13 Jun 2016

World Bank Paid Internship for Young Graduates 2016/2017

Application Deadline: The Bank Group’s Internship is offered during two seasons, and applications are accepted during the following periods:
Summer Internship (June–September): The application period for the Summer Internship is December 1–January 31 each year.
Winter Internship (December–March): The application period for the Winter Internship is October 1–31.
Offered annually? Yes
Brief description: The World Bank Group, in its effort to provide graduate students practical experience in global development, is offering paid internships for Young Graduates
Priority Fields: This internship typically seeks candidates in the following fields: economics, finance, human development (public health, education, nutrition, population), social science (anthropology, sociology), agriculture, environment, private sector development, as well as other related fields.
About Internship
The World Bank Group Internship offers highly motivated and successful individuals an opportunity to improve their skills while working in a diverse environment. Interns generally find the experience to be rewarding and interesting.
Offered Since: Not specified
Type: Paid Internship
Selection Criteria
Fluency in English is required. Prior relevant work experience, computing skills, as well as knowledge of languages such as French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, and Chinese are advantageous.
Eligibility
To be eligible for the internship, candidates must possess an undergraduate degree and already be enrolled in a full-time graduate study program (pursuing a Master’s degree or PhD with plans to return to school in a full-time capacity). Generally, successful candidates have completed their first year of graduate studies or are already into their PhD programs.
Number of Positions: Several

Value of Program: The Bank Group pays an hourly salary to all interns and, where applicable, provides an allowance towards travel expenses. Interns are responsible for their own living accommodations.
Duration of Program: A minimum of four weeks
Eligible Countries
To be taken at (country): Most positions are located in Washington, D.C. (some positions are offered in country offices).
How to Apply
This application checklist is meant to facilitate your application experience.
  • Ensure that you use either Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, or Internet Explorer 10 or higher as your browser version.
  • You will be asked to register for an account and provide an email address.
  • You must complete your application in a single session and will be able to submit it only if you have uploaded all the required documents and answered all the questions (all questions marked with an asterisk-*- are mandatory).
  • Provide the most current contact information.
  • Ensure that you have correctly spelled out your email address, since this will be the main channel of communication with you regarding your candidacy.
  • Remember to enter your complete phone number (country code + city code + number).
  • Please attach the following documents (mandatory) before submitting:
    • Curriculum Vitae (CV)
    • Statement of Interest
    • Proof of Enrollment in a graduate degree
Note: Each file should not exceed 5 MB, and should be in one of the following formats: .doc, .docx, or .pdf
Once you submit your application, you will not be able to make any further changes/updates. All applications MUST be submitted online. Applications submitted after the deadline will not be considered.
Visit program webpage to apply
Sponsors: World Bank Group

2016 Agip Scholarships for Undergraduate Nigerian Students

Application Deadline: Closing date for receipt of e-applications is strictly Midnight, June 27th, 2016.
Brief description: The Nigerian Agip Oil Company Limited is offering Agip 2016/2017 Tertiary Institutions Scholarship Awards Scheme for Undergraduate Nigerian 100 level Students
Accepted Subject Areas?
Only candidates studying Engineering, Geology, Agricultural sciences and Geosciences are eligible for the National Merit Award.
For the Host Community merit Award (for students from Bayelsa, Delta, Imo and Rivers states) other fields of study may be considered.
About Scholarship
Nigerian Agip Oil Company Limited (NAOC) Joint Venture in pursuance of its Community Development Programme invites suitably qualified candidates for its 2014/2015 Tertiary Institutions Scholarship Awards Scheme.
Categories of Awards
  • Host Communities Merit Award: For applicants strictly from NAOC host communities
  • National Merit Award: For applicants from non-host communities
 Scholarship Offered Since: Not specified
Scholarship Type: Agip Scholarships for Undergraduate Nigerian Students
Eligibility
To qualify for consideration, applicants MUST be:
  • Registered Full TIME undergraduates in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions
  • Certified 100 level students at the time of application
NOTE: The following categories of students should NOT apply:
  • 200 level students and above
  • Current beneficiaries of similar awards from other companies and agencies
  • Dependants of employees of NAOC, AENR and NAE
Number of Scholarships: Several

What are the benefits? Monetary financial aid
Duration of Scholarship: As determined by the sponsor
Eligible Countries: Nigerian Students
To be taken at (country): Nigerian tertiary institutions
Application Deadline: application is open from February 9 to close receipt of e-application on March 9, 2015.
Offered annually? Yes
How to Apply
1. Before you start this application, ensure you have clear scanned copies of the following documents
  • Passport photograph with white background not more than 3 months old (450px by 450px not more than 200kb)
  • School ID card
  • O’Level Certificate
  • Admission letter
  • Birth certificate
  • Proof of Local Government Area of Origin
  • Letter from Community Paramount Ruler
  • Letter from CDC Chairman
  • JAMB Result
2. Ensure the documents are named according to what they represent to avoid mixing up documents during upload
3. Ensure you attach the appropriate documents when asked to upload
4. Ensure to provide valid Email and Phone Contact for effective communication
For further information on how to apply for this scholarship, visit the scholarship application page – scholastica.ng/schemes/naocscholarships
Sponsors: Nigerian Agip Oil Company Limited (NAOC), Operator of the NNPC/NAOC/Phillips Joint Venture
Important Notes: Please ensure you understand the Instructions carefully before you start application to avoid errors and disqualification. The aptitude test will take place at designated centres to be communicated to applicants at a later date and candidates are to fully bear the cost of transportation to and from Aptitude test centre.

