4 Mar 2023

Thousands join climate change protests in New Zealand

Tom Peters


Thousands of people joined protests across New Zealand yesterday for this year’s first Global Climate Strike, demanding action to cut greenhouse gas emissions and stop catastrophic global warming.

Protesters march through downtown Wellington on March 3, 2023. [Photo: WSWS]

The event follows New Zealand’s worst flooding in recent memory in January and February across much of Auckland, the biggest city, Hawke’s Bay, Gisborne, Northland and Coromandel. Fifteen people were killed in the floods and about 10,500 were displaced, with many unable to return to their destroyed homes.

Auckland received 280 percent of its usual January rainfall in less than six hours during the January 27 flooding. Cyclone Gabrielle, which hit the North Island on February 13, inundated huge areas of farmland, villages and suburbs, and destroyed roads, bridges and vital infrastructure. Napier, one of the worst-hit areas, received over 600 percent of its normal February rainfall.

Such extreme weather events are becoming more frequent due to more water vapour in the atmosphere, caused by warmer temperatures. Severe storms are causing similar destruction throughout the world, including recently in California and Australia.

Despite the ever-increasing urgency of the climate crisis, turnout at this week’s events was lower than previous years. In 2019, more than 170,000 people participated. Unlike in the past, the organisers School Strike 4 Climate (SS4C) did not call on young people to walk out of school for the entire day; most rallies were held at 2 p.m. or 3 p.m. The group appealed for university students and workers to take part as well.

About 1,000 people protested in Auckland, with similar numbers taking part in Wellington and Christchurch. Rallies were also held in at least 10 other centres including Dunedin, Napier, New Plymouth, Palmerston North and Tauranga.

Members of the Socialist Equality Group (SEG) attended the Wellington protest, which marched through the city centre to parliament, spoke with some of those in attendance and distributed the statement, “New Zealand’s flooding disaster and the case for socialism.”

Miriam, a student at Victoria University of Wellington, said it was not possible to deny the effects of climate change any more. “You just have to look at what’s just happened in Auckland and Gisborne and Hawke’s Bay. There’s been evidence to say that this is going to happen for years and years, and it is happening, and it’s having an effect on everyone. So someone has to do something about it.”

Miriam [Photo: WSWS]

Governments around the world, including in New Zealand, had not acted on the scientific evidence because “that’s just not where the money is, that’s not where the incentive is,” she said, adding, “I don’t really know how you change that.”

A 14-year-old student, Will McKenzie, said he was attending out of solidarity with people affected by the flooding in Auckland, Hawke’s Bay, and other parts of the country. “It’s horrible because thousands of people have lost their homes and on the news you’ve seen that people have lost their businesses, kumara [sweet potato] farms, all because some major world powers and countries decide not to do anything about [climate change].”

Asked what needed to be done, he said governments should “stop funding oil companies. I feel like they should break the contracts and start funding more wind farms.”

A group of school students from Samoa and the Cook Islands agreed with the SEG’s demand for people in Pacific island countries whose homes are threatened by climate change to be offered help to relocate and to get residence in New Zealand.

“Our people deserve better, and I think people have to start taking initiatives,” said Leana. “The water’s rising and it’s getting hotter, and it’s costing them a lot of money [to adapt] that they don’t really have.”

Susana added: “I think the events happening here in New Zealand should make us more aware about the things that are happening everywhere. It’s a worldwide issue.” Across the Pacific, “people are dying, our people are really hurting, families are struggling, and things need to change now.”

Aimee [Photo: WSWS]

Aimee, a recent tertiary student, said “the world’s going in the wrong direction and we either fight or we die.” She said the corporations polluting the atmosphere were “not moral entities; they are machines with one purpose, which is to make as much profit as possible.” She called for more regulations on big business, and for fossil fuel companies to be taxed to pay for environmental disasters like the recent flooding.

A number of people spoken to said they hoped the Labour government could be pressured by the protests, and by the Greens, to take stronger action on the climate.

This reflects the politics of the organizers. SS4C presented five modest demands to the government: No new fossil fuel mining or exploration; lower the voting age to 16; support farmers to shift to regenerative farming; expand marine reserves; and introduce rebates for people to buy e-bikes.

In an article published by Stuff ahead of the protests, Christchurch SS4C spokesperson Aurora Garner-Randolph wrote that after five years, the government had not taken the necessary steps to address the climate crisis. “It’s clear that for politicians, the best interests of the people come second to short-term petty election politics and big corporate donors,” she said. But she offered no way forward except more “protest and direct action.”

Speaking at the Auckland rally, Joe Carolan, from the Unite union and the pseudo-left group Socialist Aotearoa, called on protesters to “vote Labour, vote Greens, vote for the parties that have the best policy.” He suggested that this, combined with more strikes and protests, would lead to a “revolution.”

At the Wellington rally, Green Party co-leader James Shaw gave a speech saying the floods were “a wake-up call” and that “the government should be acting faster on climate change.”

He declared that the problem was the Greens were “outnumbered” in parliament, “and we need more Green MPs and we need more Green ministers sitting around the Cabinet table after this election, because that is how political change happens.”

This is a lie. Shaw has been the minister for climate change in the Labour-Greens government for the past five years, during which time carbon emissions have continued to increase. The Greens, like Labour, oppose any action that would harm the profits of New Zealand’s corporate elite.

