27 Feb 2020

Germany: Nazi terrorist group planned mass murder of Muslims

Gregor Link

Over a week ago, German police arrested 12 right-wing extremists who were actively preparing mass murder against refugees, Muslims and political opponents. The arrests took place just before the murder of nine people in Hanau by a fascist gunmen, and the mowing down on Monday of bystanders at the Volkmarsen carnival.
A girl takes a picture near candles at a vigil for the victims of a far-right mass shooting in Hanau, Germany Thursday, Feb. 20, 2020. (AP Photo/Michael Probst)
According to Der Spiegel, the group had amassed large quantities of arms and ammunition to launch a coordinated series of “Kommando” raids on mosques across Germany and kill the people at prayer. Their aim was to provoke a backlash and a “civil war” throughout Germany. According to the investigating federal prosecutor, they sought to use these methods of “shock and awe” to cause havoc to the state and social order of the Federal Republic of Germany.
The suspected terrorists’ plans show striking parallels with those of the Saxon neo-Nazi group “Revolution Chemnitz,” the October 9, 2019, attack on a synagogue in Halle, and last year’s mass murder in Christchurch, New Zealand. In searches of houses, investigators discovered home-made hand grenades, large quantities of other weapons, including a functional large-calibre weapon built by a member from Saxony-Anhalt. The Halle assassin, Stefan Balliet, had built a similar “slam gun” and used it to murder two people.
The arrests once again highlight the existence of extensive terror networks, actively preparing a fascist coup in Germany and discussing the murder of thousands of political opponents.
In recent months, a number of neo-Nazi groups have been uncovered in the secret service, the police and the Bundeswehr (army). An administrative officer of the North Rhine-Westphalian police—since suspended—is among those who have now been arrested.
According to Bild-Zeitung, a V-man (Verfassungsschutz or secret service agent) was part of the alleged terror cell, but was the only one not arrested. Although investigators described the V-man as among the closest confidants of the conspirators, they nonetheless stated that suspicion of his involvement had “not been substantiated.” German broadcasters SWR and ARD reported that the V-man had given extensive information to the police in early October. However, during the final week before the arrests, he had broken off contact with the investigators, who then made the arrests.
Members of the alleged terrorist cell operated in a violent neo-Nazi milieu of fascistic groups, “Freikorps” and vigilantes. They pursued relations with right-wing extremists throughout Germany and other European countries, as well as with the far-right Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD). They discussed their plans for assault in chat groups with names like “The Hard Core” and during a minimum of two face-to-face meetings. According to media reports, the men agreed to raise €50,000 to procure additional weapons and to participate in future attacks.
A week ago, more than 10 people who were under police observation attended a meeting in Minden, Westphalia, where, according to Der Spiegel, Werner S., the alleged leader of the group, presented the assault plans.
For five months, the members of “Group S.,” from all over Germany, have been the target of Baden-Württemberg police surveillance. The defence lawyer of one of the detainees stated that the police “sometimes monitored every move by the suspect.” Werner S. was also named a “threat” months ago.
Investigators considered Werner S., alias “Teutonico,” the undisputed head of the group. Der Spiegel reported that Werner S. looked for men who were “intelligent, tough, brutal, and quick” in order to build an underground army “along the lines of the radical right-wing Freikorps of the Weimar Republic.” (The Freikorps were paramilitary organisations formed after Germany’s defeat in World War I and formed the basis of Hitler’s Nazi forces.)
A “Volunteer Association for the Mobilisation of Forces” would be built through a process of “military training.” “Treachery” will be “severely punished!” said one of the chats. Anyone who believes in doing “more than just taking part in demonstrations and the like” should contact Werner S. In his apartment near Augsburg, investigators found a functioning nine-millimetre pistol and ammunition.
Werner S.’s Facebook friends include an AfD official from Börde in Saxony-Anhalt. Two right-wing extremists arrested as “supporters” of the group, Steffen B. and Stefan K., are also from Saxony-Anhalt. They are among the regional leaders of an extreme right-wing militia called “Vikings Security Germania,” a spin-off from the Finnish “Soldiers of Odin,” which first appeared during the 2015 “refugee crisis.”
Another member of “Group S.,” Markus K., reportedly participated in a 2009 neo-Nazi march in Dortmund, during which hundreds of right-wing extremists attacked a demonstration organised by the German Trade Union Confederation. Stephan Ernst and Markus H., the suspected murderers of CDU politician Walter Lübcke on June 2, 2019, took part in this attack.
Thomas N. from Minden apparently hosted the group’s last meeting before the arrests. According to Der Spiegel, investigators found “a crossbow as well as axes, morning star medieval weapons, and numerous knives.” Thomas N. is close to the ultra-right “Reich Citizens’ Movement.” Referring to anti-fascist youth, he posted on Facebook that “It is time to get rid of this Dirt.”
According to the newspaper taz, Lower Saxony’s neo-Nazi Tony E. was “one of the driving forces in the group.” He is in close contact with well-known neo-Nazis from Hamburg, Harburg and Lüneburg; these people visited him after the police raid and were said to have threatened residents and journalists.
Tony E. follows former Verfassungsschutz Director Hans-Georg Maassen on Facebook and identifies himself as a supporter of paramilitary organisations such as the “German Defence League,” “Brigade 8” and the Hannibal association “Uniter.” According to taz, Tony E. is also a member of the “Freikorps Heimatschutz,” which advocates that members “prepare for the day when war will come and when it will be a question of defending our families and the fatherland.”
The group’s links with the security agencies and with “Uniter” are significant. This paramilitary association, which is registered as a “non-profit,” links former elite soldiers, reservists, security forces and arms dealers with one another; it trains the forces of far-right Philippine ruler Rodrigo Duterte.
The group Uniter was founded in 2016 by an employee of the Baden-Württemberg Verfassungsschutz (secret police). It is the organisational backbone of an armed network comprising elite police officers, commando soldiers, intelligence officers, judges and lawyers, in whose ranks have been forged the concrete plans for an armed coup on a “Day X,” along with the mass murder of political opponents.
This “shadow army” is orchestrated by André S., alias Hannibal, a former instructor of the Bundeswehr elite unit Command Special Forces (KSK). Hannibal was also a member of the founding board of Uniter and, according to taz, was the contact person for the German Military Intelligence Service (Militärischer Abschirmdienst—MAD), with whom he maintained friendly relations. In 2018, he threatened to bring in the MAD against the newspaper taz in order to stop its questioning. The MAD contact person warned Hannibal of upcoming raids by the federal prosecutor’s office, so that he could hide a laptop with sensitive information.
In December 2019, ARD news magazine Monitor published a 2018 drone video that documents the military operational training and combat exercises of the group. The video shows armed private individuals in combat gear who are practicing house-to-house fighting under the guidance of “Hannibal.” Because he illegally stashed cartridges along with fog and signal grenades, Hannibal recently had to appear in court for a violation of the weapons and explosives law; he was fined just €1,800.
Werner S. is a close ally of the right-wing-extremist Bundeswehr soldier Franco A. and has met him personally several times. Franco A. is under suspicion for planning to carry out political assassinations while falsely posing as a refugee. Though Franco A. will be charged with “preparing a serious crime that is dangerous to the state,” both he and Werner S. are currently not being held in custody.
Despite overwhelming evidence, including detailed reports from Focustaz and SWR, at the end of January, MAD President Christof Gramm publicly denied the existence of a “shadow army” in the German state. Nevertheless, his own organisation is officially investigating 20 “suspected cases” of right-wing extremism in the secret Bundeswehr unit KSK.
It is possible that the arrest of the 12 members of “Group S.” was carried out to limit the damage and cover up the truth of these accusations. However, the fact that the group appeared to be ready to act after just two face-to-face meetings raises the question of whether it received support from the authorities.
What is certain is that the group’s extensive plans for terror, and its far-reaching preparations for dozens, perhaps hundreds, of murders, took place under the noses of the security apparatus, which is riddled with right-wing extremists. That the danger of fascist violence in Germany is greater than at any time since the end of the Nazi dictatorship is a result of the shift to the right of the entire political establishment, the propaganda of the AfD, and the systematic trivialisation, promotion and adoption of radical right-wing positions by the federal Grand Coalition.

