4 Mar 2022

French President Macron backs NATO war drive against Russia

Alex Lantier


On Wednesday night, in a prime time address to the nation coming shortly before he is due to announce his bid for re-election in next month’s presidential elections, Emmanuel Macron spoke on the rapidly escalating war between Russia and the pro-NATO regime in Ukraine.

French President Emmanuel Macron, second left, watches screen during a video-conference with NATO members at the French Army headquarters, Friday, Feb. 25, 2022 in Paris. NATO leaders met to discuss how far they can go to challenge Russian President Vladimir Putin. (AP Photo/Michel Euler, Pool)

He spoke shortly after a poll emerged showing that 70 percent of the French public oppose joining the conflict. Defying public opinion, Macron is, however, sending French troops to neighboring Romania and warships and fighter planes to the region. His speech therefore sought to lull workers to sleep about the mounting danger of a Russia-NATO war, while demanding that the French people support NATO war policies and accept massive bloodshed and vast economic sacrifices.

Denouncing “the brutal attack launched by [Russian President Vladimir] Putin against Ukraine on February 24,” Macron warned: “The coming days will likely be increasingly difficult. … The balance of our continent and many aspects of our daily lives are already transformed by this war and will undergo profound change in the coming months.”

Macron appealed for popular support for NATO’s policy on a fraudulent basis, blaming war entirely on the Russian regime. However, while the Kremlin is responsible for launching the invasion, the NATO powers have systematically worked to threaten Russia and cut off negotiations with it, goading Putin to take military action. As a result, Macron’s appeal to the French people to support NATO against Russia collapsed into a series of lies, distortions and half-truths.

“Neither France, nor Europe, nor Ukraine nor the NATO alliance wanted this war. On the contrary, we did everything we could to avoid it,” Macron said. Pointing to his own talks with Putin, he added: “The US president made clear his availability to negotiate after physically meeting President Putin in June 2021 in Geneva. It is thus indeed alone and deliberately violating one by one all his promises to the community of nations, that President Putin chose war.”

Leaving aside his own attempts to negotiate with Putin, which clearly have failed, Macron’s claim that US President Joe Biden was “available to negotiate” with Putin is a fraud. Biden said he did not respect Putin’s “red lines,” that is, that Washington would take whatever action it pleased, even if Putin warned that this crossed a “red line” that could lead to war. All the major NATO powers then insisted that Ukraine had to have the option of joining NATO, after which NATO weapons aimed at Russia could be placed on Ukrainian soil, directly on Russia’s borders.

Macron tried to refute the arguments Russian officials have given to justify the invasion, pointing to the aggressive role played by NATO. Currently, he said, “there are neither NATO troops nor bases in Ukraine. Those are lies. Nor is this war, as intolerable propaganda would have it, a struggle against ‘Nazism.’ That is a lie.”

While it is true that NATO troops are technically not permanently deployed to Ukraine, Macron’s statement is at best a cynical dodge. In February 2014, the NATO powers backed a putsch, led by neo-Nazis of the Right Sector group, that installed a pro-NATO government in Ukraine. Since then, CIA advisors and US mercenaries from the private firm Academi (formerly Blackwater) have helped Ukrainian forces carry out attacks on Russian-speaking areas of Ukraine.

Putin’s claim that he aims to “de-Nazify” Ukraine is a political lie, as his own regime is based on close alliances with far-right groups. However, Macron’s comments covered up the enormous role played by neo-Nazi forces, like Right Sector or the Azov Battalion, in NATO’s Ukrainian puppet regime. Indeed, it was reported last year that the FBI is investigating American neo-Nazis who went to Ukraine to fight for the pro-NATO Ukrainian regime on charges of murdering non-combatants and burying them in mass graves.

A crying contradiction underlay Macron’s speech: While presenting NATO policy as moderate and Russian action as totally unprovoked, he also stressed aggressive actions NATO is taking that cut across any attempt to negotiate an end to the war. “Several major Russian banks have been excluded from the international payments system, making many transactions impossible and triggering a collapse of the ruble. Russian propaganda outlets can no longer broadcast in Europe,” he said, boasting of NATO’s “delivery of civilian and military equipment” to Ukraine to fight Russia.

Urgent warnings are needed. NATO and the Macron government are heading for a direct military clash with Russia, a nuclear-armed power. It is critical to politically alert workers and youth to this danger and mobilize opposition to NATO’s policies that threaten humanity with nuclear war.

