23 Mar 2017

Reports expose widespread use of child labor in the Congo

Eddie Haywood

In late February, Sky News aired an investigative report centered on the utilization of child labor in cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The investigation shed light on a vastly complex apparatus of the most brutal forms of exploitation utilized to extract the Congo’s vast mineral wealth.
A reporting team, which visited several mines in the Congo’s southeastern Katanga province, found children being used as laborers in all of them.
One child named Dorsen, who is aged 8, told the reporting team that he does not make enough money to buy food, and had not eaten in two days, despite toiling for 12 hours per day. His friend Richard, aged 11, talked about how sore he got from the intense physical labor he was forced to undertake in the mine.
The report also highlighted the grievous health effects on communities in and around the mines; the World Health Organization has declared that dust and particles from cobalt, which are a by-product of the mines, are hazardous to breath and cause deleterious health effects. Miners, both children and adults, are not provided with safety equipment, nor do the mines execute proper protocols for proper disposal of mine waste.
Sky News reporters found a villager residing near a mine, Makumba Mateba, who had a tumor on his throat that he believes is a result of breathing the dust fumes from the mine. “We only drink the water which comes from the mining sites after all the minerals have been washed in it. It comes right through our village and I drink it and I’m sure it’s that which has made me sick.”
While it exposed these horrifying and criminal labor and living conditions, the report failed to draw the conclusion that the horrific labor and business practices uncovered in the Congo are not an isolated occurrence but rather the predominant reality inflicted by the capitalist system on workers around the globe.
Cobalt is one of the primary minerals used in the manufacture of lithium batteries, used in smart phones and laptop computers. More than half of the world’s supply of cobalt originates in the Congo. The companies that utilize cobalt from the Congo for production—Apple, Samsung, and Microsoft, to name a few examples—reach a combined market share of over $100 billion, with many of the firms registering record profits in recent years.
According to a study concerning child labor in the Congo in 2016 produced by Amnesty International, children as young as 7 work in the mines under intense weather conditions, and under coercive conditions and beatings by bosses. They carry back-breaking loads, and descend into mines that frequently collapse, and work with no protective equipment. In addition to working long hours, they are paid at the rate of $1-$2 a day. UNICEF has estimated there are at least 40,000 children in the Congo living under forced labor conditions.
The response of the large technology companies to the study was flat denial, or feigned ignorance. Apple, for its part, responded, “Underage labor is not tolerated in our supply chain and we are proud to have led the industry in pioneering new safeguards.”
This claim is belied by the fact that one of Apple’s supply chain sources is the Chinese mineral firm Huayou Cobalt, which obtains 40 percent of its cobalt from the Congo for use in its products, such as the iPhone. Apple raked in $9 billion in profits in 2016 and holds an astounding cash and securities reserve of more than $246 billion.
Mark Dummett, a business and human rights researcher for Amnesty International, told the Guardian last year, “Around half of all cobalt comes from the DRC [Democratic Republic of the Congo], and no company can validly claim that they are unaware of the human rights and child labour abuses linked with mineral extraction in the region.”
Additionally, in 2015 the US Department of Labor conducted its own investigation into the use of child labor in the Congo. That report found that many mines employing children are operated by or for the various militant rebel groups currently carrying out bloody operations in the Congo, particularly in the eastern and southeastern regions of the country.
These militant groups are engaged in a multi-decade conflict for control of the Congo’s economic resources. The general disorder and chaos in the region has its genesis in the imperialist policies of Washington and the capitals of Europe, the brutal extraction of raw resources and minerals has a long and sordid history in the nation.
The Congo Free State was founded in 1885 by King Leopold II of Belgium as his own personal colony. Leopold made money off of the colony first through the harvesting of ivory and then by the extraction of rubber by forced labor. Historians estimate that as many as 15 million Congolese workers died under the brutal labor regimen enforced by the Belgian monarch’s mercenaries.
The Congo remained a Belgian colony until independence in 1960 and the election of the country’s first democratically-elected leader, Patrice Lumumba.
US imperialism was distinctly unhappy with Lumumba, who had promised that the newly independent country’s vast resources would be used to benefit its people. The CIA, in collaboration with Belgium, set about to remove Lumumba and replace his government with the brutal dictatorship of Joseph Mobutu.
Lumumba was arrested, then subsequently snatched from his jail cell and killed, his body was found dismembered. Washington and Europe found the three-decade long Mobutu dictatorship that followed more to their liking, as the military dictator more than willingly continued the plunder of the Congo’s resources and brutal exploitation of the working class first instituted under colonialism.
For more than a half of a century, from the Mobutu dictatorship, through the Congo War in the 1990s, and up to the present conflicts, Washington has been, often violently, a guiding influence in the affairs of the Congo on behalf of American corporations.
The ongoing use of forced child labor in the Congo demonstrates the utter failure of capitalism to undertake any progressive venture for the advancement of humanity. More than a century after his death King Leopold’s ghost still haunts the Congo.
Sitting atop and guiding this structure of exploitation remains the iron hand of the imperialist powers, with Washington and its counterparts in Europe pursuing their national corporate interests at the expense of the Congolese masses.
The contradiction between the vast economic and mineral wealth that exists in the Congo, and the vast gulf between the tiny wealthy layer of Congolese elite who are the servants of Western capitalist interests on the one hand, and the majority of Congolese who make $2 or less per day on the other, illustrates most clearly this intolerable reality.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel threatens Turkey

