8 Jun 2020

German corporations seize on pandemic to implement mass layoffs and welfare cuts

Dietmar Gaisenkersting & Ulrich Rippert

In May, the number of unemployed in Germany increased by 170,000 to 2.8 million. An additional 7.3 million workers have been placed on short-time working, involving wage losses of up to 40 percent. This latter total is four times as many short-time workers as was the case following the financial crisis of 2008–2009. The figures were announced by the Federal Employment Agency last week.
The actual number of unemployed is significantly higher. Those over 58 years of age, people with short-term illnesses, carers for small children and those assigned by job centres for further training or other measures are not included in the statistics. The number of Hartz IV welfare recipients has increased since March by 300,000 to just under 6 million. This figure includes almost 2 million children.
The coronavirus crisis has starkly revealed the class character of politics and society as a whole. From the very beginning, the policies of the German government were determined by the interests of the big corporations and banks. An aid package for the economy was put together at rapid pace and has now ballooned to €1.2 trillion (a figure four times the size of the annual federal budget) to be financed by tax revenues in the form of state loans and funds taken from social security reserves.
On Thursday, the ruling German grand coalition agreed on another stimulus package of €130 billion, which is also geared to the interests of German business associations.
This torrent of money will further strengthen the power of the financial oligarchy, which dominates political life and the economy with increasing aggressiveness. Germany’s DAX index, which fell below 8,500 points in mid-March, has since risen by more than 40 percent.
In close cooperation with the German government, major concerns are using the coronavirus crisis and state funding to prepare the economy for global trade war and carry out attacks on the working class that were planned and prepared long ago.
There has been no let-up in recent weeks to announcements of mass layoffs and cuts to social conditions.
At Volkswagen, the company and its works council had already agreed at the beginning of the year to eliminate one-fifth of the concern’s 100,000-strong workforce in Germany. Opel —part of the French PSA group for almost three years—plans to cut a further 2,100 posts in Germany by the end of next year.
At Daimler, the slashing of 10,000 jobs announced months ago is to be expanded to 15,000. BMW has announced that it will cut 6,000 from its 130,000 job total.
The automotive supplier ZF Friedrichshafen plans to cut up to 15,000 jobs. The supplier Schaeffler announced that the company now wants to cut 1,900 jobs in Europe. The subsidiary of the world’s largest automotive supplier Bosch, Bosch AS GmbH (steering technology), plans to cut at least 2,100 jobs.
The industrial group Thyssenkrupp is in a process of liquidation. How many of the company’s 160,000 jobs will survive is questionable; thousands if not tens of thousands of jobs are at risk.
Aircraft manufacturer Airbus recently announced that 10,000 jobs will be cut. Lufthansa had already announced at the beginning of April the wiping out of 18,000 jobs. The largest German department store group, Galeria Kaufhof Karstadt, is closing almost half of its approximately 170 branches. This endangers the jobs of more than half the company’s remaining 25,000-strong workforce.
Germany’s biggest bank, Deutsche Bank, has announced it will cut the number of its full-time staff by around 18,000 by the end of 2022. The bank employs a total of 74,000 worldwide. TUI, Germany’s largest holiday booking firm, plans to cut 8,000 jobs.
The Frankfurt airport operator Fraport plans to downsize its workforce of around 22,000. German Rail has announced that it will probably cut “only” 10,000 of its current total workforce of 213,000—on condition that the rest of the workforce accept wage cuts.
The list could go on and on and is not limited to big corporations. For example, the automotive supplier Eberspächer is shifting its production of heating equipment to Poland. Three hundred employees at the company headquarters in Esslingen will lose their jobs. The decision was planned some time ago, but the pandemic has accelerated the move, the company said last week. “These are the harbingers of a major clear out,” wrote the German business newspaper Handelsblatt .
The workplace massacre is directly related to the increasingly unrestrained enrichment of shareholders and board members. They are filling their pockets as companies receive hundreds of billions in taxpayer money and plunge thousands of workers into poverty and desperation.
The German Association for the Protection of Securities (DSW) announced that the 160 companies listed on DAX, MDax and Sdax will distribute €44 billion to their shareholders this year—despite the coronavirus crisis. This figure, however, is 14 percent less than in 2019.
The automakers VW, Porsche, Daimler and BMW are planning to hand out €6.8 billion in dividends to their shareholders. The main beneficiaries of this orgy of enrichment are major shareholders. VW alone plans to distribute €3.3 billion to shareholders. Dividends at VW have increased continuously over the past four years.
At VW and BMW, the families owning the companies are the main beneficiaries. The Piëch and Porsche families have already received around half a billion euros, and the Quandt and Klatten families are raking in €1.64 billion at BMW.
Even the auto supplier Continental, which was in trouble before the pandemic hit, plans to hand out a total of €600 million to shareholders, including the largest sum to the Schaeffler family. This is despite the company’s current negative balance sheet.
Mass layoffs, social cuts and wage cuts are part of a strategy of the ruling class and German government to prepare for global trade war. The German bourgeoisie is using the coronavirus crisis to reposition itself in the global battle for markets and profits, especially with its rivals, the United States and China. To this end, broad swathes of industry are being rationalised to facilitate the creation of “global champions.”
At the start of last year, German Economics Minister Peter Altmaier (Christian Democratic Union, CDU) presented his concept for a “National Industrial Strategy 2030.” It reads: “Industrial policy strategies are experiencing a renaissance in many parts of the world, there is hardly a successful country that relies exclusively and without exception on the forces of the market to accomplish its goals.” And further: “There are clearly strategies for rapid expansion with the clear goal of conquering new markets for one’s own economy and, wherever possible, achieve a monopoly position.”
Initial criticisms from Germany’s business lobby that excessive government intervention was an obstacle to economic development has ceased since the coronavirus crisis. Billions drawn from tax revenues are now being used to finance mass layoffs, structural programs and key technologies.
A year ago, Altmaier referred to “Internet companies in the platform economy,” the “sphere of artificial intelligence (AI), “new biotechnologies,” the “innovation of autonomous driving” and “the emergence of completely new mobility concepts” in the auto industry. This agenda is now being implemented at the expense of workers.
An important partner in this alliance between corporations and government is the trade unions, which have no rival—not even the far-right Alternative for Germany—when it comes to fuelling nationalism.
For a long time, the unions have been demanding protective tariffs, protectionist measures and more initiative from the government to support national economic interests. Their “defence of individual sites” policy is aimed directly against the working class, which is bound together in global corporations and everyday face the same problems.
The unions are closely linked to corporate management through the German system of co-determination, which permits union representatives to sit on the supervisory boards of companies. From their seats on the executives, the unions directly organise social welfare and job cuts—from the planning stage to implementation—including ritual and harmless protests.
A study by the Institute for Co-Determination and Corporate Management (I.M.U.) organised by the trade union Hans Böckler Foundation (end of April 2020), recorded that the number of companies in which 10 union representatives sit on supervisory boards totals 650. In other words, there are up to 6,500 works councillors and union bureaucrats sitting on supervisory boards, all of whom receive lavish salaries. Union supervisory board members transfer in turn a part of their income to the Böckler Foundation, which means that the unions are financed directly by the corporations to the tune of hundreds of millions of euros.
The German engineering union IG Metall alone has 50,000 works council members and 80,000 shop stewards, whose main task is to suppress any independent movement of workers and any struggle to defend every job.
IG Metall had already agreed in March to a wage freeze for 4 million employees in the metal and electrical industry until the end of the year. Now the union is working intensively to ensure the resumption of production, although many companies lack the necessary safety measures to protect against further infections from the COVID-19 virus.
Workers can only defend their jobs, wages and living conditions by resolutely opposing the nationalist policies of the unions, breaking with their bureaucratic straitjacket in the factories, and joining forces internationally to work for a socialist reorganization of society.
A few days ago, the Socialist Equality Party (SGP) called for the establishment of action committees to protect workers’ safety at work. In addition to reviewing and implementing health protection against the risk of corona infection, the task of these committees is to organise the fight to defend jobs and to prevent any deterioration in working conditions. This requires an anti-capitalist, i.e., socialist program and an international strategy.

