7 Feb 2018

Harvard Business School Global Opportunity Fellowship (GO: Africa) 2018

Application Deadline: Ongoing
Eligible Countries: All
About the Award: The new fellowship will provide generous financial support to students who want to make a difference working on the continent after HBS, by supplementing the salaries they earn on the continent for the first five years after graduation.
“The GO Fellowship is another example of Harvard Business School’s commitment to developing and strengthening its relationships with business and other leaders across Africa,” said Pippa Tubman Armerding, Director of the HBS Africa Research Office. “Providing students with this financial support will not only enable them to develop their careers in Africa but also allow many more African businesses to attract the vital management and leadership talent they need to drive growth and economic development across the continent.”
Africa has long been a focus of HBS student organizations as well, most notably of the 108-member Africa Business Club and its Africa Business Conference, the largest student-run conference at the School. Co-chairs Afua Ahwoi (MBA 2018) and Aminata Ly (MBA 2018) are expecting over 1,000 attendees from close to 30 countries as the conference celebrates its 20th anniversary in March of 2018, an event that will include a wide array of panels and a new venture competition that will bring 10 promising African start-ups to compete for a grand prize of $10,000.
The GO: Africa Fellowship will support students who want to make an impact specifically in Africa.
Type: MBA, Fellowship
Eligibility: Starting with the class of 2018, graduating students will be eligible for the Fellowship for up to 5 years after graduation with a maximum award of $50,000 USD per year and $150,000 USD in total.
Number of Awards: Not specified
Value and Duration of Award: The fellowship is designed to bridge the gap between a recipient’s annual salary and $100,000 USD. Students will be eligible for the fellowship for up to five years after graduation, with a maximum award of $50,000 per year and cumulative support of $150,000.
How to Apply: To be considered for GO:Africa, second-year students and recent HBS alumni complete the Global Opportunity Fellowship application, including an essay and details about their job offers and career plans.
Award Providers: Harvard Business School Alumni

U.S Embassy Rwanda Woman of Courage Award 2018

Application Deadline: 16th February 2018
Offered Annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: Rwanda
To Be Taken At (Country): Rwanda
About the Award: This annual award recognizes women from around the country who have demonstrated exceptional courage and leadership in advocating for peace, justice, human rights, gender equality, and women’s empowerment in Rwanda.
The first U.S. Embassy Rwanda Woman of Courage Award was launched in 2015.  The Woman of Courage Award honors women who are making history in Rwanda through their work to better their societies, to fight discrimination or strife, and to help resolve conflicts.
Type: Award
Eligibility: Eligible candidates are women working in the political, human rights, economic, social, judicial, health, educational, press/media, peace and national reconciliation, and scientific and technological arenas.
Number of Awards: Not specified
Value of Award: Selected nominees will be recognized at a special ceremony during Women’s History Month.
How to Apply: To nominate your candidate, please complete the following form here, highlighting the woman you personally know and explaining why you believe your nominee deserves to be recognized as a Woman of Courage in Rwanda.
Award Providers: US Embassy

British Federation of Women Graduates (BFWG) Scholarships 2018

Application Deadline: 23rd February 2018
To Be Taken At (Country): Britain
About the Award: The British Federation of Women Graduates scholarships are for women who will be in their third year of doctoral studies or part time equivalent at the time when the awards are given out n October/November of each year. The awards are given on the basis of evidence of academic excellence as shown on the application form, referee reports and, for those shortlisted, brief presentations of their research to a panel of academics.
Type: Doctoral
Eligibility: To be eligible to apply for a BFWG award for the year, candidate must be:
  • A female postgraduate student who commenced full time doctoral studies (PhD, DPhil, DMus etc.) between September 1st 2015 and October 31st 2016 or a part time student at an equivalent stage of her studies.
  • Registered at a university in England, Wales or Scotland (not Northern Ireland).
  • Awards are given to help with on-going doctoral work rather than as prizes at the end of doctoral studies so please do not apply if you expect to submit your thesis before the end of February 2019 at the earliest.
  • Awards are not given out unless fees for the year from October 2018 have been paid or are covered by available funds or waived by the university.
Selection Criteria: BFWG Scholarships (Academic Awards) are awarded in competition on the basis of overall academic excellence. In effect they are prizes for outstanding academic excellence. They are not intended to meet financial need.
Number of Awards: The number of awards made each year depends on the funds available and on the quality of the applications but six to ten awards are usually given.
Value of Award: The amounts offered in awards range upwards from £1000 with the average award being around £3000 and the maximum being £6000.
How to Apply: Only email applications will be accepted.
  • To make an application for a BFWG award, download and complete the application form.
  • Email this back to awards@bfwg.org.uk  giving the subject heading of your email ‘AWARD APPLICATION’ and at the same time ensure that you have followed the instructions for sending a £20 non-refundable administration fee through PayPal as described on the form.
  • Please make sure that you record the reference number of your PayPal transaction, the date of the transaction and the name on the Paypal account from which the payment is made if this is not yourself or if it is under a different name from the one you use on your application form.  (This is to clarify who has sent a payment We do not use the information for anything else).
Award Providers: British Federation of Women Graduates (BFWG)

Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Scholarship Research Program for Students in Developing Countries 2018

Application Deadline: 16th March, 2018.
Eligible Countries: All. Applications are particularly welcome for research projects in Asia, South America and Africa.
About the Award: The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) runs an exciting and ambitious program, working with partners to transform the world’s seafood markets and promote sustainable fishing practices. Undergraduate and postgraduate students of environmental and fisheries science are able to further their studies through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) scholarship research program.
This year, the MSC also welcomes applications from students researching best practice in sustainable seaweed harvesting and management. Direct linkage to a fishery certified or wishing to become certified by the MSC is not a requirement, although this is an additional point of interest for the MSC.
Type: Research, Undergraduate, Postgraduate (Masters)
Eligibility:  Qualifying projects will:
  • Have the objective of studying some aspect of environmental improvement, performance or best practice in fisheries and seafood product traceability and supply chain management. This may be a direct study of one particular fishery or a comparative study of fisheries problems or management. The project can be desk- or field-based.
  • Direct linkage to a fishery certified or wishing to become certified by the MSC is not a requirement, although this is an additional point of interest for the MSC.
  • The MSC also has a strong interest in identifying, assessing and managing the risks in seafood supply chains, for example, product substitution and mislabelling, traceability and DNA testing.
  • Applications are particularly welcome for research projects in Asia, South America and Africa.
Selection Criteria: Qualifying projects will:
Have the objective of studying some aspect of impact, improvement, performance or best practice in fisheries management and or seafood supply chain management. This may be direct study of one particular fishery or comparative study of fisheries problems or management. Direct linkage to a fishery certified or wishing to become certified by the MSC is not a requirement, although this is an additional point of interest for the MSC.
  • All applications will be initially assessed on comparable scoring criteria. A maximum of five applications of the highest scoring applications will then be submitted for evaluation by the MSC scholarship research award review panel. The MSC Director of Science & Standards reserves the right for final decision of the scholarship award.
  • Your application will be acknowledged with 1 week of the closing date. If you do not hear back from the MSC within that time, you should contact us immediately.
  • All applicants will be informed of the outcome of their application within 6 weeks of the closing date
Number of Awards: A maximum of five
Value of Award: The MSC awards travel and study scholarships, up to the value of £4,000 to eligible undergraduate and postgraduate students worldwide.
Duration of Program: The project must be completed within 12 months of the start date stated on the application form, and the final project report must be submitted within 15 months of the start date.
Application form to be completed and returned via email to Lucy Erickson, MSC Science Communications Manager: Scholarship@msc.org
Award Providers: Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)

East African Development Bank (EADB) STEM University Scholarship Program for Teachers and Lecturers from East African Countries 2018

Application Deadline: 7th March, 2018.
Eligible Countries: Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda and Uganda
To Be Taken At (Country): Rutgers University in New Jersey, USA.
About the Award: In partnership with the Africa-America Institute (AAI), the East African Development Bank (EADB) launched the EADB Math, Science, Technology and Engineering University Scholarship Program in 2015 to support the capacity of regional faculty teaching in fields (science, technology, engineering and math) which are critical to local employment and the growth of national economies. The fast-track, 12 month scholarships provide experienced teachers and lecturers from EADB member countries (Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda and Uganda) to earn a Masters’ degree in science, technology, engineering and Math (STEM) at Rutgers University in New Jersey, USA.
Since 2015, eight students have received this full scholarship to pursue a graduate degree at Rutgers University. As alumni, they have returned to their respective countries and are contributing towards building a skilled workforce in STEM fields in East Africa.
Fields of Study: The following Masters Degrees are eligible under the EADB-AAI STEM Graduate Program:
  • Math Education
  • Science Education
  • Cell and Developmental Biology(MS)
  • Chemical and Biochemical Engineering (ME)
  • Industrial and Systems Engineering (MS)    
Type: Masters
Eligibility: To be eligible for this prestigious scholarship, candidate must meet the following requirements:
  • Be a citizen of one of the following countries: Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda and Uganda
  • A university graduate with a bachelor’s degree with first class/upper second honors in mathematics, sciences or engineering
  • Have at least three (3) years of teaching experience in a STEM related field at a public institution in East Africa;
  • Currently working full-time in public, government-owned educational institutions
  • Committed to returning to their home country, to teach in a public government owned institution which is a mandatory requirement.
  • Diligent in successfully completing the application process by the allotted deadlines at Rutgers University
Number of Awards: Not specified
Value of Award: full scholarship
Duration of Program: 12 months
How to Apply: 
  • Interested applicants are to download, fill and submit the Application Form alongside other required documents.
  • Send your application to EADB@aaionline.org, with the above information.
  • All submissions must be in Microsoft Word or PDF format. Terms and conditions apply. Application deadline is March 7, 2018.
It is important to go through the procedures for application before and while applying.
Award Providers: Africa-America Institute (AAI), the East African Development Bank (EADB)