Examining Macron’s speech also reveals the explosive internal class conflicts the NATO powers are seeking to suppress with the war drive against Russia. Already before the war, strikes and protests were mounting against rising inflation and the policies of mass infection with COVID-19 pursued by the NATO powers. Handouts of trillions of dollars and euros to the investing classes in bank bailouts massively fueled inflation, even as over 2 million people died of COVID-19 inside NATO.

Macron laid out a framework in which NATO can try to use the war to falsely blame Russia for the mounting social and economic suffering caused by the official handling of the pandemic. Having admitted that the NATO powers are working to cut Russia out of international trade, he proceeded to blame Russia for the acceleration of inflation and economic disruption the NATO trade embargo on Russia will produce.

Among the consequences of Russia’s invasion, Macron listed: “Our agriculture, industry, many economic sectors will suffer, either because they depend on raw materials from Russia or Ukraine, or because they export to those countries. Our economic growth, currently high, will inevitably be affected. Rising prices for oil, gas, and raw materials will impact our purchasing power: Tomorrow, filling up your tank, heating your home, the cost of key products will likely rise even further.”

In reality, it is apparent that the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered an enormous escalation of the global crisis of capitalism and the NATO powers’ drive to war. The deadly political and military consequences of the Stalinist dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 are becoming apparent. The proxy wars NATO fought across Europe against allies of Russia, seeking to crush Serbia during the Yugoslav wars in the 1990s or with the 2014 putsch against a pro-Russian regime in Ukraine, now have escalated into a crisis that threatens to provoke a world war.

All the historically rooted contradictions of European and world capitalism are re-emerging in the current war. Berlin’s recent decision to triple its military spending to €150 billion and thereafter spend at least 2 percent of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on defense, amounts to an official rehabilitation of German militarism—which was discredited for decades after 27 million Soviet citizens died fighting the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in World War II.

This also means that, for the first time since its conquest of France in that war, Germany could have a more powerful military than France. While the NATO imperialist powers are all moving against Russia, Macron’s speech gave some indication of the mounting tensions among the NATO powers themselves caused by these dangerous developments.

While Biden and other NATO heads of state insist that they will not meet Putin, Macron said he would and referred to French imperialism’s traditional alliance with Russia against Germany. After pledging to “stay in contact as much as I can and as much as is necessary with President Putin,” Macron hailed “the history of Russia and Ukraine, the memory of earlier generations who fought side by side with us against Nazism.”

This reference is hypocritical and politically obscene coming from Macron. He made it while also threatening Russia in alliance with a far-right regime in Ukraine that rewarded surviving members of Ukrainian SS units involved in the Holocaust with state pensions. Nonetheless, as Macron also announced a pledge to massively escalate military spending, it is apparent that German rearmament amid a war drive against Russia is also intensifying interimperialist conflicts within NATO itself.

Concluding his speech, Macron referred briefly to the April 2022 presidential elections and made clear that none of the broad outlines of the policies he had discussed—which are shared by virtually every major candidate—would be up for discussion. He said, “This campaign will allow for democratic debate that is important for the nation, but it will not prevent us from being united on that which is essential.”

Macron’s remarks point to the accelerating collapse of French democracy under the impact of unsustainable levels of social inequality, the pandemic, and the imperialist drive to war.

Australia: Residents abandoned by government in flood crisis

Martin Scott & Michael Newman


As residents of Lismore and surrounding parts of northern New South Wales (NSW) begin to clean up and recover belongings from their flood- and storm-damaged homes, anger and frustration is mounting over the pitiful official response to the disaster.

Flooded Newmarket Road, Wilston, Brisbane [WSWS Media]

While weather on Australia’s east coast today has not been as extreme as predicted, heavy rainfall is expected to continue over the weekend and into next week, including in areas already devastated by floods. With rivers and dams overflowing, the continued downpour means the danger is far from over.

More than four days after large parts of Lismore, including the entire CBD, were inundated by floodwaters, thousands of residents are still without power, phone and internet service, while food, drinking water and fuel are in desperately short supply. Evacuation centres are overcrowded, raising the possibility of a COVID-19 outbreak amid increasing infections across the state.

From the outset, almost every aspect of the emergency response has been left up to the working class local population. In Lismore, dozens of ordinary people turned up with their own boats, and many more joined the rescue operation, bravely going from house to house to evacuate trapped residents.

