5 Jun 2021

Disappearance of influenza in 2020 proves eradication of SARS-CoV-2 and more is possible

Benjamin Mateus & Norisa Diaz


One of the curious features of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the near complete disappearance of the seasonal flu across the globe. Flu seasons that have been so much a part of the fabric of modern social history have all but vanished.

To say the least, this is astounding. Yet, hardly a word has been said of it in the media. A review of the statistics is worth the effort.

Nurses and physicians on a COVID-19 unit in Texas (Credit: Miguel Gutierrez Jr.)

In the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), since September 27, 2020, out of over one million influenza tests, there were only 1,899 (0.2 percent) positive results (713 Influenza A and 1,186 Influenza B) during the 2020-2021 flu season. Of the only 600 deaths reported from influenza, there was only one flu-associated pediatric death.

To place the above statistics into stark relief, the CDC estimated that from 2010 to 2019, between 9 and 45 million people fell ill with the flu annually. Of these, 140,000 to 810,000 required hospitalization, while deaths ranged from 12,000 to 62,000 a year. The annual healthcare cost attributed to the flu has been estimated at over $10 billion. During the 2019-2020 season, there were over 34,000 deaths reported, of which 200 were children.

The impact of the measures aimed at COVID-19 was to reduce the US death toll from ordinary influenza from 34,000 to 600, a staggering 98 to 99 percent. Child deaths dropped from 200 to only one. If similar proportions, as estimated by the World Health Organization, apply to the annual world mortality from influenza, some 250,000 to 500,000 lives may have been saved in 2020.

Influenza-associated Pediatric Mortality (Source: CDC)

This has not yet been documented, but may well be the case. In a report published on April 29, 2021 in the Scientific American, headlined, “Flu has disappeared worldwide during the COVID pandemic,” every region across the globe, from North and South America to Oceania, has seen the near complete eradication of the influenza virus. Numerous doctors reported no longer sending specimens for testing, believing the flu was not circulating in the population.

On February 26, 2021, the WHO made its recommendation for the composition of the influenza virus vaccine in the 2021-2022 northern hemisphere influenza season: a quadrivalent vaccine against the H1N1, H3N2, B/Victoria and B/Yamagata strains, using the limited number of cases they analyzed.

Each year the WHO provides recommendations based on the antigenic drift that occurs in these viruses, necessitating a constant updating. As the Scientific American report noted, “With fewer virus particles circulating in the world, there is less chance of an upcoming mutation, so it is possible the 2021-2022 vaccine will prove extra effective.”

History of influenza epidemics and pandemics

Influenza epidemics and pandemics have been present since human civilizations first began chronicling these natural events. The name of the viral infection, influenza, originated in the 15th century in Italy from an epidemic they attributed to the “influence of the stars.” The first documented influenza pandemic occurred in 1510, beginning in East Asia and then spreading to North Africa and later Europe.

After 1700, with advances in science, technology and social organization, understanding of the flu grew incrementally. The first flu pandemic in the 18th century started in 1729 in Russia, spreading thereafter across the globe over a period of three years in distinct waves. There were at least four influenza pandemics in the 19th century, three in the 20th century, including the Spanish flu of 1918 that killed upwards of 50 million people, and one so far in the 21st century.

In 1931, an American virologist and naval officer by the name of Richard Edwin Shope and his mentor Paul A. Lewis were the first to isolate influenza virus A from pigs. By 1933, it was established that the virus was responsible for human influenza. Influenza B virus was discovered in 1940.

Soon after, with the support of the US Army, the first flu vaccine was developed, which was finally licensed in 1945 in the United States. But by 1947 investigators had determined that frequent changes in the antigenic composition of the virus rendered existing vaccines ineffective, requiring continuous surveillance and characterization of circulating viruses and annual modifications to the vaccines.

The World Health Organization was established a year later, with one of its initial major tasks being influenza research and surveillance. By 1952, the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) was established to monitor the evolution of influenza viruses.

The flu seasons recur annually during the winter months of the affected hemisphere. In the United States, the season begins in October and lasts until May, reaching its highs in February. By comparison, the season begins in May in Australia, peaking in August and concluding in October. For other countries in the Southern Hemisphere—South Africa, Argentina, and Chile—the season begins later in June. The tropics and subtropics have more complex seasonality.

The disappearance of the flu is a remarkable thing for the possibilities it raises in the approach to respiratory pathogens. Public health measures, applied too inconsistently to eradicate COVID-19, did succeed in effectively eradicating the seasonal flu, at least in the United States. The half-million people who have died each year of influenza worldwide were all potentially avoidable deaths.

The example of influenza vindicates the principled scientists who have been calling for the eradication of the coronavirus. If halfhearted measures could eliminate the flu, a full mobilization of social resources, with testing, contact tracing and social distancing, and a society-wide lockdown with full economic support for working families and small businesses, could have done the same for COVID-19. They could still do so yet, if the working class intervenes on the basis of this program.

As it is now, with vaccine administration beginning to stall in high-income nations, herd immunity through vaccination will most likely not be achievable. Left to their own devices, the ruling classes throughout the world will facilitate the coronavirus becoming endemic, just another virus that humanity has to learn to live and also die with, with appalling consequences.

Influenza, an airborne virus

It is indisputable that the limited measures employed to stem the tide of COVID-19 infections had an extraordinary impact in stopping the flu almost completely. This is because the coronavirus and influenza virus share the same mode of transmission. They are both airborne pathogens, despite the insistence to the contrary by various official national and international public health agencies that ignored the preponderance of evidence that has been published to date.

One of the first studies that documented airborne transmission of the flu was published in 1979, examining an outbreak that occurred on a commercial jet plane.

On the morning of March 14, 1977, an aircraft en route from Anchorage, Alaska to Kodiak, Alaska, was delayed on the ground in Homer (an intermediate stop) for three hours after an aborted takeoff due to engine failure. A 21-year-old female passenger who had boarded in Homer became acutely ill with the flu soon after boarding. There were five crew members and 49 other passengers waiting on the tarmac for repairs to be accomplished. The ventilation system on board was inoperative during the delay.

