12 Feb 2021

Air pollution crisis in South Asia causing massive loss of pregnancies

Vijith Samarasinghe


A recent study by scientists from Peking University (China) and the University of Connecticut (USA) has revealed that 1 in 15 lost pregnancies in South Asia may be due to air pollution-related health issues. The report, which was based on an analysis of the medical records of lost pregnancies from over 34,000 women in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, was published in the January edition of the interdisciplinary journal Lancet Planetary Health.

Researchers used data collected by the US government’s Demographic and Health Surveys 2000–2016. Using a mathematical model, they analysed the correlation between air pollution exposure levels in the three countries during the gestation period and the reported pregnancy losses of the selected mothers.

Dense pollution in Delhi, 2017 (Photo: Wikipedia)

The scientists used the atmospheric concentration of Particulate Matter smaller than 2.5 microns, more commonly known as PM2.5, as the primary indicator of air pollution. These small solid airborne particles can travel deep into the respiratory system, causing severe respiratory and cardio-vascular problems.

PM2.5 concentrations larger than 40 micrograms per cubic metre of air are considered unsafe. Particulate Matter is usually generated by vehicle exhausts, the burning of wood and other bio-mass, construction work or polluting industries. Rigorous analytical and statistical procedures were used to remove any biases or interferences by other external factors and cases were identified where the dominant factor causing the pregnancy losses could be established as air pollution.

Based on this analysis, the scientists extrapolate that “349,681 pregnancy losses per year were attributed to ambient air exposure of more than 40 micrograms per cubic metre of PM2.5, accounting for 7.1 percent of the total annual pregnancy loss burden in south Asia” between 2000 and 2016.

While the researchers state that these numbers are not exact because of many experimental limitations in research of this scale, the trend is clear and a shocking indication of how capitalism in South Asia is robbing the next generation of its right to live.

The study reports that the overwhelming majority of pregnancy losses (77 percent) are from India. This is hardly a surprise given that India now has 21 out of 30 of the world’s most air-polluted cities.

In the winter of 2019, the Indian capital Delhi faced one of the worst air-pollution incidents in known history. PM2.5 levels surged above 500 micrograms per cubic metre or more than ten times the safe limit. In some neighbourhoods, air-quality measurement equipment simply stopped working because the pollutant loads were too high for them to record.

Tens of thousands suffered from respiratory difficulties, with an untold number of deaths. Schools had to be closed for several days and more than 30 flights diverted from the Delhi airport due to bad visibility. Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal described the situation as “living inside a gas chamber.”

The 2018–19 Economic Survey of Delhi reported that in addition to extreme Particulate Matter levels, hazardous gases, such as sulphur dioxide and nitrous oxide, were also well above the safe limits and have increased fivefold and twofold respectively in a decade.

Indian cities with the most dangerous air pollution, such as Delhi, Patna and Ahmedabad, are in the country’s northern plains where the cold humid air descending from the Himalayas causes heavy winter fogs. These easily capture particulate matter and other air pollutants and become a hazardous concoction commonly referred to as “smog.”

As early as 2013, the Global Burden of Health report, which was published by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, warned that air pollution was the fifth highest contributor to mortality in India. By 2017, 17.5 percent of all deaths in India could be attributed in some way to air pollution.

The urban and rural poor bear the brunt of this environmental disaster. The study showed that more than 40 percent of the mothers who suffered pregnancy losses also suffered from anaemia—a direct indicator of poverty. Malnutrition, exhaustion from long working hours and health care unaffordability, make the poor far more vulnerable to air quality-related health issues. Doctors have also reported that deaths from COVID-19, which has already killed hundreds of thousands in South Asia, are increased by air-pollution related respiratory issues among the poor.

Poor peasants involved in waste burning during early winter months are regularly blamed for the dangerous air pollution levels in northern India. While the burning of agricultural waste, such as stubble and hay, is a large contributor to pollution, official claims that this is the main cause of India’s air pollution crisis are outright lies.

A study by Urban Emissions Info notes that all bio-mass combustion, including waste burning in agricultural fields, accounts only for 20–35 percent of PM2.5 emissions, compared to 65 percent by vehicular exhaust fumes, industrial emissions and construction activities.

The air pollution crisis in India and other South Asian countries is a product of decades of ad hoc industrial and urban growth, poor environmental regulations and failure to integrate sustainable practices with small- and medium-scale agriculture.

These factors have worsened exponentially over the last two decades as rapid and unplanned growth has herded millions of poor people into the wretched conditions of the region’s mega-urban agglomerates. Moreover, thousands of tons of Particulate Matter and other polluting gases are spewed into the atmosphere every day by poorly regulated industries, such as coal-fired power plants and cement factories.

Air pollution, however, is not an insurmountable problem. Particulate Matter emissions can be very effectively reduced by proper vehicular emission regulations, dust-control measures in construction, and proper stack emission treatment in other industries. Agricultural waste, such as hay and stubble, moreover, does not have to be burnt but can be used in composting, bio-mass energy generation and sustainable building construction.

The ruling elites of South Asia, however, have no interest in allocating the urgently necessary resources to implement air pollution abatement measures to save millions of lives, including the unborn. Instead, the powers that be are preparing to dismantle the minimal safeguards for environmental protection and basic labour rights, to more effectively compete for the position of the cheapest labour platform for international finance capital.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “Agricultural Reform Bills,” which have sparked mass opposition and resistance, will facilitate an orgy of corporate plunder of land and natural resources and take the environmental issues such as air pollution to unprecedented levels.

In the early 1980s, when the Beijing Stalinist regime opened up China as a cheap labour platform, its cities quickly climbed into the world’s “most polluted” list and remained in the “extremely hazardous” category for decades. While air pollution in China has been marginally reduced in recent years, the poisoning of the atmosphere has only been shifted to other parts of the earth’s ecosystem.

