24 Mar 2021

Massive deadly fires in Bangladesh’s Rohingya refugee camp

Mike Head


Terrible fires tore through the world’s largest refugee camp, at Cox’s Bazar in Bangladesh on Monday night, leaving at least 15 Rohingya refugees dead, 400 more missing, and tens of thousands without shelter.

The blazes, the cause of which remains officially under investigation, highlight the shocking plight of the Rohingya refugees. Having been driven out of neighbouring Myanmar, mostly since 2017, nearly 900,000 remain trapped in squalid and unsafe shanty towns in one of the poorest countries in the world.

Rohingya refugee camp in flames in Balukhali, southern Bangladesh, Monday, March 22, 2021. The fire destroyed hundreds of shelters and left thousands homeless. (AP Photo/ Shafiqur Rahman)

The major powers continue to shut their borders to them and the millions of other people globally fleeing repression and poverty, compounded by the ravages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Yesterday, based on provisional reports, the UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, said that in addition to the confirmed deaths, more than 560 refugees had been injured and some 45,000 had lost their shelters and belongings in the inferno. Those figures were expected to climb as assessments continued.

Officials said the fires were believed to have started in one of the 34 camps at Cox’s Bazar before spreading to two other camps. Thick columns of smoke were seen billowing from blazing shanties and tents in videos shared on social media, as volunteer residents, firefighters and aid workers battled the flames and pulled people to safety.

Eye-witnesses described harrowing scenes. “People were turning to ashes in front of my eyes,” Saiful Arakani, a 25-year-old refugee who tried to rescue people, told the BBC. “I saw people fleeing their homes screaming, ‘Save my mother, save my sister.’ It was complete chaos. No-one knew what to do.”

A Save the Children volunteer, Tayeba Begum, said: “The fire spread so quickly that before we understood what happened, it caught our house. People were screaming and running here and there. Children were also running scattered, crying for their family. It is the most horrific incident I have witnessed recently.”

The fire started around 4:00 pm on Monday and firefighters almost doused it an hour later. But another wave of fire broke out shortly after 11:00 pm and was still burning down shanties as of 12:30 am, refugees said.

Some witnesses said barbed wire fencing recently erected around the camps had trapped many people, causing some of the casualties.

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) stated: “Early reports indicate that newly-installed barbed wire fencing seriously restricted the ability of refugees to flee the fire, including especially vulnerable women and girls.” The IRC said the fire had also destroyed health clinics, mosques, community centres and an IRC safe space for women.

The blazes were the largest of multiple fires in the camp this year. Just four days earlier, two separate fires at the camps on Friday destroyed scores of shanties. Two big blazes also hit the camps in January, leaving thousands homeless and gutting four UNICEF schools.

Amnesty International’s South Asia campaigner, Saad Hammadi, tweeted that the “frequency of fire in the camps is too coincidental, especially when outcomes of previous investigations into the incidents are not known and they keep repeating.”

The Bangladesh government has been pushing for 100,000 of the refugees to relocate to Bhasan Char island, 60 kilometres from the mainland. So far, about 13,000 Rohingya have been shipped to the flood- and cyclone-prone muddy outcrop, which was formed in 2006 by the accumulation of silt where the River Meghna enters the Bay of Bengal.

At the same time, the government is again seeking to send Rohingyas back to Myanmar, from where they fled the genocidal violence of the military, backed by Aung San Suu Kyi, who was the de facto leader of the government until the military coup of February 1.

Altogether, there are over one million Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, with some living in miserable conditions in urban areas. Prime Minister Sheik Hasina’s government considers them a burden to the country, and has branded them a “security” threat, fueling media witch hunts against them.

The Cox’s Bazar camps are among the most over-crowded refugee encampments in the world, with more than 40,000 people per square kilometre. They have no adequate water supply, sanitation and sewage facilities, constantly threatening the spread of various diseases, including COVID-19.

Those bearing direct responsibility for the inhuman treatment of the Rohingya, a mostly Muslim minority who have lived in Myanmar for centuries, include Suu Kyi. In December 2019, she appeared in the International Court of Justice in The Hague as a crass apologist for the country’s military against charges of human rights abuses, including genocide, against the Rohingya.

Since 2017, the military in Myanmar has again engaged in brutal operations to terrorise the Rohingya population, who are denied citizenship rights and branded “illegal immigrants.” A UN fact-finding mission found that military forces had killed more than 10,000 people, destroyed almost 400 villages and driven close to 750,000 Rohingya out of their homes.

But Suu Kyi claimed that the exodus of Rohingya was simply the result of the conflict between the military and armed Rohingya separatist groups, not a conscious policy of ethnic cleansing.

Equal responsibility lies with the governments in the advanced countries internationally, including those in Australia, that have refused asylum for the Rohingya.

Successive Australian governments, both Labor Party and Liberal-National Coalition, have repelled Rohingya refugee boats, and incarcerated any who got to Australia, often on isolated Pacific or Indian Ocean islands, or subjected them to impoverished conditions, without basic rights, on insecure temporary visas.

Globally, the responses of governments to the COVID pandemic have taken the world’s refugee crisis to a new level. By last May, 177 countries had either fully or partially closed their borders, abrogating the right to asylum.

According to the latest statistics available from the UNHCR, in December 2019, even before the pandemic, at least 79.5 million people around the world had been forced to flee their homes. There were also millions of stateless people, denied access to basic rights such as education, health care, employment and freedom of movement.

