11 May 2023

Notes on the financial oligarchy: Jeffrey Epstein and the criminality of the ruling class

Gabriel Black


In August 2019, financier Jeffrey Epstein died in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan as he awaited trial for criminal charges relating to his decades-long sex trafficking of underage girls. While officially declared a suicide, his death was more likely murder, a contract killing to silence the specialist in deal-making and tax evasion—and sex trafficker—before a trial could produce evidence that would implicate many others in the US ruling elite.

At the time, the World Socialist Web Site asked two important questions. First, why was the media dismissing questions about Epstein’s death as “conspiracy theories”? Two, who wanted Jeffrey Epstein dead?

We argued Epstein’s case was significant not because of the financier’s particular depravity but rather because his operation and death expressed something true about capitalist society as a whole. We wrote:

The super-rich prey upon the poor and the vulnerable, using them as they wish. They make use of their connections to cover up their crimes, or, depending on the circumstances, arrange for the elimination of those former friends and associates whose activities have become an inconvenience or a danger.

Almost four years after Epstein’s death, a series of articles last week in the Wall Street Journal have made it possible to peer further into this incestuous world of high finance and corporate-state power in which Epstein played a key intermediary role.

Due to ongoing lawsuits filed by the attorney general of the Virgin Islands, and by an unnamed victim of Epstein’s abuse, the Journal has been able to access thousands of pages of emails and schedules of Epstein, dating from 2013 to 2017. The lawsuits are against JPMorgan Chase and allege the bank knowingly facilitated the financial transactions that Epstein used to fund his abuse of young girls.

Jeffrey Epstein, March 28, 2017 [AP Photo/New York State Sex Offender Registry via AP]

The material from the Journal is limited to dates from a calendar diary of Epstein’s meetings and various notes and emails over the four-year period. It provides just a small window into Epstein’s operations over 30 years, and his wide circle of contacts. However, it is enough to get a glimpse—or perhaps a smell—of this world of powerful corporate, financial and state actors, and their incessant intermingling.

Epstein was regularly meeting with the most powerful figures in the global economy, as well as their key political agents—from Kathryn Ruemmler, general counsel in the Obama White House and later at Goldman Sachs, to Leon Black, the billionaire owner of Apollo Global Management, one of the largest asset managers in the world.

It is no secret that a few thousand people, and the institutions they control, have effective ownership over nearly every major company and bank in the world. The development of capitalism into a highly stratified world dominated, not by competition, but by the decisions of a handful of giant monopolies, is a central prediction of Marx’s economic work. 

Today, this process of monopolization and globalization has produced a remarkably narrow financial oligarchy. Stripped of their money and ownership, they would be little more than a handful of people confronting the great mass of the population. And yet the global economy is subordinated to their quest for enrichment.

A fixer for the financial aristocracy

Epstein functioned essentially as a fixer for this layer. He serviced the top layers of the financial oligarchy, parasitically attaching himself to them in the process.

Epstein himself was not a leading banker or financier in his own right. His $500 million fortune was amassed by helping billionaires manage and direct their own fortunes. His rise to power and influence was based on his initial role in managing the fortunes of Leslie Wexner, the billionaire owner of the Limited, corporate owner of Bath & Body Works, Abercrombie & Fitch, Victoria’s Secret and other well-known retailers.

Reflecting the general rise of financial parasitism in the global economy, Epstein amassed half a billion dollars without ever being involved in the production of anything.

His “work”—as further revealed by the Journal’s report—was that of connecting the ultra-rich, and those who wanted access to them. He made tens of millions of dollars in the process. 

To succeed in this rarefied world, Epstein threw lavish parties, exchanged favors and sought to woo and impress, through various means. 

The sex-trafficking operation Epstein ran was, in this sense, a kind of tool he leveraged as part of his larger operations to acquire financial clients and establish relationships. It allowed him to monetize his own proclivities and those of selected clients.

As one person familiar with Epstein and his operations explained anonymously to the Guardian, “If you invested money with him, he’d get you laid. They were young girls with no contacts, who they [potential investors] had no ability to meet. It was like a dating service and the girls were like the candy on a stick.”

There was, of course, another side to this for Epstein: insurance in the form of blackmail.

Epstein purportedly had video cameras throughout his compound in the Virgin Islands, as well as his Manhattan and Florida properties. When the FBI raided Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, they found boxes of hard-drives and CDs, photos and binders, which included labeled pornographic material collected from his cameras. With the shutdown of the criminal case following his death, none of this material has been brought to light.

Epstein with Ghislaine Maxwell in 2005. Maxwell was later convicted of helping him coerce teenage girls into sex. [Photo: US Department of Justice]

Sex with women and girls, however, was by no means the only or even principal tool Epstein was using to cultivate relationships with the ultra-rich. The vast majority of the people mentioned in the recent Wall Street Journal reports are not suspected of having partaken in the massages, sex and orgies Epstein proffered, yet Epstein curried favor with them in other ways.

Epstein frequently entertained guests at his Manhattan townhouse or flew people down to his island in the Caribbean. Epstein’s meeting diary, which the Wall Street Journal obtained, contains notes on the food preferences and interests of various guests. He made sure a specific type of sushi roll was available when he met with Kathryn Ruemmler. Likewise, he had special food items provided for Joshua Cooper Ramo, the former co-chief executive of Henry Kissinger’s consulting firm. His secretary would be tasked with upgrading the flights of financiers and lawyers he was trying to woo, giving them first class tickets.

