26 Jul 2022

US Fed meets amid fears of global recession and financial turbulence

Nick Beams


The US Federal Reserve’s monetary policy setting committee starts a two-day meeting today at which it is expected to announce a further 0.75 percentage point (75 basis points) increase in interest rates despite growing concerns that the US economy could soon enter a recession if it is not already in one.

Consumer sentiment is at a record low and yesterday the biggest US retailer, Walmart, issued a statement that higher prices for food and fuel were causing consumers to pull back spending in other areas. The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) characterised the announcement as “an ominous sign for the US economy that has relied on resilient household spending power through inflation.”

The Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington, DC [Photo by Rdsmith4 / CC BY 4.0]

While Fed officials appear to have pulled back from a full percentage point increase, the further increase in the Fed rate to be announced tomorrow afternoon will add to the pressure on central banks around the world to also lift their rates in order to protect their currencies and mitigate the transmission of inflation via higher import prices.

The US interest rate hikes, which began in March, are being driven by the rise in inflation which hit an annual rate of 9.1 percent in June and the determination of the Fed, acting as the enforcer of the interests of the corporations and finance capital, to ensure that a wages movement of the working class in response to the price hikes is crushed by slowing the economy.

While there are some indications that commodity price increases which sparked the inflationary spiral are falling, there are warnings that the inflationary surge is spreading throughout the economy.

Former Fed vice chair Donald Kohn told Bloomberg that “inflation is entrenched and spreading.”

This view was echoed by Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon as part of the survey conducted by the WSJ on the outlook of business chiefs.

“We see inflation as deeply entrenched in the economy,” he said. “In my dialogue with CEOs operating big global businesses, they tell me that they continue to see persistent inflation in their supply chains. Our economists, meanwhile, say there are signs that inflation will move lower in the second half of the year. The answer is uncertain.”

That uncertainty has led to significant swings on Wall Street with the market moving up one day in the belief that the Fed may pull back its monetary tightening in the face of recession threats only to move down the next.

But there are growing calls that the Fed must not carry out a “stop-go” policy and continue with the rate hikes even under conditions of recession.

Former US treasury secretary, Lawrence Summers, who has said an unemployment rate of 10 percent for a year is needed to halt inflation, told Bloomberg Television his instinct was “you’d not see rates cuts as soon as people think.”

“The Fed has to be careful. If you look at the history of the 60’s and 70’s, there were moments when monetary policy eased a bit and things didn’t tend to work out so well,” he said.

All central banks are now engaged in monetary policy tightening as 50 basis point increases become the norm, with some increases even higher as took place earlier this month when the Canadian central bank lifted its rate by 100 basis points, the biggest by any G7 economy since 1998.

According to the Financial Times (FT), in the three months to June, 62 policy rate increases of at least 50 basis points were made by 55 central banks, with another 17 increases of 50 basis points or more so far this month.

The underlying motivation for the rate hikes, which in and of themselves will do nothing to bring down prices, was outlined by Jennifer McKeown, head of global economics at Capital Economics, in comments to the FT.

Central banks, she said, had to move quickly to get rates out of “stimulative” territory, “particularly in an environment where wage growth and inflation expectations are rising and there is a risk that inaction would allow wage-price spirals to develop.”

In other words, rates must be lifted rapidly to crush the growing international wages struggles of the working class under conditions where living standards are being cut daily.

Last week, the European Central Bank (ECB) joined the 50-basis points club when it abandoned its previous “forward guidance” of a 25-basis point increase and indicated further rises would come.

The larger than expected rise was the result of a deal between the so-called hawks on the ECB’s governing council who had been pressing for it. In return they signed off on the so-called Transition Protection Instrument under which the ECB will buy up the bonds of the more indebted countries, particularly Italy, if the interest rates on government debt sharply diverge from those of Germany.

The “anti-fragmentation” policy is aimed at trying to prevent a recurrence of the crisis that developed in 2012 when the continued existence of the euro was threatened.

Speaking in support of the new measures, which will not have a limit decided in advance, ECB president Christine Lagarde, said the central bank was “capable of going big.” She said the ECB would rather not use the new program “but if we have to use it, we will not hesitate.”

On the same day as the new policy was announced, the Italian government, headed by former ECB president Mario Draghi, collapsed, increasing the danger of fragmentation amid fears that elections, scheduled for September, may not produce a stable government, let alone one capable of carrying out the kind of austerity measures being demanded to ensure financial support.

Added to the prospect of continuing financial and economic turbulence there is the issue of gas supplies to Germany from Russia. While Russia resumed supplies of gas via the Nord Stream 1 pipeline last week after its closure for maintenance, supplies were only running at 40 percent, casting doubt over whether sufficient reserves can be accumulated for the winter months.

Yesterday, the situation worsened when the Russian gas producer, Gazprom, announced that exports through the pipeline would be cut to 20 percent because of problems in the return of a turbine undergoing repairs in Canada because of the sanctions regime imposed on Russia.

At the same time, the Ifo Institute, a major economic research organisation, warned: “Germany is on the threshold of recession.”

Summing up the problems confronting the ECB, Krishna Guha, head of policy and central bank strategy at the US investment bank Evercore told the FT that “the combination of a brewing giant stagflationary shock from weaponised Russian natural gas and a political crisis in Italy” was about as close to a “perfect storm as can be imagined.”

