24 Aug 2016

The Sultan’s Hit List Grows, as Turkey Prepares to Enter Syria

Robert Fisk

It says a lot about post-failed-coup Turkey that you can spot the priority list of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s foreign antagonists from the Government’s reactions to a massacre. The slaughter of at least 50 Kurdish wedding guests by a suicide bomber in the border city of Gaziantep on Saturday was swiftly blamed on Isis. Erdogan said it was the “likely” culprit. Certainly the target fits Isis’ gruesome track record.
But then Erdogan’s Deputy Prime Minister, Mehmet Simsek, broadened the scope of Turkey’s enemies. Describing the mass killing as “barbaric” – which it surely was – he then listed the “terror groups” who were targeting Turkey: the PKK (the Kurdistan Workers Party), Isis and the followers of Fethullah Gulen, the exiled and rather eccentric cleric whom Erdogan still claims organised the attempted military coup in July.
Quite a hit list to be provoked by an atrocity at a wedding. And all those “terrorists”, we must suppose, will also have to be crushed by an army and police force that have themselves been cut to pieces in the purge which followed the coup-that-wasn’t.
The list contains its own oddities. If the PKK had to be mentioned in the same breath as Isis, especially in reaction to the murder of Kurds, then we must also remember that the Turks regard the brave little militia of the People’s Protection Units (YPG) of northern Syria as part of the same “terrorist” PKK. And that is the same YPG which has been receiving help from the US air force in its battle against Isis.
More intriguingly, however, is the absence from the list of the one institution which Erdogan has been trying to destroy for the past four years: the Syrian government of Bashar al-Assad.
Few Turks would believe that the Syrian regime had anything directly to do with the wedding bombing at Gaziantep. But after his jaunt to see Tsar Vladimir at St Petersburg, Sultan Erdogan seems to realise that Turkey has really got to cut down on the number of its enemies.
Syrian opposition figures in Turkey have been alarmed at reports of secret talks between Damascus and Ankara – through what the French used to call “interlocuteurs valables”, or people trusted by both sides – and an apparently stray remark by the Turkish Prime Minister just before the attempted coup (and before the St Petersburg meeting) to the effect that relations will one day have to be restored with Syria.
Clearly Erdogan’s new love for Mother Russia comes at a price. The Tsar will surely have discussed his own affection for Bashar – and Turkey’s role in trying to crush the Government which Moscow supports with its armed forces – at their mutual summit. Could it be, therefore, that the Sultan is thinking of renewing his old friendship with the Lion of Damascus? Be sure he is.
Whoever he wants to blame for the Gaziantep bombing, Erdogan must realise that these now regular atrocities are a direct result of his personal decision to involve himself in the Syrian war. Having played footsy with Isis (letting their supporters cross the Turkish frontier to join the cult and then allowing Turkey’s business sharks to buy up Isis-exported oil) and recommenced his war with the Kurds, and having (just) survived a coup planned by his ally-turned-nemesis Gulen, Erdogan is now ruling a Turkey which looks, every day, more like Pakistan after it took on the role of chief supplier to the Afghan mujahedin in the early 1980s.
There’s a rather wearying adage in Damascus that Syria will never be the same again when the war there is over. But the truth is that Turkey also will never be the same again when the conflict finishes either. It will be interesting to see who Turkey’s President is when that day comes.

Rising Divorces In India

The article went on to state that in many cases of marriages(including love marriage), couples have been unable to consummate the marriage. And therefore filed for divorce. Consummation of marriage as per Wikipedia is the first act of sexual intercourse in the marriage.
The Times of India reported that couples have jobs which demand all the attention leaving them with no time for each other. And in this age of internet, attention spans are reducing to almost nil .And all get bored too easily. This includes getting tired of their partners a swell. So loyalty is dumped & new partners sought faster .Moreover,  net offers options like porn in which no action needs to be done & gives voyeuristic pleasure. Perhaps, the selfie craze has something to do   with this. Many of the couples feel that they themselves are not good enough in bed (to be photographed!!!!)& so why bother? Pro creation is perhaps the last thing on their minds.  Of course, comparisons of being good, bad or ugly in sex is made with pornography which is all humbug. And this happens in a nation which prides itself on gifting the Kamasutra to the world!
subcription2016
 The man & the woman fail to find marriage appealing, especially, as regards sex. This is because studies have shown that teenagers have already experienced sex at tender ages http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Sexually-active-teenagers-on-the-rise-finds-study/articleshow/47994712.cms.In India, religious & political leaders & society frown on sex education in schools .And the results are glaring. Teen sex & pregnancy is on the rise. And, many times, this leads to loss of lives by suicides & honour killings.
Teen pregnancies leads to illegal abortions with scant regard to consequences.http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/dehradun/City-gynaecologists-raise-alarm-over-abortion-pill-abuse/articleshow/40204410.cms. The courts have different views on this matter of abortions even in cases of rapes. Though the Supreme Court & the Delhi High Court have allowed abortions for rape survivors, during the 24th& 26th week respectively, a court in UP  has disallowed abortion of a rape survivor  http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31804&articlexml=Cant-abort-court-tells-16-year-old-rape-18082016011019 This just means that women have no control over their bodies .The society & the government which could not prevent the rape sit in judgement over the issue of abortion of the resultant pregnancy.  All this leads to grave emotional &physical issues for girls &women.
Consent is not something which the Indian male understands .And hence, female consent is taken for granted. The result is, that girl is scarred for life & obviously would refrain from sex for the rest of her life.In many cases, the girl may find it extremely difficult or simply refuse to have sexual intercourse .This leads to marital rape which is yet to be declared as an offence under the Indian law.    Man, on the other hand, takes the sexual experience as a sign of his manliness .He feels,he needs to sleep, to conquer .And conquests with multiple partners boost the male egos like nothing else does. And then, he goes public with his ego boosters. Males believe that every female he sleeps with, is public property after his manly conquest .And more often than not, other men ape blindly. Men lust after sex  while women want companionship .And since the twain rarely meet, marriages are ending in divorces  ! If marriages did not happen, all would be spared the expenses of the fat Indian weddings & obviously the competitions of “Teri shadi meri shadi se costly kaise? “ This soon changes to “Tera divorce mere divorce se pehle kaise? Perhaps, soon things will come to such a pass, that more than employers, the last come, first go principle  http://www.lawzonline.com/legalencyclopedia/l/Last-come-first-go-rule.htm will come to apply in the marriage industry if it survives that is.
And all this makes me wonder, why was Divorce law not taught as a comprehensive subject instead of The Hindu Law, the Mohammedan Law,etc.at the graduation level?As humans, we revel not so much in our joys but on the despair of others.  And so lawyers like myself could bank on miseries of others . After all, when a  marriage is no longer sacrosanct, can assisting   in getting a divorce be called profane?

