2 Oct 2020

Nearly 20,000 US Amazon and Whole Foods workers have been infected with COVID-19

Tom Carter


On Thursday, the management of Amazon quietly revealed in a blog post that 19,816 employees in the US, including warehouse and Whole Foods workers, have tested positive for COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic.

Amazon workers protest unsafe working conditions in Staten Island, New York, on March 30, 2020 [Credit: AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews]

This revelation follows months during which the management evaded, ignored and refused to meet demands by rank-and-file workers for the release of this information.

In a statement on April 23, the World Socialist Web Site’s International Amazon Workers Voice urged workers to form rank-and-file committees to demand the release of infection statistics at Amazon as a question of basic safety, pointing out that the company “systematically refuses to provide information to workers as to the number of cases” of workers who have gotten sick.

In the intervening months, workers who demanded this information were variously told that management did not track the information at all, that management could not answer workers’ questions because of HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) or other laws, and that management was supposedly concerned for workers’ privacy. Workers were told that the total number of infections was not “particularly useful,” but that Amazon’s safety precautions in the warehouses were “working” and “paying off.”

In May, Amazon senior vice president of global operations Dave Clark claimed—despite working for a company that tracks every second of every worker’s day in a warehouse—that he did not know the total number of infections. In an interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Clark also said, “I don't have the number right on me at this moment because it’s not a particularly useful number.”

In May, a dozen state attorneys general demanded that Amazon disclose the total number of infections, but Amazon refused to make that information public.

While hiding the true number of infections, Amazon claimed that its countermeasures to the virus were “working” in the warehouses. Amazon spokesperson Lisa Levandowski told CNN Business in May that “our hard work around social distancing is paying off,” implying that workers were safe from infection.

Now that it suits the company to release the information on its own terms and at the time of its choosing, it turns out that all of the excuses that workers were given were lies.

With management refusing to disclose basic data necessary for employees’ safety, workers attempted to gather the data themselves on social media, with one count reaching 2,000 cases. Former Amazon worker Jana Jumpp, who was interviewed in June on the World Socialist Web Site regarding her efforts to compile these statistics, acknowledged at the time that the available information was “just the tip of the iceberg.”

Releasing the data on Thursday in the form of a blog post, Amazon pretended that workers’ demands had nothing to do with the release of the information, absurdly posturing as an advocate of transparency and urging other companies to release similar data. “Wide availability of data would allow us to benchmark our progress and share best practices across businesses and industries,” the company stated.

Amazon has benefited spectacularly from its decision to keep workers at their posts during the pandemic. While competitors floundered and Amazon expanded its dominance over significant sections of the global logistics infrastructure, the company’s market capitalization rose from approximately $920 billion at the start of the year to $1.6 trillion as of Friday. This amounts to $34 million for each worker who got sick.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, the world’s richest man, saw his wealth climb to over $200 billion in September, an increase of approximately $87 billion since the start of the year. This translates to approximately $4.35 million for each worker who got sick.

Amazon accompanied the release of the total number of cases with tables purporting to show the rate of infection among Amazon workers being less than the state averages, congratulating itself on keeping workers safe. This is nonsense worthy of a Trump press conference, since it is obvious that working in a warehouse alongside hundreds of other workers represents an increased risk of infection over staying at home. It is a dubious calculation in any case, under conditions where systematic testing is not being conducted.

In the case of Minnesota, Amazon’s own statistics show the average rate of infection among Amazon workers was approximately 32 out of every thousand workers, far higher than the state average of 19.

While management has released the total number of infections, it is far from the total amount of data that workers need in order to make informed decisions about the danger of going to work and the adequacy of safety precautions in their workplaces.

In the context of a deadly pandemic, there is absolutely no legitimate reason why up-to-the-minute information should not be instantly accessible to all workers in any given workplace regarding suspected and positive cases, reported symptoms, pending tests, and preemptive quarantines. Indeed, workers need this information in order to take measures to ensure that their workspace is safe. The only reason to suppress this information is to blunt workers’ opposition, to lull workers into a false sense of security, and to keep the profits flowing during the pandemic.

“Shameful that they are just now releasing this,” Jana Jumpp told the International Amazon Workers Voice on Friday. “I would love to know more specifics. How many cases at each facility? How many people were quarantined for close contact? Who is administering tests at the facilities?” She continued, “I feel like this story is just getting started.”

“I’m not shocked by the numbers,” an Amazon worker in Baltimore told the International Amazon Workers Voice, responding to the news, “because in a sense I always knew that the numbers were being buried, kind of like the president’s been doing. Business as usual, everything’s fine. So here we are.”

“I have been saying and asking for many, many weeks about contact tracing. If someone in my work area is gone because they got COVID-19, I would expect that we would be contacted so that we could get tested,” he continued, referring to his own warehouse. “Not once have I been contacted by anyone letting me know, even though I later found out that a coworker I was working closely with had contracted the virus. Is this contact tracing thing even working?”

Amazon has made no formal acknowledgment of the number of workers who have died from the virus, but NBC News has counted 10 worker deaths to date, according to a report published Wednesday.

Terrified of workers’ opposition and reeling from the swarm of walkouts in April and May, Amazon management has brought on board veteran agents from the repressive apparatus of the state to oversee its efforts to anticipate and suppress workers’ resistance. The company has also been exposed engaging in systematic violations of workers’ privacy, spying on them on social media as well as in internal listservs.

The attitude of management to workers’ safety during the pandemic is only a continuation of Amazon’s abominable safety record in the preceding years. In both 2018 and 2019, Amazon was included on “The Dirty Dozen” list maintained by the National Council for Occupational Safety and Health (National COSH), which described Amazon as a company that “put workers and communities at risk due to unsafe practices.”

In 2019, there were 14,000 serious injuries at Amazon, according to a report published Tuesday by the Center for Investigative Reporting. This amounts to the incredible figure of eight serious injuries for every 100 workers every year, or double the already atrocious industry average.