India and Australia sign military pact amid tense border conflict with China

Mike Head

Under conditions where hundreds of Chinese and Indian troops are being mobilised against each other along the disputed border between the two countries, the governments of India and Australia last week signed a series of deals that include reciprocal access to each other’s military bases.
An online “virtual summit” between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Australian counterpart, Scott Morrison, raised the relationship between the two countries to a “Comprehensive Strategic Partnership” with definite military implications, clearly directed against China.
Although the originally scheduled face-to-face meeting had been delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the timing of the event became bound up with the Indian government’s frontline role in the escalating confrontation by the Trump administration against China.
The one-hour June 4 “summit” occurred just two days after a phone call between Modi and Donald Trump, in which the US president reiterated his support for India’s conflict with China. According to Indian media reports, Modi’s government has begun moving soldiers from other sectors, including those facing Pakistan, toward the contested “Line of Actual Control” that separates India and China in Ladakh.
Earlier, in a May 27 tweet, Trump provocatively intruded into the border conflict, offering to “arbitrate” the “now raging border dispute.” Then on May 29, US Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Indian Defence Minister Rajnath Singh spoke on the phone, vowing to bolster a “strong and enduring US-India defense parthership.”
The official readout of the June 4 Trump-Modi conversation specifically stated that they discussed the Sino-Indian border standoff and the supposed need to reform the World Health Organisation (WHO). The Trump administration has withdrawn funding from the WHO, accusing it of being aligned with China, as part of its totally unsubstantiated efforts to blame Beijing for the worsening global pandemic.
Trump’s call to Modi also came amid a social explosion in the US, triggered by the brutal police killing of George Floyd. Trump had just threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 and deploy federal troops to establish martial law.
Shortly after the Trump-Modi call, China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian objected to the US interference, saying there was “no need for any third party to intervene” in the border dispute.
It was in this highly-charged context that Modi and Morrison proceeded with their “summit,” clearly making it part of the US offensive against China. They concluded nine agreements, featuring a “Mutual Logistics Support Agreement,” and issued a “Shared Vision for Maritime Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.”
In addition to allowing Indian and Australian warships and aircraft to refuel and use logistical facilities at each other’s bases, the military “logistics” pact clears the way for more military exchanges and exercises across the Indo-Pacific region and greater inter­operability between the two armed forces.
A joint statement issued by Modi and Morrison did not explicitly name China as its target, but the language echoed Washington’s anti-China propaganda. It said the two countries “share a vision of a free, open, inclusive and rules-based Indo-Pacific region to support the freedom of navigation.”
Such language has been employed to justify incendiary “freedom of navigation operations” by US warships and planes within the territorial waters of islets occupied by China in the South China Sea.
India, which in 2006 entered into a “global strategic partnership” with the US, has been transformed, especially during the past six years under Modi’s rule, into a frontier state in the US military-strategic offensive against China.
At their “summit,” in his opening public remarks to Morrison, Modi, who heads the Hindu communalist Bharatiya Janata Party, invoked religious fervour as a basis for the anti-China alliance. It was a “sacred responsibility” to uphold values such as “democracy,” “rule of law” and “freedom,” he said.
Morrison, in response, thanked Modi “for your leadership, not just within India, but more broadly throughout the G20, the Indo-Pacific and the stabilising and constructive and very positive role that you have played in these very difficult times.”
Once again, with virtually no publicity, the Australian government has placed the country’s population on the frontline against China. In a barely reported media release, Morrison said: “Our Partnership is in line with India’s increasing engagement in the Indo-Pacific region through her Indo-Pacific vision and Australia’s Indo-Pacific approach and its Pacific Step-Up for the South Pacific.”
Both the Indian and Australian ruling classes are seeking to assert their hegemony over swathes of the Indo-Pacific region, while backing the US drive against China. That is the content of Canberra’s “Pacific Step-Up” to reinforce Australian imperialism’s dominance in the South West Pacific and cut across Chinese investment and aid in the region’s island states.
There has been overwhelming support within Australia’s corporate, political and media elite for the alignment with India and the US, despite qualms over the impact on the many billions of dollars at stake annually in revenues from China.
The opposition Labor Party spearheaded this orientation when it was last in office. The Gillard Labor government signed up to the Obama administration’s “pivot to Asia” in 2011 and agreed to station US marines in Darwin. This was in line with the conclusions drawn by American strategists that US imperialism could halt the emergence of China as a rival power only through military might and, when necessary, war.
To further seek to isolate China, Trump has invited Modi and Morrison to join this year’s G7 summit, due to be held in the US, probably in September, just two months before the US presidential election. South Korea, another US ally against China, has been invited too, along with Russia. Trump is proposing to include them all in a revamped G11, to the exclusion of China, the world’s second biggest economy.
“Indian defence sources” told the Hindu India was now open to including Australia in the trilateral Malabar military exercises involving the US and Japan. This would shift the “Quadrilateral Security Dialogue” (the Quad) from being a high-level ministerial dialogue in 2019 further towards a military alliance. Japan and the US first proposed the Quad in 2007 but it was stalled by a decade by concerns in Indian and Australian ruling circles at being too openly aligned against China and with US imperialism.
As part of the US drive, the Australian ruling class is trying also to open up new markets in India to offset its reliance on commodity exports to China. Modi and Morrison agreed to “recommence” talks over an India-Australia trade agreement, suspended since 2015, after nine inconclusive rounds of negotiations.