The treatment of the Rohingyas is matched by the reaction of the Biden administration in the US to the human exodus underway from El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala, all countries long subjected to US-backed poverty and repression. The US government has closed its doors and is detaining 15,000 unaccompanied children as lawbreakers.

Similar measures are being taken across Europe, causing mass drownings to continue unabated on the Mediterranean Sea in the opening months of 2021.

Such is the cruel, irrational response of the capitalist system to human suffering on an unprecedented scale, from Asia to Africa and the Americas. This poses the necessity for the international working class to unite across national borders against the ruling financial elites on the basis of a worldwide socialist program.

That requires the unconditional defence of the right of workers to live and work in the country of their choice, with full citizenship rights, including the right to healthcare, a liveable income and the ability to work and travel without fear of repression or deportation.

Tamil parties in Sri Lanka support US-backed “human rights” resolution

Subash Somachandran & S. Jayanth


Tamil nationalist parties in Sri Lanka have been campaigning to “strengthen” a war crimes resolution being presented by the “Core Group on Sri Lanka” to the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) currently meeting in Geneva.

The resolution, which passed yesterday, was promoted behind the scenes by the US, with support from the UK and the Sri Lankan Tamil parties, and also calls for reversal of Sri Lanka’s anti-democratic laws. The Core Group is made of representatives from the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Northern Macedonia, Montenegro and Malawi.

Protest march by relatives of missing persons at Kilinochchi in February 2020 (Credit: WSWS Media)

US, UK, German and Canadian posturing over human rights is a patent fraud. These imperialist powers, which have engaged in neo-colonial interventions and are responsible for war crimes in the last three decades, are not concerned in the slightest about Colombo’s war crimes or attacks on democratic rights. Washington’s primary aim is to ensure that strategically-located Sri Lanka breaks relations with Beijing and remains actively engaged in US war preparations against China.

Like its predecessors, the government of President Gotabhaya Rajapakse denies that any war crimes were committed by the military during Colombo’s war against the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). The government, which is heavily dependent on the military as a bulwark against the rising social opposition of workers and the poor, wants immunity for all those accused of war crimes. It was desperately appealing for support from other UNHCR members to defeat the Core Group resolution.

Several of Sri Lanka’s bourgeois Tamil parties have called for the Core Group resolution to include a proposal that Sri Lanka be referred to the International Criminal Court (ICC) as suggested in UNHR Commissioner General Michelle Bachelet’s report last month.

Bachelet’s report listed some of the war crimes committed by the military under former President Mahinda Rajapakse, the current prime minister, and his brother, Gotabhaya Rajapakse, then defence secretary and now president. According to the UN, over 40,000 Tamil civilians were killed in the final months of the three-decade war against the LTTE in 2009. Hundreds of young Tamils who surrendered to the army have simply disappeared.

The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) fully backs the Core Group resolution, while the Tamil National People’s Front (TNPF) and the Tamil People’s Alliance (TPA) claim it is not strong enough and call for Sri Lanka to be referred to the ICC.

Responding to these criticisms, TNA spokesman and parliamentarian M.A. Sumanthiran told a north Jaffna meeting on March 8 that the resolution “should be prepared in such a way that it wins the support of member countries, [and] to keep Sri Lanka under supervision for the next two years.” A harsher resolution, he added, would be an obstacle to gaining the support. “The UNHRC doesn’t have the power to hand Sri Lanka over to the ICC.

TNPF leader Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam wrote to Core Group envoys, expressing his “disappointment.” He declared the resolution did not “meet the basic expectations of the Tamil victims, especially in relation to international accountability for grave violations of international humanitarian law and human rights law.”

Ponnambalam slammed the TNA for backing the resolution and said his party would no longer co-operate with that organisation.

TPA leader C.V. Wigneswaran declared that a diluted resolution would deceive the Tamil people and called for the “international community” to adopt a human rights-based approach, rather than a political approach.

These “differences” are purely tactical. The Tamil parties all appeal for support from the imperialist powers and have no fundamental opposition to Washington’s underlying war drive against China.

The TNA calculates that the UNHRC resolution will isolate Colombo, forcing it into line with US demands and thus benefit the Tamil elite. The equally cynical calculations of Ponnambalam and Wigneswaran for a so-called strong resolution is an attempt to deflect the seething anger of the Tamil masses over the war crimes and to exert greater pressure on the Rajapakse regime to grant some concessions.

These parties all responded to Washington’s backroom moves for a UNHCR resolution. In mid-December, Aliana Teplitz, the US ambassador in Colombo, held discussions with Sumanthiran who gave his party’s backing. According to the media, Sumanthiran then met with Ponnambalam and Wigneswaran who agreed on a push for a new resolution.

Fedaration of Civil Society Organizations members and students in Jaffna demand Sri Lanka be referred to the ICC (Credit: WSWS Media)

On January 15, the TNA, TNPF, TPA and civil society groups wrote to UNHRC members formally requesting a new resolution. The letter called on the UNHRC to request the Security Council and General Assembly, to “inquire into the crime of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity,” via the International Criminal Court and “any other appropriate and effective international accountability mechanisms.”

The letter also called for the establishment of an “International Independent Investigation Mechanism” similar to that used against the Assad regime Syria which was accompanied by US-led military operations.

