6 Jun 2020

Orange Ventures MEA Seed Challenge 2020 for Entrepreneurs in Africa and Middle East

Application Deadline: 19th July, 2020

About the Award: Orange Ventures Africa Middle & East is a dedicated investmentstream of Orange group on the African Middle & East continent with 50m€ assets under management and 5 companies in thecurrent portfolio.
We are looking to extend our scope to supporting more young and innovative businesseson the continent. Africa Middle & East Seed Challenge is a call for candidates to submit application for seed investmentsfrom 50k€ up to 150k€. The investees will be announced by September 2020 and will integrate the Orange Ventures Africa Middle & East portfolio. Do you think you have what it takes?


Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility:
  • This challenge targets seed ventures with high growth potential and predominantly new technologies driven.
  • The Orange Ventures MEA Seed Challenge is open to start-ups in Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Senegal and Tunisia. 
Selection Criteria: At Orange Ventures, we’ll lead your first money or co-invest alongside othersin your seed round. So if
  • You have a bold vision with passion for disruption and expansion
  • You are willing to partner with Orange
  • You are a tech-driven start-up
  • You are mainly operating in Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Sénégal, Tunisia, Morocco and Jordan
  • You run Seed stage company, you have not raised more than €1m in total equity funding
Eligible Countries: Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Senegal and Tunisia. 

Number of Awards: 7 (a winner per country)

Value of Award:
  • Orange Ventures plans to invest a total of €500,000 in the MEA start-up ecosystem as a result of this challenge, with up to seven seed stage start-ups benefiting from an investment of between €50,000 and €150,000.
  • 12 months local mentor to support your business
How to Apply: Fill out the form online, share your investor deck, excel, and 3 minute pitch (video)
Apply

Visit Award Webpage for Details

The Lore of Self- Reliant India

Rahul Kumar

Since 2014, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi has been pompously inventing new mantras as recently he has declared to make India a Self- Reliant country after a standoff with China on Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Ladakh. In the current scenario when the pandemic of Coronavirus has exposed the federal government for its incompetence to handle the rising number of cases; its incapability to offer any financial support to the marginalized farmers, devastated migrants laborers and distraught entrepreneurs, this new mantra is seen as a panacea for all ills prevailing in Indian society and economy.
The movement he announced Self-Reliant India mantra, Whatsapp University paid researchers started sending messages on Whatsapp that from today onward we will not buy Chinese goods. Not only this, a BJP leader burnt Chinese toys in Mumbai( Maharashtra) to show China that we are not depended anymore on China since our beloved Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi has declared to make India a Self-Reliant country. Thank God BJP leaders did not burn a highly expensive statue of Iron man, Bismark of India- Vallabhbhai Jhaverbhai Patel made with Chinese material. Many foreign companies left India to Indonesia, Vietnam and Bangladesh under the financial cult of China. It is important to note that only those Multinational Corporations are surviving in India in which PM Modi`s own leaders and workers have invested money or have business partnerships/ collaborations. Such MNCs are minting money in India and taking this money out of the country. PM and his leaders have no financial interest for Indian Small &Medium Sized Entrepreneurs because SMSE earns less and demands more.
Some Modi`s followers started flashing news on social media that a German company is coming to set –up a shoe factory in the city of Agra( Uttar Pradesh) and would cater to the shoe industry in India. It is, therefore, no need to import shoes from China. It clearly shows that there is no dearth of sheep-followers in India. The majority of Indians do not read newspapers hence they do not know what is happening behind the scene. The investment announced by Saudia Arabia`s state-owned oil giant Saudi ARAMCO suspended because it was opposed by Shiv Sena and BJP alliance. ARAMCO has shifted the ball into India`s court by saying that the Indian government is unable to locate land for the project. This news across the world stopped many multinational companies from coming to India and Mr. Modi could nothing.  Will Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi produce oil and petroleum products in India to make India a self-reliant country?
After Mr. Modi`s sermons on making Self- Reliant India, Swadeshi Jagran Manch(SJM), an affiliate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh(RSS) leave no chance to be in the news headlines that the Modi Government should initiate a pan-India Swadeshi Swavlamban Abhiyan( Self- reliance campaign) to promote local production. Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, Minister for Science and Technology, Government of India, claims that India’s production of mobile phones has gone up to approximately 33 crores ( 33 Million) in 2019-20. The litany is that Minister himself does not know exact figure of mobile phones being produced in India without the help of Chinese Smartphone companies. Xiaomi. Oppo, Realm, Oneplus,Vivo, iQOO, Huawei, Lenovo, Motorola, Tecno, Infinix are the Chinese Smartphone companies in India producing Smartphones. Vivo has a huge facility in greater Noida to assemble (MAKE) smartphones in India. Does Mr. Modi and His Union Ministers and those who are burning Chinese toys in Mumbai have the guts to close these Chinese companies in India?
In the last few days, Indian manufacturers have turned into Indian traders because of the complex tax systems, corruption, and license raj. For example, businessmen who were manufacturing Thermometer in India have stopped manufacturing due to the non-availability of raw material. Thermometer is still being imported from China. Another case in point is the Sports industry in India. Most of the Sports manufacturing units in Jalandhar (Punjab) are shut now. Owners prefer to import all types of Sports items from China. When asked why have they shut their manufacturing units, they responded, “It is not worth after the announcement of Goods and Services Tax (GST)”. Similarly, Furniture manufacturers in India has closed its factories barring a few after the GST. Another case in point, Kirit Nagar( New Delhi) a famous furniture market where one can see showrooms full of Chinese furniture. One of my friends has been selling Chinese furniture, told me that, “It is not financially viable after GST to manufacture furniture in India”. He further told that “Most of the owners of the showroom import furniture from China.”  “We hire labor only to assemble and repair the Chinese furniture”, he said. These are a few examples cited here to highlight the ground realities. Does Mr. Modi and his so-called anti-China leaders have the guts to shut all these Kirti Nagar showrooms that are selling Chinese furniture?
After the announcement of Self- Reliant India, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi signed an agreement with Prime Minister of Australia Scott Morrison. PM wants Australia to supply India with seven of the 12 critical minerals key to future industries, including antimony, cobalt, lithium, and rare earth elements. Before stand-off with China, India was importing most of the raw material from China. The nation wants to know what is the difference between Australia and China? Why Mr. Modi is embracing Australia under the pressure of US President Donald Trump and antagonizing China. Indian Diaspora is an important factor in the comprehensive strategic partnership between India- Australia. Mr.Modi should speak to his counterpart about Indians who are facing racial discrimination in Australia. When Ms. Sushma Swaraj was a Foreign Minister of India, many Indians were killed by racists Australians (mostly Punjabis) but she could nothing except issuing empty statements while sitting in Air-conditioned rooms in New Delhi.
Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi is not aware of the historical background of US and Britain. Edward Gough Whitlam, 21st Prime Minister of Australia (1972-1975) moved Australia towards the Non-Aligned Movement(NAM) and called for a Zone of Peace in the Indian ocean, which the US and Britain opposed. It is unfortunate that a qualified person like Dr. Subrahmanyam Jai Shankar, current Minister of External Affairs, and Government of India who has the brain and knowledge of international affairs but unable to exercise his wisdom; has been made a dignified desk clerk by Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi. The same attitude was displayed by Modi towards Ms. Sushma Swaraj(2014-2019.  It is the Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi who want to run all Indian Ministries under his thump. It is one of the reasons that the foreign policy of India has been failed. Nepal is a recent example.
Self- Reliant India under Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi imports petroleum products from different countries. India imports gas from Qatar, Russia, Australia, and the US despite India`s capacity to produce. A report published in Live mint by Kalpana Pathak shows that “Indian refineries are not running at full capacity, so we decided to divert crude and instead fill up our crude caverns. Lack of storage capacity is an opportunity lost for the country.  “We could have taken full advantage of these historically low crude oil prices.” This is how Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi will make India a Self-Reliant country when he and his team lack advance planning.  Revenue loss is an economic burden on the taxpayer.
Under US President Donald Trump Mr. Modi stopped importing oil from Iran despite US imposed crippling sanctions on India. India needs electricity grids. From 2014 to 2019, how many electric grids in Self-Reliant India Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi and his team built to cater to the needs of the burgeoning population (now 1.35 billion) is still unknown. According to Brooking India report on Electricity, “most states in India have a large deficit in electricity supply”.
Economists and trade experts believe that China has entered into the blood of Indian traders. China is sugar for Indian traders that is needed to maintain blood glucose. The moment this sugar is taken out of the body of the Indian traders, they will collapse. In the crippling Indian economy, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi has no money to boost up small or medium scale industries. Self-Reliant mantra is sinister hogwash. Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi is plaguing the domestic & foreign policy with Utopianism, sentimentalism & isolation flaws which are highly dangerous for the country. Citizens of India have to think about our nation that is made weaker, sicker, poorer, and more divided by PM Modi.

