15 Jan 2022

Norrsken Impact Accelerator 2022

Application Deadline:

28th February 2022

Tell Me About Norrsken Impact Accelerator:

Founded by Niklas Adalberth, one of the founders of Swedish fintech unicorn Klarna, in 2016, Norrsken aims to help entrepreneurs solve the world’s greatest challenges. Its ecosystem consists of Norrsken House, a co-working space for over 350 impact entrepreneurs in Stockholm, the Norrsken Founders Fund, and Norrsken VC.

African companies are again invited to apply for the 2022 edition of the accelerator, which is designed to find the world’s most promising impact startups and help them scale. The programme includes an eight-week growth sprint at Norrsken House in Stockholm and mentorship from a roster of over 50 entrepreneurs, investors and unicorn founders. All startups receive a US$125,000 upfront seed or pre-seed investment from the Norrsken Foundation. 

Join our Ask-Me-Anything-Sessions.
20th January, 15.00 CET [Click for link]
3rd February, 10.00 CET [Click for link]
17th February, 16.30 CET [Click for link]

Which Fields are Eligible?

Norrsken Impact Accelerator is sector agnostic and is open to startups in any area of impact. Each year, we’ll also highlight one or more verticals in which we’ll bring a little extra domain-specific expertise. This year, the cohort will be from mixed impact areas, with a special focus on food-tech and agri-tech.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Entrepreneurship

Who can apply for Norrsken Impact Accelerator?

We target early-stage startups that leverage technology to create and scale innovative solutions to new and old societal and environmental challenges.

We support startups in any area of impact and across all verticals. Each year, we’ll also highlight one or more verticals in which we’ll bring a little extra domain-specific expertise. This year, it’s food-tech. So no, we’re not a food-tech only accelerator, but if you’re a food-tech startup, we’re especially excited to hear from you.

> Impact
We invest across all UN SDGs and do not limit ourselves to a specific vertical, but we demand that impact is intentional. We are looking for companies where impact is built into the product, so that as your business grows, your impact automatically follows. When this is the case, we can give you the tools to manage your impact but focus on what we do best – helping you grow the business.

> Business model
We don’t think you need to sacrifice profit to make an impact. When impact is baked into your business, if you achieve financial success, you’ve almost certainly created a lot of impact too. So we’re looking for companies that, if successful, will become unicorns.

> Technology
Software or hardware, we invest in innovations that use technology as a tool in creating and scaling solutions.

> Stage
Because of the terms of our investment, we’re ideally suited to supporting companies at an early (pre-seed) stage. This means you’ve identified a clear market opportunity and path to market with your product. You may have built or be building your MVP, but you’ve gone beyond just the idea and have something to show. However, we are happy to support startups who have made more progress and fast-track your success from your base starting point.

> Geography
We are based in Sweden and ask startups to come to Stockholm for 8 weeks over the (European) summer to sprint on their businesses with our support. However, we are looking for companies from anywhere in the world.

Which Countries are Eligible?

All

Where will Award be Taken?

Stockholm, Sweden

How Many Scholarships will be Given?

20

What is the Benefit of Norrsken Impact Accelerator?

  • $125K INVESTMENT: Upfront pre-seed investment of $125k. There’s no fee for the program so you keep the full $125k.
  • UNICORN MENTORS: Dedicated 8 week sprint at Norrsken House Stockholm with mentorship from world-class founders who’ve faced the same challenges as you, including unicorn founders.
  • TOP INVESTORS: Meet hundreds of top investors at Demo Day. Continue to receive warm introductions to the right investors during and after the sprint.

How Long will the Program Last?

8 weeks

How to Apply for Norrsken Impact Accelerator:

Apply via Link below.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

US Dept of State Pan Africa Youth Leadership Program 2022

Application Deadline:

11th March 2022

Tell Me About US Dept of State Pan Africa Youth Leadership Program:

The U.S. Department of State Bureau Of Educational and Cultural Affairs has opened applications for grants to carry out 2022 Pan Africa Youth Leadership Programme.

The programme is designed to directly support the U.S. foreign policy goal of youth empowerment and development by equipping participants with the knowledge and skills to become active and responsible members of their communities.

Participants are to engage in workshops on leadership and service, community site visits related to the programme themes and subthemes, interactive training, presentations, visits to high schools, local cultural activities, and other activities designed to achieve the programme’s stated goals, while living with American families for a significant period of the exchange.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Grant

Who can apply for US Dept of State Pan Africa Youth Leadership Program?

  • Open to participants from sub-Saharan Africa
  • Applicants must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of application
  • Applicant organisations must demonstrate their capacity for conducting international youth exchanges
  • Applicants need not have organisational capacity in the participating countries, as the U.S. embassies will recruit and nominate participants
  • Organisations must have a method in place to assist participants with pre-departure activities such as coordinating travel and lodging for visa interviews and the disbursement of funds for domestic expenses such as passport fees, travel allowances, etc

Which Countries are Eligible?

FROM African countries

How Many Scholarships will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of US Dept of State Pan Africa Youth Leadership Program?

