5 Jun 2021

As Colombia’s right-wing government mounts savage repression, Canada criticizes “violence” of impoverished protesters

Roger Jordan


Strikes and protests in Colombia triggered by a regressive tax reform and fueled by hostility to police violence, widespread poverty, social inequality and political corruption have been ongoing for over a month. According to Amnesty International, at least 400 people have been disappeared by the country’s paramilitary police, which had committed 1,876 acts of violence against protesters as of May 9.

The latest estimates put the death toll at over 60 since the protests began. This figure rose by at least 10 last weekend after police savagely repressed demonstrations in the city of Cali on Friday, May 28. Far-right President Ivan Duque responded by calling in the military.

Protesters clash with police in Madrid, on the outskirts of Bogota, Colombia, Friday, May 28, 2021. (AP Photo/Ivan Valencia)

Yet as far as Canada’s Liberal government is concerned, the protesters are as guilty of perpetrating “violence” as the thuggish US- and Canadian-backed Duque regime. In a cynical statement released last month that painted a fraudulent picture of even-handedness, Foreign Minister Marc Garneau managed to avoid mentioning Duque or his far-right government, never mind the heavily armed paramilitary police force that has used American- and Canadian-made weaponry to terrorize protesters.

While condemning the “disproportionate” use of force by vaguely defined “security forces,” Garneau emphasized, “We are also concerned with the acts of vandalism and attacks directed against public officials responsible for the protection of all Colombian citizens. Canada calls upon those responsible for road blockades to allow the free passage of goods and services essential to fight the COVID-19 pandemic.”

This is the same lying propaganda used by the Duque regime to blackguard any opposition as illegal and thereby justify its vicious repression, and covers up the fact that the main reason for the disastrous COVID-19 situation is the refusal of successive governments to adequately fund health care and social services. Underscoring that Ottawa is firmly on the side of its authoritarian ally in Bogota, Garneau concluded his statement by praising the Duque government’s bogus “commitment to fully investigate and hold accountable those who may be guilty of violating human rights.”

In other words, even though photographic and video evidence together with eyewitness testimony confirm that widespread abuses have been carried out by state forces at the behest of the Duque government, Ottawa is not only content with the perpetrators investigating themselves but is also calling into question whether human rights violations have in fact occurred.

Garneau’s statement, like the brutal state repression of the Colombian protesters, has passed almost without comment in the Canadian media and political establishment. This only goes to show the hypocritical double standards of Canadian imperialism. While establishment politics has been rife in recent months with lurid allegations about a “genocide” carried out by China against the Uyghur population, for which there is no evidence, the well-documented killing and sexual abuse of protesters in Colombia have provoked barely a peep of concern from the “human rights” crusaders in the editorial offices of the Globe and Mail and Toronto Star, or from the Liberal, New Democrat, Greens, Conservative and Bloc Québécois parliamentarians.

The NDP, which has been propping up the Liberal government since the 2019 federal election, chose for its own reasons to totally ignore Garneau’s defence of the repressive Duque regime. In its only statement to date on Colombia, released nine days after Garneau’s declaration of support for Duque, the NDP provided cover for the Trudeau government by portraying it as a neutral arbiter in Colombia. “Canadians are very concerned about what is happening in Colombia and want to be assured that the Liberal government is doing all it can to stand up for human and civil rights,” stated the NDP.

Canadian imperialism is in no position to lecture anyone about human rights anywhere in Latin America, especially Colombia. The country, whose capitalist elite waged a five-decade-long bloody civil war against the FARC guerrilla movement until 2017, is one of the closest allies of Canadian and US imperialism in the region. It has served as a base of intrigue and is a firm ally in imperialist-orchestrated provocations against the Maduro regime in Venezuela, which the US-Canada imperialist alliance sees as critical to maintaining their dominance in the hemisphere against rivals like Russia and China. Colombia is also home to billions of dollars in investments by Canadian mining and other commercial interests.

Bogota played host in February 2019 to a meeting of the Lima Group at which then US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued belligerent threats against the Venezuelan government and demanded that the Maduro regime recognize the self-appointed interim president and opposition leader Juan Guaido as Venezuela’s legitimate leader.

The Lima Group is a coalition of North and South American states led by Canada that has worked tirelessly since its founding in 2017 to give Washington’s aggressive military provocations against Venezuela a degree of diplomatic legitimacy. It was central to the US-backed regime change operation fronted by Guaido, who declared himself Venezuelan president in January 2019 after receiving assurances of support from Canadian diplomats and backing from the Lima Group.

Just one week prior to the Bogota meeting of the Lima Group, Colombia’s top military commander was in Florida for a meeting with the US Southern Command to discuss military operations against Venezuela. Six weeks later, Guaido and his right-wing pro-imperialist backers launched another ill-fated coup that was rapidly suppressed.

Throughout the Colombian civil war and up to the present day, Washington has supplied firearms and other military equipment to the army and police, both under the control of the country’s Defence Ministry. Earlier this month, Amnesty International issued a statement noting that it has visual evidence of US-made weaponry being used to repress protesters.

“The United States’ role in fueling ceaseless cycles of violence committed against the people of Colombia is outrageous,” commented Philippe Nassif, the advocacy director for Amnesty USA. “The United States government has been an agonizing party to the killing, disappearances, sexual violence and other torture, and horrendous repression of dozens of mostly peaceful demonstrations.”

Much less known, however, is Canada’s booming business in supplying lethal weaponry to the murderous regime in Bogota. Under the Chretien-Martin Liberal government, Canada shipped its surplus military CH-135 helicopters through the US to Colombia to evade export controls on military equipment to countries engaged in armed conflict. In a 2001 briefing, Amnesty International Canada and the Inter-Church Committee on Human Rights in Latin America noted that Canadian companies carried out extensive maintenance and repair work on Colombian military equipment, including helicopters. Prohibitions on the conducting of such work on military equipment destined for countries engaged in armed conflict were circumvented by classifying the helicopters as “civilian” aircraft.

In 2012, the Harper government added Colombia to the list of countries that are eligible to receive exports of high-powered assault weapons from Canadian manufacturers. Among the weaponry this decision allowed Canadian producers to sell to Bogota were electric stun guns, fully automatic firearms and high-capacity magazines. At the time, Colombia was the only country in Latin America to receive such a designation from Ottawa.

