7 Sept 2018

AU-EU Youth Cooperation Hub Fellowship Programme for Young Africans

Application Deadline: 17th September 2018 (1:00 pm CEST)

Eligible Countries: African countries

About the Award: The AU-EU Youth Cooperation Hub will enable 42 selected young Africans, Europeans and Diaspora to work with the African Union, the European Union and other relevant stakeholders in developing new approaches, defining the scope of pilot projects and monitoring their implementation in six areas:
  • Business, Job Creation & Entrepreneurship
  • Culture, Sports & Arts
  • Education and Skills
  • Environmental Preservation and Climate Change
  • Governance, Political Inclusion & Activism
For the first time the youth are not only being heard but also asked to contribute to the guidelines for projects focusing on some of the most important issues concerning both the European Union and the African Union.
As a Youth Fellow, you will advise international experts and institutions on the preparation of the Youth Innovation Fund, a call for proposal for funds totalling 10 Million Euros.
By joining the AU-EU Youth Cooperation Hub, you will contribute to making youth solutions a reality, piloting projects in six sectors!

Type: Training, Fellowship

Eligibility: Any person between the ages of 18-35, African, European or Diaspora, interested in Africa-EU cooperation as well as knowledgeable in one of the six areas.
As a Youth applicant, you must meet the following criteria:
  • Be a citizen of an African Union or European Union Member State
  • Aged 18-35 upon applying
  • Proven knowledge, practical experience and demonstrated impact in one of the six thematic areas
  • Additional knowledge/experience of minimum one of three cross-cutting thematic areas is desirable: Gender, Migration, and/or Digitalisation
  • Interest in and knowledge of Africa-EU relations
  • Experience in working in international and multicultural teams is desirable
  • Ability to work effectively in either English or French, and possessing an adequate understanding of the other language
  • Writing skills and public speaking skills are desirable.
Number of Award: 42

Value of Award: 
  • Selected Youth Fellows will be divided into clusters, 7 Youth Fellows per cluster.
  • Youth Fellows, with the guidance of the experts, will work together using a virtual platform and be expected to produce regular deliverables linked to their cluster topic.
  • The 42 Youth Fellows will meet and spend 10 days in Addis Ababa (27 October to 4 November) for a first consultative meeting, in partnership with GIZ.
  • Possible field visits will take place twice a year (2019 & 2020).
  • Flights, accommodation, meals and local travel expenses are covered
Duration of programme: From October 2018 until the 6th AU-EU Summit in 2020.

How to Apply: Apply here

Visit programme webpage for details

The Hypocrisy of British Attitudes to Immigration

Faisal Khan

The above doesn’t, of course, apply to all British people just some (perhaps many) and it certainly appears to be a prevalent attitude. My father came to Britain in 1963 and I at age four: I’m not sure if that makes me an immigrant as I was naturalised, but it definitely makes me of immigrant heritage. As long as I can remember (I’m 42 now), I’ve witnessed ‘immigrant bashing’ in this country whether proverbially or even at times literally. It seems to be a favourite pet topic of populist politicians and a source of constant complaint. Immigrants are often otherised, vilified, demonised and horribly mistreated.
Immigrants are blamed for much that is wrong with British society; they are accused of taking ‘our jobs’ but also ‘our benefits’ (so which one is it?), for crime, for anti-social behaviour and even accused of being rapists. Some complain less about white immigrants from places like New Zealand, South Africa and Australia (of which there are significant numbers) and more of immigration from places like Africa and South Asia (so what is the real issue?). Such attitudes are deeply unfair, lacking balance, ahistorical and replete with double standards.
It may not occur to some but Empire of the kind we the British had (spanning a quarter of the World at its peak) was a form of immigration. British emigration to places like New Zealand and Australia changed the faces of these countries forever. In India, for instance, our rule lasted circa 200 years; a time in which we carried out a proverbial ‘rape’ of India. India’s share of the World economy when we arrived was 23% by the time we left it was 3%.  During our time there we literally looted India (loot being a Hindi word). Local industries were destroyed, onerous taxes were deducted (and sent back to Britain), massacres were committed, and many millions died in preventable famines. Moreover, so that we could ‘divide and rule’ we solidified and exacerbated religious and caste differences resulting ultimately in the partition of the subcontinent at our departure. There was a similar story in other parts of the World.
Christopher Columbus’s voyage (or migration) to the America’s led to local people being exposed to European diseases like the ‘flu’ and chicken pox wiping out large swathes of natives. There was a similar story with British and European migration to what is the now the United States, with native tribes being wiped out; with many now confined to reservations and facing deplorable discrimination. The British imprint is all over Hong Kong: even today many British people are living and working in Hong Kong with English being widely spoken.
On the back of Empire and the English language, a similar pattern of British emigration (if less brutal) is still visible today. There are British people literally living and working in almost every country on the planet, but of course, we prefer to refer to ourselves as ‘expats’.  Approximately 5.5 million Brits (nearly 1 in 10) live abroad permanently with at one point circa 2000 leaving every week. Preferred destinations are places like Australia (with approx 1.3 million British migrants) the US (750,000), Canada (700,000) and New Zealand (315,000).
There are some 750,000 Brits in Spain where we have effectively colonised some of the ‘Costas’; British style greasy spoons, pubs and clubs are ubiquitous with barely a local to be seen and not a word of Spanish heard. There are also significant numbers of long-term British immigrants in places like Dubai, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the Caribbean and more. This doesn’t include holidaymakers or those migrating temporarily. It’s a safe assumption that in many cases little effort is made to learn the local language or even to integrate.
When net migration is considered (that is the people emigrating versus those immigrating) while there are indeed more who come to Britain than leave, the numbers don’t suggest we are being ‘swamped’ by migrants. Further much of the migration is short-term (for work and study) whereas British emigration is often long-term. The idea that immigrants come to Britain to claim benefits also doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. According to a study by the UCL, in the ten years between 2006-2016 immigrants made a net contribution of 20 billion pounds to the UK and in fact, many are barred from several types of benefits until they attain permanent residency.
The link between immigration and crime isn’t supported by the evidence either. A 2013 report by the LSE concluded that there was ‘no causal impact of immigration on crime…contrary to the ‘immigration causes crime’ populist view expressed in some media and political debate’. A 2008 report by the Association of Chief Police Officers found that national crime rates had continued to fall despite rising net migration over a number of years.
Many immigrants also contribute positively to British society. For long immigrants, particularly those who arrived in large numbers in the 1960’s came here to do the jobs that White British people didn’t want to do: but needed doing. In fact, this country has become heavily dependent on immigrant Labour a fact even acknowledged by the former Conservative Mayor of London Boris Johnson when he opined ‘London would fall like Sparta’ without migrants.
A third of all doctors practising in the UK are of immigrant heritage; of which the vast majority are from India (Brits of India origin make up circa 1% of the population).  At one point the richest man in Britain (Lakshmi Mittal) was an immigrant from India. Immigrants or those of immigrant heritage contribute in every area of British society: the economy, culture, the arts, sport. People like Anthony Joshua, Amir Khan, Idris Elba, Sadiq Khan, Mo Farah being only a small number amongst many who have excelled in their respective fields.
An elderly gentleman who grew up in the 1950’s reminded me recently that the average British High Street was a pretty bland place back then especially as far as food was concerned. It was only with mass migration in the 1960’s that food from different parts of the world became available in this country. Curry-a perfect accompaniment to beer-has unofficially become the national dish in this country. It might be wise to remember some of this when we next sit down for a Chinese takeaway and complain about those ‘bloody immigrants’.

