19 Aug 2019

Wall Street plunges on fears of global recession

Nick Beams 

US stock markets experienced their biggest fall for the year yesterday amid clear signs of a growing financial crisis and a marked global economic slowdown, with increased prospects of a recession.
Market indexes on Wall Street opened significantly down and continued to fall throughout the day. The Dow ended down by 800 points, or 3 percent, the S&P 500 fell 2.9 percent and the tech-heavy Nasdaq index dropped by more than 3 percent.
A confluence of factors contributed to the market fall: clear signs of a global contraction; the continuing fall in bond yields; a growing recognition that monetary stimulus by the world’s central banks is not going to bring an upturn in the global economy; a financial crisis in Argentina; the ongoing US-China trade war; political instability in Europe as exemplified in the Brexit crisis and the break-up of the Italian government; and the growth of social opposition in the working class, exemplified by the 10 weeks of protests and demonstrations in Hong Kong.
The trading day opened to the news that the Germany economy had contracted by 0.1 percent in the second quarter, following a similar slowdown in Britain, putting both economies in line for a recession, marked by two consecutive quarters of negative growth. The decline in Germany was a sharp reversal from the first quarter when its economy expanded by 0.4 percent.
The main reason for the decline was the contraction in exports, reflecting the uncertainties resulting from the US-China trade war and the intensifying struggle for markets in the auto industry on which the German economy is heavily dependent. There is no sign of an upturn and a survey of financial analysts released on Tuesday showed that economic sentiment had dropped to its lowest level since the euro zone financial crisis in 2011.
The jobs market is down. Only 1,000 new jobs were created in June compared to an average of 44,000 over the past five years as a series of major companies have started to introduce short-time working.
The impact of trade conflicts on production was also reflected in data from China which showed that value-added industrial production grew by 4.8 percent in July, compared to an increase of 6.3 percent in June and below market expectations of 5.9 percent growth.
One of the most significant developments in yesterday’s turmoil was the emergence of an inverted yield curve in bond markets. This refers to a situation in which the return on long term government debt falls below that on shorter term bonds. This phenomenon is regarded as one of the most accurate indicators of recession as investors seek a “safe haven” in longer term bonds, pushing up their price and lowering their yield.
Yesterday the gap between the yield on two-year and ten-year government debt in both the US and the UK entered negative territory. This is the first time this has happened in the US since 2007 in the lead up to the global financial crisis and recession.
Central banks around the world are either increasing their monetary stimulus or are getting ready to do so. The US Federal Reserve cut its rate by 0.25 percentage points last month and is set to do so again in September, amid growing expectations in financial markets that it may reduce rates by 0.5 percent. The European Central Bank has also indicated that it is set to introduce more monetary stimulus next month, either by further cutting rates or expanding its program of asset purchases.
But there is a clear recognition that the various forms of monetary stimulus practised by the world’s central banks since the financial crisis of 2008, introduced with the claim that they would eventually boost economic growth, have little or no effect on the real economy and that central banks are “pushing on a string”—a term first developed in the Great Depression of the 1930s pointing to the failure of monetary policy.
“The Fed doesn’t have the cure for an economic slowdown or recession,” Kristina Hopper, chief market strategist at Invesco, a major global investment company, told the Wall Street Journal. “But I do think the Fed has the antidote for the stock-market sell-off,” she continued, expressing the demand of the financial elites for still more money to be pumped into the financial system, whatever the consequences.

14 Aug 2019

Adobe Research Women-in-Technology Scholarship 2020 for Female Undergraduate Students in STEM Fields

Application Deadline: 27th September 2019 at 5pm Pacific Time

About the Award: Adobe Research creates innovative technologies for software products to better serve consumers, creative professionals, developers, and enterprises. Adobe brings together the smartest, most driven people to give them the freedom to nurture their intellectual curiosity, while providing them the necessary resources and support to shape their ideas into tangible results.

Fields of Study: This scholarship is intended for students studying computer science, computer engineering, or related technical fields.

Type: Fellowship, Undergraduate

Eligibility: In order to be eligible for the 2020 Adobe Research Women-in-Technology Scholarship, applicants must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Be a female student currently enrolled as an undergraduate or masters student at a university for the 2019-2020 academic year.
  • Intend to be enrolled as a full-time undergraduate or masters student at a university for the 2020-2021 academic year.
  • Be majoring in computer science, computer engineering, or a closely related technical field.
  • Maintain a strong academic record
  • Not have a close relative working for Adobe Research.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The Adobe Research Women-in-Technology Scholarship includes:
  • A $10,000 award paid once.
  • A Creative Cloud subscription membership for one year.
  • An Adobe Research mentor.
  • An opportunity to interview for an internship at Adobe.
How to Apply: Applications must include:
  • A resume
  • Academic transcripts from your current and/or past institution
  • Three references (our online application system will request letters from your references via email)
  • Answers to up to four essay questions, which will be available when we start accepting applications
  • An optional 60-second video or multimedia submission describing your dream career.
If you have questions, please email adoberesearchwebmaster@adobe.com.
Scholarship recipients will be announced by November 20, 2019.

Visit the Program Webpage for Details

AIMS-NEI Big Data for Development Innovation Challenge 2019 for Young African Scientists

Application Deadline: 21st August 2019 at 11:00 PM CAT.

Eligible Countries: African countries

About the Award: The BD4D Innovation Challenge aims to support emerging young African data scientists to develop innovative solutions that leverage new and non-traditional sources of data to address development challenges.