Mining giant’s record loss highlights Australian economy’s reversal

Mike Head

BHP Billiton, the world’s largest mining company, this month announced a 2015–16 financial year loss of $US6.4 billion, the second largest on record for an Australian-listed firm. Once known as the “Big Australian,” before its 2001 merger with Anglo-Dutch giant Billiton, BHP’s plight is a symptom of the declining fortunes of Australian capitalism.
The result stands in stark contrast to the $21.7 billion in underlying profit for 2010–11, which was both the peak of BHP’s earnings and global mining commodity prices. Back then, the company’s shares traded at around $40 a share and the firm had a market value of $200 billion. BHP’s shares are now worth just over $20, a loss of almost $100 billion in valuation.
Apart from asset write-downs, the company’s underlying cash profit for 2015–16 was $1.2 billion, but this is still a far cry from the 2010–11 bonanza. This year’s cash profit was the lowest since the 2001 merger with Billiton, and the overall loss was the first posted since BHP Billiton was formed.
BHP’s reversal underscores the depth of the world slump and the particular vulnerability of Australia’s economy, following the implosion of the mining boom. It also highlights the brutalities, and insanities, of the capitalist mode of production.
Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) business reporter Stephen Letts commented: “The wealth destruction has been on an epic scale.” Every major decision made by BHP since China’s slowdown triggered a sudden glut on global mining and energy markets had “exacerbated the company’s problems.”
Much of BHP’s predicament is directly attributable to the post-2011 rout in the prices of the commodities—such as iron ore, coal, copper, uranium, and both conventional and shale oil and gas—on which the firm’s super-profits were once based. But the losses were magnified by the company’s responses to the downturn, including buying over-priced mining projects as the boom began to unravel, and ramping up production of iron ore. The mounting problems were compounded by a catastrophic dam collapse at the Samarco iron ore mine in Brazil.
Worse may be to come. The company booked after-tax charges of $7.7 billion related to the Samarco disaster, global tax issues and the reduced value of its US shale oil assets, but greater write-downs may be necessary.
Last November’s dam collapse at BHP’s Samarco joint venture with Brazilian-based firm Vale released 60 million cubic metres of potentially toxic water and waste, causing widespread destruction. At least 19 people were killed and hundreds more made homeless. There was outrage over the lack of warnings given to residents after the dam burst and revelations that Brazilian authorities had issued reports in October 2013, just before renewing the mine’s licence, of the danger of a dam breach.
Because of the slump in global commodities, Vale and BHP had sought to boost their profitability through increased production. Output at the Samarco mine rose by 37 percent during 2014, and prosecutors were reportedly investigating whether that affected the dam’s volume.
According to the Australian Financial Review, the financial markets were “heartened by a settlement with the Brazilian government in March that would limit BHP’s share of reparations to about $1.35 billion.” But the validity of that settlement is being challenged by a $48 billion lawsuit by victims, and the mine remains shut, so the total cost of the disaster remains unclear.
As well as making multi-billion losses on US shale projects and other major asset purchases, BHP and its main rivals, such as Rio Tinto, worsened the iron ore price plunge by ramping up production in a bid to eliminate smaller operators with higher production costs. In the four years to December 2014, BHP, Rio and Fortescue, a medium-sized Australian producer, boosted their iron ore outputs by 25 to 40 percent, adding 248 million extra tonnes to already glutted world markets annually.
Iron ore prices crashed from $190 a tonne in early 2011 to below $40 earlier this year. They are currently around $60, but investment bank Citi is the latest finance house to warn that such prices are not sustainable, as the latest Chinese stimulus packages abate. Oil likewise dropped more than 75 percent from $125 to $30 a barrel over the same five-year period, before recovering slightly to around $50 with analysts now predicting another slide because worldwide supply exceeds demand.
BHP remains badly exposed to commodity and currency swings. On BHP’s figures, a $1 a tonne movement in iron ore prices equates to $148 million of profit. For oil, $1 a barrel change delivers a $52 million impact. The company’s management is under intense pressure from the financial markets. Standard & Poor’s cut the company’s credit rating to A from A+ this month and warned it might downgrade the rating further if the company failed to take more steps to boost its dividends.
Briefing investors and analysts in London, BHP CEO Andrew Mackenzie said he was “disappointed, really disappointed” by the big loss. He tried to put a positive spin on the year ahead, claiming commodity prices were no longer in “free fall.” Mackenzie boasted that the company had cut unit cash costs by 16 percent from 2014–15 and expected to reduce them by another 12 percent in 2016–17.
MacKenzie declared that he was driving “a culture of higher collaboration and commitment” to “get more people coming to work with a real can-do attitude.” What this actually means is slashing the jobs and conditions of workers and contractors.
In last year’s annual report, the company said it had eliminated nearly 17,000 employee and contractor jobs, or 14 percent of its global workforce, during 2014–15, taking the numbers to their lowest levels since 2011. No similar figures were provided during this month’s profit briefing, but the job destruction has continued, making workers pay the price for BHP’s debacle.
On June 3, for example, Samarco, the mothballed BHP-Vale joint venture, said it would launch a “voluntary” layoff program with the aim of cutting 40 percent of its 3,000 employees. This will only add to the immense social cost of the dam disaster.
On June 22, without specifying precise job cuts, BHP’s coal division told investors it was pushing for a 30 percent improvement in “people productivity’’ over the next five years. That would mean output per worker at the group’s Australian mines would rise by a third, from 265,000 to 350,000 tonnes a year, by 2020–21. BHP said it would seek “greater workplace flexibility” via new enterprise agreements with the trade unions, which have imposed all the company’s cuts.
In response to MacKenzie’s commitment to an “extreme’’ focus on productivity and cost-cutting, the company’s share price rose immediately after the record loss announcement. However, renewed falls in commodity prices could send the shares diving again, throwing BHP Billiton’s survival into doubt.

