1 Feb 2024

Polyamory: Sex, Love and the Family

David Rosen




The picture shows three people in a polyamorous relationship. It was taken within a research project at the University of Vienna titling “Polyamory in media, social and identity perspective” – CC BY-SA 4.0

Since the nation’s founding, individuals, religious groups and radical communities have challenged conventional morality.  They have contested the dominant form of monogamous, heterosexual sexuality and the patriarchal nuclear family.

In 2021, only 18 percent – or 23 million — of U.S. households were “nuclear families” with a married couple and children.  This is a significant drop from nearly 60 percent during the 1970s.  According to one estimate, 19 percent of Americans have been involved in sexual threesomes and in 2019 “polyamory” was practiced by 4 to 5 percent of Americans.  In addition, 20 percent have attempted some kind of ethical non-monogamy relationship.  The term “polyamory” links the Greek poly to the Latin amor becoming “many loves,” and describes a variety of romantic or intimate non-monogamous relationships.

Traditional morality has long been challenged.  Often forgotten, between 1852 to 1890, about 20 to 30 percent of Mormon families, members of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint, practiced a form of polygamy they called “plural marriage.”  In addition, for much of the 19th century, “free love” advocates and other sexual radicals battled with what was known as the “social purity” movement over sex and the nature of the family.

Among the most notable free love communities of the pre-Civil War era were: New Harmony, a secular utopian community in Harmonie, IN, founded by Robert Owen; the Brook Farm community in West Roxbury, MA, founded by George Ripley; the Oneida community in NY founded by John Humphrey Noyes; and the interracial Nashoba community in eastern Tennessee founded by Frances Wright, her sister, Camilla, and Robert Dale Owen.

A second wave that challenged traditional family values emerged during the 1920s. This threat was represented by the “new woman” who symbolized the modernization that threatened social purists. And the Prohibition-era speakeasy was the nexus of this new erotic experience.

Having a drink at a speakeasy was an act of transgression: One was committing a crime. When one entered a speak, one crossed the line between the socially acceptable and the illegal and, for many, the immoral. Prohibition also gave rise to the “sex circus,” infamous venues of alcohol consumption and sexual liaison, be it heterosexual and/or homosexual erotic indulgence.

The 1960s forged a counterculture that challenged – and changed! — American values. It was the decade characterized by the oral contraceptive pill, the mini skirt, rock-&-roll, long hair and the growing use of marijuana, LSD and other “psychedelic” drugs. It sparked a “sexual revolution” involving premarital sex and “free love,” often involving mate swapping, group sex and homoeroticism.

It saw the Sexual Freedom League host orgies at a home in Berkley, CA. One estimate found that between September 1966 and the League’s final 1967 Christmas Eve party, over 1,200 people attended their orgies. A second example of this insurgent sexuality was the Sandstone Retreat. Founded by John and Barbara Williamson in 1969, it was located in the hills of Topanga Canyon, just north of Los Angles. It was a unique experiment in erotic exploration that drew a fairly wide and often distinguished following among “free love” advocates.

By the 1970s, with the passage of Civil Rights legislation, the end of the Vietnam War, the rise of the new Christian right represented by Phyllis Schlafly’s defeat of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), the ‘60s counterculture dissipated. However, its challenge to traditional monogamous sex and marriage persisted among the “polyamorous.”

Polyamory emerged in New York in the 1950s when John Peltz “Bro Jud” Presmont formed the polyamorous religious community, Kerista. It embodied the notion of “polyfidelity,” non-monogamous romantic relations among equal partners. During the 1960s, Kerista-inspired storefronts and communal houses operated in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and the San Francisco Bay Area. It drew admiration from Allen Ginsberg, among others.

Kerista groups consisted of up to twenty-four people dubbed “best friend identity clusters” (B.F.I.C.); discouraged romantic attachment and possessiveness; and two people slept together in a shared bed, but on a rotational sleeping schedule, insuring equal bonding time among B.F.I.C. members of the opposite sex.

Other key figures of the evolving polyamory movement included Oberon (Timothy) Zell (aka Otter G’Zell and Zell-Ravenheart) who founded the Church of All Worlds (CAW), a neo-Pagan group, and the publication, Green Eggs, that promoted polygamous relationships based on the notion of personal divinity. Fred Adams established Feraferi (i.e., “Celebrate Wildness”), a neo-Pagan community that began in Southern California into Goddess worship. In time, CAW partnered with Feraferi to form the Council of Themis and, by the late-70s, some thirty groups were members.

Two women who kept the movement’s spirit alive over the last few decades are Ryam Nearing and Deborah “Taj” Anapol.  Nearing lived outside of Eugene, OR, with her two “husbands.” In ’86, she established Polyfidelitous Educational Productions, a nonprofit group that hosts a conference (i.e., pepcon), “a networking weekend filled with workshops, films, games, dancing, and discussion groups.”  Anapol was a “polyamorous clinical psychologist,” who advocated of erotic spirituality. She co-founded (with Nearing) the magazine, Loving More in 1994. She is the author of Polymore: The New Love Without Limits (1997) and Polyamory in the 21st Century (2010), among other works.

Polyamory has gotten a good deal a media attention, including print and TV/online stories.  To learn more about the polyamory movement, check out The Ethical Slut by Dossie Easton and Janet W. Hardy (1997), a sex-positive guide colloquially known as “the poly bible”; Elizabeth Sheff‘s The Polyamorists Next Door (2023); and Christopher Gleason, American Poly: A History (2023).

Climate crisis driving extreme drought in the Amazon River Basin

Mark Wilson


South America’s Amazon River Basin is currently undergoing a severe drought, with water levels in the river lower than they have been in the past 120 years.

A boat travels through a section of the Amazon River affected by a severe drought in the state of Amazonas, near Manacapuru, Brazil, Sept. 27, 2023. [AP Photo/Edmar Barros]

An international team of scientists has found that the drought has been massively exacerbated by climate change. This has worldwide implications. As their report states: “The river basin contains the largest rainforest in the world, making it a global hotspot of biodiversity and a key part of the global hydrological and carbon cycle.”

The basin spans eight South American countries, including Brazil, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia, as well as the territory of French Guiana. Some 30 million people live in the basin and depend upon it for agriculture and freshwater. With high levels of poverty in the region, they are especially susceptible to serious impacts on their access to food, water, power and livelihoods.

The new study was published by the World Weather Attribution (WWA), which specialises in analysing the causality between climate change and extreme weather events. Although climate change has been linked as a factor in increasing the likelihood and severity of such extreme events, additional research is required to link any specific extreme weather event to climate change. The WWA conducts research for this purpose.

The recent report is titled “Climate change, not El Niño, main driver of exceptional drought in highly vulnerable Amazon River Basin.” It shows that climate change has drastically increased the severity of the current drought.

The US Drought Monitor classifies droughts from level 0 to level 4. The report demonstrates that without the effects of climate change the drought would likely have been a level 2 (severe). Instead, the extraordinary levels of dryness, which are almost entirely due to increased global temperatures, have exacerbated this drought to a level 4 (exceptional). This level of severity corresponds to a 1 in 50-year event. The analysis indicates that the drought “would have been extremely rare in a cooler climate.”

The report’s authors stress that climate change was the primary cause behind the exceptional severity of this drought, rather than El Niño. El Niño refers to the warm phase of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation cycle and has been associated with droughts in the Amazon basin before. Although El Niño and global warming had the same effect on reducing the amount of precipitation in the region, it was the increase of global temperatures caused by fossil fuel emissions that are almost entirely responsible for the dry conditions that led to this disaster, directly affecting millions of people.

In order to determine the extent to which climate change influenced this drought, the researchers used the methodology associated with the relatively new field of attribution science. This involves collecting decades of observational data on precipitation in the region and constructing models that accurately simulate the historical data. Then the scientists can alter the models to create a baseline for an Earth that had not experienced global warming. The statistical comparison between the two scenarios is used to determine how much more likely an extreme weather event is to occur due to climate change. This methodology has been well tested and peer reviewed. Attribution studies such as this are among the most rapidly expanding branches of climate science.

This exceptionally severe drought in the Amazon basin will have dire consequences on human health, the report notes. Droughts reduce agricultural productivity, significantly driving up food prices and causing deaths from malnutrition. In particular, children who experience malnutrition are more susceptible to infectious diseases.

Transportation has also been impacted, as the low water levels have reduced the amount of goods that can be transported into Brazil via the river by 60 percent. Access to food and medical supplies for people in the basin has been drastically affected.

Countries around the basin heavily rely on the river for energy production via hydropower. Brazil and Colombia rely on hydropower for around 80 percent of their electricity. Dams in Brazil and Venezuela are unable to operate in severe droughts such as this one.

An especially perverse outcome of this crisis is that as hydropower becomes less reliable during climate change driven-droughts, countries such as Peru are turning to fossil fuel sources for their energy needs, further contributing to the climate crisis that caused the problem in the first place.

The impacts of the drought have been worsened due to various practises that have decreased the moisture retention capacity of the land, such as deforestation, fires, and cattle ranching. The far-right Brazilian government of Jair Bolsonaro from 2019–2022 oversaw record levels of Amazon deforestation, due to the dismantling of environmental protection measures. The primary driver of this deforestation was to make room for cattle ranches. Scientists have stated there is clear evidence that this deforestation has been linked to increased forest fires in the Amazon.

The Amazon basin is far from the only region in the world to face threats from climate-induced weather disasters. The WWA has linked a number of other extreme weather events directly to the effects of climate change.

One such event was the 2021 western North American heat wave, which claimed the lives of at least 900 people, and possibly up to 1,400 people. The WWA noted that the event would have been “virtually impossible” without global warming, and went on to warn that “an event like this—currently estimated to occur only once every 1,000 years, would occur roughly every 5 to 10 years in that future world with 2°C of global warming.”

These catastrophes will only be the beginning unless rapid action is taken to mitigate future climate change. Currently the Earth has warmed a little over 1 degree Celsius since pre-industrial times, but more frequent and severe disasters will be observed the more this figure increases.

In the Amazon basin alone, the analysis produced by the WWA estimates that droughts similar in intensity to the one being currently observed will become 3–4 times more frequent than now if global warming reaches 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

Similar impacts will be felt across the rest of the world. The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report published in 2022 estimated that between 800 million and 3 billion people around the world are projected to experience water scarcity at 2 degrees of warming.

Droughts, however, are far from the only danger facing humanity in a 2-degree warmed world. Threats from climate change include heat waves, wildfires, floodings, rising sea levels, crop failures, and increased risk of conflict over scarce resources, among others.

A research paper published in 2023 stated that if the world is warmed by 2 or more degrees by the end of the 21st century, it will likely result in roughly 1 billion human deaths. The authors of that study compared these deaths with involuntary or negligent manslaughter and noted that the impacts would largely be felt by the poorest people in the world due to the actions of a wealthy minority.

These stark warnings published by scientists have gone unheeded by the ruling classes. The 2022 IPCC report stated that limiting global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius involves “rapid and deep and, in most cases, immediate greenhouse gas emissions reductions in all sectors this decade.” Despite this, a 2022 analysis conducted by Concordia University scientists from Canada found that global climate policies in place would not even limit warming to less than 3 degrees.