The challenges 
For this pilot program, the following three challenges have been selected. In future editions, there will be additional challenges in different development areas. 
Before submitting your application, we kindly invite you to click on each link below and take time to read the information provided about each challenge.
  1. Youth employment 
  2. Financial inclusion
  3. Food security
Type: Contest

Eligibility:
  • The BD4D Innovation Challenge is open to Applicants from member countries of the African Union.
  • Applicants may be individuals or teams of individuals. Teams are encouraged to combine skills in data science and data engineering. Applicants are responsible for compliance with the legal requirements of their country. 
  • Applicants must submit a solution to one of the 3 challenges above
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award:
  • Seed funding grants of up to USD 10,000 
  • Mentorship support
  • Public recognition and opportunity to network 
Selected candidates will pitch at the Final Challenge and compete for seed funding awards and mentorship support. 

Challenge Winners will be selected and awarded for the following categories:
  1. Best BD4D-IC solution: Up to $10,000 
  2. Most Innovative BD4D-IC solution: Up to $10,000 
 AIMS-NEI will extend an invitation to the winning solutions to explore ways to collaborate in validating, implementing or scaling the project’s reach. All winning projects will be recognized through public communications from the AIMS-NEI, IDRC and the World Bank Group and may be mentioned as part of a high-profile international event where the BD4D network will participate. 
The prizes will be awarded in disbursements, based on a deliverables plan which will be agreed with each team. 

How to Apply:
  1. Applicants must use this online form to submit their application for the BD4D Innovation Challenge.
  2. The best submissions will be invited to pitch at the Final Pitch Competition. 
  3. The Pitching Competition will take place on September 9th, 2019. Winners will be announced on the same day.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

British Council/Prince Claus Fund Mobility Grants 2019 for African Artists

Application Timeline:
  • Applications must be received at least 8 weeks before the intended date of travel; applications sent in later can unfortunately not be considered.
  • Successful grantees must request reimbursement maximum 4 weeks after the travel has taken place. Reimbursement is granted only after the travel takes place. Applicants that require a pre-payment of the mobility grant may request this. This request will be discussed case by case.
Eligible Countries: Botswana; Ethiopia; Ghana; Kenya; Malawi; Mauritius; Mozambique; Namibia; Nigeria; Rwanda; Senegal; Sierra Leone; South Africa; South Sudan; Sudan; Tanzania; Uganda; Zambia; Zimbabwe.

To be Taken at (Country): Eligible travel routes that would be supported include travel within the countries listed above as well as between the above listed African countries and countries listed in the DAC list.

About the Award: The British Council, and Prince Claus Fund for Culture and Development are issuing a Call for Proposals to support Mobility in and from Africa, specifically prioritising young artists and cultural practitioners from a range of African countries. Through this joint collaboration, we wish to assists in the professional growth and networking possibilities of emerging practitioners from Africa.

Type: Grants

Eligibility: 
  • Emerging artists and cultural practitioners are encouraged to apply (individuals or those representing independent cultural/artistic organisations);
  • Priority is given to young artists between 18 and 35 yearsof age; Special attention is given to women artists and LGBTQI+ community related projects.
  • Applications focusing on contemporary artistic and cultural disciplines including cultural capacity building are encouraged;
  • Only applicants travelling from and holding passports of the following countries are eligible for funding: Botswana; Ethiopia; Ghana; Kenya; Malawi; Mauritius; Mozambique; Namibia; Nigeria; Rwanda; Senegal; Sierra Leone; South Africa; South Sudan; Sudan; Tanzania; Uganda; Zambia; Zimbabwe.
  • Destinations eligible are limited to all countries listed in the DAC list;
  • If you are disabled or have a physical or mental health condition that makes it difficult for you to travel (on your own) please let us know. In this case you may apply for an additional Access Grant. An Access Grant will contribute to the additional costs incurred as a result of your condition. Please ensure that you clearly state what your access needs are and include the additional costs in your budget requirement in section 3c of the application form. The size of the Access grant will be determined according to your requirements.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The grant amounts are determined based on general market rates depending on country of departure and destinations. The funding available is to be used for travel, visas, accommodation and general subsistence costs

Types of Travel that are Supported
  • Attendance at a meeting, festival, conference for the first time to expand professional networks;
  • Attendance at capacity development training (e.g. workshops, talent development programmes)
  • Participation in a local arts and culture scene followed by knowledge-sharing with local and/or international peers;
  • Setting up new (experimental) cross-border partnerships for upcoming projects, particularly those in the preparation or development phase.
How to Apply: Mobility Fund Application Form 2019 PCFXBC doc 156 KB
  • The applicant must be the traveller personally and not a host organisation!
  • Please download the application, fill it in and send it to tickets@princeclausfund.nl together with a biography/Curriculum Vitae and an invitation letter from the inviting organization
  • If granted, applicants must supply scanned copies of original travel receipts, accompanied by a signed digital version of a Narrative Report.
  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.
Visit Award Webpage for Details

Centre for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG) Postdoctoral Junior Leader fellowships 2019/2020 for International Students – Spain

Application Deadline: 8th October 2019

Eligible Countries: International

To Be Taken At (Country): Either of the 2 universities that make the CRAG consortium (University of Barcelona (UB), and Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB)), Spain.