This is consistent with data obtained by the International Amazon Workers Voice, which counted 567 serious injuries at one warehouse in Texas over a two-year period, including Amazon whistleblower Shannon Allen, who became homeless after her injury and began sleeping in the company parking lot.

Amazon workers’ jobs have only become more unsafe during the pandemic, as the dangerousness of the work is now compounded by the risk of contracting the deadly virus.

The revelation that tens of thousands of workers at Amazon have already been sickened will only increase workers’ exasperation with the murderous “back-to-work” and “re-opening” policies being implemented around the world.

Trump falls victim of his own ‘herd immunity’ policy

Patrick Martin


President Trump was airlifted to Walter Reed Medical Center Friday evening after testing positive for COVID-19. According to the extremely limited information released by the White House, he was treated with a cocktail of experimental drugs during the day but had a persistent low-grade fever, a significant factor in the decision to send him to the hospital.

There is no sign that Trump’s coming down with COVID-19 has evoked any sympathy among broad layers of the American population. Among working people who have lost loved ones or barely survived a debilitating illness themselves, there is no doubt a powerful feeling that Trump is getting his just deserts. Given his role in downplaying the virus and disparaging the use of face masks, he is like an arsonist who has inadvertently set himself on fire.

Trump’s positive test for coronavirus has dramatically intensified the political crisis in the United States. It has thrown a spanner into the works, at least temporarily, for the fascist forces Trump was seeking to mobilize to spearhead an election coup d’état. And it has demonstrated the criminal recklessness of the policy of reopening the schools and forcing workers back to work in the face of the pandemic.

Millions of working people are being given an irrefutable demonstration of the real dangers posed by the coronavirus. If the President of the United States, ensconced in the White House, surrounded by an army of aides and Secret Service agents, and with access to the best medical technology, cannot be protected from COVID-19, how can workers in auto and meatpacking plants, or teachers and students in classrooms, be considered safe from this deadly threat?

Trump’s diagnosis coincides with the admission by Amazon that a staggering 20,000 of its US employees have tested positive for the coronavirus. The fortune of the world’s richest man, Jeff Bezos, like all capitalist wealth, is amassed through the destruction of the health and lives of superexploited workers.

The lavish treatment afforded Trump, who is occupying the presidential suite at Walter Reed, attended by a retinue of medical personnel, while he continues to exercise the powers of his office, is in stark contrast to the treatment received by millions of COVID-19 patients whose suffering was exacerbated by the Trump administration’s neglect, indifference and incompetence.

Trump did not languish for hours in an emergency room before he could get a bed. He will not be attended by nurses wearing garbage bags instead of Personal Protection Equipment. There will be no shortage of ventilators and other specialized equipment and drugs if his case takes a turn for the worse. He will lack for nothing, while millions of working people have already gone two months since the cutoff of federal extended unemployment benefits.

The short-term political consequences of this event are highly unpredictable. They depend to a large extent on whether Trump, at age 74 and clinically obese, is able to recover rapidly or at all. It will be several days before it will be known whether Trump’s infection is mild or more severe. Patients of Trump’s age, weight and gender have a mortality rate from three to 11 percent.

If Trump remains hospitalized, the question of handing over day-to-day political authority to Vice President Mike Pence will be raised. A more severe illness, particularly if Trump requires a ventilator, will raise the question of invoking the 25th Amendment to the US Constitution, which allows the vice president to take the place of the president with the support of a majority of cabinet officers.

None of the information being released by the White House can be taken at face value. Questions remain about how long Trump has been ill, how long he has known he was infected, and how many people he may have infected in the White House, Congress, and in his travels to and from campaign rallies. It is likely that he was infectious during the debate with his Democratic opponent Joe Biden Tuesday night in Cleveland. Biden and his running mate Kamala Harris have since tested negative.

The day-to-day operations of both the executive and legislative branches will be significantly disrupted by the Trump diagnosis. An undisclosed number of White House aides have tested positive, including Hope Hicks and Kellyanne Conway, as well as Trump’s wife Melania. Republican senators Mike Lee and Senator Thom Tillis, who visited the White House last Saturday for the announcement of the appointment of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, have both tested positive.

The Trump reelection campaign has announced that all events involving the president or any family members have either been postponed or rescheduled as virtual events. Trump’s ability to participate in future debates is in question, with the next one set for October 15 in Miami, Florida. If Trump’s illness worsens, there could be attempts to replace him as the Republican candidate, either on the November ballot, or in the Electoral College, whose voters meet December 14 in state capitals across the country.

In this crisis, the main role of the Democratic Party has been to downplay the threat of a political coup by Trump around the November 3 election. They seek to shut down any opposition to Trump that might give expression to the deep social anger in the working class. Their greatest fear is that Trump’s illness could open the way to a more general collapse of the Republicans, leading to a sweeping victory in the November 3 election that puts Biden in the White House and installs a Democratic majority in the Senate as well as the House of Representatives. The last thing they want is to face popular expectations that a Biden administration will take immediate action to undo the horrific consequences of Trump’s right-wing policies over the past four years.

Even if it comes to power in Washington as a consequence of this sudden turn of events, the Democratic Party remains a party of Wall Street and the CIA. Nancy Pelosi’s first media comments after the news broke was that measures to preserve “continuity of government” were in place. Biden speaks incessantly of his desire to restore “normalcy” to American capitalism. In other words, the Democrats wish to maintain the American ruling elite in its accustomed position of undisturbed self-enrichment, while excluding the broad mass of working people from any say in the operations of American society.

The Trump diagnosis does not alter the fundamental trajectory of the social and political crisis of American capitalism. Even if Trump were to die of the pandemic, he is not the cause of the fascist danger confronting the working class, but merely the instrument. It will disrupt the effort to build a personalist, authoritarian movement if the would-be Mussolini is removed from the political equation. But the American ruling elite will find new instruments unless the working class takes up the political struggle against the capitalist system that is so urgently needed.

