20 Jan 2017

Türkiye Government Masters and Doctorate Degrees Scholarships for International Students 2017/2018

Application Deadline: 17th February 2017
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: citizens of any country other than Turkey
To be taken at (Universities): Turkish Universities
Eligible Field of Study: Courses offered at the universities
About Scholarship: Türkiye Scholarships include both scholarship and university placement at the same time. Applicants will be placed in a university and programme among their preferences specified in the online application form. Candidates can apply only one scholarship programme in accordance with their educational background and academic goals.
Type: Postgraduate degrees
Eligibility: To be eligible for Postgraduate Programmes, applicants must;
  • be a citizen of a country other than Turkey (Anyone holding or ever held Turkish citizenship before cannot apply)
  • not be a registered student in Turkish universities at the level of study they are applying.
  • be a bachelor’s or master’s degree holder by 30th of July 2015 at the latest
  • born no earlier than 01.01.1987 for master’s programmes,
  • born no earlier than 01.01.1982 for doctorate programmes,
  • have at least 75 % cumulative grade point average or diploma grade over their maximum graduation grade or have at least 75 % success in any accepted national or international graduate admissions test.
  • be in good health
Required Documents
  • Online application
  • A copy of a bachelor or master’s diploma or document indicating that the candidate is bachelor or master’s senior student
  • A certified bachelor and/or master’s transcript (indicating courses taken and relevant grades of the candidate)
  • A copy of a valid ID card (passport, national ID, birth certificate etc.)
  • Passport photo
Number of Scholarships: several
Value of Scholarship: The Scholarship Covers:
  • Monthly stipend (600 TL for undergraduate, 850 TL for master and 1.200 TL for PhD )
  • Full tuition fee
  • 1-year Turkish language course
  • Free accommodation
  • Round-trip air ticket
  • Health insurance
Duration of Scholarship: for the period of study
How to Apply: The application to Türkiye Scholarships programmes is online and a totally free process. Applications delivered by hand or post will not be evaluated.
Candidates are expected to:
  • Open the online application system (tbbs.turkiyeburslari.gov.tr) LINK BELOW,
  • Create a user account by entering their e-mail address and password,
  • Log into the system and complete the application form,
  • Upload the requested documents to the system,
And finally complete their application.
Visit Scholarship Webpage for details
Scholarship Provider: Turkish Government
Important Notes: Most programmes in Turkish universities are instructed in Turkish. However, some departments and universities offer programmes in English, French or Arabic. The candidates who want to study in these languages need to have an internationally recognized certificate to prove their language proficiency.

MasterCard Foundation Scholarship Program at Ashesi University College 2017/2018 – Ghana

Application Deadline: 29th June 2017
About the Award: Typically, scholarships are awarded to students from low income and middle income families. Any family that cannot afford the full fees should complete a financial aid application form and return it with their admissions application. The Scholarship Committee will determine the amount of your award on the basis of demonstrated need and the strength of your application.
Number of Awards: Limited
Value of Scholarship: Scholars at Ashesi represent some of the best and brightest students from across the African continent, and will receive a holistic education that includes:
  • Comprehensive Scholarships: Students receive financial support for fees, books and supplies, transportation, accommodation, and stipends.
  • Life-long Skills: Scholars at Ashesi benefit from enrichment in skill areas relevant to success, such as critical thinking, communications, and entrepreneurship.
  • Transition Support: Scholars will receive support during their transition into Ashesi, and the workforce, with mentoring, career counseling, internships and other life skills coaching.
  • Give-Back Component: An integral component s the commitment to give back to their communities. Students will get to actively work on this through volunteer and community service opportunities.
  • Career Opportunities : Since Ashesi’s inception, some 90% of our graduates have stayed to work and contribute to growth and development in Africa; over 95% our graduates receive job offers within months of graduation.
  • A Global Alumni Network: Graduates of the Programme will be connected through a network that offers information, resources, and opportunities to learn from other scholars and Ashesi graduates around the world.
Duration of Program: 4 years

How to apply: 
    Submit your Completed Forms:
    By Post:Admissions Office
    Ashesi University College
    PMB CT3, Cantonments,
    Accra, Ghana
    By E-mailScan completed application and email to: admissions@ashesi.edu.gh
    In-PersonAshesi University College,
    1 University Avenue,
    Berekuso, Ghana
    Visit Scholarship Webpage for Details.
    Important Note: The admissions office can only process your application upon receipt of the proof of payment. The university is not liable for payments transferred into the wrong account or those which may not, due to bank error, reflect in Ashesi’s bank account.

