28 Oct 2022

European Central Bank announces another big interest rate hike as recession trends strengthen

Nick Beams


The European Central Bank (ECB) has announced a major increase in its base interest rate for the third consecutive time, despite acknowledging that the euro zone is on the way to recession.

The increase of 75 basis points was in line with market expectations as the ECB said it expected to raise interest rates further.

Christine Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank [Photo: Bernd Hartung/European Central Bank]

Outlining the economic situation at her press conference following the meeting of the governing council yesterday, ECB President Christine Lagarde pointed to worsening conditions on several fronts.

“Economic activity in the euro area is likely to have slowed significantly in the third quarter of the year and we expect a further weakening in the remainder of this year and the beginning of next year,” she said.

High inflation, currently running at close to 10 percent, was reducing people’s real incomes, pushing up costs for firms and dampening spending and production, with both business and consumer confidence falling “rapidly.”

“Demand for services is slowing, after a strong performance in previous quarters when those sectors most affected by the pandemic-related restrictions reopened, and survey-based indicators for new orders in the manufacturing sector are falling,” Lagarde stated.

In addition, worsening terms of trade—the result of the rise in the value of the US dollar against the euro, which is driving up the price of imports faster than the higher prices received for exports—was also “weighing on incomes in the euro area.”

According to the ECB, inflation in energy prices was 40.7 percent over the last year. But Lagarde made it clear the central bank is not in favour of increased government spending to try to counter the effects of the price hikes.

“Fiscal support measures to shield the economy from the impact of high energy prices should be temporary and targeted at the most vulnerable,” she said, adding that governments should pursue policies aimed at bringing down high public debt ratios.

In response to the warnings of recession, the view was expressed in some quarters that the ECB may be easing back on rate increases. The head of macro research at the Dutch bank ING, Carsten Brzeski, told the Financial Times Lagarde’s emphasis on recession “opened the door to a dovish plot.”

But given the attitude of the members of the central bank’s governing council, as revealed in the minutes of its September meeting, this may be wishful thinking on the part of finance capital, always keen to get its hands on cheaper money.

The meeting minutes noted that inflation was becoming “self-reinforcing, to the point that even a projected weakening of growth was not sufficient to bring inflation back to target.”

As with central banks around the world, the key concern of the ECB is that inflation drives workers into wages struggles and they break out of the constraints of the trade union apparatuses as it becomes ever more apparent that price hikes are going to continue.

“The longer inflation persisted, the higher the risk that inflation expectations could become unanchored and the costlier it would be to bring them back to target,” the minutes said.

Expressing the ECB’s willingness to induce a recession, if that is what proves necessary to suppress wages struggles, the minutes stated that “growth concerns should… not prevent needed forceful increases in interest rates.”

The higher interest rate regime is starting to throw up divisions in the euro zone.

On Tuesday, the newly installed Italian prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, leader of the fascist Fratelli d’Italia, used her first speech in parliament to take issue with the ECB’s tighter interest rate and monetary policy regime.

She said the decision to raise rates was “considered by many to be a rash choice, which runs the risk of impacting banking credit to businesses and families.” It was compounded by the ECB decision in July to end its bond-buying program, which “creates further difficulties for member states that have elevated public debt.”

The ECB decision to start lifting rates, taken at its July meeting, was accompanied by the launch of a new program, the Transmission Protection Initiative (TPI), which allows the central bank to buy up the bonds of highly indebted countries, Italy in particular, to prevent a bond-market selloff and escalating interest rates.

But the TPI requires that governments comply with ECB dictated “restructuring” measures which Meloni and her party opposed under former Prime Minister Mario Draghi and which in part boosted its electoral support.

Meloni is not the only critical voice. In an interview with the newspaper Les Echos last week, French president Emmanuel Macron warned against suppressing demand.

“I’m concerned to see lots of experts and certain European monetary policymakers explain to us that we need to break demand in Europe to better contain inflation,” he said. “One must be very careful.”

Macron did not specify what “policymakers” he was referring to, but the push for higher rates is largely being driven by German financial authorities.

Earlier this month, criticism of central bank policy was the subject of a tweet by Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin. She said something was “seriously wrong with the prevailing ideas of monetary policy, when central banks protect their credibility by driving economies into recession.”

These criticisms were raised in a question to Lagarde at her press conference. She gave them short shrift, saying “we have to do what we have to do.” Lagarde said the ECB was not oblivious to the “risk of recession,” but, based on its mandate, had to deal with the “reality of inflation.”