Successful applicant can receive up to U.S.$1,600,000

How to Apply for US Dept of State Pan Africa Youth Leadership Program 2022:

Visit Award Webpage for Details

HFG Foundation Young African Scholars Program 2022

Application Deadline: 1st March 2022

Eligible Countries: African countries

Eligible Fields: Applicants’ projects are expected to highlight the issues of violence and aggression.

About the HFG Foundation Young African Scholars Program: Harry Guggenheim established this foundation to support research on violence, aggression, and dominance because he was convinced that solid, thoughtful, scholarly and scientific research, experimentation, and analysis would in the end accomplish more than the usual solutions impelled by urgency rather than understanding. We do not yet hold the solution to violence, but better analyses, more acute predictions, constructive criticisms, and new, effective ideas will come in time from investigations such as those supported by our grants.

The foundation places a priority on the study of urgent problems of violence and aggression in the modern world and also encourages related research projects in neuroscience, genetics, animal behavior, the social sciences, history, criminology, and the humanities which illuminate modern human problems. Grants have been made to study aspects of violence related to youth, family relationships, media effects, crime, biological factors, intergroup conflict related to religion, ethnicity, and nationalism, and political violence deployed in war and sub-state terrorism, as well as processes of peace and the control of aggression.

Type: Grants

Eligibility: Applicants must be aged 40 or younger, currently enrolled in a Ph.D. program at an African higher education institution, and living on the continent.

Number of Awardees: 10

Value of HFG Foundation Young African Scholars Program: The program includes:

  • a methods workshop
  • fieldwork research grants of $10,000 USD each,
  • editorial and publication assistance,
  • and sponsorship at an international conference to present research findings.

How to Apply: The March 1 application deadline occurs every other year, in accordance with the program application cycle. Applicants must create an account to access the application. The guidelines are also available through the second link below.

Online Application (Login required)

Application Guidelines (PDF)

Visit Programme Webpage for details

The Right to Healthy Food: Comorbidities and COVID-19

Colin Todhunter


food packagingfood packaging

In early 2020, we saw the beginning of the COVID-19 ‘pandemic’. The world went into lockdown and even after lockdowns in various countries had been lifted, restrictions continued. Data now shows that lockdowns seemingly had limited if any positive impacts on the trajectory of COVID-19 and in 2022 the world – especially the poor – is paying an immense price not least in terms of loss of income, loss of livelihoods, the deterioration of mental and physical health, the eradication of civil liberties, disrupted supply chains and shortages.

The mortality rate for COVID-19 patients is linked to their comorbid conditions. In the US, the Center for Disease Control provides a list of comorbid conditions in COVID-19 patients, which includes cancer, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, Down syndrome, obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Research conducted in a German hospital shows that for those who died after SARS-CoV-2 infection the median number of chronic comorbidities was four and ranged from three to eight. Arterial hypertension was the most prevalent chronic condition (65.4%), followed by obesity (38.5%), chronic ischemic heart disease (34.6%), atrial fibrillation (26.9%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (23.1%). Of all patients, 15.4% had diabetes type II and chronic renal failure was noticed in 11.5%. The data suggests severe chronic comorbidities and health conditions in the majority of patients that had died after COVID-19. 

The meta-analysis Prevalence of comorbidities in patients and mortality cases affected by SARS-CoV2: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) found that hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity (affecting 32% of patients). Other common comorbidities included diabetes (22%) and heart disease (13%). The odds ratio of death for a patient with a comorbidity compared to one with no comorbidity was 2.4. The higher the prevalence of comorbidities the higher the odds that the COVID-19 patient will need intensive care or will die, especially if the pre-existing disease is hypertension, heart disease or diabetes.

In 2020, just 1,557 people aged 1-64 with no underlying co-morbidities were listed as having died from COVID in England and Wales out of a population of about 59 million. For the tens of thousands who were categorised as dying with COVID, co-morbidities were a major factor. UK data for 2020 shows that for ages 1-64 years, those who died with COVID had on average 1.71 co-morbidities. For those aged 65 and over, the figure is 2.02.

Patients with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases have a 54% increased risk for COVID-19 infection and more than twice the risk for COVID-19 death, versus the general population, according to data published in the journal Rheumatology (2021). 

In the paper COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune diseases: characteristics and outcomes in a multinational network of cohorts across three countries (2021), which also appeared in Rheumatology, researchers compared influenza with COVID-19 and concluded that the latter is a more severe disease for people with these conditions, leading to added complications and higher mortality. 

Of deaths in England and Wales where COVID-19 is listed, official government data shows the most common pre-existing condition recorded on the death certificate is diabetes (July to September 2021). This was identified in almost a quarter (22.5%) of ‘COVID deaths’.

Emerging data also suggests that obesity is a big risk factor for the progression of major complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), cytokine storm and coagulopathy in COVID-19.

A paper posted on the Center for Disease Control website provides an overview of factors associated with Covid-19 deaths for a 12-month period. The study, Underlying Medical Conditions and Severe Illness Among 540,667 Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19, March 2020–March 2021, looked at records of hospitalised adults and found that 94.9% had at least one underlying medical condition. The authors conclude that certain underlying conditions and the number of conditions were associated with severe COVID-19 illness. Hypertension and disorders of lipid metabolism were the most frequent, whereas obesity, diabetes with complication and anxiety disorders were the strongest risk factors for severe COVID-19 illness.

