four months at the end of May.

The NDP’s latest decision to back the pro-war, big business Liberals was fully endorsed by the unions, which in response to the greatest capitalist crisis since the Great Depression have dramatically expanded their corporatist collaboration with government and big business. In early September, CLC President Hassan Yussuff gave Singh and the NDP their marching orders, telling CBC Radio’s “The House” that the social democrats have “an obligation” to work with the Trudeau Liberal government.

Should Singh and the NDP get their way, the Liberals and their backers from big business and the union bureaucracy will press ahead with reopening the economy at a cost of thousands more deaths. They will continue with their planned increase in military spending by over 70 percent from 2017 levels by 2026. And they will press ahead with their ever-closer integration of the Canadian military with US-imperialist aggression around the world, including against Russia and China.

The alternative to this disastrous course is the development of a worker-led counteroffensive against austerity and war, and for a policy aimed at containing and eradicating COVID-19. Under conditions of increasing strikes and protests among workers in Canada and internationally, and the discrediting of the entire political establishment through their complicity in the enforcement of policies that are leading to mass death, the objective conditions for the organization of a mass movement in opposition to the capitalist profit system are extremely favourable. What is now required is the building of a mass socialist party—the Socialist Equality Party—to provide the struggles of the working class with the conscious revolutionary leadership that the present situation so urgently demands.

Report exposes huge scale of COVID-19 infections in UK food processing industry

Barry Mason


COVID-19 infections are rocketing in the UK. In the last week, there have been 38,123 cases and 243 deaths.

On Friday, it was announced that eight people had died due to COVID-19, with six others in intensive care at one hospital in Wales after a coronavirus outbreak. The Royal Glamorgan Hospital in Llantrisant had to impose “significant temporary service restrictions” after confirming 82 cases of COVID-19. The same day the populations of the Liverpool city region, Warrington, Hartlepool, and Middlesbrough were instructed not to socially mix with those from other households—the latest in local lockdowns affecting over 13 million people.

The PIRC “Unreported Deaths” report (Credit: PIRC)

That the local lockdowns—which only target personal behaviour—have done nothing to prevent the spread of the virus is proven by research published by the Guardian yesterday. It found that “In 11 out of 16 English cities and towns where restrictions were imposed nine weeks ago, the infection rate has at least doubled, with cases in five areas of Greater Manchester rising faster than the England average in that time.”

Since the beginning of the pandemic, the government and its agencies have done everything to play down the scale of the spread of the virus—particularly in workplaces—to keep the profits rolling in. The massive scale of under reporting of cases of COVID-19 in the meat processing industry is highlighted in a report by the Pensions & Investment Research Consultants Ltd (PIRC). PIRC describes itself as “Europe’s largest independent corporate governance and shareholder advisory consultancy” whose “remit is to offer advice to ethical investors.”

It found that cases of COVID-19 in the industry are at least 30 times higher than officially reported. PIRC reported that it “has uncovered labour rights and safety breaches with COVID-19 outbreaks and fatalities occurring across the sector.”

The report gives figures on those working in food processing and their working conditions. With 430,000 employees, around 1.4 percent of the UK workforce, it is the largest manufacturing subsector. Over two thirds of food processing companies use temporary or agency staff. A quarter of those employed in the industry are EU migrants. Average pay is lower than in manufacturing overall and nearly 7,000 workers were paid less than the national minimum wage in 2018.

There are several big employers in the sector, including Boparan Holdings which owns the 2 Sisters Food Group with 18,000 employees and Cranswick employing 7,000.

PIRC’s findings on infections in the industry were based on speaking to food processing workers, trade union representatives and companies since the beginning of the pandemic in March. It found, “From a sample of 20 media reports we know that there have been at least 1461 COVID-19 cases in food manufacturing, and 6 fatalities. We believe the actual figure to be much higher.

“This is in stark contrast with the data released by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), showing that only 47 COVID-19 cases had been reported in the sector up to 8 August. No fatalities had been reported.”

The report explained the gap between the two sets of data results from the HSE’s “RIDDOR” (Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations) guidance used by companies to report COVID-19 incidents. This only tells companies to "make a judgement, based on the information available, as to whether or not a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 is likely to have been caused by an occupational exposure."

It is left to the company to determine whether a case of COVID-19 arose with the workplace or is a result of an infection in the community. Only cases determined to have arisen in the workplace have to be reported to the HSE.

Testimonials from workers who spoke to PIRC revealed some of the terrible conditions they faced. Among comments were:

“They’ve already made redundancies in one factory, then they used agency workers to top up – which isn’t allowed. They’ve been using 100 agency workers a day during the pandemic.”

“We weren’t separated initially, people were actually touching each other. The night shift walked out over it.”

“There are only 4 or 5 sanitizer pumps around site for around 300 staff… I’ve been told by my HR manager if we don't feel safe we can take 3 months off with no pay.”

“No chance of social distancing, corridors are too small and work areas are not designed for this sort of thing.”

Conditions outside the workplace facilitate the spread of COVID-19. Workers often use company provided bus transport to get to work, and with a quarter of the workforce being European Union migrants shared accommodation for employees is common.

In August, the Food Standard Agency (FSA) disclosed it was dealing with COVID-19 outbreaks at 40 food processing plants across the country. Indicating there were many more among 20,000 food processing plants, the FSA said the 40 were ones which “we are content to make public.”

