9 Feb 2019

McKinsey&Company Next Generation Women Leaders Event 2019 for Female Students and Professionals (Fully-funded to Paris, France)

Application Deadline: 8th March, 2019

Eligible Countries: Europe, the Middle East and African countries


To Be Taken At (Country): France

About the Award: We passionately believe in developing outstanding female leaders. We do so every day, internally and with our clients. Take the next step in your leadership journey and apply to our Next Generation Women Leaders event,  to be held on May 24-26 in Paris.
In this exclusive three-day workshop, McKinsey will offer you the opportunity to explore the importance of women in leadership and the impact they are having on the economy. You will also shape your personal leadership styles by playing to your strengths and understand how to grow your potential. Across the three days, you will meet our consultants and participate in group sessions, workshops, discussions, and social events.
 McKinsey offers you—talented women based in Europe, the Middle East and Africa—the opportunity to shape your personal leadership style.

Harvard University Women in Global Health LEAD Fellowship 2019/2020 for Women in Developing Countries

Application Deadline: 15th March 2019

Eligible Countries: Low- and Middle-income Countries.


To be taken at (country): Harvard University

About the Award: A Harvard LEAD fellowship is a transformative experience designed to empower emerging female leaders in global health. Successful applicants will articulate a clear vision for personal growth, leadership and change. Based on their specific needs and goals, fellows will spend a semester at Harvard University engaging in tailored leadership training, mentoring, speaking and networking opportunities, and independent project work.
This unique opportunity combines a 4-month residence at Harvard with the development and execution of an 18-month professional development plan. Selected fellows will take classes in any of Harvard’s schools based on their field of work; they will receive general leadership training and be invited to share their experiences and to lead, both while at Harvard and upon their return to their places of work. They will also be part of a mentoring program focusing on their specific needs, industry and career path, utilizing mentors at Harvard, in their industry and in their home countries long past their time at the university. Women from all continents, regions, disciplines and sectors are eligible to apply.
Building on their Harvard experiences, fellows will return to their home organizations to execute their unique personal growth and leadership plan, with full support from their employers and institutional mentors. Deliverables for this part of the fellowship include hosting training events for peers on specific leadership skills, progress reports, and mentoring a future LEAD fellow as well as initiatives and action items specific to each fellow.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility:
  • Applicants for this mid-career fellowship must work full-time in the field of global health. They need to have at least 15 years of professional experience, including proven leadership experience. Global-health related work completed as a university student does not count as professional experience.
  • Candidates need to be able to reside in the Boston/Cambridge area during their semester at Harvard. While at the university, they must be free of work-related commitments. They must have the full support of their employers, and they must have a champion in their organization who signs on as an internal mentor. If chosen, they also must agree in writing to honor the leave-stipulations made with their employers.
  • Candidates nominate themselves by applying for the fellowship. There are no age limits or academic prerequisites. During at least two years prior to arrival, the fellows should not have participated in a full-time fellowship that lasted 4 months or longer.
Selection Process:Applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis by the Harvard fellowship application review committee. The last day to submit an application will be March 15, 2019.  The Women in Global Health LEAD Fellowship steering committee will review the top 20 applications and make the final decision on awardees, based on the criteria below, by April 30, 2019.  All candidates will be notified of their application status the week of May 1, 2019.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: 
  • The program will provide: housing in the Boston/Cambridge area; 1 roundtrip, economy class ticket to/from Harvard University; office space; a monthly stipend; and access to libraries and other resources at Harvard University during the fellowship period. Fellows are responsible for arranging health insurance for themselves and dependents in advance of the start of the program and are required to setup a US bank account while in residence.
  • Upon returning to their home institutions, fellows will be required to submit regular progress reports, execute all elements of their 18 month development plan, and will be expected to mentor trainees at their home institutions as well as future Women in Global Health LEAD Fellowship awardees.
Duration of Programme:  Fellows are in residence at Harvard University for a period of four months, or one academic semester, between August 26, 2019 and December 20, 2019.

How to Apply: 
  • Click here to start your online application.
  • It is important to go through all application requirements on the Programme Webpage see link below) before applying
Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Mwalimu Nyerere African Union Scholarship 2019 for Refugees and Displaced Persons in African Countries

Application Deadline: 30th April 2019

Offered annually? Yes


Eligible Countries: African Union Member Countries

To be taken at (country): African Union Member Countries

About the Award:The 2019 Scholarship offer is aimed to provide an important opportunity for enhancing the knowledge, professional skills and capacity of refugees and displaced persons; and thereby streamline their integration to contribute for sustainable development in Africa.
The Scholarship Scheme is intended to enable young Africans to study in reputable African Universities with a binding agreement that beneficiaries will work in any African country for at least the same duration of scholarship period after graduation.

Fields of Study: Masters Programmes in Natural Sciences, Agriculture, Health, Education, Engineering, and Social Sciences.