Based on the findings, Dr Peregrino Brimahdata (a molecular biologist, medical doctor, college professor and a published researcher) notes that obesity by itself gave a 30% increased death risk, anxiety disorders gave a 29% increased risk of death and diabetes led to a 26% increased risk of death.

Brimahdata concludes that about two thirds of ‘COVID deaths’ were patients who may be regarded as grossly unhealthy.

From the data presented above, it is clear that the vast majority of ‘COVID deaths’ (dying with COVID) are people who has serious, ongoing health conditions, the prevalence of which among the population has been rising year on year for decades and accelerating.

Food system

Although hereditary factors are involved, scientists at the Francis Crick Institute in London believe the growing popularity of Western-style diets is a major reason why autoimmune diseases are rising across the world by around 3% to 9% a year.

Professor James Lee from the institute recently told The Observer newspaper that human genetics has not altered over the past few decades, so something is changing in our environment that is increasing predisposition to autoimmune disease. His research team found that Western-style diets based on processed ingredients and with a lack of fresh vegetables can trigger autoimmune diseases.

Lee says that numbers of autoimmune cases began to increase about 40 years ago in the Western countries but are now also emerging in countries that never had such diseases before. These diseases include rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes, celiac disease, lupus, inflammatory bowel disease and multiple sclerosis.

It is estimated that approximately four million people in the UK have an autoimmune disease.

A Western-style diet is characterised by highly processed and refined foods with high contents of sugars, salt, and fat and protein from red meat. It is a major contributor to metabolic disturbances and the development of obesity-related diseases, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease – the top comorbidities where ‘COVID deaths’ are concerned.

But it goes beyond that because a lot of the health-related problems we see can also be traced back to modern farming methods and how food is cultivated, not least the toxic agrochemicals used. Michael McCarthy, writer and naturalist, says that three generations of industrialised farming with a vast tide of poisons pouring over the land year after year after year since the end of the Second World War is the true price of pesticide-based agriculture, which society has for so long blithely accepted.

Professor Carola Vinuesa, who heads another research team at the Francis Crick Institute, argues that fast-food diets can negatively affect a person’s microbiome – gut microorganisms which play a key role in controlling various bodily functions. 

The gut microbiome can contain up to six pounds of bacteria and agrochemicals and poor diets are disturbing this ‘human soil’. Many important neurotransmitters are located in the gut. Aside from affecting the functioning of major organs, these transmitters affect our moods and thinking.

Findings published in the journal ‘Translational Psychiatry’ provide strong evidence that gut bacteria can have a direct physical impact on the brain. Alterations in the composition of the gut microbiome have been implicated in a wide range of neurological and psychiatric conditions, including autism, chronic pain, depression and Parkinson’s Disease. Gut bacteria are also important for cognitive development in adolescence.

Changes to the gut microbiome are also linked to obesity. Increasing levels of obesity are associated with low bacterial richness in the gut. Indeed, it has been noted that tribes not exposed to the modern food system have richer microbiomes. Environmental campaigner Rosemary Mason lays the blame squarely at the door of agrochemicals, not least the use of the world’s most widely used herbicide, glyphosate.

Mason has written to the two professors from the Francis Crick Institute mentioned above, making it clear to them that it would be remiss to ignore the role pesticides play when it comes to the worrying rates of disease we now see. She brings their attention to concerning levels of glyphosate in certain cereals in the UK.

Based on an analysis of these cereals, Dr John Fagan, director of Health Research Laboratories, has concluded:

“The levels consumed in a single daily helping of any one of these cereals… is sufficient to put the person’s glyphosate levels above the levels that cause fatty liver disease in rats (and likely in people).”

Mason also refers the two academics to the paper Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America in Journal of Organic Systems (2014)  

It notes:

“The herbicide glyphosate was introduced in 1974 and its use is accelerating with the advent of herbicide-tolerant genetically engineered (GE) crops. Evidence is mounting that glyphosate interferes with many metabolic processes in plants and animals and glyphosate residues have been detected in both. Glyphosate disrupts the endocrine system and the balance of gut bacteria, it damages DNA and is a driver of mutations that lead to cancer.”

The researchers searched US government databases for GE crop data, glyphosate application data and disease epidemiological data. Correlation analyses were then performed on a total of 22 diseases in these time-series data sets. The Pearson correlation coefficients were highly significant between glyphosate applications and a wide range of diseases, including hypertension, stroke, diabetes prevalence, diabetes incidence, obesity, Alzheimer’s, senile dementia, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal infections, end stage renal disease, acute kidney failure and various cancers. The Pearson correlation coefficients were also highly significant between the percentage of GE corn and soy planted in the US and most of the conditions listed above.