3 Mar 2023

News Corp Media Fellowship 2023

Application Deadline: 26th March 2023

Eligible Countries: All

To Be Taken At (Country): Washington, USA

About the Award: In collaboration with The Wall Street Journal, ICFJ is offering international journalists an opportunity to participate in an innovative program that includes training on creative storytelling and offers grants to support data-driven projects.  The prize for the best project is a three-month News Corp Fellowship in New York, where the fellow will receive hands-on training and mentorship at the WSJ media science lab.

This program builds on the News Corp Media Fellowship, which has offered international journalists an immersive, hands-on experience in some of the world’s most digitally advanced newsrooms since 2014.

During the fellowship, the journalist will be embedded for three months in the WSJ’s media science lab to work on a data-driven project relevant to the fellow and tailor-made for the WSJ. The selected News Corp Media Fellow will have the opportunity to work on projects related to:

  • Workflow and collaboration in a global newsroom;
  • Data science, artificial intelligence and computational journalism;
  • New forms of training and internal leadership development;
  • Audience surveying and emerging forms of social media analysis.
Prior to the three-month fellowship, ICFJ will host a three-day orientation in Washington D.C., where the fellow will receive training and be prepared to develop his or her own digital projects at the Journal.

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: To be considered for the fellowship, journalists must:

1. Participate in two half-day webinars conducted by editors and reporters with expertise in digital tools, data journalism and visualization, artificial intelligence, mobile journalism and audience engagement. Webinars will be open to a select group of up to 50 journalists. Both webinars will occur in April.

2. Receive one of five news innovation grants to support a data or digitally-driven project. Only journalists who participate in both webinars are eligible to apply for these grants. Projects should promote new forms of storytelling, data journalism and visualization, or citizen engagement. Each grant recipient will also receive online editorial coaching and mentorship from experienced editors, reporters and experts.

Only journalists who complete both stages successfully will be considered for the News Corp Media Fellowship. The ideal fellow will be one who:

  • Has a strong news sense and curiosity
  • Demonstrates strong collaborative skills
  • Has an interest in audience engagement and building community
  • Is willing to try new things, experiment and innovate
  • Comes with ideas for several projects to work on during the fellowship

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: All travel and fellowship expenses are covered by the program.

Duration/Timeline of Programme: 3 months

How to Apply: Please apply here.

Visit the Programme Webpage for Details

Israel’s fascist minister Smotrich calls for town of Huwara to be wiped out, anti-Netanyahu opposition grows

Jean Shaoul


Israel’s fascist cabinet ministers have escalated their incendiary attacks on the Palestinians in the wake of the pogrom-style attack Sunday on Huwara and other Palestinian villages near the northern West Bank city of Nablus.

Hundreds of settlers, some masked and armed, went on a rampage, setting fire to the homes, shops, cars, property and agricultural land of the Palestinians, killing one person and injuring 120 more. At least 35 homes were destroyed, with another 40 damaged. More than 400 cars as well as agricultural property were set aflame, leaving the town smouldering for hours.

Israeli soldiers patrol an area damaged bay fires from torched vehicles during a rampage by settlers in Hawara, near the West Bank city of Nablus, Wednesday, March 1, 2023. [AP Photo/Majdi Mohammed]

Israeli soldiers stood by and did nothing to protect the Palestinians, as required under international humanitarian law. The next day, the army ordered Palestinians to stay indoors and stores to close, leaving the settlers to roam the streets of what the Jerusalem Post described as a “ghost town.”

Neither Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu nor any of his cabinet ministers denounced the assault, simply saying that it was “not our way to take the law into our own hands.”

Following a public outcry, the Israeli authorities arrested a handful of people, all of whom were released. Just one was sentenced to four days of house arrest.

Far-right party leaders have called for the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) to drive out the Palestinians from their homes in an explicit call for the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank, or a second “Naqba,” as the Palestinians call the expulsion of at least 700,000 Palestinians before and during the 1948-49 war between Israel and its Arab neighbours.

Netanyahu’s far-right and religious coalition parties absented themselves from a Knesset session called by the opposition bloc to discuss the rampage.

On Monday, Zvika Fogel of Jewish Power declared, “Yesterday, a terrorist came from Huwara—Huwara is closed and burned. That is what I want to see. Only thus can we obtain deterrence.” He was referring to the shooting earlier on Sunday of two brothers from a neighbouring settlement, killed as they drove through the town.

On Wednesday, Bezalel Smotrich, the Religious Zionist leader and Finance Minister who has been given responsibility for the civil administration of the West Bank illegally occupied by Israel since the 1967 Arab-Israeli war—said Israel should “wipe out” Huwara. Home to 7,000 Palestinians, Huwara is almost completely surrounded by Israeli settlements and bisected by a settler road.

“The Palestinian village of Huwara should be wiped out. The state needs to do it and not private citizens,” Smotrich said.

Before the assault, Smotrich had tweeted his support for a statement by David Ben-Zion, deputy leader of the Samaria Regional Council, calling for Huwara to be destroyed. He later complained that his remarks had been taken out of context and deleted his tweet, insisting that this was the government’s responsibility.

This prompted a group of Israeli human rights lawyers to call for the attorney general to investigate Smotrich and two of his allies for “inducing war crimes”. There have been online collections for the Palestinians in Huwara, as well as demonstrations earlier in the week protesting the pogrom.