As the WSWS warned in our Perspective of October 1:

The ruling class knows that it confronts mass social anger that will take an explosive and potentially revolutionary form. This is what imparts to Trump’s actions their frenzied and reckless character. Terrified of the development of social opposition, he sees in every protest and manifestation of opposition the danger of the “radical left” and “socialism.” The growth of working class militancy, already apparent in the wave of strikes, has convinced a substantial section of the ruling class that they have no way out except through violence.

With or without Trump, the fundamental class issues remain, and American political life remains poised on a knife-edge. Fascist reaction, having tried to use Trump to smash through the front door and impose dictatorship, may be compelled to push through the back door. Without the intervention of the working class, it will find a political Plan B. The most urgent necessity is for working people and young people to take up a political struggle against the capitalist system and both the parties that defend it.

Yale Young Global Scholars 2021

Application Deadline: 10th November, 2020 11:59pm ET

Eligible Countries: International

To be taken at (country): Yale University in New Haven in USA.

About the Award: Yale Young Global Scholars provides scholarships to students with demonstrated financial need. The application for partial and full scholarships are included in the online program application and must be completed by the 2021 application deadline. It is recommended that parents or guardians of applicants help students complete the required financial information.

We will award scholarship money based on need demonstrated in your completed application. Last year, approximately one third of program participants received full or partial scholarships based on financial need. Unfortunately, Yale Young Global Scholars financial assistance cannot cover travel expenses, and we cannot guarantee financial aid to all those who apply for it.

Offered Since: 2001

Type: Short Courses, Undergraduate

Eligibility: 

  • Age: Be at least 16 years old by July 19, 2021 (first day of Session III).
  • English Fluency: Be able to participate in a rigorous academic curriculum conducted in English.
  • Grade Level: Be a current high school sophomore or junior (or international equivalent).
  • Graduation Date: Be graduating in May/June 2022 or 2023 from the Northern Hemisphere, or in Nov./Dec. 2021 or 2022 from the Southern Hemisphere.
  • YYGS Participation: Be a first-time participant in YYGS. If you have participated in any YYGS session during a previous summer (e.g., 2020, 2019), then you are not eligible to participate during YYGS 2021.
  • Please note: If you previously applied to YYGS but were not offered admission or were unable attend AND you meet the eligibility criteria noted above, then you are encouraged to re-apply for YYGS 2021.

Number of Awardees: Not specified

Value of Scholarship: 

  • Thanks to generous donors, YYGS is able to offer a limited number of Scholarships, which are Need-Based Financial Aid packages that cover full-tuition ($6,300 USD) and travel costs.
  • In order to be considered for one of these scholarships (below), you MUST have completed the entire online YYGS Application, including the Need-Based Financial Aid portion..
  • As part of reviewing your financial aid request, YYGS staff will automatically review whether or not you meet any of our 2021 scholarships’ eligibility requirements, and contact you when decisions are released by mid-March
  • Apply early to receive a discount on your application fee. If the fee poses a financial burden, you can submit a fee waiver to reduce your application fee to $0 USD. For more information visit the Application Deadlines page.

Duration of Program:

Session I

(June 21-July 3)

Session II

(July 5 – July 17)

Session III

(July 19-July 31)

How to Apply: The 2020 application is available! Apply now

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Important Notes: We encourage all potential applicants to begin and complete their applications as soon as possible to ensure all materials are submitted by the deadline.

DAAD Research Grants – Doctoral Programmes in Germany 2021

Application Deadline: 20th October 2020

Eligible Countries: International

To be Taken at (Country): Germany

Type: Research

Eligibility: Excellently-qualified young academics and scientists who have completed a Master’s degree or Diploma, or in exceptional cases a Bachelor’s degree at the latest by the time they begin their grant-supported research.

  • As a rule, applicants should not have graduated any longer than six years before the application deadline. If you are already working on a doctoral degree, you should not have started your degree any longer than three years previously.
  • Applicants who have been resident in Germany for longer than 15 months at the application deadline cannot be considered.

What can be funded?

Doctoral programmes at a state or state-recognised institution of higher education or a non-university research institute in Germany:


  • individual projects under the supervision of a university teacher or academic adviser
    or
  • participation in a structured doctoral study programme

Selection Criteria: An independent selection committee consisting of specialist scientists reviews applications.
The most important selection criteria:

  • a convincing and well-planned research project or course of continuing education
  • academic achievements

Additional documents that prove academic suitability or provide information about extracurricular activities will also be considered in the assessment.

Number of Awards: Not specified

Value of Award:

  • Depending on academic level, monthly payments of:
    euros 850.- for graduates,
    euros 1,200.- for doctoral candidates
  • Payments towards health, accident and personal liability insurance cover
  • Travel allowance
  • One-off research allowance

Under certain circumstances, grant holders completing an uninterrupted stay of over 6 months may receive the following additional benefits:

  • monthly rent subsidy
  • monthly allowance for accompanying family members

To enable grant holders to improve their language skills in preparation for their stay in Germany, DAAD offers the following services:

  • Payment of course fees for the online language course “Deutsch-Uni Online (DUO)” (www.deutsch-uni.com) for six months after receipt of the Scholarship Award Letter
  • if necessary: Language course (2, 4 or 6 months) before the start of the research stay; the DAAD decides whether to fund the grant holder’s participation and for how long depending on language skills and project. If a language course scholarship is granted and the working language at the host institute is German, participation is compulsory.
  • Allowance for a personally chosen German language course during the grant period
  • Reimbursement of the fees for the TestDaF test which has either been taken in the home country after receipt of the Scholarship Award Letter or in Germany before the end of the funding period
  • As an alternative to the TestDaF for scholarship holders who have taken a language course beforehand: the fee for a DSH examination taken during the scholarship period may be reimbursed.