Given the presence of thousands of fossil fuel lobbyists at the recent COP28 conference, the link between big fossil fuel companies and governments that are supposedly devoted to mitigate change is as exposed as ever. Oil, coal and gas industries continue to collectively funnel billions of dollars to political parties around the world, which in turn approve fossil fuel projects that continue to pump carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Current greenhouse gas emissions are putting Earth on track for a 3-degree Celsius warming, twice as much as the current benchmark regarded as a “point of no return.” Yet, the summit resolution, calling for “transitioning away from fossil fuels” to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, actually allows every capitalist government to continue to produce and use fossil fuels in whatever manner they please.

Republicans advance articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Mayorkas

Jacob Crosse & Barry Grey


In an 18-15 party line vote early Wednesday morning, Republicans on the House Homeland Security Committee advanced two articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testifies before the House Judiciary Committee, on Capitol Hill, Thursday, April 28, 2022, in Washington. [AP Photo/Evan Vucci]

The impeachment articles accuse Mayorkas of “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” and “breaching the public trust.” The first charge is based on the claim that Mayorkas is deliberately refusing to enforce existing laws to halt the flow of refugees into the US from Mexico. The second is based on the assertion that he has lied to Congress and the American people.

The partisan impeachment drive, if successful, would mark the first impeachment of a Cabinet secretary in nearly 150 years. The last impeachment of a Cabinet official took place in 1876 against Secretary of War William Belknap on charges of corruption. Belknap resigned before he was acquitted by the Senate.

Should Mayorkas be impeached by the Republican-controlled House, there is virtually no chance of him being convicted and removed from office by the Democratic-controlled Senate. That, however, does not negate the significance of Wednesday’s vote.

The move to impeach Mayorkas by the Republicans is an expression of the breakdown of bourgeois democratic norms and another sign that the American constitutional order is collapsing. It both underscores and intensifies the explosive crisis-ridden conditions under which the 2024 elections in the US are taking place.

Nothing has been resolved since then-President Donald Trump headed up a nearly successful fascist attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 to block the certification of Biden’s victory and maintain himself in power as president-dictator. Far from it. The coup-leader Trump is now the likely Republican candidate in what is shaping up as a rematch with Biden, who is overseeing the Israeli genocide in Gaza and a rapidly expanding war in the Middle East, along with an escalating war against Russia in Ukraine.

With a majority of voters telling pollsters they are disgusted by the choice between two despised politicians, moves are underway to exclude Trump from the ballot in some Democratic-controlled states and Republican-controlled states are defending Texas’ usurpation of federal authority over the US-Mexico border.

Trump and the bulk of the Republican leadership are promoting the narrative that the increased flow of migrants across the southern border is a foreign “invasion,” and both Mayorkas and his boss Biden are enabling the invaders by handcuffing the US border police and undermining US sovereignty. The implication, stated more or less openly, is that Biden and the Democrats are traitors, in cahoots with America’s enemies and Mexican drug cartels, which are using illegal “aliens” to flood the US with fentanyl.

Trump doubling down on his Nazi agitation against immigrants in a December 16, 2023 Truth social media post. [Photo: Donald Trump]

This fascistic narrative is supplemented by the antisemitic and xenophobic “Great Replacement Theory”—promoted by both top Republican officials and the head of the US Border Patrol union—which claims that the Democrats are flooding the country with aliens to undercut white Americans and permanently shift political power to the “globalist” Democratic Party.

The Republican Party, dominated by Trump, is unabashedly using impeachment, a procedure reserved under the Constitution for officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” such as treason or bribery, for partisan political ends.

The drive to impeach Mayorkas is an extension of Trump’s xenophobic election campaign, centered on anti-immigrant chauvinism. The response of Biden and the Democrats is to adopt in all essentials the anti-immigrant program of the Republicans.

Wednesday’s vote by the House Homeland Security Committee on articles of impeachment against Mayorkas came in the midst of negotiations in the Senate between the White House and leading Senate Republicans on a bipartisan border deal, as part of Republican support in the Senate for Biden’s $110 billion supplemental funding request, which includes $60 billion for Ukraine’s war against Russia. The request would also provide $14 billion in military aid to Israel, in the midst of the Zionist regime’s genocide in Gaza, billions more in military aid to Taiwan and other US allies in the Indo-Pacific directed against China and $14 billion to further militarize the US-Mexico border.

There is virtually no limit to the anti-democratic measures Biden and the Democrats are prepared to accept in return for funding of the war in Ukraine, the overriding concern of the Biden administration. This was made explicit in a statement issued by the White House last Friday.

In the statement, Biden pledged to “shut down the border” should Republicans grant him new authorities under the bipartisan border agreement being finalized in the Senate. While leading Senate Republicans are praising the deal, calling it the most restrictive border policy in decades, Trump has denounced it and demanded that it be rejected by the Republican-controlled House. He has made no bones about the fact that he wants no deal on the border with Biden, whatever the consequences for the Ukraine military, because he wants to use the “alien invasion” as the central issue in his election campaign.

House Republicans, including the fascistic House Speaker Mike Johnson, have declared any Senate bill “dead on arrival” in the lower legislative chamber. A House impeachment of Mayorkas, followed by a Senate trial in the midst of the election campaign, is part of the propaganda drive mapped out by the GOP and its faction of the ruling class.

Ahead of the House Homeland Security Committee hearing, which began Tuesday morning and dragged on for 15 hours, Speaker Johnson reiterated his support for the impeachment of Mayorkas and pledged to hold an impeachment vote by the full House as soon as possible. Johnson claimed that Mayorkas “willfully undermined American laws, made false statements and handicapped law enforcement.”