Mwalimu Nyerere African Union Scholarship for Female Students in African Countries 2018/2019

Application Deadline: 30th April 2018
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: African Union Member Countries
To be taken at (country): African Union Member Countries
About the Award: The Mwalimu Nyerere African Union Scholarship Scheme was launched in 2007 with the aim of contributing to the production and retention of high caliber African human capital for sustainable development of the continent in critical development areas, while promoting regional integration through intra-Africa mobility of students. The Scholarship Scheme is intended to enable young Africans to study in reputable African Universities with a binding agreement that beneficiaries will work in any African country for at least the same duration of scholarship period after graduation.
Fields of Study: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Type: Masters, PhD
Eligibility: To be eligible for the Scholarship, a candidate must:
  • Be a Female Citizen of an African Union Member State
  • Be under the age of thirty five (35) years for Masters Programmes; and under forty (40) years for PhD Programmes.
  • Be a holder of a Bachelor’s Degree in the relevant field, at the level of Upper Second Class Honours for a Masters’ Programme; and a holder of Masters’ Degree in the relevant field for a PhD Programme. The degree must be from a reputable University
  • Have demonstrated outstanding academic achievement as evidenced by academic transcripts, and academic awards if any.
  • Have proof of admission to undertake a full time Masters or PhD programme in a recognized university of an African Union Member State.
  • Be willing to commit to work in an African Union Member State on completion of studies for at least three (3) years.
Selection Criteria: The Scholarships are granted on academic merit and based on a rigorous selection process.
Number of Awardees: 
  • Undergraduate Degree Programmes (4 Scholarships)
  • Master’s Degree Programmes (2 Scholarships )
Value of Scholarship: The scholarship award covers the following:
  • Tuition Fees: According to an official invoice from the Host University.
  • Stipend: 500 US$ monthly, to support living expenses such as housing, food, utilities, local transportation and medication.
  • Book Allowance: An allowance of 500 US$ per year for the purchase of books.
  • Air ticket: A round-trip economy fare for the most direct route between the beneficiary’s home country and the study destination of host Institute.
  • Travel Allowance:
    • One-off payment of 250 US$ to contribute towards ground transportation from airport and settling-in costs
    • One-off payment of 350 US$ to assist with shipping and other terminal expenses; upon departure from the host Institution after successful completion of the study.
  • Computer Allowance: One-off payment of 1,000 US$ for the purchase of laptop computer and accessories.
Duration of Scholarship: The Masters programme should be of two years duration; while the PhD programme should be of three years duration.
How to Apply: Interested candidates should complete the Application Form in PDF format as well as the EXCEL Applicants’ Data Sheet, which are available on the Africa Union website:
www.au.int/en/scholarship
The applicants should submit their formal application which should include the following:
  • Completed application form
  • Recent passport-size photograph
  • Summarized CV with names and contacts of two referees.
  • Certified copies of academic certificates and transcripts
  • Certified copies of Passport or national Identity Card indicating citizenship
  • Copy of admission letter from a reputable African University
  • Two (2) Reference Letters with contact addresses.
  • An essay of not more than 500 words that explains why the candidate has chosen her particular field of study and its importance to Africa’s development.
Note that Electronic Copies of all the above documents should be submitted.
Applicants must scan and produce electronic copies of all the above documents (converted to PDF format) and send to the following e-mail address.
OlgaA@africa-union.org
copied to
mwalimunyerere@africa-union.org
In addition two (2) sets of hard copies of the above documents must be sent by post to the address below.
Mwalimu Nyerere Scholarship Programme
Education Division
Department of Human Resources, Science and Technology
African Union Commission
P.O. Box 3243
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Award Provider: Mwalimu Nyerere African Union Scholarship Scheme, African Union.
Important Notes: Candidates must complete all academic work within the specified period of the programme as the scholarship cannot be extended.