About the Award: The postdoctoral fellowships programme, Junior Leader “la Caixa”  is aimed at hiring excellent researchers—of any nationality—who wish to continue their research career in Spain or Portugal. Sponsored by Obra Social ”la Caixa”, the objectives of this programme are to foster high-quality, innovative research and to support the best scientific talents by providing them with an attractive, competitive environment in which to conduct excellent research.
The Junior Leader programme is divided into two different frames:
  • “la Caixa” Junior Leader – Incoming: 30 postdoctoral fellowships for researchers of all nationalities. They will be offered a three-year employment contract to conduct a research project at a centre accredited with a distinction of excellence, such as the “Severo Ochoa” (which CRAG holds). For Spanish institutions, candidates must have resided in Spain less than 12 months in the last three years.
  • “la Caixa” Junior Leader – Retaining: 15 postdoctoral fellowships for researchers of all nationalities to carry out research at any university or research centre in Spain (including CRAG) or Portugal. For Spanish institutions, candidates must have resided in Spain more than 12 months in the last three years.
By means of a complementary training programme, these fellowships are intended to consolidate research skills and to foster an independent scientific career as an option for the future.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: The program is aimed at international students who have completed one of the following options by July 2019:
  • studies that lead to an official Spanish (or from another country of the European Higher Education Area) university degree in Biology, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, or related areas and that have 300 credits (ECTS), of which at least 60 must correspond to master level.
  • a degree in a non-Spanish university not adapted to the European Higher Education Area that gives access to doctoral studies in Biology, Biochemistry, Biotechnology or related areas.
2. Candidates are selected exclusively on merit, on the basis of their curriculum. Academic grades and the curriculum of applicants are evaluated, as well as reference letters and a motivation letter. No selection criteria for positive or negative discrimination are applied.
3. Candidates cannot be in possession a PhD Degree.
4. Candidates cannot have been hired as predoctoral students for more than 12 months before the start of the PhD Program.
5. Candidates cannot have started a pre-doctoral fellowship funded by the Spanish “Plan Estatal de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica” or any previous “Plan Nacional”.
The doctoral program is in English. Therefore, a good knowledge of English is absolutely required. We encourage candidates to support the application with scores of internationally valid language exams like TOEFL or other tests. However, they are not mandatory: a verifiable education in English, or a reasonably long stay in an English speaking country are also convincing.

Selection: Applicants will be selected by the Principal Investigator responsible for the chosen project or projects (candidates may apply to more than one project). Successful applicants will start their PhD projects in autumn 2019.

Number of Awards: 45 (30 Postdoctorate Junior Leader – Incoming AND Postdoctorate Junior Leader – Retaining)

Value of Award: Researchers of the Postdoctoral Junior Leader fellowships programme will have a labor contract in accordance with employment legislation in force in Spain or Portugal, pursuant to provisions regarding occupational health and safety and social security, with access to suitable resources, equipment and facilities. Additionally, the fellowship includes mobility and family allowances.

Duration of Programme: 3 Years

How to Apply: 
  • If interested in applying, please carefully read the Application requirements and procedure and check out all available projects.

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

LafargeHolcim Awards competition in Sustainable Construction (USD 2 million prize money) 2019

Application Deadline: 25th February, 2020 (14:00 UTC)

To be Taken at (Country): Projects evaluated and awarded across five geographic areas: Europe, North America, Latin America, Middle East Africa, and Asia Pacific.

About the Award: The 6th International LafargeHolcim Awards competition seeks leading projects of professionals as well as bold ideas from the Next Generation that combine sustainable construction solutions with architectural excellence.

LafargeHolcim Awards main category
  • For exemplary sustainable construction projects at an advanced stage of design from architecture, engineering, urban planning, materials science, construction technology, and related fields.
  • No age restriction for project authors.
  • Project must not have started construction/fabrication before January 1, 2019.
LafargeHolcim Awards Next Generation category
  • For visionary design concepts and bold ideas including design studio and research work.
  • Authors can be no older than 30 years of age (date of birth later than June 4, 1988).
  • Students and young professionals are also welcome to enter the Awards main category with projects at an advanced stage of design and a high probability of realization.
Type: Award

Eligibility:
  • Submissions must be in English.
  • Entry content includes author details, project summary, statements on sustainability, CO2 lifecycle assessment (for main category), 5–10 project images.
  • Entry is free.
  • No limit to number of projects an individual/team may enter.
  • Step-by-step guide to entering the competition explaining all details available on website.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award:
  • USD 2 million total prize money: USD 330,000 per region including USD 70,000 for Next Generation prizes.
  • Global LafargeHolcim Awards in 2021 of USD 350,000 selected from winning projects of the regional competitions 2020.
How to Apply: Apply in Link below
  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.
Visit Award Webpage for Details