Trump confers with Modi over explosive India-China border dispute

Shuvu Batta & Keith Jones

Washington continues to intrude in the tense weeks-long border standoff between Indian and Chinese troops at four points along their contested 3,488 kilometre (2,167 mile) border.
Although Beijing and India publicly insist the standoff will be resolved peacefully, they have both rushed troops, planes and war materiels to the border region, which is comprised of remote, inhospitable Himalayan terrain.
US President Donald Trump conferred with Indian Prime Minster Narendra Modi about the border crisis during a 25-minute phone call last Tuesday. No details of Modi and Trump’s exchange on the border standoff have been released. However, Washington has publicly accused China of “aggression” and has linked the dispute to the South China Sea, where the US and allied navies routinely carry out provocative “freedom of navigation” exercises to assert Washington’s right to maintain an armada menacingly off China’s shores.
The India-China border disputed
The ostensible purpose of the Trump-initiated June 2 call was to invite Modi to participate in the next G-7 leaders’ summit, which is to be hosted by the US president at an undetermined date, and to discuss the president’s proposal to make India a permanent member of an expanded G-7. According to the readout from New Delhi, they also spoke about the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to “reform” the World Health Organization (WHO), and the “situation on the India-China border.”
Trump has sought to cripple the WHO by withdrawing all US funding from the UN body, thereby jeopardizing its support to impoverished countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America in fighting the pandemic, as well as a host of other deadly diseases. Now he is looking to India to assist Washington in using the WHO as a platform to attack China based on the lie Beijing failed to inform the world about the emergence of the novel coronavirus and is therefore “responsible” for the more than 100,000 American COVID-19 deaths.
Last month, Dr. Harsh Vardan, the Health Minister in Modi’s ultra-right Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, began a three-year stint as chairman of the WHO’s executive board, giving New Delhi a major role in determining the agenda of WHO meetings.
In comments following their Tuesday call, Modi hailed his “good friend” Trump and commended his “creative and far-sighted approach.” An Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement exuded, “The exceptional warmth and candour of the conversation reflected the special nature of the Indo-US ties, as well as the friendship and mutual esteem between both leaders.”
Modi has repeatedly genuflected before Trump. But his lavish praise of the fascist billionaire takes on new significance under conditions where Trump is inciting military-police violence, has threatened to deploy the US military across the country to suppress mass protests, and is attempting to overthrow the US Constitution and establish a presidential dictatorship.
Modi is not just “returning the favour” to Trump—who on a visit to India in February lauded the Hindu supremacist prime minister’s leadership and commitment to amity among all people even as deadly anti-Muslim riots, incited and organized by the BJP and its RSS allies, were convulsing India’s capital. For Modi and his chief henchman, Home Minister Amit Shah, Trump’s actions lend legitimacy and encouragement to their own far-advanced plans to break with democratic-constitutional rule.

Mounting tensions

Washington maintained a public posture of neutrality in 2017 when Indian and Chinese troops confronted each other for 73-days on the Doklam Plateau, a Himalayan ridge claimed by both China and Bhutan, a tiny kingdom that New Delhi treats almost like a vassal state.
Today, in a development that both expresses and intensifies the escalating US strategic offensive against China, the Trump administration has publicly sided with India, and is manifestly goading New Delhi on in its confrontation with Beijing. Trump has himself issued a series of provocative tweets and comments. This includes telling a reporter in late May that Modi had told him in a phone call that “he’s not in a good mood about what’s going on with China.” New Delhi has denied any call ever took place.
Underscoring the bipartisan character of US imperialism’s incendiary campaign of diplomatic, economic and military pressure on China, the Democratic Party’s positon on the India-China border standoff is one and the same as that of the White House and State Department.
The chairman of the US House committee on foreign affairs, Democrat Eliot Engel of New York, said in a statement last week, “I am extremely concerned by the ongoing Chinese aggression along the Line of Actual Control. China is demonstrating once again that it is willing to bully its neighbors rather than resolve conflicts according to international law"
The Line of Actual Control (LAC) is the largely un-demarcated boundary that India and China, who fought a brief border war in 1962, have agreed to accept as their common border, pending final resolution of their overlapping territorial claims.
The current border tensions can be traced back to an incident on May 5, when Indian and Chinese troops scuffled with each other at an altitude of 4,200 meters (14,000 feet) on the shores of Pangong Tso Lake where Indian-held Ladakh meets Chinese-held Aksai Chin in the western portion of their border.
Over the next several days there with three other encounters between Indian and Chinese troops, two in other areas along the border between Ladakh and Aksai China and another more than 2,000 kilometers (1,240 miles) to the east in the border lands of the northeast Indian state Sikkim and China’s Tibet Autonomous Region.
Beijing and New Delhi have each accused the other of provoking the standoff by violating the LAC.
In recent years, both China and India have dramatically increased their military spending. In 2019, they had the world’s second and third largest defence expenditures, spending respectively $261 billion and $71 billion, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. In both cases this is only a small fraction of US military spending, which totaled $732 billion in 2019.
New Delhi, which has justified its development of ballistic nuclear missiles with a range of more than 11,000 kilometers (7,000 miles) with the claim that it must have the ability to obliterate any part of China, has been engaged in a major push to expand its military capacities along its northern border with China since at least 2010.
This has included the development of an extensive network of roads and railways, the reactivation and rebuilding of airfields, the creation of two new Mountain Divisions, each with 15,000 troops, and the formation of a mountain strike corps to conduct “quick reaction ground offensive” operations against Chinese forces.
India says these moves are only aimed at restoring rough military equivalence along the border, in response to previous steps by China to increase its own capabilities.

The incendiary role of US imperialism

Whatever the truth both about the immediate accusations of incursions across the LAC and the longer-term military build-up along the border, certain things are manifestly evident.
First, the key factor driving the heightened tensions between China and India is American imperialism’s push to harness India to its predatory strategic agenda and to transform South Asia and the Indian Ocean—the conduit for much of Beijing’s oil imports and of its exports to the Middle East, Africa and Europe—into a central arena in its drive to thwart’s China’s “rise.” Toward this end, Washington under Democratic and Republican administrations alike has lavished strategic “favours” on New Delhi. This has included giving it access to advanced weapons and “normalizing” India’s status as a nuclear-armed state, while drawing India into a network of security-dialogues and joint military exercises with the Pentagon and Washington’s most important Asia-Pacific allies, Japan and Australia.
Second, in response to the global economic collapse and social crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Modi government and India’s ruling elite are doubling down on their reactionary “global-strategic alliance” with US imperialism. Central to Modi’s “economic recovery” plan is to take advantage of US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s offer to help India exploit its abundant cheap labour to become an alternate production-chain hub for American companies under pressure from Washington to relocate manufacturing from China.
On Thursday, India and Australia announced they have signed a military basing agreement— patterned after one in force between India and the US since 2016—that allows each country to use the other’s naval and air force bases for routine resupply and maintenance. A similar agreement is currently being negotiated between India and Japan.
Third, India and China’s remote border regions have suddenly acquired great geo-political significance. One of the US strategies for weakening China is to exploit grievances among its ethnic minorities. India borders China’s Tibetan Autonomous Region and the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region.
Even more critically, the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (COEC)—a $60 billion program of infrastructure projects, of which the development of pipeline, road, and rail links between western China and the Pakistan Arabian seaport of Gwadar is the centerpiece—passes through Aksai Chin and Pakistan held Gilgit-Baltistan.
India claims sovereignty over both Aksai Chin and Pakistan-held Gilgit-Baltistan, and pointedly reiterated these claims last August when the BJP government illegally stripped Jammu and Kashmir, hitherto India’s only Muslim-majority state, of its semi-autonomous status. This was part of a powerplay directed at strengthening central government control over the contested Kashmir region and taking a more aggressive diplomatic and strategic stance against both Pakistan and China.
India objects to the $60 billion CPEC because it strengthens economic and strategic ties between China and Pakistan, its arch-rival since the 1947 communal partition of South Asia. Washington is no less adamantly opposed to the CPEC, because a major purpose of it and Beijing’s One Belt Initiative, of which it is a part, is to lessen China’s dependence on Indian Ocean trade, and the ability of the US to cripple China economically by seizing Indian Ocean and South China Sea chokepoints like the Straits of Malacca.
Fourth, China’s Communist Party regime, which restored capitalism three decades ago and now serves as the political instrument of a new capitalist oligarchy, has no progressive answer to the military-strategic pressure that is being placed on China by the US and other imperialist powers with the support of their Indian bourgeois satraps. Incapable of making an appeal to the international working class, the Beijing regime oscillates between building up its military, while whipping up nationalism and making its own bellicose threats, and seeking a deal with the US and other imperialist powers.
Under conditions of an economic collapse without precedent since the Great Depression, surging global geopolitical tensions, and an impending confrontation between a US president intent on establishing a dictatorial regime and the working class, the border confrontation between India and China could yet spin out of control. But whatever its immediate outcome, it is yet another sign that unless stopped through the revolutionary intervention of the international working class, crisis-ridden imperialism is dragging humanity toward a catastrophic global conflagration.