Female Subjugation In Modern Days: Hegemony By Consent

Neha Perween


Many girls with higher educational qualifications from a typical North Indian family background faces a patriarchal structure which is very unique and must be pondered upon.

Female subjugation is not a new phenomenon and it is there in the world since antiquity. But, nowadays we are witnessing a form of subjugation which is very different in structural framework. In past female were destituted from very basic rights like education, property, political rights and various social evils like sati, child marriage and dowry were there to tarnish their existence. But these evil practices were fought and triumphed with the advent of Renaissance.

Nowadays when our society claims to be ‘modern’ and ‘progressive’ one, they no doubt at some level excelled in providing females their rights, education and empowerment but with certain terms and conditions :-

Firstly, with all the knowledge and awareness young girls particularly in North Indian families are nurtured and brought up in such a way that they dare not be outspoken about their views and opinions. They are more or less trained to be silent and submissive when it comes to present their point of view or to demand to live for their rights. And if a small fraction of these girls are erudite enough to acknowledge their worth and present it to the world are labelled as ‘sharp’ and ‘discourteous’. Our very progressive society manufacture girls with rational thinking abilities but without tongue. Encourage them with fancy words like ‘decent’ or ‘well mannered’.

Secondly, In this modern society dowry is still prevalent but with a twisting approach . When the other party demands dowry what is ridiculously interesting is that the girl who are educated enough to understand dowry as a evil practice but still be fine with it without objecting once because from childhood it is injected in their minds that the more (wealth) she will take with herself the more love and respect she will get from her In-laws and husband. Obviously, the same is not with all the girls but most of the girls are nurtured in this way so that this evil practice goes on forever.

Thirdly, the men with white collared job who think of themselves as an ‘achiever’ as if they have conquered the world while looking for a bride want a girl who is educated, beautiful with a pinch of cuteness and everything else a good wife needs to have. They marry a passionate, empowered girls only to show off and when their quest of ranting and showing off ended they demand from the same girl to leave their passion /job /dream and take care of his family and be a good wife. Before marriage he does not want the girls to be a good cook or to know the art of home making but after marriage same men want their wives to have all these qualities because according to them that’s their real duty is. The society do not for once object the hypocrisy of men but demand from the girls to obey their husbands will. And in accompanying their partner these girls give them a consent to be a hegemon of their life. It can be understood by Antonio Gramsci (A neo-Marxist thinker) theory of ‘Hegemony by consent’ in which few developed countries exploit developing nations by various means of consents.

And lastly, girls from the very beginning are taught to look after their physical appearance – ‘besan’ (gram flour) is very prevalent in Indian society to teach their daughters to apply and enhance their beauty. But they do not even once clearly make them understand that beauty lies in good character and not fair look. Parents do not teach their daughters to be true to themselves and towards other and they do not teach them that no matter what the circumstances are don’t loose your self – identity just to be nice in other persons eyes whether it is your husband.

The patriarchal structure of society cannot be overthrown all of a sudden. In all the above stated points their lies the consent of the girls. So the need of the hour is for girls to understand that decency doesn’t lies in complete submissions. They should be bold enough to fearlessly present their perspectives about anything and everything and they must be well aware about their boundaries of obligations.

Secondly, in obeying their husbands a women should not loose her own self and should try to build their world with mutual consensus and not by one sided hegemony.

And the last advice is for patriarchal society that if you are giving your daughters the arms of existence and passion then do not compel her to be a silent spectator in watching the murder of her own will. It is same like teaching a bird to fly and then cut her wings and shut her down in the cage. LET HER FLY.

Venezuela, Minneapolis, Iran, Europe – Trump’s Last Gasps of Collapsing World Control – Or is it?