Agriculture Sector and Farmers ruined by Modi Government in India

Rahul Kumar

India`s agriculture sector is under deep threat. Farmers are observed protesting almost in every state of the country struggling for their genuine demands of Minimum Support Price (MSP).  The farmers are being compelled to sell almost all their produce at prices much below MSP and the Modi Government is a mute spectator. The poor farmers are committing suicide. On the other hand, the rich, affluent, big farmers are getting richer day by day since they enjoy good rapport with the corrupt politicians of the country who support them to get Bank loans which later on siphoned off by them.
Under the NITI AAYOG, the policies so far formulated by the bootlicker economists are anti-farmers. The people who are in the Advisory Board of the NITI AAYOG are simply carrier-oriented and mostly work for their own socio-economic upliftment. Modi, of course, is playing in their hands and is unable to understand who is doing what and why. Writing a letter to Ex-RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan who was insulted and humiliated by Bhartiya Janata Party MP Subramanian Swamy by alleging that ‘he is mentally not fully Indian’ and has “willfully” wrecked the economy’.  It is the same Subramanian Swamy who shot a letter to Prime Minister Modi to sack Rajan.  Shame on the BJP government when the same Ex RBI Governor was invited to advise on the economic policies of the country.
Agri-Food Production Data – Production in Stages in Million Tones/L. Bales
Name of CropHD Deve Gowda
1996-97
AB Vajpayee
2003-04
Dr. Manmohan Singh
2013-14
Narendra Modi
2015-16
Food-Grains199.34213.19265.04252.22
Rice81.7388.53106.65104.32
Wheat69.3572.1695.8593.50
C. Cereals34.1137.6043.2937.94
Pulses14.1514.9119.2516.47
Nine Oilseeds24.3825.1932.7525.30
Cotton14.2313.7335.9030.15
Sugarcane277.56233.86352.14352.16
Milk69.188.1137.7155.5
Egg27.5b40.4b74.8b82.9b
Fish5.3486.3999.57210.796
Net Irrigation55.11 mhac57.06 mhac68.10 mhacNA
Gross Irrigation76.03 mhac78.04 mhac95.77 mhacNA
FERTILIZER14.30816.79928.122*26.752
ELECTRICITY84.019 BU87.089 BU152.744 BU168.913
TRACTORSNA248,000**697,000571,000
TILLERSNA17,00056,00049,000
*in FY2011 **2004-05 Figure
Source: Agriculture Statistics at a Glance 2016, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, available at https://eands.dacnet.nic.in/PDF/Glance-2016.pdf.
The report released by the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India reflects a true picture of agriculture sectors of the country. In today` time, Modi government seems rudderless, directionless, and meaningless. Modi government cannot befool the farmers of India for a long time. Modi government after seeing this data released by his own government cannot say that opposition is misguiding the people. This venal narrative on the part of the Modi government will not work in 2019 elections. The people of India are fed with the empty rhetorics.
India under Modi stands nowhere in the global economy. China under seventh president Xi Jinping has already currency reserves surging toward an unprecedented $ 4 trillion. Many financial forecasts now project that China will surpass the U.S. as the world`s number one economy by 2030. Responding to media, Xi Jinping asserts that China has lifted 60 million of its own people out of poverty in just a few years and is committed to its complete eradication by 2020.  So far neither Modi government could uplift the people belonging to the marginalized sections of the society from poverty nor he seems to be ambitious to do so. It is unfortunate to observe that common men and women are financially overburdened with ever rising oil prices, essential commodities etc.
On the international front, the Modi Government could not generate India`s goodwill to enable Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to flow to India as expected.  As a matter of fact, Modi has weaved a web of personal ties with autocratic leaders like Donald Trump, Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman of Saudi Arabia whose vision that “put first my country. Every world leader is worried about his own country since the economic situation is volatile in the superpowers such as the USA, China, Britain, Canada. FDI data suggest that despite several round trips by Modi to many superpowers of the world, the amount of foreign investment as desired by his government could not be attracted since the leaders of the superpowers are embroiled in their own social, political and economic problems. For example, Donald Trump is facing impeachment. Germany and Britain are facing the flood of illegal migrants. China is struggling with the IMF loans.
The politically tensed atmosphere in the country also prevented the leaders of the world economies not to choose India as a viable investment. A professor of Finance rightly said that ‘ a politician who understands economics can be the best Prime Minister of India. Modi does not fit into this class. Modi is simply a politician without knowledge of economics. Modi is unable to understand the cascading effects of his policies. In comparison, Dr. Manmohan Singh, an economist knew better than Modi. We must not allow Modi to spoil the Indian economy further. The sooner Modi is removed the better would be for the economic health of the country.

