1 Mar 2023

Google Black Founders Fund Africa 2023

Application Deadline: 26th March 2023

About the Award: Through the Google for Startups Black Founders Fund Africa, we are supporting early-stage Black-founded startups and startups that are benefitting the Black community on the continent. We want to bridge the existing fundraising gap for Black startup founders in Africa’s fast-growing technology landscape. This non-dilutive $3 million fund is allocated across a pipeline of 50 investable startups in Africa. The fund is open to all startups that meet the criteria, with priority given to Google for Startups Accelerator and Partner program alumni. This fund will be given along with mentorship support and Google platform credits to help the startups grow.

Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility: A startup that is:

  • Headquartered in Africa or has a legal presence on the continent
  • Building for Africa and a global market
  • Creating jobs, has growth potential to raise more funding, and making an impact

With a founding team that is:

  • Diverse, with at least one Black C-level founding member
  • Directly supporting the Black community
Technical requirements:
  • Technology startups with a live product in market or business where technology is core to their ability to scale (not for consultancies or not-for-profits)
  • Compatibility with Google products—our products can accelerate their growth
Eligible Countries: Botswana, Cameroun, Cote D’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe.


Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: Each startup will receive either $50,000 or $100,000. Funding varies according to each startup’s product development stage, current needs, and how much they’ve already raised.

How to Apply: To apply, visit the program page at https://goo.gle/ApplyforBFFAfrica and learn more about the eligibility criteria and how to apply. Applications are open now and will close on March 26!

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

The Cost of the Nation’s Endless Wars

John W. Whitehead


“Autocrats only understand one word: no, no, no. No you will not take my country, no you will not take my freedom, no you will not take my future… A dictator bent on rebuilding an empire will never be able to ease the people’s love of liberty. Brutality will never grind down the will of the free.”

—President Biden

Oh, the hypocrisy.

To hear President Biden talk about the Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, you might imagine that Putin is the only dictator bent on expanding his military empire through the use of occupation, aggression and oppression.

Yet the United States is no better, having spent much of the past half-century policing the globe, occupying other countries, and waging endless wars.

What most Americans fail to recognize is that these ongoing wars have little to do with keeping the country safe and everything to do with propping up a military industrial complex that has its sights set on world domination.

War has become a huge money-making venture, and the U.S. government, with its vast military empire, is one of its best buyers and sellers.

America’s part in the showdown between Russia and the Ukraine has already cost taxpayers more than $112 billion and shows no signs of abating.

Clearly, it’s time for the U.S. government to stop policing the globe.

The U.S. military reportedly has more than 1.3 million men and women on active duty, with more than 200,000 of them stationed overseas in nearly every country in the world.

American troops are stationed in Somalia, Iraq and Syria. In Germany, South Korea and Japan. In Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Oman. In Niger, Chad and Mali. In Turkey, the Philippines, and northern Australia.

Those numbers are likely significantly higher in keeping with the Pentagon’s policy of not fully disclosing where and how many troops are deployed for the sake of “operational security and denying the enemy any advantage.” As investigative journalist David Vine explains, “Although few Americans realize it, the United States likely has more bases in foreign lands than any other people, nation, or empire in history.”

Incredibly, America’s military forces aren’t being deployed abroad to protect our freedoms here at home. Rather, they’re being used to guard oil fields, build foreign infrastructure and protect the financial interests of the corporate elite. In fact, the United States military spends about $81 billion a year just to protect oil supplies around the world.

The reach of America’s military empire includes close to 800 bases in as many as 160 countries, operated at a cost of more than $156 billion annually. As Vine reports, “Even US military resorts and recreation areas in places like the Bavarian Alps and Seoul, South Korea, are bases of a kind. Worldwide, the military runs more than 170 golf courses.”

This is how a military empire occupies the globe.

After 20 years of propping up Afghanistan to the tune of trillions of dollars and thousands of lives lost, the U.S. military may have finally been forced out, but those troops represent just a fraction of our military presence worldwide.

In an ongoing effort to police the globe, American military service people continue to be deployed to far-flung places in the Middle East and elsewhere.

This is how the military industrial complex, aided and abetted by the likes of Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and others, continues to get rich at taxpayer expense.