Epstein tried to cultivate connections with noted academics and artists, including Jeffery Koons, Noam Chomsky, Martin Nowak (a Harvard biologist), Leon Botstein (music director of the American Symphony Orchestra) and Helen Fisher (a leading anthropologist).

The Wall Street Journal writes that Barnaby Marsh, an executive at the time of the John Templeton Foundation, one of the largest philanthropic organizations in the world, “often went to Epstein’s townhouse for gatherings because it was full of academics and wealthy people who discussed philanthropy ideas.” Marsh told the Journal, “So many of those billionaires knew him. And he would sit in the corner, just kind of watching.”

The former prime minister of Israel, Ehud Barak, told the Wall Street Journal that Epstein “often brought other interesting persons, from art or culture, law or science, finance, diplomacy or philanthropy” to his Manhattan parties.

One of the key services that Epstein provided was to bring figures within the financial aristocracy together for mutual profit. 

Mutual favors and “finder’s fees”

He was essential, for example, in hooking up the billionaire Glenn Dubin with Jes Staley, an executive of JPMorgan Chase and close confidant of Epstein. For this role, Epstein reportedly received a “finder’s fee” of $15 million for his role in brokering the sale of Dubin’s Highbridge Capital to JPMorgan Chase. Highbridge Capital oversees several billion dollars’ worth of assets, including GFL Environmental, one of the largest waste management companies in Canada, and the Danaher Corporation, a Washington D.C.-based industrial and biotechnology conglomerate.

Epstein also exchanged various favors with Ariane de Rothschild, one of the richest women in the world and CEO of the Edmond de Rothschild Group, one of the largest private banks. In 2013 she helped Epstein in finding a multilingual female assistant. The next year she purchased a million dollars’ worth of auction items for him. In 2015, after she became president of Edmond de Rothschild Group, she made a $25 million contract with Epstein for his company to provide risk analysis. In the following years, the Journal reports Epstein returned the favor, introducing “the bank to U.S. finance leaders.” He also “recommended law firms and provided tax and risk consulting.”

These dealings form only a part of Epstein’s overall activities. But they give a sense of the backscratching world of the ultra-rich, one in which everyone more or less knows each other as they trade in a stream of personal favors and extravagant, often sordid, experiences. 

Private jets, tropical island retreats, lavish star-studded parties, access and leverage over prestigious academic institutions like Harvard and MIT, the lending of hundred-million-dollar yachts for vacations, and, yes, sex—these were all currency among this thin layer of the population for whom anything is obtainable.

In Epstein’s case he proffered, among other things, a world of massages and sex with pubescent girls. These extremely young women, coming from impoverished, destitute communities—trailer parks in Florida and broken homes—were lured by the promise of a few hundred dollars. The cash was significant to them but mere pennies for the men who abused them.

But this economy of decadent, nepotistic and often illegal favors served fundamentally to grease the wheels of what was the main event: massive economic transactions involving hundreds of millions, sometimes billions of dollars. 

Epstein’s ties to the financial and political elite

Below we review several of the significant connections Epstein had that were revealed by the Wall Street Journal’s report, and the type of dealings that occurred.

Leon Black—Billionaire, Apollo Global Management

Leon Black co-founded Apollo Global Management, currently ranked in the top 25 largest private equity firms in the world. In 2022, Apollo had a staggering $548 billion worth of assets under management. Apollo holds and manages a wide range of assets ranging from Harrah’s Entertainment to Smart & Final.

Epstein met with Black well over a hundred times between 2013 and 2017. A review from Apollo found that Black paid $148 million to Epstein for what was described as “tax and estate planning.”

Essentially what Epstein was providing was advice on tax evasion. Apollo’s report stated that Black “believed and witnesses generally agreed, that Epstein provided advice that conferred more than $1 billion and as much as $2 billion or more” in reduced taxes. One or two billion dollars is an incredible amount of missed tax money. And that from a single firm—Apple, Amazon, every major corporation engages in elaborate schemes of this sort year in and year out. Meanwhile the capitalist politicians and the corporate media declare that “there is no money” to fund necessary social services for working people and the poor.

Black and Epstein are reported to have frequently socialized with each other. Epstein was a founding trustee of the Debra and Leon Black Foundation, the charitable foundation Black established.

Black’s net worth is $9 billion. Black also served as a trustee for the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. He owns tens of millions of dollars’ worth of art, including Edvard Munch’s The Scream, which he bought for $119.9 million in 2012. 

Black stepped down from his position at Apollo Global Management in 2021, after his close ties to Epstein were revealed. He is being sued by several women who claim that he sexually assaulted them at Epstein’s mansion, suits newly permitted under the Adult Survivors Act, the same New York state law that allowed E. Jean Carroll to sue former president Donald Trump.

Kathryn Ruemmler—General counsel for Obama White House, Goldman Sachs

Kathryn Ruemmler is a leading figure in the legal establishment, specializing in civil law. She was the lead federal prosecutor in the case against the executives of Enron. In 2011, she was invited by the Obama administration to become the White House Counsel, leading a team of 25 lawyers, which she did until 2014. 

Among other things, Ruemmler was involved with the administration’s attempt to cover up the Obama administration’s extrajudicial drone assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki and his 16-year old son—both American citizens.

According to Newsweek, Ruemmler was opposed to revealing to the public either the killing of Awlaki or the pseudo-legal justification the administration had produced to justify it. Later she played a key role in convincing Democratic lawmakers to overlook the issue in the case of the confirmation of David Barron, the author of the legal memos justifying the assassination, as he faced a congressional vote on his appointment to a federal judgeship.