The sense of complete abandonment by the state and federal governments has built up throughout the ongoing crisis, as official aid has failed to materialise.

Brigitte Boll wrote on Facebook: “Milk, water, groceries, basics, everything is needed right now. Where is the help from federal gov? No one to be seen.”

Lyn Moore wrote: “Where is the State & Federal government help with getting food etc to these areas. I know the highways are flooded but can’t they bring in Army vehicles?”

The first deployment of 70 Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel to aid the rescue and recovery effort occurred only on Wednesday, and a further 170 were not sent until today.

The fact that the military was sent at all, as they now are in response to almost every disaster, is a result of decades of cuts to civilian emergency services, leaving the ADF, with its ever-increasing budget, as the only manpower available. This is also aimed at normalising the presence of soldiers on domestic soil, under conditions of widespread hostility to inequality and a social crisis that will be exacerbated by the floods.

Holly Lovegrove wrote on Facebook yesterday: “There were some ADF men working on Terania St today but they said they’re only doing other ADF people’s houses which is really disappointing.”

Lovegrove pointed out the stark contrast between the pitiful official response and the heroic and self-sacrificing actions of ordinary people. She wrote: “The Fijian/Samoan men seem to be doing more heavy lifting than our paid government services. Are there any services that aren’t run by volunteers?”

Lovegrove was referring to a group of abattoir workers who have played a major role in the rescue and recovery effort, including saving 60 residents from an aged care facility on Monday. They have only recently arrived from Fiji under the Pacific Labour Scheme, which provides cheap labour from impoverished countries to business, while denying workers basic citizenship rights.

Sally Purcell wrote on Twitter: “So much has been left to private citizens when it was so clear that Lismore, this very flood prone town, was in grave danger. The federal and NSW governments have, once again, demonstrated their incompetence and have shown how little they care about people.”

Lismore flood victims are struggling to register for the federal government’s pitiful one-off $1,000 per adult and $400 per child disaster payment. Severely limited phone and internet access is preventing many flood victims from accessing online services, and, according to social media reports, yesterday a single Services Australia worker was sent to manually handle thousands of claims.

On Wednesday, in nearby Coraki, hundreds of people were marooned at an evacuation centre as the town ran short of food and bottled water. Some resorted to siphoning petrol from their cars to use in private boats to rescue survivors trapped on the roofs of their houses. A State Emergency Service (SES) boat with supplies did not arrive in the town until late afternoon.

The central business district of Casino was flooded for the first time in the city’s history, with 330 homes reported as inundated.

In Brisbane, the state capital of Queensland, the situation is little better. Primary responsibility for the clean-up has been dumped on a “mud army” of more than 10,000 volunteers who responded to a call from the city council.

There too, residents have expressed anger at the woeful response and preparation by the state Labor government.

Brisbane Corso resident Nigel Bean told the Courier-Mail he was only notified of advancing floods late Saturday night. “Somebody has to be put on the spot and asked, ‘please explain, what has gone wrong?’” Bean said. “How on Earth can we be in a mega-metropolitan city that just won the 2032 Olympics and yet can’t even prevent, predict or communicate flooding in the CBD?”

SEQWater was forced to defend its decision not to begin releasing water from Wivenhoe Dam last Tuesday when the Bureau of Meteorology initially forecast heavy rain. Flood mitigation releases did not begin for another three days. The state-owned water authority was found guilty of negligence by a court in 2019 for contributing to the flooding of at least 20,000 Brisbane homes in 2011.

According to a new report by Deloitte Access Economics, only 3 percent of public money allocated to disaster relief is invested in preparation and mitigation. As victims of previous floods, bushfires and other disasters attest, very little of this money ends up in the hands of those who lose their homes.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison declared Tuesday that the federal government had paid out $17 billion in disaster relief in the past three years. This included $13 billion for the COVID-19 disaster payment and pandemic leave.

Two thirds of the $1.5 billion spent following the 2019 floods in Queensland was to establish a new AgRebuild loan scheme. In fact, between July 2019 and June 2021, just 64 loans were approved nationwide for flood-affected farms and agribusinesses, totaling $185 million.

A federal Emergency Response Fund established in 2019 and financed through a $4 billion cut in research funding has “committed” just $150 million to disaster mitigation, while earning more than $800 million in interest.