Peter Koenig

There comes a time when shooting around in circles just hits walls, bullets splinter off sidewalks, and shatter a window here and there. But people are in safety. They watch from a distance and with self-assurance.
Venezuela has received five tankers from Iran loaded with hydrocarbons – petrol gas, additives – shipped through a totally US-militarized Caribbean Sea, amidst warnings of attacks and retaliations – and as usual, sanctions ’no end’. How much more sanctions can a country get? There is an immune system, called sovereignty and fearlessness – confidence and dignity. Knowing your rights. That’s what makes the whole difference.
Granted, the tankers were escorted by the Venezuelan Navy and Air Force; especially through Venezuelan waters. And they made it undisturbed to the port of El Palito, a small Venezuelan port run by Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA. The American shooting didn’t take place and the event was not televised.
Another aggression against Venezuelan sovereignty is the Bank of England’s withholding totally illegally some US$ 1.2 billion worth of Venezuelan gold, deposited voluntarily by Venezuela in times of trust – as part of Venezuela’s reserve funds. With oil prices collapsed, Venezuela decided to use part of her gold reserves to purchase medication and food to counter the disastrous corona effects.
Venezuela claimed the gold deposited at the Bank of England (BoE) which offers gold custodian services mostly but not exclusively to developing nations; and so, does the New York FED and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basle and several other international institutions and central banks considered safe and trustworthy. These are legal arrangements under which the depositing country may withdraw the funds at any time and at will.
Venezuela has a sovereign right to claim these funds without any explanation or justification. The BoE refused, claiming the Government of Nicolas Maduro was not the legitimate government recognized by the UK. Can you imagine – if any government decides to confiscate funds from another government, because they don’t like its leadership — where would we end up? – Well, there is not much guessing. We are already there. The Anglo-Zionist world makes its own rules and decides over and above any international law. And the spineless European puppets follow their cue. It is high time that this matrix collapses and gives way to a civilization that recognizes the values of democracy, justice, basic ethics and human rights.
In this case, Venezuela explained that the money is needed to buy food and medication to counter the nefarious effects of COVID-19.  The UN, intervening on behalf of Venezuela, has requested the BoE to return the money. That gesture or action by the UN is in itself is an act of ‘independence’ by the UN against the US, for whom the UN otherwise does the bidding. But to no avail. The BoE didn’t release the Venezuelan-owned gold. As a compromise, Venezuela suggested that the funds be handed over to UNDP (United Nations Development Program) which would buy vital food and medication for Venezuela.
Already at the end of 2018, Venezuelan Finance Minister Simón Zerpa and Central Bank President Calixto Ortega, travelled to London to demand that Venezuela be allowed to take the gold back to Venezuela. In January 2019, the BoE refused the request. All it said publicly was that it did not comment on customer relationships. However, the real reason was clear.
The US-trained and self-proclaimed, US supported Juan Guaido, an Assembly member, who was never elected – who never faced a presidential election – asked Downing Street that the gold was not returned to the legitimate Maduro Government which Washington, the UK and other EU members, out of the blue and without any legal reasons declared illegitimate. What a world! – Imagine that some 40 or 50 countries in the world would decide that Donald Trump and Angela Merkel were illegitimately in their high offices. Well, you laugh. It would never happen.
Under pressure from Washington, and her own neofascist government, the UK and her central bank didn’t budge. The case was brought on May 14, 2020, to a Court in London. A Venezuela-favorable judgement is however unlikely. The case will then go to the International Court of Justice in The Hague. Will the ICJ have enough backbone to decide against Washington? That  remains to be seen. It would be another sign that Trump’s last trumps are gone.
On yet another account, the Trump Administration has seized all Venezuelan assets in the US, including in 2018, the CITCO refinery and gas station network, in a further attempt to hurt their self-made archenemy, socialist Venezuela. CITCO’s assets in the United States, are estimated at about 8 billion dollars, plus about 30 billion dollars of annual revenues. CITCO covers about 10% of the US domestic gasoline market. Overall Venezuelan assets confiscated – or more accurately described as stolen – in the US and overseas are estimated at about 50 to 70 billion dollars.
In addition to other strangulating sanctions and coercive actions by Washington against Venezuela, just think what these illegally US-appropriated funds could do to ease living conditions of Venezuelans whose hardship has exclusively been brought about by Washington and Washington’s coercion of its so-called western allies – alias vassals, especially Europe – to economically sanction Venezuela. A hardship being exacerbated by the Covid-19 crisis. Mind you, Venezuela has done no harm, has never threatened any of the countries that follow the US dictate on “economic sanctions”.
Yet, through this all, Venezuela remains calm, non-aggressive, non-conflictive, self-assured and survives; and Venezuela has actually mastered the Covid-crisis better than most of Latin America. According to WHO, as of 4 June Venezuela registered 1819 confirmed cases and only 18 deaths.
Venezuela’s strength of resistance and self-determination is extraordinary. It is THE recipe for success and for overcoming western oppression. This autonomy and Iran’s undisturbed solidarity and sovereign action to help Venezuela with oil tankers despite the US threats, are signals to the world that Washington’s empire is crumbling.
Or, as Andre Vltchek pointedly says in his article about the brutal police murder of Mr. George Floyd, “The World Cannot Breathe!” Squashed by the U.S. – A Country Built on Genocide and Slavery: Now more and more people can finally see what few of us have been repeating for years: The entire world has its neck squashed by the U.S. boot. The entire world “cannot breathe”! And the entire world has to fight for its right to be able to breathe!”
Let’s add to this: And the entire world is no longer afraid to stand up and defend and fight for their rights.
This “fight” is increasingly a battle of the 99 % against the 1% – the rich and powerful psychopaths wanting to control ever more of the globe’s resources. With every day this battle is turning more in favor of We, the People.
The worldwide corona-lockdown and the yet unfathomable social and economic calamity of uncountable unemployment, famine and misery – unheard of in human history – is unwittingly shocking he billions of victims worldwide into an awakening that the masters behind the crisis, behind the nonsensical lockdown, behind the power and control thirst – the Gates, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Soros and Co., may not have thought of.
The ruthless killing of George Floyd has set in motion a series of riots throughout the US – affecting some 150 US-cities. Admittedly the riots are largely financed and organized by Soros & Co. (see https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-06-02-antifa-plans-purge-of-suburbs-homes-starting-tonight.html) with the objective of a broad military lockdown. Though, these unrests will likely gain their own dynamic, as the wave spreads to Europe and possibly also to the Global South. While the generous financiers of Antifa, Black Lives Matter and other protest organizations may have as their clear objective the militarization of the west, dynamics of an awakened people may derail the diabolical psychopaths’ goals and ring in a new set of societal values.
The resisting forces and perseverance of the people of Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, let alone, Russia and China, have magical power. Never mind the physical losses of stolen assets, of economic sanctions, of attempted humiliation by the neoliberal western alliance breaching contracts and agreements at will, i.e. the Iran Nuclear Deal, several disarmament agreements with Russia – and more – the new wave of spiritual and universal consciousness gains, far outpace these losses. The forces of Light may overcome the Darkness which has engulfed humanity over the last 5,000 years – laying the foundation for a new society with values of equality and peace for a common future for mankind.

