9 May 2018

Putin begins his fourth term as Russia’s president

Clara Weiss

On Monday, May 7, Vladimir Putin was inaugurated for his fourth term as president of Russia. His presidency will be shaped by growing encirclement and pressure by US imperialism and by social struggles at home as the new government prepares to launch far-reaching attacks on the working class.
A pompous inauguration ceremony on Monday was preceded on Saturday by mass arrests of anti-Putin protesters, including supporters of the nationalist, right-wing, pro-Western opposition politician Alexei Navalny. More than 1,600 people were arrested, including Navalny himself. He was released on Sunday. Putin was reelected in the presidential elections of March 18 with over 76 percent of the vote. He is set to remain president until 2024.
In his inaugural speech, Putin, echoed his last address on the state of the nation, combining the whipping up of nationalism with phony promises of social reforms and an announcement of far-reaching economic changes.
Putin began his inaugural speech by saying that he acknowledged “the responsibility before you,...before Russia, a country of grandiose victories and achievements” and “before the 1,000-year-old history of Russian statehood.” He declared his commitment to a “holy relationship toward our native soil” and stated: “I consider it the goal and sense of my entire life to do everything for Russia.” He went on praising the Russian Constitution which was passed 25 years ago, in 1993, to solidify the new capitalist property relations that had been introduced by the Stalinist bureaucracy with its dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Putin argued that the past quarter century had shown that “all beauty and power lies in our autonomy [samobytnost’] and unity” and that Russia had learned “to defend our interests.” He declared that Russia was willing to collaborate with all states in the world “to our mutual benefit” and “in the interests of stability on the planet.” However, Putin stressed, the focus of his next term in office would be on “domestic” issues and major changes in the Russian economy.
Under conditions where the US Navy just launched a new fleet to escalate war preparations against Russia, Putin made little to no mention of the growing imperialist encirclement, stating only that the country was able to defend itself and that its defense capabilities would be secured in the future as well. As in his speech on the state of the nation in early March, Putin made no mention of the US and EU sanctions that have had a devastating effect on the Russian economy.
Putin formulated a series of goals for his presidency until 2024. In exceedingly vague terms, he promised to make Russia one of the top five economic powerhouses in the world, and one with particular success in cutting-edge technologies (where Russia is now hopelessly lagging behind); turn it into one of the top 10 countries with the best education; reduce the official poverty rate by half; introduce full coverage of child support for working mothers and assure a “better quality of life“ for the elderly; etc.
The proposals, totaling more than four pages and encompassing virtually every sphere of social and economic life, essentially suggest that Russia, 25 years after the restoration of capitalism and amid a deepening crisis of the world capitalist system, could become within the next few years the most successful capitalist economy that has ever existed, combining an almost unrestrained free market with near-perfect provision of health care, education and ideal working conditions for the population.
This is, of course, sheer demagogy. No such proposals are realizable under the rule of the criminal oligarchy that Putin represents. His demagogy served a definite purpose of covering up what he and the new cabinet that is now being put in place are actually preparing: a whole-scale attack on working class living standards and privatizations as part of a marked shift toward making major concessions to both the liberal opposition and the demands of international finance capital.
Much of the speech by Putin and his proposals were almost literal quotations from the report “A Strategy for the Development of the Country, 2018-2024,” which he had earlier commissioned from the Center for Strategic Research (CSR). The CSR is headed by the former finance minister and close Putin ally Alexei Kudrin, who is generally considered to be the greatest darling of both the liberal opposition and the world financial elite among Putin’s inner circle.
Apart from similar demagogic and vague promises for a better social future, the report was more open about the actual direction in which the Kremlin should head: “Until 2024 entrepreneurial freedom will be guaranteed in Russia on a new level, real competition in the economy will be secured. … State policy will be aimed at a partnership with private business and a reduction of the direct involvement of the state in the economy.” Key proposals—not mentioned by Putin on Monday—include:
• The reduction of control and overseeing functions of the state in the business sector by half.
• The selling of state assets that are not “essential” to the functioning of the company.
• An increased role for non-profit organizations (NGOs) in providing social services, while state involvement in providing them is to be cut.
• An increase in labor productivity by a third.
• Raising the retirement age to 63 for men and 65 for women. The Russian government has already announced in late April that it is actively working on realizing this demand.
• The facilitation of rules for customs and tariffs and lowering of taxes for both domestic and foreign companies.
• Salaries for state employees should be tied to their work performance.
• A number of measures toward granting cities and regions more autonomy, such as the creation of city police forces, as opposed to the current police acting on a federal level, as well as more control by cities and regions over local taxes.
• The creation of professional army with all members of the armed forces to be working on a contractual basis.
• A further reduction of military spending.
The “expert team” of Kudrin’s center has characteristics of a parallel government. It includes multiple members of the Putin’s cabinet as well as of various presidential councils, the Finance Ministry and other government agencies. Included among its members, to name but a few, are German Gref, the head of the Sberbank, the largest bank in Russia, a regional governor, and Vladimir Mau, a member of the President’s Economic Council and the board of Gazprom, who is also a former co-worker of Yegor Gaidar, one of the heads of the notorious “shock therapy” with which capitalism was restored in Russia.
The fact that the Kremlin is now determined to enact these proposals is also shown by his proposed new government. Putin has nominated Dmitry Medvedev to continue as prime minister. Medvedev, in turn, nominated a number of people close to Kudrin for ministerial positions.
The most significant nomination was that of Anton Siluanov, who as first vice prime minister would be in charge of the Ministry of Finance. Siluanov started his career in the finance ministry of what was then the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) during the early stages of perestroika, in 1985-1987, and continued it in the ministry of finance during capitalist restoration until 1992. He has worked as the vice-finance minister under Kudrin for several years. Tatiana Golikova, the proposed new minister for social and labor issues, has also worked closely with Kudrin in the past. The nominated ministers still must be confirmed by both the parliament and the president.
The attempts by the Kremlin to appease discontented factions within the oligarchy and the demands of international finance capital through privatizations and attacks on the working class will inevitably lead to a growth of social struggles in Russia. Meanwhile, the concessions in the realm of the economy will by no means ease the aggression of imperialism. On the contrary, they will encourage further pressure and military provocations aimed at isolating Russia and preparing for war to achieve its complete subordination to imperialism.