Johannes Stern 

German-Turkish relations have reached a new low point after the Berlin government threatened to impose a ban on public appearances by Turkish politicians in Germany.
At the opening of the CEBIT industry fair in Hannover, German Chancellor Angela Merkel demanded “that the Nazi comparisons from the Turkish side must stop … without any ifs or buts.” Germany would “not tolerate that the end justifies the means and all taboos are ignored.”
Merkel then cited a so-called verbal memo from Germany’s Foreign Ministry to Ankara. In it Turkey had “been unambiguously informed that public appearances of Turkish politicians in Germany can only take place if they occur on the basis of the principles in the Basic Law.”
The memo made the ability of the 1.4 million Turkish citizens living in Germany to vote on the Turkish constitutional referendum on Monday conditional upon the establishment of “reliable and constructive cooperation from the Turkish side on the preparations for, and conducting of the vote, particularly in affairs related to public security and order.” This applied especially to campaign appearances by Turkish politicians.
Turkey’s governing AKP responded to the threat to withdraw permission to hold the election in Germany by cancelling all planned appearances by Turkish ministers in the country. This was welcomed enthusiastically by German politicians.
“At the current point in time I see this as a sign of reason,” Social Democratic Party (SPD) leader and chancellor candidate Martin Schulz said on Tuesday in parliament at a meeting of his party’s parliamentary group. SPD parliamentary group chair Thomas Opperman expressed his “relief that Turkey no longer intends to send its ministers to Germany.” Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) parliamentary group chair Volker Kauder (CDU) stated that he was “happy that no more politicians are coming to Germany to campaign.”
The German government’s offensive against Turkey has been accompanied by a hysterical campaign with racist undertones.
In a comment headlined, “The end of Merkel’s patience,” co-editor of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Berthold Kohler raged, “It is time to show the Turks that Erdogan’s scorched-earth policies have severe consequences. Erdogan is leading Turkey into isolation. He is separating it from the free, democratic West and transforming it ever more into a form of Asiatic despotism.”
Stefan Kornelius adopted a similar tone in the Süddeutsche Zeitung on Tuesday: “There were times when states went to war because of insults against their leaders. Luckily, they are in the past.” However, he continued, “along with the usual diplomatic pressure – recalling of our own, temporary expulsion of the Turkish ambassador,” there were measures “in trade and European policy,” which could be used to sanction Turkey.
In no circumstances could the German government appear “weak,” he added. And if “this archaic test of strength [has] perhaps become unusual to Western Europeans,” against Erdogan “it is necessary, above all and especially for self-protection.” The Turkish president was encouraging “not just extremism in his own country,” but has “long had plans for Germany.”
As was to be expected, the most aggressive statements came from the Greens and Left Party. “I warn against selling the AKP cancellation of all campaigns in Germany as a political success and returning now to a self-satisfied silence towards Ankara,” stated Claudia Roth from the Greens, who is the vice president of parliament.
In an interview with the conservative daily Die Welt, Roth called on the German government to punish Ankara further. “If the German government wants to credibly oppose Erdogan’s course, they have to finally end the refugee deal, immediately stop arms exports to Turkey and reject the recently requested financial help to limit the impact of the economic crisis,” she said.