The next day several passengers reported to a physician with symptoms of severe respiratory syndrome that included high fevers, headaches, chills, and muscle aches. Two required hospitalization. The public health authorities were notified of the outbreak, and an investigation was commenced.

None of the passengers who had deplaned in Homer fell ill. Of the 53 passengers and crew aboard the grounded plane, 38 (72 percent) developed the flu within a day-and-a-half of their exposure. The attack rate was highest for those that spent the longest time on the plane. Of the 38 cases, 31 provided specimens for viral culture, of which eight were positive for the influenza A virus.

The authors of the study concluded that prolonged exposure to the index case, the young woman, in the setting of a non-functioning ventilation system, contributed to the high attack rate. They also surmised that large aerosols produced by the ill passenger may have contributed to the high number of infections.

In the last decade research has shown that the influenza virus is airborne and passed in closed spaces with shared air as an infected individual is able to spread contaminated particles throughout an area just by breathing.

In a Nature study published in June of 2013, titled, “Aerosol transmission is an important mode of influenza A virus spread,” the authors found that influenza A virus via aerosol transmission in Hong Kong and Bangkok households was the predominant mode of transmission, accounting for approximately half of all new cases, “suggesting that influenza A virus transmission among household members may not be controlled by interventions against contact or droplet transmission.”

Between 2012 and 2013 Dr. Donald Milton, professor of environmental health, and his research team at the University of Maryland School of Public Health took breath samples from 142 people infected with influenza virus. Using the Gesundheit II machine, their breath samples were taken while engaging in natural breathing, talking, coughing, and sneezing over three days. Milton’s team found that those infected contaminated the air around them with infection by just breathing.

The watershed study and its findings proved that handwashing, surface cleaning, and covering coughs and sneezes, the usual methods for treating droplet-borne infections, were insufficient at preventing the spread of influenza. They determined that the influenza virus was airborne, and demonstrated that the only way to prevent the spread of the virus was to avoid public spaces and stay home.

Milton stated in a university news article, “People with flu generate infectious aerosols (tiny droplets that stay suspended in the air for a long time) even when they are not coughing, and especially during the first days of illness. So when someone is coming down with influenza, they should go home and not remain in the workplace and infect others.”

“The study findings suggest that keeping surfaces clean, washing our hands all the time, and avoiding people who are coughing does not provide complete protection from getting the flu,” said Sheryl Ehrman, dean of the Charles W. Davidson College of Engineering at San José State University. “Staying home and out of public spaces could make a difference in the spread of the influenza virus.”

In 2018 her team published the often-cited paper Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The paper stated that, “We provide overwhelming evidence that humans generate infectious aerosols and quantitative data to improve mathematical models of transmission and public health interventions. We show that sneezing is rare and not important for—and that coughing is not required for—influenza virus aerosolization. Our findings, that upper and lower airway infection are independent and that fine-particle exhaled aerosols reflect infection in the lung, opened a pathway for a deeper understanding of the human biology of influenza infection and transmission.”

The research was funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the very agencies which took over 14 months to quietly acknowledge the airborne nature of SARS-CoV-2, after it had claimed over 3 million lives globally.

Science should guide social policy

Since the 1970s it has been documented in the highest scholarly journals that school-aged children are the most important vectors for community-wide transmission of influenza, with children aged 5-18 years suffering attack rates of 30-50 percent, the highest of any age group. They also shed viruses in greater quantities and for longer periods than adults. With every flu season, dozens or hundreds of children die. Children miss school and parents are often forced to find in-home care or stay home themselves. It is not without a sense of irony that the flu season begins and ends in conjunction with the school calendar.

Despite these findings, which are not news to any parent or educator, or to medical professionals, there have been no major efforts to upgrade ventilation systems and improve air quality for schools, classrooms or workplaces. Instead, the past 50 years have seen a widespread attack on public education. Crumbling infrastructure, increasing class sizes and dilapidated schools have become the norm, where indoor air quality is deemed some of the worst.

One of the clearest proof-of-concept studies recently published came out of Taiwan. At an undisclosed university in the suburbs of Taipei, a TB outbreak involving 27 cases with 1,665 contacts in under-ventilated buildings was investigated. Knowing the pathogen was transmitted via aerosol, ventilation engineers worked to decrease the maximum level of CO2 allowed from 3,200 parts per million to 600. The secondary attack rate dropped to zero after a follow-up of six years. By improving ventilation to keep down levels of CO2, which is a proxy for air exchanges, there was a 97 percent decrease in TB infections, highlighting the critical importance of adequate indoor ventilation.

The research in the preceding 50 years and the 2020-2021 influenza season confirms that mankind has the ability to understand and eradicate a virus which has plagued the globe for 500 years and claims hundreds of thousands of deaths annually. Additionally, there has been a dramatic decline in childhood diseases such as chickenpox, various stomach viruses and strep throat. There is no disease or virus that the human race must “live with.”

Frederick Engels, in his Dialectics of Nature, describes mankind’s uniqueness in being able to understand and to control his environment. Inherent in this is an understanding of the social production in which humanity takes part and the necessity to rationally reorganize this production:

Historical evolution makes such an organization daily more indispensable, but also with every day more possible. From it will date a new epoch of history, in which mankind itself, and with mankind all branches of its activity, and especially natural science, will experience an advance that will put everything preceding it in the deepest shade.

The only way for humanity to proceed forward, in light of the incalculable suffering and horrific human death toll which has not abated, is to throw down the gauntlet on the capitalist mode of production once and for all, which has prioritized the interests of a financial oligarchy and has sacrificed over 3.6 million people to a virus that mankind has all the scientific knowledge and advancements to rid itself of.

That the often-deadly influenza virus, which has plagued civilization for centuries, could so easily be vanquished should provoke us to ask, “What are the possibilities?” Humanity has only scratched the surface of what can be done. It is not lack of knowledge, but the capitalist system and the profit interests of the ruling class that stand in the way.