Polish president signs bill censoring free speech about the Holocaust

Clara Weiss 
Polish President Andrzej Duda signed into law Tuesday a bill censoring free speech about the Holocaust, after it has been passed by the lower and upper houses of the Polish parliament.
The bill criminalizes the use of the term “Polish death camp” for death camps such as Auschwitz or Sobibor that were built by the Nazis in occupied Poland during the Second World War. Both Polish and foreign citizens can be punished with up to three years in prison for using this term. The bill also penalizes people who are deemed to be ascribing crimes against the Jews to “the Polish nation” or the “Polish state.”
The law is a far-reaching assault on free speech. Even while it formally states that “scientific and artistic” creations are exempted, it will not only stifle public discourse on major issues such as Polish anti-Semitism and pogroms by Poles against Jews, but also impede scientific research.
For instance, a Holocaust survivor whose relatives were murdered by Poles or handed over by Poles to the Nazis could now be put on trial if his or her testimony could be interpreted as ascribing blame “to the Polish nation.”
The law will have massive implications for public education and public discussion. Moreover, there is little doubt that it is but a first step toward much further restrictions of free speech and scientific research into this and other parts of Polish history.
Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, the curator of the core exhibit of the POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw, has warned of the “chilling effects” that this law would have on scientific research. Other historians, including Barbara Engelking, one of the main experts of the history of the Warsaw Ghetto, have also spoken out against the bill. So have several foundations, among them the Center for Research on the Holocaust in Poland, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, and Yad Vashem in Israel.
In spite of this criticism, representatives of the ruling Law and Justice Party (PiS) and Polish President Duda continue to defend the bill adamantly. Duda declared in a televised address that the bill “protects Polish interests ... our dignity, the historical truth ... so that we are not slandered as a state and as a nation.”
JarosÅ‚aw KaczyÅ„ski, the head of PiS, argued that the bill “is being interpreted totally wrong.” It would penalize everyone blaming the “Polish nation” but not “someone who says that somewhere, in some village, some place, a Jewish family or one Jewish person was murdered. I'm saying this with pain and regret and with a sense of shame but such things did happen and we never denied that.”
This is, of course, a blatant lie. PiS education minister Anna Zalewska has asserted publicly that she wasn’t certain about who was responsible for two of the most notorious anti-Jewish pogroms that were committed by Poles, that of Jedwabne of 1941, and the Kielce pogrom of 1946 (more than a year after the destruction of the Third Reich).
Antoni Macierewicz, the country’s defense minister, who is considered the most powerful figure after Kaczynski himself, is a well-known anti-Semite and edited anti-Jewish publications in the 1990s which denied that pogroms such as the one in Kielce in the summer of 1946 were committed by Poles.
The entire campaign against the term “Polish death camps” started and initially focused on the figure of Jan Tomasz Gross, a Polish-American sociologist who kicked off a major public debate in Poland with his book on the pogrom of Jedwabne in the summer of 1941. This pogrom, which killed some 350 Jews, was carried out largely by Poles from the village and surrounding area, with the support of the Nazi occupiers.
Like thousands of Polish Jews, Gross was forced to leave the country with his family due to the anti-Semitic campaign by the Stalinist bureaucracy in 1968-69. Ever since his book came out, he has been the center of attacks by Polish nationalists and the far-right with implicit or overt anti-Semitic overtones. The campaign by PiS against him since 2015-16 has encouraged these forces, by portraying Gross deliberately as someone who would defame the Polish nation, an old trope of anti-Semites.
The language and argumentation of the bill need to be understood in this context. It deliberately picks up and caters to the argumentation of the Polish right, which traditionally has hidden its far-right views and anti-Semitism, usually only for a brief time, behind references to Poles who saved Jews or the deliberate Nazi murder of masses of Poles. To a hitherto unprecedented degree, their arguments are now being sanctioned and promoted by the state.
In a particularly scandalous incident of this campaign, the director of the state-run television station TVP 2, Marcin Wolski, suggested that the Nazi death camps should be called “Jewish” camps, asking rhetorically: “Who managed the crematoria there?” This despicable and cynical reference to the Sonderkommandos who were forced to manage the crematoria at gunpoint and were recruited from the camp’s prisoners, many of them Jewish, fell just short of the old fascist argument that the Jews themselves were to blame for the Nazi genocide.
On his show, Wolski also provided a platform for RafaÅ‚ Ziemkiewicz, a well-known nationalist writer who calls himself an “endek” (adherent of Poland’s fascist endecja tendency which was founded by Roman Dmowski), and has published anti-Semitic slurs on his twitter account.
The PiS law has provoked outrage and disgust internationally, and for good reason. Yet workers and youth in Poland and internationally must not lend any credibility to the fraudulent outcries by the Israeli and American governments.
While now in a diplomatic feud with PiS, the Israeli government has uttered no word of condemnation of the historical revisionism that is being promoted by the right-wing Ukrainian government in Kiev, that was brought to power in a coup backed by the US and EU that involved fascist forces.
The US government has expressed disappointment about the bill, with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson stating that the law “adversely affects freedom of speech and academic inquiry.”
Yet it is US imperialism that has been central to promoting and arming the far-right in both Ukraine and Poland. Poland has been a key military ally of the US ever since 1989, especially in the military build-up against Russia. Under Trump, the US government has started to openly back the project of reviving the Intermarium alliance against both Russia and Germany, an alliance that has historically been based on nationalist and far-right forces, led by Warsaw.
These forces are now openly supported by the governments in both Ukraine and Poland, which combine their support with the whitewashing of their bloody and criminal history. Since 2014, the Ukrainian government has issued a series of laws that glorify the far-right Ukrainian Insurrection Army (UPA) and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, both of which were responsible for mass murders of Jews, often in complicity with the Nazis, and the mass murder of Poles. The Ukrainian Institute of National Memory (UINP), which is funded by the government, actively promotes Holocaust revisionism.
The New York Times, which greeted the Kiev coup in February 2014 as a “revolution” and has covered up for these right-wing policies for years, has recently started publishing op-eds that express concern with these developments. In an op-ed in January, Lev Gorokin criticized “the American Jewish community—including Jewish lawmakers in Washington” for being “largely silent about the widespread Holocaust distortion being carried out by Eastern European allies.”
In early February, the Times published a piece by Marci Shore, a professor at Yale University, who criticized the PiS bill as a way for Poland “to dig itself a memory hole.” Shore has no right to lecture anyone about “memory holes” and historical revisionism. Like her husband, Timothy Snyder, she has authored countless articles, and toured conferences and think tanks, to glorify the right-wing “Maidan” uprising, promote anti-Russian sentiments, and spread lies about what was going on in Ukraine. As academic cheerleaders for the policies of US imperialism in Eastern Europe, she and her ilk in academia and the media share political responsibility for what is happening now in both Poland and Ukraine.
Such articles and statements such as the one by Rex Tillerson express a real concern not with historical truth or free speech, but about the fact that Washington’s most important allies in Eastern Europe for the war preparations against Russia are being discredited internationally and weakened domestically through their unabashed support for the far-right and Holocaust revisionism.
For the working class, the actions by the PiS government and the developments in Ukraine must serve as a warning of the forces that are being unleashed in the drive by US imperialism toward another world war.