As Wall Street continues to gyrate, major investors have cut their allocations to equities to the lowest level since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, according to an article in the FT last week, reporting on a survey conducted by the Bank of America.

Michael Hartnett, chief investment strategist at the bank said investors had reached a “dire level” of pessimism over concerns that the tightening of monetary policy could lead to a broad slowdown in the global economy.

The Biden administration’s new policy: Everyone will get COVID

Benjamin Mateus


At yesterday’s White House COVID-19 press briefing, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declared, “As we have said, almost everyone is going to get COVID and because of the hard work we have done since day one turning around the disjointed COVID response we had inherited, we have the tools to ensure that people can go about their daily life and work.”

Biden’s spokewoman then added, “The president is fully vaccinated, twice boosted, and taking Paxlovid. His current health speaks to how Americans should avail themselves to boosters and treatments.”

This is a remarkable admission in that it explicitly states that the Biden administration has washed its hands of any attempt to stem a pandemic that has already killed a million people in America and 20 million around the world. “Everyone is going to get COVID” should be read as a statement of intent. It confirms that a policy of mass infection, mass death and mass murder is the agenda of the US president and the ruling class for which he speaks.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, left, speaks during a briefing with White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator Ashish Jha, right, at the White House in Washington, Monday, July 25, 2022. [AP Photo/Susan Walsh]

Hospitalizations and deaths continue to climb as BA.5’s dominance grows. Nearly 450 people are dying every day from COVID-19. This translates to 164,000 a year, five times the average killed by influenza and a toll that would have been considered inconceivable before the beginning of the pandemic. And this does not take into account the predictions by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of another massive surge of infections this fall and winter.

Beyond the immediate death toll, one in five of those who are infected and survive will experience Long COVID, and a third of these can suffer from debilitating disease. Yet, with $1.3 billion given to the NIH (National Institutes of Health) to study the Post-Acute COVID Syndrome (the formal title of Long COVID), there is not a single therapeutic trial up and running. The press secretary was not asked about this and would have had nothing to say.

Meanwhile, study after study has documented that even mild COVID-19 infections can accelerate the aging process in adults and children. Allowing everyone to get infected means a generation of children and teenagers who will be deliberately crippled even before they have ventured into the world on their own.  

Hospitals across the country are facing drastic and unprecedented staffing shortages, which are further compounding worker burnout. Infections and reinfections are causing health care workers to fall sick and forcing them to choose between staying home to care for themselves or coming in to work and infecting their patients. Many hospitals are considering eliminating routine COVID-19 testing to cut wait times in overcrowded emergency rooms.

Federal funding for addressing staff shortages is being exhausted. An article published in Politico yesterday reported, “As of July 22, hospitals in nearly 40 states reported critical staffing shortages, while hospitals in all 50 states said they expected to within a week.”

Nancy Foster, vice president for quality and patient safety policy at the American Hospital Association, told Politico, “There is growing concern that this money has run out. It’s not really getting sufficient attention. While we have previously experienced staffing shortages, we’re keenly aware of the staffing shortages at virtually every kind of position within the hospital right now. If we have a large influx of COVID patients, it will be [a] much more challenging surge to meet those demands that ever before.” How will everyone catching COVID-19 avail themselves of therapeutics and treatments when the entire health care system is on the verge of collapse?

The Biden administration is keenly aware of the crisis in health care but chooses to ignore the implications. Over the past 10 days, there has been a deliberate shift by the Biden administration to force the population to accept the consequences of living and dying with COVID-19.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the longtime head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), announced in an interview with Politico last week that he would retire before the end of Biden’s first term.

Asked if he was staying in his role at age 81 out of a sense of obligation, Fauci replied, “We’re in a pattern now. If somebody says, ‘You’ll leave when we don’t have COVID anymore,’ then I will be 105. I think we’re going to be living with this.”

This was an astonishing statement, implying that the COVID-19 pandemic would continue to plague the world for another quarter century. There have already been three Omicron waves since December, ultimately producing the highly contagious BA.5 subvariant. What does a scenario of 25 years of global pandemic mean for the human race?

Clearly his statement was not a slip of the tongue. Such interviews are rehearsed and prepared in advance by the administration, and the occasion was used as a test of the public response to the declaration that COVID-19 was here to stay.

When news of Biden’s positive COVID-19 test broke on Thursday, the media response amounted to a celebration of the health care available to the US president, including Paxlovid, a drug which is out of reach for many working class victims of SARS-CoV-2. Biden’s recent world travels, with multiple maskless photo ops, were more than just careless. The president and his staff allowed nature to take its course and dropped all mitigation measures for him. In short, they allowed him to get infected.

Given his age and understanding the airborne nature of the disease, his staff and medical doctors would have demanded protecting him from contracting a virus that has killed millions and pushed life expectancy down by more than two years. Additionally, the risk of Long COVID and the impact it has on nearly every organ system despite vaccination status would have ensured his well-being was guarded carefully. He takes blood thinners and cholesterol-lowering medications which place him in a high-risk category.

The Wall Street Journal wrote on the occasion, “The President’s infection demonstrates how hard it is to avoid the new highly transmissible COVID variants. The White House has gone to great lengths to protect Mr. Biden, but there’s only so much staff can do if the President is going to do his job.”

The sub-headline of the editorial read, “His infection shows that everyone will get the virus eventually.” This was echoed nearly word for word by Ms. Jean-Pierre three days later.