    Andela Kenya Paid Fellowship Cohort XVI (All Female) 2017

    Application Deadline: 15th February 2017
    To be taken at (country): Kenya
    About the Award: The Andela Fellowship is a four-year paid technical leadership program designed to shape you into an exceptional software engineer. The program requires that you dedicate yourself to the broader Andela community and requires that you apply yourself and challenge yourself to constantly improve personally and professionally throughout the four years of the Fellowship.
    Andela’s four-year Technical Leadership Program is a blend of personalized instruction, supported self-study and hands-on experience building real products. Instead of paying tuition, as you would for a traditional academic program, you’ll earn a competitive salary and benefits throughout your four years with Andela.
    After successfully completing the initial training period, you’ll be fully prepared to start working with one of our clients as a full-time, distributed team member. During the remaining 3.5 years, you’ll apply your knowledge to client work, while receiving ongoing professional and technical development, coaching and mentorship.
    Type: Fellowship
    Eligibility: 
    • You must be 18 or older
    • Andela does not have any degree or diploma requirements. (Nigeria only: However, if you have completed university or have a Higher National Diploma from a Polytechnic, and have not been formally exempted, you must complete your one-year National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) before applying to Andela)
    • Andela is a full-time, four-year commitment, so if you have any major commitment such as school or work, we recommend applying when you have graduated, stopped school or ended other commitments
    • Most importantly, you must embody Andela’s values: Excellence, Passion, Integrity and Collaboration
    Number of Awardees: Not specified
    Value of Fellowship: Through extensive training and work experience with top global technology companies, you’ll master the professional and technical skills needed to become a technology leader, both on the African continent and around the world.
    We are training future leaders committed to helping others succeed. As you advance in the program, you’ll mentor and support the next generation of Andela fellows. The Technical Leadership Program prepares you for endless career paths, including founding your own company, moving into management positions at Andela, and taking leadership roles at local and global tech companies. Graduates become a part of an exclusive alumni network and have access to career support, advice and opportunities.
    • Competitive monthly salary
    • High speed fibre internet
    • Financing plans for accommodations and a Macbook Pro
    • Breakfast and lunch Monday through Friday
    • Healthcare coverage
    • Savings account ($5,000 USD upon completion of Fellowship)
    • A community of excellence
    • A chance to change the world
    Duration of Fellowship: 4 years.
    Application Duration:
    • Interview Dates: February 28th – 2nd March, 2017
    • Boot camp:  March 16th – 24th March, 2017
    • Andela Kenya Class XVI Fellowship:  April, 3rd, 2017 – April, 2nd, 2021
    How to Apply: Join the Andela movement by applying via Fellowship Webpage link below
    Award Provider: Andela

    TWAS Young Scientists International Awards for Developing Countries 2017

    Application Deadline: 31st March 2017
    Offered Annually: Yes
    Eligible  Countries: All developing countries
    Fields of Study: Agricultural Sciences, Biology, Chemistry, Earth, Astronomy and Space Sciences, Engineering Sciences, Mathematics, Medical Sciences, Physics and Social Sciences.
    About Scholarship: TWAS, the African Union (AU) and national ministries of science and technology, Italy are entering into partnership with national science academies, scientific research councils and high-level research organizations in Africa to institute ‘AU-TWAS Young Scientist National Awards’.
    The awards are designed to recognize scientific excellence in their countries.
    Selection Criteria: African organizations intending to award AU-TWAS Young Scientist National Awards in their respective countries are required to sign an agreement of collaboration with TWAS, the AU and their national ministry of science and technology that outlines the rules and regulations governing the scheme. The scheme is then managed by the participating organization while TWAS and the AU provide the prize money.
    Eligibility: 
    • Candidates for a TWAS Prize must be scientists who have been working and living in a developing country for at least ten years immediately prior to their nomination. They must meet at least one of the following qualifications:
      • Scientific research achievement of outstanding significance for the development of scientific thought.
      • Outstanding contribution to the application of science and technology to sustainable development.
    • Members of TWAS and candidates for TWAS membership are not eligible for TWAS Prizes.
    • Self-nominations will not be considered.
    Nominations:
    • TWAS is inviting nominations from all its members as well as science academies, national research councils, universities and scientific institutions in developing and developed countries.
    • Nominations must be made on the nomination form and clearly state the contribution the candidate has made to the development of the particular field of science for which the prize would be awarded.
    • The nominee’s CV and her/his complete list of publications are also required.
    • Nominations of women scientists and scientists from scientifically lagging countries are particularly encouraged.
    • Nominations for the 2016 prizes must be submitted to the address shown below.
    • The re-nomination of a previously declined candidate shall be accepted only if it bears substantially new elements for judgment.
    Selection:  Selection of the awardees is made on scientific merit and on the recommendations of the selection committees composed of TWAS members. The names of the winners will be announced on the first day of the TWAS 28th General Meeting.
    Number of Awards: 9
    Value of Award: 
    • USD15,000
    • Each prize is accompanied by a medal.
    • Prizes are usually presented on a special occasion, often coinciding with the General Meeting of TWAS.
    Duration of Award: Onetime