Swedish Election And The Extreme Right Wing

Peter Koenig

Sweden – Massive Up-scaling of False-flagging to Nationwide High Crimes – Will it Make the Right-Wing Swedish Democrats to Kingmakers on 9 September 2018?
The current Swedish Government, led by the Social Democrats, is governed by a coalition with the Green Party since 2014. Incumbent PM, Stefan Löfven, intends to continue his government and hopes to win on general election day, next Sunday, 9 September 2018. However, for years – ever since what they call the onslaught of undesirable immigrants, i.e. the “lesser people” from the Middle East and thereabouts – the extreme right, anti-immigration, eurosceptics ‘Sweden Democrats’ are on course to become the second-largest single party in the next parliament. On Facebook the party’s leader, Jimmie Ã…kesson, warned that “Sweden is on fire again”. He may have referred to the hundreds of cars set a blast this year in major Swedish cities – and the again likely refers to the same phenomenon at a lesser scale that has beleaguered Sweden already in previous years.
They, the Swedish Democrats, are building up their momentum to take over and becoming the kingmakers, this coming election. It looks like they have engaged hooligan-Nazi-type xenophobes – like those that fight the mainstream in Germany’s streets – the AFD (the Alternative for Germany) sponsored masses – to stage false flag terror attacks, mostly setting cars on fire. The cities principally affected are Stockholm, Malmö and Gothenburg. This year, the year of elections, the terror peaked with hundreds of car burnings and even a drive-by shooting in which at least three people lost their lives. When people feel in danger, are fearful, because they seem helpless against an unknown enemy – the terror – they turn to the right for protection. Its them, the right that promises fierce police and military protection – and, indeed, they carry out their promise.
Just a look at France. After a number of false flag attacks in which hundreds of people lost their lives – Macron was able to put the “State of Emergency” – akin to Martial Law – into the French Constitution. France today looks like a police and military state, in larger cities you find armed police and machine-gun touting military at every street corner. The sight has become the new normal. Are the French safer for it? Nope. Because the danger comes from within, not from outside. The danger comes from the very protectors which are complicit with those ‘hidden’ forces that want to maintain a police state that oppresses the public, so that this small all-controlling elite, can do what they want.
Strange enough, a year before the last elections in Sweden, in 2013, there was a similar eruption of car burnings in Stockholm, at a more modest scale, but all the same. Someone must have felt this kind of terror, rather new for Europe, and that could easily be ‘pushed off’ to unhappy immigrants – of which surely there are plenty – might ignite the anti-immigrant discourse. – This time it seems to work. The Social Democrats are way down in the opinion polls and the Swedish Democrats, way up, poised to become the key player in the next government.
France is in the middle of Europe, ready to break down any potential peoples’ uprising. Is Sweden going the Nordic way of France? – The risk is there, if the extreme right wins. – Are the Swedes conscious of this risk? – I doubt it. The corporate war propaganda tells them differently. And looking beyond one’s borders to learn, is hardly a nation’s forte. Its learning the hard way and discovering when it’s too late.