In 2017, the Trudeau government announced the deployment of a small contingent of Canadian police officers to help train the Colombian police, the same force that is now savagely gunning down protesters.

Ottawa’s firm backing for the repressive Colombian government expresses the predatory interests of Canadian imperialism, which has enjoyed a significant economic and financial presence in Latin America and the Caribbean for over a century. Over the past two decades, Colombia has emerged as Canada’s second most important export market in South America, after Brazil. Canadian companies have invested more than $5 billion in Colombia, including in the mining and energy sectors, financial services and lucrative public/private partnership contracts for infrastructure projects.

Ottawa finalized a free trade agreement (FTA) with Colombia in 2011. By 2019, trade between the two countries had risen by 50 percent. Export Development Canada, a government agency that helps Canadian businesses establish and maintain a presence in foreign markets, enthused in a 2019 that the Colombian market had been “reinvigorated” for Canadian big business. “The FTA provides Canadian companies with a competitive edge by protecting our intellectual property and investments,” noted the EDC. “Today, more than 100 Canadian companies operate in Colombia.”

The methods which these companies use to “protect their investments” in Colombia are ruthless. Toronto-based Grand Colombia Gold (GCG), which purchased the title to a gold mine near the town of Segovia for $205 million in 2010, promptly reversed the previous owner’s policies of allowing locals to mine secondary shafts at the site, a practice that has been engaged in for centuries.

GCG labelled these miners, who have no other means of making a living, as “illegal miners” who are “stealing gold” from the company. When the Colombian government refused to enforce the company’s title, fearing a social explosion in Segovia, a town of 42,500 inhabitants, 80 percent of whom are employed by the small-scale traditional mining sector, GCG used the FTA to sue Bogota for a minimum of $250 million in damages.

In Marmato, a mountaintop village about a seven-hour drive from Segovia, GCG proposed razing the village of 8,000 residents to the ground in order to build an open pit gold mine on land it bought up from local miners.

It should come as no surprise that a ruling class capable of employing such brutal methods of exploitation to boost corporate profits turns a blind eye to the massacring of dozens of protesters and the disappearance of hundreds more, especially when the government responsible for these outrageous crimes is a willing partner of Canadian imperialism’s plundering of Colombia’s natural resources.

Macron demands Malian junta endorse French occupation of Mali

Kumaran Ira


Speaking last Sunday to Le Journal du Dimanche (JDD), French President Emmanuel Macron arrogantly demanded that the Malian military junta state its support for the French occupation of Mali.

France’s eight-year war in Mali, launched shortly after a coup d’état in 2012, has relied on a series of neocolonial military dictatorships in Mali and across the Sahel. Macron spoke less than a week after Colonel Assimi Goïta, the strongman of the National Committee for the Salvation of the People (CNSP) junta, arrested interim President Bah Ndaw and Prime Minister Moctar Ouane. Goïta forced them to resign, after having first ousted President Ibrahim Boubakar Keïta in a coup last August.

French President Emmanuel Macron [Sebastien Nogier, Pool via AP]

Yet Macron unblushingly told the JDD that France will not remain “at the side of a country where there is no more democratic legitimacy.” He shamelessly demanded that the Malian government and people should state its gratitude to its French military occupiers.

Macron complained, “It is precisely those who are asking us to intervene militarily who refuse to publicly state their need for France. They are used to saying that their problems today are due to the old colonial powers of yesterday. Of course, colonization has left a deep mark. But I also told youth in Ouagadougou that their problems today are not due to colonialism, they are caused more by bad governance by some and the corruption of others.”

He spoke to the JDD amid mounting anger and disillusionment with the war across the Sahel, as well as in France, and shortly after the National Workers’ Union of Mali (UNTM) bureaucracy called off a nationwide strike to oppose falling living standards in the impoverished country. It was an empty exercise in political damage control, yet after another coup in Mali exposed Macron’s fraudulent claims that France is intervening in Mali to protect democracy from Islamism.

Last week, Washington and the European powers went through the motions of condemning the recent coup and threatening economic sanctions. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the African Union both suspended Mali’s membership. “Like ECOWAS, France believes that organizing presidential elections in Mali on February 27, 2022 is an absolute priority,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said Monday.

Such posturing about democratic values is a disgusting political fraud. France and all the NATO powers have close ties with the bloody Egyptian military junta of President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, which drowned mass working class protests in blood, and have backed Islamist militias in wars in both Libya and Syria. As for Le Drian, he is infamous not only for his close ties to al-Sisi and other bloody African dictators, but for helping French presidents select targets for France’s extrajudicial assassination program.

Goïta clearly calculated, as he launched his latest coup last month, that Paris will support his junta if he creates conditions for the French war in Mali to continue. Indeed, Macron backed Goïta’s coup last year as the only way to continue the war amid mounting protests and popular opposition to the French military presence in its former colony.

While making clear he would work with the Malian junta, Macron issued a bizarre denunciation of political Islamism in Mali to the JDD. He said, “Radical Islamism with our soldiers on the ground? Over my dead body. I know this temptation exists in Mali. But if things evolve this way, I will withdraw” the troops, Macron said.

Macron’s comments were astonishingly incoherent, as the pretext Paris gave for invading Mali in 2013 was to crush Islamist militias arriving in Mali from Libya. After the 2011 NATO war in Libya, ethnic Tuareg and other militias returned to northern Mali with heavy weapons, provoking a crisis in the country’s capital, Bamako. A coup toppling President Amadou Toumani Touré in March 2012 and a French military intervention in the nearby Ivory Coast militarily prepared the French intervention in Mali in 2013 and troop deployments to Burkina Faso, Chad, Mauritania and Niger.

It appears that Macron’s comment was not intended to seriously suggest that French troops would leave if any Islamist presence was detected in Mali, but as a signal to the Malian junta and also as an attempt at political damage control addressed to a French and European domestic audience. While French imperialism’s back channel ties to Islamist terrorist networks are an open secret in the ruling elite, Paris intends to keep control over the Malian regime’s relations to Islamist groups in order to maintain the political lie that it is present in Mali to wage a “war on terror.”

The junta has not ruled out negotiations with armed jihadist groups, and also it has ties with Islamic preachers in Mali. Goïta made clear that he would work with parties, including the June 5, 2020 Movement-Rally of Patriotic Forces (M5-RFP), to form a government. He demanded that “the prime minister’s post go to the M5-RFP.” Several M5-RFP members signaled their acceptance, with Choguel Kokalli Maiga, a M5-RFP member and former minister, declaring, “This went straight to our heart.”