Bolsonaro government attempted to censor Brazil’s coronavirus case count and death toll

Bryan Dyne

The government of fascistic Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro removed public access to months of data on the coronavirus pandemic in the country on Saturday. The Health Ministry’s official COVID-19 website did not have cases and deaths over time and by state and city, but only deaths, cases and recoveries from the past 24 hours until a mass public outcry forced the government to restore the original site.
Bolsonaro defended on Twitter the initial decision to remove the coronavirus records, claiming that “The cumulative data … does not reflect the moment the country is in.” He continued, “Other actions are underway to improve the reporting of cases and confirmation of diagnoses.” The Brazilian president also mocked the country’s media, which has used the data to report on the sharp rise in cases and deaths, commenting, “There goes the story for [well known news program] Jornal Nacional.”
There were just under 675,000 officially confirmed coronavirus cases in the country when the changes to case reporting were made, the most in the world except for the United States, and nearly 36,000 deaths, now past Italy and now only behind the US and United Kingdom. It is not clear whether or not these trends, based on the objective spread of the pandemic, will continue to be reflected in the new version of the site.
The new section of the Nossa Senhora Aparecida cemetery in Manaus, Brazil, was opened last month to cope with a surge in deaths. (AP Photo/Felipe Dana)
Brazil also leads the world in daily new cases and new deaths, a consequence of the pandemic accelerating in the country. At the current rate of exponential increase, there will be one million known cases in the country in two weeks. And as multiple reports have shown, the number of actual cases in the country, which ranks 130th in the world for per capita testing, is likely an order of magnitude higher than currently known.
The growth of infections in Brazil is mirrored by the soaring case numbers in other parts of the world. Globally, there are now more than 7 million cases, an increase of one million cases in nine days, and more than 400,000 dead. Hotspots have emerged in Mexico, Russia, Chile, Peru and Pakistan, alongside the already existing epicenters in Brazil, Western Europe and the United States.
The censorship of Brazil’s coronavirus data is a logical continuation of Bolsonaro’s pandemic policy since it first emerged in the region. He at first dismissed the pandemic as the “little flu” and has replaced medical experts that have disagreed with him with members of Brazil’s military. Once the coronavirus gained a foothold in the country, he argued against any lockdowns to stem the tide of the virus and has launched into tirades against governors and mayors that are not reopening their economies as fast as he has demanded.
Brazil is not the only country taking such measures. In the United States, the operator of Florida’s coronavirus dashboard was fired for refusing to manipulate data in support of the governor’s reopening plan. Similarly, in Arizona, the researchers involved with modeling the projections for state coronavirus cases were ordered to “pause” their work by state officials after their data suggested that the state’s lockdown orders should be extended by three weeks.
In Georgia, which was one of the first states to reopen, the Public Health Department published multiple charts which showed a downward trend in cases by rearranging dates in its data. In fact, the number of reported daily new cases in the state has remained relatively constant since the state’s reopening, while the new cases in Arizona and Florida are rising. The country as a whole now has more than two million cases, included more than 1.1 million active cases, and at least 112,000 deaths.
Despite attempts by countries to suppress their coronavirus case numbers, however, even the official counts indicate that the disease is rising significantly across the world. Saudi Arabia yesterday joined the ranks of the countries that have more than 100,000 cases, and Pakistan will follow it today and Canada in little more than a week.
Other countries with high rates of new cases include Bangladesh, South Africa, Qatar, Egypt, Colombia, Ecuador and Iraq. Iran also has consistently had more than 2,000 cases in recent days, after being very hard hit by the pandemic early on and then suppressing it for several weeks. Peru and Chile also rank as some of the most infected countries in South America and the world, ranking high in total cases and new cases, while Peru in particular has seen and continues to have a high death rate.
The explosion of cases in South America caused World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus to comment on Wednesday that, “We are especially worried about Central and South America, where many countries are witnessing accelerating epidemics.” According to analyses from WHO scientists, the continent has not reached its peak number of cases and may not for months.
The two countries that have emerged in recent weeks with high rates of the coronavirus are Mexico and India. In Mexico, Deputy Health Secretary Hugo López-Gatell has asked residents to stay home in order to halt the rising number of infections in the country. At the same time, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has ordered significant sections of the economy, including auto and parts manufacturers, to open.
These orders have played a large part in Mexico’s current public health crisis. The country has 113,000 confirmed cases and more than 13,000 deaths, and health officials have noted that because of the lack of testing in the country, the actual number of cases is likely in the millions.
India faces a similar problem. The government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has ordered workers back into factories, fields and offices even as the number of cases in the country exponentially rises. The virus has gained a beachhead in the crowded neighborhoods of India’s many megacities and has spread like wildfire. The known cases have doubled in just two weeks to 257,000 and are on track to reach one million by the end of this month. And while the death toll is still well below the highs that have been reached by Brazil and the United States, health officials are worried that the number of dead will skyrocket in the days to come.