More Australian war crimes exposed in Afghanistan

Jason Quill

Fresh revelations are emerging that further lay bare the long-running official cover-up of illegal Australian Special Air Service Regiment (SAS) killings and other abuses throughout the US-led occupation of Afghanistan.
The Australian Federal Police is now investigating a second killing by the special forces officer, known publicly only as Soldier C, after an Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) report revealed video evidence showing the murder of a disabled Afghan farmer in March 2012.
The belated investigation comes amid a protracted closed-door inquiry by the Inspector General of the Australian Defence Force (IGADF) into least 55 alleged incidents of SAS involvement in war crimes between 2005 and 2016.
Two patrol members stated that Soldier C shot Ziauddin, an Afghan farmer in his early 20s from the Paryan Nawa region of Kandahar province, in the back of the head at point blank range as he tried to “limp away.” One soldier told the ABC: “He was obviously intellectually disabled. His head exploded. There was no need for what happened. No need whatsoever. In my book that was war crimes—murder.”
Ziauddin’s relative Zalimulla backed up the claims. “There was a raid,” he said. “[Helicopters] landed at about 11:00. He was about 80 to 100 metres away from where [they] landed. As [they] landed, he came towards home, he wanted to come home. He walked a distance but those people shot him.” He explained that Ziauddin was mentally disabled due to being beaten by the Taliban two years earlier and could not have been a threat to the Australian soldiers.
A patrol member was ordered to dress the man’s body in a “battle bra” chest rig containing assault rifle magazines, in order to make it appear he was an enemy combatant. When the patrol arrived back at base they were told to regard the dead man as a “high value target” and a legitimate kill. “I knew that was a lie. Everyone there knew that was a lie,” a patrol member said.
Soldier C was stood down following the showing of a soldier’s helmet footage by investigative ABC news program “Four Corners” earlier this year, which clearly revealed the point blank execution of unarmed Afghan farmer Dad Mohammad in May 2012. Despite being initially cleared by ADF on the basis that the man had a radio (and was possibly therefore a scout for the Taliban), the footage led to a referral to the police.
The exposure of Ziauddin’s killing highlights the years of coverups by successive governments, both Liberal-National and Labor, of military abuses in the Middle East.
In 2016, the military commissioned an initial inquiry after supposedly becoming concerned about the impact of years of high-intensity deployments on Australia’s special forces. Dr. Samantha Crompvoets was hired as a consultant to gather the classified, later leaked, documents that prompted the IGADF inquiry.
The Crompvoets report, which involved interviewing a range of personnel, attributed the abuses to a military “culture” of “unsanctioned and illegal application of violence on operations.”
However, despite over 250 people being interviewed so far, not a single person has yet been charged, and the IGADF inquiry, overseen by Supreme Court Justice and Major General Paul Brereton, will reportedly only hand down “recommendations” later this year.
In fact, the only charge is against military lawyer David McBride, who faces a closed-door trial for allegedly leaking classified documents to the ABC in 2017. Known as the “Afghan Files,” they document at least 10 incidents of possible war crimes. The Federal Police also raided the ABC headquarters and two ABC journalists, Dan Oakes and Sam Clarke, could still be prosecuted.
At the same time, former special forces soldier and Victoria Cross and Medal for Gallantry recipient Ben Roberts-Smith, lauded as a “war hero” by the political establishment and mainstream media, has pursued defamation cases against three newspapers for more than three years.
Military documents recently released during the proceedings claim that in September 2012, Roberts-Smith took a handcuffed Afghan man called Ali Jan, placed him at the edge of a small cliff, then kicked him so he fell into a dry creek bed, before ordering another soldier, known only as “Person 11,” to shoot him. The documents also allege that between 2009 and 2012, Roberts-Smith was involved in another four murders during his tours of duty, including one of an unarmed civilian who had a prosthetic leg.
On Wednesday, Sandy Dawson SC, who represents the newspapers, introduced two more allegations into the proceedings. The court was told that Roberts-Smith was involved in the killings in the villages of Sola and Syahchow, both in Uruzgan province, in August and October 2012.
The first pertained to a patrol member known as “Person 4” under Roberts-Smith’s command allegedly asking for a “throw down,” which meant giving an Afghan detainee a radio to make killing him permissible under the rules of engagement.
The second concerned accusations that Roberts-Smith directed a soldier known as “Person 66” to kill an Afghan detainee in a field in Syahchow, in order to “blood” the young soldier. Dawson said: “Blooding is a term [for] the process by which a young soldier is directed to kill for the first time and is therefore ‘blooded.’”
This brings the number of war crime allegations against Roberts-Smith, one of the most decorated soldiers to serve in Afghanistan, to seven.
Attorney-General Christian Porter has applied for special secrecy laws to be invoked for the defamation case, cutting off public oversight of the hearing. Porter earlier made a similar application for the McBride trial.
Attempts to attribute war crimes to “bad apples” in the military are a whitewash. The systematic abuses and protracted cover-ups are inseparable from the decades-long imperialist wars in, and occupation of, Afghanistan and Iraq, conducted to attempt to secure US control over the strategic and resource-rich Middle East and Central Asia region.
The special forces have been on the frontline of these operations precisely because their members are trained and conditioned to kill. Far from curbing the SAS, the current Liberal-National government is following its predecessors in boosting them.
Project GREYFIN, a $3 billion program over the next two decades, will in its first phase go toward “cutting-edge body armour, weapons, and parachuting and climbing systems.” This is part of a massive expansion of military spending, with $200 billion allocated over a decade for new war planes, vessels and hardware.