Yet while the rationale may keep changing for why American military forces are policing the globe, these wars abroad aren’t making America—or the rest of the world—any safer, are certainly not making America great again, and are undeniably digging the U.S. deeper into debt.

War spending is bankrupting America.

Although the U.S. constitutes only 5% of the world’s population, America boasts almost 50% of the world’s total military expenditure, spending more on the military than the next 19 biggest spending nations combined.

In fact, the Pentagon spends more on war than all 50 states combined spend on health, education, welfare, and safety.

The American military-industrial complex has erected an empire unsurpassed in history in its breadth and scope, one dedicated to conducting perpetual warfare throughout the earth.

Since 2001, the U.S. government has spent more than $4.7 trillion waging its endless wars.

Having been co-opted by greedy defense contractors, corrupt politicians and incompetent government officials, America’s expanding military empire is bleeding the country dry at a rate of more than $32 million per hour.

In fact, the U.S. government has spent more money every five seconds in Iraq than the average American earns in a year.

Future wars and military exercises waged around the globe are expected to push the total bill upwards of $12 trillion by 2053.

Talk about fiscally irresponsible: the U.S. government is spending money it doesn’t have on a military empire it can’t afford.

Unfortunately, even if we were to put an end to all of the government’s military meddling and bring all of the troops home today, it would take decades to pay down the price of these wars and get the government’s creditors off our backs.

As investigative journalist Uri Friedman puts it, for more than 15 years now, the United States has been fighting terrorism with a credit card, “essentially bankrolling the wars with debt, in the form of purchases of U.S. Treasury bonds by U.S.-based entities like pension funds and state and local governments, and by countries like China and Japan.”

War is not cheap, but it becomes outrageously costly when you factor in government incompetence, fraud, and greedy contractors. Indeed, a leading accounting firm concluded that one of the Pentagon’s largest agencies “can’t account for hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of spending.”

Unfortunately, the outlook isn’t much better for the spending that can be tracked.

A government audit found that defense contractor Boeing has been massively overcharging taxpayers for mundane parts, resulting in tens of millions of dollars in overspending. As the report noted, the American taxpayer paid:

$71 for a metal pin that should cost just 4 cents; $644.75 for a small gear smaller than a dime that sells for $12.51: more than a 5,100 percent increase in price. $1,678.61 for another tiny part, also smaller than a dime, that could have been bought within DoD for $7.71: a 21,000 percent increase. $71.01 for a straight, thin metal pin that DoD had on hand, unused by the tens of thousands, for 4 cents: an increase of over 177,000 percent.

That price gouging has become an accepted form of corruption within the American military empire is a sad statement on how little control “we the people” have over our runaway government.

Mind you, this isn’t just corrupt behavior. It’s deadly, downright immoral behavior.

Americans have thus far allowed themselves to be spoon-fed a steady diet of pro-war propaganda that keeps them content to wave flags with patriotic fervor and less inclined to look too closely at the mounting body counts, the ruined lives, the ravaged countries, the blowback arising from ill-advised targeted-drone killings and bombing campaigns in foreign lands, or the transformation of our own homeland into a warzone.

That needs to change.

The U.S. government is not making the world any safer. It’s making the world more dangerous. It is estimated that the U.S. military drops a bomb somewhere in the world every 12 minutes. Since 9/11, the United States government has directly contributed to the deaths of around 500,000 human beings. Every one of those deaths was paid for with taxpayer funds.

The U.S. government is not making America any safer. It’s exposing American citizens to alarming levels of blowback, a CIA term referring to the unintended consequences of the U.S. government’s international activities. Chalmers Johnson, a former CIA consultant, repeatedly warned that America’s use of its military to gain power over the global economy would result in devastating blowback.

The 9/11 attacks were blowback. The Boston Marathon Bombing was blowback. The attempted Times Square bomber was blowback. The Fort Hood shooter, a major in the U.S. Army, was blowback.

The U.S. military’s ongoing drone strikes will, I fear, spur yet more blowback against the American people.

The war hawks’ militarization of America—bringing home the spoils of war (the military tanks, grenade launchers, Kevlar helmets, assault rifles, gas masks, ammunition, battering rams, night vision binoculars, etc.) and handing them over to local police, thereby turning America into a battlefield—is also blowback.

James Madison was right: “No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.” As Madison explained, “Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes… known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.”

We are seeing this play out before our eyes.