In February, these parties backed the North East Civil Society Forum march from Potuvil in the East to Polkandy in the North of Sri Lanka which sent a memorandum along the same lines as the above letter to the UNHRC.

Over the past three weeks, the Federation of Tamil Civil Society Organisations, led by the Hindu and Catholic clergy, has conducted a hunger protest campaign and a march in Jaffna. University students have also been mobilised to demand Sri Lanka be brought before the ICC.

That the US-backed Core Group resolution does not call for Sri Lanka to be referred to the ICC is no accident. Washington is only interested in pressuring Colombo to distance itself from Beijing. This, of course, does not mean that US will not try to invoke the ICC if necessary.

Concerned about the relations of the previous government of President Mahinda Rajapakse with Beijing, Washington sponsored several resolutions to pressure Colombo to break those ties. When that failed, the Obama administration orchestrated a regime-change operation to oust Mahinda Rajapakse and elevate Maithripala Sirisena into the presidency.

Sirisena and his prime minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe, integrated the Sri Lankan military closely with the US Pacific Command and its operations against China. The Tamil parties, and the TNA in particular, backed the regime change and became de facto partners of the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe administration.

The US responded by supporting the new regime in Colombo and moved a resolution in October 2015 that proposed a “domestic investigation” into human rights violations committed during the war. In other words, it allowed the government to suppress any genuine investigation in Sri Lankan war crimes. The TNA was fully involved in the preparation of that resolution.

The return to power of another Rajapakse administration and the strengthening of its economic relations with Beijing has antagonized Washington and its regional ally India. Reeling from the crisis exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, Colombo remains heavily dependent economically on Chinese investment and aid.

Washington, under the previous Trump administration and now under President Biden, has sent numerous signals to Colombo to fall into line with the US geo-political agenda. If Colombo does not heed these directives, the US will not hesitate to orchestrate another regime change operation.

The manoeuvres of these utterly corrupt Tamil bourgeois parties are a dangerous endorsement of a future catastrophic US-led war against China. Acting as quislings of US imperialism, these parties have little interest in a serious investigation into Colombo’s war crimes or establishing the democratic rights of the Tamil masses.

A genuine investigation into war crimes and an end to the decades of state discrimination against Tamil and Muslim minorities can only be achieved through a united struggle of the working class in Sri Lanka and South Asia.

Drive for in-person classes intensifies in the Philippines

Isagani Sakay


Around the globe, the capitalist class, in country after country, is pushing for the reopening of schools. The aim is to herd parents back into unsafe workplaces, offices, and factories to resume the production of profit, even as the COVID-19 pandemic remains uncontrolled.

To date, Philippine K-12 schools remain closed for in-person classes, one of 27 countries with unopened schools. The capitalist drive to resume production and the generation of profits is global. Big business and the political establishment are ramping up their campaign for the reopening of all schools in the Philippines.

Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte (Presidential Communications Operations Office/Wikipedia)

The center of their campaign is the push for the implementation of the Philippine Department of Education’s pilot program of reopening 1,000 public schools in areas with low levels of COVID-19 transmission. The objective is to prove that schools can be “safely reopened” with the bare minimum of health protocols, including hand-washing, masks, and physical distancing.

There is, however, no scientific evidence for the “safe reopening” of schools at any level of transmission. Quite the opposite is the case. A Montreal study concluded school transmissions had fueled community transmissions in the city. In Michigan, following their own “safe reopening”, K-12 schools are now the largest source of new COVID-19 outbreaks in the state.

The pilot program is an experiment, with no funds allocated for medical expenses for anyone who becomes infected. There are no funds for masks. There are no funds for the additional teachers who will be needed as physical distancing will require dividing up classes. And despite the fact that most COVID-19 infected children are asymptomatic, no mass testing will be conducted.

The pilot program is opposed by former military and police officers in President Rodrigo Duterte’s cabinet led by ex-Philippine army general and interior department secretary Eduardo Año. The Philippine Star quoted Año in November 2020 as stating, “Should there be a spike, would you [addressing legislative proponents] be the one treating (those infected)? Would you be the one shouldering the costs? Second, who will be held accountable?”

Año’s reservations do not arise from a concern for the lives and health of workers and the poor. Under the guise of a “war on drugs” and of counter-terrorism, the military and the police of the fascistic Duterte government have overseen the extrajudicial killing of over 30,000 working poor and youth.

There is an immense social anger in the working class and the poor over the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic which has prioritized profits over lives. From January to March last year, it refused to prepare—it did not even purchase Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or testing machines. The subsequent abrupt shutdown, similar to India, of the national capital region and the island of Luzon left millions without funds or sources of income. The government did not conduct mass testing or carry out adequate contact tracing.

Over 12 million people have lost employment due to the pandemic. Government financial support to the poor and unemployed has been limited to a one-time cash handout of less than $US200, amounting in total to $US4 billion. The polling firm Social Weather Station reports that four million families, 16 percent of all families in the country, have gone hungry at least once in the past three months.

By contrast, massive funds were channeled to the financial elites amounting to over $US18 billion, including an automatic annual appropriation of nearly $9 billion for interest payments on government debt and $9 billion for quantitative easing. A tax cut for businesses totaling nearly $21 billion over the next ten years is awaiting Duterte’s signature. Meanwhile, the government kept workers in Business Processing Outsourcing, mining, construction and banking at work throughout the pandemic, earning business billions more.