New COVID-19 wave in Taiwan exposes government’s lack of preparation

Ben McGrath


After more than a year of being held up as a model for its response to the global pandemic, Taiwan’s medical system is being overrun by a surge in COVID-19 cases. As of Thursday, there were 9,974 confirmed cases on the island, including 366 new cases the previous day. Nearly 9,000 of those infections have occurred since mid-May.

The Taipei Doctors’ Union warned in a Facebook post on May 27, “The coronavirus situation in the greater Taipei area continues to worsen, with an acute shortage of isolation beds and wards, as well as the [specialized] staff to run them.” It continued, “If this isn't breaking point for the healthcare system, then we don't know what is.” The statement warned that hospitals were facing a shortage of negative pressure and isolation wards, with general hospital wards being used instead, putting staff and other patients at risk of infection.

On May 28, Singapore-based doctor Lim Wooi Tee, an epidemic prevention specialist, appeared on the Taiwanese talk show “50 Era Money” to call for a total lockdown on the island. In the interview, Lim blamed the government of President Tsai Ing-wen for wasting more than a year in preparing for an outbreak. He stated, “Taiwan is more vulnerable than any other country in the world.”

The latest outbreak demonstrates that there was nothing exceptional about Taipei’s initial response to the virus. What actions the Taiwanese ruling class did take were generated by fears that a botched response to the pandemic could fuel social discontent after widespread anger over its handling of the 2002–2004 SARS epidemic.

Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen, center, walks to her inauguration ceremony in Taipei, Taiwan, Wednesday, May 20, 2020 (Taiwan Presidential Office via AP)

In January 2020, just as the pandemic was beginning, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party government of President Tsai Ing-wen accused China of lacking transparency and used the outbreak, with Washington’s support, to challenge the “One China” policy and call for inclusion in the World Health Organization (WHO). Under the “One China” doctrine, internationally accepted since the 1970s, Beijing is effectively recognised as the legitimate government of all China, including Taiwan.

Tsai’s accusations were aimed at drumming up anti-mainland sentiment, a campaign that is now being escalated by Washington, as well as Taipei, to ratchet up pressure on Beijing, risking war.

The outbreak also reveals that no country is safe from the pandemic as long as the virus is allowed to move freely anywhere in the world. It shows the necessity of maintaining scientifically mandated restrictions in order to eliminate the virus. However, Taipei, like every other capitalist government, chooses to prioritize big business profits at the expense of the working class and the poor.

Workers in the service, transportation, and tourist industries are being particularly hard hit as gatherings of five or more people are banned and many public facilities are closed. As of Tuesday, there were 445 companies that had implemented unpaid leave programs, up from 414 the previous week. Some 4,125 workers have been reported as furloughed without pay while other workers have had their salaries slashed. These statistics are likely an undercounting of the real situation.

Restrictions do not apply to the manufacturing sector. In Hsinchu city, where the industry-leading Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company is based, workers are being forced to stay on the job, leaving them exposed to the virus. Semiconductors are a major component in weaponry, and therefore considered vital in the war plans of the United States.

Workers may never see even the meager relief packages from the government as they are paid through the companies. Chairwoman of the Taoyuan Confederation of Trade Unions (TYCTU) Chu Mei-hsueh stated recently, “[W]e see that the government’s proposed economic relief packages are mostly the same as last year’s—they have to go through companies and bosses. Workers will again end up not receiving relief funds, because many employers would not report furloughed workers to the government when ordered to close for business.”

The TYCTU, a leading union confederation in Taiwan, portrays itself as a radical workers’ organization, but has played the central role in isolating strikes over recent years and preventing the development of a movement of the working class.

The TYCTU and its affiliated Taoyuan Flight Attendants Union were behind the sellout of the 17-day strike by EVA Air flight attendants in 2019, the longest in the history of Taiwan’s airlines. The sellout was all the more treacherous as airline workers around the world had been striking and staging industrial actions at that time. While issuing toothless complaints over the government’s current policies, the TYCTU has not organised any action against them.

The current outbreak also has broader international significance, particularly as the United States has attempted to leverage Taiwan as a tool against Beijing and to challenge the “One China” policy, under which countries recognize that Taiwan is a part of China. Last year, during the Trump administration, Washington backed Taipei’s attempt to gain observer status in the WHO, claiming that Taiwan was a positive force in the fight against COVID-19 while falsely accusing Beijing of being responsible for the pandemic.

The same geopolitical considerations underlie Japan’s recent pledge to donate vaccines to Taiwan. Tokyo entered into negotiations with AstraZeneca to send 1.2 million of its 120 million vaccine supply purchased from the company to Taiwan, even though the initial contract Japan signed with AstraZeneca bars it from exporting vaccines overseas. Tokyo could announce a finalized deal as soon as Friday. Beijing denounced Japan’s actions, with Foreign Ministry Spokesman Wang Wenbin saying on May 31, “We firmly oppose the use of the pandemic for a political show.”

Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi stated Thursday, “At a time of trouble, we need to help each other.” However, there is nothing altruistic about Tokyo’s motivations. Members of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party have called for supplying Taiwan with the vaccine in order to undermine Beijing. While countries like the United States have hoarded vaccines, China has offered to supply countries with its own vaccine, leading to accusations that Beijing is engaged in “vaccine diplomacy” to expand its influence.

Taipei, however, is engaged in its own version of “vaccine diplomacy.” Taipei has accused Beijing of interfering in a deal that fell through in January with drug maker BioNTech to supply vaccines. Beijing has denied this. According to Taiwan’s Health Minister Chen Shih-chung on May 27, BioNTech requested Taiwan remove the word “country” from the press release on the vaccine deal scheduled for January 8. The insertion of the word “country” was a clear attempt at undermining the “One China” policy. Taiwan supposedly offered to tweak the wording, but BioNTech still backed away from the deal.

500 jobs threatened by closure of McVitie’s factory in Glasgow, Scotland

John Vassilopoulos


Closure of the McVitie’s biscuit factory in Glasgow threatens the loss of nearly 500 jobs. McVitie’s owner Pladis Global announced in May that the factory has been earmarked for closure in the latter half of next year, pending a 90-day “consultation process”.

The Tollcross factory, which produces many popular brands of biscuit including Hobnobs and Rich Tea opened in 1925 and has been a major source of employment in an area blighted by joblessness and social deprivation.

