21 Oct 2022

Dangerous new COVID-19 variants threaten massive fall-winter surge

Evan Blake


One month into the fall season in the Northern Hemisphere, it is clear that the next global wave of the COVID-19 pandemic has begun.

Due to the dismantling of testing and data reporting throughout much of the world, official infection figures are now largely worthless. The most accurate estimate of the real number of daily COVID-19 infections from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) shows that 21 million people were infected globally on Wednesday, up 23 percent from the most recent trough of 17 million infections on September 27.

Amid this deepening crisis, the ruling elites throughout the world have discovered the perfect cure for the pandemic: Simply ignore it and cover it up. At most, the broadcast news has brief segments on the pandemic once per month, while the print media just echoes the lies of the capitalist politicians.

This propaganda has had a terrible impact on mass consciousness, and global society is wholly unprepared for the current surge. Having been told, in the words of US President Joe Biden, that “the pandemic is over,” many are failing to take even the most elementary precautions. As one observes the careless actions of the misled public, the image comes to mind of Pieter Bruegel’s famous painting “The Blind Leading the Blind.”

But the political leaders are not blind. With malice aforethought, they have ignored the repeated warnings of epidemiologists and prioritized the profit interests of the corporate-financial elite over life. From the beginning of the pandemic, far-right figures have sowed deep confusion within the population, while over the course of the past year ostensibly liberal governments throughout the world have embraced the homicidal “herd immunity” strategy pioneered by the far right. The consequences of these policies are being realized as the world enters an even more dangerous situation.

The growing wave is unlike anything seen since the start of the pandemic and has many scientists deeply concerned. As a result of the unhindered spread of COVID-19 over the past year, the Omicron variant has spawned hundreds of subvariants with different mutation profiles, creating what experts have termed a “variant soup.”

Loading Tweet ...
Tweet not loading? See it directly on Twitter

The most worrying are a collection of highly-mutated “escape variants” that are more immune-evasive and infectious than all other Omicron subvariants. Particularly worrisome are BQ.1.1 and XBB, which are considered likely to become dominant throughout the world in the coming weeks. In Singapore, XBB became dominant two weeks ago and is fueling a massive surge of infections and reinfections.

Studies indicate that both of these subvariants and others will render ineffective the last remaining monoclonal antibody drugs Evusheld and Bebtelovimab, threatening tens of millions of immunocompromised people throughout the world with greater risk of severe disease and death.

One of the greatest concerns of experts is the mounting toll of Long COVID, a broad spectrum of prolonged symptoms that can affect nearly every organ in the body. A preprint study led by Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly of the Washington University School of Medicine found that compared to those with one COVID-19 infection, those with reinfection had double the risk of all-cause mortality, triple the risk of hospitalization, and nearly double the risk of at least one Long COVID symptom. The study notes, “The risks were evident in subgroups including those who were unvaccinated, had 1 shot, or 2 or more shots prior to the second infection.”

Significantly, the XBB variant has propelled reinfections in Singapore from only 5 percent in mid-August to 17.5 percent by October 14, an unprecedented increase that underscores the dangers of the new “escape variants.”

In an alarming press briefing Wednesday, World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 Technical Lead Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove stressed that the XBB subvariant “is showing significant immune-evasion.” She continued: “This is of concern for us, because we need to ensure that the vaccines that are in use worldwide remain effective at preventing severe disease and death. The more this virus circulates, the more opportunities it has to change.”

She concluded, “We need to be able to track this virus. There are millions of cases being reported each week, but our surveillance has declined, testing has declined, sequencing has declined, and that, in turn, has limited our ability as an organization, with our expert networks around the world, to assess these [subvariants].”

Dr. Kerkhove’s comments are a devastating indictment of the pandemic policies implemented throughout the world. Even if the current “variant soup” does not render existing vaccines unable to prevent severe disease and death, the constant spread of the virus provides it with billions of hosts in which it will continue to mutate and potentially evolve into a more lethal strain, while the WHO’s ability to monitor these mutations has been substantially degraded.

To say that American and world society are flying blind into a coming storm is a vast understatement. A more accurate description would be that the plane’s pilot has deliberately jettisoned the engine’s fuel, sabotaged the landing gear and told the air traffic controllers to go home.

Following the dictates of the Biden administration, on Thursday the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) switched from daily to weekly reporting of COVID-19 cases and deaths. On Friday, the agency quietly ended its limited program for distributing free masks. Last week, epidemiologist Dr. Eric Feigl-Ding revealed that the CDC has withheld data showing that the BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 subvariants are rapidly becoming dominant across the US and now account for a combined 11.4 percent of all variants. In New York, where these new subvariants have reached their highest proportions, COVID-19 hospitalizations surged by 9 percent in the past week alone.

The same processes are underway across Europe, where COVID-19 infections, reinfections, hospitalizations and deaths are steadily rising. In Germany, Oktoberfest and other large events encouraged by politicians are now fueling a second wave of BA.5 infections, which has pushed hospitals to the brink. Since Monday, there have been 680 deaths from COVID-19 across the country, over 60 percent higher than two weeks ago, and experts warn that the new variants will only compound an already dire situation. In France, where BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 now account for the majority of all infections, COVID-19 deaths are steadily rising.

