17 Nov 2016

Grenada: School of Medicine Full Tuition Scholarships for Commonwealth Countries at SGU 2017/2018

Application Deadlines: 
  • 1st November 2016 for January class.
  • 1st of June 2017 for August class
Eligible Countries: Commonwealth nations
To be taken at (country): St. George’s University, Grenada
Eligible Field of Study: Medicine and related fields:
•  Doctor of Medicine
•  Doctor of Veterinary Medicine
•  Master of Public Health
•  Master of Business Administration
•  School of Arts and Sciences
Type: Bachelor’s/Masters/PhD
Eligibility: A prospective scholarship candidate must be a resident citizen of a Commonwealth country, have been accepted to St. George’s University, and submit an essay detailing how this award will ultimately benefit the development of his/her country.
Selection: A Commonwealth Jubilee Scholarship Committee established by the University awards the scholarships.
Number of Awardees: 60. Ten scholarships are available for Doctor of Medicine students in the School of Medicine.
Value of Scholarship: The scholarship funds tuition only.  Students must have a financial plan in place to fund living and travel expenses through their own personal resources or alternative funding sources.
How to Apply: A prospective scholarship candidate must be a resident citizen of a Commonwealth country, have been accepted to St. George’s University, and submit an essay detailing how this award will ultimately benefit the development of his/her country.
Award Provider: St. George’s University.

Denmark: FIG Foundation PhD Scholarships for Developing Countries 2017

Application Deadline: 1st February 2017.
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: Developing Countries
To be taken at (country): Denmark
Eligible Field of Study: Surveying and other related fields
Type: PhD
Eligibility: Applicants shall:
  1. be studying for a PhD degree and registered solely in a surveying/geomatics academic programme that teaches surveying in a country listed by the World Bank as a low-income, lower-middle or upper-middle income economy,
  2. must have had a paper accepted by a peer reviewed international journal based on their doctoral research project; applicants should be the lead author, and the paper should be co-authored with their supervisor,
  3. should not have submitted their final thesis at the application deadline.
Selection Criteria: Applications will be judged on the quality of the application and need. In the event that two excellent applications are judged to be of equal quality, applications from low-income and lower-middle income countries will be preferred.
Value of Scholarship: The FIG Foundation will be providing scholarships of up to 4,000 euros to PhD students. Successful applicants will qualify for a further grant of up to 3,000 euros to attend and present a peer reviewed paper at a FIG conference.
How to Apply: Applicants should submit the following set of documents in English in the order set out below as a single file in PDF format on A4 paper:
  1. A cover sheet showing the candidate’s personal details and those of his/her institution.
  2.  A 200 word abstract. This should be written in terms understandable to the lay person; similar to a press release and which the FIG Foundation could actually use as a press release in the event of a successful application.
  3. A one page research proposal as per the template below on A4 size paper. Note that the one page limit will be strictly enforced; material that extends beyond one page will be deleted.
  4. A copy of the paper that has been re-submitted to the journal after corrections have been completed.
  5. A letter from the editor of the journal indicating that the paper has been accepted and that the necessary corrections have been completed satisfactorily.
  6. The journal paper’s referees’ reports.
  7. A list of peer reviewed journal publications over the last 6 years using the International Journal of GIS reference list format. See Notes for Authors on the IJGIS website.
  8. A list of research funding obtained over the past 5 years, indicating which grants are peer reviewed or not.
  9. A description of research compliance, the research account and activity auditing structures and processes in their institution. For example, if a scientist spends money inappropriately, are there structures in place to refund the granting agency?
  10. A copy of the ethics approval notice for the research from the institution if that is relevant to the grant application. If ethics clearance is not required, then this should be stated in the application.
  11. A budget indicating how the funds will be spent and a one page justification of the budget. Note that as a general rule, equipment will not be funded. Travel to FIG Conferences to present results and tuition fees may be included in the budget. Per diems for field work will not be funded, but reasonable actual costs of field work are refundable.
Applications are to be sent to fig.foundation@fig.net with “FIG Foundation PhD Scholarship Application” shown in Subject Line.
or by post:
The FIG Foundation
c/o FIG
Kalvebod Brygge 31-33
DK-1780 Copenhagen V
DENMARK
Tel. + 45 3886 1081
Fax + 45 3886 0252
Award Provider: FIG Foundation
Important Notes: Applicants are not to contact Foundation directors individually. Decisions are final. No correspondence will be entered into during or after the competition.