The Need for Unity in Ethiopia

Graham Peebles

Ethiopia is a tribal nation, made up of 80 or so different groups, some large some small, some powerful, some not. Large numbers of people, the majority perhaps, identify themselves with their tribe more powerfully than their country, or their region. Tribal affiliation runs deep among all age groups, loyalty is strong, resentment of tribal others can be fierce.
Social divisions along tribal lines, fear and animosity, particularly between the three largest groups – the Oromo, Amhara and Tigrinian – are acute. People within all three are heavily armed; carrying weapons in rural Ethiopia is commonplace, expected even. Isolated conflicts have occurred in various parts of the country in recent months leading to deaths and displacement of people.
Ethiopia now boasts the largest number of internally displaced persons in the world. The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (iDMC) states that, “about 2.9 million new displacements associated with conflict were recorded in 2018.” The total number displaced in the country is estimated to be close to four million.
The new government has not responded effectively to this humanitarian crisis or the incidents of tribal-based violence; it appears weak and indecisive, and when it has reacted it has done so in a heavy-handed, clumsy manner. Many Ethiopians, both inside and outside the country are concerned that matters could spiral out of control; one spark, carelessly thrown, could ignite fury, civil war even. This is not a new fear, but it is becoming more widespread, and with every eruption of ethnic violence unease deepens, tensions grow.
The government, under the leadership of PM Abiy Ahmed Ali, appears unclear how to respond to the frustration that many in the country feel. Maintaining Law and order by the police is essential, the military should not be involved, but, they have been deployed to deal with unrest, and the government has on occasion retreated into the Old Ethiopian Way of Control; arresting troublesome journalists and restricting Internet access – the regime still owns the sole telecommunications company. The Committee to Protect Journalists report that “on June 22, Ethiopia was plunged into an internet blackout following what the government described as a failed attempted coup in the Amhara region.”
In the aftermath at least two journalists were detained under the country’s repressive anti-terror law. The draconian Anti-Terrorist Proclamation was introduced in 2009, was described by Human Rights Watch (HRW) at the time as “a potent instrument to crack down on political dissent, including peaceful political demonstrations…. It would permit long-term imprisonment and even the death penalty for ‘crimes’ that bear no resemblance, under any credible definition, to terrorism.” The government has been discussing reforms to the proclamation, but what is required is not endless debate, but for the law to be scrapped immediately and new legislation brought forward.
From dictatorship to Democracy
Until PM Abiy took office, the ruling EPRDF coalition was dominated by a group of men from Tigray under the banner of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF). For 23 years they imposed their ideology of ‘Revolutionary Democracy’ – a highly centralized authoritarian political and economic system, which the regime was never able to clearly define. Human rights were ignored, corruption was rife, the judiciary politicized, state terrorism commonplace in various parts of the country, and “ethnic federalism”, a system of regional administration based on ethnicity, introduced. Good on paper, it promised to respect cultural diversity and give autonomy to ethnic groups should they wish it. In practice ethnic federalism was a way for the TPLF to control the people, to “Divide and Rule”. Competition among groups for land, government funding, aid and natural resources increased, historic tribal flags hoisted, differences aggravated and national unity impaired, all by design.
The EPRDF is still in office under PM Abiy, but the cabinet is new (50% women), and the approach has radically changed; democracy is, many hope, a real possibility in the country.
Abdi is Oromo and holds the office of chairman of the Oromo Democratic Party (ODP). Although they constitute the largest group (with around 35% of the population), there has never before been an Oromo Prime Minister. As large numbers of Oromo see it, they have been dominated for generations by people from the Amhara and Tigray regions, who have suppressed and abused them. With an Oromo PM and a large number of Oromo ministers in place many Oromo people believe their time has come; their time for what precisely though, is unclear. Revenge perhaps – dangerous, to redress historic injustices, to gain independence or autonomy – something that is geographically impossible; Oromia sits on land in the center of the country and includes the capital, Addis Ababa.
Since the new government took office in April 2018 political prisoners have been released, prisons – in which torture was routine – closed down, peace established with Eritrea, troops withdrawn from the Ogaden region in the south. Ethiopians living abroad, many of who were critical of the previous regime, were welcomed back, and the media unshackled. A new beginning then, and much to be welcomed. But as the old repressive measures are rejected, deep-seated anger has surfaced; some see the disquiet as an opportunity to advance their narrow political agenda, they exploit the situation, agitating, stirring up anger.
The evolution into democracy, something Ethiopia has never before known, needs to be carefully nurtured if the transition away from fear and suppression is to be peacefully realized. The government is new and needs time, they also need support; Ethiopia’s major beneficiaries, Europe, USA and Britain, need to become engaged. As with the world as a whole, the key for Ethiopia is unity: unity enriched by the diverse tribal cultures and traditions that exist in this beautiful country.
There is a great deal to be done in Ethiopia: it remains one of the poorest countries in the world, and finds itself languishing at 173rd on the UN Human development Index, out of 189 countries. Health care is poor as is the standard of education. Civil society is weak, it lacks a comprehensive legal infrastructure, the judiciary is not trusted; the cost of living is high and inequality extreme. It will take time, cooperation, tolerance and goodwill to address these fundamental societal issues. Every effort needs to be made to unite the disparate groups; no matter the tribe, all are Ethiopian and all have a contribution to make in the New Ethiopia.

Thoughts on China’s Currency

Dean Baker

There is a conventional wisdom on China’s currency that gets repeated almost everywhere and never seems to be challenged in the media. The basic story is that in the bad old days China ‘manipulated” its currency, but that stopped years ago. At present, its currency controls are actually keeping the value of its currency up, not down. As much as I hate to differ with the conventional wisdom, there are a few issues here that deserve closer examination.
First, it’s great see that everyone now agrees that China managed its currency in the last decade. (I prefer the term “manage” to “manipulate,” since the latter implies something sneaky and hidden. There was nothing sneaky about China’s undervalued currency. It had an official exchange rate that it bought trillions of dollars of foreign reserves to maintain.) Unfortunately, almost none of these people acknowledged China’s actions at the time, when the under-valuation of China’s currency was costing the United States millions of manufacturing jobs. Oh well, it wasn’t like the Wall Street bankers were losing their jobs.
The second point is that there is a common assertion that only the buying, not the holding, of reserves affects currency prices. It is easy to show that China is not currently buying large amounts of reserves. In fact, it has been selling some in recent years to keep its currency from falling.
Okay, let’s take a step back. The Federal Reserve Board bought more than $3 trillion in assets to try to boost the economy following the Great Recession. This was done to directly reduce long-term interest rates by increasing the demand for bonds. While it stopped buying assets several years ago, it still holds more than $3 trillion in assets.
Virtually all economists agree that by holding these assets, the Fed is keeping down long-term interest rates. If this additional $3 trillion in assets were on the market, then long-term interest rates would be higher. (The size of the impact is debated, but not the direction.)
If the holding (not buying) of assets has an impact on interest rates, why does China’s holding of more than $3 trillion in foreign reserves not have an impact on the price of the dollar and other reserve currencies relative to the RMB? (It would actually be well over $4 trillion if we add in the trillion plus dollars held in China’s sovereign wealth fund.)
In the magical world of make it up as you go along conventional wisdom economics there can be peaceful coexistence of this logical conflict, but those of us who are not part of the club need not accept it.
It’s also worth adding that the Fed has raised interest rates several times in the last three years, just as China has occasionally sold reserves. Would anyone say that this means that the net effect of the Fed’s actions at the moment is to raise interest rates above the level they would be at if the Fed were not holding assets?
Finally, we get the story that if China were to remove all capital controls then the value of the RMB would fall, as Chinese sought to diversify their holdings. While this is true, it is at best half of the story as every fan of I.M.F. policies knows. The I.M.F. always tells countries to eliminate capital controls because it will increase the amount of capital that flows into the country. Investors are more likely to put their money into a country where they can freely withdraw it than one where they can’t.
While the capital inflow story needs some qualifications, there is a basic logic to it. Obviously, foreign investors will feel more comfortable putting money into a country where they can get back their investment quickly than in one where they can’t. In spite of the fact that this logic is imposed on developing countries all the time, it is virtually invisible in discussions of China’s currency.
As a practical matter we continually see stories about how European retirees are unhappy with the negative interest rates they get on the bonds of countries like Germany and France. Getting an interest rate of more than 3.0 percent on long-term bonds issued by the Chinese government would look pretty good in comparison. Furthermore, with China’s purchasing power parity GDP almost twice its GDP measured by exchange rates, most people would probably expect the general direction of its currency over the long-term to be upward, as it has been in the past. This would further increase the potential gains from holding Chinese government debt relative to the debt of European countries or the United States.
It seems as though the conventionally wise people never thought about this issue, or at least if they have, they don’t mention it in public discussions. Anyhow, it is not surprising that the conventional wisdom is missing much of the story here. After all, the conventional wisdom in economics could not see the $8 trillion housing bubble ($12 trillion in today’s economy), the collapse of which sank the U.S. economy and gave us the Great Recession. The conventional wisdom doesn’t seem any wiser today.