When Ruemmler left the White House, Obama stated that she was “a close personal friend” and that he would continue to make use of her advice and counsel. At the very same time, Ruemmler began to have dozens of meetings with Epstein. 

Epstein originally met with Ruemmler to see if she would be interested in representing Bill Gates and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Ruemmler, however, did not, and went back to her old job at Latham and Watkins, the second largest law firm in the world. At Latham she worked in white-collar defense, that is defending corporations against lawsuits, including ones brought by the government.

Her career trajectory typifies the “revolving door” between corporate lawyers tasked with evading government oversight and the federal prosecutors ostensibly charged with carrying it out.

Later, Epstein was key in connecting Ruemmler to Ariane de Rothschild. The CEO of the Rothschild family’s private bank, Edmond de Rothschild Group, paid Latham tens of millions of dollars to help them navigate US financial regulations.

Kathryn Ruemmler (former White House counsel, now Goldman Sachs counsel) [Photo: Pete Souza]

According to the Journal, Ruemmler was “scheduled to fly with Epstein to Paris and in 2017 he planned to stop in St. Lucia to take her to his island home.” A spokesperson for her at Goldman Sachs, where Ruemmler now works as general counsel, denies that this happened. 

Internal memos from Epstein’s staff show concern about whether Ruemmler would be “uncomfortable” with the various young women at Epstein’s properties. Epstein told some of these women not to be there when Ruemmler visited but told others it was okay. 

It is hard to believe that Ruemmler did not see anything. Even people who only briefly spent time with Epstein noticed. 

Helen Fisher, an anthropologist who visited Epstein’s compound in the Virgin Islands, hoping to obtain funding for her work—but did not—remarked to the Journal, “I didn’t have anything to do with Jeffrey Epstein. But I remembered it because of his spectacular house and because of the six young women.”

Epstein curried favor with Ruemmler in other ways, upgrading her flights and ensuring her favorite sushi dish was on-hand when she visited for meetings.

In 2020, Ruemmler joined Goldman Sachs, where she was the global head of dealing with financial regulations. She is now the bank’s Chief Legal Officer.

Glenn Dubin—Billionaire hedge-fund manager

Glenn Dubin is a billionaire hedge fund operator who founded Highbridge Capital Management. Eva Anderson-Dubin, his wife, a former “Miss Sweden,” dated Epstein in the 1980s and is now a well-regarded doctor in New York City, specializing in breast cancer treatment. Eva and Epstein remained in contact years after they dated.

Epstein played the key role in helping Dubin sell Highbridge Capital to JPMorgan Chase in 2004. The sale was for more than $1 billion. Epstein made $15 million from brokering the deal and $29 million in profit from his own share of ownership in Highbridge. According to the Journal, “Some people [at Highbridge] felt it was odd to compensate [Epstein] for an introduction years earlier.” The amount is about 14 times what the average, full-time worker in the United States would make in a lifetime40 yearsof work.

While the Dubins claim they were “horrified” to learn of Epstein’s sex-trafficking, their former full-time chefs claimed in a 2016 deposition that the couple flew a distraught 15-year-old Swedish girl back to Sweden who was “involved in some forced sexual activity at Epstein’s Caribbean island.” The Dubins deny this.

Epstein went on to assist the Dubins’ daughter. He arranged for her to obtain modeling jobs with some fashion brands and set up a meeting for her with a professor at Harvard while she was a student there. On another occasion Eva and her daughter dined with Epstein and Bill Gates at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse.

Ariane de Rothschild—Billionaire banker, Edmond de Rothschild CEO

Ariane de Rothschild married into the Rothschild banking family and is now head of the Edmond de Rothschild bank, based in Switzerland. Rothschild met with Epstein over a dozen times between 2013 and 2019. It is unclear how they originally became acquainted.

Rothschild and Epstein engaged in a variety of favors for each other. Epstein asked Rothschild to scout him a new female assistant that was “multilingual … organized.” Epstein brokered Rothschild’s hiring of Ruemmler’s law firm Latham and Watkins.

Ariane de Rothschild was named CEO of the bank in 2015; previously she was a vice president. In 2019, when the bank became fully private, she became chairman of the board. The bank is one of the largest privately owned banks in the world, with $178 billion in assets. It has vast real estate and industrial investments throughout the world, but especially in Europe and Africa, including biotech companies, logistics centers, commercial and residential real estate, and energy.

Following internal disputes and general financial difficulties under the changed economic environment of the last year, Ariane de Rothschild resumed control of the company as CEO this March.

Rothschild helped Epstein buy some $1 million worth of items at auctions in 2014 and 2015. She also hired Epstein’s company, Southern Trust Co., for “risk analysis and the application and use of certain algorithms” for $25 million.

Epstein also introduced Rothschild to various other figures around him. For example, he scheduled a meeting between her and Joshua Cooper Ramo, a leading executive of the geopolitical consulting firm of Henry Kissinger and a member of the boards of FedEx and Starbucks.

Mortimer Zuckerman—Billionaire, U.S. News & World Report, Boston Properties

A Canadian American billionaire, Mortimer Zuckerman, helped found and formerly ran Boston Properties, a $21 billion real estate trust that owns significant downtown and commercial real estate throughout the US. He has owned U.S. News & World Report since 1984. The news company is known for its rankings such as “Best Colleges and Universities.” Zuckerman has over $2 billion in assets.