Apply: Yale Young African Scholars (YYAS) Programme 2017 for African Secondary School Students

Application Deadline: 16th March, 2017, at 11:59pm EST.
All applicants will receive an email with final admission decisions approximately 6 weeks after the application deadline.
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: African countries
To be taken at (country): Summer 2017 sessions will be held in three locations:
Rwanda
Ghana
Mauritius
Eligible Field of Study: Any
About the Award:The 2017 application for the Yale Young African Scholars Program (YYAS) is now available! YYAS is a high-intensity program that brings together African secondary school students for a cost-free seven-day residential program designed to introduce students to the demanding U.S. university and financial aid application process and requirements. In 2016, YYAS hosted programs in Ghana, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe and welcomed 300 African high school students into its growing alumni network.
Administered by the Yale Young Global Scholars Program and building off that model of interdisciplinary academic curriculum, YYAS participants will attend lectures led by prominent Yale faculty, seminars developed by Yale student instructors, and experiential exercises designed to augment their leadership skills. Participants will engage in robust intellectual exchanges that are crucial to understanding Africa’s most pressing challenges and opportunities. In addition to the introduction to university application processes, Yale student-led courses and leadership training, YYAS also offers students standardized test preparation sessions at no cost to the students.
Type: Secondary school scholarship
Eligibility: Prospective applicants must be citizens of an African country and currently attend school on the African continent. Applicants will have two years left before completing high school and be between the ages of 14-18.
Number of Awardees: Not specified
Value of Scholarship: Fully-funded
Duration of Scholarship: seven days
Rwanda: 27 July – 2 August
Ghana: 7 – 13 August
Mauritius: 18 – 24 August
Award Provider: Higherlife Foundation, Yale University

Morocco: The Global Addictest Fellowship (GAF) Program 2017 for Young Graduates.

Application Deadline: Rolling
Eligible Countries: All
To be taken at (country): Morocco
About the Award: The Global Addictest Fellowship (GAF) Program serves to enhance the learning experiences of the students at Addictest Center in Rabat, Morocco.
Being a GAF is an opportunity for recent graduates to gain teaching experience and make an impact. You will get to coach and accompany motivated high-school students. You will see them make it to college, all while in the beautiful Morocco. There are two options: a one year full time position or two years full time position. This is an opportunity to culturally immerse yourself in Morocco. Other perks include learning/reinforcing french or arabic.
Type: Volunteer
Eligibility: 
  • GAFs are highly-motivated recent college graduates, or gap year students, with an interest in education.
  • Volunteers should be able to speak English and willing to learn French or Arabic
Number of Positions: Not specified
Value of Programme: 
  • Full time paid position.
  • Opportunity to make an impact on people’s life. Almost like an improved paid volunteer position
  • Subsidized housing and food.
  • Complementary classes in Arabic or French
Duration of Programme: There are two options: Either a 1 year program or two years. We are quite flexible. We welcome extensions from 1 year to 2 years, but do not guarantee it unless you join us for 2 years from the start. Scaling back from 2 years to 1 year is possible but will be on a case by case situation.
How to Apply: The application process is on a rolling basis. Please send your CV and cover letter to GAF@addictest.com.
Award Provider: Global Addictest Fellowship (GAF)

University of Nottingham Fully-funded Engineering Scholarship for International Students 2017

