16 Jun 2022

US and Israel ratchet up threats and aggression against Iran

Jean Shaoul


The Biden administration is escalating pressure on Iran with provocations that seem designed to blow up the nuclear talks taking place in Vienna. Israel, its regional client, is simultaneously carrying out murderous attacks on Iran and its allies, setting the stage for a dangerous new escalation of conflict in the Middle East.

The talks in Vienna between Iran and the five states still nominally party to the nuclear agreement—Germany, Britain, France, China and Russia—have been stalled since April. Indirect talks have continued, however, with Qatar, Oman and the European Union serving as go-betweens Washington and Tehran.

Iran and the US accuse each other of introducing issues extraneous to the nuclear accord. The reality is Washington continues to impose sweeping unilateral economic sanctions on Iran that are tantamount to war, and Biden is not prepared to suspend them unless and until Tehran accepts many of the demands made by his predecessor, the anti-Iran “war hawk” Donald Trump.

Washington's threats and bullying of Iran have reached a new stage since Trump pulled out of the Iran nuclear deal in 2018 and imposed punishing sanctions aimed at crashing Iran's economy.

In 2018, Trump abandoned the 2015 nuclear accords—reputedly one of the signal diplomatic achievements of the Obama administration. It then imposed punishing sanctions targeting Iran’s economy, including its oil and gas exports and banking system, above and beyond anything the US had deployed against Iran under Obama or George W. Bush.

While the Europeans bitterly protested Trump’s actions, which cut across their plans for lucrative trade and investment deals with Iran, their claims that they would develop an alternative international financial transfer system to bypass US sanctions proved to be a hollow boast.

As a result, Iran’s economy has been battered. Oil exports, a key revenue source, have plummeted. Iran’s increasingly beleaguered bourgeois clerical regime has responded by incrementally rolling back some of the commitments it made under the nuclear accord, commonly known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCOPA). This includes increasing its uranium enrichment up to 60 percent purity, some way off from the weapons-grade level of 90 percent, so as to demonstrate its unwillingness to buckle to US pressure and strengthen its bargaining position.

While continuing to publicly affirm that Trump’s repudiation of the Iran nuclear accord was a blunder, Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken have tried to use the negotiations on a US return to the JCOPA to browbeat Iran into making further concessions, aimed at limiting its influence in the Mideast. At the same time, they have not foregone the possibility of using a revived JCOPA to bring about a thaw in US-Iranian relations, with the ultimate aim of prising Iran away from Russia and China’s orbit.

Biden, in a highly provocative move, has refused to remove the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) from the US list of terrorist organizations subject to severe economic sanctions, a key Iranian demand.

The US and its European allies are also once again using the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as a political tool to criticise and bully Iran over its nuclear program. Over the objections of Russia and China, and with India and Pakistan abstaining, the US and the European imperialist powers last week pushed through a resolution censuring Iran over its supposed lack of cooperation with the IAEA. IAEA director Rafael Grossi has since said that if this didn’t change over the next three or four weeks, “this would be a fatal blow” to reviving the nuclear deal—something the Europeans have previously suggested would cause them to align still more closely with Washington against Tehran.

Iran’s clergy-led bourgeois nationalist regime has always maintained that its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes. The major powers, the IAEA and the CIA, have all concurred that there has been no evidence of Iran having any type of nuclear weapons programme since 2003, as the current CIA Director and former deputy Secretary of State William Burns has acknowledged in his autobiography.

Prior to the IAEA vote, Iran recorded its protest by shutting off two IAEA cameras at the Online Enrichment Monitor (OLEM) and one of its flowmeter systems. Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesperson for the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran, said the cameras went beyond Iran’s commitments under the JCOPA but Iran had allowed their installation to establish “goodwill.” Following the vote, Iran shut a further IAEA 27 cameras at various installations, leaving 40 operational.

At the beginning of June, Grossi paid a surprise visit to Israel, a bitter opponent of the nuclear accords. The visit, which he admitted was at Israel’s request, was a flagrant breach of protocols that demand IAEA impartiality. All the more so since Israel, which has rejected all international nuclear treaties and inspection regimes, has for decades possessed a nuclear arsenal, as then Prime Minister Ehud Olmert tacitly admitted in an interview on German television in 2006. In his meeting with Grossi, Israel’s Prime Minister Naftali Bennett accused Iran of deceiving the international community by using false information and lies” as it moved towards developing nuclear weapons and called on the IAEA to deliver a “clear and unequivocal message” to Iran.

This is part of a series of highly provocative actions by both the US and Israel.

In April, the US seized an Iranian-flagged tanker carrying 115,000 tonnes of Iranian oil that had run into trouble in Greek waters. The US had designated it along with four others for sanctions, supposedly because of its links to Russia’s defence sector. Tehran denounced the ship’s seizure as “piracy” and warned it would take “punitive action” against Athens. Last month it seized two Greek tankers in the Gulf.

This follows dozens of confirmed or suspected incidents in a shadow maritime war against Iran playing out from the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean. The Wall Street Journal reported in March 2021 that Israel had carried out at least a dozen attacks on Iranian vessels, mostly in the Red Sea and eastern Mediterranean, since 2019, a claim consistent with those in multiple Iranian sources.

Meanwhile, the White House has confirmed that Biden will visit the Middle East July 13-16. He will first meet Prime Minister Naftali Bennett—if he is still in power after his government lost its majority this week—and President Isaac Herzog in Israel and the Palestinian Authority’s president, Mahmoud Abbas, in Ramallah. He will then go on to Jeddah where he will hold talks with the heads of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan, Egypt and Iraq.

A key purpose of the US president’s visit is to patch up relations with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, whom the Biden administration initially treated as a persona non grata, because of his role in the murder of dissident journalist Jamal Ahmad Khashoggi  and other gross violations of human rights. Biden is to discuss “national security” issues with the Crown Prince, along with climate change, increasing Saudi energy exports to ease global oil prices, Iran’s nuclear program and the war in Yemen.