Back to Sweden, in concrete, none of the two leading coalitions are predicted to have an absolute majority. The one led by the Social Democrats (Labor Party equivalent) is forecast to make 38.6% and the Conservative Alliance almost 40%. The right-wing, anti-immigrant and euro-sceptic Sweden Democrats have increased their adherents by about 50% since the 2014 elections and may get up to 20% at the polls – which may make them the Kingmakers. And that largely thanks to the street havoc, destruction and terror they organized. Not a good omen for Sweden.
Of course, there is much more at stake than just the Swedish election – a country with barely 10 million inhabitants but a huge in surface (about the size of California) and with maritime borders facing Denmark, Germany, Poland, Russia, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Sweden has been and is a neutral country, unaligned to such military associations like NATO. The possibly new incoming government, the way for which was prepared for at least five years – reminds of the Ukraine coup in February 2014, also prepared for at least 5 years, according to former Assistant Secretary of State, Victoria Nuland, that turned the Kiev Government into a pure Nazi crime nest, supported by the west and by NATO. It is very possible that Sweden may become a NATO country – one more on the door steps of Moscow.
A NATO Sweden would be bordering on other NATO Russia fiends, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia and could closely collaborate with them for possible aggression towards Russia – the northern build-up of troops could easily be channeled through a new NATO Sweden.
Are the Swedes conscious of this potentially new perspective? – The extreme-right Swedish Democrats have stolen voters from all the parties under the pretext of the immigrant curse and danger. Western paid propaganda played an important role, like everywhere when right-wing and hegemonic forces are at play.
If Sweden falls, Finland – another neutral and NATO-unaligned country – might also fall. Norway and Denmark are already part of this murderous monster-club. The northern attack route is being established.
Swedish defense minister Karin Enstrom has said her country is not in NATO partly because the EU treaty contains its own security guarantee: “Who needs NATO if you have the Lisbon Treaty?” – Right. But the Lisbon Treaty is not engaging at all. Its not a European Constitution which would be binding for all member states, and which would allow Europe to build-up her own defense strategy and defense forces – and which would allow, or even force Europe to pull on the same string – and more importantly – in the same direction.
All of this is not the case today. That’s why Europe is every time more integrated into NATO – NATO is absorbing the EU, one country and one military budget at the time. Karin Enstrom’s wise words – wise, inasmuch as we don’t want NATO – are wishful thinking, delusionary, unfortunately. It would need a massive awakening in Europe and a massive resistance buildup against NATO to come clear of this ever-growing threat on Russia that has the capacity to annihilate first Europe, then the world. Mr. Putin and Mr. Lavrov warn the west all the time – but are they listening? – At least for now, President Putin’s chess-playing excellence has avoided such a global catastrophe.
The United States of America, for whom war is economic survival, the arms race is profitable, peace would be Washington’s downfall – literally down into the pits – the US of A will not listen to such warnings. It is a fine line that President Putin and China’s President Xi Jinping, a firm and powerful defense and economic alliance, are walking.
Sweden is at the crossroads of going down the dangerous and destructive path of western aggression or stay neutral, remain a northern nation of integrity, ethics and peace. It is high time – and never too late – that the Swedes awaken to the danger that might await them this coming Sunday, 9 September. Swedes, you have proudly followed a socialist-leaning and social agenda for the last hundred years. Are you thoughtlessly risking abandoning this noble tradition – for false pretexts indoctrinated by a massive campaign of false flags? – I trust not.

Waste plastics poison the food chain and contribute to global warming

Philip Guelpa

A growing body of research shows that waste plastic is becoming a major source of environmental pollution, including as a potentially significant contributor of greenhouse gases, a principal cause of global warming. As has long been the case with fossil fuels, the plastics industry is attempting to suppress knowledge of the problem.
The rate of plastics production is dramatically accelerating. Industry projects a 40 percent increase in the next decade. Already, more plastic was produced during the first decade of this century than in all previous history (mass production of plastics began after the Second World War). However, less than a fifth of that material is recycled. In addition to the huge quantities being dumped in landfills, increasing attention is being drawn to the massive amounts of waste plastic accumulating in the world’s oceans.
Plastic waste covering Kamilo beach on Hawaii's Big Island. Credit: Bob Daemmrich/Polaris/eyevine
It is estimated that approximately 18 billion pounds of waste plastic are currently being added to the world’s oceans annually. Though dispersed throughout, these materials tend to concentrate in areas of circular ocean currents, called mid-ocean gyres, which constitute 40 percent of the world’s ocean surfaces. There are five major ocean gyres. The largest of these has been dubbed the “Great Pacific Garbage Patch.” Located between Hawaii and California, it is three times the size of France.
In total, studies suggest that there are now between 15 and 51 trillion pieces of plastic in the world’s oceans. At the current rate of deposit, by 2050 the total weight of plastic in the oceans will likely outweigh that of fish. Significant quantities of plastic debris are also found in inland bodies of water, such as the Great Lakes in North America.
This steadily growing mass of material has significant damaging effects on the environment and ultimately on humans.
In its original form (e.g., bottles, bags, etc.), fish, birds, and mammals are enveloped by or ingest these materials causing injury and death by asphyxiation, strangulation and starvation. Moreover, as they degrade into increasingly small pieces, what are called “microplastics” (less than five millimeters long), these particles enter the food chain and are ingested by animals, accumulating as growing quantities of indigestible material in their stomachs, leading to injury or death, and releasing toxic materials that bioaccumulate up the food chain, including into the diets of people consuming seafood.
For example, fish in the North Pacific have been found to ingest between 12,000 and 24,000 tons of plastic each year. A quarter of fish in California markets were found to have plastic in their guts. A 2014 study by Belgian researchers concluded that seafood consumers in Europe could be consuming 11,000 microplastic particles every year. The health implications of these toxic materials, such as cancer and liver damage, are ominous.
Another recently identified danger from plastic waste is its emission of greenhouse gases. In a just-published article in the scientific journal PLOS ONE (1 August 2018), titled “Production of methane and ethylene from plastic in the environment,” Dr. Sarah-Jeanne Royer and colleagues report that “the most commonly used plastics produce two greenhouse gases, methane and ethylene, when exposed to ambient solar radiation.”
Extended exposure to sunlight substantially speeds degradation of the plastics, releasing increasing amounts of gas. As heat and physical actions cause the discarded objects to fragment, more surface area is exposed, accelerating the process even more. Both of these gases are known to contribute to global warming.
Although the individual emissions from any single piece of plastic are small, and the main source of greenhouse gases remains the burning of fossil fuels, given the massive amounts of plastic waste that has accumulated along shorelines and is floating on ocean and lake surfaces, and its continuing trend towards growth into the future, the potential cumulative effect of this finding is significant. It was already known that degrading plastics emit carbon dioxide.
The authors conclude, “Our results show that plastics represent a heretofore unrecognized source of climate-relevant trace gases that are expected to increase as more plastic is produced and accumulated in the environment.”
Another study, by researchers at the Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, “Rapid aggregation of biofilm-covered microplastics with marine biogenic particles,” published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B (29 August 2018), report that laboratory experiments indicate that microplastics aggregate into clumps held together by biofilms formed by bacteria and unicellular algae. They hypothesize that this process takes place in the ocean. Presumably a similar progression would occur in freshwater bodies as well. These aggregates may continue to float or sink to the bottom. Their subsequent fate, being consumed by pelagic or bottom-dwelling organisms for example, would be the subject of future research.
In a comment to the BBC, Dr. Montserrat Filella, a chemist at the University of Geneva, said, “As research expands our knowledge, we are realising that plastics can be insidious in many other ways. For instance, as vectors of ‘hidden pollutants’, such as heavy metals present in them or, now, as a source of greenhouse gases. And, in all cases, throughout the entire lifetime of the plastic.”
It should be noted that, although plastics degrade and change form over time, they remain in the environment indefinitely. Plastic has already begun to become part of Earth's geological record.
Attempts by Dr. Royer to obtain information from the plastics industry were met with silence. “I think the plastic industry absolutely knows, and they don't want this to be shared with the world,” she told the BBC.
Plastics are wonderful, highly useful materials. Their reckless disposal, however, is a major factor in the environmental degradation and climate change that threaten devastating consequences for humanity and all life on Earth. A major, coordinated effort is needed on the part of scientists, engineers and others around the world to address the current conditions and develop ways of benefiting from the intelligent use of these materials in the future without their negative effects (e.g., effective recycling, biodegradability, etc.). However, this will not happen under capitalism, in which the overriding motivation of the ruling class is the maximization of profit, regardless of the consequences. Instead, what we get is ineffective token gestures, such as the recent campaign to get rid of plastic straws.