Outbreaks of COVID-19 infections in their hundreds in food processing plants continue to take place, making a nonsense of claims there were only 47 cases of COVID-19 related to food and drink production.

In early September, several cases of COVID-19 were reported among staff at the Aunt Bessie’s Yorkshire pudding factory in Hull. Aunt Bessie’s is part of Nomad Foods, the parent company of Birds Eye. Around 400 work at the plant. The company announced a “small number” of its staff had tested positive for the virus. It ordered a deep clean, after which production continued.

Later in the month it was announced one of the victims, a woman who had worked for the company for over 20 years, had died in hospital. Another was seriously ill in hospital.

Also in September several members of staff at the Greggs bakery plant in Longbenton, near Newcastle, tested positive for COVID-19. The plant which employs around 300 staff halted production for a deep clean. This is just a few weeks after Greggs was forced to temporarily shut its distribution centre, in Bramley, near Leeds, after 20 workers out of 150 tested positive.

On Monday, cases were confirmed at a Bernard Matthew turkey processing plant near Halesworth in Suffolk. Public health officials tested around 100 staff and 25 tested positive with a further 54 self-isolating. Production at the plant which employs around 1,000 continued.

Yesterday, the Pilgrim's Pride pork meat processing plant in Pool, Cornwall, reported a mass outbreak. Out of 500 staff tested, more than 170 tested positive.

The lives of workers are being endangered with the government, companies, trade unions, and local authorities working together to conceal essential information about the spread of a deadly disease. Responding to the PIRC report, Unite the Union national official Bev Clarkson accused food processing companies of failing to protect workers. “The cold temperatures, metal surfaces and close working conditions found in many food manufacturing sites make them easy environments for the virus to spread in,” she said.

“In too many workplaces these risk factors have been exacerbated by employers neglecting to implement proper coronavirus health and safety measures, as well as refusing to provide adequate sick pay to those who need to self-isolate.”

Clarkson omits to mention that the employers could not have imposed such practises without its collusion. On March 20, Unite issued a statement “on cooperative working with the food and drinks industry,” declaring, “Unite, which has thousands of members working in food and drinks industry, has been working closely and constructively with employers during the current coronavirus emergency.”

A joint statement was issued May 6 by Unite, Usdaw, BFAWU and the GMB trade unions and the Food and Drink Federation (FDF). FDF chief executive, Ian Wright, said, “Partnership between employers and unions has been crucial to continuing production over the last eight weeks.” Wright concluded, “We look forward to working closely with our trade union colleagues to do so.”

Food processing workers must form rank and file committees to fight for the resources and conditions to make their workplaces as safe as possible. Every factory where there is an infection must be closed for a deep clean until it is deemed safe, with those workers forced to self-isolate afforded full pay. The fight for workplace safety must be linked with a broader restructuring of the economy to end the stranglehold exerted by the corporate and financial elite over every aspect of life.

Coronavirus in the UK: A poor schools’ pandemic

Margot Miller


Since schools, universities and the economy began reopening in the UK, the coronavirus began spreading again exponentially. The “herd immunity” policy of Boris Johnson’s Conservative government has led to a catastrophic doubling of cases per week, with the number of hospital admissions rising.

Liverpool Mayor Josh Halliday announced that 8,000 schoolchildren and 350 staff are self-isolating. The region is one of a growing number in the “red zone”.

Year seven pupils arrive for their first day at Kingsdale Foundation School in London, Thursday, Sept. 3, 2020. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)

The coronavirus, described as a “poor man’s virus,” disproportionately hits the working class. This inequality persists in its impact on schools, hitting the state sector much harder than private schools.

No sooner did state schools open their gates for the autumn term—backed by the education unions and the Labour Party—than many closed due to confirmed COVID cases. There have been around 2,023 schools reporting staff or pupils testing positive, though it is difficult to get a national picture as schools are gagged. Under conditions where social distancing is impossible, this will rise.

The situation in some schools is desperate, with reports of classes doubling up due to staff sick or self-isolating.

Schools are not “COVID-safe” as the government claims, but open to provide herding pens so parents can get back to work and begin the business of profit making. Regardless of government denials—Johnson declared with the blessing of opposition Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer that masks in school were not necessary—schools are perfect vectors for community transmission and children carry the same viral load as adults, or higher.

Many parents, terrified for the safety of their children and families, are choosing to deregister and home school, rather than face possible fines if they keep their children at home.

One headteacher wrote in the Guardian, “Three weeks into the autumn term and we are all wrecked. I look around at my leadership team in our Monday morning meeting at 7.45am. Everyone is drained from poor sleep, working over the weekend and managing colleagues’ worries.”

After deep cuts to the education budget since 2008, schools can ill afford the extra expenses incurred due to the pandemic. “It is costing us a fortune in additional PPE [personal protective equipment] and extra cleaning,” the Head continues. “We’ve had to use the supply teacher budget and it is not sustainable.”

A contributor on the National Education Union [NEU]—Unofficial Facebook wrote, “Can anyone tell me if I've missed anything about how the union is supporting us at the moment?... Schools are… in a state of crisis, senior leaders are overwhelmed by managing covid related issues, staff are exhausted and scared, and proper teaching is taking a back seat over necessary safety precautions…classrooms are going to become freezing environments where it’s too cold to be healthy, vulnerable staff are not protected, and it’s… only getting worse by the day...”