The McVities biscuit factory in Tollcross, Glasgow (credit: WSWS media)

Speaking to The Sunday Post weekly, Kirsteen Paterson, an industrial baker who has worked at the plant for 22 years, said, “Closure would be terrible for the area, the city and for hundreds of families. People would lose out on so much, not just a wage. Friendships, working relationships, will all be gone. These are the things which help bind us together and keeps communities together. To lose them tears at the fabric of society… If the factory closes, so many options are lost for people. I moved to the area when I was 24 and this was an opportunity for me. This work is so important and what is being planned is tremendously unjust.”

McVitie’s biscuits was established as a brand in Scotland in the 19th century. It is one of several confectionery brands owned by UK-based Pladis Global, a subsidiary of Turkish corporation Yıldız Holding Conglomerate. Yıldız acquired the McVitie’s brand in 2014 as part of its purchase of United Biscuits and set up Pladis in 2016 to bring together all its confectionary-based companies (Ulker, Godiva, United Biscuits and DeMet’s Candy Company) under one umbrella.

Pladis, whose parent company has received some £1 million in publicly funded grants, cited “excess capacity” across its plants in the UK as the reason for closing the Tollcross site.

This is belied by Pladis’ own figures in its 2020 Annual Biscuit Review report, published at the end of March. According to the report, six out of the top 10 biscuit brands in terms of sales were dominated by McVitie’s, all of which saw significant growth in revenue during the year. This had been largely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, which saw more people working from home, with a marked increase in the consumption of cakes and biscuits.

McVitie’s chocolate digestives topped the list, with UK sales of £104.5 million, up by 20.5 percent compared to 2019. Pladis Global’s latest accounts recorded £2.1 billion in revenue in 2019, and a profit of £153.8 million. 2020 was likely even more profitable given the increase in revenue cited in the report.

The cost of this bonanza has been borne by McVitie’s workers, who risked their lives by continuing to work in unsafe conditions throughout that pandemic, having been classified as “key workers”. The Tollcross site itself was hit by a coronavirus outbreak in October last year with around 30 workers testing positive.

According to reports, the closure of Tollcross will see additional capacity shifted to the McVitie’s plant in Carlisle. This will no doubt result in speed-ups and the increased exploitation of the remaining workers, with ever-higher growth targets being serviced by a scaled-back workforce.

This is part of a global process. The ruling class in every country is using the pandemic as a pretext for a massive assault on workers’ conditions, fuelling the growth of their already obscene fortunes. Last year, the collective wealth of the world’s billionaires increased by more than 60 percent. This looting of society is epitomised by Yildiz’s CEO and Turkey’s richest man, Murat Ulker, whose wealth—according to Forbes’ latest Rich List—jumped from $4.3 billion in 2020 to $6.3 billion in 2021.

The loss of the McVitie’s factory would continue decades of industrial devastation. Tollcross once hosted thousands of jobs, with the Tollcross Steel Tube Works forming part of the large steelworks operation at Clyde Iron Works and Clydebridge Steelworks. In its heyday, the operation employed over 2,000 workers.

Decades of de-industrialisation overseen by successive Labour, Conservative and devolved Scottish National Party (SNP) governments have decimated the living standards of Glasgow’s working class ever since. According to figures for 2019 published by the Office for National Statistics, 24.1 percent of all households in Glasgow are classed as “workless”, over 10 percent higher than the UK average. The economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will have made this situation even worse.

The SNP and the trade unions are seeking to channel opposition to the McVitie’s factory’s closure into bankrupt appeals to the Conservative government in Westminster.

Speaking in the British parliament on May 19, SNP MP for East Glasgow David Linden called on Prime Minister Boris Johnson to prevent “economic Armageddon on a very fragile part of the local economy.” Following Johnson’s empty platitudes about the plight of the Tollcross workers, Linden stated, “when we said that we’d leave no stone unturned to try and save this factory, we genuinely meant it and that includes working cross-party to save Tollcross. Engaging the Prime Minister as we try to get Pladis to think again is going to be really crucial in terms of escalating this to executives in Turkey.”

The trade union bureaucracy in Scotland has enthusiastically supported this corporatist exercise. Two days after Linden spoke in parliament, GMB Scotland—one of the two trade unions, alongside Unite Scotland, representing workers at the factory—organised a small protest at Tollcross park near the factory site. In his opening address to the crowd, GMB Scotland Secretary Gary Smith made clear the unions have no intention of mobilising their members in a fight to defend jobs but will function as an industrial police force, keeping workers in line to ensure “cross-party support”. The line-up of speakers included Linden, Pauline McNeill, a Labour member of the Scottish Parliament for Glasgow and Thomas Kerr, a local Conservative councillor.

The culmination of these efforts is the establishing of the Pladis Action Group, whose first meeting was co-chaired on May 27 by the Scottish Government’s Finance Minister Kate Forbes and Glasgow City Council leader Susan Aitken, both from the SNP. Following the meeting, Forbes stated, “We had a really positive discussion with the trade unions, Scottish Enterprise, Skills Development Scotland and Clyde Gateway, and everyone is absolutely focused on the task ahead.”

At the demonstration, McVitie’s worker Sharon Henratty told the press, “They've got an absolute cheek to say they've to shut it. We were essential workers and now we're un-essential.” Local resident Ben McKee said the closure would have a “massive impact”. “It's not just the jobs in the factory, it's the jobs outwith the factory as well. You've got all your shops and cafes on Tollcross Road. It's a knock-on effect that I don't think people realise.”

A petition opposing the closure has already attracted nearly 52,000 signatures.

Workers at Tollcross can place no confidence in the corporatist machinations of the trade unions. Any counter-proposal acceptable to Pladis management will inevitably include job losses and attacks on the wages and conditions of the remaining staff. To take the fight forward, workers at the site must form their own rank-and-file committee, independent of the pro-company trade unions who will only work to isolate their struggle.