With Israel and the Saudi regime serving as its cornerstones, Washington is seeking to cement an anti-Iran alliance, as part of its broader preparations for war with Russia and China, with whom Tehran has forged increasingly close relations.

Such an alliance would involve sharing intelligence, anti-aircraft and anti-drone capabilities, advanced radar deployment and both offensive and defensive cyberwarfare technology to be supplied by Washington and to some minor degree Tel Aviv. While seeking to curb Iran’s growing political influence across the region, including in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Gaza, the US is also determined to counter China’s economic presence and political influence by offering an alternative to China for investment in building ports, cellular networks and cyberwar capabilities.

Washington’s provocations have been amplified by Israel’s increasingly reckless military assaults and threats against Iran. Last Friday, Israeli warplanes bombed Damascus International Airport to thwart Iran's efforts to transport weapons to Hezbollah and other regional proxies using commercial flights. Russia, which patrols Syrian airspace, evidently sanctioned the bombing, although it publicly condemned Israel’s attack which has put the airport out of action for weeks.

Last month, the Israeli Air Force carried out 15 attacks against facilities it said were being used by Iran to transport and store weapons and industrial equipment to Syria and Lebanon. Tel Aviv claims that it has stopped about 70 per cent of Iranian arms shipments to the two countries.

Israel has also carried out a series of assassinations inside Iran over the past few weeks, with five senior officials killed in five separate incidents. The dead reportedly include two IRGC officers and three scientists said to be involved in Iran’s nuclear, missile production and drone projects. According to a report in the New York Times, sources in the Biden administration said that the assassination of Colonel Hassan Khodaei, who was responsible for the development of military technology, guided missiles and drones in the IRGC’s Quds Force for the use of Hezbollah and Palestinian groups operating in Lebanon, was an Israeli operation. On Monday, a spokesman for the Iranian government threatened Israel with “reciprocation.”

Israeli Prime Minister Bennett has spoken quite openly about creating “a new equation, in which we strike inside Iran in response to attacks on us by their agents.” He boasted that Israel’s policy towards Tehran has changed and, with Israel having developed the means to conduct operations in Iran on a regular basis, Tel Aviv would not tolerate Iranian attempts to attack Israel or Israeli targets overseas in “silence.” Moreover, Israel’s operations would no longer be restricted to nuclear scientists, but also people involved in “terrorism,” missile production and arms smuggling.

These provocations against Tehran come as Washington’s ever tighter economic blockade deepens the poverty of the Iranian masses and strangles the country’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic which, according to official figures, has claimed the lives of more than 140,000 people. The currency has dropped to its lowest-ever value, with the rial trading in the bazaars at 332,000 rials to the dollar, down more than 4.4 percent since June 1. Iran’s currency is now worth one tenth of its value at the time of the 2015 nuclear deal.

In recent weeks there have been mass anti-government protests across the country. They have been sparked by the government’s cuts to subsidies that have led to a sharp rise in the price of basic food staples, increasing poverty, a threefold rise in rents, low and unpaid wages, the now worthless pensions and the corruption and mismanagement that led to the May 23 collapse of a high-rise building in Abadan that killed more than 30 people.

15 Jun 2022

Government of Malaysia International Scholarships 2022/2023

Application Deadline: 15th June 2022.

Eligible Countries: (List of MTCP Recipient Countries)

To be taken at: Public and Private Universities in Malaysia

Accepted Subject Areas? Field of studies is in the following priority areas:

  • Science and Engineering
  • Agriculture and Fisheries
  • Economics and Islamic Finance
  • Information and Communication Technology
  • Biotechnology
  • Biosecurity and Food Safety
  • Infrastructure and Utility
  • Environmental Studies
  • Health not including nursing, medicine, clinical pharmacy.

Candidates may choose any related course within the field/areas mentioned above

About Scholarship: The Malaysian Technical Cooperation Program (MTCP) was established in 1980 as Malaysia’s commitment to South-South Cooperation through the sharing of Malaysia’s development experiences and expertise with other developing countries.

Type: Masters degree

Selection Criteria: Applications will be considered according to the following selection criteria:-

  • High-level academic achievement
  • The quality of the research proposal and its potential contribution towards advancement of technology and human well-being.
  • Excellent communication, writing and reading skills in English Language

Eligibility: Malaysian Technical Cooperation Programme (MTCP) Scholarship applicants must COMPLY to the following criteria:

  • Not more than 45 years old at the time of application.
  • For Master’s Degree Program, applicants should obtain a minimum of Second Class Upper (Honours) or a minimum CGPA of 3.0 at Undergraduate Degree level.
  • Proof of English Language Proficiency:
    • Scanned copy of the original proof of English Language Proficiency such as IELTS (minimum total score 6.0); or TOEFL paper-based test with a score of 500 or an internet-based test with a score of 60; or
    • Applicants obtaining Degrees with English as medium of instructions may also be accepted (evidence is a prerequisite).
  • Has an excellent level of health certified by a doctor/physician. The cost of the medical check-up shall be fully borne by the applicant.
  • Scholars must undertake full-time study for postgraduate programs at the selected Higher Learning Institutions (Please refer List of Universities).
  • Applications are only open to candidates who have received offer letters from universities in Malaysia but have not yet started their studies or those who have registered for no more than one semester for a Master’s Degree.

How Many Scholarships are available? Several

What are the benefits?

  1. This scholarship covers:
    1. Cost of Living Allowance
    2. Book Allowance
    3. Tools Allowance
    4. House Rental Allowance
    5. Family Assistance Allowance
    6. Placement Allowance
    7. Thesis Allowance
    8. Travel Allowance
    9. Practical Training Allowance
    10. End of Study Allowance
    11. Tuition Fees
    12. Medical Claims
    13. Visa Fee
  • Method of Payment: Participants will receive allowances and other benefits as mentioned above from the Scholarship Division, Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia through their individual savings accounts. Students are advised to open a Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad account.