Political crisis erupts in the Maldives

Rohantha De Silva

Maldives President Abdulla Yameen on Monday declared a 15-day state of emergency, suspending democratic rights and arresting two Supreme Court judges. The draconian measure was in response to a Supreme Court order on February 1 to immediately release jailed opposition MPs, including former President Mohamed Nasheed and eight other political leaders.
The latest political turmoil in the Maldives is part of the deepening conflict between the Yameen government and the parliamentary opposition led by the pro-US Nasheed. In line with US and Indian geopolitical intrigues against China, Nasheed opposes close strategic and economic relations with Beijing and is fighting for removal of Yameen’s government.
Nasheed issued a statement yesterday calling on India to militarily intervene. “We would like the Indian government to send an envoy, backed by its military, to free the judges and the political detainees,” it stated. He also urged the US to ban all financial transactions by the Maldives government leaders and, in an appeal to India and the US, added: “We must remove him [Yameen].”
Last Thurday’s unanimous Supreme Court ruling favouring the Maldives opposition was a major blow to the Yameen government. Prior to last week’s order the Supreme Court backed Yameen’s authoritarian rule. Its sudden about-face was in response to intense pressure from the US, the European Union and India that have backed the opposition campaign.
The Supreme Court order would remove the current legal obstacles preventing Nasheed from contesting the presidential election due later this year. It declared that prosecutors and judges had been unduly influenced “to conduct politically motivated investigations” into the accusations against Nasheed and other opposition leaders.
The ruling also restored 12 MPs to their seats. They were sacked by Yameen’s Progressive Party after they defected to opposition last year—a move that effectively handed a majority to the opposition.
Fighting for his political survival, Yameen declared in a special television address that the court verdict was “an obstruction of the very ability of the state to function.” Justifying the crackdown, he said that the state of emergency was necessary in order to expose a “plot and a coup” against his government.
As soon as the state of emergency was declared, security forces entered the Supreme Court premises, arresting Chief Justice Abdulla Saeed and another judge Ali Hameed. Abdul Gayoom Maumoon, the half-brother of Yameen and the country’s authoritarian ruler from 1978 until 2011, was also arrested.
The emergency decree gives the security forces sweeping powers of arrest and detention, curtails the authority of the judiciary, scraps immunity for Supreme Court judges and bans public gatherings and protests. The police and military have already used batons and pepper spray against protesting opposition supporters.
Late last night the Maldives government announced that the remaining three Supreme Court judges had revoked last Thursday’s order. In a statement, the judges declared that they had reversed the order “in the light of concerns raised by the President.”
Yameen had opposition leader Nasheed jailed for 13 years on trumped-up charges concerning his arbitrary removal of a former chief justice. Nasheed was released in January 2016 under the pressure from US and Britain and since then the opposition has intensified its campaign to oust Yameen.
Pitching for support from the US and India, Nasheed declares that, under Yameen, the Maldives is on the verge of becoming Beijing’s “colony.” China, he claims, is “buying up” Maldives land, key infrastructure and “effectively buying up our sovereignty.”
Yesterday India’s external affairs ministry issued a statement declaring that it was “disturbed” by the declaration of a state of emergency and “the suspension of constitutional rights of the people.” But to date, New Delhi has not responded Nasheed’s call for military intervention.
India’s has no concern for the democratic rights in the Maldives. Rather New Delhi is determined to become the regional strongman and that means undermining Chinese political and economic influence in the Indo-Pacific.
Although the Maldives is a tiny archipelago of 1,192 islands with a population just over 400,000, it is strategically situated in the India Ocean. It sits astride key sea-lanes from Middle East and Africa to South East Asia and East Asia used by China, Japan, South Korea and India with access to energy and mineral supplies.
India has repeatedly voiced concern about the Maldives’ close relations with China, and in particular its free trade agreement with Beijing last December. Yameen sent Foreign Minister Mohamed Asim to New Delhi to try to reassure the Indian government but to no avail.
Writing yesterday in the Hindustan Times, Constantino Xavier, head of the pro-US Carnegie India think tank, called on India to intervene. Entitled “India must play hardball if it wants to be part of the Maldives’ return to stability,” the article declared, “Delhi should implement sequential pressure that deploys mediation, sets clear targets contingent on red lines, and balances inducements with punitive measure… In the most extreme scenario, India could execute a military intervention.”
In response to the state of emergency declaration, the US National Security Council warned: “The Maldivian government and military must respect the rule of the law, freedom of expression and democratic institutions. The world is watching.” The US State Department issued a similar message, criticising Yameen for jailing opposition leaders and suppressing human rights.
Like New Delhi, Washington’s overriding concern is to install a pro-Western government in Maldives that serves its strategic interests. President Trump has stepped up the confrontational policy of the previous Obama administration towards China throughout Asia.
China has developed close relations with the Maldives to counter Washington’s aggressive moves. Its ambitious One Belt One Road (OBOR) envisages a huge expansion of infrastructure to link the Eurasian landmass, as well as Africa, both by land and sea. Yameen has declared his support for the project.
This week Beijing declared that it was watching the situation in the Maldives closely. Foreign affairs ministry spokesman Geng Shu said that “the relevant parties [in the Maldives] can properly resolve the differences through dialogue and consultation.”
The political crisis and intense in-fighting in the Maldives ruling elite has brought into sharp focus the intense geo-political rivalry in the Indo-Pacific as the US intensifies its strategic drive against China.