In recent months, daily new cases reported have climbed from 2,050 in January to 8,000 last week. Reported active cases now total 80,000. Over 656,056 people have now been infected, a figure that is second only to Indonesia in Southeast Asia. More concerning still, the positivity rate—the proportion of tests returning a positive result—has climbed to 14.6 percent, indicating that transmission is faster than has been tracked.

Last month, undoubtedly deeply concerned about a possible explosion of social anger, Duterte again postponed the launching of the pilot school reopening program to August this year.

The ruling elites were unanimous in their fury. Philippine Business for Education, an education reform advocacy organization comprised of big businesses and private schools, denounced the postponement as “disastrous” for the education system and economy.

The Senate, despite being dominated by Duterte’s allies, approved a resolution calling for the immediate implementation of the pilot program. Vice President Leni Robredo, the opposition leader, demanded the resumption of in-person classes.

The establishment media also chimed in, lamenting school closures as diminishing the value of Filipino workers, who would lose out in the international job market, a calamity declared more dire than the COVID-19 pandemic.

Playing the same class role as its union counterparts around the world, Alliance of Concerned Teachers (ACT), the public schoolteachers’ union politically aligned with the Stalinist Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), also demanded the “safe” reopening of all schools. It declared the government’s “blended learning” program, a fusion of remote learning and delivery of printed materials for those without internet access and interactive facilities, to be a failure.

Undoubtedly, decades of underfunding education and public infrastructure and the capitalist impoverishment of the working class has produced a situation in which millions of youth have limited or no access to education. The solution to this crisis, however, is the confiscation of the wealth of the super-rich to fund the construction of cell sites, the provision of free internet access and interactive facilities, and the hiring of more teachers who will be paid better wages and provided quality educational materials.

Using the poverty of millions as a justification, ACT is instead supporting the homicidal drive of the ruling class to send over 27 million children along with hundreds of thousands of teachers and staff back to unsafe schools.

Duterte’s delay to school reopening is a manoeuvre to buy time.

An Anti-Terror law that strips due process and democratic rights from those accused of “terroristic acts” has already been approved. Challenges to its constitutionality filed at the Supreme Court are almost certain to be dismissed as all but two of the justices are Duterte’s appointees.

A government red-tagging campaign is being escalated against critics of the Duterte administration, including a beauty pageant winner, a court judge, and actors, all of whom have been publicly labelled as “communist terrorists” or sympathizers.

Two weekends ago, security forces killed nine activists of legal non-government organizations while ostensibly serving search warrants for weapons, in simultaneous raids that became known as “Bloody Sunday.”

Preparations for an authoritarian regime are far advanced. They are being readied for a confrontation with the working class who will not allow themselves and their loved ones to suffer and die in unsafe schools and workplaces.

Ten killed in mass shooting at Boulder, Colorado grocery store

Jacob Crosse


Ten people, including three workers at the King Soopers grocery store in Boulder, Colorado, were killed Monday afternoon in the latest mass shooting to occur in the United States. The suspected shooter, 21-year-old Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, was taken into police custody Monday following a brief shootout that left 51-year-old Boulder Police officer and father of seven, Eric Talley, dead.

Alissa is currently detained in a local hospital after suffering an apparent gunshot wound to the leg. He has been charged with 10 counts of first-degree murder.

Police stand outside a King Soopers grocery store where a shooting took place, Monday, March 22, 2021, in Boulder, Colo. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

The ages of the victims range from 20 to 65. King Soopers has confirmed that three of the deceased were employees: an aspiring pilot, 20-year-old Denny Stong; front-end manager Rikki Olds (25) and Special Olympics track and field and skiing participant Teri Leiker (51).

Denny Stong (Credit: Facebook)

Nevin Stanisic (23), Tralona Bartkowiak (49), Suzanne Fountain (59), Kevin Mahoney (61), Lynn Murray (62) and Jody Waters (65) were also killed in the attack, which began shortly before 2:30 p.m. local time and ended with Alissa being led away in handcuffs just before 3:30 p.m.

Photos and video released from the scene show grocery store workers, hands on each other’s backs, helping to lead customers out of the store in single file lines, as hundreds of police and SWAT officers, along with drones, helicopters and armored vehicles, descend on the store. The market is less than two miles south of the University of Colorado at Boulder. None of the victims are believed to have been enrolled at the university.

The university, with an enrollment of over 33,000, is the social and economic center of Boulder. The city is relatively affluent, with a median income of $66,117. The median property value, at $645,600, is nearly triple the national average.

As a witness to the shooting, Ryan Borowksi, told CNN, “Boulder feels like a bubble, and that bubble burst. This feels like the safest place in America and I just nearly got killed for getting a soda and a bag of chips.”

The shooting comes one week after a 21-year-old Georgia man shot and killed eight people, including six women of Asian-American descent, at massage parlors in the Atlanta area, and five days after two workers were killed by a co-worker inside a Roundy’s grocery distribution center in Oconomowoc, Wisconsin.

The latest statistics from the Centers for Disease Control estimate that 111 people are killed every day in the US due to gun violence, with 39,707 people killed in 2019, a number that exceeds all other countries except Brazil.

As of yet, no information has surfaced that establishes a political motive, or points to links between Alissa and terrorist or extremist organizations. He appears to have been suffering from psychological distress, likely exacerbated by the pandemic.