On Wednesday, there was a mass walkout by Israeli workers along with huge demonstrations in Tel-Aviv, Jerusalem and other towns and cities in a day of action—dubbed “National Disruption Day”—in protest at the government’s plans to assume dictatorial powers by neutering the judiciary. It follows eight weeks of Saturday-night mass rallies in towns and cities across the country that have been growing in strength.

The proposed legislation, set to become law before parliament goes into recess on April 2, would allow the government to appoint Supreme Court justices and grant the Knesset the power to override court rulings. This would smooth the path for the government to ride roughshod over democratic rights and for the ultraorthodox and religious Zionist groups to strengthen the role of religion within the country. It would remove all remaining restrictions on the ultra-nationalist settler movement in their bid to expand their presence across the West Bank.

If these measures become law, the Supreme Court is likely to rule them unconstitutional, precipitating a major political crisis ahead of the celebrations planned to mark the 75th anniversary of the founding of the Zionist State.  

The government has also introduced legislation enabling thrice-convicted Shas party leader Aryeh Deri to serve as government minister, overruling a High Court decision, and is set to introduce a bill preventing the scandal-ridden Netanyahu, currently in court on corruption charges, from being removed from office. This is in anticipation of the auditor general declaring him “unfit for office” due to the “conflict of interest” between his corruption trial and his involvement in the plans to emasculate the judiciary. Such a ruling could precipitate a constitutional crisis, with the army and intelligence services unable to take orders from the prime minister.

Parliamentary committees have nodded through extra funds for Netanyahu’s homes and personal expenditure, while approving on an almost daily basis the far-right parties’ pet projects and allies, stoking public anger

Tensions boiled over on Wednesday when hundreds of police sought to disperse the demonstration in Tel Aviv, using stun grenades and water cannon against protesters, dragging them off the road. Arab News, a Saudi publicationreported that the police were met with chants of “democracy,” “police state” and “Where were you?”, a reference to the refusal of either soldiers or border police to act against settlers in Huwara.

Times of Israel reported, “In the Jerusalem neighborhood of Rehavia, hundreds of protesters marching toward the Prime Minister’s Residence were blocked by police as they sought to block the road…. Dozens are heard shouting, ‘Where were you in Huwara,’ at officers…”

One policeman was seen kneeling on a protester’s neck. At least 71 demonstrators were arrested across the country, including 42 in Tel Aviv, and 11 people needed emergency medical emergency treatment. It followed Jewish Power leader and minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir’s order for the police to “use all available means” to disperse the protesters whom he accused of anarchy.

Ben-Gvir accused opposition leader Yair Lapid of encouraging anarchy and called on him and other leaders to stop inciting against the police.

For their part, Lapid and the Zionist leaders of the opposition advance themselves as a safer set of hands to protect the Israeli state, speaking for the most part in language identical to the far right. “Two months after the establishment of a full-on right-wing government,” Lapid said, “the scope of [Palestinian] attacks is increasing, terrorists are raising their heads, and the army is confused and does not understand its chain of command.”

Netanyahu has supported Ben-Gvir’s orders to the police and refused to disavow Smotrich’s comments. Speaking on Wednesday as protesters were rallying across the country, he also accused them of anarchy and claimed the demonstrations were being funded by “foreign elements.”

Netanyahu’s far-right government is beginning to fragment amid unprecedented uproar and opposition. This includes criticism from senior lawyers, legal experts, former generals, heads of Israel’s intelligence services and business leaders, and demonstrations from army reservists who have said they will refuse to serve if the legislation passes—as well as regular mass protests well in excess of 100,000 people in a country of just 9.3 million on successive Saturdays.

Noam party leader, Avi Moaz, part of the Religious Zionism electoral alliance, has resigned from the government, complaining that Netanyahu was not allowing him to carry out his mandate to strengthen religious education in public schools. Shortly after, a minister from one of the religious parties resigned from one of his posts after a fall-out with Netanyahu over the funding for ultraorthodox Jews.

57 confirmed dead in Greek train crash, as protests and strikes erupt

Robert Stevens


At least 57 people are dead following Tuesday night’s train crash in Greece. They were killed when a passenger train, on route from Athens to Thessaloniki with more than 350 people on board—many of them young students returning to university after a holiday for Greek Orthodox Lent—crashed head-on into a freight train shortly before midnight Tuesday, outside the town of Tempe in central Greece.

According to a report on Thursday by public broadcaster ERT, 52 people remain in hospital in the city of Larissa as a result of the crash. Six people are in critical condition due to head wounds and serious burns. Residents in Larissa, near to where to crash occurred, lined up to give blood—many waiting more than an hour in heavy rain.

Cranes remove debris after a trains' collision in Tempe, about 376 kilometres (235 miles) north of Athens, near Larissa city, Greece, Thursday, March 2, 2023. Rescuers using cranes and heavy machinery on Thursday searched the wreckage of trains involved in a deadly collision that sent Greece into national mourning and prompted strikes and protests over rail safety. [AP Photo/Vaggelis Kousioras]

Late Thursday, almost 48 hours after the crash, authorities announced that another 56 people on the passenger list were still missing,

The rescue and recovery operation is ongoing amid the completely destroyed and crushed rail carriages. Rescuer Konstantinos Imanimidis told Reuters on Thursday, “It will be very difficult to find survivors, due to the temperatures [caused by fires] that developed in the carriages… This is the hardest thing, instead of saving lives we have to dig out bodies.”