Application Deadline: 10th March 2017 (12 midday UK time)
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: All
To be taken at (country): UK
Type: PhD Research
Eligibility: We are looking for applications from exceptional students who are seriously committed to pushing the boundaries of engineering, students who are excited about the prospect of working with some of the world’s leading researchers and who aspire to be the best in their profession. The high value of this award reflects the University’s aim to attract the best students from around the world and to support them during their study.
You can apply for this scholarship if you:
  • are classed as an overseas student for fee purposes AND
  • already hold an offer to start a full-time PhD research degree programme at our Nottingham campus with a start date that falls between 01 October 2017 and 01 February 2018 (inclusive) in the Faculty of Engineering AND
  • have a first-class undergraduate degree or an MSc with distinction in a relevant subject; work experience, journal papers published and other esteem indicators (prizes, top-in-class etc.) will be considered
It is important that you state on your scholarship application the specific topic you are interested in researching and why. Applications listing broad fields of research eg ‘civil engineering’ or ‘mechanical engineering’ rarely get supported.
Number of Awardees: 12
Value of Scholarship: Full tuition fee scholarships plus a stipend of £1,015 per month
Duration of Scholarship: Three-year full-time PhD research degree programme
Award Provider: University of Nottingham

University of Nottingham Research Scholarship for International Students 2017

Application Deadline: 10th March 2017 (12 midday UK time)
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: All
To be taken at (country): UK
Eligible Field of Study: Applications from suitable candidates are welcome but would particularly be valued from strong candidates wishing to work within the research priority areas of each faculty. Please check with individual faculties via the links below regarding their areas of research (link below):
  • Arts
  • Medicine and Health Sciences
  • Science
  • Social Sciences
Engineering research students should apply for the Faculty of Engineering Research Excellence PhD Scholarship.
Type: PhD Research/ MPhil
Eligibility: Interested candidates can apply for this scholarship if they:
  • are classed as an overseas student for fee purposes AND
  • already hold an offer to start a full-time research degree programme, PhD or MPhil, at our Nottingham campus with a start date that falls between 01 October 2017 and 01 February 2018 (inclusive), in any subject area** excluding Engineering***
Number of Awardees: 38
Value of Scholarship: Full-tuition
Duration of Scholarship: these scholarships are for up to each of 3 years of a research programme, subject to satisfactory progress.
Award Provider: University of Nottingham

Erasmus Mundus MaMaSELF Joint Masters Scholarships for International Students 2017/2018

Application Deadline: 30th January 2017
To be taken at (Universities): 
  • University of Rennes 1-UR1, France
  • University of Torino-TO, Italy
  • Technical University of Munich-TUM, Germany
  • Ludwig Maximiillan University of Munich-LMU, Germany
  • University of Montpellier-UM, France
About the Award: MaMaSELF is a 2 year ERASMUS MUNDUS Master Course in Materials Science Exploring Large Scale Facilities. It deals with material characterization using neutron and synchrotron radiation with strong synergies between universities, industrial partners and research centres. In an international environment, it offers excellent academic and industrial opportunities to Master Students.
Type: Masters
Eligibility: Students must have
  • A Bachelor (180 ECTS)  in Materials Science or related disciplines : Chemistry, Physics, Geo-science,…
  • Proof of good English competencies, e.g.  TOEFL  CBT 230 and PBT  550 IBT 80 / IELTS 6.5 or equivalent, except for applicants native from English speaking countries and for students having been educated in English at secondary or/and university. Students who intend to have a mobility at TUM  must have following level for admission at TUM : TOEFL IBT 88, CBT 234/ PBT 605
  • Students coming from main background : civil engineering, medicine, pharmacy, architecture, accounting, law will not be accepted unless they have a minimum background in Chemistry or Physics (at Bachelor level).
Number of Awardees: Not specified
Value of Scholarship: The Erasmus Mundus scholarship covers tuition fees and allows to cover all expenses that non eu students normally face during their studies.
Duration of Scholarship: 2 years
How to Apply: 
  • Bachelor degree (with certified English translation)
  • Transcripts (with translation)
  • English competencies certificate
  • Reference letters
  • Passport
Create your account and start your application
Award Provider: European Commission
Important Notes: When the results are published, please check your status on your file.

