23 Sept 2017

General Motors and Ford announce thousands of US layoffs

Shannon Jones

General Motors announced Friday that it is indefinitely shutting down the third shift at its Spring Hill, Tennessee plant. The shift closure at the plant, which builds sport utility vehicles (SUVs), is slated for November. There are 1,000 workers on the shift, although GM says they may not all be affected.
At the same time, Ford has announced it will temporarily idle five car assembly plants employing some 20,000 workers before the end of the year in order to reduce swelling inventories. The company reported another US sales decline—two percent—in August. Ford’s overall sales in the US are down four percent for the year.
The GM Spring Hill plant builds the Cadillac XT5 and GMC Acadia midsize SUVs. The company said the cuts were needed to reduce inventories. GM has a 105-day supply of the Acadias; a 65-day supply is considered normal.
Three of the Ford plants being idled are in the United States and the other two are in Mexico. The Ford Flat Rock plant south of Detroit will be down for two weeks. It builds the Lincoln Continental sedan and the Ford Mustang sports car. The Michigan Assembly plant, also outside of Detroit, will be down for a week. The plant builds the Focus sedan and the C-Max hatchback.
Both of Ford’s assembly plants in Mexico are being temporarily idled as well. They include the Cuautitlan Assembly Plant, which builds the Fiesta sedan, and the Hermosillo facility, which makes the Fusion and Lincoln MKZ sedans. Cuautitlan will be down for three weeks and Hermosillo for two.
The fifth plant being impacted is Kansas City Assembly, which will see Transit van production halted for two weeks to fix a defect first reported in June. Ford is recalling about 400,000 of the vehicles due to a faulty drive shaft flexible coupling. The driveshaft could separate, causing loss of power, loss of control and damage to brake and fuel lines.
Kansas City Assembly will be down for a week starting September 25. Ford did not specify when the other layoffs would take place.
The massive Kansas City plant employs over 7,000 workers and produces the F-150 truck as well as the Transit commercial van. A worker with over two decades at the plant told the World Socialist Web Site, “They’ll be shutting down the entire Transit van side of the plant, where I work, even though the vans are selling like a son of a gun. They say it could be two down weeks between now and the end of the year, but that could change at any time. It’s pretty hush-hush.”
Citing the grueling character of Ford’s alternative work schedule and mandatory overtime, he continued, “There are actually a lot of people who had been looking for a down week. We were working five 10-hour days since about the beginning of the year. Everybody’s been working Saturdays.”
Permanent workers who are laid off at the factories will be eligible for Supplementary Unemployment (SUB) benefits, which pay some 80 percent of regular wages. However, with the collaboration of the United Auto Workers union, Ford and the other US auto companies have increased their hiring of temporary and part-time workers, who receive few, if any, benefits. This has made it less costly for all of the US-based car manufacturers to carry out layoffs.
Ford’s other layoffs are directly related to declining passenger car sales, which have offset gains in the sale of light trucks. Ford’s US car sales are down 20 percent for the year, while truck sales are up 3.6 percent. Overall, US car sales are down 12 percent for the year, with GM sales down 2.4 percent.
The layoffs at Ford and GM are a further indication that the seven-year boom in US auto sales is collapsing. Ford had an 81-day supply of vehicles in September, up from 77 days in August. The Transit van built in Kansas City is the best-selling van in the US, but sales fell 15 percent in August and are down 21 percent for the year.
In August, Fiat Chrysler US sales were off by 11 percent, the twelfth consecutive month the automaker has seen a year-over-year decline. Jeep Cherokee sales are down 25 percent for the year and fell 50 percent in August. The company ended passenger car production in the US at the end of last year to concentrate on more profitable trucks and SUVs.
Fiat Chrysler is temporarily halting production at its Windsor, Ontario van plant in Canada. The company said the four-week shutdown, starting October 2, was related to new US airbag requirements, which involve retooling. Only 4,000 of the 6,000 workers at the plant qualify for SUB benefits. The others are newer hires who are not covered.
On August 31, the company permanently ended production of the Dodge Viper sports car in Detroit. The 87 workers are being transferred to other plants, Fiat Chrysler said.
Ford has extended the temporary layoff of about 140 workers at its Avon Lake Assembly Plant in Ohio through the end of the year. Production at the plant, which builds the F-650 and F-750 truck, had been cut to one shift. A UAW spokesman at the plant told local media that the layoffs could extend into the first quarter of 2018. Ford has thus far avoided permanent layoffs at its plants in the face of slowing sales.
In addition to the layoffs planned at Spring Hill, General Motors has this year carried out some 5,000 permanent layoffs at several plants, including 1,300 at the Detroit-Hamtramck Assembly plant and 1,200 workers at Lordstown, Ohio Assembly. A full shift is slated to be laid off this month at the Fairfax, Kansas assembly plant. These cuts were first announced in June.
The United Auto Workers has not opposed the job cuts. Instead, it has justified them on the grounds of “market conditions.” The layoffs come as further corruption revelations emerge concerning the illegal diversion of money from the Fiat Chrysler UAW National Training Center to high-ranking UAW officials.
The 2015 national auto contract, which provoked massive opposition from rank-and-file union members, was a milestone in the betrayal by the UAW of the interests of autoworkers. The contract, initially voted down by a two-to-one margin by Fiat Chrysler workers, maintained the hated two-tier wage system and the alternative work schedule, while allowing the auto companies to expand the use of contingent workers. It gave senior workers a measly three percent wage increase after ten years of frozen wages, and failed to restore cost-of-living raises.
Now the so-called job protections in the contact are being exposed once again as worthless.
A worker with six years at the GM Detroit-Hamtramck plant who was laid off in March told the WSWS, “They are firing people right and left. It is a way they can cut jobs and not pay benefits.”
About the UAW, he added, “They are all crooks. We pay union dues for no representation. They manipulate the contract.”
The Ford Kansas City Assembly worker spoke about the UAW bribery scandal and the impact of the 2015 contract betrayal. He said, “The UAW doesn’t like anybody knowing their business. They’ll come down on your ass. They stole from our retirees. They’re crooks.
“The whole last contract, that really, really hurt. We had temps getting insurance, but now they’re no longer getting it. The morale sucks at the plant.
“Facebook and social media was the reason the last contract almost got out of their control. You can lie so much, but you can’t run from that.”
This month the UAW launched a website promoting its reactionary Build Buy USA campaign aimed at pitting American workers against their fellow workers in Mexico and other countries. The layoffs are not the result of Mexican workers “stealing” US jobs, as claimed by the union officials, but rather the outcome of the crisis of the capitalist profit system.
Autoworkers’ jobs and conditions are under attack all over the world by the massive transnational corporations, which, with the aid of the unions, pit workers in one country against those in other countries in a fratricidal race to the bottom. The attack on jobs can by fought only by autoworkers uniting across national boundaries in a common struggle against the auto corporations.