In 2017, the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and hazardous substances and wastes, Baskut Tuncak, said

“Paediatricians have referred to childhood exposure to pesticides as creating a ‘silent pandemic’ of disease and disability. Exposure in pregnancy and childhood is linked to birth defects, diabetes and cancer. Because a child’s developing body is more sensitive to exposure than adults and takes in more of everything – relative to their size, children eat, breathe and drink much more than adults – they are particularly vulnerable to these toxic chemicals.”

Consider that little is being done to address the food-related public health crisis which, according to the data on co-morbidities, seems to be a major contribution to increased risk where COVID is concerned. Then consider that governments are going all out to vaccinate children for a virus that poses minimal or virtually no risk to them. There is no logic to this approach.

While there is currently much talk of the coronavirus placing immense strain on the NHS, the health service was already creaking due to spiraling rates of disease linked to the food we eat. But do we see a clampdown on the activities or products of the global agrochemical or the food conglomerates? Instead, we see that successive governments in the UK have worked hand in glove with them to ensure ‘business as usual’.

The UK government is going out of its way under the guise of a health crisis to undermine the public’s rights in order to manage risk and to ‘protect’ the NHS but is all too willing to oversee a massive, ongoing health crisis caused by the chemical pollution of our bodies.

The unvaccinated are being cast as irresponsible or much worse if we listen to the recent reprehensible outbursts from leaders like Macron or Trudeau (concerning a disease that is as risky as the flu for the vast majority of the population) for having genuine concerns about vaccine safety, waning efficacy and the logic behind mass vaccination across all ages and risk groups.

Given that underlying health conditions substantially increase risk where COVID-19 is concerned, it is clear where the real irresponsibility lies – with government inaction for decades in terms of failing to tackle the corporations behind the health-damaging food they produce.

Enduring Stain: The Guantánamo Military Prison Turns Twenty

Binoy Kampmark


Guantanamo Bay Detention FacilityGuantanamo Bay Detention Facility

Anniversaries for detention centres, concentration camps and torture facilities are not the relishable calendar events in the canon of human worth.  But not remembering them, when they were used, and how they continue being used, would be unpardonable amnesia.

On January 11, 2002, the first prisoners of the absurdly named “War on Terror”, declared with such confused understanding by US President George W. Bush, began arriving at the newly constructed Camp X-Ray prison at the US naval base in Guantánamo Bay.  Structurally crude, it was intended as a temporary facility, remote and out of sight.  Instead, it became a permanent and singular contribution of US political and legal practice, withering due process and civil liberties along the way.

After two decades, 779 prisoners have spent time there, many of whom were low level operatives of minimal importance.  Prior to being sent to the camp, the detainees endured abductions, disappearances, and torture in US-operated centres in allied countries.  The previous director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Gina Aspel, had more than a nodding acquaintance with this process, having overseen operations at a black site in Thailand specialising in interrogating al-Qaeda suspects.

Guantánamo Bay was a mad, cruel experiment about how legal limbos and forged purgatories of the law can function to dehumanise and degrade.  It was developed by people supposedly versed in a liberal legal tradition but keen to make exceptions in battling a supposedly novel enemy.  The detainees were deemed “unlawful enemy combatants” – as if there was such a thing – thereby placing them outside the formal protections of humanitarian law.  They were subjected to sleep deprivation, forced feeding, lengthy detainment, beatings, stress positions and an assortment of other torture methods.

In 2005, Vice President Dick Cheney sneered at suggestions that the inmates were being mistreated.  “They’re living in the tropics.  They’re well fed.  They’ve got everything they could possibly want.  There wasn’t any other nation in the world that would treat people who were determined to kill Americans the way we’re treating these people.”

The closure of the facility has been constantly urged with minimal return.  It was one of the electoral messages of the presidential campaign in 2007.  Barack Obama and his rival, Hillary Clinton, endorsed the idea.  As did the Republican contender for the White House, John McCain.  As Obama declared at the time, “In the dark halls of Abu Ghraib and the detention cells of Guantánamo, we have compromised our most precious values.”

A joint US-European Union statement from June 15, 2009 noted, with welcome, the decision by President Obama to affect a closure by January 22 the following year.  But it also acknowledged what has been a persistent problem: returning detainees to their countries of origin or a third country that might be willing to accept them.

In the dying days of the Obama administration, the facility, despite a reduction in the inmate population, remained functional.  Congress proved recalcitrant and obstructive on the issue but there was also opposition to the closure from various arms of government, including the Pentagon.  Lee Wolosky, formerly Obama’s Special Envoy for Guantánamo Closure, could only marvel darkly at this seemingly indestructible piece of legal infrastructure.  “In large part,” he wrote, this mess had been “self-inflicted – a result of our own decisions to engage in torture, hold detainees indefinitely without charge, set up dysfunctional military commissions and attempt to avoid oversight by the federal courts.”

In 2016, Donald Trump, the eventual victor of that year’s presidential contest, repeatedly insisted that he would “load it with some bad dudes”.  In 2018, he signed a new executive order keeping the military prison open, reiterating the line that terrorists were not merely “criminals” but “unlawful enemy combatants”.  Releasing any such individuals from Guantánamo had been, he observed gravely, a mistake.  “In the past, we have foolishly released hundred and hundreds of dangerous terrorists only to meet them again on the battlefield, including the ISIS leader, [Abu Bakr] al-Baghdadi, who we captured, who we had, who we released.”