The misinformed public is not to be blamed for the profound lack of scientific understanding. Misanthropy and debilitating pessimism will do nothing to effect a change in the pandemic. Rather, every effort must be made to counter the government’s propaganda and educate workers and youth on the science of the Zero-COVID elimination strategy, which remains viable and necessary today.

In the past year, the recklessness of the pandemic policies has been extended to the arena of the US-NATO proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, which Biden himself acknowledged threatens to erupt into nuclear “Armageddon.” Hospitals, schools and industries across the US and internationally are in a state of collapse after unending COVID-19 waves have caused massive staffing shortages. The coming winter will be catastrophic unless immediate action is taken by the working class.

20 Oct 2022

US Government TechGirls Programme 2023

Application Deadline: 16th December 2023 09:00PM EST

Eligible African Countries: Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestinian Territories, and Tunisia;

To be taken at (country): USA

About the Award: Since 2012, TechGirls trained and mentored 186 teenage girls (ages 15-17) from Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestinian Territories, Tunisia, and Yemen. The core of the program is a three-week experience in the United States. 

TechGirls participate in an interactive technology and computer camp (with US Girls), join a tech company for a day of job shadowing, and participate in community service initiatives. There is a TechGirls multiplier effect – inspiring others in their local community to pursue Stem.

Type: Training

Eligibility: Students eligible to apply are those who:

  • Are from one of the following eligible countries:
    • United States
    • Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestinian Territories, and Tunisia;
    •  Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan
  • Are between the ages of 15 and 17 at the start of the exchange;
  • Have demonstrated advanced skills and a serious interest in technology, engineering, and/or math in their academic studies;
  • Intend to pursue higher education and/or careers in technology;
  • Have strong English language skills;
  • Exhibit maturity, flexibility, and open-mindedness;
  • Will attend at least one additional semester of secondary school upon their return to their home country; and
  • Are committed to completing a community-based project upon their return home.
  • Preference will be given to those who have limited or no prior experience in the United States. You are not eligible if you have travelled to the United States in the last three years as part of any other ECA exchange program.

Please note that family members of U.S. Embassy or Consulate staff or U.S. Department of State employees are not eligible to apply.

TechGirls encourages people with diverse backgrounds and skills to apply, including individuals with disabilities.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The TechGirls program covers the following costs:

  • Roundtrip international airfare from participant home country to the United States
  • Housing during program
  • Double occupancy hotel or dormitory accommodations
  • Meals during program
  • Breakfast, lunch, and dinner

How to Apply: Online Application

Visit Programme Webpage for Details

Growing COVID hospitalisations and cases in New Zealand

Tom Peters


Case numbers and hospitalisations for COVID-19 are continuing to climb in New Zealand following the government’s removal of all public health measures to combat the pandemic.

Medical staff test shoppers who volunteered at a pop-up community COVID-19 testing station at a supermarket car park in Christchurch, New Zealand. [AP Photo/Mark Baker]

As of yesterday, according to Newsroom, there were 214 people in hospital with the virus, a 24 percent increase in the past week, and more than double the figure of 105 recorded on October 5. Meanwhile, the seven-day average for officially-recorded infections is 2,211, up 27 percent on a week ago. This is almost twice the seven-day average of 1,344 recorded one month ago (on September 20).

COVID-linked deaths, which are only being reported on a weekly basis, remain relatively low, with 10 reported last week. Throughout the pandemic, however, deaths have lagged behind hospitalisations and case numbers, meaning the toll is likely to increase soon.

Internationally, there is a renewed wave of the pandemic, driven by more infectious subvariants of Omicron including BQ.1 and BQ.1.1. In Germany, hospitalisations due to COVID doubled nationwide in the space of just one week, and there are reports of hundreds of outbreaks in hospitals and nursing homes. France and Italy have reported 461 and 544 COVID deaths in the last seven days, an increase on the previous week of 32 and 38 per cent.

Despite the alarming trend both in New Zealand and internationally, the Labour Party-led government is doing everything it can to disarm the population and normalise mass COVID infection. Yesterday, acting COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins announced the removal of emergency powers from the COVID-19 Public Health Response Act 2020, including the ability to impose lockdowns, border restrictions, vaccine mandates, contact tracing systems and vaccine certificates.

Like its counterparts internationally, the government is behaving as though the pandemic is over. All that remains of the public health measures are seven-day, self-isolation periods for positive cases, and mask mandates in healthcare and aged care facilities.

The ministry of health this week made the extraordinary admission that it has been dramatically under-reporting the number of COVID-19 hospitalisations. On October 17, total hospitalisations were revised up from 14,043 to 19,476—an increase of more than 5,000 or one third.

In a 169-word statement, the ministry said the undercount was a “coding issue,” relating to “a data source that has been used for the past three and a half months.” It said the under-count related to people who had “relatively short” hospital stays of between one and three days, and illogically added that the issue “did not affect the hospitalisation numbers released in the ministry’s daily, and now weekly, updates, which counted the number of beds occupied with patients with COVID-19.” In fact, it clearly did affect the reported numbers of people in hospital with the virus, creating the impression that the Omicron wave was considerably less severe than it really was.