The M5-RFP was the main political organization backing the CNSP’s coup last August, pushing protests by youth in Bamako into the dead end of supporting the CNSP. Paris backed both the M5-RFP and the CNSP in order to block a broader movement of the Malian oppressed masses and youth demanding the withdrawal of French troops. Significantly, France’s petty-bourgeois New Anti-capitalist Party also endorsed the M5-RFF during the military coup last year.

Within the M5-RFP, Imam Mahmoud Dicko, the former president of the Islamic High Commission of Mali (HCIM), has played an important role. He served as a mediator between the Malian government and jihadist groups in northern Mali. After supporting Keïta in the 2013 election, Dicko backed protests against Keïta in 2019 and 2020. In 2019, he launched the CMAS (Coordination of Movements, Associations and Sympathizers). In June 2020, the CMAS joined the M5-RFP.

Dicko, despite holding protests serving as a safety valve for anger at the French occupation, functions as a tool of French imperialism. In 2013, he stated that French intervention in Mali against jihadist groups was not an aggression against Islam, and that France had come to the aid of a people in distress.

At home, Macron is waging an anti-Muslim campaign. He is imposing a charter of principles on French Islam and promoting an “anti-separatist law” aimed against “Islamist separatism,” that is, at preventing any Muslim criticism of French imperialism’s predatory wars—measures designed to consolidate fascistic police-state rule against the working class. There is also mounting dissatisfaction among French troops in Mali following the rise of attacks against them by jihadist forces. So far, France has lost about 50 troops in Mali.

In this context, Macron fears the consequences if Goïta makes Bamako’s ties to Islamist forces too obvious, exposing Macron to criticism on his right from anti-Islamic neofascist forces as Macron attempts to run for reelection in 2022 despite his massive unpopularity.

The corrupt and reactionary dealings underscore the necessity of building a movement in the working class, across the Sahel and Africa as well as in France, against war and for the withdrawal of French troops from Africa.

World food prices rose 40 percent over past year amid expanding global hunger triggered by pandemic

Kevin Reed


The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) food price index rose by 40 percent over the past year, including a rise of 4.8 percent since April. 

The FAO report released on Thursday states: “The May increase represented the biggest month-on-month gain since October 2010. It also marked the twelfth consecutive monthly rise in the value of the FFPI to its highest value since September 2011. ... The sharp increase in May reflected a surge in prices for oils, sugar and cereals along with firmer meat and dairy prices.” The FFPI (FAO food price index) is a measure of the monthly change in international prices of a basket of food commodities.

Women wait in line for food donated by the Covid Without Hunger organization in the Jardim Gramacho slum of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Saturday, May 22, 2021. (AP Photo/Silvia Izquierdo)

According to the report, corn prices are 67 percent higher than a year ago, sugar is up nearly 60 percent and prices for cooking oil have doubled. The surging food prices are catastrophic for millions of people around the globe—already facing desperate conditions from the coronavirus pandemic—with hunger driven up rapidly in the poorest countries of the world.

The UN World Food Program reports that 270 million people are currently suffering from acute malnutrition or worse situations in the 79 countries in which the agency operates, double the number in 2019. Among the regions facing a rising hunger crisis that is exacerbated by skyrocketing food prices are Southeast Asia, Africa and Central America.

The World Bank estimates that up to 124 million people sank below the international poverty line—living on less than $1.90 a day—in 2020 as a result of the pandemic. Up to 39 million people more are expected to be added in 2021, taking the total number of those living in extreme poverty to 750 million people.

Analysts attributed the food cost increases to a series of global climate and economic factors. Bloomberg, for example, reported: “Drought in key Brazilian growing regions is crippling crops from corn to coffee, and vegetable oil production growth has slowed in Southeast Asia. That’s boosting costs for livestock producers and risks further straining global grain stockpiles that have been depleted by soaring Chinese demand.”

Among the food supply issues driven by China’s economic expansion are an increased demand for feed to rebuild pig herds that were struck in recent years by disease. The pig feed contains staples, such as corn and soybeans, that are also consumed by people.

Other analysts have pointed to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global food supply saying that restrictions on movement have increased logistics costs while decreased incomes have driven up demand for less expensive food items.

Economists have warned that the resumption of eating out around the world, following the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions despite the ongoing pandemic, is adding to price increases. Abdolreza Abbassian, senior economist at the FAO, said, “The decline in eating out was not totally compensated with eating at home, but as people start to go to restaurants again, you will see food prices rise.”

Comparing the present increases to the food price surge 10 years ago, chief economist at the United Nations World Food Program, Arif Husain, said, “What is unique about this time is that prices are going up, and at the same time people’s incomes have been decimated. The combination of the two, rising prices and no purchasing power, is the most lethal thing you could deal with.”

The extreme global food price increases and expanding hunger are among the sharpest manifestations of the crisis of the capitalist system, posing the necessity for socialist revolution and economic planning by the international working class as an immediate life-and-death matter.

Food price inflation has developed over the past year in parallel with the spread of the deadly pandemic across the globe. While the imperialist powers have hoarded the vaccines and denied them to the poorest countries, the pandemic is now surging among these populations as the cost of the basic necessities of life are becoming increasingly out of reach.

The Wall Street Journal got right down to the primary concerns of the financial aristocracy amid the food price crisis: social instability, migration and political unrest. In an article entitled “Food Prices Soar Compounding Woes of World’s Poor,” the Wall Street Journal wrote on May 20: “Previous spikes in food and fuel prices contributed to political instability in recent decades, including the ‘Arab Spring’ revolutions in 2011. While nothing of that scale has emerged this year, expensive food is part of the mix in several countries now experiencing unrest.”

Pointing to mass protests in Colombia and Sudan and rising hunger as a primary cause of migration across the US southern border—the number of people facing acute food insecurity jumped 20 percent in Guatemala and tripled in Honduras this year compared to 2019—the Wall Street Journal is raising alarm bells among the capitalist ruling elite.

The Wall Street Journal spoke with Guatemala’s coordinator of humanitarian programs for the global charity Oxfam, Iván Aguilar, who said: “In terms of food insecurity, we are at the worst point in Guatemala in at least 20 years. It’s a very worrisome combination of factors, and making things worse, you have weak governments in the region with scarce means to help the poor.”