Duration of Award:

  • a maximum of four years; the length of the grant is decided by a selection committee and depends on the project in question and the applicant’s work schedule.
  • Grants are initially awarded for a maximum of one year. Extensions depend on whether the selection committee considers the previous award period to have been successfully completed.
  • For doctoral projects in Germany that require several years of research, research phases outside Germany can be supported if these are critical for the successful completion of the doctoral degree. Planned stays must be specified in the application in the work and time schedule and should not exceed a quarter of the anticipated total funding period.

How to Apply: Current note: Due to the current pandemic situation, applications can be submitted on application dates that lie in 2020 without application reference.

  • It is important to go through all application requirements in the Award Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Award Webpage for Details

ARES Masters and Training Scholarships in Belgium 2021/2022

Application Deadlines:

  • 15th January, 2021
  • 5th February, 2021

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Students from African and  developing countries

To be taken in: Belgium

About the Award: Each year, the Academy of Research and Higher Education (ARES) grants an average of 150 fellowships in the framework of the Masters and 70 fellowships in the framework of the internships to the nationals of the countries of the South. Eligible Countries: Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cuba, Ecuador, Ethiopia (only for courses in English ), Haiti, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mali, Morocco, Niger, Peru, Philippines, DR Congo, Rwanda, Senegal, Vietnam.

Accepted Subject Areas (Masters): 

  • Master of Specialization in Development, Environment and Societies
  • Specialization Master in Human Rights
  • Master of Specialization in Aquatic Resource Management and Aquaculture
  • Master of Specialization in Risk and Disaster Management
  • Specialized Master in Integrated Management of Health Risks in the Global South (IManHR)
  • Specialized Master in International Development
  • Master of Specialization in Transfusion Medicine
  • Specialized Master in Microfinance
  • Master of specialization in integrated production and preservation of natural resources in urban and peri-urban areas
  • Specialized Master in Public Health Methodology
  • Master of Science in Public Health – Methods of Research Applied to Global Health
  • Master of Science and Environmental Management in Developing Countries
  • Specialized Master in Transport and Logistics

Accepted Subject Areas (Training): 

  • Internship in control and quality assurance of medicines and health products
  • Research Initiation to Strengthen Health Systems
  • Internship in Geographic Information System
  • Internship in secondary resource development for sustainable construction
  • Methodological internship in support of innovation in family farming

Type: Masters, Training

About the Award: Within the framework of the Belgian policy for development cooperation, the Minister for Development Cooperation and the Directorate-General for Development Cooperation entrust the Belgian Higher Education Institutions with the preparation of Postgraduate Programmes (Advanced Masters) and Training Programmes that are specifically oriented towards young professionals from developing countries.

International Courses and Training Programmes are part of the global study programmes of the Higher Education Institutions. They are open to all students who satisfy the conditions of qualification, but aim at proposing training units that distinguish themselves by their openness towards specific development issues.

Eligibility: The following will apply for the selection of holders of scholarships:

  1. Originally from a developing country. To be eligible, applicants must reside and work in their own country at the time of filing;
  2. Only nationals of the following countries are eligible to apply for scholarships ARES: Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cuba, Ecuador, Ethiopia ( only for courses in English ), Haiti, Madagascar, Morocco, Niger, Peru, Philippines, DR Congo, Rwanda, Senegal, Vietnam ;
  3. Either under the age of 40 for courses and under 45 for training periods at the start of training;
  4. Either holds a diploma comparable to a diploma of the second cycle of Belgian university education. However, for certain types of training, different requirements may be set out, which will be specified below;
  5. Demonstrates a professional occupation in a developing country of at least two years after completing his / her second cycle or three years after the end of his / her studies when the candidate holds a post-graduate diploma a university in an industrialized country;
  6. A good knowledge of written and spoken French. For courses organized in another language, it is necessary to have a good knowledge of the language of the course, written and spoken. The candidate will also be asked to commit to learning French in order to participate in everyday life in Belgium;
  7. Apply for a single training

Selection Criteria: 

  • The academic curriculum
  • For courses, priority will be given to candidates who are already holders of a diploma third cycle, save in exceptional circumstances duly justified in the application.
  • Priority will be given to candidates who have not already received a grant in Belgium.
  • Professional experience
  • Belonging to a partner institution: The commitment of the candidate in development activities
  • Nationality requirements
  • Gender equality
  • The future reintegration prospects

Number of Scholarships: ARES grants 150 scholarships for participation into the masters and 70 scholarships for participation into the training programmes.

Value of Scholarship: Travel (internal and external), Monthly living allowance, Indirect mission costs, Installation costs, Tuition fees, Registration fee, Insurance costs, Housing allowance, Allowances for dependents, Return fees, In 1st session completion bonus (June).

Duration of Scholarship:  For the duration of the program

How to Apply: Would you like to submit an application form and receive a grant? Are you unsure about your eligibility?

Follow these guides :

It is important to go through the Application requirements and procedures on the Scholarship Webpage (see Link below) before applying.

Visit Scholarship Webpage for details

Important: Applying for a ARES Masters and Training scholarship is absolutely free of charge. ARES does not charge any fee at any stage of the application or selection process. You may raise any question or concern about persons or companies claiming to be acting on behalf of ARES and requesting the payment of a fee by emailing ARES at maryvonne.aubry[at]ares-ac.be.
Any application containing cash will be automatically rejected.

French Government Eiffel Excellence Masters and PhD Scholarships 2021/2022

Application Deadline: 8th January 2021

Offered annually? Yes

Eligible Countries: Emerging economies

To be taken at: France

Accepted Subject Areas: Eiffel scholarships are available in three main fields:

  • engineering science at master’s level,
  • science in the broadest sense at PhD level (engineering science; exact sciences: mathematics, physics, chemistry and life sciences, nano- and biotechnology, earth sciences, sciences of the universe, environmental sciences, information and communication science and technology);
  • economics and management;
  • law and political sciences.