Microsoft Research Graduate Women’s Scholarships, 2016/2017 USA

Application Deadline: October 16 2016. 
Offered annually? Yes
Scholarship Name: Microsoft Research Graduate Women’s Scholarship
Brief description: The Microsoft Research Graduate Women’s  Scholarship for international PhD Students in the field of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, or Mathematics, USA  2016/2017
Accepted Subject Areas?
Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics (or related)
About the Scholarship
The Microsoft Research Graduate Women’s Scholarship is a one-year scholarship program for outstanding women graduate students and is designed to help increase the number of women pursuing a PhD. This program supports women in the second year of their graduate studies. Women who are interested in this scholarship must apply during first year of graduate studies. Scholarships are granted by Microsoft Research at the discretion of Microsoft.
Scholarship Offered Since:  Not specified
Scholarship Type: Full PhD women scholarships
Who is qualified to apply?
  • Nominees for the Microsoft Research Graduate Women’s Scholarship Program must be nominated by their universities, and their nominations must be confirmed by the office of the chair of the department. Direct applications from students are not accepted.
  • Student must attend a U.S. or Canadian university and be enrolled as a full-time graduate student in the Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, or Mathematics departments (if your department is within the scope of these areas, but is titled differently, you are eligible).
  • Students must be enrolled in their first year in a graduate program in Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, or Mathematics for academic year 2014–2015. If a student has already completed graduate-level coursework in any subject area, prior to their first year in Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, or Mathematics, then the student is not eligible for the Scholarship program.
  • A maximum of three applicants per department, per university will be accepted. A total of nine applicants total per university will be allowed.
  • Payment of the scholarship awards, as described above, is made directly to the university. The recipient must remain enrolled in a graduate program during the 2015–2016 academic year or forfeit the award.
Participating universities
The following United States universities are participants in the Microsoft Research Women’s Fellowship in the 2016–2017 academic year:

  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Cornell University
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Stanford University
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • University of Illinois, at Urbana Champaign
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • University of Washington
Number of Scholarships: Not specified however, in past years, a total of nine applicants total per university was allowed.
Scholarship Benefits
  • The scholarship recipient award includes US$20,000 for the 2016–2017 academic year.
  • $18,000 of the fellowship will be applied toward tuition costs, and $2,000 will be allocated toward travel allowance and fees for attending a conference in the fellowship recipient’s field of study.
How long will sponsorship last? One year
Eligible Countries: Scholarship is Open for International Students
To be taken at (country): USA
How to Apply
  • Interested candidates who are pursuing, or plan to pursue, a PhD at one of these universities and are interested in applying to receive the Microsoft Research Women’s Fellowship, should contact the department chair in their field of study.
  • Applications must include: Applicant’s curriculum vitae, a copy of the student’s undergraduate transcript, and three (3) letters of reference from established researchers familiar with the applicant’s research. Of these letters, one (1) letter of recommendation should come from the student’s graduate advisor, one (1) letter of recommendation should come from the student’s undergraduate advisor or another academic familiar with the student’s undergraduate work, and one (1) letter should come from another academic within the nominating institution.\
  • Applications are accepted only when submitted via the online application tool by eligible university department chairs or their designee (students may not apply directly). Emailed or hard copy applications are not considered.
Sponsor: Microsoft

AGIP Postgraduate Scholarships in Nigeria & Overseas 2016/2017

Application Deadline: Application closes Midnight 29th June, 2016. | Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: Nigeria
To be taken at (country): Nigerian and Overseas higher institutions
Brief description: Nigerian AGIP Exploration Limited Operator of the NNPC/NAE/Oando PSC Is Offering 2016/2017 Postgraduate Scholarship Award Scheme for graduate students to study in Nigeria and Overseas.
Eligible Field of Study
Only candidates with offer of admission in disciplines related to the following areas should apply;
  • Geosciences
  • Engineering (Petroleum, Civil, Structural, Mechanical, Sub Sea, Electrical, Marine, Chemical)
  • Petroleum Economics
  • Oil and Gas Law
About Scholarship
Nigerian Agip Exploration Limited (NAE), on behalf of the NNPC/NAE/OANDO PSC, is committed to the training and development of manpower as part of its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programme.
In pursuance of this, NAE invites applications from suitably qualified and interested Nigerian graduates for the 2014/2015 Post Graduate Scholarship Award Scheme. The award is in two categories – Nigerian and Overseas.
Scholarship Offered Since: Not specified
Scholarship Type: Masters scholarships
Selection and Eligibility Criteria 
To qualify, applicants MUST:

  1. Possess a minimum of Second Class Upper Bachelors degree from a recognized Nigerian University.
  2. Must have secured admission into a Nigerian or Overseas University (based on the category being applied for) for a one year Master’s Degree programme in any of the disciplines listed below.
  3. Not above 28 years of age by 31 December 2016.
  4. Have completed the one year National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) programme.
Number of Scholarships: Several
Value of Scholarship: Not specified
Duration of Scholarship: for the period of study
How to Apply
Before you start this application
1. Ensure you have clear scanned copies of the following documents:
  • Passport photograph (with white background not more than 3 months old)
  • Valid ID card
  • Proof of provisional admission into any reputable university
  • First Degree Certificate
  • Birth Certificate
  • NYSC Certificate
2. Ensure you label these scanned documents accordingly, to avoid mixing up documents during upload.
3. Ensure you attach the appropriate documents when asked to upload.
Sponsors: Nigerian AGIP Exploration Limited
Important Notes:
  • Shortlisted candidates will be required to take an aptitude test on the 21st of June 2014.
  • Successful candidates will be contacted with details of the qualifying test via SMS text and email.
  • Strict compliance with above guidelines is required
  • Employees of NAE and other affiliate companies and their dependants are not eligible for this scholarship.

Why Maradona and Pelé are Wrong About Messi

Cesar Chelala

During an appearance at a Euro 2016 event, Diego Maradona talked with Brazilian soccer legend Pelé. When Pelé asked Maradona if he knew Lionel Messi -widely considered the best soccer player in the world- Maradona’s response was nothing short of shocking, “He’s a really good person but he has no personality. He lacks the character to be a leader,” said Maradona about Messi.
Pelé then continued, “Ah, I get it, he’s not like we were back in the days. In the ‘70s, we [Brazil] had really good players like Rivellino, Gerson, Tostao.” Pelé, who together with Maradona and Messi constitute soccer’s Holy Trinity of the best three players in the history of the game, thus offered a candid assessment of the fact that most of the time he played he also had other excellent players in his team. This hasn’t always been the case for both Maradona and Messi.
However, both Maradona and Pelé are wrong in their assessment of Messi. Anybody who says that Messi has no personality hasn’t seen the last game in which he participated, Argentina vs. Panamá, when Messi did a stupendous hat trick that showed, as if it were necessary, why he is the best player in the world today. And with a personality of its own: that of a humble, perfectionist player adored by fans from all over the world.
I cannot help but think that both Pelé and Maradona comments about Messi are the result of sour grapes. After all, until Messi started playing, they were considered the two best players in the world, a place they now had to share with Messi. And while Messi isn’t annoyed by the comparison with Maradona and Pelé, both of these players seem resentful of Messi.
The recent game between Argentina and Panama was vintage Messi. At the game in Chicago, 53,885 fans were there to watch Messi, many among them wearing Argentina’s famed striped jersey with the same name and number 10 in the back: Messi, 10. No explanation was needed.
There was an air of expectation in the crowd, particularly because of a lower back injury during a friendly game between Argentina and against Honduras, there was no certainty that Messi would be able to play. However, to everybody’s surprise and under a deafening roar from the crowd Messi came to play, exactly 61 minutes from the beginning of the game, and he didn’t disappoint. Every time he touched the ball the crowd cheered.
He scored an easy goal in the 68th minute, followed by another goal from a free kick from the right side in the 78th minute to end with a hat trick in the 87th minute. By any measure, his free kick goal was as if he had a measuring tape in his eyes. The ball went up and descended with jewelers’ precision in the right top part of the net, Panama’s goalie all but defeated.  Two minutes later, Argentina’s Sergio Aguero scored the last goal of the game for Argentina.
What made this game unusual is that after each of Messi’s goals even the Panamanian fans cheered him. As Argentina’s coach said, “When Messi came in, things were taken care of.” This was an opinion shared by Panama’s coach Hernán Darío Gomez who, talking about Messi, said with a mixture of sorrow and admiration, “He’s a monster.”
Any comparison among the three players is unfair, since they played in different eras with different styles of playing. One can say that today athletes are more complete and the game is played at a faster pace. One thing is certain, however. The three of them are superb players with different styles but with the same passion for the most popular sport in the world. They are soccer’s Holy Trinity.

Genetically MODIfied Babies In Gujarat?