From left, billionaires Mortimer Zuckerman, Sergey Brin, and Michael Ovitz [AP Photo/Scott Roth, Evan Agostini, Evan Agostini]

Zuckerman met with Epstein over a dozen times between 2013 and 2017. It is unclear what the meetings were about. Their Manhattan townhouses were near each other in the elite Upper East Side neighborhood. Zuckerman has been subpoenaed as part of the lawsuits against JPMorgan Chase.

Lawrence Summers—Former US Treasury Secretary, former chief economic adviser to Obama, former president of Harvard

Lawrence Summers is one of the most important economic policymakers in the United States of the last two decades. He was the secretary of the treasury from 1999 to 2001 in the Clinton administration. In 2009 he became President Obama’s chief economic adviser, directing the National Economic Council. 

During this time, Obama orchestrated a massive bailout of the major banks and corporations and backed the Federal Reserve program of ultra-low interest rates that led to one of the largest transfers of wealth from the poor to the rich in American history. Summers was also advising Obama as he restructured the auto industry, which, among other things, reduced the pay of new autoworkers by half. Summers was also president of Harvard University from 2001 to 2006.

Summers held more than a dozen meetings and dinners with Epstein between 2013 and 2016, likely in New York at his townhouse. Records show Summers emailing Epstein for help with his wife’s fundraising. Summers’ wife, Elisa New, is a Harvard professor who runs a nonprofit that puts on the TV show Poetry in America. Epstein donated $110,000 to the nonprofit in 2016.

Larry Summers and then President Barack Obama in 2013. [Photo: Pete Souza/The White House]

The New York Times reported that Summers also attended social gatherings at Epstein’s mansion, including one in 2011 which included Jes Staley, the executive of JPMorgan Chase, as well as Bill Gates.

Reid Hoffman—Billionaire, LinkedIn

Reid Hoffman is a tech industry capitalist and billionaire known for starting LinkedIn, which he sold to Microsoft in 2016 for $26 billion. He has an estimated personal worth of $3 billion. Reid is also an influential policy figure as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Reid met with Epstein to help raise funds for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He visited Epstein’s island in the Caribbean for a weekend for the purpose of fundraising for MIT. The university confirmed that it instructed Hoffman to do so; it is unclear how many other interactions he and Epstein had.

Thomas Pritzker—Billionaire, Hyatt Hotels CEO

Thomas is a member of the Pritzker family, one of the richest families in the world, worth a total of $36.9 billion. He is the second wealthiest member of the family, with assets valued at $5.3 billion. Their wealth comes mainly from the Hyatt Hotel corporation, the fifth largest hotel corporation in the world, where Thomas Pritzker is CEO. The Pritzkers are major donors to the Democratic Party. Thomas’s cousin J.B. Pritzker is the current governor of Illinois. 

According to the Journal, Epstein “scheduled several events at his [Manhattan] townhouse with Mr. Pritzker.” It is unclear what these events were and who attended. Neither Hyatt nor Pritzker has issued a comment on it.

Bill Gates—Billionaire, Microsoft

Gates, the founder of Microsoft and once the world’s richest man, had significant ties to Epstein. Previously, the New York Times reported that Gates and Epstein began meeting at least as far back as 2011, when Gates attended a dinner party at Epstein’s that included Eva Anderson-Dubin and her daughter. 

The Times reported that their meetings continued after that: “Mr. Epstein spoke with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and JPMorgan Chase about a proposed multibillion-dollar charitable fund.” Epstein stood to gain substantial amounts of money in fees from this.

2011 photo taken at Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan mansion. From left: James E. Staley, at the time a senior JPMorgan executive; former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers; Epstein; Bill Gates, Microsoft’s co-founder; and Boris Nikolic, who was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s science adviser.

On September 8, 2014, Gates spent an entire six hours with Epstein attending meetings in Manhattan. However, by the end of the year, the Times reports, their relationship had soured. Gates Foundation officials seemed to believe that Epstein’s claims of what he could do for them were dubious.

According to the Journal, Barnaby Marsh, an academic and ex-executive for the Templeton Foundation, “Epstein convened people, including Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, to try to solve problems facing rich donors, such as how to make large gifts.” Marsh also told the Journal that Epstein stated he was managing Gates’ moneybut the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation disputes this. 

William Burns—Current director of the CIA

William Burns, the current director of the CIA, met with Epstein twice in 2014 as he was leaving the post of deputy secretary of state in the Obama administration. A CIA spokesperson said, “The Director did not know anything about him, other than he was introduced as an expert in the financial services sector and offered general advice on transition to the private sector. The Director does not recall any further contact, including receiving a ride to the airport. They had no relationship.”

Burns is a seasoned member of the US intelligence agencies and State Department. In 2008 he was promoted by then President George W. Bush to the position of Career Ambassador, the highest position in the US foreign servicesomewhat akin to being a four-star general. He was the ambassador to Russia from 2005 to 2008 and played a significant role in the US-NATO expansion eastward. In the Obama administration he ran the State Department day to day from 2011 to 2014, serving as deputy first to Hillary Clinton and then to John Kerry. It is hardly credible that someone so steeped in the world of the US intelligence agencies would “not know anything” about Epstein when they met.

CIA Director William J. Burns [Photo: Central Intelligence Agency]

Terje Rød-Larsen—Norwegian politician, International Peace Institute

Rød-Larsen was the key figure in the Oslo Accordsthe first agreements between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization. He is a Norwegian politician and diplomat.