Emergency Response Minister Bridget McKenzie yesterday dismissed any idea of federal responsibility for the disaster, proclaiming “we don’t own the bulldozers,” and that they were relying on states and territories for flood mitigations, including levees, because “they were too expensive.”

National Recovery and Resilience Agency head Shane Stone hit back at critics of the official response, blaming flood victims for their plight. Stone told Nine newspapers: “You’ve got people who want to live among the gum trees, what do you think is going to happen? Their house falls in the river, and they say it’s the government’s fault.”

The reality is, over decades, successive governments have opened up large tracts of land on flood plains for residential development, in line with the demands of property developers. With housing prices rapidly increasing while wages have stagnated or fallen, more and more working-class families have been forced out to these low-lying areas.

The failure of state and federal governments, Labor and Liberal-National alike, to respond to this crisis, before, during or afterward, is not an aberration, but a direct product of the capitalist system, in which the health and lives of working people are entirely subordinated to the profit interests of big business.

3 Mar 2022

Women Techsters Fellowship Program 2023

Application Deadline: 22nd March 2022

About Women Techsters Fellowship Program: The Women Techsters Initiative is set out to achieve the following:

  1. To empower African women to establish start-ups or technology-enabled businesses to build an entrepreneurial mindset in them.
  2. To support women to become digitally enabled, social champions, and owners of businesses
  3. To bridge the digital divide between men and women in the technology space while contributing to economic growth
  4. To ultimately improve the socio-economy of the African continent by providing skills that will elevate women from poverty The Fellowship Program is an opportunity for women to upskill and build the capacity needed to access decent work opportunities.

Type: Training

Eligibility of Women Techsters Fellowship Program: This year, we will admit girls and women between the ages of 16 to 40 years into the fellowship program. Only women in Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, and Egypt should apply.

Eligible Countries: Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, and Egypt

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Women Techsters Fellowship Program: The learning paths for this training are: 1. Software Development 2. Product Design (UI/UX) 3. Cybersecurity 4. Product Management 5. Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Engineering Fellows will be required to take part in the training to qualify for the internship.

Duration of Award: The Fellowship will commence on Monday, 8th March 2021 and will run for a year. The first 3 months will be for the technical training, followed by a 2-week soft skill training, and a six-month internship program.

How to Apply: Kindly proceed to fill the form if you can commit to the training schedule.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Professional Fellows Program (PFP) 2022/2023

Application Deadlines: 18th March 2022

Eligible Countries: Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia

To be taken at (country): USA

About the Award: The Professional Fellows Program (PFP) for Economic Empowerment, Middle East and North Africa is a two-way exchange program sponsored by the U.S. Department of State and designed to promote mutual understanding, enhance leadership and professional skills, and build lasting, sustainable partnerships between mid-level emerging leaders committed to strengthening their communities through social entrepreneurship and workforce development.

PFP Fellows are placed in intensive fellowships in non-profit organizations, private sector businesses, and government offices for an individually tailored professional development experience.  They build a broad network with American and other program participant colleagues as they develop a deeper understanding of U.S. society, enhance their professional skills.  American participants who have hosted foreign fellows travel overseas for participant-driven reciprocal programs.

Type: Fellowship, Short course

Eligibility: Who Should Apply for Professional Fellows Program (PFP)?

  • Entrepreneurs, and Social Innovators.
  • Small & medium business Owners and Managers who are investing in innovative socially conscious products and programs.
  • Individuals working in Civil Society/NGOs working on youth workforce training and development, increasing the role of marginalized populations in the economy, building financial literacy, training in technology use and IT development, and other efforts around economic empowerment.
  • Individuals working in  University incubators, accelerators, and job-readiness programs, and programs focusing on business development, financial literacy, sustainable tourism, or economic development.
  • Individuals working in Government Agencies/Ministries, national policy offices, think-tanks, and offices working to increase the presence of underrepresented citizens in the economy.

Eligible candidates must be:

  • 25-40 years old
  • A current citizen and resident of: Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Libya, or Lebanon
  • Speak fluent to English (enough to work full-time in a US fellowship)
  • Have at least two years‘ work experience in their field 
  • Currently employed
  • Interest in hosting reciprocal program for Americans in your country
  • Able to convene 25 or more colleagues for post-trip briefings
  • Have demonstrated strong leadership skills and commitment to community
  • Demonstrates initiative, teamwork, and openness 
  • Preference will be given to those who have not previously traveled on a U.S. government funded program.

