29 Jul 2022

Greek government moves to weekly COVID reporting as cases and deaths surge

John Vassilopoulos


Over the past eight weeks Greece has been experiencing a surge of COVID-19 cases, part of the wider wave of infections raging across Europe and internationally fueled by the highly contagious BA.5 Omicron sub-variant.

Latest figures released by the National Organisation for Public Health (EODY) showed 136,077 recorded new cases over the previous week, an average of 19,439 new cases a day over five times higher than the corresponding figures at the beginning of June.

The surge in Greece is down to the premature lifting of virtually all public health measures in anticipation of the summer tourist season. This began in May with the scrapping of the proof of vaccination requirement to enter restaurants, bars and cafes, which were allowed to operate at full capacity. People travelling into Greece also no longer had to show proof of vaccination to enter the country.

In June measures were further relaxed as mask mandate was lifted everywhere apart from healthcare settings and public transport. At the beginning of this month, as a further boost to the tourist industry, the conservative New Democracy government exempted hotels from providing special quarantine accommodation for tourists testing positive for the virus, who are no longer required to adhere to the already short five-day isolation period required for anyone testing positive within Greece.

These policies are part of the herd immunity agenda pursued by governments worldwide at the behest of the global financial elite, which sees all public health measures that cut across profits as unacceptable.

Of the almost 31,000 deaths in Greece, almost 10,000 have taken place since the beginning of 2022 [Photo by Our World In Data / CC BY 4.0]

The sharp climb of cases has prompted calls from within the scientific and medical community for the re-introduction of public health measures to curb the spread of the virus.

These were dismissed by medical doctor and epidemiologist Gkikas Magiorkinis who sits on the body of public health experts advising the government on COVID-19. In a Facebook post on July 5 he wrote, “Every time we have a coronavirus surge we hear ‘voices’ calling for the taking of measures… Taking NPI’s [non pharmaceutical interventions] mainly flattens the curve, it doesn’t dramatically reduce the number of infections in the long term given that with the reversal of NPI’s, which sooner or later must happen, we immediately see an upsurge until we achieve a temporary wall of immunity which will lead the upsurge to recede.”

Magiorkinis is one of many public health scientists to provide a scientific veneer to the notion that herd immunity is the inevitable course that the pandemic must run. But when NPIs are lifted has never been dictated by public health but by the profit requirements of the financial aristocracy. China’s pursuit of a zero-COVID policy has shown that infections can be brought down and contained.

Speaking to the World Socialist Web Site,neuroscientist and zero-COVID campaigner Spyros Merkouris (@covid19gr) said, “It is crystal clear that the Greek government is adopting all the core arguments of COVID deniers. This strategy aims at preventing workers who test positive from requesting absence from work or long haulers to seek support. The Greek government, as every capitalist government, considers the workers dispensable machines that only exist to make the rich richer. Zero COVID strategies are the only way forward but unfortunately there is no support from any political power in Greece.”

Having ruled out the adoption of any public health measures, the government now only reports weekly on coronavirus cases, hospitalisations and deaths, instead of daily. This follows the lead of governments across Europe such as France, Italy, Spain and the UK.

EODY’s switch to weekly reporting is aimed at concealing the fact that the virus is being allowed to run rampant. It announced the move on July 8 even as it admitted that there is a surge “in almost all European countries”, while “the course of the pandemic in our country is displaying an upward trend for approximately the last four weeks.” This was written off with the excuse that “the number of cases is a direct function of the testing policies in each country” and “Greece is the third [highest] country in the European Union with regard to the daily number of Covid-19 tests conducted.”

In other words, there are too many cases because there is too much testing! This backwards logic, forst advanced by Donald Trump, is based on a lie. On the day the statement was released the rate of positive COVID tests in Greece was 16.88 percent, nearly double that at the beginning of June. This has long since been surpassed. The positivity rate, still reported on daily, has been over 20 percent for the past three days, refuting claims by Health Minister Thanos Plevris in an interview on Open TV Tuesday that cases had been dropping for over a week.

As Merkouris commented on Twitter, “Before they peddle to you that cases reduced by 9.4 percent let us note that the number of tests conducted were reduced by 8.5 percent.”

The second falsehood in the EODY statement is the claim that, despite the upward trend in cases, the corresponding rise in hospitalisations over the preceding four weeks has been “very small”. On the day the statement was published, the average number of COVID admissions to hospital over the preceding seven days was 310. By contrast the corresponding figure on June 1 was 83. The latest seven-day average is 399 admissions.

Deaths have been steadily increasing: 292 people died during the previous week, a 38 percent increase compared to the week before and over three times the average weekly deaths recorded in June. The criminal policy of the Greek ruling elite has led to the deaths of almost 31,000 people in total and the infection of 4,349,423. This represents over 42 percent of the population of 10.3 million.

EODY’s first weekly report was met with a huge outcry on social media. According to Merkouris the number of cases and deaths were reported “not in absolute numbers but in cases and deaths per million in a desperate attempt to hide the truth.” EODY was forced to switch back to using absolute numbers.