How long will sponsorship last? For the duration of the programme of study

Visit Scholarship webpage for details.

Scottish nurses threaten pay strike in “broken” National Health Service

Richard Tyler


Nurses in Scotland are threatening strike action if the devolved Scottish government does not agree a 10 percent pay rise.

Along with other public sector workers, nurses have seen the real value of their wages decline through more than a decade of austerity and pay freezes, now exacerbated by mounting inflation.

The centre block of Glasgow Royal Infirmary, as viewed from the other side of Castle Street (Credit: Creative Commons/ Daniel Naczk)

Hailed as “heroes” during the coronavirus pandemic, nurses and health care workers throughout the UK have also confronted spiraling work pressures, with staff shortages putting patients at risk. According to a report presented at a Royal College of Nursing (RCN) conference on Monday, over 80 percent of 20,000 nurses surveyed in Scotland said staffing levels on their shifts had not met patient needs.

There are currently more than 6,200 nursing posts unfilled in Scottish hospitals and GP surgeries, a 38 percent increase in a year, according to figures from Public Health Scotland.

Data from NHS Scotland also shows almost 18 percent of district nursing posts are unfilled.

Colin Poolman, RCN Scotland interim director, described the statistics as “worrying” as they showed that the staffing crisis continued to deteriorate. “Nursing staff have never been under greater pressure and with so many vacancies adding to this, work-related absences are on the rise and significant numbers of experienced nursing staff are considering leaving the profession,” Poolman said.

An RCN poll from January found that six in 10 nursing staff in Scotland were considering or planning to leave their jobs.

Matthew McClelland, lead director for Scotland at the Nursing and Midwifery Council, said the numbers leaving reflected “the impact of pressurised environments, challenging workplace cultures and the pandemic on the workforce.”

The dire conditions facing nurses in Scotland reflect a broader crisis in the National Health Service (NHS). According to Dr. Lailah Peel, chair of the British Medical Association’s (BMA) Scottish junior doctors committee, “All across the National Health Service in Scotland we’re struggling. The system is broken and it’s breaking us.”

On the BMA Scotland website, she describes how total patient numbers are reaching new peaks week to week. It has become impossible to routinely divert ambulances to the Accident & Emergency Department (A&E) at another hospital, as had been the case in the past when demand mounted. “Right now, we’re all feeling these pressures all the time.”

For those attending A&E departments this means longer and longer waits. The last time the A&E waiting time target was met in Scotland was July 2017, with waiting times getting worse since last year. More than 2,000 people were stuck in A&E for over eight hours in mid-May, with over 600 forced to wait over 12 hours before being admitted to a ward or discharged.

Staff shortages meant it was impossible to safely monitor the rising number of patients, according to Dr. Peel. “We can’t repeat observations as often as we would like, we simply can’t keep eyes on all our patients all the time. And we just don’t have the space to see them, so short of examining patients in the corridor, they have to wait, and wait.”

The problems in A&E department are exacerbated by chronic bed shortages, with the loss of NHS beds hitting Scotland proportionately harder than the UK as a whole. Of some 25,000 NHS beds that have gone since 2010, over 4,000 (17 percent) are in Scotland, which has just 8 percent of the UK population.

Added to this is a huge shortage of social care provision, meaning hospital beds cannot be freed. At the end of last year, Simon Hodgson, director of Carers Scotland, said without further funding, “we risk sleepwalking into a new social care crisis.”

These factors combine to force patients to lie on trollies, sometimes for days, until a bed on a ward becomes free. NHS Scotland was short of 100 A&E consultants and twice as many registrars, according to Dr. Peel.

As in England, waiting lists for routine surgery in Scotland ballooned during the pandemic. A letter from senior orthopaedic clinicians leaked to The Times reveals that the number of patients waiting more than two years for common procedures, such as hip or knee replacements, in Scotland is soaring. Planned orthopaedic surgery was currently running at only 48 percent of its former capacity.

Their letter, to NHS Scotland chief operating officer John Burns, says almost 2,900 people in Scotland have been waiting over two years for orthopaedic procedures. They contrasted this with England, with 10 times the population, which had reduced the comparable waiting list to about 4,000.

Official statistics last month revealed the worst cancer waiting times since records began in 2006, with only 79 percent of “urgent” referrals being treated within 62 days. Even worse, well over a third of Scots with cancer only received a diagnosis after attending hospital as an emergency. A major study by researchers at University College London into when cancer was first detected in patients showed Scotland fared worse than the rest of the UK, with almost four in 10 cancer patients there diagnosed through emergency departments. The situation was described as a “ticking timebomb.”

Women who needed to see gynaecology specialists faced “harrowing delays”, according to Glasgow GP Dr. Margaret McCartney. Two-week waits for urgent cancer referrals to gynaecology were now taking “six to eight weeks”, she said. Screening, paused in 2020 due to COVID, has created a hidden disaster just waiting to happen.

The NHS was established as a UK-wide provider of health services and support in 1948, part of “cradle to grave” welfare provisions, free at the point of delivery, introduced following the end of World War Two. Beginning under Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s, privatisation has eaten away at the NHS. An “internal market” introduced in 1990 was designed to open the service to external competition and provide a source of profit to the private health corporations.

In 1999, as part of the establishment of devolved governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, responsibility for health was handed over to these bodies. The Scottish parliament, initially under a Labour government, abandoned the “internal market” in NHS Scotland and established a more unified approach through regional health boards. Health funding as a percentage of GDP rose slightly from 6 to 8 percent between 1999 and 2019, with the Scottish National Party (SNP) ruling since 2007.