One has to ask: Are there other “coding issues,” for instance, relating to reported COVID deaths? The ministry reports that as of October 17 a total of 3,047 people had died within 28 days of a COVID infection. However, it claims that only 2,065 deaths are attributable to COVID.

The contention that one in three people who died within weeks of contracting the deadly coronavirus actually died of something totally unrelated is highly dubious, to say the least.

The vast majority of these deaths were completely preventable. They occurred after Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced in October 2021 that New Zealand was abandoning its elimination policy, which had kept the country mostly free from COVID-19 up to that point. Lockdowns were abandoned and all schools and businesses reopened, with the full support of the union bureaucracy, allowing the virus to spread everywhere.

The decision to embrace a policy of mass infection was made against public health experts’ advice and without any democratic input. It was based entirely on the demands of big business for an end to lockdowns and public health measures that were viewed as a barrier to the extraction of profit from the working class.

The latest rise in cases has led to renewed warnings from scientists. Microbiologist Siouxsie Wiles told One News on October 18 that infection can lead to long-term problems: “The number of people who are at risk of heart attacks and strokes increases, so it’s really not something we should be complacent about.” She urged people to wear masks indoors, despite the removal of mandates.

Epidemiologist Michael Baker pointed out to the New Zealand Herald that over the last eight months, including two case peaks and varying levels of mortality, the daily average of deaths has been around 8.5. He said there could be another 700 deaths this year if the trend continues, bringing the official COVID death toll to around 2,700, or 7 percent of the expected total deaths.

Based on estimates that half the population has been infected, Baker said as many as 120,000 people could also develop Long COVID, a debilitating condition that can affect the brain, heart, lungs and other organs.

The ongoing crisis in public hospitals is likely to lead to even more deaths. This was highlighted by an independent investigation into the death of a 50-year-old woman from a brain bleed in June, which released its report this week. The woman went to South Auckland’s Middlemore Hospital but left after being told she would have to wait eight hours for treatment in the emergency department. The report stated that the overcrowded department “is an unsafe environment for both patients and staff and is not sustainable.”

One doctor at the hospital told the Herald there were “massive shortages of senior medical officers all over New Zealand and a number of resignations occurring and still senior management just keep saying everything is fine.”

Thousands of nurses across the country recently protested over the staffing crisis and low wages by refusing to work extra shifts.

Health NZ chairman Rob Campbell defended the hospital system, telling Newsroom that “bad results do happen in all medical services” due to “[f]allible people, fallible diagnoses, fallible medications, processes and technologies.” He declared: “We all bear responsibility, not some object called a system.”

In fact, the pandemic, which has killed more than 22 million people, is an unanswerable indictment of the capitalist system, which prioritises profit ahead of people’s health and lives.

Amid French refinery strike, Macron to impose 2023 budget without parliamentary vote

Anthony Torres & Alex Lantier


With refinery workers striking in France against inflation and the NATO-Russia war in Ukraine escalating, Macron moved yesterday to ram his 2023 budget through the National Assembly without a vote. After the May 2022 elections, Macron’s Renaissance party has only a minority in the Assembly, and its budget was doomed to go down to defeat in a vote.

Ultimately, the Macron government decided yesterday to force approval of the revenues portion of its budget bill, using the French constitution’s anti-democratic Article 49-3. This article allows the government to force the Assembly to adopt the budget without a vote, unless it adopts a motion of censure to bring down the government. The government is set to invoke this article again before the end of the week on the financing of Social Security—and, potentially, up to seven times before the budget is adopted.

Imposing its budget without a vote and trying to crush the refinery strike by requisitioning workers to force them to work, the Macron government operates without any popular support and with open contempt for basic democratic principles. It is a warning to workers of all industries not only in France but across Europe. They face governments that are unalloyed dictatorships of the banks, implacably opposed to working class demands and protests.

Events yesterday also revealed the mechanisms that keep Macron in power, despite his lack of a popular base: the complicity of the union bureaucracies and allied forces in the political establishment.

Even as Macron revealed his weakness, acknowledging his lack of support in the Assembly, factions of the Stalinist General Confederation of Labor (CGT) union capitulated to him, working to gradually wind down the refinery strike. Indeed, yesterday CGT officials announced the end of the strike at the Donges refinery, while police tried to shut down the strike at the Feyzin refinery near Lyon—requisitioning 20 key workers at the facility in order to to restart production.

“Today the main thing for us was to get out of this strike cleanly, with cohesion and as a unified bloc,” CGT officials at Donges told BFM-TV. They justified their action by citing low turnout at the CGT’s October 18 national day of action, asserting, “The broadening of the movement we had hoped for did not take place.”

In reality, the CGT national confederations are isolating and disarming the strikers. France’s union confederations have multibillion-euro budgets, dwarfing the €10,000 fine workers face if they disobey a requisition order, but none of the unions are helping the workers defy the requisition. Above all, despite its symbolic one-day protest on October 18, the CGT bureaucracy is not mobilizing broader support for refinery workers in any continuing solidarity strikes.