On the one hand, the atmosphere connects all living beings in one world ecosystem, on the other air pollution is driven by the ruthless thirst for corporate profit in the globalised world capitalist economy. This is international problem and can only be resolved through the intervention of the world working class fighting for a socialist program that restructures the global economy on a rationally planned and scientific basis to serve human need not private profit.

11 Feb 2021

Government of Ireland – International Education Scholarships (Bachelor, Master & PhD) 2021

Application Deadline: 26th March 2021 5pm (Irish Time)

Eligible Countries: International

To be Taken at (Country): Ireland

About the Award: Under the initiative 60 scholarships will be provided for one year study at Bachelor, Master or PhD levels to successful candidates who have an offer of a place at an eligible Irish higher education institution.

Field(s) of Study: All

Type: Bachelor, Master PhD

Eligibility: The offer is open to students from non-EU/EEA countries and is applicable to all fields of study.

Number of Awards: 60

Value and Duration of Award: Students who are successful will receive:

  • A €10,000 stipend for one year’s study
  • A full fee waiver of all tuition and other registration costs at the higher education institution

How to Apply: Applications can be submitted via the online portal here.

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Kaira Looro 2021

Application Deadline: 28th February 2021

About the Award: The challenge of the competition is to design a women’s house that aims to promote gender equality as a key factor in rural development. The architecture must be a space dedicated to hosting activities which focus on education, raising awareness, and developing the village in the name of equality.

Design: The aims of the “Women’s House” is to host meetings, seminars, labs, and any other activity that could be useful in reducing forms of discrimination, strengthening and promoting gender equality, creating awareness and knowledge, and stimulating involvement by all parts of society. The project will be self-constructed with the benefiting community and will therefore need to meet certain construction criteria. The structure will need to accommodate the following activities, which will correspond to certain areas that have been designed to be independent from or connected to one another, depending on the concept of the designer.

Eligible Field(s):

  • be easily built with sustainable technologies: that can be adapted for self-construction and which do not require the use of heavy vehicles or complex machinery;
  • make use of natural and/or recycled materials: available in the area so as to limit the environmental and economic impact caused by transport of materials and to generate revenue within the local context;
  • be integrated with the socio-cultural context: of the area by reinterpreting and respecting its traditions.
  • Management and Organisation: he structure will need to have an administrative space in order to allow for the management and organisation of activities.
  • Dialogue: One of the project’s objectives is to encourage communication between institutions and associations in the area
  • Collective Activities: The fundamental objective of the project is to promote gender equality and human rights through the organisation of awareness raising activities, seminars, labs, and exhibitions.

Participants will be sent (after registration) additional materials necessary for the project’s development:
data sheets, prices, images, and characteristics of the primary materials; maps of the village of Baghere and the valley; overview of the Tanaff Valley; images of the village of Baghere, Tanaff, and the valley; CAD and photographs of the construction site; Layouts of the designs.

Type: Contest

To be Taken at (Country):

  • The location of the project is southern Senegal.
  • The “Women’s House” will be built in the municipality of Baghere

Value of Award:

1st Prize: 5.000€ + Construction + Internship at Kengo Kuma
2nd Prize: 1.000€ + Internship at Miralles Tagliabue EMBT
3rd Prize: 500€ + Internship at SBGA
Honourable Mentions 100€
Special Mentions
20 Finalists
20 Top 50

How to Apply: Subscribe now

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Europe passes three quarters of a million COVID-19 deaths

Robert Stevens


Europe passed on Wednesday the horrific milestone of three quarters of a million dead to COVID-19.

With the 5,091 fatalities recorded yesterday, the death toll of the continent, including Russia and the Ukraine, reached 751,432 according to figures published by Worldometer. The grim tally was reached just a year short of the first recorded death on the continent—a Chinese tourist who was reported dead in a French hospital on February 15 last year.

Clinical staff care for a patient with coronavirus in the intensive care unit at the Royal Papworth Hospital in Cambridge, England, May 5, 2020 [Credit: Neil Hall Pool via AP]

Thousands of deaths are being reported daily on every continent, with global fatalities reaching 2,362,515 Wednesday evening.

COVID-19 deaths as measured by governments are around 20 percent lower than the real figure, according to a study of excess deaths by Nature magazine, meaning that Europe is in reality closer to a million deaths.

Over 31 million coronavirus infections have ravaged Europe’s population over the last year. In the first three days of this week more than 370,000 new cases were reported, with many of these mutations of the original strain.

The capitalist class is at war with society. Last week, the prestigious British Medical Journal accused the world’s governments of “ social murder ” in their collective response to the pandemic.

The scale of death being witnessed in Europe and across the globe is unprecedented outside of wartime. There were on average about 6,060 deaths a day in World War 1. Over a year after the pandemic started there were 13,000 deaths globally from COVID-19 Tuesday. In the course of 48 hours, Tuesday and Wednesday, 10,300 more deaths were recorded in Europe.

The battles of the Somme and Verdun fought in Europe during World War 1 were among the most terrible events in history, with an estimated 600,000 lives lost as soldiers were wiped out by machine guns and shells for months on end. Today even more lives have been lost to a deadly virus across the continent, with workers still being sent into unsafe factories, offices and schools as the pandemic rages.

This policy has been overseen by governments no matter what their political stripe. All have the same agenda of herd immunity dictated by the oligarchs and major corporations. All are indifferent to threat to the lives and health of millions, especially when this impacts of the working class.