Switching to weekly reporting has also caused massive inaccuracies in global COVID dashboards such as the “Our World In Data” website. Its administrators were not given adequate notice to account for the change and were not informed that total cases now include reinfections as opposed to the total number of people who were infected since the start of the pandemic. Magiorkinis stated, “It amazes me how these obvious programming mistakes were reproduced again and again.”

Responsibility lies with the Greek government’s decision, given that dashboards are set up on the assumption that numbers are provided in a consistent and accurate manner. The fact that reinfections have only now begun to be reported means that total infections have been consistently under-reported for months, with over 200,000 reinfections since the start of the pandemic not previously accounted for.

Attempts to downplay the danger are constant. In the latest EODY report, the headline figure of deaths over the previous week is given as 271, 21 deaths fewer if one considers the movement of total deaths between the last two reports. The government’s aim is not to inform, but to keep the population in the dark about the pandemic’s course. A way forward in the fight to end the pandemic can only be found by Greek workers undertaking to build a mass movement dedicated to a global elimination strategy.

28 Jul 2022

US Senate passes CHIPS and Science Act to bolster US tech against China

Kevin Reed


The US Senate passed on Wednesday a bipartisan bill that commits $280 billion over five years to the American semiconductor industry and scientific research in several strategic high-tech disciplines. The 64 to 33 vote in favor of the funding expressed the unity of Democrats and Republicans in support of intensifying US economic and military aggression against China.

The legislation, called the “CHIPS and Science Act,” will provide $52 billion in subsidies and tax credits to chip manufacturers to expand or build new facilities in the US and $200 billion for research into artificial intelligence, robotics and quantum computing as well as other technologies.

Seventeen Republicans voted with 47 Democrats to adopt the bill and move it to the House, where Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said it will be acted on quickly. President Biden has said that the CHIPS and Science Act is a top priority of the administration, and he will sign it as soon as possible.

The alliance of Democrats and Republicans was in support of a bill that directly articulates the domestic and foreign policy goals of the American ruling establishment for great power conflict with China.

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (Democrat, New York), who has been working on the bill for three years, said the semiconductor companies could do fine “on their own” in the 1970s and 1980s. He went on, “But in the 21st century, with countries like China and Germany investing heavily, we could sit back on the sidelines and who would lose out? American workers, American economic dominance, and our national security.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Schumer’s reference to American workers is, of course, entirely cynical. He knows full well that the massive investments in US high tech industries will benefit corporate America and the Pentagon, not the working class. A reliable supply of advanced semiconductors is required for manufacturers of high-tech and “smart” weapons systems, as well as the auto industry and the IT industry more generally.

The passage of the bill in the Senate was not without typical Washington horse trading. In order to obtain the endorsement of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Republican, Kentucky), the Democrats were forced to abandon any effort to undo the Republican tax cuts that were signed by then-President Donald Trump in 2017. There were also negotiations with right-wing Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who backed McConnell on upholding the Trump tax cuts that handed trillions over to the wealthiest layers of American society.

The only Democrat who opposed the bill, “independent” Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, attacked it as a handout to an already enormously profitable industry. Sanders was joined by right-wing Republicans like Senator Rick Scott (Republican, Florida), who called the package “one of the grossest gifts to corporate America I’ve ever seen.”

Sanders also criticized the semiconductor industry from the standpoint of economic nationalism saying, “Any company who is prepared to go abroad, who has ignored the needs of the American people, will then say to the Congress, ‘Hey, if you want us to stay here, you better give us a handout.’”

In a statement, Biden claimed the bill was an answer to the state of the US economy and rising inflation. Getting down to the strategic purpose of the bipartisan measure the US president said it would improve “American supply chains, so we are never so reliant on foreign countries for the critical technologies that we need for American consumers and national security.”

At the White House, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo expressed the widespread concerns within the ruling circles that the US technology industry has ceded its leadership position to the Chinese. She said the US share of global chip manufacturing had fallen from 40 percent to 12 percent and that the most advanced chips were all made in Taiwan.

Secretary Raimondo said the US had invested “next to nothing” in the semiconductor manufacturing sector, as opposed to China, which had spent $150 billion on domestic capacity. The government had to provide subsidies, she said, in order to compete with other countries and to incentivize companies to expand their production facilities.

The bill also contains provisions that prohibit any company that receives US funding from building manufacturing plants in China “or any other country of concern” for 10 years after accepting grant money.

Senator Roger Wicker (Republican, Mississippi) said that the aim of the bill was the “technological supremacy” of the US over China. Expressing the element of fear and desperation that underpins the recklessness behind the drive of the US for global military and economic hegemony, Wicker said, “Regrettably, at this moment, we are not in the driver’s seat on a range of important technologies. China is. China and other nations are increasingly dominant in tech innovation, posing a massive threat to not only our economy but to our national security.”

Among the corporations that will be lining up for government funding will be Intel Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Global Foundries, Micron Technology and Applied Materials. The global semiconductor market reached $556 billion in 2021 with US companies controlling approximately 46 percent of it, or $258 billion.