Australian government hands more cash to big business as recession deepens

Mike Head

Last Thursday, the same day that the Liberal-National government conceded that the Australian economy was officially in recession for the first time in three decades, it announced another handout to major corporations—$688 million for the construction industry.
Over the past three months, the government and its state and territory counterparts have allocated unprecedented amounts totaling more than $250 billion, either in cash or access to cheap loans, for rescue packages targeted to benefit the banks and big business.
Yet the slide into recession has continued, leaving an estimated 2.5 million workers out of work or on short hours—20 percent of the labour force. The statistics released on Thursday show that the slump began before the main COVID-19 pandemic restrictions commenced in the third week of March, and has led to the greatest loss of livelihoods since the 1930s Great Depression.
Treasurer Josh Frydenberg declared Australia was in recession after the economy officially contracted 0.3 percent in the first three months of 2020, with a much worse result expected for the current June quarter. The statistics show only the initial impact of the coronavirus, which came on top of a global downturn over the previous three months and the catastrophic summer bushfires.
If not for government spending to prop up business, the drop in gross domestic product (GDP) would have been 0.7 percent. Household consumption plummeted 1.1 percent in the quarter, the worst result in 34 years, pointing to the devastating effect on many working-class households.
This blow has intensified since the end of March. Updated retail figures for April, published this week, showed that turnover plunged 17.7 percent in the month, the biggest drop ever recorded.
Frydenberg prematurely claimed that Australia would avoid an earlier predicted GDP drop of more than 20 percent in the June quarter, saying that would have been “the economists’ version of Armageddon.” This false optimism flies in the face of the worsening worldwide pandemic, which is causing a severe global recession.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government is trying to use the crash as a reason to ratchet up the drive to fully reopen businesses. Working through the bipartisan “national cabinet,” it is ditching at breakneck speed the safety restrictions that may have limited the COVID-19 outbreak in Australia so far.
But even if this headlong rush, backed by the trade unions and the opposition Labor Party, succeeds in pushing workers back into workplaces, many of their jobs will have been eliminated and mass unemployment will continue.
Melbourne University economics professor Jeff Borland told the Australian Financial Review the “best-case scenario” is that about 850,000 to 950,000 jobs may be regained by the end of September, less than half the job losses.
By then, the government is scheduled to end its JobKeeper wage subsidies and expanded JobSeeker welfare payments, adding to the pressure on workers to take any job they can find, regardless of the pay and conditions.
The March quarter statistics underscored a longer-term economic crisis. Business investment contracted 0.4 percent in the quarter and 2.9 percent for the year. Non-mining investment went backward long before the coronavirus containment measures. It fell 1.7 percent in the three months to March 31 and 6.6 percent through the year.
For all the government’s hype about a “business-led recovery,” capital expenditure plans by business for next financial year have fallen 9 percent to $90 billion, according to figures published last week.
With the government due to hand down a delayed annual budget on October 6, it will demand that the cost of the immense business bailouts be extracted from the working class, both through deeper social spending cuts and through reduced wages and working conditions.
Because of the pandemic, federal government net debt, already at $570 billion, will rise by up to $620 billion extra by the end of this decade, according to Parliamentary Budget Office projections. The budget deficit will reach nearly $200 billion in the next financial year.
Working in close collaboration with the unions, the employers and the government are demanding that the cuts to pay and working hours they jointly imposed at the outset of the pandemic be made permanent and widened.
As the Australian Council of Trade Unions commenced its tripartite talks with big business and the government on such industrial relations “reforms,” the country’s biggest employer, retail giant Woolworths, publicly called for cutting after-hours wage penalty rates, supposedly to “create jobs.”
The Morrison government’s latest corporate subsidy—its $688 million “HomeBuilder” package—epitomises the propping up of big business at the expense of working people. The scheme offers grants of $25,000 to people to buy a new home or undertake a “renovation” worth $150,000 or more.
Only the wealthiest 10 percent of people could spend that much money, and only substantial contractors, not local “tradies,” could undertake work on that scale. That is why the Property Council and the Master Builders Association, representing the major companies, back the government’s bailout.
In reality, millions of working-class households are unable to meet their mortgage payments or pay their rent, with average household debt rising to 200 percent of income long before the pandemic.
The scheme’s only purpose is to try to reverse an underlying home building industry collapse. After the four boom years to 2017–18, when the industry started around 225,000 homes a year, new starts have fallen to around 165,000 this financial year.
Due to the Construction Forestry Maritime Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) suppressing workers’ opposition to the lack of physical distancing, construction sites have been kept open during the pandemic. Nevertheless, investment in new and used dwellings fell 2.9 percent in the March quarter and 15.5 percent through the year.
The most blatant feature of the government’s package is the exclusion of spending on social housing. Accommodation is urgently needed for those with the lowest incomes. National Shelter estimates the current shortfall at around 500,000 homes.
About a quarter of public housing applicants in “greatest need” in 2017–18 had been on a waiting list longer than 12 months, according to a study released this week by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Federal, state and territory governments have presided over the loss of more than 20,000 public housing units during the 10 years to 2017–18. Despite a 55,470 increase in non-government social housing during the decade, the increase had “not kept pace with the growth in households,” the study said.
The housing package once again demonstrates the class bias of the government’s so-called rescue operations, which bolster corporate profits and the wealth of the super-rich at the expense of the working class.