The other major aspect of official COVID-19 policy was spelled out by the White House COVID-19 Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha. In a press briefing Friday on Biden’s condition, he said, “This virus is going to be with us forever.”

Biden ran for president on the promise that he would carry out the measures necessary to bring an end to the pandemic. Now his administration has officially adopted the policy that everyone will get COVID-19 and the virus will be with us forever. While the Trump administration advocated “herd immunity,” claiming everyone would become immune if the virus was allowed free rein, Biden drops any pretense of a strategy: SARS-CoV-2 has conquered, and his administration has surrendered.

This policy is not unique to the American ruling class. In every country, with the significant exception of China, the financial aristocracy has decided that nothing should be done to fight COVID-19. The elderly, the sick and immunocompromised, working people and their children will pay the price, while those in the most privileged positions, like Biden and the billionaires he serves, will have unlimited resources to survive the deadly pandemic.

The American people have not “learned to live with COVID;” they have been coerced into it. They have been lied to, as they elected a president who claimed to “follow the science” but has actually followed the money. The measures necessary to fight the pandemic are in complete conflict with the profit interests of the financial elite, so public health will be sacrificed to private wealth.

25 Jul 2022

Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG CAT) 2023

Application Deadline:

Letter of Intent Deadline: 7th September 2022 5:00 PM (UTC)

Application Deadline: 13th December 2022 5:00 PM (UTC)

Tell Me About Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG CAT):

Cancer is becoming a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Africa. The International Agency for Research on Cancer estimates that cancer deaths in Africa will double by 2040. This trend poses major challenges for public health activities in Africa. Among the many needs, there is a need to generate local evidence and knowledge upon which appropriate clinical, public health, and policy guidelines can be built. Historically, the pool of cancer researchers in Africa has been limited, in part because early-career funding mechanisms to help launch junior investigators into research careers are very limited. In order to address the growing cancer health crisis, a pipeline of talented and creative early-career African investigators must be fostered to generate knowledge that can be used to address cancer needs in Africa and beyond. Furthermore, the development of academic and research pursuits in Africa will provide opportunities to advance the continent’s need for biomedical, economic, academic, and social development on a variety of levels. The  Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG Cat) represents a joint effort to address this need by promoting and supporting early-career investigators in Africa to establish a successful career path in cancer research, thereby increasing and sustaining a cadre of talented cancer researchers in Africa.

BIG Cat is a premier initiative by the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer (AORTIC) to build capacity for cancer research in Africa. The  goal of BIG Cat program is to aid the next generation of African cancer researchers to base their careers in their home countries and institutions, and to contribute to the overall expansion of capacity for research and training in Africa by generating evidence that will guide practice and policy. BIG Cat was initiated in 2010 by the US National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health (NCI/CGH), and it is now a collaborative effort of AORTIC, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), and NCI/CGH, with funding support from Partners including academic, industrial and scientific organizations.

The research proposed for funding may be in any area of cancer research, including basic research, clinical research, population-based research and translational research across the cancer care continuum (prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment , supportive and palliative care, and survivorship). These grants are intended to catalyze subsequent application for funding from other funding sources, not to support longer term research. Each grant will provide US$55,000 over two years for expenses related to the research project, which may include salary and benefits of the grant recipient and any collaborator, postdoctoral or clinical research fellows, graduate students (including tuition costs), and/or research assistants, research/laboratory supplies, equipment, publication charges for manuscripts that pertain directly to the funded project, and other research expenses. Indirect costs is limited to no more than 10% of the total grant amount. Up to US$10,000 may be allocated from the grant to support travel applicable to the research project and relevant scientific meetings, including mandatory attendance at the 2023 AACR Annual Meeting and biennial AORTIC conference. The grants are not intended for principal investigators outside of Africa, although collaborative research projects are encouraged. All funds provided must be spent in Africa with the exception of limited support for travel to international scientific meetings and conferences.

Which Fields are Eligible?

Research projects may be in any area of cancer research, including basic research, clinical research, population-based research and translational research across the cancer care continuum (prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment and survivorship). Applicants are encouraged to be innovative in their research proposals and demonstrate local relevance of their proposed research.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Grants

Who can apply for Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG CAT)?

At the start of the grant term on July 1, 2022, the Principal investigator (PI) must:

  • Be a beginning investigator, defined as a clinician or scientist who received his or her highest degree of study within the past ten years. An earned academic (or research) doctorate [such as a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)], or medical degree [such as a Doctor of Medicine (MD),Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) or Bachelor of Medicine Bachelor of Surgery (MB ChB, MB BS, BM MCh, etc.)] which is considered the highest degree of study in most African countries. When an investigator has received multiple terminal degrees, the calculation will be based on the date of award of the most recent degree.
  • Be a current member with AORTIC. Note: AORTIC membership is also mandatory at LOI stage.
  • Reside in and be conducting research in Africa with particular relevance to the African cancer burden on the continent. Proof of residency is required.
  • Have legal residency status in Africa.
  • Not have received a BIG CAT award in prior years.

AACR is obligated to comply with U.S. laws and regulations regarding research and related transactions in countries subject to US Government enforcement of economic and trade sanctions for particular foreign policy and national security reasons.  If your proposed project involves US Government sanctioned countries subject to restrictions, please contact the AACR’s Scientific Review and Grants Administration (the AACR’s SRGA) at grants@aacr.org.