Tens of thousands continue UK protests against racism and police brutality

Robert Stevens

Over the weekend, more than 100,000 people across the UK continued to protest the death of George Floyd who was killed by police in the US city of Minneapolis on May 25.
Protests went ahead despite Boris Johnson’s Conservative government warning they could become a vector for further spreading coronavirus. The government’s warnings were hypocritical in the extreme, with the “phased” ending of the lockdown announced on May 10, including the re-opening of primary schools last Monday, in defiance of warnings from leading scientists.
A protester in Manchester with placards referring to the police killing of US African-American woman Breonna Taylor and the preventable death of coronavirus of UK rail worker Belly Mujinga
Protesters, many wearing facemasks, turned out in large numbers, rejecting statements Friday by senior ministers including Home Secretary Priti Patel that they stay at home.
As with last week’s protests against Floyd’s death, they were multi-racial and youthful in composition, with few demonstrators over 30 years of age.
In London on Saturday, around 40,000 protested in Parliament Square and Whitehall, marching to the US embassy across the River Thames in Battersea.
Many chanted George Floyd’s name and brought home-made placards with messages including, “Black Lives Matter,” “No Justice, No Peace,” “No Freedom till we’re equal,” “None of us are equal until all of us are equal,” “Fight racism, fight exploitation, with solidarity,” “Am I Next?” and “Imagine what ISN’T caught on camera”. In reference to the decades-long experience with police brutality in the UK, many placards read “The UK is not innocent.”
People hold placards during a Black Lives Matter rally in Parliament Square in London, Saturday, June 6, 2020, as people protest against the killing of George Floyd by police officers in Minneapolis, USA. Floyd, a black man, died after he was restrained by Minneapolis police while in custody on May 25 in Minnesota. (AP Photo/Frank Augstein)
Speaking to the BBC at the London protest, Sarah Law, a 27-year-old train manager, said: “I don’t want my future children to experience what I have. It’s time for us all to unite together regardless of our race and stand up for what is right.”
Rawle, a 27-year-old teacher from Leicester, said he was protesting because he was “exhausted of being treated as a second-class citizen” and “to hopefully spark some change.
Media coverage of the events was almost exclusively focused on clashes between police riot squads and some protesters at Downing Street on Saturday evening. At around 6pm, riot police were drafted in alongside mounted police, attacking protesters. The Guardian reported, “Police were reinforced, with more than 150 officers standing off with a crowd of up to 500 who chanted choruses of “Boris Johnson is a racist” and also accused police of racism as they were kettled [surrounded by police and not allowed to leave].
“Many [protesters] opposed violence and discouraged the throwing of projectiles, but numerous others were determined to oppose officers and those remaining were reportedly kettled into Sunday, with legal observers reporting protesters had to say their names if they wanted to leave.”
A section of the protest in Piiccadilly Gardens, Manchester
A protest of around 15,000 was held in Manchester on Saturday, filling one of the city’s main squares, Piccadilly Gardens, adjacent Market Street and other streets. People were still arriving on public transport and on foot nearly an hour after the protest began. The protests then marched through the city centres and other main squares. Among the banners being displayed were “The UK is not innocent”, “The UK is Guilty,” “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” “No humanity in Police Brutality” and “The World is my country, the World is ours.”
Flowers and home-made placards were placed at a nearby mural that was painted in memory of George Floyd last week.
Flowers placed by the mural to George Floyd in Manchester
Several thousand attended the protests at Sheffield’s Devonshire Green. Libby, an 18 year old student, said, “I took part in Sheffield’s Black Lives Matter protest to stand in solidarity with people who have been affected by police brutality all over the world with George Floyd’s tragic death being a trigger of the anger built up over many years.”
Other cities and towns where demonstrations were held Saturday included Leicester, Newcastle, Ipswich, Luton, Watford, Milton Keynes, Bath, Gloucester, Cardiff, Swansea, Bangor, Caerphilly, Belfast and Derry. Around 2,000 protested in Belfast’s Custom House Square.
Over 3,000 protested at the US Embassy in Dublin. Other protests in Ireland were held in Limerick and Galway, with up to 800 protesting in Galway.
Among the placards at the Dublin protest were “We can’t breathe,” “Enough is Enough,” “Abolish the Police,” and No Justice, No Peace”. A number of placards denounced the Direct Provision system of asylum seeker accommodation used in the Republic of Ireland. One read “Direct Provision is a Prison”. The system was introduced in 2000, with strict access control—under it, asylum seekers have no right to work and do not receive any social welfare payments. Instead they receive an allowance of just €21.60 per week.
At all the demonstrations, protesters brought placards demanding “Justice for Belly Mujinga”. Belly, a 47-year-old rail worker, died on April 5 in hospital in Barnet, leaving behind her distraught husband, Lusamba Gode Katalay, her 11-year-old daughter and family. On March 21, Belly had pleaded with her manager at London’s Victoria Station not to be sent out to the station platform, as she was in an at-risk category and did not have personal protective equipment (PPE). Her appeal was ignored. Soon after she and her colleague were spat at by a man claiming to have COVID-19. Within days, Belly and her colleague had fallen ill with the virus. Last week, the British Transport Police stated that “no further action” would be taken in relation to what it described as an “incident” at Victoria station.
In just a few days, over 1.5 million people have signed a petition demanding justice for Belly.
Protesters hold up home-made placards at the Manchester protest
On Sunday, another large protest was held in London, with thousands gathered at the US Embassy packing the main road adjacent to the building. Among their chants were “George Floyd, George Floyd” and “Trump Out”. Thousands more demonstrated in Parliament Square, Trafalgar Square and Downing Street. Police mounted barricades on Whitehall in front of the high gates that are already in place to stop the public’s entry into Downing Street.
Outside the capital, more protests by many thousands of people were held in several cities including Bristol, Manchester, Norwich, Coventry, Derby, Colchester, Edinburgh, and Glasgow.
In Glasgow, thousands demonstrated at the city’s Glasgow Green. In Edinburgh, thousands gathered at Holyrood Park. In Bristol, where thousands of people gathered, protesters pulled down a statue of 17th-century slave trader Edward Colston and dumped it into the harbour of the Avon river.

6 Jun 2020

Orange Ventures MEA Seed Challenge 2020 for Entrepreneurs in Africa and Middle East

Application Deadline: 19th July, 2020

About the Award: Orange Ventures Africa Middle & East is a dedicated investmentstream of Orange group on the African Middle & East continent with 50m€ assets under management and 5 companies in thecurrent portfolio.
We are looking to extend our scope to supporting more young and innovative businesseson the continent. Africa Middle & East Seed Challenge is a call for candidates to submit application for seed investmentsfrom 50k€ up to 150k€. The investees will be announced by September 2020 and will integrate the Orange Ventures Africa Middle & East portfolio. Do you think you have what it takes?


Type: Entrepreneurship

Eligibility:
  • This challenge targets seed ventures with high growth potential and predominantly new technologies driven.
  • The Orange Ventures MEA Seed Challenge is open to start-ups in Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Senegal and Tunisia. 
Selection Criteria: At Orange Ventures, we’ll lead your first money or co-invest alongside othersin your seed round. So if
  • You have a bold vision with passion for disruption and expansion
  • You are willing to partner with Orange
  • You are a tech-driven start-up
  • You are mainly operating in Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Sénégal, Tunisia, Morocco and Jordan
  • You run Seed stage company, you have not raised more than €1m in total equity funding
Eligible Countries: Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Senegal and Tunisia. 

Number of Awards: 7 (a winner per country)

Value of Award:
  • Orange Ventures plans to invest a total of €500,000 in the MEA start-up ecosystem as a result of this challenge, with up to seven seed stage start-ups benefiting from an investment of between €50,000 and €150,000.
  • 12 months local mentor to support your business
How to Apply: Fill out the form online, share your investor deck, excel, and 3 minute pitch (video)
Apply