Compare this to the serenity in the top private schools, where children of the rich and privileged are educated.

Cocooned in his well-resourced bubble, headmaster Mark Laudar of Strathallan, an independent boarding school in Perthshire, Scotland, explains “cheerfully” to the Economist how the school provides a COVID-safe environment so the education of pupils can proceed without interruption, whatever the mayhem outside its sprawling 153-acre grounds.

Of the 560 nine to 18-year-old pupils, most have their own bedrooms, and staff live on the spacious campus—No chance of spreading the killer virus to Granny. This school has ample space to enable social distancing and money for essentials—the school upgraded its Wi-Fi to ensure enough bandwidth for online teaching. Lessons are socially distanced in small-sized classes, on laptops to minimise contagion and to include anyone isolating.

State schools are starved of the necessary resources and space to provide safe, face to face or online learning. Since 2008/9, spending on state education fell by eight percent. Around £4,700 is spent per pupil at primary school and £6,200 per pupil at secondary school.

Schoolsweek estimated private schools, attended by seven percent of UK children, spend on average three times more per pupil than the state sector. Some, like Eton College (for 13-18 year olds), spend more. Eton—annual fees £42,501, staff pupil ratio 1:8, boasting among its alumni Boris Johnson and his predecessor David Cameron—is very wealthy. It owns 200 properties with investments plus endowments in excess of £400 million.

Having charitable status, like half the private schools, Eton benefits from generous state handouts. The government subsidises private education by £200 million for fees plus tax savings worth £2.5 billion.

Not many families earn £160,000 a year to afford to send their children to private school. Before the pandemic struck, there were 14 million people living in poverty in the UK, including four million children. These figures are expected to rise sharply by the year’s end.

Successive governments that presided over this growing impoverishment feign concern for disadvantaged children. Used as an excuse for the precipitous reopening of schools, this did not translate into the promised provision of laptops for all children during the pandemic. Schools were at their wits end at the failure of the government’s £100 million scheme announced in April to provide disadvantaged Year 10 (14-15) and vulnerable pupils laptops. Many schools reported their allocation fell short by a fifth, as only 220,000 out of 540,000 were delivered.

A new study by the Data Evaluation and Learning for Viral Epidemics group revealed the achievement gap at crucial Year 3 (7-8) widened by 52 percent after lockdown. Professor Anna Vignoles from the University of Cambridge explained, “Shutting down schools has impacted all children, but the worst effects will be felt by those from lower socio-economic groups and with other vulnerabilities... Children from low income households… are more likely to lack the resources (space, equipment, home support) to engage fully with remote schooling.”

The Association of School and College Leaders warned the “catch-up funding” dedicated for support measures post-lockdown would be “wiped-out” by the expense of hiring supply teachers to cover for absences.

Staff shortages due to sickness or quarantining is compounded by failures in the government’s testing and contact tracing­­—rationed as capacity only meets a third of demand. The headteachers’ unions wrote a joint letter to Johnson “imploring” him to take control.

The National Association of Head Teachers found 45 percent of schools have teachers at home awaiting delayed test results. By winter there could be a shortage of supply teachers.

The Guardian reported a North London science teacher taught “back-to-back triple lessons to a class of 60 children in his school hall last week after a colleague called in sick with a temperature.”

At Southend High School for Boys, Headteacher Robin Bevan said he feared that if “10 or more teachers” were in isolation, “Sustaining high-quality education… becomes almost impossible. Supply teachers are hard to find, and our… budget for cover would disappear in weeks.”

Private schools have no such worries about the resources for supply cover or getting pupils and staff tested for the virus.

Eton College privately tested all staff and students at the beginning of term. Kent boarding school Benenden went a step further, purchasing the Samba II diagnostic device for £35,000 plus VAT, for rapid COVID-19 testing. With a school nurse available, everyone in school can be tested and diagnosed in 90 minutes.

Headteacher Jules White, the founder of school-funding campaign Worth Less?, said “While fee-paying schools enjoy the luxury of private testing to keep their staff and students safe… the rest of us are being let down by a wholly inadequate test-trace system.”

Turkish government lied on COVID-19 infection and death statistics

Ulaş Ateşçi


The COVID-19 pandemic’s resurgence in Turkey is intensifying, due to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan’s back-to-work campaign, supported by the bourgeois opposition parties and the union bureaucracy. Officially, around 1,500 new infections are recorded daily, and the total number of COVID-19 patients has reached 315,000. The daily death toll is between 65 and 70, and total deaths have passed 8,100.

On Wednesday, however, Health Minister Fahrettin Koca confirmed widespread suspicions that the Turkish government has deliberately lied to the public in order to downplay the severity of the pandemic and force workers back to work.

People walk in the main Kizilay Square, in Ankara, Turkey, June 16, 2020. (AP Photo/Burhan Ozbilici)

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a COVID-19 case is “A person with laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 infection, irrespective of clinical signs and symptoms.” However, Koca said: “Not all cases are patients, because there are those who show no symptoms at all even though their tests come back positive. These amount to the vast majority,” admitting that from the beginning of the pandemic, “We have given this as the daily number of patients.”