Rep. Elise Stefanik called the impeachment of Mayorkas “long overdue.” Stefanik has spearheaded the witch-hunt against university presidents for insufficiently clamping down on anti-genocide and pro-Palestinian protests. She has slandered students and faculty opposed to Israel’s fascist government of antisemitism.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican-Louisiana, speaks during a press conference with Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, Republican-New York at the Capitol in Washington on Tuesday, November 7, 2023. [AP Photo/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades]

This did not prevent her from spewing Great Replacement Theory dogma on the floor of the House. Stefanik claimed that Mayorkas, the son of a Cuban Jew, was “responsible” for the “devastation and destruction” of “countless American families” by allowing a “full fledged invasion” of “illegal immigrants pouring across our borders.”

Despite the overwhelming support for impeachment among House Republicans, the result of a floor vote remains uncertain due to the very slim Republican majority in the chamber. Two GOP defections would likely doom the impeachment bill to defeat.

Throughout the marathon House Homeland Security Committee hearing, Democrats quoted a letter issued by Mayorkas the day before. In the letter, Mayorkas noted that since May 12, 2023, his department had “removed or returned more than 500,000 individuals,” and that “total removals since mid-May 2023 exceed removals in every full fiscal year since 2015.”

Mayorkas boasted that “daily removals and returns are nearly double what they were compared to the pre-pandemic average.”

In his opening statement, the ranking member of the committee, Bennie Thompson, touted the right-wing record of Mayorkas and the Biden administration, noting that under Mayorkas the border police have “removed record levels of migrants” and “detained more people than Congress has provided funding for.”

Thompson denounced the Republicans for not supporting the $110 billion supplemental national security package, saying that “they are turning their backs on border agents and officers.” He called on his “Republican colleagues” to “get serious” and negotiate “border security legislation with the White House and Senate.”

UPS cuts 12,000 jobs: The ruling class accelerates its policy of mass unemployment

Jerry White


United Parcel Service announced Wednesday that it is firing 12,000 salaried workers—14 percent of its worldwide managerial staff—as part of a $1 billion cost-cutting plan. The mass layoffs by the logistics giant, which will go into effect in the first half of this year, are part of an accelerating global wave of job-cutting in auto, technology and other industries.   

In a conference call with investors, UPS CEO Carol B. Tomé boasted that her executive team had slashed the company’s worldwide workforce from 540,000, when “COVID demand peaked,” to 495,000 today. Even if volume increased, she said, the managers would not be hired back.  

Although the Teamsters union claims these cuts do not affect the company’s unionized workers, management positions are being reduced because UPS intends to have far fewer warehouse workers, over-the-road drivers and package delivery workers to manage. Within hours of the announcement, workers at the Baltimore hub reported on Facebook that the day shift sort had been ended, making it at least the third major hub to lose the day shift in recent weeks.

Tomé said UPS would accelerate the use of labor-saving technologies to squeeze more volume out of fewer workers. Pointing to the new UPS Velocity facility in Louisville, Kentucky, she said, “We named it Velocity because it leverages robotics, automation, machine-learning, and artificial intelligence to streamline fulfillment operations.” 

The job cuts were announced right after the company reported its year-end financials, which showed that in 2023 the company made $9.9 billion in operating profits, including $5.5 billion in the US, despite a falloff in volume. UPS also announced that $7.6 billion had been shoveled to shareholders through stock buybacks and increased dividends. While big investors reaped this massive payout, workers saw their hours cut by nearly 10 percent during the last quarter, as the company worked to offset the 12 percent increase in wages in its new agreement with the Teamsters.  

The job cuts expose the lies peddled by Teamsters President Sean O’Brien and his public relations operatives in the Democratic Socialists of America, who claimed that the union won a “historic” contract last year after defying the near unanimous strike vote by 350,000 workers. The Teamsters bureaucracy knew the job cuts were coming and offered its collaboration in the destruction of workers’ livelihoods.

Commenting on the UPS job cuts, the Wall Street Journal wrote, “Many U.S. companies are laying people off as executives look to trim costs, eliminate redundant roles and speed decision-making. Beyond the budget-tightening that often takes place at the beginning of the calendar year, executives and analysts say, there is a growing sense that the work of slimming down isn’t over.”

These cuts have spread across wide sections of the economy. After 260,000 technology jobs were eliminated last year, another 24,000 tech jobs have been slashed in the first month of 2024. The tech layoffs includes PayPal (2,500 jobs), Microsoft video game division (1,900), Unity Software (1,800), Google (1,000), EBay (1,000), Salesforce (700), messaging platform Discord (170) and hundreds of jobs at Amazon’s Prime Video, MGM Studios and Twitch livestreaming divisions. 

On Wednesday, COVID-19 vaccine maker Novavax announced it was cutting an additional 12 percent of its workforce, on top of the 25 percent it had previously said it was planning last May, as it moves to aggressively cut costs.

Elsewhere, printer maker Xerox is cutting more than 3,000 jobs. Macy’s is slashing 2,350 positions, and online retailer Wayfair 1,650 jobs. Citigroup is cutting 20,000 jobs by the end of 2026, and Blackrock has announced 600 job cuts. Thousands of journalists are losing their jobs at CNN, NBC News, the Los Angeles TimesNew York Daily NewsForbesSports Illustrated and other outlets.

Next week, nearly 4,000 autoworkers at Stellantis plants in Toledo, Ohio, and Detroit, Michigan, will be laid off just weeks after hundreds of supplementary (temporary) employees (SEs) were abruptly fired. Ford and GM are also laying off thousands. The automakers are carrying out a global restructuring, slashing costs and jobs and seeking to gain an edge in the electric vehicle market. In Germany, France and Italy, thousands of workers are being laid off at Stellantis, VW, Bosch, Continental, ZF and other auto and component makers.  