The coronavirus pandemic and the need for global socialized medicine

Alex Lantier

The coronavirus outbreak that began last December in Wuhan, China, has escalated into a global pandemic, requiring a coordinated international response to avert catastrophe. A planned, rational deployment of worldwide medical and industrial resources is essential to keep the disease from potentially claiming millions of lives.
Workers wearing protective suits spray disinfectant as a precaution against the coronavirus at a bus garage in Seoul, South Korea, Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2020. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)
The danger of an outbreak of infectious, untreatable and potentially fatal viral outbreaks causing pneumonia has been known for decades. Two different coronaviruses caused regional outbreaks, SARS in 2002–2004 mainly in China, and MERS in 2012–2014 mainly in Saudi Arabia. However, while SARS claimed 774 lives after infecting 8,000 people, and MERS killed 886 after infecting 2519 over two years, the highly contagious Wuhan coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is spreading worldwide, infecting 81,296 and killing 2,770 in barely two months.
Major outbreaks are surging not only in East Asia, but in Europe and the Middle East, with 383 cases in Italy and at least 139 in Iran. China has managed to significantly slow the disease’s spread, limiting the number of cases to 78,073, with draconian measures to place hundreds of millions of people under lockdown and shut down much of its economy. However, it is apparent we are only in the initial stages of a global epidemic.
Initially, officials in the United States and internationally tried to downplay the new virus. Even yesterday, President Donald Trump—speaking for the broad sections of the financial aristocracy who look no further than their stock portfolios—took to Twitter to ignorantly berate the media for trying “to make the Caronavirus [sic] look as bad as possible, including panicking markets, if possible. Likewise their incompetent Do Nothing Democrat comrades are all talk, no action. USA in great shape!”
On Wednesday night, Trump gave a rambling news conference in which he alternatively downplayed the severity of the disease, shamelessly praised himself and his government for their response, and denounced his political opponents.
Such ignorant and irresponsible comments notwithstanding, this coronavirus is a highly dangerous and deadly disease. Fully eight percent (2,770) of the 33,129 detected cases no longer under treatment have ended in death. Of the 48,167 detected cases still battling the disease, 8,867 (18 percent) are in serious or critical condition—kept alive by intensive care and access to artificial ventilation and oxygenation requiring attention from multiple dedicated medical staff for each patient.
Moreover, World Health Organization (WHO) advisor and University of Florida professor Ira Longini told Bloomberg News epidemiological models show that without aggressive measures to contain the virus, up to “one third of the world” could catch the disease. This could overwhelm hospitals worldwide—even in the advanced capitalist countries—with millions of desperately ill, highly contagious patients.
This danger is all the greater as the disease spreads to Middle Eastern and African countries whose hospitals lack high technology, or have been devastated by decades of imperialist occupations, civil wars, or—in the case of Iran—vindictive US and European sanctions.
An internationally-coordinated response is essential to prevent the pandemic from devastating humanity. It is critical that the world’s health system be able to isolate patients, limit the speed of the disease’s spread, and devote the necessary resources to provide intensive care for those patients who develop pneumonia from the infection. The production and use of necessary treatments and medical equipment cannot be subordinated to the diktat of the financial markets and the profit motive, or to imperialist war policies.
Modern science provides medicine with tools of enormous power against the disease. The contrast with previous global pandemics, like the 1918 flu epidemic, could not be more stark. Only two months into the pandemic, we have vast knowledge of the virus: its internal genetic RNA code, the form of its outer shell, and what cells and receptors it targets in the human body. Multiple teams internationally including in the United States, China and Europe are racing to produce vaccines, hoping to clinically test them by as early as next year.
Clinical trials in China also show that pre-existing drugs like chloroquine, used to treat malaria, or fapilavir, used to treat the flu, may also block the coronavirus and accelerate recovery.
At the same time, however, the pandemic is exposing the destructive irrationality of capitalism: it has wasted resources and wealth created by the international working class over decades, leaving humanity unprepared for the coronavirus.
The risk of coronaviruses causing highly contagious, untreatable and potentially fatal pneumonia has been known for nearly 20 years. After the SARS and MERS epidemics, 2017 research by the EcoHealth Alliance showed that Asian bats harbored hundreds of strains of coronaviruses that could potentially infect humans. Nevertheless, with the production of vaccines, viral drug and protective gear subordinated to the profit interests of major private investors, nothing was prepared for the risk of a major pandemic.
