26 Oct 2017

Duke University MasterCard Foundation Scholarships for African Students 2018/2019 – USA

Application Deadline: Ongoing
Offered Annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: Sub-Saharan African countries
To be taken at (country): Duke University, USA
Eligible Fields of Study: Courses offered at the university.
About the Award: The MasterCard Foundation Scholars at Duke University represent the intellect and energy of the youth of Sub-Saharan Africa. With a financial commitment of $13.5 million from The MasterCard Foundation, Duke will educate seven classes of five students — a total of 35 students — over the next 10 years.
The Duke University class of 2016, 2017 and 2018 include 15 of these outstanding scholars selected not only for their academic capabilities, but also for their desire to become change agents in Africa. The MasterCard Foundation Scholars studying at Duke University are from South Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania, Mauritius, and Zimbabwe.
duke university mastercard foundation scholars
One of Duke’s great advantages for The MasterCard Foundation Scholars is the network of resources the university provides to scholars, their families, and students who are interested in the program.
Offered Since: 2012
Type: Undergraduate
Selection Criteria and Eligibility: The MasterCard Foundation Scholars Program at Duke is open to students from sub-Saharan Africa who demonstrate financial need, academic ability and merit, and demonstrated commitment to improving the lives of others in their communities.
Students apply to Duke first, and are then considered for The MasterCard Foundation Scholars Program.
Number of Scholarships: 5 each year
Value of Scholarship: Full scholarship and mentorship program
Duration of Scholarship: Full period of study
How to Apply: By simply applying to Duke University all students from Africa will be considered for The MasterCard Foundation Scholars Program based on academic talent, financial need, and interest in improving their communities.
Visit scholarship webpage for details
Sponsors: MasterCard Foundation

Archbishop Tutu Fellowship Programme for Young African Leaders 2018

Application Deadline: 15th December 2017.
Eligible Countries: African countries
To be taken at (country): South Africa. Other locations will be split between Oxford University and London (UK)
About the Award:  Offered on a part-time basis over six months, the Programme includes two 9-day Group Learning Modules with an impressive array of distinguished leaders and faculty. These are intensive interactive workshops; one at the historic Mont Fleur conference facility (South Africa), and the other split between Oxford University and London (UK).
The Programme has been designed specifically for African leaders in consultation with our African faculty and advisors and with Oxford, whose famous tutorial style has been adopted. It provides participants with an intensive learning and broadening experience on the principles and application of leadership, and an opportunity to explore the issues and specific characteristics of leadership in Africa, as well as the global challenges and dimensions of an African leader.
The programme places emphasis on learning and experiencing, not teaching, offering a variety of formal and innovative informal learning opportunities to enhance the leadership capabilities of the candidate. Emphasis is also placed on peer interaction and feedback, and the participants highly value being able to share pan-African perspectives and experiences. Overall it provides a unique environment for mid-career self reflection on one’s leadership journey in transforming Africa, and has been described as life changing by many participants.
Upon completing the Programme, Tutu Fellows return to play active roles in their respective communities, countries and spheres of influence. Great value is placed upon becoming a member of an established exclusive and supportive network of Africa’s future leaders – the Tutu Fellows. As part of this network of global leaders, all Fellows are expected to attend AFLI alumni events, as well as function as ambassadors for the Fellowship across all segments of society.
Type: Fellowship
Selection Criteria: In terms of selection criteria, AFLI emphasizes integrity, strong values and responsibility, courage and a demonstrated ability to lead and inspire. A candidate must demonstrate a commitment to Africa and to serving the greater community. We seek leaders not managers.
Selection Process: Competition is extremely tough for the 20 fellowship places available; each year we receive over 200 top quality nominations from all over Africa, which are put forward by our existing Fellows, Partners and network of influential leaders.
Only once candidates have been nominated, may they submit an application to AFLI.
Number of Awardees: 20
Value of Fellowship: 
  • Entry into awards
  • Thought-leadership and speaking opportunities
  • Advocacy opportunities
  • Networking opportunities and network memberships
  • Access to projects, causes and campaigns
  • Collaborating with like-minded peers on projects
  • Job opportunities
  • Pan-African exposure
  • Attendance of multi-country meetings
  • Leadership of, and participation in, multi-country organisations and projects
  • International exposure
  • Opportunities for ongoing debate and knowledge-exchange
  • Profiling in the media
  • Peer to Peer accountability
  • Selected as board members or trustees to high profile companies/organisations
Duration of Fellowship: 1 year
How to Apply: Only once candidates have been nominated, may they submit an application to AFLI.
Award Provider: African Leadership Institute (AFLI)