Alissa resides in a suburb of Denver called Arvada, about 20 miles south of Boulder, sharing a residence with his brother and sister-in-law. Key details of his personal life, including whether he is employed or attending school, have not yet been made public.

He was enrolled at Arvada West High School from 2015 until he graduated in 2018. While in high school, he participated on the wrestling team, and on his Facebook profile he described himself as “Born in Syria 1999, came to the USA in 2002. I like wrestling and informational documentaries.”

On his Facebook page, Alissa posted videos of himself wrestling in high school and occasional posts about his Muslim faith. Like millions of other Facebook users, in November 2015 Alissa sympathized with victims of a series of ISIS-linked terrorist attacks. He changed his profile picture to the French flag in support of the victims of a mass terror attack in Paris.

In response to the far-right terrorist attack in April 2019 that targeted Christchurch, New Zealand mosques, Alissa shared a post that read: “The Muslims at the #christchurch mosque were not the victims of a single shooter, they were the victims of the entire Islamophobia industry that villified [sic] them.”

In interviews with investigators, members of Alissa’s family have stated that he may have been suffering from an undiagnosed mental illness. The Associated Press cited an unnamed official as revealing that Alissa’s family said he had complained of people following or chasing him.

In interviews with CNN and the Daily Beast, Alissa’s brother, Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, said that beginning around 2014, Alissa said he felt like he was being followed and became increasingly paranoid. Alissa said his brother put tape over his laptop camera to prevent anyone from observing him.

“He always suspected someone was behind him, someone was chasing him,” Ali Alwi Alissa said. “We kept a close eye on him when he was in high school. He would say, ‘Someone is chasing me, someone is investigating me,’ and we’re like, ‘Come on man, there’s nothing…’ He was just closing into himself.”

In interviews with the press and the police, Alissa’s brother reiterated that “[It was] not at all a political statement, it’s mental illness.” He told the Daily Beast that his younger brother “used to get bullied a lot in high school, he was like an outgoing kid, but after he went to high school and got bullied a lot, he started becoming anti-social."

Court records obtained by a local Fox affiliate, KDVR in Boulder, show that Alissa was arrested in 2017 after he allegedly punched a classmate in the head. At the time, Alissa reportedly said that the victim “had made fun of him and called him racial names weeks earlier.” Alissa plead guilty to a charge of assault.

Witnesses and the police warrant indicate that the shootings began outside the grocery store and that Alissa was armed with a “black AR-15 style” rifle and possibly body armor. Footage taken at the scene of the shooting shows that multiple victims were shot in the parking lot. The victims, according to statements given to investigators, included an older man whom Alissa allegedly shot multiple times as he stood over him. He then made his way into the grocery store.

Court documents allege that Alissa had purchased a Ruger AR-556 pistol on March 16, six days before the shooting. The affidavit, which was unsealed Tuesday, indicates that his sister-in-law, whose name is redacted, saw Alissa “playing with a firearm she thought looked like a ‘machine gun’” in the days prior to the shooting. Police have indicated that they recovered a “rifle” and a semiautomatic handgun at the scene.

While mass shootings have long since become a grotesquely regular feature American life, and an acute expression of the deeply dysfunctional character of US capitalist society, the country’s social, political and economic contradictions have intensified after a year of the pandemic.

Colorado has been home to a disproportionate number of mass shootings since the 1990s. A 2019 analysis by the Denver Post revealed that Colorado had more mass shootings per capita than all but four states, and that the Denver metropolitan area has had more school shootings per capita since 1999 than any of the other 24 largest metropolitan areas in the US. Alissa himself was born three days before the 1999 Columbine massacre.

In ritualistic fashion, Democratic and Republican politicians have offered their “thoughts and prayers,” while spouting their respective party’s political positions in the “debate” between gun rights and gun control. The Democratic party is once again promoting the panacea of limited restrictions on guns—such as the closing of “loopholes,” expansion of background checks and a ban on assault weapons—while the Republicans curry favor with their far-right supporters by opposing any limitation on what they proclaim to be their “Second Amendment” right to bear arms.

No section of the political or media establishment dares seriously examine the underlying social and political conditions that have made the US the scene of over 100 mass shootings since 1999, costing thousands of lives. Issues such as ever widening social inequality, endless wars abroad and the militarization of the police at home, and a general attack on science and culture are not raised because they point to the bankruptcy of capitalism and its ruling elite.

In bumbling comments Tuesday, President Joe Biden rehashed the usual clichès while joining fellow Democrats in calling for more gun control measures. At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on reducing gun violence, Chairman Dick Durbin of Illinois cited two pieces of legislation passed by the House in 2017 that would supposedly close “gaps” in the federal background check system.

The Republican response was made clear in the opening comments of the ranking Republican member of the committee, Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley. Grassley used the hearing to raise the bogeyman of “left-wing extremism,” absurdly linking the Boulder shooting with last year’s mass protests against police murder.

“Statistics show that the murder rate in 2020 increased most significantly in June when the rioters were on the march and policy makers forced police into retreat,” Grassley declared.

Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton, an advocate of martial law to crush left-wing protests, said the “simple” solution to gun violence was “support our police, enforce our laws and lock up criminals.”