About the Award: The Eiffel Excellence Scholarship Programme was established by the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development to enable French higher education establishments to attract top foreign students to enrol in their master’s and PhD courses.

It helps to shape the future foreign decision-makers of the private and public sectors, in priority areas of study, and encourages applications from emerging countries at master’s level, and from emerging and industrialized countries at PhD level.

Type: Masters, PhD

Eligibility

  • Only foreign nationals are eligible to apply for a scholarship from the French Government.
  • In the case of dual nationality applicants, those with French nationality are ineligible.
  • for master’s courses, candidates must be no older than 30 on the date of the selection committee meeting,March 2020; at PhD level, candidates must be no older than 35 on the date of the selection committee meeting, March 2020.
  • only applications submitted by French educational establishments are accepted. These establishments undertake to enrol scholarship holders on the course for which they have been selected. Applications submitted by any other means shall not be considered. Furthermore, any candidate nominated by more than one establishment shall be disqualified.
  • scholarships are for students wishing to enrol on a master’s course, including at an engineering school, and for PhD students. The Eiffel Programme does not apply to French-run master’s courses abroad, as non-PhD scholarship holders must complete at least 75% of their course in France. It does not apply to training under an apprenticeship contract or a professional training contract either.
  • Educational establishments that shortlist non-French speaking applicants must ensure that their level of French is sufficient to enable them to integrate satisfactorily into the anticipated course
  • Combination with other scholarships: foreign students who, at the time of application, have already been awarded a French government scholarship under another programme are not eligible, even if the scholarship in question does not include social security cover.
  • Eiffel PhD scholarships: Establishments may nominate a candidate who was previously awarded an Eiffel scholarship at master’s level for a scholarship at PhD level. Candidates who have already been awarded an Eiffel scholarship once during their PhD cannot be awarded it for a second time. No application will be accepted for any student who applied previously but was rejected, even if the application is submitted by a different establishment or in another field of study.
  • Eiffel master’s scholarships: no application will be accepted for any student who applied previously but was rejected, even if the application is submitted by a different establishment or in another field of study. Students who have already been awarded an Eiffel scholarship at master’s level are not eligible to re-apply at master’s level.
  • Language skills: when pre-selecting non-French-speaking candidates, establishments must make sure that their language skills meet the requirements of the relevant course of study.

Number of Scholarships: Not Specified

Selection Criteria: The selection criteria are as follows:

  • the excellence of the candidate, as demonstrated by his or her university career so far and the originality of his or her research subject;
  • the international policy of the establishment nominating the candidate, its action in the geographical area in question, the excellence of the host department, the establishment’s compatibility with the candidate being nominated, its efforts to publicise the Eiffel Programme and its continued support of scholarship holders, especially through a partnership with France Alumni (https://www.francealumni.fr/en);
  • the cooperation and partnership policy of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development, and in particular, the priority given to certain countries for this Programme.

The committee marks each candidate for these three criteria and calculates a total score out of 50. It sets a minimum threshold for admissibility and distributes the scholarships as follows, depending on the number available:

  • at least 70% of the scholarships are awarded to the highest-scoring candidates;
  • the remaining scholarships are distributed among the establishments that have not received one, for candidates who achieved scores above the minimum threshold.

These selected applications represent the definitive list of successful candidates.

Scholarship Amount:

Master’s level:

  • The Eiffel scholarship includes a monthly allowance of €1,181 (a maintenance allowance of €1,031 and a monthly stipend of €150).
  • In addition, the following expenses are directly covered: – one international return journey; Page 3 of 6 – social security cover; – cultural activities. Scholarship holders may also receive an additional housing allowance, under certain conditions.

PhD level:

  • The Eiffel scholarship includes a monthly allowance of €1,400.
  • In addition, the following expenses are directly covered: – one international return journey (for students in law or political sciences who may make several trips, only one return journey shall be covered); – social security cover; – cultural activities. Scholarship holders may also receive an additional housing allowance, under certain conditions.

Duration: The scholarship is awarded for:

  • a maximum of 12 months for entry at M2 level,
  • a maximum of 24 months for entry at M1 level,
  • a maximum of 36 months for an engineering degree.

A 2-month preliminary intensive language training course. The total duration of the course undertaken (including compulsory work experience or internships in France or abroad) must be clearly indicated by the educational establishment in the application form. Optional placements are not covered by the grant.

For PhD: The Eiffel scholarship is awarded for a maximum of ten months. For scientific and economic disciplines, no language course is provided for and the scholarship duration cannot be divided up. For law students, the ten-month scholarship can, with the consent of the selection committee, be split into two or three stays in France, of three or four months each. These stays must take place over a maximum of three calendar years. Only law students have the option of taking French lessons alongside their studies. This must be clearly requested in the application.

How to Apply: Only applications submitted by French higher education institutions are accepted.

Visit the Scholarship Webpage for details to apply

Living in the Neoliberal Apocalypse

Brian Platt


In June, wildfires crossed into the Arctic Circle, making them the first wildfires recorded north of the 66th parallel in human history. Blazes in Siberia have already burned through an area the size of Greece this year. It is the worst wildfire season on record for Russia, surpassing the 2019 wildfires, which surpassed the 2015 wildfires, which surpassed the 2010 wildfires.

“I was a little shocked to see a fire burning 10 kilometers south of a bay of the Laptev Sea, which is like, the sea ice factory of the world,” fire researcher Jessica McCarty told National Geographic. “When I went into fire science as an undergraduate student, if someone had told me I’d be studying fire regimes in Greenland and the Arctic, I would have laughed at them.”