Sevim Dagdelen, spokeswoman for the Left Party parliamentary group on international relations, called on SPD Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel to “immediately recall the ambassador to the Republic of Turkey.” Her statement went on, “Given the continued downplaying of the crimes of German fascism, the mocking of the victims and the incredible accusation that the EU would like to establish gas chambers, the German government can no longer look the other way.”
Merkel and Gabriel had to “finally act and make a stand against Erdogan,” she demanded, and presented the following catalogue of demands: “The government must withdraw German soldiers from Turkey and campaign in the EU for the halting of membership talks. The pre-membership assistance for Turkey of €630 million must be frozen. The campaign offensive of Erdogan and his Islamist AKP in Germany must be stopped. Among Turks willing to become citizens, the Turkish certificate of discharge [from Turkish citizenship] should be ignored in the future, otherwise one is playing into the hands of the Erdogan dictatorship.”
The hysterical demands from Dagdelen and the Left Party deserve some comment.
The demands for bans on public appearances and sanctions against Ankara are precisely the opposite of a struggle against dictatorship. In fact, the Left Party’s arguments strengthen dictatorial tendencies not only in Turkey, but also in Germany. In Turkey, Erdogan is using the attacks from Berlin to stoke nationalism and mobilise support for his authoritarian constitutional referendum. In Germany, a precedent for the suppression of undesirable opinions is being created. It will ultimately be up to the state or the government to determine what can and what cannot be said publicly.
The Left Party’s desire to suppress Erdogan’s reference to the Merkel government’s “Nazi methods” speaks volumes about its pro-imperialist character. As a party of German militarism, it finds it intolerable when someone draws a parallel between the German government or European Union and the Nazis. The Left Party is not primarily concerned with the statements by Erdogan, who himself resorts to authoritarian methods, but with suppressing any critique of German militarism. The majority of the population oppose rearmament and military interventions precisely because they recall the horrors of the Nazi period.
There are also geopolitical considerations behind the Left Party’s aggressive stance. A significant section of the German bourgeoisie believes that too close a relationship with Ankara ties Germany’s hands in the pursuit of its interests in the Middle East. For this reason, the refugee deal, negotiated by Merkel in the name of the European Union, has been met with criticism from right-wing circles from the beginning.
A section of the German bourgeoisie is ever more openly considering collaboration with the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), which is currently banned in Germany. The PYD, which has ties to the PKK, is playing an important role as a proxy force for Western interventions in Syria. The Left Party, which has close ties to the Kurdish organisations, has long campaigned for such an orientation.
Significantly, the police did not intervene at the weekend at a large demonstration for the Kurdish festival of Newroz when PKK flags bearing the likeness of its imprisoned leader Abdullah Öcalan were displayed, even though this is officially banned. On the other hand, many planned pro-AKP rallies were called off due to absurd reasons.
On Monday, Dagdelen shared a comment by Georg Restle from the Tagesthemen. In it, the presenter of public broadcaster ARD’s “Monitor” magazine asked, “Who is actually the terrorist here? The leader of the PKK, who has been closely watched in a Turkish prison over the past 18 years—or the President of Turkey, who is persecuting tens of thousands of opposition supporters and having them detained, among them politicians from the now outlawed pro-Kurdish HDP.”
The Turkish bourgeoisie, and this applies not solely to Erdogan’s AKP, is combatting the PKK as a terrorist organisation and attempting with all of the methods at its disposal to prevent the emergence of an autonomous Kurdish state in Syria.