8 May 2018

World Bank Group ACE II Masters Scholarships for Female African Students 2018

Application Deadline: 4th June 2018 (5.00 PM East African Time)

Eligible Countries: ACE II participating countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia) or Burundi

To Be Taken At (Country):

About the Award: The World Bank is partnering with eight Governments in Eastern and Southern Africa in an innovative project with the aim of improving the quality of training and research in higher education, and reducing the skill gaps in key development priority areas.
The Eastern and Southern Africa Higher Education Centers of Excellence (ACE II) Project supports the governments of Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia in strengthening selected African Centers of Excellence (ACEs) to deliver quality post-graduate education and build collaborative research capacity in the following priority areas: (i) Industry, (ii) Agriculture, (iii) Health, (iv) Education, and (v) Applied Statistics.
The ACE II Project implements three components, namely (i) strengthening the 24 higher education institutions into regional ACEs in Eastern and Southern Africa in a set of defined regional priority areas (US$ 140 million); (ii) providing capacity building support to these ACEs through regional activities (US$3 million); and (iii) supporting coordination and management of the implementation of components (i) and (ii) (US$5 million).

Type: Masters

Eligibility: In order to be eligible for the ACE II Masters Scholarships, applicant must:
  • i) be a female national of one of ACE II participating countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia) or Burundi
  • ii) be under the age of thirty five (35) years
  • iii) be a holder of a Bachelor’s Degree from a reputable university in the relevant field, at the level of Upper Second Class Honours
  • iv) have been admitted in any of the 24 ACEs to study full-time in any of the priority disciplines of the ACE II Project: (i) STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) or Industry, (ii) Agriculture, (iii) Health, (iv) Education, and (v) Applied Statistics;
  • v) have demonstrated outstanding academic achievement as evidenced by academic transcripts, and academic awards, if any.
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award: The provided financial support for each of the ACE II Masters Scholarships will cover:
  • i) University tuition fees: Approximately USD 3,000 per year (payable directly to the Host University according to an official invoice)
  • ii) Stipend: USD 800 per month to support living expenses such as housing, food, utilities, local transportation, medication and settlement expenses
  • iii) Research: USD 4,800 to support student research, payable upon approval of research proposal
  • iv) Allowance: USD 2,000 one-off allowance to cover visa, laptop and books
  • v) Air ticket: A round-trip economy fare for the most direct route between the beneficiary’s home country and the study destination of Host University
Duration of Programme: 24 months.

How to Apply: To apply for the ACE II Masters Scholarships, interested candidates are advised to fill in the application form found at
www.iucea.org   or   ace2.iucea.org attach all requested documents, and send by e-mail to exsec@iucea.org with a copy to ace2rfu@iucea.org. All applications must be received not later than 5.00 PM East African Time on June 4 2018.

For proof of eligibility, an applicant should ensure that the following are provided:
  1. Completed application form
  2.  Recent passport-size photograph
  3. Summarized CV with names and contacts of two referees
  4. Certified copies of academic certificates and transcripts
  5. Certified copies of passport or national identity card indicating citizenship
  6.  Copy of admission letter from one of the host universities (please refer to the attached table on Countries, ACEs and Universities)
Visit the Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: World Bank Group, Participating Governments in Eastern and Southern Africa.

Important Notes: Candidates must complete all academic work within the specified period of the programme as the scholarship cannot be extended beyond a maximum of 24 months.

Government of Canada Postdoctoral Fellowships for International Scientists 2018

Application Deadline: 19th September, 2018 (20:00 EDT)

Offered Annually? Yes

To be taken at (country): Canada

Fields of Research: 
  • Health research
  • Natural sciences and/or engineering
  • Social sciences and/or humanities
About the Award: The objective of the Banting Postdoctoral Fellowships program is to:
  • attract and retain top-tier postdoctoral talent, both nationally and internationally
  • develop their leadership potential
  • position them for success as research leaders of tomorrow
Fellowships are distributed equally among the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)

Type: Fellowship

Eligibility: 
  • Canadian citizens, permanent residents of Canada and foreign citizens are eligible to apply with the stipulations sstated in the Program (Link below)
  • Applicants to the 2018/2019 Banting Postdoctoral Fellowships program must fulfill or have fulfilled all degree requirements for a PhD, PhD-equivalent or health professional degree stated in the Programme (Link below)
  • Applicants must not hold a tenure-track or tenured faculty position, nor can they be on leave from such a position
Selection Criteria: The Banting Postdoctoral Fellowships program is unique in its emphasis on the synergy between the following:
  • applicant – individual merit and potential to launch a successful research-intensive career
  • host institution – commitment to the research program and alignment with the institution’s strategic priorities
An applicant to the Banting Postdoctoral Fellowships program must complete their application in full collaboration with the proposed host institution.

Number of Awards: 70 fellowships are awarded annually

Value of Program: $70,000 per year (taxable)

Duration of Program: 2 years (non-renewable)

How to Apply: It is important to go through the Application Guide before applying for this Fellowship

Visit Programme Webpage for details

Award Provider: Government of Canada

Important Notes: Interruptions used to extend the eligibility window for degree completion must have occurred after the fulfilment of your degree requirements and before the application submission deadline.

IMD Switzerland Emerging Markets Scholarships for Developing Countries 2018/2019

Application Deadline: 30th September, 2018.
Courses start January 2019.

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Developing countries

To be taken at (country): IMD Switzerland

Eligible Field of Study: Courses offered at the University MBA program

About the Award: IMD offers a variety of MBA scholarships and applicants may apply to several simultaneously, however only one scholarship can be awarded per candidate. Scholarships are granted subject to nomination by the scholarship selection committee, acceptance into the program and confirmation of candidate’s intention to participate in the program by paying the advance deposit of CHF 15,000.
IMD’s choices of scholarship participants continuously earn them the accolades for offering an educational experience second to none. Applying for the IMD MBA program develops technical competence, self-awareness and moral judgment of any candidate.