On the occasion of the twentieth anniversary of the camp’s opening, Agnès Callamard, secretary-general of Amnesty International, was yet another voice to urge its closure.  “President Joe Biden, like President Barack Obama before him, has promised to close it, but so far has failed to do so.”  She insisted that each detainee’s case be resolved, be it through transfer and release, or via “a regularly constituted federal court without recourse to the death penalty.”

Despite being an enduring blot on the country’s credibility, the facility remains ingloriously open, a reminder that there are legal provinces where the US is willing to detain people indefinitely, without trial or scrutiny.  Thirty-nine men remain, thirteen of whom are in indefinite detention.  This is despite the latter having had their transfers out of the facility approved a decade ago.  The calls for the military prison’s closure reach occasional crescendos, but these eventually diminish before the machinery of stifling bureaucracy.  Tragically, there is every risk that the Guantánamo experiment will be replicated rather than abolished.  Such creations, once brought into being, can prove deathless.

Nationwide protests break out in Lebanon amid mounting economic, social and political crisis

Jean Shaoul



A Lebanese protester holds an Arabic placard that reads: “Down with the rule of the bank,” in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, Feb. 26, 2021.(AP Photo/Hussein Malla)

In the past week, Lebanon has seen mass protests against the discredited and dysfunctional government that has failed to address mounting poverty and hardship, amid a surge in COVID-19 cases.

On Thursday, transport workers, many of whom are self-employed, took to the streets in a “day of rage” at the start of a nationwide strike protesting the terrible social and economic conditions.

Workers blocked major highways as well as towns and cities across the country with their trucks and buses. Many public offices, universities, schools and banks were closed as people were unable to get to work. One driver in Beirut said, “We can barely afford hospitalization or medicine. We are begging healthcare associations for our rights that the state is supposed to secure for us.”

Bassam Tleis, the leader of the land transport unions, called on the government to honour its pledge to compensate them. He said the strike could continue if the government did not meet their demands for fuel subsidies and money to help them cope with rising expenses.

The cost of fuel has soared as the Central Bank cut subsidies in a bid to hold onto the country’s dwindling foreign currency reserves. It costs more to fill a tank than the monthly minimum wage, currently worth just $20. Bechara al-Asmar, the leader of the General Labor Union, said the strikers were calling for the government to reinstate the subsidies on bread, fuel and other basic items.

But with the union leaders reportedly close to Hezbollah and Amal, the Shia parties, some drivers from other parties refused to join the strike.

Meanwhile, the Nabatiyeh region in southern Lebanon was rocked by a huge explosion when a fire broke out at private generating plant that reached old, unexploded ordnance left over from the 2006 war with Israel.

On Wednesday, there were demonstrations in Beirut, the northern port city of Tripoli, Lebanon’s poorest city, and the eastern province of Baalbeck, denouncing the collapse in the value of the lira, the national currency that is pegged to the US dollar. Later in the evening, angry protesters clashed with security forces outside the headquarters of Lebanon’s Central Bank as they tried to enter the building.

While the official price is 1,500 liras to the dollar, dollars on the black market were selling at almost 33,000 liras on Monday. The lira has lost more than 95 percent of its value in the last two years, leading to soaring inflation, including a massive rise in the cost of food, fuel and medicine and the complete devastation of workers’ living standards.

Food inflation, more than 550 percent last autumn, is among the highest in the world according to the UN’s World Food Programme, while ever more frequent and lengthy power cuts have forced people to turn to private suppliers, often paying out more than the cost of their rent. On Thursday, fuel distributors refused to unload their diesel until they were paid in the dollar equivalent.

On Monday, such was the anger over power outages—electricity is typically available for just one hour during the day and one hour in the evening—that protesters stormed the main power plant in Aramoun, 22 kilometres from Beirut, damaging the electrical equipment and shutting down the power system across the entire country for hours. They charged that while areas under the control of the Free Patriot Movement (FPM), the Christian party led by Gebran Bassil, President Michel Aoun’s son-in-law, were generally free of power cuts, areas allied with the FPM’s opponents were not.

The fuel crisis has caused terrible hardship and wreaked havoc across the economy, affecting water purification and sanitation. Drinking water has become ever scarcer as the companies producing bottled water cut production, forcing people to turn to dangerous coping mechanisms.

On Saturday, there were anti-vaccination protests in Beirut against the government’s requirement for public sector workers to get vaccinated or take frequent PCR tests at their own expense to go to work. Various religious sects promoted the protest. There is no question, however, that the financial crisis and the government’s arbitrary and contradictory response to the pandemic that led to tens of thousands of people losing their livelihoods while unable to access adequate health care are fueling widespread anger. Popular contempt for the politicians and plutocrats who have hoarded medicines to sell at a higher price have also played a major role in vaccine hesitancy and the spread of misinformation.

According to official figures that grossly underestimate the reality, the coronavirus pandemic has cost the lives of more than 9,330 people in a country of just six million. Only 37 percent of the population have received two jabs, leaving the rest cruelly exposed as the number of cases surge.