Shobha Aggarwal & P.S. Sahni

“If there are two daughters born in the home, and the third child born is also a daughter, then she is told, now I want a son, so get another wife. Even if the fault is with the man, the entire burden of the fault is on the woman’s head, and so our government and I have decided that for all such problems, there should be a special hospital, where families can come and there would be research on why, for what reason, back-to-back daughters are born… there are some families that have two sons and the home wants a daughter…”
“…There are physically deformed children being born and miscarriages that are stressful. I keep listening to these stories. But today, there is technology. I can assure you that this can be treated in the womb… All such women who are pregnant… families who give birth to speech- and hearing-impaired and physically challenged children… On the one hand, there will be a hospital where such mothers can go… and by sonography they can be treated, and on the other hand there can be research on such families to find out what is the reason behind this? Whose DNA should be changed to get rid of these problems? Therefore in this year’s budget, a woman and child care hospital will be ready in Ahmedabad in eight months which will solve these problems.” (emphasis provided)
Anandiben Patel, Chief Minister of Gujarat, India told a MahilaSammelan in PaviJetpur in ChhotaUdepur on the occasion of Gujarat Foundation Day.
(Indian Express, May1, 2016)
Genetically modified babies in Gujarat? That’s a bombshell! There has been neither any national debate on the issue; nor any consultation with stake-holders; Parliament is being by-passed as no corresponding law on the subject has been enacted;the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) is taken by surprise;so too, the Indian Medical Association of allopathic doctors. No scientific-ethical studies have been undertaken before going ahead with genetically modified babies. With just one country (U.K.) in the whole world having legislated on this issue in 2015, is India being projected as the second country to start genetic modification of babies. Is this part of Make in India policy? There is deathly silence of the so called national press on the issue; there are no op-ed articles or editorials in major national English language dailies.
A duly elected Chief Minister of a State swearing by the Indian Constitution ought to follow a policy whereby boys and girls are treated equally. It should not be the business of the government to enter the bedrooms of citizens and ensure birth of a boy (or rarely girl) in a family! Let Nature perform its role. On the other hand equal respect should be accorded to couples who opt not to have a child or are infertile. The cause of infertility lies in the female (1/3rd cases), male (1/3rd cases) and both male and female in the remaining 1/3rd of the cases. It should be the duty of the government to hammer the point so that there is no blame-game within the family. As females have XX chromosomes and the males have XY chromosomes, it is the Male Y chromosome that is responsible for the gender of the foetus and women are not to be blamed. Such information needs to be widely and publicly disseminated. This is the job of the State government. Besides, adoption should be encouraged amongst infertile couples, LGBTQ community and single people.
If – as the Chief Minister of Gujarat has expressed – the services of the medical establishment are used to ensure a couple gets a son after one or two daughters, then the bias against the girl-child is all too patent. There is no need to expend resources to diagnose why couples continue to have daughters only. This, anyway, cannot be part of state policy.In any case as per the 2001 census report there were 920 females to 1000 males in Gujarat; this was brought down to 919 females to 1000 males as per 2011 census report. Of course both the figures are less than the national average of 940 females to 1000 males as per 2011 census report. The concern should be to have more females. The Chief Minister of Gujarat has cleverly talked of a situation where a couple desperately wants to have a girl after one or two boys. This is an exceptional/isolated case. It has been juxtaposed in her publicly aired comments to hide the real purpose of ensuring a boy is born after one or two girls – which strengthens the stigma against the girl-child.
In the early 1980’s the ICMR – the apex medical body for conducting medical research – started amniocentesis and ultrasonography (USG) tests on pregnant women to detect congenital defects/anomalies in the foetus. The side-effect of this project was the emergence of large scale, unregulated use of USG on a commercial basis to detect the gender of the foetus; of course female foetuses got aborted. Around 0.7 million cases of female foeticide occur annually in India!So much for the hum-bug of detection of congenital anomalies in the foetuses!
Earlier during the Internal Emergency period 1975-77 under the then Prime Minister of India, Mrs. Indira Gandhi a programme of population control through vasectomy emerged as the brain child of Sanjay Gandhi – the son of the PM and an extra-constitutional body. Millions of forcible vasectomies were performed; even un-married or very old men were operated upon. Michael Egnor in his post ‘The Inconvenient Truth About Population Control, Part 2; Science Czar John Holdren's Endorsement of Involuntary Sterilization’ writes:
“The Indian sterilization program, based on principles that Holdren explicitly endorsed in his textbook, sterilized 8 million people -- 6.2 million men and 2 million women against their will. There were 1,774 deaths due to botched sterilization procedures, according to the government's own statistics. Strong legal penalties were instituted against people who resisted, including denial of irrigation water to farmers, denial of food rations, electricity, and medical care. The principle of the Indian socialist government's sterilization program was, "Who refuses sterilization shall not eat." Popular outrage at the population control atrocities played a major role in the fall of the government in elections in 1977, and it continues to play a significant role in Indian politics to this day.
Dr. Holdren, who is now President Obama's top science advisor, explicitly endorsed the Indian government's forced sterilization of millions of men.”
Lessons from history of eugenics
Hitler was to some extent inspired by forced sterilization program of California – which by 1933 was in the forefront amongst all other U.S. states combined in undertaking maximum number of forceful sterilizations. The Nazis targeted prisoners, dissidents, physically disabled persons, deaf and blind, and homosexuals. Over four hundred thousand people were forcibly sterilized; and more than three hundred thousand killed under a euthanasia program. Nazi Germany had enacted the ‘Law for the Protection of Hereditarily Diseases Offspring’ on July 14, 1933. Under this law the duly constituted Genetic Health Court could decide if a citizen suffered from a genetic disorder – the vast majority of which were not even genetic – and to forcibly sterilize such a citizen. The financial support of the Rockefeller foundation and the technological inputs of Dehomag – a subsidiary of IBM in that period of history – is well documented. Once the Nuremberg laws were passed in 1935, it was mandatory for marriage partners to get tested to exclude hereditary diseases. All this was undertaken to ensure the alleged purity of the Aryan race.