Visit Award Webpage for Details

The Lore of Self- Reliant India

Rahul Kumar

Since 2014, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi has been pompously inventing new mantras as recently he has declared to make India a Self- Reliant country after a standoff with China on Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Ladakh. In the current scenario when the pandemic of Coronavirus has exposed the federal government for its incompetence to handle the rising number of cases; its incapability to offer any financial support to the marginalized farmers, devastated migrants laborers and distraught entrepreneurs, this new mantra is seen as a panacea for all ills prevailing in Indian society and economy.
The movement he announced Self-Reliant India mantra, Whatsapp University paid researchers started sending messages on Whatsapp that from today onward we will not buy Chinese goods. Not only this, a BJP leader burnt Chinese toys in Mumbai( Maharashtra) to show China that we are not depended anymore on China since our beloved Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi has declared to make India a Self-Reliant country. Thank God BJP leaders did not burn a highly expensive statue of Iron man, Bismark of India- Vallabhbhai Jhaverbhai Patel made with Chinese material. Many foreign companies left India to Indonesia, Vietnam and Bangladesh under the financial cult of China. It is important to note that only those Multinational Corporations are surviving in India in which PM Modi`s own leaders and workers have invested money or have business partnerships/ collaborations. Such MNCs are minting money in India and taking this money out of the country. PM and his leaders have no financial interest for Indian Small &Medium Sized Entrepreneurs because SMSE earns less and demands more.
Some Modi`s followers started flashing news on social media that a German company is coming to set –up a shoe factory in the city of Agra( Uttar Pradesh) and would cater to the shoe industry in India. It is, therefore, no need to import shoes from China. It clearly shows that there is no dearth of sheep-followers in India. The majority of Indians do not read newspapers hence they do not know what is happening behind the scene. The investment announced by Saudia Arabia`s state-owned oil giant Saudi ARAMCO suspended because it was opposed by Shiv Sena and BJP alliance. ARAMCO has shifted the ball into India`s court by saying that the Indian government is unable to locate land for the project. This news across the world stopped many multinational companies from coming to India and Mr. Modi could nothing.  Will Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi produce oil and petroleum products in India to make India a self-reliant country?
After Mr. Modi`s sermons on making Self- Reliant India, Swadeshi Jagran Manch(SJM), an affiliate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh(RSS) leave no chance to be in the news headlines that the Modi Government should initiate a pan-India Swadeshi Swavlamban Abhiyan( Self- reliance campaign) to promote local production. Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, Minister for Science and Technology, Government of India, claims that India’s production of mobile phones has gone up to approximately 33 crores ( 33 Million) in 2019-20. The litany is that Minister himself does not know exact figure of mobile phones being produced in India without the help of Chinese Smartphone companies. Xiaomi. Oppo, Realm, Oneplus,Vivo, iQOO, Huawei, Lenovo, Motorola, Tecno, Infinix are the Chinese Smartphone companies in India producing Smartphones. Vivo has a huge facility in greater Noida to assemble (MAKE) smartphones in India. Does Mr. Modi and His Union Ministers and those who are burning Chinese toys in Mumbai have the guts to close these Chinese companies in India?
In the last few days, Indian manufacturers have turned into Indian traders because of the complex tax systems, corruption, and license raj. For example, businessmen who were manufacturing Thermometer in India have stopped manufacturing due to the non-availability of raw material. Thermometer is still being imported from China. Another case in point is the Sports industry in India. Most of the Sports manufacturing units in Jalandhar (Punjab) are shut now. Owners prefer to import all types of Sports items from China. When asked why have they shut their manufacturing units, they responded, “It is not worth after the announcement of Goods and Services Tax (GST)”. Similarly, Furniture manufacturers in India has closed its factories barring a few after the GST. Another case in point, Kirit Nagar( New Delhi) a famous furniture market where one can see showrooms full of Chinese furniture. One of my friends has been selling Chinese furniture, told me that, “It is not financially viable after GST to manufacture furniture in India”. He further told that “Most of the owners of the showroom import furniture from China.”  “We hire labor only to assemble and repair the Chinese furniture”, he said. These are a few examples cited here to highlight the ground realities. Does Mr. Modi and his so-called anti-China leaders have the guts to shut all these Kirti Nagar showrooms that are selling Chinese furniture?
After the announcement of Self- Reliant India, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi signed an agreement with Prime Minister of Australia Scott Morrison. PM wants Australia to supply India with seven of the 12 critical minerals key to future industries, including antimony, cobalt, lithium, and rare earth elements. Before stand-off with China, India was importing most of the raw material from China. The nation wants to know what is the difference between Australia and China? Why Mr. Modi is embracing Australia under the pressure of US President Donald Trump and antagonizing China. Indian Diaspora is an important factor in the comprehensive strategic partnership between India- Australia. Mr.Modi should speak to his counterpart about Indians who are facing racial discrimination in Australia. When Ms. Sushma Swaraj was a Foreign Minister of India, many Indians were killed by racists Australians (mostly Punjabis) but she could nothing except issuing empty statements while sitting in Air-conditioned rooms in New Delhi.
Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi is not aware of the historical background of US and Britain. Edward Gough Whitlam, 21st Prime Minister of Australia (1972-1975) moved Australia towards the Non-Aligned Movement(NAM) and called for a Zone of Peace in the Indian ocean, which the US and Britain opposed. It is unfortunate that a qualified person like Dr. Subrahmanyam Jai Shankar, current Minister of External Affairs, and Government of India who has the brain and knowledge of international affairs but unable to exercise his wisdom; has been made a dignified desk clerk by Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi. The same attitude was displayed by Modi towards Ms. Sushma Swaraj(2014-2019.  It is the Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi who want to run all Indian Ministries under his thump. It is one of the reasons that the foreign policy of India has been failed. Nepal is a recent example.
Self- Reliant India under Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi imports petroleum products from different countries. India imports gas from Qatar, Russia, Australia, and the US despite India`s capacity to produce. A report published in Live mint by Kalpana Pathak shows that “Indian refineries are not running at full capacity, so we decided to divert crude and instead fill up our crude caverns. Lack of storage capacity is an opportunity lost for the country.  “We could have taken full advantage of these historically low crude oil prices.” This is how Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi will make India a Self-Reliant country when he and his team lack advance planning.  Revenue loss is an economic burden on the taxpayer.
Under US President Donald Trump Mr. Modi stopped importing oil from Iran despite US imposed crippling sanctions on India. India needs electricity grids. From 2014 to 2019, how many electric grids in Self-Reliant India Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi and his team built to cater to the needs of the burgeoning population (now 1.35 billion) is still unknown. According to Brooking India report on Electricity, “most states in India have a large deficit in electricity supply”.
Economists and trade experts believe that China has entered into the blood of Indian traders. China is sugar for Indian traders that is needed to maintain blood glucose. The moment this sugar is taken out of the body of the Indian traders, they will collapse. In the crippling Indian economy, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi has no money to boost up small or medium scale industries. Self-Reliant mantra is sinister hogwash. Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi is plaguing the domestic & foreign policy with Utopianism, sentimentalism & isolation flaws which are highly dangerous for the country. Citizens of India have to think about our nation that is made weaker, sicker, poorer, and more divided by PM Modi.

Female Subjugation In Modern Days: Hegemony By Consent

Neha Perween


Many girls with higher educational qualifications from a typical North Indian family background faces a patriarchal structure which is very unique and must be pondered upon.

Female subjugation is not a new phenomenon and it is there in the world since antiquity. But, nowadays we are witnessing a form of subjugation which is very different in structural framework. In past female were destituted from very basic rights like education, property, political rights and various social evils like sati, child marriage and dowry were there to tarnish their existence. But these evil practices were fought and triumphed with the advent of Renaissance.

Nowadays when our society claims to be ‘modern’ and ‘progressive’ one, they no doubt at some level excelled in providing females their rights, education and empowerment but with certain terms and conditions :-

Firstly, with all the knowledge and awareness young girls particularly in North Indian families are nurtured and brought up in such a way that they dare not be outspoken about their views and opinions. They are more or less trained to be silent and submissive when it comes to present their point of view or to demand to live for their rights. And if a small fraction of these girls are erudite enough to acknowledge their worth and present it to the world are labelled as ‘sharp’ and ‘discourteous’. Our very progressive society manufacture girls with rational thinking abilities but without tongue. Encourage them with fancy words like ‘decent’ or ‘well mannered’.

Secondly, In this modern society dowry is still prevalent but with a twisting approach . When the other party demands dowry what is ridiculously interesting is that the girl who are educated enough to understand dowry as a evil practice but still be fine with it without objecting once because from childhood it is injected in their minds that the more (wealth) she will take with herself the more love and respect she will get from her In-laws and husband. Obviously, the same is not with all the girls but most of the girls are nurtured in this way so that this evil practice goes on forever.