These modest changes have not altered the fact that public health in Scotland as measured by life expectancy trails behind the rest of the UK. Comparing average life expectancy at birth, this was estimated to be 76.8 years vs 79.3 years for males and 81 years vs 83.1 years for females in 2020. Health differences are still overwhelmingly a class question. Data from Public Health Scotland shows that in the most affluent areas of the country, men enjoy 23.8 more years of good health and women 22.6 more years compared to the most deprived areas.

Moreover, the pandemic has shown that the attitude of the Scottish government under Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP to protecting life does not significantly differ from that of Boris Johnson and the Tories in Westminster. Holyrood has pursued the same herd immunity policy and has now lifted all COVID rules and restrictions.

Johnson government legislates to rip up Northern Ireland protocol

Steve James


On Monday, the UK government published legislation to drastically and unilaterally alter the Northern Ireland protocol component of the Withdrawal Agreement with the European Union (EU), setting Britain on course for legal battles and trade war.

Under the protocol's terms, a trade border has been established in the Irish Sea as Northern Ireland effectively remains within the European single market, despite, juridically, being part of the UK. Although some businesses based in Northern Ireland have benefitted from ready access to both the EU and the UK’s markets, the protocol has enraged Northern Ireland's far right and pro-British unionist parties, close allies of the Conservative government in Westminster, who insist the protocol has compromised Northern Ireland's status in the UK.

Vehicles at the port of Larne, Northern Ireland, Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2021. (AP Photo/Peter Morrison)

The Johnson government has seized on the unionists' calibrated outrage as a pretext to rip up as much as they can of the Brexit agreement.

The Northern Ireland Protocol Bill, penned in consultation with hard line Brexiteer Tories, addresses four main areas.

* It seeks to remove all trade restrictions on goods travelling from the Britain to Northern Ireland save on those intended for the Republic of Ireland (RoI). A “green” lane would be set up to allow unrestricted movement through ports on the Irish Sea in Britain and Northern Ireland, while a “red” lane would carry out documentation checks on truckloads directed towards the RoI.

* The bill gives the British government authority to apply state aid and VAT sales tax rules in Northern Ireland, without reference to the EU. It also removes the need for goods directed to the North to comply with EU standards. Companies can choose to follow either UK or EU standards.

* In line with this, the bill legislates to end the direct role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in overseeing and enforcing the operation of the protocol and in resolving disputes between the EU and the UK.

* A further, sweeping, provision in the bill, Clause 15, gives the government authority to ignore the rest of the protocol under the pretext of safeguarding “social or economic stability”, “the territorial or constitutional integrity of the United Kingdom”, and “the Belfast [Good Friday] Agreement” among other items. Only the UK and Irish Common Travel Area, North-South co-operation between Northern Ireland and the RoI and “human rights” provisions in Northern Ireland are excluded.

The final version of the bill, published just over a week after a narrowly defeated no confidence vote against Prime Minister Boris Johnson by Tory MPs, represents a sharp tack to the right by a weakened and unstable government. Sir Jonathan Jones, former head of the UK government legal service who resigned over the Northern Ireland issue, told the Financial Times the bill was “at the extreme end of anything we might have expected”.

Primarily, the bill is aimed at winning endorsement from the far right and powerful European Research Group (ERG) of Brexiteer Tories. According to the FT, ERG membership is not published but is estimated to be large enough to erase Johnson's 80 strong parliamentary majority.

ERG members view ditching the protocol, in the words of one of its unnamed members, as “the last part of Brexit and we have to make sure we have fully taken back control.” A so-called “Star Chamber” of Brexiteer lawyers is assembling to pronounce on whether the bill goes far enough.

The government also published its legal justification for trampling over its international agreement with the EU, claiming that the “doctrine of necessity provides a clear basis in international law to justify the non-performance of international obligations”. That necessity was the “maintenance of stable social and political conditions in Northern Ireland”. The protocol had created a “genuinely exceptional situation, and it is only in the challenging, complex and unique circumstances of Northern Ireland, that the Government has, reluctantly, decided to introduce legislative measures which, on entry into force, envisage the non-performance of certain obligations.”

This is the unalloyed hypocrisy. Brexit was, from the first, an attempt by sections of the British financial oligarchy to undercut and steal a march on its major competitors within the EU single market by ripping up in the UK regulatory restrictions on profitability that were bound up with EU membership. The partition of Ireland by British imperialism in 1921 means that the Republic in the south remains in the EU, while, post Brexit, Northern Ireland is not. The “doctrine of necessity” cited by the British government amounts to pursuing its own predatory interests under the combined weight of contradictions, including the carefully nurtured threat of loyalist violence, that its own policies have created.

The bill produced a sharp response from the European Commission. Maroš Šefčovič, commissioner for Brexit, warned that legal action begun March 2021 against the British government for breaching the protocol and the “good faith” obligation of the Withdrawal Agreement would be restarted, along with further legal moves. Šefčovič insisted the EU would not renegotiate the protocol, while EU officials expressed the view the UK had already failed to implement large parts of the Withdrawal Agreement.

Should a legal case against the UK for breaching any part of the Withdrawal Agreement be upheld by the ECJ, the likely outcome would be fines for non-compliance, followed by the imposition of trade tariffs on British goods. The EU has already barred British scientists from a €95 billion Horizon research project.

Liz Truss (fifth from left) meeting members of the US delegation in London (Credit:Liz Truss/Twitter)

The US government was more muted, following last month's disastrous tour to Ireland by leading Democrat and Chair of the Ways and Means Committee, Richard Neal, which was seized upon by the unionists for insensitivity and a pretext for tub thumping. Nevertheless, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken told the British Foreign Secretary, Liz Truss—a rival for Johnson’s party leadership—to “continue good faith negotiations with the EU to reach a solution that preserves the gains of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement”.