In many ways, the semiconductor industry expresses the integrated character of the global economy and the dependence of modern society upon the foundational systems that make electronic communications and digital technologies possible. Every segment of the economy as well as everyday life for billions of people on earth are increasingly dependent upon the development, supply and production of these increasingly miniaturized chips.

An attempt to reverse the internationalized process that brought these technologies into existence, by pulling production back within the borders of any one nation, is a deeply reactionary and catastrophic endeavor. However, this is precisely the direction that US imperialism must pursue in the drive to stem its historic decline and subordinate the entire world economy to its hegemonic interests.

Sri Lankan government endorses and extends President Wickremesinghe’s state of emergency

Peter Symonds


In an ominous sign of the repressive measures being prepared, the Sri Lankan parliament voted yesterday to extend the current state of emergency by another month. The state of emergency gives sweeping powers to the military to ban protests and strikes, arbitrarily arrest and detain anyone, search property and vehicles and censor the media.

In this photo provided by Sri Lankan President's Office, Sri Lanka's newly elected president Ranil Wickremesinghe, signs after taking oath during his swearing in ceremony in Colombo, Sri Lanka, Thursday, July 21, 2022. (Sri Lankan President's Office via AP)

After being installed anti-democratically as president by a parliamentary vote last week, Wickremesinghe’s first act was to authorise the security forces to violently disperse anti-government protesters on Galle Face Green in central Colombo. The protest site has been a central focus for the three months of strikes and protests fuelled by the country’s unprecedented economic and social crisis that has led to chronic shortages and huge price rises of essential food, fuel and medicines.

Wickremesinghe decreed the state of emergency after being appointed acting president by former President Gotabhaya Rajapakse who fled the country on July 13 in the face of massive popular opposition. Last week Wickremesinghe, a veteran political hack, stooge of US imperialism and advocate of pro-market restructuring, was installed anti-democratically through a vote in parliament, despite overwhelming popular opposition.

Wickremesinghe, the only parliamentarian of his rump United National Party (UNP), is completely dependent on Rajapakse’s Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), which used its parliamentary majority to ram through the extension to the state of emergency. The vote was 120 to 63 in the 225-member parliament with some 40 MPs abstaining.

Wickremesinghe has been installed to impose the austerity demands of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in return for emergency funding and to suppress the widespread opposition of workers and rural toilers. The IMF measures will mean a further acceleration of prices as subsidies are eliminated, sweeping public sector job losses, increased taxes on those least able to afford them and a raft of privatisations. All this is on top of already intolerable living conditions with large sections of the population in hunger and facing starvation.

As executive president, Wickremesinghe has sweeping powers, including to call out the military, to arbitrarily dismiss and appoint ministers and governments, and to take on ministries himself. He has reappointed virtually unchanged the hated cabinet of his predecessor but kept a swathe of ministries for himself, including the key portfolios of Finance and Defence, as well as Technology, Women, Child Affairs and Social Empowerment, Ports, Shipping and Aviation, and Investment Promotion.

As defence minister, Wickremesinghe has overall command of the repressive state apparatus, including the the military, and will not hesitate to use it to crack down on opposition. As defence secretary, the defence ministry’s top bureaucrat, Wickremesinghe has reinstalled Rajapakse’s appointee—retired Major General Kamal Gunaratne.

Yesterday, as parliament extended the state of emergency, the police announced the arrest of two anti-government activists, Kusal Sandaruwan and Weranga Pushpika, on bogus charges of unlawful assembly. A third, student leader Dhaniz Ali, was arrested on Tuesday night at Colombo’s international airport as he attempted to leave on a Dubai-bound flight.

While Wickremesinghe is dependent on the SLPP’s parliamentary majority, he is being backed by the country’s corporate elite, international investors and creditors, and the major powers, including US imperialism, as the political figure to impose the agenda of austerity and repression.

US Ambassador Julie Chung with President Wickremesinghe at the Presidential Secretariat on 27 July 2022 (Image: Ambassador Julie Chung Twitter)

Significantly, US ambassador to Colombo Julie Chung met with Wickremesinghe yesterday to assure him of Washington’s support. In what was described by the state-owned Daily News as “a friendly conversation,” Chung tweeted that Sri Lanka’s economic and political crisis had been discussed and she had assured the Sri Lankan president that the two countries would “work together to navigate toward a brighter future for all.” No mention was made of Chung’s token “concerns” about the vicious military-police crackdown on the Galle Face Green protest site.

Wickremesinghe was prime minister in the “national unity” government installed in a US-orchestrated regime-change operation that ousted President Mahinda Rajapakse, Gotabhaya’s brother, at the 2015 elections. Washington was hostile to Mahinda Rajapakse’s dependence on and strengthening ties with Beijing. Wickremesinghe was instrumental in shifting Sri Lankan foreign policy into the US camp and integrating the country more closely into the escalating US-led confrontation with China.

While the opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) criticised the government and voted against extending the state of emergency, it has no opposition to Wickremesinghe’s anti-working class agenda. Indeed until 2020, all of the SJB leaders were part of the UNP led by Wickremesinghe and their breakaway was not as a result of any fundamental policy differences. Like Wickremesinghe, the SJB’s criticism of the Rajapakse government was that it had not sought an IMF emergency bailout, with its harsh austerity demands, sooner.