The ECB had to address another issue with political consequences. As part of its policies to bail out corporations with the onset of the pandemic, it provided €2.1 trillion in ultra-cheap loans, known as targeted longer term refinancing operations.

But with the rise in the bank’s interest rate this raised the possibility that borrowers could deposit that money with the ECB and pick up $28 billion in risk-free profit, according to estimates by the US bank Morgan Stanley.

To counter what were characterised by one finance executive as “bad optics”—a massive handout to financial concerns as households were hit with a “historical shock” to their incomes—the ECB decided to raise the interest rate on the loans from November 23 to bring them in line with its base rate.

But this retroactive decision to change the rules could bring legal action, with some banks warning that it would damage the credibility of ECB refinancing operations.

In the wake of the crisis in the UK, following the Truss government’s mini budget of September 23 which saw bond prices collapse, there are concerns that European markets could also be hit with major financial turbulence.

This week the International Capital Market Association, which represents the biggest traders in the bond markets, sent a letter to the ECB warning of problems in the repo market. This is the area of the financial system which provides short-term funding, very often overnight, for banks and provides them with collateral in derivatives trading.

The European repo market is around €10 trillion. The letter said that the shortage of liquidity in this market had previously led to dislocations on a limited number of occasions, such as at the start of the pandemic.

“However, as we enter a new phase of the monetary policy cycle, with the normalization and associated market volatility, the potential for both the scale and frequency of such dislocations is likely to increase,” it stated.

The letter said current liquidity conditions in the euro zone repo and money markets raised the concern that “rising dysfunction could imperil the transmission of monetary policy.”

As the ECB lifts rates, with the warning that more is to come, such warnings indicate that the crisis that erupted in the UK, while it had certain British characteristics, was rooted in the changes in the global financial system flowing from the higher interest rate and tightening policy regime, which dominates every country and region.

27 Oct 2022

WHO/AFRO Fellowship Programme on Public Health Emergencies in Africa 2023

Application Deadline:

13th November 2022

What is the Award?

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose a challenge to health care systems, particularly in Africa. Every new surge in cases and deaths stresses an already overworked and overstretched workforce, strains resources, and negatively affects health care operations on the continent. The pandemic’s uncertain duration means that health care communities must provide opportunities for stability and growth to the health workforce as it adapts to the ongoing situation. Health care leadership is essential in ensuring the continuity of operations based on effective decision-making and enhanced response operations.

However, the gap between emergencies and public health management skills, leadership, policy, and research has become increasingly evident during the pandemic.

Having well-prepared public health managers with the requisite skills to manage any pandemic is therefore critical for implementing a new public health order that will prepare Member States to promptly detect and effectively respond to public health threats.

Through a three-month fellowship programme, WHO AFRO seeks to support 15 aspirational Master’s degree students, PhD fellows, and emergency public health managers and leaders (Fellows) in Africa in acquiring advanced skills and competencies for strategizing, managing and leading health programmes that will positively transform future public health emergency response on the continent.

The fellowship programme seeks to bridge the emergency public health management and research-to-policy gaps and produce well-equipped, versatile managers and leaders as required by the WHO Emergency Response Framework and the International Health Regulations (2005) for emergency response. Additionally, it seeks to navigate the complex environment of public health practice to achieve and maintain a positive impact on health, politics, negotiation, partnerships and health diplomacy.

The fellowship will adopt a hybrid approach, combining face-to-face engagements with technology-based activities in line with WHO’s Emergency Preparedness and Response (EPR) flagship programme, which aims to reinforce and scale up the quality and scope of public health emergency management in Africa over the next five years.

Which Countries are Eligible?

African countries

What Type of Award is This?

Fellowship , Master, PhD

Who is Eligible?

To qualify, candidates must meet the following criteria:

  • Be citizens of any WHO Member State working on COVID-19, with priority given to citizens of Member States of the WHO African Region.
  • Be registered in a Master’s degree programme (Master’s Fellows).
  • Be registered in a PhD programme (PhD/DPhil Fellows).
  • Be a full-time employee (in the public/private sector or academia) with a Master’s degree or public health qualification or PhD (mid- or senior-level career Fellows).
  • Have professional experience in public health (One Health, medicine, health financing, health economics, health policy, animal health, social sciences, and environmental health).
  • Possess relevant experience that has contributed to the advancement of public health emergency management in Africa.
  • Demonstrate potential for effective public health management that can positively impact the health outcomes of populations.