These record setting fires are the product of the collision between climate change and neoliberal policies that have dominated Russia and the rest of the planet for decades. And the story of how the fires were allowed to burn in Russia speaks to the insufficiency of mere “reform” as unrestrained capitalism pushes human civilization and the planet into a death spiral.

Before the Fires

The collapse of the Soviet Union was seen as an unprecedented opportunity for the West to remake Russia into an ideal image of a capitalist state. “The vipers, the bloodsuckers, the middlemen – that’s what needs to be rehabilitated in the Soviet Union,” Bruce Gelb, head of the United States Information Agency told reporters in 1990, “That’s what makes our kind of country click!”

The rate at which American advisors went about remaking the country was astonishing to behold, an unprecedented event in human history. Within three years unemployment jumped from less than one million to more than 15 million. By 1996, the standard of living for the average Russian had fallen by half. Wages collapsed – when they were paid at all – along with life expectancy. In 1995, the British medical journal The Lancet, estimated an excess mortality across the former Soviet Union of 500,000 deaths a year. This drop in life expectancy hit Russian men the hardest causing Pravda to ask whether or not Russian men “are becoming extinct” in 2005.

At the structural level, the Russian state was being turned into a finely tuned engine of capital transfer – from the East to the West and from the working class to the capitalist class. It was a modern primitive accumulation of the variety Marx wrote about in the darkest chapter of Capital more than a century prior.

Former Soviet industries, owned by the state, were transferred to private hands as quickly as possible for pennies on the dollar. Once in private hands, factories were generally liquidated for a quick pay-off and their empty husks boarded up. 70,000 factories were closed in two years with many workers receiving temporary employment dismantling their former places of work. Estonia became a leading exporter of aluminum as Russian firms used the country as a black market for unloading scrap metal.

At the state level, the government was turned into a vehicle of pure graft. People fought – and sometimes killed – for coveted political positions where they could sign over lucrative former Soviet enterprises to themselves and their cronies. Even the American advisors, there to midwife the “vipers, bloodsuckers, and middlemen” into being, got in on the action. Using a Boston hedge fund and his wife as a front, Harvard economics professor and advisor to the Yeltsin regime, Andrei Schleifer, funneled millions out of the country and into his own pocket.

“During each visit [to Russia],” Swedish economist and advisor to Boris Yeltsin, Anders Aslund, told reporters in 1993, “I am gladdened by the future and the new triumphs of capitalism.”

People in Russia naturally despised the ransacking of the country at their expense, so elections were fixed, reporters were disappeared, police forces and private militias were funded, and prisons were filled. The people were to be taught, as Margaret Thatcher was fond of saying, “There is no alternative.”

What was left of the Soviet state by the end of the 1990s was a hollow shell of what had existed a mere decade prior. All the copper wiring had been removed; all the scrap metal pulled out – literally in many cases. The state existed only to supervise the continual upward redistribution of wealth – a lucrative occupation in its own right, Vladimir Putin has a net worth of $70 billion – and deal out violence to any of the rabble who got out of line.

The Russian economy, once one of the largest industrial economies in the world, is now almost completely reliant on oil and natural gas exports. Which means that even as Russia burns, the country remains completely devoted to the extraction of ancient carbon reservoirs and their release into the atmosphere. America made the Russian state into its own image, an apocalyptic death cult.

The 2010 Wildfires

In 2010, Russia experienced its hottest summer on record. The hot dry weather combined with the dismantling of the Soviet era forestry service produced wildfires that choked out Russia’s capital city and filled its morgues.

Three years prior to these fires, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed the Forest Code into law that placed the care of Russia’s massive timberlands into the hands of private logging interests and corrupt local bureaucrats. The previous centralized forestry service that had 80,000 park rangers and 11,000 air-dropped firefighters was cut down to a mere 2,000 people who served a strictly monitoring function. At the time Russian environmentalists claimed the law would spell disaster. Within a few short years, the number of forest fires in the country doubled.

The 2010 wildfires burned through nearly 1,200 square miles of forest. They were the largest wildfires on record in the country and their proximity to the most populous city made them deadly. At the height of the fires, the smoke and ash combined with an unprecedented heatwave doubled the daily summer death toll in Moscow adding an additional 350 deaths per day. Moscow health chief Andrei Seltsovky reported that the city morgues were nearly overflowing.

Embarrassed by the mounting death toll, state authorities told Moscow doctors not to diagnose heat stroke as a cause of death in order to obscure the actual human cost of the fires. One group estimated the total summer deaths attributable to the heatwave and wildfires could be as high as 15,000 people. Munich Re, the world’s largest reinsurer (an insurance company for insurance companies), estimated the combined death toll in Russia as a whole from the heatwave, smoke, and wildfires to be around 56,000.

After the Putin-Medvedev government received harsh criticism over the fires and the 2007 Forest Code, a Putin spokesman continued to defend the failed system stating, “This is a well-functioning system which only needs some minor adjustments.” Russian people who were forced to suffer through the effects of the fires were not as generous. One man from the village of Tver remarked bitterly that under the communists “there were three fire ponds in the village, a bell that tolled when a fire began, and – guess what – a fire truck.”

The 2019 Wildfires

2019 was the hottest year on record for Russia. As the tundra thawed in Siberia and the peat that lay below winter snow grew dry and brittle in the unprecedented heat, a phenomenon known as “dry lightning” lit fires across Siberia. These fires grew and combined to form one massive wildfire raging across Siberia. Twelve thousand square miles burned in a single month in what became the largest fire in Russian history, surpassing the 2015 wildfires and their 2010 predecessor.

These fires were again aided by the neoliberal state. In dealing with the 2015 wildfires – which also burned in Siberia – Russia’s environmental ministry issued a decree that allowed regions to ignore fires if “the expected cost of fighting fires surpasses the expected damages.” Whether wildfires would grow to unprecedented size would be left to the market to decide – a great victory for neoliberalism!