Food delivery worker in China detained for exposing working conditions

Lily Zhao


On February 25, a food delivery worker and vlogger, Chen, was detained by the police in Beijing. Ten other food delivery workers who lived in Chen’s neighbourhood were also taken away by the police, and two of them were released the next day. There has been no official information on the whereabouts or status of Chen and the eight other workers, either for their family members or to the public.

The arrests were an attempt by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to strangle any hints of social opposition during the National People’s Congress that commenced on March 5, further revealing the fragility of this regime which sits on top of enormous social tensions.

Chen, in a screenshot from one of his videos (caption: "Hello I am the leader of the League of Food Delivery Workers")

Chen is a well-known vlogger among food delivery workers and has more than 100,000 followers across multiple social media platforms. His vlogs powerfully exposed the exploitative policies implemented by major delivery platforms like Meituan and Ele.me to extract greater profits. He spoke out bravely for delivery workers in distress over their treatment by company managements.

Last December, when a worker of Ele.me in Beijing succumbed to a sudden heart attack during work, Chen made two videos criticizing the company’s cold-blooded attitude towards human life. Ele.me claimed that the dead worker did not have a direct labour contract with them and initially refused to pay any substantial compensation. Chen also exposed in these videos how food delivery platforms profiteer from their own workers: each worker is forced to pay for insurance, but only a third actually went towards insurance.

He forcefully said, “Food delivery platforms better not be passing the buck. For now, you [the company] can use the immense power of capital against us food delivery workers, who are as unorganized as a plate of sand. It seems that you have taken a lot of advantages of us. Nevertheless, more and more people are waking up now.” His videos were viewed more than 100,000 times on Weibo (a Twitter-type platform).

Just prior to his detention, Chen had produced a series of videos exposing how food delivery platforms tricked workers into finishing more orders. Before the Spring Festival, a national holiday which is usually the only chance for migrant workers to return home, a bonus event was presented for food delivery workers. The event promised several incentives if workers stayed in the big cities during the Spring Festival and finished a certain number of deliveries over four weeks. The bonus amounted to just 8,000 RMB ($US1,145).

However, after the first two weeks, many workers found out that the company quietly raised the bar by a huge amount and even stopped counting the number of deliveries finished. A worker interviewed in Chen’s video revealed that the system seemed to deliberately assign fewer orders to workers to make sure they could not reach the requirement for bonuses. Chen also explained how the companies have forced workers to compete with each other to further drive down the payment per order. These videos received over 8 million views across social media and triggered a lot of anger against this blatant act of exploitation.

Besides these staggering exposures, Chen has also documented many funny, touching, or heart-warming moments in food delivery workers’ daily lives: the food they made, their aspirations, life tips and many more. Since August 2019, outside of vlog and social media platforms, Chen has organized more than a dozen chat groups for tens of thousands of workers in Beijing to connect and help each other out.

It is not the first time Chen has been detained. In December 2019, he attempted to organize a work stoppage to protest against the lowering of the per-order payment, calling on delivery workers to boycott Meituan for the first three days and Ele.me for the next three days. Even though this campaign did not eventuate, Chen was detained for 26 days.

Any news or discussion about Chen’s “disappearance” has been heavily censored on social media. Almost all posts have been deleted within hours or even minutes. Nevertheless, he has received widespread sympathy and support. Last week Chen’s father and sister published a letter online, appealing for financial assistance to cover legal costs. Even though their letter was deleted just one hour after posting, they still received donations of 120,000 RMB ($US17,145) in total within a day.

The detention of Chen signifies that the CCP regime cannot tolerate any voices of discontent from workers, nor attempts to connect with each other. It is terrified that exposures like Chen’s would encourage widespread opposition among food delivery workers, who constantly suffer from prolonged working hours, the high risk of injury, exposure to severe weather, lack of legal protections, and attacks on wages.

Chen was taken away just before the commencement of the National People’s Congress, in which top CCP bureaucrats expressed nervousness over the immense social tensions building up in China as a result of their rush for economic growth in a bid to reduce urban unemployment. The regime can provide no progressive solution to resolve the mounting social crisis, and resorts to police-state measures to silence any opposition.

On March 1, only a week after Chen went missing, more than a hundred food delivery workers went on strike and demonstrated at a shopping mall in Shenzhen, Guangdong. They were protesting against the lowering of their wages by calculating pay based on the distance travelled for each order.

For food delivery workers, or any sections of the working class, to win better working conditions and wages, their struggles have to be based on the fight for genuine socialism—the perspective fought for by the International Committee of the Fourth International. There should be no illusions in the Stalinist CCP, which is responsible for the restoration of capitalism in China and its exploitation and oppression of workers.

Tests used in UK schools “not fit for purpose”

Helen Clarke


Mass testing of staff and students has been central to the UK government’s justification for the reopening of all schools in England. All secondary school pupils and primary and secondary school staff are being advised to self-administer lateral flow tests twice a week.

The differences between lateral flow tests and the coronavirus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests used since the start of the pandemic are significant. PCR tests are looking for the presence of the genetic material of the virus. The lateral flow kit contains antibodies that stick to any spike proteins of the virus in the test sample. A positive result is produced if a sufficient quantity of antibodies attach to the sample.

The PCR test requires the sample to be sent to a laboratory, because the sample has to be copied a large number of times, before it can be analysed, and the presence of the coronavirus detected. The lateral flow tests can deliver a result in 30 minutes because there is no need to copy the sample in a laboratory. This comes at the cost of significantly reduced accuracy.