The policy of “herd immunity”, of letting the virus rip through the population without serious measures of containment, should more properly be called a policy of death. This was most brutally summed up, at the outset of the pandemic, by UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s former chief adviser Dominic Cummings, as “herd immunity, protect the economy, and if that means some pensioners die, too bad.”

The pandemic has taken over 120,000 lives in Britain.

With thousands still dying every day, under conditions in which the virus has mutated into even more deadly and contagious strains, and with only a fraction of the population vaccinated, the ruling elite is insisting that even limited lockdowns are ended as rapidly as possible and schools and workplaces are fully reopened.

The terrible consequences can be seen most graphically in Portugal, which, after lifting many restrictions, recently suffered the worst death rate in the world, as the highly contagious British variant rapidly spread throughout the population.

 In Britain, a “roadmap” to end what is termed the “last lockdown” begins February 22, with the devolved Scottish National Party government already planning to open schools from that date.

 In France, schools remain open under its partial lockdown. Last week French universities began to partially reopen to students. In a recent National Security Council meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron said, in a comment leaked to the media, "I have had enough of those scientists who only respond to my questions about the variants with one single scenario: that of a new lockdown... Everything must be done to avoid a new lockdown."

 Germany’s lockdown is due for review on February 14. On Tuesday Rainer Dulger, President of the Confederation of German Employers' Associations, told the Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland news station, “From the employers' point of view, it would be incomprehensible to continue the restrictive measures without finally identifying a clear and rule-based opening scenario that is also supported by a broad majority.”

The message of the ruling class was aired in Britain’s pro-Tory Daily Telegraph on Wednesday. Philip Johnston, the newspaper’s assistant editor, declared in an op-ed piece, “The Government ought to be honest that our only realistic strategy now is to treat the virus like flu”.

He added, “The Government needs to be upfront with people about the realities. We will be living with Covid for decades, people will catch it every year and thousands will die. That is what has happened with past contagions and, while we are now in a better position to mitigate, treat and vaccinate, that is what will happen with this one.”

In a summing up the universal insistence that profits are all that matters for the ruling class, Johnston wrote of the virus, “We can’t eliminate it. Well, we can, but the cost would be colossal.”

The working class can only oppose the mass slaughter taking place by intervening independently with its own socialist programme.

Rank and file committees must be established in every workplace and ensure that all non-essential production is halted until it is safe to return to work.

Schools and other education settings, which are proven vectors of virus transmission, must be closed and all the resources required for distance learning made available.

Wages and jobs must be safeguarded by seizing the assets and wealth of the pandemic profiteers—the major transnational corporations and the financial oligarchy.

Workers and young people internationally are opposed to working in unsafe conditions. Strikes by pupils have broken out in Germany and have won the backing of teachers and other education staff. But as every experience shows, including the recent struggle by teachers in Chicago in the US, the working class cannot entrust its fate to the rotten pro-capitalist trade unions, which work in alliance with governments of all political denominations to police the homicidal back to work/back to school policies.

Polish court convicts leading Holocaust historians

Clara Weiss


On Tuesday, a Polish court found Professors Barbara Engelking and Jan Grabowski, two of the most renowned historians of the Holocaust in Poland, guilty of defamation and spreading “inaccurate information.” The two historians had been sued by the niece of Edward Malinowski, the mayor of a Polish town during World War II, for a passage that appears in their 1,700 page Night W ithout End about the genocide of Jews in Nazi-occupied Poland. In the 2018 volume, testimonies are quoted which suggest that Malinowski was implicated in the local massacre of Jews by German soldiers. Engelking and Grabowski were ordered to write an apology to the niece for allegedly defaming her uncle and “providing inaccurate information.”

Holocaust historians Professors Barbara Engelking and Jan Grabowski (Source: Wikipedia, Facebook)

The trial represents a new milestone in the assaults on historical truth and democratic rights by the Polish state and the ruling Law and Justice Party (PiS). In addition to the trial against Engelking and Grabowski, a journalist, Katarzyna Markusz, is threatened with a three-year prison sentence for “defaming the Polish nation,” because of a passage she wrote on Polish complicity in the Holocaust.

These actions are part of a state-orchestrated campaign, aimed at promoting anti-Semitism and far-right forces. In 2018, the Polish government passed a law criminalizing any mention of Polish collaboration in the Holocaust. Since then, historians have faced increasing pressure, including threats of lawsuits, along with hate mail and death threats from far-right forces which feel so emboldened that they often do not even hide their names anymore. While the lawsuit against Engelking and Grabowski was brought by Filomena Leszczyńska, it was heavily backed and driven by the Polish League against Defamation, a far-right outfit that is directly funded by the state. For many years, the League has been harassing Holocaust historians with threats of lawsuits.

Engelking and Grabowski have correctly denounced the trial as an attack on historical research and free speech and will appeal the verdict. The “guilty” verdict was meant to not just discredit their historical work. By legally ordering them to apologize to the niece of Malinowski, the court also tried to force these historians to lend legitimacy to the campaign by the Polish state that is trying to whitewash Polish anti-Semites from any involvement in the Holocaust.

Both Engelking and Grabowski have authored some of the important studies in Holocaust research that have appeared in recent decades. Engelking is renowned as one of the world’s top experts in the history of the Warsaw Ghetto and is the chair of the International Auschwitz Council.

The two-volume Night Without End (2018), which they edited together and which formed the basis of the trial, provides an extensive analysis of the life and fate of 140,000 Polish Jews in the countryside in the Nazi-occupied General Government of Poland. The work highlights, in particular, the role played by the Polish police (“Blue police”), a force that the Polish right has long sought to whitewash.

Professor Dariusz Stola, who was forced out as a director of the POLIN museum of the history of Polish Jews, denounced the trial: “No book is without mistakes, but academic discussion, not a court trial, is the right place to deal with them. This book is a result of solid, meticulous research. If one can sue its authors, one can sue half of the historians who deal with the 20th century.”