Clark University Presidential LEEP Scholarships for Undergraduate International Students

Application Deadline: Essay deadline: 1st February, 2018
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: All
To be taken at (country): Clark University, Massachusetts, USA
Eligible Field of Study: All
About the Award: Clark University’s Presidential LEEP Scholars Program is part of the University’s pioneering model of education, Liberal Education and Effective Practice (LEEP), which combines a robust liberal arts experience with authentic engagement in the world and workplace for undergraduate students.
Offered Since: Yes
Type: Undergraduate taught
Eligibility: An ideal candidate for the Presidential LEEP Scholarship has a high school record which places them at the top of Clark University’s applicant pool, An ideal candidate demonstrates a strong desire to:
  • Pursue a demanding academic schedule.
  • Collaborate with peers and professors.
  • Meet ambitious career and life goals.
  • Join a community of scholars with a strong commitment to global change.
  • Tackle complex challenges at home and abroad.
Number of Awardees: 5
Value of Scholarship: Successful candidates will have the resources and opportunities to explore their interests in depth. Candidates take control of their education, connect with pioneers in their fields and develop skills to drive tomorrow’s innovations.
  • Free tuition, room and board for four years: the annual scholarship renewal would be contingent on candidate’s maintaining a strong academic record at Clark for each of their four years as an undergraduate.
Duration of Scholarship: 4 years
How to Apply:
  • If you are interested in the Presidential LEEP Scholarship, simply check that option when you fill out the Common Application (available after Aug. 1, 2017).
  • You’ll then receive detailed information — including the topics of the two short essays — on how to apply for the scholarship. The deadline for submitting the essays is Feb. 1, 2018, for Early Action, Early Decision and Regular Decision candidates.
  • Semi-finalists will be notified by the end of February, and finalist interviews will be conducted in March.
Award Provider: Clark University

Thomas Jefferson Scholarship Program for Undergraduate Tunisian Students 2018/2019