A progressive section of western scientists and thinkers have lately drawn attention to the following significant facts, observation and opinions:
i. Genetically modified crops/animals already exist; but in the large number of trials that failed, the results of the unwanted crops/animals could just be thrown away without much ethical consideration.
ii. The uncertainty which genetic modification involves – prevention of one genetic disease may trigger another one.
iii. The importance of environmental influence on health deserves to be addressed; once the environmental factors are improved the DNA would function in the best possible ways.
iv. For a stable community, diseases and variability in a population are a must as emphasized by Thomas Malthus in the eighteenth century. While presently the research is reportedly confined to genetically modifying the mitochondrial DNA, but sooner rather than later the nuclear DNA would also be subjected to manipulation. This would in the long run lead to crash of human population.
The state of Gujarat stands completely polarized along religious lines. One of the most violent anti-reservation stir took place there in the early 1980s. The anti-Muslim pogrom of 2002 has been compared to genocide of Muslims. If the socio-political environment is suffused with biases and hatred towards the subordinate castes and religious minorities and people are at tenterhooks all the while, the chance of infants being born with congenital anomalies, as also still-births and abortions is increased. True, the genetic factors are important. The Gujarat government should ensure peace and tranquility; treat all citizens as equal; provide security to the vulnerable sections of society. The plan to have a hospital for genetically modifying babies in Gujarat should be shelved.
In India the caste-system actually translates to a primitive eugenic concept. Even the political leaders, who were in the fore-front of movement against the British rulers, were wary of dismantling the caste-system. There is no reason why present-day politicians should be allowed to get genetic modification program operational in India. Instead inter-caste, inter-religion, inter-racial marriages should be encouraged to have a healthy genetic pool in the general population.

Australia’s east coast hit by devastating storms

Eric Ludlow

Intense storms, which began in Queensland on June 4 and swept south along Australia’s east coast over the next three days, killed five people, flooded hundreds of homes and destroyed basic infrastructure in parts of Queensland, New South Wales (NSW), the Australian Capital Territory and Tasmania.
Major cities impacted included Sydney, Brisbane, Canberra and Launceston with thousands advised to evacuate their homes. At least, five bodies—three in NSW and one each in Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory—have been found by search and rescue officers. Three people are missing, believed to have been killed.
While the total cost of damage caused to residences, farming and public infrastructure, including roads and bridges, has not been released it is expected to be well over $100 million.
Many farms—from banana plantations to dairy, beef and sheep properties—suffered major damage. One banana grower in northern NSW, for example, lost 70 percent of his crop. Flooding has also killed hundreds of livestock in NSW and Tasmania.
In Brisbane, the Queensland capital, dozens of roads were closed due to the heavy rain. Canberra and nearby towns recorded their wettest June day on record while parts of NSW experienced over 400mm of rain. In Sydney, winds were over 100km/hour, causing havoc on airport runways and to the city’s transport systems. Waves, recorded at over 12 metres high, caused severe damage to several coastal suburbs.
In Tasmania, over a hundred roads were blocked by flooding and damaged bridges. The state-owned TasPorts reported that freight and cruise vessels’ shipping lanes were affected by debris and damaged boats in rivers.
The state’s second largest city, Launceston, was placed on high alert with warnings that flooding could reach one-in-100-year levels. State emergency services in NSW and Tasmania called on thousands of residents to leave areas at risk. For many this was simply impossible with roads subject to flooding, power outages and many public transport systems suspended.
Emergency response units were spread thin across the affected areas with hundreds of flood victims rescued by under-resourced services. NSW State Emergency Services Commissioner Phil Campbell said that call rates were at “around 50 to 100 per hour” during and in the aftermath of the storm on June 5.
One of the areas hit hardest in NSW was Collaroy, on Sydney’s northern beaches, where heavy seas eroded up to 50 metres of beachfront and damaged numerous homes. Local residents have been calling for a protective sea wall for several years. NSW Liberal Party Premier Mike Baird told the media that if a sea wall was to be built, residents would have to “make a contribution.”
In a federal election campaign dominated by widespread disaffection and hostility to the entire political establishment, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Labor opposition leader Bill Shorten seized the opportunity to express sympathy for the victims of the storms. However, successive Coalition and Labor governments, state and federal, are responsible for the lack of emergency services and preventative measures as well as the overall rundown of infrastructure that exacerbates the impact of such disasters.
Baird joined Turnbull on a visit to storm-ravaged Picton, 80 kilometres south-west of Sydney and voiced concern for those affected. But government disaster relief for storm victims is a pittance. Under joint federal and state Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery Arrangements those who have lost their homes and belongings will only receive $200 per adult and $100 per child or a total of no more than $750 per family.
Baird, Turnbull and Shorten have fostered the illusion that the insurance companies can be pressed to assist the victims. Echoing these sentiments, Michael Keenan, the federal justice minister, told ABC radio on Wednesday: “The government would expect the insurance companies will fulfil their obligation to people.”
The insurance companies have made clear, however, that damage caused by storm surges and coastal flooding was frequently not covered by insurance. Insurance Council of Australia spokesman Campbell Fuller told the media that “many insurers don’t cover actions of the sea. It’s a very common exclusion.”
Insurance Australia Group (IAG), the country’s largest insurer, said it had 10,000 of the over 19,000 claims already lodged. The company’s share prices increased this week when it announced its market share in Tasmania was low and that other storm damage claims would not heavily impact on the company’s bottom line.
Last weekend’s storm occurred when a low-pressure trough developed into an intense low-pressure system known as an “east coast low.” While these occur several times every year the severity of the June 4–6 storms was produced by the coupling of the east coast low with a king tide. King tides (unusually high tides) are predictable events that arise naturally and periodically with highest instances being recorded both around Christmas and in the cooler winter months of June–August.
Ian Turner, Water Research Laboratory director at the University of NSW, told the media that the storms were “a harbinger of what’s to come.” Climate change, he said, “is not only raising the oceans and threatening foreshores, but making our coastlines much more vulnerable to storm damage. What are king high tides today will be the norm within decades.”
Turner warned that although the Water Research Laboratory had collected valuable data on “coastal variability” over many decades it only applied to “a 500 km stretch of southeastern Australia.”
“There are very different coasts across the country exposed to very different conditions, and we just don’t have the observational data we need to make predictions with any great confidence… For that, we need a national approach.”
But even this attitude is limited. The problem of climate change is global by its very nature. Without internationally coordinated efforts to curb the problem, nothing can be resolved. And the problem, at its core, is the capitalist profit-system, where only the most profitable endeavours are pursued.
Under the current system, humanity is coming face-to-face with a future in which the events of last weekend on Australia’s east coast will become more commonplace, affect more lives and put our future existence on this planet at risk.