Australia: Factory fire sends toxic smoke over western Melbourne

Eric Ludlow

A massive factory warehouse fire last week at Tottenham in Melbourne’s western suburbs shrouded much of the surrounding district in black, toxic smoke. Starting early on Thursday morning, the blaze took 140 firefighters with 30 trucks about 17 hours to bring under control. Material continued to smoulder on the site well into the weekend.
Metropolitan Fire Brigade (MFB) acting chief fire officer Greg Leach told the media it was “one of the biggest fires we’ve seen in Melbourne for a long time.”
State authorities warned residents within 500 metres of the factory to shut their doors and windows, and switch off heating and cooling systems, to prevent smoke getting into homes. Fifty schools and childcare centres were closed due to the toxic plume.
Firefighters at the seen on Thursday (Source MFB Twitter)
The warehouse is owned by Danbol Pty Ltd, whose sole director and shareholder is 74-year-old accountant Christopher Baldwin. On Saturday, the MFB said that the fire was “suspicious” and handed over investigations to Victoria Police arson and explosives officers. The local Maribyrnong council said it had recently inspected the property at the MFB’s suggestion but found no cause for concern.
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) revealed last Friday that Baldwin’s accountancy company, Baldwin Taxation and Advisory, had previously been subject to raids by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). ATO Deputy Commissioner Jeremy Geale told the state-funded network that the officers had been “examining a group of tax agents suspected of facilitating phoenix activity and promoting the avoidance of tax involving GST, income tax and the failure to remit pay as you go withholding tax payments.”
The old 14,000-square metre warehouse had a saw-tooth roof made of asbestos. It was reportedly storing acetone, a colourless, flammable liquid used as a nail polish remover and a solvent in paint, and acetylene, a highly-volatile gas used in welding.
Asbestos was progressively banned for use in Australian construction between 1967 and 2003. Despite this, many older buildings contain the potentially deadly substance.
The official line of the Victorian state authorities is that the asbestos used in the factory’s construction posed a “low risk” in relation to air quality because the material had likely been consumed by the fire. Acting MFB chief Leach told the ABC on Friday that although there was a chance that asbestos fibres had polluted the air, “the heat of the combustion had been such that most of that risk had been ameliorated.”
Scientific evidence, however, contradicts such claims. Asbestos Council of Victoria CEO Vicky Hamilton told the media that she tried to contact the MFB and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) following this assessment. “Asbestos doesn’t burn up in fire,” she told the New Daily, “that’s why it was considered a good product [in the past].”
University of Western Australia professor of medicine and public health and respiratory physician Bill Musk also told the New Daily that asbestos fibres that were “liberated into the atmosphere” during fires and earthquakes were dangerous. “There are different sorts of asbestos, but there’s no safe level of asbestos and that’s why it’s been banned.”
Dr Andrea Hinwood, the EPA’s chief environmental scientist, told a community meeting of concerned residents at Footscray Town Hall last week that the agency was not detecting concentrations of particulate matter above the standard for public warnings and this justified the “low risk” assessment. She told the residents just to “be sensible.” If they smelled smoke, stay out of it.
EPA official Dr Dave Barry said the agency’s tests had detected benzene and toluene compounds in the air but “at levels well below the exposure guidelines” and “not indicative of any significant risk to public health.”
The effect of the chemicals released by the fire, however, was immediately noticeable in Melbourne’s waterways. An MFB spokesperson told the community meeting that the 8,000 litres per minute of water used to quell the flames was flowing into waterways with unburnt chemicals. Since the fire hundreds of dead fish, eels and birds have been washed up along the nearby banks of Stony Creek and downstream six or more kilometres to the mouth of the Yarra River and into Port Philip Bay.
EPA inland water expert Dr Paul Leahy said Port Phillip Bay beaches up to 15 kilometres from the Yarra River, could be affected. Phenols, poly aromatic hydrocarbons, xylene, benzene and ethylbenzene have polluted popular fishing spots. Leahy admitted that these chemicals were “above recreational water quality guidelines.”
Residents who attended the community meeting were clearly frustrated by the lack of basic safety measures by state and local governments. Questions were raised over the auditing and monitoring of industrial facilities. A worker from an environmental group said such warehouses are “a time bomb” and asked why no one was monitoring the activities of these companies.
Sarah Carter, the Labor Party deputy mayor of the Maribyrnong council, told residents not to be “alarmist” and said industry was not to blame.
Last week’s fire came less than two months after a major fire erupted at the SKM Recycling plant in Coolaroo, a Melbourne northern suburb. It was the second fire within a year at that factory and the third recycling plant fire in Victoria this year.
The attitude of all the major parties—Liberal, Labor and the Greens alike—is utter contempt for the living conditions of ordinary workers. They defend big business, whose primary concern is to boost profit margins. Companies are stockpiling huge amounts of flammable material and creating the conditions for fires to occur with increasing rapidity and ferocity.
Whatever the exact cause of the Danbol-owned warehouse fire, the latest toxic blaze is a warning that the placing of profit above the needs and lives of ordinary people will produce more tragedies.