The US has huge investments in Ireland, which are dependent on the relative stability created by the 1998 Good Friday Agreement bringing the Irish nationalists of Sinn Fein into power-sharing arrangements with the Democratic Unionist Party in the North. The US views a falling out between its major allies with alarm. A State Department spokesperson added, “Transatlantic peace, security, and prosperity are best served by a strong UK, a strong EU, and the closest possible relationship between the two.”

Responses in Ireland were more frantic. Responding to Johnson's preposterous lie, on a visit to Cornwall, that the legislation was “not a big deal”, Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney described the British moves as “a breach of international law.” Coveney, recently the target of a loyalist paramilitary bomb attack hoax, told the Irish Times that the EU would be “forced to respond in a way we don’t want”. He continued, “The risk is by unilaterally acting the way they are now, they potentially risk collapsing the protocol because I don’t believe the EU can accept the approach [of] the British government.”

Irish Times political editor, Pat Leahy, warned of the dangers facing Ireland if the EU responds in kind to the UK's actions. Leahy wrote “if the trade agreements between the two sides crumble, then the Irish Government will be faced with the prospect its predecessor dreaded: choosing between a Border in Ireland or a border between Ireland and the rest of the EU.”

NATO-Russia war inflames conflict between Turkey and Greece

Ozan Özgür


Amid the ongoing US-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine, tensions are rising dangerously between NATO member states Turkey and Greece in the Aegean Sea. The two countries are holding war games aimed at each other, trading accusations of disregarding international treaties, and violating each other’s borders with jet fighters and warships.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan watches jet fighters fly past during the final day of military exercises that were taking place in Seferihisar near Izmir, on Turkey's Aegean coast, Thursday, June 9, 2022. (Turkish Presidency via AP)

The Turkish Armed Forces’ (TSK) Ephesus-2022 exercise, held in the Aegean Sea and attended by more than 10,000 military personnel, ended last week. Thirty-seven countries, including the United States and Italy, participated in air, sea and land drills. Held in Seferihisar, only 1.5 kilometers from the nearby Greek island of Samos in the Aegean Sea, the exercise was based on the scenario of a “military landing on an island.” It was widely treated in Turkish capitalist media as a threat against Greece.

Greek media reported that during Greece's naval exercise Storm 2022, which ended on May 27, Turkey sent “two F-16 fighter jets that violated Greek airspace, reaching just two 2.5 nautical miles from the northern port city of Alexandroupoli.”

During the Ephesus-2022 exercise, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan accused Greece of arming Aegean Sea islands in violation of international agreements. He warned Athens 'one last time' on this: “We invite Greece to stop arming the islands that have non-military status and to act in accordance with international agreements. I’m not joking, I’m speaking seriously.”

Threatening to militarize Turkish islands if necessary to threaten Greece, Erdoğan said, “We again warn Greece to avoid dreams, statements and actions that will lead to regret, just as they did a century ago,” a reference to the Turkish war of independence against the British-backed Greek invasion in 1919-1922.

A week ago, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Çavuşoğlu accused Greece of violating its peace treaties with Turkey: “But what is another reason for Greece to be aggressive? Greece's violation of the status of the islands given to it in the 1923 Lausanne Treaty and 1947 Paris Treaty under the condition of not arming them [Greek islands in the Aegean Sea], and our raising this violation within the framework of international law.”

Cavusoglu added: “The sovereignty of the islands will be questioned if Greece does not end its violation.” This threat to “question” Greece’s sovereignty over islands it controls amount to a threat to invade them and go to war.

The Greek Foreign Ministry reacted to the Ephesus-2022 exercise and statements by Turkish officials on Twitter, writing, “Ankara poses a threat to regional peace and security.” On Thursday, Greek government spokesman Giannis Oikonomou dismissed the Turkish claims, calling them “Ahistorical claims and baseless myths that can neither challenge nor, let alone, substitute international law and international treaties.”

Accusing Erdoğan of provocation, Oikonomou threatened, “It is clear to everyone that our country has upgraded its geostrategic and geopolitical footprint as well as its deterrent capacity to be able at any time to defend its national sovereignty and sovereign rights.”

A century after World War I began in the Balkans, NATO and the bourgeois governments in the region again risk plunging the world into a catastrophic war. In 2020, tensions between Turkey and Greece over natural gas and sea borders in the eastern Mediterranean were defused by EU and especially German mediation. Greek-Turkish talks resumed. However, as the World Socialist Web Site warned, “History shows such conflicts cannot be peacefully resolved under capitalism, whether or not a temporary Greek-Turkish peace deal is somehow reached.”

The US-NATO war on Russia in Ukraine has now inflamed the Greek-Turkish conflict, turning the Aegean into an undeclared second front in the NATO-Russia war.

The right-wing government of Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis has unabashedly aligned itself on Washington’s moves against Russia. The Greek port of Alexandroupoli in the northern Aegean Sea has been transformed into a major US military base. Alexandroupoli is also being used to deliver weapons to Ukraine and to NATO forces along the border with Ukraine in Romania.

The Turkish bourgeoisie has pursued a cynical, two-faced policy on the NATO war on Russia. On the one hand, it has backed NATO’s Ukraine policy, including the far-right coup NATO backed in Kiev in 2014, and armed Kiev with armed Bayraktar TB2 drones. On the other, it has kept diplomatic channels with Russia open, greeting Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Ankara, and posed certain obstacles to the most aggressive NATO moves targeting Russia.

Ankara closed the Black Sea straits linking the Mediterranean Sea to the Black Sea coast of Ukraine and Russia to both NATO and Russian warships, blocking a NATO naval attack on Russia. It also threatened to veto NATO’s plans to absorb Sweden and Finland and post NATO troops on Russia’s northern border with Scandinavia. The Turkish government was not objecting to the war, however, but continuing its long-standing targeting of the Kurdish people: it denounced Sweden and Finland for having ties to Kurdish-nationalist organizations.