Number of Awards: 38 

Duration and Value of Professional Fellows Program (PFP): 

This is a 42 day program in the U.S.A 

 September 24- November 4, 2022    

Spring Program 2023:  May 1-June 8, 2023

Fellows will participate in a 6-week program (Fall 2022 or Spring 2023), each with:

  • A one-week host family stay
  • A one-week business development and social entrepreneurship intensive with University Partner
  • A one-month fellowship placement in individual businesses and/or offices in Washington, D.C.
  • 4- days Participation in the Professional Fellows Congress
  • Design and development of a complete proposal for a follow-on projects to be carried out by PFP fellows, supported by mini-grants

How to Apply for Professional Fellows Program (PFP):   Apply Here

  • It is important to go through all application requirements on the Programme Webpage see link below) before applying

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

UNESCO Silk Roads Youth Research Grant 2022

Application Deadline:

31st May 2022. 

Tell Me About UNESCO Silk Roads Youth Research Grant:

UNESCO calls on young women and men under the age of 35 to apply for the 2022 Silk Roads Youth Research Grant. The grant aims to mobilize young researchers for further study of the Silk Roads shared heritage. Twelve grants of USD10,000 will be awarded per research project. 

The research needs to address specific issues relating to: 

  • the shared heritage and plural identities developed along the Silk Roads, 
  • its internal diversity, 
  • its potential in contemporary societies for creativity, intercultural dialogue, social cohesion, regional and international cooperation, and 
  • ultimately sustainable peace and development. 

The UNESCO Silk Roads Youth Research Grant was first launched in 2021 and is organized within the UNESCO Silk Roads Programme with the support of the National Commission of the People’s Republic of China for UNESCO, in the context of UNESCO Social and Human Sciences Programme. 

Which Fields are Eligible?

A broad array of research fields, including multidisciplinary and multidimensional proposals not limited to one specific region or chronology, are eligible. Proposed research may cover one or several themes associated with the Silk Roads shared heritage including, but not limited to: 

  • Science, Technology and Traditional Knowhow  
  • Religion and Spirituality 
  • Language and Literature 
  • Arts and Music 
  • Traditional Sports and Games 
  • Economy and Trade 
  • The Legacy of the Silk Roads and Contemporary Issues 

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Grants

Who can apply for UNESCO Silk Roads Youth Research Grant?

Postgraduate researchers, aged 35 and younger at the time of application, are eligible to apply for the grant. The proposed research may be carried out by an individual researcher or may be part of the research of a group or collaborative project. 

How are Applicants Selected?

The submitted research proposals will be evaluated by a scientific panel comprised of renowned international academics. 

The list of grant awardees will be announced at the end of September 2022

How Many Grants will be Given?

12

What is the Benefit of UNESCO Silk Roads Youth Research Grant?

USD10,000 per research project. 

How to Apply for Grant:

Applicants are required to submit their research proposals by downloading and completing the template provided detailing their research project, its methods, expected outcomes and contribution to existing scholarship. 

Proposals should be submitted in English and sent to: silkroadsgrant@unesco.org 

A comprehensive guide to the grant, including details on applicant eligibility criteria, suitable research topics, and evaluation process, is available here: 

  • Applicant Guidelines
  • Grant winning research projects of the first edition
     
  • More information on Social and Human Sciences at UNESCO 

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Google Code Jam 2022

Application Deadline:

3rd April 2022 at 19:00 UTC.

Tell Me About Google Code Jam:

Code Jam is back for its 19th year! Join the Code Jam community and take on a series of intriguing algorithmic puzzles designed by Google engineers. You’ll have a chance to earn the coveted title of Code Jam Champion and win $15,000 at the World Finals. What are you waiting for?

Google’s longest running global coding competition, Code Jam, calls on programmers around the world to solve challenging, algorithmic puzzles against the clock. Contestants advance through four online-hosted rounds to compete at the annual Code Jam World Finals that is held at a different international Google office each year.

Each round brings new challenges, and in the end 25 contestants will have the ultimate chance to put their skills to the test, vying for cash prizes and the coveted championship title at the World Finals.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Contest

Who can apply for Google Code Jam?

You understand and acknowledge the age requirements specified in the Terms. You understand and acknowledge that you must be at least (18) years old or the age of majority in your country of residence (whichever is greater) at the time you register for the CJ Contest to be eligible to participate in the Final Round.

How are Applicants Selected?