Application Deadline: Wednesday, 27th November, 2017, at 5 p.m. Tunisia time.
Eligible Countries: Tunisia
To be taken at (country): United States
About the Award: The Thomas Jefferson Scholarship program builds the employability skills of a diverse group of youth from across Tunisia. Through academic, cultural, and professional programming, the Thomas Jefferson Scholarship Program provides Tunisian youth with opportunities to develop the skills needed to contribute to Tunisia’s economic development.
Since the Thomas Jefferson Scholarship program’s inception in 2013, more than 360 undergraduate students from all 24 governorates of Tunisia have studied in colleges and universities across the United States. Through programming focused on skill-building and leadership growth, students enhance their academic and English skills, develop their leadership capacity, and strengthen their professional expertise, which promotes economic development in Tunisia. In a recent survey, 89% of Thomas Jefferson Scholars who returned home and completed their education reported that they are now employed.
Apply now for the 2017 Thomas Jefferson Scholarship Program
Type: Undergraduate
Eligibility: The Thomas Jefferson Scholarship Program does not discriminate against applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, disability, or any other protected characteristic as established by U.S. law.
To be eligible for the 2018/2019 Tunisia Undergraduate Scholarship Program (Tunisia UGRAD), candidate:
  • Is a citizen, national or permanent resident qualified to hold a valid passport issued by the government of Tunisia;
  • Is currently enrolled as a first- or second-year full-time undergraduate (Licence) student in good academic standing at the time of application at a registered academic institution in Tunisia;
  • Architecture students are eligible in their first-, second-, third-, or fourth-year of study. Engineering students are eligible in their first-, or second-year (preparatory classes), and third- and fourth-year of undergraduate study;
  • If you study at an ISSAT (Institut Supérieur des Sciences Appliquées et de Technologie) please see the Tunisia Community College Scholarship Program application.
  • Is currently residing in Tunisia;
  • Is able to receive a U.S. J-1 visa;
  • Is at least 18 years old by July 1, 2018
  • Is committed to returning to Tunisia after completion of the program; and
  • Is able to achieve a TOEFL score of 500 (PBT) or likely to achieve this score after short-term pre-academic English training in the United States prior to the start of the academic year. .
To be eligible for the 2018/2019  Tunisia Community College Scholarship Program (TCCSP), candidate:
  • Is a citizen, national, or permanent resident qualified to hold a valid passport issued by the government of Tunisia;
  • Is currently residing in Tunisia;
  • Is currently enrolled as a first- or second-year full-time undergraduate (Licence) student in good academic standing at the time of application at an ISET (Institut Supérieur des Etudes Technologiques), IHET (Institut Supérieur des Etudes Touristiques), or ISSAT (Institut Supérieur des Sciences Appliquées et de Technologie);
  • Is able to receive and maintain a US J-1 visa;
  • Is committed to returning to Tunisia after completing the program;
  • Is able to achieve a TOEFL score of 440 (PBT) or is likely to achieve this score after short-term preacademic English training in the United States prior to the start of the academic year; and
  • Is at least 18 years old by July 1, 2018.
Selection: The Thomas Jefferson Scholarship Program selects participants through an open, merit-based competition to attend year-long academic and professional development programs in the US. Participants also engage in community service, internships, and cultural exchange activities.
Selection panels will use the following criteria to evaluate applications (not in order of importance):
  • Academic excellence;
  • Expressed commitment to contribute to Tunisia’s economic development;
  • Demonstrated leadership potential and commitment to community engagement;
  • Proficiency in written and spoken English;
  • Flexibility and adaptability as an exchange student; and
  • Minimum TOEFL of 500 PBT or ability to achieve a 500 following short-term intensive English language training.
  • Preference will be given to students that represent disadvantaged and underrepresented communities.
Number of Awardees: Not specified
Value of Scholarship: 
  • J-1 visa support;
  • Round-trip travel from participant’s home city to host institution in the United States;
  • Accident and sickness coverage;
  • Tuition and mandatory university fees;
  • Room and board (housing and meals);
  • A wide variety of alumni networking and training opportunities.
  • Small incidentals allowance;
  • Limited allowance for books;
How to Apply: To learn more about the program and its eligibility requirements, please visit the Tunisia UGRAD or TCCSPapplication information pages. All individuals who meet the technical eligibility requirements should apply by Monday, November 27, 2017, at 5 p.m. Tunisia time.
Important Notes: Late applications will not be accepted. Do not send applications to the IREX office in Washington, DC. Faxed or emailed applications will not be accepted. Applications will not be returned to the applicants after the end of the competition; applicants should keep a copy for their own records. Applications must be clear and readable. Unclear or unreadable copies will not be accepted. Each complete application should be stapled. No other form of binding is permitted. If submitting an online application, it is not necessary to send a paper copy. Only complete applications received by the deadline will be considered.
Award Provider: The Thomas Jefferson Scholarship Program’s Tunisia Undergraduate Scholarship Program (Tunisia UGRAD) and Tunisia Community College Scholarship Program (TCCSP) are programs sponsored by the US Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA). The programs are implemented by IREX.

Yale University ISTF Innovation Prize in Forestry

Application Deadline: 17th November 2017
Eligible Countries: All
To Be Taken At (Country): USA
About the Award: In line with the theme for the 2018 ISTF Conference, Yale University is looking for innovative projects that deal with complex problems in tropical forest landscapes. All individuals or groups with a unique perspective, experience, or approach to the complexity of tropical forest landscapes are encouraged to apply. The Innovation Prize winner and runner-up will both be invited to Yale to present their project to conference attendees and receive a cash prize.
During the conference, the Innovation Prize presentations are moments when the theme of the conference is grounded in concrete case-studies and experiences.
Since 2014, Yale ISTF has offered an Innovation Prize at its annual conference to honor outstanding initiatives and ideas related to tropical forest use and conservation.
Type: Contests/Award
Eligibility: All individuals or groups with a unique perspective, experience, or approach to the complexity of tropical forest landscapes are encouraged to apply.
Value of Award: The Innovation Prize winner and runner-up will both be invited to Yale to present their project to conference attendees and receive a cash prize.
Duration of Program: Conference date is February 1-3, 2018
How to Apply: Apply Here
Award Providers: Yale University

(UNODA) OSCE Women Scholarship for Peace and Security (Funded to Vienna, Austria) 2018