Home loan stress threatening millions of households in Australia

Mike Head

An immense financial and social crisis is developing in Australia because of extraordinary levels of mortgage debt, falling property prices, rising interest rates and the driving down of real wages.
Nearly one million households—one in four—are already being labelled “mortgage prisoners.” That is, they are trapped in debt while house values are falling. That number will soar as interest rates rise from their current record lows, according to detailed research published in the past two weeks.
This financial trauma is concentrated in working class suburban and regional areas, where some postcodes have at least 90 percent of mortgaged households “in stress,” meaning they do not have enough income to cover mortgage repayments and other living expenses.
These statistics provide a glimpse of the intolerable conditions that confront millions of working class people, while corporate profits soar on the back of record low wage growth and the increasingly casualised, insecure and under-employed workforce.
A speculative property bubble fuelled by cheap credit has underpinned economic growth in Australia since the 2008 global financial crash and the 2012 slump in the China-driven mining boom. Over the past 12 months, however, that bubble has begun to burst, while interest rates are beginning to rise at the same time.
New figures this week show Sydney property prices dropped 5.6 percent over the past year, while the national market fell 2.2 percent. It signals the end of a five-year boom, during which prices in Australia’s biggest city rose 70 percent and household debt rising to 200 percent compared to disposable income—one of the highest levels in the developed world.
Numbers of financial economists and business leaders are warning of a possible crash. On Wednesday, Michael Chaney, chairman of Wesfarmers, one of the country’s biggest retailing and industrial conglomerates, said house prices could fall 20 percent and drag Australia into recession. Large numbers of people would be left with property worth less than their debts.
Another warning sign came last week. Westpac, one of the four large banks, raised its mortgage rates by 0.14 points, due to increased global borrowing costs, even though the Reserve Bank of Australia had kept official interest rates on hold at a record low of 1.5 percent for 25 months. Three other banks have since joined Westpac’s hike and others are likely to follow.
In a report broadcast on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s “Four Corners” on August 20, Martin North of Digital Finance Analytics, which conducts household financial surveys, estimated that 820,000 households were already “in stress.”
This figure would soar if interest rates rose. A 0.5 percentage point rate increase would throw another 330,000 households into stress. Nearly half these households would be in major cities, especially in outer suburban working class areas. In the Sydney outer western suburb of Kemps Creek, for example, 86 percent of mortgaged households would be in stress.
A 2 percentage point rise would see such crisis levels develop in a wider sweep of suburbs, reaching 100 percent of mortgaged households in the Melbourne northern suburb of Fawkner and Sydney’s Silverwater and Kurnell.
A 5 point rise, taking rates back to the pre-2008 “normal” level, would throw more than two million households into stress, affecting at least 90 percent of mortgaged households in more than 170 postcodes. Only the wealthiest enclaves would have less than 10 percent in stress.
In another report, North said a full-blown credit crunch was already emerging, illustrated by the growing number of people being rejected by banks for new mortgages. Due to “lax” bank lending practices a year ago, banks rejected only 5 percent of people applying to refinance their mortgage. “Now it is 40 percent, which is a huge difference.”
North said people mainly tried to refinance in order to reduce their monthly outgoings, which showed that many households are under mortgage stress. “At the same time the cost of living is rising because wages are falling, so it’s a perfect storm for householders. On top of all that, the price of their house is falling.”
Paul Dales, economist at Capital Economics, warned: “With the full effects of tighter credit conditions and rising mortgage rates yet to be felt, the current housing downturn will probably end up being the longest and deepest in Australia’s modern history.”
This prospect is now followed closely on global financial markets. The London-based Financial Times noted yesterday that it “follows a similar pattern overseas, where property markets from London to Toronto are seeing price declines as central banks begin to unwind record-low interest rates, consumers balk at paying record high prices and regulators or banks impose tougher lending criteria on consumers.
“Australia is becoming a test case of whether regulators can manage a soft landing, rather than a disorderly crash.”
This concern was magnified because at the height of Australia’s housing boom in 2015, investors took out more than 40 percent of mortgages. They relied on record low interest rates, generous tax breaks on capital gains and “negative gearing” tax concessions—when rental income undershoots interest costs.
This government-subsidised investment rush, combined with decades of deep cuts to social housing, pushed up prices, placing home ownership out of reach for many young working class people. Sydney became the second least affordable city in the world, with house prices almost 13 times median income.
The investment rush has started to go into reverse. Loans to housing investors totalled $10.4 billion in June, down 18 percent on the same month last year, the lowest approval level in almost five years.
One reason is that a royal commission inquiry into the banks and finance houses has belatedly begun exposing predatory lending practices. This week, Westpac agreed to pay a $35 million fine for lending money to borrowers who lacked the capacity to repay the loans.
The federal government and its corporate regulators, long complicit in these abuses, have felt compelled to start to clamp down, forcing banks to restrict investor lending, interest-only loans and tighten lending criteria.
At the peak of the boom, four in 10 mortgages were interest-only, with investors betting on ever-rising property prices. North told the Financial Timesa big risk is the $360 billion in interest-only mortgages, which will convert to principal-and-interest loans over the next three years. Up to a quarter of these borrowers may struggle to meet higher repayments and be forced to sell their properties, he said.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s Liberal National government, the opposition Labor Party and the corporate media are largely burying this worsening social crisis, indifferent and contemptuous toward the human impact.
This is being accompanied by misleading headlines about “booming” national economic growth. According to official statistics released yesterday, annualised growth gained up to 3.4 percent in the June quarter.
Yet, this result was largely driven by further debt-fuelled consumer spending. Wages remained flat and the household savings ratio fell to a decade low of 1 percent. These results only underscore the danger of a terrible slump, plunging more working class households into financial stress.