· Develop an achievable proposal that addresses strategic challenges for improving the management of public health emergencies on the continent.

Number of Fellowship to be awarded

A total of 15 fellowships will be awarded to:

  • Five Master’s degree students;
  • Five PhD students;
  • Five mid- and senior-level public health experts.

What is the Benefit of Award?

WHO AFRO will provide financial support to the fellows to cover tuition and research fees.

How to Apply:

  • Candidates must present the following requirements:
  • A recent Curriculum Vitae
  • Confirmation of registration in an academic institution (for Master’s degree and PhD fellows)
  • Letter of employment (mid- and senior-level experts)
  • A 500-word motivation statement for the Master’s degree students outlining their objectives and plan for the fellowship.
  • A 2000 – 3000-word proposal for all applicants (Master’s, PhD students and mid-/senior-level experts) outlining the proposed project with the following section:
    • Introduction of the subject of research
    • Relevance and pertinence of the subject
    • Brief literature review on the subject
    • Objectives
    • Research plan and activities
    • Potential use of the outcomes of the research
    • Conclusion

Submission Deadline

Applications are due by: 13 November 2022: EMAIL: whoafrofellowship@who.int

Visit Award Webpage for Details

Make Our Planet Great Again (MOPGA) Visiting Fellowship Program 2023

Application Deadline: 16th January 2023

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: Foreign researchers who fulfil the following conditions can apply:

  • having a doctoral degree for less than 5 years  
  • being exclusively of foreign nationality
  • not have resided in France after September 1st 2022 (for more than 90 days)

A research stay convention with the host institution will be established between the institutions and the laureates and will detail specifically the means made available by the laboratory so that the researcher can carry out the research project.

Number of Awards: 40 fellowships will be awarded to the young researchers over a 12-month period from Sept 2023.

Value of Award: The fellowship includes the following benefits:
– Monthly allowance of 2,500 euros  
– Moving allowance of 500 euros
– Support for social security coverage 
– Support for health insurance

A visiting fellowship agreement with the French host institution will be established between the institutions and the laureates. It will specify the means and resources made available by the host laboratory so that the researcher can carry out the research project.

Duration of Award: 12 Months

How to Apply: Applications should be submitted via the following link: here.

1. Your CV with the list of your publications in English (4 pages maximum)
2. Copy of your PhD diploma
3. CV of your research supervisor in the French host institution for the visiting fellowship (2 pages maximum)
4. Letter of support from the French host institution 
5. Letters of recommendation (maximum 3)
6. Copy of your Passport or National ID

Visit Award Webpage for Details

UK Sunak government to ban strikes and protests

Robert Stevens


The replacement as prime minister of Liz Truss with Rishi Sunak was carried out this week at the insistence of the financial oligarchy, whose main demand is that the government step up their attacks on the working class.

Newly Appointed Prime Minister Rishi Sunak holds his first Cabinet Meeting the morning after assuming office. October 26, 2022, London, United Kingdom [Photo by Simon Walker/No 10 Downing Street / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0]

Truss was thrown out because her September mini budget of £45 billion in tax cuts for the richest was paid for with borrowing, rather than the immediate imposition of additional austerity. While her axing revealed differences between factions of the ruling Conservative Party over how to finance further vast subventions to the super-rich, there are none when it comes to imposing the necessary dictatorial measures required to enforce this.

Boris Johnson’s 2019 election manifesto pledged to bring in Minimum Service Levels (MSLs) during transport strikes, which would make industrial action in the sector ineffective. Another policy aimed at neutering strikes, dating back to the 2015 Conservative election manifesto, was to legislate to allow agencies to supply temporary workers to cover workers taking industrial action.

The legislation on agency workers became law on July 21. At the same time legislation was passed to raise the level of maximum damages that courts can award against a trade union when strike action has been found “unlawful”. For the largest unions, the maximum is now £1 million.

These laws went through even though Johnson had announced his resignation on July 7, prompting the leadership election that brought Truss to power.

Truss announced she would seek to legislate on MSLs within 30 days of taking office. The task now falls to Sunak, with the law to be enacted in early 2023.

The scale of the government’s class war offensive is underscored by the Public Order Bill—one of the most draconian pieces of legislation in British history, effectively ending the right to protest and further clamping down on strikes.