Register and compete in Code Jam’s Online Qualification Round. It lasts 27 hours, but you won’t need that long to earn the round’s qualifying point minimum. Once you do, you’ll advance to Online Round 1. We offer three sub-rounds for Round 1, and you can compete in as many as it takes for you to finish in the top 1,500 of any of these rounds.

The top 1,500 from each sub-round move on to compete for a spot in the top 1,000 contestants of Code Jam Online Round 2. These top 1,000 contestants advance to Online Round 3 and earn a limited edition Code Jam t-shirt.

The top 25 contestants from Code Jam Online Round 3 will compete in the Virtual World Finals for the championship title and a cash prize of $15,000 USD.

Where will Award be Taken?

Online

What is the Benefit of Scholarship?

Code Jam T-Shirt: You are eligible to receive one (1) t-shirt if you are one of the 1,000 highest-ranked contestants from Code Jam Round 2.

Code Jam Cash Prizes: You are eligible to receive one of the following cash prizes if you advance to and make at least one submission in the Final Round of Code Jam.

Competitor RankPrize Money
1st Place$15,000 USD
2nd Place$2,000 USD
3rd Place$1,000 USD
4th—25th Place$100 USD

Goodies. Google may occasionally, and at its sole discretion, give away Google or Code Jam-branded objects, Google-related products, or other goodies (“Goodies​”) to Final Round participants as part of their participation in the CJ Contest. These Goodies are not prizes and must not be treated as prizes by participants. Recipients of Goodies are responsible for ensuring that they comply with any applicable tax laws and filing requirements (if any).

How to Apply for Google Code Jam:

Interested candidates can register online via this page.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Swiss Gov’t Impact-Linked Fund for Education 2022

Application Deadline:

25th March 2022

Tell Me About Swiss Gov’t Impact-Linked Fund for Education:

Despite strong progress over the past decades, ensuring an inclusive, quality education (SDG 4) to vulnerable children and youth across the globe is far from reality. The economic and social crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic aggravated this alarming gap.  Even before the pandemic, high-impact enterprises already were important drivers of change, since they cover the unmet needs of students and teachers and offer high-quality, free, and often technology-enabled education solutions such as mobile-phone based learning or artificial intelligence assistance.

Getting access to capital is a challenge for these enterprises, though. This is why the Impact-Linked Fund for Education will provide suitable, innovative financing instruments in the form of Social Impact Incentives and Impact-Linked Loans to high-impact organizations offering inclusive and equitable education for vulnerable children and youth in MENA and West Africa Region. In addition, a substantial amount of the fund’s target volume will be reserved for technical assistance, research and advocacy measures, which will further boost the effectiveness of this innovative approach.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Grants

Who can apply for Swiss Gov’t Impact-Linked Fund for Education?

  • Scope: The organization must be operational for at least three years and operate in one of the target countries (see below). In order to be eligible for SIINC, organizations must be seeking a repayable investment (e.g. debt, equity, etc.) in parallel. There are no specific additional requirements for the Impact-Linked Loans.
  • Business model: Although there are no specific constraints regarding the legal form, the organizations need to have a business model and generate revenues from their activities.
  • Financial sustainability: The objective of the ILF for Education program is to support organizations that will continue to generate positive impact long after the SIINC payments or the Impact-Linked Loan have ended. Thus, the organization must have either already achieved financial sustainability, or must have a clear plan for achieving it (through market-based commercial channels, public contracting, or other self-sustaining revenue generation activities).
  • Impact measurement: The support provided to the organization in this program takes the form of time-bound outcomes-based payments (for SIINC) or interest rate reductions (for Impact-Linked Loans), granted to incentivize positive social impact. In order to design a realistic incentive schedule, it is necessary to have baseline data related to the impact generated by the organization. In that respect, there are two possible scenarios:

(1) The organization already has baseline data of systematically tracked and reported impact indicators, which can act as a basis for structuring the SIINC payments or the Impact-Linked Loan.

  • The organization is immediately eligible to obtain impact-linked financing.

(2) The organization doesn’t yet have this track record, but is able and willing to put systems in place to develop it, and then continue monitoring the organization’s impact over time.

  • The Impact-Linked Fund for Education will provide TA (technical assistance) to high-potential companies in the form of training and support in developing personalized impact measurement systems. Such companies will then be eligible to obtain Impact-Linked Finance either via an accelerated process, or through a subsequent call for proposal, scheduled for July/August 2022.