Type: Masters in Business Administration (MBA)

Eligibility: 
  • A candidate is only eligible for  the program if they have been accepted into an IMD MBA Program.
  • Accepted candidates who demonstrate exceptionally strong leadership potential.
  • Demonstrate financial need by completing the Financial Aid Application
  • Good academic results (GMAT)
  • Strong reference letters
  • Steady career progression
Number of Awardees: 3 scholarships are awarded each year

Value of Scholarship: CHF 200’000 (to be split between the winners of the scholarship)

Duration of Scholarship: Duration of course

How to Apply:
  • Candidates must submit a 750-word essay on the following topic: “It has been said that success in business requires flexibility to be responsive, but also commitment to a recognized set of values. Discuss using your personal and professional experience.”
  • Candidates must submit a completed MBA Financial Aid Application Form (when requested) and submit their essay using the IMD MBA Scholarship Template.
  • It is important to visit the official website (link found below) to access the application form and scholarship template and for detailed information on how to apply for this scholarship.
Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Award Provider: IMD, Switzerland

Days of Dorcas Photography Competition and Workshop for African Female Photographers 2018

Application Deadline: 17th May 2018.

Eligible Countries: African countries

To Be Taken At (Country): Lagos, Nigeria

About the Award: The Days of Dorcas photography competition for African Female Photographers Online Competition is open to photographers across Africa that will be able to attend the workshop in Lagos, Nigeria from Monday the 28th of May 2018 to Saturday the 2nd June 2018.
Workshop Topics to be covered:
  • The best use of existing conditions and the art of mastering low, mid and high tones.
  • Principles of visual storytelling/photo essay.
  • Understanding exposure and making exposure decisions.
  • How lighting directions affect images.
  • LINES: (A) Exploring the association of lines (B) Analyzing lines (C) Forming lines.
  • CROPPING: Altering and changing the content.
Type: Contest, Workshop

Eligibility: 

Phase 1
  • To attend the workshop submit your entry in the online competition. If you are selected among the top entries you will be invited to attend the workshop.
  • Each applicant for the competition must upload 3 photographs on the theme “the elegance of the African people”.
  • Each work must be labelled with the artist’s name, date, title and Days of Dorcas.
    (e.g. obu_peter_2_8_2017_myface_
    kitten_DaysofDorcas).
  • All photographs must have a resolution of 72 dpi with dimension not larger than 1200 X 1800 pixels.
  • All materials (texts and photographs) should be added to the application form for the competition.
  • Each applicant is expected to include a Motivation statement in their competition entry of not more than 300 words of why they want to attend.
  • Applicants whose entries are eligible for the competition will be notified via email within 2 working days.
  • The application for the competition will account for 40% of the total score used to determine the winner of the online competition.
Phase 2
  • All applicants with eligible entries will be contacted to register for the Art635 gallery (if they are not already artists in the gallery) to participate in the competition
  • Once registration for the Art635 gallery is complete, emails will be sent to participants that registered.
  • Once registration for the Art635 gallery is complete, entry for the online competition is now validated.
Phase 3
  • Among the eligible applicants the top 25 will be shortlisted and invited for the workshop.
  • The workshop attendants will be sent an information pack email with more instructions.
  • Workshop attendants will attend the workshop were the winners of the online competition will be decided on the last day.
Number of Awards: 25.

Value of Award: 
  • Grand Prize: Canon EOS 80D DSLR camera + a Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM Lens + a Canon Backpack BP10(worth $2,000.00)
  • 1st runner-up: Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM Lens + a Canon Backpack BP10(worth $1,000.00)
Other Prizes/ Opportunities
  • All workshop participants will receive certificates of attendance and be noted as finalists of the 2018 GTBank art635 Gallery Days of Dorcas photography workshop.
  • All workshop participants will be included in an Exhibition organised by the Art635 gallery.
  • All workshop participants will receive mentorship from the facilitators of the Days of Dorcas workshop.
  • All workshop participants will be offered all the opportunities available to artists of the GTBank Art635 gallery.
Duration of Programme: Online Competition is open to photographers across Africa that will be able to attend the workshop in Lagos, Nigeria from Monday the 28th of May 2018 to Saturday the 2nd June 2018.

How to Apply: Apply Here

Visit the Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: The Days of Dorcas Photography Workshop for African Female Photographers is a corporate social responsibility initiative of Guaranty Trust Bank plc

Visa Everywhere Initiative in Sub Sahara Africa for African Entrepreneurs (USD25,000 Prize) 2018

Application Deadline: 18th May 2018

Eligible Countries: Sub Sahara African countries

To Be Taken At (Country): The Visa Everywhere Intiative for Sub-Saharan Africa Finals will take place in Johannesburg, South Africa.

About the Award: Visa Everywhere Initiative is a global open innovation program tapping into startup communities to drive regional business objectives, curate the startup ecosystem for Visa clients and accelerate bigger and bolder ideas, enriching consumer experience.
Wherever you want to be, Visa’s Everywhere Initiative helps you get there. Coming to Sub Sahara Africa for the first time, Visa’s Everywhere Initiative offers participants a chance to win up 50 000usd and a chance to have a support development program with Visa business or partnership with Visa’s partners.

Fields: 
  • To move away from cash on delivery (COD) culture for ecommerce in Africa: How can your startup leverage Visa Developer APIs to either: Enable smaller merchants to accept payments in-store digitally OR Provide a safe and secure solution for online merchants to drive eCommerce and reduce cash on delivery?
  • Leveraging partner social media platforms like FaceBook to create amazing bank to business onboarding user journeys in order to remotely enable businesses to accept digital payments: How can your company use Visa’s APIs to leverage mass reach partner platforms like Facebook to help businesses operating in fast-paced consumer centric environments improve cash flow and receive payments?
Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility: The Visa Everywhere Intiative for Sub-Saharan Africa is open to fin-tech entrepreneurs in sub-Saharan African countries.

Number of Awards: 3

Value of Award: 
  • 3 winners of 25 000 usd each.
  • Each Company selected as a Brief Winner will be awarded $25,000 DOLLARS. If Visa determines in its sole discretion that a Brief Winner has created a standout solution, Visa may provide further investment and mentoring support to that Brief Winner, subject to the parties agreeing a suitable development program and additional terms for the investment.
Duration of Programme: The Visa Everywhere Intiative for Sub-Saharan Africa Finals will take place on 7th July 2018.

How to Apply: Apply Here

Visit the Programme Webpage for Details

Award Providers: Visa Everywhere Intiative

Chinese Government African Union Scholarships (Masters and PhD) for African Students 2018/2019

Application Deadline: 29th June 2018

Eligible Countries: African countries

To be taken at (University): Scholarships will be taken in the following universities (See list of universities below)

Fields of Study: Various (Click to view acceptable fields of study in the various university links above)

About the Award: The Department of Human Resources, Science and Technology of  the African Union Commission has the role of coordinating AU programs in education and human resource development; science, technology and innovation and youth empowerment.
The Department provides technical support to Member states in the development and implementation of programs towards harmonisation, intra-African collaboration, and experience sharing, as well as quality assurance in these fields as contribution to the attainment of AU vision of integration, peace and prosperity in Africa. The Government of the People’s Republic of China has made Chinese Government African Union Scholarships offers to the AU through the Department of Human Resources, Science and Technology, to enable Africans to study in China for the 2018/2019 academic year.