Spanish government dispatches police reinforcements to Catalonia

Paul Mitchell

The Spanish Interior Minister, Juan Ignacio Zoido, has announced that National Police and Civil Guard reinforcements are being dispatched to Catalonia in advance of the October 1 independence referendum.
In a letter addressed to the his Catalan regional counterpart, Joaquím Forn, Zoido declared extra officers were needed “to support” the Catalan regional police force, Mossos d’Esquadra, to “maintain public order” following the “tumultuous mobilizations” that erupted after the arrest on Wednesday of Catalan officials and businessmen involved in the preparation of the referendum. The arrestees face possible sentences of 15 years for “sedition.”
Three ships are docked in the ports of Barcelona and Tarragona to provide accommodation for the forces, although dockworkers have refused to supply them.
Behind Zoido’s announcement, however, are fears that the Mossos d’Esquadra are unreliable and that it is necessary to match their number—some 16,000 officers.
The chief of the Mossos d’Esquadra, Josep Lluís Trapero, has been accused of relaying orders from Madrid to his subordinates with insufficient enthusiasm or clarity. On Thursday the force was accused of “passivity” by PP officials when demonstrators prevented Civil Guards from provocatively taking over, without a warrant, the headquarters of the pseudo-left CUP party and besieged those searching the Catalan Economy ministry.
An El País editorial criticized the Mossos d’Esquadra for not acting against those “in the commission of crimes.” Other newspapers warned that the government could put the Catalan police force under the direct control of the Interior Ministry or disband it altogether.
The PP government, according to El Espanol has decided to “park although not discard” the process of invoking Article 155 of the Spanish Constitution allowing it to suspend autonomy and take over the functions of the Catalan government. The newspaper criticized the decision complaining bitterly that, “If [PP Prime Minister Mariano] Rajoy continues to act as a mere observer, the state will continue towards the coup”—the term used by Madrid to describe the referendum.
For their part, Rajoy and the PP are counting on the ability of police operations to prevent the referendum. Ballot papers, posters and polling booths have been seized and officials arrested and threatened with fines of up to 16,000 euros a day if they continue preparing for the vote. Catalan government finances have also been taken over by Madrid.
The Public Prosecutor's Office of the National Court has filed sedition charges against the Catalan National Assembly (ANC) and Omnium Cultural for the protest that took place in Barcelona and other towns on Wednesday. It accuses the two main separatist organizations of promoting violence, when in fact ANC leader Jordi Sánchez, is on the record for calling for peaceful demonstrations.
The PP is stoking up claims of violence to justify their drafting in of more police and further repression. They are pinpointing the CUP “a movement of an anarchist origin, with a very radical and violent nature” that “is very far from the reality of Catalan society.” These sorts of statements only assist the CUP, which dresses itself up in pseudo-socialist colors while acting as the foot-soldiers of the main Catalan bourgeois parties, the Republican Left of Catalonia (ERC) and the Catalan European Democratic Party (PDeCAT).
The PP is seeking to split the secessionists by declaring that as soon as they renounce the referendum of October 1, they will begin negotiations on political and economic reforms. There are suggestions of the PP supporting the proposal of the Socialist Party (PSOE), already put before Congress, to convene a “commission on the territorial model” in Spain.
Economy Minister, Luis De Guindos, told the Financial Times, “As soon as they abandon the independence plans, we can talk…Catalonia already has a great autonomy, but we could talk about a reform of the financing system and other issues.”
Whist welcoming PP support for negotiations, PSOE president, Cristina Narbona, has said that the government should not wait for October 2 to begin but start immediately. The PSOE, however, has refused to join an initiative launched by Podemos involving, “European parliamentarians, state and autonomous community representatives, as well as councils and councillors of all political formations, except PP and Citizens.” In addition, the PSOE president of the Provincial Council of Zaragoza has banned a conference this Sunday of these organiations and individuals, although organizers are seeking to hold it elsewhere.
Meanwhile Catalan President Carles Puigdemont has announced that referendum will take place and that the Catalan government has “contingency plans”. A map of polling stations has been published and some 55,000 people needed to man them are being notified. A call for “permanent protest” has been made by the secessionist umbrella organizations, the Catalan National Assembly and Òmnium Cultural.
The events in Catalonia have also had repercussions in other autonomous regions. The Basque Country President Iñigo Urkullu, declared Thursday for an “exit to the territorial political labyrinth” of Spain, “a redistribution of the sovereignty of the State” and discussions about the idea of a confederal “shared sovereignty”. The Congress deputies belonging to Urkullu’s Basque National Party, upon whom the minority PP government relies for its survival, have refused to vote for the Budget, forcing its postponement.
Few European Union leaders have spoken out openly on the Catalonia crisis for fear of worsening the existential crisis in the bloc, beset by Brexit and the rise of nationalism and separatism. This week, Scottish National Party Nicola Sturgeon made common cause with the Catalan separatists and called for the referendum to go ahead. In Italy two “advisory” referendums promoted by the Northern League, with the support of Forza Italia, will be held on October 22 on greater autonomy for the two richest regions of the country, Lombardy and Veneto.
A spokesperson for German Chancellor Angela Merkel summed up the official EU line that the Catalonia issue was an “internal Spanish matter” but that she had often told Rajoy that the German government had “great interest in the maintenance of stability in Spain”. The German co-leader of the Greens in the European Parliament, Ska Keller, was more forthright declaring, “Rajoy has put a lot of oil on the fire, fuelling the independentist debate. He has made a huge mistake” and called for other PP leaders to put pressure on him to “calm things down”.
European Commission (EC) President, Jean-Claude Juncker, criticized Catalan politicians for using his remarks last week that Catalonia could join the EU after independence to imply he supported secession. He said a newly independent state would only be allowed to join if he had done so in accordance with the constitutional law of the member state it had left.
An editorial in the UK’s Guardian called for a “step back from the brink.” It said that “All the Spanish prime minister, Mariano Rajoy, has achieved by being so oblivious to public sentiment in Catalonia is to harden opinion in the region and draw thousands onto the streets.
“If nothing is done to work towards a compromise, a political train wreck threatens in the EU’s largest southern member state” it warned.
The Economist declared, “If the rule of law is to mean anything, the constitution should be upheld. Mr. Puigdemont should thus step back from his reckless referendum…Mr. Rajoy should be less defensive: he should now seek to negotiate a new settlement with Catalonia, while also offering to rewrite the constitution to allow referendums on secession, but only with a clear majority on a high turnout.”