On Wednesday, the government announced three days of national mourning, while asserting that the disaster was, according to Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, “mainly due to a tragic human error.”

The station master in Larissa, a worker with over 40 years’ experience on the railways, has been arrested. But the attempt to pin the blame on a single individual has been widely rejected, fueling protests and a rail strike against the New Democracy (ND) conservative government.

Workers know that the rail network has suffered years of austerity cuts, including mass job losses. Much of the network, especially in northern Greece, is not automated, relying on manual signaling.

The station master was charged Thursday with dangerous disruptions of transportation, and may face charges of manslaughter through negligence, bodily harm through negligence and dangerous interventions in means of transportation. But evidence is already emerging throwing doubt over claims that human error is to blame.

Kathimerini reported that when the station master appeared before an investigative magistrate in the town of Larissa Thursday, “He allegedly claimed that during his shift he gave an order to change the tracks on the railway network so that the two trains would not move on the same line but that the system apparently did not respond.”

The newspaper added, “This version of events is supported by a photograph from the stationmaster’s logbook that shows he instructed the fatal Inter City 62 train to continue its journey to Neos Poros, apparently not knowing that the freight train was moving on the same piece of track right toward it.”

More evidence points to the catastrophic implications of having large sections of the rail system that rely totally on manual intervention, with no implementation of automated rail systems widely used internationally. Kathimerini noted, “A colleague reportedly said in an interview with the media that before the fatal accident another train had come to a standstill at Tempe. And that in order to move the stalled train to the nearest station there were changes to the tracks, but the network was not later restored to its previous state.”

The deaths prompted angry protests in Athens, in Thessaloniki where many of the people who died lived, and in Larissa.

In Athens, hundreds of mainly young protesters demonstrated on Wednesday outside the headquarters of Hellenic Train, the privatised company responsible for maintaining Greek railways. They were attacked by riot police, who fired tear gas and stun grenades. Protesters then marched to the Greek parliament in Syntagma Square where police attacked again.

In Larissa, a silent vigil to commemorate the victims of the crash was held. Speaking to the AFP news agency, Nikos Savva, a medical student from Cyprus, said, “The rail network looked problematic, with worn down, badly paid staff.” The arrested station master should not pay the price “for a whole ailing system”. Larissa-based doctor Costas Bargiotas said, “This is an inadmissible accident. We've known this situation for 30 years”.

People hold candles, in memory of the trains collision victims, outside the train station of Larissa city, about 355 kilometres (222 miles) north of Athens, Greece, Thursday, March 2, 2023. Emergency crews inched through the mangled remains of passenger carriages in their search for the dead from Tuesday night's head-on collision, which has left dozens of passengers dead in Greece's worst recorded rail accident. [Photo: Vaggelis Kousioras/WSWS]

The BBC reported, “Families have given DNA samples to help identification efforts, with the results expected on Thursday. One of those, a woman called Katerina searching for her missing brother, a passenger on the train, shouted ‘Murderers!’ outside the hospital in Larissa, directing her anger towards the government and the rail company”.

On Thursday, rail workers in the Federation of Railway Employees began a nationwide 24-hour strike to protest the deaths and the unsafe conditions on Greece’s rail network. A statement by the union said, “Pain has turned into anger for the dozens of dead and wounded colleagues and fellow citizens.” Successive governments, it added, had ignored repeated demands to improve safety standards. The rail network required “hiring permanent personnel, better training and, above all, modern safety technology.” These proposals had always ended up “in the trash can.”

Lines 2 and 3 of the Athens Metro were also suspended for the duration of the rail workers’ action due to a solidarity strike by members of the Athens Metro Workers Union.

That evening, striking workers protested outside Hellenic Railway headquarters in Athens, with thousands then marching to Syntagma Square, with young people joining them—to protest in front of the parliament.

The train deaths are the result of social crimes for which every political party of the ruling elite shares responsibility. It is their leaders who should be in the dock facing charges.

Under-resourcing and destaffing of an already below standard rail network was accelerated over the last decade with the privatisation of the state-owned railway, TrainOSE, by the pseudo-left SYRIZA government in 2017-18.

SYRIZA was brought to power in 2015 on a wave of protests and strikes after five years of savage austerity. They then trampled on this mandate, imposing, as ND and the social democratic PASOK did before them, a devastating austerity programme. The privatisation of key national economic assets and infrastructure was the price demanded in return for any further loans by the European Union (EU) and International Monetary Fund. SYRIZA carried their instructions out to the letter.

TrainOSE was sold off as part of the third austerity package imposed after 2010, with the rail privatisation and sale of other state assets expected to raise €6 billion euros by 2018. It was bought by Ferrovie Dello Stato Italian, the Italian state-owned railway holding company, for just €45 million.

SYRIZA’s Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, at a lavish ceremony in Corfu, presented this as a glorious success. Naftemporiki, the daily financial newspaper, reported, “Tsipras explained that the importance of the investment lies in the fact that the country has been spared a great financial burden... in the price itself, but even more so in the size of the investment it will make in the Greek economy, in the Greek railway, amounting to 500 million euros.”