Motor car crashes and a faltering economy

 Vidyadhar Date

It is not just the arrogant, rich and drunken drivers who cause road crashes . Even professors in IITs, the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology, tend to drive or tended to drive rashly within the campus injuring students.
Dinesh Mohan, professor from IIT Delhi and the country’s foremost expert on road crashes, points out that when speed breakers were put in the campus in the capital to curb speed, professors complained that the bumps caused them pain in the back and neck. The director then told them that they should then ride bicycles. Indeed we forget that in the more simple days bicycles were everywhere on IIT campuses. Jairam Ramesh’s father, a teacher in IIT, used to be among the cyclists.
Dinesh Mohan did not mention about the old days but made the point about speed at a two-day workshop held in Pune recently by Road Safety Network and Parisar. India has the shameful record of accounting the highest number of road deaths in the whole world. While the government talks perpetually of bringing down the numbers, the toll keeps climbing. One never stops hearing about crashes. While I was on my way to Pune from Mumbai for the workshop came the news of an IAS officer in Kerala killing a journalist in a state of drunken driving late in the night, accompanied by a young woman. The issue could have been suppressed had it not been for the uproar from the journalistic community.
This is the greater tragedy. Those, like politicians and bureaucrats, tasked with bringing down the deaths on roads are themselves at least partly responsible. One often hears the refrain from politicians that with this new highway you will reach a particular place in just two hours or so. The worthies forget that the craze for speed they are promoting with the highway culture is a major contributor to the rapidly rising death toll. Far from lowering speeds, they are increasing highway speeds.
And the faulty construction of highways is also a major contributor to crashes, points out Dinesh Mohan and Geetam Tiwari, his colleague in IIT Delhi. The design of every new highway and old including the Mumbai Pune expressway is faulty, they point out. All these years drivers are being blamed for crashes but now it is being increasingly realised that engineers are also to blame in good measure because of faulty design. Indeed, the community is so overawed by their alleged superior intelligence that their virtual crimes have received little attention. Their design is faulty and torturous even in such simple things like steel benches at railway stations and seats in suburban trains in Mumbai. There is a desperate need to fix responsibility for the gross acts of negligence and may be corruption as well.
Though road crash investigation now requires a lot of scientific data and study, the government is not spending even a single crore of rupees on research, Dinesh Mohan points out.
The private sector has now entered research in crashes.JP Research, funded by automobile companies, is investigating cases on a large scale in Kolkata and other centres, working with the traffic police.. Its technical director Ravishankar Rajaraman made a presentation during the workshop showing a complicated accident scenario involving different vehicles at a traffic junction in Kolkata caught on cctv .camera. Several journalists in the audience too were foxed about the real cause even after seeing the crash footage. Ravishankar contended that therefore eye witnesses may not be all that reliable. That reminded me of Kurosowa’s acclaimed film Rashomon in which there are four different eye witness accounts of a murder and sexual assault. The point made is that truth could be relative , depending upon the viewer’s point of view.There are different ways of looking at life.
That is true. But very often in the crashes all evidence clearly suggests that the aggressive motorist and bad road design are to blame. The car lobby and its propaganda machine has succeeded in one respect, it has managed to suppress the bigger truth that increasing motorisation it has inflicted through public relations and manipulation in pursuit of profits is a major cause.
Innovations in road safety have come not from engineers but good hearted people in other professions. Ralph Nader, the scourge of the automobile lobby, he exposed its numerous crimes,was a lawyer and William Haddon was a doctor.
What our speed maniacs forget that driving at great speed has inherent problems. If you are going very fast you must keep a long distance from the car ahead of you, else the time available for you for safe braking is very short. But the automobile lobby has continuously propagated the speed myth, glorifying speed simply to induce buyers. But the tide and wheels are turning. The young even in India, not only in the West, are now not as much allured by car as before. So, car sales are going down and a whole gigantic manipulated exercise forged in league with corrupt politicians and bureaucrats is now in jeopardy. While there is much lamentation over declining car sales, there is little realisation of the irony that India accounts for only a tenth of the public transport buses it needs. Even our economists, academics are not bothered about these gross anomalies.
This is the problem of creating an economy in good measure around the automobile, a whole network of sectors associated with motor cars. It is possible to create many jobs and accelerate the economy through investments in bicycles, public transport and other sectors. The motor car need not be the major driver of the economy. Otherwise, the crash cycle will continue.