Washington responded to this veto threat by inviting Mitsotakis to give a speech denouncing Turkey in the US Congress. During his enthusiastically received speech, Mitsotakis blamed Turkey for the division of the Mediterranean island of Cyprus and demanded a halt to US F-16 sales to Turkey. US President Joe Biden also gave Mitsotakis strong support.

Erdoğan condemned Mitsotakis' trip, declaring that Mitsotakis “no longer exists” for him. Erdoğan added that he viewed the US-NATO bases in Greece, targeting Russia and growing Chinese economic influence in the region, as a threat to his government, saying, “And, most importantly, there are nearly a dozen bases in Greece. Whom does Greece threaten with those bases?”

Workers in Greece, Turkey and internationally must be warned: the danger that the conflicts in the Black Sea and the Balkans will escalate uncontrollably into a world war is very great. In the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic, prices are spiraling out of control as the financial aristocracy massively increases its wealth. This has provoked strikes and protests internationally, and capitalist governments are all terrified of the international eruption of the class struggle.

In Greece, there have been protests against the arrival of NATO forces, including the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, to threaten Russia. Strikes have also broken out among rail workers against being forced to ship US tanks towards the Ukrainian and Russian borders. This follows a decade of savage austerity imposed by the European Union and both Mitsotakis’ New Democracy and the pseudo-left SYRIZA (“Coalition of the Radical Left”) governments.

In Turkey, the last year has seen an eruption of health care strikes against the official mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and wildcat strikes in auto, steel, mining, shipbuilding and other industries against the devastating surge in prices. A one-day nationwide strike by over 100,000 doctors in Turkey is set to begin today.

Democratic controlled Congress allows funding for school meal programs to expire, threatening 10 million children with hunger

Alex Findijs


Federal support for school lunches is set to expire at the end of the month after the US Congress refused to renew funds for a school meal program implemented in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. The program waived food assistance requirements and allowed schools to reimburse costs for providing free lunches to all students. It provided $11 billion a year to schools, enabling them to provide breakfast and lunch to millions of students. 

Preschoolers eat lunch at a day care center, Monday, Oct. 25, 2021, in Mountlake Terrace, Wash. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

However, despite being extended by Congress two times before, the Democrats who control both the House and the Senate have decided it is no longer worth funding. By cutting the program from this year’s $1.5 trillion dollar federal budget, Congress has opened the door for hunger to return to nearly 10 million school age children this summer, a figure that is only likely to worsen as the school year returns in the fall. 

Jillian Meier, director of the advocacy group No Kid Hungry, told the Guardian, “I think we’re going to see in real time the summer hunger crisis grow, and that’s going to give us a preview of what’s going to happen next school year.” 

As food prices continue to skyrocket amid decades-high inflation, schools are being placed under an extreme amount of pressure. During the program they could rely on a steady reimbursement of $4.56 per meal for all students. Now they will only receive $3.66 for participating students as qualification restrictions go back into effect. 

The financial strain on schools will hit quickly. With food prices rapidly rising, reports have emerged of school officials shopping at Costco early in the morning to try and buy cheap food items in bulk. Some school districts have been forced to cut back on the number of food options and even the quality of the food, which could carry additional financial penalties as schools struggle to meet standards issued by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), which oversees federal school meal programs. 

Before the waivers have even been cut, schools were already struggling to keep meal programs running. According to USDA deputy undersecretary Stacy Dean, speaking to the Washington Post in March, “Ninety percent of schools are using the waivers and only 75 percent of them are breaking even.” And with a decline in school personnel during the pandemic, schools additionally lack the labor to improve services. 

“We literally believe we’re going to go off a cliff June 30,” Katie Wilson, executive director of the Urban School Food Alliance told Vox. “And we simply don’t have the labor to go back to doing what we did [pre-pandemic]. We have school districts that are missing hundreds of people, so to expect them to account for every kid and what their family income is ridiculous.” 

Millions of parents have been suddenly thrust into an impossible situation as well. They will have to somehow come up with the money to replace school meals that once provided up to 50 percent of their children’s daily caloric intake. Not only this, but school officials have noted that registering for free or reduced lunches under the previous requirements could be a year-long process.

Teachers and school workers often begin speaking with parents about meal programs in the fall, preparing them for registration for the following school year. Now schools will have to process millions of applications in a matter of months and many families may not be aware of or able to complete registration in time, leaving them without the assistance they need. 

This drastic cut to food services will have severe impacts on children’s health and ability to learn. According to a study by No Kid Hungry, providing access to summer meals for students could increase the number of high school graduates by 82,000 and save over $50 billion in educational costs each year. This is because hungry students are unable to learn effectively and often suffer from extensive learning loss over the summer, requiring additional funds to be dedicated to assist them. Not only this, but undernourished children are 31 percent more likely to be hospitalized with an average hospital bill of $12,000, a cost that could throw a family into debt for years. 

Blame for the cut has quickly been placed by the Democrats on Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who blocked the passage of the Kids Not Red Tape Act proposed by Democratic Senator from Michigan Debbie Stabenow this March. However, funding for the waiver was never included in the initial budget proposal, and despite bi-partisan support, never received any significant efforts by Senate Democrats to ensure its passage. 

Ultimately, the Democrats are in agreement with McConnell that pandemic era social measures must come to an end and that the gutting of what has become an essential service preventing child hunger is necessary to force parents back into the workplace. 

“There is no urgency and political appetite to even have this conversation,” said Meier. “Frankly this is not a priority for Congress and the White House. People are really focused on having a ‘return to normal’ ... folks aren’t talking about it and they have no clue that this crisis is looming.” 