When Koca said last month that “The number of people who have no symptoms and who are only vectors does not matter, as long as they do not infect someone else,” the WSWS explained that he “all but admitted that ‘herd immunity’ is his government’s strategy against the pandemic.”

After the health minister has acknowledged that his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has lied about and downplayed the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey, endangering public health, the Turkish Medical Association (TTB) issued a statement denouncing the government.

“We have been saying this for six months. You haven’t run the process transparently,” the TTB declared, adding: “You have concealed the truth. You haven’t prevented the spread of the disease.” In response to this scandal, thousands of people used the hashtag “What is the number of cases?” in protest on social media.

Koca’s admission comes after CHP (Republican People’s Party) deputy Murat Emir published a document on September 29 allegedly coming from the health ministry’s internal records. It showed the number of positive cases on September 10 were 29,377, compared to the 1,512 new patients announced by Koca on the same day.

Moreover, Mustafa Adıgüzel, another CHP deputy, had announced in early September that only in five large cities, including Istanbul, Ankara, İzmir, Adana and Antalya, which are governed by the CHP, total death toll from the pandemic was 8,850 according to the official municipality data compared to nearly 6,800 deaths announced by the health ministry in that time.

These revelations expose not only the government’s lies, but also the complicity of the bourgeois opposition parties like the CHP. As the AKP government lied about the pandemic, the municipalities also refused to publicize their own statistics on deaths from COVID-19. In fact, the CHP supported the back-to-work and back-to-school campaigns, pursuing virtually identical policies in its local administrations as the AKP did at the national level.

The reopening of schools has already caused disastrous results, and three teachers in Kayseri have lost their lives due to coronavirus. Confirmed cases among workers in this CHP-led Ankara municipality have reached 981 last week, though it was only 235 just one month ago. Anger and opposition are escalating among health care workers, as more than 100 have lost their lives fighting the pandemic without serious measures taken by the government.

Ultimately, the government found no way except lies and manipulation to contain growing anger and opposition among workers at the official response to the pandemic and the growing social crisis.

Real unemployment and job losses after the pandemic have reached 14.2 million in June. Workers’ purchasing power is constantly falling as the Turkish lira continues to depreciate against the US dollar. Over the year, Turkey’s minimum wage of 2,300 liras has fallen from $385 to $300. Since the pandemic began, hundreds of thousands of workers have been forced to take unpaid leave on only 1,170 liras. This forced “unpaid leave” process was extended until July 2021 with the votes of the bourgeois opposition CHP.

In response to the widespread popular outrage that emerged over his government’s lies, Health Minister Koca tweeted yesterday, using capital letters, like US President Donald Trump, “Let’s remember that, as it combats the epidemic, our state is protecting NATIONAL INTERESTS AS MUCH AS PUBLIC HEALTH, because the epidemic affects all areas of life.”

This statement has made clear that the “national interests” mean the interests of the ruling class and its war policies across the region at the expense of the vast majority of society. Events are demonstrating that the ruling elites’ only concern during the pandemic has been to transfer trillions from working people to the banks and companies, and to suppress growing opposition to the “herd immunity” policy.

These policies are not peculiar to Turkey or the ErdoÄŸan government. They have an international and bipartisan character amid the resurgence of the class struggle all over the world. Governments all over the world have lied about the danger COVID-19 poses, trying to manipulate figures to contain growing anger within the working class amid the raging pandemic.

Last month, it was revealed that US President Trump consciously sought to downplay the danger posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Ignoring warnings from US intelligence and Chinese officials on the seriousness of the pandemic, he pressed ahead, leading to more than 200,000 deaths in the United States alone. Trump said, “I always wanted to play it down ... I still like playing it down, because I don’t want to create a panic.”

His response only reflected major concerns of the ruling classes not only in the US but internationally. As the WSWS explained, “What ‘panic’ was Trump speaking about? He was primarily concerned with containing a stock market selloff before the bailout of Wall Street had been prepared. Furthermore, with workers in factories increasingly uneasy about the spread of the disease, he was afraid of mass working class walkouts, such as those that ultimately led to the closure of the US auto plants in March.”

While the most prominent example of this malign neglect policy of the ruling classes all over the world is the Trump administration in the United States, the European governments have also lied about and manipulated the real situation of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Despite the fact that the German Interior Ministry reported in March that inaction would lead to over a million deaths just in Germany, president of the German parliament, Wolfgang Schäuble, said in April, “The truth is, we all hoped among ourselves that it wouldn’t get so bad,” in response to a question on why his government had not acted more rapidly against the pandemic.

This international capitalist conspiracy against the working class has vindicated the warnings made by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) from the beginning. Only the mobilization of the working class can halt the herd immunity policy imposed by the ruling classes internationally, impose lock-downs to achieve social distancing and prevent a massive loss of life.

UK schools told “anti-capitalist” teaching prohibited

Julie Hyland


Government instructions against the teaching of anti-capitalism in schools in England have deservedly earned widespread condemnation.

Department for Education (DfE) guidance issued last week deems anti-capitalism an “extreme political stance,” equivalent to antisemitism and terrorism.

The original edict to head teachers on setting the relationship, sex and health curriculum, barred teaching any materials that could include, “a publicly stated desire to abolish or overthrow democracy, capitalism, or to end free and fair elections; opposition to freedom of speech; the use of racist, including antisemitic, language; the endorsement of illegal activity; and a failure to condemn illegal activities done in support of their cause.”