Type: Masters

Eligibility: To be eligible for the Scholarship, a candidate must:
  • Be a Citizen of an African Union Member State.
  • Be a formally registered refugee/displaced person with a UNHCR registration number or be able to demonstrate confirmed refugee status in an African Union Member State.
  • Be under the age of thirty five (35) years.
  • Be a holder of a Bachelor’s Degree in the relevant field, at least at the level of Upper Second Class Honours. The degree must be from a recognised University.
  • Have demonstrated outstanding academic achievement as evidenced by academic transcripts, and academic awards if any.
  • Have proof of admission to undertake a full time Masters programme in a recognised university in an African Union Member State.
  • Be willing to commit to work in an African Union Member State on completion of studies for at least three (3) years.
No application will be considered without an admission letter from a university, and an official registration as a refugee or displaced person.

Selection Criteria: The Scholarships are granted on academic merit and based on a rigorous selection process.

Number of Awardees: 
  • Undergraduate Degree Programmes (4 Scholarships)
  • Master’s Degree Programmes (2 Scholarships )
Value of Scholarship: The scholarship award covers the following:
  • Tuition Fees: According to an official invoice from the Host University.
  • Stipend: 500 US$ monthly, to support living expenses such as housing, food, utilities, local transportation and medication.
  • Book Allowance: An allowance of 500 US$ per year for the purchase of books.
  • Air ticket: A round-trip economy fare for the most direct route between the beneficiary’s home country and the study destination of host Institute.
  • Travel Allowance:
    • One-off payment of 250 US$ to contribute towards ground transportation from airport and settling-in costs
    • One-off payment of 350 US$ to assist with shipping and other terminal expenses; upon departure from the host Institution after successful completion of the study.
  • Computer Allowance: One-off payment of 1,000 US$ for the purchase of laptop computer and accessories.
Duration of Scholarship: The Masters programme should be of two years duration.

How to Apply:   Interested candidates can apply on-line using the link www.edu-au.org/scholarship
OR

They can submit their applications by post after completing the Scholarship Application Form, which is available on the Africa Union website:
www.au.int/en/scholarship

The application documents should include the following:
  1. Completed application form
  2. A proof of refugee/displaced person status, indicating citizenship
  3. Recent passport-size photograph
  4. CV indicating applicant’s academic background and work experience
  5. Certified copies of academic certificates and transcripts
  6. Copy of admission letter from a recognised African University
  7. Two (2) Reference Letters with contact addresses and telephone numbers.
  8. A Letter of Motivation of not more than 500 words (maximum 2 pages) that explains why the candidate has chosen the particular field study and importance to Africa’s development
Applicants applying on-line should produce electronic copies of the above documents and submit as attachments.
Applicants who submit their applications by post should make two (2) sets of hard copies of all the above documents. The Application must be sent to the address below.
Department of Human Resources, Science and Technology
African Union Commission
P.O. Box 3243
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia


Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Citibank Middle East and Africa Analyst Program 2019 for Graduate Students

Application Deadline: Ongoing

Eligible Countries: Countries in Middle East and Africa


To be taken at (country): Lagos, Nigeria

About the Award: The MEA Analyst Program begins in July with a 4-week training program (in Johannesburg or Dubai). Formal training begins with an orientation and induction sessions providing an overview of Citi, followed by classroom training sessions. Analysts have the opportunity to meet representatives from the teams that make up the Banking, TTS, Operations and Risk divisions.
The classroom training program is followed by 4 x 3-month rotations across various functions of Citi, including Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS), Corporate Bank and Operations. In some countries analysts have a rotation in Risk, in others this will be replaced with another business area.
In 2019 we are hiring Analysts in Algeria, Bahrain, Congo, Cote d’Ivoire, Egypt, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, South Africa, Tanzania, Tunisia, UAE, Uganda and Zambia.

Type: Job

Eligibility: Citibank wants to hear from you if…
  • You have completed your university degree or will complete it prior to July 2019 
  • You have a minimum grade of 2:1, a minimum GPA of 3.0 out of 4.0 or equivalent in any degree discipline 
  • You have an interest in business and banking
  • You must have completed one year of National Service (if applicable) 
  • You have less than 3 years of work experience
  • You are fluent in English
Who will be a great fit…
A dedication to learning and a true passion for the business are vital. As industries all over the globe continue to restructure and grow, we are hiring professionals who have a global perspective on the future of banking, and want to make an impact on the corporate level. We value diversity and so do you.
Citibank will also be looking for the following:
  • Commitment to personal growth and career development, a strong desire to learn, and success in team environments
  • Knowledge of the global or domestic business landscape is a plus, but not required
  • Strong communication, planning, and organizational skills
  • Desire to develop a deep understanding of the financial industry
  • Unquestioned commitment to integrity ethical decision-making
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: During your 4-week training program you will receive an in-depth education on a variety of topics to learn the fundamentals of the Analyst role and introduce you to Citi’s culture. So whatever your degree is in we will give you the training you need to excel. By the end of the program, Analysts will have the opportunity to take advantage of internal mobility opportunities.

Duration of Programme: Fulltime. Programme begins in July 2019.

How to Apply:  Apply Here
  • It is important to go through all application requirements on the Programme Webpage see link below) before applying
Visit Programme Webpage for Details

AfDB Next African Global IT Leaders Program 2019 – (Fully-funded Masters in S.Korea)

Application Deadline: 9th April, 2019 (1700 hrs Seoul time). 