Volkswagen production halt affects almost 30,000 workers

Dietmar Henning

Volkswagen management in Germany has taken a hard-line stance in a dispute with two suppliers and accepted a partial halt in production. A round of negotiations on Monday lasted well into the evening.
Almost 30,000 workers face the threat of forced time off or reduced hours because the suppliers ES Automobilguss and Car Trim will not be supplying transmissions and seat covers. Particularly hard hit will be workers producing the Golf, the highest-selling model from Europe’s largest automaker with around 620,000 employees.
At the Emden plant, 7,500 workers were already affected last week by the halt of supplies. This week, employees at the main plant in Wolfsburg (10,000), as well as plants in Zwickau (6,000), Kassel (1,500), Salzgitter (1,400) and Braunschweig (1,300)—a total of 27,700 workers—will be forced to at least partially halt production.
The company has applied for reduced working hours at the federal labour agency, which means employees will receive reduced-hours pay, meaning significant wage reductions. Workers without children will receive just 60 percent, and parents 67 percent, of their net pay.
Suppliers ES Automobilguss and Car Trim allege VW has forced them to halt deliveries by ending a development cooperation programme worth half a billion euros without notice or cause. Both firms are demanding VW pay €58 million in compensation. They describe the crisis at VW as self-made. “VW was offloading its own problems onto the supply industry” and was clearly exploiting “its dominant market position against suppliers,” they claimed. An employee meeting took place at ES on Monday.
ES specialises in transmissions, while Car Trim focuses on internal fittings like car seats. The two companies have been backed in the recent period by the Prevent Group. The suppliers group has been in business since the 1990s, mainly with VW, but also subsidiaries Audi, Skoda and Seat, as well as BMW, Ford, Opel, Nissan, Citroen and Peugeot. According to the firm’s web site, it operates more than 20 locations around the world and has an annual turnover of more than €500 million.
Prevent says it is not involved in the dispute with VW. Its own business with VW was running without any disruption. It described Car Trim and ES Automobilguss as independent firms. Nonetheless, the two suppliers and Prevent issued a joint press statement that cited ES Chief Executive Alexander Gerstung as saying, “The way in which VW deals with suppliers is not at all acceptable and could ruin small businesses.”
VW obtained a temporary injunction from a state court in Braunschweig last week to compel Car Trim and ES to supply them with parts. But this has yet to be enforced due to low prospects for its success.
The Süddeutsche Zeitung reported on Monday that Prevent is also involved in a dispute with Daimler. It was suing for compensation of €40 million in a case also related to unfulfilled and broken contracts.
The conflict between VW and Prevent is the outcome of the years-long process of cutting costs by shifting production from the major automakers to suppliers. Much of production has been outsourced to Eastern Europe, where wages are many times lower than those in Germany. Eastern Europe serves as an expanded production platform and low-wage sector. This was the primary purpose of the eastward expansion of the European Union.
The supply firm Prevent, which has its German headquarters in Wolfsburg close to VW’s main facility, emerged following the Bosnian war in the Balkans. The founder of the firm, Nijaz Hastor, reportedly played a leading role at the Tvornica Automobila Sarajevo (TAS) auto plant for many years, where the VW Käfer, Golf, Jetta and Caddy models were built from 1972 to 1992. When the conflict ended, Hastor was among the war profiteers. In the course of privatisations in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Hastor took control of several auto parts suppliers and expanded them considerably.
The supply industry has grown rapidly in recent years. Several suppliers contribute to the construction of each car, and these suppliers are in turn reliant on additional suppliers. Each car is part of a closely integrated international production network that supplies parts and components “just in time” to the automakers’ assembly lines.
The major suppliers Bosch, Conti, Schaeffler and ZF, as well as around 1,500 mid-sized suppliers, employ around 300,000 men and women in Germany. This equates to almost one in three jobs in the auto industry.
Automakers like VW use their buying power to force down prices. The suppliers pass on this pressure to their own suppliers as well as to workers. In a survey conducted this year by the Centre of Automotive Management, two-thirds of mid-sized suppliers reported that pressures associated with costs threatened their survival.
The extortion of suppliers has a long history at VW. As early as 1993, the board of directors, with the support of the IG Metall union and works council, secured the services of the notorious “cost killer” Jose Ignacio Lopez from General Motors, who specialised in squeezing suppliers to the last penny. Not for nothing was Lopez known in the auto industry as the “strangler from Wolfsburg.” Those who suffered most were the workers at the affected companies. But the trade union representatives, then as now, were bothered little by this.
The renewed intensification of pressure on the supply industry is part of a general attack on jobs, wages and working conditions at company plants and suppliers. This is, among other things, a result of the emissions scandal. At the end of June, the Automobilwoche newspaper cited a letter to business partners from VW board member Francisco Javier Garcia Sanz, who is responsible for purchasing.
This circular on the “Together Strategy 2025” program for the future, states: “What we have undertaken will cost a lot of money. To be able to finance future projects, we have to be much more efficient in investment expenditures, research and development spending as well as administrative and purchasing costs. The issue is to mobilise our enormous reserves. We want to achieve this via cooperation, but with the necessary determination to remain competitive.”
This was clear. The new cost-cutting measures will also hit the suppliers.
Now one supplier has pulled the plug, “because it has its back to the wall” (Süddeutsche Zeitung). If the talks between Car Trim, ES Automobilguss and VW are not resolved soon the consequences will further expand. The halt to production at VW means that many more suppliers cannot deliver their products “just in time.”
The dispute between VW and the two Prevent-owned firms shows how fragile the international chain of production is. At the same time, it also shows the power that a walkout from a small number of workers in this sector would have. Car Trim, with its headquarters in Plauen, employs just 1,200 workers at eight locations, including 800 at the Bosnian Zepce plant alone. In Schönheide, Saxony, fewer than 400 workers are employed at ES Automobilguss. Despite this, a halt to deliveries by these two small suppliers has caused production at the world’s largest auto plant to halt.
However, VW has been able to rely on the IG Metall trade union and works council for years not to break the fragile production chain with strikes and protests. At VW and in the supply industry, IG Metall and the works councils act as an industrial police force to ensure the seamless running of the production process. On Saturday, central works council chair at VW, Bernd Osterloh, gave his support to VW management and attacked the suppliers. He told the Bild newspaper, “There is a very dirty game going on here.”
The conflict with the suppliers will be the prelude to a new round of cuts in the auto industry. This makes it clear why it is so urgent that workers at the automakers and in the supply industry break with the nationalist and pro-corporate policies of IG Metall and their works councillors. An international strategy and a socialist programme are required to unite the millions of workers who produce cars together around the globe.