The broader economic implications of price inflation have been discussed in recent weeks and are a growing area of concern within ruling circles, such as the US Federal Reserve Bank and the European Central Bank.

While the Biden administration has officially stated that inflation is not a concern, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on May 4 that the Federal Reserve could easily control inflationary outbreaks with interest rate hikes. However, Yellen tried to walk back those comments later that same day because raising the rates would disrupt the flow of cash into the markets that is the basis of the ongoing spectacular rise of share values on Wall Street and the unprecedented increased in the number and wealth of billionaires throughout the pandemic.

Disappearance of influenza in 2020 proves eradication of SARS-CoV-2 and more is possible

Benjamin Mateus & Norisa Diaz


One of the curious features of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the near complete disappearance of the seasonal flu across the globe. Flu seasons that have been so much a part of the fabric of modern social history have all but vanished.

To say the least, this is astounding. Yet, hardly a word has been said of it in the media. A review of the statistics is worth the effort.

Nurses and physicians on a COVID-19 unit in Texas (Credit: Miguel Gutierrez Jr.)

In the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), since September 27, 2020, out of over one million influenza tests, there were only 1,899 (0.2 percent) positive results (713 Influenza A and 1,186 Influenza B) during the 2020-2021 flu season. Of the only 600 deaths reported from influenza, there was only one flu-associated pediatric death.

To place the above statistics into stark relief, the CDC estimated that from 2010 to 2019, between 9 and 45 million people fell ill with the flu annually. Of these, 140,000 to 810,000 required hospitalization, while deaths ranged from 12,000 to 62,000 a year. The annual healthcare cost attributed to the flu has been estimated at over $10 billion. During the 2019-2020 season, there were over 34,000 deaths reported, of which 200 were children.

The impact of the measures aimed at COVID-19 was to reduce the US death toll from ordinary influenza from 34,000 to 600, a staggering 98 to 99 percent. Child deaths dropped from 200 to only one. If similar proportions, as estimated by the World Health Organization, apply to the annual world mortality from influenza, some 250,000 to 500,000 lives may have been saved in 2020.

Influenza-associated Pediatric Mortality (Source: CDC)

This has not yet been documented, but may well be the case. In a report published on April 29, 2021 in the Scientific American, headlined, “Flu has disappeared worldwide during the COVID pandemic,” every region across the globe, from North and South America to Oceania, has seen the near complete eradication of the influenza virus. Numerous doctors reported no longer sending specimens for testing, believing the flu was not circulating in the population.

On February 26, 2021, the WHO made its recommendation for the composition of the influenza virus vaccine in the 2021-2022 northern hemisphere influenza season: a quadrivalent vaccine against the H1N1, H3N2, B/Victoria and B/Yamagata strains, using the limited number of cases they analyzed.

Each year the WHO provides recommendations based on the antigenic drift that occurs in these viruses, necessitating a constant updating. As the Scientific American report noted, “With fewer virus particles circulating in the world, there is less chance of an upcoming mutation, so it is possible the 2021-2022 vaccine will prove extra effective.”

History of influenza epidemics and pandemics

Influenza epidemics and pandemics have been present since human civilizations first began chronicling these natural events. The name of the viral infection, influenza, originated in the 15th century in Italy from an epidemic they attributed to the “influence of the stars.” The first documented influenza pandemic occurred in 1510, beginning in East Asia and then spreading to North Africa and later Europe.

After 1700, with advances in science, technology and social organization, understanding of the flu grew incrementally. The first flu pandemic in the 18th century started in 1729 in Russia, spreading thereafter across the globe over a period of three years in distinct waves. There were at least four influenza pandemics in the 19th century, three in the 20th century, including the Spanish flu of 1918 that killed upwards of 50 million people, and one so far in the 21st century.

In 1931, an American virologist and naval officer by the name of Richard Edwin Shope and his mentor Paul A. Lewis were the first to isolate influenza virus A from pigs. By 1933, it was established that the virus was responsible for human influenza. Influenza B virus was discovered in 1940.

Soon after, with the support of the US Army, the first flu vaccine was developed, which was finally licensed in 1945 in the United States. But by 1947 investigators had determined that frequent changes in the antigenic composition of the virus rendered existing vaccines ineffective, requiring continuous surveillance and characterization of circulating viruses and annual modifications to the vaccines.

The World Health Organization was established a year later, with one of its initial major tasks being influenza research and surveillance. By 1952, the Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System (GISRS) was established to monitor the evolution of influenza viruses.

The flu seasons recur annually during the winter months of the affected hemisphere. In the United States, the season begins in October and lasts until May, reaching its highs in February. By comparison, the season begins in May in Australia, peaking in August and concluding in October. For other countries in the Southern Hemisphere—South Africa, Argentina, and Chile—the season begins later in June. The tropics and subtropics have more complex seasonality.

The disappearance of the flu is a remarkable thing for the possibilities it raises in the approach to respiratory pathogens. Public health measures, applied too inconsistently to eradicate COVID-19, did succeed in effectively eradicating the seasonal flu, at least in the United States. The half-million people who have died each year of influenza worldwide were all potentially avoidable deaths.

The example of influenza vindicates the principled scientists who have been calling for the eradication of the coronavirus. If halfhearted measures could eliminate the flu, a full mobilization of social resources, with testing, contact tracing and social distancing, and a society-wide lockdown with full economic support for working families and small businesses, could have done the same for COVID-19. They could still do so yet, if the working class intervenes on the basis of this program.

As it is now, with vaccine administration beginning to stall in high-income nations, herd immunity through vaccination will most likely not be achievable. Left to their own devices, the ruling classes throughout the world will facilitate the coronavirus becoming endemic, just another virus that humanity has to learn to live and also die with, with appalling consequences.

Influenza, an airborne virus

It is indisputable that the limited measures employed to stem the tide of COVID-19 infections had an extraordinary impact in stopping the flu almost completely. This is because the coronavirus and influenza virus share the same mode of transmission. They are both airborne pathogens, despite the insistence to the contrary by various official national and international public health agencies that ignored the preponderance of evidence that has been published to date.

One of the first studies that documented airborne transmission of the flu was published in 1979, examining an outbreak that occurred on a commercial jet plane.