Thirdly, the men with white collared job who think of themselves as an ‘achiever’ as if they have conquered the world while looking for a bride want a girl who is educated, beautiful with a pinch of cuteness and everything else a good wife needs to have. They marry a passionate, empowered girls only to show off and when their quest of ranting and showing off ended they demand from the same girl to leave their passion /job /dream and take care of his family and be a good wife. Before marriage he does not want the girls to be a good cook or to know the art of home making but after marriage same men want their wives to have all these qualities because according to them that’s their real duty is. The society do not for once object the hypocrisy of men but demand from the girls to obey their husbands will. And in accompanying their partner these girls give them a consent to be a hegemon of their life. It can be understood by Antonio Gramsci (A neo-Marxist thinker) theory of ‘Hegemony by consent’ in which few developed countries exploit developing nations by various means of consents.

And lastly, girls from the very beginning are taught to look after their physical appearance – ‘besan’ (gram flour) is very prevalent in Indian society to teach their daughters to apply and enhance their beauty. But they do not even once clearly make them understand that beauty lies in good character and not fair look. Parents do not teach their daughters to be true to themselves and towards other and they do not teach them that no matter what the circumstances are don’t loose your self – identity just to be nice in other persons eyes whether it is your husband.

The patriarchal structure of society cannot be overthrown all of a sudden. In all the above stated points their lies the consent of the girls. So the need of the hour is for girls to understand that decency doesn’t lies in complete submissions. They should be bold enough to fearlessly present their perspectives about anything and everything and they must be well aware about their boundaries of obligations.

Secondly, in obeying their husbands a women should not loose her own self and should try to build their world with mutual consensus and not by one sided hegemony.

And the last advice is for patriarchal society that if you are giving your daughters the arms of existence and passion then do not compel her to be a silent spectator in watching the murder of her own will. It is same like teaching a bird to fly and then cut her wings and shut her down in the cage. LET HER FLY.

Venezuela, Minneapolis, Iran, Europe – Trump’s Last Gasps of Collapsing World Control – Or is it?

Peter Koenig

There comes a time when shooting around in circles just hits walls, bullets splinter off sidewalks, and shatter a window here and there. But people are in safety. They watch from a distance and with self-assurance.
Venezuela has received five tankers from Iran loaded with hydrocarbons – petrol gas, additives – shipped through a totally US-militarized Caribbean Sea, amidst warnings of attacks and retaliations – and as usual, sanctions ’no end’. How much more sanctions can a country get? There is an immune system, called sovereignty and fearlessness – confidence and dignity. Knowing your rights. That’s what makes the whole difference.
Granted, the tankers were escorted by the Venezuelan Navy and Air Force; especially through Venezuelan waters. And they made it undisturbed to the port of El Palito, a small Venezuelan port run by Venezuela’s state oil company PDVSA. The American shooting didn’t take place and the event was not televised.
Another aggression against Venezuelan sovereignty is the Bank of England’s withholding totally illegally some US$ 1.2 billion worth of Venezuelan gold, deposited voluntarily by Venezuela in times of trust – as part of Venezuela’s reserve funds. With oil prices collapsed, Venezuela decided to use part of her gold reserves to purchase medication and food to counter the disastrous corona effects.
Venezuela claimed the gold deposited at the Bank of England (BoE) which offers gold custodian services mostly but not exclusively to developing nations; and so, does the New York FED and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Basle and several other international institutions and central banks considered safe and trustworthy. These are legal arrangements under which the depositing country may withdraw the funds at any time and at will.
Venezuela has a sovereign right to claim these funds without any explanation or justification. The BoE refused, claiming the Government of Nicolas Maduro was not the legitimate government recognized by the UK. Can you imagine – if any government decides to confiscate funds from another government, because they don’t like its leadership — where would we end up? – Well, there is not much guessing. We are already there. The Anglo-Zionist world makes its own rules and decides over and above any international law. And the spineless European puppets follow their cue. It is high time that this matrix collapses and gives way to a civilization that recognizes the values of democracy, justice, basic ethics and human rights.
In this case, Venezuela explained that the money is needed to buy food and medication to counter the nefarious effects of COVID-19.  The UN, intervening on behalf of Venezuela, has requested the BoE to return the money. That gesture or action by the UN is in itself is an act of ‘independence’ by the UN against the US, for whom the UN otherwise does the bidding. But to no avail. The BoE didn’t release the Venezuelan-owned gold. As a compromise, Venezuela suggested that the funds be handed over to UNDP (United Nations Development Program) which would buy vital food and medication for Venezuela.
Already at the end of 2018, Venezuelan Finance Minister Simón Zerpa and Central Bank President Calixto Ortega, travelled to London to demand that Venezuela be allowed to take the gold back to Venezuela. In January 2019, the BoE refused the request. All it said publicly was that it did not comment on customer relationships. However, the real reason was clear.
The US-trained and self-proclaimed, US supported Juan Guaido, an Assembly member, who was never elected – who never faced a presidential election – asked Downing Street that the gold was not returned to the legitimate Maduro Government which Washington, the UK and other EU members, out of the blue and without any legal reasons declared illegitimate. What a world! – Imagine that some 40 or 50 countries in the world would decide that Donald Trump and Angela Merkel were illegitimately in their high offices. Well, you laugh. It would never happen.
Under pressure from Washington, and her own neofascist government, the UK and her central bank didn’t budge. The case was brought on May 14, 2020, to a Court in London. A Venezuela-favorable judgement is however unlikely. The case will then go to the International Court of Justice in The Hague. Will the ICJ have enough backbone to decide against Washington? That  remains to be seen. It would be another sign that Trump’s last trumps are gone.
On yet another account, the Trump Administration has seized all Venezuelan assets in the US, including in 2018, the CITCO refinery and gas station network, in a further attempt to hurt their self-made archenemy, socialist Venezuela. CITCO’s assets in the United States, are estimated at about 8 billion dollars, plus about 30 billion dollars of annual revenues. CITCO covers about 10% of the US domestic gasoline market. Overall Venezuelan assets confiscated – or more accurately described as stolen – in the US and overseas are estimated at about 50 to 70 billion dollars.
In addition to other strangulating sanctions and coercive actions by Washington against Venezuela, just think what these illegally US-appropriated funds could do to ease living conditions of Venezuelans whose hardship has exclusively been brought about by Washington and Washington’s coercion of its so-called western allies – alias vassals, especially Europe – to economically sanction Venezuela. A hardship being exacerbated by the Covid-19 crisis. Mind you, Venezuela has done no harm, has never threatened any of the countries that follow the US dictate on “economic sanctions”.
Yet, through this all, Venezuela remains calm, non-aggressive, non-conflictive, self-assured and survives; and Venezuela has actually mastered the Covid-crisis better than most of Latin America. According to WHO, as of 4 June Venezuela registered 1819 confirmed cases and only 18 deaths.
Venezuela’s strength of resistance and self-determination is extraordinary. It is THE recipe for success and for overcoming western oppression. This autonomy and Iran’s undisturbed solidarity and sovereign action to help Venezuela with oil tankers despite the US threats, are signals to the world that Washington’s empire is crumbling.
Or, as Andre Vltchek pointedly says in his article about the brutal police murder of Mr. George Floyd, “The World Cannot Breathe!” Squashed by the U.S. – A Country Built on Genocide and Slavery: Now more and more people can finally see what few of us have been repeating for years: The entire world has its neck squashed by the U.S. boot. The entire world “cannot breathe”! And the entire world has to fight for its right to be able to breathe!”
Let’s add to this: And the entire world is no longer afraid to stand up and defend and fight for their rights.
This “fight” is increasingly a battle of the 99 % against the 1% – the rich and powerful psychopaths wanting to control ever more of the globe’s resources. With every day this battle is turning more in favor of We, the People.
The worldwide corona-lockdown and the yet unfathomable social and economic calamity of uncountable unemployment, famine and misery – unheard of in human history – is unwittingly shocking he billions of victims worldwide into an awakening that the masters behind the crisis, behind the nonsensical lockdown, behind the power and control thirst – the Gates, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Soros and Co., may not have thought of.
The ruthless killing of George Floyd has set in motion a series of riots throughout the US – affecting some 150 US-cities. Admittedly the riots are largely financed and organized by Soros & Co. (see https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-06-02-antifa-plans-purge-of-suburbs-homes-starting-tonight.html) with the objective of a broad military lockdown. Though, these unrests will likely gain their own dynamic, as the wave spreads to Europe and possibly also to the Global South. While the generous financiers of Antifa, Black Lives Matter and other protest organizations may have as their clear objective the militarization of the west, dynamics of an awakened people may derail the diabolical psychopaths’ goals and ring in a new set of societal values.
The resisting forces and perseverance of the people of Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, let alone, Russia and China, have magical power. Never mind the physical losses of stolen assets, of economic sanctions, of attempted humiliation by the neoliberal western alliance breaching contracts and agreements at will, i.e. the Iran Nuclear Deal, several disarmament agreements with Russia – and more – the new wave of spiritual and universal consciousness gains, far outpace these losses. The forces of Light may overcome the Darkness which has engulfed humanity over the last 5,000 years – laying the foundation for a new society with values of equality and peace for a common future for mankind.