Appeals for support should be made to the 4,200 workers in McVitie’s factories across Britain, as well as to workers in the local community. Above all, workers at Tolcross must seek to mobilise the 16,000 workers employed by Pladis across its 25 factories in 11 different countries. Against the global operation run by Pladis, workers must establish their own international organisation drawing on the strength of their class brothers and sisters across the world.

Delta variant of COVID-19 dominant in UK, spreading rapidly with millions still unvaccinated

Robert Stevens


The highly contagious variant of COVID-19 which originated in India, now named the Delta variant by the World Health Organisation, is officially the dominant strain in Britain and is spreading rapidly.

On Thursday, Public Health England announced that the number of laboratory-confirmed Delta coronavirus cases had risen by 79 percent over the last week to 12,431 and overtaken the number of cases of the Kent, or Alpha, variant.

Passengers on the London Underground this week (credit: WSWS media)

The government has gone into overdrive to portray the virus as under control, claiming that its vaccine rollout means everything must still be allowed to return to normal. But not only is the Delta variant on the rampage, on Thursday the government admitted that a Nepalese strain of the Delta variant which has acquired a new mutation is present in the UK.

Delta was first detected in Britain on April 1, but the government did not make its existence public until April 15, of a piece with its overriding aim of doing nothing to prevent a further opening of the economy.

This reckless reopening, ongoing for months and set to be completed in less than three weeks on June 21, has allowed a comparatively successful vaccination rollout to be derailed by the spread of a highly contagious variant. On May 17, most of the economy was reopened, including cafes, restaurants, gyms, cinemas and most non-essential sectors.

Cases of Delta infections and deaths have been steadily increasing from a base of just a few infections. For the last seven days there have been at least 3,000 cases daily. On Friday May 28 this reached 4,000 cases and by Thursday had reached nearly 6,000 daily cases (5,774)—the highest number since the UK was still under a limited national lockdown in late March. On Friday, new cases reached a new high of 6,238. Deaths from Covid have also begun to rise again from the zero deaths reported on Monday—a figure the media insisted justified ending remaining lockdown restrictions without delay. Twelve deaths were reported on Wednesday, 18 on Thursday and 11 Friday.

More dramatically at this point, coronavirus cases are on the increase in all but three regions of Britain, with the R (reproduction) rate rising to between 1 and 1.2—up from between 1 and 1.1 last week. Delta cases are rising at among their fastest rate in London, with the Evening Standard reporting Friday that more than two thirds of Covid-19 cases in the capital are believed to be the Delta strain.

According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), there was a 76.5 percent surge in coronavirus cases nationally in the week to May 29. Announcing its weekly survey yesterday, the ONS said that one in 640 people (86,000) in private households in England had COVID-19 in the week to May 29—up from one in 1,120 (48,500) in the previous week.

Cases appear to be rising even faster among Scotland’s 5 million population. On Thursday, Scottish National Party First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced another 992 people had tested positive—the highest daily figure since February 17—with new Covid cases more than tripling in the last month.

All the evidence shows that the Delta variant is, as feared, far more transmissible than the Alpha (Kent) variant discovered last year, which quickly became dominant in the UK and spread rapidly around the globe.

On Thursday, Neil Ferguson, a leading epidemiologist at Imperial College London and previously a member of the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), warned on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that Delta is “between about 30 percent and maybe even up to 100 percent more transmissible.” Data was pointing in a “negative direction” and “The best estimate at the moment is this variant may be 60 percent more transmissible than the Alpha [Kent] variant.”

Ferguson is derided in the right-wing media as “Professor Lockdown”. His warnings that the government’s declared herd immunity agenda could result in up to 500,000 deaths were central in forcing the first lockdown last year.

If it transpires that the transmissibility of Delta is in the order of 60 percent higher, this could have a catastrophic impact under conditions in which only 50 percent of the population is fully vaccinated and virtually all children and millions of adults under 40 totally unvaccinated. According to SAGE modelling, a strain of COVID that is 50 percent or more transmissible than the Kent strain will lead to between 10,000 and 20,000 hospital admissions per day by the summer and 1,000 deaths daily by August. SAGE predicted that such numbers would rapidly overwhelm the National Health Service. Ten thousand hospitalisations a day is more than double the UK peak of hospitalisations in the pandemic so far.

In its technical briefing issued Thursday, Public Health England estimated that the Delta variant is as much as 2.5 times more likely to lead to hospitalisations than the Alpha (Kent) variant.

This could have further terrible consequences under conditions in which an estimated 1 million people in private households in the UK reported experiencing “long Covid” in the four weeks to May 2. Of these, over a third (376,000) contracted the virus, or thought they were first infected, over a year ago.

Of extreme concern, on Thursday the Francis Crick Institute and the UCLH Biomedical Research Centre published a study noting that the current generation of vaccines may be on the point of being outstripped by the new variants. Those who have received two doses of the Pfizer vaccine had levels of neutralising antibodies that were more than five times lower against the Delta variant when compared to the original strain. For those who had only received one dose, antibody levels against Delta were even lower. Moreover, the levels of antibodies were lower with increasing age and those levels dropped over time.

One Pfizer jab resulted in 79 percent of people having a quantifiable neutralising antibody response against the original strain. Against the Alpha (Kent) strain this fell to 50 percent, to 32 percent for the Delta strain and as low as 25 percent for the Beta (South African) strain.

Throughout the pandemic, the government, aided by the Labour Party and the trade unions, have insisted that schools were not vectors of transmission and that children and educators should be in classrooms so parents can go to work and generate profits for the corporations.

Yet again these lies are being refuted. Public Health England data this week covering April 26 to May 30 showed 140 cases of the Delta variant already in schools. At the end of April there were just three Delta clusters in primary and secondary schools, but by the end of May this had shot up to 39 clusters. With a total of 97 outbreaks in schools with at least one of the variants detected, this equates to around one in 250 schools nationally.

Professor Christina Pagel, director of the clinical operational research unit at University College London, told the Guardian the figures were evidence that schools were now “a major source” of transmission.

Just a few days after Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he saw no reason not to plough on to remove “all legal limits on social contact” on June 21, the government was forced to take Portugal off its “green list” of holiday destinations due partly to what Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said was the discovery of a “Nepal mutation of the so-called Indian variant”. Shapps said that at this stage it could not be ruled out that the mutation is “vaccine defeating”.