The World Bank has described Lebanon’s economic crisis as one of the world’s worst since the 1850s. GDP plummeted from $55 billion in 2018 to a projected $20.5 billion in 2021, with real GDP per capita falling by 37.1 percent, a rate usually associated with armed conflicts or wars. At least 80 percent of the population, including one million Syrian refugees, live in terrible poverty.

The government of Najib Mikati, Lebanon’s richest businessman and banker, barely functions. It took more than a year to cobble together a government acceptable to President Michel Aoun and his faction after the resignation of Hassan Diab, a non-aligned Sunni politician who became prime minister following the mass protests of October 2019 against Lebanon’s sectarian political system.

Diab resigned in the aftermath of the August 2020 port of Beirut explosion that killed more than 200 people, when it became clear that his government, in power for just a few months, was being forced to take the blame. He remained in a caretaker role. The blast was caused by ammonium nitrate, a key component of fertilizers, mine explosives and bombs, stored at the port since 2014 due to the negligence, inaction and corruption of the kleptocrats who run the country as their own private fiefdom.

In the event, Mikati’s cabinet has not met since October amid bitter divisions within the major sectarian blocs. Hezbollah, the Iran-backed bourgeois-clerical party and its ally, the Shia Amal movement of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, which together form the largest political bloc, have demanded that the judge leading the investigation into the port explosion be removed.

Mikati has therefore been unable to push through a budget or implement the financial and free-market economic reforms that are the precondition for an International Monetary Fund loan and aid pledged by the European and regional powers. Moreover, any such loan would also require Lebanon to align politically with the Sunni oil states and against Iran and Syria, a condition to which Hezbollah refuses to accede.

The tiny country has long been ensnared in the wider regional power struggles, including the bitter armed conflict of 1975 to 1990 between shifting alliances backed by rival powers. It has more recently faced pressure from US imperialism, Saudi Arabia and France, as part of their broader efforts to isolate Iran and Syria, with ever wider sanctions on Hezbollah and Syria, with whose economy Lebanon is closely connected. Their de facto economic blockade is aimed at isolating Hezbollah and bolstering the power of its Sunni and Christian allies after they were ousted by the mass social protests that erupted in October 2019 against economic hardship, government corruption and the country’s sectarian political setup.

The financial elite, through its political parties and the Central Bank, has carried out the financial looting and mismanagement of the economy. Lebanon’s Central Bank governor is now under investigation for embezzlement and money laundering by Lebanon and at least four European countries. These criminal operations by the ruling elite led to the government’s default on its overseas debt, a currency collapse that wiped out foreign reserves, soaring inflation, the doubling of food prices, and widespread poverty.

This week, in the face of the widespread protests, Washington was forced to concede that Lebanon’s efforts to secure natural gas imports from Egypt, via Jordan and Syria, in a deal arranged last August just hours after Hezbollah had arranged multiple deliveries of Iranian fuel, would not be subject to sanctions.

While the protests undoubtedly reflect widespread social discontent, under the leadership of trade unions or political groups allied to one or another of Lebanon’s financial oligarchs, the working masses of Lebanon face the prospect of betrayal or brutal suppression at the hands of the army, which despite sanctions Washington has continued to fund.

Mexico’s COVID cases soar as AMLO minimizes danger

Rafael Azul & Don Knowland



Mexican health workers protest; sign reads, “I'm COVID-19 positive and they ordered me to work” [Credit: Facebook]

With the onset of the Omicron variant of COVID-19, the contagion curve is skyrocketing in Mexico. In the week from January 4th to the 11th, new cases more than doubled, from 15,184 to 33,626. On January 13, 44,187 new cases were reported, along with 190 deaths, which lag two to three weeks behind infection.

The case counts this week exceed the daily maximum registered in previous COVID peaks. And this is only the beginning of the new wave, which is growing exponentially.

With the current figures, Mexico officially exceeds 4.2 million cases and 300,000 deaths from the coronavirus since the onset of the pandemic.

This number is indisputably a gross underestimation. Mexican data tracking excess deaths in 2021 from the pandemic (relative to 2015-2019) suggests that the actual death toll from the coronavirus pandemic was between 455 and 655 thousand as of December 31, 2021.

But even the official lower number places Mexico fourth in the world in deaths, trailing only the United States, India and Brazil, countries with much larger populations.

No restrictive measures have been implemented in Mexico in two years, not even travel restrictions. No negative COVID-19 test has been required to enter the country. This has allowed waves of tourists to visit the beaches of the Caribbean and Baja California Sur and infect at will. The latter state currently has the highest rate of infection.

This week, the states of Jalisco and Baja California Sur announced for the first time that as of Friday, January 15 they will “require” “proof of vaccination” or a recent COVID negative PCR test result to enter bars or restaurants. But this requirement likely will be observed more in the breach. Baja in fact stopped short of mandating the policy, noting that showing proof of vaccination would be at the discretion of individual business owners, which was always the case.