Desperate to prop up bourgeois rule, the SJB along with other opposition parties—the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) and Tamil National Alliance (TNA)—have been desperate to corral the mass popular opposition behind the demand for an all-party interim government. Such a regime would implement identical policies to those of Wickremesinghe.

SJB parliamentarian Sarath Fonseka yesterday declared that he and his party would join the final battle to get rid of the present corrupt government and nominated August 9 for a showdown with the government. The root cause of the current crisis is not corruption as such but the profit system, which subordinates all to the profits of the wealthy few. Fonseka is simply proposing another reshuffle of venal capitalist politicians—replacing Wickremesinghe as president with the current prime minister, Dinesh Gunawardena.

Field Marshal Fonseka was formerly head of the military in which he collaborated with Mahinda and Gotabhaya Rajapakse in the bloody final offensives of Colombo’s protracted communal war against the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). All three are responsible for war crimes including the slaughter of tens of thousands of Tamil civilians in the last months of the war in 2009.

27 Jul 2022

Ford Fund Fellowship 2022

Application Deadline:

15th September 2022

Tell Me About Award:

The Ford Fund Fellowship is a program designed to equip 25 next-gen entrepreneurs with the skills, resources, and experience to scale the impactful ventures they are building. Ford Fund Fellows will learn advanced skills in entrepreneurship and leadership, have the opportunity to earn seed funding, garner experience, and build a global network, as they lay the foundation to empower many more individuals and transform their communities.

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Entrepreneurship

Who can apply?

This is for advanced, next-generation entrepreneurs building impactful ventures that create scalable innovations.

  • Ideal applicants will demonstrate a proven track record of innovation, entrepreneurship, and leadership in their community.
  • We are looking for applicants from United States, China, Mexico, South Africa, and Argentina with ventures in the “Product Fit” or “Scaling” stage.
  • Ford Fund applicants must be able to commit to be part of the 16-week program from October 17th, 2022, to February 24th, 2023.
  • There is a 2-week intensive (20-25 hours per week) followed by 14-weeks of weekly programming (5-8 hours per week).

Which Countries are Eligible?

Any

Where will Award be Taken?

This program is offered with virtual and in-person components that allows fellows to take advantage of the global cohort while also focusing on creating local impact within their communities. Virtual Programming includes: Master Courses, Workshops, and Weekly Check Ins. In-Person Programming includes Fellow-Led Basecamps and a Fellow-Led Meetup.

How Many Scholarships will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of Scholarship?

  • $25,000 in seed funding will be distributed among the Ford Fund Fellows based on progress and impact throughout the Fellowship.
  • Ford Fund Fellows will be given a stipend and spend an additional 80-100 hours implementing a 3-day intensive program called Basecamp.

How Long will Program Last?

16-week from October 17th, 2022, to February 24th, 2023.

How to Apply for Scholarship?

  1. Complete the online application: The online application contains 5 short essay questions.
  2. Your application will be reviewed: Applications will be reviewed within 2-weeks of submission. Applications are accepted and reviewed on a rolling basis. The final application deadline is September 15th.
  3. You will be invited to an interview: Applicants moving forward in the process will be invited to a 20-minute Zoom interview.
  4. Enrollment process: We will send out the final admission decision and enrollment agreement within 2-weeks of the interview.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Huawei Apps Up Global App Innovation Contest 2022

Application Deadline: 9th October 2022

To Be Taken at (country): The contest will be held in Europe, Middle East & Africa.

About the Award: HUAWEI Developer is a platform ecosystem that integrates various services and resources for developers to develop and promote their apps. After registering and being verified as a HUAWEI Developer member, developers can access complete services from development and testing to promotion and monetization. Aimed at providing quality experiences for end users, HUAWEI Developer looks forward to achieving a win-win situation with all developers.

Type: Contest

Eligibility:

  • Open to global developers. You only need to register a HUAWEI ID and complete identity verification.
  • You may not participate in the contest if you are under the age of 18.
  • Employees of Huawei and its affiliates and their immediate relatives should not sign up for the contest.
  • You can participate in the contest on your own, or as part of a team. For a team, all members must belong to the same competition region before participating in the contest in this region.

Selection Criteria: Judges will review works on the basis of the following framework:

  • Business value: Has substantial commercial potential, with sustainable business models that indicate clear market positioning and a target user base.
  • Design, technology, and user experience: Features a distinctive visual design that incorporates user-friendly characteristics, and meets universal user requirements for a stable, responsive, broadly compatible, and privacy-conducive app.
  • Innovativeness: Comes endowed with innovative design and/or technological attributes, which represent a clear improvement over those in existing apps.
  • Social value: Benefits society at large, by improving the allocation of public services, or addressing social problems. This can involve enriching the lives of individual users or facilitating industry-wide development, and span a wide range of fields, such health care, education, transportation, the economy, and the environment.

Value & Number of Awards: Up to US$100,000 will be allocated for the following award winners in each participating region:

  • US$15,000 each for 3 Best HMS Innovation Award
  • US$15,000 each for 3 Best App
  • US$15,000 each for 3 Best Game
  • US$10,000 each for 3 Best Social Impact App
  • US$10,000 each for 1 All Scenario Coverage Award
  • US$10,000 each for 3 Best Arabic App
  • US$10,000 each for 1 Tech Women’s Award
  • US$5,000 each for 3 Student Innovation Award

How to Apply: Register

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Investing in Innovation (i3) Africa 2022

Application Deadline:

14th August 2022
21st August 2022 (South Africa only)

Tell Me About Award:

If you are an African entrepreneur creating a solution to a health product distribution challenge in Africa, we invite you to apply for the 2022 cohort. You stand the chance of receiving a $50,000 grant as well as access to leading donors, industry and institutional players who will support introductions to customers. Up to 30 companies will be selected this round.

Which Fields are Eligible?

Services that minimize supply chain inefficiencies and provide critical linkages between manufacturers, wholesalers, distributors, providers, and consumers, to reduce stockouts and ensure the availability of essential medicines, consumables and devices are needed.

  • HEALTH PRODUCT AVAILABILITY
  • ACCESSIBILITY OF HEALTH PRODUCTS
  • HEALTH PRODUCT QUALITY
  • HEALTH PRODUCT AFFORDABILITY
  • VISIBLITY OF HEALTH PRODUCT MOVEMENT
  • WASTE MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH SUPPLY CHAINS

What Type of Scholarship is this?

Entrepreneurship

Who can apply?

  • Representative of the business must be a founder / co-founder, and at least 18 years old with a valid ID document.
  • Company must be owned, led or operated by an African(s). We define this as having an African national with long-term control and management of the business, an equity stake and an active role in both strategic and day-to-day decision making. Organization does not need to be headquartered in Africa.
  • Business must have a legal presence on the African continent.
  • Business offerings must be focused on serving the needs of African customers
  • Business must be in the early or growth stage as defined below. Nascent/idea stage companies, or mature companies (e.g. mature incumbent distribution businesses) are not be eligible.

EARLY STAGE – You must have clearly defined your market, validated customer demand, developed a working prototype and product map, and begun to generate revenue, with a strong plan to scale and sustain growth.

GROWTH STAGE – You must have strong, well-defined revenue model, sales, and operational capabilities. Your Products and service must be primed to scale, and customer acquisition costs must be declining. You must have evidence of customer acceptance of your products (reflected in sales volumes, beyond early adopters).

  • Innovators must offer data-driven products or services focused on the distribution of health products, which includes over-the-counter medicines, prescription medicines, health care consumables, medical devices, assistive health technologies, and the movement of medical waste. This includes but is not limited to companies that are building data-driven approaches to health product distribution including medicines, consumables, devices, and more; cold chain technology; track-and-trace; direct-to-consumer delivery of health products; online pharmacies; digital marketplaces for product resupply; vendor-managed inventory for health products; counterfeit drug detection; waste management solutions, and more. Business lines do not need to focus solely on health product distribution to be consideredWe will also consider non-health businesses with documented plans to offer data-driven products or services focused on health product distribution in the short-term (2-3 months).
  • Nonprofits, consultancies, intermediaries, and consortiums are not eligible.
  • You must show good management and governance. We are looking for efficient use of funds and a strong plan to generate further income and attract additional investments. Participants must have sustainability embedded within plans and practices.

Which Countries are Eligible?

All African countries

How Many Scholarships will be Given?

Not specified

What is the Benefit of Award?

I3 connects innovators to leading local and international industry players as well as to financing, donors, and governments – in an attempt to help companies establish partnerships, pilot projects, contracts and investment.

I3 provides systematic grants of $50,000 to all participating startups for investments in commercialization and impact.

i3 provides participating startups with tailored investment readiness support, delivered by leading innovation experts at CCHub, Startupbootcamp AfriTech, Villgro Africa and IMPACT Lab.

How to Apply for Scholarship?

Apply here

Applications must be made in English or French and submitted before the 14th of August, 2022. If you have concerns or challenges applying, please let us know via mail at aida.elkohen@innovationsinafrica.com

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Twitter AMREF Health Journalism Scholarship 2022

Application Deadline:

31st August 2022

Tell Me About Award:

Amref International University (AMIU) in partnership with Twitter offers full scholarships to Health journalists to do a short course on Health Journalism and Communication at AMIU.

The course fee is KES 80,000/USD 800 and the programme will be offered virtually to
successful applicants. The aim of the course is to enhance knowledge, build skills and nurture
competencies of journalists, Public Relations Officers and health managers on all aspects related to health reporting.

What Type of Award is this?

Short course

Who can apply?