Profiting from the union bureaucracies’ demobilization of the working class, however, Macron is doubling down on his budgetary agenda of inflation, austerity and militarism.

The €480 billion budget, based on tax revenues of €320 billion, foresees a massive budget deficit of €160 billion. It raises defense spending by over €3 billion to €44 billion and cuts energy price subsidies, so that energy prices are expected to rise fully 15 percent. This will further drive up prices and decimate living standards for workers already reeling under the impact of 7 percent inflation in France in 2022. Nearly €6 billion in state revenue comes from EU bailouts, which go to pay off wealthy investors by buying up their state debt and stock holdings.

Neither the recklessness of its military build-up amid the NATO-Russia war in Ukraine nor the inflationary impact of its energy subsidy cuts and its EU bailouts of the super-rich were discussed in the parliamentary debates, however. Rather, deputies attacked the Macron government on various measures, especially smaller tax concessions to the wealthy.

Macron had authorized the government to use Article 49-3 at a cabinet meeting a week earlier, but Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne reportedly replied that “debate should take place.” In the Assembly, however, the debates on the 2023 budget spun out of the government’s control: It lost votes on numerous items in the budget bill, including sometimes even amendments proposed by members of Macron’s own Renaissance party.

Particularly embarrassing for the Macron government was its defeat by an amendment proposed by Jean-Paul Mattei, a member of the small right-wing Democratic Movement party that is part of Macron’s ruling coalition. Mattei demanded a temporary raise in taxes for “super dividends” paid out by highly profitable corporations—a tax hike the Macron government and Economy Minister Bruno Le Maire had opposed. Mattei’s amendment was supported by Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s New Popular Union, the neo-fascist National Rally (RN) and factions of Macron’s Renaissance party.

Borne met with Renaissance party deputies on Tuesday morning to prepare the use of Article 49-3 after discussions with Macron. Yesterday, under jeers from the opposition parties, Borne announced the use of the 49-3: “We could have given up looking for a compromise. We chose dialog. While we do not agree on everything, we can come together when the national interest is at stake. We must give our country a budget. I stake the responsibility of my government upon this.”

For now, this decision appears to have little chance of bringing down the Macron government. Mélenchon’s Unsubmissive France (LFI) and the far-right RN have both submitted motions of censure against the Macron government, in line with Article 49.3. Currently, however, it is expected that these motions have little chance of passing, since LFI and the RN both refuse to vote for the other party’s censure motions. The right-wing Republicans party has already let it be known that it will not vote for either motion of censure.

Above all, however, none of the decisive issues posed to workers by this budget are discussed in official political life. In this, the deputies in the National Assembly are no different than the bureaucrats of the CGT. The enormous danger of the NATO-Russian war in Ukraine erupting into a full-scale nuclear war that would devastate Europe and the role of bank bailouts and energy policy in driving a wave of inflation that is devastating workers internationally are all passed over in silence.

This sinister silence lulls the public to sleep and facilitates the union bureaucracies’ demobilization of the working class, by hiding the enormous dangers of war and economic collapse facing workers.

Particularly heavy responsibility falls on Mélenchon, who won nearly 8 million votes among urban workers and youth in the April 2022 presidential election. Despite nearly having advanced to the second round, Mélenchon did not seek to project opposition to Macron or neo-fascist Marine Le Pen, the two candidates in the run-off. Instead, he promised that he could work under either of them, as their prime minister. He then formed a New Popular Union (NUPES) alliance with the widely despised, anti-worker Socialist Party (PS) of former President François Hollande.

Mélenchon has done nothing to appeal to his masses of voters to mobilize in defense of the refinery workers, against inflation and austerity, or against imperialist militarism and war.

The significance of the UK financial crisis

Nick Beams


There are profound lessons for the working class in every country to be drawn from the extraordinary events in Britain over the past month.

After announcing its “growth, growth, growth” economic agenda on September 23, through the bringing down of a mini budget with major tax cuts for corporations and the super-rich, the Truss Tory government is in tatters.

Bank of England, Threadneedle Street, London, England [Credit: Flickr, Hongchou's Photography]

On Monday, Truss sat mute and expressionless in the House of Commons, after failing to turn up for Question Time, as chancellor Jeremy Hunt, appointed last Friday after she had axed Kwasi Kwarteng from the post, ripped up the economic agenda that she and Kwarteng had jointly produced.

The experience has revealed in living events the naked power of finance capital and the way it exercises its dictatorship.

The collapse of the Truss program was set in train as soon as the mini budget was announced. The value of sterling against the US dollar plummeted and government bonds were sold off, creating the danger of a collapse of pension funds, and threatening a major crisis for the UK and global financial system.

The objection of the money markets was not that billions of dollars were to be handed out to the corporations and the super-rich. It was that they were not funded by cutting spending but by an increase in government debt to the tune of more than £70 billion.

Hunt not only announced the reversal of the tax cuts but started to slash government spending, mostly significantly reducing the term of energy relief from two years to just six months. He warned that “eye-wateringly difficult” decisions were to come to restore “economic stability.” Nothing was “off the table,” meaning that pensions, health, education, and other social services are immediately in the firing line.