University of Laval, Canada Masters Scholarship for African and European Students 2017/2018

Application Deadline:
  • Admission for winter 2017: September 15th, 2016 (Annual)
  • Admission for summer 2017 : January 15th, 2017
  • Admission for fall 2017 : February 1st, 2017
Eligible Field of Study: Scholarships are awarded within the Faculty of Law, Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies,. Faculty of Forestry, Geography and Geomatics, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Faculty of Music, Faculty of Pharmacy, Faculty of Philosophy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Faculty of Nursing, Faculty of Social Sciences and Faculty of Theology and Religious Studies.
About Scholarship
The purpose of this program is to promote academic excellence by offering scholarships to foreign students who are citizens of an African or European country (other than France*) and are admitted to a master’s program at Université Laval.
This scholarship of $7,000 per year is renewable once, subject to compliance with the faculty’s criteria of excellence and upon the research director’s recommendation and faculty approval.
Type: Masters degree
Eligibility:
  • At the deadline indicated below, must have submitted a complete application package* at Université Laval in an eligible first master’s program and have been accepted in this program.
  • You are a foreign student who is a citizen of an African or European country other than France.
  • You graduated from a public university accredited by the ministry of higher education in your country of origin. For private institutions, eligibility is determined when the file is reviewed.
  • You are registered full time for the two firt semesters in the program of study for which the scholarship was granted (winter 2015 and summer 2015).Number of Scholarships:
Number of scholarships: Participating faculties can determine a fixed number of scholarships to be awarded.
Value of Scholarship: $7,000 per year
Duration of Scholarship: Renewable once
Eligible Countries: Students from Africa or European country (other than France)
To be taken at (country): University of Laval, Canada
Offered annually? Yes
How to Apply
There is no form to complete for master’s level scholarships. Recipients are selected using information from admission applications received by Université Laval. To be considered, candidates must submit a complete application for admission to the University no later than the deadline of the target semester (see application deadlines above).
Visit scholarship webpage for details to apply
Provider: University of Laval, Canada
Important Notes: Please refer to the person in charge of this program at your faculty to get more information.