Over a third of UK’s top earners live in London while workers struggle to get by

Thomas Scripps

Figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) show that London’s share of the UK’s top one percent of earners has increased by a fifth, from 29 percent in 2000-2001 to 35 percent in 2014-2015. The trend deepens the transformation of the city into a playground for the rich, serviced by an impoverished working class living in a different world.
London represents a grotesque concentration of all the social contradictions and inequities of British capitalism. The longstanding regional imbalance in the development of the UK economy, based on the domination of London as the country’s financial and services centre, has forced more and more people into the metropolis. Fully 35 percent of the 2.7 million new jobs created between 2007 and 2017 were in London. The UK2070 commission on regional inequality estimates that London and the South East will account for 55 percent of new jobs created up to 2051 if present demographic and economic trends continue.
The skew towards the capital is especially pronounced in the case of skilled white-collar work. Over half the jobs in London in 2017 were classed as skilled professional occupations, compared to an average of around one in four for the rest of the country outside the South East of England.
Combined, these workers produce an immense amount of value—enough to equip the city with a comprehensive social infrastructure and guarantee everyone in it a high standard of living. This is not the case because the wealth produced is monopolised by an obscenely rich elite.
According to the Trust for London, the city’s total weekly income in the 2015-2016 period was £2.4 billion. The top 10 percent of earners received almost a third of this total, more than the bottom 50 percent of earners.
So concentrated is wealth in the capital that while an annual income of £160,000 is enough to put someone in the top one percent of earners nationally, it is not enough even to break into the top five percent in London. More than £300,000 is required to enter the city’s top one percent of earners.
The chasm widens further when it comes to wealth. In the period 2012-2014, total wealth in London was estimated at £1.8 trillion. A staggering 52 percent of this is owned by the richest 10 percent of London households. The top 20 percent own 70 percent, while the bottom half own just 5.3 percent.
For the majority of London’s workforce, these huge inequities mean a life of struggle just to maintain the basics of an ordinary family life. Amid fantastic wealth, workers in the capital face the same struggle for existence as those nationwide.
Those who fall into low-pay jobs or unemployment are thrown into conditions of near-permanent social crisis, forced to visit food banks or go without meals or heating, living in substandard accommodation or ending up completely homeless.
Even those who would be widely considered as earning a high wage are left struggling.

UK supermarket workers oppose new wage-cutting contract at Walmart subsidiary Asda

Barry Mason

Workers are rallying in Leeds today to oppose the imposition of a new work contract that will negatively impact 60,000 employees of the UK supermarket giant Asda, a subsidiary of US-based global retailer Walmart.
The merging of five current contracts into one “flexible” contract, known as Contract 6, will mean workers losing paid breaks. Working bank holidays and weekends would be compulsory and they would have to agree to work more flexible hours. This would cut across the needs of many working parents to have guaranteed work hours for them to be able to perform care duties for their children or, in other cases, adult relatives. The changes would come in return for a tiny rise in basic pay from £8.84 an hour to £9 an hour.
Asda employs over 100,000 workers, including 12,000 workers just in its delivery warehouses—servicing both stores and the growing home delivery sector.
In a consultative ballot of GMB trade union members, 93 percent rejected the terms of the contract. In response the GMB has organised today’s rally, to be followed by a march passing Asda’s nearby headquarters. The GMB is the only union recognised by Asda.
Transferring to the new contract was previously voluntary but is now compulsory. The Daily Mirror on August 5 quoted from a question and answer leaflet to be given to Asda workers not wanting to move onto the new contract. It states, “You will have a number of 121s [one-to-one meetings] with your manager. As part of the 121 process, we hope you agree to move to the new contract. If you still don’t want to sign up to the contract after those 121s, at that stage we would issue notice to terminate your employment on your existing terms and conditions.”
To make clear the threat, the leaflet states, “We will offer to re-engage you on the new terms. If you choose not to accept the new terms you would leave the business.”
Asda was bought by Walmart in 1999 for £6.7 billion and, along with Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Morrisons, is one of the big four supermarkets dominating the UK market. However, this leading position is being challenged by discounter supermarkets, Aldi and Lidl. In response, attacks on workers’ conditions are being ramped up across the big four. Along with rents, labour costs are a major factor in supermarkets’ overall costs.
In May last year, in return for raising basic pay to just £9.20, Sainsbury’s imposed a new contract, with a threat to sack any worker who did not sign up, including a loss of paid breaks, premium Sunday pay and bonuses. According to the Unite union, around 9,000 workers would lose up to £400 a year, with some losing thousands. An online article in the Grocer explained that among the “contractual changes being introduced are the removal of… paid overtime, alterations to productivity, flexibility and attendance standards, and streamlined and broader roles. These include moving from 22 specific roles to just five.”
In June and July, hundreds of workers at one of Sainsbury’s 23 distribution depots—Waltham Point in London—held two 24 hour strikes in opposition to changes in the firm’s attendance policy and plans to reduce sickness pay from 26 weeks to just two weeks.
A pay rise awarded to Tesco staff in June 2017 was tied to proposals to reduce the rate of pay for Sundays and bank holidays from time and a half to time and a quarter from July 2018. This year’s basic pay rise for Tesco store and warehouse workers was set at £9 and was offset by abolition of an annual cash bonus.
Although most Asda supermarket staff are low paid, senior executives are raking it in. The Walton family, which owns Walmart, has a combined net worth of $191 billion—an increase of $39 billion since last year—with their astronomical wealth rocketing up by $4 million every hour. In the same amount of time, one of their shop floor employees in the UK earns just £9 and one of their American employees $11. Tesco’s chief executive, Dave Lewis, was given a £1.6 million annual bonus this year, bringing his total annual earnings to £4.6 million.