The government is destabilizing the economy, destroying the national infrastructure through neglect and a lack of resources, and turning taxpayer dollars into blood money with its endless wars, drone strikes and mounting death tolls.

Clearly, our national priorities are in desperate need of an overhauling.

At the height of its power, even the mighty Roman Empire could not stare down a collapsing economy and a burgeoning military. Prolonged periods of war and false economic prosperity largely led to its demise. As historian Chalmers Johnson predicts:

The fate of previous democratic empires suggests that such a conflict is unsustainable and will be resolved in one of two ways. Rome attempted to keep its empire and lost its democracy. Britain chose to remain democratic and in the process let go its empire. Intentionally or not, the people of the United States already are well embarked upon the course of non-democratic empire.

This is the “unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex” that President Dwight Eisenhower warned us more than 50 years ago not to let endanger our liberties or democratic processes.

Eisenhower, who served as Supreme Commander of the Allied forces in Europe during World War II, was alarmed by the rise of the profit-driven war machine that emerged following the war—one that, in order to perpetuate itself, would have to keep waging war.

We failed to heed his warning.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, war is the enemy of freedom.

As long as America’s politicians continue to involve us in wars that bankrupt the nation, jeopardize our servicemen and women, increase the chances of terrorism and blowback domestically, and push the nation that much closer to eventual collapse, “we the people” will find ourselves in a perpetual state of tyranny.

Stripping Shamima Begum of British citizenship a vindictive crime

Thomas Scripps


Last Wednesday, a Special Immigration Appeals Commission upheld the decision of former Home Secretary Sajid Javid to strip Shamima Begum of her British citizenship.

Begum travelled to Syria from London in 2015, aged just 15, with two friends who were all groomed to become a bride of an Islamic State (IS) fighter. She is currently in the al-Roj refugee camp in the country, with 2,000 others. In 2019, Javid ordered that she be deprived of her citizenship using powers in the British Nationality Act 1981.

This Monday February 23, 2015 file handout image of a three image combo of stills taken from CCTV issued by the Metropolitan Police shows Kadiza Sultana, left, Shamima Begum, center, and Amira Abase going through security at Gatwick airport, south England, before catching their flight to Turkey. [AP Photo/Metropolitan Police via AP]

Javid’s decision and its sanctioning by the courts is a gross violation of democratic rights designed to advance a stupefying demonisation of Muslims, preventing any questioning of the role played by world imperialism in fomenting Islamist terror.

The British Nationality Act 1981 allows the removal of citizenship if the affected person has acted “in a manner which is seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of the UK” and if there are “reasonable grounds for believing that the person is able, under the law of a country or territory outside the UK, to become a national of such a country or territory”. In other words, the person cannot be rendered stateless.

But this is exactly what the government has done, relying on the technicality that Begum could apply for Bangladeshi citizenship through her parents. Under Bangladeshi law, Begum could apply for citizenship at any time up to her 21stbirthday. But before Javid made his decision, Bangladesh made very clear that it would refuse any such application and that Begum would face the death penalty if she entered the country. In any case, she is now 23 years old—long past the deadline.

In effect, the UK government has punished Begum for an act carried out as a minor by making her a permanent refugee, denying her any rights or services afforded by any country on the planet. This was done without any public accountability whatsoever, let alone a trial.

Defending his decision in parliament in 2019, Javid considered it adequate to state, “Whatever role they took in the so-called caliphate, they all supported a terrorist organisation and in doing so they have shown they hate our country and the values we stand for.” Speaking on the issue again in 2021, he told journalists cryptically, “I’m not going to go into details of the case but what I will say is that you certainly haven’t seen what I saw. If you did know what I knew… you would have made exactly the same decision.”

Last Wednesday’s ruling underscores the gross injustice done, referring to the case made by Begum’s lawyers that she was the victim of grooming, child trafficking and sexual exploitation. Married to an IS fighter immediately upon arriving in Syria, she gave birth to three children, all of whom died young—one of pneumonia while she was in the refugee camp.

This undated photo released by the Metropolitan Police of London, shows Shamima Begum. [AP Photo/Metropolitan Police of London via AP, File]

One of her school-friends, Kadiza Sultana, died in May 2016 in an airstrike, aged 17, while planning to escape. The whereabouts of the other, Amira Abase, is not known, but her husband is dead.