Type: Masters, PhD

Eligibility: To be eligible for the Chinese Government African Union Scholarships:
  • The scholarships are open to all African nationals who meet the Admission requirements set below
  • The language of instruction shall be English
  • Candidate with potential, motivation and desire to play transformative roles in Africa, are encouraged to apply
Admission Requirements: Candidates applying for the Chinese Government African Union Scholarships must fufil the following
  • Undergraduate degree from a recognised university with at least a second class upper or its equivalent, in a relevant field
  • For Doctoral Candidates (Master’s degree in a relevant field is required)
    • Maximum age of 35 years
  • Fluency in English as it is the teaching language
  • Candidate may be willing to undergo a written or oral examination after pre-selection
Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Program: The scholarship will cover the cost related to teaching and the administration of the university and the living expenses of the students from the fund of the foreign aid, supervising thesis.
  • The cost related to teaching includes tuition, teaching materials, field trips and study tours.
  • The basic living expenses include the accommodation, living allowances, the one-time settlement fee, and the medical insurance. Of which, the 3000 RMB of settlement fee will be given to the students in one time.
  • The living allowances (36000 RMB/year for Master students and 42000RMB/year for Doctor students) will be given to the students on a monthly basis. All the other funds will be managed by the university or Chinese
Duration of Program: Duration of program

How to Apply: Applications must be submitted with a cover letter stating motivation and how the qualification will enable you serve the continent
Applications must also be accompanied with the following:
  • Curriculum Vitae including education, work experiemce and publications if any
  • Certified copies of relevant Certificates, transcripts and personal details page of national passport (at least 6 months validity)
  • Clear, coloured passport photograph (3*4)
  • Recommendations from two academic referees,  one professional referee
  • Health certificate
All applicants must apply directly through the respective University website and send copies by email to Caseley Olabode Stephens:   StephensC@africa-union.org.
The Closing date for the submission of applications with all supporting documents is: 29TH June 2018. Applications received after this deadline will NOT be considered


Visit Program Webpage for details

Award Provider: Chinese Government

Report underscores Australian rental affordability crisis

Oscar Grenfell 

Anglicare Australia’s “2018 Rental Affordability Snapshot” has provided a glimpse into a deepening housing crisis affecting millions of workers and young people across Australia. The worst impacted are the most vulnerable layers of the population, who have been the victims of cutbacks to welfare, pensions and the gutting of public housing stocks by successive state and federal governments.
The charity’s annual snapshot, released late last month, was based on a survey of over 67,000 properties listed on the national rental market over a single weekend in late March. The report examined whether they were “appropriate and affordable,” defined as costing less than 30 percent of household income for a range of demographics, including pensioners, welfare-recipients and workers on the minimum wage.
Commenting on the results, Anglicare Australia CEO Kasey Chambers noted that “Sydney and Melbourne now outstrip London, New York, and Los Angeles for expensive housing.” Along with Australia’s other capital cities, including Perth, Brisbane and Adelaide, they “rank as among the most expensive cities in the world for housing.”
The survey found that just three properties across the country were “appropriate and affordable” for a single person living on the Newstart unemployment allowance. None of the homes were located in a major capital city. For an unemployed couple with two children, just 1,097, or 1.63 percent of the listed properties, were “affordable and appropriate.”
Successive Labor and Liberal-National federal governments have frozen unemployment benefits for decades. A single jobseeker on Newstart receives an average of just $535 per fortnight.
For unemployed young people on Youth Allowance—a payment even lower than Newstart—just two properties were “affordable,” along with just two rooms in share houses across the entire country.
The official unemployment figures for April, which substantially understate the extent of the jobs crisis, showed that over 730,000 people were actively looking for work. The growth of joblessness is a result of widespread sackings and the destruction of full-time positions, overseen by Labor and Liberal-National governments alike, and enforced by the corporatised trade unions, especially since the 2008 financial crisis.
Single parents similarly have been priced out of the rental market. For a single parent with two children receiving the Parenting Payment only 530 properties were affordable.
Just 180 homes, or 0.27 percent of the total, were within the price range of a single parent receiving Newstart with one child. In 2012, the Labor government of Prime Minister Julia Gillard forced around 100,000 single parents off their Parenting Payment, and onto unemployment benefits. The austerity measure reduced the fortnightly income of many affected families by $118.70.
Single individuals on the Disability Support Pension were able to afford 485 properties, less than 1 percent of the total. For a couple on the aged pension, less than 5 percent of homes were affordable. The statistics highlight the impact of the cuts to every form of social welfare over recent decades.
Sydney, the centre of the speculative property boom, is among the most unaffordable cities in the world. Median house prices reached over $1 million last year. Rental costs have also risen dramatically. Median unit rental prices now stand at $525 per week.
No properties in Sydney were “appropriate and affordable” for single individuals on Newstart, Youth Allowance or the Parenting Payment.
Only 2,709 properties, out of over 18,000, were affordable for a family of four with both parents working on the minimum wage. The overwhelming majority were located in the western and southwestern suburbs, in the far reaches of greater Sydney, or even further out, on the Central Coast and the Blue Mountains—both more than an hour-and-a-half from the Sydney central business district by train.
The report noted that over 266,000 workers are employed on the minimum wage of $17.70 per hour, or just $672.70 per week on a full-time basis. Wage growth fell to its lowest recorded level last year, at just 1.9 percent, which is less than the rising cost of living, as a result of pay-cutting agreements imposed by big business and the unions.
Case studies from Sydney demonstrated the deepening social crisis resulting from soaring housing costs. Louise, a single parent in a three-bedroom rental paid “$400 per week in rent but receives only $600 per week in income.” The report noted: “Although she finds it hard to make ends meet, she has been in her current rental for three years. However, the landlord has refused to carry out requested repairs and has threatened to evict her if she perseveres with her requests.”
Unaffordability was increasing outside Sydney and Melbourne. In Tasmania, the situation had gone from “bad to worse.” “Affordability in and around the state’s capital is at such a low point that more than half of the low-income household types measured had no affordable rental options available,” the report stated.
In South Australia’s capital, Adelaide, the number of affordable properties for a couple on the minimum wage declined by almost 2 percent over the past year.
Anglicare Australia pointed to a number of the factors underlying the housing crisis. Successive governments, both Labor and Liberal-National, have encouraged a speculative frenzy in the property market, through incentives to investors, including “negative gearing,” which allows them to claim rental property costs as tax deductions. The influx of hot money into housing has coincided with a collapse of confidence among investors in productive investments, amid a deepening slump of the real economy.
At the same time, amid the ongoing destruction of public housing stocks, almost 200,000 people across the country are on waiting lists for government-provided properties.
Anglicare called on the major parties to boost public housing, and to increase poverty-level welfare payments. The commitment of Labor and the Liberal-Nationals to the austerity dictates of the corporate and financial elite, however, makes clear that such calls are destined to fall on deaf ears.