Rød-Larsen visited Epstein’s townhouse frequently between 2013 and 2017. There were also plans for him to visit his island. Rød-Larsen received a $130,000 direct loan from Epstein on one occasion and Epstein funded Rød-Larsen’s foundation with a $650,000 donation. 

Epstein sought to cash in on various attempts to broker deals between the Palestinian Authority and Israel, thus his meetings with Rød-Larsen as well as Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime minister, and Noam Chomsky.

Ehud Barak—Former Israeli prime minister

Ehud Barak, Israeli prime minister from 1999 to 2001, was also the leader of the Labor Party. Barak scheduled over 30 meetings with Epstein in the time covered by the Journal’s investigation. They also flew together on Epstein’s private plane and visited his Palm Beach mansion together.

“I flew only twice on his airplane, together with my wife and Israeli security detail,” according to Barak. “In retrospect, [Epstein] seemed to be a terrible version of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, but at the time seemed to be an intelligent person, socially well connected.”

Joshua Cooper Ramo—Vice chairman, Kissinger Associates

Joshua Cooper Ramo was an executive at Kissinger Associates, the New York-based geopolitical consulting firm founded by the former secretary state and war criminal. It technically belongs to the U.S.-Russia Business Council, a trade organization consisting of ExxonMobil, JPMorgan Chase, Pfizer and other major corporations.

Purportedly, Ramo and Epstein met over a dozen times between 2013 and 2017. It is unclear what they met about.

* * * * *  

The names here are just a snapshot of a segment of Epstein’s life. His schedule was remarkable, but probably not all that unique. The financial oligarchy regularly carouses and convenes, conducting business in between lavish lunch dates and tropical getaways. Epstein may have been exceptionally brazen in his trafficking of teenage girls for sex, but the overall culture of indulgence and excess is a general feature of this layer.

This minuscule segment of the global population provides the day-to-day, sometimes minute-by-minute, direction of the global economy. They are continually engaged in making deals involving tens and hundreds of millions of dollars, even billions, for their own personal gain. All global economic and financial life is effectively subordinated to their acquisitive impulses. 

Epstein latched himself like a parasite to these proceedings, making himself useful as a conductor and fixer, and providing how-to advice for tax evasion.

It should be obvious why Epstein died suddenly four years ago, once he fell into the clutches of the US legal system. He knew too much about what really goes on in the financial oligarchy. In offering orgies and other crimes as part of his career as a financial dealmaker, he had hard evidence of the sordid lifestyles of dozens of extremely powerful people.

At the end of the Roman Empire, the slave-owning elite retreated to their lavish villas in Tuscany and France. Hoping to avoid the general disintegration of urban life, they plunged their heads into barrels of wine, living out fantasies in their villas.

But for all their excess, these ancient aristocrats could not hold a candle to the degree of debauchery achieved by the modern-day financial aristocracy. Surrounded on all sides by impossible conditions—economic decline, internecine political warfare and growing mass discontent—they participate in spectacles of wealth and excess that would outrage their modern-day slaves and provoke unstoppable anger, and thus are better left a secret.

Epstein was, at the end of the day, a facilitator, a bit player, not a major actor in this world. His crimes, however grotesque, were a distilled expression of the far broader exploitation this layer oversees and from which it profits.

Sweden holds largest military exercise in 30 years

Bran Karlsson


“Sweden is at war,” provocatively states the Swedish Armed Forces in one of their announcements for Aurora 23 – Sweden’s largest military exercise since the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

In this photo provided by the Swedish Armed Forces on Aug. 25, 2020, troops prepare in the Baltic Sea region. [AP Photo/Joel Thungren/Swedish Armed Forces]

Aurora 23 began April 17; however, its operations have steadily intensified over the last week, building up to its close today on May 11.

Twenty-six thousand troops are involved in the operation, the largest show of military force in Sweden since 1989, according to the government.

Fourteen other countries have also joined the exercises. While the largest forces have come from the main NATO countries, the United States, UK, Germany, France, and Poland, it is notable that a delegation of soldiers and officers from Ukraine have also participated. 

Finland, which joined the US-led military alliance last month, sent 1,000 troops. Their contingent of American made F-18 fighters played a significant role in the air exercises preparing for war around the Baltic Sea. All the smaller Baltic states located on or near Russia’s border, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, are also participating.

The exercise is being held amid a major escalation in the NATO-Russia war centered in Ukraine.

On Tuesday it was revealed that Britain is preparing to send long-range missiles to Ukraine that would be capable of striking Crimea. The delivery by Britain will likely be followed by other such weapons from the United States and the other NATO powers, potentially including F-16 fighter jets.

The delivery of such offensive weaponry – which US President Biden previously ruled out as impossible, equating it to World War III in March, 2022 – threatens to further escalate the war. It is being given explicitly with the aim of targeting the Crimea – where Russia’s Black Sea naval base has been located in Sevastopol since 1772.

Meanwhile, the United States is directing the Ukrainian armed forces to begin a new counter-offensive against Russia. Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian and Russian soldiers have died so far from the fighting, according to leaked Pentagon documents from April.

The Aurora war games in Sweden involve a significant focus on operations in and around the Baltic Sea, including various tactical scenarios involving Gotland, the heavily fortified Swedish island in the Baltic. Gotland served as a major Cold War base for the Swedish military, and is located just 300 kilometres from the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad. British Royal Marine commandos have been deployed as part of the exercise, operating out of the amphibious assault flagship HMS Albion. 