US and UK ban carry-on electronics on flights from Muslim-majority countries

Zaida Green

On Tuesday, the US and British governments announced new restrictions against carry-on electronic devices larger than smartphones on direct flights from airports in the Middle East and North Africa. The UK announced its ban just hours after the public announcement of the US ban.
The US ban, established by an executive order signed by President Donald Trump, specifically names 10 major airports in eight Muslim-majority countries, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. The UK ban targets all direct flights from Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Tunisia. The latter two countries are not currently affected by the US ban. The UK says it is “in close touch with the Americans to fully understand their position.”
Both the US and UK have indefinitely banned non-medical electronic devices larger than smartphones, such as laptops, e-book readers, and handheld game consoles in carry-on luggage and restrict those devices to luggage in the cargo hold. Trump’s executive order vaguely forbids any device “larger than a smartphone,” while the UK ban, announced by Prime Minister Theresa May, targets devices exceeding dimensions of 16 cm long, 9.3 cm wide, and 1.5 cm deep. Passengers and airlines flying out of the affected airports have until Friday in the US and Saturday in the UK to comply with the new regulations.
The ban established by Trump’s new executive order represents an effective expansion of the administration’s travel ban, which restricts travel from Muslim-majority countries Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and halts all refugee admissions into the United States until July 14.
The new ban opens up yet another opportunity for agents of the state to search through travelers’ electronic devices, this time without their knowledge. US Customs and Border Protection agents regularly coerce travelers to comply with warrantless device searches. The agency searched nearly 25,000 cell phones in 2016, and is on track to search 50,000 this year.
Officials in both the US and UK have refused to cite any detailed and reasonable justification for these flagrantly discriminatory and anti-democratic restrictions. A statement issued by the US Department of Homeland Security claimed that “evaluated intelligence” showed that terrorists are “aggressively pursuing innovative methods” to smuggle explosives in consumer items.
A UK government source told CNN only that the UK “is privy to the same information and intelligence as US officials.” The bans were discussed and planned jointly by the US and UK weeks in advance of Tuesday’s announcements.
Electronic security experts have pointed out the absurdity in transferring suspected “bombs” from the main cabin to the cargo hold.
“If you assume the attacker is interested in turning a laptop into a bomb, it would work just as well in the cargo hold,” said Nicholas Weaver, a researcher at the International Computer Science Institute at the University of California, Berkeley, in a statement to the Guardian.
Paul Cruickshank, editor of CTC Sentinel, published by West Point think tank Combating Terrorism Center, pointed out on CNN that Abu Dhabi International Airport and Dubai International Airport are “among the most modern airports in the world” and subject travelers to the same security checks as US airports.
“From a technological perspective, nothing has changed between the last dozen years and today,” said Bruce Schneier, cryptographer and computer security specialist told the Guardian. “That is, there are no new technological breakthroughs that make this threat any more serious today. And there is certainly nothing technological that would limit this newfound threat to a handful of Middle Eastern airlines,” Schneier concluded.
“The administration hasn’t provided a security rationale that makes sense for this measure targeting travelers from airports in Muslim-majority countries,” said Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project. “Given the [Trump] administration’s already poor track record, this policy sends a signal of discriminatory targeting and must be heavily scrutinized.”
The airports affected by the US ban are major hubs for Middle East-based airlines Emirates, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways, and Turkish Airlines, which are among the world’s biggest carriers. The American airline industry spends tens of millions of dollars annually on lobbies that agitate for protectionist sanctions against their Middle East-based competitors as punishment for receiving “unfair” subsidies from their home governments. No American-based airlines fly directly to the US from these airports, so are unaffected by the ban.
Other countries may follow with similar bans. The Australian government says it has no plans to implement any restrictions, but Australian-based Qantas Airways’ security consultant and member of Australia’s Critical Infrastructure Advisory Council, Geoffrey D. Askew, told ABC News that it is “reasonably likely” that Australia will eventually implement a ban.
Canadian transport minister Marc Garneau stated that Canada is in close contact with US security officials and is looking at the bans “very carefully.” France’s Directorate General for Civil Aviation told LExpress that the French government is discussing whether or not to implement similar measures.
A German spokesperson for the country’s Federal Ministry of the Interior, Annegret Korff, said it was given advance notice of the US ban, but that Germany has no plans to implement similar restrictions. Etihad Airways is the largest shareholder of Air Berlin, Germany’s second largest airline after Lufthansa. Executives of affected airlines worry that Asian countries will adopt similar bans.
Neither of the opposition parties of the Democrats in the US or Labour in the UK have voiced any significant disagreement with these policies. Democrat and ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Representative Adam Schiff of California, gave the Trump administration’s new ban his full support, saying that it was “both necessary and proportional to the threat” posed by terrorism. In Parliament Wednesday, Labour MP Gavin Shuker grilled Transport Secretary Chris Grayling over the ban from the standpoint of expediency, not of democratic rights.

Five confirmed dead, 40 injured in terror attack in London

Chris Marsden

Two pedestrians, one police officer, the perpetrator of a terrorist act and a yet unidentified person are dead following a horrific attack outside the Houses of Parliament Wednesday afternoon.
At around 2:40 p.m., a man, who the police have now said is “known” to them, drove a grey-coloured 4x4 Hyundai i40 car at speed over Westminster Bridge, near the Houses of Parliament. It mounted the pavement, leaving around 20 casualties lying on the bridge, veering across a cycle lane before crashing into parliament’s perimeter fencing surrounding New Palace Yard. One woman died on the bridge.
The assailant, who appeared to be in his 40s and dressed in black, jumped out of the car and proceeded to sprint through the New Palace Yard gates. He was reportedly armed with two knives including one with an eight-inch blade. When police officers confronted him, he stabbed a plain-clothes officer repeatedly before turning towards a second officer. He was shot several times and later died of his injuries. The stabbed officer, PC Keith Palmer, died of his wounds.
The first doctor on the scene was Dr Jeeves Wijesuriya, the current chairman of the junior doctors' committee at the British Medical Association. He tried unsuccessfully to resuscitate both the police officer and the assailant, the latter for almost an hour, as well as attending to other injured people at the scene.
The London Ambulance Service said paramedics had treated at least 10 people on the bridge.
Among the victims of the terror attack are three French schoolchildren on a school trip as well as students from the northwest of England. At least two of the teenage pupils from a private high school in Concarneau are in critical condition. Their families have been flown by a military plane to London.
It is unclear whether other reports of two people in critical condition are in addition to the pupils. Initial reports spoke of people suffering “catastrophic injuries.”
A woman who fell into the Thames was rescued and given emergency treatment on the spot. The Port of London Authority reported that her injuries were serious and other reports speak of her being in a critical condition.
The Guardian reports witness Steve Voake, 55, seeing at least two bodies in the road and “when he looked over the side of the bridge ‘there was another body lying in the water with blood all around it’.”
Bus driver Michael Amadou described how the attacker had “started from the hospital heading towards parliament and just mowed down whoever was in his way... I heard one guy come running behind me shouting his wife had jumped into the river to avoid getting knocked down.”
Three police officers were also among those injured on the bridge.
A total of five London hospitals treated 12 casualties with serious injuries. Eight people, six males and two females, have been treated at King’s College Hospital. Two are reportedly in a stable condition at St Thomas' Hospital, which is adjacent to Westminster Bridge. The Daily Telegraph reports that the two were identified as Romanian tourists Andrei and Andrea, both in their late 20s, by their friend, Patrick Tracey.
Police locked down the area in the event reports of a second attacker proved to be true, but later confirmed that the assailant was believed to have acted alone. Additional police were put in place in the vicinity and throughout the capital. Parliament was in session and MPs were kept under lockdown until 7:45 p.m. During the morning hours raids and seven arrests were made—mostly in London and Birmingham.
The Scottish parliament at Holyrood suspended a two-day debate on whether to seek permission from the UK government for the required section 30 order to hold a legally-binding referendum on independence. The suspension was demanded by Conservative MSPs, including Scottish leader Ruth Davidson.
As could be expected, the ruling elite in Britain and internationally were quick to make political capital from the appalling event; above all to justify the repressive domestic measures that have accompanied the colonial-style wars in the Middle East and North Africa, which have played the major role in fostering the growth of Islamist terrorism.
Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May struck a Churchillian pose while reporting from a meeting of COBRA, the emergency committee made up of ministers and senior security and intelligence officials that have now spent decades plotting to curtail or eliminate fundamental democratic rights.
“The terrorists chose to strike at the heart of our Capital City, where people of all nationalities, religions and cultures come together to celebrate the values of liberty, democracy and freedom of speech,” she declared. “These streets of Westminster—home to the world’s oldest Parliament—are engrained with a spirit of freedom that echoes in some of the furthest corners of the globe. And the values our Parliament represents—democracy, freedom, human rights, the rule of law—command the admiration and respect of free people everywhere.”
This is said of a parliament that has supported illegal wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, and which has passed legislation collectively representing a frontal assault on free speech, liberty and the rule of law without precedent in British history.
French President Francois Hollande, who rules—at least for a few more weeks—over a nation subjected to a semi-permanent state of emergency with vast numbers of armed police on the streets stated, “France knows how the people of Britain are suffering today”—a reference in particular to last July’s incident, where a man well-known to the police and security services drove a lorry into pedestrians in the city of Nice, killing 84.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, for her part, pledged to “stand firmly and resolutely by Great Britain's side in the fight against all forms of terrorism." In December, a similar attack on a Christmas market killed 12 people in Berlin.
US President Donald Trump offered May his condolences by telephone, while White House spokesman Sean Spicer told reporters, “Her Majesty's government have the full support of the US government in responding to the attack and bringing those to justice who are responsible.” In New York City, armed police officers and bomb-sniffing dogs were deployed to the British Consulate, the British Mission to the United Nations, City Hall and the Grand Central Terminal.

22 Mar 2017

Google Summer of Code 2017 for Students (Get Paid to Write Code)