The destruction of workers’ jobs is a deliberate class policy supported by capitalist governments around the world. Their criminal response to the pandemic has resulted in nearly 30 million deaths worldwide, while untold millions have fallen out of the workforce due to Long COVID. This “labor shortage” led to a small uptick in wages, after decades of declining or stagnating incomes, which the ruling class has deemed unacceptable. 

In the name of fighting “wage inflation,” the US Federal Reserve drove up interest rates to their highest level in more than 22 years to sharply increase unemployment and beat back workers’ demands for wage increases that kept pace with inflation. The Fed’s rate hikes have been emulated by central banks around the world.  

Citing the December 2023 job figures, the Wall Street Journal noted with satisfaction Tuesday that layoffs had increased and the rate at which workers quit their jobs late last year had fallen below the pace just before the pandemic began. Not satisfied with the current level of joblessness, however, the Federal Reserve on Wednesday held interest rates steady, keeping its foot on the neck of the working class. “If we saw unexpected weakening in the labor market, that would make us cut rates sooner,” Fed Chief Jerome Powell declared.  

The American ruling class is conducting a war on two fronts. It is backing Israel’s genocide in Gaza, expanding its military operations in the Middle East, and preparing for direct conflict with Russia and China to reassert its hegemony over the world, its resources and pools of cheap labor. At the same time, it is deliberately immiserating the working class at home and imposing levels of exploitation and dictatorial conditions in the factories and workplaces that it needs to wage World War III.

In pursuing this policy, the Biden administration has relied on the bureaucracies that run the unions to suppress strikes or to sell them out if they occur. Just like the Teamsters, the supposed “historic” agreements signed by SAG-AFTRA, the Writers Guild and the United Auto Workers have paved the way for a massive assault on jobs. The labor bureaucracies have been well compensated for their services and further integrated into Biden’s plans for war abroad and savage austerity at home. 

Last week, the UAW apparatus officially endorsed Biden for president, with Fain joining hands with “Genocide Joe” as protesters calling for a ceasefire were dragged from the conference. The Teamsters has yet to make an endorsement, though the apparatus met with Trump Wednesday, following a meeting between O’Brien and Trump earlier in the month. Whether in supporting the Democrats or the Republicans, the union bureaucracies function as instruments of the ruling class, suppressing working class opposition to inequality, war and dictatorship.

Washington resumes imperialist sanctions after Venezuelan government disqualifies US-backed candidate

Andrea Lobo


The Biden administration announced on Monday that it will again block Venezuela from selling gold after the Venezuelan Supreme Court ruled to disqualify the presidential candidate selected by the US-backed opposition, María Corina Machado. 

George W. Bush meets with Maria Corina Machado in May 31, 2005 [Photo: White House, Eric Draper]

The White House also threatened to repeal all licenses allowing Venezuela to trade oil and other products by April unless the government of President Nicolás Maduro allows Machado to run and frees more prisoners tied to the opposition. 

The Maduro administration had certified a handful of minor presidential candidates for elections this year, but polls from several firms show that only Machado could defeat Maduro. 

The US licenses suspended some economic sanctions last October in exchange for promises by Maduro to organize general elections in 2024 and free prisoners.

The sanctions have been chiefly responsible for an ongoing humanitarian disaster. By cutting Venezuela’s main export market and source of foreign reserves—US oil purchases—and freezing $5.5 billion in international accounts, the sanctions have prevented Venezuela from importing food, medicine and other critical products. 

Moreover, Washington confiscated the state-owned Venezuelan oil subsidiary in the US, CITGO, and the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of handing it to financial vultures. 

The Center for Economic and Policy Research found that US sanctions provoked more than 40,000 deaths just in 2017-2018 and had deprived 300,000 Venezuelans access to healthcare by 2019, right before the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 7 million Venezuelans have fled the country, out of a population of 30 million, since 2014.

This served ultimately to pressure a section of the Venezuelan officer corps to turn against Maduro and carry out a series of failed US-backed coup attempts. This included the self-proclamation of Juan Guaidó as interim president in 2019, a failed invasion akin to the “Bay of Pigs” debacle in 2020 led by US mercenaries that sought to kidnap the Venezuelan leadership and an unsuccessful drone assassination attempt against the president.

Biden’s actions continue the regime of imperialist piracy and sanctions launched under Obama and vastly intensified under Trump, whose aim has been to subjugate Venezuelans through hunger, illness and mass suffering, oust the Chavista government and install a US puppet which will break ties with Iran, Russia and China. 

As the US-NATO axis escalates its war in Ukraine against Russia, expands war in the Middle East against Iran and prepares for a conflagration with China, Washington is seeking to re-establish its semi-colonial control over Latin America, which served as a key platform and supplier of commodities in the first two world wars.

Last December the US Senate hosted a forum titled “Overlooking Monroe?” where Biden’s Southern Command Chief Gen. Laura Richardson declared, “It is time to act” against Chinese influence in the region.

As recently as January 19, General Richardson, who is essentially overseeing US policy in the region from a military standpoint, pointed to “the world’s largest oil reserves” in Venezuela as one of the key resources in the region. 

Beijing had helped Caracas circumvent the US and sell a fraction of its past oil production; however, proceeds have largely gone to pay back Venezuela’s outstanding debt with China, which has refused to grant any new loans. 

Maduro and his United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV), formerly led by late president Hugo Chávez, speak for the “Boli-Bourgeoisie,” a faction of the national ruling class and the military leadership that became enormously wealthy through corruption schemes tied to government contracts, financial speculation and the decade of high oil prices driven by Chinese growth that ended in 2014. 

During that decade, however, the US remained the top buyer of Venezuelan oil, while subsequent sanctions showed Washington’s ability to brutally cut Venezuelan total exports. The economy has shrunk about 80 percent, according to the IMF.

Consequently, the Boli-Bourgeoisie has sought to bargain with US imperialism, while leveraging its ties to China, Russia and Iran, and the potential for energy prices to surge in the context of war in the Middle East. 