Eligible Countries: African countries


To be taken at (country): South Korea

About the Award: The objective of the programme is to create across the African continent a critical mass of global IT experts: highly trained professionals in ICT.
The secondary objective of the programme is to expose mid-career professionals in African countries to the latest techniques and knowledge available through graduate studies at higher educational institutions in Korea. Upon completion of their studies, the scholars are expected to return to their home countries to apply and disseminate their newly acquired knowledge and skills to enhance the development of their countries.

Type: Masters

Eligibility: The rigorous student selection focuses on employees working in the field of ICT in public and private sector in the Bank’s regional member countries.
Applicants should additionally have the following qualifications:
1. A certified Bachelors degree in an IT-related area
2. A certificate of English proficiency: TOEFL (iBT 83, PBT 560, CBT 220), IELTS 6.5, TEPS 599, TOEIC 720 or higher). These should have been taken at most two years before the deadline of the application
3. A public official, employee of public institutions or senior-level researcher at national research institutes working in IT fields (employees from private companies will not be considered)
4. Korean citizens are excluded – this also applies to Korean citizens with dual citizenship. 

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: KAIST scholarship recipients are generally exempt from paying tuition and fees. A monthly allowance of KRW 350,000 (for master’s level) or KRW 400,000 (for doctoral level) and National Health Insurance fees will be supported by the recipient’s advisors/departments

Duration of Programme: 2 years

How to Apply:  Please apply online on https://apply.kaist.ac.kr/intergradapply before 1700 hrs on 9th April, 2019 (Seoul time). 
  • It is important to go through all application requirements on the Programme Webpage see link below) before applying

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Why Indian Badly Need To Be Communists?

Kabir Deb

“The only way we’ll get freedom for ourselves is to identify ourselves with every oppressed people in the world”. ~ Malcolm X
From more than seventy years of our Independence, the Parliament is being ruled by the leaders who cannot lead without the help of a vague support. The vague support can be religion, caste, gender or class. They need the help of these social norms to blindfold a population to never make them witness the false promises and palpitating fascism. Electoral system of India too works on the basis of who is desperate to work for a particular religion as it is one of the vital playgrounds of politics. Rightist and Centrist (opportunist) ideologies follow the trend of being in a container full of grain (population) and to hide all the defaults present inside one particular grain. Party politics or parliamentary politics for years work on the single structure of religion, caste etc., built over the bodies of the civilians.
Communism denies to follow the social norms which can perforate the nation and so, communism has been said as the best ideology for leading a developing country. The issue of Left versus Right which is burning the nation has been introduced by the Right wing politicians to overrule the fight of the working class in the name of religion. India even after 70 years of Independence could not make its position in the top 10 rank in the field of economy, education, health. The reason lies in the presence of inequality which is way more than equality. A nation which has got more than 60% illiteracy level, runs for digitalisation and capitalism. The question herein may arise as, if digitalisation can solve the communication facility then how come it is a bad option? It has got a very simple answer, and that is people who cannot gather basic education can use digitalisation but only in a diminishing way. Basic education gives logic and without logic use of digitalisation would just be one big hazard.
Similarly, to build a nation it is very essential to understand what can be the impact of introducing new dimensions to an unequal field. The dimensions would either break the structured progress or it would be of no use. We can see that in the usage of mobile. India today stands as the highest mobile using nation and the usage of mobile has brought more hazards as compared to the western nations or educationally structured nation. From politics to religion, crime to fake news everything spreads like wildfire due to the use of technology in a wrong way. When writer, Arundhati Roy, talked on digital detoxification she widely meant that the use of technology to build politics over fake news is what is the consequence of an ideologically poor nation.
Whenever we use the word “Communism”, the term “working class” comes with it. Working class in Communism is someone who works for building the nation from multiple facets. It can be a tea seller or a rickshaw puller or a industry worker or anyone who earns by draining sweat. No other ideology triggers the mind from this perspective. The working class is being oppressed by forcefully closing industries, companies, draining money over foreign industries without putting them in farms forcing farmers to commit suicide, providing non uniform wages to female workers.