German population told to stockpile food in case of war

Sven Heymanns

On Sunday, the first details on the German government’s new civil defence plan were released. The plan was discussed on Wednesday in the Federal Cabinet and will be presented to the public by Interior Minster Thomas de Maizière. The paper underscores in a shocking manner how the issue of war, 75 years after the catastrophe of World War II, has returned to daily life.
The paper makes clear that the possibility of war on German soil is no longer ruled out. According to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung (FAS), which received an advance copy of the 69-page documented titled “Concept for Civil Defence,” the plan states that currently “an attack on German territory requiring a conventional national defence was unlikely.” However, it was important “to adequately prepare for such a life-threatening development which cannot be totally excluded in the future.”
In governing circles, preparations are being made for the worst-case scenario. What follows suggests a total-war scenario.
A significant component of the civil defence plan is that in the event of war, the population should at least be able to provide for itself temporarily: “The population will be encouraged to keep an individual food supply good for ten days.” Additionally, the German people are “encouraged to take appropriate measures for maintaining a five day supply of uncontaminated water in the amount of two litres per person per day for personal use and first aid until the implementation of specific measures by the state.”
Spiegel Online reported that the German government recommends having ready “a supply of medication, warm blankets, coal, wood, candles, flashlights, batteries, matches and cash reserves.” This would allow the population to survive the first days of a war, before measures could be taken by the state to provide emergency supplies.
The FAS also noted that the plan highlights the “need for a reliable alarm system.” According to Spiegel Online, in case of emergency the population should be alerted by an alarm “which in a threatening situation could be transmitted by radio, TV, sirens, loudspeaker systems, text messages, the internet and in the German subway system.”
The government also sees it necessary to ensure “sufficient capacity in the health care system,” the FAS reported. “Decontamination units should be set up in front of hospitals in the event of nuclear, biological or chemical attacks, so that the injured can be treated outside the hospitals,” explained Spiegel Online. The national reserve of smallpox vaccines and antibiotics should also be increased as needed.
The authors of the paper in the Federal Ministry of the Interior do not exclude the possibility of bombing attacks on German cities. How else can the demand for the “reinforcement of buildings” be understood? One can assume that Berlin, especially, with its large number of governmental agencies, would be the target of such an attack. Accordingly, “the task of these agencies…would be to make arrangements for the transfer of their responsibilities to secondary protected locations,” the FAS reported on the paper’s directives.
Special attention is also paid to the maintenance of public infrastructure.Spiegel Online wrote that one third of the Federal Agency for Technical Relief’s forces should be placed on standby when necessary. A “master plan for emergency power” will be proposed, with the Federal Network Agency given authority over shut-offs or to ration services in favour of vital facilities in an emergency.” A “full supply” of oil and gas sufficient for more than 90 days and to be stored in reserves at 140 separate locations is also planned.
According to FAS writer Thomas Gutschker, there are still more “delicate questions” that have “not been discussed for a long time.” The Federal Labour Office could, in time of need, conscript men and women to work in “areas vital to the nation’s defence.” This is an issue given considerable thought by the authors of the new plan. “The fast and secure delivery of mail of particular importance to the Bundeswehr (for example, draft notices and other communications relating to the resumption of compulsory military service) will be guaranteed under the post and telecommunications security act,” the paper states.
Gutschker comments: “The sentence sounds succinct, but it is politically explosive: Are there once again scenarios conceivable in which conscription must be resumed?”
While the plans are shocking to many people, they are being downplayed by politicians and the media. Zeit Online wrote: “Are you startled by the report? You have to hoard water and food for the first time? No need to panic. The end is not here. It is not even near. The whole thing is more of a friendly reminder.”
Above all, the opposition parties are eager to minimise the explosive nature of the paper. Konstantin von Notz, deputy leader of the Green Party fraction in the German parliament, said updating emergency plans for the first time since 1995 was sensible. He saw, however, “no attack scenario for which the population should stockpile supplies.”
Dietmar Bartsch, fraction leader of the Left Party, told the Kölner Stadtanzeiger, the government “must not spread new anxieties everyday…one can work people into a panic with continuous proposals, making things completely uncertain.”
In reality, there is nothing about this that is “uncertain.” This is about once again preparing the German population for war.
The document is part of the return of German militarism, which is supported by all parties in parliament. It serves to escalate the wars in the Middle East and the preparations for war with Russia, and to establish the extensive militarisation of society. It includes the entire population in its war policy as well as integrating civilian agencies in support of the Bundeswehr.
According to FAS, the paper was prepared over the course of several years. It was commissioned in 2012 by the budgetary committee of parliament and was developed within the last year parallel to the drafting of the 2016 White Paper, the new foreign policy doctrine of Berlin’s ruling elite that guides Germany’s return to aggressive foreign and military policies.