On the morning of March 14, 1977, an aircraft en route from Anchorage, Alaska to Kodiak, Alaska, was delayed on the ground in Homer (an intermediate stop) for three hours after an aborted takeoff due to engine failure. A 21-year-old female passenger who had boarded in Homer became acutely ill with the flu soon after boarding. There were five crew members and 49 other passengers waiting on the tarmac for repairs to be accomplished. The ventilation system on board was inoperative during the delay.

The next day several passengers reported to a physician with symptoms of severe respiratory syndrome that included high fevers, headaches, chills, and muscle aches. Two required hospitalization. The public health authorities were notified of the outbreak, and an investigation was commenced.

None of the passengers who had deplaned in Homer fell ill. Of the 53 passengers and crew aboard the grounded plane, 38 (72 percent) developed the flu within a day-and-a-half of their exposure. The attack rate was highest for those that spent the longest time on the plane. Of the 38 cases, 31 provided specimens for viral culture, of which eight were positive for the influenza A virus.

The authors of the study concluded that prolonged exposure to the index case, the young woman, in the setting of a non-functioning ventilation system, contributed to the high attack rate. They also surmised that large aerosols produced by the ill passenger may have contributed to the high number of infections.

In the last decade research has shown that the influenza virus is airborne and passed in closed spaces with shared air as an infected individual is able to spread contaminated particles throughout an area just by breathing.

In a Nature study published in June of 2013, titled, “Aerosol transmission is an important mode of influenza A virus spread,” the authors found that influenza A virus via aerosol transmission in Hong Kong and Bangkok households was the predominant mode of transmission, accounting for approximately half of all new cases, “suggesting that influenza A virus transmission among household members may not be controlled by interventions against contact or droplet transmission.”

Between 2012 and 2013 Dr. Donald Milton, professor of environmental health, and his research team at the University of Maryland School of Public Health took breath samples from 142 people infected with influenza virus. Using the Gesundheit II machine, their breath samples were taken while engaging in natural breathing, talking, coughing, and sneezing over three days. Milton’s team found that those infected contaminated the air around them with infection by just breathing.

The watershed study and its findings proved that handwashing, surface cleaning, and covering coughs and sneezes, the usual methods for treating droplet-borne infections, were insufficient at preventing the spread of influenza. They determined that the influenza virus was airborne, and demonstrated that the only way to prevent the spread of the virus was to avoid public spaces and stay home.

Milton stated in a university news article, “People with flu generate infectious aerosols (tiny droplets that stay suspended in the air for a long time) even when they are not coughing, and especially during the first days of illness. So when someone is coming down with influenza, they should go home and not remain in the workplace and infect others.”

“The study findings suggest that keeping surfaces clean, washing our hands all the time, and avoiding people who are coughing does not provide complete protection from getting the flu,” said Sheryl Ehrman, dean of the Charles W. Davidson College of Engineering at San José State University. “Staying home and out of public spaces could make a difference in the spread of the influenza virus.”

In 2018 her team published the often-cited paper Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The paper stated that, “We provide overwhelming evidence that humans generate infectious aerosols and quantitative data to improve mathematical models of transmission and public health interventions. We show that sneezing is rare and not important for—and that coughing is not required for—influenza virus aerosolization. Our findings, that upper and lower airway infection are independent and that fine-particle exhaled aerosols reflect infection in the lung, opened a pathway for a deeper understanding of the human biology of influenza infection and transmission.”

The research was funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the very agencies which took over 14 months to quietly acknowledge the airborne nature of SARS-CoV-2, after it had claimed over 3 million lives globally.

Science should guide social policy

Since the 1970s it has been documented in the highest scholarly journals that school-aged children are the most important vectors for community-wide transmission of influenza, with children aged 5-18 years suffering attack rates of 30-50 percent, the highest of any age group. They also shed viruses in greater quantities and for longer periods than adults. With every flu season, dozens or hundreds of children die. Children miss school and parents are often forced to find in-home care or stay home themselves. It is not without a sense of irony that the flu season begins and ends in conjunction with the school calendar.

Despite these findings, which are not news to any parent or educator, or to medical professionals, there have been no major efforts to upgrade ventilation systems and improve air quality for schools, classrooms or workplaces. Instead, the past 50 years have seen a widespread attack on public education. Crumbling infrastructure, increasing class sizes and dilapidated schools have become the norm, where indoor air quality is deemed some of the worst.

One of the clearest proof-of-concept studies recently published came out of Taiwan. At an undisclosed university in the suburbs of Taipei, a TB outbreak involving 27 cases with 1,665 contacts in under-ventilated buildings was investigated. Knowing the pathogen was transmitted via aerosol, ventilation engineers worked to decrease the maximum level of CO2 allowed from 3,200 parts per million to 600. The secondary attack rate dropped to zero after a follow-up of six years. By improving ventilation to keep down levels of CO2, which is a proxy for air exchanges, there was a 97 percent decrease in TB infections, highlighting the critical importance of adequate indoor ventilation.

The research in the preceding 50 years and the 2020-2021 influenza season confirms that mankind has the ability to understand and eradicate a virus which has plagued the globe for 500 years and claims hundreds of thousands of deaths annually. Additionally, there has been a dramatic decline in childhood diseases such as chickenpox, various stomach viruses and strep throat. There is no disease or virus that the human race must “live with.”

Frederick Engels, in his Dialectics of Nature, describes mankind’s uniqueness in being able to understand and to control his environment. Inherent in this is an understanding of the social production in which humanity takes part and the necessity to rationally reorganize this production:

Historical evolution makes such an organization daily more indispensable, but also with every day more possible. From it will date a new epoch of history, in which mankind itself, and with mankind all branches of its activity, and especially natural science, will experience an advance that will put everything preceding it in the deepest shade.

The only way for humanity to proceed forward, in light of the incalculable suffering and horrific human death toll which has not abated, is to throw down the gauntlet on the capitalist mode of production once and for all, which has prioritized the interests of a financial oligarchy and has sacrificed over 3.6 million people to a virus that mankind has all the scientific knowledge and advancements to rid itself of.

That the often-deadly influenza virus, which has plagued civilization for centuries, could so easily be vanquished should provoke us to ask, “What are the possibilities?” Humanity has only scratched the surface of what can be done. It is not lack of knowledge, but the capitalist system and the profit interests of the ruling class that stand in the way.