India today is going through a stage where researchers are being given less than half scholarship to carry on their research forcing them to leave the course. The nation which once had ample amount of jobs today is jobless. It is not just about the inequality that Communism speaks about. Rather it speaks over the inability of leaders to work for the foundation of a nation because Communism lives in the working class and every working human being of a nation falls beneath the umbrella of Communism.
Change is something which is present in a human being from his/her birth. With development we start to think of social norms and we find out the shortcomings of the norms. The word change is something which keeps rationality alive and with blind faith over religion, rationality dies. Every political party in India has got religion deeply inculcated in it which presents a vulnerable spot where the politics and religion would fail rationality.
One party would think of a particular religion denying the other. Similarly, it would give importance to a particular caste or utilise the caste card to win an election. That is the spot where politics of democracy shifts to fascism. Fascism can only be introduced by a binary system and religion is the most easy way to bring on the binary system of “this or that”. With binary system, the idea of change can be seen in only two platform which is presently happening in India: Congress or BJP. For years, whenever a person has spoken for change, the world has seen him/her as a Communist. No matter whether it was Galileo or Newton or Einstein or Bhagat Singh or Charu Majumdar.
Youth of this nation today are voluntarily accepting the title of “anti – national” which the present Right wing leaders are fond of introducing to anyone who speaks against them and that is what the nation needs to understand.
Many people who believe to “go – with – the – flow” in this era should understand that the threat hangs above our head. Fascism is not something which will rush out from the nation without causing any calamity. History has witnessed fascism and it tells us that every nation which has been a victim of fascism has seen a culture and population being wiped out by fascism. Presence of extremism or fascism in the present situation is way more penetrative and vicious to democracy because in a country which has got inequality in every field, introduction of technology which limits rationality can increase fascism.
Right wing politics uses class barrier in a very cunning way. The development happening in the nation mostly reduces the burden of the upper class thus developing the position of the upper class while the lower class is being fed development in the name of extremist religion (temples and mosques) and creating more burden with useless policies. Introduction of useless policies have always been a colonial method of right wing politics to break unity. India, today needs to understand that courage lies in identifying the burden of useless policies.
Left wing politics is a method which believes in structured development since with time left wing politics has adopted many things to understand society. A nation which has got a weak foundation cannot grow into a developed nation. No matter how much we try to introduce capitalist industries and highly proficient technology, if the education is not up to the quality level, the usage of capitalism won’t be in a fruitful manner. From the perspective of Communism, education should not be confined to “name writing”. Rather it should be to a quality level so that independence and rationality can be established. Kerala today has the highest literacy level and the education is to a quality level.
To defeat fascism, Communism needs to be introduced in every field and it should be true communism. Today when authors climb above with the help of government, more books should be written against the government. Contents of a book or a film should not obey any ideology, rather it should speak for the mass and whenever a content comes with the issue of the mass, it itself is a beacon of Communism. No matter whether the content is on the limitation of right wing economy or opening the door of sexuality, everything which breaks regularity and social norms fall under communism.
Youth of this era should not fail to be a Communist because to break any kind of vaguely established foundation over the belief of human beings, communism is essential and we cannot deny that. Today the nation is facing the worst kind of oppression because when a writer and protester feels choked for the leaders sitting on the throne and their religion, it is the era of fear. Fear of religion can only be broken by a change which believes in revolution and that is communism. Though history has seen many shortcomings of Communism but what the history has seen more profoundly is the power of red flag to free Syria, the power of a red flag in the French revolution, the power of a red flag to defeat Hitler, and the power of a red flag in the hands of youth flying to establish a change.