    How to Apply
    A committee of eminent scientists in the country — including TWAS members, where applicable — should be formed for selecting the prize winners. Names of committee members should be sent to TWAS for information.
    The awarding organizations should send a complete profile of the selected nominees to TWAS, providing details on their achievements together with curriculum vitae and list of publications. Approval of TWAS and the AU is required before announcing the names of the winners.
    The prize should be presented to the awardees by a high-ranking public figure (e.g., head of state/government, minister of science and technology) at a special ceremony held each year on 9 September: Africa Union Day.

    Fighting Fascism: the Irish at the Battle of Cordoba

    Pauline Murphy

    In the Winter of 1936 many Irishmen headed off to Spain to fight fascism with the 15th International Brigade and many of them would never return home. In one of the first major battles of the Spanish Civil war, eight Irish fighters died and were buried in the sun scorched soil of southern Spain.
    The Irishmen who enlisted to fight against Franco’s fascists came from all walks of life. Some were farmers and labourers, others were students and teachers but they all held left wing values and republican ideals which were severely threatened by Franco’s coup in Spain.
    On December 28th 1936 the Irish of the International Brigade fell in with a French battalion to experience their first battle and it would be a baptismal of fire for the volunteers from the emerald isle.
    They launched an attempt to recapture the town of Lopera from fascist forces. The engagement lasted a little less than two days with the result being a crushing defeat for those fighting the might of Franco’s forces.
    The International Brigade stood little chance against machine guns and aerial bombardment, the volunteers were ill equipped and ill prepared for the onslaught that met them on the Cordoba front. Among the brigadistas who fell on December 28th were best friends Michael May and Anthony Fox.
    May and Fox grew up together in Inchicore on the south side of Dublin and both joined the Dublin Brigade of the IRA. The two friends joined the International Brigade in early December 1936 but before the end of the month both were dead.
    May died while covering the retreat of his comrades from a low ridge. Armed with just a single rifle against a line of machine guns, May didn’t stand a chance and was cut down . Meanwhile at the other end of that ridge Fox was dressing the wounds of his injured comrades when a fascist bullet struck his neck. The 22 year old was killed instantly.
    Dubliner Henry Bonar was working as a gardener in Glasgow before he answered the call of the International Brigade and arrived in Spain on December 14 1936. He joined the engagement on the Cordoba front where he received wounds from intense aerial bombardment. The 39 year old would die of his wounds shortly afterwards in a hospital in Colmenar de Oreja.
    Another Dubliner who had been living and working in Scotland before going to Spain was James Foley. The 33 year old died alongside fellow Dublin native Leo Green when a section of Franco’s troops surprised the two rifle men who had been shooting at targets from behind a ditch. Franco’s men pounced from a blind spot at the side of the ditch and slaughtered all before them.
    Kildare native Frank Conroy had left Ireland with 25 other volunteers on a boat bound for Spain on December 13. The 22 year old son of a baker was already a member of the IRA and the Communist party before he joined the International Brigade but, only 15 days after departing his homeland, Conroy was killed in the battle of Cordoba.
    Galway man John Meehan fell victim to the intense aerial bombardment during the engagement to take Lopera town. As both he and Dubliner Gerry Doran lay injured on the ground with several other brigadistas, first aid arrived in the form of just one stretcher bearer. Meehan instructed him to “take Gerry, he is worse hit than me.” Gerry Doran was carried away and survived while John Meehan succumbed to his wounds and died where he lay.
    The youngest Irish fatality on the Cordoba front was 17 year old Tommy Wood from Dublin. He left for Spain on December 11th and died 18 days later from bullet wounds he received as he joined the advancement up the hill to Lopera town. Dublin city born Wood was shot first in the knee and as he was being carried to a first aid station a bullet pierced his head thus ending his existence.
    Days before his death , Wood wrote a letter to his mother in which he informed her the fight in Spain was ‘not a religious war’ and that they were ‘going out to fight for the working class’. Wood came from a family steeped in the Republican tradition, he was a member of the IRA youth wing Na Fianna from the age of 7.
    Frank Ryan, the leader of the Irish volunteers of the International Brigade, wrote to the teenagers mother to inform her of her son’s death. He wrote ‘He has given his life not only for the freedom of the people of Spain but of the whole human race and he will be remembered equally with those who have given their lives for freedom in Ireland.’ Like his other fallen comrades, Tommy Wood was buried in Spanish soil.
    Tommy Wood is one of those immortalised in Christy Moore’s folk song ‘Viva la Quinte Brigada’. The song commemorates the Irish who went to fight against the rise of fascism in Spain and like young Tommy Wood and his other comrades in Cordoba, they were buried where they fought and fell.
    ‘Tommy Wood aged 17 died in Cordoba,
    With Na Fianna he learned to hold his gun,
    From Dublin to the Villa del Rio,
    He fought and died beneath the Spanish Sun.’