On Thursday, it was announced that all UK holidaymakers currently in Portugal had to return to the UK by Tuesday and undergo 10 days of quarantining.

A small number of Delta variants, including the Nepalese, have an extra mutation, K417N, of which around 90 cases have been identified worldwide—12 in Portugal, 36 in the UK, 12 in the US and four in India. According to virus sequencing by Public Health England, there may in fact be 43 cases in Britain.

Despite the emerging public health disaster, the government still insists that its June 21 “Liberation Day” must go ahead, only offering the “advice” that people work from home if possible.

Dutch caretaker government accelerates lifting of social-distancing measures

Parwini Zora


Like its US and UK counterparts, the Dutch government is accelerating its scrapping of remaining social-distancing measures, following a rapid ease of restrictions since April 28, risking a surge of infections come summer. “In fact, this is the end of the lockdown,” said Prime Minister Rutte at a televised press conference on May 28.

Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte (Wikimedia Commons)

Starting today, restaurants are allowed to serve indoors with a maximum of 30 socially distanced customers. At the same time, cinemas, theatres and museums will reopen to those with bookings. Private homes will able to have four guests rather than the current two a day. Secondary schools are also to reopen by June 7, five weeks before the summer break.

“The cabinet wants to largely unlock the Netherlands sooner than planned, starting June 30,” news agency NOS reported, though most Dutch adults are still not fully vaccinated. Currently, only 9.2 million jabs have been administered, two-thirds of these being first vaccinations. The population of the Netherlands was 17.28 million in 2019, according to Eurostat.

Over the past 15 months, there have been over 1.6 million infections and at least 20,000 deaths from COVID-19 in the Netherlands. Over 2,500 infections and a dozen deaths are still recorded each day, testifying to the broad circulation of the virus. Yet the government has moved up the launch of its so-called “third phase” of reopening by four days, to June 5, pointing to a drop in new infections and fatalities late last month, even as more virulent strains of the virus, like the so-called Indian variant, spread internationally.

It is yet another indication of the subservience of the entire Dutch political establishment to big business, the Amsterdam stock exchange and the demands of the far right.

An estimated 140,000 routine hospital operations were reportedly delayed as hospitals were flooded with COVID-19 cases. The Dutch communal health services (GGD) issued a statement signed by the public health directors from the 25 GGD branches declaring that they are short at least €600 million a year to sustain routine health care. “Basic care is too impoverished,” continued the GGD, adding that “the lesson of the pandemic is that basic care has not been sufficiently funded.”

But US pharmaceutical firm Pfizer has used a letterbox company in Capelle aan den Ijssel in Zuid-Holland to hold $36 billion of its annual revenue last year and avoid paying tax on windfall vaccine profits, the investigative journalism platform Follow the Money revealed. Although Pfizer develops medicines and vaccines based on publicly-funded research, it had paid little tax, and almost no tax in the Netherlands, the report concluded. Pfizer’s revenue soared 42 percent in the first three months of the year. The Netherlands rank as the world’s fourth-largest tax haven.

According to a recent Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS) report, in 2020, absenteeism due to illness among employees was highest in health care, where absenteeism was always above average. This is the direct consequence of decades of austerity that led to chronic under funding of medical infrastructure and staff, leading to work overload with stagnant wages and high burn-out rates, even before the pandemic.

After frontline health care workers, the highest burnout rate for 2020 was recorded in education, for the fourth year in a row, as partial COVID-19 distancing measures led to rapid shifts between online and hybrid teaching that massively added to non-paid working hours for educators. Education is one of the professions most prone to burnouts: 27.4 percent of staff, compared to a national average of 17 percent, suffer from burnout complaints. Education is also plagued by acute staff shortages.

“We want to make it possible for the students to go to school for at least another six weeks before the summer holidays start,” outgoing Education Minister Aire Slob declared at a press conference, echoing the position of Rutte, a vocal advocate of “back to school” policies.

Secondary schools are to give all students in-person lessons five days a week starting May 31, which will be mandatory across all Dutch provinces by June 7. At school, students are only to keep their distance from teachers and staff, and not from each other. Face masks will be mandatory only in school hallways.

Across the English Channel, British schools are already seeing rising COVID-19 outbreaks, despite the roll-out of the vaccine, since Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative government lifted most restrictions on May 17.

According to NOS, many secondary school teachers hesitate to stand in front of full classes. “Many employees in education are concerned about their health,” declared Henrik de Moel, director of the General Union of Educational Personnel (Algemene Onderwijsbond, Aob). De Moel noted that “not everyone has had their turn for even the first vaccination.”

The unions have worked closely with the Rutte government, however, to block strike action and subordinate workers in education and other sectors to Rutte’s policy of allowing the virus to spread. They declared that they feel “forced to advise” teachers of their right to collectively invoke the Working Conditions Act, if necessary, to protect themselves. The Aob blandly added that “in recent weeks, many colleagues in secondary education have expressed serious concerns about their safety if the schools were to reopen fully without proper measures.”

Continuing to posture in order to avoid strikes, a consortium of five education unions (AOb, CNV Onderwijs, FvOv, FNV Overheid and Leraren in Actie), has submitted a joint letter to the Dutch House of Representatives. It respectfully noted the “concern” felt by the unions that it would be best if secondary schools reopened fully after the summer holidays, and not before.

The unions’ one-and-a-half page document endorsed the policy of the European Union and the Rutte government to let the virus circulate in workplaces and schools, asserting that “currently the situation at the schools is manageable, as pupils go to school on average for 2.5 days.”

On the other hand, Dutch magazine Quote 500 has released its 2020 list of the richest people in the Netherlands: the wealth of the 500 richest in the country rose by €6 billion from 2019 to 2020, to €186 billion. More than half (265) increased their wealth over the past year, as millions were plunged into poverty across Europe. The Netherlands had 38 billionaires by the end of 2020—five more than in 2019—led by beer mogul Charlene de Carvalho-Heineken, with €12.1 billion in recorded assets.