The guidance was angrily denounced on social media. Many noted that it would effectively veto large elements of the English literature curriculum—including Shakespeare, Dickens and Priestley—and much of the history curriculum—from the English Civil War, Ireland, the American War of Independence and the Russian Revolution, to South Africa and Israel/Palestine.

As for the claim that the veto is in line with “British values,” Britain's ruling elite routinely breaches virtually all of its strictures.

The Johnson government has declared its intention to break international law in pursuit of its Brexit bill and is pushing through measures empowering intelligence and military actors to kidnap, torture, and murder with impunity. It routinely deploys racist—specifically anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim—language in support of its right-wing agenda. It is one of the few countries in the world to have suspended elections under the pretext of the COVID-19 pandemic.

As for “free speech” one needs look no further than the politically motivated show trial of WikiLeaks journalist and publisher Julian Assange. The hearing at London's Old Bailey has been marked by the blatant trampling of any democratic and juridical norms as part of efforts to dragoon Assange into an American high security prison for the rest of his life, as payback for exposing imperialist war crimes.

The DfE’s subsequent “correction” changes nothing. This states that the veto applies to resources, “produced by organisations that take extreme political stances on matters. This is the case even if the material itself is not extreme, as the use of it could imply endorsement or support of the organisation.”

The guidance builds on the Prevent strategy, first implemented by the Blair Labour government, which targeted Muslims as potential extremists and required schools (later local authorities, prisons and the National Health Service) to report anyone they deemed “vulnerable to radicalisation”.

This state surveillance policy is to be massively extended under the Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Bill, backed by the Labour Party, now before parliament.

Driving these measures is the discrediting of capitalism by the global pandemic, which is fueling a resurgence of working class struggle.

COVID-19 is being allowed to rip through the population as the ruling elite force the reopening of workplaces and education facilities to recoup the multi-billion handout to the super-rich and major corporations. The result is that more than one million people globally have died, and the health of millions more has been severely compromised through the policy of “herd immunity” implemented by virtually all governments. In Britain, as elsewhere, health and social care is collapsing, millions face unemployment and destitution, and young people see their education, health and any decent future prospects laid to waste. More than one in six secondary schools are not fully open, and at least 20,000 pupils and 25,000 teachers nationally are currently forced to self-isolate due to COVID outbreaks.

The introduction of new curriculum instructions under conditions where schools are barely functioning underscores the real objective of the DfE pronouncement. It is because education facilities are at the epicentre of the “back-to-work” drive and, amid the spread of the pandemic, the government is preparing for massive resistance to its criminal measures by proclaiming “anti-capitalism” as a threat to national security.

This is an international process, led by the US. The DfE guidance came just days after President Donald Trump denounced US public schools as centres of “left-wing indoctrination” and said he would create a national commission to promote a “pro-American curriculum that celebrates the truth about our nation’s great history.”

Trump's fascistic declaration is of a piece with his mobilising of right-wing militias, police, and military units to intimidate, terrorise and murder left-wing and anti-racist protestors.

His efforts are aided by the divisive, anti-working class politics of the Democratic Party and its pseudo-left supporters, who promote their own version of the so-called “culture war” based on identity politics, specifically the claim that white workers are de facto white supremacists.

UK Education Secretary Gavin Williamson said that the DfE measures were guided by the need for “political impartiality”. This claim is made when education has been the focus for the deliberate encouragement of fascistic ideology and movements by the Tory government and the highest echelons of the state. The promotion of eugenicism in the universities was integral to its wholesale adoption by government and media alike, through the policy of herd immunity.

The target of the “anti-capitalist” measures is the working class. In the UK, as in the US, the bourgeoisie fears that its homicidal rule is threatened by a mass, socialist movement from below.

True to form, all the efforts of the dwindling Labour Party “left” and its pseudo-left coterie are directed at diverting from this essential class truth. Former Labour shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, described the DfE instruction as “another step in the culture war”, while Tariq Ali, an inveterate political opportunist, soothed that the measure was “futile” in the face of the internet.

Meanwhile, arch-Thatcherite and former Tory cabinet minister, Esther McVey, told the Blue Collar Conservatism conference that “a left-learning bias” needed to be “removed from the whole educational system.”

Conservative Party co-chairman Amanda Milling was more explicit. Denouncing calls from teachers and other education staff for the closure of schools as “hard-left”, she called on Labour leader “Sir Keir Starmer and the NEU [National Education Union] … to take a stand and put a stop to this action. Getting children back to school is a key priority.”

Labour and the teaching unions have been key to reopening schools. In August, Starmer told Prime Minister Johnson that he expected students “back at school. No ifs, no buts, no equivocation.”

With so many schools now partially or wholly closed, undermining the government's back to work drive, NEU joint General Secretary Dr Mary Bousted is calling for the creation of “Nightingale classes”. These would be “pop-up” schools, based on the so-called Nightingale Hospitals—the exhibition centres and similar large facilities requisitioned in March to provide hospital bed space.

Bousted also called for the “drafting in of retired, supply and newly qualified teachers to get class sizes down.”