Which Countries are Eligible?

Applicants must have legal residency status in Africa. A list of eligible countries can be found in the Competitive Letter of Intent Program Guidelines and Application Instructions. Proof of residency is required.

How Many Scholarships will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG CAT)?

$55,000 USD

How Long will the Program Last?

2 Years

How to Apply for Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG CAT):

Competitive Letter of Intent Program Guidelines and Application Instructions are available for download here.

  • The BIG Cat program requires applicants to complete an online Letter of Intent submission by 5:00 p.m. UTC (1:00 p.m. Eastern Time) on September 7, 2022, using the ProposalCentral website at https://proposalcentral.com/.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

The pandemic in Russia and the bankruptcy of national-chauvinist politics

Andrei Ritsky


On Tuesday, July 19, the Rospotrebnadzor press service reported the detection of the new Omicron BA.2.75 subvariant in five people in Russia. The press service wrote, “The material was sampled in July. The material was collected in the city of Moscow. The disease had a mild form in all the patients. There are no hospitalized patients.”

Previously, this heavily mutated Omicron subvariant has been found in India, Australia, Germany, Great Britain, the United States, Canada and the Netherlands. With the Omicron BA.5 subvariant currently dominant in Russia and throughout the world, it is difficult to say whether this new BA.2.75 subvariant can be considered particularly dangerous, capable of causing another wave of coronavirus around the world. What is certain, however, is that Russia’s health system is unlikely to be able to continue to withstand blow after blow from the pandemic.

According to official figures, which are significant undercounts, the pandemic has already killed about 382,000 people in Russia. Estimates of excess deaths place the real death toll in Russia above 1.2 million, among the highest per capita excess death rates in the world.

Over the past few weeks, there has been a gradual increase in the number of official cases, typical of all initial periods of coronavirus waves, indicating a real threat of a new pandemic wave in the coming weeks and months. Since reaching a trough on July 1, the seven-day average of daily new cases has risen by 79 percent, from 2,941 to 5,264. Genomic sequencing data from Russia is only available through July 4, but by that point the Omicron BA.5 subvariant already accounted for 33 percent of all cases and likely became dominant the following week and is fueling the current rise in cases.

Medics wearing special suits to protect against coronavirus treat patients with coronavirus at an ICU of a hospital in Volgograd, Russia, Sunday, Nov. 21, 2021. (AP Photo/Alexandr Kulikov)

Officially, roughly 18.5 million people have been infected with COVID-19 in Russia, also known to be a vast undercount. As is the case globally, the health care system has been under constant pressure for the past two-and-a-half years. Amid this deepening crisis, the Putin regime is gradually changing its own propaganda. It is increasingly ignoring the issue of the pandemic, bringing to the fore the “special military operation” in Ukraine, where Russia is not only waging a war against Ukraine, but also a proxy war against the US-NATO powers.

According to Russia’s draft federal budget for 2022–24, Russia has no plans to increase spending on health care by 2024, while adopting a 7.1 percent and 8.5 percent increase in spending on “national security” and “national defense,” respectively.

It is possible that BA.5 or BA.2.75 could trigger a new pandemic wave. For the working class, the hard times of confronting a pandemic are once again approaching. The class struggle could deepen in tandem with the new wave, beginning with health workers and then spilling over to other sectors of the country’s economy.

While the COVID-19 pandemic presents ongoing dangers to millions of workers across Russia, the government of Russian President Vladimir Putin, as well as public scientists such as immunologist Vladislav Zhemchugov, have downplayed the severity of the threat to the population.

Zhemchugov has repeatedly made contradictory and revealing statements on the pandemic. It is around such personalities that the propaganda that coronavirus is now “safe” is built. In June of this year, commenting on the origins of the coronavirus, Zhemchugov provocatively stated that it is impossible to fully deny that it originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

In April, according to Rambler, Zhemchugov claimed that Omicron would help “renew collective immunity.” Also, Zhemchugov stated that the Omicron variant would look for a new host instead of humans. As with official scientists internationally, including Drs. Ashish Jha and Anthony Fauci in the United States, Zhemchugov said that Omicron could supposedly cause the last wave of the pandemic. Most recently, he has decided to “correct” himself and expresses the position that the new wave will be the very “tail” of the pandemic.

All of these statements must be scrutinized critically. What are the guarantees that the new BA.5 and BA.2.75 strains will not be so deadly? What are the guarantees that the coronavirus will be done away with for good? Why would coronavirus outbreaks suddenly stop? And why should we ignore the threat to life posed by COVID-19? Under the current social and economic system, there are no guarantees.

These same conceptions were advanced by the Putin government. In January 2022, as the Omicron BA.1 subvariant was surging throughout Russia and internationally, Putin declared, “The pandemic is indeed gradually receding. The number of people sick is decreasing; the number of people who, thank God, have gotten better, has been steadily exceeding the number of those who got sick recently.”

Putin’s speech at that time was built on imaginary hopes that the virus will gradually go away. But in June 2022, reality forced him to admit that “the pandemic is not over.” Still, admissions alone are not enough. What is required is a clear policy of action against the pandemic, based on the scientific method, not on the interests of the ruling elites of Russia or internationally.