Tsipras’s lies were soon exposed, with the newly privatised firm, renamed Hellenic Railways, making no investments to upgrade the rail network. The reality, as SYRIZA knew well, was that Ferrovie Dello Stato Italian was planning only vast profits. Ferrovie’s CEO Renato Mazzoncini described buying TrainOSE as a “strategic move for the group. It is not so much about buying a piece of Greece at reduced price, but rather about a strategic expansion operation in view of the major investment in the Athens-Thessaloniki line, which is part of the European corridor project.” The European corridor project would be worth about €3 billion, said Mazzoncini.

The horrific human cost was confirmed in an EU report last year on “Railway Safety and Interoperability in the EU”. Greece was the only member state entirely without “train protection systems” that are “widely considered one of the most effective railway safety measures for reducing the risk of collisions between trains.”

Post-privatization, Greece’s rail network is one of the most dangerous in Europe. From 2018 to 2020, according to the European Union Agency for Railways, Greece recorded the highest railway fatality rate per million train kilometres among 28 European nations.

On Thursday, the Financial Times reported, “Fifteen days before the worst railway crash Greece has seen in decades, the European Commission had referred the country to the European Court of Justice for ‘failing to fulfil its obligations’ [from 2015 to the present day] under the Single European Railway Area Directive” regarding “infrastructure investments and emergency procedures”.

Governments make provocative offer to German public sector workers

Marianne Arens


The latest offer made by the federal and local governments to public sector workers is a provocation. The offer does not come close to covering the wage losses due to current inflation levels, let alone the wage cut ensuing from the last contract. What public sector workers are being offered amounts to a massive real wage cut.

The employers’ side presented the offer on February 23 in Potsdam at the end of the second round of negotiations. Prior to that, the German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser and Karin Welge, who represents the municipalities as mayor of Gelsenkirchen, held two days of talks with the main public service union, Verdi, led by Frank Werneke. Werneke rejected the employers’ offer on behalf of his union and the civil servants’ association and announced new warning strikes to take place up until a third round of talks takes place from March 27 to 29.

Werneke and his fellow bureaucrats will use the period up to the new round to strike a deal with their fellow SPD party colleagues Faeser and Welge that is only just above the current offer. This modus operandi has now become commonplace for Verdi. For example, at the end of November 2021, the contract bargaining battle for state employed public service workers was sold out in similar fashion in the third round of negotiations.

There is therefore only one way to prevent the biggest real wage cut since the founding of the Federal Republic: The struggle must be organised independently of Verdi and the leadership of the negotiations taken out of the hands of its highly paid union bureaucrats. To this end, independent action committees must be set up that network nationwide and internationally.

The lead negotiators: Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser and Verdi boss Frank Werneke [Photo by BMI]

The offer on the table provides for an increase in salaries of just 5 percent over the course of more than two years. The term of the contract is to last 27 months (from January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2025). The first wage increase of just 3 percent is proposed for October 1, 2023, i.e., after nine months of workers forgoing any wage increase. An additional 2 percent is due to be paid in June 2024.

The current soaring rate of inflation is to be “compensated” by two one-off payments, the first of which, €1,500, is due to be paid in May 2023 and the second, of €1,000, in January 2024. However, these one-off payments favoured by government will have no lasting effect on wages and are at best a drop in the ocean. The money can only be used to settle some immediate debts with wages remain painfully low, while the price of fuel, heating, housing and food continues to rise.

In the last contract agreement in October 2020, Verdi agreed to a graduated wage increase of 3.2 percent over a period of 28 months. Since then, however, prices have risen by around 12 percent according to the official inflation rate, and by 7.9 percent in the past year alone. Even under the optimistic assumption that inflation will fall to 7 percent this year and 5 percent next year, price levels would still be around 25 percent higher when the contract now on offer expires compared to the year 2020. Salaries, on the other hand, would have risen by only 8.2 percent. This corresponds to a real wage reduction of about 17 percent within five years!

For apprentices, students and trainees, there is also to be just a 5 percent wage increase over 27 months; again with one-off payments (€750 in May plus €500 in January 2024) also planned.

The proposal makes particularly regressive provisions for health workers who have suffered the most during the coronavirus pandemic. Instead of being compensated for their hardships, they are now to be further fleeced, which will undoubtedly only exacerbate the already dire staffing situation in the health service.

The Federation of Municipal Employers’ Associations (VKA) has written that the offer contains “important points for municipal employers that affect the sphere of hospitals and care facilities, communally owned banks and utilities.” In particular, in the future, institutions declared to be in “economic difficulties” are to be allowed to bypass agreed pay scales, for example, for the nursing service or for doctors.

For professional workers in higher pay grades, the employers promise to top up their “annual bonus.” This amounts to returning to the better paid a fraction of what has been withheld from all workers for years. For example, years ago a 13th and 14th month’s salary in the form of Christmas or holiday bonuses had been commonplace for all public service workers.

Such achievements have been systematically dismantled over the years with the consent of the union. The federal, state and local governments have systematically privatised, outsourced and “liberalised” the public service during the past 30 years. With the help of Verdi and its predecessor unions, contract bargaining rounds were split into numerous individual areas. In the public sector, even the contract bargaining rounds of the country’s individual states (TVL) were separated from those of the nation as a whole and its municipalities (TVöD).

The end result of these cuts is staff shortages and growing work stress everywhere. A large part of the workforce, including airport workers and rubbish collectors, are fobbed off with wages barely above the minimum wage. In the pandemic, many of them were celebrated and applauded as “systemically important,” while their real wages plummeted. The costs of energy and food, which far exceed the official inflation rate, are a particular burden on lower income groups.