The court’s judgement reads, “In the Commission’s opinion, there is a credible suspicion that Ms Begum was recruited, transferred and then harboured for the purpose of sexual exploitation.” These were “matters which were simply ignored by the Secretary of State.”

But a deeply authoritarian ruling by the Supreme Court in 2021, secured by the government to prevent Begum returning to the UK to fight her case, effectively prevented the Commission from overturning Javid’s decision.

The Supreme Court chastised an earlier ruling initially giving Begum the right to return with the extraordinary criticism that it had “mistakenly believed that, when an individual’s right to have a fair hearing of an appeal came into conflict with the requirements of national security, her right to a fair hearing must prevail,” and “mistakenly treated the Secretary of State’s extraterritorial human rights policy as if it were a rule of law which he must obey, as opposed to something intended to guide the exercise of his statutory discretion.”

Moreover, by ruling that the home secretary’s assessment was not given “the respect which it should have received, given that it is the home secretary who has been charged by parliament with responsibility for making such assessments,” the Supreme Court tied the Special Immigration Appeals Commission’s hands. It was essentially required to limit itself to asking whether Javid had lawfully exercised the extremely broad powers of the British Nationality Act 1981, under which he is entitled to ignore virtually all other considerations by citing “national security”.

The Commission noted February 22, “Reasonable Secretaries of State could lawfully apply different policies to the exercise of the section 40 function [in the British Nationality Act]. It is possible to envisage a perfectly lawful policy that precludes the decision-maker from depriving children at all, or from depriving them without deciding whether they were or may have been trafficked. But that is not the policy that this Secretary of State implemented.”

As Birnberg Peirce, the law firm representing Begum, explained in a statement, the Supreme Court judgment renders the legal appeals process pointless: “The commission’s hands, it considers, are tied by the alteration by the supreme court of its role – it is no longer allowed to come to its own decisions on the merits of a case as a whole. On the key issues, it must defer to the secretary of state. Once that is accepted, it is hard to see what part an appeal against this draconian decision can play.”

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer immediately backed Begum’s continued persecution, telling the BBC that the Court’s judgment was “the right decision”. The former Director of Public Prosecutions declared, “National security has to come first. The court's reached its decision; it's looked at all the evidence. I support that decision and as I say, national security has to come first.”

The vindictive treatment of Begum, an exploited child who was presented as nothing more than a dangerous and irredeemable monster, is intended to stop any deeper questioning of the details of the case which would expose the intrigues of British imperialism and its allies. Last September it was revealed that Begum was helped to Syria by a Canadian state intelligence asset; British intelligence knew she was being groomed online.

The court made vague reference to these facts in its judgement, writing, “It is also arguable… that there were State failures, and possible violations of the corollary protective duty, between December 2014 and February 2015.”

Begum’s is thus one of many cases in which figures who become associated with terror groups, including some who have gone on to commit terrible atrocities, are shown to have been known to the intelligence agencies. These are windows into the covert activity of the imperialist powers, who routinely use Islamist proxy forces against their geopolitical opponents, as most recently in Syria and Libya.

Nor does the government want to allow any consideration of the social conditions of contemporary capitalism which move some people to support the barbaric ideology of Islamic State, including young women who are particularly oppressed. Government-sponsored Islamophobia and anti-migrant rhetoric, conditions of social exclusion and poverty, and the relentless dehumanisation of the enemy abroad—in recent years largely in the Middle East—and desensitisation of the population to violence and cruelty all play their part.

A play exploring these issues specifically in the context of Begum and the two friends she travelled with, Homegrown, was shut down by the police and the National Youth Theatre in 2015.

The Begum decision also has dangerous implications. The ruling class routinely pioneers massive assaults on democratic rights with the initial targeting of a demonised individual or group. Through this case, it has secured vast, virtually unchecked powers for the home secretary, currently the right-wing xenophobe Suella Braverman, to use against the working class.

Begum’s treatment is seen as a weapon not primarily against terrorist groups, but in the wider attack on democratic rights—including the rights to strike, protest and free speech. In the time her case has been ongoing, the government has already strengthened its right to remove citizenship through the Nationality and Borders Act, removing the requirement to notify the affected person.