New COVID-19 wave in Taiwan exposes government’s lack of preparation

Ben McGrath


After more than a year of being held up as a model for its response to the global pandemic, Taiwan’s medical system is being overrun by a surge in COVID-19 cases. As of Thursday, there were 9,974 confirmed cases on the island, including 366 new cases the previous day. Nearly 9,000 of those infections have occurred since mid-May.

The Taipei Doctors’ Union warned in a Facebook post on May 27, “The coronavirus situation in the greater Taipei area continues to worsen, with an acute shortage of isolation beds and wards, as well as the [specialized] staff to run them.” It continued, “If this isn't breaking point for the healthcare system, then we don't know what is.” The statement warned that hospitals were facing a shortage of negative pressure and isolation wards, with general hospital wards being used instead, putting staff and other patients at risk of infection.

On May 28, Singapore-based doctor Lim Wooi Tee, an epidemic prevention specialist, appeared on the Taiwanese talk show “50 Era Money” to call for a total lockdown on the island. In the interview, Lim blamed the government of President Tsai Ing-wen for wasting more than a year in preparing for an outbreak. He stated, “Taiwan is more vulnerable than any other country in the world.”

The latest outbreak demonstrates that there was nothing exceptional about Taipei’s initial response to the virus. What actions the Taiwanese ruling class did take were generated by fears that a botched response to the pandemic could fuel social discontent after widespread anger over its handling of the 2002–2004 SARS epidemic.

Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen, center, walks to her inauguration ceremony in Taipei, Taiwan, Wednesday, May 20, 2020 (Taiwan Presidential Office via AP)

In January 2020, just as the pandemic was beginning, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party government of President Tsai Ing-wen accused China of lacking transparency and used the outbreak, with Washington’s support, to challenge the “One China” policy and call for inclusion in the World Health Organization (WHO). Under the “One China” doctrine, internationally accepted since the 1970s, Beijing is effectively recognised as the legitimate government of all China, including Taiwan.

Tsai’s accusations were aimed at drumming up anti-mainland sentiment, a campaign that is now being escalated by Washington, as well as Taipei, to ratchet up pressure on Beijing, risking war.

The outbreak also reveals that no country is safe from the pandemic as long as the virus is allowed to move freely anywhere in the world. It shows the necessity of maintaining scientifically mandated restrictions in order to eliminate the virus. However, Taipei, like every other capitalist government, chooses to prioritize big business profits at the expense of the working class and the poor.

Workers in the service, transportation, and tourist industries are being particularly hard hit as gatherings of five or more people are banned and many public facilities are closed. As of Tuesday, there were 445 companies that had implemented unpaid leave programs, up from 414 the previous week. Some 4,125 workers have been reported as furloughed without pay while other workers have had their salaries slashed. These statistics are likely an undercounting of the real situation.

Restrictions do not apply to the manufacturing sector. In Hsinchu city, where the industry-leading Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company is based, workers are being forced to stay on the job, leaving them exposed to the virus. Semiconductors are a major component in weaponry, and therefore considered vital in the war plans of the United States.

Workers may never see even the meager relief packages from the government as they are paid through the companies. Chairwoman of the Taoyuan Confederation of Trade Unions (TYCTU) Chu Mei-hsueh stated recently, “[W]e see that the government’s proposed economic relief packages are mostly the same as last year’s—they have to go through companies and bosses. Workers will again end up not receiving relief funds, because many employers would not report furloughed workers to the government when ordered to close for business.”

The TYCTU, a leading union confederation in Taiwan, portrays itself as a radical workers’ organization, but has played the central role in isolating strikes over recent years and preventing the development of a movement of the working class.

The TYCTU and its affiliated Taoyuan Flight Attendants Union were behind the sellout of the 17-day strike by EVA Air flight attendants in 2019, the longest in the history of Taiwan’s airlines. The sellout was all the more treacherous as airline workers around the world had been striking and staging industrial actions at that time. While issuing toothless complaints over the government’s current policies, the TYCTU has not organised any action against them.

The current outbreak also has broader international significance, particularly as the United States has attempted to leverage Taiwan as a tool against Beijing and to challenge the “One China” policy, under which countries recognize that Taiwan is a part of China. Last year, during the Trump administration, Washington backed Taipei’s attempt to gain observer status in the WHO, claiming that Taiwan was a positive force in the fight against COVID-19 while falsely accusing Beijing of being responsible for the pandemic.

The same geopolitical considerations underlie Japan’s recent pledge to donate vaccines to Taiwan. Tokyo entered into negotiations with AstraZeneca to send 1.2 million of its 120 million vaccine supply purchased from the company to Taiwan, even though the initial contract Japan signed with AstraZeneca bars it from exporting vaccines overseas. Tokyo could announce a finalized deal as soon as Friday. Beijing denounced Japan’s actions, with Foreign Ministry Spokesman Wang Wenbin saying on May 31, “We firmly oppose the use of the pandemic for a political show.”

Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi stated Thursday, “At a time of trouble, we need to help each other.” However, there is nothing altruistic about Tokyo’s motivations. Members of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party have called for supplying Taiwan with the vaccine in order to undermine Beijing. While countries like the United States have hoarded vaccines, China has offered to supply countries with its own vaccine, leading to accusations that Beijing is engaged in “vaccine diplomacy” to expand its influence.

Taipei, however, is engaged in its own version of “vaccine diplomacy.” Taipei has accused Beijing of interfering in a deal that fell through in January with drug maker BioNTech to supply vaccines. Beijing has denied this. According to Taiwan’s Health Minister Chen Shih-chung on May 27, BioNTech requested Taiwan remove the word “country” from the press release on the vaccine deal scheduled for January 8. The insertion of the word “country” was a clear attempt at undermining the “One China” policy. Taiwan supposedly offered to tweak the wording, but BioNTech still backed away from the deal.

500 jobs threatened by closure of McVitie’s factory in Glasgow, Scotland

John Vassilopoulos


Closure of the McVitie’s biscuit factory in Glasgow threatens the loss of nearly 500 jobs. McVitie’s owner Pladis Global announced in May that the factory has been earmarked for closure in the latter half of next year, pending a 90-day “consultation process”.

The Tollcross factory, which produces many popular brands of biscuit including Hobnobs and Rich Tea opened in 1925 and has been a major source of employment in an area blighted by joblessness and social deprivation.