It should be noted that under the cover of the pandemic, the government is significantly expanding the role of the private sector in education. Its National Tutoring Programme is part of a £1 billion “catch-up” programme which involves an assortment of nominal charitable trusts, such as the Education Endowment Foundation, Sutton Trust, Nesta and Teach First, working in partnership with global consultancies KPMG and Bain & Company, and the international law firm Freshfields.

The pandemic Depression: Bailed-out US airlines slash tens of thousands of jobs

Genevieve Leigh


The United States is in the grips of the worst social crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Eight months after the onset of the coronavirus pandemic and barely one month before the presidential election, millions of workers and young people are unemployed or underemployed and facing eviction, hunger and the loss of health care coverage. This coincides with an acceleration of the coronavirus pandemic, which has already taken more than 210,000 US lives, spurred on by the homicidal “herd immunity” policy championed by the Trump administration and administered at the state and local level by Democratic as well as Republican officials.

Fueled by the campaign of both parties to reopen the schools and campuses, COVID-19 infections are on the rise in 28 states.

On Thursday, some 50,000 airline workers were laid off or furloughed. Having received tens of billions of dollars in government handouts and virtually free credit from the Federal Reserve Board, compliments of the bipartisan CARES Act passed last March, major US airlines and defense contractor Boeing are carrying out mass layoffs.

The unprecedented corporate bailout was cynically packaged as a move to “save jobs.” But the billionaire bankers, investors and CEOs have used the money to permanently downsize and restructure their operations while further enriching themselves and boosting their stock prices. They destroy the jobs—and the lives—of their workers with complete impunity, knowing they will face no opposition from either of the two big business parties or the pro-corporate trade unions.

Meanwhile, the same politicians conspire to strip workers of the $600-per-week federal unemployment supplement, allowing it to expire two months ago, and permit state unemployment pay to run out for growing numbers of workers. Millions of laid-off workers, including some 600,000 in California alone, are unable to register for jobless pay because of antiquated and overwhelmed state unemployment systems.

The jobs bloodbath in the airline industry is part of a broader and accelerating corporate assault on jobs. On Tuesday, Disney announced it will eliminate 28,000 jobs in the US. Royal Dutch Shell announced this week it will be cutting between 7,000 and 9,000 jobs, while Dow Inc. said it will reduce its workforce costs by 6 percent.

As for small businesses, over 97,000 across the US have closed for good since March 1, according to data from Yelp Inc.

American Airlines CEO Doug Parker is leading the industry attack, announcing Wednesday that his airline will go ahead with 19,000 layoffs, or 14 percent of its pre-pandemic workforce. American received $5.81 billion through the CARES Act. Parker took in $12 million in compensation in 2018.

United Airlines is following suit, announcing that workers should expect about 13,000 furloughs in the coming weeks.

Delta, which received $5.4 billion in grants and low-interest loans from the government, started the year with over 90,000 workers and now employs less than 75,000. The airline plans to furlough roughly 1,900 pilots. Delta CEO Ed Bastian received a total compensation package of nearly $15 million in 2018.

It should be noted that the bailout scheme was supported almost unanimously by the Democratic Party and enthusiastically endorsed by Bernie Sanders.

The US government reported Thursday that over 837,000 new workers filed for unemployment assistance last week. The total pool of Americans on state benefit rolls remained at nearly 11.8 million for the week ended Sept. 19. However, the real number of workers receiving unemployment benefits, including aid from federal programs separate from state unemployment pay, or waiting to be approved, is 28 million.

Millions of workers are struggling to pay rent, utilities and car payments, and put food on the table for their families on the basis of their starvation unemployment rations. Nearly one-third of adults are reporting difficulty meeting their regular household expenses.

Hundreds of people wait in line for bags of groceries at a food pantry at St. Mary’s Church in Waltham, Mass., Thursday, May 7, 2020. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)

Restrictions on utility cutoffs and evictions have expired or are set to expire in dozens of states across the US. As of Friday, only 12 states and the District of Columbia still have disconnection bans in place for basic utilities. Over 200 million Americans are at risk of losing service, according to the National Energy Assistance Directors’ Association.

Meanwhile, the wealth of the 643 richest US billionaires grew by $845 billion, or 29 percent, in the first six months of the pandemic. The wealth of Tesla founder Elon Musk, who defied pandemic restrictions to reopen his plant in Northern California, surged 273 percent to $92 billion.

Fourteen percent of Americans, some 46 million people, say that since the virus was declared a pandemic, their emergency savings have been wiped out, according to a new study. Another 11 percent of adults have had to borrow money to cover everyday expenses.

Young workers in particular have been hard hit. Over half of people under the age of 45 say that the one-time $1,200 payment from the government under the CARES Act covered less than two weeks of expenses. Roughly a quarter, or 26 percent, of those ages 25 to 34 say they had completely depleted their emergency funds.

The response of the ruling class to the pandemic—Democrats and Republicans alike—has been dictated entirely by the interests of the financial aristocracy.

The catastrophe for the working class did not even come up in the first presidential debate, held Tuesday night. Democratic candidate Biden did not even mention the cutoff of unemployment benefits or the mass layoffs. In fact, both parties, controlled by different factions of the same corporate-financial oligarchy, support the use of mass unemployment and poverty as a club to force workers back to unsafe workplaces, so their labor can be exploited to pump out more profits to back up the trillions in grants and loans to the corporate elite.