Argentina: Government responds to peso crisis with panic selling of dollar reserves and interest rate increase

Rafael Azul 


In the midst of increasing financial volatility across the world, a massive flight of financial capital took place last week from the weaker emerging economies as speculators converted their peso investments into US dollar denominated securities. The flight was in part triggered by the recent efforts by the US Central Bank to incrementally raise domestic interest rates.
Last week, the currencies of the largest economies in Latin America—Mexico, Brazil and Argentina—suffered drops in value of 5.25 percent, 4.83 percent and 8.26 percent respectively as speculators moved billions of dollars out of the region and into Wall Street and US banks.
Among them, Argentina was the most affected. In an attempt to avert a collapse of the peso, the Argentine Central Bank fed the dollar buying frenzy, selling six billion US dollars from its reserves at the beginning of May (roughly one fourth of its total dollar reserves).
The Argentinian government also raised the interest rate for short-term government and bank bonds three times over the span of several days to 40 percent (i.e., for every 10,000 pesos the government borrows from speculators, it must pay back 14,000). The great fear is that runaway inflation will lead to a repeat of the 2001 collapse of the peso which provoked mass demonstrations and led to the fall of several presidential administrations.
By Monday, these measures appeared to have forestalled a further drop, at least for the time being.
The decrease in value of the benchmark 10-year US government bond (to 3 percent per year) and the anticipated repatriation of financial assets held overseas by US corporations, in response to the Trump administration’s corporate tax cuts and its one-time offer to lower taxes on repatriated profits, have fed into the run on emerging markets.
The banks were also partly motivated to pull funds out of Argentina attempt by the Macri government’s imposition of a small capital gains tax on short term Central Bank bonds (know as Lebacs ) owned by foreigners as a way of reducing the country’s fiscal deficit. Speculators responded by cashing in their bonds and sending their money out of the country.
Fearing that domestic inflation will explode to 30 percent this year, up from the current 24.5 percent and double the government’s goal of 15 percent, Argentine monetary authorities are preparing for new budget adjustments and social cuts.
Since the right-wing government of Mauricio Macri took power in 2015, the administration has attempted to control the peso’s value with respect to the dollar by maintaining an artificially high peso value, through restrictions on circulation.
By raising the yield on Central Bank debt to forty percent and thereby flooding the bond market with bank debt, the Argentine Central Bank is lowering the money supply and purposely slowing down the economy, part of its overall policy of financial austerity. In announcing the increase in bank interest, the Central Bank declared that it would continue to use every means at its disposal to lower inflation to fifteen percent and prevent the peso from dropping further. The new interest rate is the highest in the world. Argentina has the highest inflation rate of any Latin American nation, except for Venezuela.
Preparations for an intensified attack on living conditions and wages are being sped-up as all indications are that inflation may rise further still. In yearly contract negotiations (paritarias) between employers and the union bureaucracies overseen by the government, the unions, businesses, and government have so far managed to limit wage increases to 15 percent, generally by offering non-monetary benefits to the workers.
There are indications of a broader wage push by workers fighting to break the 15 percent ceiling which amounts to a wage cut in real terms. This week saw strikes by drivers on the Buenos Aires subway system against the wage lag. The leader of the Union of Automated Tramworkers (UTA), Roberto Fernández, noted with concern yesterday that “the political situation has much uncertainty” as a result of growing working-class discontent. In a sign that the trade unions fear they will lose control of mass discontent, Fernández called for the General Workers Confederation (CGT) to hold “a national strike” if “the national government doesn’t convoke a roundtable dialogue with business and the CGT to find a way out of this critical economic situation.”
In a nation with a labor force increasingly dominated by the presence of part time and contingent workers, many of whom work for wages two-thirds lower than full-time workers that do the same work, the high levels of inflation are contributing to rising levels of poverty and economic insecurity.
With poverty rates of 30 percent and increasing unemployment, particularly among the youth, Macri has no option but to risk a mass confrontation with the working class if he is to reassure foreign investors that his government will stabilize the argentine economy and make good on cuts in government spending and debt payments to Wall Street.
According to the IMF's most recent Fiscal Monitor report, Argentina's budget deficit in 2018 will be 5.5 per cent of GDP. The report points out that total global debt is at record levels and calls on governments to “capitalize on the good times” to build rainy day reserves, rather than increase social programs or invest in infrastructure.
The Macri administration faces a debt payment deadline of May 16 of $1.6 billion that it expects to make. However, the events of last week motivated the financial magazine Forbes to say it may be time for investors to abandon Argentina.