To be considered for this scholarship, the following criteria must be met:

  • Completion of Application. The applicant must complete the entire application required, including providing all documentation requested in the application or otherwise requested.
  • Submission of documentation. The applicants are required to submit their resume and links or attachments of health related stories to mediascholarships@amref.org
  • Geographical restrictions. Must be a practicing African health journalist reporting on health and medical issues across Africa.
  • Deadline. The application must be received by 31st August 2022. Only complete applications with all required supporting materials that are received by the published deadline will be considered by the Scholarship Application Evaluation team.
  • Eligibility. Each Scholarship recipient shall meet all eligibility requirements described above.
  • Scoring. Applicants will be scored based on the quality of the content provided and their work as health journalist in their respective countries.

How to Apply for Program?

Once the scholarship evaluation team has selected and approved the list of successful candidates, the list will be submitted to Amref International University.
• All applicants will receive written communication informing them of the outcome of their application, as well with information on the registration procedure.
• Applicants who are awarded this scholarship will have one week from the date of notification to accept the award. If documentation is not submitted before the deadline, the scholarship offer will be withdrawn.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

German government to supply heavy tanks to Ukraine

Johannes Stern


The German government is playing an increasingly aggressive role in NATO’s proxy war against Russia, arming the pro-Western regime in Kiev to the teeth.

On Monday, Ukraine received its first Gepard anti-aircraft tanks from Germany. “Today, the first three Gepards officially arrived,” Defence Minister Olexiy Resnikov announced on Ukrainian television. In addition, he said, tens of thousands of rounds of ammunition had also been handed over. A total of 15 Gepards were expected to arrive, Resnikov added.

Gepard anti-aircraft tank of the Bundeswehr (Image: Hans-Hermann Bühling/CC BY-SA 2.0/ wikimedia)

This is the second delivery of so-called heavy weaponry from Germany and the first delivery of Western-designed tanks to Ukraine. Like the seven self-propelled howitzer 2000s already handed over to Kiev by Berlin, the Gepard tanks aim to further escalate the war.

The range of the tanks against targets in the air is up to 5,000 metres. The rate of fire of the two tank barrels is 550 rounds per minute each, making a total cadence of 1,100 rounds per minute. The tanks are to be used primarily against the Russian Air Force but can also engage targets on the ground.

The actual number of tanks delivered could end up being even higher than Resnikov indicated. In May, Chancellor Olaf Scholz (Social Democratic Party, SPD) had promised Kiev substantially more Gepards after a closed government meeting in Meseberg Castle. To repel the Russian offensive in the Donbass, he said, the country wanted to “supply up to 50 Gepard tanks suitable for this purpose.”

Since then, Germany has literally flooded Ukraine with weapons. The government’s official tally of “German lethal and non-lethal military support for Ukraine” is now so long that only a fraction can be reproduced here. Among others, the following have been delivered so far:

  • 900 “Panzerfaust 3” bazookas with 3,000 shells
  • 14,900 anti-tank mines
  • 500 STINGER anti-aircraft missiles
  • 2,700 STRELA anti-aircraft missiles
  • 7 self-propelled howitzer 2000s including adaptations, training and spare parts (a joint project with the Netherlands)
  • 21.8 million rounds of small arms ammunition
  • 50 bunker busters
  • 100 MG 3 machine guns with 500 spare barrels and breechblocks
  • 100,000 hand grenades
  • 5,300 explosive charges
  • 100,000 metres of detonating cord and 100,000 explosive charges
  • 350,000 detonators
  • 280 motor vehicles
  • 7,944 RGW 90 Matador anti-tank weapons.

Additional supplies are planned to include:

  • 53,000 rounds of anti-aircraft ammunition
  • 8 mobile ground radars and thermal imagers
  • 3 self-propelled howitzer 2000s
  • 4,000 rounds of anti-aircraft training ammunition
  • 10 (+10 as option) autonomous surface drones
  • 43 reconnaissance drones
  • 54 M113 armoured troop carriers with armament (systems from Denmark, conversion financed by Germany)
  • 30 Gepard anti-aircraft tanks including approximately 6,000 rounds of anti-aircraft ammunition
  • IRIS-T SLM air defence system
  • COBRA artillery tracking radar
  • 3 MARS multiple rocket launchers with ammunition
  • 3 armoured recovery vehicles
  • 5,032 handheld anti-tank weapons

And even this is far from enough for the ruling class. Currently, leading government officials are beating the drum for the direct delivery of Leopard 2 and Marder heavy combat and infantry tanks to Ukraine. Up to now, the NATO powers have only delivered Soviet-designed battle tanks to Ukraine via a “backfilling” procedure to the East European countries providing the hardware. However, this model is not considered effective enough and has recently led to tensions between the Eastern European NATO countries and Germany. In particular, Poland has criticized Germany for not replacing Polish tank deliveries to Kiev quickly enough.

The chairwoman of the Bundestag (parliament) Defence Committee, Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann (Free Democratic Party, FDP), said on Monday that Germany had so far not been able to provide replacements for its Eastern European NATO partners’ arms deliveries to Ukraine as quickly as expected. “If this is problematic for our partners, we should stop the backfill arrangement and deliver directly to Ukraine—if necessary also the Leopard 2. Time was pressing,” Strack-Zimmermann told the dpa news agency.