Most recently, Caracas has threatened to take control over the long-disputed Essequibo region in neighboring Guyana, a former British colony, and amassed troops on the border. US conglomerate Exxon Mobil has dramatically increased production from offshore reserves in disputed waters, which greatly diminishes the negotiating position for Maduro. 

A map of Guyana, with dash lines indicating disputed areas. [Photo by Central Intellgence Agency / CC BY-SA 4.0]

For its part, the Pentagon has increased its presence and war games in Guyana, and the Russian government of Vladimir Putin announced last week that “A visit [by Maduro] is being prepared; it is necessary.” Maduro and Putin had talked in December. These maneuvers highlight the possibility that Guyana and Venezuela could become a new front in an ever-expanding world war. 

Domestically, the Maduro government has shifted the entire burden of the crisis onto the shoulders of the working class and been incapable because of its capitalist class character to appeal to workers in the United States or anywhere else for support against US aggression. 

The fact that an open imperialist puppet like Machado, who has long called for deeper US sanctions and even a US military operation in Venezuela, is expected to defeat Maduro in elections is a devastating indictment of Chavismo, its so-called “Bolivarian” revolution, and the entire Latin American “Pink Tide.”

Washington’s strong-arming has continued with ebbs and flows in negotiations between the Maduro administration and the US-sponsored opposition, currently being held in Barbados.

The Supreme Court ruling on Machado’s disqualification was based on original claims by the attorney general from 2014 that Machado did not include nutritional assistance payments in her declaration of assets, supplemented by charges of involvement in corruption on the part of the US-backed Guaidó clique and support for the draconian US sanctions.

On October 22, the US-backed opposition coalition, Plataforma Unitaria Democrática, held primaries under dubious circumstances, alleging that 2.3 million people participated, and 93 percent voted for Machado. 

The opposition had declined an offer by the Venezuelan electoral court to help organize the primaries and rejected a request to delay the vote until November.

The Venezuelan Supreme Justice Tribunal ruled a week later to suspend the results of the opposition primary and ordered the presentation of all documents related to its organization, candidate registration and voting records. The court then warned that the so-called National Primary Commission would have to account for the participation of banned candidates like Machado. 

The Attorney General then announced an investigation of the primaries and its organizers on suspicion of electoral fraud, financial crimes and conspiracy, which was followed by the Supreme Court’s confirmation that Machado remains disqualified.

Machado announced on Monday that she will continue her presidential campaign regardless and denounced Maduro for not respecting the Barbados agreement. 

In parallel with the elections, Maduro had freed several dozen prisoners tied to the opposition, including at least two former Green Berets who participated in the failed invasion in 2020. The White House also freed Alex Saab, a top Maduro ally essentially kidnapped by US authorities in Cape Verde.

Last week, however, Caracas arrested more than 30 civilians and soldiers charged with planning to “assassinate” Maduro, and on Tuesday, the Chavista negotiator in Barbados, Jorge Rodriguez, warned that renewed sanctions would lead to “severe” reprisals against the opposition. Caracas has subsequently threatened to reverse its reactionary agreement to accept repatriation flights of plane from the US carrying Venezuelan refugees.

It has become clear that the social and democratic rights of the working class are not part of the considerations by either side in Barbados or the Essequibo. Facing the immediate threat of further economic devastation, war, and the ongoing conspiracies for a right-wing coup in Caracas, Venezuelan workers must draw the necessary political conclusions from the political dead-end of “Bolivarianism” and all forces who endorsed Chavez or Maduro and promoted a “popular front” with sections of the bourgeoisie that could supposedly counter imperialism.

Ukrainian president Zelensky attempts to remove commander-in-chief Zaluzhnyi

Jason Melanovski & Clara Weiss




Commander-in-Chief of Ukraine's Armed Forces Valerii Zaluzhnyi, front, attends an event for marking Statehood Day in Mykhailivska Square in Kyiv, on July 28, 2023. [AP Photo/Ukrainian Presidential Press Office]

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky attempted to remove Ukrainian commander-in-chief General Valery Zaluzhnyi on Monday by asking for his resignation, signaling a new stage in the ongoing political crisis of the Ukrainian government. 

According to both Western and Ukrainian reports, Zelensky and Defense Minister Rustem Umerov asked for Zaluzhnyi to step down quietly and move into a less powerful position as head of the National Security and Defense Council. When Zaluzhnyi refused the offer, Zelensky allegedly threatened Zaluzhny with firing whether he accepted the demotion or not.

The Financial Times reported, based on two sources who were familiar with the discussions, “Zelenskyy had made clear to Zaluzhny that regardless of whether he took the role, he would be removed from his current position,” and that the decision to oust Zaluzhny had been taken even though he “may not be ousted for some time after reports of the plans appeared in Ukrainian media.”

Immediately following the meeting on Monday, word quickly spread on both Russian and Ukrainian Telegram channels that a serious power struggle was afoot within the Ukrainian state, setting the stage for a potential revolt against the Zelensky government. 

Within hours, the Defense Ministry felt obligated to abandon the Zaluzhnyi’s firing and released an obviously rushed statement on Telegram, “Dear journalists, we reply to all of you at once: No, it’s not true,” while Zelensky’s spokesman Sergey Nikiforov, also said that Zelensky “didn’t fire the commander-in-chief.”

On Tuesday, Western outlets such as the Guardian, Financial Times and the Economist all released their own retellings of the meeting, indicating that a dismissal of Zaluzhnyi would be met with opposition by the imperialist powers. The Financial Times warned that the move could “unnerve Ukraine’s western partners, including military officials who have worked closely with the general over the past two years to devise battlefield strategies.” 