Sigmar Gabriel’s UN address: German great power ambitions in pacifist garb

Johannes Stern

Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel underscored Germany’s claim to great power status in an address to the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday, just days prior to Sunday’s federal election. After a flood of pacifist phrases, he concluded his remarks with an explicit call for greater German “responsibility” in world affairs, including a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.
“Ladies and gentlemen, Germany is ready to assume additional responsibility,” he declared to his international audience. “This is why my country is applying for a seat on the United Nations Security Council for the years 2019 to 2020.”
Germany, he added, has “a clear course. Peace and security, global justice and human rights are inseparably bound together.” Germany wants “to cooperate in partnership with all members of the United Nations—in Africa, Asia, America and Europe.”
Phrases about “peace,” “human rights” and “global justice” are rhetorical window dressing for Germany’s renewed turn to imperialist “Realpolitik.” Unlike the 1930s, when the German Reich left the League of Nations to rearm and prepare for war, today Berlin seeks to pursue its global imperialist ambitions within existing international organisations.
Now, as then, Germany identifies the United States as its chief rival. Gabriel did not once refer to US President Donald Trump. But his speech was a clear rejection of Trump’s “America First” strategy, to which Gabriel counterposes an ostensibly more “peaceful” German policy.
“If one looks around the world,” Gabriel declared, “it appears as though a world outlook has imposed itself that considers one’s own national interests to be absolute and avoids seeking to reconcile the interests of the world’s nations and states.” He rejected such an outlook, proclaiming “national egoism” to be unsuitable “as an organising principle for our world.”
He went on to say that “this world outlook” is dominated by “the international law of the strongest and not the strength of international law.” He was certain that “we must engage to oppose this world outlook.” Again wrapping himself in the mantle of international law, he declared, “We need more international cooperation and less national egoism, not the reverse.”
Leon Trotsky, the leader of the Russian Revolution along with Lenin, wrote in the founding program of the Fourth International: “The bourgeoisie and its agents use the war question, more than any other, to deceive the people by means of abstractions, general formulas, lame phraseology: ‘neutrality,’ ‘collective defense,’ ‘arming for the defense of peace.’”
In Gabriel’s case, the phrases of choice are “reconciliation of interests,” “international cooperation” and “international law.”
All such formulas, Trotsky continued, “reduce themselves in the end to the fact that the war question, i.e., the fate of the people, is left in the hands of the imperialists, their governing staffs, their diplomacy, their generals, with all their intrigues and plots against the people.”
Gabriel’s “lame phraseology” cannot conceal the fact that he and the Social Democrats (SPD) are playing a leading role in the return of German militarism and, like Trump, are preparing for war. Significantly, he did not utter a word of criticism of Trump’s fascistic threat to “totally destroy” North Korea, a country of 25 million people.
Just a few days earlier, in an interview with Handelsblatt, Gabriel laid out his own militarist programme for the German government. “In essence,” he said, “the issue is to make Europe a global political actor” capable of standing up to the US as well as China. To this end, he said it was necessary “to double the efficiency of the European defence policy.” He described the “abolition of military service” and cutbacks in the budget for the armed forces as mistakes.
In his recent book Remeasuring, Gabriel calls for the construction of a European army capable of imposing the continent’s global interests independently of NATO and the US, and, if necessary, in opposition to the latter.
“Europe’s security is Europe’s own responsibility,” he writes. “We have to become capable of acting strategically, because currently we don’t do so sufficiently. This includes defining our European interests and articulating them independently of the US. This requires an emancipation, to some extent, from adopting positions developed in Washington.”
He continues: “Anyone with his own goals should develop the capabilities to achieve them. The EU must see itself increasingly as a security policy power. Our defence budgets must be adjusted accordingly. Europe’s military equipment must be modernised and reoriented towards operational readiness and military tasks.”
Gabriel’s criticism of Washington has nothing to do with pacifism. He opposes Trump’s threats to destroy North Korea and blow up the Iran nuclear deal because they undercut German imperialist interests. Berlin, like Paris and London, has signed multi-billion-dollar deals with Iran and wants to further open up the country to secure new energy sources and new markets for Germany’s export-dependent economy in the Middle East.
With regard to North Korea, Germany, which is one of the few countries to have an embassy in Pyongyang and North Korean diplomatic representation in Berlin, is pursuing similar goals. German Chancellor Angela Merkel said in an interview with Deutsche Welle, “Even though in terms of distance it is far away from Germany, it is still a conflict that affects us. And that’s why I am prepared and the foreign minister is prepared to assume responsibility for this. In the Iran agreement, which I believe to be correct… we also took part in the negotiations.”
Behind the call for more “responsibility” in the North Korea conflict lie the economic and geo-strategic interests of German imperialism. Rüdiger Frank, the leading German North Korean expert, describes the North Korean economy in his recent book as an “uncut diamond.” He writes: “The geographical position, between some of the largest and most dynamic markets in the world, which have substantial deposits of raw materials and largely well-educated, disciplined populations,” offers “realistic prospects for growth and economic success.”

Death toll in Mexico City earthquake reaches 286

Don Knowland

By Friday afternoon, the official death toll from Tuesday’s earthquake in Mexico had reached 286. Mexico City, the nation’s capital, accounted for 148 of those deaths. Over 3,800 buildings were damaged in Mexico City alone, of which over 40 had entirely collapsed.
The building collapses led to intensive efforts to search through rubble to locate survivors. Nineteen students and six adults died when a school in Mexico City collapsed. Dozens are still missing or unaccounted for.
The epicenter of the quake was approximately 75 miles southeast of Mexico City, in Puebla State. Some small cities and towns in that and nearby states, such as Morelos and Mexico, also suffered a significant number of deaths and major damage, including the destruction of many adobe brick structures.
Seismologists are suggesting that the quake was not of a “subduction” nature, where one of the earth’s plates sinks below another. Such earthquakes generate the largest magnitudes and destructive power, including the 8.2 temblor that occurred on September 7 off the coast of the southern Mexican state of Oaxaca, and the massive 8.1 quake in 1985 centered on the Michoacán coast, 200 miles west-southwest of Mexico City, which led to the deaths of at least 10,000 people.
Mexico City, with a population of nearly nine million, and other portions of the neighboring metropolitan zone, encompassing 25 million people, are particularly vulnerable to the effects of earthquakes because much of the area once consisted of a series of interlocking lakes, which were later dried up and filled in. This includes Lake Texcoco, on whose lakebed the city now rests.
Given the thick deposits of sand and clay and the often muddy nature of much of these sedimentary basins, earthquake waves passing through them can be as much as one hundred times stronger than they would be otherwise. This is a phenomenon that does not occur on this scale in any other major urban area in the world. It is why Tuesday’s quake shook the Mexico City more violently than other areas that were a similar distance from the epicenter.
In a rational society organized to meet human needs, this hyper-susceptibility to earthquake damage in an area populated by tens of millions of people would result in massive efforts to maximize the protection of lives and structures. Not so in a highly unequal society dominated by an oligarchy that does not allow the needed resources to be diverted from its own enrichment.
The government of then-President Miguel de la Madrid of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, the PRI, the party currently in power, reacted with criminal indifference to the 1985 earthquake. The government’s rescue efforts in the first days after the quake were wholly inadequate, and it rejected international aid. The inept federal response left millions to fend for themselves.
The ensuing mass outrage led to a certain upgrade of building codes and some increase in enforcement. But the building requirements that were put in place fell far short of what was needed, even if adhered to. For example, in the massive slums that ring Mexico City, millions live in poorly constructed homes that building regulations do not address. Many dangerous structures in the city center were not torn down or adequately reinforced.
Many of the changes to building codes following the 1985 quake were aimed at reinforcing the 8th to 13th floors of buildings that suffered the most damage in the center of the city. But Tuesday’s quake affected lower floors and lower buildings to a much greater extent, most likely because the wave generated by the more local earthquake was not in the nature of a plate subduction.
As in the hugely inadequate response of the US government to the recent hurricanes in Texas and Florida, most rescue and aid efforts after Tuesday’s quake in Mexico fell to working class volunteers.
The city’s populace spontaneously took to the streets, distributing food, water and blankets, and digging people free from the rubble, often with bare hands. Experienced volunteer brigades of so-called “moles” undertook the most dangerous building searches.
The Mexican government once again conducted itself in a reprehensible manner. It engaged in a 30-hour media spectacle, broadcasting live the efforts of security forces and emergency workers who were searching the rubble of the collapsed school where 26 died in search of a 12-year-old girl, known only as “Frida Sofía.” Senior Mexican officials, including Education Secretary Aurelio Nuño, spent hours at the school in an attempt to portray themselves as lifesaving heroes. Later the government conceded that the girl never existed.
On Tuesday, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto cut short a planned visit to areas pummeled by the September 7 Oaxaca quake, heading back to the capital to deal with the new quake. But before he left for Oaxaca, he provided figures on the scale of the damage from the September 7 quake in the two hardest hit states, Oaxaca and Chiapas: 99 had died and 2,600 schools and upwards of 100,000 homes had been severely damaged, a large percentage beyond repair.
Almost half of all households live in poverty in these poor southern states. Some 70 percent of Oaxaca’s population earns less than what is needed to satisfy basic family needs, according to the government agency Coneval, and 77 percent of people in Chiapas. In both states, low-income families earn as little as 37 pesos (US$2) per day, less than half the Mexican minimum wage.
Such poverty necessarily makes the impact of earthquakes considerably worse. Yet these are the states that have the least influence with the federal government in terms of receiving disaster aid and reconstruction funding.
The 1985 earthquake ignited a move to the left among the populace. In response, a new party split off from the PRIthe Party of the Democratic Revolution. This party has by now been thoroughly exposed as just another handmaiden of the ruling elite. The earthquakes this month further discredit an already massively unpopular government.

Dam collapse threatens to kill thousands in Puerto Rico

Rafael Azul 

Sunlight finally shone intermittently in San Juan, Puerto Rico, on Friday following a night of heavy rain—more than three feet fell in the previous twenty-four hours. There are flash flood warnings and people are being told to seek higher ground. Stores that are still open are running out of water bottles. Those that still have them are rationing them. Two days after the hurricane, virtually every necessity is in short supply.
That food, fuel and other essentials are in short supply so soon, despite having been rationed since before Maria hit the island, is an indictment of the current administration of Ricardo Rosselló, the ruling Financial Oversight and Management Board, and the American government which has kept the island under colonial subjugation for over a century. All three are guilty of criminal indifference and lack of preparation.
All over the island streets are blocked by hundreds of toppled electric posts, leaving all of Puerto Rico with no public electric power. Hundreds of trees have also been yanked out by the sustained 150 mile-per-hour winds.
The heavy rains caused a partial failure in the Guajataca Dam, on the northern coast about 70 miles west of San Juan. The breach sent streams of water toward the cities of Isabela (pop. 45,000) and Quebradillas (pop. 26,000), prompting calls for the last-minute emergency evacuation of some 70,000 people.
Abner Gomez, executive director of Puerto Rico's emergency management agency, said "thousands of people could die" if the dam suffers a total failure.
On Puerto Rico’s southern coast, Ponce, a historic city and Puerto Rico’s second largest, is incommunicado from the central government. Its mayor, María Meléndez, declared that the city “is devastated.” While no casualties have as yet been reported, 1,295 people remain in shelters. There is no electricity in Ponce; many parts of the Ponce metropolitan area have no water. There has been extensive damage at Ponce Beach and in other tourist areas, as well as in the port of Ponce. Ponce leaders have launched an appeal for food, beds for the shelters, and fuel for the area hospitals.
Bernardo Márquez, mayor of the town of Toa Baja, a western suburb of San Juan, reported that eight people drowned there. Four thousand people have been rescued from the flooded parts of the town. On Wednesday, three elderly sisters that had sought refuge in an empty house in Utuado died from a mudslide.
Further to the west, there are reports that the city of Aguadilla (pop. 61,000) suffered massive damages, including destroyed homes, toppled traffic lights and dividing walls. Aguadilla’s mayor, Carlos Méndez, gave the following details: “Homes have floated away; roofs are gone; it is impossible to travel on highway 2; all this is a disaster… Aguadilla is no more.”
The death toll from Hurricane Maria’s waves of destruction and flooding of Puerto Rico and other smaller Caribbean islands, stands at 32; 15 died in Puerto Rico. Also hit with deadly consequences were Saint Croix, part of the US Virgin Islands chain, Dominica, Guadeloupe and Martinique.
Health professionals now predict that, like in Florida and Houston in the aftermath of Hurricanes Irma and Harvey, the mosquito population will explode in the coming weeks, leading to a potentially disastrous increase in infectious diseases such as Zika, Dengue, Malaria and Nile Virus.
The flooding of antiquated sewer systems in San Juan, Ponce, Arecibo and many other coastal cities increases the danger of cholera and other diseases.
On top of these natural disasters is the economic and financial disaster in which this semi-autonomous colony of the US is in after declaring bankruptcy a little over a year ago and then defaulting on $74 billion in fiscal debt. Puerto Rico does not have access to the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank.
This financial debacle did not materialize out of thin air; it is the product of decades of economic decline, coupled with 15 years of deindustrialization and capital flight, combined with flight of human labor-power, a record wave of emigration by young workers and professionals in search of jobs and better opportunities.
In the wake of these twin natural disasters, Puerto Rico is up against a wall, reeling as it is pushed back in time to the conditions of the nineteenth century. In a nutshell, conditions for the great majority of Puerto Ricans will more and more approximate those of Haiti, Honduras and other impoverished Caribbean and Central American nations.
Whatever economic activity remains will not be enough to spur a quick recovery. What is required is massive investment in housing, education, healthcare, roads, bridges, dams, sewers, and mosquito abatement.
An article in Miami’s Nuevo Herald marveled at how citizens of San Juan spontaneously took to the streets on Thursday to help in whatever they could, removing debris, clearing trees and power poles from the roads, directing traffic, and using their vehicles to transport people to clinics.
Be it in Mexico, Florida, Houston, Mexico City, or Puerto Rico, these demonstrations of popular solidarity contrast with the indifference and lack of preparation and effort of the ruling class and their political agents, such as governor Ricardo Rosselló and, in Puerto Rico’s case, the Financial Oversight and Management Board of Puerto Rico. For all their bombastic talk about the resiliency and spirit of the Puerto Rican people, the Puerto Rican capitalists and their Wall Street masters lick their chops over the “opportunity” of big profits at the expense of the Puerto Rican population.

22 Sept 2017

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) Masters Scholarships at IHE Delft 2018 – The Netherlands