    Religious Madness in Ulster

    James Haught

    Back in 1986, I went with an editor group to Northern Ireland, where we saw religio-political horror in full bloom.
    “Interface streets” between Catholic and Protestant neighborhoods had 20-foot-high “peace walls” — barricades to prevent snipers on either side from shooting families on the other side.
    British police checkpoints and armored vehicles were everywhere, with officers wearing bulletproof vests and carrying machine guns. Barbed wire surrounded some buildings.
    Newspapers told of Catholic-Protestant bombings and assassinations. On the day before we arrived, a teen-age Protestant recruit was killed and his fiancée blinded by a bomb in their car dashboard. Police stations listed officers killed by “terrorists.”
    Our group listened to a sermon by the Rev. Ian Paisley, a fiery Protestant who denounced “bachelor priests” and “papists.” He called the Catholic mass “a blasphemy and a deceit.”
    We went to the Sinn Fein political headquarters, heavily barricaded home of Catholic resistance to British and Protestant rule. My most vivid memory was stacks of Sinn Fein magazines praising Catholic “freedom fighters” who killed Brits and “Prods.” One account praised assassins who walked up behind a university professor and shot him in the head. Catholics suspected of being friendly with Protestants were “kneecapped” by pistol shots.
    I felt like I was in a lunatic asylum where murder was lauded.
    We met Martin McGuinness, a sandy-haired youngish leader who had served two prison terms for terrorism. He was earnest and passionate as he recited British and “Prod” atrocities against Catholics. He said he and fellow Sinn Fein leaders were marked for death by the enemy.
    Ulster leaders boasted that Northern Ireland’s “troubles” were fading. They said the previous year had brought only 54 assassinations, 148 bombings, 237 shooting episodes with 916 woundings, 31 kneecappings, 522 terrorism arrests and seizure of 3.3 tons of weapons and explosives — all in a tiny land of 1.5 million people, smaller than most American states.
    Was Ulster’s horror purely religious? No. I guess that some of the killers on both sides never went to church — but being born Catholic or Protestant put them into enemy camps. University intellectuals called it “religious tribalism.”
    Six years after our editor visit, a Protestant killer disguised as a journalist entered the stockade-like Sinn Fein headquarters and murdered three. Catholic killers retaliated by blowing up a van containing eight Protestants. Then Protestants retaliated by shooting five Catholics at a betting shop. On and on the murder cycle went.
    The murder cycle actually began in 1609 when King James of Bible fame rewarded English and Scottish commanders with rich farmland in the six northern counties called Ulster. Former Catholic owners were driven into the hills. Bitterly, they joked that “Protestants got the land and we got the view.”
    Persecution of Irish Catholics persisted for centuries. Oliver Cromwell’s Puritan army massacred them, calling it a “righteous judgment of God.” Catholic worship was outlawed in the 1700s and priests were expelled. Then in the 1800s, it was allowed again — but Catholics were required to pay Protestant tithes, triggering a brief “Tithe War.”
    Mutiny continued intermittently until after World War I, when the Catholic-dominated south of Ireland finally broke free from British rule. But Protestant-dominated Ulster counties remained a loyal British province, where Catholic-Protestant strife took about 3,000 lives.
    In the 1990s, a fitful peace finally grew in Ulster. Old mortal enemies Paisley and McGuinness became government leaders together.
    Last week, McGuinness — frail and sick — resigned from the Ulster government. It triggered memories of that tragic land’s decades of religio-political bloodshed.
    Poet William Butler Yeats wrote of the “terrible beauty” that haunts the soul “wherever green is worn.” He lamented:
    “Out of Ireland we have come. / Great hatred, little room / maimed us at the start. / I carry from my mother’s womb / a fanatic’s heart.”