German interior minister supports partial ban on the burqa

Johannes Stern

The campaign in Germany for domestic repression and war is assuming ever more openly racist forms. Last Friday, the federal and state interior ministers of the Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) spoke out in favour of a partial ban on the burqa and niqab during their so-called “Berlin Declaration.” Since then, politicians and the media have intensified their agitation against Muslim citizens and refugees.
In an interview with Bild am Sonntag, Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière defended the partial burqa ban and other law-and-order measures proposed in the “Berlin Declaration,” including the expansion of state surveillance, the militarisation of the police and the domestic deployment of the German army (Bundeswehr).
“We reject the burqa,” said de Maizière, “It does not fit in with our cosmopolitan society.” The interior ministers of the CDU/CSU were agreed “that we want to establish a legal requirement to show your face where it is necessary to coexist in our society.” Being fully veiled was “an affront to an open society as well as anti-women.” He wanted “everyone in our country to show their face.”
If de Maizière and the state interior ministers have their way, the burqa and niqab will be banned in many spheres of daily life, and violations of the ban would be interpreted as a petty crime. The ban would apply in schools, institutions of higher education, day care facilities, the entire public sector, in the courts, in record and registry offices, at passport and border control, at demonstrations, public transport and anywhere “that identification is necessary and required.”
De Maizière knows very well that the virtual complete banning of the burqa that he intends is incompatible with the constitutionally-guaranteed rights of freedom of religion and the “unhindered practicing of religion.” He excluded an all-out ban of the burqa by stating, “One cannot just ban everything that one opposes. I don’t want my burqa ban to be defeated in the Federal Constitutional Court.”
The niqab or burqa, like other religious symbols or pieces of clothing, have nothing progressive about them. But anyone who wishes to cover their face for religious reasons has a right to do so. “The state is prohibited from evaluating such religious beliefs on the part of its citizens or even to describe them as right or wrong,” the Constitutional Court ruled in 2015 in the so-called headscarf ruling.
Despite this, German Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) publicly supported the interior minister. In an interview with the newspapers of the Editorial Network Germany, Merkel made clear that she viewed the full veiling of Muslim women as a barrier to integration. From her point of view, “a fully-veiled woman hardly has a chance to integrate in Germany.” With the partial ban now proposed, the issue “is a complex political and legal matter of consideration.” The minister of the interior has her “full support” in his efforts to resolve it, said the Chancellor.
Merkel and the interior ministers are being openly supported by sections of the Green Party. The chairman of the Greens’ parliamentary group in the Saarland state parliament, Klaus Kessler, said he viewed the banning of the full veil in state institutions as the right step. It was “in the spirit of integrating people of Islamic belief into our cosmopolitan society,” Kessler declared on Monday in Saarbrücken. “In the private sphere and in the general public,” a “legal ban [was] not justifiable.” But the burqa was “in contradiction with equality between men and women and therefore in contradiction with our value system.”
While the Left Party officially opposes the burqa ban, it supports the reactionary politics bound up with it. Sahra Wagenknecht, the chair of the Left Party’s parliamentary group in the federal parliament (Bundestag), regularly agitates against refugees and calls for more police.
That sections of the government and opposition are now openly undermining basic rights and German courts now sanction this—on Tuesday a court in Osnabrück refused to allow a Muslim woman to wear her niqab at school—underscores the rightward shift of the ruling class. The World Socialist Web Site has long warned that with the return of Germany to an aggressive foreign policy, all of the historical filth would re-emerge: racism, chauvinism and outright hysteria are once again methods of official politics.
In a disgusting lead article in Saturday’s issue of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, co-editor Berthold Kohler declared the burqa to be “the new symbol for a state which has already shown itself to be far too open and powerless when it comes to its borders, whose representatives preach to the citizens that the influx of migrants (including those with strange customs) has to be accepted in a liberal society as the price of an otherwise beneficial globalisation.
“But ever fewer Germans are prepared to accept this assertion,” proclaimed Kohler. Now the state must, “especially with such a symbolic issue like the burqa, go to the limits of what is permitted by the constitution.” Kohler appealed for a “general ban on the veil,” as exists in France. But this could not be enforced with fines alone. When confronted with the burqa, “and the spiritual views for which it stands,” one can be truly safe only “when we don’t allow them in the country.”
Tomas Avenarius had already declared in the Süddeutsche Zeitung, “The burqa ought to be banned.” Unlike Kohler, Avenarius based his attack on basic democratic rights in a supposed struggle for women’s rights. The full veil was not a “legal problem,” according to Avenarius. It was the negation “of a modern Islam and the German model of society by one and the same piece of cloth,” and it reduced “the woman to eyes, uterus, and submission.”
The comments from Kohler and Avenarius underscore the real target of the hysterical agitation against the burqa—which is only worn by a tiny fraction of Muslims in Germany. Both regularly call for a “strong state” and the expansion of German military deployments in the Middle East where there is a Muslim majority. The demand for a ban of the burqa, justified by Kohler with racism and by Avenarius on the basis of “women’s rights,” serves these reactionary ends.