Recently, since about March of this year, more and more regions and cities have abandoned all restrictions on the fight against the pandemic. What is quite telling is that all this began precisely after the start of the “special military operation” in Ukraine. Putin’s propaganda is now working in a different direction, seeking to deflect blame for all of Russia’s problems onto an outward enemy. He is attempting to “whitewash” himself and his elite while “denigrating” the Western ruling capitalist elite.

Putin’s message to the Russian worker is that if they are exploited by their own people, “in our own way, the Russian way, the national way,” that is fine. Exploitation and illness are only bad if they are the work of “foreign agents” and “Russophobes.”

It is clear that the policy of Western imperialism resorts to Russophobia as part of its anti-Russian campaign. However, every class conscious worker should understand that it is not Putin who is the defender of Russia, but the international working class. It is their capacity for revolutionary action that can save the world in general, and Russia in particular, from the destruction of the productive forces and cultural heritage as a result of the struggle for profits and spheres of influence between the capitalist powers.

The Putin regime has no way out of the current crisis in the country. It is only capable of adventurist actions, such as the invasion of Ukraine, which ultimately plays into the hands of Western imperialism and does nothing to stop its desire for future expansion against Russia and China. Its “social” policy is only a policy of handouts, which will not work for long with the increasing food cost inflation that is hitting the majority of the population hard.

The world bourgeoisie in general, and the Russian bourgeoisie in particular, are incapable of solving any of the looming crises characteristic of the current era of capitalism. This applies both to the persistent economic crises and to pandemics, social inequality, the impending ecological apocalypse by the end of this century, the threat of a new world nuclear war and much more.

UK Johnson government imposes massive real-terms pay cut on millions as unions suppress strikes

Robert Stevens


The Conservative government, immediately following the resignation of Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the triggering of a leadership contest, last week announced massive de facto pay cuts for more than two million public sector workers.

Clinical staff care for a patient with coronavirus in the intensive care unit at the Royal Papworth Hospital in Cambridge, England, May 5, 2020 [AP Photo/Neil Hall Pool via AP]

On the same day that Retail Price Index (RPI) inflation rose to almost 12 percent, Tory ministers announced that more than a million National Health Service (NHS) workers will receive a pay rise equivalent to just 4 percent, or £1,400 annually. Consultant doctors will receive a pay award of just 4.5 percent. According to research by the Trades Union Congress, hospital porters’ real-terms pay will be down £200 this year, nurses will suffer a £1,100 cut and paramedics a cut of £1,500.

All teachers, except the newly qualified outside London, will receive only a 5 percent increase.

None of the miserly pay deals above the originally planned 3 percent will be paid for by new funding. Any increases above 3 percent must therefore come from cuts to departmental budgets. The Institute for Fiscal Studies calculates these will total £7 billion.

The government was emboldened by the fact that hardly any industrial action was underway. With the exception of a few thousand criminal lawyers, no national strikes have taken place for weeks.

From the start of the year, figures in ruling circles have raised the threat of a “summer of discontent” with workers resisting a new offensive on their wages, pensions, working conditions and jobs. Instead, the unions have stymied a movement that had the potential to throw out Johnson’s entire government.

Only token strikes, including the just three days of national strike action by the Rail, Maritime and Transport union, have taken place.

How grotesque is this betrayal by the trade unions was made clear in a piece in Sunday’s Observer, the sister newspaper of the Guardian. The article’s headline, “Paralysis from Tory leadership race is damaging pay talks, say doctors and teachers”, is misleading as the “doctors and teachers” referred to are leading figures in the union bureaucracy.

Observer Policy Editor Michael Savage comments, “Figures from both teaching and health unions said that with a new prime minister due to be in place by the autumn, they feared the temporary status of the current government was affecting the ability of ministers to take the necessary decisions.”

He continues, “Kevin Courtney, joint general secretary of the National Education Union (NEU), said that when challenged over funding increases for next year in a call last week, newly appointed education secretary James Cleverly ‘wouldn’t answer straightforwardly and had the very good excuse that he might not be secretary of state’.

National Education Union joint leader Kevin Courtney speaking at a Trades Union Congress rally in London, June 18, 2022 [Photo: WSWS]

The article cites Courtney’s response, “This does indicate that they’re not firing on all cylinders, and that’s not good… They are not dealing with the things that matter.”

Courtney, who jointly leads a union of nearly half a million members, speaks for the union bureaucracy everywhere. He is declaring that the desperate situation facing millions of workers can only be resolved in negotiation with a functional Tory government, for which they must wait until September!

It would seem unarguable to any worker that the crisis of the Tory government be used to press home a struggle against it. But the NEU and other unions will not do this because they are not adversaries of the government, but its de facto partners. They have called virtually no action halfway into the year to ensure that the “summer of discontent” did not become a summer of action. And they fear any false step on their part, giving workers’ anger an outlet, will unleash a movement beyond their control during a crisis of rule facing the ruling class.

Already, the Observer admits on the unions’ behalf, strikes in the public sector are disappearing over the horizon to the “autumn and the new year”, which it claims, “could see an unprecedented wave of strike action among teaching staff and doctors after a pay deal that is set to see their wages falling in real terms in the face of the cost of living crisis.”

Dispensing with the rhetoric, what is being prepared by the unions is an autumn and winter of evasions, betrayals and the suppression of every struggle that seriously threatens whichever right-wing monster—likely the Thatcher-worshipping Liz Truss or near billionaire Rishi Sunak—emerges as Johnson’s successor.