9 Takeaways From the Week From Hell: the Urgency of our Corporate Democrat Problem

Adam Chimienti

Things have somehow taken a turn for the worse after Wednesday morning’s collective depression and shock. Many are alarmed and point out that this assumption of power by an energized right is unprecedented, except for that one (albeit non-nuclear) example from the 1930s when fascism swept across industrializing Europe and nearly the world. We have seen how Trump’s rise, likely fueled in part by the Brexit vote, is emboldening the worst elements on the right. We can only guess how this may embolden those same elements on the European continent, and beyond. Many of us on the left have been saying for a while now, that this is the failure of technocratic neoliberal pragmatism but want no prize for our boldest predictions coming true. However, the idea that the Democrats, led by Bill Clinton, are just going to walk away is troubling. It is clear that they will have to be shown the door and replaced by humanitarian progressives with great ideas and detailed plans.
None of what follows is especially groundbreaking but, in an exercise in catharsis that may somehow prove useful to others, here are nine thoughts from my conversations, observations, and notes:
1/ Team Clinton, Van Jones, Eric Holder, Howard Dean, Bill Maher, the Obamas, etc. have not learned their lesson. Your moral high ground exists only in your mind and in your circles. Cease and desist and let an opposition party form in the wake of your deep and very obvious political and economic corruption. If you do not, you risk any chance of capitalizing on the chaos and ineptitude of what remains of the Republicans. Just like major multinational corporations who commit crimes against humanity and nature, the Democratic Party and its cheerleaders refuse to accept responsibility for their failure (i.e. running a tight race and/or losing to a “laughable” neophyte) and appear to have no capacity to believably apologize to the victims of their hubris, much less atone.
2/ Democracy has very little to do with voting every four years actually. Democracy means consistently paying attention to what is going on in your community, your state, your country and world often. Don’t tell me or any others that if we didn’t vote at all or for the candidate you supported (especially when that candidate is terrible) that we don’t have a say. If you take a teeny bopper approach to politics and treat your party affiliation the way you would treat your city’s baseball or football team, or feel like celebrities bolster your case without their being qualified, then you are not a genuine believer in nor or a practitioner of democracy.
3/ Protests should not be primarily coordinated by major organizations like MoveOn, NOR should protesters’ anger, fear, confusion and desire to be in the streets, organize, and commiserate simply be dismissed as being manipulated by a major organization. Surely, some unsavory groups with huge sacks of cash are behind elements of the mobilizations we are seeing now and they may even be flirting with the notion of some kind of coup but this could never work and they know it. The fact that they never did the same in support of Black Lives Matter or Standing Rock or the seven countries the US has attacked in recent years is telling. However, there is hope in Ralph Nader’s suggestion urging Bernie Sanders and his voters and others demanding progressive policy shifts to come together “in visible rallies starting with a giant gathering on the mall in Washington, D.C. before going regional.” Nader should be invited of course, and it should all be “before the end of the year, while President Obama is still in office”.
4/ Yes, Hillary won the popular vote. Yes, many (likely millions) people were denied the chance to vote due to voter suppression. Professor Mark Crispin MillerBob Fitrakis and Greg Palast have been detailing what this suppression has looked like and how it is morphing, yet somehow they are virtually ignored by everyone in the Democratic Party and many on the left scratching their heads or looking for scapegoats. Republicans are responsible for putting up all kinds of obstacles to voting because of how demographics are changing US politics, but they may not have much to fear if the hapless Democrats don’t learn from their mistakes. Most people won’t vote or do so begrudgingly and have dismissed the whole debacle in 2016 as rigged and staged, which it was. Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC behaved just like Republicans in the primaries and, in doing so, elected a nominee that was easily and obviously one of the worst in the history of the party.