While massive resources were needed to invest in medical and industrial infrastructure, trillions of dollars were instead wasted on the 2008–2009 bank bailouts for the super-rich in America and Europe, as well as on US-NATO wars like the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. While hospitals were shut down in cities across America, the European Union imposed austerity that slashed health care wages and staffing levels to the bone.
Such policies not only have prevented the rational use of available technology to prepare for a global pandemic, but now cut across measures urgently needed to treat the pandemic.
Iran, the epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic in the Middle East, provides perhaps the starkest illustration of this. Hundreds of Iranians have fallen ill and the disease is spreading rapidly, under conditions where US and European sanctions imposed first in 2012 and then again after the US withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear treaty in 2018 have slashed Iran’s access to critical medicine.
Last year, an Iranian doctor told America’s ABC News that “Out of every 20 people, we have to tell at least ten that we have run out of medications they need.” There are shortages of drugs for many critical conditions, including several like asthma, diabetes and cancer that often lead to complications and death in coronavirus patients. This was in part because the US Treasury vindictively prosecuted international firms exporting medical supplies to Iran.
Last year, the Atlantic Council think-tank noted that in Iran in “2012–2013, the price of medicine increased by 50–75 percent. Coupled with an economic downturn and an increase in unemployment, medicine became less affordable to Iranian patients. According to field research conducted in Iran during 2013, asthma, cancer, and multiple sclerosis patients struggled with either shortages of medicine or skyrocketing prices. This research further found that many cancer patients had stopped treatment because of an increase in the prices of medicine.”
Today, Iran is plunging into a coronavirus epidemic that is rapidly spreading not only to the Persian Gulf States, but to neighboring countries like Iraq and Afghanistan, whose health infrastructure has been devastated by decades of US-NATO sanctions, bombings and military occupations.
With the lives of millions hanging in the balance, decisions in the critical battle against the coronavirus cannot be left up to the imperialist powers and the financial aristocracy. Sanctions against Iran must be lifted, hundreds of billions of dollars spent globally to fight the pandemic threat, and humanity’s scientific and industrial resources fully mobilized under the democratic control of working people.

26 Feb 2020

Alibaba eFounders Fellowship (Class 9) 2020 for African Entrepreneurs

Application Deadline: 27th March 2020

Eligible Countries: Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Botswana, South Africa.

To Be Taken At (Country): Alibaba Xixi Campus – Hangzhou, China

About the Award: The eFounders Fellowship is a two-week course for entrepreneurs in developing countries who are operating open, platform-based businesses in the ecommerce, logistics, big data, and tourism spaces. The program will provide first-hand exposure to and learning about ecommerce innovations from China and around the world that enabled growth and a more inclusive development model for all.
The eFounders Fellowship program provides first-hand exposure to ecommerce and digital innovations, access to business leaders across Alibaba and China, as well as an opportunity to connect with like-minded, leading entrepreneurs in your region. The fellowship is a community of passionate and successful “Champions for the New Economy” looking to inspire and create a more inclusive development model for all.
The eFounders Fellowship program is jointly organized by Alibaba Business School and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), who are implementing the Sustainable Development Goals for 2030.

Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility:
  • You MUST be a founder or co-founder of an officially registered digital venture that has been in operation for at least 2 years.
  • Your venture MUST be headquartered, located in or operates in one of the following countries: Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Botswana, South Africa.
  • You MUST provide at least 1 referral in your application (referrals from a partner/organizer/eFounders Fellow are preferred).
  • You MUST provide your official business license when requested during the application process.
  • Entrepreneurs below 35 years old, female entrepreneurs, and target country locals are strongly encouraged to apply.
Selection Criteria: Class 9 welcomes entrepreneurs who are:
  • Authentic, open-minded and altruistic leaders of the ‘new economy’.
  • Building enterprises for long-term success, not for short-term profit.
  • Mission-driven and have a strong sense of purpose, integrity, vision and drive.
  • Willing to learn and share their experiences and ideas.
Number of Awards: There will be 40 places available

Duration of Program: June 7th – 17th, 2020.