While the UK events have their own national peculiarities, they are not simply the outcome of “British” conditions. As Leon Trotsky once remarked, national peculiarities are always an “original combination” of the basic features of global processes.

The underlying international processes have been developing with increasing force over the past 35 years and centre on a deepening crisis of the global financial system, which expresses in a concentrated form all the contradictions of the global capitalist profit system.

Yesterday, the New York Times reported that the Federal Reserve and the Biden administration have been conducting investigations into whether a similar meltdown could occur in the US. According to the article, while a crash did not appear “imminent”—for the ruling classes there is never a crisis until it breaks over their heads—the answer was that “it probably could.”

It noted that while the shock was “British specific,” the violent reaction “has caused economists around the world to wonder if the situation was a canary in the coal mine as signs of financial stress surface around the globe.”

While the origins of the financial crisis can be traced back a long way—at least to the removal of the gold backing from the US dollar in August 1971 and the transition to a global fiat currency system—a key turning point was the October 1987 Wall Street crash which reverberated around the world.

In response to the crash—at more than 22 percent, still the largest one-day fall in history—then chair of the US Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan, committed the Fed to supply the stock market with all the liquidity it needed.

This decision was not a one-off. The “Greenspan put,” as it became known, was a guarantee to the financial market that whenever its speculative activities produced a crisis, the Fed was on hand to bail it out and provide more money with which to finance new levels of speculation.

This was the Fed’s response to every financial storm in the 1990s and into the first years of the new century.

At the same time, regulations introduced in response to the Great Depression of the 1930s were scrapped. The City of London, having become a centre for global speculation, was no passive bystander. In fact, regulatory measures in the US were often scrapped not least because conditions in London were much looser and Wall Street had to be able to compete with its transatlantic rival.

The Fed’s actions, often introduced to head off a potential crisis, only created the conditions for an even bigger disaster which erupted in the global financial crisis of 2008. The response of the Fed was to increase the supply of money still further.

Together with US government, it bailed out the corporations and the banks and then, under the chairmanship of Ben Bernanke, initiated the program of quantitative easing (QE) in which the central banks bought up government debt to keep interest rates at historic lows.

The Fed increased its holdings of government debt from around $800 million to about $4 trillion, leading to the creation of a mountain of debt and fictitious capital, reflected in the rise of Wall Street to record highs after reaching its nadir in March 2009.

The result was that when the COVID-19 pandemic struck in early 2020, the US government and governments around the world refused to institute necessary public health measures to eliminate the virus lest they produce a collapse on Wall Street, extending to the entire global financial system.

This danger was seen when the Treasury market in which government bonds are bought and sold—the bedrock of the global financial system—froze in March 2020. For several days, not even US government debt, supposedly the safest financial asset in the world, could find a buyer.

The Fed and other central banks responded by putting the QE program on steroids. The Fed alone more than doubled its holdings of financial assets, almost overnight, from $4 trillion to almost $9 trillion, and became the guarantor for all forms of debt, government and corporate. The total amount injected into the financial system by central banks is estimated to be around $13 trillion.

But these measures, enacted to protect Wall Street and “save” the financial system, produced a new crisis. The refusal to eliminate COVID-19, led to a supply chain crisis. Coupled with the speculation in all financial assets, including commodities, resulting from the inflow of trillions of dollars from the central banks, and profit gouging by major corporations, this has sparked the highest inflation rate in four decades.

The QE measures of the past could be enacted because inflation was low—well under 2 percent—and the struggles of the working class were suppressed by the trade union bureaucracy, leading to a fall in strike activity to historic lows around the world and the continuous decline in real wages.

The situation has now changed dramatically. The working class all over the world is coming into battle for wage increases in response to rampant inflation, exacerbated by the US-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine. Workers are demanding an end to the increasing intolerable working conditions—imposed over decades, and intensified during the pandemic—in schools, hospital and health services, and throughout industry.

The reemergence of the class struggle has produced a major shift in the monetary policy of central banks, led by the US Fed, as interest rates are continuously hiked. The new regime is being imposed under the banner of “fighting inflation.” But it will do nothing to bring down prices as central bank officials have acknowledged.

The objective is to bring about a recession, following in the footsteps of Fed chair Paul Volcker who lifted interest rates to record highs in the early 1980s. The Volcker measures induced the deepest recession to that point since the 1930s to crush the wages movement of the working class and restructure class relations.

But the suppression of the wage struggles of the working class, always a great danger to the stability of financial capital, is by no means the sole objective. The class war goes well beyond that.

The mountain of fictitious capital, arising from the escalation of stock prices and the growth of debt does not in and of itself embody value. In the final analysis, it is a claim on the surplus value extracted from the working class in the process of capitalist production.

That pool of surplus value, on which finance capital feeds like a vampire, must be expanded at all costs.

This involves not only the suppression of wages but the destruction of social services, which, from the standpoint of parasitic finance capital, constitute a deduction from the surplus value that would otherwise be available for appropriation by it.