More Australian war crimes exposed in Afghanistan

Jason Quill

Fresh revelations are emerging that further lay bare the long-running official cover-up of illegal Australian Special Air Service Regiment (SAS) killings and other abuses throughout the US-led occupation of Afghanistan.
The Australian Federal Police is now investigating a second killing by the special forces officer, known publicly only as Soldier C, after an Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) report revealed video evidence showing the murder of a disabled Afghan farmer in March 2012.
The belated investigation comes amid a protracted closed-door inquiry by the Inspector General of the Australian Defence Force (IGADF) into least 55 alleged incidents of SAS involvement in war crimes between 2005 and 2016.
Two patrol members stated that Soldier C shot Ziauddin, an Afghan farmer in his early 20s from the Paryan Nawa region of Kandahar province, in the back of the head at point blank range as he tried to “limp away.” One soldier told the ABC: “He was obviously intellectually disabled. His head exploded. There was no need for what happened. No need whatsoever. In my book that was war crimes—murder.”
Ziauddin’s relative Zalimulla backed up the claims. “There was a raid,” he said. “[Helicopters] landed at about 11:00. He was about 80 to 100 metres away from where [they] landed. As [they] landed, he came towards home, he wanted to come home. He walked a distance but those people shot him.” He explained that Ziauddin was mentally disabled due to being beaten by the Taliban two years earlier and could not have been a threat to the Australian soldiers.
A patrol member was ordered to dress the man’s body in a “battle bra” chest rig containing assault rifle magazines, in order to make it appear he was an enemy combatant. When the patrol arrived back at base they were told to regard the dead man as a “high value target” and a legitimate kill. “I knew that was a lie. Everyone there knew that was a lie,” a patrol member said.
Soldier C was stood down following the showing of a soldier’s helmet footage by investigative ABC news program “Four Corners” earlier this year, which clearly revealed the point blank execution of unarmed Afghan farmer Dad Mohammad in May 2012. Despite being initially cleared by ADF on the basis that the man had a radio (and was possibly therefore a scout for the Taliban), the footage led to a referral to the police.
The exposure of Ziauddin’s killing highlights the years of coverups by successive governments, both Liberal-National and Labor, of military abuses in the Middle East.
In 2016, the military commissioned an initial inquiry after supposedly becoming concerned about the impact of years of high-intensity deployments on Australia’s special forces. Dr. Samantha Crompvoets was hired as a consultant to gather the classified, later leaked, documents that prompted the IGADF inquiry.
The Crompvoets report, which involved interviewing a range of personnel, attributed the abuses to a military “culture” of “unsanctioned and illegal application of violence on operations.”
However, despite over 250 people being interviewed so far, not a single person has yet been charged, and the IGADF inquiry, overseen by Supreme Court Justice and Major General Paul Brereton, will reportedly only hand down “recommendations” later this year.
In fact, the only charge is against military lawyer David McBride, who faces a closed-door trial for allegedly leaking classified documents to the ABC in 2017. Known as the “Afghan Files,” they document at least 10 incidents of possible war crimes. The Federal Police also raided the ABC headquarters and two ABC journalists, Dan Oakes and Sam Clarke, could still be prosecuted.
At the same time, former special forces soldier and Victoria Cross and Medal for Gallantry recipient Ben Roberts-Smith, lauded as a “war hero” by the political establishment and mainstream media, has pursued defamation cases against three newspapers for more than three years.
Military documents recently released during the proceedings claim that in September 2012, Roberts-Smith took a handcuffed Afghan man called Ali Jan, placed him at the edge of a small cliff, then kicked him so he fell into a dry creek bed, before ordering another soldier, known only as “Person 11,” to shoot him. The documents also allege that between 2009 and 2012, Roberts-Smith was involved in another four murders during his tours of duty, including one of an unarmed civilian who had a prosthetic leg.
On Wednesday, Sandy Dawson SC, who represents the newspapers, introduced two more allegations into the proceedings. The court was told that Roberts-Smith was involved in the killings in the villages of Sola and Syahchow, both in Uruzgan province, in August and October 2012.
The first pertained to a patrol member known as “Person 4” under Roberts-Smith’s command allegedly asking for a “throw down,” which meant giving an Afghan detainee a radio to make killing him permissible under the rules of engagement.
The second concerned accusations that Roberts-Smith directed a soldier known as “Person 66” to kill an Afghan detainee in a field in Syahchow, in order to “blood” the young soldier. Dawson said: “Blooding is a term [for] the process by which a young soldier is directed to kill for the first time and is therefore ‘blooded.’”
This brings the number of war crime allegations against Roberts-Smith, one of the most decorated soldiers to serve in Afghanistan, to seven.
Attorney-General Christian Porter has applied for special secrecy laws to be invoked for the defamation case, cutting off public oversight of the hearing. Porter earlier made a similar application for the McBride trial.
Attempts to attribute war crimes to “bad apples” in the military are a whitewash. The systematic abuses and protracted cover-ups are inseparable from the decades-long imperialist wars in, and occupation of, Afghanistan and Iraq, conducted to attempt to secure US control over the strategic and resource-rich Middle East and Central Asia region.
The special forces have been on the frontline of these operations precisely because their members are trained and conditioned to kill. Far from curbing the SAS, the current Liberal-National government is following its predecessors in boosting them.
Project GREYFIN, a $3 billion program over the next two decades, will in its first phase go toward “cutting-edge body armour, weapons, and parachuting and climbing systems.” This is part of a massive expansion of military spending, with $200 billion allocated over a decade for new war planes, vessels and hardware.