“It feels like it fills your whole body. There is nothing to breathe,” a resident of a village 60 miles from the fire described the smoke in the increasingly apocalyptic scene to reporters. “We can’t hide from it… Children and adults are coughing non-stop.”

Unable to meet the disaster within the constraints of Russian neoliberalism, authorities pivoted. Krasnoyarsk Governor Alexander Uss told the press that fighting the fires was “pointless and harmful.” Deputy Emergency Minister Igor Kobzev told the press that “most fires started near roads” and that they were caused by humans, despite forestry officials stating that the fires were caused by lightning. Rumors of arsonists were promulgated by media and politicians alike as had been done during the 2015 fires.

Those forced to live with the fires had a different view. Retired local Ivan Ozornik told reporters, “They are putting out the fires now, but it should have been done long ago, when they were small enough to be extinguished.” He went on to say that under the Soviet Union fire risk was monitored and they “didn’t let it become a disaster. Now the process is out of control. Our public money is being spent and there’s no result.”

Neoliberal Apocalypse

On June 20th, 2020, a small Siberian town named Verkhoyansk recorded a temperature of 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The 100 degree day was not just unusual for the town, where June temperatures average 68, it was the hottest temperature ever recorded in the arctic circle.

As the unprecedented heatwave thawed and dried out the tundra, new wildfires have started. Some suspect that the source of the fires could be “zombie fires,” smoldering peat that stays smoldering through the long winters only to re-ignite fires during the first thaw. Siberia’s 2020 wildfires are now larger than their 2019 predecessors and have stretched above the Arctic Circle, setting a new grim record.

Now, climate scientists worry about another potential danger. Beneath the peat and layers of dirt lies the permafrost – a permanently frozen layer that is a mix of soil and ancient plant life. It is one of the largest reserves of carbon on the planet, trapped in an icy tomb. And now there is evidence that it is thawing, unlocking massive carbon reserves that need to stay in the ground.

“The blazes themselves could also exacerbate global warming,” a report in National Geographic notes, “by burning deep into the soil and releasing carbon that has accumulated as frozen organic matter over hundreds of years.” A process that could “supercharge climate change.”

Once the permafrost thaws and that carbon reservoir is released, it will likely be game over for climate change and the planet as we know it. But as the world boils, the arctic could turn into valuable beach front property and that is something that we can all agree, markets will get excited about!

Do Canadians Know?

María Páez Victor


Powerful nations consistently build a wall between their domestic policy and their foreign policy, basing them on different principles and often contradictory goals. This is one of the reasons that different forms of oppression towards other countries – such as colonialism and imperialism – have succeeded. By throwing a blanket of ignorance and misinformation over the eyes of their citizens, governments provide few opportunities for them to understand what their foreign ministries and military are really doing in their name. Within the Canadian government, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs appears to be one of the most secretive and unresponsive to public participation and consultation, in other words, it lacks transparency.

The Black Lives Matter movement, both in North America and Europe, has lately been eroding this barrier bringing to the forefront the systemic injustices towards black people, dramatically connecting the dots between past slavery and present oppression as well as to fortune and fame for a few, and between foreign and domestic policy.

A short while ago, former president Jimmy Carter – the only USA president who did not start a war, military attack or occupation – pointed out that his country is the most warlike nation in the history of the world.” He stated that the reason that the USA population lack modern social and built infrastructure such as comprehensive health care and high-speed rail, is because of the huge cost of its military which includes maintaining and operating more than 800 military bases around the world, ready to intervene in other nations as and when it suits the USA.

The Canadian government has fully identified with this political/military stance of the USA. Its military accord with the USA was forged under the justification that Canada could not defend itself and needed the arms of its powerful neighbour. This might have made sense during the Cold War, but after the disintegration of the USSR, the answer to the question of “from whom does Canada need defense?” is less clear.

Canada’s first prime minister, Sir John A. Macdonald realized that the main external threat to Canada came not from across the Atlantic but from the south. His outlook is not shared by today’s Canadian political elites. They are content with Canada having become a junior partner in USA foreign policy and the loss of sovereignty that goes along with it. Many analysts have discussed this relationship more akin to that of Batman and Robin than the Avengers. (Yves Engler, John McMurtry, Nino Paglicci, Joe Emersberger, Arnold August, among others)

In 1965, the distinguished Canadian scholar George Grant wrote Lament for a Nation in which he described how Canada had become a branch-plant of American capitalism. Grant observed that Canadian elites focused on their own economic advantages and identified more with the southern behemoth than with their own people, history or sovereignty. “…the Canadian ruling class looks across the border for its final authority in both politics and culture.” (p.9) After all, he reasoned, the wealthy rarely maintain their nationalism when it is in conflict with their economic interests. A society dominated by corporations and led by them will not be vitally interested in nationalism, sovereignty, or even, when pushed, by democracy.

So, what happens when the ideal, the all-encompassing example-to-follow, the USA, is breaking the rules and changing the game plan solely with their own interests in mind?

Just last week, a front page article in one of Canada’s leading newspapers,(Edward Keenan, The Toronto Star, 26 September 2020), presented a stark example of the supine position of the Canadian intellectual and business elites that submits to the will of the USA, convinced that Canada is and always will be second rate and subservient. The article states that without the USA, Canada would “really not be in a position to be in a more anarchic world where we’ve got to deal with China on our own, we’ve got to compete against a dozen other countries…” This is the tunnel vision of elites that cannot see beyond the status quo of USA domination and cannot see even the possibility of a new horizon. It has no trust in its own people to forge their own destiny. It is doubtful that the average Canadian would subscribe to this outlook which contrasts with the resilience of small towns despite economic challenges, the vitality of abundant community and social groups, and the enduring integrity of indigenous peoples. Clearly, a gap is growing between the Canadian people and their elites.