Application Deadline: 15th November 2017 (23.59 CET).
Offered Annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: All. Countries in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africawill be given priority.
To Be Taken At (Country): The Netherlands
About the Award: In partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (IHE Delft) has launched a new Master of Science Programme in Sanitation. It is a unique, internationally recognized programme, designed for completion in 12 months.
The programme with scholarships available for top talents, is based at IHE Delft in the Netherlands, with thesis work abroad, while, in the near future, the programme will also be available at universities in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
The state-of-the-art content was developed and provided by the world’s top experts from both academia and practice. This demand-driven and practice orientated programme will yield graduates with fundamental understanding and knowledge, as well as the skills necessary for creating impact.
Type: Masters
Eligibility: 
  • The programme is dedicated to targeting needs and delivering specialists in a short time, with the necessary qualifications. It aims to attract talented and ambitious young and mid-career sanitation professionals, working in water supply and sewerage companies, municipal assemblies, government ministries, NGOs and consulting firms.
  • Ideally these individuals are dealing with urban and peri-urban sanitation, especially in informal settlements.
  • Participants should have a Bachelor’s or equivalent degree in sanitary, civil, chemical, agricultural, environmental engineering, chemistry, ecology, biology, natural science, environmental science, agriculture, environmental economics.
  • Candidates who do not have a degree in the relevant field, but do have various years of work experience in the field of sanitation can also apply.
  • Given the global mission of IHE Delft, regional relevance of partner universities, and the close cooperation with the BMGF and its focus on professionals from South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, the new programme encourages people from those regions to apply, without excluding applicants from Latin America, North America and Europe.
  • Women, irrespective of their geographical location, are encouraged to apply.
Selection Criteria: While being at MSc level, the programme has a professional orientation. It is demand-driven, delivering graduates with the qualifications required by the sanitation sector. These areas will be prominent in the programme:
  • the linking of the taught subject matter, not only to research outcomes, but also to sanitation practice;
  • the nature of the individual research topics of  the students;
  • the embedding of the development of generic professional skills in the programme.
As a result, graduates will possess both the fundamental understanding, as well as the knowledge and skills necessary, to create professional impact ‘on the ground’.
Number of Awards: 15
Value of Award: 
  • The scholarship covers: tuition fee; direct study related cost; insurance; visa cost; monthly allowance for living and accommodation; research allowance, international travel. Visa and accommodation will be arranged by IHE Delft.
  • In the subsequent editions, starting from the class 2019-2020, the programme will be open to more students (up to 50) and funding beyond scholarships provided by the BMGF will be necessary.
Duration of Program: 1 year
How to Apply: Read more about admission requirements and how to apply.
Award Providers: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, IHE Delft.

Woodrow Wilson Residential Fellowship for International Researchers 2018/2019

Application Deadline: 2nd October 2017
Eligible Countries: International
To Be Taken At (Country): USA
About the Award: Through an international competition, the Center offers 9-month residential fellowships. The Wilson Center invites scholars, practitioners, journalists and public intellectuals to take part in its flagship international Fellowship Program. Fellows conduct research and write in their areas of interest, while interacting with policymakers in Washington and Wilson Center staff and other scholars in residence.  The Center accepts policy-relevant, non-advocacy fellowship proposals that address key challenges confronting the United States and the world.
Type: Career Fellowship
Eligibility: 
  • Citizens or permanent residents from any country (applicants from countries outside the United States must hold a valid passport and be able to obtain a J-1 visa even if they are currently in the United States)
  • Men and women with outstanding capabilities and experience from a wide variety of backgrounds (including academia, business, government, journalism, and other professions)
  • Academic candidates holding a Ph.D. (Ph.D. must be received by the application deadline of October 2)
  • Academic candidates demonstrating scholarly achievement by publications beyond their doctoral dissertations
  • Practitioners or policymakers with an equivalent level of professional achievement
  • English proficiency as the Center is designed to encourage the exchange of ideas among its fellows
Selection Criteria: The basic criteria for selection are:
  • significance of the proposed research, including the importance and originality of the project;
  • the relevance of the project to contemporary policy issues;
  • the relevance of the project to the programmatic work of the Center;
  • quality of the proposal in definition, organization, clarity, and scope;
  • capabilities and achievements of the applicant and the likelihood that the applicant will accomplish the proposed project;
  • potential of a candidate to actively contribute to the life, priorities and mission of the Center by making expert research accessible to a broader audience.
The Center welcomes in particular those projects that transcend narrow specialties and methodological issues of interest only within a specific academic discipline. Projects should involve fresh research-—in terms of both the overall field and the author’s previous work. It is essential that projects have relevance to public policy, and fellows should want, and be prepared, to interact with policymakers in Washington and with Wilson Center staff and other scholars who are working on similar issues.
Number of Awards: 15-20
Value of Award: 
  • Each fellow is assigned a furnished office around the clock.
  • The Center is located in the heart of Washington, D.C., and includes conference rooms, a reference library, and a dining room.
  • The Wilson Center Library provides loan privileges with the Library of Congress and access to digital resources, its book and journal collections, and to university and special libraries in the area, and other research facilities.
  • Windows-based personal computers are provided, and each fellow is offered a part-time research assistant.
  • Although fellows are responsible for locating their own housing in the Washington, D.C. area, the Center provides written materials to help facilitate the search process.
  • The Center tries to ensure that the fellowship award, when combined with the recipient’s other sources of income (e.g. other grants and sabbatical allowances), approximates an individual’s current level of income.
  • Awards will also include round trip travel for fellows.
  • If spouses and/or dependent children will reside with the fellow for the entire fellowship period, money for their travel will also be included.
  • In addition to stipends and travel allowances, the Center provides 75 percent of health insurance premiums for fellows who elect Center coverage and for their accompanying family members.
Duration of Program: Fellows are expected to be in residence for the entire U.S. academic year (early September through May). Occasionally, fellowships are awarded for shorter periods, with a minimum of four months. Fellowships may not be deferred.
How to Apply: Applicants may submit their applications online here
A complete application must include the following:
  1. the Fellowship Application Form;
  2. a current CV (Optional; not to exceed three pages); The Center will only accept the first three pages; please list your publications separately.
  3. a list of your publications that includes exact titles, names of publishers, dates of publication and status of forthcoming publications (not to exceed three pages);
  4. a Project Proposal (not to exceed five single-spaced typed pages, using 12-point type); The Center reserves the right to omit from review applications that are longer than the requested page length;
  5. a bibliography for the project that includes primary sources and relevant secondary sources (not to exceed three pages);
  6. the Financial Information Form.
  7. Two letters of reference
All application materials must be submitted in English.
Award Providers: Woodrow Wilson Centre
Important Notes: Applicants are notified of the results of the selection process in March of the following year.