Mexico has entrusted its entire strategy against the pandemic to immunization, a case of too little, too late. It claims to have employed Chinese, Russian and Cuban vaccines, in addition to the European and American ones, to vaccinate 80 million Mexicans to date, or about 88 percent of adults, but a significant portion of them have not been fully vaccinated. Only in recent weeks has a booster dose been started for people over 65 and for hospital staff, and only last week for educational staff in limited areas.

In November, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (popularly known as AMLO) lied in stating that Mexico had one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, when in fact it was then in 90th place.

On November 20, he commemorated three years of his rule on the 111th anniversary of the start of the Mexican Revolution with a massive congregation in the Zócalo (central plaza) of Mexico City, a space where social distancing was impossible. Nothing was said about wearing masks.

With the Omicron exploding in the current wave, AMLO and health officials are going out of their way to downplay its risk to the population. On Monday, López Obrador announced that he had contracted COVID for the second time. But, calling it “Covidcito” or little COVID, all he asked of people was to isolate themselves if they have symptoms.

Hugo López Gatell, Mexico’s deputy health minister, absurdly compared the Omicron strain to the common cold, only advising people to stay at home as they would with a cold.

Health Secretary Jorge Alcocer gave false assurances that there has been a 91 percent drop in hospitalizations relative to previous pandemic highs, and said not to worry, even as hospitals begin to fill up.

But as the magazine Proceso reported this week, Mexico’s National Health Care System has a deficit of 300,000 health care workers. The current upsurge in the pandemic, much like the previous ones, puts increasing pressure on this system, which relies on contingent workers paid low wages and lacks necessary safety equipment. On top of that, many health workers have yet to receive vaccine booster shots and have themselves become ill from COVID-19.

This week Favian Valdez, one of the leaders of the newly formed National Union of Mexican Nursing (Unión Nacional de Enfermería Mexicana, UNEM), explained the hospital situation to Proceso: “Once again we are sent into battle with no weapons. Federal Hospitals and the 32 state health systems, claiming lack of resources, refuse to give us adequate protective equipment. That is how they send us to help those patients affected by omicron.”

Valdez indicated that health workers are not being provided basic equipment such as KN95 or N95 masks. He pointed out that many patients enter hospitals without knowing they are infected by the coronavirus: “…and doctors and nurses have to treat them with totally inadequate equipment.”

Valdez summed up the situation: “With this new variant all three levels of hospital care will be overwhelmed. Health personnel will once again have to bear that weight. This is not just for the workers that have had to carry the entire load, despite extremely low wages and that have gotten ill; many have died attending COVID patients.”

As the number of COVID cases expands exponentially, the “Seven Seas,” the first cruise ship to dock in the Pacific Coast port of Acapulco in two years arrived, carrying 460 passengers and 445 crew members. Acapulco tourist authorities celebrated the event with champagne, as passengers and crew members came ashore, following perfunctory questioning as to whether they had been ill, and a recommendation to wear masks.

Acapulco Tourism director Santos Ramirez indicated that 14 more giant cruise ships were expected soon, with a goal of 90 ships a year. According to Acapulco Mayor Abelina Lopez: “Today we fulfilled the promise of cruise ships; this first is one from the Regent shipping firm. This is the step that Acapulco must take; this way we will be able to re-start the economy,” declared the mayor.

US hospitals rapidly reaching capacity as Omicron continues nation-wide surge

Benjamin Mateus



Registered nurse Estella Wilmarth tends to a patient in the acute care unit of Harborview Medical Center, Friday, Jan. 14, 2022, in Seattle. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

The number of inpatient beds in use for COVID-19 continues to climb in the United States, a byproduct of the Biden administration’s “learn to live with the virus” policy that has unfathomably enriched the financial markets while coronavirus infections spread at unprecedented rates among the population.

Yesterday, the Department of Health and Human Services reported 157,272 people in hospitals across the country for COVID-19, accounting for one in four hospitalized patients. Of these, 25,173 are being treated in intensive care units, representing 37 percent of all ICU admissions. The daily average in admissions has reached a pandemic high of 148,782, an 80 percent jump from just two weeks ago.

Hospitals in almost half the country are quickly approaching their capacity. In 18 states, at least 85 percent of adult ICUs are in use. Across 24 states, 80 percent of staffed inpatient beds are filled. Previously hard-hit states like Wisconsin and Michigan face a new onslaught of ill patients accessing their health facilities while the South is re-emerging as an epicenter of the Omicron surge.

Despite attempts by the Biden administration to downplay the dangers posed by Omicron, the pressure on health systems is creating a severe health crisis caused by staff shortages to which the federal government has no serious response outside of promising that it would deploy 1,000 military medical personnel. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court dealt a blow on Thursday to the president’s vaccine-only initiative by striking down a national vaccine-or-test requirement for large US businesses.

According to the New York Times metrics, more than 2,224 deaths from COVID-19 were recorded on January 13. The daily average in deaths is 1,873, twice as high as at the end of November 2021. These trends are expected to continue with the astonishing spread of infections.

The average in new cases has reached over 800,000 per day, an unprecedented pandemic high. On January 13, more than 889,000 new cases were reported, and more than nine million cases have been logged since the New Year. At the present rate, the US can expect to have documented 70 million COVID cases before next weekend.