Eva Schlotheuber, representative of the German associations of historians, warned, “It has enormous potential to intimidate others,” especially younger historians, if “scientifically founded research results are debated not in scientific or public discourse, but in front of a court.”

In an interview with Krytyka Polityczna from 2020, Grabowski, who is a professed admirer of the socialist Zionist historian Emanuel Ringelblum, said: “The goal of our opponents is that we stop publishing books. I would very much like to see some kind of social solidarity awaken against this background. ... An attack on history is an attack on all of us.”

He also called out the de facto complicity of Poland’s liberal opposition party, Civic Platform (PO), in enabling the right to dominate the field of history. “History in Poland—and this pains me—has been largely appropriated by the Polish right and extreme right. ... I have a great deal of resentment towards the so-called democratic and liberal elites who, by neglecting history, have handed over this very important—as it turned out—area in the hands of mythomaniacs and myth-makers. This disregard for history as an important battlefield was visible at the beginning of this century, when the left was in power. Nothing changed in this matter during the rule of the centrists from PO.”

The political trial of two of the most renowned Holocaust historians internationally has vast implications and must be opposed by all politically conscious workers, intellectuals and youth. The PiS government is at the forefront of the assault on historical truth and democratic rights, and the state build-up of the far-right that is underway internationally. In neighboring Germany, the German ruling class has bolstered neo-Nazi terror networks and the neo-fascist Alternative for Germany (AfD), while the government is backing figures like Jörg Baberowski, a professor at Humboldt University, who has declared that “Hitler wasn’t vicious.” In the US, former president Donald Trump, acting with the backing of much of the Republican Party, instigated a fascist coup on January 6, whose most critical aspects are now being covered up by the Democratic Party.

At stake in the fight to defend historical truth is the political arming of the working class for its struggle today against fascism and its root cause, capitalism.

During the war, Poland was the main site of the Nazi-led genocide of European Jews. All the major death camps, including Auschwitz, Treblinka, Bełżec and Sobibor, were located in Nazi-occupied Poland. 90 percent of Poland’s pre-war Jewish population of 3-3.5 million were murdered, making up roughly half of the total of 6 million murdered European Jews. Among those murdered were many outstanding socialist intellectuals and working class leaders, including Abraham Leon, a leading figure in the Belgian Trotskyist movement; Solomon Ehrlich, leader of the Polish Left Opposition; as well as the socialist Zionists Emanuel Ringelblum and Abraham Lewin, to name but a few.

Research into the Holocaust in Poland is intrinsically bound up with research into the history of the workers movement. For instance, a major volume of documents by the Polish Trotskyist movement appeared in 2018 as part of the publication of the complete archives that Emanuel Ringelblum had compiled in the Warsaw Ghetto.

While the genocide was led and organized by the Nazis, they could rely upon the collaboration of local nationalist and anti-Semitic forces throughout Eastern Europe, especially in Poland, Ukraine and the Baltic states. Historically, modern anti-Semitism emerged as a central ideological weapon of the bourgeoisie against the revolutionary working class movement. In Poland, a multi-ethnic country before the war, the highly combative workers movement was based largely in the Polish and Jewish working class. Hence, anti-Semitism acquired a particular intensity in the country’s ruling class and far right.

In the early and mid-1930s, the Polish government, “inspired” by the anti-Semitic legislation in Nazi Germany, implemented far-reaching anti-Jewish measures, while allowing fascist bands to terrorize Jews on the streets and in the universities. The Polish PiS government is basing itself politically on the traditions of these forces, and is systematically promoting and collaborating with their modern-day equivalents. In trying to preempt any serious historical research into the history of Polish anti-Semitism and the Holocaust, the Polish state seeks to both historically whitewash the crimes of the far right, and preempt the long overdue reckoning with the powerful but tragic history of the working class movement in Poland.

UK trade hit hard as Brexit crisis deepens

Thomas Scripps


The economic dislocation caused by Britain’s exit from the European Union (EU) is making itself felt, threatening serious political consequences for Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative government and the Brexit agreement.

At the centre of the crisis is Northern Ireland. According to the Northern Ireland Protocol agreed between the UK and the EU, Northern Ireland remains within the EU’s single market for goods, meaning import and export checks must be carried out on goods travelling between Britain and Northern Ireland. This effectively placed a customs border down the Irish Sea, rather than between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland—an EU member state—which would have compromised the Good Friday Agreement ending the armed conflict in the northern six counties.

Vehicles at the port of Larne, Northern Ireland, Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2021. Authorities in Northern Ireland have suspended post-Brexit border checks on animal products and withdrawn workers after threats against border staff. (AP Photo/Peter Morrison)

The EU implemented import checks immediately after the deal came into effect on January 1, a few days after it had been ratified by the UK Parliament. This created serious hold-ups for goods travelling from Britain into Northern Ireland, leading to shortages of products in major supermarkets.

While the initial shortages have been largely overcome, warnings are being sounded about what will happen when additional checks are imposed in April—Northern Ireland is currently in a “grace period” exempting it from certain EU import rules.

In January, the chief executives of the UK’s major supermarkets—Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Iceland, Co-Op and Marks & Spencer—wrote to Gove to request an “urgent intervention” by the government ahead of the April “cliff edge”. They said in a joint letter that Northern Ireland could face “significant disruption to food supplies” because “the current proposals, increased bureaucracy and certification in such a short time scale are unworkable.” This appeal was echoed yesterday by several Northern Ireland business leaders, speaking to the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee.