5/ Calls for Trump to be stopped before taking office are not going to work so we should instead focus on building a genuine alternative coalition of dedicated humanitarians, either within or apart from the Democratic Party. It is not going to be easy and there are enormous obstacles that may entirely rule it out but how can we not try? While most of the country, aside from the happy Hillaryites (and their guru Paul Krugman), realizes that things are not working out well or at all for nearly all of us, we on the left are clearly the most honest about the problems and challenges we face as a country and a species. Our biggest failure thus far has been designing a path forward due to the circular firing squad and a lack of imagination, so now is the time to try our hands like never before.
6/ There are grave threats posed by a successful Trump administration so no one should be wishing him luck or hoping that he is successful. On three major issues, there are clear and present dangers: criminal justice, immigration, and the environment. Trump’s law and order approach and cluelessness about how to deal with China or Latin America, along with Preibus, Bannon, Giuliani, Gingrich, Palin, and others, possibly including Joe Arpaio, having a say in the matter should frighten any keen observer. It CANNOT turn out OK. The swamp will not only NOT be drained but it will be run by the most fringe and energized right-wing faction the country has ever experienced. Again, the urgency cannot be denied.
7/ There is a strong connection between people’s attitudes toward Latinos or other new(er) arrivals, the economy, and an inadequate social safety net. This should be fairly obvious and can help to explain why 1 out of every 5 identified black voters in 2016 did not vote for Clinton and why 1 in 3 identified Latinos voted for Trump. As citizens, they feel that the government they pay taxes to is not supporting them or making their lives any easier (they are correct and justified in feeling that way, as are white working class voters) and are prone to believe that newcomers are being lovingly greeted with a red carpet and doctor waiting to give them free medicine. If people had more security in their lives, they wouldn’t believe or care as much about sensationalist tales spun by Republican demagogues and their highly-paid staffers. The causes of demagoguery are visible across Europe as well but many are not properly understanding it.
8/ White women voting for Trump, with or without a college degree, demonstrate that there is obviously some level of what researchers have termed Stockholm syndrome and this support may offer more evidence of its connection to state authority. There is no way anyone can simply ignore Trump’s abusive nature toward women. One surefire way Trump-as-leader can be justified to victims of pervasive misogyny is if you feel that it could possibly help to stabilize one’s life (this applies to any one, not just women). This may be controversial and I only bring it up because, as an expat, I notice a serious problem in US culture today. In 21st century late-capitalist USA, TV programming, advertisers, corporations, celebrities, doctors, politicians, religious institutions, or the men in your family or community continue to egregiously speak down to us even though we know their authority is illegitimate and their moral high ground is imaginary. Justifying a bully’s behavior then is not surprising. This is especially true if you feel there is no other choice, if you feel comfortable with that bully because you feel you’ve known them for so long, and/or if you are tired of expectations because you are simply part of a demographic and not a lone thinking individual.
9/ The percentage of the Jewish population (@500,000) in pre-war Germany of the 1930 was 0.74 or < 1%. The percentage of Roma or “gypsies” (@30,000) in pre-war Germany of the 1930s was 0.04 or < 1%. The percentage of Communist Party members (@360,000) in pre-war Germany of the 1930s was 0.53 or < 1%. The percentage of Socialist Party members (@3,500,000) in pre-war Germany of the 1930s was 5.2 or slightly > 5%.
Numbers for homosexuals and disabled are harder to find. The point is, not only did 164 million eligible US voters not opt for the buffoonish reality TV show authoritarian, but the people who he and his cronies will target make up large numbers of the citizen body and have many more allies in the US and around the world. And it doesn’t seem like we are about to back down.
Yes, we should be depressed that there will be traitors around every corner and in what may seem like every family, classroom, and office space, but with efforts at leadership that make a strong case against neoliberal Dems and right-wing demagoguery at the same time, while maintaining that no one deserves to be attacked for the color of their skin, their ethnic origins or how far they live from metropolitan areas, we have a fighting chance.