Haiti: What the Clinton e-mails reveal about US election-rigging

John Marion

In November 2010, Haiti held a first round of presidential elections in which no candidate received an absolute majority. The leading candidates were Mirlande Manigat, an academic and widow of politician Leslie Manigat; Jude Célestin of outgoing President René Préval’s Inite party; and Michel Martelly, a musician with ties to members of the Duvalier regime. Preliminary results showed that Manigat and Célestin would advance to the second round, but there were accusations that Inite, then in power, had committed fraud.
The Organization of American States (OAS) and US State Department intervened, and in an equally suspect count of first-round ballots insisted that Martelly had placed second, ahead of Célestin. Then-US Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice threatened a cutoff of US aid to Haiti if Célestin did not withdraw from the second round in favor of Martelly, and also threatened Préval with exile. In the March 20 second round, which saw voter turnout of only 23 percent, Martelly beat Manigat.
Martelly’s five-year presidency was characterized by corruption, the reconstitution of the Haitian army, and the de facto cancellation of municipal and legislative elections. Mayors were appointed by Martelly’s central government instead of being elected, and during his final year, there was no parliament. One of Martelly’s final acts, in December 2015, was to create by decree an unregulated offshore banking center on the island of La Gonâve.
The efforts of Hillary Clinton’s State Department to manipulate the 2010-2011 elections in favor of the comprador Martelly are shown in the e-mails released by the State Department under the Freedom of Information Act.
Like the e-mails as a whole, they reveal not extraordinary actions, but ordinary, day-to-day discussions among officials doing the business of US imperialism, in this case, running Haiti like a colonial possession, which it is in all but name.
Many of the e-mails are heavily redacted, but nonetheless reveal maneuvering by Cheryl Mills, then-Ambassador to Haiti Kenneth Merten, his predecessor Thomas Adams, US embassy Political Officer Pierre Antoine Louis, embassy “political counselor” Peter Kujawinski, and others. Among the e-mails is one from Deputy Chief of Mission David Lindwall to Merten and Kujawinski with the subject “Out of the box thinking on elections.” The State Department’s .pdf of this e-mail thread includes large boxes of blanked-out text and a page marked in bold: “Page Denied.”
Merten was an assistant to Condoleezza Rice prior to his appointment as US Ambassador to Haiti by Barack Obama. In an interview this month, he admitted to a reporter from Le Nouvelliste that Martelly turned in his US Legal Permanent Residence card at the U.S. Embassy in Port-au-Prince in 2011. The Haitian electoral law in effect at the time stipulated that candidates had to have lived in the country for five years before being elected; Martelly was therefore ineligible to be president when he was installed by the “international community.”
In a December 8, 2010, e-mail with the subject “Private Sector + Mulet: Celestin Should withdraw,” Merten wrote to Mills, Adams, and Lindwall that “I have called Martelly camp telling them that he needs to get on radio telling people to not pillage. Peaceful demo OK: pillage is not.”
In an e-mail thread started by a Jean-Lucien Cantave that was forwarded to Merten by Kujawinski, Martelly is said to have declared “that his mission was to get Haiti’s people out of misery by bringing in investments and that he did not intend to stir away from his goal.” Martelly was later known for his slogan “Haiti is open for business,” and one of his prime ministers, Laurent Lamothe, cynically touted the vacations of wealthy tourists as “a tourism of solidarity.”
A May 2015 article in Le Nouvelliste, titled “Edmond Mulet, the Proconsul,” described the OAS and UN machinations after the first round of voting. Mulet, a Guatemalan diplomat, was at the time the head of MINUSTAH, the UN’s occupying force in Haiti. Ricardo Seitenfus, a Brazilian law professor and OAS Special Representative to Haiti, wrote about attending an emergency meeting at Mulet’s house on the day of the election. Seitenfus wrote that the accusations of fraud, which were announced before noontime, “seemed to have been prepared” long before the election. In fact, the room at the Hotel Karibe where 12 of 18 opposition candidates—including Manigat and Martelly—accused Inite of fraud had been rented well in advance of the election.
While waiting for the meeting to start, Mulet told Seitenfus, “I’ve just telephoned Préval to inform him that a plane will be at his disposition for leaving the country” within 48 hours. As the meeting progressed, Seitenfus “realized that the position of Mulet was [also] that of several ambassadors of important countries.” Prime Minister Jean-Max Bellerive arrived and, before asking whether Préval would be allowed to finish his term, remarked that “it would be interesting if there were at least one Haitian in a conclave that will decide the future of Haiti.”
The clearest indication of the US role is in a January 29, 2011, e-mail from Laura G. (whose last name and e-mail address are not given) to Cheryl Mills. The e-mail refers several times to the “solution” of putting Martelly in the second round and allowing Préval to stay in power in the meantime. The writer tells Mills that she “needs to counter what appears to be a building up and potential unifying of opposition parties,” that “this solution” is “in usg best interest,” and that “IC [the international community] for many here equals USG.”
Laura also states that “confidentially - i met with Mullet (sic) yesterday and…he thinks that somehow the mms [Michel Martelly] solution and RP [Rene Préval] staying will be accepted by all.” She then advises Mills, “I think you need enhance message outreach strategy w Haitian surrogates.”
Mills did just that—“enhanced the message outreach strategy”—by giving Clinton a “message frame” for a speech the next day, in which reality was turned on its head: Clinton was advised to say that “the votes of the people of Haiti must be counted fairly.” In a second thread based on the same original e-mail and available in the Wikileaks archive, Kujawinski dismissively calls public opinion “the flavor of the month” and callously asks, “remember when nobody could stop talking about Duvalier? Now, he’s barely mentioned even though he’s still here.”
The second round of presidential elections was held on March 20, 2011, and the Clinton e-mails show how closely the State Department monitored the vote counts afterward. In a March 24 e-mail to Mills, Adams, Merten and others, Political Officer Pierre Antoine Louis included such details as: 34.19% of presidential, 24.02% of senatorial, and 35.53% of Chamber of Deputies procès-verbaux had been counted (a procès-verbal, or PV, is a summary of votes from a polling station). Attorneys were “taking about 5 minutes to review legislative PVs” and 6-7 minutes on each presidential one.
In the same chain, Shamim Kazemi in the State Department’s Office of the Haiti Special Coordinator wrote that a “CEP spokesperson held a press conference today at the CTV: no information unkown to us was presented, but it was a positive step towards having more transparency for the public.” Mills then wrote to Kazemi, Louis, Adams, Merten, and others, asking, “what is our own sense of what should be done?” Louis’s response in the same chain is heavily redacted.
The Clinton e-mails also document the State Department’s and MINUSTAH’s manipulation of legislative election results as votes were counted in April 2011. An e-mail from Merten to Mulet on April 21, for example, expresses anger that Haiti’s Provisional Electoral Council (CEP) had decided in favor of Inite in the vote tallies for 17 seats. Merten coldly writes that “it looks like our friends in the CEP may have made another misstep.” Mulet responds by offering to arrange a meeting of foreign diplomats that same afternoon.
One e-mail that is not redacted is from Mills to the band of conspirators on March 20, as the polls were closing on the second round, gloating that “you do great elections. And make us all look good.”