A pupil is assisted during a Lateral Flow Test at a school in in Manchester, England, Monday March 8, 2021. (Jon Super/PA via AP)

In February, the British Medical Journal reported on a pilot study in Liverpool of the lateral flow test produced by Innova. The study found that 60 percent of infected asymptomatic people went undetected, as did 33 percent of those with high viral loads. During a time of high rates of infection in the city and when secondary age children were showing the highest rates of infection nationwide, teachers reported whole schools being tested and every test result coming back negative. There have been numerous reports since of workers such as teachers getting a negative lateral flow result followed by a positive PCR within the same 24-hour period.

The tests were also used at universities around the UK in December to ensure that students were not COVID-positive before they returned home to their families. Data from the University of Birmingham showed a sensitivity of 3 percent, meaning the tests pick up just three in 100 of people with COVID-19. Meanwhile, universities in Scotland found that 58 percent of all positives were false positives . Professor Jon Deeks, a biostatistician at the University of Birmingham who leads the Cochrane Collaboration’s COVID-19 test evaluation activities, said of tests in response to the data: “They’re not fit for purpose. I’d rather they hang these tests on a Christmas tree in Trafalgar Square, that would be better.”

According to the government’s own report, produced by Public Health England, the Innova test has a false negative rate of 21 percent when used by laboratory scientists, 27 percent when used by trained healthcare staff and 42 percent when used by members of the public. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends that rapid diagnostic tests should miss no more than 30 percent of positive cases.

The Innova Lateral Flow test is only approved for use by professionals, but the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued an exemption for it to be distributed for self-testing under the National Health Service testing programme. This test is also not authorised as a ‘test-to-enable’—that is, a test that allows someone to take an action they would not otherwise have taken in the absence of a negative test result.

In January, the Guardian reported on some leaked e-mail correspondence between the Department for Education and the MHRA. This culminated in the regulator reiterating with capital letters that its authorisation “ONLY allows for the test to be used to ‘find’ positive cases. MHRA HAVE NOT approved the test for use in a ‘test to enable’ scenario”. Professor Jon Deeks commented, “This clarification from the MHRA is very welcome—that they have not approved this lateral flow test as a test-to-enable—such as repeated testing of contacts in classrooms, or any situations where negative results allow an activity which otherwise would not happen. This is in line with the available science.”

His point was echoed by Professor Adam Finn of the University of Bristol, a member of the government’s Joint Committee for Vaccinations and Immunisation: “These are ‘red light’ tests. If they come positive that means you are potentially infectious to others and must self isolate. They are not ‘green light’ tests. You cannot be sure that if the test is negative you are not infectious and you must continue to take the usual precautions.”

The government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) Evidence Summary on the subject states that lateral flow tests “are effective at detecting a high viral load”. Asymptomatic cases of COVID-19, however, which testing is especially important for picking up, tend to have lower viral loads. According to Mike Gill, former regional director of public health for the South East of England, “Asymptomatic people have a viral load peak that looks to be, on average, lower than the viral load peak of people with symptoms, and it stays at that peak for less long.”

SAGE conclude that “any negative [lateral flow] test should not be considered a ‘green light’.” The WHO recommends confirmatory testing with PCR after a negative lateral flow test.

These warnings forced the government to junk its original plan, announced in December, to replace the system of self-isolation for close contacts of a positive case. Under these plans, close contacts would continue attending school while being tested daily. In late January, the Department for Education announced that a positive case would still lead to the isolation of close contacts. The mass testing scheme has nonetheless served as a propaganda ploy to justify sending millions of children and staff back to school with next to no safety measures in place, and with a dangerous false sense of security.

As Jon Deeks and Dr Clare Davenport, also of the University of Birmingham, say in their most recent article on the subject, “schools and parents may take some convincing regarding potential population gains relative to harms from mass testing… there is a commonly circulating argument that any test is better than no test if it detects at least some cases of infection that would otherwise have gone undetected… However, there are important costs to be quantified, not least the possibility for increased transmission from changing behaviour patterns in those with false negative results.”

In the last weeks, as pupils returned to the classrooms, multiple newspapers and broadcasters reporting on the inaccuracy of lateral flow tests focused exclusively on the problem of false positives leading to large groups of children self-isolating. The GuardianTelegraphEvening Standard and BBC Radio 4’s Today programme all reported that positive results were very likely to be false, resulting in unnecessary absence from school. The BBC news website carried two claims that whole classes of children were isolating after a child had tested positive with a lateral flow test only to test negative with PCR.

There has been no media coverage at all of the problem of false negatives. Right across the country, schools and families are in the bizarre and dangerous situation where one class is at home isolating due to a false positive result whilst several others remain in school due to false negatives.

Besides these problems, the government’s schools testing strategy excludes primary school pupils entirely and tests are not mandatory for secondary school pupils or primary and secondary staff. Many employers do not pay workers who are isolating or caring for children required to isolate, and the government has repeatedly refused to make any financial provision for people in these circumstances, meaning some families in severe financial hardship may be reluctant to take the tests.