New Zealand’s suicide toll highlights social crisis

Jeremy Lin

New Zealand’s chief coroner’s office recently released provisional statistics showing a record number of suicides for the second year in a row. During the 2016 financial year, 579 people took their own lives, up from 564 last year.
By comparison, around 300 people die in road accidents each year. While the age-standardised suicide rate of 12.33 per 100,000 population is around the average for OECD (industrialised) countries, the youth suicide rate consistently has been one of the highest in the OECD. Men aged 25-29 are the worst affected, with a rate of 31.8 suicides per 100,000.
This data points to the devastating effects of decades of deteriorating social conditions, intensified by the National Party government’s austerity measures, including the destruction of better-paying jobs, cuts to welfare and a huge increase in the cost of living, especially housing. It is well-established that poverty and unemployment are major causes of suicide, depression and other forms of mental illness.
The highest rate of suicides this year was on the West Coast of the South Island, where 10 people took their lives. The region has been devastated by thousands of job losses, such as the closure of coal mines by state-owned company Solid Energy.
Compounding the crisis, the government has severely underfunded mental health services, along with the health system as a whole. The Council of Trade Unions estimates a funding shortfall in core health expenditure of at least $1.2 billion compared to 2009–10 levels. Infometrics data puts the figure at $1.7 billion.
Thousands of overworked doctors and other health care workers have recently taken strike action against understaffing. Ambulance workers also voted in favour of nationwide industrial action, but this was cancelled by four trade unions on November 8.
Numerous reports show the inability of mental health services to cope with demand. Workers in the sector have described a deepening crisis. The Ministry of Health itself expects a doubling of demand for mental health and addiction services by 2020 over 2010 levels, yet in the eight years between 2008 and 2016 the mental health sector’s funding increased by less than 30 percent. The ministry’s projection reveals the government’s acceptance of the rising social misery caused by its attacks on living standards.
Auckland psychotherapist Kyle MacDonald last month told TV3’s “The Nation” the mental health system was “falling apart.” He continued: “I think things are at a very dangerous point and we’re starting to see the effects of that, in terms of people not being able to access care, and lots of concerned people saying people at risk are now being left in the community, with the consequences that that causes.”
One gauge of the crisis is the growing number of calls to Youthline, a telephone counselling service for young people, staffed largely by volunteers. The number of calls for extreme depression more than doubled between 2014 and 2015. Youthline chief executive Stephen Bell says based on current data the number of suicidal callers in 2016 will be around 50 percent higher than in 2015. However, he told Radio NZ in September: “Our capacity is so full we can’t actually take more calls … the number of people who can’t get our service has increased.” Bell pointed out that thousands of young people cannot find work.
Lifeline Aotearoa, a similar service, also reported a 40 percent increase in calls this year. Its government funding is being cut at the end of the year, meaning it may be forced to close.
The Canterbury region has seen a particularly startling rise in mental health problems in the five years since the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Demand for child and youth mental health services increased 68 percent between 2011 and 2015. According to a November 7 Fairfax report: “Christchurch Primary Schools Principals Association president Jeanette Shearer said anxiety, suicidal language and evidence of self-harm was growing among children.” Yet about 92 percent of children who see a doctor for mental health issues are forced to wait more than two months for a second appointment.
In March the government announced a $20 million three-year mental health package for the region, but this year’s budget gave the Canterbury District Health Board (DHB) the lowest funding increase of the country’s five biggest DHBs. The $20 million over three years barely brings the region’s funding into line with other cities, and the DHB has a $35 million debt.
Underfunding has meant reduced capacity in acute mental health units nationwide. In the Wellington region, understaffing has led to 60 instances during the past financial year where employees of the Capital & Coast District Health Board have worked more than 60 hours a week, according to Fairfax Media.
Since September, eight beds have been temporarily closed at the He Puna Waiora unit in Auckland where the staffing shortage has become so bad workers fear for their lives. Brendon Lane of the Public Service Association (PSA) union told the New Zealand Herald on September 22 that the situation was symptomatic of staff shortages across the region. He called on the government “to properly fund mental health services in Auckland.”
The PSA’s meek appeal to the government, which has starved healthcare of funds for eight years, will achieve nothing. The PSA, the largest union in the country, has suppressed resistance to the elimination of over 5,000 public sector jobs since 2008. It collaborated with the government to prevent a united struggle by workers against the cuts.
The opposition Labour Party has called for more funding to cover up its own record of undermining the public health sector over the past 30 years. During the 1980s, David Lange’s Labour government launched a series of privatisations and other attacks on essential services, which continued under the National Party in the 1990s. This right-wing offensive led to mass unemployment and soaring social inequality, as well as suicide levels not seen since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The 1999–2008 Labour government did not reverse these attacks; it presided over huge waiting lists for surgery in public hospitals and a vast expansion in private hospitals.