    What Money Can Buy: the Quiet British-Israeli Scandal

    Brian Cloughley

    There has been a great deal of media and US Congress clamor about a supposed Russian intelligence operation involving Donald Trump.  Documents provided by Senator John McCain alleged among other matters that The Donald had been involved in naughty antics while on a trip to Russia, and the usual suspects feigned shock and horror at the allegations.
    The BBC reported that “the latest — and perhaps most headline-grabbing — source of tension between Donald Trump and the US intelligence community is an unverified report, apparently compiled by a private intelligence firm, claiming Russia has gathered compromising data about the president-elect.”  The thing is a storm in a teacup — a bit like the Clinton emails non-event — but that won’t stop it being spun out by the US mainstream media which is smarting from its dismissive treatment by a man they all resent.
    (No matter what we might think of The Donald, it’s giggling funny to reflect on the horrified indignation of those formerly unassailable media hacks who have now found themselves in positions of feeble supplication regarding the new White House.)
    On the other side of the Atlantic the picture can sometimes be rather different when scandals arise —   be they contrived or genuine — and it is interesting to look at one particularly grubby affair which can’t possibly be denied, yet has been swept under the carpet by a government whose motives for doing so are questionable.
    In mid-January the Al Jazeera television channel revealed an Israeli plan to destroy the careers of senior British government figures because they have been critical of Israel.  The evidence is undeniable.
    A senior official in the Israeli embassy in London, Shai Masot, was recorded by an Al Jazeera undercover reporter when speaking with Ms Maria Strizzolo, formerly chief of staff to the British Conservative Party government’s ‘minister of state for skills’, Robert Halfon, the past political director of the Conservative Friends of Israel, who has a colorful history.
    In an exchange between Ms Strizzolo and Mr Masot in a London restaurant, he is recorded as asking her “Can I give you some [names of] MPs [Members of Parliament] that I would suggest you take down?” to which Ms Strizzolo replied that all MPs have “something they’re trying to hide.”  (The expression ‘take-down’ is generally defined as “a wrestling maneuver in which an opponent is swiftly brought to the mat from a standing position,” but in this context is rather more disturbing.)
    Mr Masot then told her “I have some MPs” to be taken down, and specified “the deputy foreign minister,” Sir Alan Duncan, who has been critical of the Israeli government’s treatment of Palestinians.  According to transcripts of the meeting, Strizzolo implied that “a little scandal” might result in Duncan being dismissed, and added “don’t tell anyone about this meeting,” which was clear indication that she knew it was clandestine and involved sensitive matters.
    It was not surprising that Ms Strizzolo resigned following disclosure of her agenda — but first she tried to lie her way out of the affair, as is usual for such people.
    In answer to a reporter’s questions she claimed her conversation with Masot was “tongue-in-cheek and gossipy . . . Any suggestion that I could exert the type of influence you are suggesting is risible.”  She declared that the Israeli Embassy’s Mr Masot “is not someone with whom I have ever worked or had any political dealings beyond chatting about politics, as millions of people do, in a social context.”  This was strange, coming from a person who was recorded as saying she could help Israel because “If at least you can get a small group of MPs that you know you can always rely on . . .  you say:  ‘you don’t have to do anything, we are going to give you the speech, we are going to give you all the information, we are going to do everything for you’.”
    Pronouncements of non-involvement did not end with Ms Strizzolo’s assertion of virtue, and the Israeli Embassy’s official statement was that “the comments were made by a junior embassy employee who is not an Israeli diplomat, and who will be ending his term of employment with the embassy shortly.”
    This “junior embassy employee” describes himself as “a Senior Political Officer” on his business card, and his social media page states he is “the chief point of contact between the embassy and MPs and liaising with ministers and officials at the Foreign Office” which indicates that he is responsible for dealing with leading representatives of his host country.
    It is bizarre to claim that Masot would explore methods of ‘taking down’ British government ministers without authorization from a very high level — just as it is impossible to imagine that his contacts in the British Parliament might be acting entirely of their own accord.
    Shai Masot told Joan Ryan, a Labor Party Member of Parliament and Chair of Labor Friends of Israel (LFI), that he had plans for “another delegation of LFI activists” to visit Israel and Ms Ryan said “That’d be good. What happened with the names we put in to the embassy, Shai?”  To which Masot replied “We’ve got the money, more than a million pounds, it’s a lot of money . . .  I have got it from Israel. It is an approval.”
    Israelis don’t spend a million pounds for nothing.
    Predictably, Ms Ryan said the filmed revelations are “rubbish,” but the Al Jazeera recording is undeniable evidence of her involvement in chicanery as well as revealing an Israeli scheme to interfere directly in the domestic politics of the United Kingdom.
    But there was no follow-up by the British government about this murky meddling.
    It cannot be denied that an official of the Israeli Embassy in London collaborated with a British government employee who worked for a pro-Israeli Member of Parliament in order to attempt to destroy the reputation of a British government Minister.  That is outrageous.
    Yet the UK’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office — the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, whose Minister of State (in effect “the deputy foreign minister,” as he was referred to by the Israeli agent who was trying to “take him down”) was the person specifically targeted for a campaign of Israeli-British denigration — quickly stated that “The Israeli Ambassador has apologized and is clear these comments do not reflect the views of the embassy or government of Israel.  The UK has a strong relationship with Israel and we consider the matter closed.”
    And that is that.  There will be no action by the British government, in spite of Mr Masot reflecting amusingly, and no doubt to the approval of Ms Strizzolo and much of the British public, that the Foreign Minister himself, Mr Boris Johnson, “is an idiot with no responsibilities.”
    The Prime Minister, Theresa May, is entirely pro-Israel, as demonstrated by her criticism of President Obama’s Secretary of State John Kerry who described the Israeli government as the “most right-wing in Israeli history, with an agenda driven by the most extreme elements.”  He was perfectly correct, but Mrs May scolded him and pandered to the Israeli government by stating that she does “not believe that it is appropriate to attack the composition of the democratically elected government of an ally.”
    All the Friends of Israel — in both the Conservative and Labor parties — have worked their magic in Britain, as has the enormously powerful Israeli lobby in the United States, so it is not surprising that the Al Jazeera revelations of Israel’s wily intrigues were barely mentioned in the Western media.
    The Matter is Closed.
    If a “Senior Political Officer” in (for example) the Russian embassy in Britain or the United States was detected in such demonstrably underhand antics as undertaken by Israel’s Shai Masot there would be massive journalistic fandangos in American and British media.  The West’s television channels would be near meltdown with hysterical condemnation of the threat to democracy and there would be prolonged and frenzied anti-Russian outbursts in righteously protesting halls of government.
    But when Israel schemes to ‘take down’ a respected British Government minister with the assistance of a British government official,  and the Israeli ambassador acknowledges being found out, the British government ignores insult, contempt and generously-funded efforts to destroy the career one of its own senior representatives, and declares that  ‘The UK has a strong relationship with Israel and we consider the matter closed.’
    It is amazing what money can buy.