Child and youth poverty in Germany rises sharply

Elisabeth Zimmermann


At the end of January, the Bertelsmann Foundation published its fact sheet on child and youth poverty in Germany. According to the report, 2.88 million children under the age of 18 and 1.55 million young adults under the age of 25 were considered poor or “at risk of poverty” in 2021. This means that more than one in five children and one in four young adults are affected by poverty. Young adults have the highest risk of poverty of all age groups.

Young people at a demonstration in Berlin against rent profiteering and social austerity, April 2018 [Photo: WSWS]

Overall, poverty in Germany has risen to a record level. Poverty has risen particularly sharply among pensioners in recent years. Twenty percent of older people, or one in five, now receive a poverty level pension.

Researchers Antje Funcke and Sarah Menne, who prepared the fact sheet on behalf of the Bertelsmann Foundation, based their study on current figures from the federal and state statistical offices. The study contains a detailed breakdown of the extent of child and youth poverty in Germany's individual federal states and in the respective districts and independent cities.

The study defines as “poor” those persons who have so little income “that it is not possible to have the standard of living that is taken for granted or considered normal in our society.” According to the German Federal Statistical Office, the official poverty thresholds in 2021 were 1,148 euro per month for a one-person household and 2,410 euro per month for a two parent household with two children under 14. For a single parent with one child under 14, the threshold was 1,492 euro and for a single parent with three children, two under and one over 14, it was 2,410 euro per month.

It takes little imagination to see that single parents and families with children on these low monthly incomes have great difficulty making ends meet financially. Since inflation has risen to around 10 percent, it is becoming more and more impossible.

Among the most important findings is that many young people need so-called SGB II benefits (the program formerly know as social assistance, Sozialhilfe) to make ends meet. In June 2022, this applied to 1.9 million children and young people under 18. This figure rose significantly in June 2022, the first significant rise in five years. This is due in part to children fleeing the war in Ukraine, who have been eligible to receive SGB II benefits since June 2022.

In reality, the number of poor children and young people in Germany is much higher as there is a large number of unreported cases, because many are not included in the statistics. This applies, for example, to children of parents who work in the low-wage sector and whose income is just above the level required for SGB II benefits or the citizen's allowance (Bürgergeld, formerly known as Hartz IV).

Children and adolescents who grow up in group homes, institutions and youth welfare facilities or live in student dormitories also do not appear in the statistics; neither do the children and adolescents who come as refugees from countries devastated by the U.S./NATO wars, such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and other countries. Refugee children are not counted because they are required to live in refugee facilities (Erstaufnahmezentren or “initial reception centers”), sometimes alone, sometimes with their parents, for months and years until a decision has been made on their asylum application and residence status in Germany, and they are allowed to find their own apartment.

The factsheet also shows that 7 percent of young adults receive social benefits; that's 432,000 young people under 25. It shows that the support systems that are actually intended for this age group—in addition to the SGB II system, for example, student assistance (Bafög) or the housing allowance (Wohngeld)—”do not mesh well and obviously do not prevent poverty,” according to the study.

The front-runner in child and youth poverty is the federal state of Bremen, at 41.1 percent of all children and young people. But the rate is also in double digits in all other German states. Bremen is followed by the states of Saxony-Anhalt with a child and youth poverty rate of 25.2 percent and North Rhine-Westphalia with 24.6 percent.

Children and young people are particularly likely to be poor if they grow up in single-parent families or in families with three or more children, the report says. For two-parent families with three or more children, the poverty rate was 31.6 percent. For single parents, where no distinction is made by number of children, the poverty rate was 41.6 percent, approaching a situation in which every second single-parent household lives in poverty.

By age group, young adults between 18 and 24 are those with the highest poverty rate, 25.5 percent. One in four young adults is affected by poverty. In eastern Germany, the figure is 32.5 percent compared to 24.2 percent in the west. Overall, 4.43 million under-25s are considered poor in Germany. The proportion of impoverished children and young people, as well as young adults, has remained at a consistently high level for years.

Children and young people growing up in poverty are disadvantaged in every respect, both in terms of their education and health as well as their participation in society. It is a vicious circle from which they usually cannot escape.

In a special section of the study, the researchers discuss the consequences of poverty and provide many examples. They demonstrate that poor young adults who had experienced poverty in their youth are also disadvantaged as adults and suffer from poorer mental health.