French scientist tries to silence whistle-blower over discredited COVID-19 hydroxychloroquine claims

Samuel Tissot


French microbiologist Dr. Didier Raoult, who published a now-discredited paper in March 2020 claiming that hydroxychloroquine was effective at treating COVID-19, has threatened legal action against scientists criticizing his research. These include Elizabeth Bik, the whistleblower who first exposed methodological inconsistencies in Raoult’s research, and Boris Barbour, who runs the not-for-profit website Pubpeer allowing scientists to review each other’s work.

Dr. Didier Raoult (AP Photo/Christophe Ena)

On May 18, an open letter supporting Bik against Raoult’s attack titled “Scientists stand up to protect academic whistleblowers and post-publication peer review” was published. It has since been signed by over 1,000 scientists across the globe, working across multiple disciplines.

Elizabeth Bik is a microbiologist and research integrity specialist whose work investigating academic misconduct has led to more than 170 paper retractions and exposed more than 4,000 cases of duplication, data manipulation, plagiarism, and ethical breaches. On March 24, 2020, Bik published a blog post that exposed a number of inconsistencies with Raoult’s March 17 paper, which claimed treatment with the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine significantly increased the chance of survival for patients with severe cases of COVID-19.

Bik raised a number of methodological concerns within Raoult’s study. This included the removal of one subject who had died and two who had become too ill to receive treatment during the study from his results, raising suspicions that Raoult cherry-picked data to support the finding that the drug was effective against COVID-19. Bik also found that the study began on March 5, one day before it received official clearance from the French Ethics Committee on March 6, and that Raoult’s paper was peer-reviewed in just 24 hours, a process that usually takes weeks. Bik also unearthed an undeclared conflict of interest: one of paper’s co-authors, J. M. Rolain, was the editor-in-chief of the journal to which it was rapidly accepted.

Bik then began reviewing Raoult’s other work and ultimately flagged concerns with 62 more of Raoult’s papers. This led to an angry response from Raoult and his colleagues.

Raoult has denounced Bik on Twitter as a “witch-hunter,” “nutcase,” and “failed researcher,” while his colleague Eric Chabrière described her as a “dung-beetle.” Raoult later accused Bik of trying to blackmail him without any evidence and denounced her on national television. He also took the thuggish decision to publish Bik’s personal address to his followers on Twitter.

On April 29, Raoult’s lawyers sent a letter to Nature claiming they have filed a lawsuit against Bik, accusing her “of aggravated moral harassment, attempted blackmail and attempted extortion.” Bik is yet to receive any notification of legal action, however. It is unclear whether Raoult and his lawyers intend to continue the case, or if the letter was only an attempt to intimidate Bik into self-censorship with the threat of legal action.

Bik maintains her innocence and has refused to withdraw her criticisms despite these attacks. She responded to Raoult’s action by asking, “Why doesn’t he show me proof that I am wrong? I would be happy to accept that,” adding, “Science should be discussed in the scientific arena, not the legal one.”

Didier Raoult is a controversial figure within scientific circles. While his groundbreaking research has led to the discovery of hundreds of new types of viruses, he has complained of the “dictatorship of the methodologists” and dismissed the importance of randomized trials for objective experimentation. He is currently under investigation following a complaint last November by a group representing 500 specialists of France’s Infectious Diseases society, accusing him of breaking nine rules of the doctors’ code of ethics.

In France, he won popular sympathy early in the pandemic by insisting that people be treated, commendably providing free tests at his institute for anyone that showed up. At that time, he rejected a “herd immunity” policy of letting coronavirus spread unchecked and told the government that a firm test-and-trace strategy was essential to eliminate the virus. President Emmanuel Macron responded to Raoult’s rising influence and profile in the media by bringing him on as a scientific advisor.

Unfortunately, Raoult increasingly tailored his statements to what was politically acceptable to Macron. In May 2020, he stated that the virus was naturally coming to an end and that “nowhere do we see a second wave.” Despite mounting evidence schools were drivers of the pandemic, Raoult advised Macron that children are not significant spreaders of the virus, paving the way for the premature reopening of schools on May 11, 2020.

In December 2020, Raoult dismissed COVID-19 vaccines, which had proven highly effective in clinical trials, as “science fiction and, above all, as publicity.” He made a right-wing comment opposing mandatory vaccination, saying: “If we played around with making vaccines mandatory, there would be a revolution. Luckily we haven’t done that.” In fact, universal vaccination against the virus is a critical component of an international public health policy to halt the pandemic.

Raoult’s harassment of Bik has been denounced by scientists around the world. An open letter defending Bik states that Raoult’s “strategy of harassments and threats is creating a chilling effect for whistleblowers and for scholarly criticism more generally.”

Lonni Besançon, a co-author of the open letter and computer scientist in Australia, told Nature, “Investigating someone’s research is definitely not harassment. This is a scientific question, this should not fall onto the legal system to figure out.” A spokesperson for Pubpeer, the other target of Raoult’s threatened lawsuit, stated: “A successful legal action could have a chilling effect on post-publication peer review.”

Bik’s exposure of Raoult and his bullying response raise important scientific and political issues regarding scientific integrity.

At the beginning of the pandemic, Bik was joined by a host of other scientists expressing concern over research advocating the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19. This included Paul Garner, the editor of the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group, who told the BMJ (formerly, British Medical Journal ) that, “they [hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine] could do harm” and “there is absolutely no evidence that chloroquine is effective in people infected with the coronavirus.”

Nevertheless, after the first lockdowns in the spring of 2020, Raoult’s research was endorsed by capitalist politicians seeking to promote all and any “cures,” regardless of their efficacy, in order to impose a quick end to lockdowns and return to work to boost corporate profits. Then-US president Donald Trump hailed Raoult’s work as “very good” and hydroxychloroquine treatment of COVID-19 as “the biggest game changer in the history of medicine.” The drug was also promoted by Brazil’s fascistic president, Jair Bolsonaro.

The adoption of “herd immunity” policies that have led to the deaths of millions have relied in no small part on constant offensives by state officials to mislead the public about scientific data. This underscores the critical importance of free scientific discussion, unhampered by any threats of legal action or violence in the pursuit of the truth.