Mounting working class and student protests deepen Chile’s political crisis

Cesar Uco

A growing movement of Chilean workers and students against the Socialist Party-led government of President Michelle Bachelet is deepening a political crisis that has engulfed both the ruling New Majority (Nueva Mayoría) coalition and the right-wing opposition, organized in the Alliance for Chile (Alianza por Chile), the two essential political formations that have alternated in power in the quarter century since the end of the dictatorship of Gen. Augusto Pinochet (1973-1990).
Underlying the political crisis is Chile’s sharply deteriorating economic position. Once hailed as the South American capitalist miracle, today the country is facing a sharp decline in most economic sectors, including mining, fishing and agribusiness. Automobile sales, hotel occupancy and other economic indices are also falling rapidly.
The economic crisis, part of the broader collapse of the commodities and emerging market booms that has destabilized “left” bourgeois governments from Argentina to Brazil and Venezuela, is expressed in lower export earnings as well as a shrinking domestic consumer market. The Chilean Central Bank growth figures for this year have been revised downward from 2 per cent to 1.25 per cent, while the official unemployment rate has risen from 5.9 to 6.3 percent in the first quarter of this year.
According to a union spokesperson, 68,000 workers have been laid off in the large mining sector since 2014, i.e., since Bachelet took office. Out of these 21,000 were employed directly by the mining companies and 47,000 by contractors.
As the economy decelerates, layoffs in mining continue. In 2015, 19,000 miners lost their jobs. The ranks of the jobless have swollen to roughly 20 percent of the mining sector, which, according to the figures of the INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas), today employs 244,000 miners.
The British Anglo-American mining company, which operates four mines in Chile, eight in Brazil and one in Colombia, recently announced a workforce reduction from 162,000 in 2013 to 99,000 by 2016, and is expected to further shrink to 50,000 by the end of 2017.
The government-owned mining company, Codelco, the largest copper producing company in the world, set the pace with the the layoff of 4,292 miners late last year.
The loss in domestic consumption is highlighted by a drop of 14 per cent in car sales year-to-year. Total fruit exports have fallen to 2.4 million tons worth US$ 4.2 billion, the lowest figures since 2012.
Last month, an environmental crisis devastated the fishing industry in the southern part of Chile. This came on top of the industry losing a contract with US retail giant Costco to a Norwegian company due to the high use of antibiotics in Chilean farm-raised salmon. This represented a loss of 16 per cent in export dollars for the industry.
The environmental crisis, which has been attributed to “red tide,” a naturally occurring toxic algae that has been intensified by a strong El Niño weather pattern, is also believed to have been aggravated by the salmon industry’s dumping of toxins, including 4,000 tons of dead salmon, into the ocean.
To pressure the government to come up with a decent relief package (it initially offered only 100,000 Chilean pesos, one quarter of what is required by fishermen and their families to survive), the fishermen in the first three weeks of May blockaded Chiloe Island, the largest in the archipelago, that runs one thousand kilometers parallel to Chile’s continental shore. Carabineros (Chile’s militarized national police) used tear gas and water cannon to disperse the striking fishermen.
The fishermen contrasted the US$405 million that President Michelle Bachelet lavished upon the salmon industry during her first presidency in 2008, when it was thrown into crisis by the spread of a virus, to the pittance her government offered them. This was only one of the many illustrations of the fact that the ruling Socialist Party is an instrument of the capitalist ruling class, defending profit interests against the interests of the working class.