At the same time, the government has pulled out of its hat a €100 billion special fund for the German army and supplied huge amounts of weapons to Ukraine, although there is supposed to be “no money” for social needs. This has all been done with the consent of the Verdi leadership, which supports militarism. For example, in Munich during the recent security conference, the flights of official visitors to the war summit were explicitly excluded from Verdi’s warning strikes.

Millions of workers all over Europe are no longer prepared to sacrifice their standards of living for war, rearmament and the billions in profits made on the stock exchanges. This is shown by the large participation in the warning strikes in Germany. In France, millions are fighting against the deterioration of their pensions, and in Britain hundreds of thousands of public and private sector workers have been on strike for months against the attacks on their wages, jobs and the right to strike.

In Germany, strikes are taking place at airports, in hospitals, day-care centres and throughout the public sector. During the second round of negotiations in Potsdam, strikers from municipal clinics, city cleaning, administrations and waterworks demonstrated. On Wednesday, trainees, students and interns in the public sector, who have to live on a starvation wage, will go on strike. Strikes are also taking place at post offices, on the railways and in private industry.

The unions are desperately trying to keep this pent-up anger under control. For postal workers, Verdi reluctantly raised a demand for a wage increase of 15 percent and in the public sector the demand for a monthly increase of at least €500, i.e., an increase of more than 10.5 percent for lower wage groups.

It is precisely the militancy on the part of workers that has aroused the ire of business and banks and their henchmen in politics. The negotiators on the employers’ side have made it clear that a minimum wage increase of €500 per month is out of the question. Such an amount would far exceed the budgets of the municipalities, declared the mayor of Gelsenkirchen. Another employer spokesperson is quoted in the Handelsblatt as saying that agreeing to €500 per month would be sending “the completely wrong signal at a time when the municipalities are desperately looking for managers and persons in positions of responsibility.”

The interior minister also rejected the demands, saying: “They simply stand in opposition to difficult budget discussions both at a federal level and especially in the municipalities.” Faeser described the provocative offer as “very good and very fair” and an “expression of respect” for the workers.

The municipalities are also systematically stonewalling. The federal government says that the current demands are not economically viable. The business association BDA has even called for some kind of legal ban on strikes following the strikes at airports. Political and business leaders are determined to pass the costs of war and militarism onto the working class and ensure the stock market boom continues at their expense.

In so doing, they work closely with the trade unions. This is the purpose of the government’s Concerted Action initiative, which has met several times to coordinate attacks on wages, jobs and social spending.

Verdi leader Frank Werneke has only rejected the latest offer and spoken of “absolute dissent” between the partners in the negotiations because he fears losing control. The union leadership knows it is sitting on a powder keg. It is therefore carefully separating out the warning strikes, conducting them region by region and as minimal “pinpricks,” so as to avoid a conflagration. The Verdi leadership is doing everything in its power to break off the struggle as quickly as possible.

The growing crisis of declining obstetric services in rural America

Benjamin Mateus


President Joe Biden’s ending of the public health emergency declaration related to the COVID-19 pandemic on May 11 will take a catastrophic toll on the already precarious state of rural hospitals and obstetric care. 

Traffic passes the publicly owned Greenwood Leflore Hospital, in Greenwood, Miss., Friday, Oct. 21, 2022. The hospital closed its labor and delivery unit on Nov. 30, 2022. The closure means the area's women will need to travel about 45 minutes to give birth at a hospital, and without focused hospital support, the city's only OB/GYN clinic could struggle to provide maternity care. [AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis]

Millions of Americans will abruptly lose their Medicaid health insurance, which means that many rural hospitals across the US that serve poorer, underserved populations will lose the federal assistance that has kept their doors open and theirs lights on, and helped pay their skeleton crews of health care workers.

At present, more than 600 rural hospitals, or about one-third, are at risk of closure due to receiving less reimbursement than the cost of delivering their life-saving services. Over 200 such facilities are poised to close in the next two to three years. Administrators, trying to keep their systems afloat, are curtailing or discontinuing unprofitable services like maternity care, endangering the reproductive health of these communities, such as in the Southeast, rural Ohio and Appalachia, where chronic poverty is systemic. 

In all, 36 percent of US counties, mostly rural, are considered maternity care deserts, defined as a county without a hospital or birth center that offers obstetric care and has no obstetric providers. More than 7 million women live in areas where there is limited or no access to such obstetric services.

A survey of hospital administrators before the COVID-19 pandemic found that 20 percent had indicated their system would not be providing labor and delivery services in the next five years. The onset of the pandemic accelerated the shutdown of obstetric services.

In particular, lack of access to prenatal care and follow-up care with their doctors or midwives after the end of their pregnancies has serious health consequences for women and their infants. Chronic health issues like high blood pressure can go unrecognized, leading to severe complications such as preterm delivery, preeclampsia and even massive life-threatening hemorrhage. 

Not surprisingly, a 2018 investigative study on the loss of hospital-based obstetric services and birth outcomes in rural counties published in JAMA found higher rates of out-of-hospital and preterm births, as well as low utilization of prenatal care. 