The exercises are happening simultaneously with the smaller Formidable Shield 23 – a Scottish and Norwegian-led exercise of air, missile, and naval capabilities in the North Sea and its surrounding coastline. Norway has witnessed a major escalation of American and British troop activities over recent months, especially in its far north where major military exercises were held in March.

Sweden has yet to officially join NATO – being temporarily blocked by the Turkish and Hungarian governments – although it has been officially agreed upon in the Swedish parliament. However, Sweden effectively operates already as a member of NATO, and has long been a close intelligence and military ally of the United States.

The Swedish exercises were meant to demonstrate to Russia this pre-existing military integration with NATO and prepare further for war. As Colonel Anna Siverstig – commander of the Swedish Air Force – stated, “our air force interoperability with NATO is already well established, and this exercise will improve it further.”

The Aurora 23 military exercises have been protested by hundreds of people around Sweden.

In Stockholm, a demonstration was held in April at the beginning of the exercise – with placards reading “NATO’s war will get our children killed for a dollar.” Several hundred protesters also demonstrated in Gothenburg.

The military exercises come amid a deepening cost of living crisis facing the Swedish working class as well as ongoing efforts by the far-right to scapegoat immigrants for the country’s worsening conditions.

Last year Sweden announced it would increase its military budget by 64 percent over five years. Over the past three decades, governments led by the social Democrats and right-wing Moderates have slashed social spending and implemented sweeping privatisations, going a long way to destroy the country’s once much-vaunted social welfare system.

In fact, this year it was revealed that Sweden now has the highest rate of inequality since records began in the 1970s. While Ferraris, Porches and Teslas are common sights in the country’s up-scale neighborhoods, large sections of the population face a cost-of-living crisis that has placed the working class on edge.

In December 2022, inflation rose to a record high of 12.4 percent year-on-year. High energy and food prices only further exacerbate one of the main problems, high rents. 

The Swedish economy is in a recession that is “expected to last until 2025,” according to the Ministry of Finance. It is the only country in Europe in recession.

The news agency Reuters explained, “After years of ultra-low borrowing costs, the pandemic and the Ukraine war have served up a toxic cocktail of high inflation and rapidly rising interest rates to many countries… But in Sweden, the structural problems rooted in its housing market are magnifying the effects.”

Sweden has one of the highest debt levels in the entirety of the European Union – about 200 percent of disposable income per person. Meanwhile, almost two-thirds of Swedish mortgagees have floating rates, meaning they have now increased as central banks internationally have sharply hiked interest rates over the past year.

The right-wing Moderate party-led government, which relies on the support of the fascistic Sweden Democrats for its parliamentary majority, has sought to blame the country’s ills on desperate migrants who fled to Sweden in the 2010’s to escape war and destitution in the Middle East and Africa.

The right-wing ruling coalition just doubled the mandatory income of all job-seeking immigrants coming to Sweden – a move that is expected to bar at least 30 percent of current migrants to Sweden who move with a job in-hand.

Mass protests erupt across Pakistan after military seizes opposition leader Imran Khan

Keith Jones


Pakistani authorities deployed troops to cities across the country Wednesday, amid a second day of mass protests against the violent arrest and detention of former Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Khan was seized by Army Rangers outfitted in riot gear, when he showed up for a court appearance Tuesday, then declared to be under arrest in a separate corruption case.

Khan’s detention immediately triggered mass protests across the country, led by supporters of his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) or Movement for Justice.

One protester was killed in Quetta on Tuesday and at least four more Wednesday in Peshawar.

Supporters of Pakistan's former Prime Minister Imran Khan smash a police vehicle during a protest against the arrest of their leader, in Peshawar, Pakistan, Wednesday, May 10, 2023. [AP Photo/Muhammad Sajjad]

In addition to deploying the military to the capital Islamabad and three of Pakistan’s four provinces, Punjab, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, the government has suspended mobile data services across the country. This effectively cuts off the vast majority of the population—at 220 million people, Pakistan is the fifth most populous in the world—from access to the internet and social media, so as to suppress information about the protests and the extent of the state repression.

In both Islamabad and Punjab, Pakistan’s most populous province and the traditional political stronghold of the incumbent prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif and his Muslim League (Nawaz), the government has imposed “Section 144” of the Criminal Code, thereby banning any gathering of more than four people and empowering security forces to violently repress protests at will.

At least 1,400 people have been arrested just in Punjab, and hundreds more elsewhere.

The police-military crackdown has thus far failed to quell the protests, which not only target the current coalition government, but also have given voice to mass popular anger against the Pakistani military brass, the backbone of the capitalist state.

“The protests have escalated not just in the federal capital, but also in other parts of the country,” reported Al Jazeera correspondent Osama Bin Javaid around 2 p.m. Wednesday, Pakistan time. “We are hearing reports that at least seven PTI supporters have been killed. We have been seeing pictures of protesters opening fire on security forces and the security forces retaliating.”

At a cabinet meeting Wednesday, Prime Minister Sharif called for protesters accused of involvement in arson and violence to be charged under the country’s draconian, anti-democratic “anti-terrorism” laws. Also yesterday, Khan, who was the country’s prime minister only 13 months ago, appeared at a police headquarters that had been temporarily transformed into a court. He denied the charges against him and expressed concern for his personal safety. But the court brushed all this aside and ordered him held for questioning for eight days.