    Six Things We Should Do Better As Everything Gets Worse

    David Swanson

    Here I am in occupied DC. The White House looks like a Green Zone. There was a time when you could walk up to it. Caravans of police cars and black SUVs zoom by with sirens blaring and everyone else forced aside. Do people look outraged? No, they grin and admire. We need more democratic perspectives. Here are six.
    1. Get active around policy not personality. And try to nudge newly active or re-activated people in that direction. To take one example of thousands, we should be cheering more loudly for the commutation of Chelsea Manning’s sentence. And we should have raised a lot more hell than we did over the idea of locking her up to begin with — and Obama’s pronouncing her guilty before his subordinates tried her — and over all the other whistleblowers still in cages or facing persecution. More support for not bombing Syria in 2013, and more condemnation for arming proxies instead. More — hell, any — support for Trump deescalating hostility with Russia, and more opposition to his proposals to “kill their families” and “steal their oil.”
    2. Recognize that the crisis is not new. It’s just ever more urgent, with environmental or nuclear apocalypse threatening. Obama increased military spending, dropped more bombs on Iraq than Bush did, still occupies Afghanistan, is now helping to destroy Mosul, and radically expanded presidential war powers for his successors. Each president does a lot more harm than good. Each should be protested and resisted and impeached and removed — but for good reasons, of which there are always plenty, not for bad ones.
    3. Promote a positive vision. We can move toward a better future in which reduced or eliminated military spending makes possible what we don’t now even try to dream of.
    4. Go local and global. Build power in towns, cities, states, and through alliances across borders. The latter is crucial for avoiding war and protecting the planet.
    5. Take on Washington too, but recognize what we are up against. The activism that may have saved Chelsea Manning, delayed the bombing of Syria, prevented as of yet a war on Iran, and led to Trump campaigning on the idea that attacking Iraq and Libya was stupid, could do more if it knew its own strength. But the wars have now gone secret, outsourced, privatized, and taken to the skies rather than the ground. The lies have become slicker too, though that may be about to change. We have to up our game. A nuclear war is not one that can be criticized after it starts on the grounds that it costs too much money or hurts someone sympathetic or because the people nuked are not showing gratitude. We are also up against a permanent government sending troops to Russia’s border, facilitating a coup in Ukraine, sabotaging peace in Syria, and making recent accusations against Russia that have in some cases proven false and in no case yet been proven true.
    6. Resort to the most powerful tool: nonviolence. You cannot expect violence to work on children, even presidential children. It does not educate or control. Children need attention, positive when they do right and negative when they do wrong. The CIA, “Homeland-” “Security,” and “Democrats” are effectively telling Trump that he can only be loved or respected if he joins in spitting in the face of a nuclear armed government. The people who found the one candidate who could lose to Trump are finding the one way to oppose his agenda that will fall apart under scrutiny if it doesn’t kill us all first. Let’s have no more partisanship. No more cults of or against personalities.
    We need principles. Policies. Peace.