Expectant mothers in rural areas typically drive close to 25 miles to see their doctor for a prenatal visit. With the closure of obstetric services, that distance will usually double to 60 miles on average. Studies have shown that the longer the distance to prenatal care, the higher the chance of developing high blood pressure, which remains one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. 

This leads in turn to complications for infants, who will most likely need to stay longer in the hospital after delivery under a higher level of care, such as in a neonatal ICU. This also means that the medical costs of pregnancies can skyrocket. The average cost of preterm and low-birthweight care and deliveries is above $76,000, but can exceed $110,000. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, in 2023 the average cost of pregnancy, delivery and postpartum care in the US is $18,865.

Driving the abandonment of obstetric services are low Medicaid reimbursement rates, an epidemic of staffing shortages, as well as the declining birth rates experienced in these areas. According to Becker’s Hospital Review, at least 89 obstetric units were shuttered in rural hospitals across the country between 2015 and 2019. Since 2020, the number of US counties that are categorized as maternity care deserts has increased by 2 percent. 

The American Hospital Association noted that in 2020 only half of rural community hospitals were offering maternity care. Yet one in 10 babies are born in rural community hospitals, which has significantly contributed to the disproportionate rates of maternal mortality in rural America compared to the rest of the country. 

Dr. Anne Rossier Markus, PhD, chair of the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Milken Institute School of Public Health at the George Washington University, explained that she had reservations about the term “maternity care deserts.” As a visual representation of the issue, “it implies that there’s nothing there, which isn’t true. The community is living there. There’s history, there are relationships, there are practices there.”

The rural and urban divide was recently placed into context by a National Center for Health Statistics study published in May 2022 by Lauren M Rossen et al., which found that in 2017 rural women had a maternal mortality ratio (MMR) 45 to 65 percent higher than other women. (Rural MMR 34.4 per 100,000 live births versus medium/small urban MMR 23.7 per 100,000 live births and urban MMR 20.9 per 100,000 live births.) While rates of MMR were relatively stable from 1999 to 2017 in urban regions, they have increased by 60 percent in rural areas during this period, according to the authors. 

As an aside, while it had appeared that maternal mortality rates in the US had been climbing over the last two decades, the implementation of a pregnancy checkbox on death certificates after 2003—but adopted by states in a staggered fashion—made it seem that trends in MMR were rising when in fact these rates were already much higher than previously thought. 

The authors summarized in their conclusions, “Currently, we are unable to determine how much of the increase in rural MMRs during 1999-2017 was due to true increases in maternal mortality, increased identification of maternal deaths (i.e., under-ascertainment after the checkbox), or false positive deaths (i.e., over-ascertainment before the checkbox). True increases in maternal mortality in rural areas are plausible given recent trends in rural mortality overall, and documented barriers to maternal and obstetric care in rural areas, which could contribute to inadequate obstetric care for rural women.”

They also stated that it was possible that many of these deaths were misclassified. They called for initiatives to improve the National Vital Statistics System.

With respect to the Rossen et al. report, a 2021 US Government Accountability Office (GAO) report noted that “many rural counties lack hospital obstetric services, meaning those hospitals or emergency rooms lack trained staff or the necessary equipment to manage prenatal care. This occurs in part due to difficulties recruiting and retaining maternal health providers in rural areas. … When hospitals and obstetric units close, rural and underserved areas lose the infrastructure that supports providers, like obstetrician-gynecologists, specialists, and licensed midwives.” Pregnant women living in rural areas face delays in necessary care due to the long distances they need to travel and the associated prohibitive costs.

Not frequently mentioned is the fact that maternal deaths rose by 25 percent during 2020 and 2021 due to COVID-related deaths. The state of pregnancy compounds the risks associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. While maternal deaths not related to COVID-19 remained on par with pre-pandemic years—754 in 2019, 759 in 2020, 777 in 2021—there were 102 COVID deaths among pregnant women in 2020 and 401 in 2021. In 2021, COVID caused 34 percent of all maternal deaths.

Also significantly aggravating maternal mortality in rural US regions was the overturning of Roe v. Wade in June 2022. States like Kentucky, Indiana, Kansas and Nebraska, which have some of the strictest abortion laws, also have some of the worst maternal and child health outcomes and the lowest investment in at-risk populations, according to National Public Radio (NPR).

Dr. Anne Banfield, an OB-GYN with experience working in rural West Virginia, told NPR“The post-Roe situation, and the issues we have with maternal mortality, and the issues that we have with access to care in rural areas in the United States … are all coming together in a way that is going to make our battle against maternal mortality 1,000 times worse.”

The United States, which spends more on health care than other high-income countries, both on a per capita basis and as a share of GDP, has one of the highest maternal mortality rates among these nations. This is attributable to high rates of cesarean section, inadequate prenatal care and social factors of poverty that drive obesity, diabetes, heart disease and other chronic illnesses that are increasingly affecting younger populations.

The US maternal mortality rate is currently three times higher than in other high-income countries. These atrocious rates reflect in large part reliance on a profit-driven system of health care delivery that disenfranchises the well-being of the US population on the basis of simple economics.

Massive surge in COVID infections across Canada as federal Liberal government suspends dispatch of rapid test kits

Steve Hill


Canada is in the grip of a massive COVID-19 surge that is going virtually unreported. According to figures from Tara Moriarty, Associate Professor at the University of Toronto, one in 43 Canadians was infected as of February 26. This equates to almost 900,000 people.

Moriarty is co-founder of COVID-19 Resources Canada, a group of Canadian researchers, clinicians and community members that has provided logistic and scientific support since the start of the pandemic. The group’s weekly forecasts and estimates are the only reliable source of information on the pandemic in Canada, which has been ignored and declared over by the corporate-controlled and state-funded media alike.

Moriarty warned in her weekly forecast for February 12 that a surge of infections was imminent. The COVID-19 forecast for Feb 19-25, 2023 stated that the current infection rate is about one in 43 people. Compared to the lowest point of the pandemic in Canada, waste water indicators, infections and Long COVID cases were about eight times higher; hospitalizations were about six times higher; and deaths were about four times higher.

The organization’s Hazard Index is calculated from three equally weighted categories: Current infections and spread; health care system impact; and mortality. It rates provinces in categories: Severe; very high; high; elevated; moderate; and low. For February 19, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia were in the “severe” classification, with Nova Scotia experiencing about one in every 31 people infected. Waste water indicators, infections and Long COVID cases were about 11 times higher; hospitalizations were about six times higher; and deaths were about 13 times higher compared to the lowest point in the pandemic.

By the time of the February 26 report, Canada’s overall risk on the scale rose to “very high.” Significantly, not a single province or territory fell into the “low” or “moderate” categories, the two lowest on the scale. Only one province, Newfoundland, was categorized as having “elevated” risk.

Based on data gathered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States, Moriarty noted that one in five people now has a health condition that might be related to a previous COVID-19 illness. The official death toll from COVID-19 in Canada is now over 51,000. As of February 25, the seven-day average for deaths was 34 every day.

The response by the ruling elite to the renewed flood of infections is to try and cover it up and remove the limited services they provided earlier in the pandemic. The CBC reported Thursday that the federal Liberal government suspended the shipment of rapid test kits to the provinces at the end of January. This criminal decision, which prevents even the most basic tracing of infections, was taken without any public discussion. Health Canada blandly noted in an email to CTV News that it still has 90 million test kits in its inventory. Eighty thousand of these will expire within six months and over 6 million within the year.

This decision by the federal government is in keeping with the Liberals’ embrace of a strategy of “forever COVID.” As soon as the infectious Omicron variant emerged in late 2021, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau oversaw the abandonment of almost all public health mitigations. After the fascistic “Freedom” Convoy occupied downtown Ottawa for three weeks and blocked border crossings with the US in January and February 2022, Trudeau gave the go-ahead for the dismantling of all remaining measures by provincial governments across the country.

Governments and health authorities insist that the population must now learn to “live with the virus.” Vaccination clinics are closing, data collection and reporting are ending and specialized pandemic services are being withdrawn. 

The staffing situation in hospitals remains dire. Nurses continue to leave the profession due to burn-out from mandated overtime caused by high vacancy rates. Three years of a pandemic emergency on top of decades of underfunding from all levels of government have placed an unbearable burden on the health care system.

According to the Manitoba Nurses Union, in Winnipeg alone, a city with a population of 750,000, nurses worked nearly 650,000 hours of overtime in 2022. Province-wide, Manitoba nurses logged over 1 million overtime hours in 2022.

With the health care system already overwhelmed and collapsing, governments of all political stripes are winding down specialized services for those seriously affected by the virus and shifting everything to primary care.

In British Columbia, the New Democratic Party government’s Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) announced the closure of its four post-COVID recovery clinics in Vancouver, Victoria and the Fraser Valley. The interdisciplinary program, which also offers educational resources and classes, currently includes doctors, nurses, social workers, and physiotherapists. At the end of March, the four regional clinics will transition to one centralized, virtual program, which will only provide educational resources and self-management tools. The program will no longer offer access to a doctor. Instead, those who were referred to the clinics have been informed that they will have to visit a family doctor or a walk-in clinic.

BC’s NDP health minister, Adrian Dix, claims there is no longer the same demand for the regional clinics as there was two years ago. BC has a notorious record for systematically under-reporting cases and deaths.

 Hôtel-Dieu Grace Healthcare in Windsor, Ontario, also offered a COVID Recovery Program until it was scrapped due to lack of funding in July 2022. The program included consultations with occupational and physiotherapists, and a support group led by a social worker. However, the resources to fund the initiative were all borrowed from existing assets, with no additional support provided by the provincial Tory government. When the hospital could no longer sustain the extra burden, many people were left with nowhere to go for support.

Advocates and those suffering from Long COVID stress that access to doctors specialized in their condition is crucial to recovery because general practitioners are not always knowledgeable about the potential long lasting effects of COVID-19. A major issue for those seeking treatment for Long Covid is the recognition from health care providers that the condition is both real and serious. 

The drive to shift the burden of post-COVID care from hospitals and dedicated clinics to a desperately under-resourced health care system underscores the contempt for the lives of working people felt by the political establishment. Telling those recovering from COVID to visit their primary care physician ignores the well-known fact that 6 million adults in the country currently do not have access to a family doctor. That number is only expected to increase as Canada continues to fall behind its peers in the OECD, with the number of doctors per capita already well behind countries such as Germany and France. A recent report by the Royal Bank of Canada predicted that the current shortfall of 17,000 doctors in the country will rise to approximately 44,000 before the end of the decade. This lack of access to doctors creates pressures and outcomes that cascade throughout the entire health care system.