Nissan confirms job cuts as strike against Spanish plant closures continues

Alejandro López

Thousands of Nissan workers, their families and sympathisers are striking, protesting and blocking roads to protest the Japanese automaker’s decision to shut down its Barcelona plant by December. Twenty-five thousand workers are to be directly or indirectly affected by the closure of Nissan’s largest plant in Spain.
Since May 4, amid the resumption of production in its plants after the Socialist Party (PSOE)-Podemos government imposed the reactionary back-to-work policy, unions have called Nissan workers out on strike. The cynicism of the company formerly led by fugitive CEO Carlos Ghosn could not be clearer. They ordered workers back to work on May 4, amid the pandemic, to complete 1,300 unfinished Mercedes vans and then close the factory.
Last week, Nissan reported a US$6.2 billion loss for the fiscal year ending in March, its first annual loss in 11 years. The plant closure is part of a plan to restructure the Alliance, cut costs and raise profits. Under the plan, the company aims to reduce its production capacity worldwide by 20 percent, to about 5.4 million units, and cut its costs by 15 percent. Another Nissan factory will also be closed in Indonesia.
Their aim is to intensify the exploitation of workers by pooling production facilities elsewhere in Europe as well as in South America, South Africa and Southeast Asia.
Last week, soon after the announcement, workers blocked off streets and burned tires outside the plant, located in the Zona Franca industrial area.
Cristina Montero, 43, a single mother with a mortgage who has been working at the Nissan plant for 15 years, told El País, “It’s very tough news. We knew about it, we imagined it could happen, but you never think it’s really going to come true. There are many families who could be left out in the street, and we feel impotence and a lot of anger.”
Another Nissan worker with 21 years seniority, José Antonio Pina, said, “We have been doing badly for many years, and now it has been a total collapse.”
Outside, hundreds of workers gathered to hear the head of the Workers Council, the trade union delegate Juan Carlos Vicente, after a meeting with company executives.
In an orchestrated announcement to the media, Vicente complained, “They’ve left us to die,” and asserted that workers “will not make it easy” for Nissan to shut down: “We now have six months to try and make them change their plans. … This is a long process, we have to pressure both the politicians and the company so that they understand that Nissan must stay, because around 20,000 families are at risk, and the industrial fabric of Catalonia and Spain are at stake.”
Nissan workers’ fight against the closure is arousing enormous sympathy and solidarity. The following day, thousands of autoworkers gathered at the doors of the four main Nissan dealerships, shouting with fists raised, “War, war, war, Nissan will not close!” As protesters marched and blocked roads, dozens of vehicles honked their horns in support; neighbours clapped or raised their fists.
Yesterday, Nissan workers organised a slow march of hundreds of vehicles in the centre of Barcelona. Autoworkers, many accompanied by their families, also received support from taxi drivers, who have been waging a bitter struggle against Uber for over a year.
Amid this jobs massacre, workers now confront a concerted attack by the PSOE-Podemos government, the Catalan nationalist-led regional government, and the trade unions to isolate, wear down and finally suppress the strike.
The unions and the PSOE-Podemos government are sowing illusions that negotiations with Nissan remain open, and that there still exists a possibility of the plant remaining open. The Works Council, run by the Podemos-linked Workers Commissions (CC.OO) and pro-PSOE General Union of Labour (UGT) unions, has argued for delaying any escalation of the strikes and protests until the business meeting of the Nissan executives on June 6, insisting that Nissan could reverse its decision.
In a joint statement with the Catalan regional government, the Foment Del Treball business association, and small business groups, the CCOO and UGT, urged “Nissan to reconsider the decision bound with their responsibility with their workers.” They added that they would “continue working to maintain Nissan’s supply chain in Catalonia and value the unity of action of the different administrations, employers and unions to avoid confirming the definitive closure of the plants in Catalonia.”
Similarly, Economic Affairs Minister Nadia Calviño claimed she is willing to look for “an alternative solution,” adding, “We have proposed to the company to implement a process of discussion and negotiation to see how this process can be channeled,” since “it is a plant that made strategic sense for the company, being the only one in Europe.”
However, Gianluca De Ficchy, president of Nissan Europe, reappeared to state that the decision to close the Barcelona plant has been taken and is irreversible.
Last week, Nissan indirectly alluded as to why it wanted its plants in Barcelona to remain open until December. Ashwani Gupta, the Japanese company’s global chief operating officer, said that it would close its Sunderland manufacturing plant in the UK if London leaves the EU in a no-deal Brexit. He stated that with the EU being the Sunderland factory’s biggest customer, the tariffs that would come with a no-deal Brexit would mean manufacturing in Britain would not be viable.
Whether in Spain, the UK or France, all the unions are using the same “common front” to lull workers to sleep as they work to increase the exploitation of workers or force workers to accept plant closures.
In Spain’s Nissan plant, the last “common front” of unions, big business and regional and national governments happened in June 2019, when the USOC, CC.OO and UGT accepted a redundancy scheme, backed by the regional Catalan government, affecting 620 workers through early retirement and other cuts. In exchange, Nissan fraudulently committed to making new investments in Barcelona plants.
Spanish unions have even refused to mobilize workers in the other Nissan plants unaffected by the closures, let alone other auto factories of Seat, Mercedes, Volkswagen and PSA. On the same day as Nissan made its announcement, at Ford the UGT and CC.OO signed a redundancy scheme affecting 350 workers from the plant in Valencia, to make the plant more competitive.
This same tactic is now being implemented in the UK, where Nissan announced plans to end a defined benefits pension scheme for hundreds of workers as part of its cost saving measures.
British trade union Unite reacted by announcing that it “is more than willing to help Nissan recalibrate to a changing world but this must not come at the expense of our members’ jobs, terms and conditions or other benefits. In the coming days we will be seeking our members’ views and be sitting down with the company to find a positive way forward for all.”
In neighbouring France, Renault has announced plans for an international wave of plant closings and layoffs, including 15,000 jobs worldwide, 4,600 of these in France. The French unions are not even organizing symbolic protests. Philippe Martinez, the head of the Stalinist General Confederation of Labour (CGT) union, responded with impotent and nationalist rhetoric. “We are very upset,” he said. “What Renault needs is to produce Renault cars in France and work on creating French jobs.”
Whether in Spain, the UK, France or other countries, workers confront the same reactionary trade union tactics to divide workers on national lines, trying to sell multinationals their workers’ labour power for a cheaper market rate than other countries.
A fight against this requires the construction of an international movement among workers. The opposition of autoworkers, including strikes and other struggles, can only be effective if it is mobilized across national borders against transnational companies, which shift production from one country to another to maximize profits. This requires building rank-and-file committees of action independent of the nationalist and pro-capitalist trade unions.