Italy: Democrats, Five-Star Movement call for technocratic government

Marianne Arens

Last night, the Italian Senate decided that the parliamentary vote of no confidence that is expected to mark the end of the current government will take place on Tuesday, August 20, following a speech by Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte.
The 345 members of the Senate had been recalled from their traditional summer holidays because their party leaders were unable to agree on a course of action on Monday. The far-right Lega party had announced its lack of confidence in Conte on August 9, after its leader, Interior Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, formed a coalition government with Conte’s Five-Star Movement (M5S) over on August 7.
Salvini is aiming to hold new elections and to become the leader of a far-right government. His party received 34 percent of the votes in the recent European elections and has since recorded stronger polling results. He wants to form a coalition with the fascist Fratelli dItalia (Brothers of Italy), with Silvio Berlusconi’s Forza Italia, or with both. On Tuesday, Salvini had talks with Fratelli dItalia leader Giorgia Meloni and with Berlusconi.
However, the decision on the what steps to take next lies with President Sergio Mattarella of the opposition Democratic Party (PD). If the government falls next week, he has three options: to find a new majority in the existing Senate, call new elections or appoint a “technocratic” transitional government.
Currently, the strongest proponent of a technocratic government is former Prime Minister Matteo Renzi (PD), who vehemently opposes new elections. He has declared that an unelected government is needed to save Italy from an “extremist course,” reduce the size of parliament, and push through the next budget with European Union (EU) approval before new elections. He thus directly plays into the hands of Salvini, who could present himself Tuesday in the Senate as a “true democrat” wanting to “give the people the vote.”
Salvini’s previous coalition partner, the M5S, also rejects new elections, after party founder Beppe Grillo spoke out against it on his blog. The M5S also wants to approve the budget and reduce the size of the parliament before new elections are held. They would also lose about half their seats if a vote took place now.
On Tuesday evening, the M5S and PD together blocked a vote of confidence from taking place in the Senate as Salvini had demanded. Since then, speculation has continued in Rome as to whether the two parties, which have been public political enemies, will form a new ruling coalition. They could jointly secure a parliamentary majority supporting a technocratic government appointed by the president.
Salvini’s speech in the Senate was interrupted several times by loud denunciations from senators of the PD and its breakaway, LeU ( Liberi e Uguali). This parliamentary opposition to Salvini is from the right, however. It is not directed against Salvini’s fascist and anti-refugee policy, which was fully supported by the M5S, the new ally of the PD, for 14 months, but against his threats to ignore the EU’s limits on Italian budget deficits.

Argentina’s stock market crashes after Macri loses pre-election poll

Rafael Azul

Argentina’s “PASO” primary election, which is designed to select candidates for federal posts and weed out political parties that obtain less than 1.5 percent of the vote, took place on August 11.
The unexpected collapse of support for President Mauricio Macri and his Juntos for El Cambio coalition spurred a run on the Argentinian stock market, which plummeted 60 percent to close down nearly 40 percent, the second largest one-day market collapse in the world since 1950. The peso lost 23 percent of its value, reaching a low of 61 pesos per US dollar.
Above all, the market crash shows international finance capital’s concern that the vote reflects massive social opposition to austerity regimes. Spain’s El Paíscalls the collapse “Black Monday” and warned that the economy is “on the verge of collapse.” What is “even worse” than the crash, El País wrote, is the “fear over the long coming months of a vacuum of power … without a credible government.” The first round of the general election is October 27. The New York Times, meanwhile, makes references to Argentina’s 2001 default when the country confronted mass demonstrations and went through a handful of presidents in a matter of weeks.
In Sunday’s elections, four political coalitions qualified to run on October 27. The big winner was the Peronist and trade union-led Frente Para Todos (Front for All), with 47.4 percent of the total vote. Its presidential and vice-presidential candidates are Alberto Fernández and former President Cristina Kirchner. The ruling coalition won just 32.1 percent of the vote. Its candidates are Macri and Migue Ángel Pichetto (Peronist).
Third, with 8 percent, was former economics minister Roberto Lavagna (Peronist) of the Consenso Federal, an anti-Kirchner Peronist group.
The pseudo-left Frente de Izquierda Unidad (an electoral alliance consisting of Partido Obrero, Partido de los Trabajadores Socialistas, Izquierda Socialista and Movimiento Socialista de los Trabajadores) came in fourth with 3 percent. Another pseudo-left candidate, running independently of the FIT-U, Manuela Castañeira, of Nuevo MAS (Movement for Socialism) obtained 0.8 percent of the vote.
Opinion polls leading into Sunday’s vote predicted a toss-up election between Macri and the Peronists. The difference was overwhelming, with Macri’s supporters acknowledging his chances in the general election are close to zero. If Sunday’s vote holds up in October, the Peronists will not only win the presidency in the first round, but will also very likely control the lower house of Congress. The possibility of such an outcome is provoking consternation in financial and industrial sectors.
There are some indications that Wall Street and the Argentine bourgeoisie are ready to dump Macri, whose illegitimacy will make enforcing International Monetary Fund (IMF) cuts more difficult. Among the domestic capitalist class, some are now demanding that Macri abandon the race and throw his support to Roberto Lavagna, of the anti-Kirchner Peronist Alternativa Federal.
Lavagna, 77, was economics minister for President Eduardo Duhalde during the 2001 debt crisis; shortly thereafter he became economics minister once again, under President Néstor Kirchner, where he was charged with negotiating the IMF’s “rescue” package of social service cuts.
As the voting was taking place, a group called the “256 executives” (members of the country’s industrial business association) actively discussed the voting results through Nuestra Voz, a Whatsapp chat group. Included in the discussion was the the proposal that Macri drop out of the race and lend support to support Lavagna.
The following day, Juan Manuel Urtubey, Lavagna’s candidate for vice president, denied having received such indications from the big business association. At the same time, Urtubey called on Macri to listen to the 47 percent “that did say something” on Sunday, demanding that he abandon the “electoral model” and begin thinking about his next steps, given the seriousness of the election results, calling for a transition organized by the political and productive establishment to accomplish a “common goal.”
Concerns over the legitimacy of Macri’s rule goes beyond Argentina’s borders. The British Financial Times weighed in on Tuesday, accusing Macri of having lost touch with reality.
“With voters giving Mr. Fernandez a 15-point lead, the peso tumbled while the Merval—the local stock index—lost 48 per cent of its value in US dollar terms. Government dollar bonds lost about 25 per cent on average, with yields rising to about 35 per cent on short-term notes, while credit default swaps showed an implied default probability of 75 per cent.
“At a press conference, [Macri] vowed to fight back and blamed the market crash on voters. This presidential loss of touch with reality may have scared markets even more than the prospect of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s return...