Today we are witnessing social, political and economic turmoil in the USA. The USA is the epicenter of the covid-19 world pandemic, which has clearly exposed the criminal negligence of the USA government, the mendacity of the Republican Party, the pitifully inadequate public health and welfare system, and the long standing social and ethnic fault lines of inequality and discrimination. It has produced historic levels of unemployment and poverty and a disturbing political crisis encouraged by an amoral and megalomaniacal president who threatens their constitution and democratic institutions to hold on to power.

This tragic situation is not confined to the USA’s domestic sphere. With its enormous military power and greater still, its economic power based on hegemony of the USA dollar, USA foreign policies have tremendous international impact. Its domestic crisis casts a shadow in the world outside its borders, to wit: withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord, withdrawal from the Iran nuclear agreement, attacks on the WHO and reduced funding, attacks on the European Union, attacks on the UN itself, attacks on the International Criminal Court, conflict with China, Iran and Russia, attacks even on NATO. And when it suits them, imposing criminal unilateral illegal economic sanctions on countries it disagrees with, even during a pandemic when buying medicines and food is vital. Hence, in Latin America, the USA wages a relentless and cruel hybrid war on Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua.

There is no other nation in the world that is more susceptible to USA power and influence than its northern neighbour, Canada. So, the USA has assigned to it the role of doing its most important dirty work in Latin America today: to overthrow the legitimate, democratically elected, popular government of Venezuela. The USA wants to privatize its oil and gold mines, placing them in the hands of corporations and to disembowel a nation that dares to go its own way instead of obeying USA dictats.

Canada was urged by the USA to create and lead the Group of Lima and to use it to demonize the Venezuelan president and other leaders, and finance extremist opposition groups. By creating the Group of Lima with its false “multilateralism”, the usually compliant Organization of American States was bypassed. The USA could not get enough votes there or at the UN itself to support the destruction of Venezuela. Only the uninformed can believe that these actions, said to be in the name of democracy, are anything other than an attempt to grab resources and crush Venezuela’s peaceful Bolivarian revolution.

By following the USA’s policies regarding unilateral economic sanctions and openly trying to overturn the elected Venezuelan government, Canada has given the lie to its commitment to the rule of law. What applies, more or less at home, is found wanting when it comes to international law as embodied in the UN Charter, the OAS Charter, the International Criminal Court Rome Statute, all of which Canada has transgressed.

What is even worse is that Canada has aligned itself with the most corrupt and anti-democratic governments in the region: world cocaine producer Colombia where nearly 1,000 social leaders have been assassinated since 2016 and last year had 55 massacres; Peru where 6 of its former presidents are either in exile or in jail for corruption; Bolivia where a bloody coup overthrew the first indigenous president of the Americas; Guatemala where for years human rights are trampled with impunity and murders have averaged 100 a week; Honduras with the highest murder rate in the world; Panama which is on the EU black list of fiscal paradises and featured in the infamous Panama Papers; Brazil that is burning the Amazon and trying to hide it, where police killed 881 people in Rio de Janeiro last year; Chile that sent 10,000 troops against peaceful protestors, blinding, injuring and killing; Ecuador where protesting citizens and opposition leaders are criminalized with 200 indigenous leaders jailed; and Haiti where 1 in 2 live in poverty and half of its youth is illiterate.

These are now Canada’s partners in crime trying to overthrow the peaceful, democratic government of Venezuela. On whose behalf? Not Canadians, who hardly know what the Minister of Foreign Affairs does, but of the USA State Department, USA oil corporations, and the Canadian mining industry that has been promised the gold mines of Venezuela. That is an industry known for trampling on human rights of rural and indigenous peoples at home and abroad and countless outrages against the environment.

This government has left an embarrassing blot on Canadian history by enforcing USA sanctions that in just one year alone directly killed 40,000 Venezuelans.

George Grant pointed out that due to the reality of the French Canadians and the Indigenous treaties, “One distinction between Canada and the United States has been the belief that Canada was predicated on the rights of nations as well as on the rights of individuals.” However imperfectly implemented through the years, a belief in the rights of other nations has been in the Canadian mindset. Until recently that is, as Ottawa openly adheres to USA “regime change” doctrine that violates the statutes that guard world peace.

And during this horrific pandemic when Canada should have shown a modicum of international solidarity with its hemispheric and much poorer neighbour, it has increased its defamation of Venezuela with, among other attacks, a bogus “human rights report” presented to the world as if it was from the UN. Venezuela is a nation that has done no wrong to the Canadian people and is struggling to obtain medicines and food. How will Canada ever erase this shame?

Some Canadians are now beginning to see the road ahead more clearly because of the pandemic. Noticeably, the conservative premier of Ontario, who previously had publicly lauded Trump, became enraged when the USA president halted a shipment of medical supplies that Ontario had bought. Most Canadians are in no hurry to reopen the border and are appalled at the political and social chaos of their supposed “big brother”. They are discovering the truth of what John Foster Dulles, a former Secretary of State, who supposedly said: The United States of America does not have friends, it has interests.” Henry Kissinger said much the same thing two decades later.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau should remember that one of the most popular decisions that a Canadian prime minister has taken in modern times was when Jean Chrétien refused to take Canada into the Iraq war despite intensive USA pressures. That was an independent Canadian foreign policy position that made Canadians proud.

These past years of the Trump regime have brought uppermost to mind the rise and fall of that other huge empire, the Roman Empire. Many coincidences are obvious, including the madness of emperors. Therefore, it is appropriate to read the words of a very wise witness to that historic time, the great Cicero, who wrote about characteristics of moral goodness:

‘The first is the ability to distinguish truth from falsity, and to understand the relationship between one phenomenon and another and the causes and consequences of each one. The second category is the ability to restrain the passions. And the third is to behave considerately and understandingly in our associations with other people.’

Most Canadians prefer an independent foreign policy that deals with good will towards other countries and respects international law, not one that seeks to overthrow their elected governments. Will its government continue to pander to the elites or listen to the people?