New flashpoint in escalating war: Turkey shells ISIS and Kurdish forces in Syria

Barry Grey

Following last week’s threats by Washington to attack Syrian government war planes bombing US-backed Kurdish forces in the northern Syrian town of Hasakeh, Turkey has launched artillery barrages against both ISIS fighters and Kurdish militia in and near the Syrian border town of Jarablus.
Turkey claims shells that fell Monday on its border towns of Karkamis and Kilis were fired by ISIS forces occupying Jarablus.
In addition to retaliatory shelling, Ankara is assembling a force of some 1,500 Syrian “rebels” in the Turkish city of Gaziantep, which was hit by the suicide bombing of a Kurdish wedding Saturday that killed at least 54 people and wounded dozens more. Turkey has blamed ISIS for the atrocity.
The state-run Anadolu Agency reported that Turkey had increased security on its border opposite Jarablus, deploying tanks and armored personnel carriers.
The “rebel” force in Gaziantep is expected to cross into Syria with the aim of breaking ISIS control over Jarablus and at the same time preventing the Kurdish-led, US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces from filling the resulting power vacuum.
This latest explosive turn in the tangle of shifting alliances and conflicts among the global powers intervening in Syria threatens to bring Turkey into direct conflict with Washington’s chief proxy force in northern Syria, the Kurdish People’s Protection Units, or YPG, which is the backbone of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).
Earlier this month, the SDF, backed by intensive and deadly US air support, drove ISIS out of the strategic town of Manbij. This alarmed the government of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, which is waging a brutal war against the Kurdish separatist Kurdistan Workers Movement (PKK) within Turkey. It fears that the YPG victory in Manbij will further consolidate a de facto Kurdish enclave in northern Syria that is being set up with the tacit support of the United States.
Turkey and the US, NATO allies, are increasingly working at cross purposes in Syria, further frustrating Washington’s central aim in the horrific war it has inflicted on the country, the removal of the pro-Iranian and pro-Russian regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and the installation of a US puppet government. The looming confrontation in Jarablus follows Turkey’s accusations of US complicity in the failed military coup of July 15, Erdogan’s turn to a rapprochement with Russia and Iran, and Ankara’s softening of its opposition to Assad.
It also coincides with the visit today of US Vice President Joseph Biden to meet with top Turkish officials under conditions that were already fraught with tension.
The New York Times on Tuesday quoted Nasswer Haj Mansour, an SDF official on the Syrian side of the border, as saying the forces gathering in Turkey included “terrorists” as well as Turkish Special Forces. A statement from the SDF declared that “we are prepared to defend the country against any plans for a direct or indirect occupation.”
Abdel-Sattar al-Jader, a rebel commander aligned with the SDF, was killed late Monday shortly after broadcasting a statement proclaiming the formation of the “Jarablus Military Council” and pledging to protect civilians in the town from Turkish “aggression.” Al-Jader was shot by unidentified gunmen. The Military Council subsequently blamed his murder on Turkish security agents. Haj Mansour said two suspects were in custody but would not reveal their identities.
There is an evident convergence between the expanding attack by Turkey on Kurdish forces in Syria and the more aggressive posture of the Assad regime toward the YPG and SDF. Last week, after six days of fighting between the YPG and Syrian troops and pro-government militia in Hasakeh, which has been split between the two camps since the early days of the Syrian civil war, the Syrian Air Force for the first time bombed YPG positions. That move was apparently in response to an attempt by the Kurds to drive the pro-government forces out and take control of the entire city.
Just how explosive and potentially catastrophic the situation in Syria is, and how reckless the policy of Washington, was demonstrated by the US response. Claiming that some of its Special Forces troops embedded with the Kurdish militia—completely illegally—were endangered by the government bombing, the US scrambled jets to confront the Syrian warplanes, setting up a possible military clash with the Russian-backed Syrian forces.
Pentagon spokesmen followed with threats of US retaliation in the event of further bombings. Lt. Gen. Stephen J. Townsend, who on Sunday took over command of US and allied operations in Syria and Iraq, told CNN, “We will defend ourselves if we feel threatened.”
That the increasingly conflicted and complex situation in Syria could quickly escalate into a far greater and more bloody conflagration, possibly involving nuclear exchanges between the US and Russia, is shown by the deployment in Hasakeh on the side of the Syrian government of both Iranian and Hezbollah forces, and the presence of British and French, as well as American, Special Forces within the Kurdish-led SDF.
On Tuesday, Syrian state media and the Kurdish Hawar News Agency both announced the implementation of a cease-fire in Hasakeh, evidently brokered by Russia. However, while the Kurdish statement said government forces had agreed, as part of the cease-fire terms, to withdraw from the town and leave it under the control of the local Kurdish police force, the Syrian statement made no mention of a withdrawal.
There were other indications of a moderation of the animus between the Assad regime and Turkey. On Friday, the Syrian military’s General Command, in an evident concession to Turkey, released a statement referring to the Kurdish Asayesh internal police in Hasakeh as the “military wing of the Kurdistan Workers Party.” Turkey has long pressed Damascus to declare the Syrian Kurdish forces to be an extension of the PKK.
From the other side, Turkish Prime Minister Binali Yildirim, speaking to foreign media Saturday in Istanbul, spelled out a shift in Turkey’s posture toward Assad, saying for the first time that while Assad could not be part of a long-term solution to the crisis in Syria, Ankara was willing to accept a role for him in a transitional government. At the same time, Yildirim stressed that Turkey would intervene more actively in the Syrian crisis and would not permit the country to be divided along ethnic and sectarian lines—an implicit criticism of US policy toward the Syrian Kurds.
Within this explosive mix of great power brigandage and conflicting geo-political interests, which in general is becoming increasingly unfavorable to the realization of Washington’s imperialist aims, the US is preparing to escalate its military violence.
On Monday, the new US commander, General Townsend, said Washington would step up its operations in support of its proxy forces as they prepared offensives to retake Mosul in Iraq and Raqqa in Syria from ISIS. He said the escalation would include intensified air and artillery strikes and increased efforts to equip and train local forces. He left open the possibility of an enlargement of the US troop presence in the two countries.

India-Syria Linkages: Yesterday and Today

VP Haran


Syria is a country that has been inhabited for over several thousand years. Aleppo, the commercial capital of Syria and its largest city, claims to be the oldest continuously inhabited city in the world. With the destruction that has been ongoing there for the past three years, retention of this distinction for long is in question.

Syria and India have had historical contacts for at least over 4000 years. In addition to the commonly known linkages, there were some others, which are not so widely known. Details on those are minimally available, and have been elaborated upon, below. However, it must be noted that there are different narratives with respect to some of them.
 
Historical Linkages
 
Mari Civilisation
In the Aleppo museum, there exists a small intricately carved piece of ivory, which is said to date back to the days of the Mari Civilisation. From 2900 BC, this civilisation flourished intermittently for approximately 1100 years on the banks of the Euphrates in present day eastern Syria. This would make the carved ivory piece about 4000 years old. Reportedly, historical records indicate that the ivory was brought to Mari from India. This would make it the earliest evidence of contact between the two countries. However, the guide at the museum disputes these historical records. His theory is that approximately 5000 years ago, Syria and the Mesopotamian region were green areas full of forests and wild animals, including elephants, and that they have turned into a desert over several centuries due to climate change. If the guide is indeed correct, it would raise a question on the absence of evidence for the presence of wildlife during the days of the Mari civilisation.

Aleppo Museum, which houses a collection dating back over 5000 years and where the piece of ivory is a prized exhibit, has been attacked by the rebels a few times in the last four years; but the damage has been minimal. However, projectiles recently fired by the rebels caused serious damage to some sections of the museum and some artefacts were also damaged.

India and Syria as Neighbours
Interestingly, approximately 2200 years ago, India and Syria were ‘neighbours’. The Greek Seleucid Empire under Empreor Antiochus II Theos (261BC to 246BC) extended from Syria to Bactria province, in present day Afghanistan. Theos chose to rule from Syria. Meanwhile, the empire of the Indian Emperor Ashoka extended up to Bactria. Ashokan edicts mention Antiochus II Theos. Thus, for a brief period in history, the then Syrian empire and the then Indian empire shared a common boundary.
 
BuddhismEmperor Ashoka sent Maharaskshit Sthavira, a prominent Buddhist monk, to ‘neighbouring’ Syria and other countries in the region in his efforts to spread Buddhism. There is no historical evidence to suggest that this effort was a success in Syria but there was limited success in Alexandria. None of the major museums in Syria have any Buddhist relic dating back to that period. This is surprising, because despite the Crusades, Syria had absorbed and allowed different religions and sects to coexist; that is, till about four years back, when religious/sectarian fault-lines were noticeable.

Trade Contacts
Records and evidence of trade linkages between India and Syria are aplenty. India has traded with this region for at least over 4000 years. Indian spice caravans used to come to Mari, Dura-Europus and Palmyrah in eastern Syria, and proceed to Aleppo, where spices used to be exchanged – mostly for gold – with European traders. In those days, Aleppo was a major entrepôt center that facilitated trade between the East and the West. According to the governor of Aleppo, spice was valued as much as gold in those days and a kilogram of spice used to be bartered for a kilogram of gold. The market where this exchange used to take place does not exist anymore; but Indian spices are still valued in Syria and can be found in the spice souks of Damascus and Aleppo. Particularly valued is saffron from Kashmir, which they say is the best in the world.