Makerere University/Norwegian University of Life Sciences/University of Dar es Salaam Masters Fellowship in Climate Change 2018

Application Deadline: 29th September 2017 at 4:00 pm.
To Be Taken At (Country):  University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
About the Award: Makerere University, in conjunction with the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) and University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM,) is implementing a Capacity Building Project on REDD+.  The project is supported by Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) under the Norwegian Programme for Capacity Building in Higher Education and Research for Development (NORHED).
The goal of the project is to contribute to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and improved ecosystem health for sustainable livelihoods in Eastern Africa. The intended outcome is to strengthen capacity of Central Government, Local Government, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), and community institutions to plan and implement Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, ‘plus’ conservation of forests, sustainable management of forests for enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+).
The specific objectives are to strengthen the capacity for education and research on climate change and REDD+ at Makerere University and University of Dar es Salaam through strengthened scientific and institutional capacity to deliver better quality education and research on REDD+
Fields of Study: Interested applicants should understand that upon completion of their Coursework, their research and dissertation will dwell on either of the following themes:
1. Payment for Ecosystem Services in the context of REDD+.
2. Cost-benefit analysis of REDD+.
3. Key drivers of forest cover change.
4. Uptake of mitigation measures towards reduction of carbon emissions.
5. Carbon markets and REDD+ financing mechanism.
6. Ecosystem services, such a pollination, under REDD+.
7. Carbon sequestration and biodiversity in different ecosystems in east Africa.
8. Vegetation dynamics in a changing climate.
9. International debates/politics and their implications on REDD+.
10. Land/Forest/Carbon tenure issues in the context of REDD+.
11. Implications of economic policy on implementation of REDD+.
12. Legal and institutional framework related to REDD+.
13. Performance of previous REDD+ and allied projects.
14. Approaches for forest monitoring, measurement, reporting and verification.
15. Implications of agricultural intensification on forest conservation.
16. Reward/penalty systems on behavioural change in relation to REDD+ policy implementation
Type: Masters
Eligibility: Applicants should be those who have admissions and/or interested to apply for Masters Studies in climate change related programmes at the University of Dar es Salaam.
1. Staff of the University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM).
2. At least 2nd class Bachelors degree in any one of the following disciplines: natural sciences, environmental science, economics, social sciences and law.
3. Highly motivated to develop a scientific career.
4. Good scientific writing skills.
5. Good methodological background in relevant scientific disciplines.
6. Admission for Masters studies in climate change related programmes
Number of Awards: 3
Value of Award: The fellowship will cover tuition, stipend and field costs.
How to Apply: Potential applicants are invited to submit application by email to cccs@udsm.ac.tzby 29th September 2017 at 4:00 pm.
All applicants should submit application letter, which state clearly the need for scholarship, attach CV, academic transcripts and concept note for prospective dissertation. The concept note should contain an outline of the rationale for the proposed study, a list of research questions or hypotheses, and outline of proposed methodological approach, a time schedule, and a list of expected outputs.
Award Providers: The project is supported by Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) under the Norwegian Programme for Capacity Building in Higher Education and Research for Development (NORHED).

AfyaBora Fellowship in Global Health Leadership for African Medical Practitioners 2018/2019

Application Deadline: 1st December, 2017
  • Interviews Mid-December 2017 – March 2018
    • Select applicants will be contacted for an interview
  • Notification of Acceptance March-April 2018
  • New Trainee Orientation in Botswana June 2018
  • New trainee participants will be brought together for a 3-day orientation. Immediately following the orientation there will be three 1-week course modules that will be held in the same country.
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: Botswana, Cameroon, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda or the US
To be taken at (country): Botswana, Cameroon, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda or the US
Eligible Field of Study: Meet ONE of the following education requirements:
  1. Medical applicants with a M.D. or MBChB with a MMed, MPH or Masters degree in related field.
  2. Nursing applicants with a Masters degree in Nursing, Public Health or a related field (PhD or DNP preferred).
  3. Other Public Health professionals with a PhD in Public Health or a related field.
About the Award: The Core Curriculum for the AfyaBora Fellowship is taught at the African partner institutions and brings together each new cohort of African and U.S. trainees. The Core Curriculum consists of eight one-week didactic modules.
Type: Fellowship
Eligibility: In order to be eligible to apply for the AfyaBora Fellowship, all applicants MUST meet the following criteria:
  1. Be a citizen or permanent resident of Botswana, Cameroon, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda or the US AND
  2. Meet ONE of the following education requirements
  • Medical applicants need to have a M.D. or MBChB with a MMed or Masters degree in related field.
  • Nursing applicants need to have a Masters degree in nursing, public health or a related field (PhD preferred), or substantial work experience.
  • Other public health professionals (those without a clinical degree) must have a Doctoral degree in public health or a related field.
Number of Awardees: 20
Value of Fellowship: 
African trainees
  • Airfare from home to training sites of the AfyaBora Fellowship
  • Monthly stipend equivalent to $1500 per month
  • Evacuation insurance if stationed outside home country
  • Accommodations and per diem up if attending didactic sessions and meetings outside of home country
  • Housing allowance of up to $750 per month if placed outside of home country
  • Reimbursement for other selected fellowship-specific activities in Africa (i.e. travel to rural sites, visa, etc.)
US Trainees
  • Monthly stipend based on NRSA NIH stipend levels (stipend cap is at 2 years post-doctoral level)
  • Roundtrip airfare from home city-Africa
  • Airfare within Africa to attachment site placement and modules
  • Per diem when attending didactic sessions and meetings
  • Housing allowance of up to $750 per month
  • Support request for an NIH loan repayment up to $35,000 for one year (only postdoctoral applicants are eligible to apply)
  • Reimbursement for other selected fellowship-specific activities in Africa (i.e. travel to rural sites, visa, etc.)
Duration of Fellowship: 12 months
How to Apply: Apply here
Award Provider: AfyaBora Fellowship is sponsored by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), President’s Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the Office of AIDS Research (OAR), a unit of the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship (Fully-funded to London, UK) 2018