Many Japanese schools fail to meet earthquake-resistant standards

Gary Alvernia 

Thousands of school buildings and structures in Japan fail to meet earthquake resistant standards, according to Tokyo’s Education Ministry. This includes both the school buildings themselves and exterior walls found on school campuses. The danger was highlighted when one such exterior wall collapsed during a June 18 earthquake in Osaka Prefecture killing two people.
On August 28, the Education Ministry announced that 978 buildings at public elementary and junior high schools were not earthquake resistant as of April 1, putting the ministry three years behind its own schedule to have all buildings up to code. Despite this, the government only plans to reduce this number of schools to 360 by the end of fiscal year 2020.
An emergency review from the ministry published on August 10 also revealed that even more schools have external walls on their grounds that do not meet building regulations for safety.
The report identified 12,640 schools out of 51,058 surveyed nationally that had such deficient structures. The schools included kindergartens, elementary, junior and senior high schools, and universities. Given that only about 20,000 of the schools actually have external walls, this indicates that 60 percent of these schools have hazardous, unsafe structures.
Of these walls, 7,473 had clear signs of visible damage and degradation, heightening the risk of a collapse. Other structures violated height limitations or failed to have required buttresses.
The review took place after a wall at the Juei Elementary School in the city of Takatsuki, Osaka Prefecture collapsed during the June 18 earthquake. A nine-year-old girl who attended the school and an 80-year-old man were killed. The wall separated the school’s swimming pool and a pedestrian path the two were using when the earthquake struck.
The entire structure stood at 3.5 metres, which included the wall itself at 1.6 metres, sitting on a 1.9-metre foundation. This placed the entire structure 1.3 metres above existing regulations. The wall also lacked necessary buttresses and had not been adequately reinforced by steel beams. Professor Yasushi Sanada of Osaka University, an expert in concrete structures and part of the government investigation team, noted “that the wall was already extremely unstable.”
Sanada also stated that the steel rods found inside the school wall were too short, increasing the risk that the cinder blocks would detach themselves for the main structure, as happened during the earthquake. Many such walls were built before 1981, when updated regulations required the building of earthquake-resistant structures, a necessity in Japan where earthquakes are common.
This danger was already well known to local city officials in Takatsuki. Three years prior to the June tragedy, Ryoichi Yoshida, a disaster management expert, had informed the local education board responsible for Juei Elementary of the dangers inherent in the wall, which was close to a route to school taken by many students. He was ignored. The education board officials claimed to have “tested” the wall by hitting it with a hammer, and then told the school that it was safe.
Only 80 percent of the schools with dangerous walls identified in the report have taken measures to address the situation, with some removing the structures. Others merely placed warning signs for passers-by to stay away in the event of an earthquake. Following the deaths at Juei Elementary, the Takatsuki municipal authorities declared their intention to remove any concrete wall higher than 1.2 metres within the city.
The response from local authorities is indicative of a far wider problem. Under capitalism, vital safety issues are ignored or papered over in the name of saving money until disaster strikes, then officials posture as if they will make genuine changes to dispel anger and outrage, then drop their promises until the next tragedy.
In addition, there were significant regional disparities in the proportion of schools with dangerous walls, with 52 percent of schools in Okinawa prefecture found to have such structures, as compared to Hokkaido with only 4.5 percent, the highest and lowest rates in the country respectively. These numbers could be an underestimation, as the education ministry’s review consisted of little more than a survey sent to education boards, with no external checks of the responses.
However, it is significant that Okinawa reports higher levels of dangerous school conditions as the prefecture also faces greater economic stresses than the rest of Japan. A third of Okinawan children live in poverty, more than double the rate on the mainland. Unemployment is more widespread and per capita income is also only 70 percent compared to the rest of the country. While poverty in Japan is by no means limited to Okinawa, this highlights that it is the poor and the working class who bear the brunt of attacks on education.
The condition of Japanese schools is not simply a product of neglect by local governments, but the result of decades of cuts in education spending. The government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has pledged no new funding to address school safety. It is only offering to re-direct funds from other school-related subsidies, while claiming that additional funds could be sought in the next fiscal year, which begins in April 2019.
The response by Tokyo is symptomatic of the broader slashing of funds for public education over the past 30 years. Japan currently spends roughly 3.5 percent of its GDP on education, well below the OECD average for advanced capitalist countries of 4.7 percent, and a marked decline from the 5.6 percent it spent in 1987.
The lack of funds has contributed to the continued use of deteriorating and unsafe structures by schools, which lack the resources to replace them or adopt safer alternatives. The lie that there is no money for schools to keep children safe is belied by the fact that the government recently requested another record increase in military spending—a 2.1 percent jump from last year to 5.3 trillion yen ($47 billion).