Application Deadline: 3rd April 2017 (W. Central Africa Standard Time)
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: All (Particular interest will be taken for students from Africa)
About the Award: Through Google Summer of Code, accepted student applicants are paired with a mentor or mentors from the participating projects, thus gaining exposure to real-world software development scenarios and the opportunity for employment in areas related to their academic pursuits. In turn, the participating projects are able to more easily identify and bring in new developers. Best of all, more source code is created and released for the use and benefit of all.
Students contact the mentor organizations they want to work with and write up a project proposal for the summer. If accepted, students spend a month or more integrating with their organizations prior to the start of coding. Students then have three months to code, meeting the deadlines agreed upon with their mentors.
Type: Training
Eligibility: To participate in the Program, a Student must:
  1. be eighteen (18) years of age or older upon registration for the Program;
  2. be enrolled in or accepted into an accredited institution, including a college, university, masters program, PhD program and/or undergraduate program, as of the Acceptance Date;
  3. for the duration of the Program, be eligible to work in the country in which he or she resides; and
  4. not be an Organization Administrator or Mentor in the Program.
  • Ineligible Individuals. A Student may not participate in the Program if:
    1. He or she is:
      1. a resident of a United States embargoed country;
      2. ordinarily resident in a United States embargoed country; or
      3. otherwise prohibited by applicable export controls and sanctions programs.
    2. He or she is an employee (including intern), contractor, officer, or director of:
      1. Google or its affiliates, or
      2. an Organization or any of its affiliates.
    3. He or she is an immediate family member (including a parent, sibling, child, spouse, or life partner regardless of where the Student lives) of one of the individuals listed in subsection (ii) above or a member of their household (whether related or not).
    4. He or she has participated as a Student in Google Summer of Code two (2) or more times previously.
Number of Awardees: Not specified
Value and Duration of Program: Accepted students spend the summer coding with guidance from a mentor (3 months).
  • Successful student contributors are given a $6000 USD stipend,  enabling the student concentrate on coding for 3 months
  • In 2017, we  are using a Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) based calculation to determine the stipend. We start with the base amount of $6000 USD then adjust it based on each country’s PPP value. There is a minimum ($2400) and maximum ($6000) value.
How to Apply: Apply via the Program webpage (Link below)
It is important to go through the Application Requirements before applying
Award Provider: Google

International Medical University (IMU) Scholarships for Undergraduate Students 2017/2018: Malaysia

Application Deadlines: Deadlines vary for individual programs selected for the scholarship:
  1. Medicine:                                      14th July 2017
  2. Chiropractic:                                 18th Aug 2017
  3. Chinese Medicine
    Psychology:                                   18th Aug 2017
  4. Pharmaceutical Chemistry:       23rd June 2017,  18th Aug 2017
  5. Pharmacy:                                      23rd June 2017,  18th Aug 2017
  6. Biomedical Science
    Medical Biotechnology
    Dietetics with Nutrition
    Nutrition:                                       23rd June 2017,  18th Aug 2017
Eligible Countries: International/Home
To be taken at (country): Malaysia
Fields of Study: Medicine, Chiropractic, Chinese Medicine Psychology, Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Pharmacy, Biomedical Science, Medical Biotechnology, Dietetics with Nutrition, Nutrition.
Type: Undergraduate
Eligibility: 
  • Malaysian and international students are eligible to apply.
  • These scholarships will be awarded to students demonstrating outstanding academic excellence, extra curriculum participation and leadership qualities.
Selection Procedure: IMU Scholarship Committee may vary the selection requirements as and when it deems necessary.
Number of Awardees: Not specified
Value of Scholarship: There will be two types of scholarships available:
  1.  Full Tuition Fee (100%) for full duration of programme
  2.  Partial Tuition Fee (50%) for full duration of programme
All scholarships will only cover the tuition fees and no allowance for living expenses, books and study-related equipment.
Duration of Scholarship: Duration of Program
How to Apply:
  1. Make an online application for the programme of your choice at www.imu.edu.my/slim-oaa.
  2. Upon successful application and meeting the scholarship’s eligibility requirements, student will be invited to apply for the scholarship via email.
  3. If you have received a conditional offer, kindly submit your final results to Admissions Department before the closing date to be eligible for the scholarship.
Award Provider: International Medical University (IMU)
Important Notes:  Scholarship is not automatically disbursed and is subject to approval from the Scholarship Selection Committee based on the candidates’ actual SPM or O-Level results and achievement in ECA. An interview is not required.

Wellcome Trust Collaborative Awards in Science for Intermediate and Senior Researchers 2017