Application Deadline: 16th November 2017
Eligible Countries: nationals of OSCE participating States and Partners for Co-operation. See List below
To Be Taken At (Country): Vienna, Austria
About the Award: The OSCE Scholarship for Peace and Security is a joint initiative of OSCE and United Nations Office for Disarmament Affaires at Vienna in partnership with a number of organisations whose work contribute to disarmament, non-proliferation (DNP) and development-related issues.
The initiative offers a training programme providing foundation skills and knowledge on non-proliferation, disarmament and development related issues. In particular, it also focuses on conflict prevention, arms control and confidence and security building measures implemented in accordance with the commitments in the OSCE area.\
The programme consists of two components:
Online foundation course lasting 8 weeks on:
  • Weapons of mass destruction
  • Conventional weapons
  • Disarmament and development
  • Gender and disarmament
  • Impact of conflict on neighbouring regions
  • Multilateral security coopearation initiatives
In-depth in-person course lasting one week to be held in Vienna (Austria) with:
  • Workshops
  • Case studies
  • Lectures
  • Visits to Vienna based organisations
Type: Training
Eligibility: Early career professionals from various fields from OSCE participating States and Partners for Co-operation. It is not required to have previous knowledge of the issues of disarmament, non-proliferation and development.
Number of Awards: 70
Value of Award:
  • 15 full scholarships covering registration cost for the online and the in-person courses as well as travel and accommodation to attend the in-person course;
  • 35 partial scholarships covering registration cost for the online and the in-person courses
  • 20 online course scholarships covering registration cost for the online course
Duration of Program: 10 weeks
  • Online foundation course lasting 8 weeks
  • In-depth in-person course lasting one week
Award Providers: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, United Nations Office for Disarmament Affaires

British Council West Africa Arts Program for Creative Entrepreneurs 2018

Application Deadline: 30th October 2017
Eligible Countries: Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone and United Kingdom
To Be Taken At (Country): Abuja, Nigeria
About the Award: The Creative Hubs Programme will support hubs to strengthen their sustainability through a programme of facilitator-led and peer-to-peer learning and networking for hub managers or founders involved in day-to-day leadership or management of the hubs.
The programme will also support participating hubs to develop their business support, capacity building and advisory services to artists and creative entrepreneurs.
The expected outcome for the programme is a more vibrant network of stronger hubs across West Africa and the UK that stimulate increased capacity in creative ecosystems in the hubs’ locations.
Type: Training, Entrepreneurship
Eligibility: To be selected to join the programme, hubs will:
  • Have founders or managers that are aged 18 – 35 OR have a demonstrable focus on supporting creative enterprises and / or artists that are aged 18 – 35.
  • Have been operational for at least 6 months
  • Have a physical space that brings artists and / or creative entrepreneurs together AND offers them at least two of training, networking, advisory or business support (like incubation or acceleration).
  • Be located in one of these cities in West Africa: Abuja, Accra, Calabar, Dakar, Enugu, Freetown, Kano, Kumasi, Lagos Port Harcourt OR any location in the UK.
  • Be available to attend a workshop in Abuja, Nigeria from 4 to 7 December 2017 (Hub Managers or Founders involved in Day to Day management only)
Number of Awards: Not specified
Value of Award: 
  • Participation in the workshop is free.
  • There are bursaries available to support participants from outside Abuja with flights, accommodation and breakfast and lunch each day.
Duration of Program: 4 to 7 December 2017
How to Apply: Please fill in the form by 30 October 2017. Selected Hubs will be notified by 6 November 2017.
Award Providers: British Council

Mastercard Foundation Fellowship for Young African Artists 2018

Application Deadline: 15th November 2017
Eligible Countries: African countries
About the Award: Young visual artists (ages 18–35) who live or do most of their work in Africa are invited to submit examples of their art in response to the following question:
WHAT DO YOU HOPE FOR AFRICAN YOUTH?
Africa is a young and vibrant continent experiencing a major demographic shift. By 2050 it will be home to more than a billion young people, with a workforce larger than that of China and India combined. There is enormous potential in this multi-decade demographic boom, and tremendous challenge. Young artists have a unique perspective on Africa’s future. We are seeking artwork that reveals your perspective and captures your vision of living and working on a continent experiencing massive change.
Type: Contest, Fellowship
Selection Criteria: Mastercard encourages the submission of a wide range of visual art of different types suitable for reproduction. Its intention is to license selected works for reproduction as photographs in print and digital media. To be selected, the artwork must render well when photographed. The Foundation will arrange for chosen artwork to be professionally photographed if needed.
Number of Awards: Not specified
Value of Award: Selected artists will receive a licensing fee of US$1,000 for the non-exclusive right to reproduce the chosen artworks in the Foundation’s publications, for non-commercial use.
How to Apply: Mastercard encourages submissions from both emerging and established young artists from diverse backgrounds. Artists wishing to participate should send their submissions no later than 15 November 2017.
The submissions should include:
  • The artist’s name, age, gender, country of origin, current home, language of submission
  • A biography of not more than 500 words
  • Clear, accurate photographs of each work, submitted as presentation-quality jpeg files (minimum 1000 pixels x 1000 pixels)
  • The creation date of each work submitted, along with dimensions and materials
  • One artist’s statement of not more than 500 words explaining the relation between the work(s) submitted and the submission question
  • Submission text supplied in any language in which the artist feels comfortable
Send all requested material to: artwork@mcfound.org
Award Providers: Mastercard Foundation