Plummeting vaccinations in the US and globally put millions of children at risk

Katy Kinner

New data gathered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) points to the alarming effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine pediatric vaccinations. Data from two different sources examined—Vaccines for Children Program (VFC) provider order data and Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) administration data. Both sources showed a significant decline in routine pediatric vaccinations beginning one week after the national emergency declaration on March 13, 2020.
Vaccines for Children Program (VFC) is a federally funded vaccine program that accounts for roughly 50 percent of pediatric vaccines in the US, providing vaccines to the under- and uninsured. The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data is collected from a collaborative project between the CDC and eight US health care groups serving publicly and privately insured patients.
Both data sets compared two different weekly intervals: January 7, 2019–April 21, 2019 (time period A) and January 6, 2020–April 19, 2020 (time period B). Data was further separated to examine all non-influenza vaccines and measles-containing vaccines only, as well as age group categories of under 24 months and over 24 months–18 years of age.
[Source: CDC Authors: * VFC data represent the difference in cumulative doses of VFC-funded noninfluenza and measles-containing vaccines ordered by health care providers at weekly intervals between Jan 7–Apr 21, 2019, and Jan 6–Apr 19, 2020]
As the graphs above show, the administration of non-influenza vaccines and measles-containing vaccines dropped precipitously after January 20, when the first COVID-19 case was reported in the US. On April 13, non-influenza vaccines from time period B were down 3 million as compared with time period A of the previous year. Measles-containing vaccines dropped 400,000 doses in time period B as compared with time period A.
The decrease was less prominent in the under 24 month age group for both vaccination categories, suggesting that the systematic prioritization of vaccinating this age group before and after the start of the pandemic has had a minor effect.
On a global scale, the decline in vital pediatric immunizations is of monumental proportions. The WHO dedicated its May 22 press conference to the issue of routine immunizations during COVID-19, with guest panelists Henrietta Fore, UNICEF executive director and CEO of Gavi, and Dr. Seth Berkley of the Vaccine Alliance. Together, the WHO, UNICEF and Gavi warned that at least 80 million of the world’s children under the age of one are at risk of vaccine preventable diseases such as diphtheria, measles and polio.
Immunization programs became widely available in high-income countries beginning in the 1950s. To increase access to immunizations, the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) was founded in 1974 with its first major goal being the eradication of smallpox. Just six years later, as a result of coordinated and international participation, smallpox was eradicated worldwide.
Since the smallpox milestone, EPI has continued to play a major role in the rising levels of immunization around the world contributing to the 86 percent global child protection rate from vaccine preventable diseases. In 1974, only 5 percent of the world’s children were protected from the aforementioned diseases. Globally, the WHO estimates that vaccinations saved 10 million lives in the years 2010 through 2015.
COVID-19 threatens to unwind this progress. Fifty-three percent of the 129 countries with sufficient vaccination data have reported moderate to severe decline or total suspension of vaccination services in March to April 2020.
Mass immunization campaigns, especially crucial in developing countries with fewer resources, have been severely cut back, putting children at risk for diseases like cholera, measles, meningitis, polio, tetanus, typhoid and yellow fever. Mass immunization campaigns for measles and polio have been particularly hard hit with immunization campaigns put on hold in 27 countries for measles and 38 countries for polio.
There are several factors contributing to the decline of immunizations. Regular health clinic appointments and mass immunization campaigns have been halted in the name of social distancing or because of a lack of personal protective equipment (PPE). Health workers have been pulled from clinics and campaigns to work with COVID-19 patients instead. Parents, understandably, are fearful of bringing their children to hospitals or clinics for regular check-ups for fear of exposing their families to COVID-19.
The comeback of vaccine preventable diseases as a result of a decline in immunization rates rivals the global threat of COVID-19.
One study from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine seeks to develop a risk-benefit analysis of routine childhood immunizations against risk of COVID-19 infections in Africa. While the study is currently in the process of peer-review, its results are worth a closer look.
The study takes into account that upon infection with COVID-19 a child would likely infect his or her entire family. Even with such risks accounted for, the researchers found that for every one COVID-19 infection acquired during the process of routine immunization, 140 children’s lives could be saved by maintaining immunization schedules. While health clinics and mass immunization campaigns must be prepared to implement infection control protocols to decrease COVID-19 infections, the above data clearly indicates that regular immunizations must continue.
Furthermore, the disruption of global systems of immunization threatens to slow or halt the delivery of a COVID-19 vaccination when it is available.
To further highlight the global crisis of missed vaccinations, it is necessary to zoom in on the measles crisis. In an April edition of Nature, an article titled “Why measles deaths are surging—and coronavirus could make it worse” outlines the risk of the spread of measles, especially in developing countries. The article explains that in many countries, “measles is a constant, simmering at low levels until the number of children susceptible to the virus builds up and it takes off.”
Measles is the most contagious known virus in the world, with a reproduction number—the scientific term used to quantify the infectiousness of a virus—of 12 to 18. For comparison, COVID-19 has a reproduction number between 2 and 3 and Ebola is estimated at 1.5–2. Measles is spread by respiratory droplets that can remain in the air for hours, infecting those who enter a room hours after a measles infected person has exited.
With this high of an infection rate, immunization rates of a population at minimum must be 92 percent to keep the virus at bay. Before the COVID-19 outbreak, many countries had low measles immunization rates. The Democratic Republic of the Congo, for example, had a 57 percent immunization rate against measles. These figures are worsening due to COVID-19, creating the perfect conditions for a worldwide measles outbreak. Global measles immunization rates are currently stalled at 86 percent.
Under-immunization of children in one country presents a risk in all countries. In addition, the rapid spread of COVID-19 in the Southern Hemisphere presents the possibility of a new flare-up in the US later this year. Pathogens don’t recognize borders. The fight against infectious disease will inevitably fail within the outdated nation-state system. Instead, the mobilization of society against the pandemic requires internationally coordinated scientific planning, which at every point comes into conflict with the pursuit of private profit and individual wealth.

US colleges and universities continue jobs bloodbath as they press to open in the fall

Alexander Fangmann

Colleges and universities throughout the United States are carrying out mass layoffs, furloughs and pay cuts of university workers, including faculty, in response to budget pressures stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. Facing declines in enrollment and tuition revenue and losses from unused dorms and other facilities, public universities and colleges are additionally being hit by cuts to state spending on higher education.
A report in the Chronicle of Higher Education suggested that as of May 26, at least 48,086 higher education employees have been affected by layoffs or furloughs, whether temporary or permanent. The Chronicle report also noted that Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers from early May suggest there were 19,200 fewer workers in higher education this March than there were in March of 2019.
Among the universities facing deep cuts is the University of Wisconsin system, which is facing cuts that University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee chancellor Mark Mone has called “catastrophic.” The 26 campuses of the UW system stand to see a potential revenue collapse of up to $100 million for next year out of a total budget of $650 million, on top of this year’s $18 million deficit. Adding to the damage is a five percent cut in state funding carried out by Democratic governor Tony Evers in collaboration with the Republican-led state legislature.
At the University of Hawaii, the official in charge of the budget, Kalbert Young, told the university’s board of regents in a meeting, “There will be prolonged, possibly perpetual changes to how the university is run.”
Out of several presented budget scenarios, in the worst case the university would stand to lose 25 percent of its funding from the state and 15 percent of its tuition revenue. This would translate to a $181 million decline from its current $1 billion operating budget.
Jan Sullivan, a UH regent and COO of Oceanit, said “We have to do cuts, and they have to be done in a way that will leave the university standing.” Young warned the regents not to get too specific about plans, saying, “I don’t know if anyone would want to throw ideas out here in a public meeting right now.” He added, “The depth will be significant, maybe never seen.”
At the University of Texas at San Antonio, president Taylor Eighmy told university workers in a letter to prepare for budget cuts of 9–10 percent, which would include layoffs.
A group of faculty department chairs responded, “As a group we are committed to ensuring that student success and research excellence are maintained as the core principles underlying our budgetary decisions.” If departments are forced to get rid of teaching and research faculty, the council said, “We are very concerned that those two core principles will be seriously undermined by a 9 percent cut to academic programs.”
In response to shortfalls, the University of Alaska board is considering the merger of the University of Alaska Southeast into the University of Alaska Anchorage, the University of Alaska Fairbanks or possibly both. Also on the table are cuts to around 50 degree or certificate programs. Last year, the UA board agreed to $70 million in cuts to state funding over three years after governor Mike Dunleavy proposed cutting $135 million from the system.
Even in states that are not cutting funding outright, schools will still face funding shortfalls and budget cuts. While Illinois kept state funding for colleges and universities flat, they will still be forced to make cuts given regular and pandemic-driven cost increases. Illinois state support of higher education is also still lower than it was in 2015, even without taking inflation into account. Moreover, many Illinois schools, like their counterparts elsewhere, are public in name only, with the majority of their revenue coming from other sources, primarily tuition.
The concern to stem the tide of financial losses on campuses, including extremely lucrative college sports, especially football, has led many schools to announce they will be opening in the fall, despite very real concerns about the ongoing pandemic and the near-impossibility of maintaining social-distancing or otherwise preventing the spread of COVID-19 on college campuses.
According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, which has been tracking announcements, 68 percent of the 890 colleges being tracked are planning for in-person instruction in the fall. Many of the schools anticipate ending the in-person part of the fall term at the Thanksgiving break, in order to reduce the possibility of travel causing a coronavirus outbreak. Only a minority of the schools being tracked, 7 percent, are planning for instruction to be completely or largely online.
The drive for an in-person fall semester has led some college and university presidents to call for blanket immunity from COVID-related lawsuits should students get sick or die. In a May discussion between Vice President Mike Pence, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and 14 college presidents, University of Texas at El Paso president Heather Wilson, a former Republican congresswoman and Secretary of the Air Force, suggested the best way the government could be helpful “is to have some kind of liability protection.”
US President Donald Trump has linked the reopening of college campuses to the overall reopening of the economy, saying, “I don’t consider our country coming back if the schools are closed.”
Senate Republicans, led by Tennessee Senator Lamar Alexander, have floated the idea of a general protection from liability for colleges and schools as long as they follow “reasonable practices.” Linking this protection from lawsuits to school reopening, Alexander said, “Schools and businesses will be less likely to reopen if they think they’ll be sued if someone gets sick.”
Regardless of whether any action is taken at the federal level, some states have already granted blanket immunity to colleges. North Carolina may have gone furthest, giving immunity to businesses and schools with no specific requirements to follow, while Utah and Alabama have approved measures limiting lawsuits or raising the bar of proof in such cases.
Despite the very real danger to many faculty and students from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the faculty unions have been largely working to push for reopening along the lines being used by states, accepting as good coin the idea that it is possible to maintain social distancing or other effective disease-control measures on campus.