Leader of breakaway republic in Ukraine assassinated

Andrea Peters

Last Friday’s assassination of Alexander Zakarchenko, the head of the breakaway Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) in eastern Ukraine, is exacerbating already heightened tensions between Russia and the Western imperialist powers. The 42-year-old leader of the Russian-backed rebel state died in an explosion at a café in Donetsk on the evening of August 31.
According to official sources, an improvised explosive device was placed in the restaurant before the prime minister arrived for dinner. Zakharchenko’s body guard was also killed. Twelve others, including the minister of finance, were injured. Dmitri Trapeznikov, Zakharchenko’s deputy, has been appointed temporary head of government, and the republic’s parliament will vote on holding new elections this Friday. Over 100,000 people attended the slain politician’s funeral on Sunday.
The DNR and Moscow blame Kiev for the attack. Maria Zakharova, a spokeswoman for Russia’s Foreign Ministry, denounced the Ukrainian government of Petro Poroshenko on Friday for “implementing a terrorist scenario” and resorting to “bloody means.” An official press release decried the murder as an event that “runs along Kiev’s logic of a military solution to the internal Ukrainian crisis.” It warned, “Such actions carry the serious risk of destabilizing the situation in southeast Ukraine.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin, without directly accusing Ukraine of involvement, paid tribute to Zakharchenko and described his murder as a “dastardly crime.” The speaker of the DNR Parliament, Denis Pushilin, insisted that the murder was carried out by Kiev with the aid of US special operations forces.
The head of Ukraine’s security services, Igor Guskov, denied the country’s involvement. He stated that Zakharchenko’s death was either the result of infighting among warring factions inside the DNR or an act carried out by Russia, which wished to remove the allegedly troublesome Zakharchenko from power.
Moscow has dispatched investigators from its own Federal Security Services (FSB) to the DNR and called for an international investigation into the murder. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) has said it is considering the matter. After initially circulating images of two suspects wanted by police on Wednesday, DNR officials declared that the individuals in question were no longer being sought.
Zakharchenko’s murder is one of a series of recent assassinations of prominent military and political figures in Ukraine’s two breakaway republics where there is a complex web of relationships between politicians, wealthy oligarchs, and state actors.
The fighting in the Ukraine’s southeast stems back to the US-backed, far-right coup in the country in February 2014. Viktor Yanukovych, Ukraine’s president, who was moving in the direction of closer ties with Moscow, was driven from power in a wave of protests and violence led by ferociously anti-Russian, Ukrainian nationalists with the support of Berlin and Washington.
As millions of ethnically Russian citizens fled Ukraine, a separatist movement took hold in the largely Russian-speaking eastern coal-mining region known as the Donbass. The DNR and its sister state, the Lugansk People’s Republic (LNR), supported by Russia, formed out of this conflict. Powerful sections of the American ruling class, which are braying for war with Russia, see the conflict in Ukraine, like that in Syria, as an important front.
After Zakharchenko’s murder, DNR officials declared a state of emergency in the region and placed the military on high alert. They said that Ukrainian armored vehicles had been seen advancing on Volnovakha-Dokuchaevsk, a frontline south of Donetsk.
Daniel Bezsonov, spokesperson for the DNR’s operational command, stated Sunday that large numbers of foreign mercenaries, including US and Canadian forces, had arrived in Ukraine and joined two of Kiev’s artillery and infantry brigades in preparation for a major attack. Eduard Bazurin, a DNR military leader, said that Ukrainian shock troops have also been deployed to the southeastern city of Mariupol. The Ukrainian military also stated last weekend that anti-government attacks were escalating in the Donbass.
On Monday, joint Ukrainian-NATO exercises started in the western Ukrainian city of Lvov. American Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch declared at the opening ceremony that the ten countries involved “stand in solidarity with Ukraine for Ukrainian security, Ukrainian sovereignty, and Ukrainian territorial integrity.”
The murder of Zakharchenko may be the death knell of the Minsk II peace accords, agreed in 2015 between Ukraine, Russia, France, and Germany (known as the Normandy Four), and to which Zakharchenko was a signatory. That agreement, which was supposed to stop the fighting and grant the DNR and LNR limited recognition, has been repeatedly violated by the Ukrainian army and far-right paramilitary stationed on the border.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov declared Saturday that forthcoming talks among the Normandy Four to discuss the implementation of Minsk II were now “impossible.” Zakharchenko’s murder “is a provocation, a frank one, aimed at frustrating the implementation of Minsk accords. Although, Kyiv authorities never fulfilled them anyway,” he added.
While France and Germany initially insisted that the assassination not be used to further escalate tensions, on Wednesday the European Union (EU) extended sanctions against 154 Russian individuals and 44 Russian companies over the country’s involvement in Ukraine. The number of sanctioned individuals dropped by 1, as the now-dead Zakharchenko was removed from the list.