Application Deadline: 
  • Preliminary application deadline: 20th April 2017
  • Full application deadline: 13th July 2017
Eligible Countries: UK, Republic of Ireland, Low- and middle-income countries
To be taken at (country): UK, Republic of Ireland, Low- and middle-income countries
About the Award: Collaborative Awards promote the development of new ideas and speed the pace of discovery. We fund teams of researchers, consisting of independent research groups, to work together on the most important scientific problems that can only be solved through collaborative efforts.
Type: Research
Type of Researcher: Basic, Clinical, Public health
Career Stage of Researcher: Intermediate, Senior
Eligibility:  Collaborative Awards are for teams of researchers bringing together the relevant expertise and experience to address the most important scientific problems.
Each applicant must be essential to the proposed collaborative research and have:
  • Proven research expertise and experience in their field.
  • An academic or research post (or equivalent).
  • A salary for the duration of the award period. If this is not in place, your employing organisation must provide a guarantee of salary support for the duration of the award.
Members of the team must have proven experience in collaborative research and consist of independent research groups.
Team size will depend on the proposed research, but should generally have more than two applicants, and no more than seven. Teams may be based in the same or in different organisations, and must bring different expertise or disciplines to the research question.
Applicants should usually be based at eligible organisations in the UK, Republic of Ireland, or low- or middle-income countries. However, we can make exceptions for projects that need specific expertise or resources provided by team members based in other countries.
Selection Criteria: 
  • Your proposal should describe a significant piece of work that addresses the most important questions, in an area relevant to the mission of the Wellcome Trust.
  • You should be able to demonstrate why the scientific problem you are tackling can only be solved through an integrated, collaborative team effort.
  • We encourage interdisciplinary research collaborations, although they are not essential. We also encourage applications that propose interdisciplinary research across our Science, Humanities and Social Science and Innovations teams.
Number of Awardees: Not specified
Level of Funding: Up to £4 million
Duration of Funding: Up to 5 years
How to Apply: You must submit your application through the Wellcome Trust Grant Tracker (WTGT).
Award Provider: Wellcome Trust

Mandela Rhodes Scholarships for African citizens to Study at South African Universities 2017/2018

Application Deadline: 18th  April 2017
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: open to citizens of all African countries
To be taken at (country): South African universities or tertiary institutions
Eligible Area of Study: Honors or Masters degree and leadership development
The leadership development programme is made up of the following three components.
  • Three residential workshops
  • Three regional group pods
  • Mentoring
About Scholarship: The Mandela Rhodes Scholarships Programme is a combination of financial support for postgraduate studies and a high quality leadership development programme, with the intention to build exceptional leadership capacity in Africa.
A Mandela Rhodes Scholarship enables a Scholar to study at a South African tertiary institution registered with the South African Council on Higher Education for an accredited postgraduate degree programme. The Scholarship is awarded for one or a maximum of two years, currently for an Honours or Masters degree.
Type: Honors/Masters degrees.
Eligibility and Selection Criteria
  • The Scholarship is open to citizens of all African countries
  • The Scholarship is for postgraduate study at South African universities or tertiary institutions
  • Full funding is for Honours (maximum one year) or Masters (up to a maximum of two years) or their equivalents (MBA’s excluded)
  • Any individual who will be between the ages of 19 and 30 years at the time of taking up the Scholarship may apply
  • Applicants must posess a first degree or its equivalent or must be in the process of completing one by 31 January 2017
  • Applicants should have a history of well above average academic results
  • Individuals that reflect in their character a commitment to the four principles of Education, Reconciliation, Leadership and Entrepreneurship
  • The MRF leadership development activities sometimes include weekends. It is a condition of the Scholarship that attendance is compulsory
Number of Scholarships: Several
Value of Scholarship: The Scholarship covers the cost of a Scholar as follows:
  • Tuition and registration fees as set by the institution;
  • A study materials allowance as set by the MRF;
  • Accommodation and meal allowances as set by the MRF;
  • A medical aid allowance as set by the MRF;
  • Economy-class travel allowance for international Scholars only from the Scholar’s home to their institution at the beginning and back home at the end of their degree programme;
  • Personal allowance.
Duration of Scholarship: Full funding is for Honours (maximum one year) or Masters (up to a maximum of two years)
How to Apply: All Mandela Rhodes Scholarship applicants are to apply online via the Embark application system.
Scholarship Provider: The Mandela Rhodes Foundation
Important NotesIf you qualify for the Scholarship, The Mandela Rhodes Foundation does not apply to tertiary institutions on your behalf. Applicants must apply seperately to their chosen tertiary institution for the degree they wish to undertake. The Scholarship award is conditional on the applicant being offered a place at the relevant institution.