The seriousness of the situation is indicated by Cabinet Secretary Michael Gove’s meeting with European Commission vice-president Maroš Šefčovič today, where he will seek an extension of the “grace period” to 2023. Gove has attempted to leverage the fallout from the EU’s aborted attempt to override the Northern Ireland protocol late last month (using Article 16 of the Brexit agreement) in connection with ongoing vaccine trade wars. He accused the EU on Monday of putting its “integrationist theology ahead of the interests of the people of Northern Ireland”.

Multiple Whitehall and EU officials have confirmed that the EU is only likely to agree to an extension of three to six months. Johnson has told MPs that the UK government is prepared to invoke Article 16 to ensure there is no “barrier of any kind in the Irish Sea”.

The inter-imperialist conflicts left unsolved by the Brexit deal are inflaming sectarian and national conflicts left unsolved by the Good Friday Agreement. The pro-British and Protestant Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) leader Arlene Foster wrote in the Telegraph last week to insist, “the Northern Ireland Protocol has not worked, cannot work and needs to be replaced.” She concluded by raising the spectre of “greater division” in Northern Ireland and threatening that the UK government should remember, “not a single unionist party in Northern Ireland supports this flawed Protocol.”

Speaking in the UK parliament, DUP MP Ian Paisley demanded that Johnson “Be the unionist we need you to be” and use “all of the instruments at his disposal… to remove the impediments to trade in Northern Ireland.” The protocol “has betrayed us and made us feel like foreigners in our own country.”

On February 1, customs inspections were suspended at Belfast and Larne ports, and inspectors, local council and EU officials sent home amid reported threats from loyalists. Threatening graffiti referring to border staff as “targets” was found, and the chief of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) called on the region “to step back from the brink in terms of community tension.” The PSNI later said they had no evidence of “credible threats”.

Sinn Féin member of the Northern Ireland Assembly (MLA) John O’Dowd said port staff were being used as pawns in a “very cruel game” of “half-truths and manipulation”, arguing that the DUP were talking up threats to advance their agenda of scrapping the Northern Ireland protocol. Mary Lou MacDonald, president of Sinn Féin, has said, “Brexiteers… should not be surprised at the fact that Brexit is disruptive” and called for “a sensible informed conversation between the British government and the European Commission… to iron out and mitigate those initial problems.”

The scope of the Brexit crisis is not limited to Northern Ireland. Shortages across the Irish Sea are an initial warning of the situation facing the rest of the UK. The Johnson government chose not to immediately begin import checks on goods entering from the EU, in large part because it did not have anywhere close to the required infrastructure in place to carry out the necessary procedures. They are due to come into force in several phases, the first two this April and July.

Adam Shuter, joint managing director of transport company Exact Logistics, told the Guardian the situation “has got disaster written all over it. I don’t think the systems are robust enough to be able to process the information quickly enough.” Accounting firm KPMG has said that business’s “biggest headaches” are to come.

Tim Morris, chief executive of the UK Major Ports Group, and Richard Ballantyne, chief executive of the British Ports Association, warned at the end of January that lack of funding from the government meant ports were falling behind on infrastructure plans to make themselves ready for the new regime. Morris stated, “We need urgent action from the government to show flexibility either on the July 1 deadline or what is required on that date. The alternative is to accept potentially serious implications for traffic flows through the ports this summer.”

There has already been serious disruption of UK exports. The Road Haulage Association (RHA) reported February 1 that the volume of exports going through British ports to the EU fell by 68 percent this January compared to last. The government fiercely disputed this claim, citing traffic figures, but the RHA counters that 65-75 percent of vehicles are returning to the EU empty due to hold-ups in the UK, or because their UK contractors have stopped exporting.

According to a survey of supply chain managers by the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply, more than half of UK companies trading with the EU suffered delays in January, with more than a third reporting delays of multiple days. Nearly a quarter believed they would run low on stock in weeks if the situation does not improve.

Some businesses, especially small and medium sized, are being threatened with ruin by the increased bureaucracy costs of exporting to the EU and the extra charges applied to their products as they enter the union.

These initial losses are likely to be dwarfed by the ultimate impact on Britain’s services sector, 80 percent of the UK’s economic output, which was left out of the Brexit deal. As an indication, the Centre for Economics and Business Research reported yesterday that London, accounting for 40 percent the UK’s export earnings from services, stood to lose £9.5 billion a year—and more if no deal on services is ever reached.

The government’s response to this expanding crisis will be to proceed more viciously with its plans to slash workers’ conditions and hand out massive corporate tax breaks through the establishment of free ports. This will be coupled with nationalist outbursts against its imperialist rivals in the EU and repression of social anger at home. Supply disruptions and shortages were part of the disaster scenario outlined in the government’s “ Operation Yellowhammer ”, drawn up as part of a series of plans for massive police and military deployments against the unrest flowing from a no deal or hard Brexit.

The working class in Britain must oppose this reactionary agenda with its own political programme of unified class struggle with the European and international working class.

Germany: Commerzbank employees confront phalanx of government, company and unions

Gustav Kemper


The Supervisory Board of Commerzbank approved the CEO’s “ Strategy 2024 ” on Wednesday. Starting in 2024, costs are to be reduced by €1.4 billion a year and return on equity increased to 7 percent. To do this, the bank will cut 10,000 full-time positions and close 340 of its 790 branches.

Headquarters of the Commerzbank (right) in Frankfurt

The works council and the Verdi trade union are represented on the Supervisory Board, which has equal representation. As the Supervisory Board has no formal decision-making authority on strategy, there was no vote. After the special meeting of the Supervisory Board, the Bank merely announced that the majority of the Supervisory Board had approved the CEO’s plans.