The McVities biscuit factory in Tollcross, Glasgow (credit: WSWS media)

Speaking to The Sunday Post weekly, Kirsteen Paterson, an industrial baker who has worked at the plant for 22 years, said, “Closure would be terrible for the area, the city and for hundreds of families. People would lose out on so much, not just a wage. Friendships, working relationships, will all be gone. These are the things which help bind us together and keeps communities together. To lose them tears at the fabric of society… If the factory closes, so many options are lost for people. I moved to the area when I was 24 and this was an opportunity for me. This work is so important and what is being planned is tremendously unjust.”

McVitie’s biscuits was established as a brand in Scotland in the 19th century. It is one of several confectionery brands owned by UK-based Pladis Global, a subsidiary of Turkish corporation Yıldız Holding Conglomerate. Yıldız acquired the McVitie’s brand in 2014 as part of its purchase of United Biscuits and set up Pladis in 2016 to bring together all its confectionary-based companies (Ulker, Godiva, United Biscuits and DeMet’s Candy Company) under one umbrella.

Pladis, whose parent company has received some £1 million in publicly funded grants, cited “excess capacity” across its plants in the UK as the reason for closing the Tollcross site.

This is belied by Pladis’ own figures in its 2020 Annual Biscuit Review report, published at the end of March. According to the report, six out of the top 10 biscuit brands in terms of sales were dominated by McVitie’s, all of which saw significant growth in revenue during the year. This had been largely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, which saw more people working from home, with a marked increase in the consumption of cakes and biscuits.

McVitie’s chocolate digestives topped the list, with UK sales of £104.5 million, up by 20.5 percent compared to 2019. Pladis Global’s latest accounts recorded £2.1 billion in revenue in 2019, and a profit of £153.8 million. 2020 was likely even more profitable given the increase in revenue cited in the report.

The cost of this bonanza has been borne by McVitie’s workers, who risked their lives by continuing to work in unsafe conditions throughout that pandemic, having been classified as “key workers”. The Tollcross site itself was hit by a coronavirus outbreak in October last year with around 30 workers testing positive.

According to reports, the closure of Tollcross will see additional capacity shifted to the McVitie’s plant in Carlisle. This will no doubt result in speed-ups and the increased exploitation of the remaining workers, with ever-higher growth targets being serviced by a scaled-back workforce.

This is part of a global process. The ruling class in every country is using the pandemic as a pretext for a massive assault on workers’ conditions, fuelling the growth of their already obscene fortunes. Last year, the collective wealth of the world’s billionaires increased by more than 60 percent. This looting of society is epitomised by Yildiz’s CEO and Turkey’s richest man, Murat Ulker, whose wealth—according to Forbes’ latest Rich List—jumped from $4.3 billion in 2020 to $6.3 billion in 2021.

The loss of the McVitie’s factory would continue decades of industrial devastation. Tollcross once hosted thousands of jobs, with the Tollcross Steel Tube Works forming part of the large steelworks operation at Clyde Iron Works and Clydebridge Steelworks. In its heyday, the operation employed over 2,000 workers.

Decades of de-industrialisation overseen by successive Labour, Conservative and devolved Scottish National Party (SNP) governments have decimated the living standards of Glasgow’s working class ever since. According to figures for 2019 published by the Office for National Statistics, 24.1 percent of all households in Glasgow are classed as “workless”, over 10 percent higher than the UK average. The economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic will have made this situation even worse.

The SNP and the trade unions are seeking to channel opposition to the McVitie’s factory’s closure into bankrupt appeals to the Conservative government in Westminster.

Speaking in the British parliament on May 19, SNP MP for East Glasgow David Linden called on Prime Minister Boris Johnson to prevent “economic Armageddon on a very fragile part of the local economy.” Following Johnson’s empty platitudes about the plight of the Tollcross workers, Linden stated, “when we said that we’d leave no stone unturned to try and save this factory, we genuinely meant it and that includes working cross-party to save Tollcross. Engaging the Prime Minister as we try to get Pladis to think again is going to be really crucial in terms of escalating this to executives in Turkey.”

The trade union bureaucracy in Scotland has enthusiastically supported this corporatist exercise. Two days after Linden spoke in parliament, GMB Scotland—one of the two trade unions, alongside Unite Scotland, representing workers at the factory—organised a small protest at Tollcross park near the factory site. In his opening address to the crowd, GMB Scotland Secretary Gary Smith made clear the unions have no intention of mobilising their members in a fight to defend jobs but will function as an industrial police force, keeping workers in line to ensure “cross-party support”. The line-up of speakers included Linden, Pauline McNeill, a Labour member of the Scottish Parliament for Glasgow and Thomas Kerr, a local Conservative councillor.

The culmination of these efforts is the establishing of the Pladis Action Group, whose first meeting was co-chaired on May 27 by the Scottish Government’s Finance Minister Kate Forbes and Glasgow City Council leader Susan Aitken, both from the SNP. Following the meeting, Forbes stated, “We had a really positive discussion with the trade unions, Scottish Enterprise, Skills Development Scotland and Clyde Gateway, and everyone is absolutely focused on the task ahead.”

At the demonstration, McVitie’s worker Sharon Henratty told the press, “They've got an absolute cheek to say they've to shut it. We were essential workers and now we're un-essential.” Local resident Ben McKee said the closure would have a “massive impact”. “It's not just the jobs in the factory, it's the jobs outwith the factory as well. You've got all your shops and cafes on Tollcross Road. It's a knock-on effect that I don't think people realise.”

A petition opposing the closure has already attracted nearly 52,000 signatures.

Workers at Tollcross can place no confidence in the corporatist machinations of the trade unions. Any counter-proposal acceptable to Pladis management will inevitably include job losses and attacks on the wages and conditions of the remaining staff. To take the fight forward, workers at the site must form their own rank-and-file committee, independent of the pro-company trade unions who will only work to isolate their struggle.

Appeals for support should be made to the 4,200 workers in McVitie’s factories across Britain, as well as to workers in the local community. Above all, workers at Tolcross must seek to mobilise the 16,000 workers employed by Pladis across its 25 factories in 11 different countries. Against the global operation run by Pladis, workers must establish their own international organisation drawing on the strength of their class brothers and sisters across the world.

Delta variant of COVID-19 dominant in UK, spreading rapidly with millions still unvaccinated

Robert Stevens


The highly contagious variant of COVID-19 which originated in India, now named the Delta variant by the World Health Organisation, is officially the dominant strain in Britain and is spreading rapidly.