The extent and depth of the driving force of the class war now being unleashed is indicated by the fact that global debt, government and corporate, is now calculated to be more than 350 percent of global GDP, or around $300 trillion. The demand of finance capital is that increased surplus value must be extracted from the working class to pay for it.

That is the significance of the UK bond market crisis, not only for British workers but for workers around the world. This agenda was set out in the IMF’s Fiscal Monitor Report produced for its semi-annual meeting in Washington last week.

In the words of the chief author of the report, Vitor Gaspar: “In the context of high inflation, high debt, rising interest rates, and elevated uncertainty, consistency between monetary and fiscal policy is paramount … this means keeping the budget on its tightening course.”

If governments of whatever political stripe fail to carry out these demands they will be punished by the bond markets until they do.

19 Oct 2022

Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degree Scholarships 2023/2024

Application Deadline: Most consortia will require applications to be submitted between October and January, for courses starting the following academic year.

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: EU and Non-EU Countries

To be taken at (country): European Universities/Institutions participating under approved Erasmus Mundus Action Joint Programmes.

Eligible Fields of Study: See links below

About the Award: About 116 Masters courses are supported by the Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degrees (EMJMDs) scholarships. The field(s) of study covered are usually: Agriculture and Veterinary, Engineering, Manufacture and Construction, Health and Welfare, Humanities and Arts, Science, Mathematics and Computing, Social Sciences, Business and Law.

Type: Masters (Joint Degree)

Eligibility: Erasmus Mundus Joint Programme defines its own selection criteria and admission procedures. Students or scholars should contact the Consortium offering the Masters Programmes for more information.

Number of Awardees: Not specified.

Value of Scholarship: The programme offers full-time scholarships and/or fellowships that cover monthly allowance, participation costs, travelling and insurance costs of the students.  Scholarship amounts can vary according to the level of studies, the duration of studies, and the scholar’s nationality (scholarships for non-EU students are higher than for EU students).

Duration of Scholarship: EMJMDs last between 12 and 24 months.

How to Apply: Students, doctoral candidates, teachers, researchers and other academic staff should address their applications directly to the selected Erasmus Mundus masters and doctoral programmes (Action 1) and to the selected Erasmus Mundus partnerships (Action 2), in accordance with the application conditions defined by the selected consortium/partnership

You are advised to consult in advance the websites of each of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Programmes that interest you. There you will find all necessary information concerning the content of the course, its structure, the scholarship amounts as well as the application and selection procedures. Deadline varies depending on the programme but falls around December to January.

It is important to visit the official website (link below) and an EMJMD site for detailed information on how to apply for this scholarship.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Award Provider: European Commission

UK Supreme Court case on the Scottish referendum draft bill: a reactionary distraction

Steve James


The Scottish government's case seeking a legal basis for a second referendum on independence reached the UK Supreme Court last week. The two-day hearing arose from the publication, June this year, by the government of First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, of a draft Independence Referendum Bill.

The bill sought to legislate in the Scottish parliament for a new independence poll, to be held October 19, 2023, nine years after the previous poll of September 18, 2014.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon launches the Scottish government's independence economy prospectus. [Photo by Scottish Government / CC BY 2.0]

A manouevre by the ruling Scottish National Party (SNP), the draft bill was accompanied by the government's exploration of the legal grounds for the new referendum in the UK Supreme Court. Under the terms of Section 30 of the 1998 Scotland Act, powers on constitutional and other matters reserved for Westminster, can be transferred temporarily to the Scottish parliament. After the 2014 vote, held under a Section 30 transfer of authority, was much closer than expected, successive British governments have refused to transfer powers for a rerun.

Anticipating that the court will throw out the Scottish government's case, Sturgeon also announced the SNP's intention to treat the next UK general election, due 2024, as a “de facto” referendum on independence, without explaining precisely what that means.

The Supreme Court hearings summarised the arguments put forward by Scotland's current Lord Advocate, Dorothy Bain KC and her opponent, James Eadie KC, representing the Office of the Advocate General. The Lord Advocate is Scotland's leading law officer, overseeing criminal prosecutions, advising and representing the Scottish government on civil cases. The Office of the Advocate General is a British government department, set up as part of the devolution settlement, dealing with Scottish legal matters.

The issues in dispute in the Supreme Court amount to the following:

- Could the Supreme Court even issue a verdict on the case at all? The Lord Advocate argued she could not sign off on the draft referendum bill without being confident that the bill was legally competent. The Advocate General said the case should not even be heard since the bill should have been passed by the Scottish parliament before it was presented to the Supreme Court.

- Given the British government is opposed to a Section 30 order which would allow the Scottish government to hold a poll, could the Scottish government nevertheless hold a legal referendum on such a crucial constitutional question, which should be reserved for Westminster; and even should that vote only be viewed as only having an 'advisory' role? The Scottish government case appears to rest on the claim that an “advisory” vote would have no constitutional impact.

Unsurprisingly, there is a broad consensus among commentators that the Scottish government's case will be thrown out. It is not even being heard by the whole Supreme Court. Only five Supreme Court judges are sitting, out of a possible eleven, although these include representatives of the differing legal environments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland along with two experts in English law. Nevertheless, the judges, who have 8,000 pages of submissions to digest, are not expected to issue a verdict for months.