The situation is being made much worse as a result of the current crises and the attendant increase in prices. The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic in early 2020 and developments since then have led to a further sharp increase in poverty. If the policies of capitalist governments in all countries can be summarized under the maxim “profits before lives,” this maxim can be taken literally, too: Well over 20 million people worldwide, almost 170,000 in Germany alone, have fallen victim to the pandemic. At the same time, the governments' “rescue measures” and “aid packages” have made the situation worse for the lower layers of society.

First, billions of euro, dollars and other currencies were handed over to the banks and corporations during the pandemic, and the rich were allowed to enrich themselves further on the misery and suffering of billions of people. At the same time, hardly more than small change was provided to support those who lost their jobs and incomes as a result of the pandemic. Since then, with the outbreak of the US/NATO war against Russia in Ukraine, inflation has soared to record heights, dramatically affecting those who were already barely making ends meet. Again, the hardest and most severely affected were the millions of people working in low-wage jobs, and their families.

As a result of the economic sanctions against Russia, electricity and gas prices in particular have risen dramatically in Germany. The compensation payments that the government granted for the high energy costs proved to be a drop in the bucket. Inflation is effectively the mechanism by which the costs of massive rearmament and war, as well as bailouts for the rich, are squeezed out of the working class.

Like many other studies on poverty and social inequality, the Bertelsmann Foundation fact sheet provides important information and a great deal of useful numerical material. As in all the years before, the demands they derive from it and present to the government will fall on deaf ears. While the ruling coalition can launch a 100-billion special fund for the Bundeswehr (German military) overnight, as well as tens of billions more for rearmament and war, there is ostensibly no money to meet social needs. While the defense budget rises and rises again, spending on health and education has been massively cut in the latest federal budget.

At the end of last year, the Child Protection Association (Kinderschutzbund) warned of a further increase in child poverty. Inflation is hitting poorer families and children in particular, said the president of the Kinderschutzbund, Heinz Hilgers. “Inflation hits families with little money particularly hard,” Hilgers said. Child poverty will therefore inevitably continue to increase. Hilgers also warned that families with children will not be able to get by with the standard rates provided by the citizen's allowance in 2023. This rate increase comes too late and is immediately absorbed by inflation.

While the large majority of the population suffers under inflation and a sharp rise in food and energy prices, there is a small minority at the peak of the society that enriches itself enormously on the consequences of the crisis. Here we need only mention the recently publicized example of Hapag-Lloyd.

On February 8, 2023, Handelsblatt reported that the shipping company Hapag-Lloyd would distribute more than eleven billion euro to its shareholders after a “fabulous record year.” Hapag-Lloyd has benefited from the boom in container shipping. The Executive Board therefore intends to almost double the dividend to 63 euro per share compared with the previous year (2021: 35 euro). During the coronavirus crisis, freight rates for transporting goods on the high seas had exploded as a result of disrupted supply chains.

The greatest beneficiary of the wave of dividends is Hamburg billionaire Klaus-Michael Kühne, one of the richest Germans. As a major shareholder in Hapag-Lloyd, he alone receives 3.3 billion euro in dividends. “Within two years, the shipping company's profit dispensations thus add up to more than 17 billion euro,” writes Handelsblatt.

German government ends masking requirement in health and care facilities

Tamino Dreisam


At the beginning of February, the obligation to wear a mask in buses and trains was ended throughout Germany, along with the Coronavirus Occupational Health and Safety Ordinance. This momentous decision will now be followed by the repeal of the testing and masking requirement for employees and residents in health care and nursing facilities on March 1. This means that wearing a mask will only be mandatory in medical facilities.

[Photo by Arquus / wikimedia / CC BY-SA 4.0]

Originally, the masking requirement was to apply until April 7. On its website, the federal Health Ministry justifies the early lifting of this obligation by citing an “infection situation that has been stable for weeks.” Leading politicians from all parties are outdoing each other in declaring the pandemic over and dismissing coronavirus as a normal disease among many others.

“We are now treating COVID-19 like any other infectious disease—even in our country. That means there is no regulatory framework in Schleswig-Holstein that goes beyond that,” said the state’s Minister President Daniel Günther (Christian Democratic Union, CDU), for example. Baden-Württemberg’s Green Minister of Health Manfred Lucha announced the state had “reached endemicity. In terms of acute respiratory illnesses, we are at pre-pandemic levels.”