Britain’s main pseudo-left outfits the Socialist Workers Party (SWP) and Socialist Party (SP)—who count among their membership a significant number of local, regional and national union officials—have responded by doubling down in defence of these organisations.

The SWP offered advice to Courtney et al that they should try to present a more militant face and preserve whatever dwindling support they retain among workers. They wrote July 19, “The all too familiar pattern—consultative ballots followed by weeks of talks, then formal postal ballots followed by weeks more talks and maybe a strike in months afterwards—falls far short. At the very least there should be more strikes and protests.”

The SP wrote on July 20 of its efforts to encourage a more militant response, “The leadership of the union in the ‘NEU Left’ grouping previously told us [national action] was fantasy, and that in reality only school-by-school action was possible. But we argued that the union needed to lead from the front as well as build from below.

“Now we must build a mighty campaign, starting immediately, and then getting ready to hit the ground running when the schools start in September.”

These organisations deliberately avoid the central question: why has there been no co-ordinated, national strike action organised by the unions this year, despite the eagerness of millions to take the fight to the Tories as expressed in a series of near unanimous ballots for strikes among rail, bus, postal and other key sections of workers.

Calls for the union leaders to act as if they are actually in a fight against the government and the employers are used to conceal the actual character of the trade unions as organised opponents of the class struggle—an industrial police force for the corporations and the state.

Central to the chloroforming of the working class by the unions and their pseudo-left apologists is their covering over the fact that every significant dispute, especially in the public sector, is a struggle against the government. They therefore offer no perspective for the working class to intervene in the government crisis, even under the extraordinary conditions of the resignation of a prime minister.

New Sri Lankan president appoints his predecessor’s cabinet

Saman Gunadasa


Last Friday, Sri Lankan president Ranil Wickremesinghe appointed virtually the same cabinet of 18 ministers as his predecessor, Gotabhaya Rajapakse, making clear that there will be no change in the government’s agenda. In response to the country’s unprecedented economic and political crisis, it will impose the austerity measures demanded by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and brutally suppress any opposition.

Army soldiers stand guard as protesters shout slogans at the site of a protest camp outside the Presidential Secretariat in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Friday, July 22, 2022. (AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

Just prior to appointing the cabinet, in the early hours of Friday, Wickremesinghe gave the go-ahead for a violent crackdown on unarmed, anti-government protesters on Galle Face Green in central Colombo demanding his resignation. Thousands of soldiers and police attacked protesters and journalists and tore down tents and makeshift structures. Galle Face Green has been the central protest site in the three months of mass strikes and protests, fueled by extreme shortages and skyrocketing prices for essentials, which forced Rajapakse to flee the country and resign.

Wickremesinghe was appointed “acting president” by Rajapakse as he fled then installed as president in a parliamentary vote last week. Wickremesinghe, a longstanding right-wing political hack known for pro-US and pro-IMF loyalties, has no popular support and depended on the votes of Rajapakse’s Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP). He has assumed the powerful ministerial posts of defense and finance, as well as wielding the sweeping autocratic powers of the executive presidency.

As prime minister, Wickremesinghe has appointed Dinesh Gunawardane, a close confident of the Rajapakse brothers and parliamentary leader of the House who has held senior ministerial posts in SLPP-led governments. Gunawardane, who entered parliament in 1983, is leader of the Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP), a Sinhala chauvinist party established by his father Philip Gunawardene—a renegade from the Trotskyist movement in the 1940s.

Gunawardene takes over from Wickremesinghe who was appointed as prime minister in May, after Mahinda Rajapakse was compelled by mass strikes to step down. The only other change in the cabinet line-up is the omission of the previous foreign minister, G.L. Peiris, who refused to back the Rajapakses’ choice of Wickremesinghe as president. Instead, Peiris openly called for the SLPP to vote for one of its own MPs, Dallas Alahapperuma, in last week’s parliamentary vote.

The Rajapakses strongly supported Wickremesinghe, even though he is the only parliamentarian of the rump United National Party (UNP), as the political figure most able to carry out the anti-working class agenda demanded by the ruling class. He also undoubtedly had strong backing from the country’s corporate elite, US imperialism, the IMF and Sri Lanka’s international creditors.

Ranil Wickremesinghe [Source: United National Party Facebook]

Ali Sabry, Gotabhaya Rajapakse’s personal lawyer and trusted confidante, was appointed foreign minister. He was justice minister in the Rajapakse government then briefly finance minister in April.

According to media reports, Wickremesinghe told the first cabinet meeting that the security forces are empowered to uphold the constitution and to create an environment for people to live without fear. This is a pledge to the ruling class, not working people, that the government will do whatever is necessary to protect the wealthy, their property and bourgeois rule. The attack on the Galle Face Green protesters on Friday was to underscore this promise.

Wickremesinghe had already declared a state of emergency which gives the military wide powers to ban protests, arbitrarily arrest and detain people, and carry out searches. He issued another decree on Friday, deploying the military throughout out the island to maintain “public order.”

On Friday evening, Wickremesinghe, along with Inspector General of Police and foreign ministry officials “unofficially” briefed Colombo-based diplomats. This followed token expressions of concern by some diplomats, including US ambassador Julie Chung, over the early morning raid on protesters. These “concerns” were not for the protesters, but rather that the crackdown could provoke further widespread popular unrest.