100,000 Turkish doctors strike amid growing global movement of health care workers

Ulaş Ateşçi


Eleven organizations representing a majority of physicians and other health care workers in Turkey are striking nationwide Wednesday after their demands for better wages and benefits were rejected by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s government.

In addition to the Turkish Medical Association (TTB), which has around 110,000 members, doctors' organizations such as Hekimsen, Hekim Birliği Union and Tabip Sen, as well as nurses and other health workers, are participating in the strike. At least 100,000 physicians are expected to participate in this work stoppage.

Health care workers in Turkey have been the most combative section of the working class since December last year, organizing numerous strikes and protests for their demands. Following strikes in January, February and March, Hekimsen went on strikes for six days.

The decision to strike came after the Erdoğan government submitted a bill to parliament that rejects all the basic demands of doctors and health care workers. Holding a 'Great Physician Workshop' last Saturday, they decided on a joint nationwide strike today.

In a joint statement yesterday, they declared, “We do not accept this proposed law, which was passed by the [parliamentary] commission and will be brought to the Parliament today, which does not include any improvements for us, our demands and our rights. We say ‘withdraw this law.’” They added that “Tomorrow we will be on strike for our social rights, and tomorrow we will not provide services except for emergency cases, intensive care and oncology cases.”

The statement drew attention to the link between the increasing subordination of the health system to capitalist profit and the deterioration of the working and living conditions of health care workers and public health services: “Turkey's health system, which has been privatized with the Health Transformation Program and which sees patients as customers, hospitals as businesses and us as slaves, is increasingly collapsing due to pandemics and crises.”

The doctors are demanding that COVID-19 be counted as an “occupational disease,” as health care workers have fallen ill with COVID-19 ten times more often than the broader population, and doctors have lost their lives four times more than the average. To date, over 500 health care workers in Turkey have died of COVID-19.

They also said, “Instead of reviewing and changing the system to solve the failure of the health system; violence, poverty, resignations, migration, lack of merit, unqualified education, performance-based work, mobbing, pressures” were imposed on them. The population, they stated, “is subjected to virtual queues at home, appointments that can be made months later, ever-increasing out-of-pocket expenses, incentives for private hospitals with regulations that devastate public health services, and inequality in health.”

The statement said that this year alone, 938 Turkish physicians have gone abroad due to these conditions, and suicides among health workers have increased. Speaking on March 8 on the growing emigration of physicians, Erdoğan said, “Let them go, if they go. Then we will employ our newly graduated doctors.” According to the Hekimsen union, “approximately 9,000 doctors have resigned from the public service in the last 20 months; nearly 2,000 of them have gone abroad or are about to leave.”

However, Erdoğan changed his tone in the first day of a two-day strike on March 14-15, stating, “This country owes a debt of gratitude to its doctors and needs them.” He claimed his government would make legal regulations to meet some health care workers’ demands. The bill that was then submitted to parliament completely ignored health workers’ demands, however.

Doctors and health care workers have also warned of wider and longer strikes if their demands are not met: “This is neither our first nor our last action. This is a protest against the proposed hollow law. Let no one doubt that we are in a crisis that will not refrain from longer work stoppages.” The statement concluded by calling on the public to support the strike.

Inflation, triggered by the massive printing of money by central banks to be handed over to the super-rich during the COVID-19 pandemic, has surged with NATO sanctions against Russia during the war in Ukraine. In Turkey, annual official inflation rose to 73.5 percent in May and food inflation to 91.6 percent. According to a more reliable report by the independent Inflation Research Group (ENAG), however, real annual inflation already exceeds160 percent.

Moreover, the poverty line for a family of four in Turkey reached 19,600 Turkish lira (currently $1,135) in May, according to the pro-government Türk-İş union confederation. The “hunger limit” (monthly food expenditures required for a family of four to have a healthy, balanced and adequate diet) rose to 6,017 Turkish lira ($350), 1,750 lira more than the minimum wage (4,250 TL, or currently $245).

The Erdoğan government is sitting on a social powder keg that is about to explode. According to a survey conducted by the Turkish Consumer Rights Association in March, nearly 90 percent of Turkey's population of about 85 million, or 76.5 million people, live below the poverty line. The survey also showed that 25.5 million of these 76.5 million people have an income below the hunger limit.

On the other hand, the share of corporations in national income increased from 42.9 to 47 percent in the last two years of pandemic profiteering, while the total wealth of millionaires reached 3.9 trillion Turkish lira.

Nonetheless, “Specialist physicians receive a salary of 12,000-13,000 TL and other physicians 9,500-10,000 TL with a fixed additional payment,” according to a recent report by Hekimsen. Doctors and health care workers are demanding a significant increase in their salaries and pensions as well as improved benefits.

Doctors are demanding that “malpractice” decisions be stopped against them and oppose working over 36 hours non-stop. They pointed out that the number of physicians in Turkey is one-third the average in OECD countries. Physicians also oppose reducing the time to examine a patient to five minutes.

They are demanding legal measures to deter assaults against them in the health care facilities. Each day, there are 40 acts of violence against health care workers in Turkey.

The growing strike movement of health care workers in Turkey expresses the rising anger of broad sections of the working class against the skyrocketing cost of living and social inequality. This year witnessed an explosion of strikes in Turkey, with at least 106 wildcat strikes in January and February alone.

Moreover, it is part of a global movement of strikes and protests by health care workers against understaffing, exhausting workloads and the erosion of their living standards, from Germany, the UK, and France to India, New Zealand and the United States and beyond.

The demands of health care workers in all these countries, and in fact, of the working class as a whole—an end to the subordination of health care to profit, a policy based on science and the protection of public health against the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, decent wages and living conditions—require a frontal attack on the wealth and power of the financial oligarchy. It is enriching itself at the expense of the health and well-being of the overwhelming majority of the world's population.