The ruling class is acutely aware of the fact that it confronts mass social anger that threatens to take an explosive and potentially revolutionary form. Already there have been signs of massive opposition among teachers, autoworkers and other sections of the working class on the front-lines of the pandemic.

Terrified of the development of social opposition, a substantial faction of the ruling class, expressed most openly in Trump’s effort to defy the results of the November election, overthrow the Constitution and establish a presidential dictatorship based on sections of the military, the police and fascist militia, has decided it has no way out except through violence.

Trump’s biggest asset is the spinelessness and duplicity of the Democratic Party, which represents sections of Wall Street, the military and the intelligence agencies, in alliance with privileged sections of the upper-middle class.

Its role is to downplay and obscure the immense dangers to democratic rights and cover up the source of the crisis in the failure of the capitalist system. Its response to the mass multi-racial protests against police violence and racism has been to double down on its promotion of racial politics in order to obscure the fundamental class issues, presenting police brutality as the result of “white racism,” rather than the violence of the armed enforcers of the capitalist state against the working class. This aids the ruling class by sowing confusion and division within the working class.

The precondition for a successful struggle to defend democratic rights, contain and eradicate the pandemic and secure decent-paying jobs, housing, education and health care for all is a complete break with the political corpse of the Democratic Party and the building of a mass independent movement of the working class for socialism.

Popular organizations independent of the pro-corporate trade unions and the two big business parties must be established in workplaces and working class communities across the country—and around the world—to prepare a political general strike against the ruling class drive to dictatorship.

1 Oct 2020

Max Weber Post-Doctoral Fellowships 2021/2022

Application Deadline: 18th October 2020 at 24:00 (Florence Time)

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: All countries

To be taken at (country): Italy

Eligible Fields of Study: Economics, History, Law and Social and Political sciences. All areas and types of research within these fields are considered.

About the Award: Amongst the largest, most prestigious and successful post doctoral programs in the historical and social sciences, and located in one of the most beautiful settings, with truly outstanding research facilities, we offer from 50-60 fully funded 1 and 2 year post doctoral fellowships to applicants from anywhere in the world in the fields of economics, history, law and social and political sciences. All areas and types of research within these fields are considered. Last year 98% of Fellows found an academic position on completing the Fellowship.

Type: Research, Fellowship

Eligibility: 

  • Candidates must have received their Ph.D within the past 5 years or have official approval to defend their thesis by the time of the start of the programme (1 September).  Therefore, to apply for 2021-22 they should have received or submitted their Ph.D. between 1/9/2016 and 1/9/2021 and the Ph.D. defence should take place no later than 31/12/2021.
  • Extensions to the five-year rule are allowed for applicants whose academic career has been interrupted for maternity or paternity leave, illness or mandatory military service. Cite circumstances in the application form in the field ‘Additional Notes’. Successful candidates will be asked to provide supporting documents.
  • EUI graduates can only apply for a Max Weber Fellowships after having been away from the EUI and in a full-time occupation or another fellowship for at least a year after defending their Ph.D
  • Candidates of any nationality are eligible for the Max Weber Fellowships.
  • The expected level of English proficiency is level C1 of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). Successful candidates will be requested to provide a certificate/supporting document on registration. This can be one of the international certificates listed below, or a supporting document showing that the candidate has written the doctorate, or published an article or a book chapter of at least 6000 words in English, or has studied and hold a qualification from a University where the language of instruction and assessment was English. Native English speakers are exempt of proof.
  • The following international certificates of English proficiency are recognised by the EUI:
    • IELTS: From 7.5
    • TOEFL (IBT)
    • Cambridge Proficiency
    • Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE)

Selection Criteria:

  • Academic accomplishments and potential: Academic excellence is assessed on the basis of the candidate’s contributions (publications, PhD thesis, etc. as outlined in the CV), their plans and commitment to an academic career as outlined in their ‘Research Proposal’ and ‘Academic career statement’, and other supporting evidence (i.e. two letters of reference). Preference is given to applicants in the early stages of their post-doctoral career, who can gain most from the programme.
  • Research Proposal: the proposal must be clear and well structured, with well-defined and realistic goals that can be achieved within the duration of the fellowship.
  • Mentorship: The capacity and availability of EUI faculty, be it in the departments or the RSCAS, to provide mentorship is taken into account; however, while having common research interests may be helpful, it is not a necessity for mentorship

Number of Awardees: 50 to 60 candidates

Value of Fellowship:

  • The Fellowship provides a grant of 2000 euro per month plus – when appropriate – a family allowance.
  • The Max Weber Fellows enjoy the superb research facilities of the European University Institute (including an outstanding library, a shared office space, and a personal research fund of 1000 euros).
  • The MWP is unique among postdoctoral programmes in helping Fellows to become full members of a global academic community.
  • Fellows are given training and support in all aspects of an academic career – from publishing and presenting, teaching, applying for research grants and jobs. A particular focus is placed on communicating effectively in English to different kinds of academic audiences.
  • Its placement record is second to none: most Max Weber Fellows secure an academic position in the finest institutions around the world upon completion of the Programme.

Duration of Fellowship: 1 and 2 year post doctoral fellowships

How to Apply: The deadline is 18 October, but applications for self-funded fellowships will be considered until 25 March. Apply below

Visit Fellowship Webpage for details

Higher Education & Human Development (HEHD) Research Programme/Doctoral and Postdoctoral Awards 2021

Application Deadline: 30th November 2020. 