Prince Mohammed’s Khashoggi bullet: An insight into Saudi strategic thinking

James M. Dorsey

Continued, albeit slower-paced US and Turkish leaks potentially provide insight into far more than the circumstances of the October killing of Saudi journalist and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi. They focus attention on crown prince Mohammed bin Salman’s strategic thinking as well as his tightened control of the kingdom’s media.
In the latest disclosure, The New York Times, quoting anonymous US intelligence sources, reported that Prince Mohammed had threatened a year before the killing in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to take out Mr. Khashoggi with “a bullet” if he refused to return to the kingdom or continued to publicly criticise Saudi policies.
While significant in and of itself, equally interesting is the fact that the crown prince was speaking at the time to Turki Aldakhil, a prominent Saudi columnist and former general manager of the of Al Arabiya television nework.
Prince Mohammed is believed to have obtained a controlling share in satellite broadcaster Middle East Broadcasting Center, Al Arabiya’s mother company, when he detained scores of members of the kingdom’s ruling family, senior current and former officials and prominent businessmen in November 2017 in what amounted to a power and asset grab.
Disclosures this week by The Wall Street Journal and Amazon Inc. Founder and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos as well as earlier cooperation agreements with Bloomberg News and Britain’s online Independent newspaper suggest that Prince Mohammed’s media ambitions are global, not just limited to Saudi Arabia.
The Walll Street Journal reported that Prince Mohammed had in August of last year invited Vice Media Executive Chairman Shane Smith to his yacht moored off the Red Sea coast to discuss cooperation. Vice had already been contracted to produce videos about Prince Mohammed’s social and economic reforms.
In a blog post, Mr. Bezos alleged National Enquirer publisher American Media Inc. had tried to blackmail him and potentially colluded with Saudi Arabia to damage his reputation. The National Enquirer last year published a front-page cover of Prince Mohammed and nearly 100 pages dedicated to his kingdom’s reform efforts.
In what was seen at the time as a reflection of his master’s voice, Mr. Aldakhil detailed two weeks after Mr. Khashoggi’s killing a laundry list of potential Saudi responses if the the United States were to sanction the kingdom and/or the crown prince for the murder.
The list included allowing oil prices to rise up to US$200 per barrel, which according to Mr. Aldhakhil, would lead to “the death” of the US economy, pricing Saudi oil in Chinese yuan instead of dollars, an end to intelligence sharing, and a military alliance with Russia that would involve a Russian military base in the kingdom.
It remained unclear whether Mr. Aldhakhil was reflecting serious discussions among secretive Saudi leaders or whether his article was intended either as a scare tactic and/or a trial balloon. Mr. Aldakhil’s claim that a Saudi response to Western sanctions could entail a reconciliation with the kingdom’s arch enemy, Iran, seemed to make his assertion more of a geopolitical and economic bluff.
Similarly, Mr. Aldakhil’s suggestion that Saudi Arabia still maintained the ability to singlehandedly manipulate world oil prices was called into question in December when the kingdom needed an agreement with non-OPEC member Russia on production levels as well as Russian assistance in managing Iranian resistance to achieve an understanding within the oil cartel.
Mr. Aldakhil’s column did, however, highlight the fact that uncertainty about US President Donald J. Trump’s reliability as an ally and mounting anti-Saudi sentiment in the US Congress has prompted Prince Mohammed to hedge his bets by forging closer ties to Russia despite Russia’s alliance with Iran and Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.
Prince Mohammed has been in Moscow several times since first travelling there in March 2017 with his father, King Salman, the first Saudi monarch to visit Russia. Oil and weapons topped the agenda of Prince Mohammed, who doubles up as Saudi Arabia’s defense minister and oil czar.
Saudi Arabia is in advanced discussions for the purchase of Russia’s S-400 anti-aircraft defense missile system and is entertaining a Russian bid to build 16 nuclear reactors worth US$80 billion with far less restrictions on enrichment of uranium and reprocessing of spent fuel than the United States would likely impose.
Gulf analyst Theodore Karasik argues that Russia has been creating a ‘north-south’ economic corridor built on a web of commercial deals, monetray arrangements and soft power instruments such as business councils focused on the Gulf in general and Saudi Arabia in particular.
Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), is discussing with Saudi Arabia billions of dollars worth of deals in oil refining, petrochemicals, gas chemicals and oilfield services.
Saudi Arabia has pledged to invest up to US$10 billion in Russia’s economy, with Saudi companies interested in investing in Russian infrastructure, agriculture, hi-tech, energy and mining sectors, including US$5 billion in a liquefied natural gas project in the Russian Arctic.
Russia’s strategy of what Russian national security scholar Stephen Blank dubs ‘strategic denial,’ denying the United States the role of sole dominant power in the Middle East, serves Prince Mohammed’s hedging of his bets.
Prince Mohammed would like the Trump administration to believe that Russia’s strategy could work.
Now we know who our best friends are, and who our best enemies are,” the crown prince told Russian, Chinese, Japanese and French businessmen on the sidelines of an investment conference in Riyadh last October that was attended by a 40-man Russian delegation and boycotted by numerous Western CEOs and officials because of the Khashoggi killing.