The Bill has been used to revive sections of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 deemed so nakedly dictatorial they were voted down by the House of Lords. They include making it unlawful for a person to interfere with the use or operation of key national infrastructure, including airports, the road network, railways and newspaper printers. Effective industrial action in these sectors would be essentially illegalised.

Protests are deemed illegal if they include acts causing “serious disruption to two or more individuals, or to an organisation”. “Serious disruption” includes “noise”, meaning that any protest can be declared illegal.

Police are also granted massive new stop and search powers and the right to issue “Serious Disruption Prevention Orders” (SDPO). An SDPO can be imposed on people who have participated in at least two protests within a five-year period, whether or not they have been convicted of an offence. The person can be served a two-year order forbidding them from attending further protests.

Those handed an SDPO can be forced to wear an electronic tag to monitor their movements.

Jail sentences of up to 51 weeks are introduced for people who “lock on” to immovable objects or each other.

To impose this dictatorial assault, Sunak brought back as home secretary one of the most right-wing figures in the Tory party, Suella Braverman. This was just days after she was forced to stand down from the position for breaching the ministerial code.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman leaves the first Cabinet meeting under Prime Minister Liz Truss in 10 Downing Street. September 7, 2022, London. [Photo by Simon Dawson/No 10 Downing Street / CC BY-NC-ND 2.0]

Two days before Truss resigned, Braverman slipped through a last-minute amendment to the Public Order Bill allowing the home secretary of the day to apply for injunctions against anyone they deem “likely” to carry out protests that could cause “serious disruption” to “key national infrastructure”, prevent access to “essential” goods or services, or have a “serious adverse effect on public safety”.

In the final House of Commons vote on the Public Order Bill, before it was sent to the House of Lords second chamber for scrutiny, the government won with a majority of 49. Labour voted against only on the basis that the current repressive apparatus of the state was adequate to clamp down on protests. But Labour MP Sarah Jones boasted, “The Labour Party, last April, called for greater injunction powers following the disruption by Just Stop Oil… We suggested injunctions because they are more likely to prevent further disruption to, say, an oil terminal than more offences to criminalise conduct after it has taken place, with all the added costs and logistics of removal. Injunctions are more straightforward for the police, they have more safeguards as they are granted by a court, and they are future-proof when protesters change tactics.”

With further protests held by environmental groups, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer warned of the repression he had lined up were Labour to take office. He told an LBC Radio phone-in show Monday that during his tenure (2008-2013) as director of public prosecutions, “we always had laws available” to prosecute people taking such action.

He added, “What we were pushing for in that was longer sentences for those who were gluing themselves to roads and motorways. We didn’t get that through, but that’s what I wanted.” Asked by host Nick Ferrari, “And that’s what you’d want in the future?”, Starmer replied, “Yes.”

The unions have done nothing to mobilise their millions of members against the legislation. The only response from the Trades Union Congress was a declaration from outgoing leader Frances O’Grady, “If ministers cross the road to pick a fight with us then we will meet them halfway… Read my lips: We will see you in court.”

Among the key section of workers the legislation is aimed at suppressing are tens of thousands of rail staff, who have taken national strike action throughout the last few months. The Minimum Service legislation sets the stage for mass firings, with the government stating that under it “specified workers who still take strike action will lose their protection from automatic unfair dismissal.”

Train drivers picket line at London's Euston station, October 1, 2022 [Photo: WSWS]

The main concern of ASLEF train drivers’ union leader Mick Whelan was that the Minimum Services Level legislation “will only lead to industrial strife lasting longer.” Whelan played down the dangers of the savage legislation and intentions of the Tory government, stating, “The government claims that similar legislation exists in other European countries, such as Germany, France, and Spain. Yes, it does, but what the government doesn’t know—or doesn’t choose to say—is that it is not enforced. Because they know it doesn’t work.”

This is false. Not only is such legislation used by these governments and others; even more draconian legislation has been used as the class struggle sharpens throughout Europe on a regular basis.

This year alone, striking Spanish airline workers and metal workers have been subjected to Minimum Service orders. This summer Spain’s Socialist Party (PSOE)-Podemos government and Ryanair imposed a minimum service requirement preventing many workers from legally stopping work. In the case of the metal workers’ strike in Cantabria, 150 workers were banned from striking by the imposition of a 100 percent minimum service requirement in 12 companies.