Application Deadline: Sunday 8 October 2017.
Offered Annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: All
To Be Taken At (Country): London, UK
About the Award: Index helps fellows build key partnerships, troubleshoot and receive expert support in multiple areas including personal safety, finance, PR and mental health. Fellows work with Index and partners to identify and realise key strategic goals. Index promotes news and regional developments through our magazine, website and social media.
Categories:
  • Arts: for artists and arts producers whose work challenges repression and injustice and celebrates artistic free expression
  • Campaigning: for activists and campaigners who have had a marked impact in fighting censorship and promoting freedom of expression
  • Digital Activism: for innovative uses of technology to circumvent censorship and enable free and independent exchange of information
  • Journalism: for courageous, high-impact and determined journalism that exposes censorship and threats to free expression
Type: Fellowship
Eligibility: 
  • The 2018 Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship is open to any individual or organisation involved in tackling free expression threats.
  • Four fellowships will be offered,, one in each of the following categories: journalism, campaigning, arts and digital activism.
  • Anyone can nominate or self-nominate.
  • Nominees must have had a recognisable impact in the past 12 months.
Selection Criteria: 
  • Timeliness: A significant contribution within the past 12 months.
  • Resilience: Courage to speak out, persisting in the face of adversity.
  • Innovation: Creative ways of promoting free expression or circumventing censorship.
  • Impact: Evidence of shifting perceptions, influencing public or government opinion, contributing to legislative change.
Need: Those cases where the 2018 Awards Fellowship can potentially add the most value.
Number of Awards: 4 Fellowships in each of the categories above.
Value of Award: Fellows receive 12 months of direct assistance, starting with an all-expenses-paid training week in London in April 2018.
How to Apply: Submit your nomination
Award Providers: Index on Censorship

ICAO Young Aviation Professionals Program (Fully-paid Internship at Montréal, Canada) 2018

Application Deadline: 13th October 2017
Eligible Countries: All
To be taken at (country): Montréal, Canada.
About the Programme: The selected Young Aviation Professional Officers will be expected to contribute to ICAO, IATA and ACI work programmes related to aviation safety, air navigation capacity and efficiency, or to economic development of air transport, aviation facilitation, or environmental protection, focusing on inter-relationships between regulatory activities of ICAO and those in the airline and airport industries in IATA and ACI.
Type: Internship
Eligibility: 
  • Commitment to continuous learning: The willingness and ability to engage in self-development, keep up-todate with new developments, help others to learn and learn from others.
  • Planning and Organizing: Ability to set clear goals, prioritize, anticipate problems or risks, and have effective time management skills.
  • Communication: Ability to write in a clear, concise and accurate manner. Ability to communicate verbally and with diplomacy.
  • Client Orientation: Ability to see from the clients’ perspective, anticipate client needs and concerns; find appropriate solutions for clients, and keep clients informed.
  • Teamwork: Ability to work collaboratively with others and maintain harmonious working relationships in a multicultural environment.
  • Technological awareness: Ability to use contemporary software such as MS Office Suite (Word, Excel and PowerPoint), SharePoint, or equivalent and demonstrate a willingness to learn and use new technology.
Selection Criteria: 
  • Level of educations: a) Master’s degree (or equivalent, to be demonstrated by the applicant); or b) Bachelor degree, supplemented with a Commercial Pilot License or an Air Traffic Control License.
  • Experience: Minimum of two years’ professional working experience in aviation-related regulatory activities and/or in the aviation industry.
  • Language skills: Fluent reading, writing and speaking abilities in English. Working knowledge of a second language commonly used in international organizations (French, Spanish, Chinese, Russian or Arabic) would be an asset; and
  • Age criteria: Aged 32 years or less on the closing date of this announcement.
  • Note: Preference will be given to candidates who are not currently serving, or who have not previously served, as an intern with either ICAO, IATA and ACI.
Number of Awardees: 3
Value of Programme: 
  • Living Costs: All living costs and expenses will be borne by the Young Aviation Professional Officer.
  • Financial Support: A fixed amount of CAD $4 000 per month will be provided to each selected Young Aviation Professional Officer to assist with living costs.
  • Annual leave will be provided at the rate of one and a half days per month.
  • Sick leave will be provided at the rate of one day per month.
  • Medical insurance will be provided at the single rate for prescription/medical/dental coverage within Canada. The selected candidates will be required to pay the employee portion of the premium, which is estimated to be approximately CAD $ 117.65 per month.
  • Occupational accident insurance will be provided (at no cost to the selected candidates).
  • Non-occupational accident insurance will be available to the selected candidates, at their own cost.
  • Travel: Where required, travel costs to and from Montreal at the beginning and at the end of the Programme will be provided at the lowest available applicable fare. The cost for one excess baggage (i.e. baggage in excess of the weight or volume carried without charge by transportation companies) will be covered up to a maximum of 25 kilograms.
  • Visa: ICAO will provide a letter of support to assist in obtaining the required visa.
Duration of Programme: Each Young Aviation Professional Officer position will be filled for twelve months.
How to Apply: : Interested candidates who meet the selection criteria are requested to submit their candidature by the closing date of 21 October 2016 by completing the online application form available at https://careers.icao.int. They must also attach a motivation letter summarizing: their professional achievements to date; their suitability for the Programme; their career aspirations in regulatory activities and/or the aviation industry; and the field of work for which they wish to be considered. Candidates should also indicate their preferred task(s) from the lists provided in Appendix A and Appendix B and explain why they have this interest.
It is important to visit the Programme Webpage before applying for this Internship
Award Provider: The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
Important Notes: Candidates who do not complete the online application and the motivation letter will not be given consideration.