Australian police used multiple lawyers as informants

Mike Head

What began in 2010 as a scandal reportedly involving an individual lawyer providing information on her clients to police in the Australian state of Victoria has become a crisis engulfing the entire legal system.
From the High Court down, judges, lawyers, politicians and media commentators have warned that the affair could undermine “public confidence” in the police and what is euphemistically called the “criminal justice system.”
In other words, the carefully-cultivated illusion that the legal system ensures “fair trials” with a right to genuine and independent legal representation is being called into question before the eyes of millions of people.
Two revelations this week struck a blow to the attempts of successive state governments, including the current Labor Party administration in Victoria, to keep covering up the fact that the police use defence lawyers as informers, in violation of lawyer-client confidentiality, to secure the conviction of their own clients.
First, Victorian Police had to admit that the female criminal lawyer, still identified only as “lawyer X” or “informant 3838,” became a registered police informant in 1995, not 2005 as it had previously testified.
It was further revealed that two years earlier, while she was still a law student, police dropped serious drug trafficking charges against her, after raiding her share house and finding $82,000 worth of amphetamines. This suggests that her recruitment as an informer began before she was even admitted to the legal profession.
Second, the government and the police conceded that, far from being a “unique” case, as they had previously claimed, multiple lawyers have fed information to police and helped to convict the very people they were supposed to be defending. There was media speculation that six other lawyers are involved, but the true number remains unknown. All names, including that of “lawyer X,” are being suppressed by court orders.
Even if the figure is only six, that still constitutes a significant proportion of the criminal lawyers appearing before the courts in the state of Victoria. Moreover, it indicates that the practice must have been known to prosecutors and condoned at the highest levels of the police.
Taken together, these two revelations throw into disarray the efforts of the government and the police to insist that “lawyer X” is a one-off instance of a lawyer who decided to conspire against her clients between 2005 to 2009. Initially, her motives were presented as helping to end what the media and the authorities dubbed “gangland” killings. Now, what is evident is that she has been a police informant throughout her entire career.
While the media has fixated on the fact that hundreds of criminal convictions, including those of alleged “drug lords” and crime bosses, now face challenge in the courts because of tainted trials, the implications go far wider and deeper.
How many innocent people have been convicted, or others wrongly convicted, on the basis of confidential information supplied to police by lawyers? In a 2015 letter to the assistant police commissioner Stephen Fontana, “lawyer X” said the evidence she had provided had led to the arrest of at least 386 people.
The police and government admissions point to the systemic, and ongoing, use of lawyers as informants to entrap or frame-up people. This modus operandi will not be confined to “gangland” activities. Other police operations, including against alleged terrorists, must be suspected of having involved similar conspiracies.
Moreover, these are police-state methods, overturning longstanding legal principles, and establishing precedents for use against other targeted victims, such as political activists.
Lawyer-client confidentiality is a centuries-old protection against authoritarian rule. It is also central to the democratic principles of independent legal representation and “innocent until proven guilty.”
As a result of this week’s revelations, Premier Daniel Andrews’ Labor government was forced to amend the terms of reference of a royal commission that it announced last December into the “lawyer X scandal.” One of the commissioners, a former South Australian state police chief, also had to stand aside because he was a senior Victoria Police officer in 1995. This leaves a single former judge to conduct the inquiry.
Officially, the inquiry will examine “the adequacy and effectiveness of Victoria Police’s processes for recruiting, handling and managing human sources who are subject to legal obligations of confidentiality or privilege.”
In truth, this inquiry has the same purpose as previous ones conducted into the affair by the police in 2012 and the state’s anti-corruption commission in 2014. It is to provide a whitewash by depicting the practice of recruiting lawyers as an aberration, while legitimising the wider use of secret “human sources”—i.e., informers and infiltrators.
Even as he announced the royal commission, Andrews effectively pre-empted its findings. He told reporters he still had faith in Victoria’s police chief commissioner, Graham Ashton, but that a royal commission was necessary to ensure the “integrity” of the criminal justice system in the future.
Andrews made this statement despite Ashton continuing to justify the recruitment of “lawyer X” as a “desperate measure” during a “dangerous time” of gangland crime. Ashton also defended the fact that the police opposed allowing her past clients to know that their lawyer may have been informing on them, insisting that it was necessary to prevent her from being murdered. The High Court, however, ruled that the woman could be shielded by entering a witness protection program.
There is no doubt that the latest revelations have caused outrage in the legal profession, as well as the public. Victorian Bar Council president Matthew Collins told Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) radio on Thursday that the conduct “is recognised universally as being so egregious, so beyond what is acceptable, that it has come as a shock.”
Collins stated: “The culture of the legal profession is and has always been that the fundamental duty is a duty of confidentiality towards one’s client. Where that is breached that is as egregious as it gets. You lose your ticket for this kind of thing.”
Yet it is inconceivable that the recruitment of lawyers as informants was not known throughout the police, intelligence, legal and political establishment. The conduct of “lawyer X” has been discussed in these circles since at least 2010, when she was called to testify in a murder trial involving an alleged corrupt police officer and was publicly named in the media. After refusing to testify, she then sued the police for endangering her anonymity and safety. That case was settled behind closed doors.
Media reports in 2014 also identified the lawyer, triggering a four-and-a-half year coverup. This featured a Victorian Independent Broad-Based Anti-Corruption Commission (IBAC) finding in February 2015 that criticised police “negligence,” followed by litigation by “lawyer X” and Victoria Police chief Ashton to block the release of any material from the IBAC investigation, even to those imprisoned on the basis of her collaboration with the police.
That coverup partially ended last December. Following a month’s delay until after the Victorian state election, a unanimous High Court judgment was published that dismissed a final appeal in those “public interest immunity” proceedings and authorised the release of some limited information about the “lawyer X” case.
In a joint judgment, all seven judges of Australia’s highest court branded the police conduct as “corrupt,” “atrocious” and “reprehensible,” involving “fundamental and appalling breaches of EF’s obligations as counsel to her clients and of EF’s duties to the court.” The judges’ primary concern, however was “ensuring that the court’s processes are used fairly and of preserving public confidence in the court.”
Obvious questions are raised about the likelihood of similar methods being employed by the police in other Australian states, as well as by the Australian Federal Police and their intelligence agency partners, such as the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.
Legal profession bodies have demanded assurances from the New South Wales (NSW) state police that it was not engaged in similar conduct. Interviewed on ABC radio, Law Council of Australia president Arthur Moses hinted at a problem in that state. Asked whether he had heard “on the grapevine” about lawyers being used as police informants in NSW, he stated: “I am not at liberty to disclose matters that I may have come into possession of through some other means.”