This month the Macron government in France requisitioned striking refinery workers to force them back to work in order to break a powerful action hitting the arteries of the economy.

This offensive has accelerated over the last decade as the ruling class in Europe enforced brutal austerity to make workers pay for the 2008 global financial meltdown.

In December 2010, Spain’s PSOE government forced 2,200 air traffic controllers back to work at gunpoint to smash a wildcat strike. Armed soldiers stood over them with the threat of immediate arrest should they stop work.

In January 2013, the New Democracy-led Greek coalition government, which included the social democratic PASOK and the Democratic Left, placed striking metro workers under martial law, forcing them back to work under pain of imprisonment. The following month, the coalition invoked emergency powers in the form of a “civil mobilisation,” formally conscripting striking ferry workers into military service and ordering them to return to work.

Erdoğan orders Turkish Medical Association head detained

Ulaş Ateşçi


The police detention of Prof. Dr. Şebnem Korur Fincancı, president of the Turkish Medical Association (TTB), from her home in Istanbul yesterday is a assault on basic democratic rights. The World Socialist Web Site protests her arbitrary detention and demands her release.

In this Feb. 4, 2022 file photo, Sebnem Korur Fincanci, the head of the Turkish Medical Association, speaks during a protest in Ankara, Turkey. (AP Photo/Burhan Ozbilici, File)

Fincancı’s detention provoked protests in many cities, including Istanbul, Izmir, Diyarbakır and Adana yesterday. The TTB’s Central Council issued a formal protest, stating: “The detention decision, which follows statements by government circles interfering in the judiciary, constitutes the final stage of the pressure that these circles have been increasing against the TTB and all labor and professional organizations for a long time.”

It asserted that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s government aims to get the TTB under its control: “As a matter of fact, the government has admitted that it will use this agenda created in the public opinion for an amendment in the Law on Professional Organizations.”

Last week, Fincancı, a forensic medicine specialist and the elected leader of the TTB, whose membership includes over 100,000 doctors, told Medya Haber of the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) in its ongoing operation against Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) forces in Iraqi Kurdistan. On October 18, the pro-PKK Fırat News Agency (ANF) published footage of two PKK militants allegedly exposed to chemical weapons by the Turkish army.

In an interview with Medya Haber, Fincancı stated that she had watched the footage, adding: “Obviously, one of the toxic-poisonous chemical gases that directly affects the nervous system have been used. Although its use is forbidden, we see that it is used in conflicts.”

The Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office took immediate action on the instructions of the Erdoğan government to investigate Fincancı. In a statement, it said that the investigation was opened “on charges of ... making propaganda for a terrorist organization and ... insulting the Turkish Nation, the State of the Republic of Turkey, the institutions and organs of the State due to her statements to the so-called media organ of the PKK/YPG armed terrorist organization.” It also demanded that Fincancı be dismissed as TTB president.

Speaking to bianet on the same day, Fincancı criticized Medya Haber, stating: “I criticize the way my statements were presented; it was irresponsible reporting. … I stated that these involuntary movements could occur with the effect of a chemical getting hold of the nervous system and that an effective investigation should be carried out in relation to this if there were allegations that a chemical had been used.”

Fincancı continued: “I stated that if there was death, it was necessary to make a medical investigation according to the Minnesota Protocol and that it is compulsory that the investigation should be carried out by independent institutions since this is considered as a war crime in the scope of the Geneva Convention. However, the presentation of the news was indicating that I had proven this incident, so it was not reflected very correctly.”

“Opening an investigation to the one who is saying ‘an investigation should be made’ gives the impression of concealing a crime,” she said. However, Fincancı has been targeted by the government and bourgeois media, despite the absence of any criminal offense, and was detained yesterday after her house was raided, even though she had previously declared her readiness to testify.

The TTB have organized numerous nationwide strikes for better wages and conditions this year. Moreover, Fincancı and the TTB have also been in the government’s crosshairs due to its opposition to the government’s concealment and manipulation of pandemic data.

Until recently, the TTB opposed Erdoğan’s “herd immunity” policies that put profit before human life. Fincancı also drew attention to this in the interview, saying: “We were also criminalized as a professional organization during the pandemic process when we said, ‘your data and the data we compiled from the field do not coincide.’ Human rights defenders are constantly criminalized. So it is not surprising that an investigation was opened ...”