Damascus Sword
In the West Asian region, from the Iron Age to the Viking age, Damascus swords were the equivalent of the present day AK 47s. The secret of its success was the usage of high carbon steel ingots from South India. Reportedly, the Damascus sword could cut an enemy’s sword as easily as it can the enemy themselves without ever losing its edge or sharpness. The sword was also said to be capable of slicing a feather in flight. Reportedly, Aristotle had commented on the high quality of the Damascus swords' blades. Alexander the Great’s favoured weapon was the Damascene sword. There are references to steel from India in Mediterranean sources from that period. Arab sources indicate that from the 3rd to the 17th century, steel ingots were regularly imported from India and sent to Damascus. The swords became better known during the Crusades, when it was used widely.

Blades for the Damascus Swords were made from ‘wootz’ steel manufactured in South India. The term wootz is possibly an anglicised term for ukku, the word for steel in some South Indian languages. The sword industry in Damascus witnessed a steep decline from the early 18th century, probably because of the disruption of trade routes. Another reason cited for the disruption in the trade of steel ingots is the suppression of the industry in India by the East India Company. The sword industry revived in Damascus in the 1970s but is not dependent on steel from South India anymore.

With advancement in metallurgy, there is no use for ‘wootz’, which is now not common, even in the place of its manufacture. The Sword is more a collector’s item now, gifted to departing ambassadors. Its use was limited to cutting soft targets like cakes at weddings and national day receptions; that is, until the Islamic State (IS) entered the scene and began using swords for decapitating their enemies, or cadres who have fallen out with it.

Indian Number System
Severus Sebokht, a resident of Kennesrin Monastery on the banks of the Euphrates, is credited with introducing the Indian number system to the Arab World. He was from the Syrian Orthodox Church and was a well known Syrian personality in the 7th century AD, who popularised Greek philosophy and science in Syria. He is said to have remarked, “Indians are good in numbers.” Syrians call the numbers system they currently use as the Indian number system. In India, the same number system is called by some as the Arabic number system. Severus is, however, not well known in present day Syria.

Sacrifice for Syria
Indian soldiers contributed to the ‘Liberation’ of Syria’, as members of the Commonwealth forces during the Ist and IInd World Wars. Indian soldiers were part of the Commonwealth forces that entered Damascus and later Aleppo in October 1918 to drive out Turkish troops.  176 Indian soldiers made the supreme sacrifice in Syria during World War I. Of them, 49 died in Damascus; and were buried or their ashes interred in the Damascus Indian War Cemetery. In 1961, the remains were shifted to the cemetery in central Damascus, maintained by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission.

Every year, on 11 November, the Commonwealth Remembrance Day, Indian ambassadors pay respects to these Indian soldiers at the cemetery. The 127 Indian casualties in Aleppo during World War I were buried in two Indian cemeteries. These cemeteries do not exist anymore. The Aleppo War Cemetery, created in 1941, has a memorial with a dedicatory panel acknowledging the contribution and sacrifice of the 127 Indian soldiers. In World War II, Indian soldiers were part of the Commonwealth forces that were tasked with preventing the German and Vichy French troops from crossing Syria to reach and close the Suez Canal. In this effort, 67 Indian soldiers died in Syria, including 46 in Damascus; they are buried/their ashes interred in the aforementioned two cemeteries. That the contribution of Indian soldiers was valued by Syria is evident from the separate cemeteries that were established for the fallen Indian soldiers.

Present Day State-of-Affairs
While Indian soldiers participated in the efforts to drive out the Turks/Germans and Vichy French from Syria in the two World Wars, today, some Indians have joined efforts to drive out the present Syrian regime. The first such case was noticed in the summer of 2012 in Damascus. He was probably recruited in the Gulf and came along with the Salafists and Takfiris sent into Syria by some Gulf countries. Since then, there is growing evidence of Indians being enticed into joining the ranks of the armed opposition of different hues in Syria. Their numbers may not be many but the association of some Indians with the IS now is a matter of serious concern to us, for there is growing evidence of IS trying to establish a base in India.

23 Aug 2016

EPFL Post-Doctoral Fellowships in Any Science Discipline 2016

Brief description: École Polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) is offering fellowships which may be held in any scientific discipline within the EPFL and run for a period of 24 months.
Application Deadline: 1st October 2016 (17:00 hr CET).
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries:  All countries
To be taken at (country): Switzerland
Eligible Field of Study: All scientific disciplines
About the Award: EPFL’s international postdoctoral fellowship programme aims to attract experienced researchers of any nationality to the EPFL, to provide them state-of-the art conditions for research, to develop their leadership potential and to position them for success as future research leaders through a research-intensive training.
EPFL Fellows’ has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. These fellowships may be held in any scientific discipline within the EPFL and run for a period of 24 months. Applications should be made jointly with the Fellow’s mentor, a senior scientist at EPFL. EPFL Fellows conduct their own research in the framework of the proposed project.
Type: Science Research
Eligibility: 
  • Participation is open for candidates of any nationality
  • The applicants must hold a doctoral degree
  • The applicant must fulfil the incoming or re-integration criteria:
    • (incoming) Applicants must not have resided or carried out their main activity (work, studies, etc.) in Switzerland for more than 12 months in the 3 years immediately prior to the deadline for the submission of proposals.
    • (re-integration) Applicants must not have resided or carried out their main activity (work, studies, etc.) in Switzerland for more than 12 months in the 3 years immediately prior to the deadline for the submission of proposals, and show at least two (2) years of experience in research at the postdoctoral level in any other country by the time they submit the application.
  • Have arranged in advance a research plan with a host laboratory at the EPFL.
  • There are no restrictions concerning the age, gender or nationality of the candidates.
  • Candidates with career breaks or variations in the chronological sequence of their career steps are welcome. These candidates are encouraged to submit evidence-based CVs, reflecting a representative array of achievements and qualifications appropriate to the EPFL Fellows programme. Exceptions to the above rules are possible for women in particular in case of maternity leave, as EPFL has adopted a clear policy of equal opportunities for men and women (e.g. by including the legal provisions related to maternity leave, etc. in the employment conditions).
Selection Procedure: The selection procedure is based on an international peer review process.
Number of Awardees: Several
Value of Fellowship: Successful applicants will be granted a fixed term employment contract at the EPFL, annually renewable, for a maximum 4 years post doc.
Duration of Fellowship: 24-month fellowship.
How to Apply: Interested candidates should visit the Fellowship Webpage to apply
Award Provider: École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)