Sri Lankan president’s Independence Day speech exposes deep crisis of rule

Vijith Samarasinghe 

Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena delivered a speech to mark the country’s National Independence Day which summed up the hypocrisy, political decay and deep crisis of capitalist rule in the country. The independence ceremony was held at Galle Face Green in Central Colombo on February 4.
The celebration was dominated by military parades. Military officers provided commentary boasting of the role that each regiment played during the bloody 30-year communal war by successive Sri Lankan governments to suppress the Tamil minority and divide the working class along ethnic lines.
Invitees to the ceremony included political leaders, the military top brass, Colombo diplomats and religious leaders including Buddhist prelates. Their presence alone graphically demonstrated that the event had nothing to do with working people and the poor.
Significantly, the guest of honour was the newly-elected Maldivian President Ibrahim Mohamed Solih who was installed in a regime-change operation by the US and India to scuttle China’s strategic influence in that country. The Maldivian opposition which rallied behind Solih operated mostly from Sri Lanka. By honouring him, every faction of the Sri Lankan ruling elite is seeking the blessing of the US imperialism.
Sirisena began his speech by lamenting: “It is sad to note that the leaders of our history, including us, are responsible for the inability to find a clear political solution that all can agree on, although a decade has passed after the end of the 30-year war.”
The war ended with the military defeat of the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam in May 2009. During the final offensives, tens of thousands Tamil civilians were killed, nearly 300,000 were detained and more than 10,000 abducted.
Sirisena came to power in 2015, together with Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, promising to change the constitution to enable a “political reconciliation,” thereby securing the backing of the Tamil National Alliance. This would have involved a limited devolution of powers to the Tamil bourgeoisie in the north and east of the island.
Neither Sirisena nor Wickremesinghe had an iota of concern for the democratic rights of Tamils who have been repressed by successive Colombo governments. In his speech, Sirisena repeatedly praised the “war heroes,” that is those responsible for war crimes, for liberating the country and promised them greater benefits. The North and East are still under oppressive military occupation.
Sirisena’s reference to the lack of a political solution reflects the fear in ruling circles that unrest in the North and East is taking place amid growing struggles by workers throughout the island. He also referred to the basis for this broader social turbulence, bewailing the failure of political leaders “to bring about the economic development our country and the people have expected for decades.”
The president pointed to the official poverty rate of 6.7 percent and added that “more than 50 percent of the population is suffering from relative poverty.” They have a daily wage of less than 1000 rupees ($US5.60), unemployment and debt problem is rampant. “One child out of four is suffering from malnutrition,” he said.
These figures are indictment of the failure of successive governments to meet the pressing social needs of the masses in 71 years since formal independence from British colonial rule.
Hinting at the social consequences, Sirisena said: “The people of the country are no longer ready to continue in an economic recession… The political leaders who lead the country should be aware of this.”
The Sri Lankan ruling class is nervous about the resurgence of the international working class. As the class struggles were developing in the US and Europe, hundreds of thousands of plantation workers in Sri Lanka were engaged in a wage struggle for the past four months along with protests by other private and public sector workers.
Sirisena, who was a senior minister for decades and a leader of Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), falsely claimed that as president he sought to address the social crisis. “I attempted to enter into a new political journey with novel development experiences,” he said.
In reality, Sirisena came to power in the 2015 presidential election by exploiting the opposition to the government of President Mahinda Rajapakse over its war atrocities, and attacks on social and democratic rights. Despite Sirisena being one of Rajapakse’s ministers and close allies, the pseudo-left organisations and so-called civil society groups falsely promoted him as the democratic alternative.
It was through this right-wing movement that Washington orchestrated a regime change operation to oust Rajapakse and install Sirisena. The US was hostile to Rajapakse, not because of his anti-democratic rule, but because his relations with China cut across Washington’s aggressive confrontation with Beijing.
After four years, the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government has been thoroughly discredited because of its attacks on living conditions and democratic rights. Poverty has worsened as a result of its implementation of International Monetary Fund dictated austerity measures.
Amid rising popular discontent, the parties of both Sirisena and Wickremesinghe faced heavy losses in local government elections last February. Sirisena quickly distanced himself from the government and lined up with his arch rival Rajapakse in a bid to bring in a “strong” government to suppress the mounting opposition.
Sirisena sacked Wickremesinghe in late October as prime minister and replaced him with Rajapakse. However, this attempted political coup failed. Hostile to the return of Rajapakse, the US mounted intense pressure to reinstate Wickremesinghe. When Rajapakse was unable to muster a parliamentary majority, Sirisena dissolved parliament, only to be overruled by the Supreme Court, which compelled him to reappoint Wickremesinghe.
The political infighting is continuing, however. Without a clear parliamentary majority Wickremesinghe is now seeking to form a “national government” by politically bribing MPs from other parties with minister posts. In his speech, Sirisena publicly criticised the prime minister’s moves to form a national government.
Despite criticising the “failures” of past governments, the president could not say a word about how he could solve the pressing economic and social problems facing the country. Sirisena’s open flouting of the constitution was another sharp warning that the ruling class will resort to police state measures to suppress the growing movement of the working class.
The decay of capitalist rule in Sri Lanka since formal independence in 1948 poses crucial political tasks for workers and youth. The only way to achieve essential democratic and social rights is on the basis of the fight for socialist internationalism and the struggle to establish a socialist republic of Sri Lanka and Eelam as a part of a Union of Socialist Republics of South Asia. The Socialist Equality Party fights for this perspective.

8 Feb 2019

Structural Transformation of African Agriculture and Rural Spaces (STAARS) Fellowship Program 2019 for Early-Career African Researchers

Application Deadline: 1st March 2019

Eligible Countries: African countries


About the Award: The STAARS project is a collaboration between Cornell University, the African Development Bank (AfDB), the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC), the Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP), and the World Bank. The CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM) established a collaboration agreement with Cornell University to provide technical mentorship and funding support for selected early-career African researchers.

Type: Fellowship, Research

Eligibility: 
  • The call is open for early-career African researchers, either late stage Ph.D. students or those who completed their Ph.D. in 2014 or later.
  • Researchers must be based and working in Africa, with priority given to proposals relating to the research themes indicated above.
  • Qualified female researchers are particularly encouraged to apply.
  • While a Ph.D. is not mandatory, STAARS encourages fresh Ph.D. graduates who can benefit from a mentorship and additional training.
  • Fellows are expected to complete the proposed project by publishing findings as a working paper and submitting to a peer-reviewed journal by December 15, 2019.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The fellowship will cover travel and training. STAARS fellows will be paired with mentors at Cornell University with whom they will jointly author a paper on a topic of mutual interest relating to structural transformation in Africa south of the Sahara. PIM will support the publication of resulting research findings in high quality journals and as working papers. In addition, PIM and Cornell will facilitate fellows’ participation in scientific and policy conferences.