What will participants learn?
• The key factors in Alibaba’s long-term success.
• The defining moments and failures that have shaped Alibaba’s journey (including the early stages of development).
• An understanding of Alibaba’s ecosystem.

Program costs:
Covered:
  •     Hotel accommodation(shared room).
  •     Training materials and training session costs.
  •     Field trips and site visit transportation costs.
  •     Small daily living allowance of 30 RMB/day.
Not covered (costs you must personally cover):
  • Air tickets and transportation/pick-up services to and from Hangzhou, China.
  • Single hotel room requests (if you would like to stay in a single room you will be required to cover the full cost yourself).
  • Additional food or personal expenses
How to Apply: Apply Here

Visit the Program Webpage for Details

Commonwealth Medical Fellowships 2020 for Students in Developing Countries

Application Deadline: 23rd March 2020 by 16:00 (GMT)

Eligible Countries: Bangladesh, Cameroon, The Gambia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Rwanda, Samoa, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia.

To be taken at (country): UK

About the Award: Commonwealth Medical Fellowships (Enhancing Clinical Skills) are offered for mid-career medical staff from developing Commonwealth countries. These fellowships are funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID), with the aim of contributing to the UK’s international development aims and wider overseas interests, supporting excellence in UK higher education, and sustaining the principles of the Commonwealth.
The purpose of the Commonwealth Medical Fellowships are to provide mid-career medics with the opportunity to enhance their clinical skills, and to have catalytic effects on their workplaces.
The Commonwealth Medical Fellowships are offered under the second of the CSC’s six themes:
  1. Science and technology for development
  2. Strengthening health systems and capacity
  3. Promoting global prosperity
  4. Strengthening global peace, security and governance
  5. Strengthening resilience and response to crises
  6. Access, inclusion and opportunity
Offered Since: 1959

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: To apply for the Commonwealth Medical Fellowships, you must:
  • Be a citizen of or have been granted refugee status by an eligible Commonwealth country , or be a British Protected Person
  • Be permanently resident in an eligible Commonwealth country eligible Commonwealth country
  • Have an academic appointment in an eligible Commonwealth country at one of the medical schools by the World Directory of Medical Schools, employed by a hospital affiliated to the Medical School where you have the academic appointment
  • Be available to start your fellowship in the UK between October-December 2020
  • Have qualified as a doctor before 1 October 2005
  • Have qualified at a medical school recognised by the World Directory of Medical Schools
  • Have met the English language requirements of the General Medical Council (GMC) by August 2020
  • Have verified your primary medical qualification independently by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) for General Medical Council (GMC) registration by 31 August 2020
  • Your award is undertaken at an approved UK university hospital
You will be expected to participate in clinical practice during your fellowship, and to register with the General Medical Council (GMC). If your proposed programme does not require this registration, your application will be considered ineligible.

The CSC aims to identify talented individuals who have the potential to make change. We are committed to a policy of equal opportunity and non-discrimination, and encourage applications from a diverse range of candidates.

Selection Criteria: Applications will be considered according to the following selection criteria:
  • Academic merit of the candidate
  • Quality of the proposal
  • Potential impact of the work on the development of the candidate’s home country
Duration of Fellowship:  Between three and six months

Value of Fellowship: Each fellowship provides:

  • Approved airfare from your home country to the UK and return at the end of your award (the CSC will not reimburse the cost of fares for dependants, nor usually the cost of journeys made before your award is finally confirmed)
  • Research support grant, payable to your host university hospital
  • Stipend (living allowance).
  • Reimbursement of the fee for a single English language test and the fee for General Medical Council (GMC) registration
  • Warm clothing allowance
  • Study travel grant towards the costs of approved travel within the UK
  • If you are widowed, divorced, or a single parent, child allowance of £457 per month for the first child, and £112 per month for the second and third child under the age of 16, if you are accompanied by your children and they are living with you at the same address in the UK
How to Apply: You must make your application directly to the CSC using the CSC’s online application system. Your application must be submitted to and endorsed by the Dean of the Medical School which you have the academic appointment The CSC will not accept any applications that are not submitted via the CSC’s online application system.
Only one application per applicant for these fellowships will be accepted.
Supporting documentation: You must provide the following supporting documentation by 16:00 (BST) on 14 April 2020 in order for your application to be eligible for consideration:
  • Proof of citizenship or refugee status; copy of your valid passport (or national ID card) showing your photograph, date of birth, and country of citizenship – uploaded to the online application system
  • Full university transcripts and certificates detailing the dates of qualification for your primary medical degree – uploaded to the online application system
  • Academic reference from the Head of your Teaching Hospital Department outlining how the skills gained are required. All references are to be submitted directly by the referees to the online application system (referees will be sent an email request)
  • An Endorsement by the Dean of the Medical School at which you have the academic appointment confirming your academic appointment submitted directly by the Dean to the online application system (the Dean will be sent an email request)
  • Supporting statement from your first choice proposed supervisor in the UK university hospital – submitted directly to the CSC (supervisors will be sent an email request)
The CSC will not accept supporting documentation submitted outside the online application system.
You can view a read-only paper of the application form before you access the online application form below.