On October 18, the Kurdish nationalist Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) brought the alleged use of chemical weapons before parliament and demanded an investigation. But the Defense Ministry rapidly denied the allegations. “There are no chemical weapons in the inventory of the Turkish Armed Forces,” Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar said on Friday. “We respect the borders and sovereign rights of all our neighbors, especially Iraq and Syria,” Akar claimed in the same speech.

In reality, both the Syrian and Iraqi governments are demanding that Turkey withdraw its armed forces from their territory.

On the same day, Erdoğan said his government will pursue Fincancı, declaring, “My friends immediately filed lawsuits [against her] and we will definitely not let this go. We will go after her by opening both compensation and severe criminal cases. Our Armed Forces have never had any negligence such as using chemical weapons.”

Remarkably, Erdoğan also claimed these allegations were “slanders of communists,” stating: “This is not the first time they are making these slanders. They are impudent, they are immoral. This is the mud they always throw at our army. They think that if they throw mud, it will leave a trace. This [slandering] is the most important motto of communism and communists. Since these are their remnants, they will always throw such slanders. And we will hold them to account for it within the law, whatever it takes.”

On Sunday, Devlet Bahçeli, the head of the MHP, the fascistic ally of the Erdoğan government, called Fincanci a “terrorist and a criminal.” He said, “Anyone who clings to the slanders of the separatist terrorist organization PKK and accuses honorable Turkish soldiers is a terrorist, dishonorable, traitor and criminal.” On Tuesday, Bahçeli also called to close the TTB and strip Fincanci of Turkish citizenship.

TTB was also targeted by Erdoğan at the beginning of 2018. Eleven members of the TTB’s central council were detained for issuing a statement opposing the war, titled “War is a Matter of Public Health,” after Ankara’s invasion in northern Syria against the US-backed, Kurdish-nationalist People’s Protection Units (YPG) around Afrin. Prior to these detentions, Erdoğan had declared them “traitors” and “terrorist lovers.”

In Iraq, where allegations of the use of chemical weapons have been raised, the Turkish army has been conducting military operations code-named “Claw” against the PKK since 2019. After the 'Claw Lock” operation began this April, the Iraqi central government and the Kurdistan Regional Government blamed Turkey for a bombardment in July that killed many civilians. Ankara denied the allegation, however, implicitly blaming the attack on the PKK.

The detention of the TTB’s president comes as the government steps up attacks on democratic rights amid growing social discontent with the cost of living. Amid ongoing military operations in Iraq and Syria and growing tensions with Greece in the eastern Mediterranean, the Turkish government is promoting militarism to suppress and divert class tensions.

Moreover, a so-called censorship bill openly targeting all kinds of political and social opposition was recently passed into law. It asserts that “publicly disseminating untrue information on social media about the country’s internal and external security, public order and public health in order to create fear and panic among the public in a way that is conducive to disrupting public peace will be punishable by one to three years in prison.”

The day before Fincancı's detention, nine Kurdish journalists working for the Mesopotamia Agency (MA) and JINNEWS were detained. The Ankara Security Directorate shared footage of the journalists being taken into custody in handcuffs, claiming that the journalists were operating under the “press committee of the PKK/KCK terrorist organization” and that they were “reporting on content that incites hatred and hostility among the public.” Last June, 16 journalists were arrested in another antidemocratic police operation against the Kurdish press. They are still being held in prison without charge.

Sri Lankan president declares “harder times are inevitable”

Saman Gunadasa


In an address to the nation on October 19, Sri Lankan President Ranil Wickremesinghe declared that his government will implement the International Monetary Fund (IMF) austerity program to the very last letter.

Ranil Wickremesinghe [Photo: United National Party Facebook]

“If we withdraw from this program,” he said, “we will not receive assistance from the IMF.” Moreover, without IMF certification, he added, the government would not be able to get further help from institutions like the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank and various countries.

“If that happens, the country will be back to the era of queues,” he warned, pointing out to the acute scarcities of essential food, medicines, fuel and gas during the past months. In the same breath, the president insisted that “harder times are inevitable.”

Echoing the president in an interview on October 22, Central Bank Governor Nandalal Weerasinghe declared that, as far as he could see, the IMF was “the only way out” to achieve economic recovery.

Wickremesinghe’s speech and Weerasinghe’s remarks came amid an uproar from big business lobbies over the government’s new tax increases announced in early October.