It is obvious, however, that in addition to the shareholders, the supposed employee representatives also support the slash-and-burn proposal. At the end of January, when Commerzbank CEO Manfred Knof announced “very painful cuts,” Verdi representative Stefan Wittmann told the dpa news agency that the union could largely support the content of the strategy, objecting only that the timeline for staff reductions was too short.

On Wednesday, the Management Board and the Central Works Council agreed on a “regulation agreement,” which is only concerned with making the job cutting go as smoothly as possible. According to this agreement, “by the time of the Annual General Meeting on May 5, 2021, the necessary regulations frameworks—a framework reconciliation of interests and a framework social plan—are to be concluded with the Central Works Council.” In other words, the Management Board and the Works Council will jointly agree on how the 10,000 jobs will be eliminated.

Bank employees are facing a tight phalanx of the Group’s Board of Management, the Verdi union, the Works Council, the shareholders and the German government. During the financial crisis of 2008, the German government took a stake in Commerzbank, paying more than €5 billion for a 25 percent share. Even then, the concern of the government was not for jobs, but for the economic interests of the large corporations. According to its own figures, Commerzbank handles about 30 percent of Germany’s foreign trade, by financing and securing import and export transactions.

Currently, the German government still holds 15.6 percent of Commerzbank shares and is fully behind the bank’s rationalization plans. When Verdi official Wittmann complained about the early announcement of the job cuts, Federal Finance Minister Olaf Scholz made it perfectly clear that “Everyone knows something has to be done, even something very drastic.” Scholz warned that the job cuts should be carried out in accordance with the “tradition of social partnership” and that “a closing of ranks” should be established between the Works Council, the union and the company.

It was two years ago that German Economics Minister Peter Altmeier called for the formation of “large and strong players” that would be “on a par with competitors from the USA or China.” Thus, two years ago the government had advocated a merger of Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank. Since those plans failed, it has advocated Commerzbank’s restructuring.

According to the new strategy, the bank is to streamline its international presence, focus on customers “with a clear connection to Germany” and expand its business with high-net-worth customers and corporate clients in “private banking and wealth management.” Customer traffic is to be greatly reduced through digitization. Employees appear in the strategic plan only as cost factors.

In order to achieve annual cost savings of €1.4 billion by 2024, the bank is prepared to spend €1.8 billion on restructuring. Fifteen international locations will be closed, 350 branches in Germany will be eliminated, and the 200 branches already shut down due to the coronavirus pandemic will not be reopened. Internationally, one in four jobs will be cut; in Germany, one in three. Specific figures are to be presented at the bank’s annual press conference on February 11.

Countless workers in recent years have learned the meaning of the “social partnership tradition” invoked by Finance Minister Scholz. Tens of thousands have been manoeuvred out of their jobs in this way—with low severance payments, partial retirement, transfers to transitional companies, and from there into unemployment. Those affected are often urged by the works councils to accept these “offers,” with the warning that otherwise they risk a less advantageous firing.

Commerzbank employees are shocked and deeply concerned about their professional futures. In an internal survey conducted by the bank, 80 percent of respondents were not optimistic about the bank’s future. For shareholders and the board, on the other hand, the new strategy is a goldmine. Class antagonisms between labour and capital is on full display.

In 2019, when they were drawing up plans for branch closures, Commerzbank board members received a 39 percent increase in their pay compared to the previous year, according to the annual report, which amounts to more than €12 million.

Now, the prominent weekly paper Welt am Sonntag reports that “the bank’s top managers are discussing a program for the second half of the planning period” that will “make shareholders happy.” The newspaper states that the bank wants to use the money saved and equity released from the reduction of unprofitable business relationships to spend several billion euro on a dividend program and share buybacks. Share buybacks are a common business model that increases the value of shares and thus the wealth of shareholders. The German government, as the main shareholder, will also welcome this programme.

Commerzbank CEO Knof’s post about the bank’s strategy on his LinkedIn page was answered by a branch manager with a clear comment: “It’s a pity that so many people lose their jobs for this, so that the heads up there can once again push through their strategy.” The little people in the branches were working hard “so that the trough up there can get even bigger.”

Doctors predict global mental health crisis to persist post-pandemic

Ben Oliver


The mishandling of the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 by ruling elites around the world has resulted in a pandemic of mass suffering, death and dislocation. The University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation model predicts that 630,000 Americans will die from the coronavirus by the end of May. The greatest burden has fallen on the most vulnerable. Effective control measures have been eschewed for policies that keep profits flowing for the rich. The nightmare this has created is having a lasting negative impact on the mental health of untold numbers of Americans and people internationally.

(Source: Pixabay)

According to a recent survey of doctors worldwide, most believe that widespread adverse effects on mental health will persist when the pandemic subsides. The survey, conducted by Sermo, an international social media platform for doctors, found that 86 percent of 3,334 doctors from 24 countries believe that the most significant non-virus-related public health issue will be mental health and depression.

The declining mental health caused by the pandemic has been clearly demonstrated by scientific data. Forty-two percent of respondents to a December 2020 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey reported depression or anxiety. That number increased from 11 percent in 2019. A recent Gallup poll shows that mental health in America is at its lowest point in two decades, a period of time which includes the assaults on democracy of the stolen election of 2000, the Patriot Act, and the social havoc wreaked by the 2008 Great Recession.

The mental health impacts of the pandemic are significant and widespread, but it is the working class, health care workers and youth who are most affected. In the UK, it has been shown that members of the working class are the most likely to die from the virus. Investigators point to decades of social austerity for the high rates of mortality and economic depression in England compared to the rest of the European Union.

As the virus is allowed to spread rampantly, health care workers assume a great psychological burden. While they confront a dangerous novel pathogen, and the media lauds them as “heroes,” they are vastly under-resourced and overworked. Although this will come as no surprise to health care workers, the risk factors most closely associated with their poor mental health are increased workloads, insufficient PPE and fear of close contact with the disease. Wherever transmission occurs, these three factors are ever-present for this section of workers.