The social crisis facing working people is dire. Annual inflation has hit nearly 60 percent and there are chronic shortages of essential foods, fuel and medicines. A recent FAO report found “6.3 million people are food insecure, while another 6.7 million people are not consuming acceptable dietary food as of June” in Sri Lanka.

Wickremesinghe emphatically defended the military’s actions, reportedly asking the assembled diplomats whether “protesters could illegally occupy the President’s Office in their respective countries.” He called on diplomats “to check with the relevant officials when making statements, as statements based on social media reports alone could damage Sri Lanka's image.”

Wickremesinghe is attempting to dress up his regime as an all-party government. Prime Minister Gunawardane has been assigned to negotiate with opposition parties and, if one or more is prepared to join the government, the cabinet reportedly could be expanded from the current 18 to 25 or more members with parliamentary approval. Wickremesinghe is desperate to present a united political façade for the brutal measures that the government will carry out.

The Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB), led by opposition leader Sajith Premadasa, and the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), led by former president Maithripala Sirisena, had indicated their willingness to join an all-party government depending on what was proposed. However, last Friday’s attack on protesters prompted them to maintain their distance for the time being.

Premadasa declared last weekend: “We are prepared to play a role in the government through (parliamentary) committees, but do not intend to accept ministerial portfolios.” After meeting with some trade union leaders, he announced that he will set up a national council including representatives of the trade unions and civil organisations on Tuesday that will function from his office.

All of the government and opposition parties are committed to carrying out the IMF’s austerity agenda but are fearful of the reaction of the working class and rural masses to the intolerable conditions they confront.

Over the past three months, the opposition parties and the trade unions have been instrumental in undermining the mass popular uprising and sabotaging the independent intervention of the working class. All of them have backed the formation of an all-party, interim government as the means of keeping working people shackled to the political establishment and blocking a political struggle against the source of the social crisis—the capitalist system. A “national council” is just a variant of the same political trap.

WHO Director-General declares monkeypox a public health emergency of international concern

Benjamin Mateus


On Saturday, World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared the unprecedented global outbreak of monkeypox a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), the highest alert before declaring the outbreak a pandemic. In doing so, he overruled the decision of the International Health Regulations (IHR) Emergency Committee (EC) which had reconvened on July 21 to address the continued “unexpected” spread of the disease in non-endemic regions across the globe.

When they first met a month ago, on June 23, the EC decided against declaring monkeypox a PHEIC by a vote of 11 to three. The cumulative case count at the time was 3,621 infections, and the seven-day rolling average was just 225 per day. Since then, cases have exploded to over 16,000 cases in at least 75 non-endemic countries, with a seven-day rolling average of 535 per day.

Despite this massive and global spread of the virus, after several hours of deliberations last Thursday the EC reached a vote of nine to six that there were still insufficient grounds to declare monkeypox a PHEIC. Dr. Ghebreyesus’ decision to overrule this vote is the first such overruling in the history of the WHO.

The head of the World Health Organization, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, speaks during a media conference at an EU-Africa Summit in Brussels on February 18, 2022 (Johanna Geron, pool photo via AP, file)

During a press briefing following the announcement, Dr. Ghebreyesus noted, “Nine and six are very, very close. Since the role of the committee is to advise, I then had to act as a tiebreaker. We believe this will mobilize the world to act together. It needs coordination and not only coordination but solidarity.”

He added, “There are now more than 16,000 reported cases from 75 countries and territories and five deaths. WHO’s assessment is that the risk of monkeypox is moderate globally and in all regions except in the European region, where we assess the risk is high. Although I am declaring a public health emergency of international concern for the moment, this outbreak is concentrated among men who have sex with men [MSM], especially those with multiple sexual partners. That means this outbreak can be stopped with the right strategies in the right groups.”

It has been the failure of governments and their public health institutions over the last three months to contain the spread of the infections that have pressed the Director-General to declare the monkeypox outbreak a PHEIC. Basic tenets of isolating cases and contact tracing could have brought the outbreak under control by late May.

The unprecedented inaction by governments in the face of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, as well as growing criticism that the WHO was once again failing to act to swiftly contain what could become another uncontrolled pandemic, clearly played a significant factor in this decision.

Figure 1: Monkeypox cases across Europe. (Source @antonio_caramia)

Announcing the PHEIC, the WHO included a lengthy list of recommendations and guidelines on conducting surveillance, managing cases and reporting these for various groups of states based on their epidemiological situation, transmission patterns and capacities.

Under the 2005 IHR agreement, states have a legal duty to respond to the declaration of PHEIC, which is defined as “an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other States through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response,” especially when the situation is “serious, sudden, unusual, or unexpected.”

It must be recalled that smallpox, a deadly disease endemic throughout human history, was infecting 50 million people globally during the 1950s, despite the fact that a vaccine had existed for more than 150 years. Precisely because a globally-coordinated effort to address the scourge had never been attempted, smallpox remained a threat to most of the world’s population.

When the WHO targeted smallpox for eradication in 1967, the annual global caseload was around 10 to 15 million. Ten years after proclaiming the initiative for the eradication of smallpox, the last known case was reported in Somalia in 1977. More than 40 years have passed since smallpox was conquered and the international experiences amassed since then are considerable. Given the resources and technology available today, one must ask how quickly a coordinated effort could end the monkeypox pandemic with only tens of thousands infected?