Explosions at Russian military facilities leave eight dead

Andrea Peters

Seven workers killed in a nuclear military accident last Thursday in Russia’s far north were buried on Monday. Details of the events surrounding the men’s deaths are still largely unknown, with the Russian government providing few specifics about the explosion that took place at its naval facility near the town of Nyonoska on August 8.
According to Rosatom, the country’s nuclear energy corporation, the blast was set off by the ignition of some form of liquid propellant, which experts say is a component of cruise or ballistic missiles, during a failed test. After several days, officials acknowledged that the test took place on an offshore platform in the White Sea.
In addition to the seven dead, more than a dozen others were injured.
Defense ministry officials initially denied that the explosion discharged any radioactive materials into the atmosphere, flatly contradicting reports by the Civil Protection Department in nearby Severodinsk—home to nearly 190,000 people—of a sharp spike in background radiation. It took several days before the Kremlin acknowledged that there had been a nuclear accident.
Maritime officials have since banned shipping in the White Sea’s Dvina Bay for a month-long period. There are also reports that a military vessel designed to clean-up and store nuclear waste has sailed to the area. Online sources show images of emergency responders in hazardous materials suit working with victims and deploying to the area.
In Arkhangelsk, a city of 350,000 about 90 kilometers from the site of the accident, there has been a run on the pharmacies. Frightened residents are buying up iodine, which can help protect parts of the body from certain radioactive isotopes.
The experience of Chernobyl, the 1986 nuclear accident in Soviet Ukraine that sickened thousands and threatened the world with catastrophe, is a recent memory for the people of the former USSR and no doubt shaping the response of Arkhangelsk’s inhabitants to news of the explosion. The deceit and corruption that contributed to the Chernobyl disaster, well portrayed in an immensely popular recent HBO series, can be found in equal measure among the occupants of today’s Kremlin.
Within the press there is widespread speculation as to which weapons system was being tested last week outside of Nyonoska, with the explosion happening as the Russian government presses to expand its nuclear capabilities in the face of growing threats from the United States. On August 3, Washington formally scrapped the decades-old Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
Last week’s nuclear-test-gone-wrong underscores the immense dangers posed by both the American war drive and the frenzied efforts of Russia’s ruling class to shore up its position in response. Even as it guts social spending for an increasingly discontented, impoverished population, the Kremlin is trying to arm itself to the teeth.

Concerns grow over global financial stability

Nick Beams 

The current turmoil in financial markets was set off by the Trump administration’s threat to impose tariffs on an additional $300 billion worth of Chinese goods and its decision to label China a “currency manipulator,” following Beijing’s move to allow the renminbi to fall. The extreme volatility has prompted questions about the stability of the global financial system.
But the latest round in the US-China conflict was only the catalyst for the emergence of these issues. Under conditions where the world economy is clearly on a recessionary trend—the euro zone is slowing and the UK economy contracted in the second quarter—the deeper question now coming to the surface is how long central banks can continue to pump money into the financial system without setting off a systemic crisis?
Having cut interest rates to record lows in response to the global financial crisis of 2008, the world’s major central banks have reversed their policy of trying to “normalise” monetary policy and are moving to provide further stimulus.
The US Fed cut interest rates last month and is set to do so again in September, with the prospect that more cuts may follow. The European Central Bank has signaled it is looking to further ease monetary policy at its meeting next September, and the central banks of Australia, New Zealand, India and Thailand have already moved and cut their rates.
The results so far have created a historically unprecedented situation in bond markets. It is estimated that some $15 trillion worth of government bonds are trading at negative yields, meaning an investor who purchased the bond and held it to maturity would make a loss.
This phenomenon may spread still further. Over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal published a lead article with the headline “Investors Ponder Negative Bond Yields in the US.” It quoted one financial analyst who noted that if you had raised the prospect of negative rates 10 years ago you would have been “laughed out of the room,” but now “people are getting on board the negative-rate idea very quickly.”
The fall in long-term interest rates is essentially a vote of no confidence in the prospects for global growth, as investors seek safe havens for the cash that has been injected into the system. If there were opportunities for profitable investments in the real economy, money would move in that direction. Instead it is being pushed into financial assets.
In the market for equities, this leads to higher stock prices. It also brings higher bond prices, pushing down their yield, since the two factors move in the opposite direction.
In an expression of the growing concern, the Journal article cited another analyst who said he was “perplexed” over yield levels and it was as if “Armageddon is being priced in.”
Across the Atlantic, similar concerns have been voiced in the pages of the Financial Times. As a column by Rana Foroohar noted, the market volatility was “ostensibly triggered by the US-China conflict turning into a full-blown currency war.”
But, she continued, at its heart it was about the “inability of the Federal Reserve to convince us that the July rate cut was merely ‘insurance’ to protect against a future downturn,” when, “as any number of indicators now show… the global downturn has already begun.”
However, stock markets have in general continued to rise. But this is not an indication of health, as stocks are rated at their most expensive levels in more than a century. “I don’t think it’s a question of whether we’ll see a crash—the question is why we haven’t seen one yet,” she wrote.
There were “plenty of worried market participants,” as evidenced by the record levels of negative-yielding bonds around the world. When many are prepared to pay for the “security” of losing a little bit of money as a hedge against losing a lot, “you know there’s something deeply wrong in the world.”