No solution to Italian government crisis

Marianne Arens

Two months after the Italian elections, all attempts to form a majority government have failed. President Sergio Mattarella announced on Monday night that he will try to form a “neutral” caretaker government to prepare new elections by the beginning of next year. If such a government is not supported by the political parties, new elections could take place in autumn or as soon as July.
On May 3, the second attempt to form a government failed when the leadership of the Democratic Party rejected a coalition with the Five Star Movement.
The March 4 election saw the Five Star Movement (M5S) emerge as the single largest party. Party leader Luigi Di Maio first tried to form a coalition with the Lega. The Lega is the strongest force in the right-wing alliance of Silvio Berlusconi, which also includes Forza Italia and the fascist FdI (Brothers of Italy).
However, a coalition of M5S and Lega failed due to the inclusion of Silvio Berlusconi: the Five Star Movement did not want to be part of government involving a man whom they had referred to as the epitome of corruption for years. But Lega leader Matteo Salvini did not want to leave out Berlusconi, because without the entire right-wing alliance backing the coalition he would have to let Luigi Di Maio take the post of prime minister.
As a result, the second option, a coalition of M5S and the Democrats, was explored last week. It failed on Thursday night, when Maurizio Martina, interim PD leader, declared this chapter “over” after a brief party congress.
Former PD chief Matteo Renzi, who vehemently rejects a coalition with the Five Star Movement, had prevailed. In the TV show “Che Tempo Che Fa,” he had strictly excluded participation in a government with the party of Beppe Grillo. He set up a website with the slogan “Senzadime” (without me). PD deputies were encouraged to sign up to make clear that they would not support such a coalition.
On Thursday evening, interim PD leader Martina said, “It was never our aim to make Di Maio premier.” In fact, in such a coalition government the role of the PD would have only been to secure a majority. The Democrats would have had no claim to the post of prime minister, because the M5S were the strongest party in the general election with 32.7 percent, while the PD received only 18.7 percent.
The Democrats only narrowly prevented an open split in their party on Thursday. But the government crisis remained unresolved. Since the parliamentary elections on March 4, three camps have confronted one another—the Democrats (PD), the right-wing alliance around Silvio Berlusconi and Beppe Grillo’s Five Star Movement. None of them can command a majority and they are also divided internally.
The reason for this is a deep social crisis, far deeper than five years ago, when eight weeks passed in spring 2013 between the election and the formation of a government. Two years earlier, the drastic cuts in social spending to offset the gigantic budget deficit had begun. The EU had ensured that the Berlusconi government was replaced by the non-elected technocrat government of Mario Monti. Monti began the cuts and “reforms” that continue to this day. In the process, health and social security spending has been cut, the retirement age increased from 58 to 66, and workers’ employment rights eroded.
The 2013 election was the first to take place under conditions of massive social cuts, and it led to a stalemate between the Democrats and Berlusconi’s party. It also saw the first election victory of the Five Star Movement, which acted as a protest party and made the “fight against corruption” its slogan. In its first electoral outing, Grillo’s party received 25.6 percent of the vote. The government crisis was finally ended through forming a grand coalition of the Democrats with Berlusconi’s party, at that time the PdL.
Enrico Letta (PD) was followed by Matteo Renzi (PD) and Paolo Gentiloni (PD) as prime minister—and each of these governments continued the social cuts. Nevertheless, Italy’s debt has not decreased to this day; on the contrary, it amounts to €2.3 trillion. The gulf between the ruling parties, above all the Democrats, and the working class has continued to widen.
This chasm between the population and official policy is also the deeper reason for the current government crisis: Whoever comes into government today will be confronted from the beginning with the growing anger and rebellious mood of the working class, and yet under conditions of capitalist crisis they will continue and intensify the cuts and increased military spending.
Italian President Sergio Mattarella is now trying to bring about a government that could at least agree a budget and run business for a while. Commentators are already mocking this as a “bathing” or “beach” government, i.e.. a transitional administration that could run the government over the summer months.
Mattarella could appoint a “government of the president” or a “technical government” led by a nonpartisan “expert,” such as a former president of the Constitutional Court or the State Council, or an EU and banking politician like Mario Monti.
The EU and the stock exchanges are pressing hard on the Italian president. The banking crisis is unresolved, and unless a national budget exists by October and is passed by an incumbent government by the end of the year at the latest, global speculators could attack Italian government bonds, as they did in 2011.
Before the talks on a new government failed, only the Five Star Movement was calling for new elections. M5S feels cheated out of its election victory on March 4, because neither the right-wing alliance nor the Democrats are ready to form a coalition with it. “I never thought it would be easy,” said Di Maio, “but I could not have imagined it was impossible.” The M5S boss has proposed new elections for 24 June and also asked Lega boss Salvini to support this demand.
Salvini, however, sees a chance to bring the Lega to power. The right-wing alliance feels itself bolstered by the outcome of recent regional elections. On April 22, elections were held in Molise, and on April 29 in Friuli Venezia Giulia, where Lega politician Massimiliano Fedriga, as a candidate of the right-wing alliance, won over 56 percent of the vote, and in Molise, where a Forza Italia politician won.
However, both regional elections are primarily an expression of a clear turn away from politics by voters. Voter turnout was extremely low; it was only 52 percent in Molise and less than 50 percent in Friuli Venezia Giulia.
The president could still try to form a minority government of the right-wing parties, which emerged out of the parliamentary election as the strongest coalition. The prerequisite for this would be that Mattarella receives the commitment of the Democrats to tolerate such a government.
To satisfy the Lega, Mattarella could appoint a leading member of the Lega as prime minister. Giancarlo Giorgetti, the Lega’s new parliamentary leader in the House of Representatives, is already under discussion. He is a more diplomatic and less polarizing figure than Matteo Salvini and has good relations with the PD. In the government crisis of 2013, the then President Giorgio Napolitano had already appointed Giorgetti to his “Group of Wise Men,” which prepared the then Letta government.
This would give Italy a government, in the background of which Silvio Berlusconi as well as Matteo Renzi, the leaders of parties that were firmly rejected in the March 4 election, would be pulling the strings. Both the Democrats and Forza Italia were the losers in the general election.