23 Mar 2021

Four Ways to Support Latinas/os during the Pandemic and Beyond

Alvaro Huerta


The COVID-19 pandemic has not only devastated the U.S. economy, healthcare system and educational way of learning, it has also exposed or exasperated the racial and class inequalities in the formal economy (and informal economy). (The informal economy is also known as the unregulated economy, among other terms.) While it’s true that pandemic has impacted all citizens and residents, it’s especially true that Latinas/os and other racialized groups continue to contract and die from COVID-19 at higher rates compared to Whites. On December 10, 2020, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported on their official website that “…racial and ethnic minority groups are disproportionately represented among COVID-19 cases. The percent of cases for racial and ethnic minority groups are higher than the percent of these populations within the total U.S. population. Comparing the percent of cases and the percent of the total U.S. population by race and ethnicity provides an indication of disparities.”

In the state of California, Latinas/os comprise about 40 percent of the population in 2019, representing a significant part of its low-wage and service workforce. This includes the formal and informal economy. According to the state’s official COVID-19 website, “COVID-19 disproportionately affects California’s low income, Latino, Black, and Pacific Islander communities, as well as essential workers such as those in health care, grocery, and cleaning services.”

In terms of the County of Los Angeles, where Latinas/os represent the largest racialized/ethnic group (48.6% in 2019), similar to the City of Los Angeles (48.5% in 2019), we’ve been hit hard with COVID-19 related infections, hospitalizations and deaths. According to an article by NBC News (Jan. 17, 2021), Latinas/os are dying at higher rates from COVID-19 compared to Whites: “Death rates among Latinos in L.A. are twice as high as in the rest of the population, according to Los Angeles County public health officials. And Latinos, who are about half of all county residents, are hospitalized three times more often than white people.”

Given the disproportionate health and economic toll COVID-19 has had on Latinas/os, especially those who toil in the informal economy, which has yet to be accurately measured, our communities demand immediate relief. While not comprehensive, I propose the following recommendations (non-ranked), where much more needs to be done as we recover from this brutal pandemic (which the previous Trump Administration lied about and mismanaged!) and enter a new normal reality.

1. PROVIDE DIRECT AID TO INFORMAL WORKERS AND PETTY-ENTREPRENEURS

Government should provide direct financial aid to workers and petty-entrepreneurs in the Informal economy. While there have been two rounds of stimulus checks at the federal level to qualified individuals/families impacted by COVID-19, in addition to the recently passed/signed American Rescue Plan (or $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief bill)—without a single Republican vote in Congress—these checks, along with the business loans (i.e., Paycheck Protection Program or PPP), only go to those in the formal economy or regulated economy (e.g., filed taxes, established businesses). Unfortunately, many individuals who toil in the informal economy don’t file taxes, while they still contribute to the economy. In the case of the undocumented (or human beings on the move), by assigning them with an Employer Identification Number (EIN), etc., the government can (and should!) also help los de abajo / those on the bottom.

2. PROVIDE MICRO-LOANS TO PETTY-ENTREPRENEURS

The idea of micro-loans in the informal economy is not unique to the United States. Internationally, many non-government organizations (NGOs) and for-profit groups have been successful for years in helping individuals/families in need, particularly in underdeveloped and developing countries. By providing individuals/families with small loans at 0% percent interest rates under affordable regular payment plans, non-profit organizations, for-profit groups and government agencies in the U.S. can make a major impact on the lives of Latinas/os who depend on the informal economy to survive (and sometimes thrive). In fact, Inclusive Action for the People—an economic development organization in Los Angeles—recently initiated a micro-loan program called the Semi’a Fund.

3. ADOPT THE PROMOTORES MODEL

The promotores model (better known as promotoras) consists of a brilliant, grassroots idea/practice to enlist organic community leaders and trusted individuals to share vital information among community members. This includes navigating the health care system and promoting good health. In the U.S., we see Latinas in particular taking a leading role in these grassroots efforts. Recently, the County of Los Angeles, under the leadership of Supervisor Hilda L. Solis, has expanded the promotora model to deal with COVID-19. Given the lack of trust Latina/o communities have towards the government based on White America’s dark history of neglect, racism and marginalization, it’s imperative that we rely on and cultivate the existing organic leadership found in our communities to share important and reliable information and resources. More specifically, this is one way we can get more Latinas/os vaccinated!

4. MASSIVE PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS IN LATINA/O COMMUNITIES

Given that Latinas/os are a vulnerable racialized/ethnic group with disproportionate rates of COVID-19 infections and deaths compared to Whites, as noted above, there’s a desperate need for a massive educational campaign in Spanish and English catering to this historically marginalized group on importance being vaccinated, along with wearing masks, practicing social distancing and washing hands. This includes relying on trusted community leaders to share medical information in a way that our people can understand via photography, music and online videos. This should also be done through their trusted sources: churches, schools, non-profit organizations, hair salons, barbers, taco stands, restaurants, bars and sporting events. This also includes Spanish-language media outlets (e.g., television, radio, print) and social media (e.g., Facebook, WhatsApp), etc. Also, let’s enlist popular individuals and groups in Latina/o communities, like Mexico’s Los Tigres del Norte—Grammy Award-winning norteño group—can make a big difference in educating our people on doing the right things when it comes to COVID-19. Los Tigres, for instance, recently released a song on COVID-19 and conducted a PSA on the importance of la vacuna (that’s “vaccine” in Spanish).

In short, now that we have three available and reliable vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson), we must prioritize the most vulnerable groups amongst us, such as Latinas/os, along with other racialized and marginalized groups.

American Philanthropy: the Wealthier the Donor, the Bigger the Taxpayer Subsidy