Impact focus

Organizations that target vulnerable children and youth will be of particular interest. Organizations that do not have a specific impact focus are also eligible if they prove to be willing and able to deliver positive social outcomes for such target populations. The focus of the ILF for Education window lies around improving access to basic education, and learning outcomes of pre-primary, primary and secondary students (K12), including non-formal basic education opportunities (eg. accelerated or catch-up education, remedial education etc.). The window is also open to organizations contributing to bridging education gaps for youth and adults on skills such as literacy/numeracy.

While a technological aspect as part of the organization’s business model is appreciated (EdTech companies), we also encourage providers of non-technological products and services to apply as well.

Which Countries are Eligible?

Target countries: West Africa and MENA (Middle East and North Africa). More specifically, the following countries are in scope: West Africa: Ivory Coast, Ghana, Benin, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Niger / MENA: Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Tunisia, Occupied Palestinian Territory.

How Many Grants will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of Swiss Gov’t Impact-Linked Fund for Education?

The overall objective of the ILF for Education is to provide impact-linked funding to impact organizations active in the Education sector in West Africa and the MENA region (Middle East and North Africa), thus enabling them to scale both in economic as well as impact terms. The fund will support impact organizations with two different Impact Linked Finance mechanisms: Social Impact Incentives (SIINC), and Impact-Linked Loans, for amounts ranging from USD 150K to USD 500K.

How to Apply for Swiss Gov’t Impact-Linked Fund for Education:

Apply here

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Russia’s Nuclear Warning is an Act of Desperation From Putin, Which Makes it Even More Dangerous

Patrick Cockburn



Photograph Source: Jaume Escofet – CC BY 2.0

The decision by President Vladimir Putin to put Russia’s strategic nuclear forces on high alert is even more dangerous than it looks because it is an act of desperation. The nuclear threat is a reminder that Russia is still a great power to be feared, despite its multiple failures since it invaded Ukraine last week.

The invasion may only have happened last Thursday, but Russia is already weaker in the eyes of the world because it has not achieved its objectives. Its army has failed to take the larger Ukrainian cities and Ukrainian resisting has blocked the Russian advance on almost all fronts. Pictures of the smouldering wreckage of Russian armoured vehicles fill television screens nightly.

The Russian campaign plan apparently assumed a Blitzkrieg advance against negligible opposition, swiftly eliminating the Ukrainian political and military leadership. Mindless wishful thinking is the only reason why Putin could have imagined that an army of only 190,000 soldiers, many of them non-combatant cooks, drivers and the like, would be able to seize and occupy a country three times the size of Britain.

Remaining UK COVID restrictions end as study shows most Omicron deaths occurred in deprived areas

Robert Stevens


Despite an overall fall in cases, the UK is still recording hundreds of thousands of COVID infections per week. In the seven days since February 24, the date on which all COVID restrictions were ended in England, 231,973 cases were recorded, and 741 deaths.

This is an underestimate, given that there is no systematic testing nationally, with universal contact tracing already ended. A more reliable picture of COVID prevalence is provided by the regular survey conducted by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). According to the latest estimate, more than 2 million people had coronavirus infections last week.

People queuing outside a COVID test centre in east London, January 2022 (WSWS Media)

COVID deaths in Britain are officially counted by the government if someone dies within 28 days of a positive test. On this measure 161,630 people have already been killed by the virus. According to a more accurate ONS measure, which records mentions of COVID-19 as a cause on the death certificate, 183,579 have died up to February 18. According to the latter measure, 969 died in the week to February 18.

The other UK nations are following suit in ending restrictions. Northern Ireland ended all anti-COVID measures even before Johnson did. Democratic Unionist Party and Sinn Féin ministers gave their unanimous backing for ending all legal restrictions on February 15 and replacing them with guidance.

On February 28, Wales’s Labour Party-run government ended the legal requirement to wear a face mask in many indoor settings, including gyms, cinemas, theatres, community centres, and museums. After returning from half-term this week, secondary school pupils are no longer required to wear a mask in classroom settings. First Minister Mark Drakeford’s government plans to end the use of face masks in all settings by the end of March.

This week, Scotland’s Scottish National Party administration ended the requirement for secondary school pupils to wear face coverings in classrooms and for large venues to implement the vaccine passport scheme. All remaining coronavirus restrictions in Scotland will go on March 21.