ONE Campaign Essay Contest for Young Africans 2018

Application Deadline: 17th November, 2017.
Eligible Countries: African countries
About the Award:
what’s your big idea for girls in Africa?
What are the ways in which African leaders can harness the power of girls in Africa? How can we use this power to transform Africa’s future? The ONE Campaign wants to hear your ideas.
130 million girls around the world are being denied an education — and 53 million of them are right here in Africa. Without an education, no child can reach their full potential. This has to change.
Young people will shape the future of the continent, so we’re asking 18-35 year olds to share their best ideas for how African leaders can make sure all girls count.
How do we get every girl in to school and learning? How do we make sure girls don’t face violence at home, in school or on the street? How do we enable girls to become the engineers, entrepreneurs and political leaders of tomorrow?
Share your idea, and you could be joining the ONE team at the AU Summit in January 2018, in Addis Ababa.
Type: Contest
Eligibility: 
  1. Entrant essays may not exceed 500 words. If any essay exceeds the maximum word count described herein, it will be disqualified at the sole and absolute discretion of ONE.
  2. Eligible Entrants: Entrants must:
    1. Be between the ages of 18 and 35 years;
    2. Be currently living in Africa and a citizens or permanent resident of the African country in which they live;
    3. Submit an essay according to these Rules;
    4. Submit an original piece of writing answering the question posed in paragraph 1 above; and,
    5. Have a valid passport or international travel document.
  3. Ineligible Entrants: Entrants may not be ONE employees, judges or direct suppliers of the Awards, or immediate family of ONE employees, competition judges or direct suppliers of the competition.
Judging Criteria:
  1. Ability to articulate the challenge; and,
  2. Ability to share possible solutions to the challenges they face.
Selection:
  • A judging committee will select the winner (the judging committee will be made up of representatives chosen by ONE, such as employees of ONE, partners of ONE, or other, experts and/or community leaders) (the “Judging Committee”).
  • Based on the recommendation of the Judging Committee, ONE will choose the winner or winners of the competition (“Winner(s)”). Winner(s) will be chosen at the sole and absolute discretion of ONE. ONE is not obligated to inform or otherwise update those competition entrants who did not win.
  • At the recommendation of the Judging Committee, ONE may also choose a runner-up or runners-up (“Runner(s)-up”). As with Winner(s), Runner(s)-up will be chosen at the sole and absolute discretion of ONE.
  • The winners will be notified by e-mail. Winner(s) will be required to participate in a prize fulfillment process and sign documentation, such as a release, within the time frame specified by ONE, as will be more fully detailed when Winner(s) is notified.
Value of Award: 
  1. Winner(s):
    1. Winners may be contacted for editorial coverage by ONE and agree to participate in any media interviews facilitated by ONE.
      1. Winner(s) will be required to participate in a prize fulfillment process and sign documentation, such as a release, within the time frame specified by ONE, as will be more fully detailed when Winner(s) is notified.
      2. Winner(s) agree to make themselves available for publicity purposes relating to the competition, the AU Summit, and may be called upon to become ONE Pan-African Champions during the course of 2018 through supporting ONE’s actions across the African continent.
      3. The Winner(s) will join ONE to share their big idea directly with African leaders / decision makers at an event organised with the African Union. Winner(s) eligibility is dependent on her/his adherence to these Rules;
  2. Runner(s) up:
    1. Runner(s) up will receive: a package with ONE merchandise.
How to Apply: Entries are made by completing an online form available here.
The winners will be announced on 15 December, 2017.
Award Providers: ONE Africa Campaign

America: Divided and Conquered?