The government agreed to the IMF goal of lifting state revenue collection to between 14.5 to 15 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2026, through massive tax increases. In 2022, revenue is estimated to be only around 9 percent of GDP.

Wickremesinghe was seeking to console big business by referring to the massive tax concessions of up to 50 percent given by the previous government. Sri Lankan corporations have reaped unprecedented record profits during the past two years.

The government has proposed the corporate tax rate to be increased to 30 percent, which is still lower than some South Asian corporate tax rates. Most big business investors are enjoying decades of tax holidays and concessions.

However, those hit hardest by the new taxes will not be big business but workers, professionals, self-employed people, small and micro-businesses. The government has brought down the monthly taxable threshold from 300,000 ($US820) to 100,000 rupees. Some workers are drawing monthly salaries and allowances of 100,000 rupees.

Wickremesinghe’s claim to have eased burdens on working people that led to months of mass strikes and protests since April is a lie. The government has increased the supply of some goods in a limited way, but the doubling and trebling prices of all essentials has made the cost unbearable for ordinary people.

New tax burdens come as workers and the poor have been battered by hyper-inflation. According to the government’s figures, the annualized inflation rate rose to 70 percent in September nationally, while food inflation increased to more than 80 percent. The food inflation rate has ballooned to 102 percent from 2020 which means the real value of wages has declined by around 50 percent.

Sri Lanka announced a temporary default on foreign loans in April, due to an acute lack of foreign exchange. The IMF requires the country to negotiate with creditors to restructure the defaulted loans to assure repayment. To fulfill this requirement, the government has to implement the IMF austerity program and squeeze workers and the poor to repay the sharks of international finance capital.

Apart from direct price increases and tax hikes, the government has to privatize or commercialise state-owned corporations, slash hundreds of thousands of public sector jobs and further reduce welfare subsidies.

Sri Lanka’s economic turmoil is the sharpest expression of the worsening global economic crisis exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and the “let it rip” policy of the governments around the world, and the US-NATO war against Russia in Ukraine.

The World Bank report on Sri Lanka issued on October 12 noted: “The current crisis has doubled the poverty rate from 13.1 to 25.6 percent ($3.65 per capita, 2017) between 2021 and 2022, increasing the number of poor people by 2.7 million.”

The poverty rate in urban areas has tripled from 5 to 15 percent in the same period. “Half the population in estate areas is now living below the poverty line. Across districts, Mullaithivu continues to be the poorest (57 percent poverty in 2022), followed by Kilinochchi and Nuwara Eliya,” the report states.

Young family from Deeside Estate in Maskeliya, Nuwara Eliya District, Sri Lanka, 12 September 2022. [Photo: WSWS]

However, a recent survey by Peradeniya University’s economics statistics department put the number below the poverty line at 9.6 million, or 45 percent of the population.

According to the World Bank, GDP growth rate will be negative 9.2 percent for this year and the decline will continue into next year. Industry and service sectors are predicted to decline by 11 percent and 8 percent destroying half a million jobs.

Moreover, there is no economic recovery as Wickremesinghe and the Central Bank chief claimed. The growing recessionary conditions internationally will only worsen with the US Federal Reserve and other central banks raising interest rates.

The IMF programme is supported by all the opposition parties in the country. Iran Wickremaratne, a leading MP of the main opposition Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB), said that the “targets set by IMF must be reasonable and achievable.”

A Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) leader told a TV programme on Hiru last week that implementing the IMF program is inevitable after the country declared bankruptcy. He added that people will have to undergo hardships for several years, saying the JVP was prepared to form a government through a general election to carry out this agenda.

The trade unions also accept the IMF program. On Saturday, Pradeep Basnayake, national organiser of the Sri Lanka Government Officers’ Trade Union Association that claims 500,000 members, told the Morning news: “If the government cannot increase the salaries of its employees, it should provide them with an interim allowance until the economy recovers.”

This is the position of all trade unions. They agree with the capitalist class that the working class must bear the burden and simply appeal to the government for limited concessions. The trade unions have been instrumental in derailing, dividing and suppressing the mass popular opposition that has erupted. All these unions are controlled or backed by the political parties—government and opposition—that support the IMF program.

US expands military presence near Russian border

Andre Damon


This month, the US Army’s 101st Airborne Division deployed to Europe for the first time since the Second World War as part of a major military buildup of NATO’s front line along the borders of Ukraine and Russia.

NATO members are sending “more ships, planes and troops to NATO’s eastern flank, from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south,” NATO said in a statement earlier this month.