YALI John Paul Usman Award for Civic Leadership for Nigerians 2017

Application Deadline: 14th April 2017
Eligible Countries: Nigeria
About the Award: The purpose of this grant is to memorialize the late John Paul Usman, 2016 Mandela Washington Fellow, by funding project(s) submitted by YALI Network members from Nigeria focusing on his areas of interest listed below.
Purpose of Funding:
  1. Children’s rights issues
  2. Peace building.
Grant proposals must demonstrate how projects support these thematic areas.  Any project outside these areas will not be considered.
Additional activities not eligible for funding include, but are not limited to: 
  • Social welfare projects;
  • Individual travel to conferences;
  • Construction projects;
  • Completion of activities for projects begun with other funds;
  • Projects that are inherently political in nature or that contain the appearance of partisanship/support to individual or single party electoral campaigns; and
  • Political party activities.
Public diplomacy grant funding from the U.S. government may not be used for any commercial, for-profit activity or business operations.  All events, conferences, workshops, training, or other engagement activities must be free of charge to participants and audiences.
Type: Grants
Eligibility: PAS encourages applications from Nigeria YALI Network members or their organizations located in Nigeria including:
  1. Registered not-for-profit and civil society/non-governmental organizations with at least two years of programming experience;
  2. Individuals with two years of not-for-profit, project management, or education; experience.
This award is open to RLC alumni but NOT open to alumni of the Mandela Washington Fellowship program or their organizations.
Selection Criteria: Applications will be reviewed on the basis of their completeness, coherence, clarity and attention to detail. Each application submitted under this announcement will be evaluated and rated on the basis of the evaluation criteria outlined below.
  • Organizational Capacity: The organization has expertise in its stated field and PAS is confident of its technical capacity to undertake the project.
  • Goals and Objectives: Goals and objectives are clearly stated and the project approach is likely to provide maximum impact in achieving the proposed results.
  • Embassy Priority: The applicant has clearly described how stated goals are related to and support the award’s priority areas.
  • Sustainability: Project activities will continue to have positive impact after the end of the project.
  • Feasibility: Analysis of the project’s economic, organizational, and technical feasibility. This is related to the project approach, budget items requested, and technical/human resource capacity of the organization.
  • Budget: The budget justification is both reasonable and realistic in relation to the proposed activities and anticipated results.  Grants will be awarded to programs with the highest impact per dollar spent.
  • Monitoring and Evaluation Plan: The applicant demonstrates it is able to measure program success against key indicators and provide milestones to indicate progress toward goals outlined in the proposal.  The project includes a systematic recording and periodic analysis of selected information on the project activities.
Number of Awardees: Not specified
Value of Grants: 
Funding Instrument Type:  Fixed amount award
Floor of Individual Award Amounts:  N500,000
Ceiling of Individual Award Amounts: N1,500,000
Duration of Grants: Grant projects must be completed before September 30, 2017.
How to Apply: Proposals should be submitted online to U.S. Embassy Abuja at the following email address: AbujaYALI@state.gov using the attached proposal and budget templates. Applicants are also required to fill out the attached SF-424 form and submit with their application. Applications are accepted in English only.  Final grant agreements will be concluded in English.  Applications that do not use the proposal and budget templates and do not submit the SF-424 will not be considered.
Depending on the response, U.S. Embassy Abuja will attempt to notify those proposals not selected.  Proposals will be accepted until April 14, 2017 and with positive responses issued by April 30, 2017.
The application form requires a DUNS number, a unique nine-digit identification number.  DUNS Number assignment is free for organizations required to register with the federal government for grants.
It is important to visit the Grants Webpage for Application Instructions before applying.
Award Provider: U.S. Embassy Nigeria
Important Note: This award is NOT open to alumni of the Mandela Washington Fellowship program or their organizations.

University of Manchester Global Development Institute (GDI) Masters Scholarship for Developing Countries 2017/2018

Application Deadline: 26th May 2017
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: Developing Countries
To be taken at (country): UK
Eligible Fields of Study: 
  1. Development Economics and Public Policy
  2. International Development
  3. Human Resource Development
  4. Development Informatics
  5. Management and Development
Type: Masters
Eligibility: Eligibility for the scholarships is as follows:
  1. Applicants must already hold an unconditional offer for one of the courses above.
  2. Applicants must be a national of and resident in a DAC-listed least developed, other low-income or lower-middle income country. The full list of eligible countries can be found in link below.
  3. Applicants for international scholarships must not have previously studied in an OECD country.
  4. Applicants must hold a First Class Honours bachelor’s degree or equivalent, and an overall score of 6.5 in IELTS (or similar exam), with 6.5 in writing and no other subsections below 6.0.
Selection: Applicants will be advised of the outcome of their application within four weeks of the deadline.
Number of Awardees: 9
Value of Scholarship: Full tuition waiver
Duration of Scholarship: 1 year
How to Apply:
  • Applicants should email a 500-word statement detailing how they will apply their learning to develop a credible career track into development leadership.
  • Please send statement to the relevant email address below by clicking on the scholarship name. Please ensure you include your ID number and name of scholarship you are applying for in the subject line.
Please email statement to the available email addresses beside each scholarship in the Scholarship Webpage link below.
Award Provider: University of Manchester