Eligible Countries: South Africa, International

To be Taken at (Country): University of the Free State, South Africa

About the Award: The Fellowship is open to all South African and foreign nationals for full-time research at the University of the Free State. Prospective fellow’s need to meet the following criteria in the different links below.

Type: Post/Doctoral, Research

Eligibility: We especially encourage applicants interested in higher education and human development  in relation to; environmental justice, epistemic justice, gender justice, racism, pedagogic justice, reconciliation and justice, critical digital literacy and social media, political agency, institutional cultures, political economy, disability and justice. We encourage diverse approaches to research including participatory methods.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award:

Doctoral: R 180,000 annual fellowship (Note that registration fees are deducted annually), which includes R 30,000 for research expenses.

Postdoctoral:

  • Each fellow will receive an annual stipend of R250 000, which includes research expenses of R30 000pa. The stipend is paid in advance in quarterly instalments.
  • Unless already resident in Bloemfontein, each fellow will normally have travel paid from their home city or home country to the UFS at the start of the fellowship. For those who stay for at least one year a return ticket to their home city/country will be paid by the HEHD Research Programme.

Duration of Award: 3 years

How to Apply: All applications for either fellowships should be emailed to Prof Melanie Walker at: walkermj@ufs.ac.za with the supporting documents as set out in each call (see below). 

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Facebook Community Challenge 2020

Application Deadline: 26th October, 2020 5:00pm EDT

Eligible Regions: 7 regions:(i) North America, (ii) Latin America, (iii) the Asia Pacific, (iv) India, (v) Sub Saharan Africa, (vi) Middle East/North Africa, and (vii) Europe.

About the Award: This time around, we’re inviting participants to go a step beyond building software solutions by creating tutorials about the code they’ve created. Winners are eligible to receive up to US$133,000 in cash prizes, Oculus VR headsets and fully credited amplification of their tutorials to millions of other developers across Facebook’s ecosystem.

We’re also broadening the products that competing innovators can build with, now spanning Open Source technologies including Docusaurus, Hack, Pytorch, React and React Native, as well as Messenger, Spark AR and Wit.ai.

Within each of these products, we see enormous opportunity for you and your teammates to connect, learn and build together, all while sharing your journey step-by-step through immersive tutorials for fellow tech enthusiasts.

Type: Entrepreneurship, Contest

Eligibility:

  • Build software applications that help bring communities together and use at least one Facebook developer product.
  • To compete for optional bonus prizes, developers are invited to build solutions across one of the three community categories (i) bridge on and offline experiences; (ii) build and grow community; and (iii) drive engaging communities.

Selection Criteria:

  • Quality of the Tutorial (30%)
    Includes creativity and originality of the idea (the tutorial has not have been written before). How helpful is this tutorial to developers and does it provide best practices for Open Source development.
  • Implementation of Facebook products (30%)
    Includes how many Facebook product (s) and features (s) are used and how well are they implemented in the sample software solution and showcased in the tutorial.
  • Clarity (20%)
    Includes how easy the tutorial is to follow along for the intended audience (beginner or advanced developer).
  • Relevance (20%)
    Includes what’s the usability/impact the tutorial has in helping the intended audience learn the skills to build other projects and address real world problems.

Value and Number of Awards: $133,000 in prizes

Global First Place – English Tutorial for Beginners

  •  $10,000 USD
  • Oculus headset (ARV: $399USD; 1 per individual, 4 max per Org or Team)

 Global Second Place – English Tutorial for Beginners

• $7,000 USD

Global First Place – English Tutorial for Advanced

  • $10,000 USD
  • Oculus headset (ARV: $399USD; 1 per individual, 4 max per Org or Team)

 Global Second Place – English Tutorial for Advanced

  • $7,000 USD

Regional – English Tutorial for Beginners (21)

  • $2,000 USD

Regional – English Tutorial for Advanced (21)

  • $2,000 USD

 Local Language – Tutorial for Beginners (5)

  •  $1,500 USD

Local Language – Tutorial for Advanced (5)

  • $1,500 USD

How to Apply:

Create a step-by-step written tutorial that demonstrates the use of one or more features of any of the technologies below.

In your tutorial, use Open Source sample code from your newly built solution or use a solution that you’ve built in the past. If you are using an existing solution, be sure it works with the latest version of the products being used.  

Curious to learn more about beginner versus advanced tutorials? Visit our Resources page

Submit the following assets:

REQUIRED

  • Written tutorial on GitHub (max 4000 words): The written portion of the tutorial must include citations wherever necessary (e.g. code inspiration). Tutorials and provided code must be Open Source and hosted on a publicly accessible GitHub repository.
  • Sampled Software on GitHub: A link to the publicly available Open Source software code that was used as a basis of the tutorial.
  • Walkthrough Video (hosted on YouTube, Vimeo, or Youku): Your video should be 2 minutes long and serve as a walkthrough of your tutorial.
  • MIT license: Include MIT Open Source licensing in your GitHub repository.

OPTIONAL

  • Not required – Additional video: Entries may also contain a comprehensive video tutorial (maximum length: thirty (30) minutes). 

We can’t wait to see what our global developer community builds! #DevCChallenge

Visit Programme Webpage for Details