How to Apply: 
  • Applicants are required to prepare a maximum 2500 word (5 page) concept proposal, which motivates the selected research issues and objectives, outlines data sources, proposed methodology and contains a convincing plan for completing the project by December 15, 2019. All proposals shall be prepared in English. All proposals will be peer reviewed by experts from PIM and Cornell University.
  • The deadline to submit a concept proposal is March 1st, 2019. Applicants should submit their completed proposal via email to staars@cornell.edu. Accepted applicants will be notified in mid-April and are expected to begin remote collaboration with their mentor immediately upon acceptance.
Template for preparation of concept proposal
  1. Completed 2019 STAARS Fellowship Applicant Information Form.
  2. Concept Proposal:
    • Title of the proposed research
    • Targeted country (countries)
    • Introduction and motivation that includes clear statement of research objectives and hypotheses
    • Description of data source(s) and any prior experience working with the proposed data.
    • Proposed methodology
    • If applicable, summarize any preliminary results
    • Proposed timeline for the research
  3. Bibliographic references (not included in the 2500 words)
  4. CV of the applicant (not included in the 2500 words)
Visit the Program Webpage for Details

Award Providers: Cornell University in collaboration with the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM) and other partners.

Komla Dumor Award 2019 for Outstanding African Journalists

Application Deadline: 26th February 2019 at 23:59 GMT.

Eligible Countries: African  countries

To be taken at (country): London, UK


About the Award: Komla Dumor was a journalist of Africa.His passion was to tell African stories to the world with honesty and integrity. Its a legacy that the BBC wants to continue.

Type: Contest, Job

Eligibility: To apply for this prestigious award, you must be currently living and working as a journalist in Africa with 3 to 10 years experience as a professional journalist in Africa. You must also have the following skills and experience:
  • Excellent journalism skills, including in digital and social media.
  • Broadcasting experience is preferable.
  • An excellent broadcasting voice and strong presenting skills with the ability to perform at the microphone with flair.
  • The ability to identify and pitch a strong original African story idea, aligned to the BBC editorial guidelines http://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/
  • Wide and up-to-date knowledge and understanding of the African continent, including politics, business, culture, history and sport.
  • Fluency in English as a first or equivalent language.
Additional requirements for all applicants
  • You must provide a CV (maximum two pages) / complete a careers hub profile.
  • You must hold or be able to obtain by 1st March 2019 a passport that is valid until at least 31st January 2020.
  • You must not be a current or former member of BBC staff.
  • If successful, your employer must be willing to release you for three months from September 2019 for you to travel on your own to take up your placement in London.
  • The visa requires that you hold a degree or are studying towards a degree equivalent to a UK Bachelors degree from a recognised university.
  • References, proof of employment, birth certificate, passport, an appropriate UK visa and proof of level of English will be required from shortlisted candidates.
Number of Awardees: 1

Value of Program: The winner of the BBC World News Komla Dumor award will receive a once-in-a-lifetime training and development opportunity with the BBC in London, starting in early September 2019 and running for three months. Working with teams from across BBC News, the winner will produce an African story for the BBC and have their story and their voice shared across the continent and the world. They will be supported by a high-level BBC mentor and attend courses run by the BBCs world-class training department, the BBC Academy.
The BBC will pay for the winners flights to and from the UK and for their visa. We will also arrange and pay for the winners accommodation in London during their placement. The winner will receive 2,000 per month for the three month placement to cover their living expenses and a one-off payment of 5,000 as a contribution towards loss of salary in their home country. Some of the above may be subject to taxation (and deductions will be made as appropriate).

Apply

Visit Program Webpage for details

Mark Wainberg Fellowship Programme in HIV Service Delivery 2019 for African Clinicians

Application Deadline: 1st March 2019

Eligible Countries: African countries


To be taken at (country): Selected applicants will spend one year in a Country in Europe and Africa each.

About the Award: The programme will offer in-depth training for clinicians committed to careers in HIV clinical service delivery in sub-Saharan Africa with the aim of strengthening access to high-quality services for sub-Saharan Africa populations, with a client-centred service delivery approach.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: To be eligible for the Mark Wainberg Fellowship Programme, candidates should meet the following requirements:
  • Terminal research degree as a medical doctor (or equivalent)
  • Minimum of two years’ clinical experience
  • Currently working in sub-Saharan Africa
  • Commitment to become a specialist in HIV
  • English, French or Portuguese speaking.
Number of Awards: 5

Value of Award:
  • The fellows will be selected with a view to their potential of functioning as a multiplier and disseminate the knowledge learned (for example, towards other physicians, nurses, community healthcare providers) to further broaden the impact of the programme. At the end of their fellowship, the fellows should have skills that enable them to mentor and train other fellows.
  • Please note that fellows will receive a living allowance for the duration of the Mark Wainberg Fellowship Programme; applicants should ensure they are financially able to enrol in the 2-year programme before accepting the fellowship.
Duration of Programme: Two years

How to Apply: 
  • Eligible candidates can apply for the Mark Wainberg Fellowship Programme by completing the electronic application form in EnglishFrench or Portuguese.
  • Please have a scanned copy of your terminal research degree and letter of support from your institution ready to upload at the time of application.
  • The deadline for applications is 1 March 2019, 23:59 CET. Applications not submitted through the online system will not be accepted.
Visit Programme Webpage for Details