The report by BBC Ukraine cited “interlocutors of the BBC” within the Ukrainian authorities, who reported that “Kyiv’s Western partners intervened in the situation, and expressed their sharp disapproval of Zaluzhny’s resignation. This version can be justified quite easily. Ukraine is now completely dependent on Western military and financial aid. Moreover, the coming days promise to be critical in the process of providing Kyiv with multibillion-dollar tranches of both European and American support.”

BBC Ukraine noted that Zelensky currently also had no replacement for Zaluzhny, as his two favored choices — Kiril Budanov, currently the head of Military Intelligence, and the Commander of the Ground Forces Oleksandr Syrskyi — had both already refused to accept the position and take up the vacated position of Zaluzhnyi.

Illia Ponomarenko, a war reporter for the pro-NATO Kyiv Independent who was previously embedded with the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, wrote on X/Twitter: “If you ask me, the dismissal of General Zaluzhny would be, of course, a massive shot not only in the leg but also in the head, right there. Zaluzhny has his reputation as an iron general and the national Salvator, the embodiment of the Ukrainian armed forces that saved this country against an enemy as fearsome as Russia.”

Ponomarenko went on to state, menacingly, “It’s a shot in the head. The apocalyptic rampage that is taking place now amid rumors on Telegram [regarding Zeluzhnyi’s dismissal] is just a walk in the park compared to what would be happening if Zelensky really signs a dismissal order.”

With the war, Zaluzhnyi has become one of the most powerful figures in the country, polling far above Zelensky in recent months. He has been a key liaison with NATO and US military officials, including Mark Milley, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. At the same time, Zaluzhnyi has never made a secret of his admiration for the Ukrainian fascist leader Stepan Bandera and has been photographed repeatedly with far-right paraphernalia. As commander-in-chief, he has overseen neo-Nazi formations such as the Azov battalions that have been integrated into the Ukrainian armed forces, and is no doubt closely tied to them. 

Zaluzhnyi with soldiers in an office, decorated with busts and portraits of Stepan Bandera and other Ukrainian fascists.

According to the Ukrainian news outlet ZN.ua, the removal of Zaluzhnyi was viewed by the Zelensky government as “only the first links in the chain of personnel changes in the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the political leadership of the country.”

Just before Zelensky’s meeting with Zaluzhnyi, Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU), announced it had uncovered a $40 million corruption scheme within the Defense Ministry regarding the procurement of mortar shells. Allegations of corruption are regularly used by the Ukrainian oligarchy as a means to remove political rivals. Zelensky has made the fight against “corruption” the preferred pretext for repeated purges of the state apparatus and sections of the military.

The failed attempt by Zelensky to dismiss Zaluzhnyi is the starkest expression yet of an intense political crisis and power struggle in the Ukrainian ruling class and state apparatus.

Following the US-EU backed coup in Kiev in February 2014, NATO spent almost a decade building up Ukraine into a launching pad for war with Russia, systematically provoking the Russian invasion which followed in February 2022. Yet after the initial successes of the Ukrainian military in 2022 in pushing back Russian forces in parts of East Ukraine, the NATO-backed counteroffensive of spring-summer 2023 resulted in an unmitigated disaster with 125,000 deaths and no territorial gains.  

It is now widely assumed that in the first two years of the war at least 400,000 Ukrainian soldiers — almost 1 percent of the pre-war population — were killed, with many more wounded. But in response to the military debacle, the Zelensky government is seeking to not only continue but expand the war. 

The new year began with the announcement that yet another half a million men would be drafted. Over the past weeks, Ukraine has struck targets deep inside Russia. Last week, the Ukrainian military first shelled a market in East Ukraine, killing 27 civilians, and then shot down a Russian airplane, carrying dozens of Ukrainian prisoners of war. Also last week, the Zelensky government issued a presidential decree, laying claim to major cities and areas in southern and southwestern Russia, including Belgorod, Kuban and Voronezh, as “historically inhabited by Ukrainians”. 

These steps to escalate the war have come in the wake of the first, initial expression of growing anti-war sentiments in the population. Since October, families of soldiers have been taking to the streets across the country to demand that their husbands, sons, brothers and fathers be sent back home. Last weekend, there were renewed demonstrations by families of soldiers in Odessa.  

It is under these conditions that tensions between the president and army leadership, which have been simmering for some time, have exploded into the open. In October of last year, Zaluzhnyi came out with a major interview in the British Economist, admitting that Ukraine was in a disastrous military situation and that the war had reached a “stalemate”. His statements prompted angry denials from Zelensky and his cabinet members. 

Shortly thereafter, Zelensky and his entourage decided to cancel the presidential elections due to be held this year in which Zaluzhnyi was widely considered to be Zelensky’s main rival in the election. In an open endorsement of dictatorial forms of rule, Zelensky stated at the time, “And if we need to put an end to a political dispute and continue to work in unity, there are structures in the state that are capable of putting an end to it and giving society all the necessary answers.” 

The same day that Zelensky announced that the elections were canceled, one of Zaluzhnyi’s closest assistants and friends was killed by a hand grenade that had been delivered to his home as a “birthday gift” by someone in the military.

Prime Minister Attal outlines fascistic agenda for French government

Alex Lantier


On Tuesday, incoming Prime Minister Gabriel Attal delivered the traditional presentation of his government’s general policy before the French National Assembly. He outlined a far-right agenda of cuts to unemployment insurance, health care and pensions, strengthening France’s police forces and their ability to target immigrants and youth, and accelerating the return to universal military service amid NATO’s war on Russia in Ukraine and Israel’s war on Gaza.

The French government’s agenda is shaped by capitalism’s downward spiral into World War III. Last year, President Emmanuel Macron slashed pensions, despite overwhelming popular opposition and mass strikes, to divert €100 billion to the military by 2030. While France’s corrupt union bureaucracies called an end to protests, stating that they did not want opposition to Macron to grow beyond their control, it is now widely known among workers that Macron rules against the people.