Apply now

Visit Fellowship Webpage for details

HEINEKEN Africa Foundation Grants 2020 for Sub-Saharan African countries

Application Deadline: 1st May 2020

To Be Taken At (Country): Underpinning HEINEKEN’s long-standing commitment to Africa, projects are only carried out in the Sub-Saharan African countries in which HEINEKEN is operating.

About the Award: For each project a partnership is created between the HEINEKEN Africa Foundation, the local HEINEKEN brewery and a local or international (N)GO. The Foundation provides funding and administrative assistance. The local brewery supports through means of manpower, expertise and monitoring. The (N)GO is responsible for the implementation and continuation of the project.

Type: Grants

Eligibility: An eligible project proposal:
  • focusses on Mother & Child care or WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene)
  • directly improves the health situation for needy communities living in the environment of a HEINEKEN Sub-Saharan African organization. See where where HEINEKEN operates in the Program Webpage.
  • cooperates with global and/or local partners (NGOs/GOs/overseas development ministries/international organizations)
  • has measurable positive results
  • has a sustainable follow-up or clear conclusion
  • is approved and motivated by the General Manager of the related HEINEKEN operation
  • is submitted to the HAF General Manager by the local HEINEKEN operating company
  • does not exceed the maximum requested amount of EUR 75,000 per year (with a 3-year maximum)
The HEINEKEN Africa Foundation excludes projects that:
  • may lead to a direct commercial benefit for the local HEINEKEN operation
  • replace health benefits currently provided to HEINEKEN employees and their family members
  • focus on adolescents (in the age of primary and secondary school)
  • are research projects, scholarships and medical or health-related events and conferences
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Maximum requested amount of EUR 75,000 per year (with a 3-year maximum).

How to Apply: 
  • Project proposals can only be submitted by the local HEINEKEN operating companies in close collaboration with a (N)GO. By making use of HEINEKEN’s local infrastructure and network we believe that we can make a bigger impact.
  • Does your project comply with these criteria? Please contact the local HEINEKEN operating company to further discuss your project proposal.
Visit the Program Webpage for Details

How the US Intelligence Community is Interfering in the 2020 Elections

Jefferson Morley

President Trump’s ongoing purge of the intelligence community, along with Bernie Sanders’ surge in the Democratic presidential race, has triggered an unprecedented intervention of U.S. intelligence agencies in the U.S. presidential election on factually dubious grounds.
Former CIA director John Brennan sees a “full-blown national security crisis” in President Trump’s latest moves against the intelligence community. Brennan charges, “Trump is abetting a Russian covert operation to keep him in office for Moscow’s interests, not America’s.” But congressional representatives, both Democratic and Republican, who heard a briefing by the intelligence community about the 2020 election earlier this month say the case for Russian interference is “overstated.”
On February 21, it was leaked to the Washington Post that “U.S. officials,” meaning members of the intelligence community, had confidentially briefed Sanders about alleged Russian efforts to help his 2020 presidential campaign.
Special prosecutor Robert Mueller documented how the Russians intervened on Trump’s behalf in 2016, while finding no evidence of criminal conspiracy. Mueller did not investigate the Russians’ efforts on behalf of Sanders, but the Computational Propaganda Research Project at Oxford University did. In a study of social media generated by the Russia-based Internet Research Agency (IRA), the Oxford analysts found that the IRA initially generated propaganda designed to boost all rivals to Hillary Clinton in 2015. As Trump advanced, they focused almost entirely on motivating Trump supporters and demobilizing black voters. In short, the Russians helped Trump hundreds of thousand times more than they boosted Sanders.
The leak to the Post, on the eve of the Nevada caucuses, gave the opposite impression: that help for Trump and Sanders was somehow comparable. The insinuation could only have been politically motivated.
What’s driving the U.S. intelligence community intervention in presidential politics is not just fear of Trump, but fear of losing control of the presidency. From 1947 to 2017, the CIA and other secret agencies sometimes clashed with presidents, especially Presidents Kennedy, Nixon and Carter. But since the end of the Cold War, under Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, the secret agencies had no such problem.
Under Trump, the intelligence community has seen a vast loss of influence. Trump is contemptuous of the CIA’s daily briefing. As demonstrated by his pressure campaign on Ukraine, his foreign policies are mostly transactional. Trump is not guided by the policy process or even any consistent doctrine, other than advancing his political and business interests. He’s not someone who is interested in doing business with the intelligence community.
The intelligence community fears the rise of Sanders for a different reason. The socialist senator rejects the national security ideology that guided the intelligence community in the Cold War and the war on terror. Sanders’ position is increasingly attractive, especially to young voters, and thus increasingly threatening to the former spy chiefs who yearn for a return to the pre-Trump status quo. A Sanders presidency, like a second term for Trump, would thwart that dream. Sanders is not interested in national security business as usual either.
In the face of Trump’s lawless behavior, and Sanders’ rise, the intelligence community is inserting itself into presidential politics in a way unseen since former CIA director George H.W. Bush occupied the Oval Office. Key to this intervention is the intelligence community’s self-image as a disinterested party in the 2020 election.
Former House Intelligence Committee chair Jane Harman says Trump’s ongoing purge of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is a threat to those who “speak truth to power.” As the pseudonymous former CIA officer “Alex Finley” tweeted Monday, the “‘Deep state’ is actually the group that wants to defend rule of law (and thus gets in the way of those screaming ‘DEEP STATE’ and corrupting for their own gain).”
Self-image, however, is not the same as reality. When it comes to Trump’s corruption, Brennan and Co. have ample evidence to support their case. But the CIA is simply not credible as a “defender of the rule of law.” The Reagan-Bush Iran-contra conspiracy, the Bush-Cheney torture regime, and the Bush-Obama mass surveillance program demonstrate that the law is a malleable thing for intelligence community leaders. A more realistic take on the 2020 election is that the U.S. intelligence community is not a conspiracy but a self-interested political faction that is seeking to defend its power and policy preferences. The national security faction is not large electorally. It benefits from the official secrecy around its activities. It is assisted by generally sympathetic coverage from major news organizations.
The problem for Brennan and Co. is that “national security” has lost its power to mobilize public opinion. On both the right and the left, the pronouncements of the intelligence community no longer command popular assent.
Trump’s acquittal by the Senate in his impeachment trial was one sign. The national security arguments driving the House-passed articles of impeachment were the weakest link in a case that persuaded only one Republican senator to vote for Trump’s removal. Sanders’ success is another sign.
In the era of endless war, Democratic voters have become skeptical of national security claims—from Iraq’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction, to the notion that torture “works,” to “progress” in Afghanistan, to the supreme importance of Ukraine—because they have so often turned out to be more self-serving than true.
The prospect of a Trump gaining control of the U.S. intelligence community is scary. So is the intervention of the U.S. intelligence community in presidential politics.