CBS titled its profile of the deployment, “The U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne is practicing for war with Russia just miles from Ukraine’s border.”

Brigadier General John Lubas, noting that nearly 5,000 troops from the 101st Airborne had joined the more than 100,000 soldiers deployed in Europe, told CBS, “This is not a training deployment, this is a combat deployment for us. We understand we need to be ready to fight tonight.”

A graphic created by NATO showing the military alliance's "eastern flank." [Photo: NATO]

CBS’s “embedded” reporter concluded, “If the fighting escalates or there’s any attack on NATO, they’re fully prepared to cross the border into Ukraine.”

The last time the unit was deployed to Europe was in the storming of D-Day during the Second World War. “The 101st hasn’t been back to Europe since the end of World War II,” 2nd Lt. Patrick Tabor said in a statement. “Now we’re back aligned underneath the 1st Infantry Division. It’s a very unique opportunity.”

The 101st Airborne is being deployed in Romania as part of the NATO battle group set up in May.

Speaking Wednesday to Romanian Prime Minister Nicolae Ciucă, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg described the extent of NATO’s buildup in the region: “You host one of NATO’s new battlegroups in the Black Sea region. We are reinforcing NATO’s presence from the Black to the Baltic Sea. Fighter jets from Canada help to keep your skies safe. And thousands of French, Dutch, Belgian and US troops are in Romania to deter aggression.”

Replying to what he called Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “dangerous nuclear rhetoric,” Stoltenberg said, “NATO will not be intimidated or deterred from supporting Ukraine’s right to self-defense.”

Following the outbreak of the Ukraine war, NATO reinforced its existing four battle groups in Eastern Europe and pledged to form four additional battle groups in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia.

“This has brought the total number of multinational battlegroups to eight, effectively doubled the number of troops on the ground and extended NATO’s forward presence along the Alliance’s eastern flank—from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south,” NATO said in a statement last week.

This expansion is proceeding further, with NATO allies pledging at the June summit in Madrid to “enhance the multinational battlegroups from battalions up to brigade size.”

In a provocative article entitled, “American Troops Prepared to Engage in War With Russia,” Newsweek reported, “A U.S. aircraft carrier is prepared to lead an international charge should Russia escalate attacks against Ukraine and its allies.”

Newsweek noted, “The USS George H.W. Bush … is in the Adriatic Sea leading Neptune Strike 2022—a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) deployment that tests deterrence and defense in the Euro-Atlantic area.”

“The Neptune series is a tangible demonstration of the power and capability of the NATO Alliance in all domain operations,” Vice Admiral Thomas Ishee, commander of the US Sixth Fleet and Naval Striking and Support Forces NATO, said in announcing the exercise.

“Neptune Strike 2022 is a prime example of NATO’s ability to integrate high-end maritime warfare capabilities of an allied carrier strike group, ensuring our collective ability to deter and defend.”

The exercise includes over 80 aircraft, 14 ships and approximately 6,000 personnel.

On Wednesday, US President Joe Biden met with leaders of the Defense Department, pledging to expand the size and funding of the US military.

“We made clear in the National Security Strategy that modernizing and strengthening our military is a core source of our national strength and is a priority for me and my administration,” Biden said.

“And as we made clear in the National Security Strategy, this is a decisive decade, not because of any one of us—because the world is changing.”

On Wednesday, Russia staged a series of nuclear tests, demonstrating “Russia’s strategic offensive forces’ readiness to conduct a massive nuclear strike in response to an enemy nuclear strike,” in the words of Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

Shoigu said the nuclear test, the first since the start of the war in Ukraine, was designed to simulate a “massive nuclear strike.”

Russia launched an intercontinental ballistic missile, fired a missile from a nuclear submarine and carried out tests with two Tu-95 long-range strategic nuclear bombers.

Russia’s drills took place at the same time as NATO’s “steadfast noon” nuclear tests, in which US B-52s simulated dropping nuclear bombs in Europe. The drills are ongoing and will continue trough October 30.

Also Wednesday, the US launched a rocket from Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, conducting nearly a dozen hypersonic weapon experiments in their rush to build new hypersonic missiles that could be used to deliver nuclear warheads.

Under these supercharged conditions, in which both the United States and NATO are carrying out nuclear weapons tests on a daily basis, the danger exists that a miscalculation or provocation could dramatically escalate the conflict.