George Ochenski 

Growing up in the ’50s and ’60s, many of us got to see divisions arise in our nation which seemed unprecedented — at least until now. While the Vietnam War was percolating toward disaster, the struggle for civil rights was raging. Major cities were wracked with violent race riots, college campuses were generational battlegrounds between students and “the establishment” — only the battle wasn’t very fair since the establishment had the cops, clubs and tear gas. If all this seems like déjà vu in President Trump’s reign of error, there are plenty of good reasons.
Stoking the fires of civil dissension has long been recognized as the “divide and conquer” strategy military and political leaders have followed for thousands of years. Today’s political parties, for instance, have devolved from the goal of making the nation better for citizens of all political affiliations to a grim and pointless football game where the Red Republican team beats endlessly on the Blue Democrat team and vice-versa.
And while “bipartisanship” is slathered on efforts as a measure of their worth, just because both parties support bad ideas doesn’t make them good policies. If you doubt that, history is rife with examples, not the least of which are the Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq wars and perhaps the most misnamed law ever, the Patriot Act. All those disasters drew “bipartisan support.”
It’s gotten so bad that when two members of different political parties actually talk to each other it’s lauded as some kind of miracle. But the truth, which is now lost in the smokescreen of accusations of “fake news” and endless blame-casting, is that it’s virtually impossible to deal with the issues facing a society as complex as ours without serious, sincere and respectful debate in the political arena.

The fact is, that’s exactly the model upon which our government was founded and intended to function. Citizens vote for those they think will represent their best interests. And make no mistake, there are a lot of different opinions on what those interests are. But once the votes are cast and counted, the winners go to a much different function in the policy arena — a function in which knowledge and diplomatic skills are vastly more necessary and useful than partisan cheerleading.
Unfortunately President Trump, with his total lack of political experience, hasn’t figured out the election cycle is over and it’s time to actually govern in the interest of all the people. Instead, he seems to thrive on sowing hatred and chaos, issuing vindictive executive orders out for no good reason except to undo what’s been done by his predecessors and with no vision or knowledge of what comes next. His health care debacle is the perfect example, throwing the nation and its citizens into vast uncertainty with no workable alternative to offer.
It’s gotten so bad that both former presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama came out on the same day last week to denounce the tactics and direction of the Trump presidency — but were diplomatic enough to do so without actually naming the Divider-in-Chief.
If there’s a silver lining to the dark cloud hanging over America right now, it might be to remember what happened after the tumultuous events of the ’60s. We impeached a corrupt president, took a break from ill-advised foreign wars, passed landmark laws to protect the environment upon which all life relies, and instituted sweeping civil rights advances. The way it’s going, unless we want a future of division, pollution and hatred, we’re going to have to do that again — and the sooner, the better.