Over 20,000 tons of diesel spilled in Russian arctic river

Clara Weiss

On May 29 an accident at a power plant near the northern Siberian city of Norilsk led to a massive spill that released 23,000 tons of diesel into the environment, most of which has drifted into the Ambarnaya River. It is one the greatest environmental catastrophes to ever occur in the Arctic, and is being compared to the Exxon Valdez spill of 1989, when about 39,000 tons of fuel flooded into the waters off the coast of Alaska.
Aerial view of the oil spill into the Ambarnaya River
The company which owns the plant, Norilsk Nickel, stated that the accident likely occurred because thawing permafrost caused an oil tank to collapse. According to Norilsk, the tank rested on 30-year-old pillars. An area of 350 sq kilometers (135 sq miles) has been contaminated. The Ambarnaya is now crimson red.
Special booms could contain the spill. However, Alexei Knizhnikov from the World Wildlife Fund Russia warned, this “doesn’t mean that toxic elements have not gotten into the water of the lake [Pyasino]. Unfortunately, the most poisonous elements of diesel fuel are aromatic compounds like benzol, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylene, which will massively mix with water. It is impossible to collect them using oil booms.”
Environmental groups have noted that cleaning up the spill is difficult because of its scale and the geography of the river, which is located in a remote and swampy area. According to Oleg Mitvoi, the former deputy head of Russia’s environmental agency Rosprirodnadzor, there has “never been such an accident in the Arctic zone”. The clean-up, he said, could take between five and ten years, and cost up to $1.5 billion.
The criminally slow response by both the company Norilsk Nickel and regional authorities has dramatically amplified the scale of the disaster.
Even though the catastrophe occurred on May 29, regional authorities did not take any action until two days later on May 31, when images of the spill had spread on social media. Authorities claimed that they were not aware of the incident until oil oozed onto a highway, causing a car to catch fire.
Sergey Verkhovets from Greenpeace Russia said that in the case of such a catastrophe two days is “a very long time.” He also stated that the company had been reckless in its exploitation of natural resources under conditions where thawing permafrost—a result of global warming—has dramatically transformed the ecological landscape.
Verkhovets warned that the impact of the oil spill would be felt for “many years to come”, further polluting the already damaged water systems in the region. The indigenous population, which depends on these rivers for its livelihood, will be particularly impacted.
“We are talking about dead fish, polluted plumage of birds and poisoned animals”, he said. Authorities have assured the population that the oil has not polluted the ground water, but whether this is true or not is far from certain. About 175,000 people live in the nearby city of Norilsk.
On June 3, Russian president Vladimir Putin, in a highly-staged televised address, chided the company and declared a federal state of emergency. A federal investigation was initiated and state television made a point of showing the foreman at the power plant being led off to jail in handcuffs. He is being made the main scapegoat of the disaster, and is being charged for violating environmental protection rules. He may face up to five years in prison.
In reality, however, it is the government and Norilsk Nickel that bear primary responsibility.
Norilsk Nickel is one of the largest producers of nickel, platinum and copper in the world, and one of the most influential and valuable in Russia. The multi-billion state-owned company has been at the center of intense struggles between Russian oligarchs since the destruction of the Soviet Union and restoration of capitalism. It is now headed by Vladimir Potanin, who is worth over $25 billion, and is close to President Vladimir Putin. In a statement on Friday, Potanin claimed the company would pay for the clean-up of the disaster.
Environmental protection regulations in Russia are notoriously poor, and systematic violations by companies are routinely overlooked by state authorities. Four years ago, an accident at another plant of Norilsk Nickel in the region resulted in an oil spill that turned another river red and transformed an area twice the size of Rhode Island into a “dead zone.” The company was fined less than $1,000, which made clear signal that it had nothing to fear in case of future disasters.
The catastrophe on the Ambarnaya underlies the dangers bound up with the “new scramble for the Arctic” by the major powers and corporations. Rapidly warming temperatures have made the exploitation of raw material resources in the region much more dangerous from an environmental standpoint, but also more alluring for major corporations.
At the same time, the Arctic, which is of major economic and geostrategic significance to Russia, has become a central arena of the US imperialist drive to encircle Russia. This further heightens the danger of military and environmental catastrophes.
As part of the standoff with the US, Russia launched a floating nuclear power plant in the Arctic Sea late last summer. The ship has been called a “nuclear Titanic” and “floating Chernobyl” by environmental groups that warn of the potentially catastrophic consequences of any accident on board. Just a few months before the launching of the floating nuclear power plant, a fire on a Russian nuclear submarine in the Barents Sea killed 14 high-ranking Russian navy officers. An aide to the commander of Russia’s navy later ominously warned that, “With their lives, they saved the lives of their colleagues, saved the vessel and prevented a planetary catastrophe.”