UK government accelerates privatisation of National Health Service

Ajanta Silva

Conservative Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt often appears in the media cynically proclaiming that the government “wants the NHS [National Health Service] to be delivering the safest, highest quality care anywhere in the world.”
He shamelessly claims, “We will be increasing our emergency care provision over the next few years. We are putting more resources. We are training more doctors and nurses.”
What is actually taking place is an unprecedented gutting of services and a wholesale privatisation of the NHS. With virtually no publicity, last month the government put out to tender a massive £7.9 billion worth of NHS services in London, the North West, South West, Yorkshire and Humber, South East, and East Midlands regions of England. This amounts to 7.3 percent of the total NHS budget. Bidding for the contracts ended on November 4, and it is not yet known who won the tenders. If private companies were successful in winning the bids, this would represent the biggest sell-off in the nearly 70-year history of the NHS.
NHS England states that they “intend to award whole contracts for 2017-2019 using the NHS Standard Contract to the incumbent providers without further publication, unless expressions of interest are received from alternative economic operators.”
Appealing to the alternative economic operators (private companies) to make inroads into NHS-run services, NHS England writes in tender notices in each region: “From service reviews and from locally led change through sustainability and transformation plans, we expect there to be more networks of specialist providers and re-shaping supply models and contracting approaches to integrate care around patients.”
Services up for grabs in these areas are termed as “prescribed specialised services” on the government web site. These encompass large parts of the NHS including accident and emergency (A&E), cancer care, mental health, women and children services, blood and infection, and pharmacy services.
The call for outsourcing of services comes as the NHS is bled dry by a thousand cuts, destroying its ability to “integrate care around patients.” Over the last six years, the share of Department of Health funding that has gone to private providers has more than doubled, from £4.1 billion to £8.7 billion. However, private sector involvement is most likely far greater. Denis Campbell, the Guardian ’s health policy editor, points out, “The myriad different bodies that make up the NHS in England and their opaqueness, especially in terms of contracts to provide services, makes mapping the true extent of the privatisation of public healthcare difficult.”
What is certain is the Tory government, on behalf of the capitalist class, is on a mission to destroy the NHS. They oppose its founding principles—i.e., that it meet the health needs of everyone, that it be free at the point of delivery and that it be based on clinical need, not ability to pay.
According to figures gathered by investigative health journalist John Lister, in 2014, £1.76 billion out of £9.74 billion of Primary Care Trust (PCT) spending on community health services were going to private providers. From PCT spending on mental health care services, £1.3 billion went to private providers in the same year. In 2013/2014 alone, 3.7 percent of elective and emergency hospital care was outsourced.
The 2010-2015 Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition introduced the Health and Social Care Act in 2012 and created 211 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in order to expedite the privatisation process. These CCGs were given authority to buy care from “any qualified provider”. Under the act, the secretary of state for health no longer has a “duty to provide care” for the population, only a “duty to arrange care.” Since its implementation in 2013, private firms have won NHS clinical contracts worth £5.5 billion. Year 2015/2016 has seen 37 percent of the CCG contracts going to private providers.
One of the main beneficiaries of the privatisation process is private health care company Virgin Care. It has won over £1 billion in contracts to run vital services ranging from community health services to General Practices (doctor’s surgeries). This month, it was awarded a £700 million contract to run a wide range of services, in both the NHS and social care, in Barth and North East Somerset, to nearly 200,000 people over a seven-year period.
Many private health care giants, especially operators using tax havens as their bases, will fight for their share of the £116.4 billion NHS budget. Early this year, the Independent reported, “[R]ules that prevent tax-avoiding private companies from securing NHS contracts are being scrapped” by NHS England.
To create the most favourable conditions for private firms to make profits from publicly run services, the government of Prime Minister Theresa May and its predecessors deliberately starved the NHS of funds. The last six years saw the lowest-ever funding increase to the NHS in its history, under conditions in which the demand for patient care services has soared.
May and Hunt routinely claim the Tories are putting an additional £10 billion into the NHS by 2021. Five members of the health select committee, including Sarah Wollaston—a Conservative MP and qualified GP—refute this claim. They put the true figure between £4.5 billion and at most £6 billion.
Even if the £10 billion were allocated, this still represents a cut in funding, as the government is demanding a further £22 billion in “efficiency savings” from NHS hospital trusts, which are already mired in an overall £2.5 billion deficit.
To carry out the “Five Year Forward View” of the chief executive of NHS England, Simon Stevens, the government has carved England into 44 Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs). The role of the STPs is to carry out at local level the cuts demanded by government. Some English Counties have already made plans to close down or downsize A&E units, maternity units, children units and community hospitals. Many NHS properties that become vacant through these closures are to be sold in order to cover the deliberately created deficits.
The Labour Party played a critical role in laying the basis for privatisation of public health care. In 2002, the Labour government of Tony Blair introduced Foundation Trusts (FTs) as semi-autonomous organisational units. FTs allowed the private sector to earn income from private patient treatments and paved the way for a two-tier system, in opposition to the founding principles of the NHS. Those who have money to spare were able to jump the queues to receive early treatment. The FTs had a cap of 2 percent, with some variations across country for the income they could earn from private treatments. The Health and Social Care Act abolished this income cap.
According to the Act, FTs have to do a majority of their work for the NHS. This means 49 percent of their income can be generated from treating private patients. FTs made a collective income of nearly £750 million in 2013 and 2014, largely thanks to long waiting lists and selling treatments to patients from other countries. Income earned from private treatment has remained relatively low in many NHS hospitals. However, this is set to increase substantially with hospitals struggling with deficits and the government demanding further “efficiency savings.”
The privatisation of the NHS poses a grave threat to patient care and safety and to the pay, terms and conditions of the 1.3 million NHS workforce. Neither the NHS trade unions nor Labour—despite its left-talking leader Jeremy Corbyn—are doing anything in opposition to these attacks. Rather, any struggles that have broken out, such as that by 50,000 junior doctors, have been localised, isolated and led to defeat.