The timing of WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC on monkeypox, which takes place as the Omicron BA.5 subvariant continues its assault across the globe, underscores the significant challenges facing depleted public health institutions globally. Nearly every country outside China has allowed the coronavirus to surge without considering its impact on the well-being of its population. The tattered state of public health raises the question whether these countries will do anything to address any infectious disease that threatens the public?

Last week, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Anthony Fauci stated bluntly that the COVID-19 pandemic will go on for another quarter century, while White House COVID Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha claimed, “This virus is going to be with us forever.”

These very same officials whose responsibility is to protect the public from dangerous pathogens are promoting the idea that becoming infected with COVID-19 is no longer a critical or serious matter. In short, they encourage the subordination of public health to the demands of the markets.

Under such conditions, it remains doubtful if much will be done to stem to tide of monkeypox infections across the globe. As Dr. Ghebreyesus said at Saturday’s press conference, current mathematical models suggest that the reproduction number (R0) among the MSM population is above one, meaning there is continued growth in cases among this group. For instance, in Spain, the R0 is around 1.8, and for the UK at 1.6.

It bears reviewing what is known about the virus and the infection it causes.

The following video with Dr. Lisa Iannattone, Canadian dermatologist, on signs and symptoms of monkeypox, has been viewed widely. We encourage our readers to watch the very informative presentation:

The monkeypox virus is an enveloped double-stranded DNA virus, unlike the RNA single-stranded coronavirus. It belongs to the orthopoxvirus genus of which the vaccinia virus, cowpox virus and variola virus (the virus that causes smallpox) are related. The current clade causing the monkeypox pandemic is from West Africa and is known to cause less severe disease.

The demographics of the concurrent monkeypox outbreak in West Africa affect women and children most. However, on Friday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that two children in the US contracted monkeypox through household transmission. With summer ending, schools and day cares will open their doors again in the coming weeks for the new school year, raising concerns about the monkeypox virus taking hold in these high-risk and vulnerable groups.

One of the features of the monkeypox virus is its ability to resist drying and tolerate changes in temperature and pH on surfaces. The crusts of lesions from infected people or fomites in bed linen can remain infectious for months or years. However, they are sensitive to common disinfectants but less to organic disinfectants.

Air samples have indicated that these infectious particles could become airborne. And though the primary mode of transmission is through contact with infected lesions, if these are on the mouth and oral membranes, there is the risk that the virus can be transmitted via respiratory droplets and aerosol. For these reasons, health care workers should don PPE for airborne precautions.

The incubation period for monkeypox infection can range from five to 21 days, usually around one to two weeks. Symptoms of the disease begin with a combination of fever, headaches, chills, exhaustion, fatigue, muscle aches and swelling of lymph nodes. Three days after these prodrome symptoms, a reddish rash begins at the site of infection and spreads to other body parts.

The lesions progress over a 12-day window from macules to papules, vesicles, pustules, crusts and scabs before falling off. They can be painful or itchy, and secondary bacterial infections can occur if patients scratch themselves. The illness lasts from two to four weeks, and people confirmed to have monkeypox should isolate for the duration under medical supervision.

The current outbreak in non-endemic regions has been more atypical and milder, meaning awareness of the possibility of infection can be overlooked by the infected and physicians treating patients with these symptoms. However, complex and more invasive modes of exposure (i.e., bites from animals) may lead to more severe forms of the disease than through skin contact.

In endemic regions of Africa, the case fatality rate for monkeypox can range from 0 to 11 percent. Complications of monkeypox include encephalitis, skin infections, dehydration, infections involving the cornea and conjunctiva of the eyes, and pneumonia. Mortality with monkeypox has been seen mainly among young children, and the immunocompromised are especially at risk of severe disease.

As of July 23, 2022, there have been 16,353 confirmed and suspected cases. Eighty countries and territories have reported monkeypox cases, and the seven-day global average of cases has plateaued at around 535 cases per day. One could surmise that if testing capacity remains limited, these figures are underestimates, as public health officials have indicated.

Though Europe is the region most severely affected, cases in the US (2,581) and Brazil (614) continue to climb exponentially, accounting for more than 50 percent of all daily cases on July 22 combined. Only Spain leads the US with 3,125 monkeypox cases. It is expected that the US will soon surpass Spain and become the global epicenter of the monkeypox pandemic.

Figure 2: Daily, seven-day, and cumulative cases of monkeypox in the US. (Source @antonio_caramia)

The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a statement on July 15, 2022, that an additional order for 2.5 million doses of Bavarian Nordic’s Jynneos vaccine was placed above the 2.5 million doses ordered on July 1.

The initial order will arrive in the Strategic National Stockpile over the next year. The HHS anticipates it will have 7 million doses by mid-2023. A course of the vaccine requires two doses given four weeks apart. Currently, only 300,000 doses have been available to states and jurisdictions.

Dr. Boghuma K Titanji, an infectious disease physician at Emory University in Atlanta, who recently published a contemporary review for health care professionals on monkeypox in the journal Open Forum Infectious Disease, said of the WHO’s declaration, “[It’s] better late than never … [but] one can argue that the response globally has continued to suffer from a lack of coordination with individual countries working at very different paces to address the problem. There is almost capitulation that we cannot stop the monkeypox virus from establishing itself in a more permanent way.”