Pirating Into The Czech Elections

Binoy Kampmark

The Pirate Party are buccaneering their way into European politics, having found a foothold in the testy soil of Central Europe after colonising, in small measure, various hamlets in Sweden, Germany and Iceland.  The Czech Pirates (PPCZ), a term certainly exotic by current political pedigrees, managed to obtain over 10 percent of the vote, a result that gave them a rich harvest of 22 members in the parliamentary elections.
It took nine efforts, but the Czech Pirates had been edging their way onto conspicuous terrain in various local elections, including netting 5.3 percent of the total vote in Prague in 2015.  The city of Mariánské Lázně also found itself having a Pirate Mayor after garnering 21 percent of the vote.
Retaining their oppositional colours, the Czech Pirates are insisting on avoiding the muddying nature of coalition talks with the overall winners.  (The dangers of compromising collaboration!)  Their agenda is one that has become fairly known across its other incarnations: the abolition of internet censorship, the favouring of institutional transparency, and the revision of, amongst other things, punitive copyright laws. But other agenda items form their twenty point program, including improving the lot of teacher salaries and tax reform.
The latter point is particularly appropriate, given the party’s experimentation with testing EU laws on the subject of pirate sites through its “Linking is not a Crime” stance. This was sparked, in large part, by attempts by the Czech Anti-Piracy Union to target a 16-year-old for that great terror of the regulator: linking to content designated as infringing of copyright law.
Launching several of their own contrarian sites, including Tipnafilm.cz and Piratskefilmy.cz, the latter carrying some 20,000 links to 5,800 movies, the Czech Pirate Party was overjoyed by the prospect of prosecution. “Our goal is to change the copyright monopoly law so that people are not fined millions for sharing culture with their friends.”
As Czech Pirate Party chairman Lukáš Černohorský said at the time, belligerent and defiant, “Instead of teenagers, copyright industry lobbyists are now dealing with a political party which didn’t run the website for money but because of our conviction that linking is not and should not be a crime.”
The gains of the party showed a certain mood at work and, as has been the case in much of Europe, proved boisterously, and at stages angrily, anti-establishment.  Across the political spectrum, the Czechs were again showing that they can add fuel to any political fire, setting matters to rights on the continent while tearing down assumptions.  As with any fire, however, the consequences can be searing.
While the Pirates did well, the Freedom and Direct Democracy party (SPD), a strident right wing outfit, nabbed similar numbers from the other side of the spectrum, sporting its own anti-EU, anti-immigrant brand. As its leader, Tomio Okamura, insists, “We want to leave just like Britain and we want a referendum on EU membership.”
Billionaire fertilizer tycoon Andrej Babiš, the sort of oligarchic figure who should always trouble democratic sensibilities, weighed in the elections with some 30 percent of the vote with his ANO party.  His version of politics, another confection of anti-politics dressed for disgruntled consumption, reprises that of the businessman turned party leader. The claim made here is common: that the machinery of governance is somehow analogous to running a business.
Traditional parties, foremost amongst them the long performing Social Democrats, with whom Babiš had been in coalition with after gains made in 2013, found themselves pegged back to sixth position in the tally.
The swill stick of politics did not tar Babiš all that much, a figure who has managed to develop a certain Teflon coating in a manner similar to other billionaire leaders (think Silvio Berlusconi and a certain Donald Trump in the White House).  He had become the focus of suspected tax crimes, and lost his job as finance minister.  European subsidies, it was claimed, had found their mysterious way into his pocket.
Such suggestions merely touched the tip of a considerable iceberg, one which also consists of allegations of previous employment with the Czechoslovak secret state security service Stb. According to Slovakia’s Institute of National Memory, his code name for collaboration during his espionage stint was Bureš.
The billionaire seemed distinctly unperturbed, and his party’s showing suggested that some water will slide off a duck’s back.  “I am happy that Czech citizens did not believe the disinformation campaign against us and expressed their trust in us.”  He roundly insisted that his was “a democratic movement” positively pro-European and pro-NATO “and I do not understand why somebody labels us as a threat to democracy.”
These elections, however, will be savoured by a party that promises a fresh airing of a stale political scene, and one not nursing those prejudices that provide all too attractive gristle. Legislation, should it be implemented, may well remove the cobwebbed fears long associated with the Internet. But facing these newly elected figures will be ANO and an invigorated, indignant right-wing of politics, a far from easy proposition.