Similar tones can be heard from the SPD. “The aim of the backfill arrangement was primarily to support Ukraine in the short-term with weapons that soldiers there can operate without training, but that has not really worked so far,” noted Michael Roth, chairman of the Bundestag Foreign Affairs Committee. He added that it was now “a new phase of the war.” Deliveries of Western weapons so far had made a “real difference” in recent weeks, he said, adding this must “now be resolutely continued.”

Defence Minister Christine Lambrecht (SPD) said she had “great respect” for Poland because the country had very quickly delivered the promised Soviet-designed T-72 tanks to Kiev. The “gaps” that had arisen would have to be made up quickly under the backfill procedure, she said. However, she was currently “unable to do so from Bundeswehr [armed forces] stocks” if she wanted to “ensure national and alliance defence.” She was therefore “holding talks with industry” and was “certain that we will reach a good result.”

In other words, the German defence industry will now be even quicker to make more German battle tanks and infantry fighting vehicles fit for purpose and build new ones—for NATO’s Eastern European allies, for Ukraine, but above all for Germany’s own armed forces.

The Greens, who have been clamouring incessantly for more direct tank deliveries to Ukraine for several days now, are acting particularly aggressively. “The backfill arrangement is not working as planned,” Katrin Göring-Eckardt, vice president of the Bundestag and long-time parliamentary group leader of the Greens, told the RND press agency. “Alternatives belong on the table. For example, supplying weapons directly, if we can.” She said the Polish government’s criticism was “a wake-up call” and that Germany must organize “sufficient support for Ukraine with weapons.” After all, “arms deliveries help decide the duration of the war, decide human lives.”

The argumentation of the former Green pacifists follows the murderous war logic of German militarism in the last century. The leading representatives of the Imperial Empire and the Nazis’ Third Reich also justified the mobilization of the German war machine in the First and Second World Wars with the cynical argument of wanting to achieve a quick “victorious peace” or “final victory.” In reality, they prolonged the wars and sacrificed millions of lives to the predatory interests of German imperialism.

This is what is at stake today as well. The ruling class knows perfectly well that massive support for Ukraine is not only prolonging the war and the suffering it entails, but even conjures up the danger of a nuclear third world war. Only a few weeks ago, President Joe Biden warned that the delivery of NATO fighter jets to Ukraine could “trigger World War III.” Now, his administration is planning to do just that. Over the weekend, National Security Council Strategic Communications Coordinator John Kirby confirmed that the Pentagon was preparing to deliver fighter jets to Ukraine.

The German government is participating in the war madness because it wants to be in the forefront when it comes to dividing up the spoils and subjugating the resource-rich and geostrategically central Eurasian landmass. Moreover, it sees the NATO war as an opportunity to finally throw overboard the last post-war shackles and rise once again as the leading European military power after the defeats and unspeakable crimes of two world wars.

“After the German crimes of World War II” it was “difficult to deal with anything military,” complained Bundestag President Bärbel Bas (SPD) in a speech to Bundeswehr recruits last Wednesday. Only to then announce, “Ladies and gentlemen, our Bundeswehr must now be superbly equipped again.” The Ukraine war, she said, makes one “aware again of what we need the Bundeswehr for—after years of austerity, the suspension of conscription and base closures.”

Bas openly declared that the ruling class was concerned with the comprehensive militarization of society and that the new recruits could soon find themselves at war. “When you swear your oath today, you know: At this moment in Ukraine, servicemen and women are defending their homeland and putting their lives on the line to do so. And you know that the case of defence can actually occur for Germany as well,” she declared without batting an eye. “With the turn of the times and the special fund [of €100 billion for the Bundeswehr],” she said, it was now possible “to turn the hardship of war more and more into a virtue of appreciation for the Bundeswehr.”

The occasion for her war speech was the ceremonial swearing in of new recruits on the 78th anniversary of the failed assassination attempt on Adolf Hitler by Wehrmacht officer Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg on July 20, 1944. That the ruling class is now relying on the July 20 assassins in its war offensive is a sign of the times. Stauffenberg and several of his supporters were staunch militarists and themselves long-time Hitler partisans. Contrary to official propaganda, their assassination attempt on the “Führer” had nothing to do with the fight for “freedom” and “democracy,” but was intended to avert a complete military defeat in World War II and secure the interests of German imperialism.

European Union demands rationing of natural gas to wage war

Peter Schwarz


The European Union has committed its member states to reduce their natural gas consumption by 15 percent from next month until March next year. The energy ministers of the 27 EU countries adopted an EU Commission proposal on Tuesday.

Smoke rises from a chimney of a Vattenfall heating power plant in Berlin, Germany [AP Photo/Michael Sohn]

The way in which the cuts are implemented is up to the individual states and the targeted savings are voluntary. However, if an acute emergency occurs, mandatory savings targets can also be adopted if at least 15 member states representing 65 percent of the population agree. Originally, the EU Commission wanted to reserve the right to declare an energy emergency, but could not enforce this position.