Why We Shouldn’t Run Government Like a Business

George Ochenski

It’s been popular in recent years for certain wealthy capitalists to claim they will “run government like a business” when they seek political office. While that may sound good to some, neither the state nor national Constitution ever suggests that governance and business are or should be the same — just the opposite, in fact. The Founding Fathers specifically designed our government structure to ensure life and liberty to benefit the well-being of the governed through the checks and balances of three separate but equal branches of government. It is at our peril — and that of our democracy — should we confuse business with governance.
One needn’t search far for current examples of misled wealthy individuals who don’t seem to understand the difference between government and business. At the top of the list, of course, is Donald Trump, the current occupant of the White House, who attained that position not through a vote of the people, but through the manipulation of the American electorate by none other than the very nation in which he wants to plant the Moscow Trump Tower.
Yet, what happened when those particular details were revealed to this businessman? He fired the government staffers who were responsible for simply doing their job to ensure foreign governments did not intrude in our elections. Why? Because that’s what CEOs do when someone in their “organization” isn’t “loyal” to the CEO.
It would be great to say that something has changed in that regard, but let’s not kid ourselves. Donald Trump continues to “run government like a business” and one of the worst parts about it is the enormous national debt this guy, who calls himself “the king of debt,” is racking up. Remember, he’s gone bankrupt six times already, including his casinos in which, as everyone knows, the house always wins.
Those who naively thought impeachment might teach Trump something now get to watch him play “The Apprentice” with our federal agencies, firing people who were doing their jobs, hiring incompetent personal friends or campaign contributors to fill positions for which they are completely unqualified, and putting loyalty to him above service to the populace. They do have a word for when government “leaders” operate like this, but it’s not called “business,” it’s called dictatorship.
Or take Michael Bloomberg and his incredible debate failure in Nevada last week. Bloomberg has amassed over $65 billion, which means if he spent a million dollars a day, every day, it would take him 200 years to spend his fortune if he didn’t earn another penny in interest or profit from his investments. Yet, when asked about some of the simplest functions of government, he was like a deer in the headlights — and like the billionaire he is, he was indignant about being challenged.
Unfortunately, we have our own version in Greg Gianforte — a mega-millionaire who body-slammed a helpless reporter, bought his seat in Congress, achieved little for the people and now wants to buy the Montana governor’s seat.
“Oligarchy” is the word for rich people running countries, which is defined as “a government in which a small group exercises control, especially for corrupt and selfish purposes.” Democracy, on the other hand, is “a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them.”
At this critical juncture in our history, we would do well to note the difference and the mounting evidence that “running government like a business” enriches the oligarchs — but disregards “we, the people” and ignores the nation’s very real and pressing needs.