Julian Assange loses initial bid to overturn British arrest warrant

Mike Head

A judge in London yesterday rejected an application by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to withdraw a British arrest warrant issued against him in 2012. In a judgment full of obvious contradictions, she ruled that way even though a Swedish-initiated European arrest warrant—the trigger for the British warrant—was cancelled in May 2017.
Despite the trumped-up Swedish government “sexual assault” allegations against Assange being dropped long ago, he still faces immediate arrest if he steps outside the Ecuadorian embassy, where he has been confined for five and a half years in a tiny, windowless room, 15 feet by 13, without access to sunlight, fresh air or exercise.
Swedish authorities last year formally closed their investigation, effectively confirming that there was never any case to investigate in the first place. What was involved was a “dirty tricks” operation aimed at discrediting and paralysing WikiLeaks and putting Assange behind bars, or worse.
Nevertheless, senior district judge Emma Arbuthnot insisted that Assange must still be arrested by the British police, despite no charges of any kind ever being laid against him—not even for skipping bail itself. She claimed this was a “straightforward reading” of the UK Bail Act. Assange had not been charged with “absconding” from bail, but she ruled that he must be brought to court to possibly face such a charge.
After handing down her ruling, the judge agreed to adjourn the hearing until next Tuesday to consider “public interest” arguments submitted by Assange’s lawyers. Tweeting after the ruling, Assange said: “We only lost the first of four points. I was never charged. My asylum was over US extradition and Sweden dropped its so-called ‘preliminary investigation’ a year ago. We are arguing four points ... If we win any point the warrant falls.”
Even if Arbuthnot were to withdraw the arrest warrant next week, however, Assange would still face almost certain arrest and extradition to the United States to be tried for espionage and treason, crimes carrying potential death penalties.
A sealed indictment was drawn up under the Obama administration. The Trump administration’s Attorney General Jeff Sessions said last April that Assange’s arrest remains “a priority.” CIA director Mike Pompeo has described WikiLeaks as “a non-state hostile intelligence service.” James Comey, then the FBI director, last May told a US Senate panel Assange would be arrested “as soon as he stepped outside the embassy.”
As these statements underscore, the US political, military and intelligence establishment is determined to punish Assange and silence WikiLeaks for having exposed its war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan and its diplomatic intrigues and crimes around the world.
This included the release of the “collateral murder” video showing the 2007 US helicopter massacre of 12 Iraqi civilians, the posting of over 250,000 secret US diplomatic cables, and the ongoing publication of thousands of files detailing the CIA’s “malware” operations to secretly seize control of computer networks.
Outside the court, Assange’s lawyer Jennifer Robinson said whether or not the warrant was quashed, Assange would not leave the embassy until he had an assurance he would not be extradited to the US. “Mr Assange remains willing to answer to British justice in relation to any argument about breaching bail, but not at the expense of facing injustice in America,” she said. “This case is and always has been about the risk of extradition to the United States and that risk remains real.”
Robinson pointed out that Assange had already suffered far in excess of any penalty for absconding from bail—possibly a fine or a short term in jail—to seek political asylum in the embassy.
In a written submission to the judge, Assange’s barrister Mark Summers QC said Assange had genuine fears, later proved correct, that the US authorities sought to prosecute him over his work with WikiLeaks. If arrested, Summers stated, Assange would face rendition to the US, treatment similar to that meted out against WikiLeaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning and possible “persecution, indefinite solitary confinement and the death penalty.” Manning spent seven years in a military prison and was subjected to abuse amounting to torture.
In her ruling, Judge Arbuthnot made no mention of this reality. Instead she declared that it was essential to uphold the Bail Act to avoid the “administration of justice” being “undermined.” She flatly dismissed the argument that the arrest warrant was “obsolete” because the “substantive proceedings”—the European warrant—was “no longer in existence.”
Assange’s barrister also submitted a medical report about Assange’s deteriorating health. Summers said Assange was in constant pain, regularly suffered respiratory infections and had significant depression. Judge Arbuthnot, however, said the health issues were “not that bad.”
Assange’s lawyers argued his punishment was not “proportionate” and it was in the court’s interest not to proceed with Bail Act charges. They cited the December 2015 UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention report that condemned Assange’s detention as “arbitrary, unreasonable, unnecessary, disproportionate” and called on Swedish and British authorities to immediately end his “deprivation of liberty’’ and compensate him.