São Paulo’s high-rise fire collapse tied to city’s homeless crisis

Gabriel Lemos 

In the early morning hours of May 1, a 24-storey building caught fire and collapsed in Paiçandu Square, in downtown São Paulo, the largest city in the Americas. According to the city’s security secretary, the fire was started by a short circuit on the fifth floor of the building.
Built in 1966 and abandoned 17 years ago, the building had been occupied in 2013 by one of São Paulo’s homeless movements, Luta por Moradia Digna(LMD–Movement for Fair Housing). It housed 146 families and 372 people, 25 percent of them immigrants. One resident died when as was being rescued by firefighters at the moment the building collapsed. According to São Paulo City Hall, five people are still believed to be buried under the rubble, which is expected to take a month to remove.
The extensive and frenetic coverage of the collapse by the Brazilian corporate media, which attracted record audiences for all network television channels, focused on the attempt to blame the residents of the building for the fire, pointing to the accumulation of flammable materials in the building—garbage and wood that separated the rooms in each floor—and their supposed “neglect” of the building’s electrical system.
After media reports that residents of the building paid up to 500 reais (US$140) in rent to the coordinators of the homeless movement, the corporate media escalated its efforts to demonize the squatters.
Right-wing columnist Leandro Narloch in daily Folha de S. Paulo wrote that “a specialized group in invasions enters an abandoned place, takes possession of it, divides it into small spaces and transfers them to poor people, charging a good rate for the service. This is the way the militias of Rio de Janeiro act… It is also the way of action of the LMD.”
Narloch went on saying, “of course there are differences between the São Paulo homeless and the Rio militias. One has left-wing marketing, the other does not … In the real estate branch, however, the business of the militias and the homeless movement is the same: take a property for free and profit from the sale of possession or rent.”
São Paulo’s former right-wing millionaire mayor, João Doria (PSDB), who left office in early April to run in this year’s election for governor in the state of São Paulo, went further, charging that a criminal faction had occupied the building, and it “was a drug distribution center as well, and, unfortunately, a place of shelter for homeless families.” In May of last year, Doria sent 900 armed policemen into São Paulo’s so-called “crackland”, less than 1km from the fire, to beat and expel addicts and workers and demolish tenement buildings supposedly housing drugs and arms caches.
However, reports on the history of the occupied building and data on housing in São Paulo reported by the corporate media itself reveals the real cause of the spectacular fire and collapse of the building: the total negligence of the state in relation to the occupied building and the huge housing deficit in one of the most unequal cities in the world.
In 2015, after a complaint from a neighbor of the building, the public attorney’s office in São Paulo initiated an investigation into the lack of security in the building. Despite finding a series of irregularities, such as obstructed corridors and escape routes and a lot of flammable material, São Paulo’s civil defense and licensing office evaluated that its interdiction was not necessary, which led the public attorney’s office to close the investigation in March of this year.
However, another document released by G1 news web site, issued by São Paulo’s licensing office in January of last year, showed that “the building does not meet minimum fire safety requirements”, such as the lack of fire extinguishers, hydrants not working and an irregular electrical installation. This document was also shelved by São Paulo’s public attorney’s office. The state’s disregard for the dangers in the building is aggravated by the fact that it belonged to the federal government, having housed for two decades the São Paulo headquarters of the Federal Police.
The precarious and dangerous situation faced by the residents of the collapsed building is essentially the same as that confronting the other 206 homeless occupations in the city of São Paulo, which comprise more than 45,000 families. However, the number of families facing similar dangers in the city is much higher. Today, 1.2 million families live in a precarious situation in the city, spread mainly among the 1,700 favelas (shantytowns) of São Paulo. According to a report from G1, the city has a housing deficit of 358,000 homes, while there are almost 1,400 unoccupied properties.
Both the number of occupations and the number of people living on the streets in São Paulo has increased rapidly since the global capitalist crisis began to hit hard in Brazil in 2014, causing the destruction of nearly four million jobs in the formal sector and raising the unemployment rate to 13.1 percent. In São Paulo, the unemployment rate is 16.9 percent.
Official data show that almost 16,000 people live on the streets of São Paulo, a figure that has doubled since 2000. Other São Paulo City Hall estimates put the figure at 25,000.
In São Paulo’s downtown, however, this rise in homelessness and squatting has been driven by a rapid process of gentrification, a consequence of a housing boom in the city which caused a 175 percent increase in real estate values between 2000 and 2010. In the same period, the cost of living in the city of São Paulo – the 43rd most expensive in the world – has doubled, becoming, along with Caracas, Venezuela, the city with the highest increase in the cost of living in the world.
This has been the result, above all, of the collusion between successive governments and major construction conglomerates under so-called “requalification” plans—the same kind of corrupt for-profit operations responsible for the Grenfell Tower fire in downtown London and similar disasters in so many other cities.
While both right-wing and nominally “left” governments have implemented a years-long draconian austerity program, which slashed the housing budget by 51 percent last year and cut it by 34 percent this year, the number of privately built small and medium apartments for affluent upper middle class professionals has increased by 111 percent between 2011 and 2017. A few dozen meters from the building that collapsed, the price of “studios” between 28 and 54 square meters ranges from 190,000 to 300,000 reais (US$54,000 to US$85,000), with the most expensive apartments in the area costing up to 1 million reais (US$ 283,000).
The far-right rage over “protection of criminal squatters” by the nominal “left” notwithstanding, this gentrification process was vastly accelerated under the rule of the Workers Party (PT) in the city during Fernando Haddad’s term in office (2013-2016), while the nationwide property boom has coincided with the Workers Party rule at the federal level (2003-2016).
The enormous number of fires in the favelas of São Paulo—202 in 2016—led the São Paulo City Council to open a parliamentary commission of inquiry to determine the causes of the fires in 2012, but it ended up being canceled. News agency A Pública published a report in 2016 showing that the favelasmost affected by fires were located in the richest areas of São Paulo, and the frequency of fires—many suspected to be arson—is also higher in these areas.
The huge money handouts to the construction giants in for-profit housing programs during the PT rule, a major cause of the property boom, and the upper middle class-oriented “lifestyle politics” of Fernando Haddad—a mayor obsessed with a moralistic debate over cycling lanes and Harveyite discussions on the “right to the city”—are not only responsible for these tragedies, but also for the rise of the far-right Doria and his pro-repression politics.