Ending all restrictions, after almost 19 million people (almost 28 percent of the population) have recorded a COVID infection, lays the basis for a further spread of the disease and new mutations. By the start of this week, total cases just this year had reached 5.5 million in Britain, driven by the Omicron surge.

More evidence has emerged showing that deaths and cases disproportionately hit the most deprived working-class sections of the population. This week, the Independent newspaper reported on a COVID study by Colin Angus, a senior research fellow and health inequalities modeler at the University of Sheffield. It revealed that “a majority of hospital and at-home deaths—close to 25 percent, respectively—are occurring in the most deprived parts of England.”

The Independent noted, “At least 30 percent more coronavirus deaths have occurred in the most deprived areas of England since the turn of the year…”

“Of the 7,053 deaths registered in the six weeks after 1 January, 1,589 (22.5 percent) were from the most deprived 20 percent of the country, compared to 1,188 (16.8 percent) in the least deprived 20 percent.”

It added, “Such figures, which are only available to 11 February, are likely to underestimate the scale of Covid inequalities: the most deprived areas in England tend to be younger in age, while the least deprived have an older population, who are more vulnerable to coronavirus. Despite this, the poorest parts of the country still account for a higher proportion of deaths.”

The spread of COVID in the most deprived areas will only worsen as the UK’s governments end access to free testing for the general public on April 1, as well as sick payments for those ill with COVID forced to self-isolate. Researcher Angus commented that the “inequalities we’ve seen in recent months reflect the situation with free mass testing and mandatory self-isolation [emphasis added].” The Independent cited the Health Foundation charity saying that the “figures were ‘concerning and represent a warning sign that the virus may continue to have a disproportionate impact’ in the weeks and months to come.”

The same day as he terminated COVID restrictions, Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson told parliament, “We will also end self-isolation support payments, although COVID provisions for Statutory Sick Pay can still be claimed for a further month [March 24].”

During the pandemic, workers were allowed to claim statutory sick pay from their first day of absence. From March 24, employees off sick will be required to wait for four days to claim sick pay. The cancelled £500 Test and Trace Support Payment was available for those on low incomes required to self-isolate. The ending of even extremely limited support for those infected with COVID will force many to work while ill, jeopardising their health and their co-workers.

Johnson admitted that the last measures in place to protect against COVID were being scrapped due to their cost. He said, “The Testing, Tracing and Isolation budget in 2020-21 exceeded the entire budget of the Home Office. It cost a further £15.7 billion in this financial year, and £2 billion in January alone at the height of the Omicron wave. We must now scale this back.”

There is no such reluctance when it comes to upscaling spending on the military as the NATO confrontation with Russia escalates.

Justifying the measures, Johnson said, “I’ve often heard it said over the last couple of years that we have a habit of going back to work, or going into work, when we’re not well. And people contrast that with Germany for instance where, I’m told, they’re much more disciplined about not going to work if you’re sick.”

German employers are legally required to pay staff 100 percent of their wages for the first six weeks of sickness. In Britain, statutory sick pay paid by employers is set at just at just £96.35 a week, and only up to 28 weeks. The Guardian noted, “The proportion of a UK worker’s salary covered by sick pay is just 19%, according to the TUC [Trades Union Congress]. Rates are higher in Spain (42%), Sweden (64%) and Belgium (93%), with support only worse in South Korea and the US, where workers do not have a legal right to any sick pay at all.”

The final ripping up of all protections against COVID includes the axing of mandatory vaccination for social care workers in England on March 15. Care home staff were required to be vaccinated to work in the sector from last November. A proposed move to introduce the mandate for frontline NHS staff had already been abandoned.

Everything is being done to end any acknowledgement of the pandemic’s existence. For the first time, COVID cases and deaths were not officially reported this weekend, with those days’ cases instead added to Monday’s total.

All restrictions are being ditched despite warnings from the government’s own Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) last month that even under an “Optimistic” scenario there could be a “Seasonal wave of infections in Autumn/Winter with comparable size and realised severity to the current Omicron wave” in the next 12-18 months.

All scenarios modelled by SAGE “assume that SARS-CoV-2 will continue to circulate for the foreseeable future and that variants will emerge.” This week Dr Susan Hopkins, Chief Medical Advisor for the UK Health and Security Agency (UKHSA), said in relation to one of the Omicron variants, “We now know that BA.2 has an increased growth rate which can be seen in all regions in England. We have also learnt that BA.2 has a slightly higher secondary attack rate than BA.1 in households.”