In France, which will surpass 110,000 deaths by the end of the week, Macron has declared war on scientists, repeatedly ignoring their calls for lockdown and denouncing their “incessant tracking of errors.” Macron’s adviser Stéphane Séjourné even went as far to denounce the “uncontrolled and suffocating interventions of scientists” in January of this year. The targeting of scientists like Bik for pursuing scientific investigation of existing research only worsens this toxic atmosphere and hampers the fight to inform the public about the coronavirus.

East Timor’s coronavirus pandemic worsens

Patrick O’Connor


East Timor has seen a significant increase in daily coronavirus infection rates, with the impoverished South East Asian country last month recording an official seven-day average of between 100 and 200 over the past four weeks.

AstraZeneca vaccinations at Dili Plaza (Source: WSWS Media)

This is the highest registered in the country during the pandemic. East Timor has an official tally of 7,310 infections since the beginning of the pandemic, but 2,396 of these occurred between May 19 and June 1.

The real rate of infection spread is almost certainly significantly higher than these numbers. Throughout the country, contact tracing is virtually non-existent. Testing remains limited, especially outside of the capital, Dili. Within the capital, positive tests as a proportion of the total carried out were nearly 17 percent in mid-May, indicating widespread undetected transmission.

Lockdown restrictions, initially affecting the capital Dili, were imposed in early March and remain in place. They have been undermined, however, by a series of government decisions aimed at bolstering its political position and promoting business activity.

Infection numbers in East Timor (Source: Our World in Data)

Timor’s President Francisco Guterres and Prime Minister Taur Matan Ruak have imposed a series of restrictions on movement and on social and recreational activities—but there are a number of dangerous exemptions, most notably by allowing the Catholic Church to continue to hold indoor ceremonies.

This has been absurdly defended on the grounds that the Church can help “educate” the population about the coronavirus threat. In other words, people are gathering in large numbers in enclosed places, supposedly to be informed that the most dangerous thing to do amid the pandemic is to gather in large numbers in enclosed places. The government’s decision sacrifices public health to the obscurantist priorities of the Catholic Church, which is a powerful institution in the country.

Other government decisions also threaten to create super-spreader events. Some food has been distributed to alleviate the threat of mass hunger caused by the worsening economic crisis. But this has been done in disorganised ways, with distribution centres featuring little social distancing and proper use of personal protective equipment.

There are few restrictions on economic activity. The main shopping complex in Dili was briefly closed during the initial wave of infections, but is now open, allowing large numbers of people to shop in enclosed spaces.

A lack of basic social infrastructure is hampering health efforts in numerous ways. At Dili’s busiest market, Taibessi Market, a single hand-washing station has been broken and disused for months.

East Timor is among the most impoverished countries in the world and the economic crisis triggered by the pandemic has worsened the conditions of the working class and rural poor. The government is protecting an $18 billion sovereign wealth fund, generated by the country’s oil and gas exports, while taking only the most limited measures to compensate people for lost jobs and incomes.

Many residents in Dili are still dealing with the devastating consequences of floods in March and April. The flooding triggered by Cyclone Seroja was the worst natural disaster in Timor’s history—41 people were killed, 27,000 homes were washed away, and 22 roads and 11 bridges were destroyed. Many affected families are still waiting for promised public assistance.

Bairo Formosa health care centre, Dili (Source: WSWS Media)

The government’s failure to provide adequate social and economic support during lockdown conditions has undermined the public health response.

After restrictions were first imposed on March 8, including on travel from and to Dili and the regions, university students in the capital reported going hungry after being unable to receive assistance, including food, from their families in the countryside. Bags of rice were delivered by university administrators, but this was not enough for students.

On April 2, the beginning of the Easter weekend, hundreds of students and other Dili residents responded to a fake alert on social media suggesting the government was lifting travel restrictions, and gathered in close contact with one another at the city’s three main exit points.

“We have to travel to the municipalities,” Feliciano Mota, one of those who fled the capital, told the Timorese agency Tatoli. “We can’t handle living conditions here in Dili.”

It is likely that this event contributed to the spread of COVID-19 throughout East Timor, with all 13 of the country’s municipalities registering infections.

Also undermining the public health response is the ongoing political crisis in the country. In early 2020, former president and prime minister Xanana Gusmão had been on the verge of returning to office. The global coronavirus pandemic coincided, however, with a political shift that saw Gusmão’s erstwhile allies join Taur Matan Ruak’s coalition government that includes the Fretilin party.

Broken and disused hand washing station at Dili's Taibessi Market (source: WSWS Media)

Gusmão has since mounted a Trump-Bolsonaro type misinformation campaign, suggesting that COVID-19 is no worse than the flu and that restrictions are unnecessary and illegitimate. His reckless, anti-scientific statements have spread confusion. Many people are ignoring public health advice on face masks, hand washing, and social distancing.

Vaccines are only slowly being made available. The primary responsibility for this lies with Australian imperialism. The Liberal-National government in Canberra has responded with utter indifference to the danger posed by COVID-19 to the people of East Timor, and the wider South Pacific and South-East Asian region. Timor has received just 60,000 doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine from Australia, while an additional 24,000 doses have come from the World Health Organization’s COVAX programme.

The limited Australian donation was largely driven not by humanitarian concerns but by geo-political ones. It followed the Chinese government’s announcement that it will send 100,000 doses of its Sinovac vaccine.

Numerous articles in the Australian media and foreign policy outlets have sought to portray China’s vaccine donations to the region as a sinister plot aimed at undermining Australian hegemony. The Age last month quoted former Australian diplomat Ian Kemish who declared that Canberra needed “to be careful about a Chinese attempt to opportunistically seek to gain influence in our near neighbour.”

Australian imperialism’s exploitation of its impoverished neighbour’s oil and gas reserves, and neglect of the Timorese people’s basic needs, now threaten a humanitarian disaster. If COVID-19 infections continue to spiral higher, East Timor’s piecemeal healthcare system—there are just 3,300 essential medical personnel in the country of 1.3 million people—will quickly collapse.