After a mass movement of workers and rural masses in April-July 2022 chased Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapakse from power, the Pakistani ruling class fears that these protests could trigger a far broader movement in the working class.

For masses of people, including broad swathes of the middle class, the economic situation is increasingly unbearable. Annual inflation now exceeds 35 percent, and the IMF is demanding harsh austerity and privatization measures. As Pakistan teeters on the brink of state bankrutpcy, manufacturers are slashing production because they cannot get dollars to pay for imported parts and raw materials. This further drives up mass joblessness.

To convince the IMF to pay a $1.1 billion tranche of a bailout package first negotiated by Khan, the current Pakistani government is further slashing subsidies. However, despite months of wrangling the IMF has yet to provide the funds. Washington, which dominates the IMF, is demanding geopolitical concessions from Islamabad, including secret arms and munitions shipments to Ukraine, as a precondition for disbursing the funds.

Khan is a right-wing Islamic populist, whose political rise, including his election in 2018, was facilitated by support from the military. Once in office, he and his PTI quickly abandoned their demagogic promises of an “Islamic welfare state” and imposed arguably the most savage IMF structural adjustment program in the country’s history.

However, the military top brass and much of the ruling class soured on Khan after he backtracked, in the face of mass popular anger, on imposing IMF-demanded energy price increases in the first months of 2022. Khan also damaged Islamabad’s already frayed relations with Washington by signaling his willingness to seek closer ties with Moscow in the first weeks of the NATO-instigated Ukraine war.

Since he was ousted as prime minister 13 months ago in a parliamentary regime-change operation orchestrated by the military and encouraged by Washington, Khan has rallied popular support by demagogically casting himself as an opponent of IMF austerity, Washington’s bullying and the machinations of the military.

The PTI’s principal base of popular support is in the urban middle class. Nevertheless, there is great apprehension in ruling circles, that amid acute economic distress, Khan’s calls for elections could create fissures through which the long-suppressed anger and opposition of the masses of workers and toilers could erupt.  

Especially concerning for these elite layers is the destabilizing impact of Kahn’s attacks on the military brass—the bulwark of the Pakistani capitalist state and the linchpin of the reactionary decades-long alliance between the Pakistani bourgeoisie and US imperialism.  

Relations between the Pakistani military and government, on the one hand, and Khan on the other have become ever more fraught in recent months. The decision to seize Khan at the courthouse on Tuesday was apparently triggered by Khan’s decision to again accuse a top military intelligence officer, Major General Faisal Naseer, of being responsible for an assassination attempt last November that left him wounded.

In an editorial Wednesday, Pakistan’s leading English-language daily, the Dawn, expressed grave concern that the military and government’s actions are accelerating the emergence of deep opposition in the working class to the Pakistani capitalist state. “Removing Mr. Khan from the picture solves nothing,” declared the Dawn. “Instead, as the protests yesterday showed, arresting him may have deeply fractured the historic compact between the people and the country’s armed forces.” It continued:

Violence and confrontation are never an answer to political challenges, especially not when the economy is on the ventilator and the people looking to vent their anger over the daily despair that now defines their lives.

The provocation of Mr Khan’s arrest has only led the government and establishment deeper into controversy and will engender even greater public distrust in their policies. This is the last thing the country needs, teetering as it is on the verge of an all-out default. … As long as elections continue to be postponed and the public silenced, continued confrontation will only drive even more wedges between the people and the state.

The military is also in political crisis. On Wednesday it issued a statement denouncing May 9 as a “black day,” in which “attacks were perpetrated on the army’s properties and installations while anti-army slogans were raised.”

“Any further attack,” vowed the statement, “on the army, including all law enforcement agencies, military and state installations and properties will be retaliated severely against the group that wants to push Pakistan into a civil war and has repeatedly attacked them.”

Pakistan’s workers and toilers must oppose the brutal crackdown against the protests. Undoubtedly, the military—which has directly ruled Pakistan with Washington’s support for almost half of the country’s history—is seeking to use the current crisis to expand its repressive reach and political power.

 Above all, the confluence of political, economic and geopolitical crisis underscores the urgency of the working class intervening as an independent political force, rallying the rural toilers behind it, in opposition to imperialism and all factions of the Pakistani bourgeoisie and their political representatives.

An ex-cricket star turned Islamist politician, Imran Khan is a fraud, who during his political career has repeatedly criticized the US, the IMF and military one day only to embrace them the next. He won government in 2018 as an outsider, then immediately promoted a cabal of former members of ex-dictator General Pervez Musharraf’s government to his own. Today, he cries foul over the actions of the National Accountability Bureau, the politically manipulated “anti-corruption” agency. However, when in power he similarly used it to jail and silence his political rivals.  

As for the PPP, the dynastic party led by the Bhutto family and that in an earlier period postured as “left,” for decades, it has done the IMF’s bidding and courted Washington. This included trying to help George W. Bush provide a “democratic” face-lift to Musharraf’s foundering dictatorial regime, then greenlighting Obama’s drone war, which devastated parts of Pakistan’s northwest starting in 2009.

Student debt to soar in Australia as indexation reaches ten-year-high

Sofia Devetzi


Three million university graduates will see their student debt soar this year, as the Australian government pockets a windfall from high indexation. Student debt is set to rise by almost $5 billion from June, further compounding the immense cost of living and housing pressures already felt by young people.