2020 began with the hottest January in recorded history

Philip Guelpa

The Earth just experienced its hottest January in recorded history, as reported by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Both land and ocean temperatures exceeded all records for the last 141 years. The readings were 1.13 degrees Celsius (2.05 degrees Fahrenheit) above the 20th century mean. This is no aberration; the four hottest Januarys have all taken place since 2016, and the 10 hottest all occurred since 2002.
For the year as a whole, 2019 was the second hottest on record after 2016. Temperatures were more than 0.6 degrees Celsius (1 degree Fahrenheit) above the 1981 to 2010 average, according to Copernicus Climate Change Service. Based on this trend, 2020 is likely to be among the five hottest on record. Scientists have warned that an increase of 2 degrees Celsius above the pre-industrial mean will have catastrophic consequences, including massive flooding, drought, wildfires and crop failures.
Spatial distribution of the direct and indirect effects of SLR on human migration. All counties that experience flooding under 1.8m of SLR by 2100 are shaded in blue, and colors indicate the remaining counties based on the number of additional incoming migrants per county that there are in the SLR scenario over the baseline. Color gradients are implemented in a log scale. (Credit: Robinson et al, 2020)
One especially telling statistic was recently recorded in Antarctica. On February 7, the highest temperature ever measured on the frozen continent—18.3 degrees C (64.9 degrees F)—was reached at the Esperanza Base along Antarctica’s Trinity Peninsula. This tops the previous record of 17.5 degrees C (63.5 degrees F) just five years ago in March 2015. Antarctica is among the fastest warming regions in the world.
What makes this especially alarming is the huge amount of water currently held by the continent’s glaciers. As temperatures increase, the rate at which these glaciers melt is accelerating. Measurements show that approximately 87 percent of glaciers on the west coast of the Antarctic Peninsula have retreated (i.e., melted back) over the last half-century, with the rate increasing during the past dozen years.
If the Antarctic Ice Sheet were to melt completely, global sea levels would rise approximately 60 meters (200 feet). Add to that, the Greenland Ice Sheet, which is also melting at an accelerating rate, sea level would rise by another 6 meters (20 feet). And that does not even include the additional contribution from smaller glaciers around the world, such as in the Himalayas and the Alps. All told, if all the world’s glaciers were to melt, which is highly likely given current trends in rising global temperatures, sea level would reach about 70 meters (230 feet) above current levels.
Even short of these extreme scenarios, sea level rise will have devastating impacts. Current projections indicate that by the end of this century, global sea levels will rise between 0.5 and 2.5 meters (1.6 and 8.2 feet). Globally, in 2000, approximately 30 percent of urban land lay within high-frequency flood zones, projected to rise to 40 percent by 2030.
An analysis of the dire consequences of projected sea level rise (SLR) on one part of the global population was recently published in the scientific journal PLOS ONE. “Modeling migration patterns in the USA under sea level rise” (Robinson, Dilkina, and Moreno-Cruz, 22 January 2020) describes the displacement of tens of millions of people resulting from the inundation of low-lying portions of the US, including many of its major cities.
This enforced migration would not only have devastating consequences for those driven to flee their homes, jobs and their whole way of life, but would also have drastic consequences (so-called “indirect effects”) for the “recipient” areas, which are totally unprepared for the massive influx of people that would ensue.
In the US alone, 123.3 million people, 39 percent of the population, lived in coastal counties in 2010. By 2100, 13.1 million would be in permanently flooded areas, based on a rise of 1.8 meters (6 feet) in sea level, resulting in a massive migration of climate refugees. The Robinson et al model predicts that by 2100, 56 percent of counties will experience substantial population influxes under a 1.8-meter sea level rise scenario.
It must be remembered that sea level rise will result not only in permanent inundation of formerly habitable areas, but also the more frequent temporary flooding of adjacent areas due to increasingly powerful storms. In addition, infiltration of saltwater into the groundwater of low-lying agricultural areas will negatively impact food production.
The authors stress that these migrations will not necessarily follow the relatively limited, “business as usual” patterns of population movement that have been experienced so far due to such temporally limited events as Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Recipient areas will include both nearby and more distant locations far from coastal regions. As a result, major disruptions will occur in a wide variety of spheres, including housing, transportation, employment and food production.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the entirety of the US Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts will be under water, including many major cities. Among these are Boston, New York, Philadelphia, New Orleans and Miami, to name just a few. Inundation will reach significantly inland as well. Much of Florida will be inundated, leaving only a central island and a northern-most remnant. Beyond that, many counties will experience population influxes of tens and hundreds of thousands of additional people.
The Robinson et al model has been applied only to the United States. Similar effects will occur around the world, affecting billions of people directly and indirectly.
Sea level rise is only one consequence of anthropogenic (human-induced) climate change. Droughts, flooding due to excessive rainfall, wildfires (as recently experienced in Australia and California) and other extreme weather events have already disrupted the lives of millions of people. The impact of climate refugees from Africa, Mexico and Central America, along with those driven out by war, political persecution and economic crises, moving to Europe and North America pales in comparison to the massive disruptions that will occur under even “moderate” projected scenarios of climate change.
As decades of inaction have demonstrated, the capitalist system is totally unprepared for the consequences of sea level rise and other effects of climate change which will increasingly manifest themselves over the next few decades. Only a massive, globally coordinated effort, encompassing both a drastic reduction in greenhouse gas pollution and measures to prepare for population dislocations, can avert catastrophe. This will not happen as long as the world is divided into rival nation states and dominated by competing private corporations. Only a united, socialist world can deal with this existential crisis.