Since early May 2016, this has been the growing sentiment driving demonstrations by students and workers over the failure of Bachelet to make good on the promises she made during her 2013 election campaign to alter a social order that makes Chile one of the most socially unequal nations in the world.
In the capital of Santiago, thousands of students demonstrated against the government’s protracted stalling of a proposed education reform that was at the center of Bachelet’s election platform. Over a period of two decades, previous Socialist Party-led governments had failed to change an education system inherited from the Pinochet dictatorship that abolished the previous right to free higher education, imposed tuitions that exclude much of the population, and encouraged the development of private universities to exploit education as a source of profit.
On one of the almost daily student demonstrations on May 27, the authorities denied permission for the march. As result a brutal confrontation ensued, leaving 117 arrested and 31 carabineros wounded. Many people videotaped the events.
In another incident, students belonging to the Asamblea Coordinadora de Estudiantes Secundarios (Aces) burst into the interior of Palacio de La Moneda (government headquarters). Thirty-two students were arrested.
Valparaiso and Valdivia also witnessed clashes between students and carabineros. The government accused the encapuchados (hooded protesters) of being anarchists and having started the violence. But many residents of Valparaiso denounced police, accusing them of infiltrating theencapuchados with the explicit purpose of provoking violence.
Valparaiso’s Mayor Gabriel Aldoney said after visiting La Moneda that the protests were “a cancer that must be removed now.”
The student demonstrations have sharply deepened the crisis of Bachelet’s government. Her approval rating has shrunk to a record low of 24 percent.
Hostility to the president has been fueled in part by the so-called Caval Case, a scandal that surfaced early last year involving her son and former aide, Sebastian Davalos, along with his wife, in alleged fraud and influence-peddling in the pursuit of a multi-million dollar real estate deal.
Bachelet’s unpopularity is exceeded only by that of her rightist opponents. In a poll conducted last August, her New Majority coalition was viewed favorably by only 16 percent, while the Alliance for Chile received only a 15 percent approval rating, meaning that more than two-thirds of the population is hostile to both the “left” and right representatives of the Chilean bourgeoisie.
The crisis has led to a series of cabinet reshuffles. In the latest, Minister of the Interior Jorge Burgos, who had expressed open disagreements with the president, resigned, citing health concerns. His replacement is a fellow Christian Democrat, Mario Fernández Baeza, who as a young man was a member of the Falange and participated in the right-wing demonstrations that preceded the CIA-backed coup that overthrew the government of Salvador Allende in 1973. He is also a leading figure in the ultra-conservative Catholic Opus Dei cult.
Meanwhile, the UDI (Independent Democratic Union) the leading party in the right-wing Alliance for Chile coalition, has been beset by a large number of resignations. Both coalitions have been implicated in illicit campaign financing by business interests, underscoring their equal subservience to capitalist interests.
The working class has been increasingly restive, but held back from a head-on confrontation with the government by the CUT (Central Unica de Trabajadores) union federation, whose leadership is dominated by the Communist Party, which in turn has ministers in the Bachelet government.
The CUT called a protest strike March 31. Its principal concern has been the exclusion by the Tribunal Constitucional of two key points in a proposed labor reform: (i) unions have the exclusive right to negotiate contracts with the bosses, and (ii) extending negotiations to benefits for new members.
The proposed labor reform would give a monopoly on negotiations to the CUT bureaucracy as a reward to its leadership for the CP’s work in diverting and containing the struggles of workers and students, while maintaining its support for the corrupt capitalist administration headed by Bachelet.