Amid strike wave across France, Macron calls to rearm against Russia

Alex Lantier


On Monday, President Emmanuel Macron pledged to put France on a war footing, boost military spending and impose speedup on workers.

Speaking at the Eurosatory military show in Paris, Macron said France and the European Union (EU) are in a “war economy [for which] we must lastingly organize ourselves.” Citing NATO’s war with Russia in Ukraine, he said, “I have asked the [defense] ministry and the general staff to carry out in coming weeks a reevaluation of the military budget law given the current geopolitical context.”

With France’s military budget of €40.4 billion set to increase to €50 billion by 2025, Macron said: “We still have much to do to react to the deep transformations we are going through. And anyone who doubts the urgency of these efforts should look yet again to Ukraine, whose soldiers are demanding quality weapons and who have a right to an answer on our part. … We will take the decisions on investment and will advance the demands that go with them.”

As strikes spread across France, Macron is doubling down in support of the NATO war with Russia shortly after winning reelection against neofascist candidate Marine Le Pen in April. Hospital and airport workers went on strike last week, and mass transit workers and truckers are set to strike next week amid mounting anger at inflation and rising prices. Macron’s party was beaten into second place in this weekend’s first round of the legislative elections by Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s New Popular Ecological and Social Union (NUPES).

France’s “president of the rich” is providing a classic example of how a desperate, hated government uses military adventures abroad to try to strangle the class struggle at home. Macron is trying to use the war NATO has launched with Russia in Ukraine to justify a reactionary agenda of military spending increases, €80 billion in social cuts, and imposing speedup on workers in strategic industries—in the face of mounting social opposition.

As Macron spoke, military planning officials revealed to Le Monde drafts of a draconian new law allowing the state to requisition industrial production and dictate workflow speed in any industry related to defense. The General Directorate for Armament (DGA) is coordinating this plan together with France’s major defense contracting companies such as Thales or Dassault and their parts suppliers.

Le Monde described it as “a bill allowing for the requisitioning of material or abilities of civilian companies even if France is not formally at war, as the law currently specifies. … The state could, for example, ask a mid-sized business specializing in precision mechanics that does not work in the defense sector to make itself available to a defense contractor and to speed up work on its assembly line.”

DGA chief Alexandre Lahousse told Le Monde it aims to boost France’s capacity to produce “shells, missiles, artillery and armament for infantrymen,” the main equipment needed in the Ukraine war. It also entails requisitioning large quantities of critical raw materials, including titanium, steel, and rare earth elements, or critical parts such as semiconductors. “Many corporations fear that Washington will requisition these materials for its own armies,” the paper noted.

Not only the rapidly increasing danger of world war breaking out in Europe, but also bitter strategic and corporate rivalries between the major NATO imperialist powers—notably between Washington and the EU powers—are driving Macron’s reckless military planning.

Germany in particular has announced a massive €100 billion special fund for military rearmament, as it repudiates the policy of military restraint it adopted after the fall of the Nazi regime and seeks to again emerge as Europe’s hegemonic military power. After the two world wars fought between France and Germany in the 20th century, the explosive rearmament of Germany is no doubt causing consternation in significant sections of the French military brass.

During the presidential elections, neofascist candidate Marine Le Pen denounced Germany as “the absolute negative of the strategic identity of France.” She also called for “a strategic rapprochement between NATO and Russia” once the Ukraine war was ended and criticized US foreign policy towards China as “too aggressive.” While apparently less aggressive against Russia and China, however, Le Pen called to threaten Algeria and develop France’s imperialist wars in its former colonial empire in Africa.

Macron speaks, however, for forces in the French bourgeoisie that, despite growing conflicts with Berlin, are trying to work with it to build up the EU as a counterweight to Washington. He did not denounce Berlin, but implicitly criticized it for devoting its €100 billion special fund to purchasing US weapons, like F-35 fighters and Chinook helicopters, rather than to multibillion-euro plans for a new, jointly developed Franco-German tank and jet fighter.

“Let us not go forward by repeating the errors of the past: spending a lot to buy things from elsewhere is not a good idea,” Macron said. “Now is the time to impose a preference for European products. … We need to reinforce industry and an industrial and technological base for European defense that is much stronger and more demanding, otherwise we will simply build the new dependencies of tomorrow.”

Macron’s warmongering remarks point to the mortal crisis of the capitalist system. In the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, EU and US authorities plunged trillions of euros and dollars into bank bailouts for the super-rich, while insisting that there was no money for a scientifically guided fight to stop the pandemic. These bank bailouts have fueled inflation that is now devastating workers’ living standards and provoking a growing strike wave.

Like other NATO heads of state, Macron is responding by stoking the war with Russia and moving to reimpose some form of state of emergency or martial law, on the fraudulent pretext that he is preparing for a war of national defense. But the threat to workers’ lives and living standards in France and across Europe comes not from Russia, but from the reckless social and military policies of NATO imperialist governments.

During the second round of the presidential elections between Macron and Le Pen in April, the Parti de l’égalité socialiste (PES) called for a campaign in the working class to boycott the second round, reject both candidates, and prepare for a movement against whichever candidate won. It emphasized that Macron would not be an alternative to Le Pen, but would also march towards dictatorship and war. Macron’s calls to place France on a war footing vindicate this assessment.

It also exposes the strategy advanced by Mélenchon and the NUPES against Macron, which is to call on voters to give the NUPES a majority in the National Assembly that would make Mélenchon prime minister. Such an arrangement would leave Macron as president with full control over foreign policy. It would thus allow Macron to impose military rearmament and press for cuts to wages and social spending, tearing apart Mélenchon’s promises to increase wages and pensions.

Mélenchon’s decision to align himself on the flood of denunciations of Russia by Macron and the capitalist media must be taken as a warning: He and the French union bureaucracies would capitulate to Macron’s calls to slash living standards to boost the war effort.