The cumulative death toll has reached 870,000. However, according to the Economist, excess deaths are now over 1.1 million. In historical terms, the scale of death is reaching the proportions of death that occurred in the population during the 1918 influenza pandemic.

According to Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, the national positivity rate has reached 26 percent, underscoring the massive undercounting and the scale of infection that continues to run rampant across the country. The District of Columbia and Colorado, Kansas and Pennsylvania report a seven-day average of 100 percent positivity on COVID-19 tests.

As Kaiser Family Foundation’s state COVID-19 data from January 12 demonstrates, the impact on health systems affects every region in the country.

Presently, the District of Columbia boasts the highest rate of COVID-19 admissions in the country, with 1,215 admissions per million population. Though D.C. public officials are spinning the statistics and celebrating a downturn in the peak of cases, hospitalizations continue to plague the region. One in four hospital workers are quarantining or isolating after testing positive for COVID-19. Health systems rely on traveling nurses at twice the rates than before the pandemic, paying $160 to $200 per hour for each nurse.

Notably, D.C. was one of the first and hardest-hit regions during the initial Omicron wave, providing an indication of what other states and regions can expect. As the surge ripples across the country, the impact on health systems will be compounded by the exhaustion of even the reserve of traveling nurses who are also becoming infected in droves.

In California, where more than 13,000 COVID-19 patients are admitted to hospitals, legal maneuvers are being employed to force infected health care workers to continue returning to their place of employment. If they resist by staying home, they are being threatened with disciplinary actions or told they would lose personal time off for not showing up. These measures, too, will be adopted by other states as they face similar predicaments.

The demand for health care workers to remain on the job regardless of their infection status leads to many patients who were not COVID-positive becoming infected at hospitals. However, there is no federal database that is publicly tracking each hospital in this particular metric—hospital-acquired COVID-19. According to KHN Midwest correspondent Lauren Webber, there has been a wave of liability shield laws enacted by state legislatures across the country to protect hospitals from being held responsible for in-hospital infections.

“The reality on the ground,” Webber reported, “is that many families who have lost a loved one they can’t use a lawsuit as a way of getting hospitals to improve their infection control practices and has left them with no recourse to use their loved one’s death to cause change at the hospital.” The change in isolation policies due to staffing crises brings these dangers to the forefront. These are also a significant source of fear and frustration among health care workers who risk sickening the patients they have taken an oath to protect.

The majority of patients admitted to hospitals are COVID-negative. They are being treated for serious conditions like heart attacks or kidney failure and must spend several days in the hospital for tests and treatments. They have significant comorbidities that threaten them if they become infected despite their vaccination status. For instance, between April and September 2020, more than 10,000 patients, a vast undercount, acquired COVID-19 during their admission to a hospital. Twenty-one percent of them died, and most of them were over 65.

Florida, which is facing a catastrophic spike in infections, has 11,552 in patient beds for COVID-19, or 516 per million. According to the Florida Hospital Association, COVID-19 hospitalizations have risen 361 percent in the last two weeks. The Cleveland Clinic in Weston, Florida, has seen a ten-fold increase in COVID-19 patients, pushing the 206-bed hospital’s capacity over 120 percent.

In Texas, where a record 74,254 people were confirmed positive Thursday, almost 2,160 people were admitted to hospital on January 12, bringing their total to 11,764 or 401 COVID-19 admissions per million population. Children make up 4 percent of all these admissions. There are over 2,200 people in the ICUs leaving only 315 adult ICU beds left.

John Henderson, the president and CEO of the Texas Organization of Rural and Community Hospitals, told Vox, “Ideally, everybody would take this thing seriously and follow the steps that we know work, which is primarily get vaccinated and boosted, but also be smart about gatherings and wear a mask. But in Texas, especially rural Texas, people have prioritized getting back to normal. On some level, I understand that. But the virus is in charge, and until we get control of the virus, we can’t get back to normal.”

Indeed, the virus has taken over, not because of any unique qualities, but as a deliberate policy enforced by political leaders to ensure that profit-making is functioning at whatever cost to the population. The shift in the blame for repeated COVID surges onto the population’s back is part and parcel of deflecting all responsibility for any public health measure that would stem the tide of infections and provide a respite for health systems that have faced a repeated deluge of patients for nearly two years, pushing health care workers to the brink of human capabilities.

The trends in hospitalizations are moving from the coasts and large cities towards the Midwest and more rural regions where health systems have faced decades of cutbacks and staffing shortages, which will be compounded by the sudden acceleration of patients seeking immediate life-saving treatment. These populations are also chronically debilitated by years of overwork and daily stresses that have seen life expectancy stall and now plummet.

As a trigger event in history, the pandemic has exposed the rot and decay at the root of the capitalist system. COVID-19 is a disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, every COVID-19 infection bears the mark of social relations that threaten the working class’s livelihood. The policy of the ruling elite and their political representatives is reactionary and opportunistic all down the line.

The false notion that herd immunity could be achieved, that vaccines by themselves would bring a swift end to the pandemic and the idea that the virus will soon be endemic are all political constructs that place the demands of the financial markets ahead of the life and well-being of the population.