Kenyan election re-run exposed as a farce

Eddie Haywood

Kenya’s hotly disputed presidential election between incumbent Uhuru Kenyatta and challenger Raila Odinga has been exposed as a complete farce, plunging the country’s political establishment into a deep crisis. The election was decided initially on August 8 in Kenyatta’s favor, but subsequently nullified by the Kenyan Supreme Court with a new poll scheduled for today.
Odinga, however, has stated his intention to boycott the election, calling on his supporters to stay home, while supporters in Kisumu, a stronghold for Odinga and his National Super Alliance party (NASA), have declared emphatically that there will not be an election, indicating they will attempt to disrupt polling.
Last Friday, Roselyn Akombe, one of seven senior officials on the board of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC), resigned and fled to the United States, citing that she had received death threats. She expressed no confidence that the election re-run would be “free and fair.”
Akombe reported that the IEBC was beset by corruption, “We need the commission to be courageous and speak out, that this election as planned cannot meet the basic expectations of a credible election. The commission has become a party to the current crisis. The commission is under siege.”
In telling the BBC that she feared for her life, Akombe referenced Christopher Musando, a senior official found tortured and murdered in the days preceding the August 8 poll. She said, “I have never felt the kind of fear that I felt in my own country. You'll be suicidal to think that nothing will happen to you.”
No longer able to maintain the pretense of the IEBC’s credibility after Akombe’s resignation, IEBC chairman Wafula Chebukati concurred with Akombe’s assessment, stating that he did not think that a credible poll was possible. “Without critical changes in key secretariat staff, free, fair and credible elections will surely be compromised.”
Akombe’s revelation exposes as a lie the unanimous certification by Washington and Europe that the August 8 poll was conducted “free and fair,” and their claims of the IEBC’s “independence.”
The Western election observers, in making their bogus certifications, never uttered a word regarding the extremely suspicious incidents, such as Musando’s murder, which occurred in the lead up to and during the August 8 poll.
Raising the specter of an organized campaign aimed at intimidating the country’s judiciary, the bodyguard of Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu was shot by unknown assailants just before the Supreme Court was to hear a petition to postpone the election. Mwilu was one of four justices who ruled to nullify the August 8 poll.
In a scantly veiled threat to the judiciary after the Supreme Court nullified the August 8 poll, President Kenyatta had called the judges crooks, and stated ominously, “the judges should know they are dealing with an incumbent president.”
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court declined to hear the petition to postpone the election, with Chief Justice David Maraga stating that the court was unable to provide a quorum for the petitioners, as only he and one other justice were available. Maraga claimed that since several judges on the seven-member court were conveniently on holiday or undergoing medical treatment the court could not be empaneled.
The petition to halt today’s election was brought by representatives of several Kenyan civil organizations, stating that the election should be postponed in light of the resignation of Akombe and chairman Chebukati’s declaration that he did not think that a credible poll was possible.
Harun Ndubi, the lawyer for the petitioners, stated his disbelief in the court’s claim of unavailability. “I don’t buy their explanation. I don’t see a credible or legitimate election happening tomorrow.” Ndubi added that if the poll occurs, “it would be a farce.”
Clearly illustrating the ruling government’s aim at silencing political opponents, on Tuesday, the police arrested Ruth Odinga, former Kisumu deputy governor and sister to Odinga, and Kisumu senator Fred Outa, alleging that the two “incited mob attacks” in which a crowd of NASA supporters allegedly tore apart tents and destroyed blank ballots shipped in for the October 26 poll.
Odinga and Outa had gone into hiding for several days, stating that Nyanza Police Regional Coordinator Wilson Njega issued a “political directive” against the two. Keriako Tobiko, Director of Public Prosecutions, called for Odinga’s and Outa’s “immediate prosecution.” Tobiko has not offered any evidence to substantiate the charges.
The toxic atmosphere produced by such blatant corruption in the electoral process have found expression in the reaction by state forces to mass demonstrations across Kenya, with police shooting and beating protesters. Scores of demonstrators have been killed, the majority residents from the poor districts and slums of Kisumu and Nairobi.
A joint investigation conducted by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch found that as many as 45 people were killed by police responding to demonstrations since the initial election in August, including several children caught in police crossfire. The numbers of killed are believed to be higher, as many people are still missing and unaccounted for.
Responding to the Kenyan business elite, Interior Minister Fred Matiangi last week banned demonstrations in the business districts of the three Kenyan cities of Nairobi, Kisumu, and Mombasa, claiming that demonstrators were criminals and a threat to the Kenyan economy. In spite of the proscription against protests, demonstrations have continued to take place almost daily in the three cities in a display of defiance and contempt for the ruling government.
Overshadowing the election are the fears of Kenyan and Western capitalist elites that the unrest could explode into a large-scale insurrection by the working class independent of the current rotten political set up and in opposition to the capitalist system.
The economic prospects for East Africa’s top economy, already suffering from a significant slowdown, have dimmed considerably in the crisis-ridden weeks preceding today’s poll.
Last week, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) raised Kenya’s risk profile for investment in the wake of turmoil produced by the election re-run. In lowering its national economic growth prospects for Kenya to 5 percent in 2017, the IMF pointed to the historic famine sweeping the continent, caused by a persistent drought, resulting in rising prices and bringing lower crop yields. This comes amid an ongoing drop in Kenyan stocks and a sharp rise in yields of the country’s Eurobonds.
Jan Mikkelsen, a Kenyan representative with the IMF, told Bloomberg, “The prolonged election period has increased risks for investors and traders. This in turn has led to a slowdown in economic activity.” Mikkelsen added that bank lending in Kenya to businesses and individuals has stagnated due to the overall economic pessimism in the country, compounding the country’s growth woes.
On Monday, organizations and envoys from several Western countries, including the US and Britain, issued a warning on the “deteriorating political conditions,” and called for a postponement of the poll.
The International Crisis Group (ICG), a Washington, D.C.-based think tank which monitors global conflict, stated, “Proceeding under current conditions would deepen Kenya’s ethnic cleavages and prolong a stalemate that has already claimed dozens of lives and come at a high economic cost.”
US Ambassador to Kenya Robert Godec stated, “[I]f the electoral commission felt it was not ready for Thursday’s poll, it should ask the courts for a delay. We would be fine with that.”