Report shows NSA tripled its domestic surveillance operations in 2017

E.P. Milligan

A US intelligence agency report released on Friday revealed that the National Security Agency (NSA) collected 534 million records of phone calls and text messages made by Americans last year, more than triple the amount gathered in 2016. The revelations come five years after the leaking of documents by whistleblower Edward Snowden, who first revealed the US government’s mass electronic surveillance operations.
The sharp increase from 151 million recorded interactions from 2016 points to deep-seated anxiety amongst the American ruling class over historic and ever widening economic inequality, political instability, and growing social unrest. As the capitalist state slides deeper and deeper into crisis, it increasingly must resort to police state measures to maintain its rule. The growth in surveillance occurs within the context of the re-emergence of working class resistance to declining living standards.
In addition to spying on US citizens, the agency monitored record numbers of foreign individuals living outside the United States. The NSA targeted these individuals through a warrantless internet surveillance program, known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, renewed by Congress earlier this year. The number of targets increased from 106,469 in 2016 to its current level of 129,080. This number has risen from 89,139 since 2013, a 45 percent spike.
The NSA’s illegal surveillance operations expanded rapidly after the still unexplained events of September 11, 2001 which were used to launch illegal wars against Afghanistan and Iraq. The agency first became the subject of controversy over illegal wiretapping in 2005 and again in 2013 when Snowden’s revelations concerning mass electronic surveillance sparked major public outcry.
The latest figures prove the fraudulent character of Obama’s so-called “reform” of the NSA in 2015, which was presented to the public as a measure to curtail the agency’s bulk telephone records spying program. The legal modifications by the Obama administration, drafted by and for the military-intelligence apparatus, actually served to expand the illegal and unconstitutional operations of the NSA.
As a parting gift to the current US President Donald Trump, in the last days of his administration Obama announced a further expansion of the spying power of American intelligence agencies. Under the new rules, the NSA was given the ability to share raw bulk data of private communications with 16 other intelligence agencies, including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. Edward Snowden responded to the news on Twitter with a warning: “As he hands the White House to Trump, Obama just unchained NSA from basic limits on passing raw intercepts to others.”
The fact that the expansion of NSA spying was the direct result of policies pursued and implemented by Obama once again demonstrates just how close the Democratic Party has merged with the military-intelligence apparatus.
A three-part World Socialist Web Site investigative report published earlier this year, titled “The CIA Democrats,” revealed the extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. Regarding the right of the American government to unconstitutionally spy on the entire world’s population there is broad bipartisan agreement between the Democrats and Republicans, both parties of big business.
Under Bush, then Obama and now Trump, the NSA’s domestic spying program has been ever more closely integrated into the US military. In 2009, President Obama oversaw the creation of the Pentagon’s US Cyber Command, the US military’s cyberwarfare unit, and its simultaneous integration with the NSA. Under this arrangement, the agencies began operating under joint leadership, a policy known as “dual-hatting.”
On Friday, Army Gen. Paul Nakasone took over leadership of Cyber Command and the NSA. Nakasone’s installment represents a new milestone in the drive toward war against Russia and China in every sphere, including online. At his confirmation hearing in March, Nakasone argued for a more aggressive stance in the realm of cyber warfare. “Our adversaries have not seen our response in sufficient detail to change their behavior,”Nakasone told legislators. “They don’t think much will happen.”
At the same time Cyber Command has been elevated to an independent “unified command,” putting it on par with the nine other US warfighting commands. The command also boasts a brand new $500 million Integrated Cyber Center at its headquarters at Fort Meade in Maryland. This development constitutes “an acknowledgement that this new war fighting domain has come of age,” in the words of Deputy Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan.
The Trump administration, using the tools crafted and honed under Obama, now seeks to further weaponize government spying in the current drive to war. The appointment of Nakasone and the elevation of Cyber Command, however, also highlights the bitter struggle that has erupted within the American state between rival factions within the ruling class. In particular, the US intelligence agencies have cited the bogus claims of Russian “meddling” in the 2016 US presidential elections as the reasoning behind the recent decision to back Nakasone. The Trump administration has shown itself to be no less bellicose, accusing Russia of employing hackers to gain remote access to energy sector networks earlier this year.
The continued development of NSA surveillance and the US military’s preparations for cyberwarfare again demonstrate the true purpose of the “War on Terror” as the pretext for the development of police state measures at home and an open confrontation against the rivals of US imperialism abroad. As well as gathering intelligence on Russia and China, the NSA also spies on its supposed allies. The increase in spying operations on foreign nationals points to the growth of inter-imperialist disputes, in particular with Germany. According to a heat map of NSA surveillance operations leaked by Snowden in 2013, Germany is by far the most spied on country in Europe.

5 May 2018

INSEAD Olam MBA Scholarships for sub-Saharan Africa Students 2018/2019

Application Timeline: 
  • December 2019 Class:
    Round 1:
    Applications Open: 23rd April 2018
    Deadline: 7th May 2018
    Round 2:
    Applications Open: 11th June 2018
    Deadline: 25th June 2018
Essay Questions:
 1).Describe (a) why you wish to undertake the INSEAD MBA (b) How you envisage contributing to the future development of your country or region (c) Why you should be selected for the INSEAD Olam International MBA Scholarships for Change Catalysts in African Markets. (Max 400 words for all the questions)
2).Provide a concise but accurate description of your financial circumstances as well as a cash flow forecast for the year at INSEAD (details of income set against all expenditures). Explain how you expect to finance your studies if you do not obtain this scholarship (200 words).
Eligible Countries: Sub-Saharan Africa countries

To be taken at (country): France

About the Award: Olam recognises the need to foster leadership and governance in Sub Saharan Africa by supporting aspiring and capable students to pursue higher education at international centres of excellence. Through the INSEAD MBA scholarship and Olam mentoring, we hope to play our part in developing the necessary skills and knowledge in a highly talented select group of change agents. They in turn will then have the opportunity to contribute towards economic transformation and catalyse change in their community.

Type: MBA

Eligibility: The INSEAD Olam International MBA Scholarships for Change Catalysts in African Markets will be open to meritorious candidates who are nationals of Sub-Saharan Africa, regardless of their current country of residence, but who are committed to working in their home country or region. Only candidates admitted to INSEAD’s full-time MBA programme will be considered (December 16 and July 17 Classes) .

Selection Criteria: Candidates for this scholarship will need to demonstrate:
  • academic achievement and promise
  • teamwork as well as personal ownership to deliver
  • leadership potential and entrepreneurial spirit
  • a commitment to contributing to their country or region at the end of the course.
Number of Awardees: Not specified

Value of Scholarship:  73000 EUR

How to Apply: To access the scholarship application form on-line, you will first need to register (important : your name should be indicated exactly as on your admission application).
Upon registering, you will receive your personal login ID and password to navigate through the scholarship website.   You will first need to answer all the profile questions (personal contact details, educational and professional information).  This will serve as a background for all applications.  Thereafter, you will have the option to apply for different scholarships.
Throughout the period that the on-line application is available, you can modify or withdraw your scholarship applications as you please. You can track the status of your on-line application with the help of your scholarship login ID and password. Please note that the scholarship portal is not part of the platform for the admitted candidates and therefore you will need to register for it separately.

Access the scholarship application form
You can access the scholarship application form on Monday 24th October.  To submit an application, first go through the Scholarship Application Guide and then register yourself.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Award Provider: INSEAD  Business School