Other politicians go even further, attacking the protective measures implemented in the past, which—despite their limitations—have undoubtedly saved tens of thousands of lives. In Saxony, for example, the Liberal Democrats (FDP) are calling for a state parliament investigative committee which would, “review the measures taken during the pandemic and put them to the legal test.” Such an investigative committee had previously only been called for by the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD).

At the federal level, Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP), vice president of the Bundestag (parliament), is calling for a “comprehensive... parliamentary review” that would open “a new chapter in coronavirus politics.”

It is clear what is at stake. The imposition of protective measures is to be outright criminalized. Health Minister Karl Lauterbach (Social Democratic Party, SPD) told broadcaster ARD’s Morgenmagazin earlier this month that the closure of schools and day-care centres at the start of the pandemic was a mistake. He dismissively referred to the position that “schools must be closed because transmissions occur there” as “science at that time.” In another interview, he called the official figure of about 180,000 coronavirus deaths in Germany “not a bad number.”

The position of the ruling class could not be any clearer: To maximize its profits without interruption, it was and is willing to sacrifice hundreds of thousands of lives. Workers should also take Lauterbach’s statements as a warning for the future. In the event of a new pandemic, the ruling class would undertake no serious measures to protect the health of the population from the very beginning—no matter how many people might die.

And contrary to official government propaganda, the coronavirus pandemic is by no means over. This is shown, among other things, by a projection of the Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) on excess mortality. According to the report, 98,632 people died in January, 11,000 more, or 13 percent, than the median number for 2019 to 2022. For 2022, the excess mortality rate was nine percent, suggesting a high number of indirect deaths because of the pandemic. Data from the EuroMOMO network confirm that this is a Europe-wide trend.

The current 7-day incidence of 119.1 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (February 26) does not begin to reflect the true level of infections. For example, the level of coronavirus measured in wastewater in the capital city of Berlin suggest that the true infection numbers are more than 40 percent higher than reported.

Even if the officially reported COVID deaths are taken as a yardstick, it is clear that the virus is still rampant. More than 500 people are still dying from COVID-19 every week in Germany. A recent study by the University of Lucerne, published in the journal Jama Network Open, found that mortality resulting from infection with the Omicron variant is 1.5 times higher than infection with seasonal influenza.

The adjusted incidence of hospitalizations per 100,000 is also nearly 12, which corresponds to nearly 10,000 hospitalizations per week because of coronavirus infections. 1,005 people require intensive care—up from 776 the previous week. In medical treatment facilities, where masking requirements are scheduled to be eliminated March 1, the number of active outbreaks rose to 167 from 117 the previous week. In nursing homes and homes for the elderly, there were 182 outbreaks.

Of particular concern, the Omicron subvariant XBB, also known as “Kraken,” increased to 26 percent of cases. This is considered the most contagious subvariant to date.

The spread of Omicron variants and the accompanying removal of protective measures had already led to a massive increase in infections last year, directly impacting the lives of millions of workers.

According to an analysis by health insurer Barmer, there were significantly more people taking sick leave in 2022 than in the previous year. The proportion of sick leave that was coronavirus-related rose from 0.9 percent in 2021 to 20.2 percent in 2022. In January, health insurance providers Techniker-Krankenkasse and DAK-Gesundheit also published figures on sick leave. The latter recorded a sickness rate of 5.5 percent in 2022 for its 2.4 million working clients. The Kaufmännische Krankenkasse stated that in 2022, the number of those taking sick leave due to mental health problems had skyrocketed. It reported that the nursing, education, and social work sectors were particularly affected.

In addition to the immediate consequences, aggressive infection with the virus also damages public health in the long term. Even seemingly harmless courses of infection can attack the organs and seriously damage them. Hundreds of thousands of people in Germany are already struggling with the consequences of Long Covid. The murderous character of the official coronavirus policy is most clearly reflected in life expectancy, which has already fallen by half a year in this country.

US demands for “existential struggle” threaten war with China

Andre Damon


On Tuesday, a bipartisan House committee held a hearing proclaiming an “existential struggle” between the United States and China.

In his opening remarks to the hearing, committee Chairman Mike Gallagher said the United States’ “competition” with China will not be “polite,” calling the US conflict with China an “existential struggle over what life will look like in the 21st century.”