For young people, the pandemic came at a time when economic recession and climate change presented a bleak future. Increasing uncertainty, financial instability and the loss of social connections have led to a staggering decline in mental health. In the UK, a 2020 follow-up to a 2017 study of 3,500 young people ages 5–16 showed an increase in self-reported depression and anxiety, from one in nine, to one in six, a 50 percent increase. Among patients recently screened by psychologists, 40 percent are in need of psychiatric intervention, as determined by an increase in self-harm and suicidality. This represents a threefold increase. Before the pandemic, only 10 percent needed psychiatric intervention.

If and when people can safely return to work, school and social engagement, many will be “coming up for air.” Speaking to the New York Times, clinical psychologist Luana Marques, of the Harvard Medical School, expressed what the majority of doctors surveyed by Sermo might say, that the increased numbers of those suffering from depression and anxiety will not “go back to baseline anytime soon.” She cited a study of New York residents and first responders grappling with psychological turmoil 14 years after the attacks of 9/11. Out of 36,000 respondents, 14 percent reported post-traumatic stress disorder, and 15 percent reported depression, double and triple the rates in comparable populations.

Just as the capitalist health system was not prepared for the medical disaster of the virus, it is not prepared for the coming mental health disaster. Chief medical officer of the National Alliance on Mental health, Ken Duckworth, told the Times that while it only takes months for mental health services demand to “skyrocket,” it takes years to train new providers. To make matters worse, community health centers, which typically provide behavioral care for the uninsured, of which a disproportionate number are working class and minorities, are struggling to remain financially solvent due to decreasing revenue.

A majority of the doctors surveyed by Sermo believe that the most significant public health issue directly related to the pandemic will be its long-term side effects. In addition to the known impacts of the virus on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, there is growing evidence that the virus has neurological and psychiatric impacts as well.

Patients referred to as “long-haulers” suffer from a host of complications, which include fatigue, brain fog, depression and insomnia. Anecdotes include patients who couldn’t remember their partner’s name or how to dress. Of the 3,800 members of Body Politic, an online community for long-term COVID-19 survivors, 85 percent experience some kind of cognitive dysfunction, and 81 percent report neurological symptoms.

Even more chilling is the link between COVID-19 and psychosis. In a UK study of 153 patients who presented with cerebrovascular or neuropsychiatric symptoms, 10 experienced new-onset psychosis. This study confirms the experience of doctors who have encountered this phenomenon well after patients recovered from relatively mild bouts of COVID-19 that included neurological symptoms. There was the Long Island mother, who, months after recovering from relatively mild symptoms, started hearing a voice that told her to kill her children and herself; a construction worker in New York City who attempted to strangle his cousin in his sleep because he believed his cousin was going to murder him; and a British woman who started seeing monkeys and lions and believed one of her family members to be an imposter.

Researchers theorize that the body’s immune response to the virus may be the cause of neurological and psychiatric symptoms, as some immune substances can cross the blood-brain barrier and act as neurotoxins. This response may be unable to shut down in some patients as the body tries to rid itself of lingering amounts of the virus.

Cases of psychosis are a small proportion of people who have had COVID-19. However, like Dr. Anthony Fauci said about “long-haulers,” given the widespread infection rates, even a small proportion of cases will translate into a significant public health issue. Possibly hundreds of thousands of people will be affected, according to one Johns Hopkins expert.

The impacts on mental health of the pandemic, both directly and indirectly related to the virus, are a result of the “herd immunity” policy of the working class. The decision to let the virus run rampant in order to maintain profits for Wall Street is the immediate cause of widespread transmission and social havoc.

A study by Columbia University found that spring lockdowns, including school closures, in New York City decreased transmission by 70 percent. Public health measures limiting the spread of the virus would in turn limit disease, death and its attendant mental health issues. A UK study demonstrated that high levels of anxiety and depression at the outset of the pandemic were lessened by the nationwide lockdown. Contrary to what has been reported by the media, lockdowns, including the cessation of in-person classes for schoolchildren, are not only highly effective, they alleviate mental health suffering. School and government authorities have seized on the mental health crisis among children caused by the pandemic in an effort to herd them back into unsafe schools, subjecting students, teachers and their families to increased transmission of the virus, disease and misery.

The mental health catastrophe predicted by doctors in the Sermo survey speaks to the stark contrast between the capitalist program and the socialist program in a public health disaster. The socialist program places a priority on social good and therefore calls for all measures to stop the spread of the virus, whereas the capitalist program is recklessly pushing for the economy to be completely reopened, which will only exacerbate the pandemic. The capitalist program follows the logic of profit, whereas the socialist program follows the advice of science. A rational approach that prioritizes the preservation of life, including lockdowns to stop transmission and financial support for all affected, would serve to significantly limit the mental health impact of the coronavirus.

PSOE-Podemos facilitates fascist attacks on migrants in Canary Islands

Alice Summers


Recent weeks have seen a series of violent attacks by far-right thugs against migrants stranded on the Spanish Canary Islands. Various WhatsApp chats and videos have also been leaked to the press in which far-right individuals discussed plans to kill and maim migrant workers.

The fascist Vox bears direct responsibility for these incitements to violence, but the groundwork for the attacks has been laid by Spain’s Socialist Party (PSOE)-Podemos government which has lobbied for European Union funds to support Moroccan police operations to terrorise migrants.

Migrants who manage to arrive on makeshift boats in the Canary Islands are placed into concentration camps, their children separated from mothers, prevented from flying to the peninsula and then deported as fast as possible.