The austerity decision is being sold as an act of “solidarity” because all countries, regardless of how much they are affected by possible supply shortfalls, have to make the same savings. The reduction of demand across the EU is an expression of the “principle of solidarity enshrined in the EU Treaty,” the Commission’s text states.

In fact, it is a war measure that was enforced by the EU Commission and the German government with brute force. The aim is to enable Europe to continue the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine for months and years, until Russia’s military defeat.

Brussels and Berlin fear that resistance to energy scarcity, inflation and horrendous rearmament costs could lead to resistance and that social pressure on governments could jeopardize the EU’s cohesion. Therefore, the concentrated power of the EU apparatus is used to push through the austerity measures and to bring all members into line.

Like any war, the war against Russia, driven by the United States and the European powers with billions of dollars in arms, requires unity, discipline, material sacrifice and the suppression of any internal opposition. The massive energy crisis, which has caused the prices of gas and petrol to explode and threatens to lead to a massive energy outage during the coming winter, is a direct result of the war in Ukraine.

Even before the reactionary Russian attack on Ukraine, the commissioning of the completed Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which, with an annual capacity of 55 billion cubic metres, could meet 15 percent of the total European demand, was permanently cancelled. Other pipelines, which have been supplying Russian gas to the EU through Ukraine or Belarus for decades, stopped operating due to the war.

Nord Stream 1, which has the same capacity as Nord Stream 2, currently supplies 40 percent of its capacity and only 20 percent from Thursday. Moscow has justified the supply reduction with the necessary maintenance of turbines, some of which fell victim to Western sanctions, and has denied the intention of wanting to stop operations altogether.

The EU has rejected this as an excuse and accused Russia of deliberately trying to “use gas as a political weapon.” German Economics Minister Robert Habeck accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of playing a “perfidious game”: he tried to weaken the great support for Ukraine and drive a wedge into German society.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has always been a reliable supporter of Western propaganda, also accused Moscow of “terrorizing” the West by curbing Nord Stream 1 and inciting an “open gas war against united Europe.”

These accusations are absurd. They are reminiscent of the burglar who cries “Stop the thief!” to distract the police. In reality, it is the EU that is pursuing the stated goal of driving Russia into ruin through economic sanctions. According to the official decision, the EU no longer wants to import fossil fuels from Russia by 2027 at the latest. The militaristic tone of the accusations confirms that the EU is not concerned with energy security, but with the instrumentalization of energy policy as a weapon of war.

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen used all her authority to oblige all EU members to reduce gas consumption. The Christian Democratic Union politician already played a leading role as German Defense Minister in reviving German militarism. In 2014, the government in which von der Leyen was a member supported the right-wing coup in Kiev, which laid the seeds for today’s war.

The von der Leyen gas savings plan is based on the controversial Article 122 of the Treaty on European Union, which allows the EU to intervene deeper than usual in the national sovereignty of the member states in emergencies.

Already during the euro crisis, when the EU helped the banks out of the crisis with billions, and forced countries such as Greece, Portugal and Spain to make brutal social cuts, it invoked this article. Likewise, after the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, when it again made available hundreds of billions for a “reconstruction fund” in favour of banks and corporations.

This time, however, von der Leyen met with considerable resistance. Countries in the south, which now meet their gas demand from North Africa, were reluctant to agree to a programme that primarily benefits Germany, which is particularly dependent on Russian gas supplies.

The Spanish Minister for the Environment, Teresa Ribera, initially rejected the plan outright. Her country would not make any “disproportionate sacrifices.” No Spanish family would have to fear cuts in the gas supply in winter, she said, explaining this was because Spain has done its homework and not lived beyond its means.

Like the German government, the Spanish government fully supports the proxy war against Russia. But the arrogance with which the German government faced more heavily indebted countries during the euro crisis and forced them to take drastic austerity measures has not been forgotten.

On Monday, the diplomats of the 27 EU member states negotiated well into the night, until they finally reached a majority agreement thanks to numerous special arrangements. For example, a number of countries—Cyprus, Malta and Ireland—which are not connected to the gas network of other member states, are excluded from the austerity objectives.

In the end, only Hungary voted against the decision to reduce gas consumption. Viktor Orbán’s government, which maintains good relations with Russian President Putin, is now also rejecting economic sanctions against Russia.

But the centrifugal tendencies in the EU are enormous. In Italy, Mario Draghi’s government of “national unity” has also broken up over the question of war. While Draghi unreservedly supported NATO’s war course, Silvio Berlusconi’s right-wing Forza Italia and Lega refused to deliver arms to Ukraine. It is unclear what the government will do after the elections at the end of September.

What welds the ruling class of Europe together is the fear of working class uprisings. German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock recently declared that if no more gas came from Russia, “then we as Germany can no longer provide any support at all for Ukraine, because we are then occupied with popular uprisings.”

The Baden-Württemberg Prime Minister Winfried Kretschmann, a member of the Greens like Baerbock, also warned against a split in society, commenting, “If we walk into a gas emergency, the centrifugal forces will be great, greater than in the case of the Coronavirus.”

The escalation of the war in Ukraine serves not least to direct these internal tensions outward—even if it leads to a third, nuclear world war.