Particularly since the result of the Brexit referendum of June 2016, the Sturgeon government has been seeking an opportunity to reverse the clear rejection of independence, by 55 to 45 percent, in 2014. Year after year, Sturgeon has made statements on the imminence of another poll.

The SNP leadership, however, are anxious to avoid emulating the Catalan example. In 2017, the regional Catalan government held a referendum on Catalan secession from Spain, which was declared illegal by the Spanish Constitutional Court. Voters in the outlawed poll were subjected to brutal repression by the Spanish state and leading Catalan nationalists were hounded and jailed across Europe. The SNP leadership made clear its own attitude towards democratic rights by saying almost nothing in defence of its Catalan peers. It prioritised largely futile efforts to convince the European bourgeoisie that Scotland could be granted its own place in the European Union (EU) and its Single Market—weakening British imperialism after Brexit—without inflaming separatist movements in Spain, Belgium and elsewhere that threaten the stability of member states.

The SNP are in addition seeking to square the circle and maintain relations with the British government, its legal system and massive state and military apparatus, and access to markets on which Scotland’s economy still depends. In effect, Sturgeon is using the draft bill as means to keep the independence issue in the headlines, fending off pressure from hardline nationalists within the SNP and from former SNP leader, Alex Salmond and his Alba party, seeking a more aggressive independence push.

First Minister Alex Salmond and Anne MacColl of SDI meet Dr William Rodriguez, CEO of Daktari Diagnostics in New York as part of his economy-focused trip to the United States. April 4, 2013 [Photo by Scottish Government / CC BY 2.0]

Salmond's stance has been endorsed by the Scottish pseudo-left tendencies, underscoring their role as a ginger group for a section of the financial oligarchy.

Former Scottish Socialist Party leader Tommy Sheridan, now an Alba member, has for years insisted that the successive electoral triumphs of the SNP, in power since 2007, give the party a “mandate” to open independence negotiations immediately. A Socialist Party Scotland statement echoed this, declaring its support for “the right to indyref2” and advocating “a mass mobilisation of the working class and trade unions in the streets, workplaces, schools and colleges to deliver it.”

But Sturgeon and Salmond speak for business interests in Scotland, including those whose access to EU markets and dependence on a steady supply of workers from Eastern Europe have been disastrously disrupted by Brexit. Scotland voted 65 to 35 percent against Brexit, the largest majority in the UK. The Scottish government presents independence as a means to reverse Brexit, while offering a stable platform for the intensified exploitation of the working class and the expansion of private wealth for transnational companies seeking access to the Single Market.

Further indication of the class interests driving the SNP, regardless of any independence poll, is its response to the British government's proposal for freeports, where national tax, labour, planning and environmental regulations can be ripped up in pursuit of unrestricted profit making.

The SNP aims to host two “green freeports”, where, under the cover of some net zero rhetoric, that same basic model will apply. One of the candidate freeports is the North East Scotland Green Freeport, based around Aberdeen and Peterhead, centres of the oil, windfarm and carbon capture industries. The freeport's backers include the local authorities, Macquairie Group one of the world's largest infrastructure investors and Scottish billionaire Sir Ian Wood, founder of the global oil services giant, Wood Group PLC.

Screenshot from the North East Scotland Green Freeport website. The text states, "A Green Freeport for North East Scotland... will secure vital trade and support the acceleration of innovation, diversification and decarbonisation of the region's key sectors and deliver a £8.5 billion GVA boost, ushering in a new era of investment, innovation, regional regeneration and opportunities for those that need them most."

The SNP has also stepped up efforts to present the business case for independence. The latest in a series of government papers, “Building a New Scotland: A stronger economy with independence” was published this week. The section “What our proposals would mean for your business”, stressed increased productivity, access to the European Single Market and “reformed models of corporate governance that evidence shows improve productivity.”

The draft bill and Supreme Court case have emerged amid the greatest upsurge of the working class for decades internationally, including in all corners of the UK. All factions of the Scottish bourgeoisie, the Labour and trade union bureaucracy and the pseudo-left recognise the immense utility of the endless arguments and counter arguments on the “Scottish question” towards maintaining political control of the working class.

This is underscored most clearly by the fact that the SNP vociferously supports NATO's war against Russia, an issue that counts for nothing when determining the pseudo-left’s nationalist orientation. Indeed the war is an issue that barely concerns them as they pursue the chimera of “national independence”, curtesy of the global corporations, the EU and NATO.

The net result is that the essential class questions of brutal and deepening exploitation across Britain and the catastrophic decline of public services under the impact of inflation, war and world crisis can be suppressed and diverted.

US and Mexico begin mass deportation of Venezuelan migrants

Andrea Lobo


Last weekend, the administrations of presidents Joe Biden in the United States and Andrés Manuel López Obrador, known as AMLO, in Mexico, set in motion their agreement to summarily deport all Venezuelan migrants seeking to enter the United States.

The agreement was initially announced on Wednesday in response to a surge of Venezuelans escaping the humanitarian crisis created by years of U.S. sanctions aimed at starving the country into submission.