On Thursday, Public Health England announced that the number of laboratory-confirmed Delta coronavirus cases had risen by 79 percent over the last week to 12,431 and overtaken the number of cases of the Kent, or Alpha, variant.

Passengers on the London Underground this week (credit: WSWS media)

The government has gone into overdrive to portray the virus as under control, claiming that its vaccine rollout means everything must still be allowed to return to normal. But not only is the Delta variant on the rampage, on Thursday the government admitted that a Nepalese strain of the Delta variant which has acquired a new mutation is present in the UK.

Delta was first detected in Britain on April 1, but the government did not make its existence public until April 15, of a piece with its overriding aim of doing nothing to prevent a further opening of the economy.

This reckless reopening, ongoing for months and set to be completed in less than three weeks on June 21, has allowed a comparatively successful vaccination rollout to be derailed by the spread of a highly contagious variant. On May 17, most of the economy was reopened, including cafes, restaurants, gyms, cinemas and most non-essential sectors.

Cases of Delta infections and deaths have been steadily increasing from a base of just a few infections. For the last seven days there have been at least 3,000 cases daily. On Friday May 28 this reached 4,000 cases and by Thursday had reached nearly 6,000 daily cases (5,774)—the highest number since the UK was still under a limited national lockdown in late March. On Friday, new cases reached a new high of 6,238. Deaths from Covid have also begun to rise again from the zero deaths reported on Monday—a figure the media insisted justified ending remaining lockdown restrictions without delay. Twelve deaths were reported on Wednesday, 18 on Thursday and 11 Friday.

More dramatically at this point, coronavirus cases are on the increase in all but three regions of Britain, with the R (reproduction) rate rising to between 1 and 1.2—up from between 1 and 1.1 last week. Delta cases are rising at among their fastest rate in London, with the Evening Standard reporting Friday that more than two thirds of Covid-19 cases in the capital are believed to be the Delta strain.

According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), there was a 76.5 percent surge in coronavirus cases nationally in the week to May 29. Announcing its weekly survey yesterday, the ONS said that one in 640 people (86,000) in private households in England had COVID-19 in the week to May 29—up from one in 1,120 (48,500) in the previous week.

Cases appear to be rising even faster among Scotland’s 5 million population. On Thursday, Scottish National Party First Minister Nicola Sturgeon announced another 992 people had tested positive—the highest daily figure since February 17—with new Covid cases more than tripling in the last month.

All the evidence shows that the Delta variant is, as feared, far more transmissible than the Alpha (Kent) variant discovered last year, which quickly became dominant in the UK and spread rapidly around the globe.

On Thursday, Neil Ferguson, a leading epidemiologist at Imperial College London and previously a member of the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), warned on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that Delta is “between about 30 percent and maybe even up to 100 percent more transmissible.” Data was pointing in a “negative direction” and “The best estimate at the moment is this variant may be 60 percent more transmissible than the Alpha [Kent] variant.”

Ferguson is derided in the right-wing media as “Professor Lockdown”. His warnings that the government’s declared herd immunity agenda could result in up to 500,000 deaths were central in forcing the first lockdown last year.

If it transpires that the transmissibility of Delta is in the order of 60 percent higher, this could have a catastrophic impact under conditions in which only 50 percent of the population is fully vaccinated and virtually all children and millions of adults under 40 totally unvaccinated. According to SAGE modelling, a strain of COVID that is 50 percent or more transmissible than the Kent strain will lead to between 10,000 and 20,000 hospital admissions per day by the summer and 1,000 deaths daily by August. SAGE predicted that such numbers would rapidly overwhelm the National Health Service. Ten thousand hospitalisations a day is more than double the UK peak of hospitalisations in the pandemic so far.

In its technical briefing issued Thursday, Public Health England estimated that the Delta variant is as much as 2.5 times more likely to lead to hospitalisations than the Alpha (Kent) variant.

This could have further terrible consequences under conditions in which an estimated 1 million people in private households in the UK reported experiencing “long Covid” in the four weeks to May 2. Of these, over a third (376,000) contracted the virus, or thought they were first infected, over a year ago.

Of extreme concern, on Thursday the Francis Crick Institute and the UCLH Biomedical Research Centre published a study noting that the current generation of vaccines may be on the point of being outstripped by the new variants. Those who have received two doses of the Pfizer vaccine had levels of neutralising antibodies that were more than five times lower against the Delta variant when compared to the original strain. For those who had only received one dose, antibody levels against Delta were even lower. Moreover, the levels of antibodies were lower with increasing age and those levels dropped over time.

One Pfizer jab resulted in 79 percent of people having a quantifiable neutralising antibody response against the original strain. Against the Alpha (Kent) strain this fell to 50 percent, to 32 percent for the Delta strain and as low as 25 percent for the Beta (South African) strain.

Throughout the pandemic, the government, aided by the Labour Party and the trade unions, have insisted that schools were not vectors of transmission and that children and educators should be in classrooms so parents can go to work and generate profits for the corporations.

Yet again these lies are being refuted. Public Health England data this week covering April 26 to May 30 showed 140 cases of the Delta variant already in schools. At the end of April there were just three Delta clusters in primary and secondary schools, but by the end of May this had shot up to 39 clusters. With a total of 97 outbreaks in schools with at least one of the variants detected, this equates to around one in 250 schools nationally.

Professor Christina Pagel, director of the clinical operational research unit at University College London, told the Guardian the figures were evidence that schools were now “a major source” of transmission.

Just a few days after Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he saw no reason not to plough on to remove “all legal limits on social contact” on June 21, the government was forced to take Portugal off its “green list” of holiday destinations due partly to what Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said was the discovery of a “Nepal mutation of the so-called Indian variant”. Shapps said that at this stage it could not be ruled out that the mutation is “vaccine defeating”.

On Thursday, it was announced that all UK holidaymakers currently in Portugal had to return to the UK by Tuesday and undergo 10 days of quarantining.

A small number of Delta variants, including the Nepalese, have an extra mutation, K417N, of which around 90 cases have been identified worldwide—12 in Portugal, 36 in the UK, 12 in the US and four in India. According to virus sequencing by Public Health England, there may in fact be 43 cases in Britain.

Despite the emerging public health disaster, the government still insists that its June 21 “Liberation Day” must go ahead, only offering the “advice” that people work from home if possible.