    Nuclear Fiddling While the Planet Burns

    Linda Pentz Gunter

    There is a climate crisis upon us. Polar ice is melting. Sea level rise is happening. Time is running out. Emergency solutions are the only option — energy supplies that can come on fast and sustainably.
    Sadly, some in the U.S. Congress would rather bury their heads in radioactive quicksand, sinking our money into nuclear energy research at national laboratories that have sought but failed to find illusory atomic answers for decades.
    The House and Senate are re-introducing near identical versions of the “Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act of 2017,” which promises to throw our money down the nuclear rabbit hole rather than direct major funding to renewable energy solutions that are already addressing climate change quickly and effectively but should be supported and accelerated before it’s too late.
    The Act states as its purpose “To enable civilian research and development of advanced nuclear energy technologies by private and public institutions, to expand theoretical and practical knowledge of nuclear physics, chemistry, and materials science, and for other purposes.” It passed the House last year but stalled in the Senate.
    In reality, it is another futile tilt at the so-called “advanced reactor” windmill, when real windmills would actually do the job far faster, more safely and cheaply and without all the attendant risks of tinkering with radioactive materials and perpetuating a deadly waste problem into eternity.
    The bill states it would authorize research, modeling and simulation of “advanced nuclear reactor concepts” that are “inherently safe.” This chimera has been chased for decades and inherent safety won’t be found in the designs the national laboratories are pushing, such as the sodium-cooled reactor, proven to be literally explosive.
    So-called new generation “fast reactors” are another old idea from an old research establishment, the Argonne National Laboratory, which would be delighted to be on the receiving end of this latest transfusion. Argonne’s first attempt at a fast neutron reactor was canceled by the U.S. Congress in 1994.
    A new documentary, The New Fire, (a singularly odd choice of title given the subject), celebrates the excitement of eager young scientists determined to invent the better nuclear mousetrap. But back in 1996 the National Academy of Sciences already acknowledged that the development of a reactor that could recycle its own waste would have very high costs and marginal benefits and would take hundreds of years — time we definitely do not have.
    The thrill of theoretical experimentation in the laboratory may be exciting for young engineers. But they shouldn’t get our money. Nor should we hand these aspiring atomic alchemists the mandate to cure climate change. That race is already being won by renewable energy research and implementation. It is in this field where the real “innovation” lies and where Congress should be directing their mandate and funding dollars.