Congress, Obama call for a Financial Control Board for Puerto Rico

Rafael Azul

On June 11, US President Barack Obama devoted his weekly Saturday Address to defending House Bill 5278, passed last Thursday, which imposes a seven-member federal fiscal control board over the government of Puerto Rico, supposedly to manage the restructuring of Puerto Rico’s $72 billion government debt.
After making the dubious claim that the US mainland has recovered from the 2007-2008 Great Recession, Obama declared that this is not the case for Puerto Rico:
“Today, the island continues to face a crippling economic crisis. Schools are closing. Power is being cut off at homes and hospitals. Teachers have to choose between turning on the lights and turning on the computers. Doctors can’t get medicine to treat newborns unless they pay in cash. And as the Zika virus threatens both the island and the mainland, workers dealing with mosquito control to help protect women and their unborn babies are at risk of being laid off.”
The grim conditions that President Obama describes are not acts of nature or destiny; they are a direct result of Wall Street’s financial stranglehold over Puerto Rico, which has been shut out of credit markets, and of the refusal of the Obama administration to provide emergency relief funds of a humanitarian nature, even in the face of an accelerating Zika epidemic in Puerto Rico and potentially across the mainland US.
The solution, declared Obama, is “debt restructuring” for Puerto Rico, a code-phrase that in essence means massive austerity measures on the Puerto Rican working class, much like measures imposed on workers and youth in Greece, Detroit, Spain, and across Europe.
The problem, however, according to Obama, is that Puerto Rico does not have the tools with which to “restructure” its debts. The president went on to assure his listeners, fraudulently, that not only will these new measures not cost US taxpayers any money, they would also protect the pensions of 300,000 Puerto Ricans, and safeguard essential services.
The US president also advanced the equally false claim, “This bill also includes something else – a temporary system of oversight to help implement needed reforms and ensure transparency”
In fact, participating in the writing of HB 5278—the “Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act” (PROMESA)—were lobbyists for the major Wall Street hedge and vulture funds that own most of Puerto Rico’s debt. The so-called “temporary system of oversight” will be a seven-member fiscal control board. Republican lawmakers will appoint four of its seven members.
Supposedly, the Fiscal Oversight Board will cease operations once Puerto Rico regains its credit standing in world bond markets and balances its budget for four consecutive years. For Puerto Rico such a balanced budget is estimated to require the elimination of 100,000 public jobs and the reduction of government expenditures by 30 percent.
The role of the Fiscal Oversight Board is to impose these draconian measures from the outside, providing a political cover to the local political establishment, the trade unions, and the US government.
Further exposing the deceptive nature of Obama’s Saturday’s assurances, according to HB 5278, the Fiscal Control Board is to meet in secret: so much for “ensuring transparency.”
As written in the law, the Fiscal Control Board imposes a layer of federal authority over all elected officials in Puerto Rico, with the power to erase existing regulations and impose new ones. It will have the last and final word on fiscal policies, and its rulings will extend far beyond “debt restructuring,” to ensure the profits of the financial parasites and big business in Puerto Rico by sacrificing the social conditions and jobs of Puerto Ricans. Choosing his words carefully, Obama assured that he would respect “the democratic rights of the people of Puerto Rico. I am committed to making sure that Puerto Ricans are well-represented in this process.”
Obama is in reality not committing himself to anything that will in any way interfere with the imposition of a financial dictatorship over the island’s economy.
Wall Street Journal article on the passage of PROMESA acknowledged as much. According to this commentary, the Financial Control Board will be “muscular” and it is based on the Financial Control Board set up for Washington DC in 1995, responsible for the sacking of thousands of municipal workers and draconian reductions in city programs, and attacks on education and other municipal services.
Like the Washington, DC Financial Control Board, its Puerto Rican twin would meet in private and make all-important decisions in secret. The takeover of the Puerto Rican economy by the FCB also means that whatever new borrowing takes place, even to combat the Zika health emergency, requires board approval.
The Wall Street Journal also indicated that by the US Congress passing the bill, and President Obama signing it, a moratorium would then exist that would stall legal action on a $2.1 billion payment default expected to occur this July 1 and allow negotiations to take place. “If negotiations fail, the board could authorize a debt restructuring similar to Chapter 11 bankruptcy that protects creditor priorities. The board’s proposed plan of adjustment would have to be fair and equitable and in the best interest of creditors. So general obligation bondholders couldn’t get shorted to pay pensioners.”
Also included in the new bill is a provision that makes it possible for Puerto Rican authorities to impose a sub-minimum wage of $4.25 per hour on young workers (aged 25 and below). While Obama and the Democrats claim that they do not support that clause in the bill, and had to accept in as an unfortunate compromise, the subminimum wage, points to one more agenda of Wall Street and big business, converting Puerto Rico into a low-wage platform from which to extract more and more surplus value.
This is part of an ongoing attack on working conditions in Puerto Rico. Since 2006, under the governors Aníbal Acevedo Vilá (Popular Progressive Party), Luis Fortuño (Statehood Party) and Alejandro García Padilla (Statehood Party), tens of thousands of public employees have been laid-off. Full time work has been increasingly replaced by contingent labor, while unemployment reached 16 percent.
Against all this, the Puerto Rican union movement reacted to each turn of the screw against jobs and working conditions with protests strikes and empty phrases, designed to disarm popular discontent.
Early on in his administration, García Padilla made clear his contempt for Puerto Rican workers. “We cannot think of lifting Puerto Rico out of the lack of economic growth by lying on the beach. Longer working days are needed to get the nation out of this stagnation,” he declared in 2015, calling for the elimination of holidays, vacation days, and personal time off. He now anticipates that the soon-to-be-appointed Control Board will impose further attacks on jobs and working conditions, which he euphemistically labels “labor reform.”
Puerto Rico confronts its worse economic and fiscal crisis since the 1950s. The public debt of $72 billion cannot be paid, even at an enormous human cost. The commonwealth has no access to capital markets. In the last decade over 400,000 people have migrated away to the US mainland. None of this deters Puerto Rican creditors, who aim to suck out as much as they can, at whatever social cost.
Obama, the US House of Representatives, the US Senate, Wall-Street hedge funds, the Puerto Rican government and legislature, and the trade unions may disagree on this or that aspect of the new legislation. But all accept it as the vehicle to use the debt crisis as an opportunity to reduce working conditions and living standards in Puerto Rico drastically.
All can be counted on to work with the Fiscal Control Board, which requires their support, and against the interests of Puerto Rican workers. The only alternative for the Puerto Rican workers and youth is to reach out to workers in the US, Latin America, and across the globe, in a socialist movement to nationalize the banks under workers’ control and use the wealth of society for human needs.