US authorities estimate that the number of Venezuelans seeking to reach the United States has increased 30 times since April, with 3,000 migrants, mostly from Venezuela, crossing into Panama daily on their way to the United States.

Despite enforcing a policy of mass infections responsible so far for 1.1 million COVID-19 deaths and having declared that “the pandemic is over,” Biden continues to base his immigration policy on Title 42, a Trump-era decree that cites COVID-19 as a pretext for violating the right to asylum enshrined in international law.

Describing forced relocations characteristic of the most entrenched dictatorships, a Venezuelan migrant who had crossed into the United States told France 24, “At no point were we told that we were going to be deported. They just took us out and drove us away” into Mexico. Pointing at the Tijuana-San Diego border crossing behind him, another migrant said “We are hungry in Mexico. We are on the border. Look, there is the wall. They kicked us out without even saying ‘Look, you are being deported.’ If I was being deported then send me to Venezuela on a flight.”

The actions of the Biden administration, which claims to be a lighthouse for democracy and human rights, can only be described as tossing human beings across the border like trash.

As a meaningless cover, Biden’s program will allow 24,000 Venezuelans to apply for legal residence. However, migrants can only apply from their country of origin and must prove that they have a local sponsor and financial means to sustain themselves in the United States before traveling exclusively via air.

Not only are these requirements unaffordable for all but a privileged layer of professionals and businesspeople, but the Biden administration is also banning all those who have already entered Panama, Mexico or the United States irregularly during the past five years from applying.

Biden’s program in fact has the cruel and punitive stench of the far right and only serves to legitimize and strengthen the fascist movement being cultivated by the American ruling elite. Ultimately, these forces will be used as shock troops against the emerging mass movement of the American and international working class against inflation, war, the pandemic and social inequality.

Blas Núñez-Neto, the Chief Operating Officer at the US Customs and Border Protection, declared on Thursday that the program “is only for Venezuelans, but we are going to be closely monitoring how effective it is in reducing the influx of migrants and, if it works, we’ll begin a process of reviewing if it can be expanded.”

So far this year, a record 160,000 migrants, approximately 70 percent of them Venezuelans, have crossed the dangerous Darien jungle into Panama on their way to the United States, according to Panamanian authorities.

While crossing Costa Rica on Monday, the Venezuelan migrant and physician Fidel José Reinoza described powerfully to Crhoy what this means: “The Darien is a mountain that tries to find the best way to kill you. You might run out of food; it could be the rushing rivers; it could be its immense jungle of 21,000 [square] kilometers… Truly, all of us who have crossed the Darien are warriors. We are heroes.”

For weeks and sometimes months, these migrant workers uprooted from their homes and neighborhoods cross thousands of kilometers, facing immense jungles, brutal armed forces trained and armed by US imperialism to stop them, along with gangs, storms and drought.

Having arrived at the US-Mexico border, the Venezuelan migrants usually turn themselves in. The US Border Patrol then forces them to throw away their wet clothes and backpacks, takes their names, fingerprints and pictures, gives them plastic bags for other belongings and sends them to a camp for a few hours or days before deporting them.

The abuse by government officials is generalized on both sides of the border. A migrant, Paolo Gutiérrez, told Jornada that one US official said to another, “Take this shit away” referring to the groups of migrant families. Another told him, “Are you stupid, you son of a bitch?” and several called them “illegals.”

The Mexican authorities then drive them farther south to migrant stations, where they are handed orders for “your definitive exit of the country within 20 calendar days.” On top of it all, a migrant told Jornada that Mexican officials steal their clothes and cash. “We were all in shock, crying, given the certainty that we were also being kicked out from here, that we don’t even have enough to eat… We don’t believe this is fair, we are a group of working people,” she said.

A group of Venezuelans that traveled to the Ministry of Inclusion and Social Welfare in Mexico City told Jornada that they were refused even shelter.

Following its own agreement with Washington, the Guatemalan government announced Monday that it had detained 350 migrants, mostly Venezuelan, and was immediately deporting them south to Honduras.

About 6 million Venezuelans have left the country since 2015, trying to escape truly abhorrent conditions. A 2021 household census by the Andrés Bello Catholic University and the Central University of Venezuela found that 94.5 percent of the Venezuelan population was living in poverty. Similarly, only 5.8 percent of the population is not suffering any level of food insecurity. In the historically higher-paid public sector, the average wage is $12 per month.

Such a humanitarian catastrophe in a country with one fifth of the world’s oil reserves and a once thriving industrial sector is an indictment of the entire capitalist system. The ongoing crisis is above all the product of sanctions imposed during the Obama and Trump administrations and renewed under Biden against corporations doing business in Venezuela. These were aimed at bankrupting the country and facilitating the installation of a US puppet regime.

Venezuelan crude oil production remains between 400,000 and 723,000 barrels per day, compared to 2.5 million-3.5 million barrels before the US sanctions.

On the other hand, it has been the bourgeois nationalist government of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela that has been in charge of enforcing this massive drop in living standards while using police-state measures to crush all social opposition from below and defend capitalism at all costs.