Gallagher told the Wall Street Journal the committee would create a two-year “blueprint” for “selective economic decoupling from China.”

The prime-time hearing was aimed at promoting public hostility toward China to justify the United States’ massive military build-up in the Pacific.

In January, Gen. Mike Minihan, head of the Air Mobility Command, sent a letter to his subordinates stating, “My gut tells me we will fight in 2025,” and urging them to get their “personal affairs” in order in preparation for a conflict with China.

U.S. Army mariners-in-training pose for pictures at Joint Base Little Creek-Fort Story May 27, 2017. [Photo: US Army]

On Thursday, it became known that the US is planning to triple the number of US troops stationed in Taiwan, which the United States has for decades treated as part of China. Last year, Congress passed a national defense authorization act that would directly arm Taiwan, effectively ending the one-China policy with the aim of provoking a Chinese invasion of Taiwan similar to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The warmongering testimonies by former Trump administration officials—H.R. McMaster, a war criminal who helped organize the illegal invasion of Iraq, and Matthew Pottinger, a key ally of the fascist Steve Bannon—were interrupted by protesters opposing US war plans with China who were gagged and led away by police.

The hearing, which was convened by Republicans who now control the House, won the enthusiastic backing of Democratic members of the committee.

But not a single one of the Democratic members of Congress opposed the warmongering orientation of the hearing. Ro Khanna, a national co-chair of Bernie Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign, fully embraced the premise of the meeting, casting the war plans of American imperialism as a struggle to defend US manufacturing jobs.

“Over the last three decades, both Democrats and Republicans underestimated the CCP, and assumed that trade and investment would inevitably lead to democracy and greater security in the Indo-Pacific. ... Instead the opposite happened,” said Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, the ranking Democrat on the committee, in his opening remarks.

Democratic Michigan Congresswoman Haley Stevens called on the United States to carry out policies aimed at ensuring the domination of US manufacturing exports and control of raw materials.

While fully accepting the framework for US-China relations, the entire criticism of the Democrats was that the US conflict with China should not be acclaimed by overt anti-Asian racism. Democrat Shontel Brown said she supported “boosting American competitiveness with equity and inclusion.”

But perhaps the most overt statement of sympathy for Gallagher’s “existential conflict” came from the White House, by way of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

In an interview with Fox News, FBI Director Christopher Wray accused China of having created COVID-19 and then covering it up, in the most high-profile, public statement to date of the White House’s approval of the Wuhan lab lie.

The announcement was a direct overture toward Pottinger, who is a leading public advocate of the Wuhan lab conspiracy theory, which he has consistently advocated alongside his demands for the US to prepare for conflict with China.

The hearing marks a major milestone in the embrace of the entire political establishment of the framework of the US-China relationship pioneered under the Trump administration by the fascist ideologue and chief white house strategist Steven K. Bannon, which calls on the United States to economically “decouple” from China in preparation for military conflict.

This narrative was first officially trailered in October 2018 in a speech by Vice President Mike Pence, who argued that the reproachment between the United States and China in the aftermath of Richard Nixon’s 1971 trip to Beijing was a mistake.   

The “Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party” was effectively a vehicle for its star witness former United States deputy national security advisor Matthew Pottinger, who Bannon described as “one of the most significant people in the entire U.S. government.”

In the words of Josh Rogin, Pottinger’s views have lived on in the Biden administration, with the “incoming Biden administration is set to preserve many of the changes in the government’s approach to China that Pottinger, along with other like-minded officials, worked to implement.”

Over the past two months, the Biden administration has massively intensified its conflict with China, passing a bill at the end of last year that would directly arm Taiwan, Surging US troops to the island, and this month, carrying out an attack on what was by all indications a Chinese research balloon that had been blown over the United States.

Tuesday’s prime-time hearing is a major component of the US media’s month-long effort to demonize China, which erupted with the announcement days-long media hysteria over a the Chinese balloon, and continued with the US media’s incessant promotion of the Wuhan lab lie over the past week.

These developments must be seen as a warning. Even as the United States massively intensifies its involvement in its war with Russia in Ukraine, it is escalating its conflict with China, threatening to embroil the whole world in a globe-spanning military conflict between nuclear-armed powers.