The Westminster Magistrates Court room was packed and protests were conducted outside, demanding Assange’s freedom.
The British government, however, is just as intent on putting Assange away as the US. Before seeking asylum in the embassy, Assange was jailed in Wandsworth Prison in isolation for 10 days and then put under house arrest for 550 days under powers granted by the European warrant. Scotland Yard mounted a 24/7 police presence outside the Ecuadorian Embassy for three years and remains committed to arresting him. In 2015, the UK government refused an earlier request for Assange to access hospital treatment without the threat of arrest.
In a bid to end the impasse in its embassy, Ecuador recently granted Assange citizenship and tried unsuccessfully to persuade British officials to give him diplomatic status, which might have allowed him to leave Britain even if he was sought by US officials.
Assange, an Australian citizen, was forced to seek Ecuadorian assistance because successive Australian governments have closely collaborated in the US drive to capture him. In 2010, Prime Minister Julia Gillard vilified his actions as illegal and established a taskforce of Australian intelligence and police officers to actively aid US efforts to fabricate criminal charges against Assange and others.

6 Feb 2018

Africa Food Prize (Win up to USD100,000) 2018

Application Deadline: 15th May, 2018
Offered annually? Yes
Eligible Countries: Countries in Africa
To be taken at (country):  The Prize will be awarded annually at the Africa Food Prize gala dinner in Kigali, Rwanda.
About the Award: The Africa Food Prize evolved from the Yara Prize, which was established in 2005. With agriculture emerging as Africa’s best bet for increasing food security and expanding economic opportunity,  a $100,000 award called the Africa Food Prize, has been created to inspire innovations in the field and the marketplace.
Today, in places like Ghana and elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa there are glimpses of the enormous progress African farmers can make when they have what they need to succeed, and how the food they produce and the income they earn can send good vibrations throughout the economy. But many challenges remain. In addition to a dearth of financing, millions of farmers lack understanding of good agricultural practices and they have limited or no access to high quality agricultural inputs, safe storage, and basic processing, which collude to stifle production and income opportunities.
Type: Contest, Entrepreneurship
Eligibility:
  • The Africa Food Prize can be awarded to any individual or identifiable group of individuals, as well as to established institutions, associations, organizations or government bodies with a formal and recognized judicial and organizational structure contributing to the overall objectives of the Prize.
  • The Prize can be awarded to any qualified candidate, irrespective of nationality, profession or location, whose work, and contributions deriving from the work, has had a clear impact on the African situation, nationally, regionally or for the continent.
  • The Prize can be awarded with reference to a specific contribution or achievement, or a series of efforts and results in the recent past, preferably within the last few years. Current or recent members of the Africa Food Prize Committee, or an institution/ organization headed by such a member, are ineligible for the Prize.
  • The Prize cannot be awarded to a person already deceased, but will be presented in the event a Prize winner dies before receiving the Prize. The Prize can be awarded to more than one winner, but not more than two.
  • If shared, each winner will receive equal prize money (USD 100 000 divided in two), a diploma and a trophy.
Selection Criteria:
  • Contribution to reducing poverty and hunger and/or improving food and nutrition security in measurable terms
  • Contribution to providing a vital source of income and/or employment in measurable terms
  • Potential for transformative change through scalability, replication, and sustainability
  • Increased awareness and cooperation among African audiences and organizations
  • Proven leadership potential of the individual or organization, specifically the ability of the to persevere desp
Number of Awardees: One (1). The Africa Food Prize Committee chooses the Africa Food Prize winner by unanimous vote. The Prize Committee has absolute authority and its decisions cannot be overruled or appealed.
Value of Award:  $100,000, a diploma and a trophy.
How to Apply: Please fill the nomination form and submit it through any of the following three methods:
  1. Complete the form, attach the supporting documents and submit it online
  2. Complete the form, save and send it to nominations@africafoodprize.org attaching the supporting documents
  3. Complete the form, print it together with the supporting documents and deliver it either physically or by post to:
The Africa Food Prize Secretariat
West End Towers, Floor 4,
Kanjata Road, Off Waiyaki Way,
Nairobi, Kenya.
OR mail it to:
The Africa Food Prize Secretariat
P O Box 66773-00800 Westlands,
Nairobi, Kenya.
Award Provider: The Africa Food Prize Committee