    Myanmar: A scribe’s Murder And Its Aftermath

    Nava Thakuria


    Guwahati: Killing of media persons in the Indian subcontinent is no unusual happening as it annually losses around ten journalists to assailants. India, Pakistan and Afghanistan often lead the list of victims with additional inputs from Bangladesh and Myanmar, where Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Tibet (under China) and Nepal normally maintain their no-journo killing index.
    Myanmar (also known as Burma or Brahmadesh) as a whole witness lesser incidents of journo-killing and the Buddhist majority country witnessed the assassination of only five journalists in the last one and half decades. But the recent murder of a young reporter in its northwestern part, which is adjacent to Nagaland & Manipur, exposes the vulnerability of media persons, who dare to report on critical issues including the environment and shockingly with little hope for justice.
    Ko Soe Moe Tun (35), a Monywa (Sagaing) based Burmese journalist was found dead on 13 December 2016, who was convincingly targeted for his extensive investigation & coverage on the wood smuggling, illegal logging and mining in northwest Myanmar. The reporter, engaged with Daily Eleven newspaper, published by the Yangon based Eleven Media Group, also posted few details in his facebook account about the people involved with the illegal timber trades.
    The investigating police officers found a long stick, a rough rope, his cell phone etc nearby the body on the location. The severe injury-marks were visible on Soe’s nose, head and eyes. The autopsy report revealed that Soe’s skull was fractured causing his death. His mobile phone showed some miss calls in the midnight of 12 December, which might help the investigating authority to trace the killers. Soe left behind his mother (Ye Ye Htay), young wife (Daw Khin Cho)
    and a minor son. The family source claimed that he was popular in his locality with no enmity to anyone. Hence, they believe that Soe was targeted because of his reporting-works primarily on illegal logging, farmland confiscation, karaoke lounges and the controversial Chinese-backed Letpataungdaung copper mine project.
    Myanmar, which still possesses some of the most important biodiversity areas in the world, faces massive deforestations because of its prized teak wood and other wildlife. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Myanmar lost one fourth of its forest covers in the last two and half decades. The losses are visible in Sagaing, Shan, Kachin, Arakan States of the underdeveloped country. Moreover the destruction of forests has severely affected the important habitats of various wildlife species.
    The ancient stories narrate that the hills of Sagaing range were once covered with thick forests, where the king used to exile the condemned criminals for capital punishments as those were full of wild animals. But today because of recent legal and illegal loggings the country had lost two million hectares of its virgin forests.
    Nevertheless, the country has around 30 million hectares of forest covers, which is impressive compared to many other southeast Asian countries. The government under the mentorship of Nobel laureate Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, which partially banned timber exports & logging, now declares that it would impose a nationwide ban on logging to protect the old trees in the coming days.
    Myanmar Journalist Network (MJN), while condoling over the demise of Soe, seconded the family’s view arguing that the young scribe used to write regularly on conservation issues and often received threats from the illegal logging traders prior to his death. Myanmar Press Council also supported the view arguing that threats against the journalists are common in the country.
    The overall media freedom in Myanmar has improved since 2011, the year Myanmar’s military rulers handed over the political power to a quasi-civilian government led by President Thein Sein. Soon the government at NayPieTaw abolished the pre-publication censorship and allowed the privately owned daily newspapers to hit the stands. The situation further improved following the massive win by the National League for Democracy (NLD) in the last historic national
    elections on 8 November 2015 under the leadership of Suu Kyi. Though the great lady could not become the President, because of some clauses in the 2008 military backed constitution, Suu Kyi emerges as the most powerful political figure in Myanmar.
    Sadly, the Burmese journalist fraternity continues to work under threats, earlier if it was from the military forces, now it comes from different anti-social elements. It is still identified as one of the most censored countries in the globe. In reality the idea of press freedom is still new in the low literate country, which had slowly changed its face from the decades-long military dictatorship to a multi-party democracy.
    The Yangon based Myanmar Frontier, in one of its editorials, argued that there were many challenges for the newly emerged democratic government, ‘but ensuring a media that is free from threats and is able to carry out its work would be a sign that the country (Myanmar) is moving in the right direction’.
    The year 2016 ends with the statistics of 16 journalist-murder incidents in India, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh along with Myanmar. India witnessed the murder of six journalists (Tarun Mishra from Uttar Pradesh, Indradev Yadav/ Akhilesh Pratap Singh from Jharkhand, Rajdeo Ranjan from Bihar, Anshita Bawa from Punjab, Kishore Dave from Gujarat and Dharmendra Kumar Singh from Bihar) in twelve months.
    India’s troubled neighbor Pakistan lost three journalists (Mehmood Khan, Shehzad Ahmed and Muhammad Umar) to assailants, but Afghanistan lost more scribes (Nematullah Zahir, David Gilkey, Zabihullah Tamanna, Yaqoub Sharafat and Mohammad Zubair Khaksar in 2016. Myanmar and India’s immediate neighbor Bangladesh reported the killing of one editor (Xulhaz Mannan) and a netizen (Samad Nazijmuddin) in the bygone year.
    Prior to Soe’s murder, Myanmar had lost four journalists namely Aung Kyaw Naing (also known as Ko Par Gyi in 2014), Kenji Nagai (2007), Hla Han and Tha Win (1999) to assailants with impunity. Moreover, the government imprisoned many media personalities including Lu Maw Naing (since January 2014), Aung Thura (February 2014), Sithu Soe (February 2014), Yarzar Oo (February 2014), Tint San (February 2014) etc. Meanwhile, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), Reporters Sans/without Frontiers (RSF), Myanmar Journalists Association (MJA), International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) etc deplored the murder of Soe and demanded actions against the criminals. Facing the heat, the Myanmar authorities recently detained three suspects in the murder, but reportedly two of them were already released. The Sagaing chief minister Dr Myint Naing, who visited the residence of Soe on 19 December, stated that the police would find out the truth about his murder. Dr Naing asserted that he too wanted to see the true picture and appealed to everyone to work together to find out the truth.
    Asia-Pacific Forum of Environmental Journalists (APFEJ), while appreciating the Myanmar police for questioning few persons relating to Soe’s murder, has urged the authority for further investigation and stringent actions against the culprits. The Dhaka based scribe’s forum argued that killing a journalist because of his reporting on environmental issues must be dealt with absolute seriousness. “Killing of a scribe is a serious offence, but the assassination of an environmental journalist should be recognized a major crime both against the humanity and Mother Nature. We demand a fair probe into Soe’s murder and visible punishment to the culprits,” said APFEJ chairman Quamrul Chowdhury. He also appealed to the Burmese government to adequately compensate the family of the slain journalist and support his eight years old son in pursuing proper education.