Spain Halts Moroccan Immigrants’ Protests in Canary Islands

This policy is based on the fascistic notion of the “call effect,” i.e., that treating migrants humanely will provoke new waves of migrants. Therefore, the policy of the entire political establishment in Spain, backed by the European Union, is to brutalise migrants. Physical assaults by fascist thugs or the police at the borders are therefore, unofficially at least, a part of the policy.

In an audio message on a WhatsApp chat leaked to news site La Marea, one man says: “This is a government of shit, bro, but it’s gonna end. From tomorrow, we’re gonna go out hunting. A group of four or five Moors together: beating time.” In another chat, an image of two pistols was shared, accompanied by the ominous caption: “These two are coming to Maspalomas [a town on the island of Gran Canaria, where a number of migrants are currently accommodated].”

Participants in another chat can be seen to discuss plans for this “hunt,” with one threateningly declaring: “Tomorrow we’re gonna go down there and we’re going to bust them [the migrants] up. At least 15 guys are ready. They’re gonna go crazy. We’re armed up to here. The Moors are gonna die, I’m telling you this straight.”

This is not the first reported incident of far-right threats or violence against migrant workers on the Canary Islands. In December, dozens of fascistic individuals from the town of Mogán, Gran Canaria, gathered outside hotels housing migrants to scream insults and threats at them. Police were called to the scene but no arrests were made.

The Red Cross, which helps to run many of the migrant reception facilities on the Canary Islands, was forced to advise migrants not to leave their accommodations for the next 48 hours.

The most recent far-right rants on WhatsApp are not empty threats. Numerous injuries to migrant workers have already been reported in the Spanish press, and multiple formal complaints have been lodged with the police.

One migrant worker, Hassan, told elDiario.es that a group of men fired a pellet gun at him from inside a car, with one man making threatening gestures with a “machete,” miming slitting his throat. A man was arrested as part of an investigation into the alleged “machete” threats but was subsequently released. In a video of the incident leaked to La Marea, the assailant can be heard exclaiming: “I’m going to teach a lesson to the first little Moor [I see].”

Nineteen-year-old Ahmad also told elDiario.es that he had been beaten by “eight boys” while out on a walk with three friends, with one of them hitting him with a metal baton. “They dragged me across the floor and hit me in various parts of the body,” he said.

Another Moroccan youth, Oussman, described to the same news site how he had been hit on the back while out for a walk with a friend. After beginning to run away from their attackers, Oussman tripped and fell and was then surrounded by “four or five men” who kicked and hit him. He received injuries to his jaw and leg. “I couldn’t sleep for three nights. I had a lot of pain in my mouth. I couldn’t eat,” he said .

Público also reported that at least three migrants at a reception facility run by the White Cross Foundation had received injuries to their heads after rocks were thrown at them outside their accommodations. Other young migrants report being hit on the head, kicked or beaten when going out to take a walk, having to run for their lives to escape the attacks.

The most recent attacks on migrants came in the wake of a far-right campaign of hoax videos on WhatsApp and social media, falsely purporting to show migrants in the Canary Islands robbing shops, churches or restaurants.

The videos of ethnic minority youth—none of whom were in fact migrants or in the Canary Islands—were circulated across these online platforms, accompanied by captions such as, “When you introduce thousands of illegal [migrants] with no jobs into your country” and “Look what the ‘grateful’ immigrants who we have housed, looked after and fed in the Canary Islands are doing.”

These efforts to depict migrants as criminals were enthusiastically promoted by the far-right Vox party, which launched a xenophobic “Stop Islamicisation!” campaign on Twitter. “They [migrants] make up approximately 0.2 percent [of the population] and are responsible for 93% of complaints,” Vox declared, with no evidence on its official Twitter account. “The majority are from the Maghreb,” it continued, echoing the threats against “Moors.”

Twitter temporarily suspended Vox’s account for “inciting hate” over these tweets, prompting Vox leader Santiago Abascal to launch into another anti-immigrant tirade, writing: “Of course, the tweet which provoked the censorship provided data about the violence which Spaniards are suffering. …. The tech millionaires don’t want us to know the consequences of the migrant invasion which they are promoting along with some governments.”

Vox’s anti-migrant agitation has been supported by the PSOE-Podemos government. While it cynically declared that “we’re not going to accept hoaxes, images from other places, old videos published as current or false complaints,” its delegate to the Canary Islands, Anselmo Pestana Padrón, stated that migrants with “bad behaviour” would be subject to priority deportation. Many of these migrants have been “directly repatriated,” he said, while others have been transferred to the Immigration Detention Centres.

According to the Red Cross, at least 70 migrants were deported in the last week of January for supposed “bad behaviour.”

The PSOE-Podemos government is dutifully stepping up its efforts to rapidly deport migrants in line with Vox’s calls. In December, Vox leader Abascal declared in parliament that the government must “prevent any more illegal migrants from passing and demand their immediate and forcible deportation if it’s necessary.”

The government reacted by recently signing a deal with Air Maroc to carry out three deportation flights a week from the Canary Islands to Morocco. In mid-January, the Spanish Interior Ministry also pledged €10.89 million for charter flights to deport migrants over 18 months.

At the same time, it is refusing entry at its border to hundreds of thousands of migrants. In 2019 before the impact of COVID-19, nearly 500,000 migrants were refused entry. The effective shutting off of the direct migration route across the Mediterranean from Morocco, with the assistance of the European Union, has forced migrants to risk the far more dangerous sea crossing to the Canary Islands. Migration to the Canary Islands increased by 1,670 percent this January, as compared to the same month last year.

The bloody result of the “call effect” policy has led to the deaths of at least 2,000 migrants on this crossing in 2020, for which the PSOE-Podemos government bears direct responsibility.