After reading the names and seeing the photographs published in newspapers, it has become clear that those killed in the Delhi bomb blast included both Hindus and Muslims. The explosion occurred at Gate No. 1 of the Lal Qila (Red Fort) metro station — an area that is always crowded and frequented by people from all communities.
According to reports so far, 13 people have been killed and many others injured. It is being said that the terrorists had planned a large-scale massacre but failed to carry it out. In the past few days, weapons and explosive materials have been seized from various parts of the country.
It is deeply distressing that a significant number of doctors are reportedly involved in this conspiracy. The duty of doctors is to save lives, serve the injured, treat the sick, and create conditions that prevent disease. How can anyone who has taken the oath to heal humanity turn to violence and destruction? Such actions are a complete betrayal of medical ethics and human values.
The Government of India had claimed that once Article 370 was abrogated, terrorism would end. Similar promises were made during demonetization and after the Pulwama attack. All these statements have proved to be hollow political slogans and false propaganda.
Through continuous media campaigns, the government succeeded in convincing many people of these claims. At the same time, the RSS–BJP government also managed to spread hatred among Hindus against Kashmiris, particularly Muslims. Later, certain films further deepened these prejudices, and — in line with a well-planned political strategy — an atmosphere of hatred and communal poison was deliberately fostered to maintain political power.
When 26 people were killed in Pahalgam — including one Muslim — the RSS and its affiliated organizations once again launched a campaign of communal propaganda. The Prime Minister then declared that any such incident in the future would be treated as an attack on the nation, and all those involved in or supporting terrorism would be completely destroyed. The Delhi bomb blast, therefore, could have dangerous consequences.
A deeper international conspiracy behind it linked to forces interested in destabilizing South Asia cannot be ruled out. Arms manufacturing companies, especially from the United States, may have an interest in fomenting unrest in the region.
It is true that there was anger among the people of Kashmir after the removal of Article 370. However, after the Pahalgam incident, the people of Kashmir stood united against terrorism — not only condemning it verbally but also taking to the streets in protest. Sadly, the government failed to build on this positive sentiment.
After “Operation Sindoor,” teams were sent abroad to seek international support, but no tangible outcome was achieved. The risk, therefore, remains that “Operation Sindoor” could be repeated.
On the same day as the Delhi blast, a bomb explosion in Islamabad, Pakistan, killed 12 people. The Prime Minister of Pakistan, without any evidence, blamed India for the attack. This shows that terrorists are willing to strike anywhere — they have no respect for human life.
If war now breaks out between India and Pakistan, it will not end within days. Large numbers of soldiers and civilians would be killed, and both already impoverished nations would be driven toward ruin and instability.
An even more dangerous development is taking place in Pakistan. Under a recent constitutional amendment bill, the army chief will hold all powers — including control over the nuclear button. Concentrating such immense power in a single individual poses a grave risk, as one wrong decision could lead to catastrophe.
In today’s environment of religious extremism and hostility between nations, the risk of nuclear confrontation has increased dramatically. Studies suggest that the use of nuclear weapons could kill as many as two billion people — an unimaginable human tragedy.
India’s nuclear doctrine states that the country will not be the first to use nuclear weapons. However, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has stated that this policy could be revised if necessary. Pakistan’s doctrine, by contrast, allows the use of nuclear weapons even in response to a conventional attack. This makes it clear that even a limited conventional war could escalate into a nuclear conflict — the consequences of which would be catastrophic for the entire region and the world.
In these tense circumstances, utmost restraint is required from all sides. People must maintain peace and communal harmony. It must be understood that terrorism has no religion.
Educated young men and women turning toward terrorism is an alarming trend — and while the causes may not be economic, it is vital to understand why such extremist, hate-driven mindsets are developing.
Governments too must act with restraint. Pakistan remains under strong military influence, and India must not fall into the trap of emotional or aggressive reactions. Given the changed situation in Bangladesh, China’s immense military power, and the looming nuclear threat, avoiding war at all costs is not just prudent — it is essential for the survival of humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment