24 Jan 2019

Shopko retail chain files for bankruptcy, 105 stores across US to close

Jacob Crosse

General merchandise retail chain Shopko, with 367 stores across 26 states and over 14,000 employees, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in a Nebraska courthouse on January 15, becoming the latest in a string of retailers to enter or consider such a move in recent years.
Shopko, which had an operating revenue of over $3 billion dollars in 2017 and its parent company Speciality Reality Shop Holdings Corp, along with 11 other subsidies, including Shopko Hometown, cited excessive debt and “changes in consumers shopping patterns” in court documents as the reason for the bankruptcy.
McKesson, a pharmaceutical medicine supplier to the retailer had sought a restraining order against Shopko earlier this month, in response to unpaid debts. The order would have barred Shopko from selling medicinal goods already delivered to the company. Lawyers for McKesson stated that the company was owed $67 million dollars for unpaid inventory from November 2018.
Shopko lawyer Stephen Hackney in arguing against the restraining order cited the risk to public health if Shopko was barred from selling medications over the counter or through the pharmacies located inside the stores. Brown County, Wisconsin Judge William Atkinson agreed with Hackney’s argument, denying the restraining order, “I do not believe it is safe for citizens, residents ... and patients if I grant your order,” Atkinson told McKesson's attorneys. “There would be significant public health effects. The public harm, I don't think it can be understated.”
A week later Shopko lawyers were back in court filing for bankruptcy and agreeing to shut down 105 stores, many of them in rural locations. Shopko pharmacies accept Medicaid and Medicare and in many small communities in the Pacific and Midwest regions of the US it is the sole drug store.
Apparently the “significant public health effects,” were not taken into consideration during the bankruptcy hearing. Shopko has until March 14 to, “secure a reorganization plan sponsor or show the company can finance operations post-bankruptcy.” If this is deadline is not met the bankruptcy process will end and all of Shopko stores will be liquidated.
Shopko has yet to announce how many employees will be laid off, but it’s safe to assume thousands will be searching for new jobs beginning in February. On average a single Shopko store will employ 10 to 25 people. Several stores previously identified for closure began selling off inventory in November.
Of Shopko's over 14,000 employees, 5,000 reside in Wisconsin. In total, 16 stores will be closing in the Midwestern state, including the original Green Bay store founded by pharmacist James Ruben in 1962. Following Wisconsin, Utah will have the second most store closing with 13 locations slated for liquidation, 11 more stores will be closed in Iowa, 8 in Kansas, 3 in Michigan, and 7 in Nebraska.
The pending loss of the Shopko store in Kimball, Nebraska, (population 2,400), prompted concerned residents to file a petition on change.org hoping to save their store. The petition has garnered over 1,700 signatures and was delivered to Shopko’s co-CEO’s Rodger Krause and Marc Leder.
Nicole Sanneh, the author of the petition noted in her plea, “Without this retail store, Kimball and surrounding area residents will have to drive 35-plus miles for basic household items. So much more than just the retail sales will be lost. Jobs will be lost as well as the economy.”
Shopko corporate public relations responded to the petition on January 7, stating, “The decision to close a store is not an easy one for us and is only made after a careful study of the market and various economic factors. The right decision for Shopko, although extremely difficult, is to close this store. We have some great Customers, great teammates, and will miss operating in the community.”
The WSWS recently spoke to a Shopko employee of more than two decades, whose Madison store will close this April. “Twenty-three years of showing up to work on time and in the end I get a two week severance “package” for my loyalty,” they noted bitterly.
The employee, who wished to remain anonymous, cited the acquisition of Shopko by Sun Capital Partners in 2005 as a turning point for the company: “After they sold the land, it was only a matter of time.”
Sun Capital Partners purchased Shopko for approximately $1.1 billion dollars in 2005, the next year it sold most of the real estate to Spirit Reality for $815 million. Spirit in turn began charging rent on the land that had previously been Shopko owned, exacerbating a tenuous fiscal situation that only worsened after the 2008 financial crash. As Shopko was spiraling into debt Spirit granted a $35 million dollar loan to Shopko in 2018. The loan carried with a 12 percent interest rate, resulting in $600,000 quarterly payments.
Sun Capital was founded in 1995 by two former Lehman Brothers investors, Marc Leder and Rodger Krause. Leder is also a co-owner of the Philadelphia 76ers basketball team and the New Jersey Devils hockey team.
Dubbed by tabloids as, “the Hugh Hefner of the Hamptons,” Leder is known for hosting extravagant parties for his wealthy friends and embarking on yachting expeditions. The inspiration for Sun Capital, Leder recalled to the New York Times, followed a visit to Mitt Romney’s private-equity firm, Bain Capital, in 1995. During this visit, Leder recalled a conversation he had overheard between Bain executives complaining over an investment in which they only “doubled” their initial investment.
This epiphany prompted Leder and Krause to get into the parasitic practice of buying businesses, stripping them of any meaningful assets and selling off the carcass for a profit. This destructive process can be extremely profitable for executives at private equity firms such as Sun Capital. In a rush to extract as much profit before discarding the husk, private equity firms often neglect or purposefully shortchange employee pension funds while selling off company assets before declaring bankruptcy.
Before Shopko this year, five other recent purchases by Sun Capital, including the Marsh Supermarket grocery chain have filed for bankruptcy, leaving employees empty handed, while executives collect millions in “consulting fees.”
In the case of Marsh Supermarkets, after Sun Capital bought the grocery chain 11 years ago, the firm restructured the employee retirement plans. There were now three separate plans, one for the the top five executives at Marsh, one for warehouse employees and one for store employees.
However, only the executives plan has been fully funded since the sales agreement, with $14 million dollars siphoned from workers to executives including $7 million dollars for CEO Don Marsh. Meanwhile, the pension for store employees, has been underfunded by $32 million and the pension plan for warehouse employees was $55 million underfunded at the time of the bankruptcy. This shortfall will likely leave pensioners with nothing barring a government intervention.
Despite filing for bankruptcy, Shopko still achieved a profit of $45.2 million on $2.7 billion in sales in 2017, and $35.6 million in profit in 2018. While thousands of employees will be left jobless, the company has sought approval for “retention payments” to employees who are “key to the future success” of Shopko. An undisclosed payment was made on November 9 to a small group of “corporate” employees. Additionally, 22 more employees will be paid $280,000, on April 12 as long as the bankruptcy process continues.
As with the leveraged buyout at Sears, Toys R Us and other big box retailers, the “retail apocalypse” is a catastrophe for workers who have toiled in miserable low-wage retail conditions, often neglecting family and friends over the holidays to ensure a “profitable quarter” for the company. In return, after decades of loyal service, they are to be laid off and their pensions raided so that already wealthy executives can reap millions of dollars in stolen bonuses and fees.

Washington engineers right-wing coup in Venezuela

Bill Van Auken

The US recognition of Juan Guaidó as the self-proclaimed and unelected “interim president” of Venezuela marks the initiation of a right-wing coup engineered in Washington.
Guaidó swore himself in Wednesday before a mass anti-government rally in Caracas. Virtually simultaneously, Donald Trump tweeted: “The citizens of Venezuela have suffered for too long at the hands of the illegitimate Maduro regime. Today, I have officially recognized the President of the Venezuelan National Assembly, Juan Guaido, as the Interim President of Venezuela.”
This attempt at regime change by tweet has been supported by a number of right-wing governments in Latin America, including that of the fascistic former army officer, Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who was inaugurated at the beginning of the year. Canada also quickly fell into line behind Washington’s conspiracy, while the Macron government in France has reportedly begun discussions within the European Union aimed at drumming up support for Washington’s puppet.
Russia, Turkey and Mexico reiterated their recognition of Nicolás Maduro as Venezuela’s constitutionally elected president, as did Cuba and Bolivia.
Washington’s recognition of Guaidó as president constitutes a naked intervention by US imperialism with the aim of achieving its own predatory aims in Venezuela, which boasts the world’s largest proven oil reserves. At the same time, it is aimed at rolling back the influence in the hemisphere of Russia and China, which have both established close economic and political ties with Caracas.
This regime change operation has been two decades in the making, from the abortive 2002 CIA-orchestrated coup against Maduro’s late predecessor, Hugo Chávez, under George W. Bush, through the imposition of sanctions by the Obama administration and its designation of Venezuela as an “extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”
By in effect throwing US support to a rival government, the Trump administration is seeking to create the conditions for a military coup or even civil war within Venezuela as well as a US military intervention from without.
Venezuelan President Maduro responded to the US intervention by breaking off diplomatic relations with Washington and ordering all US diplomatic personnel to leave the country within 72 hours. Guaidó, no doubt operating in close consultation with the State Department, countermanded Maduro’s decree, declaring that he, as “interim president,” was asking US officials in the country to remain in place. The State Department has responded that it will ignore Maduro’s order, setting the stage for a confrontation that can be used as the pretext for US intervention.
In statements to reporters on Wednesday, Trump made it clear that military intervention is under active consideration. Asked by reporters whether he was contemplating sending US troops to Venezuela, he responded that “all options are on the table.”
A US official speaking not for attribution told reporters that if the Maduro government acted against Guaidó and his supporters, their “days will be numbered,” while media reports indicated that Washington is considering a naval blockade of Venezuela to stop its oil exports and the seizure of Venezuelan assets in the US on the supposed behalf of the “interim president.”
Maduro, for all of the rhetoric about “Bolivarian Socialism,” heads a capitalist government that defends private property in Venezuela and has imposed the full burden of the country’s deep-going economic crisis onto the backs of the Venezuelan working class, whose strikes and protests have been brutally repressed. Under Maduro and his predecessor, the late Hugo Chávez, private control of the country’s economy actually grew and the profits of the financial sector soared, as the government diverted vast social wealth to meet debt payments to Wall Street and the international banks.
Nonetheless, the claims from the Trump administration that this government is “illegitimate” and that Washington is standing for “democracy” are nothing short of obscene. This same administration, it should be noted, has no problem with the legitimacy of the murderous police state monarchy of Prince Mohamed bin Salman in Saudi Arabia, the dictatorship of Gen. Sisi in Egypt or the various similar regimes that constitute Washington’s principal allies in the Middle East.
On less specious grounds than Washington is using to declare Maduro an “usurper,” any government in the world could claim that Trump’s own government—elected with less popular votes than those of his opponent and opposed by the majority of the American people—is “illegitimate” and should be overthrown.
Moreover, any regime that emerges from the US-backed operation in Venezuela will be a right-wing dictatorship of the banks, big business and foreign capital that will organize a bloodbath against the Venezuelan working class that will far eclipse the massacre carried out in 1989 against the Caracazo, the popular revolt of the country’s workers and poor against IMF austerity.
The principal pillar of the bourgeois nationalist government headed by Chávez and Maduro has been the military, with senior officers controlling key sectors of the government and the national economy. Washington is hoping that this will become the government’s Achilles’ Heel, with senior commanders persuaded to change sides and carry out a coup.
It was revealed last year that US officials repeatedly met between the fall of 2017 and the beginning of last year with a group of Venezuelan military officers seeking US support for the overthrow of Maduro. These contacts failed to reach fruition because Washington believed that the conspiracy was insufficiently prepared.
These calculations may now have changed. An isolated uprising by a group of national guardsmen who seized arms and police stations on Monday has been followed yesterday with a video statement from division Gen. Jesús Alberto Milano Mendoza, appearing together with other officers, declaring that the army should revolt against Maduro and that the high command should not serve as “the armed branch of the government for its personal benefit.” Milano Mendoza had previously served as the chief of Chávez’s presidential guard.
It is not just Trump and the CIA supporting the Venezuelan coup and the sharp lurch to the right in Latin America. This was made abundantly clear at the World Economic Forum which opened this week in the exclusive Swiss Alpine resort of Davos, bringing together global billionaire CEOs, bankers, hedge fund managers, celebrities and government leaders and officials.
Davos rolled out the red carpet for Jair Bolsonaro, the fascistic ex-army officer who was inaugurated as Brazil’s president at the beginning of the year. Bolsonaro delivered a bizarre and stunningly short keynote speech to open the forum. Investors present were described as “excited” by the prospect of increased profits under a new government headed by an individual who has voiced his support for the former Brazilian military dictatorship and its murder and torture of left-wing opponents, and who has packed his government with generals and right-wing ideologues.
Bolsonaro cast himself as part of a continent-wide crusade for political reaction, declaring, “The left will not prevail in this region, which is good, I think, not only for South America, but also for the world.” He received a positive response from the representatives of financial oligarchies and their respective governments that all feel themselves besieged by intensifying economic crisis and a resurgence of the struggle of the working class on an international scale. All of them are looking towards methods of dictatorship, authoritarianism, repression, censorship and outright fascism as a means of defending their wealth and rule.
Within the United States itself, despite the internecine political warfare in Washington, there are no disagreements about the unfolding Venezuelan coup. US Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durban issued a statement Wednesday hailing the State Department stooge Guaidó and his supporters as “brave patriots who see a more hopeful and democratic future for the Venezuelan people.”
And, on the day that Guaidó declared himself president, the New York Times published a glowing tribute to the right-wing political operative under the headline “As Venezuela crumbles, a new voice of dissent emerges.” It did not bother to inform its readership that this “new voice” is a paid mouthpiece for the US State Department.
The same newspaper, the erstwhile voice of bourgeois establishment liberalism in the US, praised the abortive CIA coup against Chávez in 2002, declaring that “Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened” after an elected president had been dragged from his office and arrested and a military-backed business association leader had been proclaimed president.
The unfolding coup in Venezuela has implications for the whole of Latin America and the entire planet. It is part of the shipwreck of the so-called “left turn” that began at the beginning of the millennium, the advent of a number of bourgeois nationalist governments that diverted a share of booming commodity revenues into modest social welfare programs and utilized a rising China to offset US influence in the region. Promoted by Pabloite and other pseudo-left tendencies internationally as a new form of socialism, this “Pink Tide” only served to politically disarm the working class in the face of the inevitable turn to reaction and repression.
Moreover, it is inseparable from a turn by the international bourgeoisie toward reaction and dictatorial forms of rule, from Trump’s threat to impose a state of emergency, to Macron’s embrace of Pétain, the emergence of the fascistic AfD as the main opposition party in Germany and the consolidation of the extreme right’s grip over the government in Italy. Everywhere, the domination of a narrow financial oligarchy is incompatible with democratic forms of rule.
The political crisis in Venezuela can only be resolved in a progressive manner by the independent intervention of the working class. What is required is not the intervention of the military, but rather the arming of the masses. The resolution of the country’s underlying economic crisis is possible only through the seizure of bourgeois property and the placing of Venezuela’s vast oil wealth under popular control. Popular assemblies must be established to carry out such a program, while appealing to the workers and oppressed throughout the Americas for support.
The working class in the United States must oppose the reactionary intervention of the Trump administration and fight to unite its struggles with those of the workers in Venezuela and throughout Latin America against the common enemy, the capitalist system.

23 Jan 2019

Professional Fellows Program (PFP) for Economic Empowerment, Middle East and North Africa – Fall 2019

Application Deadlines:
  • Morocco & Tunisia:Application: CLOSED
  • Algeria, Egypt, Libya & Lebanon: Application: OPEN
Deadline for Libya & Lebanon: 15th February, 2019
Deadline for Egypt & Algeria: 22nd February, 2019


Eligible Countries: Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia

To be taken at (country): USA

About the Award: The Professional Fellows Program (PFP) for Economic Empowerment, Middle East and North Africa is a two-way exchange program sponsored by the U.S. Department of State and designed to promote mutual understanding, enhance leadership and professional skills, and build lasting, sustainable partnerships between mid-level emerging leaders committed to strengthening their communities through social entrepreneurship and workforce development.
PFP Fellows are placed in intensive fellowships in non-profit organizations, private sector businesses, and government offices for an individually tailored professional development experience.  They build a broad network with American and other program participant colleagues as they develop a deeper understanding of U.S. society, enhance their professional skills.  American participants who have hosted foreign fellows travel overseas for participant-driven reciprocal programs.

Type: Fellowship, Short course

Eligibility:
Who Should Apply?
  • Entrepreneurs, and Social Innovators.
  • Small & medium business Owners and Managers who are investing in innovative socially conscious products and programs.
  • Individuals working in Civil Society/NGOs working on youth workforce training and development, increasing the role of marginalized populations in the economy, building financial literacy, training in technology use and IT development, and other efforts around economic empowerment.
  • Individuals working in  University incubators, accelerators, and job-readiness programs, and programs focusing on business development, financial literacy, sustainable tourism, or economic development.
  • Individuals working in Government Agencies/Ministries, national policy offices, think-tanks, and offices working to increase the presence of underrepresented citizens in the economy.
Eligible candidates must be:
  • 25-40 years old
  • A current citizen and resident of: Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Libya, or Lebanon
  • Speak fluent to English (enough to work full-time in a US fellowship)
  • Have at least two years‘ work experience in their field 
  • Currently employed
  • Interest in hosting reciprocal program for Americans in your country
  • Able to convene 25 or more colleagues for post-trip briefings
  • Have demonstrated strong leadership skills and commitment to community
  • Demonstrates initiative, teamwork, and openness 
  • Preference will be given to those who have not previously traveled on a U.S. government funded program.
Number of Awards: 38 

Duration and Value of Programme: 
  • Spring Delegation (Tunisia & Morocco):  April 20 – June 1, 2019.
  • Fall Delegation: (Egypt, Algeria, Libya & Lebanon):  October 12 – November 23,  2019.
Fellows will participate in a  6-week program, (Spring and Fall, 2019) each with:
  • A one-week host family stay
  • A one-week business development and social entrepreneurship intensive with University Partner
  • A one-month fellowship placement in individual businesses and/or offices in Washington, D.C.
  • 4- days Participation in the Professional Fellows Congress
  • Design and development of a complete proposal for a follow-on projects to be carried out by PFP fellows, supported by mini-grants
How to Apply:  Apply Here

  • It is important to go through all application requirements on the Programme Webpage see link below) before applying
Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Popular Democracy in Cuba

Charles McKelvey

The socialist governments of the Third World plus China have developed popular democracy, with structures that are alternatives to those of representative democracy.  Laws and policies are decided by deputies of the people, and not by politicians dependent on the support of corporate and wealthy interests.  Let us look at the historical development of the alternative political process in the case of Cuba.
During the neocolonial Republic of 1902 to 1959, Cuba had the basic structures of representative democracy.  Military dictatorships periodically interrupted the democratic process, in response to political instability, which itself was a consequence of the incapacity of the Cuban system of representative democracy to ensure the sovereignty of the nation or the needs of the people.  It was a system designed to support the interests of international capital and a weak international bourgeoisie, with political power in the hands of a political class dependent on both.  In key historic moments (1924, 1944, & 1948), the people were able to elect candidates who promised reform, but once in office, they were not able to deliver on their promises.  Revolutionary leaders in Cuba could not possibly overlook the limitations of representative democracy.
The July 26 Movement led by Fidel Castro came to power on January 1, 1959, with overwhelming popular support.  At that historic moment, the principal concern of the revolutionary leadership was the challenge of delivering on promises made to the people, given the political and economic obstacles, both national and international, that they confronted.  Such promises included the redistribution of agricultural land, the raising of salaries of workers, an increase in the standard of living, the nationalization of foreign utilities companies that set exorbitant rates, confiscation of property fraudulently obtained through government corruption, and restructuring the economy away from its peripheral role in the world-economy.  In that challenging and confrontational situation, holding elections seemed a superfluous activity; no one doubted that the program put forth by the revolutionary leadership had the support of the people.
Rather than organizing elections, the revolutionary leadership took decisive steps in mobilizing the people, so that the people would be an effective arm in the attainment of revolutionary goals.  In 1959, in response to acts of sabotage and terrorism emanating from the Cuban counterrevolution in Miami, a civilian-militia was formed.  In 1960, Committees for the Defense of the Revolution were formed in all neighborhoods, for the purpose of vigilance over sabotage and terrorist activities.  At the same time, revolutionary leaders from the ranks took control of the Federation of Cuban Workers and the Federation of University Students, previously controlled by leaders tied to the neocolonial order, and they expanded their numbers. In 1961, small farmers were organized into the National Organization of Small Agriculturalists.  Thus, in responding to political necessities, the revolution took in practice the first steps in the formation of an alternative political process; it created mass organizations of workers, women, peasants, and students, which provided structures for active popular participation.
At the same time, a political process in which the revolutionary leadership and the people interacted in mass assemblies emerged.  The speeches of Fidel were pedagogical, with detailed descriptions of the challenges that the Revolution confronted, as well as formulations of revolutionary goals.  The mass assemblies also enabled the revolutionary leadership to assess the pulse of the people.  At the peasant mass meeting in Havana on July 26, 1959, the people demanded that Fidel return to the post of Prime Minister, from which he had resigned due to the anti-communist declarations of the President.  On September 2, 1960, the National General Assembly of the People of Cuba emitted the Declaration of Havana, which defined the concepts and rights that would guide the revolutionary process in the subsequent stage.  The National General Assembly of the People of Cuba was constituted by a mass meeting of one million persons, constituting perhaps 20% of the Cuban adult population of the time.
Fidel expressed the new concept of democracy, evolving in practice, on May 1, 1960.  “They made up a democracy for you, a rare and strange democracy in which you, who are the majority, count for nothing.”  He characterized it as a “false democracy where all the means of corruption and fraud are used, in order to distort the true will of the people.”  In contrast, true democracy protects the rights of peasants to land, of workers to a decent standing of living, of all citizens to schools and doctors.  Moreover, true democracy is “direct democracy,” which has existed in Cuba since January 1, 1959.  “Real democracy . . . has been expressed in this form; it has been expressed directly, in the intimate union and identification of the government and the people; in this direct agreement; in this making and struggling for the good of the great majority of the country, and in the interests of the great majority of the country.”
Everyone understood that the Revolution was being led by a person with an exceptional capacity to analyze national and international affairs, to discern politically intelligent solutions to problems, and to forge the necessary unity of the people.  And everyone understood that in the long term, this form of revolutionary leadership was not sustainable.  As early as 1961, Fidel was speaking of the importance of replacing leadership by one person with the collective leadership of a vanguard political party.  During that year, attempts were made to form a vanguard political party thought the unification of the revolutionary organizations, which were the July 26 Movement (established and led by Fidel), the March 13 Revolutionary Directory (initially a revolutionary student organization), and the Popular Socialist Party (the first Communist Party of Cuba).  After some problems, these efforts eventually culminated in the formation in 1965 of a new Communist Party of Cuba.
Thus, in the early 1960s, there was emerging in practice the basic structures of an alternative political process that involved popular participation in mass organizations and mass assemblies and the formation of a vanguard political party that has the duty of educating and leading the people.  The conception is that of a united leadership that possesses a commitment to defend the rights of the majority, and as a result of this commitment, is liberated from the distorted understandings that have roots in particular interests.  The leadership seeks to educate the people, freeing them as well from the ideological distortions that are disseminated throughout the world.  At the same time, it is the people who have political power, because the people are organized in various mass organizations.  The people find strength in their numbers and their organizational and ideological unity.
There is a symbiotic relation between the vanguard party and the people.  The vanguard educates and exhorts, and yet it at the same time is dependent on the people, who ultimately hold political power. And the people are dependent on the vanguard, for without it, they cannot have that informed understanding that is necessary for their emancipation.  The charismatic leader educates both the vanguard and the people, preparing them both for the day in which the leader is no longer physically present.  However, everyone understands that the leader always will be present in the form of his teachings and example.
The structures of this alternative political practice were institutionalized in the Cuban Constitution of 1976.  The Constitution concentrates political power in the hands of the elected deputies of the people.  It establishes a National Assembly that is the highest authority of the nation, with the power to enact laws and designate the high members of the executive and judicial branches of government.  The deputies of the National Assembly are elected by the delegates of the 169 municipal assemblies of the nation.  These municipal assemblies are elected through direct and secret voting in 12,515 small voting districts, in which voters choose from two or more candidates.
Because direct elections by the people of the delegates of the municipal assemblies occurs in small voting districts, electoral campaigns are not necessary. The candidates are known by the people, because of their work in mass organizations in the community.  Brief biographies are displayed in public places. There is no need for campaign financing, and thus the distorting influence of large contributors to political campaigns is eliminated.  The structure is designed to ensure that political power is in the hands in the people, and it is so named as “popular power.”  The assemblies that constitute popular power are the decision-making voice of the people, an institutionalized version of the mass assemblies of the early 1960s.
The mass organizations established in the early 1960s remain integral to the political process.  Among other functions, they play a central role in the second-degree elections for the National Assembly and the executive branch.  Candidacy commissions propose lists of candidates to the delegates of the municipal assemblies and the deputies of the National Assembly, when these assemblies carry out their electoral functions.  The candidacy commissions are formed by representatives of mass organizations of workers, farmers, women, students, and neighborhoods. The mass organization have a participate rate of 84% to 99% of their respective populations, and they have a similar process of direct elections at the base and indirect elections for positions at higher levels of authority.
The Constitution of 1976 abolished electoral political parties.  Candidates for the municipal assemblies are nominated by the people in a serious of nomination assemblies in neighborhoods in the numerous voting districts.   The Constitution defines the Communist Party of Cuba as the only party and as the vanguard political party of the nation, consistent with revolutionary intentions of the early 1960s.  The vanguard party, however, in guiding the people, cannot usurp the voice of the people. Accordingly, the Constitution prohibits the Party from participating in the electoral process.  The Party is obligated by the Constitution to be the highest leading force in the society, but to lead through education and by example. The Constitution establishes that the people, through the structures of popular power, will decide.
The Constitution of 1976, like the 1960 Declaration of Havana, affirms the right of Cuba to sovereignty as well as the social and economic rights of the people, including rights to employment, food, health, education, culture, and recreation.  The state has the obligation to play an active role in the protection of these rights.
For the past several months, the Party, the National Assembly, and the people have been developing a new constitution, taking into account the new social and economic model of 2012 and changes in Cuban society.  In accordance with their revolutionary socialist tradition of popular democracy, they are forging a remarkable constitutional assembly of the people.  As the process unfolds, it is clear that the new constitution preserves Cuban traditions of direct democracy and popular democracy.
The development of an alternative political process by the nations constructing socialism in the Third World plus China is a consequence of political necessity. If the nations of the Third World are to overcome the colonial legacy and become the subjects of their own social and economic development, they must take control of their territories and resources from foreign corporations and governments.  In order accomplish this, they must have a political structure that ensures that power is in the hands of the deputies and delegates of the people, and not in the hands of an accommodationist national elite aligned with international actors.  For this reason, the nations that are constructing socialism are precisely the ones that enjoy the greatest level of sovereignty.
We of the nations of the North increasingly are discovering that representative democracy does not respond to our needs.  We have the right to know that the socialist revolutions of the Third World plus China have responded to their colonial situation through the forging of alternative political structures that provide the foundation for a political debate that leads to consensus and political stability, and not to confusion and division.

Beyond Universal Education

Moin Qazi

The true teachers are those who help us think for ourselves
–Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan
The building blocks of a nation are the citizens of its tomorrow. The way these seeds will sprout will always depend on the way you choose to water them. India’s education sector is one of the largest sunrise sectors in the economic and social development of the country.  India’s education sector has expanded rapidly in the last decade but the quality of learning remains pathetic on account of unimaginative and misguided policies. The purpose of education has to be, to inspire and develop children to think creatively, reason systematically and release their potential to shape their own future.
The latest ASER 2018 survey-the most authentic barometer of India’s educational health-shows that its findings are not inspiring, and in some cases quite dismal. The fragile foundation of basic education augurs a dim horizon for India’s future human capital. The students are not able to learn the basics of reading, writing, and arithmetic and do not meet even elementary mathematics standards.
While enrolment has improved sharply since 2006 for both boys and girls, not only at the primary but also in the 11-14 age group, literacy and numeracy skills remain dismally below par. The ASER   survey covered 5.46 lakh children in the age group 3-16 across 596 districts. What is alarming is the decline in reading and arithmetical abilities at the Class VIII level since 2012, with government schools faring worse than private ones: more than a quarter of all children at this level cannot read a Class II text, while over half of all children cannot do division (three digits by a single digit number). Seen along last year’s ASER survey on learning abilities of the 14-18 age group, those about to enter the workforce, it would seem that India’s ‘demographic dividend’ is turning into a sour joke.
These figures are a serious concern in a country where only 74 per cent of its 1.2 billion inhabitants are literate, making India home to the largest illiterate population in the world. We all know that a sound and productive education system needs to focus on science, math engineering and technology — the skills today’s employers are looking for to fill jobs right now and in the future.”Inefficient teaching methods, such as rote learning, which focuses on memorisation as opposed to critical reasoning, are still widespread at the primary and secondary school level.The rote teaching methodology has demonstrated shortcomings. Studies by the Programme for International Students Assessment, an OECD initiative, and Wipro found that students at the primary and secondary school level have fallen back in math, science and reading literacy in recent years.
The skewed priorities of the government in this vital sector manifest in low learning levels. The Sustainable Development Goals include a commitment to provide every child with access to free primary and secondary education by 2030. While we are on the right course, our obsession with universal coverage of education has compromised the quality of learning. It is time that India moves beyond a singular focus on enrollment numbers and grapples with the problem of poor quality.
The usually parroted reasons for the poor standard of education are teacher absenteeism, poor student attendance, bad infrastructure, inadequate teacher preparation programmes, and rote learning practices. The most common refrain is: “The ones who understand education are not empowered while the ones empowered have no idea about education”. While these issues are valid, they do not fully explain the learning crisis apparent in our classrooms.
More Indian children are in school today than ever before, but the quality of public schools has sunk to abysmally low levels, as government schools have become the reserve of children at the very bottom of India’s social ladder. The RTE Act has been quite successful in achieving three broad objectives: higher enrolment, lower dropout and completion of mandatory basic education.
The present-day education reformers believe that market solutions and technology can remedy the situation. They blame the proponents of status quo of failing to leverage the benefits that technology has brought to other sectors such as health, travel, financial services and communications. Many of them advocate disruptive innovations, primarily through online learning. There is a strong belief that real breakthroughs can come only through the transformative power of technology or the invisible hand of the market.
The bane of the modern examination system is its regressive testing regimen which we stubbornly refuse to reform. Exams are no longer a metric for the test of learning or intelligence. Instead, they have degenerated into an awfully pernicious ritual designed to produce compliant drones who can regurgitate facts faithfully. What we test is the acquisition of a narrow collection of facts, not whether children have the skills for a fruitful employment or the ingredients for a gainful adulthood. Children are being coaxed into learning merely to pass tests. Schools are not fostering love for learning. Moreover, they do not inculcate the all-round skills they need when they leave the portals of learning to the world of competition outside. Real education is more about wide reading, deep thinking and asking hard questions rather than simply reproducing crammed answers faithfully. Formal teaching needs to be supplemented by in-school pull-out programmes, after-school tutoring, and summer camps supervised by NGOs with emphasis on non-conventional innovative pedagogies.
Much of the malaise in the realm of public education has less to do with salaries and more to do with lack of accountability and corruption in recruitments and transfers of teachers. The government schools have not been able to attract good talent. The stark reality is that India is not getting even a modest return on its investment in the education sector.
Teacher salaries in government schools are relatively high in India, at three times per capita income compared to China, where it is about the same as per capita income. However, learning outcomes are better in private schools where average teacher salaries and costs per student are less. A break-up of government spending shows that only 0.8 percent goes towards capital expenditure, while 80 percent goes towards teachers’ salaries, leaving little to be spent on infrastructure creation.
Formal teaching needs to be supplemented by in-school pull-out programmes, after-school tutoring and summer camps supervised by NGOs with emphasis on non-conventional innovative pedagogies. Much of the malaise in the realm of public education has less to do with salaries and more to do with lack of accountability and corruption in recruitments and transfers of teachers. The stark reality is that India is not getting even a modest return on its investment in the education sector. Education should combine just the right amount of physical adventure and intellectual stimulation. The most effective approaches are those that foster bonds of care between teachers and their pupils. The process of teaching and learning is an intimate act that neither computers nor markets can replicate.
India must reorient its education policy which is very results oriented,   very system oriented, is very policy oriented; just not too child oriented. it risks squandering the  future  of millions of children, as well as the entire country’s economic  prospects Formal teaching needs to be supplemented by in-school pull-out programmes, after-school reading classes and summer camps by voluntary organisations using innovative pedagogies. There has to be a direct teacher-development pipeline and evaluating systems for monitoring and upgrading teaching skills. There is a dearth of ideas for reform to address fundamental flaws in the system.
India’s emphasis on rote learning and its rigid examination system do not encourage creative thinking. instead of just  focusing  on results learning should also foster  intellectual, spiritual and social growth more Indian children are in school today than ever before, but the quality of public schools has sunk to abysmally low levels, as government schools have become the reserve of children at the very bottom of India’s social ladder. According to the World Development Report 2018 “Learning to Realise Education’s Promise”, India ranks second from the bottom after Malawi in a list of 12 countries where some Grade 2 students were found to be unable to read a single word from a short text. India also tops the report’s list of seven countries in which some Grade 2 students could not calculate simple two-digit subtractions.
The fourth Industrial Revolution is going to be a major test for the education system focused on reciting facts and performing formulaic calculations—precisely the areas where humans cannot compete with intelligent machines. With all of our technological developments, human ingenuity and creativity remain unmatched. We should capitalise on it and give our young people the opportunity to use their innate advantages as effectively as possible.
Education needs more champions than health and environmental advocates because it is one rising tide that can lift all the boats. Since, education has more room for innovation than any other development sector, there is a unique opportunity for social entrepreneurs. We need to transform curriculum and teaching practices to focus less on rote learning or straightforward calculation and more on relevant skills, like communication, reasoning ability, problem-solving and reasoning ability, and critical and independent thinking. We are under an illusion that our children are   digital savvy but more often their knowledge is only screen-deep. If young people are to be empowered citizens, they will need to understand how technology affects every aspect of our life. Greater tech literacy will be essential to ensure that the human implications of the ongoing fourth Industrial Revolution are positive.
If India is to truly rise as a global economic power, the policymakers and education specialists must focus its efforts on developing its public schools into a world-class education system.  Catchy announcements like ‘blackboard to digital boards’ will have relevance only when we translate rhetoric into commitment and into genuine action. Goals without actionable strategies are just good intentions. The proof should come by first addressing the fundamental concerns of public education .Nelson Mandela famously said: “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.”Adequate resources, higher standards for teachers and the flushing out of corruption must all be part of a reform package that seeks to make Indian education the nation’s top priority.

“Youth Bulge” in the Arab World: an Asset or a Burden

Lirar Pulikkalakath

Introduction
The systematic analysis of human resource, especially its composition, representation, and productivity is an important aspect of the study of any country. The demographic dividend of a youth bulge can be transformed positively especially in economically weak countries by enhancing educational and employment opportunities. These countries can take advantage of their physical strength to intellectual potential. But without due implementation and proper establishment of necessary infrastructure, the youth population can become a source of unrest rather than a national resource.
Over the past couple of decades, the demographic transition from having high birth and death rates to low birth and death rates in the West Asian and North African region has resulted in the creation of a large number of young population constituting one-third of the total population of the Arab world. This demographic advantage needs to be capitalised rightly and in a positive direction to empower the youth population and to ensure a better future for the region. But unfortunately, the education system in the region has been failing to provide relevant skills for the youth and not ready to accommodate them in the political and administrative system. At this juncture, as most of the states in the Arab world have limited infrastructure facilities and lack productive human resources but with a bulging youth population, the future will be dependent on how this vacuum is filled and what strategies are adopted to address these issues.
Now the demographic transition in the region led to a political transition in the name of Arab Spring since the end of 2010. It was mainly due to the active participation of large number youth, who were frustrated due to the higher unemployment rate, corruption and poor representation in the decision making bodies. A dynamic and developed society can best stimulate, utilise, and reward their vibrant youth. As the Arab world is always chaotic due to its socio-political and economic profiles, the theme of the population study of this troubled region deserves much attention. Contextualising these things, this article is intended to analyse the role of population dynamics of youth in the fate and future of the region.
Youth in West Asia and North Africa
Most of the international organisations consider young people belong to the age group between 15 and 25, later extended the range up to 29 due to the prolongation of schooling (Paciello and Daniela 2014; United Nations 1993 & 2005; Council of Europe 2003). Historically, the age grading has not been part of the feature of Arab societies. “Youth” or “young people” is used by social scientists, international organizations, etc. to include variously those age ranges from 14-25, 15-25, 15-29, under 30 and sometimes even up to 35 or 40 (Joseph 2011:5; OECD 2015:20; UNESCWA 2009; Hafferkamp 2014:8; The Global Youth Wellbeing Index 2014; 6). According to the Population Reference Bureau (2007), the median age of most of the countries in West Asia comes under this age. When the highest median age is shown as 32 years for Qatar the lowest for Yemen is at 17 years. For Jordan and Syria, it is 21. When the median age of population at the world level is 29, it is even lower in most of the West Asian countries.
Interestingly, in Arabic, Shabab, a word used to denote youth, includes even those population group aged 30 or above (Hafferkamp 2014: 8). In a West Asian and North African (WANA) context, the upper limit for this category of the population is often extended upwards, spanning 25–34 (Stave and Solveig 2015: 30). Again the definition of ‘youth’ varies for countries in WANA. Among the countries having a youth policy, Bahrain defines youth as those who are in the age group between 15-30 years, whereas Yemen says this category of individuals belongs to age category 0-24 years. In Egypt, it is those between 6-36 years, while Palestine considers them as aged between 15-19 years (Paciello and Daniela 2014; Salehi-Isfahani and Navtej 2009). According to the Middle East Youth Initiative, population aged between 15 and 29 years are youth (UNDP Arab Human Development Report (AHDR) 2016: 22). This group can be described “as a ‘generation in waiting’ to become full adults, struggling with securing jobs, getting married and starting families” (Paciello and Daniela 2014; Dhillon and Yousef 2009).
In the Arab Region, a majority of the population is now under the age of 25 (Arab Human Development Report, 2016). The increasing number of youths in West Asia, according to the Population Bulletin (2007), is due to a dynamic fertility rate and the decline in mortality trend, especially after the 1980s. The significant fertility rate has resulted in a “youth bulge” in major West Asian countries which resulted in youth being one-third of the total population of the region. The growth of the youth population in West Asia is the second highest after sub-Saharan Africa. Youth in general and in the Arab world, in particular, got little or no attention till the last century. Two events at the beginning of the twenty-first century were crucial in bringing the Arab youth into the limelight. The first one was the 9/ 11 terrorist attack in 2011. The second one happened almost a decade later popularly known as ‘Arab spring’. If the former one happened outside the Arab world, the latter swept across the WANA region. These two events challenged many of the existing perceptions and hegemonic assumptions about ‘youth’ in the WANA region. In between these two events, the global financial crisis of 2008-09 also played an important role in shaping the issue of youth. Before these events, especially till the popular uprising in the region; academicians, international policymakers and western publics considered youth in the region merely as a social or demographic phenomenon, ‘youth bulge’. Since then, debates and discussions about this particular phenomenon is a regular one from global to local. Now those youths who were before identified only in terms of demographic numbers or statistics were suddenly given credit as individuals who can make changes or have the potential to change the society, politics and economy of a country, region and the world.
Arab Youth: an Asset to a Burden
According to M.C. Paciello and Daniela Pioppi (2014), the youth bulge is a potential opportunity in any society and state, a “demographic dividend” or “demographic gift”. The assumption here is that youth can become a great opportunity for the development of a country only if they get proper skills, education, employment and adequate human capital policies (Paciello and Daniela 2014). It is important to note that some of the frameworks of analysis regarding youth have constructed them as a “threat”, “challenge” or “problem” to domestic and regional political stability. This assumption is by emphasising the disappointing conditions of a youth bulge and unemployment among them in the South East Mediterranean (SEM) countries. This approach views that youth population is bringing with it specific economic and political challenges for the countries concerned regarding the creation of new jobs and supply of social services (Paciello and Daniela 2014; World Bank 2004 & 2008). Anyhow the importance of young population in contemporary international relations and political economy discourse is growing. As mentioned earlier this scenario is more or less filled with concerns and references about “youth bulge”, “youth extremism”, and “youth unemployment”. However, there is empathy also towards youth empowerment” and “youth dynamism” (Paciello and Daniela 2014). All these scenarios are pretty much evident in the case of the Arab world. Youth in the Arab world have shown their strength and determination when the revolution spread across West Asia and North Africa region within a short period; from Tunisia to Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Syria and other areas.
As a quote of Khalaf appeared in the Financial Times immediate after the Arab Spring swept across the WANA region:
He is the young Egyptian who occupied Tahrir Square, and awakened a sleepy population. She is the young Libyan defying the madness and brutality of Muammar Gaddafi. He is the empowered Bahraini and Yemeni youth raising his voice in a resolute call on governments to listen to their people instead of oppressing them. Each revolt has drawn in swaths of its own society, but it is the young Arab who is the driving force; the unassuming leader (Khalaf 2011)
A dynamic and developed society can best reward, stimulate and utilise their vibrant youth; from their physical strength to intellectual potential. But without due implementation and proper establishment of infrastructures, the same youth can be problematic and will become a burden rather a national resource. The deficiency of job opportunities in accordance with the increasing population will create unrest and economic chaos. Recent protests in Greece, France, Italy, Spain, and different parts of the Arab world were triggered to an extent due to the lack of opportunities for young people. Thus youth population represents a dynamic reservoir of any nation that could be a source of strength and can pose challenges to the state and society. While today’s young men and women are more educated than previous generations, but the quality of education is poor. Moreover, these youth face diminishing opportunities to secure good jobs, access credit and housing, achieve financial independence, and form successful families. The region will have to create more jobs soon to accommodate the youth.
Conclusion
The dynamics of the region regarding socio-economic development is very significant as it experiences a demographic boom side by side a flourishing oil boom. This historic opportunity needs to be capitalised rightly and in a positive direction to empower the youth population in West Asia and to ensure a better future for the region. “While the West perceives youth as a demographic asset, the Arab world finds in them a demographic burden,” says Dr. Rola Dashti of the Kuwait Economic Society (Mourad 2009:3). It is very clear that now most of the Arab countries are in trouble; both economically and politically. If the youth bulge creates things more complex, then the region cannot think of a secure and stable future.
Anyhow the demographic reconfiguration favouring youth caused unrest and challenged the established social, political and economic systems in the Arab region. Unemployment, along with the increasing urban concentration of population, often lead to rising extremist tendencies, which in turn lead to unrest and insecurity. The youth bulge, in other words, can be taken as an asset which could be the building bricks of a strong state, with vibrant socio-economic tendencies, by channelising their untapped potential in a positive and creative way. At this critical juncture, as most of the states in the West Asian region have limited infrastructure facilities and lack productive human resources but with a bulging youth population, the future will be dependent on how this vacuum is filled and what strategies are adopted to address these issues.
Today, countries in the WANA region holds their largest youth cohort in modern history. However, the youth in the region encounter various kinds of social, political and economic exclusion and marginalisation. Some of the important problems they face in the region are rising unemployment rates, a weak position in political participation and decision-making processes. The costs of neglecting them from the mainstream socio-economic activities and public sphere can lead to the depletion of human and social capital and can also lead to unrest in the region.

Does Our Civilization Has At Least Some Chance To Survive?

Andre Vltchek

Lately, I have been asked this question on several occasions. “Can our humanity really survive?” “Am I an optimist or a pessimist?”
My replies vary, as I don’t think there can ever be one single answer to this most urgent, the most important query.
Sometimes my answer gets influenced by location: where I am at that moment, or where I have been recently? In a Taliban-controlled village in Afghanistan, on a rooftop of a whorehouse in Okinawa while filming deadly US air force bases, or perhaps in an elegant café after visiting an opera performance with my mom, in Stuttgart or in Paris.
Whether I have been injured on a battlefield or in a slum, or have been applauded (most of the time, hypocritically) at some event where I was invited to speak? Have I been doing something ‘forbidden’, insane and dangerous, or merely processing my visual or written materials in Japan or in Bangkok?
Depending on the circumstances, I can sound negative or cautiously optimistic.
But the truth, the honest truth is: I am scared.
Not scared for my own life, or my health or even my well-being. My work and my struggle: nobody forced me into it; all that I do is my own choice. I want to do it and therefore I do it. And while I do it, as it is often not safe, I have to understand that my life may end, prematurely, or that something else, very unpleasant, could happen. I have to understand, and I do understand. Shit happens! Unfortunately, it happens often. But that’s not what makes me scared.
What truly frightens me is something else, something much more essential: this beautiful ‘project’, this incredible,gigantic experiment called humanity, could very soon end in ruins and up in smoke.
What scares me even more is that, perhaps, it is already ending although I sincerely hope that it is not.
I have no religion, and I have absolutely no idea whether there is some sort of afterlife or not. Afterlife, God: what I am absolutely certain of is that no one on this planet really knows any answers to these so-called big questions, and those who claim that they do, know even much less than me.
This world and this damn humanity of ours is all that I know, and it is all that I have and care about. And I love it, because I have no other choice but loving it, despite all of its brutality and foolishness, recklessness and short-sightedness. But this planet, which used to be so brilliantly beautiful and pleasing, to all of our human senses, is now frightened, humiliated and plundered. It is getting raped, savagely, in front of our own eyes. And we are just watching, ruminating like cattle, shitting, and amusing ourselves in increasingly brainless ways.
That’s what we are actually supposed to do, according to those bastards who are ‘in charge’.
Our humanity had been derailed from its natural aims, goals and dreams. Goals like egalitarianism, social justice, beauty and harmony, used to be on everyone’s lips, no matter where they were living; just so recently, just one century ago.
The brightest minds, bravely and determinedly, worked on finishing with all forms of inequality, exploitation, racism and colonialism. Crimes against humanity committed by Western imperialism, racism, slavery and capitalism were being exposed, defined, condemned and confronted.
Unfortunately, it was one century ago that we were just about reaching the peak of enlightenment, and as humanity we were much closer to harmony and peaceful co-existence, than we are now.
Our grand-grandparents had no doubts whatsoever, that reason and logic would soon be able to triumph, everywhere on earth, and that those who had been ruling so unjustly all over this world, would either “see the light” and voluntarily step down, or would be once and for all defeated.
Great revolutions erupted on all continents. Human lives were declared to be well above profit. Capitalism seemed to be finished. Imperialism and capitalism were discredited, spat at and stepped on with millions of feet. It was clearly just a matter of years, before all people of all races would unite, before there would be no more dictatorship of greedy and degenerate business people, of crooked religious demagogues, of perverse monarchs and their serfs.
In those days, humanity was full of optimism, of ground-breaking ideas, inventions, intellectual, as well as emotional courage and artistic creativity.
A new era was beginning. The epoch of serfdom and capitalism was ending.
But then, the dark revanchist forces of oppression, of greed, regrouped. They had money and therefore could pay to buy the best psychologists, propagandists, mass-murderers, scholars, and artists.
*
A hundred years later, look where we are! Look at us now.
There is nothing to celebrate, and plenty to puke about.
Gangsters and moral degenerates,who ruled during all previous centuries, are still in full control of the planet. As before, oppressed people form majority: they inhabit Africa, the Middle East, Latin America, Sub-Continent and Southeast Asia.
Actually, things have gone much further than before: the majority of people on our planet lost their ability to think logically. They have been brainwashed by the propagandist mass media, by mass produced movies and pop music, by bizarre ‘trends’ in fashion and by aggressive consumerism.
Education and media outlets have lost all their independence and become subservient to the interests of the regime.
Western ‘democracy’ (not much of a project to begin with), has kicked the bucket quietly and discretely, and its advocates again began taking direct dictates from big business, multi-billionaires and their multi-national corporations. The system has evolved from turbo-capitalism into turbo-kleptocracy.
I work all over the world, on all continents, and what terrifies me is how ‘complete’, or call it ‘bulletproof’ the system has become.
With advanced computerization, with the ability of the regime to monitor and analyze basically all corners of our planet, there seems to be no place on earth that can escape the advances and attacks of Western imperialism and neo-colonialism.
Just imagine: some country decides to resist and to work for the well-being of its own people, and immediately the Western propaganda, its NGO’s, academia, media outlets, and potentially its mercenaries and military, get to work, systematically smearing the rebellious government, and potentially ruining entire countries. This is how Argentina collapsed, and then Brazil. This is how Syria was first destabilized and later almost destroyed.
It appears that nothing can withstand the global dictatorship.
And the global dictatorship has no mercy; it lost all rationale.
Greed, the maximization of profits, knows no boundaries. Sacrificing human lives is now commonly perpetrated. Thousands of human lives, or a few millions, it does not seem to matter. In the Democratic Republic of Congo or in West Papua, who cares, as long as coltan, uranium, gold and oil are flowing.
I witnessed entire nations ‘sinking’, becoming uninhabitable, due to global-warming: Kiribati, Tuvalu, Marshall Islands. I see tremendous islands like Borneo (known as Kalimantan in Indonesia) being thoroughly and irreversibly ruined. And nobody gives a damn. Corrupted(by the West and their own servile governments) scientists in places such as Indonesia,are still arguing that global warning and deforestation, as well as the palm oil plantations, are actually not threatening the world and its survival.
Some fifty years ago, there would have been powerful books written on these subjects. Wonderful art films were made,songs written and sang by brave bards,and the masses in both the oppressed world, but also in the West itself, bought revolutionary novels by the millions of copies. Multitudes of people stood in line, to watch films that were depicting their life, their struggle and their suffering.
Now? The destroyed masses are conditioned to forget about their nightmares and instead watch brainless horror films, some Star Wars ‘epic’, ‘romantic comedies’ depicting sweet suffering or the rich and famous. After saving for months, poor families in the devastated world are dragging their children to Disney Worlds; to those factories of plastic, emotionless dreams, to those Burger Kings of fairy tales!
Mobile phones have replaced paper books, newspapers and magazines. For centuries, paper books were symbols of knowledge. No computer or telephone screen can ever replace the printed word. A scholar, a man or a woman of letters has always been surrounded by books, by notes, by documents.
All this is not happening by chance.Electronic offering is much easier to control, divert and choke, than materials that are printed on paper. Thede-intellectualization of the world is clearly being done by design, step by step, in an organized fashion. Forget about ‘renaissance men and women’ in the 21st Century: even educated Western anti-capitalist thinkers are now ‘specialized’. They ‘don’t read fiction’. They are collecting ‘facts’, producing non-fiction essays and books, as well as documentary films and videos, but fully neglecting the point that all successful revolutions were always based on emotions, creativity and art; inspiring the masses, making people laugh and cry, dream and hope.
The world has become full of ‘data’, of digits. ‘Facts’ are widely available, but they do not inspire or move anybody. They do not call people to action; to the barricades. Everything is standardized. Western propaganda has managed to regulate human desire, dictating how the ‘perfect’ female or male body should look and behave. Or what the ‘correct’ perception of ‘democracy’should be,or what is trendy and what should be considered boring and outdated.
The life of both the victims and victimizers appears to be ‘de-politicized’. But it is not! The acceptance of Western propaganda and collaboration with the regime is actually an extremely political act!
*
I am scared because it appears that a great majority of the people have accepted what the twisted regime has ordered them to accept.
They have accepted surveillance, trends, de-humanized ‘desires’, ‘political correctness’, global imperialist fascism, pop, grotesque capitalism and grey uniformity.
Like parrots, they repeat anti-Communist slogans, as well as propaganda barks against all the countries and governments that are still resisting this monstrous Western dictatorship brought to its most bizarre extreme.
I am scared, and at the same time, I am increasingly furious. If this is the future for humanity, do we, as human beings, really have right to exist; to survive as a species? Are we so submissive, so uninventive that we always end up begging for crumbs, praying to some invented superior forces, and prostrating ourselves in front of evil greedy monarchs and morally-corrupt individuals and systems?
Fortunately, not everyone is blind, and not everyone is on his or her knees. Not all of us have lost the ability to resist, to dream, and to fight for a world that appeared to be so possible just one century ago.
Those who are still alive and standing on their feet, know perfectly well: Revolution is possible and morally justifiable. Capitalism and imperialism are totally inhuman. A Socialist or Communist system is the only way forward: not in some ‘conservative’, dogmatic form, but in an ‘internationalist’,enlightened and tolerant way.(As clarified in my latest book Revolutionary Optimism, Western Nihilism).
It is the beginning of the year; 2019. Let us try to recap some basics:
Destroying entire parts of the world, and ransacking their natural resources for cold, selfish profit, is wrong.
Brainwashing countries, overthrowing their progressive governments, and derailing their natural development, is damn wrong, too.
Turning populations of the entire planet into idiots and zombies, making them consume violent and brainless movies, listen to crap music and eat junk food, dreaming about making love to shop window figurines and their human equivalent, is evil.
Using the media, education and entertainment for indoctrination purposes is barbaric.
And so is turning the entire planet into some primitive consumer market.
To fight such a system is glorious. And it is by definition ‘trendy’ and fun.
To use the terminology of the empire: collaboration and uniformity can never be ‘cool’. Listening and watching the same garbage cannot be ‘fashionable’. Banging into the same mobile phone screens can hardly be defined as ‘advanced’, and broad-minded.
Licking the boots of some old fart who owns banks or destructive corporations, is far from a modern, elegant and refined way of living.
Watching how our beloved planet is going up in flames, due to neo-imperialism and turbo-capitalism, while not doing anything to stop it, is nothing else other than stupid.
*
I began 2019 by writing the first chapter of my 1000-page novel “One Year of Life”. This novel began in 2019 and it will finish at the end of the same year. At the very end of it. Enough of non-fiction only!
As a novelist and playwright, I believe in human emotions. I have also witnessed enough uprisings and revolutions to finally realize that naked facts and data will never bring people to the barricades.
Time to un-dust the old banners, to bring back poetry, art, literature, films, theatre, and music. They are our best allies.
The West tries to silence emotions, ‘burn’ books and hit us all with ugly, meaningless noise and images, because it knows perfectly well that beauty is creative and inspiring.Beauty and creativity are also ‘dangerous’, in fact fatal to the regime’s dark and depressing designs.
I may be scared, but I am also cautiously hopeful. We can still win. Actually, it is our obligation to win. This Planet has to survive. If we win, it will. If we lose, it will go to hell.
It will be an extremely tough struggle that lies ahead of us. And no one will fight just in the name of facts and data, people are known to fight only in the name of a beautiful future.For us to win, all great muses are expected to march by the side of brave and determined revolutionaries!