Attal’s fascistic policy speech confirms that an explosive confrontation is brewing between his government and the working class. He spoke amid farmers’ protests across France and Europe, a nationwide rail strike in Germany, and strike calls by French school teachers and transit workers. Yet his speech, laced with invocations of French national identity, arrogantly thrust workers’ demands aside, offering nothing but poverty and repression.

Attal began by calling on the French people not to doubt the national government. He said, “The particularity of human society is to look to the future developing before its eyes. A society never loses itself. If it doubts, it loses.” He added that, “France rhymes with power [puissance in French]. France is a guide-post, an ideal. … I will not allow our identity to be diluted or dissolved.”

Attal’s speech confirmed that these constant, noxious invocations of nationalism are nothing but a defense of the capitalist oligarchy’s power over the working people.

Attal called to slash unemployment insurance, eliminating the Specific Security Benefit (ASS) program for the long-term unemployed. They will be put on the Active Solidarity Revenue (RSA) welfare program, and RSA recipients will be made to work at least 15 hours a week to receive a €607.75 monthly benefit. A large layer of workers would have to work at below the minimum wage, doing work they could no longer count towards retirement.

This explains Attal’s promise to “cut regulations” and “de-minimum wage-ify” France. The minimum wage (SMIC) is indexed on inflation, which has surged, bringing it to €1,398.70 (€1 766,92 pre-tax) monthly for a full-time job. With average monthly wages stagnating at €1,880 for employees and €1,940 for manufacturing workers, against €4,500 for managers, this means ever-larger layers of workers are paid barely above the SMIC. With inflation still high, the SMIC could overtake their wages and then compel employers to raise wages at least in line with inflation.

To continue plundering the workers, the government is looking for pseudo-legal ways, beyond the resort to part-time work, to let capitalists employ millions of workers at sub-SMIC wages.

Attal also pledged to increase costs for health care, by forcing patients to pay for medical visits they miss and raising patient co-pays on drugs. He pledged to cut State Medical Aid (AME), a longstanding target of the neo-fascists, which finances medical care for non-citizens.

After mass youth rioting last summer provoked by the police murder of a teenager, Nahel, Attal proposed to further strengthen police-state repression. He pledged to hire 8,500 more cops to form 238 new military police units, and to increase the number of forced labor sentences. This includes new programs to sentence youth under 16 to “educative labor”, and “parents of delinquents” that the state deems to have “ignored their parental responsibilities” to “labor in the general interest.”

As European ruling circles discuss reintroducing conscription for war with Russia, Attal pledged to accelerate Macron’s plans for mandatory universal military service. He justified this by arguing it would bind youth to a unified French people: “Finally, our civic rearmament means reinforcing the republican unity of our youth, allowing all France’s youth to form one nation. … This is the role of universal national service. I will begin work to implement it by the autumn of 2026.”

Attal is an ex-member of the social-democratic Socialist Party (PS), which he left in 2016 with Macron, and he made predictable references to identity politics and collaboration with the union bureaucracies. In his closing remarks, he stressed that he is not only France’s youngest prime minister, at 34, but also its first openly gay prime minister. “To be French in 2024,” he said, “means you can be prime minister while being openly homosexual.”

“I will never renounce dialog,” he added. “My method has always been the same. Each French citizen carries a truth about our country. We—the political forces, trade union organizations, and local elected officials—must listen and respond.”

Despite Attal’s rhetoric, his agenda has an indubitably fascistic character. It is ever clearer why in 2018 Macron hailed France’s Nazi-collaborationist dictator, convicted traitor Philippe Pétain, as a “great soldier.” Macron does not lead a fascist regime, but his policies—impoverishing workers via inflation and social cuts, and suppressing mass opposition by police-state violence and invocations of French militarism as war devastates Europe—are ones Pétain would have recognized as his own.

Attal’s contempt for the population came out in his response to the farmers’ protests. He pledged to delay taxes on diesel and trumpeted that European subsidies would be paid in full to farmers by March 15. While Attal presented this as a major concession, farmers pointed out that March 15 is actually the legal deadline for payment of the subsidies.

Attal’s speech vindicates key points made by the Parti de l’égalité socialiste (PES) in last year’s pension struggle. There is nothing to negotiate with the French capitalist state, which brazenly defends the privileges of the capitalist oligarchy against the people. Politicians and union bureaucrats who negotiate with it only implicate themselves in its crimes—from its repression of workers at home to its backing for genocide in Gaza.

The way forward is to prepare a struggle of the working class in France, allied to workers in struggle across Europe and internationally, to bring down the Macron government. This nerve center of police-state repression, social counterrevolution and imperialist war is incompatible with the most fundamental interests of the working class.

This means making a political break with pseudo-left parties, allied to the union bureaucracy, who tie working class opposition to the dead end of parliamentary maneuvers and union officials’ horse-trading with Macron. These parties felt compelled to criticize Attal. “Attal is very unhappy because the people refuses to believe that it lives in Paradise,” Jean-Luc Mélenchon of the France Unbowed (LFI) party wrote on X/Twitter, calling Attal’s speech “the most reactionary in a century.”

Stalinist French Communist Party (PCF) leader Fabien Roussel criticized Attal’s speech for its “great social violence against the weakest, whether unemployed or working,” pledging to oppose Attal “in the National Assembly and in struggles.”

However, they only presented yet another censure motion targeting Attal—a motion backed by around 140 votes in the 577-seat Assembly, and which will predictably, as before, go down to defeat. Mélenchon, Roussel and their allies still work to demobilize working class opposition as they did most blatantly in last year’s pension struggle.