Employment-Based Scholarship Postgraduate Programme for International Students in Ireland 2018

Application Deadlines:
  • Applicant deadline: 16:00 (Irish time) 12 April 2018FAQ deadline: 16:00 (Irish time) 5th April 2018
  • Supervisor, employment mentor and referee deadline: 16:00 (Irish time) 19th April 2018
  • Research office endorsement deadline: 16:00 (Irish time) 26th April 2018
Eligible Countries: All
To Be Taken At (Country): Ireland
About the Award: The Council offers opportunities for suitably qualified individuals to take up an employment-based award to carry out research leading to a postgraduate qualification in any discipline, granted by an eligible HEI within Ireland. The application for a scholarship is developed by the applicant, in collaboration with an Employment Partner and host HEI. Awardees have, for the term of the award, dual status as employee of the employment partner and postgraduate student of the host HEI.
Application for a scholarship can be made in respect of both a Masters Degree by Research or a PhD.
Irish Red Cross Health in Justice Programme: The Irish Red Cross and Irish Prison Services fund the Irish Red Cross Health in Justice programme. This partnership will support one 48-month PhD application under the Employment-Based Postgraduate Programme 2018.
Fields of Study: The Scholarship supports research across all disciplines
Type: Masters, Research, PhD
Eligibility: Scholars must fulfil the following criteria:
  • must not have applied more than once to the Scheme and at the time of application:
  • be a new entrant to the degree for which they are to receive Council funding and have been formally accepted by the relevant department/school by, at the latest, 1st October 2018; or
  • fulfil the criteria in Clause 4.5 if already registered and part of the degree has been completed.
and in the case of
  • Research Masters Scholarships, not currently holding or having previously held a Council Postgraduate Scholarship.
  • Degree Scholarships, not currently holding or having previously held any Council Postgraduate Scholarship other than those which would enable them to obtain a Research Masters Degree.
  • Scholars from any country may hold a Council Postgraduate Scholarship. However, Scholars must:
    • maintain her/his principal residence in Ireland (as defined) during the period of the Scholarship.
    • satisfy the State’s regulations on immigration and have the support of their HEI and Employment Partner with respect to these regulations and requirements if not a national of a member state of the European Union (EU). This must be completed in advance of signing a contract with the IRC.
    • For all Scholarships, arrangements with respect to immigration will be a matter forsettlement between the Scholar, his/her HEI, the Employment Partner, and therelevant immigration authorities of the State.
Number of Awards: Not specified
Value of Award: The total value of the Employment Based Programme Scholarship, will be up to a maximum of €24,000 in any approved year for the duration of the Scholarship and will consist of the following:
  • A contribution of €16,000 to the employment of the Scholar.
  • A contribution of up to a maximum of €5,750 to Scholarship fees (including non-EU Scholarship fees). In the event of any differential between this contribution and the institutional fee, this must be paid by the Scholar and/or HEI and/or Employment Partner. Scholars who hold a fee waiver from their HEI, or where no fee is required, or where fees are paid in full or in part by a third party, must inform the Council and the appropriate offices in their HEI and will not be eligible for the fee portion of the Scholarship.
  • Eligible direct research expenses of €2,250 per annum to enable the scholar to carry out the research project. Please see Appendix III for guidance on what is considered an eligible direct research cost.
Duration of Award: 
  • All Scholarships will commence with effect from 1st October 2018 (no later or  earlier).
  • The duration of funding to be given for the Scholarship is dependent on the type of degree being pursued and the date of first registration.
How to Apply: Applications (including academic supervisor, employment mentor and referee forms) will only be accepted through the online application system. The online application system will open shortly, and a guide for applicants will be posted on this page.
Award Providers: Irish Research Council
Important Notes: once the online application system opens, guideline documents will be made available here for applicants, supervisors, employment mentors, referees and research offices.