Canada: Metro Vancouver housing crisis deepens as rents rise

Penny Smith

Skyrocketing rents and high demand in Metro Vancouver’s housing market are plunging ever larger numbers of people into poverty and homelessness.
According to a recent study conducted by rentals.ca, Vancouver ranked last November as Canada’s fourth most expensive city or borough, behind Toronto, Etobicoke, and Richmond Hill, all in Ontario. Another study of data from November 2019 by the rental site PadNapper found that average rents for a one-bedroom apartment in Vancouver were $2,200, up 1.4 percent from a month earlier and 4.3 percent over the previous year. Average rents for a two-bedroom unit stood at $3,190.
The exorbitant rental prices mean that a minimum-wage earner working 40 hours a week cannot afford a modest one- or two-bedroom apartment in any of Vancouver’s 70 neighbourhoods, according to a report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives published last July. The report also calculated that a single-income minimum wage earner in Vancouver would have to work 112 hours a week to afford the average-priced two-bedroom apartment and 84 hours a week to afford a one-bedroom.
The United Gospel Mission, which provides housing services to low-income people, presented shocking figures that underline how wide swathes of the population are being priced out of the region. A single mother raising a 10-year-old child on earnings from a minimum-wage job would have on average just $4 in her monthly budget after paying rent, essential foodstuffs, and childcare costs.
A spike in insurance premiums has contributed to the recent rental price hikes, especially in the condo market. But the primary culprit is the lack of available and affordable rental units. Even though Vancouver's housing market has cooled recently, the rental supply remains at close to zero percent, the lowest vacancy rate of any big Canadian city.
As would be expected, the poorest and most vulnerable members of society are most severely affected by the housing shortage. The 2019 Homeless Count survey released last June estimates that homelessness in Metro Vancouver is at a record high, with 2,223 individuals identified as homeless, up 2 percent from 2018. These figures are likely an underestimation, as it is difficult to know how many live out of their vehicles.
Out of those surveyed, sixty per cent were experiencing two or more health problems, and eighty-one per cent were already living in the city when they became homeless (as opposed to seeking refuge there because pf Vancouver’s warmer winter temperatures). Almost a quarter of respondents were 55 years or older, up from 21 per cent last year. The three main barriers to accessing housing were identified as high rents (53 percent), low incomes (51 percent), and a lack of available, suitable housing (30 percent).
One hundred and fifty residents now live in the growing tent city in Oppenheimer Park, located in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. The park is now being viewed as a “permanent” site by city officials, with portable toilets recently installed by the city.
The housing crisis that is driving many into transience, unsafe housing and homelessness is rooted in rampant financial speculation on housing that has been pushing Vancouver’s housing market to new heights for several decades. Beginning in the late 1980s, provincial and federal governments of all stripes, including the New Democrats, launched a campaign to commodify, deregulate, and internationalize Vancouver’s housing stock.
A recent academic paper authored by University of British Columbia geographer David Ley titled, “A regional growth ecology, a Great Wall of capital and a metropolitan housing market” documents the billions of dollars in revenue that the BC Liberals raked in during their 16-year reign from property taxes, property transfer taxes and interest-free investment loans demanded from wealthy new immigrants. The relationship between the BC Liberals and the real estate industry was so friendly that property developers became most of the party’s top donors.
The speculation mania drove up the assessed value of all properties in the city by 56 per cent between 2015 and 2020.
Developers are even making speculative investments in single-room occupancy (SRO) units, which have traditionally provided inadequate shelter to low-income residents who cannot afford an apartment. There are roughly 3,000 privately owned units, more than 50 percent of the city’s SRO stock, and already four SRO buildings in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside are up for sale as “micro-lofts” and “investment opportunities.”
When the 2020 provincial budget was released on February 18 by the social-democratic NDP-Green Party de facto coalition government, Finance Minister Carole James claimed, “The days of cashing in on a speculative real estate market at the expense of hardworking British Columbians are done. Instead of turning a blind eye to money laundering and the housing crisis, we’re acting so that everyone can afford a future in British Columbia.”
This is all hot air, as shown by the NDP’s record in government over the past two-and-a-half years. Since her party took office in 2017, it has broken or backpedaled on all of its campaign promises to address the province’s housing affordability crisis.
Just a measly 4,300 new affordable housing units have been completed to date out of an NDP commitment to build 114,000 over the next decade. The Rapid Response to Homelessness program it has initiated has built only 600 of the promised 2,000 modular supportive housing units across BC, and this year’s budget provides funding for only 200 more across the whole province. Furthermore, according to the first-quarter 2019-20 BC Housing Report, only 71 rental housing units have been completed out of the promised 1,598, with 59 percent of projects suffering minor or major delays.
The 2020 budget boasts of a “record total” of $4.2 billion over three years for “housing initiatives,” which means more funds to subsidize the private market horse-trading of developers and speculators. Meanwhile, the provincial housing agency’s 2020 service plan shows the government delaying yet again the completion of 2,400 units of affordable rental housing. Additionally, there is still no mention of a renter’s rebate, even though the 2017 NDP election campaigned featured a promise of a yearly $400 grant for renters.
The pauperization of Vancouver’s population due to low wages and rent-price gouging is in no small part due to the support the trade unions and other so-called “left” organizations give to what they tout as a “progressive” NDP-led government, even as it enacts austerity budgets and doles out tax breaks to big industry. During the 16 years of Liberal rule, the unions regularly scuttled militant strikes that had widespread popular support and the potential to spearhead a working-class offensive aimed at driving the pro-austerity Liberals from power.
With the NDP now in power, the BC Federation of Labour trumpets the government’s feeble pledge to increase the provincial minimum wage at a snail’s pace to $15 an hour by 2021. Leaving aside the various exemptions to the minimum wage regulation, most notably those employed in the food service industry, a $15 minimum wage will do absolutely nothing to lift workers in Vancouver out of poverty, given that a living wage in the city, according to one conservative estimate, is currently $19,500 and rising.
The NDP’s inability to fulfill even its own inadequate election pledges underscores its subordination to the interests of the corporate elite and was entirely predictable. During the 2017 provincial election campaign, the World Socialist Web Site noted that NDP leader John Horgan based the party’s program for government on the budgetary framework laid down by the right-wing Liberals, i.e. austerity budgets for public spending and social services, and the maintenance of low taxes for big business and the wealthy.
Horgan’s government has carried out this agenda to the letter. As a laudatory editorial in the Globe and Mail, the mouthpiece of Canada’s financial elite, noted last month, “The NDP have maintained a balanced budget… The debt-to-GDP ratio was just 15.9 per cent in spring 2017; since then, the debt load has declined further, to 14.6 per cent. That’s low compared with most provinces.”