Students at the University of Adelaide [Photo: University of Adelaide]

In Australia, the federal government lends students up to $109,206 to pay for tuition fees (or even more for those studying degrees such as medicine, dentistry or aviation) in a scheme known as the Higher Education Loan Program (HELP). Graduates repay the debt gradually through the taxation system once they earn $48,361 per year—just above the minimum wage—taking a decade, on average, to repay the full amount.

While student loans do not technically accrue interest, the outstanding debt is indexed to inflation on June 1 each year. As inflation has increased, so has indexation, climbing from 0.6 per cent in 2021 to a record 3.9 per cent in 2022. This year, students and graduates will be hit with an indexation of 7.1 percent.

Those with an average outstanding student debt of $24,770 face an increase of $1,759. This means that graduates with taxable income of less than $62,739, will see their debt balance rise, despite making the compulsory repayments.

One arts/law graduate, Zoe, spoke with the Guardian about the $123,000 student debt incurred from her studies. That debt is set to rise by about $9000 next month, meaning that the $10,000 she is estimated to pay back this year—the second biggest expenditure in her life after rent—will scarcely make a dent. In the past five years of working, she has paid off more than $15,000 of her debt, but the total has only reduced by about $4,000.

“It’s a bitter pill to swallow,” she said. “There doesn’t seem to be an end. My rent went up $80 a week in March and everything is more expensive… wages don’t keep up with indexation, why do our debts?”

This is a sentiment echoed across age groups and occupations. As Gemma McWhirter, a 52-year-old school teacher, told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation: “Paying mine off was a case of two steps forward, one step back. It took me 27 years to get rid of the debt.”

While graduates see their loan increase with inflation each year, the government accesses the money to fund the loans at the Reserve Bank cash rate, which currently sits at 3.6 per cent. This discrepancy—with inflation adding roughly double that rate to debt amounts—means that the government will actually profit off student debt, pocketing up to $2.5 billion.

The Labor government has rebuked calls to freeze indexation on student loans this year, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers arguing that the student debt program is fair.

“I understand and obviously listen respectfully when student unions and others raise their concerns,” he said. “But this is an ordinary indexation and in terms of payments and pressure on people, the repayments go up when your salary goes up… That is how the system works.”

Chalmers also touted the fact that graduates only begin to pay back their debt after they earn a certain amount of money, and said that “the arrangements for HECS [the original name of the program] and for university loans and education loans have been unchanged by this government.”

But when Chalmers says Labor has left HECS settings unchanged, he is also referring to the recent measures by the Coalition government that dropped the minimum repayment threshold from $56,000 to $52,000, and then again to less than $46,000. Despite professed objections to this while in opposition, now, once in government, Labor has refused to restore the threshold from this historical low point.

Labor’s attack on tertiary education is not a new phenomenon. It was the Hawke-Keating Labor government that abolished free university tuition and introduced the HECS-HELP scheme in 1989. Since then, tuition fees have only been ratcheted upwards, under the auspices of Labor and Liberal-National Coalition governments alike.

The Labor government of 2007 to 2013 imposed an “education revolution” which forced universities to compete for enrolments while cutting funding by $3 billion in 2012‒13, driving them to become increasingly dependent on full-fee paying international students. That laid the basis for further cuts by the subsequent Coalition governments—the most recent of which exploited the COVID pandemic to eviscerate university jobs and courses, citing the loss of international revenue.

Last year, both major parties marched in lockstep in targeting higher education for steep cuts, with the then-opposition Labor Party helping the Coalition government push its budget through parliament within 24 hours. This will see $3 billion sliced off universities from the 2017‒18 to 2025‒26 period.

It seems that Labor will also leave the Coalition’s notorious “Job Ready Graduates” scheme intact, which massively shifted the cost of delivering a university education from the government and onto students. Course fees for humanities degrees increased 113 percent in an attempt to dissuade students from studying subjects such as history, politics or philosophy—and loading them with massive debt if they chose to do so.

The soaring student debt comes at a time when young people are already facing a crisis in the cost of living and a decrease in real wages. School-leavers struggling with high rent and food costs are increasingly being compelled to drop out of their degrees, or else are drastically cutting back time spent studying to devote more hours to paid employment.

Cost-of-living pressures are also locking people out of postgraduate study, with the minimum PhD stipend sitting at less than $30,000 a year, below most measures of the poverty line.

Outstanding HECS debt lowers a person’s borrowing capacity when they try to take out a home loan, as it is counted like any other financial liability. By increasing the amount of student debt that current and former students acquire, the government is further locking young people out from the housing market.

Speaking to the SBS, student and casual worker Ngaire said that knowing she has so much debt accruing makes owning a home or buying a car seem “really unreachable.” She said having another layer added to the cost of living “makes me feel a lot of dread.” “And I feel a lot of pressure now to go into a job where I can start paying off my HECS debt and get it done quicker.”

The situation facing students in Australia is the result of tertiary education becoming increasingly commodified. As seen most starkly in reforms such as the “Job Ready Graduates” scheme, the sector must serve the profit interests of employers and the capitalist class. The corporatisation of universities and degradation of academic qualities mean that the least profitable aspects are either underfunded or discarded outright, as universities hunt for more savings. And, perversely, the cost of degrees continues to grow while the value of those degrees decrease.

The attacks on students form part of a broader austerity offensive, being taken forward by the federal Labor government, including through its cost-cutting austerity budget. While there are billions of dollars for tax breaks for the wealthy and handouts to the corporations, and billions more for the military in preparation for war, essential services, such as health and education are being slashed.